Display Kept in this browser only
Docket Yard
AbandonmentIn AB 167

AB 167 (Sub-No. 1189X)

Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/AB-167/sub/1189X · entries shown: all, newest first

CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION--ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION--IN HUDSON COUNTY, N.J.

Caption from the Board’s record.

282 filings, 46 decisions and 1,533 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC.

Cite View on stb.gov

Entries

By type (22)
Newest first · oldest first
  1. (printed as 3/6/2026)
    Supplement
    310947Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Green Interfaith Environmental Organization
  2. (printed as 3/2/2026)
    Public
    310922Public Use Condition Request
    Green Interfaith Environmental Organization
  3. served (printed as 2/27/2026)
    Decision
    52718Entire Board
    (1) VACATED A STAY AND ALLOWED CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION TO ABANDON, AND CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY TO DISCONTINUE SERVICE OVER, AN APPROXIMATELY 1.36-MILE PORTION OF A LINE OF RAILROAD IN JERSEY CITY, N.J., SUBJECT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION AND PUBLIC USE CONDITIONS; AND (2) DENIED AN APPEAL OF A MAY 23, 2025 DECISION REJECTING AN OFFER OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY.
  4. (printed as 2/27/2026)
    Section
    310920Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  5. (printed as 2/27/2026)
    Section
    310919Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  6. (printed as 11/13/2025)
    Substitution
    310165Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    City of Jersey City, Rails to Trails Conservancy, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition
  7. (printed as 11/12/2025)
    Comment
    EI-34145Donna Dorgan
    Objection to Abandonment
    Jersey CIty, NJ
  8. (printed as 9/12/2025)
    Letter
    310062Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  9. (printed as 8/12/2025)
    Motion
    309948Motion/Petition/Request
    212 Marin Boulevard, LLC; 247 Manila Avenue, LLC; 280 Erie Street, LLC; 317 Jersey Avenue, LLC; 354 Cole Street, LLC; 389 Monmouth Street, LLC; 415 Brunswick Street, LLC; and 446 Newark Avenue, LLC
  10. (printed as 8/8/2025)
    Letter
    309929Letter
    Congressman Robert Menendez
  11. (printed as 8/5/2025)
    Reply
    309878Reply
    212 Marin Boulevard, LLC; 247 Manila Avenue, LLC; 280 Erie Street, LLC; 317 Jersey Avenue, LLC; 354 Cole Street, LLC; 389 Monmouth Street, LLC; 415 Brunswick Street, LLC; and 446 Newark Avenue, LLC
  12. (printed as 7/30/2025)
    Letter
    309834Letter
    NJ State Senator Raj Mukherji
  13. (printed as 6/9/2025)
    Reply
    309644Reply To Appeal
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  14. (printed as 6/9/2025)
    Reply
    309643Reply To Appeal
    212 Marin Boulevard, LLC; 247 Manila Avenue, LLC; 280 Erie Street, LLC; 317 Jersey Avenue, LLC; 354 Cole Street, LLC; 389 Monmouth Street, LLC; 415 Brunswick Street, LLC; and 446 Newark Avenue, LLC
  15. (printed as 5/30/2025)
    Appeal
    309615Appeal
    City of Jersey City
  16. served (printed as 5/23/2025)
    Decision
    52612Director Of Proceedings
    REJECTED AN OFFER OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FILED BY THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY.
  17. (printed as 5/23/2025)
    Letter
    309598Letter
    City of Jersey City
  18. (printed as 5/21/2025)
    Reply
    309591Reply Comments
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  19. (printed as 5/20/2025)
    Letter
    309577Letter
    CNJ Rail Corporation
  20. (printed as 5/19/2025)
    OFA
    309576OFA - Offer Of Financial Assistance
    City of Jersey City
  21. (printed as 4/17/2025)
    Reply
    309481Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  22. served (printed as 3/11/2025)
    Decision
    52507Director Of Proceedings
    GRANTED AN UNOPPOSED REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE UPDATED VALUATION INFORMATION UNTIL APRIL 17, 2025.
  23. (printed as 3/10/2025)
    Request
    309330Request For Extension Of Time
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  24. served (printed as 3/5/2025)
    Decision
    52484Director Of Proceedings
    ORDERED THAT CONRAIL SHALL FILE WITH THE BOARD UPDATED VALUATION INFORMATION FOR THE HARSIMUS BRANCH BY MARCH 17, 2025.
  25. (printed as 2/20/2025)
    Reply
    309252Reply
    CNJ Rail Corporation
  26. (printed as 2/20/2025)
    Reply
    309251Reply
    City of Jersey City
  27. (printed as 2/18/2025)
    Reply
    309243Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  28. served (printed as 2/10/2025)
    Decision
    52455Director Of Proceedings
    ORDERED: (1) CONRAIL RAIL CORPORATION (CONRAIL) TO CERTIFY BY FEBRUARY 18, 2025, THE CONTINUED ACCURACY OF ITS JUNE 1, 2015 VALUATION INFORMATION, AND (2) THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY AND CNJ RAIL CORPORATION TO INFORM THE BOARD BY FEBRUARY 20, 2025, AND CONRAIL WHETHER THEY INTEND TO MAKE AN OFFER OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE.
  29. (printed as 11/4/2024)
    Comment
    EO-3971Section 106 Consulting Parties
  30. (printed as 11/4/2024)
    Comment
    EO-3970Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
    Emily Choi, e106
  31. (printed as 4/12/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33415SHPO
    Kate Marcopul · Trenton, NJ
  32. (printed as 3/14/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33405Hamilton Park Neighborhood Association
    Aaron Underwood · Jersey City, NJ
  33. (printed as 3/14/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33404Friends of Liberty State Park
    Sam Pesin · Jersey City, NJ
  34. (printed as 3/14/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33403East Coast Greenway
    R. Bruce Donald · Farmington, CT
  35. (printed as 3/14/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33402NY/NJ Baykeeper
    Greg Remaud · Hazlet, NJ
  36. (printed as 3/14/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33401Harsimus Cove Association
    Tom Monahan · Jersey City, NJ
  37. (printed as 3/13/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33400City of Jersey City
    Charles Montange · Seattle, WA
  38. (printed as 3/13/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33399Embankment Coalition
    Maureen Crowley · Jersey City, NJ
  39. (printed as 3/12/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33398Donna Dorgan
    Jersey City, NJ
  40. (printed as 3/11/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33397City of Jersey City, PRRHS Embankment Preservation Coalition, RTC
    The attached comments are on behalf of City, Coalition and RTC, which I submit at their attorney in this and all related dockets. It responds to Mr. Tabachnick's email found on the STB env. comments website as EO-3911.
    Charles Montange · Seattle, WA
  41. (printed as 3/11/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33396Marin Blvd LLCs
    Peter Pfohl · Washington, DC
  42. (printed as 3/6/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33393Conrail
    Steven Magouirk · Mount Laurel, NJ
  43. (printed as 3/5/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33392East Coast Greenway Alliance
    Dennis Markatos/R. Bruce Donald · Durham, NC
  44. (printed as 3/5/2024)
    Comment
    EO-3911Section 106 Consulting Parties
  45. (printed as 1/16/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33242City of JC, RTC, and EPC (City et al)
    Charles Montange · Seattle, WA
  46. (printed as 1/8/2024)
    Notice
    307770Notice
    Slover & Loftus LLP
  47. (printed as 12/20/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33212Slover & Loftus LLP
    Peter Pfohl · Washington, DC
  48. (printed as 12/18/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3863Donna Dorgan
  49. (printed as 12/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33209Representing Jersey City, RTC and EPC
    Charles Montange · Seattle, WA
  50. (printed as 11/22/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33159LLCs and Albanese Organization, Inc.
    Peter A. Pfohl · Washington, DC
  51. (printed as 11/6/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33154Richelle M. Reyes
    Hello. I'm a board member for the 208 6th Street HOA. We have 8 units in this building, which was constructed in 1880s. It is as historic as the Embankment across the street. We urge you to protect the structure and natural forest above it. We're less than 1 mile from the water and need help with rain absorption. We were borderline evacuation zone for Sandy. Next hurricane will be worse. Also please preserve the stone. Any removal of the stone with heavy machinery will be destructive to our bldg which is less than 50 ft away from us.
    Jersey City, NJ
  52. (printed as 11/3/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33153Bike JC
    Beatriz Bofill · Jersey City, NJ
  53. (printed as 11/2/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33152NJ Department of Environmental Protection
    Katherine Marcopul · Trenton, NJ
  54. (printed as 10/19/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33128Donna Dorgan
    Jersey City, NJ
  55. (printed as 10/18/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33126Danny Victor
    Jersey City, NJ
  56. (printed as 10/16/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33125Jake Lefeber
    Jersey City, NJ
  57. (printed as 10/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33124David Yeager
    Jersey City, NJ
  58. (printed as 10/13/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33123Lisa F. Schneider
    Jersey City, NJ
  59. (printed as 10/12/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33122Will Stamatis
    Jersey City, NJ
  60. (printed as 10/12/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33121Katy Lyness
    Jersey City, NJ
  61. (printed as 10/12/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33120Michael Kopf
    Jersey City, NJ
  62. (printed as 10/12/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33119Galina Espinoza
    Jersey City, NJ
  63. (printed as 10/12/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33118Bike JC
    Beatriz Bofill · Jersey City, NJ
  64. (printed as 10/11/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33117James Lee
    Jersey City, NJ
  65. (printed as 10/11/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33116Harsimus Cove Association
    Tom Monahan · Jersey City, NJ
  66. (printed as 10/11/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33115Bobby
    Jersey City, NJ
  67. (printed as 10/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33114Agnes de Bethune
    Jersey City, NJ
  68. (printed as 10/9/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33113Joann Brennan McKee
    Jersey City, NJ
  69. (printed as 10/9/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33077Bethany Wall
    see attached
    JERSEY CITY, NJ
  70. (printed as 10/6/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33112Richelle Reyes
    Jersey City, NJ
  71. (printed as 10/4/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33075Hadi Chemaly
    My wife and I are for any measure that preserves the Harsimus Branch and Embankment. We could use more greenery in Jersey City to help improve the air pollution and CO2 emissions, especially that we are near the Hoboken Tunnel entrance. If we can make the embankment walkable like the High Line in NYC, that would be outstanding and much welcome.
    Jersey City, NJ
  72. (printed as 10/4/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33074Stephanie DiBrita
    The Harsimus Branch Embankment is a cornerstone (literally) in the foundation of Jersey City. It's historical significance to how the city was built and how the historical district in surrounds, is irreplaceable. So often we look back after historical buildings and structures have been taken down and wonder why the people of those times do that, (i.e., Roosevelt Stadium in Jersey City, the original MSG)? Once we demolish something like that, we lose forever the historical significance of that building or structure. The potential benefits of this Embankment to the city of Jersey City far surpasses what a developer could provide to the city. Jersey City does not need more luxury housing what the city needs is more parks and outdoor spaces, as seen in a recent study that shows Jersey City's tree canopy has dipped to below that of New York City to a paltry, 10.9%. The Embankment can help boost that number by creating a 'Highline Park' that is friendly to walkers, runners and families alike to enjoy the city from a unique perspective. Finally, as stated by many constituents in the meeting, Conrail should not be rewarded for trying to circumvent the process and sell to a developer before consulting your department. This sets a terrifying precedent for other rail lines to be sold in back door deals only to come to the Surface Transportation Board later because 'they were unaware of the process' or 'forgot that step'. Please use your power to preserve this piece of Jersey City History so it can be saved for prosperity. Thank you,
    Jersey City, NJ
  73. (printed as 10/4/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33073NA
    Please see the attached Word Document.
    Wynn Wagenseil · Supply, NC
  74. (printed as 10/4/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3847Jay Lee
  75. (printed as 10/3/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33111Evan Bender
    Jersey City, NJ
  76. (printed as 10/3/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33068smaranda grajdieru
    Hi, I am from Montreal, Canada and I have lived in Jersey City since May 2023. My apartment is on 10th St. which is very close to the Harsimus Line Embankment. I think the Embankment is an important environmental resource as well as a historic one for the people of Jersey City. As an environmental resource, the Embankment is an urban forrest that generates oxygen and captures pollutants, contributes to biodiversity in the city and captures rain water that would otherwise flood the adjacent neighbourhoods during storms (like we had last week). The Embankment is especially important to the city infrastructure going forward as the climate emergency will exert more pressure on Jersey City's drainage systems. As a historical resource, the Embankment is living testimony to Jersey City's industrial past and is a landmark that is part of the citizens' personal past. It has become a friend to me as I walk my dogs along it every morning and evening and I look at the weathered stones and think about all the people that built it. Finally, I think it would be a gross injustice to the people of Jersey City and a gross dereliction of duty on the part of the STB to grant the abandonment of the Harsimus Branch to Conrail after it sold the Harsimus Branch illegally. The Harsimus Branch and Embankment need to be protected for future generations. Thank you, Smaranda Grajdieru
    Jersey City, NJ
  77. (printed as 10/2/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33110Thomas Young
    Jersey City, NJ
  78. (printed as 10/2/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33109Lenny Spiro
    Jersey City, NJ
  79. (printed as 10/2/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33065NJ-08 For Progress
    Don’t reward rail companies by turning a blind eye to unlawful sales of regulated railroads Do hold Conrail accountable for its unlawful sale Don’t check off bureaucratic boxes indicating consultation and public engagement have been conducted meaningfully Do engage consulting parties and the public in considering ways to avoid, minimize and mitigate adverse effects to historic resources Don’t ignore demolition and development realities on the ground in favor of abstract scenarios Do use Section 106 to consider Master Plans, Redevelopment Plans, development issues, and the STB’s own powers to mitigate adverse effects Don’t create tombstones and eulogies for a historic corridor you presume dead Do facilitate efforts to protect a historic industrial infrastructure critical to 21 st -century public needs Don’t assume “No Action” adverse effects are comparable to adverse effects from development Do recognize that STB will actively contribute to resource destruction if it permits abandonment without preservation conditions
    Rebecca Missel · Jersey City, NJ
  80. (printed as 10/2/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3846James Bruno
  81. (printed as 9/30/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33108Wayne Zimnock
    Jersey City, NJ
  82. (printed as 9/30/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33107Dennis Murphy
    Jersey City, NJ
  83. (printed as 9/30/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33106Rochelle R. E. Magno
    Jersey City, NJ
  84. (printed as 9/30/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33069Sustainable Jersey City
    The embankment is one of the last few remaining historíala green spaces that will be instrumental in protecting Jersey City from extreme heat and flooding in the years to come. I urge you to protect it.
    Abhilasha Meshram · Jersey City, NJ
  85. (printed as 9/30/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33067Susan Schmidler
    Allowing Conrail to abandon the Sixth Street Embankment in downtown Jersey City, without very strong requirements that it ultimately be transferred to the City of Jersey City for preservation and development as a community park, would open it up to intense pressures from real estate interests and lead to its destruction. It is needed by the community for its recreational and ecological benefits, as well as its role in mitigating the negative effects of climate change.
    Jersey City, NJ
  86. (printed as 9/30/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33066Katherine Glavin Auteri
    This embankment protects hundreds of homes and residents from disastrous flooding and effects of global warming. This needs to stay as a fixture of nature and history in Jersey City. Do not allow abandonment with just a sign and a website of what was. The government needs to protect this space!!
    Jersey City, NJ
  87. (printed as 9/29/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33105Vivek Viswanathan
    Jersey City, NJ
  88. (printed as 9/29/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33104Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Sean Gallagher · Jersey City, NJ
  89. (printed as 9/29/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33103We CARE Movement, Inc.
    Rochelle Myers-Hoffman · Jersey City, NJ
  90. (printed as 9/29/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33102New Jersey Bike & Walk Coalition
    Debra Kagan · Upper Montclair, NJ
  91. (printed as 9/29/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33101Jerry Homan
    Jersey City, NJ
  92. (printed as 9/29/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33100Roger Heitmann
    Jersey City Heights, NJ
  93. (printed as 9/29/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33099Ellen Glynn
    Jersey City, NJ
  94. (printed as 9/29/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33098William DiMotta
    Jersey City, NJ
  95. (printed as 9/29/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33096Jennifer Dickenson
    Jersey City, NJ
  96. (printed as 9/29/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3845Dan Horgan
  97. (printed as 9/29/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3842Donna Dorgan
  98. (printed as 9/29/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3836Various
    Section 106 Interested Parties-General Public
  99. (printed as 9/28/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33150Section 106 Public Meeting Transcript
    Jersey City, NJ
  100. (printed as 9/28/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33095Wynn Wagenseil
    Supply, NC
  101. (printed as 9/28/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33094We CARE Movement, Inc.
    Rochelle Myers-Hoffman · Jersey City, NJ
  102. (printed as 9/28/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33092Andrew Saccomanno
    Jersey City, NJ
  103. (printed as 9/28/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33089Historic Paulus Hook Association
    Diane Kaese · Jersey City, NJ
  104. (printed as 9/28/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33088Eileen Ferara
    Jersey City, NJ
  105. (printed as 9/28/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33072City of Jersey City et al.
    Donna Dorgan · Jersey City, NJ
  106. (printed as 9/27/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33071City of Jersey City et al.
    Charles Montange · Jersey City, NJ
  107. (printed as 9/27/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33070Bethany Wall
    Jersey City, NJ
  108. (printed as 9/23/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33087Ashwani Vasishth
    Mahwah, NJ
  109. (printed as 9/22/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33086Michael Kopf
    Jersey City, NJ
  110. (printed as 9/13/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33054Maryanne Serafin
    Jersey City, NJ
  111. (printed as 9/13/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3838Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Maureen Crowley
  112. (printed as 9/13/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3831Various
    Interested Parties
  113. (printed as 9/12/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3837Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Maureen Crowley
  114. (printed as 9/8/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33063Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Maureen Crowley · Jersey City, NJ
  115. (printed as 9/5/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33062Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Maureen Crowley · Jersey City, NJ
  116. (printed as 7/18/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33016Gabriel Senbei
    Jersey City, NJ
  117. (printed as 7/17/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33015Danny Victor
    Jersey City, NJ
  118. (printed as 7/17/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33014Valeriya Efimova
    Jersey City, NJ
  119. (printed as 7/16/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33013Mia Scanga
    Jersey City, NJ
  120. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33207Rails to Trails Conservancy
    Andrea Ferster · Washington, DC
  121. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33012Jersey City Parks Coalition
    Laura Skolar-Gamarello · Jersey City, NJ
  122. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33011Bike JC
    Ayla Schermer · Jersey City, NJ
  123. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33010Rails to Trails Conservancy
    Andrea C. Ferster · Canaan, NY
  124. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33009Consolidated Rail Corporation
    Michael L. Rosenthal · Washington, DC
  125. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33008NY/NJ Baykeeper
    Greg Remaud · Hazlet, NJ
  126. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33007The Friends of Liberty State Park
    Jersey City, NJ
  127. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33006Carol A Massar
    Jersey City, NJ
  128. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33005Diane Kaese
    Jersey City, NJ
  129. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33004Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy
    Christopher Perez · Jersey City, NJ
  130. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33003Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Branch Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Stephen Gucciardo · Jersey City, NJ
  131. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33002Bergen Arches Preservation Coalition
    Rahid Cornejo · Jersey City, NJ
  132. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33001Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Maureen Crowley · Jersey City, NJ
  133. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33000Donna J Dorgan
    Jersey City, NJ
  134. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32999Gary J. Bucca
    Jersey City, NJ
  135. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32998Irene Barnaby
    Jersey City, NJ
  136. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32997Van Vorst Neighborhood Association
    Gerry Bakirtjy · Jersey City, NJ
  137. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32996Nisha Ahamed
    Jersey City, NJ
  138. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32991Village Neighborhood Association
    Eric Hofmann · Jersey City, NJ
  139. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32990Elizabeth Drenning
    Jersey City, NJ
  140. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32989Wai-Sing Chew
    Jersey City, NJ
  141. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32967Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Branch Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Embankment Preservation Coalition also concurs in and adopts the comments filed this date by Rails to Trails Conservancy
    Jersey City, NJ
  142. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32959National Trust for Historic Preservation
    Elizabeth Merritt · Washington, DC
  143. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32956LLCs
    Michele Donato · Lavallette, NJ
  144. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32955City of Jersey City
    Margaret A. O'Neill · Jersey City, NJ
  145. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3822Bergen Arches Preservation Coalition
    Rahid Cornejo
  146. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3821Bike JC
    Ayla Schermer
  147. (printed as 7/13/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33023Hamilton Park Neighborhood Association
    Aaron Underwood · Jersey City, NJ
  148. (printed as 7/13/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32993Vi Nguyen and David Silverman
    Jersey City, NJ
  149. (printed as 7/13/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32987Claire Suh
    Jersey City, NJ
  150. (printed as 7/13/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32986Paul-Martin Maki
    Jersey City, NJ
  151. (printed as 7/13/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32985Dina Lucchesi
    Jersey City, NJ
  152. (printed as 7/13/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32984Gail Kutac
    Jersey City, NJ
  153. (printed as 7/13/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32983Geoffrey Eisele
    Jersey City, NJ
  154. (printed as 7/12/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32982Joseph Vita
    Jersey City, NJ
  155. (printed as 7/12/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32981Joanne Gucciardo
    Jersey City, NJ
  156. (printed as 7/12/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32980Susan Flores
    Jersey City, NJ
  157. (printed as 7/12/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32979Alexander Brody
    Jersey City, NJ
  158. (printed as 7/11/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32978Arthur Cook
    Jersey City, NJ
  159. (printed as 7/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32992Chris Cordell
    Jersey City, NJ
  160. (printed as 7/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32977Suzanne Winkler
    Jersey City, NJ
  161. (printed as 7/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32976Andrea Underwood
    Jersey City, NJ
  162. (printed as 7/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32975Richard Paget
    Jersey City, NJ
  163. (printed as 7/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32974Scott Moulaison
    Jersey City, NJ
  164. (printed as 7/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32973Steve Krinsky
    Jersey City, NJ
  165. (printed as 7/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32972Marina Conlin
    Jersey City, NJ
  166. (printed as 7/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32971James Conlin
    Jersey City, NJ
  167. (printed as 7/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32970Craig Buckbee
    Jersey City, NJ
  168. (printed as 7/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32957Tim Binder
    Jersey City, NJ
  169. (printed as 7/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32954Tim Binder
    Jersey City, NJ
  170. (printed as 7/9/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32969Peter Gliatto
    Jersey City, NJ
  171. (printed as 7/9/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32966Liliane Freitas
    Jersey City, NJ
  172. (printed as 7/9/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32965Kevin Brown
    Jersey City, NJ
  173. (printed as 7/9/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32964Devika Brown
    Jersey City, NJ
  174. (printed as 7/8/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32962Maryanne Serafin
    Jersey City, NJ
  175. (printed as 7/7/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32960Donna Ristorucci
    Jersey City, NJ
  176. (printed as 7/7/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32958Margaret Kessler
    Jersey City, NJ
  177. (printed as 7/7/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32941Hamilton Park Neighborhood Association
    Robert Garner · Jersey City, NJ
  178. (printed as 7/6/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3820Bergen Arches Coalition and Historic Jersey City & Harsimus Cemetery
  179. (printed as 6/27/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32930Section 106 Consulting Parties Meeting
    Transcript from the 6/8/23 Consulting Parties meeting.
    Washington, DC
  180. (printed as 6/14/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3818Various
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  181. (printed as 6/7/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32903Peter Pfohl, for LLCs and Albanese Organization, Inc.
    Please find attached for filing the attached Reply to the City Parties May 31, 2023 Motion to Strike.
    Washington, DC
  182. (printed as 5/31/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32968City of Jersey City, et al
    Please see attached environmental/historic comment, submitted for inclusion in the record.
    Charles Montange, attorney for City, et al. · Seattle, WA
  183. (printed as 5/31/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32939Jersey City, EPC, RTC
    Charles Montange · Seattle, WA
  184. (printed as 5/25/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3830Section 106 Consulting Parties
  185. (printed as 5/16/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32871Covington & Burling, LLP atty for Conrail
    Michael Rosenthal · Washington, DC
  186. (printed as 5/15/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32870NY/NJ Baykeeper
    Greg Remaud · Hazlet, NJ
  187. (printed as 5/15/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32869Friends of Liberty State Park
    Sam Pesin · Jersey City, NJ
  188. (printed as 5/12/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3805Counsel for Jersey City, EPC, and RTC
    Charles Montange
  189. (printed as 5/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32847LLCs and Albanese Organization, Inc.
    Please see attached letter for inclusion in the docket.
    Peter A. Pfohl · Washington, DC
  190. (printed as 5/8/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32849Counsel for Jersey City, EPC, RTC
    Charles Montange · Seattle, WA
  191. (printed as 5/5/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3804Various
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  192. (printed as 3/21/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3795Jersey City
    Peter Baker
  193. (printed as 3/17/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32826City of Jersey City
    Peter Baker · Jersey City, NJ
  194. (printed as 3/17/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32825Charles Montange
    Seattle, WA
  195. (printed as 12/15/2022)
    Substitution
    305806Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    212 Marin Boulevard, LLc; 247 Manila Avenue, LLC; 280 Erie Street, LLC; 317 Jersey Avenue, LLC; 354 Cole Street, LLC; 389 Monmouth Street, LLC; 415 Brunswick Street, LLC; 446 Newark Avenue, LLC
  196. served (printed as 11/3/2022)
    Decision
    51485--
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OCTOBER 20, 2022 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
    in the court-action register
  197. served (printed as 8/22/2022)
    Decision
    51043Entire Board
    CONCLUDED THAT THERE WAS NO VIOLATION OF SECTION 110(k) AND THE BOARD WILL PROCEED WITH COMPLETION OF THE SECTION 106 HISTORIC REVIEW.
  198. (printed as 8/22/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3747Section 106 Consulting Parties
  199. (printed as 11/8/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31309Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
    Jaime Loichinger · Washington, DC
  200. (printed as 10/25/2021)
    Comment
    EI-32670ACHP
    Jaime Loichinger · Washington, DC
  201. served (printed as 10/21/2021)
    Decision
    50989Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED NOTICE OF A CORRECTION TO A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ISSUED ON SEPTEMBER 23, 2021.
  202. (printed as 10/21/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3746ACHP
    Jaime Loichinger
  203. (printed as 10/15/2021)
    Reply
    303092Reply
    212 Marin Boulevard, LLC; 247 Manila Avenue, LLC; 280 Erie Street, LLC; 317 Jersey Avenue, LLC; 354 Cole Street, LLC; 389 Monmouth Street, LLC; 415 Brunswick Street, LLC; and 446 Newark Avenue, LLC
  204. (printed as 10/15/2021)
    Reply
    303090Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  205. (printed as 10/12/2021)
    Comments
    303085Comment
    City of Jersey City, Rails to Trails Conservancy, and Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition
  206. served (printed as 9/23/2021)
    Decision
    50963Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDED THAT A CERTAIN CONDITION BE IMPOSED ON A DECISION GRANTING ABANDONMENT AUTHORITY.
  207. (printed as 9/23/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31301Michele R. Donato
    Lavallette, NJ
  208. (printed as 8/9/2021)
    Reply
    302831Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  209. (printed as 8/6/2021)
    Reply
    302827Reply
    212 Marin Boulevard, LLC; 247 Manila Avenue, LLC; 280 Erie Street, LLC; 317 Jersey Avenue, LLC; 354 Cole Street, LLC; 389 Monmouth Street, LLC; 415 Brunswick Street, LLC; and 446 Newark Avenue, LLC
  210. (printed as 7/19/2021)
    Reply
    302752Reply
    212 Marin Boulevard, LLC; 247 Manila Avenue, LLC; 280 Erie Street, LLC; 317 Jersey Avenue, LLC; 354 Cole Street, LLC; 389 Monmouth Street, LLC; 415 Brunswick Street, LLC; and 446 Newark Avenue, LLC
  211. (printed as 7/19/2021)
    Reply
    302751Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  212. (printed as 7/19/2021)
    Rebuttal
    302749Rebuttal
    City of Jersey City, Rails to Trails Conservancy, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition
  213. (printed as 7/9/2021)
    Letter
    302698Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  214. (printed as 6/21/2021)
    Comments
    302572Comment
    Bergen Arches Preservation Coalition
  215. (printed as 6/21/2021)
    Comments
    302565Comment
    North Jersey Transportation Planning Authority
  216. (printed as 6/21/2021)
    Comments
    302562Comment
    Village Neighborhood Association
  217. (printed as 6/21/2021)
    Statement
    302561Opening Statement
    212 Marin Boulevard, LLC; 247 Manila Avenue, LLC; 280 Erie Street, LLC; 317 Jersey Avenue, LLC; 354 Cole Street, LLC; 389 Monmouth Street, LLC; 415 Brunswick Street, LLC; and 446 Newark Avenue, LLC
  218. (printed as 6/21/2021)
    Statement
    302560Opening Statement
    City of Jersey City, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition and Rails to Trails Conservancy
  219. (printed as 6/21/2021)
    Statement
    302557Opening Statement
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  220. (printed as 6/21/2021)
    Comments
    302555Comment
    Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition
  221. (printed as 6/21/2021)
    Comments
    302554Comment
    The Historic Jersey City and Harsimus Cemetery
  222. (printed as 6/21/2021)
    Comments
    302553Comment
    Karin Williams
  223. (printed as 6/17/2021)
    Comments
    302551Comment
    Harsimus Cove Association
  224. (printed as 6/17/2021)
    Comments
    302547Comment
    Historic Paulus Hook Association
  225. (printed as 6/17/2021)
    Comments
    302546Comment
    NY/NJ Baykeeper
  226. (printed as 6/17/2021)
    Comments
    302545Comment
    Peter Zirnis
  227. (printed as 6/17/2021)
    Comments
    302544Comment
    Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy
  228. (printed as 6/17/2021)
    Comments
    302543Comment
    Friends of Liberty State Park
  229. (printed as 6/17/2021)
    Comments
    302542Comment
    Robb Kushner
  230. (printed as 6/17/2021)
    Comments
    302540Comment
    Van Vorst Park Association
  231. (printed as 6/17/2021)
    Comments
    302539Comment
    Jersey City Parks Coalition
  232. (printed as 6/16/2021)
    Comments
    302532Comment
    Hamilton Park Neighborhood Association
  233. (printed as 6/16/2021)
    Comments
    302530Comment
    Tia Biasi
  234. (printed as 6/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-33078Richard James
    Attached are my comments to the OEA on the relevance and import of the NHPA, section 110(k) to the proposed abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, Jersey City N.J.
    Brooklyn, NY
  235. (printed as 6/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-30899ACHP
    Jamie Loichinger · Washington, DC
  236. (printed as 5/28/2021)
    Letter
    302422Letter
    Honorable Donald M. Payne, Jr., Honorable Albio Sires
  237. (printed as 5/26/2021)
    Letter
    302408Letter
    Honorable Donald M. Payne, Jr., Honorable Albio Sires
  238. served (printed as 5/19/2021)
    Decision
    50767Director Of Proceedings
    ORDERED OPENING SUBMISSIONS DUE BY JUNE 18, 2021; AND REPLIES DUE BY JULY 19, 2021.
  239. (printed as 5/19/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3745Section 106 Consulting Parties
  240. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Comment
    EI-30695New Jersey SHPO
    Katherine Marcopul · Jersey City, NJ
  241. (printed as 4/19/2021)
    Comment
    EI-32669ACHP
    Jaime Loichinger · Washington, DC
  242. (printed as 3/24/2021)
    Comment
    EI-30439Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition
    I am submitting comments on behalf of one of my clients, PRR Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition. The Coalition wishes to stress that Conrail and its chosen developer did not act in accordance with the City's intentions as claimed by the OEA in its 2009 Environmental Assessment in the OEA's suggestions in connection with section 110(k) (anticipatory demolition). The Coalition submits 30 letter showing that Conrail acted in disregard, and contrary, to the City's intentions. City of Jersey City and Rails to Trails Conservancy affiliate with these comments and the evidence presented, noting that the letters further demonstrate an intentional violation of section 110(k) by Conrail.
    Charles Montange, attorney, on behalf of Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition · Shoreline, WA
  243. (printed as 3/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-32668Attorney
    Charles Montange · Seattle, WA
  244. (printed as 3/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-30372City of Jersey City, Rails to Trails Conservancy, and Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservatoin Coalition
    Charles Montange on behalf of City of Jersey City, et al. · Seattle, WA
  245. (printed as 3/8/2021)
    Comment
    EI-30367ACHP
    Jaime Loichinger · Washington, DC
  246. (printed as 3/5/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3741ACHP
    Jaime Loichinger
  247. (printed as 2/23/2021)
    Comment
    EI-30001Covington, for Conrail
    Michael Rosenthal · Jersey City, NJ
  248. (printed as 2/18/2021)
    Comment
    EI-27089Embankment LLCs
    Michele R. Donato · Lavallette, NJ
  249. (printed as 2/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-27081Rails to Trails
    Andrea Ferster
  250. (printed as 2/2/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3312ACHP
    Jaime Loichinger
  251. (printed as 1/29/2021)
    Comment
    EI-32661Albanese Organization
    Michael Ritz · Garden City, NY
  252. (printed as 1/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-27078ACHP
    Jamie Loichinger
  253. (printed as 1/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-27077Rails to Trails Conservancy
    Andrea Ferster
  254. (printed as 12/4/2020)
    Comment
    EI-32667Attorney for City
    Charles Montange · Seattle, WA
  255. (printed as 12/4/2020)
    Comment
    EI-32666Conrail
    Michael Rosenthal · Washington, DC
  256. (printed as 12/3/2020)
    Comment
    EI-32665NJ SHPO
    Kate Marcopul · Trenton, NJ
  257. (printed as 12/3/2020)
    Comment
    EI-27051NJ SHPO
    Katherine Marcopul
  258. (printed as 11/13/2020)
    Comment
    EI-27004Consolidated Rail Corporation
    Michael L. Rosenthal · Washington, DC
  259. (printed as 11/13/2020)
    Comment
    EI-27003Richard James
  260. (printed as 11/12/2020)
    Comment
    EI-27000ACHP
    Sarah Stokely
  261. (printed as 11/9/2020)
    Comment
    EI-27005City of Jersey City, PRR Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition and Rails to Trails Conservancy
    You need to change state agency in this form to state or local government
    Charles H Montange · Seattle, WA
  262. (printed as 11/5/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26999Michele Donato
  263. (printed as 10/29/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26995City of Jersey City, PRR Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition and Rails to Trails Conservancy et al
    This is for inclusion in your environmental and historic preservation comments and is in reference to your October 27 consulting parties hearing.
    Charles H Montangre · Seattle, WA
  264. (printed as 10/27/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26997Section 106 Consulting Parties Meeting
    Video Recording
  265. (printed as 10/22/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26993Hamilton Park Neighborhood Association
    Our organization is filing a comment on the Draft Supplementary Environmental Assessment issued in September 2020.
    Corey Klein · Jersey City, NJ
  266. (printed as 10/21/2020)
    Comment
    EO-3300Section 106 Consulting Parties
  267. (printed as 10/20/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26992Hudson County Office of Cultural & Heritage Affairs / Tourism Development
    I am filing a comment on the Draft Supplementary Environmental Assessment issued in September 2020.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  268. (printed as 10/19/2020)
    Comments
    301191Environmental Comment
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  269. (printed as 10/19/2020)
    Comments
    301186Environmental Comment
    City of Jersey City, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition and Rails to Trails Conservancy
  270. (printed as 10/19/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26994Jersey City Parks Coalition
    Laura Skolar
  271. (printed as 10/19/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26991Frank Gallagher
    Montague, NJ
  272. (printed as 10/19/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26990NY/NJ Baykeeper
    NY?NJ Baykeeper comments on the Draft Supplementary Environmental Assessment issued in September 2020 NY/NJ Baykeeper has been a leading non-profit conservation organization that has tackled clean water, land preservation and green-infrastructure issues in communities of the NY/NJ Harbor region for over 30 years. We have partnered on more than three dozen land preservation and natural restoration projects in the region, totally more than 3,000 acres. This includes adding land to Laurel Hill Hudson County Park, the nationally recognized natural restoration of Hudson County’s Lincoln Park West, funding land acquisitions to create Jersey City’s Hackensack Riverfront Park. As the NY/NJ Baykeeper I have the pleasure of serving as Co-chair of the NewarkDIG Coalition (Doing Infrastructure Green) and the Vice Chair of the Meadowlands Conservation Trust. Our staff attorney, Michele Langa, serves as Co-Chair of the Passaic River Citizens Advisory Group. So, we are aware that investments into urban open space preservation, natural restoration, green infrastructure, public trails for hiking and low impact transportation are large and increasing significantly regionally and throughout the country. Nowhere is that more important than crowded urban neighborhoods, and Hudson is among the most densely populated counties in the nation. Finding existing open space or areas that could be retrofitted for these purposes in cities is extremely challenging because of intense competing land uses. Planners, elected officials, even engineers regularly lament the limited opportunities to preserve more natural lands in cities However, with creativity and strong public support, Communities near and far are finding creative way to green their urban neighborhoods. Nearby it was done in Bloomfield with a 17-acre Lions Gate Green Infrastructure Park, in several natural restorations in the Meadowlands, in Trenton’s Capital Park, and at a re-envisioned and restored landfill Camden. The Embankment, may be the best opportunity anywhere to expand this concept and practice, as it is an existing marvelous, ready-made structure and linear park in the heart of Jersey City and Hudson County that can provide myriad public benefits The Embankment Coalition vision for the Harsimus Branch and its Embankment takes advantage of a rare opportunity to use unique existing elevated urban open space that preserves thriving upland forest and a wildlife corridor that runs from the Hudson River to the Hackensack. The Harsimus stem Embankment as environed by the citizen-led Embankment Coalition provides more recreational and enjoyment of nature for people, more habitat for wildlife, rainwater capture and floodwater reduction while having the foresight to reserve a portion of the corridor for future light rail and low-impact transportation needs. Furthermore, the Coalition and has strong positive relationship with Jersey City, the community at large, and an extensive network of local, state and regional organizations who support these objectives. NY/NJ Baykeeper has commented on this project for well over a decade and has witnessed the public good that should be derived from this golden opportunity to transform the Embankment and rail line into a greenway has been thwarted by legal technicalities based on false assumptions proffered by Conrail representatives. It has happening again in this faulty DSEA that fails to acknowledge the adverse impacts that would result from authorizing an unconditional abandonment and fails to consider both the environmental impacts and the alternatives to mitigate them. Therefore, it fails to serve as an alternative to an Environmental Alternative or an Environmental Impact Statement. We applaud and support the strong comments of Jersey City’s legal team who have detailed and called out the attempt to circumvent the public’s right (by way of Jersey City) of first refusal by trying to pass a well-known easily documented rail line as a rail spur. The City also details the adverse impacts that should have been captured and presented in the DSEA. Underhanded tactics such as these are what understandably breeds public cynicism and a loss of faith in government agencies. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Greg Remaud Baykeeper and CEO NY/NJ Baykeeper
    Greg Remaud · HAZLET, NJ
  273. (printed as 10/19/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26989Harsimus Cove Association
    filing a comment on the Draft Supplementary Environmental Assessment issued in September 2020
    Christy Sayre · Jersey City, NJ
  274. (printed as 10/19/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26988East Coast Greenway Alliance
    Bruce Donald · Farmington, CT
  275. (printed as 10/19/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26987NY/NJ Baykeeper
    NY/NJ Baykeeper Comment on the Draft Supplementary Environmental Assessment issued in September 2020 NY/NJ Baykeeper has been a leading non-profit conservation organization that has tackled clean water, land preservation and green-infrastructure issues in communities of the NY/NJ Harbor region for over 30 years. We have partnered on more than three dozen land preservation and natural restoration projects in the region, totally more than 3,000 acres. This includes adding land to Laurel Hill Hudson County Park, the nationally recognized natural restoration of Hudson County’s Lincoln Park West, funding land acquisitions to create Jersey City’s Hackensack Riverfront Park. As the NY/NJ Baykeeper I have the pleasure of serving as Co-chair of the NewarkDIG Coalition (Doing Infrastructure Green) and the Vice Chair of the Meadowlands Conservation Trust. Our staff attorney, Michele Langa, serves as Co-Chair of the Passaic River Citizens Advisory Group. So, we are aware that investments into urban open space preservation, natural restoration, green infrastructure, public trails for hiking and low impact transportation are large and increasing significantly regionally and throughout the country. Nowhere is that more important than crowded urban neighborhoods, and Hudson is among the most densely populated counties in the nation. Finding existing open space or areas that could be retrofitted for these purposes in cities is extremely challenging because of intense competing land uses. Planners, elected officials, even engineers regularly lament the limited opportunities to preserve more natural lands in cities However, with creativity and strong public support, Communities near and far are finding creative way to green their urban neighborhoods. Nearby it was done in Bloomfield with a 17-acre Lions Gate Green Infrastructure Park, in several natural restorations in the Meadowlands, in Trenton’s Capital Park, and at a re-envisioned and restored landfill Camden. The Embankment, may be the best opportunity anywhere to expand this concept and practice, as it is an existing marvelous, ready-made structure and linear park in the heart of Jersey City and Hudson County that can provide myriad public benefits The Embankment Coalition vision for the Harsimus Branch and its Embankment takes advantage of a rare opportunity to use unique existing elevated urban open space that preserves thriving upland forest and a wildlife corridor that runs from the Hudson River to the Hackensack. The Harsimus stem Embankment as environed by the citizen-led Embankment Coalition provides more recreational and enjoyment of nature for people, more habitat for wildlife, rainwater capture and floodwater reduction while having the foresight to reserve a portion of the corridor for future light rail and low-impact transportation needs. Furthermore, the Coalition and has strong positive relationship with Jersey City, the community at large, and an extensive network of local, state and regional organizations who support these objectives. NY/NJ Baykeeper has commented on this project for well over a decade and has witnessed the public good that should be derived from this golden opportunity to transform the Embankment and rail line into a greenway has been thwarted by legal technicalities based on false assumptions proffered by Conrail representatives. It has happening again in this faulty DSEA that fails to acknowledge the adverse impacts that would result from authorizing an unconditional abandonment and fails to consider both the environmental impacts and the alternatives to mitigate them. Therefore, it fails to serve as an alternative to an Environmental Alternative or an Environmental Impact Statement. We applaud and support the strong comments of Jersey City’s legal team who have detailed and called out the attempt to circumvent the public’s right (by way of Jersey City) of first refusal by trying to pass a well-known easily documented rail line as a rail spur. The City also details the adverse impacts that should have been captured and presented in the DSEA. Underhanded tactics such as these are what understandably breeds public cynicism and a loss of faith in government agencies. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Greg Remaud Baykeeper and CEO NY/NJ Baykeeper
    Gregory A. Remaud · HAZLET, NJ
  276. (printed as 10/19/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26985Friends of Liberty State Park Inc.
    I'm filing a comment on the Draft Supplementary Environmental Assessment issued in September 2020
    Sam Pesin · Jersey City, NJ
  277. (printed as 10/19/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26984Village Neighborhood Association
    Eric Hofmann · Jersey City, New Jersey
  278. (printed as 10/19/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26983CivicJC
    Comment on the Draft Supplementary Environmental Assessment issued in September 2020
    Valerio Luccio · Jersey City, NJ
  279. (printed as 10/19/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26982Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy
    Filing a comment on the Draft Supplementary Environmental Assessment issued in September 2020.
    Jennifer Furlong · Jersey City, NJ
  280. (printed as 10/18/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26986moriah kinberg
    Re: Draft Supplementary Environmental Assessment Issued in September 2020. I am a resident of Jersey City Heights. For several years I have been working to ensure that community voices are represented in the CSO Long Term Control Plans required by The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection to comply with the federal Clean Water Act. Cities must adopt plans to address stormwater issues and combined sewer outflows (CSOs) that contaminate waterways. Like other cities in the state and nation, Jersey City has an antiquated system of combined storm water and wastewater sewers that allow pollutants like motor oil, trash, animal waste, and raw sewage to flow into basements, streets, and rivers when storm water exceeds the handling capacity of the system. The City and region will be spending billions of dollars to address this issue through increasing sewer capacity, retention facilities, and green infrastructure. Local taxpayers will be picking up most of the cost. The Harsimus Branch Embankment is an example of already existing green infrastructure that serves the community in stormwater control. The Embankment is a massive stone and earthen structure that runs through a flood plain. A forest has grown up on its top. The trees and other vegetation there break up heavy rain, and the structure’s fill absorbs it and slowly releases excess water into the City’s overburdened combined sewer system over a period of days or weeks. Multiple development proposals have been made by the developer to whom Conrail unlawfully sold Embankment property, and both Conrail and the developer applied for demolition permits. There is a strong likelihood that some development proposal will move forward in the event of an unconditioned abandonment. Yet the DSEA does not provide relevant information about this to the decision-makers, as required to do by NEPA. If the Embankment is demolished, the rainwater now soaked up by the Embankment would instead flow directly into the overburdened combined sewer system, with even more local flooding and combined sewer outflows (CSOs) requiring abatement. On top of that, any redevelopment of the open space will result in more impermeable lot coverage with even greater adverse stormwater effects on the community. A major sewer line adjacent and parallel to the Branch directs water along Sixth Street and its extension to the end of Thomas Gangemi Drive on the Hudson. The impact of Embankment demolition and the removal and transport of tons of earth and stone by heavy equipment on this system has not been analyzed nor even mentioned in the DSEA. The DSEA should recognize the adverse effects of demolition, quantify the stormwater or contaminants that would be released, describe the deleterious effects on human health and well-being, and calculate the cost to the taxpayer of addressing these issues. That the cost may be incalculable is no reason not to describe the reasonable and foreseeable impacts for decisionmakers. Sincerely, Moriah Kinberg
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  281. (printed as 10/14/2020)
    Substitution
    301174Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  282. (printed as 10/14/2020)
    Comment
    EO-3299Section 106 Consulting Parties
  283. (printed as 10/13/2020)
    Comment
    EO-3298Section 106 Consulting Parties
  284. (printed as 10/7/2020)
    Letter
    301158Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  285. (printed as 10/7/2020)
    Comment
    EO-3291Jersey City et al.
    Charles Montange, Esq.
  286. (printed as 10/5/2020)
    Motion
    301153Motion To Dismiss Or Discontinue
    212 Marin Boulevard, LLC.; 247 Manila Avenue; LLC; 280 Erie Street, LLC; 317 Jersey Avenue, LLC; 354 Cole Street, LLC; 389 Monmouth Street, LLC; 415 Brunswick Street, LLC; and 446 Newark Avenue, LLC
  287. (printed as 9/30/2020)
    Request
    301133Request For Extension Of Time
    City of Jersey City, Rails to Trails Conservancy and Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalitionn
  288. (printed as 9/25/2020)
    Comment
    EO-3297Section 106 Consulting Parties
  289. served (printed as 9/10/2020)
    Decision
    50416Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED A DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND SOUGHT COMMENTS BY OCTOBER 19, 2020.
  290. (printed as 9/10/2020)
    Comment
    EO-3287Notice of Availability: Draft Supplemental EA
  291. (printed as 2/19/2020)
    Comment
    EO-3311ACHP
    Jaime Loichinger
  292. (printed as 1/24/2020)
    Comment
    EI-27088ACHP
    Jaime Loichinger
  293. (printed as 1/21/2020)
    Comment
    EO-3228OEA
    Kate Marcopul
  294. (printed as 1/17/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26811NJ HPO
    Kate Marcopul
  295. (printed as 1/16/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26809Conrail
    Robert Jenkins
  296. (printed as 1/10/2020)
    Comment
    EI-26808Genova Burns LLC
    Eugene Paolino
  297. (printed as 12/4/2019)
    Comment
    EI-26755Charles H. Montange
    Mr. Wayland, these comments on STB OEA's Nov. 2019 CREAR Addendum are filed on behalf of City of Jersey City, PRR Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition, and Rails to Trails Conservancy. The format for disclosure of affiliation in your e-filing website needs to be reformatted to allow proper designation of affiliation. The comments indicate deficiencies in the CREAR Addendum which should be addressed in order to address determination of adverse impact, and before addressing mitigation. Although addressed to your attention in the e-filing format, I request that you forward same to all officers involved.
    Seattle, WA
  298. (printed as 12/4/2019)
    Comment
    EI-26754SHPO
    Katherine Marcopul · Trenton, NJ
  299. (printed as 11/26/2019)
    Comment
    EI-26752State Historic Preservation Office
    Katherine Marcopul · Trenton, NJ
  300. served (printed as 11/12/2019)
    Decision
    47353Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED A CULTURAL RESOURCES EFFECTS ASSESSMENT REPORT ADDENDUM IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  301. (printed as 10/28/2019)
    Comment
    EO-3181NJ SHPO
    Kate Marcopul
  302. (printed as 5/14/2019)
    Comment
    EI-26481Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
    Jaime Loichinger
  303. (printed as 5/13/2019)
    Comment
    EI-26480NJ State Historic Preservation Office
    Katherine J. Marcopul
  304. (printed as 4/29/2019)
    Comment
    EI-26474LLCs
    Michele Donato, Esq. · Lavallette, NJ
  305. (printed as 4/29/2019)
    Comment
    EI-26473Mayer Brown LLP for Conrail
    Please see attached Conrail comments on the Cultural Resources Effects Assessment Report. Service has been effected pursuant to the attached Certificate of Service.
    Robert M. Jenkins III · Washington, DC
  306. (printed as 4/28/2019)
    Comment
    EI-26472Embankment Preservation Coalition et al.
    The attached Embankment Preservation Coalition comments are supplementary to,and in support of, those filed by City of Jersey City et. al and are endorsed by the following nonprofit organizations: East Coast Greenway Alliance, Friends of Liberty State Park, Hamilton Park Neighborhood Association, Harsimus Cove Association, Historic Paulus Hook Association, Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy,Jersey City Parks Coalition, New York/New Jersey Baykeeper,The Historic Jersey City & Harsimus Cemetery, The Village Neighborhood Association, and Van Vorst Park Association
    Maureen Crowley · Jersey City, NJ
  307. (printed as 4/25/2019)
    Comment
    EI-26475Jersey City et al.
    Charles Montange
  308. served (printed as 3/29/2019)
    Decision
    39674Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED A CULTURAL RESOURCES EFFECTS ASSESSMENT REPORT AND CONCLUDED THAT CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION'S PROPOSAL IN THIS PROCEEDING COULD RESULT IN ADVERSE EFFECTS TO HISTORIC PROPERTIES LISTED IN OR ELIGIBLE FOR LISTING IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER. PROVIDED NOTICE THAT COMMENTS ARE REQUESTED RELATED TO THE ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS PROCESS AND POTENTIAL MITIGATION MEASURES THAT COULD BE ADOPTED TO RESOLVE THOSE ADVERSE EFFECTS.
  309. (printed as 10/31/2018)
    Comment
    EI-26470LLCs
    Michele Donato
  310. (printed as 10/31/2018)
    Comment
    EI-26469Jersey City et al.
    Charles Montange
  311. (printed as 10/31/2018)
    Comment
    EI-26468LLCs
    Michele Donato
  312. (printed as 10/17/2018)
    Comment
    EI-26467Jersey City et al.
    Charles Montange
  313. served (printed as 10/16/2018)
    Decision
    46660Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED AN ADDENDUM TO THE CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION REPORT ISSUED ON MAY 5, 2017, IN THESE PROCEEDINGS.
  314. served (printed as 10/12/2018)
    Decision
    46654Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION DETERMINED THAT ANY FUTURE DISCOVERY MATTERS AND DISCOVERY DISPUTES IN THESE PROCEEDINGS SHALL NO LONGER BE DIRECTED TOWARDS FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES.
  315. (printed as 10/1/2018)
    Comment
    EI-26371Conrail
    Robert Jenkins
  316. (printed as 5/25/2018)
    Comment
    EO-3003Richard Grubb Associates (c/o) Damon Tvaryanas
  317. (printed as 4/24/2018)
    Notice
    245610Notice
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  318. (printed as 4/24/2018)
    Appeal
    245609Appeal
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  319. (printed as 1/3/2018)
    Comment
    EO-2969NJ SHPO, ACHP
  320. (printed as 10/18/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26218Mayer Brown LLP
    Please see the attached letter to Ms. Rutson that is being filed by Robert M. Jenkins III of Mayer Brown LLP on behalf of Consolidated Rail Corporation. We are providing the correspondence as a pdf (signed and with attachment) and in Word (unsigned and without the attachment)
    Robert M. Jenkins III · Washington, DC
  321. (printed as 10/16/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26212City of Jersey City et al.
    Comments on issues raised by Conrail in environmental correspondence dated 8 Sept. 2017, and reiteration that Conrail has violated section 110(k) of the National Historic Preservation Act, with verified statement and exhibits and attachments
    Charles H Montange · Seattle, WA
  322. (printed as 9/14/2017)
    Comment
    EO-2928New Jersey Historic Preservation Office
    Andrea Tingey
  323. (printed as 9/8/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26195Conrail
    Robert Jenkins
  324. served (printed as 8/21/2017)
    Decision
    45916Entire Board
    DECISION DENIED JAMES RIFFIN'S REQUEST TO RECONSIDER OR REOPEN ITS APRIL 28, 2017 DECISION, WHICH UPHELD SANCTIONS IMPOSED ON RIFFIN, INCLUDING TERMINATING HIS PARTICIPATION IN THESE CASES. THE BOARD ALSO DENIED RIFFIN'S REQUEST FOR A STAY.
  325. (printed as 7/28/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26153City of Jersey City, et al
    Charles H Montange · Seattle, WA
  326. (printed as 7/28/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26152LLCs
    Please find attached the reply of the LLCs to the comments submitted by the New Jersey State Historic Preservation Office on July 14, 2017.
    Michele R. Donato, Esq. · Lavallette, NJ
  327. (printed as 7/24/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26154City of Jersey City, et al
    Charles H Montange · Seattle, WA
  328. (printed as 7/17/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26148New Jersey Historic Preservation Office
    Katherine Marcopul
  329. (printed as 7/10/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26142Van Vorst Park Association
    Oona Jackson Moore
  330. (printed as 7/8/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26140CivicJC
    Esther Wintner
  331. (printed as 7/7/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26141Richard James
  332. (printed as 7/7/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26139Bike JC
    Patrick Conlon
  333. (printed as 7/5/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26138LLCs
    Michele Donato
  334. (printed as 7/2/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26137Harsimus Cove Association
    Rachael D'Silva
  335. (printed as 7/1/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26136Friends of Liberty State Park
    Sam Pesin
  336. (printed as 6/29/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26132Conrail
    Robert Jenkins
  337. served (printed as 6/28/2017)
    Decision
    45908Director Of Proceedings
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE FOLLOWING COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON JUNE 22, 2017, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
    in the court-action register
  338. (printed as 6/23/2017)
    Supplement
    243850Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    City Of Jersey City, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition, And Rails To Trails Conservancy
  339. (printed as 6/23/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26122Jersey City et al.
    Charles Montagne
  340. (printed as 6/20/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26121Jersey City Democratic Organization
    Emmy Tiderington
  341. (printed as 6/19/2017)
    Reply
    243800Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  342. (printed as 6/19/2017)
    Reply
    243797Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  343. (printed as 6/19/2017)
    Comments
    243794Comment
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  344. (printed as 6/19/2017)
    Reply
    243791Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  345. (printed as 6/19/2017)
    Comments
    243787Comment
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  346. (printed as 6/19/2017)
    Substitution
    243777Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    Llc Intervenors
  347. (printed as 6/19/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26119City of Jersey City, et al.
    Charles Montange
  348. (printed as 6/19/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26118City of Jersey City, et al.
    Charles Montange
  349. (printed as 6/19/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26117Conrail
    Robert Jenkins
  350. (printed as 6/19/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26116Historic Jersey City & Harsimus Cemetery
    I am uploading comments on behalf of The Historic Jersey City & Harsimus Cemetery on the Cultural Resources Identification Report issued May 5, 2017, and on the Section 106 Process for the Harsimus Branch as conducted by STB OEA. Thank you very much, Eileen Markenstein, President, Board of Trustees (201)-707-0738
    Eileen Markenstein · Jersey City, NJ
  351. (printed as 6/19/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26115Steven L. Hyman
    New York, NY
  352. (printed as 6/19/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26114LLCs
    Please find attached the Comments to the Cultural Resources Identification Report filed today by the LLCs (212 Marin Boulevard, LLC; 247 Manila Avenue, LLC; 280 Erie Street, LLC; 317 Jersey Avenue, LLC; 354 Cole Street, LLC; 389 Monmouth Street, LLC; 415 Brunswick Street, LLC; and 446 Newark Avenue, LLC).
    Michele R. Donato, Esq. · Lavallette, NJ
  353. (printed as 6/19/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26113Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Maureen Crowley
  354. (printed as 6/19/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26112Jersey City Parks Coalition
    I am uploading comments ON BEHALF OF the Jersey City Parks Coalition on the Cultural Resources Identification Report issued May 5, 2017 and on the Section 106 Process for the Harsimus Branch as Conducted by STB OEA "
    Laura A. Skolar · JERSEY CITY, NJ
  355. (printed as 6/18/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26111Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy
    I am uploading comments regarding the Cultural Identification Resources Report issued May 5, 2017 and on the Section 106 process for the Harsimus Branch as conducted by the STB OEB.
    Norrice L. Raymaker · Jersey City, NJ
  356. (printed as 6/18/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26110Richard James
    Attached are my comments on the Cultural Resources Identification Report, issued May 5, 2017; NHPA Section 106 Review, Harsimus Branch.
    Brooklyn, New York, New York
  357. (printed as 6/12/2017)
    Substitution
    243740Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    Llc Intervenors
  358. (printed as 6/6/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26109Riverview Neighborhood Association Inc
    Please support the designation as open space for the Harsimus embankment in Jersey City.
    Kern Weissman · Jersey City, New Jersey
  359. (printed as 6/5/2017)
    Comment
    EI-26124Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Christina Donnelly
  360. (printed as 5/30/2017)
    Motion
    243554Petition To Reopen
    James Riffin
  361. (printed as 5/30/2017)
    Motion
    243546Motion/Petition/Request
    James Riffin
  362. (printed as 5/15/2017)
    Comment
    EO-2915Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
    Charlene Dwin Vaughn
  363. served (printed as 5/5/2017)
    Decision
    39672Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED A CULTURAL RESOURCES IDENTIFICATION REPORT AND SOUGHT COMMENTS ON THE REPORT BY JUNE 19, 2017.
  364. (printed as 5/4/2017)
    Comment
    EO-2914Section 106 consulting parties
  365. served (printed as 4/28/2017)
    Decision
    45708Entire Board
    DECISION DENIED JAMES RIFFIN'S APPEAL OF AN ORDER DISMISSING HIM FROM THESE PROCEEDINGS, STRIKING HIS PLEADINGS, AND ORDERING HIM TO PAY CERTAIN ATTORNEY'S FEES.
  366. (printed as 3/30/2017)
    Comment
    EI-25881LLCs
    Daniel Horgan
  367. (printed as 3/28/2017)
    Comment
    EI-25916Sierra Club
    Jonathan Perrelle
  368. (printed as 3/11/2017)
    Comment
    EI-25819Embankment Preservation Coalition
    This filing duplicates material previously sent to you in paper copy. We thought an ecopy would be easier for you to file online.
    Christina Donnelly · Jersey City, NJ
  369. (printed as 3/8/2017)
    Reply
    242774Reply
    James Riffin
  370. (printed as 2/23/2017)
    Supplement
    242693Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    James Riffin
  371. (printed as 2/22/2017)
    Comments
    242683Comment
    Llc Intervenors
  372. (printed as 2/17/2017)
    Comments
    242657Comment
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  373. (printed as 2/10/2017)
    Rebuttal
    242608Rebuttal
    James Riffin
  374. (printed as 2/7/2017)
    Reply
    242584Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  375. (printed as 2/7/2017)
    Motion
    242581Motion To Withdraw
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  376. (printed as 2/7/2017)
    Reply
    242572Reply
    Llc Intervenors
  377. (printed as 2/2/2017)
    Motion
    242560Motion/Petition/Request
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  378. (printed as 1/31/2017)
    Appeal
    242545Appeal
    James Riffin
  379. served (printed as 1/26/2017)
    Decision
    45631Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART JAMES RIFFIN'S PETITION FOR OTHER RELIEF.
  380. (printed as 1/17/2017)
    Supplement
    242460Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    James Riffin
  381. (printed as 1/9/2017)
    Motion
    242399Motion/Petition/Request
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  382. (printed as 1/9/2017)
    Reply
    242394Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  383. served (printed as 1/4/2017)
    Decision
    45620Administrative Law Judge
    DECISION ORDERED, PURSUANT TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE JOHN P. DRING'S ANNOUNCEMENT IN THE OCTOBER 24, 2016 ORAL ARGUMENTS, THE DISCOVERY PROCEEDINGS IN THE ABOVE REFERENCED DOCKETS ARE HEREBY TERMINATED.
  384. (printed as 12/22/2016)
    Reply
    242322Reply
    James Riffin
  385. served (printed as 12/21/2016)
    Decision
    45575Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION TENTATIVELY ACCEPTED JAMES RIFFIN'S APPEAL.
  386. (printed as 12/21/2016)
    Letter
    242311Letter
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  387. (printed as 12/21/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25727ACHP
    Najah Gabriel
  388. (printed as 12/21/2016)
    Comment
    EO-2872City of Jersey City
    Charles Montange
  389. (printed as 12/20/2016)
    Supplement
    242300Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    James Riffin
  390. (printed as 12/20/2016)
    Motion
    242297Motion To Dismiss Or Discontinue
    James Riffin
  391. (printed as 12/16/2016)
    Comment
    EI-21246City of Jersey City
    Jersey City's response to OEA request for information on post-abandonment plans for Harsimus Branch right-of-way.
    Mayor Steven Fulop
  392. (printed as 12/15/2016)
    Letter
    242266Letter
    Llc Intervenors
  393. (printed as 12/13/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25676City of Jersey City
    Charles Montange
  394. (printed as 12/9/2016)
    Supplement
    242223Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    James Riffin
  395. (printed as 12/7/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25675City of Jersey City
    Charles Montange
  396. (printed as 12/7/2016)
    Comment
    EO-2870City of Jersey City
    Charles Montange
  397. (printed as 12/5/2016)
    Reply
    242193Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition, And Rails To Trails Conservancy
  398. (printed as 12/5/2016)
    Reply
    242188Reply
    Llc Intervenors
  399. (printed as 12/2/2016)
    Comments
    242182Comment
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  400. (printed as 11/30/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25674City of Jersey City
    Charles Montange
  401. (printed as 11/30/2016)
    Comment
    EO-2869City of Jersey City
    Charles Montange
  402. (printed as 11/29/2016)
    Reply
    242135Reply
    James Riffin
  403. (printed as 11/29/2016)
    Supplement
    242132Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    James Riffin
  404. (printed as 11/29/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25673City of Jersey City
    Charles Montange
  405. (printed as 11/21/2016)
    Supplement
    242093Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    James Riffin
  406. (printed as 11/21/2016)
    Reply
    242090Reply
    Llc Intervenors
  407. (printed as 11/15/2016)
    Transcript
    242049Transcript Of Oral Argument
    Ace Federal Reporters
  408. (printed as 11/14/2016)
    Appeal
    242046Appeal
    James Riffin
  409. (printed as 11/4/2016)
    Transcript
    241970Transcript Of Oral Argument
    Ace Federal Reporters
  410. (printed as 11/4/2016)
    Reply
    241967Reply
    City Of Jersey City
  411. (printed as 11/3/2016)
    Letter
    241949Letter
    Llc Intervenors
  412. (printed as 11/1/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25672Residents of Jersey City
  413. (printed as 10/31/2016)
    Motion
    241930Petition
    James Riffin
  414. served (printed as 10/26/2016)
    Decision
    45539Administrative Law Judge
    DECISION ORDERED THAT JAMES RIFFIN'S MOTION TO STAY BE STRICKEN FROM THE PROCEEDING IN THE DOCKETS.
  415. served (printed as 10/26/2016)
    Decision
    45538Administrative Law Judge
    DECISION: (1) PROHIBITED JAMES RIFFIN (MR. RIFFIN) FROM INTRODUCING ANY FURTHER EVIDENCE INTO THE REFERENCED DOCKETS; (2) STRUCK MR. RIFFIN'S PLEADINGS FROM THE PROCEEDINGS IN THE REFERENCED DOCKETS; (3) DISMISSED MR. RIFFIN FROM THE PROCEEDINGS IN, AND PROHIBITED MR. RIFFIN FROM FURTHER PARTICIPATION IN, THE REFERENCED DOCKETS; (4) ORDERED MR. RIFFIN TO PAY THE COUNSEL FEES OF CITY OF JERSEY CITY, RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY, AND PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD HARSIMUS STEM EMBANKMENT PRESERVATION COALITION; AND (5) ORDERED THAT THE DISCOVERY PROCEEDINGS IN THE REFERENCED DOCKETS BE TERMINATED NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 30, 2016.
  416. (printed as 10/25/2016)
    Correction
    241862Correction
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  417. (printed as 10/25/2016)
    Reply
    241855Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  418. (printed as 10/25/2016)
    Supplement
    241852Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    James Riffin
  419. (printed as 10/25/2016)
    Motion
    241845Petition For Stay
    James Riffin
  420. (printed as 10/24/2016)
    Argument
    241833Argument
    James Riffin
  421. (printed as 10/20/2016)
    Reply
    241819Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition, And Rails To Trails Conservancy
  422. (printed as 10/14/2016)
    Correction
    241780Correction
    Llc Intervenors
  423. (printed as 10/13/2016)
    Reply
    241774Reply
    Llc Intervenors
  424. (printed as 10/13/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25422Residents of Hamilton Park
  425. (printed as 10/13/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25420Residents of Harsimus Cove
  426. served (printed as 10/12/2016)
    Decision
    45515Administrative Law Judge
    DECISION SCHEDULED ORAL ARGUMENTS FOR OCTOBER 24, 2016.
  427. served (printed as 10/7/2016)
    Decision
    45500Administrative Law Judge
    DECISION: (1) SCHEDULED AN ORAL ARGUMENT ON THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY, AND PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD HARSIMUS STEM EMBANKMENT PRESERVATION COALITION'S MOTION TO COMPEL AND MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND JAMES RIFFIN'S MOTION TO STRIKE FOR MONDAY, OCTOBER 24, 2016, AT 10:00 A.M. IN A HEARING ROOM TO BE DESIGNATED AT THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION; AND (2) DIRECTED ALL PARTIES TO THIS DISPUTE TO ATTEND
  428. (printed as 10/5/2016)
    Reply
    241672Reply
    Llc Intervenors
  429. (printed as 10/5/2016)
    Reply
    241665Reply
    Llc Intervenors
  430. (printed as 9/27/2016)
    Supplement
    241588Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    James Riffin
  431. (printed as 9/26/2016)
    Reply
    241581Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  432. (printed as 9/26/2016)
    Motion
    241571Motion To Strike
    James Riffin
  433. (printed as 9/26/2016)
    Reply
    241570Reply
    James Riffin
  434. (printed as 9/26/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25424Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy
  435. (printed as 9/26/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25419La Festa Italiana Attendees
  436. (printed as 9/23/2016)
    Reply
    241563Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  437. (printed as 9/21/2016)
    Comment
    EO-2861Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
    Charlene Dwin Vaughn
  438. (printed as 9/20/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25423Residents of Hamilton Park and Village
  439. (printed as 9/20/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25421Residents of Harsimus Cove and Italian Village
  440. (printed as 9/15/2016)
    Motion
    241506Motion To Compel
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  441. (printed as 9/15/2016)
    Motion
    241503Motion/Petition/Request
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  442. (printed as 8/31/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25355St. Anthony Padua Roman Catholic Church
  443. (printed as 8/26/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25346None listed
    Nine Citizens
  444. served (printed as 8/25/2016)
    Decision
    45408Administrative Law Judge
    DECISION ORDERED JAMES RIFFIN TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY (DOCUMENT) REQUESTS BY AUGUST 26, 2016.
  445. (printed as 8/23/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25357La Festa Italiana Attendees- signature pages protesting action
    La Festa Italiana Attendees
  446. (printed as 8/23/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25356Children from School
    Embankment School
  447. (printed as 8/22/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25343None listed
    Eight Citizens
  448. (printed as 8/20/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25316None listed
    41 Citizens of Jersey City
  449. (printed as 8/19/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25341None listed
    21 Citizens
  450. (printed as 8/17/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25335None listed
    13 Citizens
  451. (printed as 8/17/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25334None listed
    Maureen Cowley
  452. (printed as 8/17/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25333None listed
    Maureen Crowley
  453. (printed as 8/15/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25315None listed
    Four Citizens
  454. (printed as 8/10/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25312None listed
    Six post cards from citizens of Jersey City
  455. served (printed as 8/5/2016)
    Decision
    45368Administrative Law Judge
    DECISION: (1) SCHEDULED AN ORAL ARGUMENT ON CITY, ET AL.'S SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL FOR WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 24, 2016, AT 10:00 A.M. IN A HEARING ROOM TO BE DESIGNATED AT THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION; (2) DETERMINED THAT THE ORAL ARGUMENT WILL BE HELD ON THE RECORD; AND (3) DIRECTED ALL PARTIES TO ATTEND THIS ORAL ARGUMENT.
  456. (printed as 8/4/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25314ACHP
    Charlene Dwin Vaughn, Assistant Director
  457. (printed as 8/3/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25313Italian Educational and Cultural Center
    Louis Iozzi, President
  458. (printed as 7/28/2016)
    Reply
    241203Reply
    James Riffin
  459. (printed as 7/25/2016)
    Reply
    241153Reply
    Llc Intervenors
  460. (printed as 7/21/2016)
    Comment
    EO-2805Jennifer Batinich
  461. (printed as 7/14/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25094None listed
    Two citizens for embankment preservation
  462. (printed as 7/13/2016)
    Comment
    EI-25095None listed
    Rebecca Symes
  463. served (printed as 7/5/2016)
    Decision
    45242Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION ORDERED PROCEEDING ASSIGNED TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE JOHN P. DRING FOR HANDLING OF ALL DISCOVERY MATTERS AND INITIAL RESOLUTION OF ALL DISCOVERY DISPUTES.
  464. (printed as 7/5/2016)
    Motion
    241042Motion To Compel
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  465. served (printed as 7/1/2016)
    Decision
    45103Entire Board
    DECISION: (1) GRANTED IN PART, AND DENIED IN PART, A MOTION FILED BY A GROUP OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLCS) TO COMPEL COMPLIANCE WITH A BOARD ORDER SERVED ON NOVEMBER 2, 2015; AND (2) GRANTED A MOTION FILED BY THE LLCS TO FILE A REPLY TO A REPLY.
  466. (printed as 7/1/2016)
    Exhibit
    241037Exhibit(s)
    Llc Intervenors
  467. (printed as 6/30/2016)
    Comment
    EI-24566None listed
    Comment card about embankment
  468. (printed as 6/30/2016)
    Comment
    EI-24358None listed
    Twenty citizen's comments on embankment
  469. (printed as 6/29/2016)
    Comment
    EI-24357None listed
    Six comments from citizens on embankment
  470. (printed as 6/27/2016)
    Comments
    240988Comment
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  471. (printed as 6/27/2016)
    Comment
    EI-24247None listed
    25 citizen's comments
  472. (printed as 6/25/2016)
    Comment
    EI-24359None listed
    Two comments about embankment
  473. (printed as 6/25/2016)
    Comment
    EI-24246None listed
    56 combined citizen's comment cards
  474. (printed as 6/23/2016)
    Comment
    EI-24042Embankment Coalition
    Stephen Gucciardo, President
  475. (printed as 6/7/2016)
    Motion
    240873Motion To Strike
    James Riffin
  476. (printed as 6/7/2016)
    Motion
    240869Motion To Withdraw
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  477. (printed as 6/6/2016)
    Comment
    EI-23321Jennifer Batinich
    Letter expresses concern about potential impacts of the redevelopment of the Harsimus Branch embankment on adjacent neighborhoods and historic districts.
    Jersey City, NJ
  478. (printed as 5/31/2016)
    Supplement
    240818Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Llc Intervenors
  479. (printed as 5/27/2016)
    Reply
    240803Reply
    Cnj Rail Corporation
  480. (printed as 5/26/2016)
    Comment
    EI-23231Jeff Sepp
    Comments on potential adverse effects of embankment demolition to adjacent historic districts and other potential community and environmental impacts.
  481. (printed as 5/24/2016)
    Reply
    240742Reply
    Llc Intervenors
  482. (printed as 5/20/2016)
    Supplement
    240732Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    James Riffin
  483. (printed as 5/19/2016)
    Supplement
    240724Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    James Riffin
  484. (printed as 5/19/2016)
    Reply
    240720Reply
    James Riffin
  485. (printed as 5/17/2016)
    Request
    240673Request For Extension Of Time
    Rails To Trails Conservancy
  486. (printed as 5/12/2016)
    Reply
    240655Reply
    James Riffin
  487. (printed as 5/3/2016)
    Motion
    240594Motion To Strike
    James Riffin
  488. (printed as 5/2/2016)
    Motion
    240586Motion/Petition/Request
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  489. (printed as 5/2/2016)
    Reply
    240584Reply
    Cnj Rail Corporation
  490. (printed as 4/25/2016)
    Comment
    EO-2783Section 106 Consulting Parties
  491. (printed as 3/2/2016)
    Comment
    EI-21354Jersey City, Rails to Trails Coalition, Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Comments on the Section 106 process and recent letters submitted by Conrail and LLCs. Recommendations for historic properties to be considered in the Section 106 process. Comments on Conrail's support of embankment demolition.
    C. Montange
  492. (printed as 2/29/2016)
    Comment
    EI-21365LLCs
    LLCs response to Conrail letter of same date on topic of reasonably foreseeable post-abandonment use of the Harsimus Branch.
    Dan Horgan
  493. (printed as 2/29/2016)
    Comment
    EI-21355Conrail
    Conrail's response to input by LLCs and City Parties on reasonably foreseeable reuse of the Harsimus Branch.
    Rob Jenkins
  494. (printed as 2/23/2016)
    Comment
    EI-21389Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy
    Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy supports preservation of embankment, is concerned about validity ofSection 106 process, and supports an OFA.
    Norrice Raymaker
  495. (printed as 2/5/2016)
    Comment
    EO-2725Various
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  496. (printed as 1/22/2016)
    Comment
    EI-21326Jersey City, Rails to Trails Conservancy, Pennsylvania RR Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition
    Letter with attached information on Jersey City's Master Plan components that address goals and strategies for future use of the Harsimus Branch right-of-way. Comments and information on property owner's (LLCs) plans for development.
    Charles Montange
  497. (printed as 1/11/2016)
    Reply
    239861Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  498. (printed as 12/23/2015)
    Motion
    239790Motion/Petition/Request
    Intervenors Llc
  499. (printed as 12/22/2015)
    Letter
    239787Letter
    Intervenors Llc
  500. (printed as 12/16/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21253City of Jersey City
    Jersey City's response to OEA's request for information on plans for post-abandonment land use in Harsimus Branch right-of-way.
    Mayor Steven Fulop
  501. served (printed as 12/14/2015)
    Decision
    44961Director Of Proceedings
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE FOLLOWING COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON DECEMBER 2, 2015, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
    in the court-action register
  502. (printed as 12/9/2015)
    Errata
    239695Errata Sheet
    Cnj Rail Corporation
  503. (printed as 12/9/2015)
    Reply
    239688Reply
    Cnj Rail Corporation
  504. (printed as 12/8/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21241Waters, McPherson, McNeill
    LLC Intervenor's response to OEA request for information on post-abandonment develop plans.
    Dan Horgan
  505. (printed as 12/1/2015)
    Reply
    239642Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition, And Rails To Trails Conservancy
  506. (printed as 11/17/2015)
    Motion
    239560Motion/Petition/Request
    Intervenors Llc
  507. served (printed as 11/10/2015)
    Decision
    44884Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED CITY OF JERSEY CITY'S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION AND CLARIFIES THAT CNJ RAILROAD IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PRODUCING THE UNREDACTED, CONFIDENTIAL VERSION AND PUBLIC VERSION OF EXHIBIT D IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE BOARD'S NOVEMBER 2, 2015 DECISION.
  508. (printed as 11/6/2015)
    Reply
    239509Reply
    Llc Intervenors
  509. (printed as 11/3/2015)
    Motion
    239488Motion/Petition/Request
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  510. served (printed as 11/2/2015)
    Decision
    44644Entire Board
    THIS DECISION ADDRESSED CERTAIN MOTIONS AND APPEALS FILED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  511. (printed as 10/27/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2681Section 106 Consulting Parties
  512. (printed as 10/5/2015)
    Reply
    239297Reply
    James Riffin
  513. (printed as 9/17/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2659Marin Blvd LLC et al.
    Dan Horgan
  514. (printed as 9/17/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2658City of Jersey City
    Mayor Steve Fulop
  515. (printed as 9/14/2015)
    Reply
    239195Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  516. (printed as 9/7/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21090Harsimus Cove Association
    Acknowledges interest in Section 106 consultation and confirms contact information.
    Jeremy Jacobsen
  517. (printed as 9/4/2015)
    Supplement
    239149Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    James Riffin
  518. (printed as 9/4/2015)
    Supplement
    239146Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    James Riffin
  519. (printed as 9/4/2015)
    Reply
    239142Reply
    James Riffin
  520. (printed as 9/4/2015)
    Supplement
    239138Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    James Riffin
  521. (printed as 9/4/2015)
    Reply
    238829Reply
    James Riffin
  522. served (printed as 8/25/2015)
    Decision
    44660Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION ORDERED ALL DOCUMENTS FILED BEFORE THE BOARD MUST BE SERVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 49 C.F.R. § 1104.12 AND CONTAIN AN APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. DOCUMENTS FILED IN THE FUTURE WITHOUT A SUFFICIENT CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE ARE SUBJECT TO BEING REJECTED WITHOUT FURTHER BOARD DECISION.
  523. (printed as 8/12/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21036Village Neighborhood Association
    Email confirming contact information for this group as a consulting party in the Section 106 process.
    Rob Crow
  524. (printed as 8/10/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21044Embankment Preservation Coalition, City of Jersey City, Rails to Trails
    C. Montange
  525. (printed as 7/31/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2611Various Consulting Parties
  526. (printed as 7/31/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2610New Jersey SHPO
  527. (printed as 7/31/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2609ACHP
  528. (printed as 7/28/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2640Statement of Work for Section 106 Contract
  529. (printed as 7/28/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2639MOU for Section 106 Contract
  530. (printed as 7/27/2015)
    Certificate
    238917Certificate Of Service
    James Riffin
  531. served (printed as 7/24/2015)
    Decision
    44623Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION ORDERS THAT ALL DOCUMENTS FILED BEFORE THE BOARD MUST BE SERVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 49 C.F.R. § 1104.12 AND CONTAIN AN APPROPRIATE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE.
  532. (printed as 6/25/2015)
    Reply
    238704Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  533. (printed as 6/11/2015)
    Reply
    238616Reply
    Cnj Rail Corporation
  534. (printed as 6/11/2015)
    Reply
    238596Reply
    James Riffin
  535. (printed as 6/11/2015)
    Letter
    238594Letter
    Llc Intervenors
  536. (printed as 6/11/2015)
    Reply
    238591Reply
    Llc Intervenors
  537. (printed as 6/10/2015)
    Motion
    238581Motion/Petition/Request
    City Of Jersey City
  538. (printed as 6/9/2015)
    Reply
    238575Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  539. (printed as 6/8/2015)
    Motion
    238562Motion/Petition/Request
    James Riffin
  540. (printed as 6/8/2015)
    Notice
    238559OFA - Notice Of Intent To File OFA
    James Riffin
  541. (printed as 6/8/2015)
    Notice
    238556Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    James Riffin
  542. (printed as 6/1/2015)
    Reply
    238515Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  543. served (printed as 5/22/2015)
    Decision
    44098Entire Board
    DECISION: (1) GRANTED IN PART, AND DENIED IN PART, A MOTION OF THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY (THE CITY), RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY, AND PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD HARSIMUS STEM EMBANKMENT PRESERVATION COALITION (COLLECTIVELY, CITY PARTIES) TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FROM CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION (CONRAIL), NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY, AND CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.; (2) GRANTED IN PART, AND DENIED IN PART, THE CITY PARTIES' MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FROM A GROUP OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES (LLCS) THAT INTERVENED IN THIS PROCEEDING; (3) DENIED THE LLCS' MOTION TO COMPEL RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS FROM THE CITY PARTIES AND CONRAIL; AND (4) GRANTED THE CITY PARTIES' MOTION TO COMPEL OFFER OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE VALUATION INFORMATION FROM CONRAIL.
  544. (printed as 4/30/2015)
    Reply
    238298Reply
    Cnj Rail Corporation
  545. (printed as 4/28/2015)
    Comments
    238273Comment
    City Of Jersey City
  546. (printed as 4/10/2015)
    Reply
    238187Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  547. (printed as 4/7/2015)
    Reply
    238136Reply
    City Of Jersey City
  548. (printed as 4/7/2015)
    Reply
    238130Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  549. (printed as 3/18/2015)
    Motion
    237994Motion/Petition/Request
    212 Marin Boulevard, Llc;247 Manila Avenue, Llc;280 Erie Street, Llc;317 Jersey Avenue, Llc;354 Cole Street, Llc;389 Monmouth Street, Llc;415 Brunswick Street, Llc;446 Newark Avenue, Llc;Nz Funding, Llc;Limited Liability Companies Of New Jersey
  550. (printed as 3/4/2015)
    Motion
    237884Motion/Petition/Request
    212 Marin Boulevard, Llc
  551. (printed as 3/3/2015)
    Reply
    237858Reply
    212 Marin Boulevard, Llc, 247 Manila Avenue, Llc, 280 Erie Street, Llc, 317 Jersey Avenue, Llc, 354 Coles Street, Llc, 389 Monmouth Street, Llc, 415 Brunswick Street, Llc, And 446 Newark Avenue, Llc
  552. (printed as 3/2/2015)
    Motion
    237836Motion To Strike
    City Of Jersey City
  553. (printed as 2/10/2015)
    Reply
    237717Reply
    Llc Intervenors
  554. (printed as 2/6/2015)
    Reply
    237696Reply
    City Of Jersey City
  555. (printed as 1/26/2015)
    Reply
    237622Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  556. (printed as 1/21/2015)
    Errata
    237586Errata Sheet
    City Of Jersey City
  557. (printed as 1/20/2015)
    Motion
    237549Motion/Petition/Request
    City Of Jersey City
  558. (printed as 1/14/2015)
    Reply
    237464Reply
    212 Marin Boulevard, Llc;247 Manila Avenue, Llc;280 Erie Street, Llc;317 Jersey Avenue, Llc;354 Cole Street, Llc;389 Monmouth Street, Llc;415 Brunswick Street, Llc;446 Newark Avenue, Llc;Nz Funding, Llc;Limited Liability Companies Of New Jersey
  559. (printed as 1/12/2015)
    Reply
    237441Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  560. (printed as 1/9/2015)
    Comment
    EI-20895Waters, McPherson, McNeill
    Requests information on why previous letter not posted on STB's website and confirmation of letter receipt. Notes consideration of a motion to abate environmental review pending STB decision on motion to compel discovery submitted by same party on 12/8/14.
    Dan Horgan
  561. (printed as 1/8/2015)
    Statement
    237414Support Statement
    Honorable Brian P. Stack
  562. (printed as 12/29/2014)
    Reply
    237340Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  563. (printed as 12/23/2014)
    Motion
    237319Motion To Compel
    City Of Jersey City
  564. (printed as 12/19/2014)
    Reply
    237286Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  565. (printed as 12/18/2014)
    Statement
    237280Support Statement
    New Jersey General Assembly
  566. (printed as 12/18/2014)
    Statement
    237279Support Statement
    City Of Jersey City
  567. (printed as 12/16/2014)
    Statement
    237244Support Statement
    Assemblyman Raj Mukherji
  568. (printed as 12/8/2014)
    Motion
    237180Motion/Petition/Request
    212 Marin Boulevard, Llc,247 Manila Avenue, Llc, 280 Erie Street, Llc, 317 Jersey Avenue, Llc, 354 Cole Street, Llc, 389 Monmouth Street, Llc 415 Brunswick Street, Llc, 446 Newark Avenue, Llc Limited Liability Companies Of New Jersey
  569. (printed as 11/14/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20886Waters, McPherson, McNeill
    Harsimus Branch property owner requests participation as 106 consulting party
    Dan Horgan
  570. (printed as 11/14/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20583Waters, McPherson, McNeill
    Harsimus Branch property owner requests participation as consulting party
    Dan Horgan
  571. (printed as 11/13/2014)
    Reply
    237047Reply
    212 Marin Boulevard, Llc;247 Manila Avenue, Llc;280 Erie Street, Llc;317 Jersey Avenue, Llc;354 Cole Street, Llc;389 Monmouth Street, Llc;415 Brunswick Street, Llc;446 Newark Avenue, Llc;Nz Funding, Llc;Limited Liability Companies Of New Jersey
  572. (printed as 10/24/2014)
    Motion
    236893Motion To Compel
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  573. (printed as 10/16/2014)
    Reply
    236834Reply
    212 Marin Boulevard, Llc,247 Manila Avenue, Llc, 280 Erie Street, Llc, 317 Jersey Avenue, Llc, 354 Cole Street, Llc, 389 Monmouth Street, Llc 415 Brunswick Street, Llc, 446 Newark Avenue, Llc Limited Liability Companies Of New Jersey
  574. (printed as 10/15/2014)
    Reply
    236818Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation, Csx Transportation, Inc. And Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  575. (printed as 10/7/2014)
    Reply
    236773Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation, Csx Transportation, Inc. And Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  576. served (printed as 10/2/2014)
    Decision
    44056Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION DENIED A MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION FILED IN THESE PROCEEDINGS.
  577. (printed as 9/25/2014)
    Comments
    236736Comment
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  578. (printed as 9/25/2014)
    Reply
    236734Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  579. served (printed as 9/24/2014)
    Decision
    44030Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED A PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  580. (printed as 9/18/2014)
    Reply
    236702Reply
    212 Marin Boulevard, Llc;247 Manila Avenue, Llc;280 Erie Street, Llc;317 Jersey Avenue, Llc;354 Cole Street, Llc;389 Monmouth Street, Llc;415 Brunswick Street, Llc;446 Newark Avenue, Llc;Nz Funding, Llc;Limited Liability Companies Of New Jersey
  581. (printed as 9/18/2014)
    Motion
    236696Motion To Compel
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  582. (printed as 9/15/2014)
    Motion
    236672Motion For Protective Order
    Cnj Rail Corporation
    in the protective-order register
  583. (printed as 9/3/2014)
    Reply
    236573Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition, Rails To Trails Conservancy
  584. (printed as 8/21/2014)
    Environmental
    236484Environmental Materials
    Consolidated Rail Corp
  585. served (printed as 8/11/2014)
    Decision
    43631Entire Board
    DECISION: (1) LIFTED A STAY; (2) GRANTED THE REQUEST OF A GROUP OF LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANIES TO INTERVENE; AND (3) DISCUSSED THE PREPARATION OF A SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
  586. (printed as 8/5/2014)
    Reply
    236406Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy,;And Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation;Coalition
  587. (printed as 7/18/2014)
    Motion
    236333Motion/Petition/Request
    Intervenors
  588. (printed as 7/7/2014)
    Motion
    236286Motion/Petition/Request
    212 Marin Boulevard, Llc;247 Manila Avenue, Llc;280 Erie Street, Llc;317 Jersey Avenue, Llc;354 Cole Street, Llc;389 Monmouth Street, Llc;415 Brunswick Street, Llc;446 Newark Avenue, Llc;Nz Funding, Llc;Limited Liability Companies Of New Jersey
  589. (printed as 7/3/2014)
    Reply
    236280Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  590. (printed as 6/17/2014)
    Motion
    236196Motion/Petition/Request
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition
  591. (printed as 6/3/2014)
    Letter
    236148Letter
    City Of Jersey City, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition, And Rails To Trails Conservancy
  592. (printed as 5/29/2014)
    Reply
    236122Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  593. (printed as 5/28/2014)
    Reply
    236116Reply
    City Of Jersey City
  594. (printed as 5/28/2014)
    Motion
    236113Motion/Petition/Request
    212 Marin Boulevard, Llc
  595. (printed as 5/22/2014)
    Reply
    236078Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Preservation Coalition, And Rails To Trails Conservancy
  596. (printed as 2/26/2014)
    Motion
    235529Petition To Intervene
    212 Marin Boulevard, Llc
  597. (printed as 2/21/2014)
    Motion
    235517Motion/Petition/Request
    212 Marin Boulevard, Llc
  598. (printed as 1/14/2014)
    Reply
    235297Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  599. (printed as 1/14/2014)
    Letter
    235294Letter
    212 Marin Boulevard, Llc
  600. (printed as 1/10/2014)
    Reply
    235274Reply
    City Of New Jersey, Rails To Trails Conservancy
  601. (printed as 1/3/2014)
    Reply
    235256Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  602. (printed as 12/31/2013)
    Reply
    235250Reply
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition
  603. (printed as 12/11/2013)
    Reply
    235172Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  604. (printed as 12/11/2013)
    Notice
    235167Notice Of Intent To Participate (With Comment)
    212 Marin Boulevard, Llc, 247 Manila Avenue, Llc, 280 Erie Street, Llc, 317 Jersey Avenue, Llc, 354 Coles Street, Llc, 389 Monmouth Street, Llc, 415 Brunswick Street, Llc, And 446 Newark Avenue, Llc
  605. (printed as 11/22/2013)
    Motion
    235110Motion/Petition/Request
    Rails To Trails Conservancy, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition, City Of Jersey City
  606. (printed as 5/10/2010)
    Comment
    EI-18171Mat Su State Parks Citizens Advisory Board
    Please find attached a copy of the Mat Su State Parks Citizens Advisory Board comments in regard to the DEIS for Port Mac Rail Extension Project
    Mary Anderson · Wasilla, Alaska
  607. served (printed as 4/20/2010)
    Decision
    40524Entire Board
    DECISION HELD THESE PROCEEDINGS IN ABEYANCE WHILE THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, ACTING AS THE SPECIAL COURT, ADDRESSES THE UNDERLYING QUESTION OF THE NATURE OF THE TRACKAGE SOUGHT TO BE ABANDONED.
  608. (printed as 7/6/2009)
    Reply
    225335Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  609. (printed as 7/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17814NJ Committee for the East Coast Greenway
    Mike Cruimer
  610. (printed as 6/17/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17795The Village Neighborhood Association
    Rob Crow
  611. (printed as 6/17/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17794Hudson County Division of Planning
    Stephen Marks
  612. (printed as 6/16/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17793City of Jersey City
    Rosemary McFadden
  613. (printed as 6/16/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17792Newport Neighborhood Association
    Robert Vivien
  614. (printed as 6/16/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17790City of Jersey City
    Charles Montange
  615. (printed as 6/15/2009)
    Appeal
    225261Appeal
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy
  616. (printed as 6/15/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17791Preservation New Jersey
    Ron Emrich
  617. (printed as 6/15/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17789NY/NJ Baykeeper
    Gregory Remaud
  618. (printed as 6/15/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17788New Jersey Historic Sites Council
    David Markunas
  619. (printed as 6/15/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17786Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Maureen Crowley
  620. (printed as 6/12/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17785Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy
    John Gomez
  621. (printed as 6/12/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17784Pennsylvania Railroad Technical & Historical Society
    Alan Buchan
  622. (printed as 6/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17783Hudson County Office of Cultural & Heritage Affairs
    Bill LaRosa
  623. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1240NJ Committee for the East Coast Greeway
    Delores P. Newman
  624. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1239NY/NJ Baykeeper
    Gregory A. Remaud, Conservation Director
  625. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1238Hudson County Planning Division
    Stephen D. Marks, Director
  626. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1237Harsimus Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Maureen Crowley
  627. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1236The Friends of Liberty State Park
    Sam Pesin, President
  628. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1235Newport Neighborhood Association
    Robert Vivien, President
  629. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1234Historic Paulus Hook Association
    Gretchen Scheiman, President
  630. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1233Van Vorst Park Association
    Dan Webber, Vice President
  631. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1232The Village Neighborhood Association
    Robert Crow, President
  632. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1231Powerhouse Arts District Neighborhood Association
    Jill Edelman, President
  633. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1230Hamilton Park Neighborhood Association
    Jennifer Greely, President
  634. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1229Harsimus Cove Association
    Eric Fleming, President
  635. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1228Jersey City Economic Development Corporation
    Daniel Frohwirth
  636. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1227New Jersey Historic Sites Council
    J. Mark Mutter, Chairman
  637. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1226Roebling Chapter, Society for Industrial Archaeology
    Lynn Rakos
  638. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1225Camden & Amboy Railroad Historical Group
    John Kilbride
  639. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1224Pennsylvania Railroad Technical & Historical Society
    Alan Buchan
  640. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1223Preservation New Jersey
    Ron Emrich, Executive Director
  641. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1222National Park Service, Northeast Regional Office
    William Bolger
  642. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1221Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy
    John Gomez, President
  643. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1220Rails-to-Trails Conservancy
    Andrea Ferster, General Counsel
  644. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1219Hudson County, Office of Cultural and Heritage Affairs
    William LaRosa
  645. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1218Hudson County
    Thomas DeGise, County Executive
  646. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1217Jersey City Historic Preservation Commission
    Stephen Guicciardo
  647. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1216City of Jersey City
    Jerramiah T. Healy, Mayor
  648. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1215New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
    Ken C. Koscheck
  649. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1214New Jersey Transit
    Martin Judd
  650. (printed as 5/29/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1213New Jersey Department of Transportation
    Ronert Miller
  651. served (printed as 5/26/2009)
    Decision
    39951Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION DIRECTS CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATION NECESSARY TO FORMULATE AN OFFER OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE (OFA) AND GRANTS THE REQUEST OF THE CITY OF JERSEY AND CNJ RAIL CORPORATION TO TOLL THE DUE DATE TO SUBMIT AN OFA.
  652. (printed as 5/26/2009)
    Reply
    225165Reply
    City Of Jersey City
  653. (printed as 5/20/2009)
    Comments
    225141Environmental Comment
    City Of Jersey City
  654. (printed as 5/18/2009)
    Reply
    225118Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  655. (printed as 5/15/2009)
    Comments
    225129Environmental Comment
    New Jersey Department Of Environmental Protection
  656. (printed as 5/13/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17746Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
    John Fowler
  657. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Motion
    225077Petition To Reopen
    Embankment Preservation Coaition, City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy
  658. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comments
    225070Environmental Comment
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  659. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comments
    225068Environmental Comment
    Embankment Preservation Coaition, Rails To Trails Conservancy, City Of Jersey City
  660. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17680David Mazzola
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  661. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17679Embankment Preservation Coalition
    As coordinator of the Embankment Preservation Coalition, I would like to point out that our organization has joined with the City and Rails to Trails in environmental comment filings that provide compelling legal arguments. This comment is intended only as a personal comment. It is anecdotal which I believe is at least as appropriate as Conrail’s anecdotal history of events, which has been accepted by the woefully inadequate Environmental Assessment. When I moved to Jersey City in 1978, my neighborhood was downtrodden. Many buildings were burned out or boarded up. The Harsimus Branch was still operating then, and continued to do so for more than a decade. The Branch and its elevated stone Embankment contributed to the blight of the area – not so much because of its function (after all, residences and freight had happily co-existed for many decades) but because of the railroad’s lack of maintenance. Dark trestles covered 100 feet at each intersecting avenue. Pigeons roosted under them, and lighting was nonexistent or broken. Sidewalk was missing along the 400-foot lengths of most Embankment blocks. Because uncared for, the site attracted garbage and graffiti. The City had to deal with safety issues caused by the private owner. It finally turned its attention to the Embankment, with an eye to alleviating blight along Sixth Street. By 1998, however, the area had already undergone change. Many individuals and small investors had seen beneath the grit and grime and started to reclaim these buildings one by one. City Administration perception of the area’s needs lagged a bit behind that of the individuals who had engaged in this reclamation. When the City undertook a redevelopment study, residents came together to study the site and after much consideration of its history, function, and aesthetic and environmental contributions, decided the Embankment should be retained and reused. The Embankment Preservation Coalition was formed, and proceeded to take the steps necessary to insure the site received the recognition it deserved. It was listed on the State Register in 1999 and declared eligible for the National Register in 2000. In 2003 the City of Jersey City recognized it as a Municipal Landmark. (It has since received additional recognitions: NY/NJ Harbor Estuary Priority Habitat Acquisition Site; Preservation NJ’s 10 Most Endangered Historic Sites; priority acquisition in Hudson County Master Plan; recommended segment of the East Coast Greenway; suitability for light rail and light freight in our City’s Master Plan.) All of the public uses envisioned for the Embankment are beneficial for our environment and compatible with with each other and with historic use. To the contrary, the private use proposed would degrade the environment, erase our history, and fragment and develop an assembled transportation corridor. When we first approached Conrail and the City about acquiring the property for reuse as historic site, open space, and trail, we were puzzled by Conrail’s seeming unwillingness to negotiate acquisition. Even more confounding, after we researched the status of the rail line, was Conrail’s failure (and later, the failure of the potential buyer) to acknowledge the rail line needed to be abandoned. Conrail’s failure to maintain its property had caused much harm to the community over the decades, making it especially difficult to understand why they would not try to give the community what it wanted, especially if the community was able to raise the money that Conrail was asking for the property. We indeed had helped the City raise $3.2 million and lined up additional contributors around the time Conrail sold the property for private development--for under $3 million. We took heart from our research, however, that the abandonment permit process would provide historic and environmental protections for the site. We were gratified that the STB agreed with our petiton and found that the Harsimus Branch had not been properly abandoned. We are now alarmed, however, that the inadequate Environmental Assessment may be signalling a failure of the agency to follow through logically on its abandonment finding. We go back to the provisions of NEPA and NHPA that encouraged us to pursue our preservation effort, and ask the STB to administer them in the spirit they were intended. NEPA states its purpose “To declare a national policy which will encourage productive and enjoyable harmony between man and his environment; to promote efforts which will prevent or eliminate damage to the environment and biosphere and stimulate the health and welfare of man; to enrich the understanding of the ecological systems and natural resources important to the Nation...” Our organization and thousands of individuals who have contributed to our efforts over eleven years have worked in the spirit of NEPA, even if not everyone knows what NEPA is. We are dependent on your administering NEPA in the spirit in which it was intended. Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. Please keep the public trust.
    Maureen Crowley · Jersey City, NJ
  662. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17678Stephen Gucciardo
    I believe that the Environmental Analysis presented is flawed in that it fails to examine the transfer of ownership of the Sixth Street Embankment and assumes that the actions of local agencies will be sufficient to address historic preservation and environmental issues. The EA has chosen to pick up the ball as if SLH is the rightful owner and that Conrail has appropriately sold its interests in the property. I believe that Conrail sold this property to SLH without maintaining a exclusive rail easement and that SLH did not purchase the property as the new carrier. It is my understanding that a property may not be transferred in this way and that abandonment authority must be obtained first from the STB. Proper abandonment procedure allows the public to be protected via environmental and historic preservation review. Failing to address the ownership issue first renders 106 review meaningless and deprives the public of its rights provided by the law. The proverbial horse is already out of the barn. In addition, I believe that an important historic landmark and pivotal transportation corridor is at stake. The Sixth Street Embankment landmark borders on the Hamilton Park and Harsimus Cove Historic Districts. It is a monumental structure that is integral to the fabric of these neighborhoods and warrants a full EIS.
    Jersy City, New Jersey
  663. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17677Reynold M. Bolivar
    I have serious concerns about the list of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) found in the Embankment soil as recorded in the perfunctory Dresdner Robin Subsurface Report completed over 10 years ago. Even with the most stringent of clean-up policies, the unearthing and transport of more than 200,000 cubic yards of soil and sandstone blocks would without doubt result in sending particles of arsenic, hydrocarbons, lead, mercury, antimony into our heavily polluted air. In such a densely populated urban area, with thousands of children attending schools within blocks of the structure, it is absolutely essential that a full Environmental Impact Statement is conducted before any ruling is made. According to the Ferderal Department of Health and Human Services' Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry: What happens to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) when they enter the environment? In soils, PAHs are most likely to stick tightly to particles; certain PAHs move through soil to contaminate underground water. PAH contents of plants and animals may be much higher than PAH contents of soil or water in which they live. How likely are polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to cause cancer? The Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) has determined that some PAHs may reasonably be expected to be carcinogens. Some people who have breathed or touched mixtures of PAHs and other chemicals for long periods of time have developed cancer. Some PAHs have caused cancer in laboratory animals when they breathed air containing them (lung cancer), ingested them in food (stomach cancer), or had them applied to their skin (skin cancer).
    Jersey City, NJ
  664. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17676Jeanette
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Orlando, Fl
  665. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17675Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Professors, researchers, parents and monarch enthusiasts from Ohio State, Colorado State, University of Kansas and more, have been informed about the imminent threat to Monarch butterflies, which are very delicate creatures and their habitats are officially endangered. We will not allow Conrail, the STB, the developers nor the City of Jersey City overlook this key factor!!!! If we have to bring in the EPA, WWF and stage a Monarch awareness event (which will obviously be covered by the press) to get people to realize that these walls CANNOT be knocked down because of the butterflies, then that's what we'll do. http://wiki.answers.com, http://www.worldwildlife.org/species/finder/monarchbutterflies/monarchbutterflie s.html, /Q/Why_are_monarch_butterflies_endangered Monarch habitats are protected under the law.
    Amy Dubin · Jersey City, NJ
  666. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17674Meredith Lippman
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch. It needs to be done for our safety.
    jersey City, nJ
  667. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17673Dinah Bolivar
    Myself and my loved ones are among the families whose lives would be literally upended if Conrail is granted abandonment rights and with their developer partner, given a free pass to demolish the Embankment. In August of 2007, I was overjoyed when the STB ruled that the Embankment remained a part of national rail system and was subject to abandonment process. I had hoped this decision meant the public would finally have a voice in the future of this historic structure. It would be a travesty of justice and a mockery of this prior ruling if the STB did not go forward with a complete EIS. Please do not let the SEA be the last word when making your decision on the future of the Embankment. On behalf of my family and neighbors, I implore you to recoginize this public outcry and order a full and impartial Environmental Impact Statement to guide the Board's pending rulings.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  668. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17671Alison Harle
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Gladstone, NJ
  669. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17670Kathleen davis
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch. More park and open space in the residential areas benefits everyone!
    Jersey City, NJ
  670. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17669Tony Barrett
    The Harsimus Embankment is an impressive structure when viewed from the ground -- which I did a few years ago on my only visit to Jersey City. Aerial photos really demonstrate the impact that its preservation can have on the city. Industrial archeology of this magnitude is impressive and can be important in reforming transportation from car-based to muscle-powered in this densely developed city. Please retain this transportation infrastructure for use as active transportation not some non-transportation related development. --Tony Barrett
    Harpswell, Maine
  671. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17668Barrie Doucette
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  672. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17667Sidney Greene
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  673. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17666Charles Greene
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  674. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17665Susan Conte
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  675. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17664Dan Strechay
    Please do not sell the 6th Street Embankment to developers. It should be made into a park not condos. We need to preserve our industrial past. A park similar to Highline is Chelsea is what Jersey City Needs. Thank you, Dan Strechay
    Jersey City, NJ
  676. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17663Stephen Musgrave
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  677. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17662Zennia Barahona
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  678. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17661H. Melendez
    Please authorize an Environmental Statement for Harsimus Branch.
    jersey city, new jersey
  679. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17660Melissa Montenes
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our environment and daily lives. I am concerned about the impact that the demolition of such a massive structure might have on air quality, water quality, health, and quality of life in the neigborhood. Since the neighborhood is located on a floodplain, homeowners in the area already have to contend with structural damage caused when homes settle. A demolition project could further impair the structural integrity of buildings close to the Embankment.
    Jersey City, NJ
  680. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17659seamus sullivan
    It astounds me that a developer could swoop in and purchase the rights to the historic 6th street embankment in Jersey City without the city being given the proper opportunity as required. Down town Jersey City is in desparate need for more green space and this would be twarted by allowing Hyman to build on the structure. In addition I do not believe there is anyway the city's infrastructure could support the additional services required with these new residents and that does not even include parking.
    jersey city, nj
  681. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17658Jill Peck
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  682. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17657Matthew Navarro
    In a high density population known for contaminated industrial sites it is imperative that ALL issues pertaining to this issue be fully investigated prior to taking action. The health of our children and community at large deserve nothing less. Jersey City, needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Jersey City, NJ
  683. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17656Cherise Tricia Fung
    Please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  684. (printed as 5/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17650New Jersey DEP, Historic Preservation Office
    Daniel Saunders
  685. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Trail
    225055Trail Use Request
    East Coast Greenway Allliance
  686. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17768Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Maureen Crowley
  687. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17767Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Maureen Crowley
  688. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17766Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Maureen Crowley
  689. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17765Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Maureen Crowley
  690. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17764Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Maureen Crowly
  691. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17763Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Maureen Crowley
  692. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17762Philip Rivo
  693. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17761Hugh Harrison
  694. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17760Debbie Davis
  695. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17759Dolores Rennar
  696. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17745Willie L. Flood
  697. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17744Melissa Aroca
  698. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17743Kelly Justice
  699. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17742Mary Grace Manger
  700. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17741Todd Robinson
  701. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17740Julianne Park
  702. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17739Greg Nicholson
  703. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17738J Mutch
  704. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17737Lisa Friesz
  705. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17736Bjorn-Riise
  706. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17735Dorothy Weblowski
  707. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17734KD Pierce
  708. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17733Jamie Davis
  709. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17732Dhyana Kluth
  710. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17731Cherilyn Nicholas
  711. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17730Desiree Goldfinger
  712. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17729Margaret McDade
  713. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17726Michelle Manzo
  714. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17725Virginia Nunez
  715. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17724Anthony Rotello
  716. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17723James Cotreau
  717. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17722Hrdlovic Jana
  718. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17721Roy Cramer
  719. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17720Jennie Oliver
  720. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17719Bellamy Forrest
  721. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17718Dave Slutz
  722. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17717Priya Gopinath
  723. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17716Bozhena Etin
  724. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17715Deanne Welle
  725. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17714Eden Fucci
  726. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17713Michael O'Connor
  727. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17712Peter Kaufmann
  728. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17711Jeff Halpern
  729. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17710Nielam Mankoff
  730. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17709Charles Gayner
  731. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17708Edward Dominguez
  732. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17707Mark Auleta
  733. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17706Rita Ahlert
  734. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17705Harry Ozkaya
  735. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17704Lisa Garson
  736. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17703Jason Sansone
  737. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17702Sam Stoia
  738. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17697Vincent E. Hayden
  739. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17696Julia Sansone
  740. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17695Alina Abazova
  741. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17694Arghya Das
  742. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17693William Mitchell
  743. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17692Michael Bacon
  744. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17691Claire Dienes
  745. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17690David Custo
  746. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17689Prashant Kumar
  747. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17688Simon Ng
  748. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17687Seth Jones
  749. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17686Russell Pareti
  750. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17685D. Flood
  751. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17684J. Harari
  752. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17683Marianne Fourie
  753. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17682Christine Barney
  754. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17655Joan Pierre
    I would a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. It is important to understand the impacts of any construction to the safety of the people in this neighborhood
    Jersey City, NJ
  755. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17654Stephen
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  756. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17653Joyce Ocone
    It would be a disservice to the downtown population of Jersey City to tamper with the embankment It is part of the charm of that area and also helps to draw people to the annual Holy Rosary Feast. Many were born and raised in this section (including me) and it is part of their/my heritage. Pursuing another avenue of thought we do not need any more contributors to air pollution which this demolition would bring about.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  757. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17652Donna Schwichtenberg
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Bayonne, NJ
  758. (printed as 5/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17651Carlin Miller
    please keep the emabankment an open green space
    Jersey City, NJ
  759. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Motion
    225051Motion To Strike
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  760. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17645Laura Kortz
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Brooklyn, NY
  761. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17644Patrick Shalhoub
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Jersey City, NJ
  762. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17643Nancy Salomon Miranda
    It makes little or no sense to bypass a system of checks and balances that was put in place to ensure that large projects do not adversely impact residents and businesses taking place in urban environments. An EIS is necessary and prudent when decisions are made that will directly affect those that live there. Why would Jersey City want to give up land to developers without doing the research necessary to ensure that whatever choices are made, are made for the communty and in a way that will benefit those that live and work there. It is irresponsiable to do such a huge project without an Enviromental Impact Statement. Is someone trying to hide something???
    Brooklyn, NY
  763. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17642Angelina Valles
    Please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  764. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17641Pamela Dalton
    These comments are in support of the community's request to have an environmental impact statement for the current proposals for the 6th Street Embankment in Jersey City, as in accordance with Federal policy this action is likely to significantly affect the human environment in the local community and beyond. There are currently several competing proposals on the table, all of which would have major impacts on the historic downtown community, including the demolition and/or shoring up of the embankment for a multi-story condo development or housing as well, the establishment of a light rail line or a park/green space for the enjoyment of all. Demolition permits have already been applied for without the proper investigation as to the environmental impact of this action and the loss of this structure on the surrounding community. As it has already been more than 3 years since the land was sold to a developer, the STB should not now rush to proceed without the information accruing from a study to determine the full environmental impact of demolition and subsequent construction or the establishment of a green space in downtown Jersey City.
    Philadelphia, PA
  765. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17640Daniel Mulvihill
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  766. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17639Nicole Ramirez
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Jersey City, NJ
  767. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17638Embankment Preservation Colation
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Deirdre Kennedy · Jersey City, NJ
  768. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17637Suzanne Dell'Orto
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  769. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17636Alejandra N Ytuarte
    JERSEY CITY. Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    jersey city, nj
  770. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17635Carrie Craft
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.""
  771. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17634Carly Cohen-Bradshaw
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. Please enforce the federal law, don't destroy this valuable resource for the neighborhood. We need more green spaces--not less!
    Jersey City, NJ
  772. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17633Lawrence E.Higgs
    I am writing to request the STB conduct a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on the neighborhood and the city. This is an area of the city which suffers from drainage problems, demolition would increase this by decreasing recharge area and increasing impervious surface. There also would be the adverse effect of truck and heavy equipment traffic in the neighborhood during demolition and more traffic from development. There will also be impact of noise dust and vibration during demolition and construction in an area of the city already overburdened by these effects from construction. From an environmental standpoint, preservation is a better option for an area of the city in need of open space. The embankment is very similar to New York City's High Line which they have had the wisdom to make into an linear park. Please reconsider and do a full environmental study. Thank You.
    Jersey City, NJ
  773. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17632Rebecca Lee
    Please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  774. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17631raymond garraty
    The only reason I live in Jersey City is because of the 6th Street Embankment. I couldn't find an apartment I liked until I found one with a view of the embankment. Every morning I wake up to the always lovely setting atop the embankment. Whether it be the snow white purity of a winter storm or the early bloom of flowering trees it is a view that never disappoints. The eco system atop the embankment is one of the few untouched environments in the area. It is home to a wide variety of birds, trees, and natural flower gardens. Please do not ruin our neighborhood. Do not let greed win over beauty. Do not tread on our view; our property values and the pride of Downtown Jersey City.
    jersey city, nj
  775. (printed as 5/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17630Stephanie Daniels
    Since any action taken on the Harsimus Branch Embankment in Jersey City will significantly impact the quality of the environment in our community, I request that you please authorize a full environmental impact statement. Abandonment of the structure will lead directly to its demolition. Jersey City is sorely lacking in open space, and the Embankment could help fulfill this need. Further, by destroying this historical structure, we lose the possibility to connect the Secaucus Light Rail with downtown Jersey City, and invite traffic congestion and air pollution. Please consider the quality of life of the citizens of Jersey City!
    Jersey City, NJ
  776. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17629Erasmia Voukelatos
    For years, my husband and I have had serious concerns about continuing to live in JC, with its poor air quality and areas of hazardous waste. We have observed the devastating effects on children city-wide. It is absolutely imperative that a full study take place, to research the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Jersey City, NJ
  777. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17628Tim Bradshaw
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. Demolishing this massive structure will lead to serious air quality issues, noise, lots of loud trucks in an area not far from where childern play (Hamilton Park just 2 blocks away), dust, not to mention habitat destruction and a loss of a cultural pillar of this community. The embankment is beautiful and has the opportunity to make an amazing public space. Please don't destroy it.
    jersey city, NJ
  778. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17627Laura Gosa
    It is essential that the STB conduct a full Environmental Impact Study on the Harsimus Cove Embankment in Jersey City. The Embankment covers a major portion of downtown Jersey City and any action of removal or demolition of the Embankment would have significant consequences on the community. The embankment was constructed during a period of civic development when public health was not of the utmost concern. Lead contamination has been detected in the soil surrounding the embankment in at the least the Brunswick Community Garden space located on the western most piece of the Embankment. If there is a significant lead presence in the Embankment any demolition or reconstruction or development of the existing structure could pose a major public health issue. Especially considering the schools and residences immediately adjacent to the blocks long structure. The long-term significant presence of any construction vehicles in the area would enhance this risk as well as add major stress to the roadways, majorly disrupt traffic and pedestrian flow, and the citys sewers and water systems. Other concerns include issues of ecosystem and wildlife migration, flooding, and noise pollution. While those other issues are important. The aforementioned issues of public health related to lead, dust, air quality, and other contaminants are more the just cause to order an EIS. The National Environmental Policy Act requires Federal agencies to prepare EISs for major Federal actions that significantly affect the quality of the human environment." The Embankment should qualify and fall under this statement. Thank you in advance for your time and effort to be thorough regarding the impact any action on the Embankment would have."
  779. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17626Toby Heyman
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Little Falls, NJ
  780. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17625Elizabeth Cantor
    A full environmental study is necessary to give a fair shake to this issue.
    Nyack, NY
  781. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17624Zachary Buck
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch. I feel strongly that that Harismus Embankment should be a park!!
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  782. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17623Nicole Bolduc
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  783. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17622Linda Zimmerman
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. How could you think to allow this historic structure to be abandoned without such a study? I live a block away from the Embankment, and I know that abandonment will lead directly to Conrail and its partner demolishing the Embankment. In fact, they are seeking demo permits already. If they are allowed to demo the massive structure, I don't think we can imagine what that will mean in terms of decreased air quality, dust, noise, not to mention damage to structures like my home which is nearby. Does the City want to face class action lawsuits for that kind of damage? Require a study at the bare minimum. Linda Zimmerman
    Jersey City, NJ
  784. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17621Cindy Smith
    I demand that the STB do a full environmental impact statement.
    Parsippany, NJ
  785. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17620Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Gregory P. Kardell · Jersey City, N.J.
  786. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17619Colleen Tucker
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  787. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17618William Lewis
    To Whom It May Concern: I am a long time resident of a neighborhood known as Queen Village in Philadelphia,, PA. As a result of community interest and involvement is has changed from an old, beat neighborhood into one of the most vibriant commumunities in Philadelphia. As a frequent visitor to Jersey City over the past 20 years I have seen the neighborhood that the Embankment runs through slowly develop into an exciting neighborhood as a result of the committment of the community, just as the one I live in. You are now entertaining an action that flies in the face of everything the community has worked together on for the past decade. The demolition of the Embankment will have a significant, adverse impact on the quality of the human environment. There will not only be temporary adverse impacts associated with traffic, noise, urban wildlife and air pollution as a result of the demolition activities but permanent, adverse impacts to the environmental and cultural community through which it extends. Such impacts require that the action before you be evaluated in the format of an Environmental Impact Statement. It is only through an EIS that this major Federal action will be adequately assessed. In support of the President's Greening of America, I urge you to fully assess the impacts of this project through the preparation of an EIS and the public involvement in that process which will ensue. I look forward to participating in the comment period on the EIS.
    Philadelphia., Pa
  788. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17617David E. Nicolls
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.""
  789. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17616Marcello Pitino
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.""
  790. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17615Gregory Boland
    We need an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment of the Embankment. I as a citizen of that area would like to see it studied and turned into common green space for the whole city.
    Jersey City, NJ
  791. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17614Garth Atchley
    The STB should prepare a complete Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Harsimus Branch Embankment in Jersey City, NJ. Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. We are strongly opposed to the abandonment and demolotion of the embankment, and in favor of the preservation of the embankment site as much needed open space.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  792. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17613Marcy Andersen
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  793. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17612BERNARD GILLIAM
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. JERSEY CITY HAS LIMITED public places - we are overburdened with taxes that never get put to use for the people that live in the community
    Jersey City, New JErsey
  794. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17611Cindy Bryant
    Our community needs a ful study of the effects that the abandonment of the Harsimus Branch and demolition of the Emabankment will have on our community. I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  795. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17610Patricia M deRobertis
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  796. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17609Dennis Wurst
    The National Environmental Policy Act requires Federal agencies to prepare EISs for major Federal actions that significantly affect the quality of the human environment. The STB’s environmental arm is so far saying that no EIS is necessary for the Embankment. This must change. Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. My concerns include air quality, dust, noice, vibrations and trucks through our historic and fragile neighborhood.
    Jersey City, NJ
  797. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17608Olga Cantarella
    Abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have a very negative impact on our community. I would like to see further study on how turning this now open space into something commercial or residential would affect our area. I predict the following negavite affects: * too much residential units and not enough open space * we need more parks - parks per number of residents in downtown Jersey city is low. * Not enough parking (Already a problem) to accomodate potential new residents. * Jersey city downtown is already overbuilt with too much new residential contruction - we do not need more. * removal of a cultural resource * potential health problems * flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) * water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) * release of contaminants * habitat destruction * wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species * ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) * cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community * loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic * loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront
    Jersey City, NJ
  798. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17607Jose Acosta
    I'm hoping the Embankment isn;t abandoned and turned into another blight & burden on the community. Please conduct a full study of the effects the Embankment. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  799. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17606Dan Wynne
    Jersey City needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. Without stopping them, demolition will occur - I understand they are seeking permits now. Without fully understanding the environmental impacts we risk too much as a community.
    Jersey City, NJ
  800. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17605John Whyte
    I urge a full environmental impact study before Conrail or anyone else starts demolition on the 6th Street Emankment. The possible community value of using this embankment for public transportation, recreation, and its wildlife and park potential should not be forsaken so that it can be torn down to build more housing in a neighborhood that does not need it nor can its infrastructure support it. The issues include the following: · air quality · dust · noise · vibrations · heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts · damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile · removal of a cultural resource · health · flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) · water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) · release of contaminants · habitat destruction · wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species · ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) · cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community · loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic · loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront · loss of light freight opportunities
    Jersey City, NJ
  801. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17604Blas Hernandez
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  802. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17603Sean Murphy
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  803. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17602Carly Kotinek
    Hello, Please conduct a full environment study on the Embankment in Jersey City, NJ. The demolition of this historical landmark will completely alter the look and feel of the entire community. The Embankment should be preserved and be set aside as green space for those living in and those visiting Jersey City. Thank you, Carly Kotinek
    Jersey City, NJ
  804. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17601Gabriole Van Bryce
    I lived in Jersey City from 2000-2003, and was an active member in the Van Vorst Park Assn., having also designed several of the still existent public gardens in the Park. As a landscape designer, I was one of the first Jersey City professionals to see the unique potential in the embankment for public usage. It would be a great error to allow development in this area and fail to preserve this unique historic landscape.I'm requesting that this land immediately be preserved as a community park area and that connecting parkways be established to interconnect this historic area with pedestrian and bikeways. Please think creatively and see the potential for a distinct design opportunity that could serve the City in much more valuable ways than a development.
    Miami Beach, FL
  805. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17600Kyle Whipple
    I am suggesting that the embankment site be evaluated properly for environmental contaminants. I also feel that the addition of 1,000 units will place unnecessary burdens on an already overcrowded PATH system. I believe the space could be much better allocated for a park system, with many renditions possible. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  806. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17599Carla Criqui
    Please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  807. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17598B. Miluski
    The environmentla impact of the embankments being turned into multi storied metal boxes has me concerned. As does the detrimental impact these buildings would have on my quality of life. The PATH trains are already packed to capacity, during rush hours (I had to wait for another train on several occasions these past months.). I can't imagine what they will be like if you add the 5,000 to 10,000 new residents these buildings would house. I'm also concerned that, considering the reputation of the buyers, the embankments would be razed to the ground and then left there as empty barren land while the owners of the land wait for a developer to buy it from them. Considering the economic situation we are at present in, it could be some time. I really do not want Jersey City to be Hobokenized.
    Jersey City, NJ
  808. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17597Kerrie Sovelove
    please authorize an environment impact statement for the Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  809. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17596Carrie Lincourt
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  810. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17595Anthony Carrino
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch. Aside from environmental issues in conjunction with its removal, you are removing a great piece of architectural history from this city.
    Jersey City, NJ
  811. (printed as 5/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17594Orlando F Reyes
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch.""
    Miami Beach, FL
  812. (printed as 5/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17593Dave Polesky
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  813. (printed as 5/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17592Lorraine Saulino
    Please authorize an environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  814. (printed as 5/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17590john collins
    As a resident and homeowner in downtown jersey City I feel strongly that the Embankment should remain and be given to the people as a green space for all to use as a park and recreation area.
    jersey city, nj
  815. (printed as 5/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17589Ryan Jolley
    Please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    jersey City, NJ
  816. (printed as 5/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17588Catherine A. Hechht
    Please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch and preserve the historic Harsimus Embankment in Jersey City. Thanks you.
    Jeresy City, NJ
  817. (printed as 5/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17587Jeff
    The demolition of the Harsimus Branch would have significant impacts on the preservation of the neighborhood's history, environmental benefits of the embankment, and added congestion in the area Downtown Jersey City needs more open, public use, park space and the embankment is a prime for this conversion.
    Jersey City, NJ
  818. (printed as 5/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17586Embankment Preservation Coalition
    The abandonment of the Embankment will directly lead the Harsimus Cove neighborhood to the unfortunate demolition of this historic and natural preserve. The direct effect of any demolition will not only destroy a potentially wonderful park/transportation hub but will cause the loss of a beautiful park. You only need to see what New York City is doing with the rail sites on the West Side of Manhattan along 10th Ave. and 30's to realize the benefit. This park could be a potential Promenade Plantée as in Paris brining visitors and a view of the surrounding area. The environmental impact for the community would be devastating with dump trucks carrying debris and dust of unknown contaminants in a fragile historical neighborhood. Not to mention the flood impact where no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain. The loss of public transportation potential and natural beauty will be irreversible. Please reconsider anything that would destroy this EMBANKMENT. The photos I have provided could be Jersey City instead of more housing that the neighborhood is not prepared to handle. Regards, Mark Fletcher
    Mark Fletcher · Jersey City, NJ
  819. (printed as 5/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17584James Cox
    To Whom It May Concern, The Surface Transportation Board should authorize a full environment impact statement of the Harismus Branch. Failing that the board should at least comply with Section 106 regulations of the Department of the Interior and New Jersey State Historic Preservation Office. A cultural resource survey of the embankment should be performed. This will allow planners a overall picture of how the embankment fits into the community historically and how it may continue to serve the aforesaid community. In terms of the green" movement and creation of jobs, generally, reuse is of utmost importance at this time and repurposing the embankment is far superior to demolition. I have seen that the embankment has been in the papers recently because of eroding conditions. I find this hard to believe because of the original intent of the structure. However, if it is indeed eroding every effort should be taken now to preserve it. This is the "green" solution. This is the conscientious decision."
  820. (printed as 5/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17583mike hart
    I live in an area one block away from the proposed development. We have flooding bin our basements and on the corners. parking is impossible becasue of so many pre-existing driveways. police are agin struggling to keep up with crime. I want to know what efect the new development will have on these issues.
    jersey city, nj
  821. (printed as 5/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17582John Hanussak
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  822. (printed as 5/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17581Louis Musso
    I ask the federal agency with responsibility for administering the National Environmental Protection Act to authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  823. (printed as 5/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17580Brian Hennessy
    Please do an EIS. The safest & optimum use is for walkers, bikers & low impact commuters. SAVE THE ENBANKMENT !!!
    Highland Lks., N.J.
  824. (printed as 5/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17579John Crowley-Delman
    I live in Jersey City, near the Harsimus Branch. I believe the Environmental Assessment (EA) is not the objective, independent assessment it is supposed to be. It accepts Conrail's version of status completely, suggesting that the City of Jersey City is responsible for Conrail's failure to follow federal abandonment law before selling the right of way. This is an absurd position to take, because ordinary citizens with not much knowledge of railroad law had determined through fairly simple research that the line, which everyone locally knew to be the main freight line of the PRR into Harsimus Cove, had not been abandoned, and had so advised Conrail representatives. Yet Conrail, a rail company that should be very familiar with rail law, sold the right of way after the City said it wanted to acquire it. The EA further (incredibly!) quotes Conrail representations of City actions, rather than the City's own representations, even those in the very extensive record available at the STB. Without knowing what local or state regulations exist to protect the environment, the EA just assumes any environmental impacts will be appropriately treated by local control, and absolves the STB itself and Conrail of any responsibility, even that of providing an objective record. The EA discounts the environmental impacts of abandonment, though NEPA requires all federal agencies to look at both direct and indirect impacts of their actions, both immediate and cumulative. It compartmentalizes abandonment from what will be the immediate results of this federal action. The EA says that what will ultimately happen to the branch is unknown." To the contrary, the results of abandonment ARE known, to the extent that the future is at all knowable. Either of two alternatives will occur: (1) demolition and residential development for private profit (2) rail, trail, and habitat-oriented open space, all public uses and needs. The details of each of these alternatives may be "unknown," and the implementation of each may be either immediate or phased, but there is no doubt that these are the broad outlines of what will result from this federal abandonment action. An Environmental Impact Statement would explore these alternatives and make it clear to decisionmakers what the likely impacts of each alternative would be. Regarding salvage: The EA says "all track and track structures have been removed," completely ignoring the elephant in the room. How can this statement be made when the Embankment itself, the largest stone structure in Jersey City, remains, and Conrail and its partner have co-applied for permits to demolish and presumably salvage it? The scope of the EA does not cover the full Branch. It focuses on the area of the Harsimus Branch that contains the National-Register-eligible Embankment. This is the area that preservationists have been working for 11 years to preserve. That doesn't mean the community is interested only in historic preservation of this particular segment. We are also concerned about the general environment along the entire length of the Branch. The EA completely ignores the rest of the Harsimus Branch Conrail is abandoning. To the immediate west of the Embankment the right of way goes between parking lots and service stations and other structures, some of which seem to encroach on the ROW. It is quite likely that toxins from these sites from decades of use have entered the soil of the Branch, even if the railroad itself released no toxic substances. The one study that is available to the public, which the EA cites as reporting "nonhazardous" infill, actually found four heavy metals and PAH's in soil samples, and does not give residents any assurance that they will be unharmed by Embankment removal. Furhter, this study applies only to the Embankment, not to other segments of the Branch. Conrail also reveals the existence of a more recent study, in 2005. The public is entitled to see that study, which has not been made publicly available. The next Branch segment, which has free-standing stanchions on it, abuts a historic park. Farther to the west, the Branch is a boundary of the historic Jersey City and Harsimus Cemetery. To my knowledge, no soil sampling for contaminants or studies of wildlife has been done in this area, which is now overgrown and provides habitat. The users of this park and the volunteers who are now restoring the historic cemetery should know what toxins, if any, the railroad is leaving behind, and what development of this area will mean to wildlife that uses the area now. The residents of Jersey City are owed a full environmental impact statement that will look at these subjects - not just the historical, which is very important, but also the broader environmental and cultural impacts of abandonment. STB must not so narrowly construe its obligations under federal law as to make them meaningless. It must not just accept the word of Conrail, ignoring all evidence that does not fit Conrail's preferred story. Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. The thousands of residents along this ROW require no less."
  825. (printed as 5/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17578Sebastian Bernheim
    My family and I live in Jersey City, very close to the railroad embankment which Conrail proposes to abandon. As a member of the community directly affected by the near certain demolition of this historic site, I believe that we need a full environmental impact study of the proposed abandonment and demolition of the Harsimus Branch. It would be highly negligent of the board to fail to consider the impact of the release of soil contaminants in the midst of a densely populated area. The preliminary testing that has been done so far is wholly inadequate, and must be followed-up by extensive testing of the landfill that would be removed and likely dispersed into the surrounding atmosphere. The Harsimus Branch was an industrial site for many years, the risk of contamination is very high, and the list of possible contaminating agents is frightening in the extreme. You hold the lives and health of generations of Jersey City residents in your hands. When you deliberate this issue, please consider your responsibility to our children and grandchildren.
    Jersey City, NJ
  826. (printed as 5/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17577gregory w schwer
    Dear Ms. Johnson-Ball I am writing to you about an STB regulatory issue of great importance to me and my young family. Please support the use of the national enviromental protection act to require an enviromental impact survey with respect to the Harasimus branch which was improperly abandoned by Conrail in Jersey City. As a 22 year resident of this area I can attest to the importance of this historical and enviromental treasure. This greenway sits parallel to one of the most traffic snarlled areas of New York City. The loss of this special spot will have a great impact on the tranquility of our historic district as well as the carbon footprint in one of the most polluted city in the nation. Please bring this issue to the front of the STB agenda and pass this message along to Ms. Rustin, and Mr. Zimmerman. Thank you all for your consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Gregory Schwer
    jersey city, new jersey
  827. (printed as 5/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17576Megan Klim
    Save the Embankment!!!!
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  828. (printed as 5/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17575Elizabeth Nussbaum
    The plan to demolish the embankment is extremely shortsighted and will be very detrimental to the surrounding community. Demolition would not only destroy a piece of Jersey City's history, it would contaminate the air and water, damage neighborhood buildings, and cause immense annoyance and inconvenience for those living in the vicinity and those who have to pass through the area. We could also lose the perfect opportunity for a light rail link between Secaucus and the waterfront, and for a light freight corridor. In short, abandonment of the Harsimus Branch and demolition of the Embankment would be an unmitigated disaster for the community, and we need to perform a full study of what the effects would be before doing anything damaging and irreversible.
    Jersey City, NJ
  829. (printed as 5/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17574Lance Michel
    Please do not make any determinations on the fate of the Jersey City Harisimus Cove Embankment until an EPA report has been done. Thank You.
    JERSEY CITY, NJ
  830. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17573Mark Williams
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  831. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17572New Jersey Bicycle Club
    Please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch. Bicyclists have a hard time in Hudson County, with its heavy motor vehicle traffic. The County has no safe east-west bicycle route. If the Harsimus Branch is abandoned and developed, it will foreclose the only opportunity for a direct, off-road route for the East Coast Greenway to reach the Hudson River waterfront. This trail is important not only to recreational walkers and bicyclists but also to local commuters who prefer to use their own power to get to work
    Jay Cazes · Long Valley, NJ
  832. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17571Melinda DeNegri
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  833. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17570Sean Salmon
    I live about 100 feet from the Harsimus Branch 6th Street Embankment and I feel there needs to be a full study of the effects of abandonment of this integral part of our neighborhood. The detrimental effects of the abandonment and almost certain demolition of the Harsimus Branch are too numerous to list.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  834. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17569Kris Reiss
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch, the impact of destroying and then building on that site would be tragic for Jersey City. It would also be a lost opportunity to improve the lives of City residents with additional light rail, a park, or both.
    Jersey City, NJ
  835. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17568Alexandra Lopez
    I am requesting an environmental impact statement for a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Jersey City, NJ
  836. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17567Daniel Krugman
    I live two doors down from the embankment on Jersey Ave. While I am deeply troubled by the prospect of the abandonment (and no doubt demolition) of a structure that offers so many great possibilities for improving my neighborhood and city, I am even more concerned that such a proposal might go through without conducting a thorough study of the impact these actions would have on our local environment. Dismantling the embankment, as some have proposed, would be a huge task, affecting every resident north and south of the structure for it's entire length for a considerable amount of time. I would have to live with work crews outside my house every day producing a huge amount of dust and debris from stone and unknown soil content from its years of use, not to mention noise and pollution from the construction traffic for months or years before a new structure is built. All of this does not take into account how the removal of so much soil would affect storm drainage and soil erosion once the structure is removed. Nor does it consider how this might impact the wildlife that no doubt uses the green space on top of the embankment as a safe haven from the rest of the city. For all of these reasons, I strongly urge you to conduct a thorough study on the impact these changes would have on our environment, quality of life for local residents, and subsequent use of the land.
    Jersey City, NJ
  837. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17566New Jersey Bicycle Coalition
    Please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch. Bicyclists have a hard time in Hudson County, with its heavy motor vehicle traffic. The County has no safe east-west bicycle route. If the Harsimus Branch is abandoned and developed, it will foreclose the only opportunity for a direct, off-road route for the East Coast Greenway to reach the Hudson River waterfront. This trail is important not only to recreational walkers and bicyclists but also to local commuters who prefer to use their own power to get to work.
    Joseph Amatuzzi · Allendale, NJ
  838. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17565Marisa Mulvlihill
    Please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch. The health and safety of our community depends on it.
    Jersey City, NJ
  839. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17564Andrew C. Hubsch
    As a 16-year resident of Hudson County, including 12 years in Jersey City, I deeply value the cultural (and architectural) legacy of the area's rich history. Today -- nature quiet and flowering atop, stone cool and massed below -- the Harsimus Branch Embankment is a stunning physical feature that anchors Downtown Jersey City. But even before detailing the catalog of legal reasons for nullifying the process by which a private developer has attempted to lay claim to this vital public land, any and all must pause to appreciate the site's unique reverted" state and its geographic centrality to the urban fabric of New Jersey's most-densely populated city. We are describing a serene-yet-dominant element of the landscape, respecting the rectilinear city grid, but still free. Untouched for decades, the Embankment is a precious civic (and natural) resource, as is, a prime community asset deserving of every protection your agency can extend. Please, save this treasure. Yours in hope and reason, ANDREW C. HUBSCH"
  840. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17563Moshe Rozenblit
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch. The affected area of Jersey City is awefully short on green space.
    Jersey City, NJ
  841. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17562Regional Plan Association
    Abandonment of the Harsimus branch -- which would likely be followed by demolition -- would be a tragic mistake. The remarkable success of the preservation of the High Line in New York City provides a model easily transferred to Jersey City. Preservation and enhancement of the Harsimus Stem Embankment offers a rare opportunity to preserve valuable right-of-way for possible future transit services and create additional open space in a dense urban environment. The Embankment is historically significant and a much loved local landmark. We are requesting that the Surface Transportation Board prepare an Environmental Impact Statement as required by the National Environmental Policy Act. We believe a competent EIS will demonstrate conclusively that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch would be irresponsible and contrary to sound Federal policy. Thanks you.
    Carlos Rodrigues · Princeton, NJ
  842. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17561Scott Lauben
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  843. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17560Shana Cohen
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  844. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17559Janine Berger
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Hoboken, NJ
  845. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17558Rick Goldfarb
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  846. (printed as 5/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17557Brigid Siegel
    Please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch. Bicyclists have a hard time in Hudson County, with its heavy motor vehicle traffic. The County has no safe east-west bicycle route. If the Harsimus Branch is abandoned and developed, it will foreclose the only opportunity for a direct, off-road route for the East Coast Greenway to reach the Hudson River waterfront. This trail is important not only to recreational walkers and bicyclists but also to local commuters who prefer to use their own power to get to work.
    Bloomfield, NJ
  847. (printed as 4/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17672Moira Brett
    I ask you to please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch of the Embankment.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  848. (printed as 4/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17555Caroline Burton
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. I am concerned about the following related to this topic: · air quality · dust · noise · vibrations · heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts · damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile · removal of a cultural resource · health · flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) · water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) · release of contaminants · habitat destruction · wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species · ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) · cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community · loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic · loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront · loss of light freight opportunities
    Jersey City, NJ
  849. (printed as 4/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17554David Boyle
    The Harsimus Branch is as important to Jersey City's future as it was to its past. The STB should authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Branch, so decision-makers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  850. (printed as 4/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17553April Black
    The Harsimus Branch is important and please, before any decisions are made concerning it, consider the impact to the surrounding area.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  851. (printed as 4/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17552James Long
    Please authorize and Environmental Impact Statement. Not doing so will cause adverse effects to our neighborhood.
    jersey city, nj
  852. (printed as 4/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17551Kate Landman
    To Whom It May Concern: As a resident of Jersey City, and a professional involved in the Land Use Development field it is somewhat appalling to see the lack of in depth information provided in the Environmental Assessment (EA) performed for the abandonment of the Harsimus Branch Embankment. I understand per the regulations at 49 CFR 1105 that a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) may not legally be required, however this does not subvert the fact that the EA performed for the site is wholly inadequate. The argument that the demolition of the embankment is not part of the abandonment progress, and as such not subject to the review requirements is shameful. The Embankment was constructed by Conrail and as such is Conrail’s property. The effects of the demolition of the structures need to be included in this assessment to fully understand the implications involved in the abandonment process. The demolition is a secondary or cumulative impact of this process and is not addressed in the least in this report, issues which are required to be addressed per the regulations. I expect to see a revised EA or an EIS which covers these impacts which should include but not be limited to discussion regarding the following topics: The project is located within an extremely busy downtown area which a high degree of pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular traffic. The demolition of the structure will require a large amount of construction equipment with continual entry and egress from the properties. As such, a detailed traffic analysis/assessment needs to be performed to characterize the degree of impact to the area and assess if these impacts preclude the construction of the project or require mitigation. The structures currently provide pervious surface which provides stormwater infiltration. If demolished the structures will no longer provide such infiltration and may have flooding impacts upon neighboring properties. An assessment should be performed to characterize these impacts and assure proper mitigation and compensation is made. It may also be necessary to assess the project with regard to the New Jersey Departement of Environemental Protection’s Stormwater Management Rules at N.J.A.C. 7:8, as well as the Flood Hazard Area Control Act Rules at N.J.A.C. 7:13. Thank you for your attention to these matters and the many others raised by concerned citizens and organizations. I hope the public has made you consider the imprint of your actions upon the community and cumulative effects which will result.
    Jersey City, NJ
  853. (printed as 4/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17550Jason Wiener
    To Whom It May Concern: As a resident of Jersey City, and a professional involved in the Land Use Development field it is somewhat appalling to see the lack of in depth information provided in the Environmental Assessment (EA) performed for the abandonment of the Harsimus Branch Embankment. I understand per the regulations at 49 CFR 1105 that a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) may not legally be required, however this does not subvert the fact that the EA performed for the site is wholly inadequate. The argument that the demolition of the embankment is not part of the abandonment progress, and as such not subject to the review requirements is shameful. The Embankment was constructed by Conrail and as such is Conrail’s property. The effects of the demolition of the structures need to be included in this assessment to fully understand the implications involved in the abandonment process. The demolition is a secondary or cumulative impact of this process and is not addressed in the least in this report, issues which are required to be addressed per the regulations. I expect to see a revised EA or an EIS which covers these impacts which should include but not be limited to discussion regarding the following topics: • The project is located within an extremely busy downtown area which a high degree of pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular traffic. The demolition of the structure will require a large amount of construction equipment with continual entry and egress from the properties. As such, a detailed traffic analysis/assessment needs to be performed to characterize the degree of impact to the area and assess if these impacts preclude the construction of the project or require mitigation. • The structures currently provide pervious surface which provides stormwater infiltration. If demolished the structures will no longer provide such infiltration and may have flooding impacts upon neighboring properties. An assessment should be performed to characterize these impacts and assure proper mitigation and compensation is made. It may also be necessary to assess the project with regard to the New Jersey Departement of Environemental Protection’s Stormwater Management Rules at N.J.A.C. 7:8, as well as the Flood Hazard Area Control Act Rules at N.J.A.C. 7:13. Thank you for your attention to these matters and the many others raised by concerned citizens and organizations. I hope the public has made you consider the imprint of your actions upon the community and cumulative effects which will result.
    Jersey City, NJ
  854. (printed as 4/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17549Annemarie Conte
    The Embankment is something that could be a real jewel of Jersey City, something that provides community space for the well-being of everyone. Allowing abandonment to happen will result in expensive homes being built, which will benefit few.
    South Orange, NJ
  855. (printed as 4/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17548Lydia Peavy
    I want a full Environmental Impact Statement.
    Jersey City, NJ
  856. (printed as 4/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17547Carla Weisberg
    To Whom it May Concern: Please consider the long term beauty and the improvement in the quality of life in creating a 6 block park along the elevated Conrail train tracks in Jersey CIty, not to mention the increase in property and resale values, enhancement to it's residents and protection of the existing environment, including the impact on migratory birds and the impact on the quality of life of the community during the construction. Long term Conrail's plan will have adverse effects on traffic patterns, noise pollution & water. I recommend a full review by the Federal Agency, especially in light of the abysmal track record of Conrail to maintain the site these many years. I would ask at the very least for an Environmental Impact Statement to be made. Thank you.
    NYC, NY
  857. (printed as 4/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17546John Shanchuk
    Hey, I am very concerned about the envirommental impact that could come from demolishing the 6th st embankment and think it is necessary to study the effects it would have by preparing an EIS. Some effects of demolition of this massive structure on air quality, dust, noise, vibrations, heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts, damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile removal of a cultural resource, health, flooding (there would be no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain), water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary), release of contaminants, habitat destruction, wildlife including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species ecosystem PLease consider preparing an EIS for this site. Thank you very much!
    Jersey City, NJ
  858. (printed as 4/29/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17545Raymundo Bolivar
    The attached picture shows a section of Sixth Street which runs parallel to the Embankment walls. My family and I live in one of the buildings shown. Whether the walls are ultimately preserved, demolished and/or developed, its fate will affect my home and family immensely. We need the STB to order an Environmental Impact Statement. It is the only way to discern the implications of any actions imposed onto the Harsimus Branch. Please consider those of us who have the most at stake if a decision is made without benefit of a complete study.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  859. (printed as 4/29/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17544susan kulakowski
    The STB should authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch. Demolition of the embankment will have damaging environmental effects and will diminish the quality of life for residents.
    jersey city, nj
  860. (printed as 4/29/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17543Remi Fujii
    Considering the historic nature of the neighborhood it is located in, please authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch project before proceeding with it.
    New York, NY
  861. (printed as 4/29/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17542Pamela Huebner
    Due to the tremendous revitalization of this area over the last decade this area has become a tranquil residential area known for its historic buildings and neighborhoods. The impact of any changes to the Harsismus Embankment and branch area would be significant due to the historical nature of this area, the number of residents and young families living in the area and environmental concens. Demolition of the embankment would destroy what has become a wildlife habitat and potentially release toxins in a densely populated area. There is also concern regarding the impact on the structures in the surrounding area that are over one hundred years old. A full study should be conducted so that a prudent and safe plan can be devised that addresses concerns of all those impacted especially the area residents and in particular those whose homes overlook this area and who have enjoyed the increased wildlife development there.
    Easton, CT
  862. (printed as 4/29/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17541Brett Wilson
    We need an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)for the embankment. The National Environmental Policy Act requires Federal agencies to prepare EISs for major Federal actions that significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Jersey City, NJ
  863. (printed as 4/29/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17540Nancy Harrison
    I encourage you to not sell off for development the Jersey City Embankment which can become part of the East Coast Greenway bike path. I ride my bike a lot and have loved trips throughout Connecticut, New York, Illinois and also Florida. One day I want to ride with my husband from CT to FL and visit friends along the way, including our children and stepchildren in Jersey City. They are just a few blocks away from the Harsimus Branch. Please don't vote to not develop the greenway in NJ.
    Stamford, CT
  864. (printed as 4/29/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17539Ketan Dodhia
    The Harsimus Branch is as important to Jersey City's future as it was to its past. The STB should authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Branch, so decision-makers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  865. (printed as 4/29/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17538Harsimus Cove Association
    As president of the Harsimus Cove Association, the primary neighborhood organization representing residents of the National Historic District and other areas in Harsimus Cove, I strongly object to the inadequate Environmental Assessment (EA) issued by your Section of Environmental Analysis. The EA re-packages a Conrail story, and cannot be considered objective. Conrail's history of so-called City involvement in its illegal demolition activities is a case in point. It is common knowledge that the City was interested in protecting the safety of its citizens, who were threatened by Conrail's neglect of the structure and its bridges. In any event, any City actions to correct safety problems have no bearing on Conrail's abandonment action or inaction. Conrail continues to this day to not maintain its structures or the sidewalks along them. as property owners are obliged to do. We do not understand why the EA did not call for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The 1998 Dresdner Robin report, which is only a preliminary environmental investigation, found antimony, arsenic, lead, and mercury and PAH levels in the soils of the Embankment that require the fill to be handled with appropriate engineering and institutional controls. We want further in-depth studies, and we want Conrail's partner to release results of soil samples it took at the site. Tons of contaminated soil cannot be removed and trucked through the streets of a major urban area without careful controls. The EA has not considered that the Embankment top has been providing habitat for migrating and local species of birds and butterflies in this otherwise built-out area. It says there is no evidence of threatened or endangered species - but then, no one has every studied the area to see if there are. There are certainly such species documented nearby - and bird and butterflies usually ignore No Trespassing" signs. The STB must not separate what it sees as the direct effect of abandonment (nothing) with what it sees as the indirect effects (demolition and reuse). The probable reuses of this site are heavily influenced by what happens at STB, and they must be further explored. The EA's bureaucratic evasion is not in the spirit of the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA), under which federal agencies are to study direct and indirect effects, both immediate and cumulative, of their actions. I ask STB, on behalf of the thousands of residents in our neighborhood who will be affected by the outcome of this case, to authorize a full EIS. Eric Fleming Harsimus Cove Association, president"
    Eric Fleming
  866. (printed as 4/29/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17537Steven Greenblatt
    It's essential that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared with respect to the Sixth Street Embankment. Jersey City needs to know what the effects will be on the community and the environment of the abandonment of the Harsimus Branch and the demolition of the Embankment. I believe abandonment and demolition is simply the wrong way to go for the Embankment. Not only will it be an environmental disaster (loss of habitat, air and water polution as a result of the demolition, etc.), but it will be a loss to the community. It should be preserved as open space for all the residents of Jersey City to enjoy. We have enough condos built or planned already. What we don't have is sufficient park space. In the downtown area, there is only Hamilton Park and Van Vorst Park - both of which are small, and which even together, are not big enough to service the needs of all of the new families and residents that have come to and will continue to arrive in the neighborhood over the coming years.
    Jersey City, NJ
  867. (printed as 4/29/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17536Ray Nord
    My spouse and I are retired, and we bike for recreation and exercise. We live part of the year in Stamford , Connecticut , and part in Naples , Florida . In Stamford as well as other parts of CT and Massachusetts, several organizations work to complete the East Coast Greenway, which provides safe, off-road trails for people who use nonmotorized transportation for commuting, recreation, and exercise. Wehave made significant use of these trails and believe it very important to utilize these spaces for the public in wholesome and health conscious activities. When completed, the East Coast Greenway will be especially desirable to the young and to retired people like ourselves who cannot or do not want to depend on the automobile. We look forward to the day when we can put our bicycles on the Greenway in Stamford, take a leisurely trip through New York, stopping at Bed & Breakfasts along the way, visit our friends in Jersey City who live a few blocks from the Harsimus Branch, and continue all the way to Florida. Please do not make a decision that will set back the East Coast Greenway’s coming to Jersey City . Ray Nord
    Stamford, CT
  868. (printed as 4/29/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17535Emma Wu
    The STB should authorize a full environmental impact statement for the Harsimus Branch Embankment. The city will benefit more from a lightrail or public park than residential development. There are plenty of lots in Jersey City that could be developed into housing, but the embankment is the only continuous strip that could be used for a lightrail, without having to knock down existing housing. Jersey City is an urban environment and needs more public transport and space. Using the embankment makes the most sense financially. It would be a lost opportunity to turn it into housing.
    Jersey City, NJ
  869. (printed as 4/29/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17534Neighborhood Resident and Member of Brunswick Community Garden
    I love the embankment. It is a beautiful historic structure, and plans for a park on top would increase and improve attractiveness to downtown Jersey City residents. There is limited green space in the city, and creating a park on top could provide an effective model to future generations of the importance of green areas which enhance people's lives in that it allows them to enjoy the outdoors in a way that is not available when overdevelopment takes place.
    Cassie King · Jersey City, NJ
  870. (printed as 4/28/2009)
    Reply
    225008Reply
    Conrail
  871. (printed as 4/28/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17528Lisa Best
    Please conduct a complete environmental study to this land on the embankment. This would be a lovely overhead park, as they have in Paris, France. We could have small shops and businesses below the raised park, as they also have in Paris, France. Demolishing this site would be a foolish waste of land and income. This would bring visitors to Jersey City, who would also spend money here relaxing. I live in the historic area and it is nice to live far from high rise buildings and utilitarian looking housing. A park on the embankment would bring beauty and income to Jersey City. Please conduct this study to test this land for our safety and use. Thank you, Lisa Best
    Jersey City, NJ
  872. (printed as 4/28/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17527Edward Alvarez Eskew
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. -- I'm worried about the possibility that demolition of the embankment will severaly disrupt the flow of traffic, as well as cause massive problems with air quality, noise, and vibrations to the houses sitting directly next to it. In addition, the enbankment is a cultural icon of Jersey City, and removal of the landmark would be destroying part of the city's identity. The landmark is not only an icon for residents of Jersey City, but home to migratory birds and local species that already struggle to find green space to live in the extremely developed area.
    Jersey City, NJ
  873. (printed as 4/27/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17526Caroline Booth
    As a resident of 5th St, and mother of a 1 year old, I have grave concerns regarding the environmental impact of the proposed demolition of the embankment. What precautions will be taken to ensure that unknown toxins are not released into the air by the planned demolition? What studies will be undertaken ahead of demolition work to understand what potential hazards will be released? I urge you to take all necessary precautions by conducting an environmental impact study BEFORE undertaking any work, to avoid endangering the health of local residents.
    Jersey City, NJ
  874. (printed as 4/27/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17525Karla Kirby
    There should be a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Jersey City, NJ
  875. (printed as 4/27/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17524Beth Smith-Moncrief
    We live less than a block away from The Embankment and would like to see and WIS. We have two small children and are VERY concerned about the demolition of the structure and it's impact on air quality, the dust it will kick up, the impact on the buildings in the historic neighborhood we live in, release of contaminants and many other potential affects. Downtown Jersey City needs additional open space and the proposed park usage of the structures would add tremendously to the quality of life in the neighborhood.
    jersey city, nj
  876. (printed as 4/27/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17523Henry Faulkner
    I want to urge you to make sure that any evaluation of the Harsimus Branch (the Embankment in downtown Jersey City) include the entirety of the area which Con Rail is responsible for. Please, please, please include a study on the way that run-off water will be affected by any proposed action. This is an area that is prone to heavy flooding--with fewer and fewer green spaces for ground water recharge, this will only get worse. Thank you for your willingness to hear from the community.
    Jersey City, NJ
  877. (printed as 4/27/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17522Geoffrey Furin
    I would like a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch before Conrail vacates. I am afraid that a developer will tear down this structure that may be full of oil pollutants from decades of trains running over it.
    jersey city, nj
  878. (printed as 4/27/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17521Kashif Anwar
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Jersey City, NJ
  879. (printed as 4/27/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17520Nadia Kashif
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Jersey City, NJ
  880. (printed as 4/27/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17519Carrie Furin
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  881. (printed as 4/27/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17518Helen Weinberg
    The environmental impact to this area of Jersey City, NJ will be breathtakingly horrific if the plan goes through. Look to other places like the Viaduct in Paris, France for much smarter ways to use this piece of land.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  882. (printed as 4/27/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17517Sam Crawford
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  883. (printed as 4/26/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17516Brendan Kuntz
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes adverse effects to Jersey City. The possible impacts of demolition include decreased air and water quality, possible release of contaminants, and also a cultural loss for our neighborhood.
    Jersey City, NJ
  884. (printed as 4/26/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17515Maria Brady
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Bayonne, New Jersey
  885. (printed as 4/26/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17514Meghan Fitzgerald
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  886. (printed as 4/26/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17513Elizabeth Morrill
    I am opposed to the demolition of the Sixth Street Embankment in downtown Jersey City. Jersey City is in dire need of open space and the embankment is one of the few remaining open spaces we have. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  887. (printed as 4/25/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17512Russell Williams
    I believe an environmental study is necessary prior to proceeding with any development at the embankment.
    Jersey City, NJ
  888. (printed as 4/25/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17511David Weber
    Regarding the embankment land transaction in Jersey City, it is paramount that an environmental impact study be down. What it will take to dismantle the embankments for development will be hugely impactful to the area residents, schools and nursing homes. It would devastate the lanscape of two historic districts. Be prudent and responsible to the areas residents.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  889. (printed as 4/24/2009)
    Statement
    224987Verified Statement/Support Statement
    City Of Jersey City
  890. (printed as 4/24/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17510Lynn Baskin
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the embankment, will have on our community and city.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  891. (printed as 4/24/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17509Robin Tew
    OuAn environmental impact statement must be conducted in occordance with federal law as abandonment of the embankment will lead directly to demolition and associated massive environmental impact on the resedential neighborhoods through which it runs. My understanding is that no environmental impact study has been conducted, and futhermore very limited environmental testing of any descriptions has been undertaken. If a structure of this size were to be demolished in the middle of our neighborhood the dust and potential polution would be enormous. There are likely all kinds of contaminants in this ground that may be stirred up and released. Robin Tew.
    Jersey City, NJ
  892. (printed as 4/24/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17508Erik Botsford
    I urge you to conduct a full environmental study of the effects of abandonment and demolition of the Harsimus Branch and Embankment. The loss of this important cultural resource and potential transportation corridor warrants such a full and thorough study.
    Brooklyn, NY
  893. (printed as 4/24/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17507Laura
    Please build. Everyone needs a park.
    New York, New York
  894. (printed as 4/24/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17506Tatiana
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. The demolition of such a huge structure, located in the heart of the family residences of Jersey City and very near several schools, would mean months- (or years-) long contamination of the air and streets of our neighborhood. This structure has the potential to be a point of pride in the community and could increase the value of the area if it were to be turned into a public park (just look at what the High Line in Chelsea is doing to the neighborhood!). Before abandonment and demolition take place, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be prepared to fully understand what the best course of action would be.
    Jersey City, NJ
  895. (printed as 4/24/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17505Conklin Costantin Architects LLP
    The Embankment of downtown Jersey City, NJ, is a one-of-a-kind urban artifact in the entire New York City metropolitan area and should be preserved as an integral part of the area's history. A remnant of the days when the Jersey City Hudson River shoreline was a critical transportation hub, especially for shipping of goods but also transport of passengers, the Embankment has sat abandoned for decades. A full environmental study should be commissioned regarding it's preservation, followed by a public ideas competition for its adaptive reuse. The shoreline of both sides of the Hudson has been, and continues to be, developed as a vital public recreation area; the development of the Embankment as a linear park feeding the Hudson's esplanade would perfectly echo the way it used to suply and receive goods from the same shore.
    Michael Costantin · NEW YORK, NY
  896. (printed as 4/23/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17503Geoffrey Meyer
    Highland , NY , where I live, is a semi-rural area along the Hudson River with several rail trails and other trails. Farther south on the Hudson , the East Coast Greenway route connects to New York City and from there to the Hudson River Waterfront Walkway in Jersey City . I have friends there who have been working to bring the Greenway to Jersey City, a heavily populated city in the most densely populated county in the nation. These city dwellers deserve to have rail trails, too. Please take care to consider the consequences of abandonment on the 240,000 people living in Jersey City and those of us from the wider region who want to see the completion of the Greenway. Sincerely, Geoff Meyer
    Highland, NY
  897. (printed as 4/23/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17502Geoffrey M. Elkind
    I have resided in the Hamilton Park community for nearly 26 years. As a former US Govermental Enforcement Attorney, I have been appalled by Conrail's apparent lack of diligence in following proper regulatory procedure in an apparent attempt to fast track the sale and demolition of the Harsimus Branch Embankment. I am writing in full support of the Embankment Preservation Coalition's efforts to preserve the Embankment and their request that a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be performed before taking further action. The National Environmental Policy Act requires Federal agencies to prepare EISs for major Federal actions that significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. Fast tracking the abandonment process will lead directly to the demolition of the Embankment, as Conrail is now seeking demolition permits before local Jersey City agencies. Having lived in this community, I am fully aware of the history and use of the several remaining railroad embankmentsition in Jersey City. The Harsimus Branch Embankment is the largest of these structures. The Harsimus Cove Embankment is wedged in between two densely populated Historic Disricts of downtown Jersey City -- Hamilton Park and Hasimus Cove. The demolition of this Embankment will have serious potential impacts on our adjoining neighborhoods, which needs to be studied and understood, including, among other things, impacts on: · air quality · dust · noise · vibrations · heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts · damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile · removal of a cultural resource · health · flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) · water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) · release of contaminants · habitat destruction · wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species · ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) · cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community · loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic · loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront · loss of light freight opportunities Given the magnitude of these structures, their potential for adaptive re-use, as-is (without demolition), and the potential serious environmental impacts, the option of doing nothing" (leaving the structures in place) may be the best possible option of minimizing the Embankment's environmental impact on the adjoining communities. Only one preliminary study of contaminants has been done, and only on one section of the Branch. Conrail’s developer partner has not submitted results of an environmental sampling study to STB. The federal agency should enforce federal laws that protect the public interest rather than burdening local governments and citizens. I respectfully request the STB to consider carefully the need for an EIS, before proceeding with the abandonment process. Sincerely yours, Geoffrey M. Elkind"
  898. (printed as 4/23/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17501Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Please do a full environmental study. Check the soil for contamination. Think what moving this soil would mean to the air and the place the soil is moved to. Consider the children living in the area. The amount of water not flowing into the drainage and sewer system (very old sewer system) because of the ground absorbing moisture. Think of the amount of oxygen these trees and grasses are providing, replaced by roofs and concrete, asphalt. Make my park or at least let the land rest.
    Nancy Mahoney · Jersey City, NJ
  899. (printed as 4/23/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17500Brittany
    I have a 4 year old and DO NOT want anything in the environment that is going to harm him and so I do not think it is a good idea to tear down the railroad embankment! :(
    Jersey City, NJ
  900. (printed as 4/22/2009)
    Supplement
    224933Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    City Of Jersey City
  901. (printed as 4/22/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17493Embankement Preservation Coalition
    Jersey City needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on the community and city.
    Lise Brenner · Brooklyn, NY
  902. (printed as 4/22/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17492Ernesto Bustamente
    The STB should authorize a full Environmental Impact Study on the Harsimus Branch. This area is a densely populated are and the full impact must be known before it is disturbed.
    New York, NY
  903. (printed as 4/22/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17491Daniel Czerniawski
    The STB should authorize a full Environmental Impact Study on the Harsimus Branch. It is a key segment of the East Coast Greenway, a 3000-mile trail from Maine to Florida that will go through all state capitals and many other cities on the East Coast.
    Newark, NJ
  904. (printed as 4/22/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17490Alfred J Birchler
    The STB should authorize a full Environmental Impact Study on the Harsimus Branch. It is a key segment of the East Coast Greenway, a 3000-mile trail from Maine to Florida that will go through all state capitals and many other cities on the East Coast.
    Fairfield, NJ
  905. (printed as 4/22/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17489Sheelin Wilson
    I would like to request an environmental study of the Embankment site. There are many houses and residents that would be effected by ANY material movement of this structure.
    New York, NY
  906. (printed as 4/22/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17488Alison Lutz
    The STB should authorize a full Environmental Impact Study on the Harsimus Branch. It is a key segment of the East Coast Greenway, a 3000-mile trail from Maine to Florida that will go through all state capitals and many other cities on the East Coast. The Greenway is an urban equivalent of the Appalachian Trail, bringing safe short- and long-distance walking, bicycling, and other exercise opportunities to many citizens who have no access to cars or to rural recreation. If STB ignores Conrail's sale of part of this line to a developer, it will foreclose the best opportunity to bring the Greenway through Hudson County. Over 21% of the route is already on safe, traffic-free paths. The New Jersey portion of the Greenway is currently 48% on traffic-free paths and has the second highest percent of completed trail in any Greenway state. Unfortunately, the most populous cities of Jersey City and Newark have yet to be connected. Right now, because there is so much traffic on local roads, bicyclists and pedestrians trying to cross this county on an interim on-road route have to have a police escort to do so safely. So far, users are urged instead to use mass transit to cross the county. Harsimus Branch preservation will do much to spur completion of the Greenway through this most densely populated county.
    Newark, NJ
  907. (printed as 4/22/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17487Anne Holman
    My sister lives on Fifth Street, and I visit her often from the suburbs, where we enjoy more open space than is available in Jersey City. Her garden backs up to the south wall of the Harsimus Embankment, and is sheltered by the wall. Trees and flowers create a hanging garden above, and vines climb the wall. This space is especially treasured because so rare in an otherwise built-up city. On her block alone, there are 16 multi-unit buildings that back up to the Embankment, with perhaps a hundred or more residents living in them. I can't imagine what demolition of this structure would do to these buildings and these residents. Demolition would wreck these properties and property values, and threaten people's health and peace of mind. It is not only these private properties that would be damaged but also the ambiance of the entire area. Your decisions will affect the homes and well-being of so many people. At the very least, you should authorize a study to determine what the impacts of your decisions will be.
    Short Hills, NJ
  908. (printed as 4/22/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17486John Donnelly
    I would like STB to authorize a study to determine that there are no endangered or threatened species on the Harsimus Branch, which includes much habitat at its eastern end (the protected Embankment between Marin and Brunswick) and its western end near Waldo. There's a webcam in Jersey City that keeps watch on a peregrine falcon nestbox on top of 101 Hudson Street in Downtown Jersey City. According to a web site, the building's tenants were alerted to the birds' presence, and have acted as the stewards of their resident endangered species ever since. In 2000 the pair produced 2 young, and every year since has seen 3-4 chicks fledge. In 2005 four eggs were laid but only 3 hatched." A web entry for April 8, 2009 says: "...we are still anxiously awaiting the appearance of the first egg in the Jersey City nest. Last year, the falcons at 101 Hudson began incubation of four eggs around March 29, which means the first egg was laid around March 21. In comparison, the birds are more than two weeks behind last year’s schedule." This site is just a short flight from the Harsimus Branch, which provides habitat for critters that these birds of prey no doubt find tasty. No study has been done to see if these endangered birds use the site, but it would be odd if they avoided it. Just like the residents of 101 Hudson, residents along the Harsimus Branch care about the wildlife that has moved into their neighborhood. STB cannot say that there are no endangered or threatened species there if no one has ever looked. This site is just a short flight from the Harsimus Branch, which provides habitat for critters that these birds of prey no doubt find tasty. No study has been done to see if these endangered birds use the site, but it would be odd if they avoided it. Just like the residents of 101 Hudson, residents along the Harsimus Branch care about the wildlife that has moved into their neighborhood. STB cannot say that there are no endangered or threatened species there if no one has ever looked."
  909. (printed as 4/22/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17454Nicole Le Bris
    I live on First Street at the southern boundary of The Village area of Jersey City. My yard backs up to the old Pennsylvania Railroad main line section that still exists, although the iron trestles that once ran down Columbus Avenue (then Railroad Avenue) to Exchange Place are gone. The Village area is defined by the old Pennsylvania railroad. The Harsimus Branch is our neighborhood's northern boundary at Sixth Street. Stanchions mark where it once went past Mary Benson Park, the main park in our neighborhood, and it also skirted the Jersey City and Harsimus Cemetery to our west. As you can tell from this description of our boundaries, our neighborhoodwill be very much affected by what happens to the Harsimus Branch when you allow it to be abandoned. I am not only concerned with the harm to the rich history of this area but also with the fate of wildlife that have moved in as the trains moved out. A wild turkey has been sighted on the Embankment, and police chased one down a local street just a few weeks ago. Monarch butterflies use the Embankment and the area west of Mary Benson Park, which provide habitat for them and other wildlife. We see opposums, skunks, raccoons, and many, many birds in this area. The niches wildlife find in our growing city are important to identify and preserve. To my knowledge, no one has ever studied the habitat here and what it supports. We do know, however, that threatened and endangered species have been documented nearby. For this reason alone you should require further study. There are many other reasons why you should do a full Environmental Impact Statement. Everyone should understand what destruction of the Branch will mean for future transportation options in the City, for open space, for air quality, and for cultural loss.
    Jersey City, NJ
  910. (printed as 4/21/2009)
    Reply
    224929Reply
    City Of Jersey City
  911. (printed as 4/21/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17453Palisades Nature Association
    I am Nancy Slowik the Director/Naturalist at Greenbrook Sanctuary, a 165 acre nature preserve in the New Jersey Palisades which is part of the lsrger Palisades Interstate Park system. In 1993 and 1994 I conducted 5 site visits to the Harsimus Branch Embankment. Although most sites were not accessible I was able to make observations on the eastern most segment which is thirteen feet above grade level on the eastern edge. I cataloged the plant and animal life observed during 4 different months and submitted this informatio to the STB. Although no endangered or threated (E & T) species were identified, these visits were short and confined to only a 400 X 400 foot section of the Harsimus Branch, which is more than a mile long and includes habitat not only on the Embankment segments, but also farther west. This was by no means the sort of study that the site warrants. The SEA's Enviornmental Assessment discounts the presence of E & T species on the Harsimus Branch. It does so on no evidence, since no formal studies have been done on most of the Harsimus Branch. An Environmental Impact Statement should be authorized to further determine whether protected species use the habitat of the Branch and what impacts of abandoment and demolition will have on all species if this habitat is further destroyed. In such a densely populated area, even a small space provides valuable habitat for both resident and migratory species. The Harsimus Branch begins at the Palisades and extends toward the Hudson River. In A Naturalist's Guide to the Southern Palisades" (2004), I documented E & T species a little farther north on the Palisades. These include: American Bittern, Black-crowned Night Heron, Osprey, Bald Eagle, Northern Harrier, Cooper's Hawk, Northern Goshawk, Red-shouldered Hawk, Sedge Wren and Savannah Sparrow. Peregrine Falcons are also found nesting in this area. A nesting pair resides at 101 Hudson Street, Jersey City, atop the Mack-Cali Building, less than a mile from the Embankment "as the peregrine flies". This site is well documented. Please authorize an environmental impact statement to be conducted on this site. Thank you for your attention in this matter."
    Nancy Slowik
  912. (printed as 4/21/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17452Gianina Valdivieso
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Jeresy City, New Jersey
  913. (printed as 4/21/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17451Hudson County Hispanic Coalition
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Frank Lorenzo · Jersey City, New Jersey
  914. (printed as 4/21/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17450Mercedes Maldonado
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  915. (printed as 4/21/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17449Michael R. Petronko Jr.
    A full environmental study must be completed. This is the only way for the true impact (not only to the environment but also to the adjoining neighborhoods) to be determined. If the demolition process is allowed, it will rob downtown Jersey City of an irreplaceable piece of it's history. Too many of Jersey City's historical landmarks have been callously stripped for monetary gain without community input. By keeping the Embankment as open-space it not only enriches the community's sense of history but helps to promote civic pride.
    Jersey City, NJ
  916. (printed as 4/21/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17448Joyce Moneypenny
    I would like to respectfully DEMAND a full environmental study before any demolition of the embankment near here. Do you know how this demolition will shake the foundations of our precious and sometimes fragile historic buildings? Not to mention all the millions of rats, mice, raccoons and possums that will be dislocated and forced into our homes and backyards. Also, it's no secret that the site is contaminated by years of Conrail's use. An environmental study is absolutely necessary.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  917. (printed as 4/20/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17447Pat Kirshner
    I am writing in support of the open space proposals to authorize the STB to do a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision makers have the best information available to them. Thank you for your consideration
    New York, Nwe York
  918. (printed as 4/20/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17446Silkie Bamberger
    Please complete a more through Environmental Impact Statement for the Jersey City Embankment. The demolition of the 6.5 acre long structure would result would be catastrophic situation for the community. It is registered as a historic landmark and should be protected on that basis alone. Please do not assist in taking the rock wall away from Jersey City.
    jersey city, New Jersey
  919. (printed as 4/20/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17445Lisa Garrison
    It is my opinion that STB should authorize a complete environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so that all decisionmakers have the best and most accurate information available to them.
    Fairton, NJ
  920. (printed as 4/19/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17444Mike Steinberg
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement prior to any construction on the 6th Street Embankment in Jersey City in order to properly assess the likely harm to local residents from the deconstruction of this former industrial use site. Thank you.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  921. (printed as 4/19/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17443JC Homeowner
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement prior to ANY construction activity on the 6th Street Embankment in Jersey City, NJ. Based on the insufficient environmental laws in place at the time of its construction, and its use as an industrial site for many decades, there is no understanding of how any modifications to the Embankment will impact the local resident, especially with respect to exposure to toxic contaminants, rodents, traffic interruptions and overall quality of life. Please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you, Lis Steinberg (Coles and 6th)
    Elisabeth Steinberg · Jersey City, New Jersey
  922. (printed as 4/19/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17442Gary Grutman
    I am concerned that Historic place in Harsumus Cove is in danger of being demolished. Embankment is part of history and by no means has to be preserved. Environmental impact is also a big concern. Please consider a full environmental study. Regards,
    Jersey City, NJ
  923. (printed as 4/19/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17441Svetlana Grutman
    The demolition will decrease quality of life in my neigborhood. As a parent of two small children, I am really concerned about air polution, noise and traffic if demolition takes place. I believe the full environmental study is necessary to understand what it means to my neigborhood.
    Jersey City, NJ
  924. (printed as 4/19/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17440Eric Hagin
    As an interested and concerned homeowner of the Harsimus Cove Historic District in downtown Jersey City, I request that the Surface Transportation Board require that a full environmental study be completed with respect to the Embankment that spans downtown Jersey City along 6th Street. Before the demolition of this historic landmark structure is seriously considered, I believe the Surface Transportation Board must fully understand the potential impacts such drastic action could have on the historic downtown Jersey City neighborhood of which the Embankment is part. The demolition of the Embankment could have detrimental impact not only on the character & authenticity of the surrounding historic neighborhoods/districts, but also on the overall environment of the area. Before such rash action is allowed, the STB should require that a thorough environmental impact study be conducted so that ALL potential impacts of a demolition can be fully understood. Thank you, Eric Hagin
    Jersey City, NJ
  925. (printed as 4/19/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17439Sarah Kafka
    I am writing in hopes that STB will authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision-makers have the best information available when making a determination about the proposed destruction of the embankment. The embankment is an important part of our city's history. Thanks
    Jersey City, NJ
  926. (printed as 4/18/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17438Patrick James Lavin
    I live across the street from the Embankment. My primary concern is the stress that the demolition of it will place on the local environment. I do not feel the owners have conducted thorough environmental testing, and I kindly request that a full environmental study from a non-biased party be conducted. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  927. (printed as 4/18/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17437Natalie Behm
    Please perform a full environmental study. Conrail and the developer have not provided adequate information as to the environmental impact that would be caused by demolition of the 6th Street embankment. I live one block away. I am not satisfied that anyone has studied the level of toxins that would be released during demolition. There is no information as to how the demolition of the embankment would affect the structural integrity of my building and other buildings in the area. As you know the housing market has slowed. Any development of the embankment would take years. Allowing for the demolition of the embankment without a full environmental study poses an unreasonable risk to the neighborhood. Please perform a full environmental assessment.
    jersey City, NJ
  928. served (printed as 4/16/2009)
    Decision
    39892Commissioner
    DECISION ISSUED A STAY OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE EXEMPTION IN THIS PROCEEDING, PENDING FURTHER ORDER OF THE BOARD.
  929. (printed as 4/16/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17436Dana Boll
    This is a request to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch Embankment. The demolition of this historic structure would cause an awful disruption to the neighborhood, affecting the air quality, destruction of habitats for area wildlife, and the loss of a light rail linking Secaucus to the waterfront. Further, Conrail's developnet partner has failed to submit environmental sampling and has been in bad faith seeking demolition permits. Your attention is greatly appreciated!!
    New York, NY
  930. (printed as 4/16/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17435David Hall
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city.
    New York, NY
  931. (printed as 4/16/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17434ben perez
    I want a fact-based study that looks at the effects, direct and indirect, immediate and cumulative, of abandonment, demolition, and reuse alternatives.
    jersey city, nj
  932. (printed as 4/15/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17433Paul Meyers
    I'm a 20 year resident of Jersey City, and I believe that the community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. Demolition of this massive structure would affect air quality, noise, vibrations, heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts and much more. I urge our elected officials to study this issue carefully and consider the public needs for open space and a healthy environment.
    Jersey City, NJ
  933. (printed as 4/15/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17432Embankment Presevation Coalition
    I want a fact-based study that looks at the effects, direct and indirect, immediate and cumulative, of abandonment, demolition, and reuse alternatives. The embankment is an integral part of the community and should remain intact.
    Seth Lubin · Jersey City, New Jersey
  934. (printed as 4/14/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17431Stephen Bisogno
    The Harsimus Embankment is an enormous structure in a historic neighborhood. My building - and the condominium i own inside of it, along with many in the Hamilton Park Historic District, were built in the post-Civil War era (circa 1890s). Over that time, the buildings have flexed with the natural elements and increase in population on the streets and inside the buildings. As of now, they are deemed safe. However, without a thorough EIS by the STB, it is not certain that the buildings can survive the weight of the modern machinery needed to teardown the Embankment. Keeping the Embankment as it stands today, is very important to me. Ensuring the structural security of my building and home is critical. Please conduct a thorough EIS. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  935. (printed as 4/14/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17430Katy Lyness
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. It is potentially a gem of the Jersey City community, an historic, cultural, and environmental site that needs to be saved from personal greed and selfish motive. We have this one chance to make a difference.
    Jersey City, NJ
  936. (printed as 4/13/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17429John Eckert
    The Harsimus Branch Embankment is an historic landmark in Jersey City. It is a a reminder of the quality of construction in the early days of the area. It could be utilized in many ways. Because of it's elevation, it could support public spaces and facilities which would be striking in their sense of space, without the monotony of just more of the same low lying downtown monotony dwarfed by the Newport development. It seems ridiculous at this time of economic stress to consider the expense of demolishing this unique and potentially functional structure to alter the environment of the area in a way that would make it less valuable as a place to live. Sincerely, John Eckert.
    Jersey City, NJ
  937. (printed as 4/13/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17428Carlos Torres
    To destroy the embankment and then embed additional housing (low/middle class) would not do Hamilton Park Historical Area any good. It would devalue the properties already in the area. What most of us would like is for it to be a scenic trail to the beauty of Jersey City. A place where the community could enjoy and visitors can come see. Run a trolley from one end of the embankment to the other charging $1.00 for each ride. Lease parts of the park for snacks, drinks to vendors so the city profits. There are many other areas in Jersey City, which are available for house especially off Jersey Avenue and 17th Street. We must preserve visual history and not always rely on documented history. If all landmarks are taken then we have no history but the present.
    Jersey City, NJ
  938. (printed as 4/13/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17324New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Permit Coordination and Environmental Review
    Kenneth Koschek
  939. (printed as 4/13/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17323New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Office of Permit Coordination and Environmental Review
    Kenneth Koschek
  940. (printed as 4/10/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17427John DeGrazia
    Hoboken needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have. There is a better way, one that works with the historic heart of the old industrial (transportation) section, emphasizing the positive aspects of return to nature in parts in the most heavily used migratory corridor in the country. The following factors need to be considered: · air quality · dust · noise · vibrations · heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts · damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile · removal of a cultural resource · health · flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) · water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) · release of contaminants · habitat destruction · wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species · ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) · cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community · loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic · loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront · loss of light freight opportunities Thank you, John deGrazia
    Princeton, New Jersey
  941. (printed as 4/10/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17426Annisia Cialone
    I would like you to require that an EIS before any development can happend on the land that is now the Harsimus Branch Embankment. I have been involved with many large scale development projects as an Urban Designer and in my professional experience these studies are extremely important in guiding the future development of crucial sites. And I believe that the embankment is one of these sites that warrants futher investigation before any changes to it may happen.
    Jersey City, NJ
  942. (printed as 4/10/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17425Sherry Kosinski
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighbors and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  943. (printed as 4/10/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17424Michael Francisco
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement of the Harsimus Branch Embankment. Abandonment of the structure will lead to its demolition and cause severe adverse effects to the surrounding neighborhood where I live, including the decline of air quality; the loss of wildlife habitats; and increased flooding, noise, dust and contaminant release. As a federal agency, the STB should enforce federal laws that protect the public interest rather than burdening local governments and citizens. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  944. (printed as 4/9/2009)
    Motion
    224850Petition For Reconsideration
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy
  945. (printed as 4/9/2009)
    Reply
    224846Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  946. (printed as 4/9/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17423Robert W Dandorf II
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Thank You.
    Jersey City, NJ
  947. (printed as 4/9/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17422Dr. Gregory Tau
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, As a Hamilton Park resident, I am critically aware of the factors that make this neighborhood desirable and that contribute to its ongoing revitalization. Structures like the Harsimus Branch Embankment are unique and attractive features of the neighborhood that must be preserved at all costs and developed into unintrusive public recreational use. Thoughtlessly moving forward with any plan that bows to commercial interest would be an unfortunate missed opportunity and will detract from the neighborhood. I therefore insist on an evidence-based study that examines the effects, direct and indirect, immediate and cumulative, of abandonment, demolition, and reuse alternatives of the embankment. I thank you for your attention to this matter of vital importance.
    Jersey City, NJ
  948. (printed as 4/9/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17421David Boyle
    The Hamilton Park and Harsimus Cove neighborhoods need a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. The impact on our community will be devastating if these plans go through. In addition to a marked decline in air quality and an increase in dust, noise and vibrations, demolition will pose a grave threat to the historic districts of Hamilton Park and Harsimus Cove. Removal of the stone blocks will cause damage and the loss of buildings on two sides for one half mile. Parts of the embankment are within inches of historic structures. Preserving the embankment as it is will not only save the historic district and prevent the construction of buildings that do not fit with the existing architecture, it will provide additional green space, preserve our ecosystem as a habitat corridor, provide a possible future light rail and ease congestion in a heavily urban setting.
    Jersey City, NJ
  949. (printed as 4/9/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17420Ryan P. Kennedy, Esq.
    As a former resident of Jersey City, and a citizen of New Jersey interested in preserving both our historic landmarks and our valuable transportation ROW, please accept the following brief comment on the proposed abandonment and demolition of the Harsimus Branch. 1. The 6th Street Viaduct is a historically significant structure that should receive the STB's scrutiny. Jersey City rose to prominence as a major railroad hub for the region and staggeringly few landmarks remain to show its important past. 2. New Jersey lacks the public transportation infrastructure needed to adequately serve its residents. Current projects like THE Tunnel are moving the region in the right direction, but at an extreme expense, especially when it comes to ROW acquisition in one of the nation’s most expensive real estate markets. What little ROW that is left intact from rail’s more active era should be permitted to remain intact for future expansion and use for freight and passenger service. The Harsimus Branch is a prime example of this, especially considering that it connects one of the most thriving downtown districts to a major passenger rail junction in Secaucus New Jersey. I thank the STB for its consideration.
    Princeton, NJ
  950. (printed as 4/9/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17419Johanna
    We want the STB (Surface Transportation Board) to REQUIRE an Environmental Impact Statement. Jersey City needs all the parks possible for the citizens to enjoy our city. Creation of a public park on the Embankment is necessary for the well being of the citizens.
    Jersey City, NJ
  951. (printed as 4/9/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17418Jessica Diamond
    Our community does not need more demolition and construction in the downtown area! There are so many buildings already standing that could be refurbished, and the embankments could be made into some spectacular park areas.
    Jersey City, NJ
  952. (printed as 4/9/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17417Jaryd Moran
    only living 50 feet from the sixth street embankment we have great concern for the demolition of the embankment. Health and Environmental concerns. We need an official Environmental Impact Statement done for this situation. This is a part of history. No one builds with this material anymore. Once it comes down it will not be able to come back. This is a big part of the neighborhood and could be even better. Jersey city is undergoing many future plans for a few different areas and this area would be a great addition potentilly or at least leaving it open for future light railway. Please!
    Jersey City, NJ
  953. (printed as 4/9/2009)
    Comment
    EI-1741669 Erie Street LLC
    Residents of Jersey City's Historic District need an Environmental Impact Statement regarding the affects on the fragile, Victorian buildings neighboring the Embankment should the Harsimus Branch be deemed abandoned and then demolished. We also require a study of the increased burden on the current outdated sewer systems and the affects of runoff into the estuary.
    Josh Avramovich · Jersey City, NJ
  954. (printed as 4/9/2009)
    Comment
    EI-1741569 Erie Street LLC
    We require a full environmental impact study on the abandonment of the Harsimus Branch and demolition of the Embankment. Our most immediate concern is the loss of ground which absorbs rain and run off. Jersey City sits on a flood plain and currently the downtown section along Jersey Ave where the embankment crosses suffers from significant flooding after moderate rain requiring home owners to pump water from their basements. Additionally, we are concerned flood insurance rates will increase should more damage claims be filed in this area after the loss of the Embankment
    Lisa Garson · Jersey City, NJ
  955. (printed as 4/8/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17414Peter Lewis
    Available land for recreation is always a challenge to find. That's why the Embankment is such a valuable resource not to be squandered. Please help make it possible to be developed into a recreational site.
    Seattle, WA
  956. (printed as 4/8/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17413Christopher Costantine
    Destroying the Embankment will not only destroy a local landmark, but the environmental impact on the community will be large--not only in terms of it destruction, but also by implication that something will undoubtedly be resurrected in its place. I live across from the Embankment and I am truly concerned about the total implication of what destroying the Embankment would mean for not only my community but also my family, and new born baby. I shudder to think about the tangible pollution in the air, soil, and water and how it will affect my baby's health (and my own for that matter). At a minimum, the notion of destroying the Embankment must NOT have ever been considered a rational idea unless the community had a well defined understanding (and better yet--a say) in its future.
    Jersey City, NJ
  957. (printed as 4/8/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17412Kevin Hyde
    I want a full and fact based environmental impact of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  958. (printed as 4/8/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17411Grigoriy Ruzis
    The Embankment is a historical landmark that is an important part of downtown Jersey City. Keeping it as, or creating a park, would be of a great benifit to neighborhood that is already scarce on trees.
    Jersey City, NJ
  959. (printed as 4/8/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17410Miranda Helck
    The Harsimus Stem Embankment (6th Street Embankment) is a half-mile long abandoned raised railroad bed that runs south of 6th Street and creates the border of Harsimus Cove, The Village and Hamilton Park in Historic Downtown. It is registered as a city historic landmark and state historic site. Here is a picture from the top of it looking east towards the waterfront, when there were fewer skyscrapers that way. http://www.embankment.org/3935_blk1faceastweb.jpg If it were saved, the segments would be connected by new bridges to create a linear park connecting with the Hudson Waterfront Walkway in Newport (it'd be part of the ECG and something like the future High Line in NY). The city and the Embankment Preservation Coalition have been in and out of court for years struggling to preserve it. Conrail, CSX and Norfolk Southern abandoned it, but were supposed to jointly file an application to the Surface Transportation Board http://law.justia.com/us/codes/title49/49usc10903.html. This is so the STB can determine whether it should be left for the public use. None of them did so and when a local developer found out it was being considered for open-space in 2003, he bought the right-of-way. This sale was overturned since the three did not file with the STB, but the companies recently filed for abandonment exempt from the original conditions because now they are meeting new terms (ex it hasn't been used in over two years). Once this abandonment is approved, it can be legally sold to this developer. It can still be given to the city as public space under this condition of the exempted abandonment: (5) A notice or decision to all parties will be issued if use of the exemption is made subject to environmental, energy, historic preservation, public use and/or interim trail use and rail banking conditions.
    Cranbury, NJ
  960. (printed as 4/8/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17409Jason Bohan
    Our community needs a full study of the effects that abandonment of the Harsimus Branch, and demolition of the Embankment, will have on our community and city. Abandonment of the Embankment will lead directly to its demolition. The negative effects of such a massive demolition are many and include impact to air quality, noise, potential damage to nearby historic buildings and homes, release of contaminants, habitat destruction and damage to local wildlife, amongst others. Only one preliminary study of contaminants has been done, and only on a section of the Branch. Conrail’s developer partner has not yet submitted results of an environmental sampling study to STB. The federal agency should enforce federal laws that protect the public interest rather than burdening local governments and citizens.
    Jersey City, NJ
  961. (printed as 4/8/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17408Leonard M Misuraca
    I have lived in the Hamilton park neighborhood for the last ten years. Five years in my current home and five years on 5th St. I have lived with the embankment as a part for my life for ten years and I have come to appreciate it presence in my neighborhood. Its demolition raises many concerns effecting my quality of life and effecting the environment. I would hope that you can please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to the Jersey City historic district, neighborhoods, and families. I am concerned with its effect on our air quality from moving so much dirt and the noise created by all of the work. As well as heavy dump trucks driving up and down the streets and the damage caused to the old buildings of this neighborhood by all the vibrations. Not to mention the effects on air quality from all of the exhaust fumes from the trucks and machinery used for the demolition. As well as the length of time required for its completion . I am concerned with possible contaminants being released and the impact this could have on my health, dew to lack of extensive testing to this sight. I am concerned with the the fact that Conrail's development partner has failed to submit environmental sampling studies to theSTB. I am also concerned with the displacement of wild life like birds, rodents and insects into the surrounding areas and homes. Finally I am concerned with the possibility of development of more homes and the impact this would have on the neighborhood. It would create less parking, more traffic, and pollution, and a strain on our sewer systems by increasing use. I am fearful of all of these things and would question weather or not I would consider leaving the Jersey City if such a project were to take place. Thank you for you consideration, Lenny Misuraca
    Jersey City, NJ
  962. (printed as 4/8/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17407Pamela Thomas
    Please, I request a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Brooklyn, New York
  963. (printed as 4/8/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17406jeff rohe
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    jersey city, nj
  964. (printed as 4/8/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17405Grace Ingravallo
    I want a full environmental study of the entrie Harsimus Branch. I want to know the imapact of having the embankment torn down. I believe it will lead to very poor air quality. We need to think of the neighbors and children that live here.
    Jersey city, NJ
  965. (printed as 4/8/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17404Embankment Preservation Coalition
    An Environmental Impact Statement should be authorized since actions to alter or remove the Harsimus Stem Embankment would negatively affect the human and natural environment. The Embankment serves as a culturally important aspects of The Village, Harsimus Cove and Hamilton Park neighborhoods. The Embankment provides a rare semi-natural landscape amongst a densely populated city and reminds its residents and visitors of the historical industrial relevance of the city. With the efforts to make the modern city green, it is important to have parks for humans to enjoy and to provide a natural environment for other species to co-exist. Rainwater and runoff are able to be filtered because of the soil and plants that surround and sit atop the Embankment. With so many streets and paved areas in Jersey City and New York, every park is crucial to prevent further pollution in the groundwater and rivers. Linear parks are greatly utilized and such use for the Embankment would allow residents to have a safe, natural and unique place to get from place to place, exercise outdoors or simply enjoy both the urban and wild environment that the Embankment creates. Removal of the structure would be a loss of another great historical gem of the city and a cultural symbol synonymous with Sixth Street. It would remove a natural spot for the many migratory birds who fly over our state. Partial or total removal would create debris that would need to be dumped elsewhere, release contaminants and likely have other averse effects on the community both in the removal and lasting afterwards. Because it is such a unique structure that has become an important aspect of the area and is one of the few parks in Historic Downtown, the consequences of its abandonment should be carefully assessed. Thank you for your consideration in this important matter.
    Alex Goggin-Callahan · Annapolis, MD
  966. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Request
    224830Request For Extension Of Time
    City Of Jersey City
  967. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Request
    224829Request For Extension Of Time
    City Of Jersey City
  968. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17403EA Browne
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. . The area needs more mini-parks,not condos
    Township of Washington, New Jersey
  969. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17402Charles G. Bergstresser
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I live only a few blocks from the Embankment.
    Jersey City, NJ
  970. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17401Paul Orlowicz
    I am an alumni of St. Peter's Preparatory School and a graduate of Temple University with my BS Degree in Architecture. Jersey City has a special place in my heart, and while (as an architect) I will always support development, I have been dismayed by the rampant and poorly planned development that has strangled downtown. With the industry that once dominated the Jersey City waterfront now gone, a spectacular opportunity to forge Jersey City into a World Class City has been created. Please do not allow the Harsimus RR branch in downtown Jersey City to be torn down to make way for condominiums. The rail bed provides an opportunity to create a vibrant public space that would celebrate Jersey City's rich history and enrich the lives of its citizens. I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. It is my hope that design professionals of all backrounds can come together with the community within Jersey City to create a city that we can be proud of. Thank You
    Philadelphia, PA
  971. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17400Stephen Harbas
    I want a full and fact based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Thanks you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  972. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17399Mark & Jen Timmer
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. I live right next door to the Embankment and I fear for the safety of my family and children. Removal of the emabankment will affect the air quality, noise, flooding in the area as the embankment absorbs water. Also the possibility of trash collecting in the area which my child could wander to and injure herself. Please perform this assessment to ensure the right things are done.
    Jennifer Onggowidjaja · Jersey City, NJ
  973. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17398Steven Samuel
    I am requesting that the STB authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before allowing the abandonment of the property. I live directly across the street from the Enbankment. My house has moved 6 since I moved here in 1998. The heavy trucks and cranes that would be neccessary to demo the Enbankment would force me to move."
  974. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17397Mark Timmer
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. I am concerned with the demolition of the 6th St Embankment because it can have a horrible effect on the surrounding air quality, noise, and the release on unknown contaminants, which will have a negative impact on me and my family.
    Jersey City, NJ
  975. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17396David DeNoon
    Please Authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    jersey city, nj
  976. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17395Richard Deagle
    The Federal Surface Transportation Board needs to make a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch before Conrail is allowed to walk away from the Harsimus Branch Embankment.
    Jersey City, NJ
  977. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17394judith elins
    Please authorize an environmental impact statement before abandonment causes adverse effects to jersey city historic districts.
    richard palacio · jersey city, new jersey
  978. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17393Willow Latham
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Jersey City Embankment. Jersey City lies on a major avian migratory route: the Atlantic flyway. With increasing development along the flyway, stopover sites where birds can roost during there journey are increasingly far between and also increasingly vital. As a student at High Tech High School in Hudson County, I have learned in various environmental clubs and courses about the importance of green spaces like the Embankment in cities for both human and wildlife communities.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  979. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17392Todd Burns
    Dear Sirs: I am writing to request an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed demolition of the Embankment. As a homeowner whose home is next to the embankment, I am very concerned regarding health risks that will accompany such demolition. One can only imagine what is in the soil of the Embankment from many years of rail car travel over it. This raises the concern that those of us who are in close proximity to the Embankment will be forced to breath in contaiminated dust and debris during the demolition process. This is just one of many concerns I have regarding this process. If you would like further input, please contact me at my telephone number or email addresss. Sincerely, Todd J. Burns
    Jersey City, NJ
  980. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17391Erika Goldbaum
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I am an American citizen and registered voter (in Harsimus cove area of Jersey City). I look forward to returning to a beautiful park in the former railway embankment.
    Paddington, NSW
  981. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17390Eric Bravin
    This project will have significant impact on the human environment and threaten local and migratory wildlife species. An EIS must be filed.
    Milford, NY
  982. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17389don sipley
    please authorize a EIS before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to the downtown jersey city neighborhood. the release of any contaminants in the ground is especially concerning.
    jersey city, nj
  983. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17388Catalina Carvajal
    Please meke of the Harsimus embankment a Park! it will be very important for me that the city will make a environmental study and not destroy this beautiful 6 bloks of history. if you destroy this will kill the essence of 6th st, it will kill my view and my kids future park
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  984. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17387Diana London
    Please do a full impact study. We really need more lovely green spaces in the center of JC
    Hoboken, nj
  985. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17386Jason Manuel
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  986. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17385D. Saunders
    I have read about this issue and I frequently work and visit the are. This should be made into a park. There are enought condos in JC already!
    Brooklyn, NY
  987. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17384Ashley
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  988. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17383Sharon Torres
    Please authorize an Environemntal Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment will lead diretly to demolition. The effects of demolition will lead to poor air quality, noise, vibrations, heavy track traffic through fragile histoiric disticts, possible flooding, not to mention habitat destruction.
    bROOKLYN, New York
  989. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17382Whitney Bernard
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment and/or demolition causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, wild life, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  990. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17381Susan Dunkerley
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Waco, TX
  991. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17380Maggie Ens
    Please do not make more condos instead please make a park out of the area referred to as the Embankment. The downtown neighborhood needs more parks for children and their families. There are not enough green spaces and too many cars, too much traffic. This is a time when dozens of chromium waste clean up sites dominate the psychology of Jersey City's citizenry. Do your part as city planners to make it pleasant for the folks that come across the Hudson from NYC to make Jersey City their home. Please do your job and plan for the quality of life today and tomorrow. Remember this is the Garden State, not an industrial wasteland for short-sighted politicians and greedy developers. We common citizens should have more beautiful green spaces and cleaner air, land and water. Make our children proud of you and Jersey City. They deserve the best and so all of us.
    Jersey City, NJ
  992. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17379Pro Arts
    I urge the prevention of condo development of the embankment. It should be made into a public park and nature preserve.
    Franc Palaia · Jersey City, NJ
  993. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17378joe chirchirillo
    there should be a full fact based environmental impact study before proceeding with this project. I lived in jersey city for 30 years and still own 2 properties there thank you joe c
    north bennington, vermont
  994. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17377Elaine Hansen
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Please do not allow developers to buy our local government's support and, once again, override the voices of JC's tax-paying residents. Thank You!
    Jersey City, NJ
  995. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17376Yesenia Beutel
    Please build a park instead of a condo! We need more parks in the commuinity. The children are our future.
    Cranford, NJ
  996. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17375Nicole Stanton
    Please do not develop the Embankment. Jersey City needs more green space. Let's make it a park for our community!!!
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  997. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17374Gabriela Traistaru
    Hi, I am writing this petition in order to stop the demolition of the old train embankment situated on 6th St. in Downtown Jersey City. I've been living in Jersey City for the past 6 years and i grew to love it. I've seen numerous changes since then. Unfortunately, the real estate developers don't care about the historical aspect of the city's architecture and how it affects us. I consider that demolishing the embankment is going to add to the crowdiness of the city, increase the parking problem, minimize the green lanscape of the city and last but not least, is going to affect our social life, especially those of us that live in the immediate vicinity. Therefore, i'm strongly opposing the demolition and i'm requesting a full environmental study of how this is going to impact the city and its people. Thank you for your time and for taking in consideration our oppinion. Sincerely, Gabriela Traistaru
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  998. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17373Jeremy Hierso
    Please conduct a full environmental study. Demolition will be a great loss for our community and future generations. Save the embankment!!!!!
    Jersey City, NJ
  999. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17372jeremy smith
    As a resident directly across the street from the embankment I will be greatly impacted with the demolition of the embankment. My main concern is the flood plane and the loss of the trees and soil that sucks up the ground water. I currently have a stream of ground water that runs through my sub-basement , i can't imagine the impact of losing the embankment and how much worse the flooding would increase. PLEASE do an environmental study to see how this change would impact our homes thanks for your consideration--jeremy smith
    Jersey City, NJ
  1000. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17371James Cornell
    Conrail and partner are currently seeking permits to demolition a large abandoned site that runs through the heart of Jersey City’s Historic District and at least two residential neighborhoods. It is Conrail’s blatant neglect of this site for decades that warrants a thorough and independent environmental impact study of this property. It is imperative that such a study be preformed to ensure against any possible adverse effects that the development of such a site could have on Jersey City’s neighborhoods and families. The released contaminants from such a large scale demolition will undoubtedly cause issues with concern to the health and welfare of our communities’ families. This situation calls for a federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and its citizens.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1001. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17370Alicia Kurzer
    Surface Tranportion Board should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision-makers have the best information available to them.
    New York, NY
  1002. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17369Andrew Wilson
    As a resident of Jersey City, it is very important to me to have a full and fact-basedEnvironmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. The Embankment is an amazing resource which has deep historical and cultural importance for our growing city. Please make sure that we take care of it and take the time to measure the impact of any development. Given the location of this property, a park would seem to be the best use.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1003. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17368Jasmine Graf
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1004. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17367Jennifer Rossi
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  1005. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17366Lorin Emile
    Please save this historic landmark.
    Adesuwa Ehimwenman · Jersey City, NJ
  1006. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17365Lorin Emile
    My apartment faces one one of the embankment lined blocks. The view from my third floor apartment is amazing. I am in favor of the preservation of this historic landmark and support it's use as a park. Planting more trees would be an environmental asset in this densely populated, urban area. The embankment adds a certain charm and character to the our community and it would be a great loss were it be demolished.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1007. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17364William C. Donohue
    Dear Sir/Madame, I am writing to comment as a local concerned citizen regarding the Surface Transportation Board’s assessment of what is locally referred to the 6th Street Embankment and as referenced in the docket number in this form. I am an individual who was born in Jersey City and whose family was fundamentally instrumental to the founding of St. Aloysius R.C. Church and the development of Jersey City during the early 20th Century. I have served as president of the Van Vorst Park Association and the boards of various other community organizations and continue to do so. I am committed to and concerned about Jersey City and hope you will assess your commitment to your responsibilities as rigorously as I assess my own. I start only with this reference to myself in order to highlight our shared commitment to serving our community. One of the mandates of the Surface Transportation Board as it is stated in the board’s own documents’ relating to the environment is as follows: “Under NEPA, the Board must take into account in its decision making the environmental impacts of its actions, including direct, indirect and cumulative impacts. The Board must consider these impacts before making its final decision in a case.” My only request of the board is that it fulfill this obligation it has made to the community. By authorizing an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment of the 6th St. Embankment property causes potentially severe adverse effects to jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families the board will be fulfilling that obligation. Please don’t abandon your responsibilities. We as a community have not abandoned ours and share your fundamental commitment to serving the best interest of this and future generations just as my family has throughout its own history here in Jersey City. Regards, William C. Donohue
    Jersey City, NJ
  1008. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17362Erica H Dixon
    Please authorize a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. As someone who lives directly across from the Embankment, I am highly concerned that there has been no Environmental Impact Study conducted! It seems obvious to me that if Conrail abandons and demolishes the Embankment, as a close resident I will have to deal with numerous possible health threats. Issues such as dust and air quality - not to mention the release of contaminants! Then there's the resultant heavy noise, vibrations and truck traffic through fragile and historic districts, and possible flooding. As a resident I can also attest to the fact that the Embankment serves as a major wildlife refuge to many local species of animal and bird, the loss of which would be a disgrace to say the least. The abandonment and consequent destruction of such a valuable cultural, historic and environmental resource would be a tragedy for Jersey City. As a resident that daily enjoys the tranquil view of the Embankment from my bedroom window, I can honestly say that I do not know if I would continue to live here. I urge you - at the very least - to authorize an Environmental Impact Study before Conrail's continued neglect (over decades!) leads to demolition and the loss of such a precious landmark and resource. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1009. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17361Melissa
    The 6th Street embankment is a beautiful part of not just my neighborhood, but of all downtown Jersey City. Those stone walls belong & live there, just like the brownstones of historical downtown. I can't imagine walking home without passing by the embankment. It would be very sad, it wouldn't feel like home anymore.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1010. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17359Steven Davison
    I am writing in regarding to the Embankment (rail) property in Jersey City. I urge you to require an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) before coming to any decision regarding this property. It appears that developers are trying to circumvent required processes and bulldoze a perfectly good public space in the name of greed. Regards, Steve Davison.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1011. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17358Dale Hardman
    The Harsimus Stem, better known as the Embankment", was reviewed by the the SEA of the STB and issued a preliminary EA that does a grave injustice to this community of Jersey City, as a full Environmental Impact Statement is due and has in fact been called for by many local, Jersey City Municipal Government, Hudson County and NJ State Organizations as well. Even the NJ State Historic Preservation Office has called for a full EIS and listed the Embankment as one of the major NJ Historical Sites of Preservation endangered in NJ. I have lived in downtown Jersey City for over 25 years, and during that time the Embankment has meant much to everyone here for it's historic, and potential for a National connection with the Greenway Alliance that provides over 3,000+ miles from Maine to Florida available as both a walk, bike and open space park for not just the local community, but for NJ State and regional significance as well. None of that can be done by the demolition of this site due to not doing a full EIS. Just a few reasons there is need for a Full EIS,please consider the following: *Abandonment of Embankment-this will lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partnerS are seeking permits now) *Effects of demolition of massive structure (The Embankment) on *air quality-The Embankment sits midway between many Federal Historic District Neighborhoods including Harsimus Cove (where I live) and Hamilton Park. Demolition of the Embankment will impact these neighborhoods drastically as demolition will expose all to toxins at site that will become airborne. *dust-The amount of dust raised by demolition and then become airborned will affect the entire neighborhoods, not just Embankment, and is another reason for a full EIS! *noise-Demoliton will require excess neiborhood noise *vibrations-Demolition will cause many vibrations affecting neighborhoods homes and peace of mind. *heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts-This will be very dramatic if allowed caused by site building on Embankment *damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile-Many homes will be damaged due to demoliton of the Embankment *removal of a cultural resource-There is a 150 year history of the building not only of America's Industrial Revolution starting here in Jersey City and the Harsimus Stem of the Embankment contributed to this early part of US History. *health-Suits may arrive out of the issuing of a Demolition permit as caused by not doing a full EIS. Demoliton would cause many health problems to those with compromised lungs, heart, nasal and neurological damage caused by demolition as a result of not doing a full EIS *flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain)-It has been esitmated by the MUA, that it would take $150M+ to accomodate new infrastructure repairs to improve downtown flooding. The Embankment provides a major berm absorbing excess stormwater. *water quality-There could be an increased burden on combined sewers and the release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary impacting fish, wildlife) *release of contaminants-Demoliton of the Embankment could release toxins buried underneath and allowed to escape and impact both health and quality of life in downtown neighborhoods. *habitat destruction-We have seen that the Embankment provides habitat for migratory birds, monarch butterflies, rabbits, possums, herons, and many local flora and fauna. *ecosystem-The Embankment is part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack, a greater ecosystem than just our neighborhoods. *cultural loss-Holy Rosary has a very historic festival and Italian community, that demolition of the Embankment would impact negatively. (loss of grade-separated transportation-The Embankment structure is ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic and the Mayor of Jersey City, along with City Council support using this established rail corridor structure for lite or Bus transit which would be lost by demoliton. *loss of light rail-The Embankment is a site for potential linking Secaucus to Hudson waterfront, which would be lost if Embankment is demolished *loss of light freight opportunities-With the increase of petroleum, rail frieight has become a cheaper way to deliver goods, all lost if Embankment destroyed. *Failure of Conrail’s developer partner-By not submiting environmental sampling study to STB, relative to the Embankment, Conrail and partner jeopardize and impact the Environment without a full EIS! The above are a few reasons for why a full EIS is called for but there is also the need for your federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens with the lack of follow-through and due diligence required in this matter. I refer you to Mr. Montaigne's brief and comments for more judicious reasons for doing a full EIS, but in the 25+ years I've lived here, the Embankment is most important of what bridges a historical structure that if not demolished, can provide more than condos, but open space and part of a National Greenway that would make all of NJ proud. I therefore beseech the SEA request that a full Environmental Impact Statement be required and that no work shall be approved without such an EIS. Thank you for your time."
  1012. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17357Anna Grady
    Please authorize a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. It is very important to me as a Jersey City resident.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1013. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17356William S. Lewis
    Jersey City is a lovely city! What you're planning to do will have a severe,adverse impact on its environment - air, noise, health, habitat destruction, release of contaminants - the overall quality of the city and its residents. Will you, Bush-like, ride roughshod over people and their rights? At the very least, how about an EIS to reveal the degree of degredation? Sincerely, William S. Lewis
    Philadelphia, Pa., Pennsylvania
  1014. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17355Liza hataf
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Prospect park, NJ
  1015. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17354Michael Flinck
    Hello, I am a Jersey City resident and I believe that the Surface Transportation Board should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision-makers have the best information available to them. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should be issued for the Harsimus Branch Embankment in order to fully assess the consequences of abandonment and possibly demolition of the historic landmark. It would be irresponsible of the STB to allow abandonment and demolition without a thorough study of the effects. Thank you Michael Flinck Jersey City Resident 646-251-2890
    Jersey City, NJ
  1016. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17353Marc Simon
    I am a resident of Jersey City and am very concerned that the pressures to overdevelop our neighborhood are causing a lack of concern with respect to basic development issues. It is imperative that a full and accurate Environmental Impact Study be made of the entire Harsimus Branch. Abandonment of the branch is hastening decay of this extremely large structure. It needs to studied and stabilized, not demolished. Its scale, location, and impact on our neighborhood is enormous, and only a full and factual EIS will provide the requisite data concerning its condition and future. Thank you, Marc Simon
    Jersey City, NJ
  1017. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17352Rodney Reyes
    I want a full and fact-based environmental study of the entire harsimus branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1018. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17351Alexandra Levin
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision-makers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1019. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17350Liz Long
    Our company is in full support of preserving the embankment on 6th street. Its abandonment or demolition is totally unacceptable to our community!
    Jersey City, nj
  1020. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17349Let's Get Dirty Together
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision-makers have the best information available to them.
    Nisha Moodley · Jersey City, NJ
  1021. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-173486th Street Embankment Preservation Coalition
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision-makers have the best information available to them. I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. As a long-time Jersey City resident, I ask this for historical, cultural, and environmental reasons.
    Patricia Szymanski · Jersey City, NJ
  1022. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17347Amie Figueiredo
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Effects of demolition of massive structure on § air quality § dust § noise § vibrations § heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts § damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile § removal of a cultural resource § health § flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) § water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) § release of contaminants § habitat destruction § wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species § ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) § cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community § loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic § loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront § loss of light freight opportunities Inadequate studies done of contaminants Failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB Need for federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens Environmental justice issues Conrail’s neglect of site over decades and continuing bad faith seeking demolition permits
    Jersey City, NJ
  1023. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17346Ryniee DeCheser
    Before any demolishing take place of the embankment, we residents want to know what kind of health risks we are subjected to and have a right to know.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1024. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17345Newport Neighborhood Association
    Please authorize a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Statement of the entire Harsimus Branch. Abandonment would cause severe adverse effects to this critical Jersey City historic landmark as well as the citizens who live near the Embankment. Living on the waterfront, destruction of this embankment would cause not only great disruption to the daily lives of local Jersey City residents via large amounts of noise and traffic, but would also severely lessen the air quality of the neighborhood; displace all the wildlife currently living in the embankment, and generally ruin a large cultural and aesthetic part of what makes living in this neighborhood so appealing. I’m also very concerned about flooding, as the embankment currently helps absorb some stormwater - flooding is already bad enough in this part of town. Let's go forward the Coalition and City's plans for a public park for everyone's use in this densely populated City of Jersey City.
    Robert Vivien · Jersey City, New Jersey
  1025. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17344Keith Myers
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abondoment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. I have two young children and love living in the area. The resulting demolition of massive structures from abandonment will result in poor air quality, dust, noise, vibrations and the removal of a cultural resource.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1026. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17343Christine Goodman
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision-makers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1027. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17342Barry McMahon
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Minneapolis, MN
  1028. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17341Lillian Ribeiro
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Newark, NJ
  1029. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17340Christopher Graves
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    New York, NY
  1030. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17339JERSEY CITY LANDMARKS CONSERVANCY
    To Surface Transportation Board Officials: On behalf of the Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy - a not-for-profit 501c3 historic preservation organization founded in 1999 to preserve, protect and promote the architectural, engineering, environmental and cultural resources of Jersey City, New Jersey - I hereby submit this electronic comment in relation to the Harsimus Branch (Sixth Street) Embankment (Docket No. AB 167 1189 X). We find it incomprehensible - and shocking - that no complete environmental and historic resources impact study will be required for the right of way Conrail is seeking to abandon. How was this anti-preservation position determined? Can this STB action be explained to the citizens of our city? Consider the threat - consider the potential loss of historic fabric. Aside from the possible permanent erasure of the Embankment (1901-1905) itself, the site is flanked on both sides by two National Register of Historic Places districts: Hamilton Park (north) and Harsimus Cove (south). Its eastern terminus opens up to a waterfront vista; it southern terminus meets the ancient Prior's Mill forest (1836), Mary Benson Park (1899), and the Jersey City-Harsimus Cemetery (1831). How is it that all of these ancient perimeter resources are being ignored by the STB? The Embankment, it must be understood, is threaded through them. Although the imposing walls cut through the Downtown Jersey City area, there is the sense that they do not divide or draw lines. The industrial is infused with the residential. All is superimposed and therefore inseparable. If you rip out one site, you rip out them all. We ask that you order a full analysis and study of the Embankment. We insist. We take historic preservation seriously here in Jersey City - just take a look at our website at www.jclandmarks.org. And we expect all governmental agencies to follow proper protocol and allow a fair review process to unfold. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully submitted, JOHN GOMEZ Founder & President, Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy M.S. Historic Preservation, Columbia University, Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation
    JOHN GOMEZ · Jersey City, NJ
  1031. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17338Kit Sailer
    Please undertake a full and fact based Environmental Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I am concerned about the over development of Jersey City, and believe that the few existing open spaces, like the embankment, are important to retain as open spaces and made accessible to the public at large. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1032. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17337David Case
    The 6th Street Embankment should be park/open space. Before any thought of development there should be a full, science and fact based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Cove Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1033. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17336Matthew Caulfield
    I think there should be a thorough Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I have lived close to the Sixth Street Embankment for over 15 years. I am concerned about the adverse effects of abandonment and consequent demolition. These could lead to poor air quality, damage to nearby buildings, noise pollution, and disruption of the neighborhood.
    Jeresy City, NJ
  1034. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17335Tania Lindsay-Jean
    I want a full and fact-based environmental impact study of the entire Harsimus branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1035. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17334Veronica Houghtalin
    Please conduct a full Environmental Impact Statement to ensure that all of the impacts are clearly documented and that the granting of the permit is conditioned to ensure that whomever ends up with Embankment will be responsible to mitigate these impacts. I live in the downtown area and have for over 25 yrs., I see more hi- rise buildings half full and only low rise buildings for low - middle income people. The hi-rise bulding owners get tax breaks, and more tax breaks because of the warehousing of empty apt/condo units. They do not make good neighbors because tax braks and hi-rise deplete our public services. Please have the study completed. We need more open places and nature in the city not unruly humans . . and more hi-rise bldgs.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1036. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17333Heather Munson Rushforth
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Greensboro, NC
  1037. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17332Nancy A. Ghani
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch in Jersey City, NJ.
    Belleville, NJ
  1038. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17331Danielle Fotopoulos
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  1039. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17330Didier Jean-Baptiste
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. My downstairs neighbors in my condo have flooded in the recent past, which affects the foundation of our condominium building. I am, therefore, concerned about the impact that taking away water-absorbing soil can have on the flood conditions in our neighborhood.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1040. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17329Ava C. Thorin
    I live two blocks away from the embankment. I know from past experience that all railroad properties contain significant levels of environmental contaminents, including chromium and benzine, known cancer causing toxins. Since demolishing the embankment will cause the release of huge amounts of these and other contaminants, I, and my family request that an Environmental Impact Statement be conducted to insure that the health of my family and the residents of the Downtown Jersey City community will not be affected by any demolition/construction.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1041. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17328Terry Pearl
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1042. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17327Aida Reyes
    This is a request for a full Environmental Impact Statement instead of relying on information supplied by one source. I do not live in the area but I have a family member who does and who cares deeply about her neighbors and disastrous impacts on the people, their livelihood, their health, that the demotion of the Embankment will directly or indirectly cause.
    St Paul, MN
  1043. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17326Amy Miller
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. We do not need more condos. We need more parks, more trees, more greenery. This is vital to future generations that we not make this grievous mistake.
    New York, NY
  1044. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17274Cindy Cupolo
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1045. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17273City Council - Jersey CIty
    As a representative of this area serving as a councilman in Jersey City, I can attest to not only the need of a complete and thorough study, but also the long term dedication that residents throughout the whole city have given to the preservation of this space. I have been floored by their out spoken determination, and well rounded knowledge of the Harsimus corridor. There is a history of issues that will be impacted by any decision rendered from the STB including issues that effect open space, transportation access, potential air/ground contaminants, and flooding. Furthermore, the area in question is located between two historic districts with many residences that were built more than 100 years ago is located in proximity of 4 schools and 3 elder care facilities . As the nation moves forward in green initiatives and planning, since the City administration, elected representatives, and residents are asking for this study in such great numbers, this only makes sense to complete the study to the fullest extent.
    Steven Fulop · Jersey City, NJ
  1046. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17272Josh Urso
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1047. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17271Doris Cacoilo
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Please help this neighborhood and this community by really investigating what is best for all of us.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1048. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17270Michael Reyes
    Please consider doing a full Environmental Impact Statement. As a home owner, there are a number of issues that concern us, including: - noise - air quality - damage to our property - flooding - and so on.... We thank you for your full consideration.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1049. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17269Kevin M. Sirk
    To whom it may concern: My name is Kevin Sirk. I'm a new resident of Jersey City and I live directly across the street of the Embankment (~30-40 feet away). I became aware of the proposed demolition and redevelopment of this open space and I urge the STB to authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement assessment of this site. Since I live right across the street, I am extremely concerned that the removal of the hundreds of 1 ton stones will cause significant damage to the foundation of my condo building and to those belonging to other residents. In addition, all the streets surrounding the embankment are residential, so the increased truck traffic would cause the local traffic to grind to a halt for months on end. Plus the physical wear and tear on the streets could result in increased car repairs for many of the residents, including myself. I did my Ph.D. work (Carnegie Mellon University, Chemical Engineering Class of 2007) exploring novel ways of remediating contaminated groundwater, so I am well aware of the potential impact demolishing the Embankment can have on the environment. Since this was once a rail line, I'm sure many contaminants from heavy metals to liquids (oil, fuel, DNAPL, LNAPL, etc.) were once transported on this line and could have spilled onto the ground and permeated through the soil. Given the number of decades the train line was in service, it's prudent that someone accurately assesses the soil and groundwater for contaminants. Likewise, any excavation work would introduce dust into the local air and if those contaminants were to become airborne, they could have serious adverse health impacts on all of the residents and the wildlife. Finally, this space is unique to the culture and history of Jersey City. Many of the residents I have spoken to would prefer to see this open space converted into a park for everyone to enjoy rather than several new high rise developments. The park would enhance the sense of community and be a great addition to the neighborhood. Thank you for taking the time to read this. Sincerely, Kevin M. Sirk
    Jersey City, NJ
  1050. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17268Lets Get Dirty Together
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Melissa Ronga · Hoboken, NJ
  1051. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17267Ellen Broudy
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1052. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17266Melinda Mangin
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I lived across the street from the embankment for 10 years. I loved looking out at the greenery, watching wildlife and observing the seasons change. Please respect the embankment and conduct a complete study!
    East Lansing, NJ
  1053. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17265Julie Markowski
    I would like a full and fact based environmental impact study of the entire harismus branch.
    Jersey city, NJ
  1054. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17264Rod Scott-Thomas
    I urgently suggest that you authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed project. While I am conscious that there are limited resources available for the pursuit of such studies, I do believe that in the case of the embankment in Jersey City there are many factors that must be properly factored in and the people supporting the porject have shown marked disregard for the local community and its environs, both for people and for the ecosystem. Jersey City has been the location of a number of construction projects in recent years, with a noticeable impact on the quality of the air we breath, noise, dust and pollution. Adding yet another project without even assessing the impact seems a misstep likely to cause harm to people and given the nature of the embankment to remove possible future options. This land was, as I understand, sepcifically earmarked and landscped to allow rail transportation, which seem to be a type of infrastructure that we will need more and more of in future years. Allowing questionable transactions and processes to be fast-tracked smacks of regulators and ligislators unable or unwilling to do their jobs, in a grab for a fast buck that we've seen far too much of in recent years. Local residents do care about these and other issues, and we do not want the project to proceed. Please do everything you can to review the proposal, assess the impact, and prevent yet more people, noise, and pollution crammed into smaller and smaller spaces without regard for proper building designs and processes. Best regards, Rod Scott-Thomas
    Jersey City, NJ
  1055. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17263Beverly A. Rogers
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1056. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17262Melissa Ehn
    A full, fact-based environmental impact statement should be prepared before this structure is abandoned. As an architecture student, I have spent a lot of time studying the importance of green spaces to the urban fabric; it would be terrible to see Jersey City let this potential resource go without adequately considering the potential adverse impacts.
    Portland, OR
  1057. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17261Sean Hagerty
    To Whom It May Concern: As a resident of Jersey City I am very concerned and alarmed by the ongoing neglect of the 'Embankment' by Conrail - not to mention their continuing bad faith in seeking demolition permits. The Embankment is an historic landmark of cultural importance to Jersey City and should be utlized and preserved in such a way that benefits the city, its residents, and visitors - not destroyed. As someone who lives directly across from the Embankment, I am also highly concerned that there has been no Environmental Impact Statement conducted! It seems obvious to me that if Conrail abandons and demolishes the Embankment, as a close resident I will have to deal with numerous possible health threats. Issues such as dust and air quality - not to mention the release of contaminants! Then there's the resultant heavy noise, vibrations and truck traffic through fragile and historic districts, and possible flooding. As a resident I can also attest to the fact that the Embankment serves as a major wildlife refuge to many local species of animal and bird, the loss of which would be a disgrace to say the least. The abandonment and consequent destruction of such a valuable cultural, historic and environmetal resource would be a tragedy for Jersey City. As a resident that daily enjoys the Embankment, I can honestly say that I do not know if I would continue to live here. I urge you - at the very least - to authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before Conrail's continued neglect (over decades!) leads to demolition and the loss of such a precious landmark and resource. Yours Sincerely, Sean Hagerty
    Jersey City, NJ
  1058. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17260JC Family
    Jersey City is in need of green space. A raised park would be invaluable to the community. If it is demolished increasing the flood issues alone would be just one of the many issues that would occur.
    Gwen Shook · Jersey City, NJ
  1059. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17259Carin Sherrard
    We want the STB (Surface Transportation Board) to REQUIRE an Environmental Impact Statement regarding the demolishment of the Jersey City Embankment.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1060. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17258Brian O'Neil
    A full environmental study needs to be conducted to deteremine the impact of the demolition of the embankment. I have lived in the neighborhood of the embankment for 20 years (one street away), and really appreciate this magnificent historic structure. Tearing it out would rip the heart out of the neighborhood, not to say subject the residents to adverse environmental effects caused by the demolition.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1061. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17257Micheline Amy
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1062. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17255Patrick Werner
    I don not want the 6th street embankment demolished. I support the plan to turn it into a park. I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  1063. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17254Peter Jensen
    An EIS must be performed for this project. The embankment is so close to houses on either side that the dust, which undoubtably is contaminated due to the site's rail use, is a significant concern to all in the neighborhood.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1064. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17252Larry Zhang
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1065. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17251Jaime Durham
    To have a park along the embankment (the ultimate goal of the Embankment Preservation Coalition) would be such a fantastic asset for our community.
    jersey city, nj
  1066. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17250Timothy Snyder
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe damages to the environment and the historic community downtown. I own a property at 284 6th street that faces the embeankment. Removal of the embankment will decrease water and air quality and release contaminats into the community. Further, if heavy construction equipment comes moves in to tear apart the embankment, this could lead to severe strain on the old houses like my own.
    East Lansing, MI
  1067. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17249Andrea Zuckerman
    As someone who has lived in downtown Jersey City for many years, I urge you to authorize an Environmental Impact Statement on the Harsimus Branch Embankment. Abandonment will not only lead to the destruction of an historic landmark, but it will guarantee that an opportunity to preserve and improve desperately needed green space has been lost. Our local government has favored business interests to the great detriment of our quality of life in this area. There may be higher rents and more restaurants, but the quality or our air and our community connections have deteriorated immensely. Conrail has neglected the site for decades and does not deserve to take precedence over the interests and concerns of the citizens of Jersey City. Thanks you for your attention.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1068. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17248Anna Kettell
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Livermore Falls, ME
  1069. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17246Holly Budd
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Tearing down the Embankment and putting in condos would destroy a wonderful opportunity to create a benaficial green space that would create value for Jersey City residents and their friends. Thank you for your consideration. Holly
    Sunderland, MD
  1070. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17222Jon Wilkes
    The Embankment in Jersey City is an integral asset to our historic neighborhood. It help determine the fate of the community in the 1800's and is an oasis today in the midst of explosive neighborhood development. Let us remember the industrial past with the serene woodland setting that has replaced it three stories above the ground. There will be no second chance to create as asset for the community that has the strength of massive stones and the joy of woodland creatures in an urban setting. It is a unique community resource that can be shared by al who live here, not just those who want to exploit it for more congested urban housing
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1071. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17221Yiwen Ouyang
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersecy City, NJ
  1072. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17220Arun Gupta
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Jersey City needs more parks, not less!
    NY, NY
  1073. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17219Emily T Berges
    We need an Environmental Impact Statement because we desperately need to forestall the negative impact on our community that would be caused by the abandonment of the Embankment. Abandonment would have dire consequences for our safety and health. Our air quality would be severely compromised. We would become more vulnerable to floods. We would be deprived of a precious local green" place--within walking distance--where we can be close to nature, breathe fresh air, and peacefully socialize with neighbors in the outdoors. The complex system of wildlife that enriches the area--birds species, butterflies, small mammals--would be lost to us forever. This loss would be extended to other nearby communities, through interconnected habitats and migration corridors. Our diverse cultures would be diminished, as festivals and celebrations would no longer be able to use this traditional venue. Without the Embankment, all local denizens--humans, trees, plants, companion animals--would become more vulnerable to diseases and blights caused by contaminated water and noise pollution. Even our precious historic buildings would suffer from increased toxic exhausts and destructive vibration. We must have an Environmental Impact Statement to ensure and preserve the health of our community."
  1074. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17218Mark Welsh
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. All these effects of imminent demolition concern me: § air quality § dust § noise § vibrations § heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts § damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile § removal of a cultural resource § health § flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) § water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) § release of contaminants § habitat destruction § wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species § ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) § cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community § loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic § loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront § loss of light freight opportunities There are inadequate studies done of contaminants contained in this site. Conrail’s developer /partner has failed to submit environmental sampling study to STB. When will this occur?
    Jersey City, NJ
  1075. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17217Joanne Gifford
    Please do not destroy our little natural habitat for trees, birds, and wild animals. Our city is desperate for this bit of open and natural space. More environmental studies are needed, and trust once completed this area will be left as is.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1076. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17216Yssa Bobrow
    I want a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch before Conrail is allowed to walk away
    Jersey City, NJ
  1077. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17215Anne Pope
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Brooklyn, NY
  1078. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17214Maria Marin
    I think it is mandatory for the city to maintain a historical place like this. I, as a historian, know from first hand how sometimes the interests of a few had lead to the loss of such important places. Please, keep the parks. Please, allow this comunity to have traces from its past as we continue growing towards the future.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1079. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17213Paul Bennett
    Greetings, This is to urge the Surface Transportation Board to authorize an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) of the Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Branch Embankment so decision-makers have the best information available to them. Abandoning the Embankment without such an assessment risks immeasurable adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. The Embankment borders the National Historic Districts of Harsimus Cove and Hamilton Park and is itself a recognized historic site. It was entered into the State Register of Historic Places in 1999, is eligible for the National Register, and was named a Municipal Landmark in January 2003. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition. An EIA will reveal the likely health effects that demolishing the massive structure would have on the air and sound quality to local residents including children. An EIA is needed to inform the Board and the public of the potential dire consequences of demolition in the following areas as well: * vibrations * increased heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts * damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile * removal of a cultural resource * release of contaminants (studies done on them have thus far been inadequate) * flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) * water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) * habitat destruction of wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and many local species * ecosystem destruction (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) * cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community * loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic * loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront * loss of light freight opportunities It should be noted that Conrail’s developer partner has failed to submit an environmental sampling study to the Board. Rather than destroy the Embankment, why not care for it as a much needed greenway in a densely-developed urban environment located six blocks from the Holland Tunnel? An open space full of the wonder and beauty of vegetation and wildlife for all to enjoy is an oasis in such a setting. Like most children and adults alike, I derive enormous pleasure from exploring and relaxing in nature. It's contemplative and recreational. It provides mental and physical health benefits as well. Please authorize an Environmental Impact Assessment for the benefit of the Jersey City community. Sincerely, Paul Bennett
    New York, NY
  1080. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17212David Jehn
    There are dozens of homes in the Historic Districts adjacent to the Embankment which were built in the mid nineteenth century before the re-introduction of cement mortar. The homes, including mine, arebcomposed of bricks held together with mortar composed of lime and sand. These masonry buildings are very fragile and the vibration from the demolition of thecEmbankment is highly likely to damage them irreparably. If the demolition goes forward the developer should be required to hold the adjacent homeowners harmless. This would mean that the developer should be required to photographically document the exterior walls of the adjacent buildings within 500 feet of any demolition and provide a security deposit and an insurance policy sufficient to repair many millions of dollars of expected damage to irreplaceable historic buildings.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1081. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17211Ellen Gaulkin
    The destruction of treasures like the Harsimus/Penn RR Sixth Street Embankment diminishes the fabric of our urban landscape. At best, an environmental study for enlightenment as to its historical significance and physical elegance is warranted.
    Weehawken, NJ
  1082. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17210Althea Bernheim
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch located in Jersey City. This is an open space that is rich and unique in its history. As a professional archivist I have dealt with preservation issues throughout New Jersey. I strongly believe that not everything needs to be preserved. This is why I do not make the decision to preserve the Harsimus Branch lightly, but I wholly support a full study of this open space as this is the only way to allow the people of Jersey City to make an informed decision on how the little available open space is treated. As a community activist for all of Jersey City and as a resident and leader of the Hilltop Neighborhood Association, I again reiterate the need for this study. This open space is not in our neighborhood, but our city government is telling us that included in their plans to redevelop Journal Square, where our neighborhood is located, is to link the huge planned open green space in the square to the Harsimus Branch. Our community has worked with the City government in good faith with the belief that this open space be the center piece of what will be a very disruptive redevelopment project. I am asking for myself, my family, and for my community that that the full environmental impact study be conducted. Thank you for your attention in this matter.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1083. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17209NJ Committee for the East Coast Greenway
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Dolores Newman · New Brunswick, New Jersey
  1084. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17208David DeCheser
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. I have a young child and am concerned about the potential for harmful particles in the air that could arise during the demolition of this structure. The back of our building is less than a block away from the embankment.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1085. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17207Paul Raitano
    I am writing to request that you consider the absolute importance and necessity of conducting an Environmental Impact Sutdy prior to making any decision regarding the Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment in Jersey City. We need to CONSERVE our open spaces especially in heavily populated cities. This is registered on the state list of Historic places and to even consider abandonement which will, in all liklihood lead to demolition is a serious concern which will have devastating results on the area surrounding the Embankment. I strongly urge that EVERY option to prohibit this abandonement be considered.
    Hazlet, NJ
  1086. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17206Jeremy Adams
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Brooklyn, NY
  1087. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17205Brooke Martin
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Gilbertsville, PA
  1088. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17204Raylie Dunkel
    The Emankment MUST be made into a park. We have far too many condos and not enough green space. For once, the decision should go to the residents and not the developers!!
    Jersey City, NJ
  1089. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17203Dan Ogden
    A full environmental impact study of the propsed Jersey City Embankment removal should be performed in advance of any permits being granted. A 100+ year old rail bed has significant toxins in it that may become airborne if diggin begins. There are also air quality considerations from the removal of so much vegetation. Further, other proposals should be heard. There are a number of options for the use of the space that would benefit the local residents more than new construction. Thank you for your consideration.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1090. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17202Embankment Coalition
    I would like to request that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be made with regards to the impending possible demolition of the Harsimus Cove Embankment. Thank you, Tom McGlynn
    Thomas McGlynn · jersey City, new Jersey
  1091. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17201Jonathan Cloud
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch area in Jersey City.
    Basking Ridge, NJ
  1092. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17200Rose Zayco
    I'm urging the STB to do a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) in regard to the Embankment in Jersey City. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1093. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17199Matthew Mohr
    The Embankment is like NYC's High Line. Much needed green space in our urban environment. I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  1094. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17198Embankment Coalition
    I would like to express my support for the establishment of a park on the 6th St. Embankment in Downtown Jersey City. The loss of this open space would be irreplaceable and represents a real opportunity to maintain a green asset for the City of Jersey City. Thank you, Tom McGlynn
    Thomas McGlynn · Jersey City, New Jersey
  1095. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17197Chris Fisk
    There is an urgent need for an EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) for the 6th street embankment in Jersey City as required by the National Environmental Policy Act. The proposed development of this property will significantly impact the air, water and noise levels in Jersey City. It will also have great impact on many other aspect of quality of life for bothe the people and wildlife in the area. PLEASE DON'T ALLOW SUCH IRRESPONSIBILITY AND GREED TO GO UNCHECKED. Please authorize an EIS!!! Thank You! Chris Fisk 14 year resident of Jersey City
    Jersey City, NJ
  1096. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17196Let’s Get Dirty Together
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I am against the following consequences of abandonment: -demolition (Conrail and partner are seeking permits now) -reduction in air quality -dust -noise -vibrations - heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts -damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile -removal of a cultural resource -health problems -flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) -decreased water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) -release of contaminants -habitat destruction--> I've seen animals there -impact on wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species -impact on ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) -cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community -loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic -loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront -loss of light freight opportunities
    The Common Man · Jersey City, NJ
  1097. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17195Allyson C. Johnson
    I feel it is important to authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1098. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17194Richelle Reyes
    Please conduct a full Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Embankment. I live across from it and the destruction of the Embankment, and eventual construction of high rises would significantly impact our neighborhood with young families. JC is also at a critical point at which many young families are moving here to have more space and live in historic neighborhoods, much like Park Slope in Brooklyn. The appeal for those neighborhoods is returning and is attractive for families working in Manhattan. Off the top of my head, immediate impact would be things like: Air quality Dust Noise Damage to buildings on two sides of the embankment for ½ mile. Release of contaminants Loss of an open space resource Loss of transportation corridor Environmental justice issues Heavy truck traffic thru fragile historic districts
    Jersey City, NJ
  1099. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17193Sally O'Driscoll, PhD
    The most important thing is for a full Environmental Impact Statement to be made. Anyone who goes to look at the Embankment can see why this is necessary: trains ran atop this large mound of earth, blocks long, for many years, dumping oil and other toxins that seeped into the soil. The first effect of demolishing this would be air quality: in this densely populated neighborhood (with three schools, a nursing home, and two senior living centers within a couple of blocks), one can imagine the vast clouds of toxic dust that would swirl up into the air the neighborhood breathes. Those of us who developed asthma after being near the World Trade Center on 9/11 know full well the irreversible effects of toxic dust on our long-term health. Next, let’s consider the vibration caused by such huge excavation: downtown Jersey City already suffers frequent flooding due to an inadequate and crumbling century-old sewer system that was never designed to service such a dense population. Large delivery trucks already often cause breaks in sewer lines in our streets – imagine what the concentrated effect of this demolition would be. Further effects of vibration: damage to our homes themselves, many of which were built more than 120 years ago, and will not necessarily withstand the enormous impact of such demolition. These are the immediate and obvious effects of the proposed demolition: there are other issues – the loss of a potential light rail branch, which would help reduce the traffic that is choking our neighborhood; the loss of a last piece of open space and a delicate ecosystem that could be used for recreation and passive enjoyment (once open space is developed, there’s no way to get it back). Downtown Jersey City is in desperate need of open space, since every empty lot has been built on, and there’s no more park space to be had. I have lived in downtown Jersey City for 15 years, and now live one block from the Embankment – I know that the dreadful impact of demolition and housing development would ruin our neighborhood, just as it is in the process of being revitalized in a very positive way, combining the old and the new. There is a far better alternative that takes all our real needs into account: open space, light rail system to improve transportation while reducing traffic, sensitivity to the cultural needs of the neighborhood, maintenance of air quality – these are our neighborhood’s real needs. Why throw all that potential away so that one developer can make money and ruin a neighborhood that he doesn’t even live in?
    Jersey City, NJ
  1100. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17192Ed Treath
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch! There is not enough parks and open space in the Downtown Jersey City Area. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partner are seeking permits now) Effects of demolition of massive structure on § air quality § dust § noise § vibrations § heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts § damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile § removal of a cultural resource § health § flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) § water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) § release of contaminants § habitat destruction § wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species § ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) § cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community § loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic § loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront § loss of light freight opportunities Inadequate studies done of contaminants Failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB Need for federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens Environmental justice issues Conrail’s neglect of site over decades and continuing bad faith seeking demolition permits
    Jersey City, NJ
  1101. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17191David Downs
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to an irreplaceable historic landmark in Jersey City / Hudson County / State of New Jersey. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition and the effects of demolition of the Jersey City embankment include a negative impact on: - air quality - dust - noise - vibrations - heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts - damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile - removal of a cultural resource - community health - flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) - water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) - release of contaminants - habitat destruction - wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species - ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) - cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community
    Hoboken, NJ
  1102. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17190David Barrett
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Minneapolis, MN
  1103. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17189Kim Bricker
    Per the Embankment in my neighborhood, I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. This is a wonderful green space for local wildlife that would be a shame to lose. We already have enough condo towers. Let's save some of the history of this neighborhood that makes it such a special place to live.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1104. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17188Let's Get Dirty Together
    Please require a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. It is the belief of Let's Get Dirty Together that this land would be an excellent place for an urban agriculture/community garden.
    Blane Friest · Jersey City, NJ
  1105. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17187Les Sugai
    This Conrail property is a park, and should remain in that state. Too much overdevelopment in the area
    Flushing, NY
  1106. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17186Caroline Eichberger
    I strongly request of the STB that a full Environmental Impact Study be initiated in regards to tearing down the Jersey City Embankment. I am a resident of the area and am concerned about the reprocussions of the demolition. There are many people and young children that are in the area that would be impacted by the potential poor air quality due to heavy machinery constantly in and out of the area, air quality due to the demolition of the stones, etc. I also am concerned about the impact to the buildings in the area that are in many instances over 100 years old. Please take time to research the impact of the demolition prior to approving the request.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1107. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17185Brian McGovern
    I live less the two blocks from the Embankment. My home and my neighborhood have been declared a Historic Land Mark. At first I did not agree with such preservations however to see how it helps preserve the quality of the neighborhood, I now do agree. Our neighborhood has become crowed and less and less green space in our down town area. Our only green area in this neighborhood is a small local park Hamilton Park which must accommodate children, pet owners, sports, elderly and soon residence from the new high rise across the street. . I am also concerned if the Embankment is lost traffic will increase on our narrow and already dangerous street. I am a home owner in Jersey City and prior I lived in Park Slope Brooklyn where green space was very important to the community. Please see the value, the Embankment can give back to Jersey City has green space. Please forward the full environmental study. Please do not remove the Embankment rather create green space for our residents and youth.
    Jersey City, new jersey
  1108. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17184Katelyn Belyus
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. I believe in all kinds of community development and a reorganization of existing structures in order to maintain a well-balanced and efficient neighborhood, including affordable housing and residential development. I'm concerned about the environmental issues inherent in demolishing such a large structure, especially one that had been used for industrial purposes. Demolition will most certainly cause air contaminants, a flooded drainage system, an imbalance in the wildlife, increased exhaust from trucks, a strain on our roads, etc. But most important to me is that we recognize that development and demolition are not necessarily the same thing. To me, a community thrives best with outside-the-box thinking, particulary during these tough economic times, and particularly by employing methods, ideas, and processes that allow for a unique brand of development. City planning needn't be solely for the high rise residential design seen in other areas (think: Hoboken), and it's important for Jersey City to carve its unique niche within green communities surrounding New York. The High Line project in lower Manhattan is a wonderful example of the fusion of green architecture while keeping in mind its residential constituency. Jersey City would be remiss in its duties to its constituents if it were not to analyze every option for the Embankment from every possible angle, whether it be residential, commercial, green, or a hybrid design. Our leaders have a true chance to do something different and personal, and without an Environment Impact Statement, they move forward without the full weight of analysis presented to them. It would be like building a home without any hammers; the Impact Statement is a necessary tool in order to make informed decisions. Thank you for your time.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1109. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17183Christopher Silk
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1110. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17182Katherine Gilfilen
    Greetings! I am writing with concern regarding the proposed demolition of the Embankment in downtown Jersey City. I have visited Jersey City on multiple occasions, and found that there is need for further green space for the community. My sister, brother-in-law, and 3-year-old nephew live in Jersey City, and would regularly visit the Embankment if it were transformed into a park. In the last couple of years, there have been other similar situations in the area, where old buildings or structures were demolished, and my nephew, who has asthma, was negatively impacted by those tear-downs and constructions. Why not provide a better place for him in the Jersey City area, versus building additional condos in an overly-congested area? The quality of life for the community would benefit from the preservation of the Embankment as a park rather than more, unnecessary condo developments. Sincerely, Katherine Gilfilen
    Raleigh, NC
  1111. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17181Andrew Lee
    I understand the developers for the Embankment at 6th St and Marin Blvd in Jersey City, NJ are looking to demo the 6 blocks so they can build high-rise condos. I am concerned about the environmental affect this act of destruction will have, and would like the Surface Transportation Board to require an Environmental Impact Statement. Your immediate attention to this matter is greatly appreciated.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1112. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17180Charles Rhee
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes adverse effects to our historic neighborhood. I am concerned with air quality, noise and most importantly the release of contaminants that remain unknown, if the embankment is demolished.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1113. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17179Peter Bilton
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, and neighborhoods. As a former resident of the Van Vorst neighborhood of Jersey City adjacent to the subject site, I object to abandonment of the Harsimus Stem Embankment without further study. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition of this important cultural resource, which otherwise has the potential to provide a future greenway and light rail corridor through this dense city. In addition, demolition will cause significant short-term impacts in the form of heavy truck traffic, noise, dust and debris, and potential long-term impacts in the form of damage to buildings in this historic district and release of contaminants contained within the embankment.
    Highland Park, NJ
  1114. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17178Heather S. Coady
    We want a full, fact-based Environmental Impact Assessment of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1115. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17177liz young
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    hoboken, nj
  1116. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17176Nancy Graf
    I live in downtown Jersey City and I am concerned about the impending development of the 6th Street Embankment as well as the full Harsimus Branch. My concern is with the the effect this will have on the environment and subsequently the people who live and work in the surrounding areas. I want a full environmental impact study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1117. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17175Zachery L. Feris
    As a resident of Jersey City and a member of a vegetable producing community garden adjacent to the Historic Embankment at Brunswick between 5th and 6th Streets, I am personally very interested in seeing that a complete, fact-based EIA for the entire Harsimus Branch occur. The quality of Jersey City's neighborhoods' air and the very soil in which we grow the food we put on our table risk serious impacts if this extremely important step in overlooked. Thanks for your sincere consideration!
    Jersey City, NJ
  1118. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17174E. Onorato
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1119. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17173Kevin Mayer
    As a former downtown resident of Jersey City I know about the embankment and care about this issue. I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Anything less would be a disservice to the people of the area and the valuable bit of wildness in an otherwise overexploited, biologically depleted and devastated landscape. Thank you for your impartial and public-spirited consideration of this issue. Kevin Mayer
    Freeville, NY
  1120. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17172gayle edgerton
    I am a previous Jersey City resident, long aware of the existance and fantastic green-space possibilities of the embankment. I was shocked to hear that this area has been slated for condo development. I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    New York, NY
  1121. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17171Beth Fischer
    I desire a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch Thank you
    New York City, New York
  1122. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17170Joseph Conte
    I would like to see a full environmental study completed on harsimus Branch Embankment
    New York, NY
  1123. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17169Scott Sayre
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Minneapolis, MN
  1124. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17168Amie Kollatz
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Richmond, VA
  1125. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17167Zachary Cuttler
    I ask that a full environmental study be performed for the Harsimus Branch Embankment. Demolition of this historic structure without a full study of the impact and other preservation options will be detrimental to the history and future of Jersey City. The Embankment appears to be a prime property for a unique downtown park. Thank you for your time.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1126. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17166Diana Irene Sosa
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  1127. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17165Joy Grimes
    Demolition to the Embankment would not only take an important part of Jersey City's History, it will destroy the home of some the city's beautiful structures. Looking out towards the Emabankment, whether the trees are in full bloom or covered with snow- it's a peaceful and serene site. It's something Jersey City hasnt had while I was growing up here, and something Jersy City needs to get away from the stress of urban life. When I was growing up in Jersey City, I hav never seen a hummingbird, woodpecker, or cardinal, and I believe they all live in the Embankment now. Do not destroy a beautiful home.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1128. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17164Thomas Swartz
    I live one block away from the 6th Street Embankment. It is a beautiful structure and should be preserved to the maximum extent possible. Limited development on the ends of the embankment would be reasonable, but before any such development should take place environmental impacts should be considered. The structure is very close to other buildings and development would cause negative environmental impacts to the surrounding area at least on a temporary basis.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1129. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17163Anna Lamm
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1130. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17162Scott Sovinee
    Please do due diligence and perform a full environmental study before considering demolition of the embankment. I seriously hope that demolition doesn’t happen and that the embankment is converted into necessary green space, which is rare in Jersey City. Besides the aesthetic considerations of green space, the embankment soaks up massive amounts of ground water during rains/floods. Downtown Jersey City is already plagued by a seriously antiquated sewage system (we’ve flooded several times ourselves); loss of the green space on the Embankment will only amplify Downtowns flooding problems.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1131. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17161Neil Vicars-harris
    As a resident of downtown jersey City, I request an EIS on the destruction of the harismus cove embankments. This area is full of children and elderly who could potentially be adversely affected. Many Thanks nh
    Jersey City, NJ
  1132. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17160Jessica Costantine
    I recently moved to 6th ST, right across from the embankment. Demolition of the embankment would be devastating to our community and to our home. We have a baby and demolition would mean that there would be many hazards added to our environment. Polution, both envirnmental and sound, would increase and would decrease the value of our home and community. In addition, we would much rather the embankment become a park or green space. I would like there to be a full environmental study of the embankment.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1133. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17159Madeleine Cohen
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  1134. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17158Nik Michalios
    want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    vancouver, Wa
  1135. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17157Pam Michalios
    Vancouver, WA
  1136. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17156Dylan Cohen
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  1137. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17155Vikki Michalios
    want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  1138. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17154Christine Wiltanger
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    jersey city, nj
  1139. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17153John Seroff
    This space would better serve our community as a public park than as yet more half-inhabited condominiums. Jersey City is continuing to strive for an identity; this green space could go a long way in helping establish that.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1140. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17152Jeff Yeager
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Accokeek, MD
  1141. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17151Debra David RA
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Although I no longer live in the neighborhood, I am tied to the Historic Downtown area by my work as a historically oriented registerd architect. My practice has focused on the Historic Downtown Districts of Jersey City. I presently have 7 projects within a 4 block radius of the 6th Street Embankment, but over the past 10 years I have completed at least 15 others. Therefore, I feel that I can speak with confidence to the great damage to the neighborhood that removing the embankment would bring. Removing the embankment and replacing it with housing would interfere with the neighborhood structure by introducing an enormous increase in housing that the current fragile infrastructure of city services, parking and transportation corridors. The historic neighborhood buildings around the embankment are mostly in a fragile state and as people are moving into these old rowhouses and renovating them, they must spend a great deal of money to first stablize them - as most of the buildings were built in the 1870's. A large intrusive construction project of this nature would surely have an impact upon the stability of the buildings at many levels, first the destruction of a large historic landmark and then the construction of too many homes, which will most likely require extensive invasive footings because of the poor soils in the area. The proposed construction of so many more residential units in this neighborhood would drastically affect the fabric and neighborhood feel of the area - it would not be the same neighborhood". Beyond that - the embankment is a historic structure which reminds us of our past. We would like to see further environmental study of the embankment - we feel that it would be detremental for it to be removed from environmental, historic and at a human level. Please feel free to contact me to discuss further. Thank you Debra David (architect)"
    Debra David
  1142. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17150Kyle Myers
    The Embankment requires an Environmental Impact Statement before touched. In addition the habitat and wildlife destruction would a great loss to the area. The possible effects of air, water and noise pollution must be considered on the people who live here!
    Jersey Ciy, NJ
  1143. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17149Linda Zimmerman
    Dear STB, I cannot think of a better idea than preserving the Embankment and its historical value by making it into a public park, which is what the Embankment Preservation Coalition has been fighting for for years. Moreover, I cannot think of a WORSE idea than to let a developer tear down the Embankment to build homes for a quick profit. Please do the right thing by the Citizens of Jersey City and put an end to the developer's challenges to the Embankment Coalition's worthy plan once and for all so we can get a park built during my lifetime. Thank you, Linda Zimmerman
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1144. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17148JCWPC
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision-makers have the best information available to them.
    Matthew Johnson · Jersey City, New Jersey
  1145. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17147Divya Venkateswaran
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1146. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17146William Paterson University
    There should be a full Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I have read about this issue and I have visited the area. This area should become a park and certainly not a high density development.
    David Horton · Wayne, NJ
  1147. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17145Jennifer Zarate
    We need to have the Environmental Impact Statement. I am concerned about the air and ither important qualities of life issues.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1148. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17144Toni Graves
    Please require an Environmental Impact Statement on the Harsimus Branch Embankment. Demolition has a multitude of deleterious effects, while preservation has as many advantages. Choose people and environment by saving this historic landmark which can become a vital asset to the community.
    Kernersville, NC
  1149. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17143shelley skinner
    As a long time resident of downtown Jersey City I can not express enough the importance of protecting the Sixth Street Embankment from condominium development. If you look at the Jersey City landscape there are condos as far as the eye can see. The Embankment is a wonderful and historic piece of land and means a tremendous amount to our community. I strongly advocate for its preservation and using the space for much needed green space for the community
    Jersey City, NJ
  1150. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17142shelley skinner
    As a long time resident of downtown Jersey City I can not express enough the importance of protecting the Sixth Street Embankment from condominium development. If you look at the Jersey City landscape there are condos as far as the eye can see. The Embankment is a wonderful and historic piece of land and means a tremendous amount to our community. I strongly advocate for its preservation and using the space for much needed green space for the community
    Jersey City, NJ
  1151. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17141longtime resident of Jersey City
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    stefania mccall · jersey city, nj
  1152. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17140Nathan Gruwell
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Please preserve the green belt!!!!
    Yorba Linda, CA
  1153. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17139Peter Gliatto
    I am writing this for two main reasons: 1. As a physician I am very concerned about demolishing the railroad embankment in downtwon Jersey City. There is a strong potential for release of lead and chromium into the environment. That section of the city is densely populated, and may young children live there. I myself have two young children and we live about 5 blocks away. 2. As a resident of the city, I would be very saddened to see the opportunity to make the embankment into a park squandered. There is a lack of park space in downtown, and the embankment could be a good connection between Harsimus Cove and the waterfront. In 50 years, the residents could thank us for protecting and enriching this space, or blame us for wasting such a great opportunity on more condos.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1154. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17138john j. hallanan jr.
    I am requesting an environmental study of this area. The developer who wants this property does not build anything but sells it to those who do build. He sees hundreds of apartmrnts and houses in an area which is clogged already by cars going to and from the Gold Coast." "
    Jersey City, nj
  1155. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17137David Landau
    Parks and open space are essential for a healthy community. I am requesting a complete fact-based (EIS) Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Portland, OR
  1156. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17136Paul Meyers
    Re: the Embankment on 6th Street I urge you to work to have it be preserved rather than abandoned, then demolished, then developed on. Preserving it would mean having passive open space, and would create a network of walkable, bikeable greenways within Jersey City. This would be truly wonderful for the people who live here. STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. Thank you, Paul Meyers
    Jersey City, NJ
  1157. (printed as 4/7/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17135Kirsten Greene
    I request that a full environmental impact study be completed before Conrail is allowed to abandon the embankment to have it demolished by a developer. I'm greatly concerned with how the potential toxins in the soil will affect the air quality. There will be immense amounts of dust and noise and an impact to the local species as well. Our children cannot afford to have their health jeopardized by this abandonment.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1158. served (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Decision
    39867Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION: (1) GRANTED THE EMBANKMENT PRESERVATION COALITION'S (COALITION) REQUESTS FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR FILING PETITIONS TO REOPEN AND REQUESTS FOR TRAIL USE AND PUBLIC USE CONDITIONS UNTIL MAY 7, 2009; AND (2) REJECTED THE COALITION'S CHALLENGE TO CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION'S NEWSPAPER PUBLICATION.
  1159. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17485Natasha Boobis
  1160. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17484Karyn Dembrowski
  1161. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17483Edward & Elham Beeson
  1162. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17482Lee
  1163. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17481Emily T. Berges
  1164. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17480Yasmin Meah & Peter Gliatto
  1165. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17479Liliane C. Freitas
  1166. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17478Sylvio Bastos
  1167. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17477James V. Conlin
  1168. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17476Ajoy Chandra & Katharine Griffing
  1169. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17475Henry Paul Sullivan Jr.
  1170. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17474Barbara Landes
  1171. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17473Allison Lee
  1172. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17472Linda Sofen
  1173. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17471Susan Khazoyan
  1174. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17470Julie Behounek
  1175. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17469Tamara Duker Freuman
  1176. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17468Colleen Kirk
  1177. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17467Kristin B. Burnett
  1178. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17466Thomas John Carlson
  1179. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17465William Ortega
  1180. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17464Sara Wolfe
  1181. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17463Jim Rife
  1182. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17462Michelle Jolliffe
  1183. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17461Cassie King
  1184. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17460Carmine Cuasundo
  1185. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17459Karen Vasey
  1186. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17458Gynine Visconti
  1187. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17457Bruce Morozko
  1188. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17456Jeana Sager
  1189. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17321Ann Gallagher
  1190. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17320Paula LHeureux
  1191. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17319Eryn Feinsod
  1192. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17318Ayda Erbal
  1193. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17317Gulseren Mutly
  1194. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17316Neal Kronley
  1195. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17315Walter Sidoroff
  1196. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17314Carmen M. Gandulla
  1197. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17313Christopher S. Bonini
  1198. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17312Frank Lorenzo
  1199. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17311Kathy Huze
  1200. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17310David Dunkel
  1201. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17309Eric Wigginton
  1202. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17308Clifton Bazar
  1203. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17307George Ramirez
  1204. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17306Elna Mukaida
  1205. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17305Guy Carillo
  1206. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17304Moshe Rozenblit
  1207. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17303Anthony R. Cucci
  1208. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17302Jessica Cepek-Graeve
  1209. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17301Carmen T. Guerra
  1210. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17300Owen Henry
  1211. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17299Mario Gonzalez
  1212. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17298William Benzon
  1213. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17297Aaron Dodd
  1214. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17296Sheila Kirven
  1215. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17295Khaled Dardirk
  1216. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17294Paul Ceregshock
  1217. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17293Lori Ceregshock
  1218. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17292Rob Dog Rizzo
  1219. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17291Iulian Paul Morise
  1220. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17290Anne Pollara
  1221. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17289Neal Kimball
  1222. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17288Susan Curry
  1223. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17287Frank Coletta
  1224. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17286Candice Osborne
  1225. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17285Jasmin Norwood
  1226. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17284Justine Mills
  1227. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17283Juan Mills
  1228. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17282Sonia Diaz
  1229. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17281Catherine P. Grimm
  1230. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17280Lesley Darman
  1231. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17279Anca Ariciuc
  1232. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17278Dragos Serseni
  1233. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17277Ricardo Melendez
  1234. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17276Samantha A. Lythe
  1235. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17275Dawit Kibreab
  1236. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17256Geraldine Tan
  1237. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17253Rose Rivera
  1238. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17247Basilio Rivera
  1239. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17245Emilio DeLia
  1240. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17244Alicia Kingue
  1241. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17243Saul Crook
  1242. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17242Jeff Salgado
  1243. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17241Tonia Chauvet Sura
  1244. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17239Mace H. Bell
  1245. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17238Jahn Bonfiglio
  1246. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17237Debra Freitay
  1247. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17236Ashley Sinnett
  1248. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17235Jon Doelling
  1249. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17234Lisa Strum
  1250. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17233Shana Dagenhart
  1251. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17232Jeff Monachino
  1252. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17231Tara Spilman
  1253. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17230Elizabeth LaBue
  1254. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17229Grant Kretchik
  1255. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17228Olga Villalon
  1256. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17227Raghu Reddy
  1257. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17226Kirti Vaidya Reddy
  1258. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17134Paul Pizzimenti
    As a registered Professional Engineer in the State of NJ (practicing in environmental and geotechnical engineering) and an owner/resident of 6th Street in Jersey City, I consider the demolition of the Harsimus Cove Conrail Embankment without due consideration of such work on the surrounding dense residential urban neighborhood NEGLIGENT. The possibilities exist to damage adjacent infrastructure and buildings and to spread environmental contaminants throughout the neighborhood. Given the history of subsurface environmental contamination throughout Jersey City, such studies are not only warranted, but should be considered standard-of-care. In addition, many of the neighboring structures and utilities are more than 100 years old and fragile. The vibrations caused by heavy construction may exacerbate pre-existing conditions or cause new ones. The effects of such work may result in individual and group claims and lawsuits in the short- and long-term if not studied properly and planned in advance.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1259. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17133Christie Freeman
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1260. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17132Jennifer McVetty
    I am writing to urge that an EIS be conducted for the Harsimus Branch Embankment. The embankment is a significant part of our local environment and has the potential to be productive for the community (as passive open space, etc) or destructive if it is abandoned or demolished, potentially releasing contaminants. Whatever the outcome will be, an EIS is a necessary first step. Thanks for your consideration.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1261. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17131Jenny Aleman
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1262. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17130Jersey City Parent
    I would like to urge the STB to conduct a full environmental study of the Harsimum Branch, before allowing Conrail to proceed with demolition. I believe the Harsimus branch plays a vital environmental role in Jersey City, and it should be carefully studied before you start demolishing pieces of it.
    Richard Narramore · Jersey City, nj
  1263. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17129Patricia Phillips
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. An analysis on the Harsimus Branch of the Jersey City Embankment will provide the necessary information for lawmakers and others to decide the future of a very important piece of land. This important land can be the green answer to an urban problem. STB can be the channel in which a city finds its answers. Thank you for your consideration. Failure to do a study, citizens will question the integrity of this board. I have faith in the STB as a citizen of the former, Railtown" of South Plainfield, New Jersey. Your actions will set precedence throughout the state of New Jersey. Thanks!"
  1264. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17128Mary Birmingham
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Upper Montclair, NJ
  1265. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17127Melissa LeBoeuf
    As a Jersey City resident, I am calling for an EIS statement (Environmental Impact Statement) to be done on the Embankment area prior to any proposed demolition. I am deeply concerned about the effects that demolition of this area will have on the environment & general quality of life in our area. This includes effects on & concerns about air quality, noise & increased traffic, health, release of contaminants, issues related to our flood plains, water quality, destruction to local wildlife & ecosystem, and loss of a light rails linking Seacaucus to the waterfront. I find it completely irresponsible for any agency to neglect performing such an environmental study before demolishing such a massive structure. Furthermore, I personally endorse preservation of this area to create a network of parks & walkable greenways & bike paths ... because this is what is truly in the best interests of Jersey City.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1266. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17126Steven Dressler
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement befor the abandonment of the embankment. I live around the corner - i park right next to the emabankment, i'm very concerned about the demolition of this structure.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1267. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17125Talking Politics
    I want a full environmental impact study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Conrail cannot just abandon and demolish this corridor, which is in a densely populated area. Historic neighborhoods exist side by side next to this corridor.
    Mia Scanga · Jersey City, NJ
  1268. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17124Mary Ann Sherman
    I am writing to urge you to comply with the National Environmental Policy Act and provide an Environmental Impact Statement for the Embankment in Jersey City!. Under that act an EIS is required for Federal actions that have quality of life implications -- and you know that the Embankment carries many! Conrail and its partner are seeking permits to demolish the Embankment which will have sever negative effects on air quality by generating enormous amounts of dust in a very populated residential area. It will create significant noise. It will create dangerous vibrations from heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts, damaging buildings on two sides for one-half mile. It also threatens flooding to this historic and residential area – there is no half-mile of fill to absorb storm water in the flood plain. It threatens water quality by increasing the burden on combined sewers, which are old and inadequate. It will severely pollute the area: It will release CSOs into the Hudson Estuary. It will release contaminants and destroy wildlife habitats of migratory birds and monarch butterflies. It will destroy important cornerstones of the local community. It will be a cultural loss for the historic Holy Rosary festival, key to the historical Italian community in downtown Jersey City. We will lose an important and needed grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for an urban area’s heavy traffic and a light rail linking Secaucus to the waterfront. We will lose light freight opportunities. Inadequate studies have been done of the contaminants that will be emitted into the water and air of a very densely populated area. Conrail’s developer has failed to submit an environmental sampling study to STB, as required by the federal law. This ridiculous omission burdens local governments at a time when they are suffering budget deficits of record proportions. This violates citizens’ rights and environmental justice. Conrail has neglected this site for decades. Its failure to seek demolition permits is unconscionable. How can you do this at a time when public transportation and environmental issues are now such critical and accepted issues in public poly. We demand and have a right under federal law for an EIS on this project. Mary Ann Sherman.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1269. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17123robin germany
    I would want to see a full fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Thank you.
    slaton, tx
  1270. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17122Margaret Weber
    I am writing to support a full environmental study of the entire Hartimus Branch. Conrail has neglected this site for many years and now continues to deny the interests of the neighborhoods affected by these structures. Legal abandonment will result in demolition of a potential extraordinary environmental, cultural and recreational resource unequaled in our urban setting. Demolition will also result in severe problems with dust, flooding, over development and loss of transportation options. A decision for Conrail's abandonment, and therefor for demolition, will signal government's cynical arrogance toward the democratic process which so many individuals and groups have participated in on the local and state level in order to save and revive these structures. Thank you.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1271. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17121Diane Branco
    Jersey City could stand to gain from a recreation center to keep the youth entertained. A park and a swimming pool would be a much better option for this.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1272. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17120Matthew Horesta
    I write with the hopes the Embankment in Jersey City will not be demolished. I moved to Jersey City six months ago. I was drawn to the community for many reasons, least among them was the sense the old beauty of the neighborhood in which I live. The streets of the Hamilton Park and Harimus Cove sections of the city are lined with turn of the century brownstones and mom and pop businesses. The buildings and the residents combine to give the section of town near the 6th street embankment a historic feel. I can imagine nothing which would be more detrimental to the very features which attract new residents and hold old ones to this part of town. I can also think of nothing better than to create a green space in an urban area.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1273. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17119Anne Millheiser
    I would like a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Chicago, IL
  1274. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17118Lucy Korn
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  1275. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17117Lee Slater
    I want a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch before Conrail is allowed to walk away. The right of way that Conrail is abandoning extends from the Hudson River waterfront to the Embankment and from the western end of the Embankment into the Village area and along an edge of the Jersey City and Harsimus Cemetery. The Cemetery is a Revolutionary War and War of 1812 historic site as well as a historic burial place for Jersey City families. A full environmental impact study for the whole right of way should help decisionmakers make good choices about this important corridor.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1276. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17116Audrey Doyle
    There must be a full Environmental Impact Study before any decision is made regarding the Embankment in Jersey City. Unnecessary demolition and inappropriate development will have severe negative impacts on the environment and quality of life of the entire surrounding community.
    Brooklyn, NY
  1277. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17115Eric Fluger
    Prior to a decision on the abandonment of the Harsimus Branch I would like to see a thorough study of the likely environmental effects of the proposed uses. I understand there are currently three. 1. Demolition of the embankment and replacement with residential development. 2. Light Rail right of way. 3. Park with bicycle and foot paths. The first option seems likely to pose some serious environmental problems. In the short term, the demolition process seems likely to have adverse environmental effects on the surrounding area. Longer term, residential development seems likely to increase density and tax the infrastructure of an area already on the verge of over-development and destroy habitat for local wildlife and migrating birds. In contrast, the other options seem likely to provide environmental benefits by providing alternatives to automobile travel, providing green space where it is needed, and enhancing community life by connecting several neighborhoods.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1278. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17114Jacqueline Winkler
    I am writing in response to a request that is before you regarding the Harsimus Branch Embankment. It is my understanding that you are considering a request to allow for the abandonment, demolition and subsequent development of the Embankment, a feature of long standing within Jersey City, New Jersey. As a former resident of the State of New Jersey and a frequent traveler through the area, I was stunned to hear that your agency was contemplating allowing for the abandonment of this feature and its consequent demolition and development by a third party that has no interest in maintaining the historical context of the community within which it is located nor using it as a vital resource as the community works hard to enhance itself. It is difficult to believe that you are prepared to make a decision regarding this critical issue without the benefit of an Environmental Impact Statement to fully assess the impacts of the decision before you on the quality of the human environment. As the lead federal agency tasked with making the final decision regarding the future of the embankment, it appears to me that the only decision you can make is that the change in use that will ensue if the embankment is abandoned by Conrail and subsequently demolished and developed without the full support of the local community is that the action will have a significant adverse impact on the quality of the human environment. As an environmental professional who has been deeply involved in the development of transportation and water supply infrastructure for almost 30 years, I am well of aware of the balancing act that is made as an agency weighs the costs and benefits of its decisions. In this new and exciting Green Infrastruture Environment I am requesting that you fully assess the impacts of this decision on the quality of the human environment via the preparation of an EIS. Based upon the information I have been provided to date it appears clear to me that you have not been provided with the information necessary to fully evaluate the proposal and complete the full public interest review. I look forward to having the opportunity to provide you with comments on that document. Thank you for considering my comments.
    Philadelphia, Pa., Pennsylvania
  1279. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17113Deirdre Kennedy
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  1280. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17112Nicole Stratemeier
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1281. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17111Dan Stratemeier
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. The Harsimus Cove Embankment CAN NOT be demolished. My 15 month old son and I walk up and down the side of the embankment every day when I come home from work. He touches the stone, runs up and down the grass on the side and we already have many wonderful memories courtesy of the embankment. It would be an absolute shame for it to be knocked down. It is one of the most impressive structures in our whole neighborhood. please do not allow it to be knocked down
    Jersey City, NJ
  1282. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17110Lynn Kuzma
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. This issue is the most important issue to me as a resident of Jersey City.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1283. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17109Sarah Neuburger
    As a previous resident of Jersey City, I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Savannah, GA
  1284. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17108J. Booth
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effect to Jersey City's historic district, landmarks, neighborhoods and families. Thank you.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1285. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17107Bethe Schwartz
    What's going on boggles the mind. We're talking about what's already been established as a pivotal part of JC history. Conrail did not properly abandon this railroad property, & did not properly sell it; STB rules for just about everybody else is that such a site be made available to an entity representative of the PUBLIC, not sold to a PRIVATE party. Despite the 3 million dollar price tag, that site legally sh/ not be the property of Victoria--vis-a-vis developer Steve Hyman. The City of Jersey City sh/ have had the opportunity to purchase it. Why sh/ Conrail have been immune to the rules & regs ro which others are expected to adhere. & the idea of demolishing such a behemoth while foregoing an environmental impact study is lunancy. Negative ramifications such as particulate matter, flooding, increased traffic, ecosystems & wildlife, & culture need to be part of the decision-making process.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1286. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17106Arden Keller
    Please pay attention to the embankment project and issue and EIS. This is such an incredible structure that speaks to our past and the era of the railroads. Look at those Stones! They are hand hewn. This is our history. It would make a great community space and landmark and begin give Jersey City the dignity it deserves. It is important to out citizens and families. Please consider it. Thank you. Arden Keller (a frequent visitor to JC)
    Delhi, N.Y.
  1287. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17105Rebecca Matthews
    I would like a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study done of the entire Harsimus Branch. Thank you.
    Amherst, MA
  1288. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17104Steve Krinsky
    I own a home a few blocks from the Embankment, in a wonderful but crowded urban neighborhood. The mix of people makes Downtown JC a great place to live and raise kids. But the lack of green space, the excessive high rise development and the increase in traffic threaten the neighborhood. The Embankment serves as a buffer, an historical artifact that holds the neighborhood together. And the potential for the Embankment to be a park is substantial. My kids play little league baseball near the Embankment, my wife and I bike around it. Please do not let it get torn down. Please do not let this urban environment suffer from excessive construction and unnecessary destruction.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1289. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17103Grace Malley
    As a 30 year resident of Jersey City, I urge the Board not to support the demolition of the 6th Street Embankment in downtown Jersey City. The embankment has become a natural habitat that supports wildlife; demolishing the embankment would be detrimental to the neighborhood. Development of the site would add density and traffic to the neighborhood; we have endured enough development and deserve some relief! Conrail has been very negligent regarding their property. The Embankment should be preserved for historical, environmental and planning reasons.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1290. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17102Dylan Morris
    The currently abandoned embankment area of Harsimus Cove in Jersey City would and should make a wonderful park. Elevated from the streets it would provide a quiet, safe respite from the city while benefiting the environment. Please perform a full public-land use and environmental impact survey before building more poorly constructed, ill conceived condos.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1291. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17101BD
    I believe this project has been obfuscated and mis-represented by most of the parties involved and would like to see a full environmental impact study of the project.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1292. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17100Jane Cunniffe
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Thank you for your time.
    Pleasantville, NY
  1293. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17099Jill Kelly
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1294. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17098Kathryn Klanderman
    I want a full and fact-based environmental impact study of the entire Harsimus branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1295. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17097Emily Machado
    Over two years ago, my husband and I decided to move from NYC to NJ. Wanting to start a family, we had the option to move anywhere – from Montclair and the Oranges, to Summit and Short Hills. After a long search we decided to buy a brownstone right across from the Embankment. The integrity, beauty, and history of the Embankment that we would come to look at each day played no small part in our decision to buy in Jersey City. And I am confident our neighbors would echo my sentiment. The Embankment plays a role in our life each day. Every morning my young daughter and I look out her bedroom window to talk about the trees and the flowers that grow so vibrantly atop the Enbankment, and she thrills at the idea of the history of this amazing structure. And each night, after a long day in the city, we walk our dogs up and down the Embankment, letting them sniff and explore in peace. I strongly encourage the interested parties to conduct an environmental survey of the Enbankment and it’s surrounding areas. The demolition of this majestic structure will severely damage the integrity of the Hamilton Park area as a historic district. Please allow this neighborhood to continue to enjoy this great piece of history, and allow our children, and future generations to enjoy it, and the beautiful plants, trees, and flowers it brings into our view everyday.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1296. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17096Megan Klim
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1297. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17095Jon Romberg
    I support a comprehensive environmental study of the Harsimus Branch in Jersey City, NJ. The implications of demolishing the Embankment concern me (I live one block away).
    Jersey City, NJ
  1298. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17094Neil Blundell
    I live directly across from the embankment and was disturbed to discover that plans are in the works to redevelop the property. One of the main reasons I purchased a brownstone in the neighborhood is because of landmarks such as the embankment. Its really a pleasure to look at the foliage during the summer and escape from the urban setting that I live in. I also appreciate the privacy that it affords my property. Please do not turn such a wonderful landmark into condos, it would really be a shame. Additionally, I would ask that an environmental study be conducted before any demolition take place. I would also look to be compensated for my inconvenience if any massive construction occurs adjacent to my property and of course, if any damage was caused to my 100+ year brownstone as a result. I think transforming the embankment into a park would be the best thing for the neighborhood and the historical integrity of the district. Thank you for listening. Best regards, Neil Blundell
    Jersey City, NJ
  1299. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17093Amanda Koch
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment. Please don't destroy the history and uniqueness of Jersey City blindly sighting advancement. Jersey City is a lot more and deserves to be a lot more than a bunch of condos. Please don't destroy a unique and interesting aspect of Jersey City for more cookie cutter condos.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1300. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17092Jacob Kono
    I believe that the STB should perform a full Environmental Impact STatement before granting Conrail an abandonment permit for the 6th Street Embankment in Jersey City. I think that dismantling it could potentially expose the surrounding neighborhoods to environmental hazards.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1301. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17091Roman Faizov
    My Name is Roman Faizov: I have visited Jersey City and seen the Embankment which runs through the old historic neighborhoods. To allow this monumental embankment to be demolished will damage the surrounding area in many ways. To give up something that is a rail right-of-way into the center of an overbuilt, super-dense urban area is totally insane. This could and should be used for public transport, if not now at sometime in the future. In any event, it is inconceivable that you have not done a FULL environmental impact study when so many people will be effected by this event. Please do the right thing. Conduct a full study so that all issues and dangers to the residents are fully undestood before you give a permit to Conrail.
    Moscow, Moscow
  1302. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17090JC Preserve the Resevoir
    STB should aquire a full enviromental study of the Harrison Branch so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Margo Jura · Jersey City, NJ
  1303. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17089Katharine Meyer
    My name is Katharine Meyer. I am writing to ask you to do a full Environmental Impact Statement with regard to the proposed abandonment of the 6th Street Embankment in Jersey City. Your Environmental Assessment is just not enough. Taking down this gigantic historic structure will cause all sorts of environmental damage. It is clear that you have not studied this enough. Abandonment will lead to demolition which will wreck streets and many homes near the Embankment. The natural resources on top of the embankment will be ruined with your having done a real study to see what is up there. Jersey City has one of most severe open space deficits in the United States, and the area in which the Embankment is definitely the most densely populated area in Jersey City. To lose this open space will effect people’s heatlth and welfare throughout the City. Please do not give the permit to Conrail before you have conducted a very thorough Environmental study.
    Rangeley, Maine
  1304. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17088Douglas Earl
    Need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). There are continual shady dealings from Conrail and they are hoping to get this slide under the wire just the way the Arts District got lampooned. The structures in place for the utilities are already overstressed.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1305. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17087Lisa
    Dear Mr., I am a current resident of Jersey City who is extremely concerned about the consequences my neighborhood will face if Conrail is granted permission to demolish the Embankment. I am begging the Federal Government to enforce the federal law, specifically the Environmental Policy Act that requires federal agencies to prepare Environmental Impact Statements for major federal actions that can have detrimental effects on the human environment. For example, by demolishing this historic site, many contaminants will be released into the water system burdening the sewers. Migratory birds and monarch butterflies will lose their safe haven. And, a cultural symbol will be lost for the Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community. These are just a few of the consequences. Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement to help ease the burden of our local government and citizens. Thank you, Lisa Fung-Kee-Fung
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1306. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17086Trustee, East Coast Greenway Alliance
    I urge you to require a complete Environmental Impact Statement of the entire Harsimus Branch in order to preserve Jersey City's historic districts and landmarks.
    Elizabeth Brody · New York, NY
  1307. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17085Elizabeth Reynoso
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1308. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17084Zoe Weber
    As a Jersey City native I want a complete environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1309. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17083Richard Wake
    Hello, I would like to see the Embankment remain undeveloped or turned into a park for the residents of Jersey City to enjoy. The LAST thing we need is more development in that area. Give us green space!
    Jersey City, NJ
  1310. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17082Village Neighborhood Association
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Abandonment will cause negative effects to Jersey City landmarks and historic districts.
    Benjamin Dorner · Jersey City, NJ
  1311. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17081Kelli Sayre
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Venice, FL
  1312. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17080Andrew Sayre
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Venice, FL
  1313. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17079Sue Nilsson
    Please authorize an EIS on the Embankment. The impact to those living around the area will be severe, and may even destroy landmarked homes in the area. The demolition will most certainly shake foundations, and at the very least cause pollution. It will also ruin a cultural resource and a resting spot for many migratory song birds. Each year I have noticed the number of flocks song birds who stop in the Embankment area. Removal of the embankment would most certainly impact many species of birds.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1314. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17078Embankment coaltion
    Please authorize an EIS before abandonment causes severe & permanent damage to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, wildlife habitat & migration corridors & air & water quality.
    lorraine russo · Jersey City, New Jersey
  1315. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17077Hilltop N.A.
    I'm gravely concerned with Conrail's abandonment and the potential long term consequences. While instances are few, corporate deniability for past actions has consequences too severe to be ignored. I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    james mikusi · jersey city, nj
  1316. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17076William Montgomery
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. The demolition of the embankment could: 1. have adverse effects on the air quality 2. cause dust, noise and other pollution 3. affect water quality 4. destroy habitat for wildlife Removal of the embankment will: 1. remove one of the few open spaces in downtown Jersey City 2. remove a cultural resource from the neighborhood 3. remove a possible light rail link to Secaucus and the waterfront The studies on this property have been inadequate. Please step in as the people of the community are not being heard. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1317. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17075Nancy Bergman
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Harmony, Pennsylvania
  1318. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17074Aaron Yassin
    I want a complete and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. This must be done on behalf of all of the residents of Jersey City and Hudson County deserve. Please do not delay in executing and completing this.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1319. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17073Anne-Marie Wright
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. As a resident of this area for the last 8 years, I have no doubt that any action to remove the Embankment structure would have serious and wide reaching consequences and it is imperative that the community and the decision makers have as much information as possible before any action is taken. It is my opinion that the trees and plants which grow on the embankment offers a great help in combating the often overpowering haze of smog which settles around the entrance of the Holland Tunnel. This is especially true with the thousands of vehicles that are often stuck in traffic with the engines idling. The embankment is a scant 1/8 of a mile from the entrance to the tunnel entrance and without this greenery I have no doubt that there would be subsequent air quality issues. In addition, I have observed the wildlife that have made the embankment their habitat. These include possums as well as a huge number of birds, both local and migratory. Again, any disturbance to this area could have a long lasting impact to this area. Lastly, any study must take into consideration the essential role that the Embankment plays in the drainage of rainfall and water runoff. The Harsimus Cove historic district, where the Embankment sits does not have an adequate sewer system, and as such, the Embankment filters thousands of gallons of water. Again, there should be complete information before there is any action taken which could affect this area and the possibility of flooding.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1320. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17072Barbara Boyles
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1321. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17071Matthew
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1322. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17070Jennifer Smith
    As a member of downtown Jersey City community for 11 years, a homeowner directly across the street from the Embankment, and a parent of 2 young children I ask that you authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Thank you
    Jersey City, NJ
  1323. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17069John Moore
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. This parcel of land should become a park for the citizens of Jersey City, NJ
    Jersey City, NJ
  1324. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17068Russ Shahani
    I want a full and fact based environmental impact study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1325. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17067Heights Hope Neighborhood Association
    Our neighborhood assoc. wants a full environmental assessment of this Harsimus Branch project. The Embankment is a valuable asset in a town that has inadequate parks. The acquisition of this land which was clearly preferred as a park by the public was wrong.We want a park.
    Mary Mills · Jersey City, NJ
  1326. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17066Heights Hope Neighborhood Association
    We want a full environmental assessment of this Harsimus Branch project. The Embankment is a valuable asset in a town that has inadequate parks. The acquisition of this land which was clearly preferred as a park by the public was wrong.
    Mary Mills · Jersey City, NJ
  1327. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17065Timothy Drouet
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I do not believe proper procedure was followed in Conrail's abandonment.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1328. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17064Ryan Conley
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment.
    Hoboken, NJ
  1329. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17063Elizabeth LaBue
    There seem to be several reasons for Conrail not to abandon & demolish the embankment(s): the desire of the people in our community to want to preserve the embankment(s), historical significance of the land(s), the release of possible contaminants, the need for green space & trees to counteract our increasing envionmental contamination, rather than more hi-rises. The community members of Jersey City & The Embankment Preservation Coalition want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch!
    Jersey City, NJ
  1330. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17062Marty Larkin
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Monmouth Beach, NJ
  1331. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17061Stuart Culpepper
    As a resident of downtown Jersey City, I will be immediately impacted by any decision to alter or destroy the Sixth Street Embankment. I insist the Surface Transportation Board conduct a complete environmental study before Conrail is allowed to give up, or transfer ownership of the property.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1332. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17060Janet Irwin
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Monmouth Beach, NJ
  1333. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17059Noaa Stoler
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I am an educator at Jersey City Museum. I believe my students need a park, not more condos and congestion.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1334. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17058John Colaneri
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment. This would be a great area to have a park for the city. The city needs more things like this and it would allow the residents to enjoy more of the city.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1335. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17057Christopher Cardinal
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I believe that the land in question is a great asset to the City of Jersey City as a refuge of open space and passive recreation. Jersey City has too few parks and too little open space--to lose this land to private development would add to the over-development in the area and harm the environmental quality of the neighborhood.
    Hoboken, NJ
  1336. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17056marcus fitzgerald
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Until an overhaul of the downtown jersey City Sewage system occurs the addition of any new housing in the downtown area will prove to be too much of a strain on an area susceptible to floodingand declared a flood plain. This land should be turned into parkland and not become an added burden on the city both financially , transport-wise after several 'shady' deals involving this property have already undermined the residents trust in their government and conrail.
    jersey city, nj
  1337. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17055katie Madarasz
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    jersey city, nj
  1338. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17054Bulent Morali
    I am against the demolution of the Jersey City downtown Embankment or putting buildings on it. It takes away the history in this districts. The Newport Mall has done enough harm by sperating the city into half. The Embankment can be turned into a park connected with small walking briges.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1339. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17053Samuel Weisgerber
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1340. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17052Yolanda Foley
    As a ten year resident of Jersey City, 8 of which I lived on 6th Street (right across from an embankment), I am very concerned about issues such as these that may have an adverse impact on the quality of life of my beloved JC! I am also very concerned with the historic preservation of the area, as the historic look and feel of the area was one of the things that first attracted me to JC ten years ago. Conrail cannot be allowed to walk away from the Harsimus Branch Embankment. I am an extremely concerned citized and I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1341. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17051Elizabeth Weisgerber
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I am greatly concerned about the safety and health of Jersey City's citizens.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1342. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17050Jillian Slane
    Please don't take away my friend's family park. Green space, especially in urban areas, is too important!
    Brooklyn, NY
  1343. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17049shelly fehr
    Do somehting for the citizens and tax payers of the city and county. Conduct an Environmental Impact Study on the Harsimus Branch (including the 6th street embankment).
    jersey city, nj
  1344. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17048Stephanie Werthman
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. I already live in a severe flood zone & among other factors such as health concerns, noise pollution & living in a 100+ fragile house, I & my fiancée would be forced to relocate. This directly effects all of my friends & collegues in the area who will be reviewing & commenting on this as well...
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1345. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17047Matthew Weisgerber
    I live just north of the embankment on Pavonia Ave. The shame here is that so many people's lives will be negatively affected by a development, and positively affected by the maintenance of this area as a green space. Wake up! This is the type of thing that enriches lives. Additional housing here will further erode the neighborhood. Thank you for listening!
    Jersey City, NJ
  1346. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17046Gerald Homan
    I implore STB to authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch so that the decision makers have the best information available to them. I see great potential in this embankment and do not want to see it destroyed. We need our open spaces in this urban environment!
    Brooklyn, NY
  1347. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17045Heather A, Wightman
    Dear STB: I would like to request a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Conrail's abandonment and demolition of the railroad embankment would have a negative impact on the local air quality, create noise, lead to heavy truck traffic through fragile historic district, damage buildings on two sides for one-half mile, remove a cultural resource, exacerbate a stormwater absorption problem in an area already probe to flooding, negatively affect water quality by increasing the burden on combined sewers, destroy a habitat for local wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species. Additionally, it would destroy the character of a neighborhood and, as stated, take away what has become important green space. Please conduct an environmental review before any drastic measures are taken. Many thanks for your time.
    JERSEY CITY, NJ
  1348. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17044david watson
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I love green space, we need more.
    brooklyn, ny
  1349. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17043Mattias Gustafsson
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I live right next to it and I need to know. Thank you
    Jersey City, NJ
  1350. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17042Betz White
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. J City needs green space!
    North Potomac, MD
  1351. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17041Linda D'Esposito
    Representing myself, a former Jersey City resident and frequent visitor, I implore you to authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. I frequently cycle through that area on my way to see various clients and visit stores in that area. The dust and rubble will make that impossible for me. In addition, it will cause irreparable damage to the wildlife in that area, particularly migratory birds and monarch butterflies, already sruggling because of all the degraded habitat along their route - and for other wild animals who make this area their home. In addition, it will deprive residents of that area a place to relax in and make it difficult for Holy Rosary to hold their fair.
    North Bergen, NJ
  1352. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17040Clay Sherman
    An Environmental Impact Statement for the 6th Street Harsimus Stem Embankment is essential for the wellbeing of the surrounding community. The site is on every major list of preservation from the Jersey City's Landmarks Conservancy, Hudson County's Open Space Plan, New Jersey's Historic List and listed in the Federal EPA's Priority Acquisition and Restoration Sites. On top of all of that it is listed in the regional East Coast Greenway Plan. These are just a few of the issues that need to be looked at more closely as part of the EIS that should be performed.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1353. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17039Alice
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  1354. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17038J Jarema
    As nearly a lifelong resident of Jersey City, I respectfully ask that the Surface Transportation Board require that Conrail perform a full Environmental impact study on the Entire Harsimus Branch before being abandon and demolish by Conrail. That route transported freight of various chemical and other hazardous materials. Currently, there are many residents and other people, including children who live and play in this area. They should know and made aware of any hazardous materials that may be in the area. As you probably know, the Harsimus Cove embankment was the life-line to the Historic Jersey City Warehouse district. (see http://www.jclandmarks.org/nomination-warehousedistrict.shtml) The Harsimus Cove South which was the railroad shipyard was a brownfield site. A site assessment revealed that the site contained petroleum compounds and the soil contained lead." (see page 20, http://cei.org/pdf/1782.pdf) Please reassure the City of Jersey City and the residents that our health and safety will not be comprised. Thank you for your attention. John Jarema Resident and native of Historic Jersey City."
  1355. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17037Anthony Protopapas
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement to explore the consequences of demolishing the Embankment. The lost opportunity to develop its unique properties into a combination of light rail and open space should be considered as part of the environmental cost to approving demolition. It should also be considered that while Jersey City is relatively small, it is one of the densist cities in the country (over 16,000 per sq mile). As such the notion of environmental impact" has broader meaning for air pollution, congestion and livability. Losing the elevated right-of-way of the embankment means forever losing the chance to make environmental progress in our neighborhood. Thank you for considering my comment. -Anthony"
  1356. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17036Liz Allen
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. As a citizen of the earth who desires to breathe clean air and hear the song of birds, I think it is vital that we conserve our open spaces. Here in Phoenix we have some amazing open spaces ie South Mtn Park and Piestawa Peak. These parks enhance my quality of life and make it possible for me to live in the city.
    Phoenix, AZ
  1357. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17035James Gouijn-Stook
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I live directly behind the Embankment and my home has flooded twice. What is the impact of flooding in Downtown Jersey City if the Embankment disappeared?
    Jersey City, NJ
  1358. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17034Robert Gaul
    We need a full environmental impact study on the embankment project. Regardless of the over developement that this particular project will contribute to in Jersey City, it would be irresponsible to allow it to continue in light of the loss of green space that necessitates it. Please realize the urgency of this request and the delicacy of the enviroment requires an immediate investigation of the how environment will be effected. Thank you.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1359. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17033W C Woods
    I am writing to support the citizens of Jersey City in their desire that an Environmental Impact Statement be issued before the proposed condominiums on the Harsimus Branch Embankment are authorized. Thank you.
    Coatesville, PA
  1360. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17032Tim Keating
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1361. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17031Heights Hope
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I want to preserve as much of Jersey City's history, architecture and greenspace as feasible as an antidote to too much recent under-thought over-development.
    pam shaw · jersey city, nj
  1362. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17030William Murray
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, and neighborhoods.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1363. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17029Shannon Leckey
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1364. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17028Elizabeth Ceccio
    I have lived in Jersey City for nearly 12 years. The lack of open green space is sad and the over building of now unsellable condo buildings in potential green space is a travesty. Local elementary public schools don't even have outdoor playgrounds! I also graduated from the Historic Preservation program at Columbia Univ. that first helped to identify the historic neighborhoods in downtown that became the current districts. These historic designations have done so much for the community - retaining character, home values, and local economics. Please, please take a look at the Embankment Park option as these could have as much if not even more impact on the quality of life for Jersey City residents now and in the future on many, many levels. Please respect the City and not let developers run how the future of the city unfolds. These historically significant embankments that played such a historic role in the history of JC and the region shipping corridor should at least be honored by a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1365. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17027Mr. Robert Meyer
    Jersey City is in need of an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Stem Embankment Project. As a resident of New Jersey, I am writing out of concern for the health of this Landmarked Structure, as well as the health of the people who live in proximity to the Embankment. The six elevated blocks that make up the old railroad stone walls are a marvelous opportunity to make a walking trail in the middle of a city, which desperately needs more parks. The Amount of new development in Jersey City is immense and although some of the growth is beneficial, much also remains uninhabited and yet the building continues. What scares me is the lack of parks for such a huge amount of anticipated residences. Some of the open spaces that developers are claiming, are in fact, only for their fenced in “Private Communities”. I feel that this is an outrage! I am also worried for those who live in the area of the Embankment, if demolition is allowed to take place. What about the contaminants that have settled deep in to the soil over the past 100 years? Won’t those particles then be airborne and putting the neighbors at risk? It seems this would be a tragic mistake. Why not allow the walls to stay and instead use the space as a garden, allowing the plant growth to naturally take out many of the toxins and simultaneously produce oxygen so desperately needed in the city environment. Please consider and respect the opinions of those who live in the Historic District of Jersey City where the development is happening. The destruction of this railroad corridor is not one that can be taken back.
    Fort Lee, New Jersey
  1366. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17026Lorraine Garry
    I certainly want you to Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. I've lived here for approximately 30 years. You may be aware that Jersey City is not know for its green spaces. One can not really consider Liberty State Park just a Jersey City green space since it is a state park. Having just spent a lovely day, yesterday, April 5th in both The Great Swamp and Watchung State Park and lovely park near Clark, NJ., the acute need for green space in Jersey City is so obvious. At the moment the Embankment provides for a diverse wildlife habitat of migratory birds and butterflies. thank you
    Lorraine Gagliardotto Garry · Jersey City, NJ
  1367. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17025Patricia Boland
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  1368. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17024Mike Brosco
    Hello, I have been following the sad story surrounding recent developments with the 6 block railroad embankment in downtown Jersey City. I was introduced to this issue while visiting a friend living near the embankment. It is so rare to find such a beautiful natural area in the middle of an already congested urban setting. This is a precious piece of land that should be cultivated and nurtured. How can a society spend billions promoting green living and allow a beautiful piece of nature to be wiped out to make way for more condos. At the time my friend showed me plans that had been created to turn this area into a gorgeous (and much needed) park. Everyone that I meet in his neighborhood spoke of the proposed park with dreamy hope. It is simply criminal to allow something like this to disappear. I am writing to voice my sadness on the latest turn of events and to request that a full and fact-based environmental impact study of the Harsimus Branch be conducted before allowing any further changes to take place.
    Champaign, IL
  1369. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17023brendan carroll
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1370. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17022LEVENT YARAR
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    JERSEY CITY, NEW JERSEY
  1371. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17021Lauren Hayer
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to the neighborhood I live in, such as air quality, vibrations, noise, wildlife concerns and release of contaminants - to name a few. Thanks
    Jersey City, NJ
  1372. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17020Priya Devaya
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    NEW YORK, NY
  1373. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17016One Citizen Against Embankment Preservation
    Hello. I am a resident of downtown Jersey City, NJ in the Harsimus Cove neighborhood. I believe that the abandoned Harsimus Cove Embankment should be demolished. There are many reasons why this demolition should take place. 1) The embankment is no longer in use by any sort of railroad. 2) The sections of the embankment that are left have absolutely no historical value 3) Most certainly the embankment contains harmful toxic byproducts from its years of use as a railroad tressel 4) The embankment is a major safety issue in that it suffers from decay and portions of either stone or masonry have fallen off the tops of the structures. 5) The embankment is a blight on the downtown community, encouraging urban vandalism and graffiti 6) At night, the embankment is poorly lit, or not lit at all, and creates an UNSAFE environment for criminals to mug and rob citizens. 7) Pro embankment liberals have concocted an unfeasable plan to establish an elevated park" without any financial plans for real viability. Meanwhile existing real parks such as Hamilton park just TWO blocks away desperately need major restoration. 8) Pro embankment persons are against change for the common good and have ulterior motives (like not loosing parking space access behind the embankment) 9) Even if a park could be funded and built, it would require significant investment and would increase already extremely high local property taxes 10) The embankment proposal has huge insurance implications. Unlike a traditional ground park, this is an elevated train tressel and because of the height, the insurance costs to the city would be enormously expensive. Also, very expensive safety measures would have to be incorporated to prevent someone from falling off. 11) The ground area abutting the embankment frequently becomes a dumping area for trash, rubbish, discarded shopping carts, etc. 12) certain portions of the embankment are listed on the internet as cruising grounds for inappropriate activity ranging from drug dealing to sexual misconduct - again presenting a danger to the community. I believe that the embankment should be demolished and hope you agree. In its place, I believe affordable (middle-class) housing should be built. This housing, built to the style of the surrounding brownstone neighborhood, would do so much more for the community and help stabilize declining property values. A derelict eyesore does nothing to help home values and its time has come. The embankment needs to go. Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks Fletcher Gensamer"
    Fletcher Gensamer
  1374. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17015david poppie
    i am a former resident of jersey city and think the need of more green space is essential. converting the railway property to condos would do the city a dis-service
    easthampton, ma
  1375. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17014Sanjay Coutinho
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1376. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17013Matthew Baldwin
    I just heard about the attempts to develop the embankment with condos. As a person who has lived in Nyc for the last 20 years, Jersey City is missing an amazing chance to strengthen the lives of its current residents by not pursuing better alternatives, specifically the development of a public park that stretches the 6-block lenghth of the embankment. A condo development would have devistating effects on the environment and the lives of the residents around the Embankment. I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. thank-you.
    Austin, TX
  1377. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17012ROSSELLA AQUILA
    I really do not see how the STB’s can say that no EIS is necessary for the Embankment in Jersey City. Effects of demolition of a massive structure on air quality, dust, noise, water quality, vibrations, health, flooding, heavy truck traffic, removal of a cultural resource etc.must be assessed. The National Environmental Policy Act requires Federal agencies to prepare EISs for major Federal actions that significantly affect the quality of the human environment so why not this project. As a Jersey City citizen I'm very very concerned!
    JERSEY CITY, NEW JERSEY
  1378. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17011Anne Barry
    Without an EIS the immediate demoltiion of the embankment would cause loss, danger and harm on many fronts. Environmentally we would lose a glorious natural habitat that harbors monarch butterflies, many birds and many indigenous plant and animal species. In addition, demolition would worsen our already critical flood situation in downtown Jersey City.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1379. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17010Stephan Ryshkewitch
    Demolition of the embankment at Sixth Street would not only have a negative impact on the environment, but also risk the release of harmful contaminants into the air and water. Aside from these very serious concerns, without the embankment the area would lose an important relief for storm water in an area that is already prone to flooding.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1380. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17009Jorge Mastropietro
    I want a full environmental impact statement of the entire Harsimus Branch. The demolition of this Conrail embankment will significantly affect the quality of the neighborhood environment.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1381. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17008Preservation New Jersey, Inc.
    Preservation New Jersey, the statewide nonprofit historic preservation and advocacy organization with more than 1,200 individuals, groups and businesses as members, asks the STB to authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment of the Harsimus Embankment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. The resource is listed in Preservation New Jersey's 10 Most Endangered Historic Sites in NJ list. See: http://preservationnj.org/ten_most/ten_most_property_detail.asp?COUNTY=Hudson+Co unty&PropID=132
    Ron Emrich · Trenton, New Jersey
  1382. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17007Sarah Feyl
    I have read about this issue, and I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch Embankment. Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Beacon, NY
  1383. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17006Embankment Preservation Coalition
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment. As a live long resident in JC and homeowner in the Italian Village area, I support preservation of the embankment that will improve the quality of life in the area. Currently, the site is an osais of rats,vermits and the homeless that decrease property value and creates havoc in the area. Its an eyesore that can be transformed into passive recreational park that can be used by everyone. Thank you and please remember that we are taxpayers with grandchildren that need recreational space. Thank you Sonia Araujo"
    Sonia Araujo
  1384. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17005Jennifer Young
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Study Statement of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment. I am concerned of the potential adverse effects that demolition of such a structure may cause. I believe there are inadequate studies done of the contaminants that may be released into our drinking water and into the air. In addition, I am quite certain that there would be a significant damage to our quality of life due to: increased dust and poor air quality, flooding due to the change in landscape, noise due to heavy traffic, construction and demolition, property damage due to vibration. As a mother of a 20 month old, I am VERY concerned about the health and safety of my child, my family, the rest of the families on our block and the neighborhood.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1385. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17004Karin Williams
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I am afraid that the destruction of the Sixth Street Embankment would create unbelievable air-quality and pollution pollution issues in my historic neighborhood in downtown Jersey City, not to mention the threat to invaluable historic buildings and landmarks. The Embankment borders the downtown historic district, and its destruction (and potential new construction on the site) could potentially damage many historic homes.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1386. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17003Mallory King
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1387. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17002Mrs. Florence Meyer
    I was stunned to hear that there is even discussion of taking down the old stone walls in downtown Jersey City. I’m a resident of Fort Lee, NJ and have watched in dismay as bits of our county’s history have been destroyed and replaced by something “new”. Jersey City is a place that got much of it’s notoriety from it’s railroad lines which extended down to the Hudson River. Why in the world, would this historic community allow the destruction of such a site. Although I have never had the opportunity to go up on top the railroad structure, I have often imagined what the breathtaking views would be like from 30 feet above street level. What an amazing opportunity the City of Jersey City has, to give the neighborhood a park with such an unusual perspective. Please do an Environmental Impact Study before you allow yet another historic site to disappear.
    Fort Lee, New Jersey
  1388. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17001Ronald Varga
    As a resident of Jersey City, I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1389. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17000Gregory Bimbiras
    Please give us our fair chance by doing an environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. The community shoudl not be left with a mess before Conrail leaves.
    Jersey CIty, NJ
  1390. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16999Victoria Fisher
    It is critical to the health of Jersey City;s children, seniors, families, visitors, business people-EVERYONE- that a complete environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch be conducted before Conrail leaves. Please consider this request a matter of life and death for the community.
    Jersey CIty, NJ
  1391. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16998Mary Tan
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I moved to the JC area about 5 years ago. Prior to that, I had worked and visited friends that lived in the JC area. Back in the 80's the Harsimus branch wasn't a children friendly environment and a safe" place to live. Slowly, the neighborhood changed and businesses grew and families (with children) moved in the area. I, too, have two children. I would like to keep the area "cleaned" and safe for my children as well as for me and my husband. Please do make an environmental study of this area."
  1392. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16997Perry Tymeson
    You need to do the environmental study (EIS) for many of the obvious reasons. Stick to the laws and regulations and we will all be happier in the future.
    jersey City, New Jersey
  1393. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16996Jessica Dalrymple
    I hope that an Environmental Impact Statement is being considered in regards to the Embankment in Jersey City. During this environmentally conscious era we live in, to use signficant energy and resources to tear down something with such green" potential seems a terrible mistake. Especially when the subject of demolition offers so many benefits to the community including tree's, birds, grasses, indigeous flower species, etc."
  1394. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16995Embankment Preservation Coalition
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Mark Quigley · Jersey City, NJ
  1395. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16994James Certoma
    I request that a full environmental study be conducted of the Harsimus Branch. I have lived in Jersey City for 9 years and are familiar with the potential of the Embankment for the city. As a member of the communiity I believe the impact study will identify key points that will be used by decision makers to do what is best for the future of Jersey City and make it a premier city.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1396. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16993Chris A Johnson
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch done, as I believe tearing down the old embankment would cause serious problems with dust and flooding in Jersey City. Thank you.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1397. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16992marlene sandkamp
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    jersey city, new jersey
  1398. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16991lynn mertz
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    jersey city, nj
  1399. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16990Christine Dalzell
    We need a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. My home abuts the 6th Street Embankment at its highest point. From my kitchen window, I can see a multitude of wildlife and a forest of trees. This is a view hardly known in Jersey City and it would be a tragedy to lose it. On the flip side, destroying the Embankment would not just take away the living creatures, it would kick up huge amounts of dust and debris (containing a host of unknown contaminants)and bring inevitable damage to the old houses lining the length of it. That is not progress, that is destruction for no real need. Development must be balanced against the real need for open, green space in an urban environment.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1400. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16989nancy perls
    My property backs up to the Harsimus Branch embankment. I have 2 young children and want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1401. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16988Suzy Winkler
    I urge you to authorize a thorough Environmental Impact Statement. The residents of Jersey City need an impartial study of the effects that abandonment and demolition will have on our community. I’ve lived in Jersey City for 24 years and feel as though the 6th Street Embankment is a part of not only Jersey City's history, but my history as well. The stone structure surely deserves it’s historic status in our historic district. This landmark stands as reminder and evidence of the railroad and industrial past of Jersey City. I believe that the survival of the Harsimus Stem Embankment as a series of consecutive blocks, running adjacent to Sixth Street is vital to our community. I feel strongly about maintaining the railroad corridor and turning the 6 block expanse into a lateral park and part of the East Coast Greenway Trail. A green space which could then connect to the Jersey City Waterfront. This property affords the city a unique opportunity to merge railway, park and trail. My concerns regarding the demolition of the walls are great. I worry about additional flooding in our community (these walls serve to retain rainwater). I anticipate much physical damage to the adjacent residences (most of which are registered as Historic and which exist on both sides of the Embankment). I also dread the traffic nightmares that will occur during the process of demolition and redevelopment, as well as additional parking problems which will come with more buildings. The embankment offers our community a real sense of place, and one that the developer (whom I believe still does not own the property, but rather took" illegally) has no understanding of or genuine interest in. Please help preserve this fabulous piece of history that helps ground our community and which holds so much promise for needed open space. We need a Federal Agency to enforce our federal laws. WE NEED AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT. Thank you for your attention."
  1402. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16987Sara Welch
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1403. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16986John Carhart
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Effects of demolition of massive structure on § air quality § dust § noise § vibrations § heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts § damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile § removal of a cultural resource § health § flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) § water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) § release of contaminants § habitat destruction § wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species § ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) § cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community § loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic § loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront § loss of light freight opportunities Inadequate studies done of contaminants Failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB Need for federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens Environmental justice issues Conrail’s neglect of site over decades and continuing bad faith seeking demolition permits
    Jersey City, NJ
  1404. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16985Ted Sondergaard
    I would appreciate a complete, factual Environmental Impact Study of the entire harsimus Branch. As a home owner, I have several concerns with demolition as it relates to air and water quality, structure damage to our 130 year old home and other adverse effects to our environment.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1405. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16984NA
    Dear board members, I would like you to require an Environmental Impact Statement on The Embankment and the Harsimus Branch. Firstly, Jersey City sits at sea level. The Harsimus Cove neighborhood on which much of the Embankment sits literally used to be a sea cove, and has been filled in. This neighborhood frequently suffers from flooding because of these two factors. Most houses in this neighborhood employ sump pumps," and on rainy days you can see these pumps forcing water out of basements onto the sidewalk and down into the city sewer system. As sea levels rise, and as more of Jersey City becomes concreted over, the flooding problem will only worsen for those living alongside the Harsimus Branch area. Although it us unstudied, The Embankment provides a significant amelioration effect on flooding in this neighborhood. It's top contains the equivalent of a scrubby forest, and its bulk is made of soil, dirt and sandstone. Combined, this six-block structure temporarily prevents a huge amount of water from reaching street level during a rain storm. It is a giant sponge, in effect. You can see the hydraulics of the Embankment after rain has ended -- water continues to run slowly down the sides of the Embankment for several days afterward. It is even possible to judge the water level inside the Embankment by seeing from which height on the wall the water is emerging. If the Embankment were removed and replaced with houses, this rainwater would reach the ground immediately during any rainfall and exacerbate the flooding problem in the neighborhood. Secondly, the Embankment provides a significant cooling effect on the neighborhood in the summer. Generally, trees take heat out of the air in summer because the water within them remains cooler from its lowered temperature during the nighttime. The trees on top of the structure -- particularly the willows -- provide a constant downward flow of cool air along Sixth Street in the summer time due to this effect. You can feel it if you stand near the wall on a hot day; there is a palpable downward breeze of cooler air coming off the Embankment. If the Embankment is removed, summer temperatures in the neighborhood -- already uncomfortable in July and August -- will only get higher. For these reasons I believe the environmental impact of the Embankment and its removal should be studied before decisions are made to remove it."
    Jim Edwards
  1406. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16982Susan Szochet
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1407. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16981Tara Achenbach
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I'm concerned about the destruction of a historical landmark located within a historic neighborhood. Not only will this demolition remove an integral part of the history of transportation in the United States, but the effects of the proposed demolition could cause a number of problems. Possible release of contaminants, noise, traffic, destruction of wildlife area. A study must be conducted before moving forward.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1408. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16980Michelle and Maurizio Masi
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement of the entire Harsimus Branch before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. I am a person who suffers from asthma and worry about the effects demolition of the Embankment would have on air quality for myself and for others. Let alone the many other reasons; the damage to our historical buildings, the loss of wildlife, increased traffic to the neighborhood and our health.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1409. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16979Grace Community Services, Downtown Neighborhood Watch, and Embankment Coalition
    There needs to be a serious, impartial, environmental study done on the Harsimus Branch. We are dealing with historic sites and important environmental factors near schools, parks, residences. I am involved in many citizens groups in the area and want to make sure this is taken seriously to the benefit of the community, not developers or corporations.
    Dana Patton · Jersey City, NJ
  1410. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16978Laura Fraschilla
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1411. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16977Salvatore LoNero
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1412. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16976John Crittenden
    I am calling for an Environmental Impact Statement to be done on the 6th Street Embankment in the Downtown section of Jersey City. I understand that one of your component panels feels that no such study and report is necessary. I strongly disagree. Any change to this historic structure will greatly impact thousands of people who live near it -- forever. This must be taken into account before anything is done! I think this structure should be enhanced, repaired, and generally spruced up, and opened as an first-class urban park. That Conrail has neglected it for decades and ignores any such potential use for it is shameful. Why should residents of the city have to struggle to have a park made out of such a unique and historic structure? And why, when so many federal dollars are spent on measuring environmental impacts of actions taken where no one lives, in wilderness and wild areas, does your agency not want to do a study of the potential effects of altering an urban landscape -- which has a natural component -- that so many people live in and around?
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1413. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16975Christina Donnelly
    I would like to request a full environmental study. There are contaminates in the site and unleashed could be very harmful to the community. Also the area has problems with flooding. Loss of the Embankment blocks could make the situation much worse.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1414. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16974David Arnold
    I'd like to request a full environmental study on the impact of demolition of the 6th St Embankment in Jersey City. The downtown area, containing the Embankment, consists of established and emerging residential neighborhoods, focused around the transportation corridors to the waterfront commercial region, Newark and New York City. The 6th St Embankment represents a means to link these communities, and open up links to other areas in the Jersey City Heights region, for example, which are currently difficult to access. It also provides a green corridor in the heart of the city, which sadly the residents are largely unable to access. Demolition of the Embankment would provide further housing in the area, something that is already available in abundance, at the expense of removing the opportunities for green space, public transit and community integration that the Embankment currently offers.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1415. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16973Rosensweet
    The 6th St. Embankment in Jersey City must not be destroyed, especially in the absence of an Environmental Impact Statement. The National Environmental Policy Act requires Federal agencies to prepare EISs for major Federal actions that significantly affect the quality of the human environment. this demolition will certainly affect our environment both in the short term and the long run. Demolition and construction of such a massive structure will damage the air quality in our entire neighborhood; the heavy equipment and truck traffic will cause dust, noise, and vibration that can damage the 150-year-old buildings in the area. Conrail long ago abandoned this tract and has shown nothing but bad faith and illegal actions as they have repeatedly attempted to circumvent local ordinances regarding the disposition of this land. The citizens of this neighborhood have long sought that the Embankment be converted to park lnad for the use of all residents. the city of Jersey City has considered building a light rail on the Embankment, sharing the space with the parkland. this would then become impossible. Finally, there have not been adequate studies of potential environment contaminants that are common to this area. Federal agencies must enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens.
    Tom · Jersey City, NJ
  1416. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16972Daniel Ferrara
    I am writing to respectfully request that the Surface Transportation Board require an Evironmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch Embankment. My wife and two kids and I live across the street from the embankment. We think it's beautiful; its magnificence is a big part of why we bought our apartment. But that's beside the point here. I am deeply disturbed by the idea that the STB thinks the community does not have a right to know what's in there. Absent a thorough and expert evaluation, there is not a chance that I would stay in my apartment while the embankment was dismantled. I would not risk my kids' health. The destruction of the embankment would be a horror and a shame for our neighborhood on so many levels. But nothing is as important for me as the health risk to my family. I'm counting on all government entities, including the Surface Transportation Board, to look out for us. Thank you for your consideration. Daniel Ferrara
    Jersey City, NJ
  1417. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16971Seth Siditsky
    To whom it may concern: As a local resident, I'd like to express my concern about the possible demolition/construction Harsimus Branch Embankment located along sixth street in downtown Jersey City, NJ. Although relatively new to the area, I am looking to settle in Jersey City and am concerned about how major demolition and having large vehicles downtown could effect air quality, noise, and the general ecosystem that has been developed on railroad embankment. I'd like to express my interest that the Surface Transportation Board approve an Environmental Impact Statement for anything related to the Harsimus Branch Embankment before any official abandonment/demolition is approved. Please approve this statement/study so as local residents we can be informed of any adverse effects to our neighborhood, landmarks, and ourselves. Sincerely, Seth Siditsky
    Jersey City, NJ
  1418. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16970Yolanda Rodriguez
    I am a mother of two young children & I am very concerened about the potential health issues associated with this project. We need a full EIS.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1419. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16969Joan koehler
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement to determine the adverse effects regarding the demolition of Embankment". I live in the neigborhood and consider this structure a treasure. The only feasible solution is to leave "as-is", devlop park space pr use the structure for light rail transportation. WE DO NOT NEED FURTHER PRESSURE ON OUR INFRASTRUCTURE!!!! There is an overabundance of condo and real estate inventory in our area. This embankment is cutting directly through our historic district. Demolition would be a disaster to the multitude of Civil War era homes on either side of the structure. As a federal agency it would be great if you could bring your expertise and "clout" to this issue. Please help us."
  1420. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16968Tara Panella
    I own a house less than a block from the Embankment in downtown Jersey City, and I want to encourage you to do a full environmental impact study of the Harsimus Branch. Development and/or demolition of the Embankment would significantly affect the quality of the surrounding environment, and a full study should be done to assess the impact before any actions are taken. I personally hate the idea of demolishing or the embankment. Aside from the disruption and damage that would cause to the surrounding neighborhood, our area already has plenty of residential and commercial development. What we need is more green space, and I think any future plans should preserve and develop the Embankment for that purpose.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1421. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16967Mike Bloom
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    jersey city, NJ
  1422. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16966Patricia Phillips
    My sons need to breathe fresh air and preservation of the Historic Embankment as green space would help hundreds of little kids like my sons in the area. Conrail and its developer did not allow Jersey City to purchase the area prior to their own, secret negotiation. This is illegal. Conrail is obligated by law to offer sale of the land to the city. The city has the money and additional money from the Embankment Preservation Coalition. My family is from South Plainfield aka Railtown" and those residents look to this case as precedence for to what Conrail is obligated to do throughout New Jersey. Thank you for your kind consideration."
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1423. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16965Jacquelyn Tuerk Stonberg
    I write in concern and care for the preservation of the embankment in Harsimus, Jersey City. I write with concern that this business be conducted within the proper legal boundaries, with care for our historical preservation, and responsibility toward our living environment. Demolition of the embankment and the development of high rise buildings will seriously lower the original historic quality of our neighborhood, and thereby lower property values. It is the historic quality along with the proximity to the PATH train that sustains property values here. In addition, such high rise buildings will seriously diminish the available natural light in our neighborhood, the wildlife, and the natural environment which is more and more important to preserve as the neighborhood grows more populated and urban. PLEASE CONDUCT A FULL ENVIRONMENT STUDY. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1424. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16964Roseann Mazzeo
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I am a life-long resident of Jersey City and know well the neighborhoods which will be negatively affected if Conrail is allowed to walk away. Preservation of the Embankment is a vote of respect for the character and the history of the area.
    JERSEY CITY, NJ
  1425. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16963Lily
    An Environmental Impact Statement is necessary before disturbing the embankment grounds and environment. We need and want to maintain our green space!
    Jersey City, NJ
  1426. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16962Rob Garver
    We need an Evironmental Impact Statement for this project!
    Jersey CIty, NJ
  1427. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16961Scott Taylor
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. We already live in a flood zone and have experienced 2 floods within a 2 year period. I can only imagine this will worsen drainage and add more pressure to an already overworked sewage system which has needed replacing/upgrading for too long.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1428. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16960Michael Ortalano
    I am writing to express my deep concern over the proposed demolition of the embankment. Aside from the obvious stresses it will place on a fragile historic neighborhood I am alarmed at the lack of consideration toward the environmental impact of this project. It was not until the modern era that a better understanding of the hazardous nature of those substances prompted guidelines for their safe handling. During at least the first half of the structure's nearly 100 year history little regard was given to the environmental effects of the chemicals being transported and used for railway maintenance. Consequently it is very likely some of those materials spilled, leaked or were intentionally dumped within the rail right of way. In its present state there is little cause for safety concerns. But disturbing the contents of the embankment will expose residents and passers-by to those pollutants. Residents have a right to know the environmental risks are associated with exposure to those particulates therefore it is imperative that independent soils and air quality tests be conducted prior to granting approval to demolish the structure. It is my hope that the embankment be allowed to remain in its currrent state or re-purposed to better serve the entire community, not just the interests of a developer. But if this proposal is approved continuous air quality tests will be essential.
    JERSEY CITY, NJ
  1429. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16959Robert Whyte
    The abandonment anticipated in STB's Environmental Assessment has no impact on the residents and neighborhood adjacent to the Harsimus Cove Embankment. Reuse can not be determined and should not be a consideration. The requirements contained in the STB's Environmental Assessment provide adequate review and protection. Going forward, control and approval of the Embankment use after abandonment is the responsibility of local boards and agencies, supported as needed by state and federal development related agencies. There is no reason for the STB to be involved. Sufficient Public participation in the impact of abandonment is assured in the required Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act review. Support for a full EIS is not found in precedent of law for Out of Service" abandonments and should not be where all the railroad "equiptment" was removed many years ago and the the line has been out of service for over a decade."
  1430. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16958Doug Pulick
    I am writing to ask you to do a full Environmental Impact Statement to study and document the many impacts (both direct and indirect) that abandonment of the Harsimus line will have on the surrounding community. Given that disposition of this property has been a 10 year controversy involving thousands of citizens and given the many serious impacts that demolition of this structure - which is what the developer Conrail seeks to transfer the property to has stated he will do - you must do a serious study to ensure that the public is protected. I urge the STB to be diligent in protecting the citizens of Jersey City.
    Riverside, CT
  1431. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16957Robert Dvorkin
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Brooklyn, NY
  1432. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16955Cynthia Ritzler
    I demand that the STB do a full Environmental Impact Statement before issuing the abandonment permit for the Harsimus Stem Line. As it is very likely that the abandonment of this line will lead directly to the demolition of the landmarked Embankment structure and since that will have severe impacts on the built, cultural and natural environment of the surrounding neighborhoods you are duty-bound to make sure that all of the facts are studied thoroughly so that the next owner's responsbility to remediate or ensure the safety of the public is clear and documented."
  1433. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16954Charles Kessler
    An Environmental Impact Statement for the Embankment is absolutely necessary. I used to own property near the Embankment and every time there would be a heavy rain we would get water in the ground floor. Without the Embankments to absorb the water flooding will be much worse in the area. Also, on a personal level, I have learned the hard way that the City of Jersey City does not have enough power to protect historic resources. For twelve years I, along with hundreds of fellow citizens, fought to preserve an historic warehouse district - now call the Powerhouse Arts District. The city hired the Urban Land Institute (ULI) to advise them on what to do about the district, and the ULI advised preserving the building via historic re-hab and re-use as live work space. The city unanimously approved historic designation for the district and also unanimously adopted a redevelopment plan implementing the ULI recommendations. Nevertheless, a determined owner of two pivotal buildings, The Lorillard Tobacco Warehouses (see attached photo), through persistent legal action, was able to demolish the buildings. The historic warehouses that suffered the wrecking ball are directly related to this case since these warehouses were supplied by the Pennsylvania Rail Road using the Harsimus Stem. To fully protect the Embankment we need federal law.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1434. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16953Christopher Englese
    Please allow a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1435. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16952mark graves
    Preserving and reclaiming green-space is critical to the survival of humankind and the natural world. Considerations of environmental quality have too long been shelved in favor of development, which invariably becomes yet a larger problem to contend with in the future. A problem that compromises the health of all the planets inhabitants while extinguishing vital links in the ecosystem that sustains us. Imagining a future where the environment is considered before that of commerce will invariably lead us into a green economy" which will bind our communities in ways that technology, traditional development and commerce will never be able to accomplish. The Harismus Stem Embankment is a project that can serve as an excellent example of the "greening" of the urbanized landscape and in doing so enhance a sustainable development model vital to raising the quality of life all along the eastern seaboard."
  1436. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16951george hannigan
    Please do not allow the negative effects of abandonment to destroy the Hamilton Park & Harsimus landmark neighborhoods. An impact study is neseccary to determine the effects such as potential release of contaminants, damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile, flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, homes and families.
    jersey city, nj
  1437. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16950Debby DeVenezia
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1438. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16949John Graves
    Rather than act in haste and later regret it, please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Kernersville, NC
  1439. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16948Carlos A Garcia
    There needs to be a full and fact-based environmental impact study for the Harsimus Branch.
    New Jersey, 07302
  1440. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16947Robert McPherson
    I would like a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch performed and the results publicized for review.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1441. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16946Sam Vo
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1442. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16945Gillian Allen
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1443. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16944Michael Sanchez
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1444. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16943Deirdre O'Malley
    Please ensure a full environmental impact assessment of the embankment and entire Harsiumus Branch in Jersey City. The development of this land would severely damage quality of life in an already crowded neighborhood, increasing noise and other pollution, worsening flooding, and disrupting wildlife. As a lifelong resident, I strongly believe that Jersey City needs to maintain open spaces to ensure its future.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1445. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16942Lindsay Loderstedt
    An Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch is necessary not only for the residents living in Jersey City now, but for those in the future! Let's do the responsible thing and see how and what is going to be effected depending on our actions. From the health of the men, women and children of Jersey CIty, the disruption of life because of noise, traffic and dirty industry, the wildlife/ecosystem and the stability of surrounding historic buildings and neighborhoods – we need to do right by the people and not just “business.” This is the future of downtown Jersey City – one of the happiest city in the US – let’s keep it that way by respecting our history, our future and one another.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1446. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16941Helene Taylor
    I want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I am extremely concerned about the water table changing when we lose such tremendous amounts of soil. We are in a major flood zone with old sewage and water piping systems and our neighborhood is prone to flooding. If water absorbtion is taken away from that area it could have a dramatic effect on all the neighborhood residences and their potential flood issues could increase significantly. Have you even thought about these realities?
    Jersey City, NJ
  1447. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16940Allison Bell
    Please conduct a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus branch of the Conrail right of way in Jersey. I live in this neighborhood with a 6-year-old daughter who loves the chunk of Embankment near our home dearly and kisses it whenever we pass it. It's part of our landscape. We don't want it torn down, anymore than someone who lives near Mount Everest or Mount Rushmore wants those parts of the landscape torn down. Second, it seems as if urban nature preserves have developed on top of the chunks of The Embankment." Development already has taken away much of the accidental wilderness that developed in Jersey City during the years when the city was falling apart. Why not make an effort to preserve some of what's left? Birds and rabbits are people, too, sort of, and it's not fair to force them from homes that they and their ancestors have been living in for many bird and rabbit generations. Third, The Embankment is on land that's been inhabited by the Lenape Native Americans for centuries and are of archaeological interest. No one should be permitted to further disturb the land in, around and under The Embankment without conducting a full, serious archaeological survey. Finally, The Embankment chunks consist of many millions of tons of "dirt." Who knows what's in that "dirt"? Maybe it's really all dirt, but maybe it's a mixture of chromium, lead dust, mercury-tainted auto exhaust dust, coal dust, etc. Why would you encourage my landlords to protect my daughter by encapsulating the lead paint in our building under crash paint and drywall, then fill my daughter's lungs with poisonous dust by letting a developer disturb The Embankment just to put up a few two-family homes? Jersey City is already an incredibly, no doubt dangerously dusty city. It seems foolhardy to to disturb all that dust. If you decide to let development proceed on part of the right of way, I think you should require the materials on the right of way to very well encapsulated, not broken up and carted away in a fashion that will make the quality of the air even more terrible for many years to come."
  1448. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16939Emma Hindell
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    JERSEY CITY, NJ
  1449. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16938Wade Hindell
    Abandonment will lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partner are seeking permits now) Effects of demolition of massive structure on § air quality § dust § noise § vibrations § heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts § damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile § removal of a cultural resource § health § flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) § water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) § release of contaminants § habitat destruction § wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species § ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) § cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community § loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic § loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront § loss of light freight opportunities Inadequate studies done of contaminants Failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB Need for federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens Environmental justice issues Conrail’s neglect of site over decades and continuing bad faith seeking demolition permits
    JERSEY CITY, NJ
  1450. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16937John Perls
    My property backs up to the Harsimus Branch embankment. I have 2 young children and want a full and fact-based Environmental Impact Study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1451. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16936emmanuel naval
    i want a full environmental study of the entire harsimus branch. i am a life long resident of jersey city as well as an architect in the area. i am concerned that any significant change in the physical landscape of the area in question should be analyzed before allowing anything. the amount of historic places in jersey city is already scarce and there should be more discussion as to the opportunity to provide alternate methods of adaptive reuse as opposed to complete demolition.
    jersey city, new jersey
  1452. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16935Bill Armbruster
    I urge the STB to conduct a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch. This has important consequences for Jersey City. Once this property is used for other purposes, there's no chance of changing policy. If you do this study, you will have vital information on which to base your decision. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1453. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16934Melissa Scheurer
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1454. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16933Jessica Noon
    Please ensure that the STB prepare and submit an Environmental Impact Statement concerning the demolition of the embankment. Demolition of the embankment will create environmental issues such as dust, noise and construction debris. More importantly, it will remove an important piece of infrastructure that can be used for future forms of mass transit as well as open space in the interim. This is a unique historic environmental and cultural resources of Jersey City that can contribute to making the City more sustainable and more livable. Its removal will greatly reduce these opportunities.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1455. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16932Kristin Russell
    I am a resident of Jersey City, NJ, and live 3 blocks from the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment. While I believe it should remain intact for historical purposes, I am also concerned with any detrimental environmental impacts its demolition could cause. I am writing to request that the STB authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment. We do not know what is in the Embankment fill, and this could be hazardous to our community and our children. Thank you for your time and consideration.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1456. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16931Richard James
    The environmental assessment" I have reviewed in conjunction with the proposed abandonment of the Harsimus Branch is woefully inadequate and conclusory under the terms of the N.E.P.A. It is replete with unsubstantiated assertions, and represents anything but a "hard look" at the proposed action. While there are clearly matters that must be examined under section 106 and 110 of the N.H.P.A., a host of other issues both social and environmental will not fall within the perview of the historic review. The STB should insist that a full environmental review be conducted on this highly sensitive strip of property located in a densely packed urban setting. To allow a perfunctory "assessment" would be to avoid the explicit obligation of the STB."
  1457. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16930Gene Panchana
    My name is Gene Panchana. My brother lives across the street from one of the Embankment blocks. They are raising an infant son in the rowhouse they purchased over 10 years ago. As you can imagine, the fate of the Embankment and the surrounding historic neighborhood is subject matter we take very seriously. This is why I was exceedingly disturbed by the SEA's recent EA. Why would any government agent, with full knowlege of the illegal actions perpetrated by Conrail and their developer partner, rely exclusively on Conrails' own reports to form their conclusions? I for one, am completely unmoved by Conrail's findings and have absolutely no confidence in their tendentious determinations. Further, the EA itself makes reference to the 'unique complexities' of this proceeding and by this assertion, attests to the fact that this NOT the typical rail abandonment. How can it then turn around and suggest that a EIS is unwarranted? I speak for my family and their neighbors when I contend that the Embankment and the neighborhoods directly affected by its fate are wholly undeserving of this type of frivolous treatment. I hope the STB acknowledge this public outcry and sanctions a full and impartial Environmental Impact Statement to guide their pending rulings. Thank you for giving my concerns your utmost consideration.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1458. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16929Lourdes Garcia
    My name is Lourdes Garcia. I live across the street from one of the Embankment blocks. My husband and I are raising our infant son in the rowhouse I purchased over 10 years ago. As you can imagine, the fate of the Embankment and the surrounding historic neighborhood is subject matter I take very seriously. This is why I was exceedingly disturbed by the SEA's recent EA. Why would any government agent, with full knowlege of the illegal actions perpetrated by Conrail and their developer partner, rely exclusively on Conrails' own reports to form their conclusions? As a Veteran I have seen what atrocities people can do to one another when government agents lay on the side lines and do not do the right thing by the people. I for one, am completely unmoved by Conrail's findings and have absolutely no confidence that theirs any truth to Conrails proposals. Once again I have witness the destruction that people with money and drunk in its power can plague the innocent when given the opportunity. Further, the EA itself makes reference to the 'unique complexities' of this proceeding and by this assertion, attests to the fact that this NOT the typical rail abandonment. How can it then turn around and suggest that a EIS is unwarranted? I speak for my family and neighbors when I contend that the Embankment and the neighborhoods directly affected by its fate are wholly undeserving of this type of frivolous treatment. It is the your responsibility to protect this neighborhood and its members from extinction. I hope the STB acknowledge this public outcry and sanctions a full and impartial Environmental Impact Statement to guide their pending rulings. Thank you for giving my concerns your utmost consideration.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1459. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16928Metropolis Music Inc.
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Mark Dalzell · Jersey City, NJ
  1460. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16926Robert D. Cotter
    Please be advised that I believe the the STB should require Conrail to conduct a full Environmentat Impact Statement before they allow the abandonment of the Harsimus Branch of the Pennsylvanie Railroad. The Harsimus Branch carried trains to the Jersey City Waterfront which was the largest concentration of rail yards in the nation for over a century. Today its value as a historic resource is obvious. Its value as a right-of-way for rail use is another reason for an EIS. Consider that Jersey City has grown from a virtually non-existent downtown to the 12th largest downtown in the nation, the need to move office workers and residents in and out of the district by means other then the private automobile will only increase. THis R-O-W cannot be abandoned and sold for housing. This is an asset that must be preserved for historic and transportation purposes.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1461. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16925Alexandra Blondel
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. As someone who lives directly across from the Embankment, I am concerned about myriad negative issues associated with the demolition that an “abandonment” declaration would bring about. The amount of dirt, noise, vibrations, poor air quality, and general decline in the standard of living across from a huge construction site would be immediate and massive. The already overrun streets, due to mall traffic, would become impassible from the construction truck traffic. The risk of flooding, due to the area having no half-mile of fill to adsorb storm water in a flood plain, would increase and that risks ruining my home and that of my neighbors. The destruction of something as large as the Embankment risks severe environmental damage, not just from flooding, but from the release of contaminants and from the habitat destruction of several species of birds, butterflies, and other “friendly” insects, not to mention the risk of the proliferation of rats. The clear benefits of turning the Embankment into a park with historical, cultural, and economic significance should not be overlooked if Jersey City is to become a more attractive destination for individuals and families fleeing the exorbitant prices of Manhattan and Brooklyn, and give those of us who already live here an excellent reason to stay.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1462. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16924Carlos Panchana
    My name is Carlos Panchana. I live across the street from one of the Embankment blocks. My wife and I are raising our infant son in the rowhouse I purchased over 10 years ago. As you can imagine, the fate of the Embankment and the surrounding historic neighborhood is subject matter I take very seriously. This is why I was exceedingly disturbed by the SEA's recent EA. Why would any government agent, with full knowlege of the illegal actions perpetrated by Conrail and their developer partner, rely exclusively on Conrails' own reports to form their conclusions? I for one, am completely unmoved by Conrail's findings and have absolutely no confidence in their tendentious determinations. Further, the EA itself makes reference to the 'unique complexities' of this proceeding and by this assertion, attests to the fact that this NOT the typical rail abandonment. How can it then turn around and suggest that a EIS is unwarranted? I speak for my family and neighbors when I contend that the Embankment and the neighborhoods directly affected by its fate are wholly undeserving of this type of frivolous treatment. I hope the STB acknowledge this public outcry and sanctions a full and impartial Environmental Impact Statement to guide their pending rulings. Thank you for giving my concerns your utmost consideration.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1463. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16923Brian Meriaho
    I am writing to request a full study of the environmental impact of Conrail's abandonment of the Harsimus branch. Eliminating areas of possible green space in an area as densely populated as downtown Jersey City is something that would have an irreversible impact on the areas surrounding the Harsimus branch. It would be in the best interest of the state to ascertain if this impact would be positive or negative. Regards, -Brian Meriaho
    Jersey City, NJ
  1464. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16922Eileen Ferara
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1465. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16921Erin Lombard
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1466. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16920Cydnee Martin
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1467. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16919Richard Kelly Paget
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1468. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16918Mike Paget
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1469. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16917Carol McNichol
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment
    JERSEY CITY, NJ
  1470. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16916David Shumbris Duif
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. i am concerned about the effects of demolition of such a huge structure. I feel the air quality will be affected as well as possible damage to buildings near by including my home.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1471. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16915Bradley Stonberg
    I love living in jersey city. When i heard that there is talk about demolishing the 6th ave old elevated train line it made me feel horrible. Please do everything in your legal power, such as make a full environmental study or refuse to allow any demolition permits. Destruction of the history of a community is often a huge tragedy, that can never be redone. Thanks, Brad Stonberg
    Jersey Ctiy, NJ
  1472. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16914Lisa Acevedo
    As the mother of 2 small childtren living less than two blocks from the 6th street embankment, I am very concerned with the envirnmental impact of tearing it down. I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1473. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16913Patricia Paget
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1474. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16912June Paget
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1475. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16911Richard S. Paget
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1476. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16910Leda Duif
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. We witness the flora and wildlife that exist along the embankment every day. I am concerned about the damage to our own home and those of our neigbors should the embankment be demolished. The flooding situation may also worsen without this half a mile of fill that absorbs the stormwater.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1477. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16909craig buckbee
    i support a complete and thorough environmental impact study on the Harsimus branch. i comment as a 20+ year resident and home owner in jersey city (specifically harsimus cove historic neighborhood). the residents and elected officials need, deserve, and are entitled to the information this study will document, without which informed, educated decisions can not be made. as a very prominent historic landmark for the area, with great potential for adding to the quality of life such as in public park space, greenway thoroughfare, flood control, and traffic calming, the embankment needs this study. thank you for your attention.
    jersey city, NJ
  1478. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16908Thomas Ogorzalek
    To whom it may concern, Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement to allow informed decisions to be made regarding the 6th Street Embankment before abandonment causes severe and/or adverse effects to downtown Jersey City neighborhoods and families. Abandonment will lead directly to the demolition of a significant piece of infrastructure that spans across five city blocks. It currently contributes to the community as a habitat for a variety of flora, fauna, and insect life; a part of the east coast greenway, a potential park and transit connection to other neigborhoods in Jersey City, and a significant Historic cultural resource. Abandonment would lead to demolition without any study of the environmental impact it could have on the community as a result of its' former use as a transit corridor. Thank you for your attention in this matter.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1479. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16907Joe Giglio
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partner are seeking permits now) Effects of demolition of massive structure on air quality heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts removal of a cultural resource flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) habitat destruction for wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and local species cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront Inadequate studies done of contaminants Failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB Need for federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens Conrail’s neglect of site over decades and continuing bad faith seeking demolition permits
    Jersey City, NJ
  1480. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16906Joshua David
    The STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. Abandonment and demolition would have serious environmental effects. Preservation of the branch, meanwhile, offers significant public benefit in the years to come.
    New York, NY
  1481. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16905Jackson Wandres
    I want a full environmental impact study EIS of the entire Harsimus Branch rail road right-of-way (ROW) performed and the EIS should look at the feasibility of and benefits associated with utilizing the ROW for implementation of a shared use trail non-motorized forms of transportation. This ROW is the preferred route of the East Coast Greenway, for more information go to www.greenway.org Thank you.
    Brooklyn, New York
  1482. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16904David Clarke
    Please, conduct an environmental impact study, before doing anything to the embankment in Jersey City.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1483. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16903Carol Nissen
    The potential for damage to the comnunity from the demolition of this embankment would be far reaching. The fact that this this is a dense residential area and the last thing needed there is more housing"is secondary to the immediate effects of knocking it down. Jersey City is full of developers with NO connection to the area and politicians willing to sell out their own citizens no matter what the cost. We need a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment."
  1484. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16902Peter Economou
    I am writing to request an Environmental Impact Statement. I am concerned about the release of contaminants and the removal of cultural resource. Thank you for your time.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1485. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16901Michael Lupica
    To Whom it May Concern: I am writing to urgently request that an Environmental Impact Statement be issued for the 6th Street Embankment before abandonment causes severely adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Demolition of the structure will make homes which are directly adjacent to the embankment, absolutely unlivable for families such as my own. To proceed with such action without first issuing an EIS would be an irresponsibility of the highest order.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1486. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16900Dionya Webb
    We call for the preservation of the endangered railroad monument in Jersey City. It is not an eyesore.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1487. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16899e sipley
    an Environmental Impact Statement should be authorized before abandonment causes adverse effects to Jersey City neighborhoods
    caldwell, new jersey
  1488. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16898The East Coast Greenway
    When evaluating the Harsimus Branch corridor, please consider the historic context of this transportation link through Jersey City. The corridor was created in the public's interest and should remain a link in the trasportation network of Jersey City, Hudson County and the region. The Harsimus Branch can again be a world class transprotation connection, offering economic development to Jersey City, by attracting commuting, recreation and tourism trips to Jersey City along the East Coast Greenway. Thank you for continuing to support the public's trust.
    Michael Dannemiller · West Orange, NJ
  1489. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16897Ruth Mitchell
    Please fully address the Harsimus Brank/ PA RR 6th St Embankment that runs from the Hudson River Thru Jersey City. A full environmental study of this unique area needs to be done to ascertain what the impact would be of its demolition or abandonment. It runs along the edge of a Revolutionary War era cemetery. We must consider saving history and the impact of actions on the environment. Sincerely, Ruth D. Mitchell
    Jersey City, NJ
  1490. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16896Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy
    I strongly believe that the STB" should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment."
    Ted DeMaio
  1491. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16895Christy Hamilton
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch, please. My neighborhood, the old, original section of downtown Jersey City, is now surrounded by tall buildings .. office buildings, condos, etc. Tearing down the embankment would just allow more tall buildings" to break-up this beautiful, historic area. Allowing the embankment to be made into a park/walkway would let this area keep it's neighborhood feel. Thank you!"
  1492. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16894Timothy Walsh
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    JERSEY CITY, NJ
  1493. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16893glenn susser
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    JERSEY CITY, nj
  1494. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16892Albert Maiocchi
    When is enough building enough. Sections of Jersey City have become cramped neighbors. They allow house to be built on cliffs. How about some open space. Preserve the 6th Street embankment as an open space park and bikeway. What will happen to the SAFETEA-LU earmark allocated to Jersey City to purchase the embankment?
    Maywood, NJ
  1495. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16891Chris Payne
    Requesting your assistance to require an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment of the embankment. Without an EIS, there could be severe adverse efects to JC historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1496. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16890Damian WIeczorek
    lease authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1497. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16889Jason Renker
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment of the site will lead directly to demolition of the embankment, which will have severe effects---releasing contaminants into the surrounding neighborhoods through dust, disrupting a historic residential neighborhood with heavy truck traffic with possible damage to foundations of surrounding buildings, removal of one of the last habitats for wildlife in downtown Jersey City, and eliminating the potential for grade-separated transportation possibilities for future development.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1498. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16888Brian Finnerty
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch
    Jersey City, NJ
  1499. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16887Corey Stewart
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1500. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16886Richard Snyder
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1501. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16769U.S. Senator
    Robert Menendez
  1502. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16885Brendan Sullivan
    There must be an Enviormental Impact Statement before Conrail is allowed to sell the Embankment in Jersey City for development
    Jersey City, NJ
  1503. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16884Jamie Keller
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Simply put- removing these massive walls will have a negative environmental impact upon Jersey City residents.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1504. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16883Cynthia Burns
    I am writing to request authorization of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the entire Harsimus Branch. I am extremely concerned about the negative impact that abandonment of the property would have upon the local environment and the community at large, as well as the direct effects upon my family. Abandonment would certainly lead to the loss of a natural and cultural resource for the community, while likely creating direct problems for the local population. As a Jersey City resident whose street lies adjacent to the Harsimus Stem Embankment, I am concerned that the habitat destruction resulting from demolition would not simply create a conceptual environmental problem, but could easily create concrete problems, including displacement of a rodent population that could have adverse health and safety effects. Additionally, I am concerned about the pollution that would result from demolition of the property, affecting air quality as well as ground water and nearby waterways. As my 8-year-old daughter is one of many children in the area who already suffers from asthma, this could be profoundly exacerbated by the release of toxins during demolition. Also, without further study, we will not know the full range of contaminants that could be released and their potential public health impact. I believe that a comprehensive understanding of the potential impact of abandonment and consequent destruction of the Harsimus Branch is essential in order to mitigate the damage for the community and the environment. Thank you for your consideration.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1505. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16882harry kafka
    Concerned about Harsimus Branch embankment. It should be maintained as a public service. It would create environmental hazard for no good reason if torn down. The gov't should do an impact study.
    jersey city, nj
  1506. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16881Scott Phillips & Vivian Brady-Phillips
    We write to request that the Surface Transit Board (STB) authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. We write as owners who live directly across the street from the embankment and who will be irreparably harmed by abandonment. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partner are seeking permits now) and demolition will have a deleterious impact on air quality, create unacceptable noise, cause heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts and damage to buildings on two sides for one-half miles. We are also greatly concerned about the potential health risks demolition will pose, particularly as parents of a three-year-old girl. We are gravely concerned about contaminants because there have not been adequate environmental impact studies conducted. Moreover, because of our proximity to the embankment and the health risks demolition will cause, we will be forced to move from our home in the event of demolition because we do not want to risk our health or the health of our child. We believe that STB, as a federal agency, must enforce federal law and take affirmative steps to ensure that local Jersey City residents, like us, are not unduly burdened.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1507. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16880Sophie Colle
    My name is Sophie Colle and I live downtown in Jersey City very to the Embankment. I have two young daughterss who have been waiting for this Embankment to become a park since they were very small. It is clear that your agency has not done a full Environmental Impact Statement so you do not understand all of the problems that allowing the Embankment to be torn down will cause. The Embankment is very big and made of very heavy stone. To take this apart will break apart the streets, and to take it down will also break apart the houses that are near the Embankment, which are also very old. Some houses actually touch the wall of the Embankment. I am from France where we have many historic sites and we honor these. The Embankment is an historic site with two landmarks for state and city and yet this is not honored. If you have not done a full Environmental Impact Study you do not know all of the problems that will be caused. The natural habitat above the Embankment will be destroyed. The dust and pollution and noise from the destruction of the Embankment will effect everyone – families with young children, older people - there is an senior residence right across from the Embankment on 6th & Brunswick and another on 5th Street and Erie street. And another on 8th Street and Monmouth. All of these people will suffer from the pollutants and disruption that will occur if the Embankment is destroyed. You need to study these and require the people who want to take down the Embankment to be responsible to protect our community. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1508. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16879Kerri McCoy
    Before reaching a decision on the Harsimus Branch Embankment, an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) needs to be done. Abandonment of the embankments would lead to their demolition. This is unacceptable. Demolition of the embankments would be harmful to the residents of this part of Jersey City. Demolition of such large structures could lead to vibrational damage to surrounding structures and roads, not to mention the harmful dust which would cloud a densely populated residential area.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1509. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16878Mattias Gustafsson
    My name is Mattias Gustaffson, I live very near the Embankment with my wife and two girls. We are very concerned that the STB has not done a full Environmetnal Impact Statement. Your environmental assessment is not enough given the enormity of what would occur if the Embankment railline is abandoned and then torn down. This is a landmark that is in the middle of two neighborhoods that are also landmarks. You cannot allow someone to tear the heart out of the middle of the district and say that there is no impact. The impact is huge. There will be problems with flooding, worse than we already have, even with the Embankment there to soak up rain water, we still have flooding. There will be rats and vermin and there will just be dirt and dust and we do not know what chemicals there are in there. You can make guesses about this and you can take the word of Conrail whose reports would naturally show that there is ‘no problem’ but the citizens do not believe this. In New Jersey there is such a bad history of mishandling of environmental issues. We are watching you and we will hold the STB responsible if you do not do all you can to protect us, to protect our families. To not do an EIS is a crime when so many people’s health are at stake. I own a business near the Embankment and I expect it will suffer greatly from the disruption as well. Thank you for reconsidering and doing a full Environmental Impact Statement. Sincerely, Mattias Gustaffson
    Jersey City, NJ
  1510. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16877Alice Troietto
    My name is Alice Troietto. I own a restaurant on 4th Street only 3 blocks from the Embankment. I also live on 8th Street only two blocks from the Embankment. I have two daughters and I will tell you that I am very concerned that you are not doing your job to protect us. How can you not do a full Environmental Impact Statement when your allowing Conrail to sell the Embankment to be torn down will effect so many people. The Embankment should be a park and the whole community was looking forward to having the East Coast Greenway bring tourists to our area to help our business. If this Embankment is torn down there will be rats and contamination and many bad things happening in our neighborhood. Today the sewers back up whenever it rains on 6th Street. If you tear down the Embankment there will be more floods and sewage. This is bad for people’s health and it is bad for business near the Embankment. Please do your job as a government agency and make sure that a true EIS study is done to protect our city and our families. Alice Troietto.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1511. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16876Renata
    I believ an EIS is necessary for the Embankment. As a mother of two kids I understand that is important to know the impacts a demolition will cause on air quality, wildlife and others.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1512. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16875Dan Salemson
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch before Conrail is allowed to walk away. The abandonment and destruction of the Harsimus Branch would have significant impact on the surrounding neighborhoods.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1513. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16874Tia Biasi
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. We live across the street from the embankment, and abandonment, or worse, demolition of the embankment would be devasting to us for the following reasons: We have two small children and we have serious concerns about fumes from the debris and how the air quality of our home would be affected. Given what is known about the contents of the embankment fill, we would have to move during any major demolition activity, which would cause huge financial hardship. We live across the street from the embankment and the dust, noise, and vibration alone from demolition is enough to cause concern; the liklihood of damage to ours or our neighbors' homes is huge. And not just from the demolition process. The removal of a half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain would put unthinkable strain on our already over-taxed sewers, causing an enourmous potential for flood damage in our homes on a regular basis. Not to mention the inadequate studies done of contaminants in the embankment is unnerving to all of us who on property nearby. Failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB worsens the case. We need a federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens. These are issues of environmental justice and they need your attention. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1514. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16873John Steadwell
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. It is the least that the community deserves and I expect.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1515. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16872Lainie Vande Woude
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. . How will releasing these contaminates effect the health of our children?
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1516. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16871Beth Bentley
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1517. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16870Earle Sandberg
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement of the Embankment demolition before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Jersey City has had enough environmental issues to deal with, including chromium, and the people of our neighborhoods should not be subject to further environmental assault because of the willful abandonment of a quasi government entity.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1518. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16869Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Please reconsider and provide a full environmental study for the embankment. Please do all that is in your power to preserve the embankment and turn it into a park!!!
    Jason Stanco · jersey city, NJ
  1519. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16868Kenneth D. Sebesky
    I support efforts to develop open public park space on the embankment with bike path.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1520. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16867laura friedman
    I am advocating for a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I am very concerned about the impact on our neighborhoods and the wildlife.
    jersey city, nj
  1521. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16866Ozgun Tasdemir
    I have learned that a developer submitted a request to tear down the Harsimus railroad embankment. I hope this does not go through. That area can be turned into a wonderful park as it was in Paris. We have spent time on the railroad park exactly the same as the embankment in our area and it was fantastic. Why can't we do that rather than tearing down? We need green areas or we'll lose all the families who are getting a bigger population in our area. It's already polluted here and this may add up to the problem. Please be sensible and responsible and protect our environment. Thanks, Ozgun Tasdemir
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1522. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16865Leon Greene
    Please performa a full environmental study on the entire Harismus Branch. i live only 4 blocks away and my 2.5yo son is in day care less than one block away. The demolition of this area could significantly impact the health of my child as wella s the thousands of other children and adults in close proximity. Sincerely, Leon Greene
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1523. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16864Werner Bargsten
    The 6th Street Embankment in Jersey City was built and used by railroads at a time in this country when there was little awareness or concern about environmental impact of chemicals and materials. The rail line hauled quite a lot of freight from all over the country into New York City and to Jersey City factories. It is not plausible, to me, that the railbed would be contaminant free, so the removal of the Embankment mass would entail a substantial environmental challenge which I would not want to leave in the hands of a developer. The removal of the landmarked structure would also change the water level of this part of the city which is part of a flood zone, according to maps. Open space on top attracts migratory birds and butterflies. The stone walls add to the historical nature of the district. As a homeowner here, I have been required to conform to the standards of a historic district. If a developer can knock down a historic structure, I should be able to change my 1860 rowhouse into a Home Depot for reasons of hardship. If I can't afford my mortgage on the house I may need to make the structure a commercial venture to avoid hardship". There is no logic in this argument but enough about this topic. Please begin the discussion of what to do with the embankment by first doing a full environmental study of the structure. Then let's talk about the history and the impractical idea of removing it and using the space for buildings. Thank you, Werner Bargsten 236 5th Street Jersey City, N.J. 07302"
  1524. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16863Alfred C. Martino
    As a resident of Jersey City's historic downtown area -- which includes the 'embankment' structure in question -- I believe the STB should authorize an Environmental Impact Statement. It is clear that abandonment will almost immediately lead to demolition, the effects of which would be devastating to my neighborhood. I am most concerned about the resulting air quality and the inevitable release of dust and contaminants to an area that includes tens of thousands of residents, numerous grammar and high schools, elder care facilities, athletic fields and parks.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1525. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16862Julie Kaufman
    Given the likely severe negative impact on the area community's water quality, health, noise, vibrations, air quality regarding the demolition that Conrail and their partner are seeking permits for concerning the area at issue, it is imperative that an environmental impact statement be authorized.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1526. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16861Robert Garner
    As a neighborhood resident, I believe it is apparent given the high density population that an environmental impact statement must be authorized - further demolition of the appropriate structures will have a terrible effect on the air and water quality for the surrounding population, as well as negative impact regarding release of contaminants noise, heavy truck traffic, damage to the immediate properties (especially the adjoining community gardens I happen to be a part of), likely flooding, and destruction of the habitat.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1527. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16860Harriet Taub
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Jersey City has been a dumping ground for centuries. It is time for the government to take care and show some concern about the citizens of JC.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1528. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16859Harriet Taub
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Jersey City has been a dumping ground for centuries. It is time for the government to take care and show some concern about the citizens of JC.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1529. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16858Amy McHugh
    I am appalled that our government officals would allow a project of this scope and potential impact on the public move forward without extensive research. Please ensure that a full enviromental study is performed prior to proceeding with this project.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1530. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16857Theresa O'Brien
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1531. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16856William McHugh
    In consideration of the history of Jersey City and the known contaminants that are abundant from industry, I believe a full enviromental study would be prudent before approval is granted for the referenced project. This is a neighborhood with many families and young children. Please put public health and safety above a developers desires and ambition.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1532. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16855Tanya Hannagan
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1533. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16854richard garcia
    please authorize an envirmental impact statement before abandoment causes severe adverse effects to jersey city historic districs, landmarks, neiborhoods, and families.
    jersey city, new jersey
  1534. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16853Sile Dooley
    I am opposed to the demolition of the embankment to be used to create new housing. Please consider the appeals by the community to create a much needed park for the area in an attempt to draw more families to the area.
    Jersey City, Nj
  1535. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16852Yvonne Garcia
    Make sure that a environmental statement is done before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City. And also have the sewer lines updated before anything. There is a problem right now in Jersey City under heavy rain falls that the sewer lines gets full and water is getting pushed in to peoples apartments where children are living. To take down the embankment is going to lead to catastraphic consequences during heavy rain fall for the residents of down town Jersey City during rain season. People before profit Jersey City make my tax money work the right way for ones.
    Jersey City, Nj
  1536. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16851Todd Corless
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1537. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16850Peter Cross
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment." Furthermore, preserving historic sites is essential to understanding our history and where we came from. Additionally, green park space in an urban environment is truly precious and contributes greatly to quality of life. I can think of no better use for the 6th Street embankment than as a public park. Thank you for taking the time to read this."
  1538. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16849Embankment Preservation Coalition
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Penny Trappes · Jersey City, NJ
  1539. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16848Carla
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    jersey city, nj
  1540. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16847Paul Nugent
    I would ask for a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1541. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16846Embankment Preservation Coalition
    I WANT A FULL ENVIORMENTAL STUDY
    Linda Black · Jersey City, NJ
  1542. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16845Donna Dorgan
    I own the house at 274 Fifth Street, Jersey City. The Embankment" is adjacent to my backyard. I am also an attorney. Pursuant to NEPA, an Environmental Impact Statement is required before the Embankment is abandoned or demolished. The demolishment of the Embankment will have a negative impact on my property and will cause my property, which I paid a lot of money for, to depreciate. Pollutants will be released into the atmosphere and additional flooding will occur. Conrail should clean up any hazardous material on the Embankment as well. Harsimus Cove is a designated historic district and the Embankment is part of that history. There is not enough parkland or open space in the area and this would be better used as open space or for public transportation like a light rail link to alleviate the traffic and congestion. President Obama was elected on a change platform. Lets see some change! Why don't you give the middle class a break instead of catering to wealthy developers and large corporations. Since that the housing market has tanked, no one will buy the overpriced housing that the developers want to build. (Donald Trump can't give away his overpriced condominiums which are in walking distance.)"
  1543. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16844Marshall W. Mount
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch. This is important to all Jersey City residents and decision makers need to have the best information possible available to them.
    Jersey City, N.J.
  1544. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16843Mike Ostervich
    I am requesting a full enviornmental impact survey for any and all planned changes to the Harsimus Branch Embankment located in Jersey City. I am someone who will be directly affected by any changes that will occur to this structure & therefore I believe the government is obligated to provide local residents with information on what we can expect after renovations.
    jersey city, nj
  1545. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16842Tom Ross
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods and families. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition of the embankment. The results could prove disastrous to the area, with a significant decrease in air quality, an increase in dust and noice. Vibrations may cause foundation damage to historical homes. There is a probablity of release of contaminants. This may impact the Holy Rosary Historic Festival and other neighborhood cultural traditions. Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1546. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16841Laurinda Stockwell
    Please require an Environmental Impact Statement for this area before abandonment. As the wife of a Jersey City Firefighter, I am concerned about demolition of this site causing downtown pollution and decreases in air quality. As a former 12 year resident of Jersey City I am concerned about effects upon this fragile historic neighborhood. Please require an EIS before abandonment is allowed. Thank you. Laurinda Stockwell
    Lebanon, NJ
  1547. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16840Peter Martin
    An Environmental Impact Statement is necessary for the Jersey City Embankment. The severe changes in Jersey City caused by the proposed projects in and around the Embankment area could prove to be drastic. Not only will the new construction cause neighborhood" damage. But, also real dangers to the residents, wildlife and quality of living in Jersey City. Please look much further into the possible impact the proposed projects for the Jersey City Embankment. I believe you will see that an Environmental Impact Statement is truly warranted."
  1548. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16839JOAN M. PALMER
    I WANT A FULL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY OF THE ENTIRE HARSIMUS COVE BRANCH TO PRESERVE THE HISTORICAL INTEGRITY OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND THE HEALTH AND WELFARE OF THE CURRENT AND FUTURE RESIDENTS OF JERSEY CITY. SINCERELY, JOAN M. PALMER
    JERSEY CITY, NJ
  1549. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16838Nadim Azam
    this is a call for an environmental impact statement...it is necassary.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1550. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16837Melissa Villa
    this is a call for an environmental impact statement...it is necassary!
    Jersey City, NJ
  1551. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16836Robert Nadelson
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. Aesthetically AND environmentally I do not believe it makes sense to tear down the embankment
    Jersey City, NJ
  1552. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16835Brian McCallister
    as a new resident of the concerned area, i would ask that a full environmental study be conducted before considering any action regarding the demolition of the harismus embankments. i recently moved here from a neighboring city currently suffering the toxic financial, cultural and environmental consequences of decades of feckless overdevelopment and chose this (more expensive) location because of its serenity and historic beauty. in short, if the embankments are forfeit without a plan to replace them with something of equal benefit to the neighborhood, my wife and i will not remain.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1553. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16834Embankment Preservation Coalition
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    David Boyle · Jersey City, NJ
  1554. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16833Diane Atwell
    I think a full environmental study is required. Demolition will release chemicals into the air and potentially harm the many young children and residents of the area.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1555. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16832Arati Patel
    The Harsimus Branch should be an open space that should be preserved. New Jersey is a highly populated state in the United States, having open green space in Jersey City expecially is hard to see. The Embankment provides home to many bird species as well as other organisms. It is habitat to many different species. The embankment symbolizes the green space that Jersey City should strive for. By constructing and builting on the embankment it shows a negative example on how to preserve open space. STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. The full study will show the people how this land is crucial to the organisms living and builting on this land will not bring good to anyone. The embankment should be used as a nature trail to educate many people about nature and the importance of it. Many people would be interested in learning about their environment. In order to get the community educated on environmental problems people like us need to protest for things they believe are crucial. I believe the embankment is important and should be investigated upon. Thank you
    New Brunswick, New Jersey
  1556. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16831Archana Dusa
    Please do not demolish this Jersey City Beauty. My family enjoyed the activities conducted at the reservoir. Thank you, Archana
    Jersey City, NJ
  1557. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16830Dianne Battleson
    I demand an environmental protection study.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1558. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16829Mike Turner
    I demand an environmental protection study.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1559. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16828Lynn Young
    I demand an environmental protection study.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1560. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16827Steve Herrick
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition. I am concerned that demolition will adversely impact on air quality. I am also concerned about heavy truck traffic through the fragile historic districts and damage to buildings on both sides for one-half mile. I live in a basement apartment on E. 3rd St., and I have experienced flooding once in my apartment the past couple of years, and I have had a couple of close calls as I watched storm waters overwhelm the storm drains outside my unit. I am concerned that the loss of the embankment and the fill for 1/2 mile will enlarge the flood plain, and seriously threaten my home. If this happens, I will consider suing the relevant agencies that disregarded the flooding threat to the surrounding community. The embankment also serves as a habitat for wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and many local species. This is an ecosystem corridor that joins Hudson to Hackensack. Again, I urge you to conduct a comprehensive EIS! Yours truly, Steve Herrick 237 3rd Street Jersey City, NJ 07302
    Jersey City, NJ
  1561. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16826Sameer
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). A detailed study will be a good guide in the decision making process. Preserve the Embankment. Tearing down the Embankment would mean loosing a vital part of Jersey City's glorious History.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1562. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16825Jim Legge
    I request that you undertake - or order to be undertaken - a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. The entire Harsimus Branch has been polluted for very many years and absolutely needs to be examined fully and carefully.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1563. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16824Mildred Kerr
    Dear Sirs, We really need to know what toxic chemicals have been spilling on these tracks for decades, all the way from the waterfront back to the Harsimus Cemetery at the foot of the Palisades. Frankly, any demolition of the Sixth Street Embankment will also cause major distress to the entire local community. Therefore, we really need a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Sincerely, Mildred Kerr
    Jersey City, NJ
  1564. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16823jane pedler
    For years, I worked very near the Embankment, and I believe demolishing it would be extremely detremental to the envoirnment, where dust & noise is concerned...hazardous as well, badly damage the fragile ecosystem re: birds, butterflies & plants--all precious commodities in a city, & would be a disaster for homeowners/dwellers in the area. Next door to my house a 4 story construction project is ongoing; this is only ONE Building, ONE construction project--and the dust, noise, construction materials here & there, is not pleasant to live with. I can only imagine how awful it would be for nearby homes, to have the embankment leveled. Please consider a park/smaller project, instead!
    union city, n.j.
  1565. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16822D. James Baker
    I am writing about the need for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for the Embankment. I am urging you to authorize the Statement as soon as possible so that the Embankment is not abandonded and demolished. The proposed action will significantly affect the quality of the human environment in the area surrounding the Embankment, and will have impacts well beyond the local neighborhoods including on New Jersey families, neighborhoods, landmarks, and historic districts. An Environmental Impact statement is strongly needed. If even part of the Embankment is abandoned, Jersey City will see all significant impacts of demolition, including bad air quality, dust, release of contaminants, degradation of water quality, heavy traffic through fragile historic districts and possible damage to buildings, removal of a cultural resources, habitat destruction and possibly flooding. Don’t allow this to happen – authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Embankment.
    Philadelphia, PA
  1566. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16821Nandita Apte
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). We need to understand the repercussion of demolition of the Embankment. Stop the destruction of the Embankment. Please protect the home of these birds and plants. These nature preserves are the vital organs of Jersey City.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1567. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16820Oona Jackson
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. This branch is not just the Embankment on Sixth Street; the right of way that Conrail is abandoning extends from the Hudson River waterfront to the Embankment and from the western end of the Embankment into the Village area and along an edge of the Jersey City and Harsimus Cemetery. The Cemetery is a Revolutionary War and War of 1812 historic site as well as a historic burial place for Jersey City families. A full environmental impact study for the whole right of way should help decisionmakers make good choices about this important corridor. Thank you for your time and attention! Regards, Oona Jackson
    Jersey City, NJ
  1568. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16819JC Reservoir
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision makers have the best information available to them.
    Charles Stofko · Jersey City, New Jersey
  1569. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16818Jessica Goldberg
    I demand an Environmental Impact Statement before Conrail can sell the Embankment.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1570. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16817Matthew Coleman
    I am writing to demand an environmental impact statement be done on this land. To allow development without an Environmental Impact Statement could be irreversibly bad for the environment. Conrail abandoned this property for decades, and now wants to sell it off without any acknowledgment of the ecosystem that naturally developed there. This area soaks a huge amount of rainfall from the downtown area and it would be irresponsible to develop without an EIS. Jersey City residents demand that an EIS be done before any development is allowed.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1571. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16816Morgan Doherty
    I wish for the STB to authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. Although I am not active in the politics and policies of Jersey City/Hudson county, I am an active community member and continue use many of the green spaces, parks, and public spaces on a regular basis since my move to New Jersey 5 years ago. At a time when Jersey City and its surrounding areas are being developed, I believe it is important to develop natural areas as well. The reservoir area has great potential to be a community center, educational area, and oasis in a city. I hope that it will continue to be a part of the rich infrastructure of Jersey City. Thank you for your consideration.
    Hoboken, NJ
  1572. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16815Christine Beyer
    Please authorize and Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods and familes. It would be CRAZY not to do an EIS before going forward with development on the embankment. Thank you, Christine
    Jersey City, NJ
  1573. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16814Gerard Gallagher
    To whom it may concern: It is of great concern to me that there is no planned environmental impact study planned for the removal of the 6th Street Embankment. Knowing of Jersey City's long standing environmental problems (chromium deposits, creosote, etc), it is unacceptable to the local community that a four story tall industrial structure would be dismantled without close scrutiny. Considering that the landmark GE case of mercury poisoning took place in the neighborhood to the north, it seems that greater care should be exercised in the repurposing of industrial sites in this area. The Sixth street embankment stands less than 50 feet from residential homes on both sides for its' entire length. There are schools, senior residences, day care centers and churches directly next to the structure. Certainly this historic structure is a serious demolition hazard to the neighborhood. Please do not allow the sale and further development of the site to proceed without an environmental impact statement.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1574. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16813Libra Balian
    I am writing to support the preservation of the 6th Street Embankment. I heard that a developer has submitted a request to tear it down and we want a full environmental study done before any consideration of demolition is reviewed. We all have children and the environmental impact of tearing down a former railroad embankment -- releasing potentially hazardous contaminants and dust in the middle of our neighborhoods – cannot be ignored. I am worried about my children getting asthma or other ailments if this developer is allowed to tear this structure down without regard for the environmental affect. Please keep the thoughts of the local residents in mind before action is taken. Regards, Libra Balian
    Jersey City, NJ
  1575. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16812Ed Coleman
    I don't think that after utterly abandoning their property for decades and allowing it to become an ecosystem for unknown animals in the heart of our city, that Conrail should be able to sell to developers without an EIS. It is obnoxious to suggest that there will not be possibly devastating effects to our community. I have lived in Jersey City all my life, and our downtown is being sold away to developers at an alarming rate. My worry isn't development per se, but irresponsible development. There needs to be an EIS before anything can move forward. Our community demands it.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1576. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16811Roger Heitmann
    I urge the Surface Transportation Board to authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment of the Harsimus Branch Embankment. Demolition may adversely effect the residential environment's air quality, noise and cause vibrations as well as releasing contaminants. It may also cause flooding and habitat destruction. The urban residents of this area need your help with this prudent step to authorize the study. Thank you for your time and consideration.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1577. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16810Cara Birnbaum Harmon
    Hello- I live in Jersey City near Hamilton Park. I'm also a journalist and have done quite a bit of research into the JC Embankment issue. I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Conrail's abandonment and demolition of the embankment will have a profoundly negative impact on our neighborhoods. I'm horrified that a portion of the area slated for destruction is an history cemetery dating back to the Revolutionary War and War of 1812, a burial place for Jersey City families. I intend to follow this story continue discussing it with my editors. Thank you for your attention. Cara Birnbaum Harmon
    Jersey City, NJ
  1578. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16809jane grannis
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment. In this time of increasingly shrinking green spaces in urban areas, the fate of the Embankment becomes even more important. The right of way that Conrail is abandoning also includes a cemetery that is Revolutionary War and War of 1812 historic site as well as a historic burial place for Jersey City families. A full environmental impact study for the whole right of way should help decision makers make good choices about this important corridor.
    jersey city, nj
  1579. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16808Emily Newman
    As a resident of Jersey City for the past 7 years, I believe that STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1580. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16807Pamela Windo
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1581. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16806Lisa Tardelli
    Please authorize an Enviromental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to our Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods and families. Jersey City needs more green space not condos!
    Jersey City, NJ
  1582. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16805Pershing Field Garden Friends
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Laura Skolar · Jersey City, NJ
  1583. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16804Catherine Boland
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment. Demolition of this site would have an impact on the surrounding historic resources, such as the Jersey City-Harsimus Cemetery (both a Revolutionary War and War of 1812 Historic Site). I urge you to consider the historical loss to the city if the Sixth Street Embankment were to be demolished. Thank you, Catherine Boland
    Jersey City, NJ
  1584. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16803Rose Mirjah
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    Detroit, MI
  1585. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16802embankment preservation coalition
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision-makers have the best information available to them. Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.Abandonment will lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partner are seeking permits now) Effects of demolition of massive structure on § air quality § dust § noise § vibrations § heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts § damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile § removal of a cultural resource § health § release of contaminants § flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) § water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) § release of contaminants § habitat destruction § wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species § ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) § cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community § loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic § loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront § loss of light freight opportunities Inadequate studies done of contaminants Failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB Need for federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens Environmental justice issues Conrail’s neglect of site over decades and continuing bad faith seeking demolition permits.
    Lin Solomon · Jersey City, NJ
  1586. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16801Monica Orso
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    New, NJ
  1587. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16800David McGrath
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch and the Embankment. Decision makers need to know the potential environmental impact of the destruction of this property in an area that is already prone to flooding and backflow from the Hudson River.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1588. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16799PS # 8 NEIGHBORHOOD BLOCK ASSOCITION
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision-makers have the best information available to them.
    PANKAJ GANGARAM KAPADIA · JERSEY CITY, NJ
  1589. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16798Carolina Garcia-Paris
    Dear Sirs, Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment of the Embankment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment of the Embankment will lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partner are seeking permits now). Effects of demolition of massive structure will have a severe impact on: - Air quality - Dust, compromising the health of local residents - Noise to all residents in the area, particularly to those of us who live in the proximity to the Embankment. - Vibrations, affecting the structure of our properties. - Heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts. - Damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile. - Removal of a cultural resource. - Health, this is a very critical issue!!. - Flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) - Water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) - Release of contaminants - Habitat destruction. The Embankment provides lots of trees to the neighborhood. - Wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species. - Ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) - Cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community - Loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic - Loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront - Loss of light freight opportunities Inadequate studies done of contaminants --------------------------------------- Failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB Need for federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens Environmental justice issues ---------------------------- Conrail’s neglect of site over decades and continuing bad faith seeking demolition permits Thanks so much in advance for your urgent attention in this matter, Carolina Garcia-Paris Jersey City resident Attachments: Pictures of the Embankment from our property (5th Street) and also from Monmouth Street. Please note the greenery and trees on top of the Embankment.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1590. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16797Embankment preservation coalition
    We have lost too much already. My newborn needs space to walk, so the embankment should become a park, but he should also have a chance to get some idea about what Jersey City was like before the high rises. So please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Karin Vanoppen · Jersey City, NJ
  1591. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16796ruth grauert
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision-makers have the best information available to them. We need this area as historic record, green thoroughfare, a corridor of peace and beauty in our lives.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1592. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16795Catherine Crowley-Delman
    Please authoriye a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. It is time to think about the needs of our citizens instead of the desires of big companies. The potential environmental impact and damage to historic neighborhoods from demolition of this massive structure, are too great to ignore. Please do what is right for the Jersey City Community.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1593. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16794Sergio Gonzalez-Parga
    We live in a flood prone area.... The embankment potentially provides relief from the sewer system absorbing extra water and increasing the likelihood of my home flooding.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1594. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16793Jill Sigman
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Harsimus Branch Embankment in Jersey City. Without an EIS, the embankment will be demolished leading to severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. As a person concerned about the health of the planet, and of my friends and colleagues who live and work in Jersey City, I think it is important to preserve the existence of this green space, keep its environmental benefit in the exhaust filled area so close to the entrance to the Holland Tunnel, and set a civic example of preservation and respect for green space for other cities and neighborhoods.
    New York, New York
  1595. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16792Brian Weinberg
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment.
    BRONX, NY
  1596. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16791Sergio Gonzalez-Parga
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Corey Gaul · Jersey City, NJ
  1597. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16790Sergio Gonzalez-Parga
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Sergio Gonzalez · Jersey City, NJ
  1598. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16789Felicia Palmer
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I live right across the street with my 4 year old and husband and fear the environmental hazards that would be unearthed with the demolition of the Harsimus Stem Embankment. We know the Embankment was once a railway -- what oils and other hazards are beneath the soil could pose a serious environmental threat. This is a dense, residential neighborhood -- unearthing hazardous materials would have a devastating effect. We need to know what's in the soil before any consideration is given to demolish the Embankment!
    Jersey City, NJ
  1599. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16788Joel Caminer
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment. Us local residents treasure our historic embankment and desire a much different solution than the one being proposed by these developers.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1600. (printed as 4/5/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16787Aaron Haier
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1601. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16786Allen W. Kratz
    Because of the historic nature of the Sixth Street Embankment, the Surface Transportation Board should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment. A full environmental impact statement will help decisionmakers weigh the impact on adjacent historic resources.
    Hoboken, NJ
  1602. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16785Friends of Liberty State Park
    Representing the Board and the 900 members of The Friends of Liberty State Park in Jersey City,I urge you to please authorize a Full Environmental Impact Statement of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment before abandonment causes irreparable adverse effects to this priceless public resource, Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. The environmental effects of abandonment and demolition would have a devastating cultural, historic and open space impact on the Embankment's priceless value and of the surrounding resources. The Embankment is a sister urban natural, historical and cultural public resource to Liberty State Park,Jersey City's public resource behind Lady Liberty, and our nonprofit, all volunteer organization urges you to have a full EIS for the whole right of way to help lead to a wise decision for this important corridor. Sincerely, Sam Pesin president of The Friends of Liberty State Park
    Sam Pesin · Jersey City, NJ
  1603. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16784Friends of Liberty State Park
    Representing the Board and the 900 members of The Friends of Liberty State Park in Jersey City,I urge you to please authorize a Full Environmental Impact Statement of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment before abandonment causes irreparable adverse effects to this priceless public resource, Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. The environmental effects of abandonment and demolition would have a devastating cultural, historic and open space impact on the Embankment's priceless value and of the surrounding resources. The Embankment is a sister urban natural, historical and cultural public resource to Liberty State Park,Jersey City's public resource behind Lady Liberty, and our nonprofit, all volunteer organization urges you to have a full EIS for the whole right of way to help lead to a wise decision for this important corridor. Sincerely, Sam Pesin president of The Friends of Liberty State Park
    Sam Pesin · Jersey City, NJ
  1604. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16783David Kennedy
    I feel that the tearing down of the embankment will degrade my quality of life. The pollution alone would be detrimental to my little boy who plays in the park several blocks away. Please help us.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1605. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16782Hudson County Genealogical Society
    Does Jersey City need to forget all of its history? The answer is no. SAVE THE EMBANKMENT!
    Jacqueline Wisner · Timonium, MD
  1606. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16781East Coast Greenway Alliance - NJ Committee
    We would like a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. This will show just how important this abandoned rail line will be to the neighborhood, Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey, and the entire USA! I mean just that. I feel that the 6th Street embankment, if preserved and used as a part of the East Coast Greenway and park space, will rival Central Park in NYC. It will provide a non-motorized transportation link from Newark and the Meadowlands to NYC that will build a more sustainable transportation system and provide a tourism venue that will rival everything else in NJ. The transportation, health, and viewshed of the entire area counts on this being preserved in it's present state and kept as a transportation corridor as it always was. President and Mrs. Obama have mandated that we do just that to build on the future of our country and keep it healthy. Please do a full environmental study of the entire area!
    Mike Kruimer · Edison, NJ
  1607. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16780Jack N. Chekijian
    I want a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. I haven't lived in Jersey City for three years and preservation of this site is STILL important to me.
    Livingston, NJ
  1608. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16779Margaret Harrer
    I would respectfully request that STB authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch/Pennsylvania Railroad Sixth Street Embankment. The potential for negative environmental effects of abandonment and demolition, as well as the impact upon surrounding historic resources, which include the Cemetery dating from the Revolutionary War and War of 1812 historic site, is quite serious. Additionally, the cemetery is a historic burial place for Jersey City families, and this much history should be protected. Please move forward with caution and with the necessary and appropriate historical and environmental research. Thank you
    Oradell, New Jersey
  1609. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16778Chris Wagenseil
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. I believe green space is important to maintaining and improving quality of life in urban areas.
    Alpharetta, GA
  1610. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16777Leon Adlershteyn
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch; so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. The environmental effects of abandonment and demolition are known to be disastrous especially for the former industrial areas.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1611. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16776Deirdre O'Dea Garrahan
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. Abandonement will lead to demolition of the structure. This will cause the following negative effects: air quality, dust, noise, vibrations, heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts, damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile, removal of a cultural resources, water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary), release of contaminants, habitat destruction, wildlife (migratory birds and monarch butterflies and much local species), ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack), cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community, loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront
    Jersey City, NJ
  1612. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16775Christopher Garrahan
    I urge you to perform an EIS because abandonement will cause an extremely negative environmental impact, and adversely affect Jersey City's families, historical landmarks and neighborhoods.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1613. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16774robin edgerton
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    jersey city, nj
  1614. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16773Ulana Zakalak
    The Harsimus Branch Embankment is truly one of the most outstanding physical and historical landmarks in Jersey City. It should be studied in great deal, as well as the entire corridor of the Harsimus Branch. I am insisting on a full environmental study of the entire Branch.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1615. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16772Elizabeth B. Gilmore
    FULL ENVIORNMENTAL STUDY OF THE HARSIMUS BRANCH IS IMPERATIVE SO THAT FULL BEST INFORMATION WILL BE AVAILABLE TO THOSE MAKING DECISIONS.
    New York, New York
  1616. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16771Halayn Hescock
    I am concerned about the possible demolition of the 6th Street Embankment. I don't even know where to start; - particulates in the air during demolition? - ground tremors affecting house stabilization in the area? - what is the embankment filled with? more chromium? This area is distressed enough, why add more stress to it? Please be sure that an environmental study is thorough, if considering demolition. I understand that demolition/excavation of areas on 440 caused higher rates of cancer and asthma. Please do not cause additional risk to this small, historical area of JC. Thank you
    Jersey City, NJ
  1617. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16770Denis Cretinon
    I support that the Surface Transportation Board authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. The abandonment of the Harsimus Branch will lead to its demolition which will have serious adverse effects for all residents in the area. The loss of the Harsimus Branch Embankment would be a considerable lost opportunity as far as wildlife habitats, and mass transit oppportunities.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1618. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16768Ken Goldman
    I want an full environmental study conducted for the entire Harsimus Branch. This is already a densely packed neighborhood. Destruction of Harsimus branch will cause problems in terms of traffic, dust, noise, vibrations, air quality, and a negative impact on the general health of people living in the area. Most of the existing structures in the areas are over 100 years old and will suffer from the vibrations generated by the heavy truck traffic required to remove the embankment. Moreover the embankment is a cultural resource. Currently as a neglected relic it serves to break up the density of tightly packed housing in the area, provides needed greenery and habitat for birds and other wildlife. Once it is permanently preserved as part of the historic legacy of downtown Jersey City it has the potential to provided a needed park/recreation area for the neighborhood, desperately needed public transportation to neighborhoods west of Jersey City, and a patch of nature and greenery in an enviroment otherwise dominated by concrete and ashfalt. § removal of a cultural resource § health § flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) § water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) § release of contaminants § habitat destruction § wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species § ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) § cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community § loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic § loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront § loss of light freight opportunities Inadequate studies done of contaminants Failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB Need for federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens Environmental justice issues Conrail’s neglect of site over decades and continuing bad faith seeking demolition permits
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1619. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16767Powerhouse Arts District Neighborhood Association
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Jill Edelman · Jersey City, NJ
  1620. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16766Embankment Preservation Coalition
    I urge you to authorize a full environmental study of the entire Harsimus Branch. Abandonment and demolition will cause severe adverse effects to the surrounding neighborhoods. This would include poor air quality, water pollution, noise, damage to buildings and habitat destruction.
    Patricia Guida · Lyndhurst, NJ
  1621. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16765Eric Weis
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Providence, RI
  1622. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16764E. L. Baker
    Please authorize an EIS for the Embankment in Jersey City. Abandonment and demolition would have an extremely adverse effect on this improving neighborhood in terms of economic and environmental health. Conrail and the developer did not submit an environmental sampling study to the STB.
    PHILADELPHIA, PA
  1623. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16763Deborah Siegel
    Jersey City is a fragile ecosystem, with enormous potential to grow as a sustainable model urban environment". The post industrial recovery is vital to creating a safe, thriving city. Please hold Conrail accountable. STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision makers have the best information available to them. Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families."
  1624. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16762Reservoir Alliance
    Please require Conrail to officially abandon the railroad embankment in downtown Jersey City, and prepare an environmental impact study before selling it. It is incorrect to assume that just because it exists within a heavily urbanized area, that there is no natural value involved. As a resident of the Jersey City for over 25 years, I know that a wide variety of birds and mammals still manage to survive here and their numbers increase when natural areas are kept intact. The embankment, just like the JC Heights Reservoir #3, are de facto nature preserves due to years of abandonment and neglect. They harbor many insects, plants, and even mammals. Open space is sorely needed by the human population as well. And if we are to move to being green," let's start with where it already exists. Please consider the views of the citizens of the city. Thank you."
    Susan Schmidler
  1625. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16761Roswell Sanford
    An Environmental Impact Statement should be done before the downtown Jersey City railroad Embankment is officially abandonned or demolished.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1626. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16760CivicJC
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment leads to the demolition of the Harsimus Brach embankment. The demolition will have a severe negative impact on the historic district where it is located. The local residents will have to contend with dust, noise, circulation of heavy machinery and release of unknown contaminants. Thank you. Sincerely,
    Valerio Luccio · Jersey City, NJ
  1627. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16759Cynthia Sanford
    Please authorize and EIS (Environmental Impact Statement) for the Embankment in downtown Jersey City before abandoment leads to demolition resulting in serious harmful effects to the surrounding historic neighborhoods and their residents. This densely populated and historic area surely merits an EIS when the stablity of many historic structures and the health of local residents seem likely at risk in the event of destruction of the embankment.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1628. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16758Jennifer Lane
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch decisionmakers need to have the best information available to them.
    Rockville, MD
  1629. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16757Karen Farquhar
    April 3, 2009 Members of the Surface Transportation Board: According to my understanding, the National Environmental Policy Act calls for an Environmental Impact Statement to be issued prior to actions that could lead to adverse effects for residence of Jersey City and sites of historical importance. The potential demolition of the Harsimus Branch Embankment appears to fall into this category. I join the many members of our community and the city in strongly urging that an EIS be authorized at once, as per the requirements of the Policy Act. The reasons are many and include both environmental and personal concerns. Our backyard ends at the embankment. Our home is over 135 years old and we paid good money for it. I find it hard to imagine that having demolition machinery virtually enter our backyard would not have a seriously harmful effect on our property, the foundation of our home, and our peace of mind. That’s to say nothing of the mind-numbing noise generated by all the heavy equipment and demolition – noise that would make it extremely difficult for my husband (a freelance writer) to work. Or the dust and dirt stirred up by the demolition that would aggravate the asthma I’ve been fighting since I was a child. I’d also much prefer to look out our back door and see a more natural environment of vines and greenery rather than the back of some out-of-place townhouses or condominiums. I could certainly add to this list, but I’m sure many others will be expressing their concerns to my own. It’s important for the Surface Transportation Board to recognize these issues and authorize the Environmental Impact Statement in a timely manner. Sincerely, Karen Farquhar 256 Fifth Street Jersey City, NJ 07302
    jersey city, NJ
  1630. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16756kenneth lapham
    The possible demolition of the Harsimus Branch Embankment is of great concern to me. This structure is composed of enormous stone blocks, likely close to or more than 1000 of them. The type of heavy equipment and the vibrations caused by same could cause irreparable damage to the masonary construction historic structures and their foundations located as close as 30' away. Furthermore, the blocks comprise only the exterior of the structure, the interior is made of of many tons of unknown material from an age in our country's history when most hazmats were completely unknown. The dust and the hundreds of dumptrucks could cause exptensive health problems in this small 99.9% residential neighborhood, not to mention the students at at least 3 local schools that can see the structure from their windows in close proximity. I feel an EIS is a no brainer here.....or do we just want to ASSUME all will be ok and easy ? Seems like this is a shovel ready project to me! Thank you for your time.
    Jersey city, new jersey
  1631. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16755Wendy Setzer
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision makers have the best information available to them. This reservoir is beautiful and is a haven for fish, birds and trees. We live a block away and enjoy being there every summer on Saturdays.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1632. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16754Bethany Wall
    I urge you to authorize a FULL Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods and families. The Harsimus Branch extends through neighborhoods located just 6 blocks from the Holland Tunnel. In 2008, 33,742,000 vehicles entered and exited the tunnel. The Harsimus Branch Embankment has, quite literally, become a source of oxygen in an exhaust-laden urban landscape. A mature leafy tree produces as much oxygen in a season as 10 people inhale in a year. Demolition or development, which will follow shortly on the heels of abandonment, will deprive the surrounding neighborhoods of a much needed source of oxygen. Please examine fully the environmental ramifications of the upcoming abandonment decision. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1633. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16753Jersey City Resevoir Preservation Alliance
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. From the website of the Embankment Preservation Coalition, http://www.embankment.org/whitesite/actionalert1.html: From the The Embankment and streetscape will be a linchpin in a network of walkable, bikeable greenways within the City of Jersey City, and beyond. From north to south along Jersey Avenue, a main boulevard, the Embankment will serve as a midpoint in a series of parks, including Hamilton Park, Van Vorst Park, and Liberty State Park. From east to west, the Embankment will join the Hudson Waterfront Walkway with the Hackensack Meadowlands, via the Bergen Arches. A 2004 Northern New Jersey Route Study for the East Coast Greenway recommends this latter route as the main ECG pathway through Hudson County. The route has been endorsed by all six counties and 26 municipalities along it.""
    Andrew Kafel
  1634. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16752Grace Brown
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1635. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16751Jersey City & Harsimus Cemetery
    I am a volunteer working to restore the Historic Jersey City & Harsimus Cemetery. The Historic Jersey & Harsimus Cemetery was founded in 1829, and is a National Treasure. It is the sacred eternal resting place of hundreds & hundreds of soldiers from the Revolutionary War, The War of 1812, The Civil War, The Mexican War, The Spanish-American War, WWI & WWII, The Korean War and Vietnam, aw well as the earliest founders of our great Jersey City. It is also the historic site of Revolutionary War battles led by General Lafayette, at the request of General George Washington, during 1779-80, and the site of an active Ammunitions Bunker and Lookout Point during the War of 1812, which still stands proudly on the Cemetery grounds. The Cemetery grounds were also used as a military training camp for U.S. Army soldiers druing WWII, and to our amazement, many remaining military artifacts have recently been discovered. This Cemetery is also one of the first Garden-style cemeteries. Unfortunately, this special Cemetery was seriously neglected and finally abandoned about 12 months ago. This past summer, a new volunteer Board of Directors was organized, and through their tremendous efforts, and the efforts of some very special volunteers, these grounds are now being protected and restored. Our goal is to achieve State and National Landmark Preservation Status to ensure the perpetual preservation for this historic site and the soldiers who gave their lives for our freedom. Our vision also includes the development of a Historic Museum & Learning Center to increase public knowledge and appreciaton of the Cemetery's natural beauty and historical significance. The Harsimus Branch appears to run along an edge of the cemetery. I want a full environmental impact study, which will more carefully delineate where the Branch runs, what contaminants may exist along it, and what species the now overgrown right of way may support. Thank you. Sincerely, Jan Nordland
    Jan Nordland · Jersey City, NJ
  1636. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16750Nora Cheung
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. My family and young nephews are Jersey residents and I fear that development plans will have severe adverse effects on the environment. I feel green space would be better used for parks where the children can run freely. Thank You.
    New York, New York
  1637. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16749Scott Keller
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    New Yorl, NY
  1638. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16748Kristen Haas
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition and the effects of demolition of this massive structure will affect our air quality, create dust and noise in our quiet neighborhood.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1639. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16747Embankment Preservation Coalition
    I attended an April 1st hearing of the Historic Preservation Commission of Jersey City. Conrail and its partner developer were there applying for demolition permits. They tried to enter into evidence the Environmental Assessment that your Section of Environmental Analysis just issued March 23. Can the Environmental Assessment say it is recommending a NHPA section 106 condition that will prevent demolition, when Conrail and its partner think it will help then get demolition permits? It's frightening when regulatory agencies help the parties they're regulating destroy assets that are needed for public use.
    Peter Delman · Jersey City, New Jersey
  1640. (printed as 4/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16746Steven Singer
    Environmental studies need to be effectuated before more green spaces are eradicated from downtown Jersey City. The Harsimus Branch Embankment is beautiful, historic and inspiring and is in desperate need of preservation and public use.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1641. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16745Alissa Rose
    I am concerned about the Embankment and the environmental impact of development. Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement to prevent severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1642. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16744Cory Braiterman
    To start, I would like to request that an Environmental Impact Statement be authorized for the Embankment. The land surrounding it at Newport and Shoprite plaza was significantly toxic for decades and there isn't any reason to think otherwise of the embankment. Having said that, I wish for the embankment to be all or partially demolished. It's an eyesore with little historical relevance. While I do not support some of the current plans that call for high-rise condos, I am very much in favor of smaller buildings, businesses and townhouses. I would be happy to see a park in it's place, but not an elevated park, as that would be a waste of money building the ramps, fencing and/or bridges and maintaining them. It's too narrow to be much more than a jogging path, so using up six half-blocks worth of land seems beyond wasteful. I would also like to say I'm fine with it being used as a Light Rail link to Journal Square or Secaucus should a feasible plan be worked out to allow this.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1643. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16743Alessandra Rafferty
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    JErsey City, NJ
  1644. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16742Mike Selender
    Being that the PRR Harsimus Stem Embankment passes through a late nineteenth century residential district that was constructed on landfill, I believe that a full EIS should be required as part of any abandonment process.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1645. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16741Richard E Meyer
    It is extremely imortant to my cmomunity that the 6th Street Embankment be preserved. It not only serves as a monumnet to the efforts of our workforce but represents the ethic of the community and should serve as a continuing monument as a community park. It should not be permitted to be used for the construction of buildigns that will further polute and diminish the value of Jersey City. I urge you to do a full environmental impact study so that you and and all other interested parties will be fully aware of the negative impacts that allowing the embankment to be torn down will have on the community. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1646. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16740Frank Cadden
    I own a house within 60 feet of the 6th Street Harsimus Cove Embankment in Jersey City. This is a massive structure in the middle of a residential area. Demolition of this structure would cause untold effects on houses and people who live in the area. We need an Environmental Impact Study of this structure to tell us what is in the Embankment and what effect its demolition would cause to the neighborhood and to the city. Given the history of this area of NJ, we don't know if this is a Super Fund Site or not! Various plans have been submitted for the use of this area, a study is needed for us to proceed with these plans. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1647. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16739Kim Andrews
    There is concern in my neighborhood about the demolition of 6 blocks of the Harsimus Branch Embankment in Jersey City, NJ. I would like to request your agency to please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City’s historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition. Conrail, which has neglected this site over the decades, and their development partners, are now actively seeking permits to demolish the Harsimus Branch Embankment, in bad faith. They have also failed to submit an environmental sampling study to your agency. The effects of the demolition will negatively affect the surrounding areas in a number of ways. There will be a number of environmental justice issues, including an increased burden on water quality on combined sewers, causing a release of CSOs into the Hudson estuary; the release of contaminants, which will impact air quality; with regard to the local eco-system, there is a chance for flooding (there will be no half-mile of fill to absorb storm-water in flood plain), the destruction of the local habitat, which will negatively impact our local wildlife. Additionally, transportation will be impacted in a number of ways: there will be heavy truck traffic through our historic districts, which will cause vibrations and damage to the area’s historic buildings, a loss of grade-separated transportation structure, which is ideal for our area’s heavy traffic flow (we are located in near the Holland Tunnel, as well as near two major highways), and the loss of light freight opportunities. There is a need for a Federal Agency to enforce federal laws, rather than burdening our local government and citizens. The National Environmental Policy Act requires Federal agencies to prepare EISs for major Federal actions that significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Your organization's environmental arm is so far saying that no EIS is necessary for the Embankment. Please reconsider, and issue an Environmental Impact Statement. Thank you very much. Kim Andrews Jersey City, NJ
    Jersey City, NJ
  1648. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16738David Manzo
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1649. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16733Sarah Fishtein
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. The Jersey City Embankment is an important historical and ecological feature of our community. Commercial development would destroy its vital presence to Jersey City and devalue the interests of Jersey City's residents.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1650. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16732Caroline Katz-Mount
    I urge STB to authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch. This is an important environmental issue for our city and decision makers need the best information made available to them. We cannot allow the terrible environmental effects that would result from abandonment and demolition.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1651. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16731Santiago Gonzalez
    My name is Santiago Gonzales-Jabega, I am a resident of Madrid, but I have visited Jersey City many times. I look forward to returning this summer. The Embankment is an impressive piece of history in a town that is changing so fast and losing much of its past. I had understood that the community worked for many years to keep the Embankment as open space. This is a very important issue for Cities. In Madrid we have parks every where. In Jersey City there is building everywhere. The neighorhood of the Embankment is also sandwiched in between the New Jersey Turnpike and the Entrance of the Holland Tunnel so it gets much air polution. Removing the open space will have a bad effect on the health of people living in this area. It doesn't seem like you have thought enough about all of the bad effects of allowing this Embankment to be torn down.
    Madrid, Spain
  1652. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16730janice bissell
    Demolition of the embankment will wreck havoc on not only a natural environment for birds, trees and plants, but be a scar on the neighborhood. Jersey city has had enough of development gone wild, please leave our embankment alone!
    jersey city, NJ
  1653. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16729Suzanne Meyer
    I now live in Madrid , Spain but I have spent time in Jersey City a few blocks from the landmarked Embankment along 6th Street . I can tell you when I was there homes were routinely flooded along 6th Street during heavy rains, even with the huge Embankment right across the street to absorb the rain fall. I cannot imagine what kind of flooding people will have to deal with if the Embankment is taken down and replaced by housing. If you had sent anyone to visit the area and talk to people from the city you would know how serious a problem this is. The city has really old sewers that are on the verge of collapse all over the downtown. The Embankment does a lot to relieve that so removing it will have serious consequences. STB needs to do a full EIS to understand the how this will effect the residents of downtown Jersey City.
    Madrid, Spain
  1654. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16728Dana Winfield
    As a lifelong New Jersey resident and a Jersey City resident of 15 years I am writing to urge the STB to do a full Environmental Impact Study of the Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment. Demolition of the Embankment poses huge environmental and health hazards to many Jersey City residents. The Embankment has become an oasis for birds and other wildlife as well as the countless species of trees and other plants that grow on it. We are particularly concerned that if the Embankment were to be demolished an already flood-prone neighborhood would be even more apt to flood. The prospect of demolition in terms of health and quality of life is devastating: we would experience horrendous noise, vibration (potentially inflicting damage on our fragile historic homes), and dust (exacerbating asthma and other health problems). I am further concerned about the potential release of contaminants that demolition of the Embankment would present. As someone who lives along the Embankment I can attest that we often find scrap metal from the railroad and trains, coal, and glass in our yard that are clearly waste from the abandoned train trestle. I cannot imagine the level of unsafe and contaminated debris that would be released in the event of demolition. In addition the Embankment is a beautiful reminder of the rich industrial history that is part of the fundamental cultural fabric of Jersey City. To lose the Embankment would be to lose one of the last vestiges of old Jersey City. In terms of proposed construction of more high-rises in Jersey City I cannot think of a greater waste of space and resources. In the past several years there have been many new high-rise residential buildings constructed in Jersey City, are any of these even at ½ capacity at this point? It would seem grossly wasteful to build more apartments, particularly in this economy, that would most like lie fallow, especially when we have a dearth of open space in Jersey City – the Embankment would serve as much needed additional open space available to every resident of Jersey City. Thank you or considering this request.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1655. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16727Karen Lorentz
    Demolition of the Embankment poses huge environmental and health hazards to many Jersey City residents. The Embankment has become an oasis for birds and other wildlife as well as the countless species of trees and other plants that grow on it. We are particularly concerned that if the Embankment were to be demolished an already flood-prone neighborhood would be even more apt to flood. The prospect of demolition in terms of health and quality of life is devastating: we would experience horrendous noise, vibration (potentially inflicting damage on our fragile historic homes), and dust (exacerbating asthma and other health problems). I am further concerned about the potential release of contaminants that demolition of the Embankment would present. As someone who lives along the Embankment I can attest that we often find scrap metal from the railroad and trains, coal, and glass in our yard that are clearly waste from the abandoned train trestle. I cannot imagine the level of unsafe and contaminated debris that would be released in the event of demolition. In addition the Embankment is a beautiful reminder of the rich industrial history that is part of the fundamental cultural fabric of Jersey City. To lose the Embankment would be to lose one of the last vestiges of old Jersey City. In terms of proposed construction of more high-rises in Jersey City I cannot think of a greater waste of space and resources. In the past several years there have been many new high-rise residential buildings constructed in Jersey City, are any of these even at ½ capacity at this point? It would seem grossly wasteful to build more apartments, particularly in this economy, that would most like lie fallow, especially when we have a dearth of open space in Jersey City – the Embankment would serve as much needed additional open space available to every resident of Jersey City.
    Jersey City, New JErsey
  1656. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16726Donald C. Whitney
    Harsimus Branch is an important Historical and Recreational asset of the community and should not be destroyed. STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Edmond, OK
  1657. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16725Susan Schwarzwald
    I am writing to request that an Environmental Impact Statement be prepared and released to the public before abandonment of the Embankment (quite literally in my backyard) incurs severe and irreversible environmental damage to the downtown Jersey City historic district and beyond. I fear that the air quality will be severely compromised due to the nature of the use of the embankment by Conrail for many years during the last century. I also have grave concerns about removing a structure that absorbs and contains massive amounts of water in a flood zone. I pay quite a bit of money for flood insurance as required by my mortgage company. I suspect that any attempt to remove or change this structure will cause severe flooding in a neighborhood that already suffers from flooding during severe storms. There is a great deal of wildlife that survives in this area on the top of the embankment. This is in an area that otherwise has scarce access to nature and the benefit that comes from living around green plants. Furthermore, last and not least, I am extremely distressed that this structure would be demolished to the possible detriment of the structural integrity of my own home of 23 years.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1658. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16724Nick D'Angelo
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, N.J.
  1659. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16723Angel Nunez
    Please do not allow any developers to tear down the Embankment as doing so will disrupt our neighborhood and cause a host of health and flooding issues to name a few. We do not need anymore apartment buildings going up in Jersey city!!
    Jersey City, NJ
  1660. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16722Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy
    I'm a member of the advisory board of the Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy and Director of Real Estate & Marketing for the Jersey City Economic Development Corporation. I do not think the NHPA Section 106 condition you recommend in your Environmental Assessment will protect the Embankment from demolition by Steve Hyman. The need for an Environmental Impact Statement is clear. If this wonderful stone structure is demolished, it is sure to have drastic environmental effects on the surrounding historic neighborhoods. Its loss will remove habitat of threatened and endangered species that has not yet been studied . An EIS will provide decisionmakers with comprehensive information about the site.
    Daniel Frohwirth · Jersey City, NJ
  1661. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16721Rebecca Feranec
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them to make the RIGHT decision.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1662. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16720David Najjar
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1663. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16719andreas scholtz
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. Given that Lefrak was stopped from building on the 10th street embankment due to foundation cracks on neighboring buildings, demo on the 6th street embankment would have greated adverse effects due to the proximity of housing. Demo or building is far from a wise decision or use of the area.
    jersey city, nj
  1664. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16718Embankment Preservation
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Richard L Williams · Jersey City, NJ
  1665. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16717Embankment Preservation
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Richard L Williams · Jersey City, NJ
  1666. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16716Embankment Preservation Coalition
    The STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision-makers have the best information available to them. Thanks!
    Jim Agostine · Jersey City, NJ
  1667. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16715Bryony Romer
    I am writing to ask you the Surface Transportation Board to please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement on the Harsimus Branch Embankment before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition, which will have devastating affects on the environment and surrounding community: impairing air and water quality, endangering historic buildings, destroying wildlife habitats, reducing transportation options, and potentially leading to flooding and other immediate physical crises. Thank you, Bryony Romer
    Brooklyn, NY
  1668. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16714Dr. Irina Bereznaya
    SBT should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch; so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. This former industrial area has now more amd more young families with growing children -it's their fate that we worry about.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1669. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16713Mark Bryant
    I am a Jersey City resident near the proposed Conrail embankment demolition project. I am extremely concerned about toxic materials that may be released as a result of its destruction, as well as damage to the environment and surrounding historic structures. I urge you to authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before the project begins in order to ensure the safety and financial interests of local residents and businesses. Thank you for your assistance.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1670. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16712patrick fusco
    the surface trans board should do a complete environmental study of the Harsimus branch so that everyone knows exactly what's going on.
    jersey city, nj
  1671. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16711Judith Schteingart
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. There are many small children in this area (including ours!)whose health could be irrevocably impacted by any contaminants dispersed into the air or ground.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1672. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16710Natalie Miyamoto
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. Jersey City's polluted enough with toxins in the soil and air.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1673. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16709Richard Haymes
    I am writing because of my concerns about the Embankment. I believe the STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so that decision makers have the best information available to them. As a resident of Jersey City, I am concerned about the negative environmental effects of abandonment and demolition. Jersey City (as do most urban centers) needs more green space than less, and with highrise housing encroaching from the east (Hudson River), we need more parks than housing. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1674. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16708Riverview Neighborhood Association
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement of the Harsimus Branch in Jersey City before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. STB should authorize this study so decisionmakers have the best information available to them Abandonment will lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partner are seeking permits now)and this will damage the air quality of the area during demolition, remove a vestige of our historic rail past from a historic district, and destroy natural habitats that have been created since Conrail left the embankment to deteriorate. Thank you.
    Becky Hoffman · Jersey City, NJ
  1675. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16707Anibal Escobar
    I live close to the 6th St. Embankment and want to make sure that all of the necessary steps are taken with respect to its abandonment and possible demolition. STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1676. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16706Nisha Ahamed
    I believe the STB should authorize a full environmetal study of th Harsimus Branch to assess the impacts of demolition of the 6th St Embankment. Without such a study it is impossible for federal, state and city agencies to make an informed decision that protects the environment and health of Jersey City Citizens. As a resident who lives on 5th street directly behind the Embankment, I have serious concerns about demolition of the Embankment, which was an active railway line for at least 50 years. It is well known that a number of contaminants are present along old rail lines including PCBs. Furhter, there is no information about the orrgin of the fill used to build the Embankment in approx. 1905, which may have already been contaminated. It appears completely impossible to remove these 6 block-long sandstone/limestone structures whicih are between 17 and 25 feet high, without aerosolization of the dirt and dust contained within the embankmetn walls. It is essential to know what chemicals and pollutants will be contained in this particulate matter that will be inhaled by residents, and settle in our yards. Furhter, once the embankment is opened and the fill exposed it can easily wash down into city streets, residents' yards, and into the storm sewers where it flows into the Hudson River. This is an unacceptable risk to take without first thoroughly assessing the nature of the fill, and conducting a complete enviromental impact study.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1677. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16705lambda sigma upsilon
    while attending st.peter's college the only thing that really attracted me to the area and scenery. Being able to drive down to the waterfront without any hassle. Building more homes will only jeopardize everything. More traffic and more pollution. More kids in over crowded schools. All these things would kill the beautiful that the area has. When I become a home buyer I would not consider moving to that area because of those factors and would rather move to an area where there will be peace and quite, less pollution, and be able to see grass and trees instead of opening my window and seeing another building instead of the view of the city.
    fabian pattarroyo · mahwah, nj
  1678. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16704Linda Herdman
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1679. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16703Margaret Kessler
    We in Jersey City desperately need your help because our local officials seem powerless to do the right thing to protect us. We need a complete environmental study of our Harsimus Stem railroad embankment. What havoc it will wreak on us if it is demolished! With the bad stuff that has accumulated in it, and with its service as a sponge to help offset our local flooding due to an inadequate sewer system, for so many reasons we need to keep it. It is a precious source of open space that is so desperately needed in our urban environment, and a priceless historic resource. Our local officials have no idea about what is of real value. The irreplaceable historic warehouse district that the railroad trains went to after passing over the Embankment has been severely compromised through demolition already because of decisions made by our local politicians. (see photo) This must not happen to the Embankment as well. The photo is one I took as I happened to walk by when the first of our 19th century warehouses to be demolished was ripped down. It was sickening.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1680. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16702Kim Bressant Kibwe
    STB should require a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. This I think is a no brainer. Do it right in the short run and save money in the long run by not having to correct potentially costly mistakes.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1681. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16701Linda Herdman
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1682. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16700ronit
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    jersey city, nj
  1683. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16699Laura Israel
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. This is a very important space to the people in the surrounding area.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1684. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16698Matt Amory
    The Surface Transportation Board should do all in its power to restrict the ability of unscrupulous property developers in Jersey City to transform the Harsimus Branch Embankment, a piece of public property, into one or more commercial development projects which will benefit the developers alone and degrade the environment of the Harsimus Cove Historic District. The only reason these projects are on the drawing board at all is because of the shockingly low price of the embankment To allow commercial development to go forward would be to allow private profit at the direct expense of the public interest. As a former resident of the neighborhood, I know how densely populated it is already and how desperate the need for open space. Please authorize a full environmental study, the cost to be borne by the developers alone. I believe such a study will show definitively the degradation of local quality of life which will be the result of any further commercial development of these parcels, and the marginal value to the public of any proposed development. Sincerely, Matt Amory
    Brookline, MA
  1685. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16697Pershing Field Friends
    Authorize an environmental impact statement before abandonment causes damage to Jersey City residents and neighborhoods. Thank you!
    Diane M. Brown · Jersey City, nj
  1686. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16696B. Miluski
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. This is the least you can do for the people of Jersey City.
    jersey city, NJ
  1687. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16695Mary Anikow
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision makers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1688. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16694Don Ciandella
    I'm a four-year resident of Jersey City who along with my wife is raising two young children in the city. The Embankment sits behind our house, and I am deeply concerned about environmental issues. Disturbing the Embankment could pose a health danger to my children and others in my community. STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1689. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16693Norrice Raymaker
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. In Jersey City, we need every square inch of space to be put to the best and highest use. We are the most densly populated county in New Jersey. Please do the full study. I am depending upon you to empower us to make a wise decision. We are at the mercy of developers who have made campaign contributions to local politicians who support special interests and not OUR interests. Please help us defend our community. Thank you.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1690. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16692mike hart
    The embankment park is the single greatest opportunity for the jersey city area. it will be like a central park for NY., and perminantely increase quality of life and financial value. - Tha major problems that plaque the downtown area, of flooding, bad sewers , electric brown outs, garbage, transportation, old services and crime, will be exacerbated by any new housing development such as is proposed for the embankment site.
    Jersey city, NJ
  1691. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16691Michael Brandli
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision makers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1692. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16690michelle
    I would not like to see this project go through since the city has so many apts & condo that have recently been built that are still vacant. Also those of us that live in the heights dont need the view of another high rise and our enviroment can do with out it also. They should make this space a green zone.
    jersey city, nj
  1693. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16689Jim Moore
    STB should authorize a full environmental impact study of the Harsimus Branch so that decision makers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1694. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16688Zennia Barahona
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decision makers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1695. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16687Vince O'Hara
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them. Moreover, the Harsimus Brach is located in a very densely populated residential community. Destruction or modification of the Harsimus Branch could release toxins and other dangerous pollutants into the air and water. These possible effects most be studied and discussed to the fullest extent permitted by law. Furthermore, the Harsimus Branch is an important historical relic that distinguishes its neighborhood for its industrial heritage. It is critical that we preserve the Harsimus Branch for its historical value and its beauty as a wall of stone, a beauty that may not be easy to see at first glance, but reveals itself over time. It should also be preserved as open space in a densely populated city severely lacking open space. Please take all actions and decision within your power to protect the Harsimus Branch and the health, beauty and historical character of its surrounding community from the predations of a greedy developer.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1696. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16686Russell Agle
    STB should authorize a full environmental study of the Harsimus Branch, so decisionmakers have the best information available to them.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1697. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16685Michael A. Nolan
    Authorize a study of the Harsimus branch so decisionmakers have the best information availble.
    Jersey City, N.J.
  1698. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16684Sally B Rivera
    As a former Jersey City resident and a concerned citizen, I would like the Board to reconsider their position on abandonment of the Sixth Street Enbankment. I support the continuation of preserving the Enbankment as a historic site. Don't destroy a part of history. This site is one of so few that remain in the Northeast and to add to its historic value consider it a tourist attraction." The Embankment has a quality that adds to its unique appearance. To neglect it would be foolish, however, to continue to preserve its unique beauty speaks volumes of my beloved community and to the world about your appreciation for historic sites and their endearing value. Let's keep it and nurture it, it's that simple."
  1699. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16683Leo Ospina
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jessey City, NJ
  1700. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16682Altulga Ozagar
    My name is Altulga Ozagar I live in the Jersey City and I own a house downtown that is two blocks from the Embankment. It is wrong to give an abandonment permit to the railroad without first doing a full Environmental Impact Statement so that your agency can condition the abandonment permit to protect the public. Isn’t part of your agencies duty to enforce the laws to protect the public? Please do this. The health and welfare of thousands of people who live downtown near the Embankment is in your hands. Please do not treat it lightly. A full Environmental Impact Study is necessary.
    jersey city, NJ
  1701. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16681mehves ozagar
    My name is Mehves Toksoy I live in the Jersey City Heights and I own a house downtown that is two blocks from the Embankment. It is wrong to give an abandonment permit to the railroad without first doing a full Environmental Impact Statement so that your agency can condition the abandonment permit to protect the public. Isn’t part of your agencies duty to enforce the laws to protect the public? Please do this. The health and welfare of thousands of people who live downtown near the Embankment is in your hands. Please do not treat it lightly. A full Environmental Impact Study is necessary.
    jersey city, NJ
  1702. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16680Anthony Jabbour
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families. Thank You
    Matawan, NJ
  1703. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16679Wendy Schor-Haim
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1704. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16678Mary Suliburk
    Please do not allow the destruction of the Embankment, I fear for the noise, traffic and release of contaminants. I have two beautiful kids that I want to raise in downtown Jersey City and the destruction of the Embankment will not only cause increased noise and traffic but could threaten the very health of my young children.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1705. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16676Joanne Robinson Hill
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1706. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16675Danya Sherman
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition. The effects of demolition of this massive structure will have extreme negative consequences, including adverse health effects and the loss of an important historical and cultural resource, as well as crucial natural habitat for migratory birds and other species.
    Brooklyn, NY
  1707. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16674Hamilton Park Neighborhood Association
    Hello, I am president of the Hamilton Park Neighborhood Association, the neighborhood association which represents several thousand of residents who live in the area directly North of the Harsimus Branch Embankment. Our association calls for a full environmental impact statement. Our neighborhood organization is alarmed about the physical threat presented by large scale demolition adjacent to our Historic homes and buildings. There are dozens of fragile buildings along the Sixth Street side of the Embankment that are in our neighborhood, including a senior citizen residence, two churches, and a school. Some of these buildings are listed on the national historic register and ALL are less than 50 feet from the embankment. These will be most immediately impacted, but our entire neighborhood will also be affected. In addition, to the potential economic damage to our community, there are health and safety concerns which are of prime importance to us (and should be to STB). We are in an area adjacent to the Holland Tunnel entrance into New York City. This is a nonattainment area for air quality. Removal of the Embankment, with its immediate impacts and the foreclosure of mass transit opportunities, will only add to our problems in this area. Finally, a study done for the Jersey City Redevelopment Agency in 1997 reported levels of four heavy metals and PAHs that would prohibit reuse of the soils under most circumstances. More recently, residents of our area noticed environmental sampling trucks on top of the Embankment, but we have seen no report of this study's results. A full Environmental Impact Study (EIS) would uncover that study, the 1997 study and perhaps recommend more in-depth studies. Please authorize a full environmental impact statement (EIS). Thank You Olu Howard
    Olu Howard · Jersey City, NJ
  1708. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16673Christine
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1709. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16672lynn mullins
    Please consider the need to do an environmental assessment of this fragile area. Many families live within this neighborhood and would be affected by the lack of one. Air quality, local water supply, historic buildings, ancient sewers, would all be possible compromised. thank you.
    jersey city, nj
  1710. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16671Rich Mendez
    I'm a businessman whose business is six blocks from the Embankment. Please do a full environmental study before allowing demolition of this massive structure that is a half-mile long. Its destruction will wreck our environment. Railroads used it for 100 years; now don't let them walk away and leave us their problems.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1711. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16670Carlos Santiago
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Robbinsville, NJ
  1712. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16669Kenneth Phalen
    The developers for the proposed 6th street Embankment project in downtown Jersey City are pushing to DEMOLISH 6 (SIX!!) blocks so they can build. I want the Surface Transportation Board to REQUIRE an Environmental Impact Statement. SAVE THE EMBANKMENT!!
    Jersey City, NJ
  1713. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16668Steven Hecht
    The developers for the proposed 6th street Embankment project in downtown Jersey City are pushing to DEMOLISH 6 (SIX!!) blocks so they can build. I want the Surface Transportation Board to REQUIRE an Environmental Impact Statement. SAVE THE EMBANKMENT!!
    Jersey City, NJ
  1714. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16667Steven Hecht
    The developers for the Embankment are pushing to DEMOLISH the 6 blocks so they can build. We want the Surface Transportation Board to REQUIRE an Environmental Impact Statement. SAVE THE EMBANKMENT!!
    Jersey City, NJ
  1715. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16666Freddy Rambay
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Effects of demolition of massive structure on § air quality § dust § noise § vibrations § heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts § damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile § removal of a cultural resource § health § flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) § water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) § release of contaminants § habitat destruction § wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species § ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) § cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community § loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic § loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront § loss of light freight opportunities Inadequate studies done of contaminants Failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB Need for federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens Environmental justice issues Conrail’s neglect of site over decades and continuing bad faith seeking demolition permits
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1716. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16665Hugo Reyes
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment and subsequent demolition causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. I think the toxic fumes that came about from 9/11 should be a reminder that any work or construction done in a neighborhood where millions of people live and commute through each day, should serve as a reminder that due diligence should always be done. Please be aware Conrail has neglected this site and is only now looking to demolish the area since it has become a profitable venture. Ensure it is environmentally safe to allow this!!
    Harrison, NJ
  1717. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16664Latinos Siempre Unidos
    Please take the utmost care to monitor and preserve the embankments in the area. They should be used to the benefit of all the area residents,in this spirit I am calling on you to authorize an Environmental Impact Statement on the Harsimus Branch Embankment property, as is called for by law. Jersey City would be done a disservice if the land were speed-delivered to Conrail. It would be unhealthy, bad for business, and bad for the community.
    Sergio Tupac Uzurin · Buffalo, NY
  1718. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16663Fabbio Areche
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    passaic, nj
  1719. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16662Angela Ferrao
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families
    Hamilton, NJ
  1720. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16661Susan Wright
    The STB must perform an EIS immediately on the Sixth Street Embankment structure. I bought my home in Hamilton Park six years ago. I am a first time homebuyer and I am thrilled to be a resident of the neighborhood. I feel very proud of my historic home and have spent endless hours stripping the woodwork and repairing the plaster walls, ceilings and moldings. The foundation of my home and adjacent 19th Century neighbors bears on a stone rubble foundation which supports the brick party walls. Interior framing is wood timbers bearing on the brick party walls. Although the party wall separating my home from my neighbor is three or four wythes of brick I feel and hear the vibration of the joists when they walk up their interior stairs. The street front and rear yard facades of our homes deteriorate over time as the bricks and mortar are exposed to moisture and freeze and thaw cycles. Interior repairs to these walls loosen the dry mortar and for days afterward I hear sand falling between the lath and plaster finish of the wall. The brownstone materials around the first floor windows and stoops are brittle and have probably been saved by layers of paint or the glues of the 1970s brick face that conceal them. My home was standing when the embankment was built in 1901. Very little information is known about the construction of the embankment other than that the elevated metal tracks remained in operation throughout the raising of the stone retaining walls and are likely buried inside the Embankment. The interior was likely filled with dirt and loose materials dumped from freight cars. In spite of the 100+ years that have passed since the construction of the embankment, construction demolition technologies have hardly changed since the time of the Romans. Basic demolition technology is limited to hitting a structure until it fails or pulling it apart piece by piece. Unless protected, adjacent parts of the structure and adjacent structures are undermined by the battering. Removal of the dirt fill and loose debris requires use of a front loader or excavator, which will need to be installed on the public streets dangerously close to our homes or lifted onto the top of the embankment. Removal of the tremendous stone blocks that form the retaining walls of the embankment will require shoring of adjacent sections, removal of infill materials and lifting of the stones one by one for removal. At some point the structure will simply be rammed with heavy objects until it breaks. The vibration caused by the removals will be significant. I have not even mentioned concerns over noise, debris, dust, and the release of hazardous materials into the environment. The STB must prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for the entire structure. The EIS should address the environmental impact of any demolition approach. The plan should include proposed shoring methods for the Embankment and neighboring buildings, the locations of sidewalk bridges, heavy equipment and street closures should be identified. The EIS should include a photo survey of the exterior and interiors of all buildings within 200 feet and to call for vibration monitoring of those homes for the entire demolition and construction period, should such happen. Aside from the noise and debris associated with any construction project, the wear and tear on the city streets from heavy equipment traffic, and the potential for damage to the city sewer, water and gas mains caused by vibration and impact, I am convinced that the demolition of the embankment will lead to the subsequent damage and ultimately the demolition of many of the historic homes in the neighborhood.
    Jersey City, nj
  1721. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16660Peter Zirnis
    I understand that you have ruled the Harsimus Embankment does not need an evironmental study (EIS). That is highly mistaken. The Embankment is a 6-block long, 30-foot high structure built 100 years ago over which all sorts of freight was delivered. It now sits in the middle of residential areas,schools and old age homes. I understand a developer wants to tear it down - of course there should be an environmental study. I'm sure neither you nor the developer would want to be living in the neighborhood of that structure as it is being demolished and wondering what carcinogens are being released. Do the correct thing and let's find out what the dangers,if any,there are.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1722. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16659Brenda Cruz
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. I live 1 city block from the 6th St./Erie St. portion of the Embankment and it’s very saddening to think that a lifetime landmark such as this will not belong to the neighborhood residents due to the personal interests of developers and financiers. I am deeply concerned about the negative effects that the demolition of such a massive structure will have on;  air quality  dust  noise  vibrations  heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts  damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile  removal of a cultural resource  health  flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain)  water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary)  release of contaminants  habitat destruction  wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species  ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack)  cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community  loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront My family and I have lived in the Embankment area neighborhood (on 7th and Erie Sts.) for over 30 years and would really hate to see such destruction occur right in front of our eyes. Sincerely, Brenda Cruz
    Jersey City, NJ
  1723. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16658Renata Zednicek
    I am a homeowner who resides just steps away from the 6th street embankment. I also work as an architect with over 20 years of experience and am well aware of the impact that demolishing a structure such as the embankment would have on the community. From an environmental standpoint, it would destroy an oasis for birds and natural habitat and run the risk of releasing contaminants into the atmosphere. As a green space, the embankment does much to reduce the heat island and carbon footprint of the area. Being an asthma suffrer, I am particularly concerned about compromised air quality resulting from dust and debris and its effect on my health. From a quality of life standpoint, the demolition noise and congestion associated with mobilizing and staging of heavy equipment would be devastating. From a real value standpoint, surrounding properties (including the one I own) would experience a decline due to their close proximity to a work zone. I am personally concerned about potential structural damage to my 100 year+ historic home. From a cultural standpoint, the emankment's aesthetic supports the historic character of the neighborhood that is so appealing to residents and potential home buyers. For these reasons, I urge the Surface Transportation Board to review the impact of demolishing the embankment on the community as a whole, and request that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be prepared so that all factors can be taken into account. Thank you. Renata Zednicek Senior Associate Perkins Eastman Architects
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1724. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16657E. Junior Maldonado
    As an affected resident and former Councilman for this Ward I am asking for an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The National Environmental Policy Act requires Federal agencies to prepare EISs for major Federal actions that significantly affect the quality of the human environment. This is one such example. I have been a supporter of the Sixth Street Embankment Coalition for over 8 years and will continue to do so for the next lifetime. Downtown Jersey City has seen a complete revitalization of its waterfront and surrounding areas. Thousands upon thousands of condo units have been built. Just in the last couple of years approvals have been given to build an additional 25,000!! There is no need for more development! There is a need for more open space which would provide residents of the area with a safe haven. A declaration of abandonment will lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partner are currently seeking City permits and approvals to do this now). The effects of this potential demolition from this massive structure would create havoc on air quality with the large amount of dust that will circulate. The noise and vibrations from heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts would create the potential to do damage to buildings on both sides for one-half mile. That would be inexcusable. Imagine the concern for the safety and health of all the residents in the nearby area. It would create problems with flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb storm water in flood plain) and water quality. It would destroy habitat and wildlife including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species. There would be a tremendous loss of the ecosystem and not to mention the cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community that has taken place there for over 50 years. Thus far there have been inadequate studies done of contaminants that include the failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB. There has been a gross neglect of the site over decades by Conrail and they continue to deal in bad faith as they and their partner seek demolition permits. There is an ABSOLUTE need for this federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens. I am asking as a resident of this community that you please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families that would be irreversible!
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1725. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16656Embankment Preservation Coalition
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Embankment in Jersey City, NJ. The Embankment is surrounded on all lateral sides by residential neighborhoods and business thoroughfare. It is deeply rooted in a community and historical district. Due to insufficient studies done on the contaminants in the Embankment, it is public federal policy to protect its people and comply with the National Environmental Policy Act to prepare an EIS - especially for projects such as this one. Please make all responsible considerations for the families, residents and businesses in the historical districts of Downtown Jersey City.
    Alma Malabanan-McGrath · Jersey City, New Jersey
  1726. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16655Gary Bucca
    Members of the Surface Transportation Board: In accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act, an Environmental Impact Statement is required for actions that could lead to adverse effects for Jersey City families, neighborhoods, and sites of historic importance. I ask the Surface Transportation Board to authorize this statement immediately with regard to the Harsimus Branch Enbankment and the looming possibility of its demolition. There is strong reason to believe such actions will seriously impact conditions and quality of life for the area and its residents Right now, my backyard is bordered by the embankment. I’m deeply concerned over a number of factors that could be raised by the demolition. Included among these are damage to the structural integrity of my home due to vibrations and machinery, noise pollution, dust and particles which will affect my wife’s asthma, potential damage to our backyard if demolition occurs, an increased likelihood of flooding without the land on the embankment to absorb rainwater, plus, numerous other concerns. In addition to these factors, there is the unquantifiable joy of waking up in the morning and looking out into my backyard –– seeing the beauty of these magnificent stone bricks with vines running down into our yard. I’m sure my neighbors feel much the same way. This is an important environmental matter not to be taken lightly –– and one that affects me and my wife on a personal basis as well. I ask nothing more than that you comply with the policy act and authorize the EIS as required. Thank you for your time. Gary Bucca 256 Fifth Street Jersey City, NJ 07302
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1727. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16654Corrina Bouthilette
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Brooklyn, NY
  1728. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16653Janice Vasquez
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families
    Livingston, NJ
  1729. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16652Roger Sayre
    As a Jersey City resident I am very concerned about the environmental impact and health concerns concerning demolition of the embankment.Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    jersey city, nj
  1730. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16651Jennifer Meyer
    I am writing to request that the STB do a full Environmental Impact Statement as part of consideration of Conrail's abandonment application. The environmental impacts of allowing Conrail to abandon and sell the Harsimus Stem Embankment to a developer who is bent on demolishing the enormous, historic structure will have myriad negative impacts on the physical and cultural environment of not only the surrounding neighborhoods and will also have more far reaching negative consequences. The decision to do an EA instead of an EIS given the level of controversy surrounding this site is incredible. The fact that there are such obvious issues as physical damage to the adjacent neighboods, exacerbation of flooding in the area, destruction of habitat, the proxmity 4 schools and two elder care facilities whose populations are particuarly suseptible to health risks associated with dust, noise and potentially airborne contamiannts. The loss of critically needed open space in a city with an enormous open space deficit. The list goes on and on. Moreover, the Environmental Assesment performed already appears only to depend on Conrail's presentation and seems to ignore the wealth of evidence assembled by many, many members of the public which would support a full EIS. I urge you to do the full EIS so as to ensure that the public will be protected. Thank you. Sincerely, Jennifer A. Meyer
    Jersey City, NJ
  1731. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16650Miguel Pincay
    Please keep the sixth st embankement as an open space. The city, its neighbors and the environment would appreciate it for years to come. Thanks, Miguel Pincay
    Teaneck, NJ
  1732. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16649Heidi Gutierrez
    Please authorize an EIS before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition, which in turn will adversely affect our air quality, increase the noise, cause vibrations, introduce heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts, cause damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile, affect the health of my neighbors, cause flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain), worsen our water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary), release contaminants, destroy natural habitats of wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species, affect the ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack), cause cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community, cause loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic, introduce loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront and loss of light freight opportunities.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1733. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16648Jacquelyn Maldonado
    Preserving the Sixth St. Embankment would be doing a great service to the community. It's historical remnents should be preserved and celebrated!
    South Kearny, New Jersey
  1734. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16647B Gonzalez
    Abandonment will lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partner are seeking permits now) Effects of demolition of massive structure on § air quality § dust § noise § vibrations § heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts § damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile § removal of a cultural resource § health § flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) § water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) § release of contaminants § habitat destruction § wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species § ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) § cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community § loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic § loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront § loss of light freight opportunities Inadequate studies done of contaminants Failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB Need for federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens Environmental justice issues Conrail’s neglect of site over decades and continuing bad faith seeking demolition permits
    Jersey City, NJ
  1735. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16646Kenneth Belasco
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment of the embankment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partner are seeking permits now) Demolition will effect... - air quality - noise - heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts - flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) - release of contaminants - habitat destruction - wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species - cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian festival. Thank you for your time.
    Bayonne, NJ
  1736. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16645Stephanie Urdang
    Please preserve this structure! The impact of tearing it down has too many negative effects. OUr environment needs to be protected and demolition and rebuilding of another structure would be too poisonous for the connecting neighborhoods. Why not make the best of what's already there and protect the city, state and planet at the same time>
    New York, NY
  1737. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16644Zoe Keramea
    As a Greek artist who visits often New York City and participates in exhibitions in the metropolitan area, I am very interested in the High Line project in New York and the similar Embankment project in Jersey City. The Embankment is like a landscape art piece by Robert Smithson or Andy Goldsworthy. It lends incredible interest to the historic Downtown, reminding me of European neighborhoods and the Promenade Plantee . It should never be destroyed, but used instead for a park and trail that brings people to the Hudson River. I would like to ask the STB to prepare an EIS in this matter. Thank you.
    Athens, Greece
  1738. (printed as 4/2/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16643James Young
    Although I am not a member of the Embankment Preservation Coalition, I have been aware of their work for ten years. I have a long-standing interest in the railroads because my father was an expert in rail financing and a big supporter of the use of abandoned rights of way for rail trails until government came to its senses and invested in railroads again instead of subsidizing motor vehicles. I think the Embankment provides a unique opportunity to combine a rail, trail, and open space use in the metropolitan area. I applauded the STB ruling that forced Conrail to face up to their illegal sale of the right of way. Now, however, the Environmental Assessment prepared by SEA suggests that what Conrail did was ok, and they should be able to get an abandonment permit without facing up to their responsibilities. It is basically a Conrail-prepared document. A full Environmental Impact Statement is obviously needed so the public can weigh in, because STB obviously hasn’t heard them yet.
    New York, NY
  1739. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Environmental
    224804Environmental Materials
    Ny/Nj Baykeeper
  1740. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Motion
    224801Motion/Petition/Request
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  1741. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Reply
    224798Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  1742. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16642Wendy M. Levy
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. The Embankment is literally in my back yard, and I'm concerned about the environmental issues inherent in demolishing such a large structure, especially one that had been used for industrial purposes. This will adversely affect the quality of life of not just us who call the Embankment our back yard, but everyone who lives in this neighborhood. From the dust and contaminants that will go into the air, to the impact on the city's already fragile flood drainage system, to the wildlife that take residence in the Embankment (including a pair of Northern Cardinals I've spotted living up there!), to the trucks that will need to come in to haul away the rubble, etc. I think I've made my point. Thank you for your time.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1743. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16641Shawn Cox
    I would like you to do a full environmental impact statement. We need a full and impartial study of the effects on our families and neighborhoods. Demolition and development plans, from Conrails abandonment of right of way, will have severe adverse effects.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1744. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16640Carmen Cheung
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. Though I am not a Jersey resident, my younger cousins are. I would hate to see green space given to developers as opposed to using that space to create parks and other public spaces where my cousins could run around and enjoy the environment around them. Thank you.
    New York, New York
  1745. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16639Catherine Townsend
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Since abandonment may lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partner are currently seeking demolition permits), it's critical that the STB analyzes the potential impacts of abandonment, particularly flooding, the release of contaminants into heavily populated neighborhoods and the noise, dust etc that such a demolition would entail.
    South Orange, New Jersey
  1746. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16638Wynn Caison
    I have been a visitor to Jersey City because my sister lives there. We have enjoyed the park called Liberty I believe, a haven so near the skyscrapers of Manhattan. I noted lots of families. I say if there's any remaining green space left in that area it ought to be preserved for the health and well-being of the citizens.
    Supply, NC
  1747. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16637Susanna Brooks
    I call for an EIS. The National Environmental Policy Act requires Federal agencies to prepare EISs for major Federal actions that significantly affect the quality of the human environment. The STB’s environmental arm is so far saying that no EIS is necessary for the Embankment. We need to change their minds.Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partner are seeking permits now) Effects of demolition of massive structure on  air quality  dust  noise  vibrations  heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts  damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile  removal of a cultural resource  health  release of contaminants  flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain)  water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary)  release of contaminants  habitat destruction  wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species  ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack)  cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community  loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic  loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront  loss of light freight opportunities Inadequate studies done of contaminants Failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB Need for federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens Environmental justice issues Conrail’s neglect of site over decades and continuing bad faith seeking demolition permits
    New York, NY
  1748. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16636Melissa Bonkoski
    As someone who has lived in this community and often spends time in the area of the Sixth Street Embankment, I would be nervous to see what demolition would bring to the area. The infrastructure already cannot support much of the waste water in this city, as demonstrated during storms. Without the buffer of the Embankment, thousands more gallons of waste and rainwater will cripple the decrepit system. This is on top of the fact of subjecting numerous historical districts to the noise, vibration and debris of demolition and heavy machinery as well as the loss of one of the few wild" spaces in the city. Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families."
  1749. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16635American Museum of Natural History
    An EIS statement is necessary for the Embankment. As someone who works with bio-geographical data, I see the large-scale impact of development and the reduction of green space. As someone who often bikes to work, greenways are important for keeping cyclists safe and encouraging drivers to switch to biking.
    Arlene Ducao · Brooklyn, NY
  1750. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16634Eileen Sweeny
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment cause severe adverse consequences in Jersey City to its historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Jersey City is one our state's greatest urban centers, and we need to treat all of its open spaces with the utmost respect and consideration. Thank you.
    Montclair, NJ
  1751. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16633Frances
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1752. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16632Claire & Robert Perrault
    An Environmental Impact Statement re. the 6th Street Harsimus Stem Embankment is essential for the wellbeing of the surrounding community, comprising two Federal Historic Districts. Abandonment, which will lead directly to demolition, will have severe adverse effects: The release of dust and with it untold contaminents brought about by demolition of this enormous rock structure in an area where asthma in children is already high alone demands analysis and review. The embankment is at least half a city block deep and some six sidestreet (i.e., long) blocks in length. The dust, noise, and vibrations will clearly have an adverse impact on the 2 historic districts, consisting of fragile,19th-century brick rowhouses, on either side of it. In addition, the Embankment currently has a beneficial effect both in flood control, its half-mile of fill absorbing stormwater in a serious flood plain, and as a habitat for local species of wildlife and a corridor for migratory birds and, famously, the Monarch butterfly; it is an essential part of the ecosystem corridor joining the Hudson to the Hackensack. Historically, it is an irreplaceable cultural monument to the railroads, and abandonment and demolition preclude its possible future use as a combined light rail linking Secaucus to the waterfront and a passive natural park in a city famous/infamous for having the least per-capita greenspace in the state and arguably in the country. Conrail's development partner failed to submit an environmental sampling study, which speaks to Conrail's neglect of the site for decades and its ongoing bad faith in now seeking demolition permits. As we understand it, a federal agency acting in good faith seeks to enforce federal laws in the name of environmental justice and to protect local communities. We trust that you will do this and at the very least require an Environmental Impact Statement. Thank you for your much-needed help and attention to this. Sincerely, Claire and Robert Perrault
    Jersey City, N.J.
  1753. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16630Susan Ryan
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1754. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16629Jennifer Chang
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition as Conrail and partner are seeking permits now. Effects of demolition of the massive structure will effect such important areas such as: § air quality § dust § noise § vibrations § heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts § damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile § removal of a cultural resource § health § flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) § water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) § release of contaminants § habitat destruction § wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species § ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) § loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic § loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront § loss of light freight opportunities Inadequate studies done of contaminants and failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB shows a need for federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens thank you
    jersey city, nj
  1755. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16628Matt Douglas
    Requesting that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) be done for the area of Jersey City known as the embankment.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1756. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16627Sanaya Kaufman
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Enbankment before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    New York, NY
  1757. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16626Joanne Gucciardo
    Please! Authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes Severe, Adverse Effects to my neighbors, my historic neighborhood, our historic landmarks and all JC historic districts! There are TOO MANY Children and Adults who I know who have asthma...I can't imagine how they can take anymore abuse from the terrible air quality and dust in this area, what with the Holland Tunnel, re-routing of traffic, all the construction going on here for years! I can't imagine the contaminants that will be released by the ridiculous idea of demolition! I can't imagine how homeowners can remain in their homes with a ridiculous and unnecessary demolition of a backbone of our community, one that helps with so much of the flooding issues they deal with each year. And a demolition would be ruinous to those homes that have the Embankment as their back yard wall!
    Jersey City, NJ
  1758. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16625Laura Keller
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement against demolishing the Embankment in JC. I've lived in JC for 3 years one brownstone down from the Embankment. I don't envision leaving soon unless the city decides to demolish the Embankment. As other cities, world-wide, are trying to balance growth with preserving nature, JC seems to be taking a step backwards in their considering demolishing the Embankment. Most cities would dream of having a landmark like the Embankment, one which is so primed to be cleaned up and utilized the right way (as a park/greenway) to preserve nature (positive growth for all residents and visitors)...rather than destroying it for condos, retail space, etc. (positive growth only for investors).
    Jersey City, NJ
  1759. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16624Friends of the High Line
    I started the High Line project 10 years ago and this is a chnace to recreate our success. Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    Robert Hammond · New York, NY
  1760. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16623Stephen Bumgarner
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Living one house away from the embankment that spans from Jersey Ave to Marin Ave, destruction of this embankment would cause not only great disruption to our daily lives via large amount of noise and traffic, but severely lessen the air quality of the neighborhood, displace all the wildlife currently living in the embankment, and generally ruin a large cultural and aesthetic part of what makes living in this neighborhood so appealing. I’m also very concerned about flooding, as the embankment currently helps absorb some stormwater - flooding is already bad enough in this part of town.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1761. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16622Sharon Bamberger
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is not fair to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods.
    CASTLETON ON HUDSON, NY
  1762. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16621Mike Pratt
    As someone who bikes around the region with my family, enjoying historic neighborhoods as a destination, I am concerned about Jersey City in general and the area of the embankment in particular I request that you authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    New York, New York
  1763. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16620Leslie Rich
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. To date, there have been inadequate studies done of contaminants Failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB Need for federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens Environmental justice issues Conrail’s neglect of site over decades and continuing bad faith seeking demolition permits
    Dobbs Ferry, NY
  1764. (printed as 4/1/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16619Daniel Woods
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1765. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16618Pauline Leung
    Please authorize a full Environmental impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe aderse effects on our environment. I want a full impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    Flushing, New York
  1766. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16617Philip Nostrand
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. New Jersey needs to save and create all the open space it can. As the nation's most densely populated state, and also one of the most polluted, abandonment would result in a loss of green space and the possible release of pollutants in a city that needs more parks and less pollution.
    Bloomingdale, NJ
  1767. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16616Ben Golden
    I am writing in response to the SEA's recent decision on the Jersey City Embankment. The SEA's failure to order an Environmental Impact Statement will adversely affect our neighborhood. Conrail's abandonment of the Embankment and its subsequent demolition and develop will have permanently scar our neighborhood and damage our environment. The SEA should require a full and impartial analysis to determine the full effects of the Embankment's abandonment on Jersey City and its residents.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1768. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16615Edward Fausty
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families.
    union city, NJ
  1769. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16614Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy
    As a board member and the immediate past president of the Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy, I urge you to require a full Environmental Impact Statement and Historic Report. The Embankment in fact has significant environmental and historic significance, and the impacts should be fully studied before allowing abandonment of such a crucial resource for the city. I note that Conrail appears to have omitted critical information in its filing, and such omissions should not be sanctioned by the STB.
    Joshua Parkhurst · Jersey City, NJ
  1770. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16613Jonathan Stead
    I am writing to request that you authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. Conrail should not be allowed to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have a serious negative impact on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhood.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1771. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16612Tomas Liogys
    I request that a full environmental impact statement be completed before Conrail is allowed to abandon the embankment to have it demolished by a developer. Demolishing the embankment may adversely affect the over 50 residences adjacent to the property, many of which are multiple dwelling residences; the over 50 residences that are located across the street, many of which are multiple dwelling residences; and the housing complex south of the property at the eastern end of it. The housing complex contains within it a day care center that is not more than 50 feet away from the property. This is a facility that my family and many of our friends use. Demolition equipment and work would disturb the general residential area and particulates generated by the demolition may adversely impact the air quality of the surrounding area. I do not know if the soil within the embankment contains and chemicals or toxins that may be disturbed and released if the embankment is demolished. Most importantly, the noise impact and particulates may have a significant impact on the day care facility. I would be concerned for the safety and health of my child if the demolition process would be allowed. Lastly, the property is adjacent to many well used streets - Jersey Ave, Erie St. Manilla Ave, Marin Blvd., and 6th Street. These streets are used by many as their primary route to the Holland Tunnel. Demolition may lead to closures and/or delays along these routes which may lead to increased traffic along other local streets. As such, I request a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1772. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16611Embankment Preservation Coalition
    The Embankment is a migratory home of Monarch Butterflies and is an important rest stop for them on their way south every year. It is important to keep butterfly habitats that exist in the city because there are so few. THEY ARE ENDANGERED! Their home should not be destroyed and there may be legal reprocussions for doing so. Also, there have already been studies done showing significant environmental concerns such as Arsenic. VERY IMPORTANT TO GET A FULL REPORT!!
    Amy Dubin · Jersey City, NJ
  1773. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16610Chris Lowe
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families. Leaving this priceless landmark in the hands of a disinterest profit-driven developer is immoral. I can assure you that just as these magnificent structures stood guard and witness to the Historic District of Downtown Jersey City's Hamilton Park, abandonment, demolition/destruction and development will result in a permanent loss of community history and unique sense of place. Do the right thing, which 9 times out of 10, is the hard thing to do. Hear the people and review all sides, including a full EIS.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1774. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16609Alex Capulong
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families
    Jersey City, NJ
  1775. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16608Robin Pinkowitz
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families. thank you
    Jersey City, NJ
  1776. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16607Genevieve Hannon
    Please do whatever you can to disallow the reversal of the Embankment near Hamilton Park being a Historic Landmark. Developers cannot be allowed to used this important piece of history for more buildings in Jersey City. I personally would love to see it be a dedicated green space with a tribute plaque stating the history of the Embankment. Thank you for your kind attention and assistance in this important matter.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1777. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16606Lily Wu
    Please authorize a full environmental impact study to ensure that adverse effects are not made on neighborhoods and families due to demolition and development. Families and residents are a city's greatest resource, and need more parks and open space.
    Rego Park, NY
  1778. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16605Christy Sayre
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)on Conrail's abandonment of the Harsimus Cove Stem embankment. Abandonment will lead straight to its demolition, which would significantly affect the quality of the human environment as well as local fauna, birds, bees, trees that help clean the air. The families of Jersey City are steeped in carbon monoxide and need more green space, not less, to counter this. More development is absolutely the wrong direction. However small the redevelopment of this site might seem to those on the outside, this downtown neighborhood is a small neighborhood in which development on such a scale squeezes our resources and infrastructure.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1779. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16604Dan Pelosi
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families
    Jersey City, NJ
  1780. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16603Richard Bamberger
    Please require a full environmental impact review for the embankment project in Jersey City. I believe that at times we must not let our desire for progress overtake our environmental concerns.
    CASTLETON ON HUD, NY
  1781. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16602Powerhouse Arts District Neighborhood Association
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement for the Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment in Jersey City. Abandonment will lead to severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition of the Embankment. In addition to the disruption and potential effect on buildings and homes in this historic area, there has been no submission of an environmental sampling study by Conrail’s developer partner, and inadequate studies done of contaminants. it is well known that Jersey City's industrial past has marked it with contamination of various types across the city, and any demolition of existing structures should be treated as a serious and potentially dangerous matter. The Harsimus Stem Embankment is an elevated stone structure that once carried seven tracks of the Pennsylvania Railroad to the Hudson River Waterfront. It runs for a half mile along 6th street in downtown Jersey City, and joins the National Historic districts of Hamilton Park and Harsimus Cove. The Embankment is itself listed on the State Register of Historic Places, is eligible for the National Register, and is a Municipal Landmark. Please ensure that all federal laws are fully enforced to avoid any premature action on this site. If an Environmental Study is not required and demolition is authorized, Jersey City will incur the loss of a historic local asset that can never be recovered.
    Stacy Nusbaum · Jersey City, NJ
  1782. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16601John McCluskey
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Abandonment will lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partner are seeking permits now) Effects of demolition of massive structure on § air quality § dust § noise § vibrations § heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts § damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile § removal of a cultural resource § health § release of contaminants § flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) § water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) § release of contaminants § habitat destruction § wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species § ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) § cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community § loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic § loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront § loss of potential for light freight opportunities
    Flushing, NY
  1783. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16600Steven Gold
    I have lived near the embankment for 12 years and am in favor of a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families. Conrail must not be allowed to abandon the right of way.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1784. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16599Robert Kosinski
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1785. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16598Helen Salese
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.""
  1786. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16597Anna Nugent
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families. Our community garden is right next to the embankment. Will I still be able to eat the vegetables I grow? I also have an allergy to aspergillus and dust, can you guarantee my health if the embankment is destroyed?
    Jersey City, NJ
  1787. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16596Gary Grochmal
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1788. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16595Tatiana Morin
    At the least, we ask that you provide an Environmental Impact Statement. That will show that consideration has been given to the surrounding environment and community. It is standard protocol and there is no excuse for avoiding it these days, since our knowledge of the environment is incomparable better than it was even a decade ago. Your proposal will cause distress to the environment;furthering the risk of degrading the water quality and environmental habitat (natural wetlands)that increasingly proving to be vital resources in our already limited natural environment-especially with the closer threat of climate change. An obvious impact will be the one you are imposing on the community. Degrading their environment, their air quality, their right to their open space and pedestrian routes, and damaging the cultural lifestyle that gives people identity and serenity. Please condier our pleas and recommendations. thank you
    New York, NY
  1789. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16594geoffrey mills
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Effects of demolition of massive structure on air quality, dust, noise, heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts.
    jersey city, nj
  1790. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16593Carrie Cheung
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    New York, NY
  1791. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16592rob buchanan
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. Historical transportation corridors are essentially in the public trust, and should not be privatized.
    brooklyn, ny
  1792. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16591Jill Nanfeldt
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families
    West Caldwell, NJ
  1793. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16590Jennifer Batinich
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1794. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16589DANIEL LEVIN
    I have support support preserving, protecting, and reusing the National Register-eligible Embankment for open space while at the same time protecting the rail right of way (rail banking) for future use. Developing the Embankment as habitat-oriented open space and as part of the national East Coast Greenway, linking Maine to Florida, would provide Jersey City with an opportunity of a lifetime to link city neighborhoods and the greater region with off-road walking and bicycle trails. This linear park and trail will improve the quality of life of our residents and support residential development to the west of the Embankment where development is needed. To date the city has landmarked the Embankment, passed legislation to acquire the property, and successfully petitioned the federal Surface Transportation Board to assert its authority over Conrail, which sold the right of way before securing a necessary federal permit to abandon the line. Now is NOT the time to capitulate. The city must use every means it has to secure the site for public use. The Embankment Preservation Coalition helped the City raise more than $3 million, which can be used for acquisition and park and trail development. Environmental concerns include - Inadequate studies done of contaminants, failure of Conrail’s developer partner to submit environmental sampling study to STB, need for federal agency to enforce federal laws rather than burdening local governments and citizens Environmental justice issues, conrail’s neglect of site over decades and continuing bad faith seeking demolition permits. Abandonment will directly lead to demolition as and effects of demolition of this massive structure on - Abandonment will lead directly to demolition (Conrail and partner are seeking permits now) Effects of demolition of massive structure on * air quality * dust * noise * vibrations * heavy truck traffic through fragile historic districts * damage to buildings on two sides for one-half mile * removal of a cultural resource * health * release of contaminants * flooding (no half-mile of fill to absorb stormwater in flood plain) * water quality (increased burden on combined sewers; release of CSOs into Hudson Estuary) * release of contaminants * habitat destruction * wildlife, including migratory birds and monarch butterflies, and much local species * ecosystem (part of habitat corridor joining Hudson to Hackensack) * cultural loss for Holy Rosary historic festival and Italian community * loss of grade-separated transportation structure, ideal for urban area’s heavy traffic * loss of light rail linking Secaucus to waterfront * loss of light freight opportunities
    JERSEY CITY, NJ
  1795. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16588Timothy Hunt
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historic districts, landmarks, neighborhoods, and families. In the railroad era, it was a key access to NYC, The Embankment is also part of the nation's industrial history, and once gone it cannot be recovered.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1796. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16587Marc Anderson
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1797. (printed as 3/31/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16586Jessica Cabrera
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families. In point we do not want or need more development in our city and want to allow for green and open space.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1798. (printed as 3/30/2009)
    Request
    224769Request For Extension Of Time
    Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition
  1799. (printed as 3/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-1658593 erie condo association
    My condo is in a 4 unit building, which literally touches the Embankment. The three other owners and I will be affected more directly by the proposed development of the Embankment property than any other parties. As the president of the 93 Erie street condo association, I speak for all of us in requesting that a complete environment review be completed before the Embankment is allowed to be abandoned or otherwise transfered to the developer. Our health, our property values and our neighborhood are in danger. I am convinced that the removal of the Embankment will directly harm me /us. Please use extreme caution and examine the Environmental impact of proposed development before making a decision. thank you scott
    scott beckerman · jersey city, nj
  1800. (printed as 3/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16584Andrea Gaines
    Please authorize a full environmental impact study. It is not right to allow Conrail to abandon right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our neighborhood. I would like a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on neighborhoods and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1801. (printed as 3/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16582Mark BOYLES
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1802. (printed as 3/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16581Carmine Simmons
    Given the extremely high density of the community, the legitimate concerns of the opposing parties, and the irreversible nature of demolition and development, I believe that a full Enviornmental Impact Statement is warranted in this matter. Conrail's proposal to abandon the right-of-way and the dire effects this will have on our community and our environment are too important for short-cuts. Please uphold the STB's duty to enforce federal laws that protect neighborhoods and families. I and my neighbors demand nothing less than a full, complete and fact-based Environmental Impact Statement. Thank you, Carmine Simmons Jersey City, NJ
    Jersey City, NJ
  1803. (printed as 3/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16580Crista Grauer
    I think that it is vital to have an environmental Impact Statement. It seems obvious that a park in the sky is not only beautiful but, environmentally healthy, where as, destroying it would be damaging and polluting and you would loose something truly unique. For me, it has such aesthetic impact and it makes Jersey City very special.
    New York, NY
  1804. (printed as 3/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16579E.J.Kounitz
    Please authorize an Environmental Impact Statement before abandonment causes severe adverse effects to Jersey City historical districts, landmarks and neighborhoods with possible releasing of contaminants and the loss of a cultural resource. Thank-you
    New York, New York
  1805. (printed as 3/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16578Christine Bamberger
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families.""
  1806. (printed as 3/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16575S. Flores
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1807. (printed as 3/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16574James Douglas
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. There clearly needs to be an impartial study of the adverse environmental effects on our community. The 100 year old sewer system will be extremely taxed by not only the new developement and the sewage it produces but also the water that was once absorbed by the embankment.
    Jersey City, New Jersey
  1808. (printed as 3/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16573Wendy Tom
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families
    jersey city, NJ
  1809. (printed as 3/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16572Robert Greenwald
    Please authorize a full Environmental Impact Statement. It is wrong to allow Conrail to abandon the right of way when demolition and development plans will have severe adverse effects on our environment. I want a full and impartial study of direct and indirect effects of abandonment on our neighborhoods and families
    Jersey City, NJ
  1810. (printed as 3/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16570David Greenwood
    Abandonment of the spur will lead to the demolition of the underlying embankment, since developers are interested in the site and are seeking demolition permits. I urge you strongly to authorize an Environmental Impact Statement! Demolition of this very large structure will seriously and negatively affect the neighborhood and the city in many ways. Damage to neighboring buildings, dust, noise, and vibration will result. Destruction of what has become a wonderful habitat for birds and other wildlife is clearly an environmental issue. And eliminating a potential corridor for light rail means more automobile traffic, with all the consequences we know so well. So an Environmental Impact Statement is clearly called for. Thank you for your serious consideration of this concern.
    Jersey City, NJ
  1811. (printed as 3/30/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16569Suzanne Toepffer
    I am a New Jerseyan now living in Germany. I have travelled extensively and seen many stone structures throughout the world, including the walls that run to the cliffs on the west side of Ireland, stone bridges of many European cities, the 2000 year old Roman acqueduct in Segovia, and the elevated rail park, the Coulee Verte in Paris. The Embankment is Jersey City´s monumental stone work, running from the Palisades to the Hudson River. It will be a travesty if the structure is torn down and replaced with some undistinguished housing that could be built anywhere. Its destruction will wreck the National Historic Districts that I spend time in when I visit the States and that I love so much. The STB should not make an irreversible decision that will decide its fate without having the benefit of an Environmental Impact Statement.
    Nuernberg, Germany
  1812. (printed as 3/27/2009)
    Notice
    224765OFA - Notice Of Intent To File OFA
    Cnj Rail Corporation
  1813. (printed as 3/27/2009)
    Notice
    224764OFA - Notice Of Intent To File OFA
    City Of Jersey City
  1814. (printed as 3/26/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1171Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
    Charlene Dwin Vaughn
  1815. (printed as 3/25/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16568National Geodetic Survey
    Simon Monroe
  1816. served (printed as 3/23/2009)
    Decision
    39673Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED AN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUDED THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT.
  1817. served (printed as 3/18/2009)
    Decision
    39774Director Of Proceedings
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION (CONRAIL), CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. (CSXT), AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY (NS) HAVE JOINTLY FILED A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FOR CONRAIL TO ABANDON, AND FOR CSXT AND NS TO DISCONTINUE SERVICE OVER, AN APPROXIMATELY 1.36-MILE PORTION OF A LINE OF RAILROAD KNOWN AS THE HARSIMUS BRANCH, IN HUDSON COUNTY, NJ.
  1818. (printed as 3/18/2009)
    Reply
    224705Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  1819. (printed as 3/13/2009)
    Motion
    224678Motion/Petition/Request
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition
  1820. (printed as 2/27/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1154Accept/Reject Notice
  1821. (printed as 2/26/2009)
    Notice
    224608Notice Of Exemption
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  1822. (printed as 2/3/2009)
    Comments
    224461Comment
    County Of Hudson
  1823. (printed as 1/30/2009)
    Comments
    224454Comment
    Ny/Nj Baykeeper
  1824. served (printed as 1/26/2009)
    Decision
    39676Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION: (1) DENIED CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION'S, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.'S, AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY'S (COLLECTIVELY APPLICANTS) REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF PREFILING NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS; (2) REJECTED APPLICANTS' VERIFIED NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO ABANDON AND DISCONTINUE SERVICE IN THIS PROCEEDING; AND (3) DENIED, AS MOOT, APPLICANTS' AND THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY'S, PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD HARSIMUS STEM EMBANKMENT PRESERVATION COALITION'S, AND RAILS TO TRAILS CONSERVANCY'S REQUESTS FOR STAY.
  1825. (printed as 1/26/2009)
    Comments
    224434Comment
    Hamilton Park Neighborhood Association
  1826. (printed as 1/26/2009)
    Comments
    224433Comment
    Harsimus Cove Association
  1827. (printed as 1/26/2009)
    Comments
    224414Comment - Fax Copy
    State Of New Jersey Department Of Environmental Protection
  1828. (printed as 1/26/2009)
    Comments
    224411Comment
    Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy Inc
  1829. (printed as 1/26/2009)
    Comments
    224408Comment
    Village Neighborhood Association
  1830. (printed as 1/26/2009)
    Comments
    224405Comment
    East Coast Greenway Allliance
  1831. (printed as 1/26/2009)
    Comments
    224402Comment
    Preservation New Jersey Incorporated
  1832. (printed as 1/26/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16299Hamilton Park Neighborhood Association
    Olu M. Howard
  1833. (printed as 1/26/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16298New Jersey DEP - State Historic Preservation Office
    Daniel Saunders
  1834. (printed as 1/24/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16300Harsimus Cove Association
    Eric Fleming
  1835. (printed as 1/21/2009)
    Exhibit
    224372Exhibit(s)
    Rail To Trails Conservancy, City Of Jersey City, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition
  1836. (printed as 1/21/2009)
    Letter
    224371Letter
    Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition, Rails To Trails Conservancy, City Of Jersey City
  1837. (printed as 1/15/2009)
    Reply
    224352Reply
    Coalition Rail Carriers Etal, Rails To Trails Conservancy, City Of Jersey City, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition
  1838. (printed as 1/15/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1133Accept/Reject Notice
  1839. (printed as 1/6/2009)
    Comments
    224304Comment
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  1840. (printed as 1/6/2009)
    Motion
    224301Petition For Stay
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  1841. (printed as 1/6/2009)
    Notice
    224298Notice Of Exemption
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  1842. (printed as 12/23/2008)
    Comment
    EI-16244New Jersey Historic Preservation Office (SHPO)
    Daniel Saunders
  1843. (printed as 5/27/2008)
    Comment
    EI-7338New Jersey General Assembly
    L. Harvey Smith
  1844. (printed as 4/30/2008)
    Reply
    222221Reply
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  1845. (printed as 4/28/2008)
    Motion
    222197Motion/Petition/Request
    Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy
  1846. (printed as 4/28/2008)
    Comments
    222196Comment
    City Of Jersey City, Rails To Trails Conservancy, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition
  1847. (printed as 4/21/2008)
    Comment
    EI-7235National Geodetic Survey
    Simon Monroe
  1848. (printed as 4/17/2008)
    Letter
    222115Letter
    Consolidated Rail Corporation
  1849. (printed as 4/11/2008)
    Reply
    222049Reply
    Hudson County
  1850. (printed as 4/7/2008)
    Public
    222019Public Use Condition Request
    Friends Of Liberty State Park
  1851. (printed as 4/7/2008)
    Comments
    222018Comment
    Ny/Nj Baykeeper
  1852. (printed as 4/7/2008)
    Supplement
    222017Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    City Of Jersey City, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition, Rails To Trails Conservancy
  1853. (printed as 4/4/2008)
    Environmental
    221994Environmental Materials
    Preservation New Jersey Incorporated
  1854. (printed as 4/2/2008)
    Public
    222014Public Use Condition Request
    Van Vorst Park Association, Village Neighborhood Association, Powerhouse Arts District Neighborhood Association, Historic Paulus Hook Association, Harsimus Cove Association, Hamilton Park Neighborhood Association, Newport Neighborhood Association
  1855. (printed as 4/2/2008)
    Public
    222013Public Use Condition Request
    Civic Jc
  1856. (printed as 4/2/2008)
    Public
    222012Public Use Condition Request
    Jersey City Landmarks Conservancy Inc
  1857. (printed as 4/1/2008)
    Notice
    221956Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    East Coast Greenway Allliance
  1858. (printed as 4/1/2008)
    Comment
    EI-7066NJ Committee for the East Coast Greenway
    Delores Newman
  1859. (printed as 3/31/2008)
    Comment
    EI-7065Charles Montange
  1860. (printed as 3/21/2008)
    Notice
    221863Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    City Of Jersey City, Pennsylvania Railroad Harsimus Stem Embankment Coalition, Rails To Trails Conservancy
  1861. (printed as 3/12/2008)
    Notice
    221808Notice Of Intent To Initiate Case
    Consolidated Rail Corporation