AB — Abandonment
A reading aid, not legal advice, and not a substitute for the record. Every statement carries a grade — [B] the Board’s own words, [R] the rule or statute, [N] the National Archives’ description of the series, [C] measured from this record, [?] unconfirmed. Nothing here says what any party argued or which side it is on. Figures are counted from the record as it stands.
What it is
“Rail line abandonments and discontinuances of services. This would also include proceedings in which there is trail use (i.e., rail banking).”[B] The series began in 1972 when the ICC separated abandonments from Finance Dockets.[N] The registry holds 6,646 AB dockets, 5,542 of them sub-numbers — one per line a carrier abandons.[C]
What is being asked for
Permission to stop: to abandon a line (remove it from the rail network) or to discontinue service over it (stop operating, leaving the line and the obligation intact — often a lessee’s or trackage-rights operator’s request). Three routes:
- Application for a certificate under 49 U.S.C. §10903 — the full case, with a showing that the public convenience and necessity permit abandonment.[N][R]
- Petition for exemption — an individual request to skip the full case. (49 CFR §1152.50 notes the difference)[R]
- Notice of exemption under the class exemption for out-of-service lines, 49 CFR §1152.50 — the carrier certifies “no local traffic has moved over the line for at least 2 years” and overhead traffic can be rerouted; the notice is filed at least 50 days before the planned abandonment and is “effective 30 days after publication, unless stayed.”[R] This is the route most AB sub-dockets take — the X suffix, on 3,370 of them.[C]
What the Board can and cannot do
Grant, deny, or grant subject to conditions; and hold the door open for someone else to keep the line alive. An offer of financial assistance (OFA) lets a party offer to buy or subsidise the line (49 U.S.C. §10904); a public use condition (§10905) and a trail use / rail banking request under 16 U.S.C. §1247(d) can stay an abandonment so the corridor is preserved as a trail with the possibility of future rail use.[R] The Board does not decide who owns the land afterwards, or what a state or town may do with a crossing; those are matters of property law and of other agencies.
What happens next, typically
Notice or application → environmental and historic review (an Environmental Assessment is required for “line abandonment, service discontinuance”[B]) → decision or effective date → OFA, public-use or trail-use requests if any → the carrier’s consummation notice, or its lapse. In the record: 6,089 decisions, 1,407 environmental reviews, 674 notices of exemption; the commonest filings are reply (3,281), request for extension of time (2,255), notice of exemption (945), consummation notice (862), environmental materials (680).[C]
Examples in the record
AB 55 (CSX Transportation’s abandonment docket, with more than a thousand sub-numbers), AB 167 (Conrail’s).[C]
Every AB proceeding on record, by number — including the ones this record holds nothing filed in. The count is on that page: quoting it here too is how two pages come to disagree.
Sources (all read 2026-08-26): the Board’s Tips for Searching STB Records (the one page on stb.gov that defines prefixes), About STB, Litigation Alternatives, Need Assistance?, Environmental Overview, Household Goods Tariff Guidance, Legal Resources, Major Railroad Mergers FAQs, press release PR-22-55; 49 CFR §1152.50, §1180.2, Parts 1150 and 1111; NARA records schedules N1-134-99-002 and DAA-0134-2013-0017; the search form’s own prefix and suffix lists. Permanent address docketyard.org/about/AB. Something wrong? Corrections.