Display Kept in this browser only
Docket Yard
Finance DocketBefore the Surface Transportation Board

FD 36500

Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/FD-36500 · entries shown: all, newest first

CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY LIMITED; CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY; SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY; CENTRAL MAINE & QUEBEC RAILWAY US INC.; DAKOTA, MINNESOTA & EASTERN RAILROAD CORPORATION; AND DELAWARE & HUDSON RAILWAY COMPANY, INC. – CONTROL – KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN, THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, GATEWAY EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, AND THE TEXAS MEXICAN RAILWAY COMPANY

Caption from the Board’s record. Sub-dockets, included below: FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)

865 filings, 53 decisions and 1,306 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 15 Sep 2026, 20:59 UTC.

Cite View on stb.gov

Entries

By type (23)
Newest first · oldest first
  1. (printed as 9/15/2026)
    Report
    312331Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  2. (printed as 8/17/2026)
    Report
    311942Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  3. (printed as 8/7/2026)
    Comment
    EI-34266CPKC
    Supplement to Environmental Mitigation Report
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  4. (printed as 7/31/2026)
    Substitution
    311868Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Thompson Hine LLP
  5. (printed as 7/15/2026)
    Report
    311783Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  6. (printed as 7/15/2026)
    Report
    311782Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  7. (printed as 7/14/2026)
    Comment
    EI-34260CPKC
    CPKC 13th Quarterly Environmental Mitigation Report
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  8. (printed as 6/15/2026)
    Report
    311630Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  9. (printed as 5/15/2026)
    Report
    311377Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  10. (printed as 4/15/2026)
    Report
    311138Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  11. (printed as 4/14/2026)
    Comment
    EI-34211CPKC
    CPKC 12th Quarterly Environmental Mitigation Report
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  12. served (printed as 3/13/2026)
    Decision
    52896Entire Board · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    DENIED REQUESTS FROM NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY RELATED TO ALLEGED SERVICE ISSUES ON THE MERIDIAN SPEEDWAY BETWEEN MERIDIAN, MISS., AND SHREVEPORT, LA.
  13. (printed as 3/13/2026)
    Report
    311014Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  14. (printed as 2/13/2026)
    Report
    310870Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  15. (printed as 2/10/2026)
    Reply
    310858Reply · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  16. (printed as 2/6/2026)
    Letter
    310847Letter · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  17. (printed as 1/15/2026)
    Report
    310749Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  18. (printed as 1/15/2026)
    Report
    310742Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  19. (printed as 1/14/2026)
    Comment
    EI-34170CPKC
    CPKC 11th Quarterly Environmental Mitigation Report
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  20. (printed as 1/12/2026)
    Comment
    EO-4077CPKC
  21. (printed as 12/15/2025)
    Report
    310516Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  22. (printed as 12/15/2025)
    Supplement
    310508Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  23. (printed as 12/11/2025)
    Report
    310495Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  24. (printed as 11/24/2025)
    Errata
    310343Errata/Correction · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  25. (printed as 11/14/2025)
    Report
    310166Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  26. (printed as 11/13/2025)
    Reply
    310198Reply · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  27. (printed as 11/13/2025)
    Report
    310196Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  28. (printed as 10/16/2025)
    Comment
    EI-34133CPKC
    CPKC 10th Quarterly Environmental Mitigation Report
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  29. (printed as 9/30/2025)
    Letter
    310151Letter · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  30. (printed as 9/30/2025)
    Letter
    310133Letter · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  31. (printed as 9/15/2025)
    Report
    310070Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  32. (printed as 9/5/2025)
    Substitution
    310040Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Grand Trunk Corporation, on behalf of itself and its U.S. rail operating subsidiaries
  33. (printed as 8/15/2025)
    Report
    309960Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  34. (printed as 8/7/2025)
    Notice
    309908Notice · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian National Railway Company and its rail operating subsidiaries
  35. (printed as 8/7/2025)
    Substitution
    309907Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian National Railway Company and its rail operating subsidiaries
  36. (printed as 8/7/2025)
    Substitution
    309905Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian National Railway Company and its rail operating subsidiaries
  37. (printed as 7/30/2025)
    Report
    309843Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  38. (printed as 7/23/2025)
    Report
    309814Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  39. (printed as 7/18/2025)
    Errata
    309795Errata/Correction · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  40. (printed as 7/18/2025)
    Errata
    309794Errata/Correction · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  41. (printed as 7/16/2025)
    Report
    309788Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  42. (printed as 7/15/2025)
    Report
    309774Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  43. (printed as 7/15/2025)
    Report
    309772Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  44. (printed as 7/14/2025)
    Comment
    EI-34095CPKC
    CPKC 9th Quarterly Environmental Mitigation Report
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  45. (printed as 7/9/2025)
    Report
    309756Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  46. (printed as 7/3/2025)
    Errata
    309732Errata/Correction · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  47. (printed as 7/2/2025)
    Report
    309729Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  48. (printed as 6/25/2025)
    Report
    309711Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  49. (printed as 6/20/2025)
    Report
    309692Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  50. (printed as 6/17/2025)
    Letter
    309673Letter · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Chairman Fuchs
  51. (printed as 6/16/2025)
    Report
    309672Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  52. (printed as 5/15/2025)
    Report
    309564Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  53. (printed as 4/15/2025)
    Report
    309467Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  54. (printed as 4/14/2025)
    Comment
    EI-33890CPKC
    CPKC 8th Quarterly Environmental Mitigation Report
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  55. (printed as 3/14/2025)
    Report
    309353Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  56. (printed as 3/3/2025)
    Report
    309298Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  57. (printed as 2/18/2025)
    Report
    309242Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  58. (printed as 1/15/2025)
    Report
    309108Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  59. (printed as 1/15/2025)
    Report
    309102Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  60. (printed as 1/14/2025)
    Comment
    EI-33670CPKC
    CPKC 7th Quarterly Environmental Mitigation Report
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  61. (printed as 12/13/2024)
    Report
    309006Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  62. (printed as 11/15/2024)
    Report
    308904Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  63. (printed as 11/4/2024)
    Errata
    308871Errata/Correction · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  64. (printed as 10/15/2024)
    Report
    308815Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  65. (printed as 10/14/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33639CPKC
    CPKC 6th Quarterly Environmental Mitigation Report
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  66. (printed as 9/25/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33628SHPO
    Branden Scott · Des Moines, IA
  67. (printed as 9/13/2024)
    Report
    308710Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  68. (printed as 8/27/2024)
    Errata
    308643Errata/Correction · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  69. (printed as 8/20/2024)
    Errata
    308618Errata/Correction · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  70. (printed as 8/15/2024)
    Report
    308588Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  71. (printed as 8/8/2024)
    Errata
    308530Errata/Correction · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  72. (printed as 7/17/2024)
    Supplement
    308477Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City
  73. (printed as 7/15/2024)
    Report
    308468Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  74. (printed as 7/15/2024)
    Report
    308467Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  75. (printed as 7/15/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33607CPKC
    CPKC 5th Quarterly Environmental Mitigation Report
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  76. (printed as 6/28/2024)
    Notice
    308434Notice
    Kaplan Kirsch LLP
  77. (printed as 6/17/2024)
    Report
    308391Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  78. (printed as 5/22/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33589Nathaniel Lukefahr
    Houston, TX
  79. (printed as 5/15/2024)
    Report
    308316Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  80. (printed as 4/15/2024)
    Report
    308192Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  81. (printed as 4/15/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33424CPKC
    4th Quarterly Environmental Mitigation Report
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  82. served (printed as 4/5/2024)
    Decision
    52019Entire Board · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    DENIED THE REQUEST OF THE COALITION TO STOP CPKC TO MODIFY THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  83. (printed as 3/18/2024)
    Report
    308103Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  84. (printed as 2/15/2024)
    Report
    307980Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  85. (printed as 1/16/2024)
    Report
    307808Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  86. (printed as 1/16/2024)
    Report
    307806Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  87. (printed as 1/16/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33248CPKC
    3rd Quarterly Environmental Mitigation Report
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  88. (printed as 1/8/2024)
    Notice
    307770Notice · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Slover & Loftus LLP
  89. (printed as 1/3/2024)
    Comment
    EI-33218CPKC
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  90. (printed as 12/18/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33205CPKC
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  91. (printed as 12/15/2023)
    Report
    307642Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Paciifc Kansas City Limited
  92. (printed as 12/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33204CPKC
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  93. (printed as 12/12/2023)
    Errata
    307624Errata/Correction · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  94. (printed as 12/5/2023)
    Reply
    307587Reply · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  95. (printed as 12/5/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33199Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Response to CPKC 2nd Quarter Report
    Tom Wilcox · Washington, DC
  96. (printed as 11/27/2023)
    Motion
    307545Motion/Petition/Request · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    The Coalition to Stop CPKC
  97. (printed as 11/15/2023)
    Report
    307487Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  98. (printed as 11/7/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3853EPA
    Abby Swaine
  99. (printed as 11/6/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33155EPA
    Abby Swaine · Boston, MA
  100. (printed as 10/26/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33134CPKC
    Jay C. Johnson · Washington, DC
  101. (printed as 10/19/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33093USFWS Oklahoma
    Matthew Fullerton · Tulsa, OK
  102. (printed as 10/17/2023)
    Errata
    307311Errata/Correction · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  103. (printed as 10/16/2023)
    Report
    307304Status Report · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  104. (printed as 10/13/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33090CPKC
    Jay Johnson · Washington, DC
  105. (printed as 10/6/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33081USFWS Arkansas
    Lindsey Lewis · Conway, AR
  106. (printed as 10/6/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3841USFWS Iowa
    Kraig McPeek
  107. (printed as 10/6/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3840USFWS Oklahoma
    Susan Minnick
  108. (printed as 10/6/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3839USFWS Arkansas
    Lindsay Lewis
  109. served (printed as 10/5/2023)
    Decision
    51901-- · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
    in the court-action register
  110. (printed as 9/28/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33064USFWS Missouri Ecological Services Field Office
    Josh Hundley · Columbia, MO
  111. (printed as 9/20/2023)
    Notice
    307174Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    U.S. Department of Agriculture
  112. (printed as 9/15/2023)
    Misc.
    307130Miscellaneous · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Surface Transportation Board
  113. (printed as 9/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33053Jay C. Johnson
    Washington, DC
  114. (printed as 9/12/2023)
    Notice
    307105Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
  115. (printed as 9/11/2023)
    Notice
    307106Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  116. (printed as 9/11/2023)
    Notice
    307102Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Canadian National Railway Company
  117. (printed as 9/11/2023)
    Notice
    307101Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    BNSF Railway Company
  118. (printed as 9/11/2023)
    Notice
    307100Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  119. (printed as 9/11/2023)
    Notice
    307099Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  120. (printed as 9/11/2023)
    Notice
    307098Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Lyondell Chemical Company, Equistar Chemicals, LP, LyondellBasell Acetyls, LLC, and LyondellBasell Advanced Polymers Inc.
  121. (printed as 9/11/2023)
    Notice
    307097Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    General Motors LLC
  122. (printed as 9/11/2023)
    Notice
    307096Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    The Fertilizer Institute
  123. (printed as 9/11/2023)
    Notice
    307095Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    The American Chemistry Council
  124. (printed as 9/11/2023)
    Notice
    307094Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  125. (printed as 9/11/2023)
    Notice
    307092Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Chlorine Institute Inc.
  126. (printed as 9/11/2023)
    Notice
    307091Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    The National Industrial Transportation League
  127. (printed as 9/11/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3832USFWS Missouri
    John Weber
  128. (printed as 9/8/2023)
    Notice
    307082Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    The National Grain and Feed Association
  129. (printed as 9/8/2023)
    Notice
    307081Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    The Coalition to Stop CPKC
  130. (printed as 9/6/2023)
    Notice
    307069Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    Evergy Metro, Inc.
  131. served (printed as 9/1/2023)
    Decision
    51796Entire Board · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 6)
    INSTITUTED A PROCEEDING TO IMPLEMENT THE GENERAL OVERSIGHT CONDITION AND PROVIDE FURTHER GUIDANCE REGARDING CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED’S REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING OBLIGATIONS.
  132. served (printed as 9/1/2023)
    Decision
    51779Entire Board
    (1) CLARIFIED THE REPORTING REQUIREMENTS SET FORTH IN A DECISION APPROVING THE ACQUISITION OF CONTROL BY CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY OF KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN; (2) DENIED REQUESTS FOR MODIFICATIONS TO THE REPORTING AND RECORDKEEPING CONDITIONS IMPOSED IN THAT DECISION; AND (3) CLARIFIED CERTAIN LANGUAGE IN THAT DECISION REGARDING THE EXISTENCE OF AN INTERCHANGE AT MERIDIAN, MISS.
  133. (printed as 9/1/2023)
    Section
    307057Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  134. (printed as 8/14/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3826CPKC
    Joe Van Humbeck
  135. (printed as 8/9/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33035Joe Van Humbeck
    Calgary, Alta
  136. (printed as 8/8/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33033Jay Johnson
    Washington, DC
  137. (printed as 8/3/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33032Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Tom Wilcox · Washington, DC
  138. (printed as 7/27/2023)
    Misc.
    306897Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  139. (printed as 7/14/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33022Venable, LLP
    Jay C. Johnson · Washington, DC
  140. (printed as 7/13/2023)
    Exhibit
    306827Exhibit(s)
    Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd., Canadian Pacific Railway Company, and their U.S. rail carrier subsidiaries Soo Line Railroad Co., Central Maine & Quebec Railway US Inc., Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corp., and Delaware and Hudson Railway Co., Inc.
  141. (printed as 7/13/2023)
    Transcript
    306826Transcript Of Hearing/Conference
    Surface Transportation Board
  142. (printed as 6/30/2023)
    Substitution
    306795Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  143. (printed as 6/28/2023)
    Exhibit
    306828Exhibit(s)
    Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd., Canadian Pacific Railway Company, and their U.S. rail carrier subsidiaries Soo Line Railroad Co., Central Maine & Quebec Railway US Inc., Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corp., and Delaware and Hudson Railway Co., Inc.
  144. (printed as 6/13/2023)
    Reply
    306721Reply
    BNSF Railway Company
  145. (printed as 6/13/2023)
    Reply
    306720Reply
    The Coalition to Stop CPKC
  146. (printed as 6/13/2023)
    Statement
    306719Protest/Opposition Statement
    American Chemistry Council, The Fertilizer Institute, and The National Industrial Transportation League
  147. (printed as 6/2/2023)
    Comment
    EI-33203Venable
    Kathryn Floyd · Washington, DC
  148. (printed as 5/30/2023)
    Motion
    306671Motion/Petition/Request
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  149. (printed as 5/25/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32896FWS
    Kathryn Bulliner · Columbia, MO
  150. (printed as 5/24/2023)
    Letter
    306659Letter
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  151. (printed as 5/18/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32877CPKC
    Joe Van Humbeck · Calgary, Alta
  152. served (printed as 5/17/2023)
    Decision
    51726-- · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED FOR THIS PROCEEDING, ON MAY 12, 2023, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
    in the court-action register
  153. served (printed as 5/12/2023)
    Decision
    51722-- · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED, ON MAY 11, 2023, IN THIS PROCEEDING IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT.
    in the court-action register
  154. served (printed as 5/10/2023)
    Decision
    51709-- · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED FOR THIS PROCEEDING, ON MAY 3, 2023, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
    in the court-action register
  155. (printed as 5/9/2023)
    Reply
    306581Reply
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  156. (printed as 5/5/2023)
    Reply
    306564Reply
    Canadian National Railway Company And Its Rail Operating Subsidiaries
  157. served (printed as 5/1/2023)
    Decision
    51693Entire Board
    CLARIFIED THAT PARTICIPATION IN THE TECHNICAL CONFERENCE TO BE HELD IN THIS PROCEEDING WILL BE LIMITED TO ONLY BOARD STAFF AND CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY LIMITED AND DENIED REQUESTS FOR THIRD-PARTY PARTICIPATION.
  158. (printed as 4/24/2023)
    Statement
    306497Support Statement
    American Chemistry Council, The Fertilizer Institute and The National Industrial Transportation League
  159. (printed as 4/24/2023)
    Reply
    306496Reply
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  160. (printed as 4/24/2023)
    Reply
    306495Reply
    Canadian Pacific Kansas City Limited
  161. (printed as 4/24/2023)
    Statement
    306494Support Statement
    Evergy Metro, Inc.
  162. (printed as 4/20/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32872Venable LLP
    Kathryn Floyd · Washington, DC
  163. (printed as 4/19/2023)
    Reply
    306481Reply
    BNSF Railway Company
  164. (printed as 4/14/2023)
    Letter
    306457Letter
    Ronald L. Batory
  165. (printed as 4/6/2023)
    Reply
    306422Reply
    The Coalition to Stop CPKC
  166. (printed as 4/4/2023)
    Motion
    306412Petition
    The Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  167. (printed as 4/4/2023)
    Motion
    306410Petition
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  168. (printed as 4/3/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32829Missouri Department of Natural Resources SHPO · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Toni M. Prawl · Jefferson City, MO
  169. served (printed as 3/23/2023)
    Decision
    51650Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE BOARD’S OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS WILL NO LONGER BE CONDUCTING ITS ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW OF THE PROPOSED DIVESTITURE PURSUANT TO THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
  170. (printed as 3/23/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3798Sidley Austin · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield
  171. (printed as 3/23/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3797Section 106 Parties · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
  172. (printed as 3/23/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3796Illinois, Missouri and Michigan Environmental Review Parties · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
  173. served (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Decision
    51549Entire Board · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    APPROVED, WITH CERTAIN CONDITIONS, THE ACQUISITION OF CONTROL BY CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY LIMITED (CANADIAN PACIFIC), THROUGH ITS INDIRECT, WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY, CYGNUS MERGER SUB 2 CORPORATION, OF KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN, AND THROUGH IT, OF THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY (KCSR) AND ITS RAILROAD AFFILIATES, AND FOR THE RESULTING COMMON CONTROL BY CANADIAN PACIFIC OF ITS U.S. RAILROAD SUBSIDIARIES, AND KCSR AND ITS RAILROAD AFFILIATES.
  174. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Section
    306321Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  175. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Section
    306320Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  176. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Section
    306319Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  177. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Section
    306318Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  178. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Section
    306317Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  179. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Section
    306316Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  180. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Section
    306314Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  181. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Section
    306313Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  182. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Section
    306312Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  183. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Section
    306311Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  184. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Section
    306310Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  185. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Section
    306309Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  186. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Section
    306307Section 5 Summary
    Surface Transportation Board
  187. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32824Venable LLP
    Kathryn Floyd · Washington, DC
  188. (printed as 3/15/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3793Burns and McDonnell · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Steve Thornhill, et al
  189. (printed as 3/14/2023)
    Letter
    306308Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  190. (printed as 3/10/2023)
    Letter
    306296Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  191. (printed as 3/8/2023)
    Letter
    306288Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  192. (printed as 3/7/2023)
    Comments
    306270Comment
    Honorable Michael A. Rulli
  193. (printed as 3/6/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3792Missouri Federally Recognized Tribes · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
  194. (printed as 3/6/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3791Illinois Federally Recognized Tribes · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
  195. served (printed as 3/3/2023)
    Decision
    51624Entire Board
    APPROVED BOTH THE APPOINTMENT OF RONALD L. BATORY AS SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE OF THE INDEPENDENT VOTING TRUST IN THIS PROCEEDING AND THE RELATED ASSUMPTION AGREEMENT.
  196. (printed as 3/3/2023)
    Transcript
    306259Transcript Of Hearing/Conference
    Surface Transportation Board
  197. (printed as 3/3/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32819Sidley Austin · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  198. (printed as 3/3/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3790Illinois Department of Natural Resources · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Coleen Callahan, Director, SHPO
  199. (printed as 3/3/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3789Missouri Department of Natural Resources · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Dru Buntin, Director, SHPO
  200. (printed as 3/2/2023)
    Letter
    306256Letter
    Honorable Elizabeth Warren
  201. (printed as 3/1/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32811Attorney for Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Thomas Wilcox · Washington, DC
  202. (printed as 2/28/2023)
    Letter
    306243Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  203. (printed as 2/28/2023)
    Motion
    306238Motion/Petition/Request
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  204. (printed as 2/28/2023)
    Comment
    EO-3807Sam Noble Museum of Natural History
  205. (printed as 2/27/2023)
    Reply
    306224Reply
    The Coalition to Stop CPKC
  206. (printed as 2/27/2023)
    Notice
    306221Notice
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  207. (printed as 2/27/2023)
    Supplement
    306219Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  208. (printed as 2/27/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32809Venable, LLP
    Kathryn K. Floyd · Washington, DC
  209. (printed as 2/27/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32808Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Thomas Wilcox · Washington, DC
  210. (printed as 2/27/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32807US Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6
    Robert Houston · Dallas, TX
  211. (printed as 2/24/2023)
    Letter
    306225Letter
    Honorable Rodney Ellis
  212. (printed as 2/24/2023)
    Letter
    306217Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  213. (printed as 2/23/2023)
    Letter
    306211Letter
    Honorable Raja Krishnamoorthi, Honorable Richard J. Durbin, Honorable Tammy Duckworth, Honorable Delia C. Ramirez
  214. (printed as 2/17/2023)
    Letter
    306183Letter
    Honorable Richard J. Durbin, Honorable Tammy Duckworth, Honorable Raja Krishnamoorthi, Honorable Delia C. Ramirez
  215. (printed as 2/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32779Sidley and Austin for CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    CN's Voluntary Mitigation.
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  216. (printed as 2/8/2023)
    Letter
    306114Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  217. (printed as 2/8/2023)
    Substitution
    306111Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    The Chlorine Institute Inc., Chlorine Institute Inc.
  218. (printed as 2/3/2023)
    Substitution
    306092Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    U.S. Department of Transportation
  219. served (printed as 1/27/2023)
    Decision
    51566Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    ISSUED A FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY BY CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY.
  220. (printed as 1/25/2023)
    Comments
    306031Comment
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  221. (printed as 1/24/2023)
    Comments
    306023Comment
    U.S. Department of Justice
  222. (printed as 1/23/2023)
    Letter
    306017Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  223. (printed as 1/23/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32770Michigan Department of Natural Resources · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Jared Duquette · Lansing, MI
  224. (printed as 1/19/2023)
    Letter
    306011Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  225. (printed as 1/13/2023)
    Letter
    306001Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  226. (printed as 1/13/2023)
    Errata
    305972Errata/Correction
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  227. (printed as 1/13/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32762Sidley Austin for CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Information Request #2 Response
    Brooklyn Hildebrand for Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  228. (printed as 1/13/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32749Patrick Bosold
    This is a public comment on the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern railroad merger. I live in Jefferson County, southeast Iowa, and have followed stories about this merger and meetings held about it nearby. NOT ONCE in the coverage I’ve seen was mention made of how this merger will enable the shipment of Tar Sands crude oil from Canada to Mexico. “Transport of hazardous materials” is as close as anything I’ve seen about this, and even that was barely mentioned. The emphasis was mostly on the increase in train traffic and the ‘minor inconveniences’ to be caused by that traffic. This merger should be stopped for that reason alone. The public HAS NOT been adequately informed about what these trains will be carrying if this merger is approved. The record of derailments and other accidents involving trains transporting crude oil should be more than enough to prevent this merger from happening. The massive oil spills, fires and explosions, etc. coming from accidents involving these trains is a public safety and environmental hazard. Why would any government agency approve such a scheme, just so more Tar Sands crude can be moved from Canada to Mexico? I urge you to deny permission for this merger. It’s a disaster waiting to happen and a bomb waiting to go off if it gets approved. Sincerely, Patrick Bosold 202 N. 5th St. Fairfield, IA 52556 Tel. 641-472-1691
    Fairfield, IA
  229. (printed as 1/12/2023)
    Letter
    305959Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  230. (printed as 1/12/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32752Canadian Pacific Railway
    Venable LLP · Washington, DC
  231. (printed as 1/10/2023)
    Letter
    305944Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  232. (printed as 1/10/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32743Sidley Austin for CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Question on dwell time in information request #2.
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  233. (printed as 1/9/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32740Iowa SHPO
    Sara Andre · Des Moines, IA
  234. (printed as 1/5/2023)
    Errata
    305925Errata/Correction
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  235. (printed as 1/5/2023)
    Errata
    305924Errata/Correction
    BNSF Railway Company
  236. (printed as 1/4/2023)
    Comment
    EI-32731Sidley Austin for CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    CN email clarifying OEA questions on KCS and CN organic growth.
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  237. (printed as 1/3/2023)
    Letter
    305906Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  238. (printed as 12/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32750City of Gibson · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Gibson City appreciates and understands the contributions the railroad system has made to the success of our community, state and country and encourages the enhancement of the same through continued improvement of efficiencies and safety. Our concern is for the safety of our citizens and we would encourage the continued safety enhancements of the crossings in our community. We also encourage improvements, if needed, to the rails going through our community to enhance the time it takes trains to pass to allow less time disruptions to our citizens, EMT, schools and police and fire departments. All said, safety is our number one concern. We will continue to support the rail system as we believe it is in all of our best interests. We thank you for this opportunity to contribute our input.
    Mayor Daniel Dickey · Gibson City, IL
  239. (printed as 12/21/2022)
    Misc.
    305853Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  240. (printed as 12/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32897Venable
    Kathryn Floyd · Washington, DC
  241. (printed as 12/21/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3779Sidley Austin for CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield
  242. (printed as 12/20/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32713Sidley Austin for CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    CN's clarification of various endpoints, naming conventions, rail segment lengths, organic growth, etc.
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  243. (printed as 12/19/2022)
    Motion
    305832Motion/Petition/Request
    The Chlorine Institute
  244. (printed as 12/16/2022)
    Transcript
    305830Transcript Of Hearing/Conference
    Surface Transportation Board
  245. (printed as 12/16/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32714MO SHPO · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    MO SHPO "No Comments" email.
    Jeffrey Alvey · Jefferson City, MO
  246. (printed as 12/15/2022)
    Substitution
    305807Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    Olin Corporation; Iowa Interstate Railroad, LLC; Texas International Terminals; Port of Corpus Christi; and Evergy Metro, Inc.
  247. (printed as 12/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32769Osage Nation · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Requesting that a Cultural Report be prepared.
    Deseray Helton · Pawhuska, OK
  248. (printed as 12/13/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3778Sidley Austin for CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield
  249. (printed as 12/12/2022)
    Reply
    305774Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  250. (printed as 12/9/2022)
    Brief
    305768Brief
    Mohawk Council of Kahnawake
  251. (printed as 12/2/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32707City of Kansas City, Missouri · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    See attached letter
    Jason Waldron · Kansas City, MO
  252. (printed as 12/1/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32753U.S. FIsh and Wildlife Service
    Oklahoma Ecological Services Field Office · Tulsa, OK
  253. (printed as 12/1/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32710State of Missouri · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Governor Michael Parson · Jefferson City, MO
  254. (printed as 12/1/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32706Osage Nation
    Deseray Helton · Pawhuska, OK
  255. (printed as 12/1/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3815USFWS Oklahoma Ecological Services Field Office
    Matt Fullerton
  256. (printed as 12/1/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3813USFWS Missouri Ecological Services Field Office
    Josh Hundley
  257. (printed as 12/1/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3767Sidley Austin on behalf of CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield
  258. (printed as 11/30/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32708City of Kansas City, MO · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Per 40 CFR 1508.25, “Scope” consists of the range of actions, alternatives, and impacts... [and] the scope of an individual statement may depend on its relationships to other statements (§§1502.20 and 1508.28)... The relationship between the proposed CP-KCS merger/expansion of operations at the International Freight Gateway terminal (IFG); and the proposed CN-ICCR acquisition of KCS rail line/ADDITIONAL expansion of operations at the IFG, is integral. All "Cumulative" and "Similar" actions are to be considered in the process of coming to a determination. Commenters for both proposals have previously noted that there are likely discrepancies in the projected volume of truck traffic, with underestimations being probable. The cumulative impact of the similar actions proposed by both the CP-KCS merger, and the proposed CN acquisition are significant, with roadway safety, railroad safety, municipal and county infrastructure expansion and maintenance, noise and vibration among the key issues needing address. Further, there continue to be substantial (20, 40, 78, 174 acre, in the case of the National Nuclear Security Administration), private sector driven developments in the area that themselves will increase truck traffic and likely rail traffic over the course of time. Now is the time to anticipate the impacts, and ensure that the railway infrastructure can adapt/accommodate changes along 155th Street, Missouri Highway 150, Botts Road, Interstate 49, Prospect Avenue, Highway 58, North Avenue, Markey Road, Holmes Road, Kensington Avenue, and at least a half dozen other roadways that can be expected to require upgrade, protection, and myriad other modifications. At the IFG, and in other locations (like Birmingham, MO) flyover rail infrastructure could make sense and, while a substantial investment, it would pay off over time, in the reduction of accidents, eliminating delays along roadways, and eliminating delays for emergency responders.
    Thomas Neff · Kansas City, MO
  259. (printed as 11/30/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32703OK SHPO
    Lynda Ozan · Oklahoma City, OK
  260. (printed as 11/29/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32704BIA
    Barry Cantley · Phoenix, AZ
  261. (printed as 11/29/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32701Illinois Commerce Commission · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Brian Vercruysse · Springfield, IL
  262. (printed as 11/29/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3808University of Arkansas Collections Facility
    Arkansas Archeological Survey
  263. (printed as 11/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32702Michigan Geologic Survey · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    John Yellich · Kalamazoo, MI
  264. (printed as 11/25/2022)
    Reply
    305690Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  265. (printed as 11/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32751Canadian Pacific Railway
    Venable LLP · Washington, DC
  266. (printed as 11/22/2022)
    Comments
    305678Comment
    Runyowa Law
  267. (printed as 11/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32694Sidley and Austin for CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Follow-up question on prior scoping comment regarding planned pedestrian bridge over KCS line near Bowling Green, MO.
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  268. (printed as 11/18/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32693Iowa SHPO
    Sara Andre · Des Moines, IA
  269. (printed as 11/17/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32695MO SHPO · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Comments on new digital submission requirements.
    Jeffrey Alvey · Jefferson City, MO
  270. (printed as 11/17/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32689USDA-NRCS · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    see attached pdf
    Kim Vinson · St. Joseph, MO
  271. (printed as 11/16/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32692US Army Corps of Engineers, Rock Island District · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Albert Frohlich, Acting Chief · Rock Island, IL
  272. (printed as 11/16/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32691USDA, Natural Resources Conservation Service · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Kim Vinson · St. Joseph, MO
  273. (printed as 11/16/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32690Federal Aviation Administration - Central Region Airports Division · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Scott Tener · Kansas City, MO
  274. (printed as 11/10/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32686MO SHPO
    Toni Prawl · Jefferson City, MO
  275. (printed as 11/10/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3748City of Roodhouse, IL City Hall · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Thomas Martin
  276. (printed as 11/9/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32672Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska
    Alan Kelley · White Cloud, KS
  277. (printed as 11/8/2022)
    Letter
    305606Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  278. (printed as 11/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32673Canadian Pacific Railway
    Venable LLP · Washington, DC
  279. (printed as 11/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32664Missouri Dept of Conservation · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Please see attached files for comments
    Phillip Brinkley · Blue Springs, MO
  280. (printed as 11/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32663Baker and Miller, PLLC for KCS · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Email exchange regarding KCS property access form.
    William Mullins · Washington, DC
  281. (printed as 11/7/2022)
    Comments
    305602Comment
    Glenview Action Committee
  282. (printed as 11/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32766Mayor, City of Grain Valley · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Mike Todd · Grain Valley, MO
  283. (printed as 11/6/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32662MO State Representative, District 33 · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Chris Sander · Jefferson City, MO
  284. (printed as 11/4/2022)
    Letter
    305598Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  285. (printed as 11/4/2022)
    Letter
    305597Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  286. (printed as 11/3/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3744Federally Recognized Tribes · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Tribal Government to Government Consultation Letters - IL, MO, and MI
  287. (printed as 11/3/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3743THPOs MO, IL, and MI · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Tribal Historic Preservation Office Consultation Letters - MO, IL, and MI
  288. (printed as 11/3/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3742IL, MO, and MI State Historic Preservation Offices · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    State Historic Preservation Offices - Illinois, Missouri, and Michigan
  289. (printed as 11/1/2022)
    Reply
    305582Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  290. (printed as 10/28/2022)
    Reply
    305578Reply
    The Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  291. (printed as 10/28/2022)
    Supplement
    305577Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  292. (printed as 10/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32657U.S. House of Representatives
    Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi · Washington, DC
  293. (printed as 10/27/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3727Iowa SHPO
    Heather Gibb
  294. (printed as 10/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32697Ann Geiger
    Princeton, IA
  295. (printed as 10/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32650MN SHPO
    Sarah Beimers · Saint Paul, MN
  296. (printed as 10/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32649Mayor Jim Arico · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Comments regarding the proposed siding at Bowling Green and a proposed pedestrian bridge over rail line ROW.
    Bowling Green, MO
  297. (printed as 10/25/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32642OK SHPO
    Lynda Ozan · Oklahoma City, OK
  298. (printed as 10/25/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32641US Fish and Wildlife Service · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Please be aware that the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis), gray bat (Myotis grisescens), northern long-eared bat (Myotis septentrionalis), and proposed endangered Tricolored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) are likely to be present within the railroad project area. To “not adversely affect” these listed species, the USFWS requests tree cutting and maintenance be restricted to the the bats’ inactive season, November 1 - March 31. Various projects may impact active season bats and/or their habitat. Bats may be exposed to stressors (e.g., noise, smoke, tree removal, collision with vehicles, and collision with turbines) during the active season. Depending on the proximity to these stressors, responses of the bats may result in injury or death. In addition, should the railway include any cave and karst area and will involve construction methods that may cause deep ground disturbance, a cave search should be conducted to determine if any caves are present in the action area that would be considered suitable habitat for listed bats and/or are currently or formerly used by listed bats prior to disturbance.
    Kris Budd · Columbia, MO
  299. (printed as 10/24/2022)
    Motion
    305544Motion/Petition/Request
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  300. (printed as 10/24/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32637Baker and Miller, PLLC for Kansas City Southern · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    KCS' site access approval
    William Mullins · Washington, DC
  301. (printed as 10/24/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32636Henry Walker
    Not Provided, MO
  302. (printed as 10/24/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32635Lauren Brady
    Not Provided, MO
  303. (printed as 10/24/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32634Debbie Ketner
    Houston, TX
  304. (printed as 10/24/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32633Christopher Rice
    Little Rock, AR
  305. (printed as 10/24/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32632Patricia Messer
    Albion, MI
  306. (printed as 10/24/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32631Debra Walker
    Houston, TX
  307. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Motion
    305552Motion/Petition/Request · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    Canadian National Railway Company
  308. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305551Brief · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    Canadian National Railway Company and Illinois Central Railroad Company
  309. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305550Brief
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  310. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305549Brief
    Kansas City Southern, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  311. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305548Brief
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  312. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305547Brief
    Texas International Terminals Ltd.
  313. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Reply
    305546Reply
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  314. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305543Brief
    Industrial Minerals Association - North America
  315. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305542Brief
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  316. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305541Brief
    BNSF Railway Company
  317. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305540Brief
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  318. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305539Brief · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak")
  319. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305538Brief
    International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division , American Train Dispatchers Association
  320. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305535Brief
    Olin Corporation
  321. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305534Brief
    Evergy Metro, Inc.
  322. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305533Brief
    The American Chemistry Council, The Fertilizer Institute, and The National Industrial Transportation League
  323. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305532Brief
    International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO
  324. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305531Brief
    LyondellBasell
  325. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305529Brief
    BMWED, BRS, SMART MD, NCFO, IBB, BLET
  326. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305527Brief
    Michael Edgar, U.S. Wheat Associates
  327. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305526Brief · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    The Coalition to Stop CPKC
  328. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Comments
    305525Comment
    Village of Glenview
  329. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305524Brief
    Hennepin County, MN and the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
  330. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305522Brief
    National Association of Wheat Growers
  331. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Brief
    305520Brief
    The Chlorine Institute
  332. (printed as 10/21/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3749Sidley Austin LLP · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield
  333. (printed as 10/20/2022)
    Comments
    305517Comment
    Honorable Raja Krishnamoorthi
  334. (printed as 10/20/2022)
    Letter
    305515Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  335. (printed as 10/20/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32643Iowa SHPO
    Daniel Higginbottom · Des Moines, IA
  336. (printed as 10/20/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3726Consultation Letters with Maps - State of Michigan · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
  337. (printed as 10/20/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3725Consultation Letters with Maps - State of Illinois · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
  338. (printed as 10/20/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3724Consultation Letters with Maps - State of Missouri · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
  339. (printed as 10/20/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3721Baker and Miller, PLLC · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    William A. Mullins
  340. served (printed as 10/19/2022)
    Decision
    51458Entire Board · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    DENIED A MOTION FILED BY THE COMMUTER RAIL DIVISION OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY TO STRIKE CERTAIN EVIDENCE FROM THE RECORD.
  341. (printed as 10/19/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32638Department of the Interior
    U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Denver, CO
  342. (printed as 10/18/2022)
    Misc.
    305498Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  343. (printed as 10/18/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32677Paulette Taylor
    Davenport, IA
  344. (printed as 10/18/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3720Site Visit Summary
    Office of Environmental Analysis
  345. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Letter
    305493Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  346. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Letter
    305488Letter
    Honorable Amy Klobuchar, Honorable Tina Smith
  347. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32640Iowa SHPO
    Daniel Higginbottom · Des Moines, IA
  348. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32628Bernie Stephenson
    Wood Dale, IL
  349. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3765Osage Nation
    Andrea Hunter
  350. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3758Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska
    Lance Foster
  351. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3740Thlopthlocco Tribal Town
    Ryan Morrow
  352. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3739Thlopthlocco Tribal Town
    David Frank
  353. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3738Delaware Tribe of Indians
    Larry Heady
  354. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3737Delaware Tribe of Indians
    Brad Killscrow
  355. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3736Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma
    Devon Frazier
  356. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3735Absentee Shawnee Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma
    John Johnson
  357. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3734Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma
    Paul Barton
  358. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3733Eastern Shawnee Tribe of Oklahoma
    Glenna Wallace
  359. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3732Seminole Nation of Oklahoma
    Ben Yahola
  360. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3731Seminole Nation of Oklahoma
    Lewis Johnson
  361. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3730Kialegee Tribal Town
    Brian Givens
  362. (printed as 10/17/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3729Kialegee Tribal Town
    Brian Givens
  363. served (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Decision
    51460Director Of Proceedings · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    GRANTED APPLICANTS’ REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE APPENDICES OUTSIDE THE 30-PAGE LIMIT FOR FINAL BRIEFS.
  364. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comments
    305483Comment
    Move Minnesota
  365. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comments
    305479Comment
    Hennepin County, Minn., and Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
  366. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comments
    305478Comment
    Prospect Park Association Land Use Committee
  367. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32675Camanche Public Library
    J.L. Griswold · Camanche, IA
  368. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32630U.S. House of Representatives
    Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi · Washington, DC
  369. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32625Marilyn Ciucci
    Attention: Office of Environmental Analysis: Whoever concluded that the merger would have minimal impact on the entire certainly did not come to the area. Increasing freight traffic by 300% is hardly insignificant. Blocking grade crossings would affect fire, police and hospital emergencies...Then there is the air quality and noise impact. Taking 1400 trucks off the road would impact the trucking companies, and put those drivers out of work, but trucks do not block crossings, do not bellow their horns as freight "horn" bellows at all hours of the night. Seems profit is the only concern of management and stockholders...Certainly no one who claimed minimum problems on all the entire population of DuPage county has visited any town in that county. Yes, I repeated that. Which area or town in Iowa, Missouri or Texas has thought it was a good idea?
    Roselle, IL
  370. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32624Marz Marrero
    The railroad merger is a terrible idea. If this merger were to happen it would have horrific consequences for the environment that would impact the air, water, wildlife, and plant habitats. And if the trains on this railroad carry flammable crude oil that would mean that there could be risk of explosions which could kill people who live near the tracks.
    Not Provided, MO
  371. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32623Madeline Kull
    Dear Joshua Wayland, I am writing in concern to the Canadian Pacific merger with the Kansas City Southern line. I live in Davenport IA along the river near the Nahant Canadian Pacific Rail Yard and I work at Nahant Marsh Education Center who have already expressed how detrimental the merger will be to the nature preserve. However, I want to express concern for the safety of myself and my neighbors. I live on South Concord St. I went to one of the public forums that was offered and when I looked through the EIS, I was very concerned to see there was NO flood planning or flood risk assessment in the EIS. Flooding happens often at South Concord St. as the river is just yards away from the road. If the merger goes through the city of Davenport would close the crossing at Wapello Ave. This could be a death sentence for myself and the other residents of South Concord St. Wapello Ave is the highest road/access point when it floods. Where River Drive and Utah Ave. meet South Concord St. go under water at minor flood stage, because of this most of the residents of South Concord will park their cars at Wapello Ave and then boat to and from their homes. If we lose access to Wapello Ave myself and my neighbors will basically be stranded when it floods. Even during minor flooding we still park our cars on Wapello in case of any flash flooding or unpredictable waters. I understand that there may be an overpass built where River Drive meets South Concord, this is not necessarily a solution for residents of South Concord St. if we are not given accommodations or space to park our vehicles on the overpass. This is a huge safety risk for the approximately 100 residents of South Concord St. and can not be ignored. I think it is incredibly negligent for the EIS Draft for the merger to have been approved without proper flood risk assessment as the entire railway for the proposed merger is so close to the Mississippi River. My personal belief is the STB should reevaluate the EIS.
    Davenport, IA
  372. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32622Madeline Kull
    I am a resident of Davenport IA. Please read my letter concerning the merger and the lack of flood planning within the EIS Draft. Madeline Kull
    Davenport, IA
  373. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32621Douglas Hauser
    This environmental impact statement ignores virtually all of the impacts citizens will feel as a result of this merger. With a 500% increase in train traffic, 500% increase in pollution, 500% increase in noise, 500% increase in train-related traffic congestion, not to mention 500% increases in risk of collisions as well as derailments and associated hazardous waste spills, there is virtually nothing studied which analyzes the real-world impacts to the citizenry of Excelsior Springs. Property values will inevitably decrease as a result of such a huge increase in traffic, and quality of life for a significant % of citizens will also decrease. We need an impact study that analyzes REAL WORLD IMPACTS TO THE PEOPLE THIS MERGER WILL NEGATIVELY AFFECT, as well as proposed solutions for mitigating these risk factors. It's nice that you figured out 60,000 less trucks will travel US highways as a result, but those 60k trucks aren't going through our town, or any other town affected by this merger, but these trains will! It is either grossly myopic or willfully callous not to consider the human impacts this change will have, and we demand there be a "human impact study" that includes potential mitigation actions these multi-billion dollar rail corporations can provide to minimize negative consequences to the citizenry. Small towns like ours often have a less empowered/educated populace, whose interests are woefully under-represented, and this is exactly how it appears with this issue. We see ZERO potential benefits to us, yet the negative effects will be life-altering to many. It would be nice if the regulating agencies actually approached this issue from a "human impact" approach as much as a 30,000 foot "environmental" one. If it means getting another agency involved, then so be it. It seems painfully obvious who this merger benefits and who it costs. Maybe it's time someone besides the small town, ignored & forgotten average citizen be required to pay the price.
    Excelsior Springs, MO
  374. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32617The Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Carie Anne Ergo · Itasca, IL
  375. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32616Paige Kahle
    Stop the merger! If CP and KCS combine, there could be significant environmental impacts related to noise, traffic, safety, air quality, wildlife, plant habitats, and water, including streams and wetlands. That’s a high price for the rest of us to pay so wealthy companies can boost their efficiencies and profits.
    Minnetonka, MN
  376. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32615Sarah Gesiakowski
    These rails are already full of commuter Metra traffic. During rush hours the crossing at Roselle Road between Irving & Central the tight schedule of commuter trains already has it near grid lock. This rail is already at the border of two communities in areas such as Rodenberg Rd between Roselle and Schaumburg. This complicates emergency responsibility. This already increases response time. When crossing the tracks on Rodenberg for 15 years during rush hour. It already is just about daily id be stopped for commuter traffic. This line is already at the highest capacity the communities can handle.
    Roselle, IL
  377. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32614Flannery White
    I am deeply opposed to this merger and how it would increase the transportation of fossil fuels. We must respect the sovereignty of the White Earth Nation! Any railway accident or spill could deeply harm the water and ecosystem. We cannot increase our reliance on fossil fuels.
    St. Paul, MN
  378. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32613Sidley Austin on behalf of CN
    CN Supplemental Comments on EIS
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  379. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32612Orlando Pulido
    I am aware that trains is one method of transporting materials. However, NO privately owned company/organization should come before residents of a community with train tracks close to their home, right-of-way to receive emergency services, or breath all the dangerous/hazardous chemicals released while stopped(odor, or chemicals drip that to the ground). While the constant honking of a train horn is annoying at all hours of the day and night what’s worst is 18 wheeler’s rerouting through an old community with low hanging wires, two way streets ( enough space for regular vehicles), & what’s even more scary is that when these trains stop & 18 wheelers begging rerouting though the community since the comercial street is blocked only increases the risk of incidents, especially when it comes to school buses carrying children, followed by children, teens, adults and pets trying to be safe while riding their bikes, walking their pets, or connecting from the walking trail to the park. Again, blocked crossings is the root cause of my stress and worry in my life
    Houston, TX
  380. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32611Erin Dodge
    This merger is NOT in the best interest of White Earth and other communities, and must be stopped. it is not conducted with the free and informed consent of frontline communities (most importantly the native tribes whose land this affects) and it is not good for the environment. We must be bold and just in our defense of the environment and equity.
    Dover, NH
  381. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32610Chris McCarthy
    Please do not allow this. Our neighborhoods are so clogged with trains already we can not take anymore.
    Houston, TX
  382. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32609Brian Ritter
    Of all the areas impacted by this potential merger, our eastern Iowa communities will likely be the most negatively impacted. For hundreds of miles, the railroad travels through the Upper Mississippi River valley, in some stretches only feet from the river. It is my opinion that the draft EIS was flawed because it failed to look at the potential hazard this merger poses to our economy, to our health, to our connection with the river, and to the Upper Mississippi River ecosystem and the thousands of species that call it home. The river is the primary source of drinking water for several hundred thousand people in our community alone. The Upper Mississippi is one of the most important migratory flyways in the world and is a major economic engine for our region. According to the Upper Mississippi River Drainage Basin Association, “the Upper Mississippi supports a $55 billion tourism and recreation industry." The DEIS does not consider the risk of flooding. In our region, the tracks are next to, and sometimes, in the river. In several areas, the tracks are well within the 100 year floodplain. With the uncertainty of climate change and the trend of increased flooding, we are concerned about the potential impact of increased trains carrying increased loads of hazardous materials, including crude oil from Alberta and North Dakota. From the period from 2010 to 2019, our stretch of the river was at or above flood stage for an unprecedented 355 days or nearly 10 percent of the time, representing a three-fold increase from the 1990's and 2000's. The draft EIS also failed to assess all the ecologically-sensitive areas that will be impacted, including Nahant Marsh, which is feet from CP's railyard and is home to over 1,100 documented species of, including 3 federally listed and 27 state-listed species. We request that the STB strongly consider our concerns and the potential threat this merger poses to the ecological health and economic vitality of our region.
    Davenport, IA
  383. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32608Callie Laz Davis
    I oppose this merger due to the potential significant environmental impacts related to noise, traffic, safety, air quality, wildlife, plant habitats, and water, including streams and wetlands. The CP/KCS deal would nearly double the number of trains running right through five small villages in White Earth Nation, as well as through the territory we ceded in the 1855 Treaty. The White Earth Reservation Business Committee opposes this merger, and so do I. Please work with the White Earth Nation to honor the treaties and do what is in the best interest of this community and the Earth.
    Wheeler, WI
  384. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32607Juan Pena
    Is there any way to slow down this trains it's safety first always it seem like there's so much in a hurry to get what they're getting they forget about safety first if they drive slow and honk slowly instead of working the whole damn neighborhood there's ridiculous he will hold the horn and more than eight seconds and have been a wreck here in the east side since I've been here but they act like they're back to back cars getting hit by train. There's a motorbill dollar company they can invest in every light pole and put some lights like the Metro does. Mattress a small company versus the Union Pacific and Canadian Pacific these are billion dollar companies does it make no sense they're trying to pull their weight at the end the people have the last say so or they could rewrought these trains somewhere else I'm borderline leaving Harris County I came from LaPorte I don't mind going back the hell of Houston and the officials they can't stand up for us because they get paid under the table like the rest of the idiots in office.
    Harris County, TX
  385. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32606Daniel T White
    Dear Sirs, I oppose the merger for one simple reason: a foreign nation (Canada) should not have a controlling interest in the infrastructure of the United States of America…especially a Class 1 railroad. There used to be a time when there were innumerable Class 1 railroads within the United States of America and now they have been whittled down to five excluding CN and CP. With this impending merger/acquisition, the STB further consolidates the railway industry and as such further limits the choices available to customers and the public. Furthermore and recapitulating an aforementioned point; a Class 1 railway in the United States of America will fall under the aegis of a foreign company who will potentially impose the values and Human Resources practices of another country upon citizens of the United States who will work for “CPKC.” The divestment of a Class 1 railway, like KCS, that has a 140 year history, threatens the sovereignty of the United States and its citizenry. As such, it would be a great mistake to ratify this merger as it will cede yet another American industry to a foreign power as was done throughout the 1980’s leaving our manufacturing base neutered and deracinated. It’s time for a government bureaucracy (STB) funded by American tax dollars to do the will of the American people and not what shareholders and Wall Street advocates. Vote no. Best Regards, Daniel T White 1926 Red Cedar Trl Rosenberg TX, 77472 Sent from my iPhone
    Rosenberg, TX
  386. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32605Carol L Jones
    Attached.
    Muscatine, IA
  387. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32604Shirley Johnson
    I don’t like the idea of this merger. The bridge built to mitigate the train traffic is not accessible and the tracks have boxed me in. In case there is a fire, the station is two miles away and sometimes these trains get stuck between 2-3 hours, a situation like that is scary. These type of changes are inaccessible to older individuals like myself who is 79 years old.
    Houston, TX
  388. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32603Kathy Brown
    Traveling westbound on Stearns through Bartlett, a trip I frequently make normally takes 20 minutes. If I catch a train, I can add another 20 minutes to my trip. Last week, waiting for an extremely long train going on 25 minutes, the train then stopped. Waited another 10 minute, it did not move; forcing me and other motorists to negotiate a u-turn to seek a detour. This frequently happens and is a public safety concern for detouring motorists as well as expense of gas and time. No to merger unless there are remedies, bridges etc to alleviate already existing conditions.
    Hanover park, IL
  389. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32602Holly Secker-Brosman
    : Comments Regarding Merger of CP/KCS Docket No. 36500 ISSUES TRAFFIC – People drive over RR tracks to access homes and businesses. Increased traffic will have adverse effect on residents and businesses along the hwy 67 corridor from Camanche, IA past Davenport, IA. Travel time to school, work and other necessary travel will be negatively impacted by increased number of trains, and length as well. DANGER TO LIFE AND PROPERTY- In an emergency, vehicles may not be able to reach affected people or properties. Important note: there is a 50-bed nursing home just north of our 100+ residential neighborhood, and Arconic, manufacturer of aluminum products employing 13,000+ people. DANGER TO CHILDREN – Increase in traffic increases danger for children getting to and from school. Children have to cross RR tracks to catch the bus. The bus, then drops them off and they need to cross RR tracks to get home. Additionally, there are no RR crossing lights and no arm that comes down, as well as a turn along the tracks that obstructs view. NOISE POLLUTION - the increased amount of trains will increase the amount of noise pollution along the Sabula Iowa to Kansas City corridor. Sec. 1.3.2 of cp-kcsmergereis.com document reads noise pollution would be decreased because of a reduction in truck traffic. I beg to argue that the increase of 100s of RR cars a day will nullify reduction of 64,000 trucks/year. CARGO - What is being hauled and where is it going? I cannot find info on that. DERAILMENTS: Not mentioned and a danger in these populated areas. Recent derailment in 2022-Le Claire. IA. ACCOMMODATIONS – It’s stated if board authorizes proposed acquisition, applicant plans to make 25 capital improvements. However, no improvements list the most heavily affected areas between Sabula IA and Kansas City MO. This area is positioned to have over 100% increase (14.4 trains/day)in traffic and nothing is in place to help alleviate issues caused by the merger. (sec. 1.3.2)
    Bettendorf, IA
  390. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32601Beatrice Sbelgio
    I recently moved to the Elgin area to embrace walkable living, find services and infrastructure, and escape highway noise as I started raising a baby. This merger stands not only to impact every careful decision my family made before moving to the area, but the time and energy of all new parents in my area. Cities want me to pay more in taxes to solve the problems of a train merger that happened without our permission just after we moved. Inexcusable. My family will simply find a better place to raise our child.
    Elgin, IL
  391. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32600Stefan Di Pippo
    Do the right thing and honor the requests of the natives who have already tolerated generations of lies and deception from colonizer governments. It’s obvious to everyone that the oil industry is the primary reason we suffer the threats of climate change, please reconsider your goals and priorities and choose life over profits.
    Providence, RI
  392. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32599Albert Taylor
    When can we get additional rail service in our state and others.
    Rosenburg, TX
  393. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32598Rosa Creekmur
    We do not want this merger as it will affect our community negatively! It will make our area less desirable to live in due to the noise and inconvenience of the train!
    Bartlett, IL
  394. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32597Demitrick Becks
    They need to provide more cameras and improved safety across the tracks near Gregg and noble in 5th Ward. I don't support the merger. More people will be hurt trying to cross the trains or take long detous to get around. Being late causes people to lose their jobs. Traffic blocks streets Sundays and Mondays.
    Houston, TX
  395. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32596George Becks
    I don't want the trains here. We oppose the merger. Trains aren't here for the community. If this goes forward, the companies should provide safety improvements and funding for the community. We are too impacted by existing trains.
    Houston, TX
  396. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32595Maria Guefarro
    I do not want more trains in my neighborhood, there is enough pollution and noise impacting our lives. I oppose this merger.
    Houston, TX
  397. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32594Ana Cerna
    I do not want more trains in my neighborhood, there is enough pollution and noise impacting our lives. I oppose this merger.
    Houston, TX
  398. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32593Jereme resendez
    No trains Traffic Noise
    Houston, TX
  399. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32592Patricia Donaldson
    This merger doesnt need to happen. We have enough going on in our small town already. People don't want it! We are trying to make our voices heard. Do you hear us ?!
    Unknown, MO
  400. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32591Rodney Bishop
    These trains are going to ruin the land for future generations. These companies need to think about someone else besides them selves!!
    Not Provided, MO
  401. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32590Wanda Banks
    I vote no on this merger
    Not Provided, MO
  402. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32589Kurt Compeau
    Does anyone remember the train wreck of 2013?? The amount of oil spilled from ONE train derailment? We can do better than this. We should not be adding more trains on a daily basis.
    Not Provided, MO
  403. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32588Milania Giletti
    The pollution from these trains already are ruining my curtains, clothes, rugs. All the pollution gets on everything and it turns this gross dirty color. I absolutely do not want to add MORE trains!
    Not Provided, MO
  404. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32587Veronique Appleton
    I love the environment and animals. So because of this, I vote no on this merger and I hope you hear me!
    Not Provided, MO
  405. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32586Gabriela Barahona
    As a resident of the Houston area, I’m deeply concerned with air quality, noise pollution, and quality of life impacts to Harris County. I oppose this merger because anti-trust policy demands it. I oppose this merger because environmental common sense demands it. I oppose this merger because it’s clear it will be used to transport tar sands crude oil, and I oppose any expansion of dangerous fossil fuel extraction, especially given the impacts to Indigenous tribal land in Canada. Transportation of crude oil through historically polluted and disinvested communities, like those in Houston/Harris County, is racist and discriminatory. CP has already had four derailments this year! It is not a question of if a derailment will happen in our area, but when. I oppose this merger because I oppose pipelines. I oppose this merger because I want a livable future and I want my kids to have one too. Residents of Harris county area don’t want dangerous, noise-polluting, oil-carrying, monopolistic freight. We want to see our regulators do their job. Stop this merger. It’s bad for our air, our neighborhoods, and our future.
    Houston, TX
  406. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32585Jordan Speisak
    Please dont let this merger happen. Think of the Native Americans who are AGAIN getting the short end of the stick!
    Not Provided, MO
  407. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32584Allen Doherty
    The increased traffic is going to make me even later for work. I already have a hard time with the number of trains we have already. Say no to this merger!
    Not Provided, MO
  408. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32583Cindy Heilweil
    I oppose this merger because of the damage it's going to do to the environment.
    Not Provided, MO
  409. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32582Briana Burke
    This merger is not happening! Are our voices being heard? You need to listen to the ACTUAL people who are going to be living through this!
    Not Provided, MO
  410. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32581Karen Obermiller
    I live along the existing track that has had one oil spill in the 10 years I have been here which sounds good but that's one spill too many. Like others have said, I would prefer to live near a train that carries passengers that live nearby rather than oil that is just passing through from one country to another. Please use your money and energies to be more sustainable for our future.
    Henning, MN
  411. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32580Fred Burnham
    I live in Davenport, IA across the highway from the CP railroad tracks. I have been a resident for 40 years, 2 yrs in my present home. We moved here because of the beautiful river view. Recently, while sitting on our patio, I cked the decibel reading of a passing locomotive with a decibel meter: The locomotive, as it passed, with no horn sounding, generated a reading of 8.3 decibels. It also produced a large amount of diesel smoke. For a city which was highlighted in Outside Magazine as one of the best River Towns in the US, it would be a shame to destroy the river front with 3X the train traffic and noise. To ride my bike from my home to the Farmers Market I cross the tracks 2 times in each direction. Davenport is attempting to expand and improve our river front, but the increased train traffic will cause irreparable harm to the purpose. I strongly oppose the merger.
    DAVENPORT, IA
  412. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32579Trisha Rea
    Crossing RRX DOT #375779U in Ottumwa, IA has been a huge problem for the motorists and businesses for many years and it’s about to get much bigger with the merger of CP & KCS. As concerned citizens and business owners we have been working with local leaders for a solution. The only long term sustainable and viable solution we can agree on is an overpass. The upcoming merger will will connect railways coast to coast in Canada with the southern parts of Mexico. Ottumwa RR track is on the main artery connecting these lines. It is not uncommon for trains to block this crossing for 30-45 minutes. There is an average of 4.2 trains per day this is expected to increase to 18.4 trains per day with the merger. If the RR could reduce the delays to 15 minutes average x 18.4 trains = 4.6 hours per day the crossing will be blocked. Emergency vehicles will be delayed also. We will not be able to function with this situation.
    Ottumwa, IA
  413. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32578Frank Gonzales
    Hello, I live in the East End neighborhood in Houston Texas. I kindly ask that you please do not increase the number of trains that pass through our community. Already, we have a massive problem with trains stopping at various crossings and blowing their horns at all times. The trains have hurt all of us in this community not only by affecting our daily lives like making us late to work or school. But also, the hundreds of ambulances and fire trucks that have to find a way around. Please reconsider the merger. Thank you, Frank Gonzalez
    Houston, TX
  414. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32576Missouri State Council of Firefighters
    Demetris Alfred · Kansas City, MO
  415. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32573Diana Kosmach
    I’m against the merger for several reasons, safety number one . We have enough issues with what we get already as to trains just stopped gates down for long periods of time . IWe have schools on both sides of town that this would disrupt property daily. This will divide our town 100 percent! Perhaps do over or under pass before you destroy the many towns this will affect.
    Wood Dale, IL
  416. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32572John Dixon
    I am a local physician and Camanche ambulance director and home owner for over 30 years The train length will completely block access to schools, and emergency vehicles for 1/2 the town. The increase number of trains will increase noise and cause medical morbidity by interrupting sleep ,cause potential mortality in children caused by trying to cross blocked paths to school or avoiding racing cars trying to find open crossings. It will decrease home values, increase fentanyl and drug availability,and cause morbidity and mortality by increasing emergency response and time to hospital facilities. Camanche realizes no gain from this merger and over 2 million in expense to even partially mitigate these problems causing people to leave or not want to come to live in the community. The vibration caused by the increase weight and length can damage homes and any spills can permanently damage a very fragile Misissippi River basin. This merger will maim and KILL people and DESTROY small towns . Basically there is no rational reason for this merger to continue as other routes are available. I hope you take responsibility for the carnage and deaths this will precipitate. I will obtain the names of this board to hold personally responsible. John Dixon MD
    Camanche, IA
  417. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32571Natasha Villanueva
    We must respect the autonomy of the White Earth Nation and commit every resource to the land back movement if we are every to heal our country from exploitative industries and their damage to our existence.
    Minneapolis, MN
  418. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32570Mary Richter
    No to the merger and increased train traffic in tribal lands. No to the transport of crude oil through tribal lands
    St paul, MN
  419. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32569Susan Roberts
    Please do not allow any merger that will increase the amount of trains that travel through the Eastwood Neighborhood unless there will be strong mitigation efforts to deal with noise and traffic.
    Housfon, TX
  420. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32568Samuel Chumas
    We do not need any more mega-mergers or giant railroads larger than the existing class 1's. American owned is better for public interest. and competition is healthy for a good economy. Help the consumers.
    Eau Claire, WI
  421. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32567Sara Gavin
    This merger will increase the amount of railway traffic in the community resulting in longer wait times to cross railways, increased vehicular traffic, and substantial issues with transportation for medical and emergency response services. The communities around these railways will have to wait longer in cases of emergencies for police officers, EMS and fire officials. The working class community will have their travel time increased significantly to get to and from work. As a Healthcare professional, my commute demands I cross the railroad, and the merger will cause more trains to pass frequently. I won't be able to commute in a timely fashion to provide quality health services. Please say no to this merger.
    Wood Dale, IL
  422. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32566Jennifer Nowatzki
    Don’t approve the merger. If CP and KCS combine, there could be significant environmental impacts related to noise, traffic, safety, air quality, wildlife, plant habitats, and water, including streams and wetlands. That’s a high price for the rest of us to pay so wealthy companies can boost their efficiencies and profits.
    St Paul, MN
  423. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32565gabriel coleman
    Decisions about rail infrastructure in the Western United States have important implications for indigenous sovereignty, the United States' climate future, and transportation. Allowing this merger to process undermines all three, violating indeginous decision making processes on their own land, locking in fossil freight transportation networks, and hardening the stranglehold of freight companies on long-haul rail lines that already struggle to accommodate Amtrak's limited passenger load. It is therefore in the interest of the United States and the indigenous nations with whom we have signed treaties to stop the CP/KCS acquisition from progressing.
    randolph, MN
  424. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32564Becky Olmsted
    Please DO NOT LET this merger go through. We live just steps away from Wood Dale's metra train station and if this merger is allowed to go through our lives will be foreveer changed for the worse. It will block routes of police, fire department and ambulance service to our home which could prove deadly to us. We beg you, stop the merger!!!
    Wood Dale, IL
  425. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32563George Nikolaou
    Regarding the CP/KCS acquisition STB all they did was a study on the Environment .Nothing about the effect on the people of the communities .what about the noise the traffic delay . About emergency delays where seconds count. About a fire where a house is burning and the fire engine is waiting for a train to go by, .or an accident that has victim but the first aid can't get to him/her. where is the study for that. Please please DO NOT LET THAT TO HAPPEN. Their blood is going to be in your hands.
    Wood Dale, IL
  426. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32562Scot Byrd
    This acquisition lies within the existing right of way and the environment is protected by the acquisition by enabling the goal of increasing public transit options in Louisiana. This will remove thousands of cars annually from the roadways and their emissions. Additionally, this will expand employment opportunities for the disadvantaged, improving environmental justice for those citizens.
    Gonzales, LA
  427. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32561Bonnie Stephenson
    Opposed unequivocally! Stop this Madness! Wood Dale not included in analysis! The tracks are angled; thus blocking traffic in every direction! Last night there were ACTIVE shooters in Wood Dale! WDPD and SWAT teams along with police from five other suburbs called! Increase in train traffic could have resulted in the loss of many lives! STOP THIS INSANE MERGER
    Wood Dale, IL
  428. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32560Julie Elliott
    I live in itasca IL, I am opposed to this merger and it’s impact on our community. Our town has one ambulance on the south side of the tracks but our hospital is on the north side of the tracks. The added train traffic will impact our emergency response team and its ability to get us to a hospital. Also two of our schools are on the north side of the tracks, the kids that live on the south side of the tracks may be late for school. It could be dangerous for those kids as well since they don’t understand the danger of crossing the tracks. Please consider the residents and its impact on our community and others
    Itasca, IL
  429. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32559Noah Trottenteimer
    I oppose this merger because it's going to ruin land in my small town. It's going to bring unwanted noise and pollution.
    Not Provided, MO
  430. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32558Cyrus Bouteillon
    Please dont let this merger happen, it's going to ruin everything!
    Not Provided, MO
  431. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32557Corey Moss
    The natives who live near these tracks have already put up with enough. They were not nearly consulted enough and their voices are the ones that should be heard the most!!
    Not Provided, MO
  432. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32547Madeline Kull
    Please read my letter with concerns about flood planning and flood risk assessment.
    DAVENPORT, IA
  433. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32546Madeline Kull
    DAVENPORT, IA
  434. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32545Sierra Club Delta Chapter
    Comments attached in document.
    Angelle Bradford · New Orleans, LA
  435. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32542Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Tom Wilcox · Washington, DC
  436. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32540Environmental Defense Fund
    see attached
    Stephanie Coates · Austin, TX
  437. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32539Charles A. Spitulnik
    Washington, DC
  438. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32538Kaplan Kirsch & Rockwell LLP
    Charles A. Spitulnik · Washington, DC
  439. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32537Harris County Pollution Control Services
    Submittal of Harris County Pollution Control Services Comments to Docket No. FD 36500, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited Merger with Kansas City Southern on behalf of Dr. Latrice Babin
    Herman Rogers · Pasadena, TX
  440. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32536City of Houston
    Good afternoon, Attached is a signed letter from the City of Houston regarding the CP-KCS merger Draft EIS, Docket No. FD 36500. Robert Gallegos Houston Council Member District I
    Robert Gallegos · Houston, TX
  441. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32535Arconic Davenport Works
    Arconic Corporation and its employees at the Davenport Works plant will be negatively impacted by the proposed merger of the Canadian Pacific and the Kansas City Southern if there are not sufficient mitigation measures taken. Arconic manufactures aluminum products for the automotive, aerospace, industrial, and building & construction markets. Of the company’s ~7,000 employees in the United States, we have nearly 2,500 employees in the Quad Cities. Currently, an average of seven trains per day pass our facility and block inbound/outbound traffic for up to 15 minutes at a time. CP expects the number of trains passing the plant to increase to 21 per day – a threefold increase. With trains that are 2+ plus miles long (compared to the current 1 mile-long trains), we also expect the traffic stops will be longer. Our biggest concern is for the safety of our employees. This change will require employees to leave for work earlier and perhaps be blocked in the facility longer during regular operations of these longer and more frequent trains. Worker safety is a top priority for Arconic – but if there is an injury that requires immediate medical attention when the tracks are blocked, we could lose precious minutes waiting for the tracks to clear. In addition to safety concerns, the increase in trains passing could cause delays in our outbound shipments. We also rely on timely inbound shipments of raw materials and supplies to keep our facility operating 24/7 – and we are concerned that the significant increase in trains on the line will make it difficult to have the necessary 75 railcars weekly delivered to Davenport Works. If the promised railcars are not delivered to our plant, supplies will be delayed – and we’ll miss deadlines to our customers. On behalf of our employees and our customers we ask you to reject the proposed merger or ensure adequate mitigation is taken to address the issues that the merger will cause for Arconic operations in Riverdale, Iowa.
    Steven Jennings · Bettendorf, IA
  442. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32534Office of Harris County Judge
    Helen Bonnyman · Houston, TX
  443. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32533Air Alliance Houston
    Jennifer Hadayia · Houston, TX
  444. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32532Harris County Attorneys Office
    Sarah Jane Utley · Houston, TX
  445. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32531Eastwood Civic Association
    Danielle Laperriere · Houston, TX
  446. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32530City of Princeton, Iowa
    The City of Princeton is in opposition to the railroad merger
    Kisa Tweed · Princeton, IA
  447. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32529Harris County Pollution Control Services
    I am forwarding this letter on behalf of Dr. Latrice Babin and Harris County Pollution Control Services
    Herman Rogers · Pasadena, TX
  448. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32524City of Houston
    Robert Gallegos · HOUSTON, TX
  449. (printed as 10/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32522Iowa Professional Fire Fighters
    Ryan Hanghian · Iowa City, IA
  450. (printed as 10/13/2022)
    Comments
    305475Comment
    Sierra Club
  451. (printed as 10/13/2022)
    Motion
    305474Motion To Strike
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  452. (printed as 10/13/2022)
    Comments
    305472Comment
    Teresa L. Stickler
  453. (printed as 10/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32577Ray Allen
    LECLAIRE, IA
  454. (printed as 10/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32575Connie Allen
    This merger exclusively benefits the railroad. There are NO benefits for the city, residents, businesses, or the environment. Our city has built a tourism industry over the past few decades focusing on the Mississippi River and our levee. This merger is a detriment financially, with increased noise pollution and additional safety risk. The railroad used strong arm tactics to get the cities to agree to the money offered. They said if you don’t accept this offer, you may not get any money. The railroad is not taking any responsibility for safety, they expect these towns to use the money to mitigate any safety concerns cities may have. Public safety must be a priority and you should make the railroad mitigate these issues before any merger can happen. There is not one benefit for the residents of the city. Some are not impacted directly in their homes as we and many others are (the noise will reduce property values along with reducing our quality of life) but they will be negatively impacted. As property values decline along the tracks and tourism suffers due to noise pollution and safety concerns, the city will lose tax revenue and be forced to raise the property tax levy rate impacting all residents. This merger will increase noise pollution. Each train may make the same noise as the train before it but that is not the measure of the cumulative effect of the noise of each of train. Currently, there may be one or two trains during any one event on the levee. People can cover their ears once or twice, but triple the number of trains and it will ruin all festivals and activities on the riverfront. Consider the environment. The highest increase in rail traffic due to this merger will be right by the Nahant marsh, the largest wetland on the upper Mississippi. One gallon of oil contaminates a million gallons of water. This is nothing but a Keystone pipeline on wheels. They will transport 2.7 million gallons of oil at over 40 mph.
    Le Claire, IA
  455. (printed as 10/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32574Aaryn Graeve
    The Canadian Pacific-Kansas City Southern merger will severely impact the environment if approved. Canadian Pacific anticipates 14 additional trains because of this merger, some of which will be transporting crude oil from Canada to Mexico. These trains, running on diesel, will result in 7,967,445.06 metric tons of new CO2 emissions from the commute, or the equivalent of a year’s worth of CO2 emissions in Jamaica. Not to mention, additional trains will carry 37,800,000 gallons of hazardous material straight through Davenport each day. The final Environmental Impact Statement needs to address pollution as a profound impact of added trains and consider superior climate-friendly alternatives.
    Davenport, IA
  456. (printed as 10/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32556Harris County Precinct One
    See attachments
    Commissioner Rodney Ellis · Houston, TX
  457. (printed as 10/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32541J.A. Publishing, LLC
    I oppose the merger of KC Railroad with Canadian because of the disaster it will bring to the community of Houston, Texas. The Houston area is already suffering from the terrible conditions at the Englewood Rail Yard in 5th Ward. All over the city we have to deal with train stalls that last over an hour. Medica, fire, and police personnel are continuously delayed in their response because of the railroads that already exist here. This merger will make the quality of life exponentially worse! The pollution will get worse and the traffic delays will get worse. We, as a community, don't want railroads here. Union Pacific has already poisoned 5th ward with creosote and many community members have been killed by the cancer caused by this deadly chemical. Even the State has declared this area a "cancer cluster". We don't want another rail road company merger.
    Jacob Angelo · Houston, TX
  458. (printed as 10/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32528Arconic Davenport Works
    Arconic and our employees here in the Quad Cities will be negatively impacted by the proposed merger of the Canadian Pacific and the Kansas City Southern. And that is why we come to the STB today in opposition to the proposed merger. We currently average about seven trains per day passing our facility and blocking inbound and outbound traffic for anywhere from a few minutes to 10 to 15 minutes at a time. We have been told by the CP that they expect the number of trains passing our plant to increase from seven per day to about 21 per day. That is a threefold increase in the number of times traffic trying to exit our facility or entering our facility will come to a complete stop. With trains that are two-plus miles long compared to the current one mile long trains the traffic stops will be longer. Our biggest concern is for the safety of our employees. This change will require employees to leave for work earlier and perhaps be blocked in the facility longer during regular operations of these longer and more frequent trains. We have over 2,400 employees who work at our Riverdale plant. If there is an injury that requires hospitalization at the same time the tracks are blocked, we could lose precious minutes waiting for the tracks to clear or calling for a life flight helicopter to come and pick up the patient and transport to the hospital. In addition to the safety concerns, we will be faced with delays in our outbound shipments to customers. In many cases we are in a very tight contractual timeline for getting materials to our customers. We also rely on inbound shipments of raw materials and supplies to keep our facility (which operates 24/7) running around the clock. If supplies are late we can miss deadlines for customers and that can cost us business and the potential loss of jobs or hours of work. On behalf of our employees and our customers we ask you to reject the proposed merger.
    John Riches · Bettendorf, IA
  459. (printed as 10/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32527Illinois Commerce Commission
    Brian Vercruysse · Springfield, IL
  460. (printed as 10/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32523Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP)
    Tim McMahon · Chicago, IL
  461. (printed as 10/12/2022)
    Comments
    305469Comment
    Daniel Lee Bennett
  462. (printed as 10/12/2022)
    Comments
    305465Comment
    Saint Paul Bicycle Coalition
  463. (printed as 10/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32629Susan W. Leuthauser
    Bettendorf, IA
  464. (printed as 10/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32627Shelby Yankee
    Blue Grass, IA
  465. (printed as 10/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32555Professional Fire Fighters of Wisconsin, Inc.
    Mahlon Mitchell · Madison, WI
  466. (printed as 10/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32554Minnesota Professional Fire Fighters
    Scott Vadnais · St. Louis Park, MN
  467. (printed as 10/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32553Minnesota Professional Fire Fighters
    Scott Vadnais · St. Louis Park, MN
  468. (printed as 10/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32552Julie Trentz
    My biggest concern is the potential derailment of a train at the Iowa American water treatment facility near the Village of East Davenport. If the water treatment facility is contaminated or damaged by a derailment, the water supply for the entire Quad City area will be affected. We get our water from the Mississippi and cannot run the risk of tainting or eliminating the supply. The following is from a Quad City Times newspaper article published on December 16, 2021: Canadian Pacific's main line also bisects Iowa American Water's treatment facility on the eastern edge of Davenport and operates a spur line that borders the northern edge of the plant. The private utility is the only provider of clean drinking water for six cities and Scott County. "These facilities must be readily accessible and have protections against possible emergency situations in the event of a train derailment," Spiegel wrote. The probability of which Davenport Mayor Mike Matson fears will increase with the significant increase in train traffic. If this merger takes place, there needs to be barriers constructed to protect the plant and river from such an accident. Loss of our water supply would be a monumental disaster.
    Bettendorf, IA
  469. (printed as 10/11/2022)
    Motion
    305450Motion/Petition/Request
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  470. (printed as 10/11/2022)
    Exhibit
    305447Exhibit(s)
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
  471. (printed as 10/11/2022)
    Comments
    305446Comment
    City of Camanche, Iowa
  472. (printed as 10/11/2022)
    Comments
    305441Comment
    Midtown Greenway Coalition
  473. (printed as 10/11/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32619CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  474. (printed as 10/11/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32551Houston Professional Fire Fighters
    Marty Lancton · Houston, TX
  475. (printed as 10/11/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32550Larry Keith
    Beaumont, TX
  476. (printed as 10/11/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32526Iowa Mississippi River Parkway Commission
    Ann Geiger · Fort Madison, IA
  477. (printed as 10/11/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32521Professional Fire Fighters Association of Louisiana
    Chad Major · Baton Rouge, LA
  478. (printed as 10/10/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32676Teresa L. Stickler
    Riverdale, IA
  479. (printed as 10/10/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32525Clinton County Board of Superviors
    Please find the attached letter of opposition to the proposed merger of the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Sothern Railroads as approved by a unanimous vote of the Clinton County Board of Supervisors on October 10, 2022. Areas of concern include lack of study data collection points in Clinton County, Iowa; the reduced ability of first responders to reply to calls in areas isolated from those services when crossings become more frequently blocked; negative impact on residential quality of life and property values; and air quality deterioration.
    Daniel A. Srp · Clinton, IA
  480. (printed as 10/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32544Elmer Costabile
    As a long time home owner in Roselle, I would like to state my objection to this planned merger. 1. Dividing the communities will hugely impact emergency and police response. 2. Our roads will become parking lots another 14 times a day. The resulting traffic jams will take 20-30 minutes to clear. 3. Local businesses will suffer because patrons will avoid our area entirely. 4. Noise and diesel exhaust air pollution much more frequently. 5. Greater probability of derailments and hazardous material spills In dense population centers. 6. More likely to have loss of life and damage to property with increasingly frustrated people and vehicles running around gates at railroad crossings. Thanks for listening. Elmer Costabile
    Roselle, IL
  481. served (printed as 10/7/2022)
    Decision
    51450Director Of Proceedings · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE HEARING IN THESE DOCKETS WILL RESUME ON OCTOBER 7, 2022, TO ALLOW THE APPLICANTS TO CONCLUDE THEIR CLOSING PRESENTATION.
  482. served (printed as 10/7/2022)
    Decision
    51445Director Of Proceedings · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    REVISED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR FINAL BRIEFS TO OCTOBER 21, 2022.
  483. (printed as 10/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32549Kyle Rogers
    Docket No. FD 36500 I'd like to address my disapproval for the CP-KCS merger. The East End of Houston, 2nd Ward, Greater Eastwood as well as NE Houston's 5th Ward area have been a parking lot for Union Pacific as well as BNSF for decades. Adding an estimated 8 to 14 trains per day through the Houston complex will only exacerbate this. I would like to add that there are zero assurances that those numbers will not grow. CP-KCS primarily wants to utilize a line in West Houston, but their documents also show an alternate route right through East Houston, an area certain to be used as Houston rail management is terrible. This area is already plagued by trains parked on at-grade street crossings frequently for hours, occasionally for a literal day plus (my civic association has proof of this). These parked trains cause innumerable problems for my community, from children crawling under to reach school on time, to cars speeding through residential streets to bypass a crossing, and emergency vehicles being rerouted during time-critical events. I blame almost all of these issues on rail operators and their poor rail management. However, I am forced to agree with Union Pacific and BNSF that adding any additional traffic to these lines will make things worse for residents in every possible ways. For these reasons I would like the STB to deny this merger. I'd also implore the STB to deeply study the Houston complex, as well as how poorly local operators manage their train loads before allowing more trains through an already hectic and slapdash rail system. Specifically I'd like a critical eye focused on crossings: 859516 V, 859517 C, 859518 J, 859519 R, 859521 S, 859522 Y, 859523 F, 859524 M, 859527 H, 859529 W, 859530 R, 859533 L, 859538 V, 288051 H, 288050 B, 288048 A, 288046 L, 288039 B, 288034 S, 440828 R, 288024 L, 288011 K, 920030 G, 288035 Y, 288221 A, 288224 V, 288226 J, 288227 R, 288228 X, & 288229 E Thank you for your attention to community concerns. Kyle Rogers
    Houston, TX
  484. (printed as 10/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32548Arcelia Medina
    I do not agree with the merger between KCS and CP railroad operators. There is already an exorbitant amount of train activity in our neighborhoods. Our quality of life is negatively impacted by the current train activity and adding more activity would make it exponentially worse. People trying to go about their day moving around their neighborhood on foot should not be forced to resort to climbing under and over train equipment to get to their destinations. People are put in these dangerous and risky scenarios because trains sit in intersections for hours at a time. It is bad business and the train companies are not being good neighbors or responsible members of the community.
    Houston, TX
  485. (printed as 10/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32543Sarah Shafer
    The Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern railroad merger poses a significant threat to residents of Davenport. If approved, train traffic will be increased by 300%. Trains already get in the way of everyday tasks. As a graduate student living off campus at St. Ambrose University, it will become increasingly difficult to make it to class on time and focus on academics while horns blare by. My concerns deepen as CP trains are already over 1.5 miles long, a number that will increase after the merger. Not only will everyday citizens be stuck behind these trains for an extended period of time, but so will emergency responders. I hope the Surface Transportation Board rejects this railroad merger based on how increased train traffic will disrupt the general well-being of residents along the rail line.
    Davenport, IA
  486. (printed as 10/5/2022)
    Exhibit
    305431Exhibit(s)
    Richardson International Limited
  487. (printed as 10/5/2022)
    Exhibit
    305430Exhibit(s)
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  488. (printed as 10/5/2022)
    Exhibit
    305429Exhibit(s) · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    BNSF Railway Company
  489. (printed as 10/5/2022)
    Exhibit
    305428Exhibit(s) · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  490. (printed as 10/5/2022)
    Exhibit
    305427Exhibit(s)
    The American Chemistry Council, The Fertilizer Institute, and The National Industrial Transportation League
  491. (printed as 10/5/2022)
    Exhibit
    305426Exhibit(s)
    Canadian National Railway Company
  492. (printed as 10/5/2022)
    Exhibit
    305425Exhibit(s)
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  493. (printed as 10/5/2022)
    Exhibit
    305422Exhibit(s) · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  494. (printed as 10/5/2022)
    Exhibit
    305420Exhibit(s)
    Canadian Pacific Railway Company Limited
  495. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32520Kathryn (Kate) Oliver
    See attached.
    Davenport, IA
  496. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32519Catherine Cacioppo
    I don't want this to merger happen because I live in Wood Dale IL not to far from Wood Dale train Station. We deal with the noise from the airplanes and all this traffic on Irving Park Rd due to the 390 tollway that no one uses because of the tollway fees. We just have enough trains crossing Irving Park Rd and Wood Dale Road and it get so backed up there!
    Wood Dale, IL
  497. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32518Ethel Terrell
    We have enough trains running thru our neighborhoods. They block people going and coming from work. At 2-3 in the mornings the trains are blowing the horns so loud and for a long period of time. It looks like they deliberately want to wake us up. Please, no more trains!
    Houston, TX
  498. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32517Ronnie Kelp
    I oppose this merger for the environment's sake!
    Not Provided, MO
  499. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32516Bert Reynolds
    This merger is going to ruin the environment. It's going to pollute the air. As an asthmatic, I don't need/want more junk in my air!
    Not Provided, MO
  500. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32515Roan Miller
    The river area is such a nice place for locals. They can bring their families and have a picnic or quick soccer game. The addition of 9 more daily trains will definitely disrupt that!
    Not Provided, MO
  501. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32514Carrie Nooten
    Our animals don't deserve more trains and more pollution and more habitat destruction. I oppose this merger! !
    Not Provided, MO
  502. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32513Britt Wilkins
    No one wants this train stuff coming around. We have enough to deal with.! I dont want to pay for more companies to roll through our land!
    Not Provided, MO
  503. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32512Kelvin Sommers
    I remember the big disaster from 2013 when that train derailed and spilled all that oil. I dont want this to happen ever again, stopping this merger is a step towards that!
    Not Provided, MO
  504. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32511Taryn Potter
    I oppose this merger because i hate train. I dont want anymore coming through our small town. They cause traffic and make me late for work.
    Not Provided, MO
  505. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32510Robert Brady
    Have you ever been stuck behind at a railroad crossing waiting for an ambulance?? And there's a huge train running through town? I have! Those seconds of time really make a difference! Adding more trains could mean the difference between life or death!!
    Not Provided, MO
  506. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32509Sammy Bell
    Just say no to this merger! Listen to the little people for once...WE DONT WANT IT HERE!
    Not Provided, MO
  507. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32508steve Rittenburg
    This merger is going to be bad for our health. We might not notice it at first, but the long term effects will be evident.
    Not Provided, MO
  508. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32507Callum Tonder
    This merger will wreck havoc on small towns. More trains are going to cause more commotion. Say no to this merger!!!
    Not Provided, MO
  509. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32506Carol Stearns
    I live by this track where theyre proposing to run 10+ more trains a day. My walls are already disgusting because of the train soot and pollution. It is a hassle to keep them clean. Adding more trains is going to add to my scrubbing. A 74 year old woman should not have to scrub this much! No thank you!!
    Not Provided, MO
  510. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32505Theresa Ballard
    I don't think this merger should go through. I was talking to my friends and they all agreed. Our town doesnt need this!
    Not Provided, MO
  511. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32503Steven Schumacher
    The potential for horrific train derailments increases significantly with this merger. Everyone thinks it wont happen in their small town, but do some research... it happens more often than you think!
    Not Provided, MO
  512. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32502Ida French
    No one wants these greedy companies running more trains through our towns. I oppose this merger!
    Not Provided, MO
  513. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32501Paula Bennett
    People forget about us in these small towns. People don't wanna hear our opinions. But Im here today to say I oppose this merger! We cannot let this happen! !
    Not Provided, MO
  514. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32500Winston Clam
    I am vehemently opposed to this merger. I have tried making my voice heard at meetings and I heard a lot of similar minded people. This merger will be terrible for the Earth!
    Not Provided, MO
  515. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32499Carlos Rios
    Me opongo a esta fusión. ¡Es malo para el medio ambiente!
    Not Provided, MO
  516. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32498Yasmine Hastens
    I vote no on this merger. I oppose it!!
    Not Provided, MO
  517. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32497Kelly Takas
    Im sick of getting stuck in train traffic lines trying to get my kids to school. It will happen sometimes 4 out of 5 mornings per week. Please do not add any more trains!!
    Not Provided, MO
  518. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32496Dylan Doherty
    No means No! you've heard from us in the meetings.. you know this merger is a mistake. Please don't let this go through!
    Not Provided, MO
  519. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32495Daphne Simpson
    I love our Earth and she doesn't deserve this merger to happen. There are bigger things in life than just money!
    Not Provided, MO
  520. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32494Allison Watson
    Oil spills will continue to destroy our Earth and this merger is going to increase the chance of them happening. Use common sense and block this merger!
    Not Provided, MO
  521. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32493Pete Smanter
    I oppose this merger for environmental reasons!
    Not Provided, MO
  522. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32492Ryan Greene
    I'm writing on behalf of my grandpa who cant use technology. He would like you to know he opposes this merger and doesn't want more trains in town. Thank you.
    Not Provided, MO
  523. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32491Militia Shurro
    We don't need any more trains blocking traffic and making it more dangerous for kids who wander near the tracks. Please dont let this merger happen!
    Not Provided, MO
  524. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32490Harold Schmeltz
    The water in the Mississippi is going to become even dirtier with the addition of extra trains. This merger is bad news for the environment!
    Not Provided, MO
  525. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32489Cyrus Bouteillon
    Please dont let this merger happen, it's going to ruin everything!
    Not Provided, MO
  526. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32488Julie Elliott
    I live in itasca IL, I am opposed to this merger and it’s impact on our community. Our town has one ambulance on the south side of the tracks but our hospital is on the north side of the tracks. The added train traffic will impact our emergency response team and its ability to get us to a hospital. Also two of our schools are on the north side of the tracks, the kids that live on the south side of the tracks may be late for school. It could be dangerous for those kids as well since they don’t understand the danger of crossing the tracks. Please consider the residents and its impact on our community and others
    Itasca, IL
  527. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32487Bonnie Stephenson
    Attn: Chairman Martin Oberman NOISE!! You allow the above article to be printed without any apology or rebuttal from you or your independent government agency!! 1. Why was Wood Dale Illinois not included in your analysis? Wood Dale has angled tracks stopping the two main streets at the same time! Not to mention the traffic will back up from Elgin to Bensenville in every direction! YOU MUST STOP THIS MADNESS! 2. Tens of thousands of citizens will be cut off from timely police, fire and ambulance services! How many lives will be lost before 31 Billion Is no longer worth the price no matter where the dollars are going! 3 . Toxic Materials?? 4. What about time lost by parents trying to spend said time with their families! 5. Residential neighborhoods filled with drivers making undesirable alternate routes! 6. Local businesses losing their clientele due to not being able to reach planned destinations due to traffic gridlock! This merger for the impacted residents is horrific, sadistic, tragic and life threatening! Regards, Bonnie Stephenson Home. 630 595 1252 Cell. 773 664 9162 340 S. Wood Dale Rd. Wood Dale, IL 60191
    Wood Dale, IL
  528. (printed as 10/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32485Texas House of Representatives
    Representative Ron Reynolds · Missouri City, TX
  529. (printed as 10/3/2022)
    Comments
    305413Comment
    Ms. Pamela Fraser, Ms. Heather Dockrell, Mr. Edward Dockrell, Ms. Lorelei Desrochers, and Ms. Kaitlyn Timmerman
  530. (printed as 10/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32680Tracy Slaughter
    Davenport, IA
  531. (printed as 10/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32679Sharita Lacy
    Davenport, IA
  532. (printed as 10/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32678Sheila Pettigrew
    Davenport, IA
  533. (printed as 10/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32486Texas State Senate
    Senator Carol Alvarado · Houston, TX
  534. (printed as 10/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32483Glenda & Michael Guster
    Davenport, IA
  535. (printed as 10/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32482Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Tom Wilcox · Washington, DC
  536. (printed as 10/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32481La Coaltion Rail Safety Campaing, Woods & Wetlands Group, Sierra Club - IL Chapter
    I’m writing to voice concern for public safety resulting from a lack of emergency preparedness for threats posed by transporting hazardous substances near schools and other public locations. An estimated 14,800 schools and 5.7M students are located within an Oil Train Blast Zone. Chicago, with 77,000 kids at school in this zone, is one of the top 5 cities having school children at risk from derailments, emissions, and explosions. A coordinator from McHenry County's LEPC estimates it would take 8 paid staff 2 years to identify all at-risk schools that could be negatively impacted by any of nearly 400 hazardous substances transported by rail, and to then identify a 4-corner safety zone plan for each school since determining where to move students will literally depend upon which way the wind is blowing. McHenry County's LEPC has 4 paid staff, Lake County only 3! We're also concerned about the industry’s use of private police with full criminal law powers. Although these unique powers date back to the 19th century, the cargo transported by rail has dramatically changed. Trains are heavier and longer, and cargo is increasingly more toxic and volatile. Trains now have the potential to decimate entire city centers, as demonstrated by the Lac-Megantic catastrophe. Allowing CP to extend police powers in the US by acquiring KCS’s American police force through a private, commercial, cross-border transaction raises considerable concern for our sovereignty, national security, privacy rights, civil rights, and constitutional rights. Enabling an industry that historically thumbs its nose at railway safety and regulation to police itself is a ridiculous conflict of interest. We ask for a full STB investigation of CP Railway’s use of private police and its impact on American interests BEFORE the CP-KCS merger is approved, and that a merger not be approved until emergency response plans are in place to protect residential areas, schools, and other public locations.
    Gerri Songer · Lake Zurich, IL
  537. (printed as 10/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32480Ann Louise Geiger
    For the past two years the railroad has been working on the tracks, raising them so they make more noise, and parking their cars behind my house with their klieg lights on all night long. I am writing you with a request to deny the merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern, docket number 36500. Much to my dismay, the railroad is destroying my house. My house was built in 2016 with full-cut boards and plaster and lathe. I have lived here for 45 years. Last winter the porta cachere started to pop and snap. I thought insects had gotten into it, but after calling the pest control people, that was not the case. This summer I noticed one of the top sashes of my porch window had dropped. I looked again a couple of weeks ago, and two more of them have dropped. These sashes have been attached to the frame since I moved here 45 years ago. My only conclusion is the vibration of the railroad which is shipping heavier and longer trains (2 miles most of the time) every day. To increase the number of trains would surely damage my house further, not to mention those homes and businesses along the route. If you do the math, each gallon of crude oil weighs 7.21 pounds. Take that times the 27,000 gallons per car, and you have 19,467 pounds per car, and multiply that by the additional trains suggested to be added – 104 – and you have 20,245,568 pounds of moving material running down the road. That is going to set up major vibrations. It is impossible, in my opinion, to mitigate that damage. The tracks are about an acre away, and there is a large stand of trees between the house and the tracks which SHOULD absorb some of the vibration. However, it is too much for the buildings to withstand. I have no idea what other damage has been, or will be done to my home.
    Princeton, IA
  538. (printed as 10/3/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3717Sidley and Austin for CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield
  539. served (printed as 9/30/2022)
    Decision
    51436Director Of Proceedings · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    ANNOUNCED THAT THE HEARING WILL RESUME ON OCTOBER 3, 4, AND 6, 2022, AND UPDATED THE SCHEDULE OF APPEARANCES TO REFLECT RESCHEDULED PANELISTS.
  540. (printed as 9/30/2022)
    Letter
    305410Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  541. (printed as 9/30/2022)
    Letter
    305409Letter
    Honorable Ilhan Omar
  542. (printed as 9/30/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32479mary richter
    This must be approved by the tribal communities first and foremost. It is their land that these trains will disrupt and cause damage to. No to the transport of fossil fuels through tribal lands and any lands
    st paul, MN
  543. (printed as 9/30/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32478Madeline A
    I am opposed to the merger between Canadian Pacific Railway and Kansas City Southern, which could bring even more freight trains through Houston, specifically East End. As residents, we are deeply concerned that an increase in freight train traffic due to this proposed merger will exacerbate the issue of blocked crossings and further impact emergency response and mobility, as well as the environment.
    Houston, TX
  544. (printed as 9/30/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32477Evan Alvarez
    I am opposed to the merger between Canadian Pacific Railway and Kansas City Southern, which could bring even more freight trains through Houston, specifically East End. As residents, we are deeply concerned that an increase in freight train traffic due to this proposed merger will exacerbate the issue of blocked crossings and further impact emergency response and mobility, as well as the environment.
    Houston, TX
  545. (printed as 9/30/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32476Kathy Klabacha
    Against merger. Just listen to all peoples statements. You must listen and understand the impact on safety of those living around these sites
    Wood dale, IL
  546. (printed as 9/30/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32475Ellen Nelson
    To the Board: The only entity that benefits from this merger is CP, a Canadian, not American company. If moving crude oil products is the goal, use barges. More fuel efficient and hold double the amount a 100 car train can haul. What about life along this river. Towns, parks, wetlands and of course the Mississippi River. Please don’t dismiss derailments as non-consequential. Look at the YouTube video of 20 CP cars landing on the levee in LeClaire with only a small chemical leak. At least it happened in town and didn’t put 20 cars into the river. 100 or so quiet zone’s doesn’t help anyone who is not within that zone. Why can trains roar through towns at 55 miles an hour and cars need to go 25 , for reasons of safety. This is not the middle of empty fields where this train travels. Have any of you driven the Great River Road and seen what this encompasses and what this merger will significantly change forever. Please. Notice on this drive that the only landscape next to the tracks in many areas, is the river and what a spill will do to our environment. Please don’t make a decision for short term economic gain. There are other ways that don’t affect thousands of people and hundreds of towns. Please protect our river and don’t make this a pipeline because that is really what this is about. We have trains already and barges and trucks that don’t change or endanger our lives or livelihood. Please consider all aspects of this endeavor. Ellen Nelson LeClaire, Iowa
    LeClaire, IA
  547. (printed as 9/30/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32474Christine Moody
    I love being by the water with my kids, we do not want more trains and pollution coming through our small town. I oppose this merger.
    Not Provided, MO
  548. (printed as 9/30/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32473Christine Schmidt
    I am so against this this would be horrific if you allow this disruption of trains think about the emergency vehicles this is ridiculous
    Not Provided, MO
  549. (printed as 9/30/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32472James Perry
    I only have two comments. I live in Port Bryon, IL across from LeClaire Iowa. About the merger...I would like to see the trains stop blowing their horns so loud late at night! Drop the decibel level of these horns at the RR Crossings. My second comment is, I would like to see the increase in rail traffic take place in the day time as much as possible. The train noise at night is sometimes so loud at night that it wakes us up from a sound sleep.
    Port Byron, IL
  550. (printed as 9/30/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32471Gary Stevens
    I think this merger is a good idea. Thank you to all who are working to make this happen. Sincerely yours, Gary Stevens
    Not Provided, MO
  551. (printed as 9/30/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32470Not Provided
    Letting a murderous company like CP just waltz through the merger process sucks. Open the floor to everyone publicly!
    Not Provided, MO
  552. (printed as 9/29/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32626Kansas City District Corps of Engineers
    Comments regarding DEIS
    Kansas City, MO
  553. (printed as 9/29/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32620Emma Needham
    I'm an allied Tribal Member from the Red Lake Nation. The merger of these two huge railroad lines - Canadian Pacific (CP) and Kansas City Southern (KCS) is a danger to the White Earth Nation, with whom I feel deeply connected with. The CP/KCS merger is a danger to the environment and water in Minnesota - These types of surface transfers have the potential for massive damage to the earth and human life risk in communities, like White Earth, which will receive absolutely NO direct benefit from the increased transportation through their homelands. These types of projects require more than just an Environmental Impact Statement. They require MEANINGFUL consult and considerations with the tribal nations effected, and that consultation has not taken place. There is the potential for significant environmental impacts related to noise, traffic, safety, air quality, wildlife, plant habitats, and water, including streams and wetlands. That’s a high price for the White Earth Community and the state of Minnesota to pay for an already wealthy foreign company to boost their efficiencies and profits. This merger is a terrible idea for everyone from the local to a national levels- The White Earth Nation, the land, water and air of Minnesota, and the United States. This purchase endangers the U.S. ability to protect, and oversee transport in our country. The White Earth Reservation Business Committee opposes this merger and I stand with them as an ally. I oppose the Canadian Pacific (CP) and Kansas City Southern (KCS) merger as a tribal citizen, citizen of Minnesota, and a patriot of the United States.
    BRAINERD, MN
  554. (printed as 9/29/2022)
    Comment
    EI-324609HVG9V
    After attending the Surface Transportation public meeting held in Davenport Iowa, I respectfully want to express my/our STRONG OPPOSITION to what is being proposed. The increase in train traffic from this merger is extremely concerning and would be detrimental to not only the environment but also to our quality of life. The fact that they will be moving dangerous chemicals as well as 30,000 gallons of flammable crude oil IN EACH CAR through our neighborhoods and community is very alarming and extremely dangerous. The 19th century railroad tracks cannot and will not support the increase in train traffic. Accidents and derailments are only a matter of time. Being located right on the Mississippi River with the Rock Island Arsenal and the Cordova Nuclear Plant so very close should sound the alarm for everyone. Please do not allow this merger to go forward.
    Gwendolyn Halsey · Riverdale, IA
  555. (printed as 9/29/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32453Sun Prairie Fire Department
    Chris Garrison · Sun, WI
  556. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Reply
    305404Reply
    Kansas City Southern and its U.S. rail carrier subsidiaries The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Gateway Eastern Railway Company, and The Texas Mexican Railway, Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd., Canadian Pacific Railway Company, and their U.S. rail carrier subsidiaries Soo Line Railroad Co., Central Maine & Quebec Railway US Inc., Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corp., and Delaware and Hudson Railway Co., Inc.
  557. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Reply
    305396Reply
    Pamela Fraser, Heather Dockrell, Edward Dockrell, Lorelei Desrochers, and Kaitlyn Timmerman
  558. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Notice
    305395Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    La Coalition Rail Safety Campaign Woods and Wetlands Group - Sierra Club, IL Chapter
  559. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Exhibit
    305393Exhibit(s)
    William E. Gluba
  560. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32452Elizabeth F
    Detroit lakes is considered an Environmental Justice Area (Census Tracts that are 40% non-white, 35%, at or below 200% FPL, 40% or more of the population has limited English proficiency, or have an American Indian Reservation within its boundary.) I ask the MPCA to join me, a resident of Detroit Lakes in Becker County, in opposing the CPR and KCS Railways merger. I oppose in an effort to protect my family and the citizens in an EJ Area in Greater MN from increased risk of pollution from additional rail traffic carrying crude oil and hazardous materials through the area. https://www.house.leg.state.mn.us/comm/docs/3VBJnYfLmUC1sabPnRSpDg.pdf
    Detroit Lakes, MN
  561. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32451Stoddard/Bergen Fire Department
    Joseph Pfaff · Stoddard, WI
  562. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32449Super Neighborhood 64 & 88
    See attached document
    Amy Dinn · Houston, TX
  563. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32445Oklahoma Archeological Survey
    Kary Stackelbeck · Norman, OK
  564. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32441Scott Brewer
    I oppose this for so many reasons, but mainly for the environment. We have already caused the earth so much damage.
    Not Provided, MO
  565. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32440Earl Wittig
    Greedy companies will always win out. I oppose this merger because everything will be ruined if we add more daily trains!
    Not Provided, MO
  566. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32439Katie Marks
    We have already harmed the planet irreparably. I am opposed to this merger.
    Columbus, OH
  567. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32438Mary Rodkey
    Stop this dangerous, unnecessary merger. More trains carrying flammable material through downtown areas will result in increased noise, traffic back ups, restricted access to the riverfront, and increased risk of injury injury and death to local citizens. I do not support this effort that benefits no one
    Moline, IL
  568. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32437Adam Hutchinson
    I oppose this merger for environmental reasons
    Not Provided, MO
  569. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32436Todd McNally
    I oppose this merger for many reasons. The most important being quality of life along the Mississippi River. This merger will negatively affect people, land, and animals
    Not Provided, MO
  570. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32435Ari Zimmerman
    This merger should not go through. I am already waiting in enough train track traffic jams. If this goes through, there will be something like 13 more trains a day?? WTF
    Not Provided, MO
  571. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32434Keith Winter
    I oppose this merger for environmental reasons mainly. Oil spills could happen a long the River and that would be disastrous for so many who depend on the River for their livlihoods
    Not Provided, MO
  572. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32433Mindy Hughes
    I do not want this merger to go through. It will affect me and my family negatively.
    Not Provided, MO
  573. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32432Charles Smith
    This merger will devastate the Mississippi River area. I do not approve of this merger.
    Not Provided, MO
  574. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32431Morgan Silverstein
    I oppose this merger because of the land it's going to take away from the indigenous people of our country.
    Not Provided, MO
  575. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32430Brenda Schaaf
    I oppose this mega merger for the safety and concern of my relatives. I oppose this mega merger also for the reason being that you cannot just bully your way into & through communities, and tribal lands. Realize that people are humans and when it is substantially opposed to that it should be honored.
    DEER RIVER, MN
  576. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32429Amalia Peppino
    This merger is going to ruin lives and land. It's going to put more money into Canada than it is the US! I oppose this merger!
    Not Provided, MO
  577. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32428Benoit Gerard
    I oppose this merger for environmental reasons.
    Not Provided, MO
  578. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32427Alana Peppers
    This merger is a terrible idea. No one in my town wants more train traffic or noise. This is going to make driving 1000x worse!
    Not Provided, MO
  579. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32426Josephine M Huffnagle
    We dont need more oil disasters, we NEED clean water and nutritious foods!!!
    Painseville, OH
  580. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32425Jesus Gonzalez Jr.
    We are already experiencing access blockage from trains staling for hours. This proposed merger will make matters worse for us in Houston.
    Houston, TX
  581. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32424Cristina Lopez
    This merger would increase air pollution, noise pollution, and would be negatively affecting the people of White Earth Nation. This merger works against the climate emergency we are facing. Stop the merger!
    Whiting, IN
  582. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32423Martha Burnham
    Docket FD36500 Merger of CP_KCS rails will ADVERSLY AFFECT Davenport IA,Scott Co, & Quad Cities. Our area will see triple the train traffic which can result in back to back traffic ACCESS to crossing tracks is vital for many to reach home, work & recreation. ENVIRONMENT EIS admits increased traffic, noise, air quality, safety risk. All above is a risk to Nahant Marsh Preserve . EIS states we will have over 500 receptors of unacceptable noise & vibration levels At triple train traffic this will be constant. PLEASE PAY ATTENTION to this. Any mitigation measures will NEVER lessen the number of trains and adverse affects on citizens. Our citizens are opposed. Many believe railroads get what they want. City leaders exchanged silence for money if merger goes through. The offer will not begin to cover cost of noise mitigation, rail crossings, quality of life. It will NEVER lessen the train traffic, noise, vibration, delays. I invite you to spend a few days to enjoy downtown activities & restaurants, Nahant Marsh, tour boats, Mississippi River. Then imagine what triple the train traffic would do. I urge you to oppose the merger. Sincerely, Martha Burnham
    Davenport, IA
  583. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32422j g
    Good morning. I am writing in favor of the KP/KCS acquisition. As a Native American, to often the professional protestors in our ranks get an amplified voice. These people make a living off finding the next controversy to drum up financial support for. Our native communities need to start being partners in these projects, not opposition. Decades of opposition have left tribes financially unstable, and have created unnecessary roadblocks to infrastructure projects. Treaty rights are not all encompassing. They provide the right to hunt fish and gather. They do not provide the right to be obstructionists at every turn. By amplifying the voice of these profesisonal protestors, the regulatory process for companies that want to invest in Minnesota has become overburdensome and all to time consuming. Incentivize those that will create jobs and opportunities, not the ones yelling the loudest.
    Woodbury/Mahnomen, MN
  584. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32421Patrice Pekofske
    The village of Schaumburg has already approved plans for a new truck stop/ headquarters/ gas station that is being built. The huge facility is right by the train stop on Rodenburg. I live off of rodenburg in Roselle. This street has not been expanded to allow the truck stop so I can’t imagine the accidents/deaths from additional trains. Sounds like a nightmare to me
    Roselle, IL
  585. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32420Nadia Garcia
    I believe this should not happens as we already have enough noise with the airplanes. And the amount of traffic this would create in wood dale I can’t even imagine. Irving park is already congested during traffic hours.
    Wood dale, IL
  586. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32419Kelly Caruso
    I'm very concerned about the impact on traffic being backed up due to extremely long trains or trains that stop on the tracks. I have been blocked by stopped freight trains countless times in my life. It has caused me to be late to things. That's definitely an inconvenience to people trying to get to work, appointments or school, but one of my biggest concerns is for Emergency Vehicles. A fire truck, ambulance, or police car responding to a call or transporting someone in need of immediate medical care can be stopped for, not just precious minutes, but hours. We do not want this merger. It will be damaging to our community, and possibly detrimental to many lives.
    ROSELLE, IL
  587. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32418Dave Willis
    I urge the current EIS be rejected immediately as I don't believe any human inspectors site visited most areas of concern that have been brought to your attention through meetings, e-mails, etc. Physically visit areas with local county, city, Representatives to create new EIS. Also, existing and to be built pipelines are much more safe than RR's. Pipelines are constantly monitored for leaks, etc. These new mile long, hazardous material containing trains are not being monitored for leaks during their long travels thru the heart of USA from Canada and to Mexico. There is no caboose, no train staff at the rear of the trains to notice trails of leaking materials and how many rail cars are leaking on each train. Unlike semi rigs who must stop for fuel and drivers rest, the drivers walk around their rigs to inspect for leaks, tire conditions, lights. I don't believe the new long, hazardous trains are scheduled to periodically stop and the train staff get outside and walk both sides of these mile long trains inspecting and looking for leaks, bad wheels, brakes, etc. My biggest fear of this merger, aside of my part of Camanche being blocked by the length and number of trains, is no Emergency Services can reach my family when needed. My home burning, no Emergency medical help. My biggest fear that I don't believe is being investigated is the large scale movement of fentanyl and possibly human trafficking. After all, the USA has an open border at Mexico where most, if not all fentanyl, other drugs and human trafficking is currently taking place. Please DENY this merger and consider other methods, such as pipelines. Another alternative if the merger is considered is to direct trains North out of Kansas City to the West side of Iowa and join the present rail lines going thru the middle of Iowa, avoiding our town being devastated by this super highway rail line carrying fentanyl, hazardous materials and preventing Emergency services to care for us. Thank you.
    Camanche, IA
  588. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32417Daniel Clements
    This merger should have never even have been proposed. There are plenty of trains already rolling through our small towns. Say no to this merger!!
    Not Provided, MO
  589. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32416Victoria Sanyshyn
    This merger shouldnt go through!!!!!
    Not Provided, MO
  590. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32415Mike Blinken
    This merger shouldnt happen. There are so many illegal things happening it's ridiculous. These companies think we dont get it!
    Not Provided, MO
  591. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32414Donnie Smiden
    I oppose this merger for the environment and Mother Earth.
    Not Provided, MO
  592. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32413Jack Maroz
    I feel bad for the farmers and Native Americans who will take the brunt for this merger. It is going to destroy their livelihood and shouldnt go through!
    Not Provided, MO
  593. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32412Charlotte Miller
    This merger doesnt need to happen. Our trains/transport are fine without it. I hope someone hears us regarding this!
    Not Provided, MO
  594. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32411Kristen Schaff
    This merger is going to ruin my small town. We hate the train traffic already and I dont want more trains added!
    Not Provided, MO
  595. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32410Yohann Wick
    No more trains! No more using our land! No more taking our money! I oppose this merger!
    Not Provided, MO
  596. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32409Dean Cowley
    I don't want this merger to go through!
    Not Provided, MO
  597. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32408Sunny Wharton
    Adding 8 more trains to the daily number is going to kill our small town. Everyone forgets about us or tries to pretend they care. If they really cared, they wouldnt let this merger go through.
    Not Provided, MO
  598. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32407Robert LeRoyer
    I dont want more trains because I seen how they ruin the environment. Farmers need their land to be healthy so we can continue to grow crops and make money.
    Not Provided, MO
  599. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32406Anton Markowitz
    This merger will bring danger all along the tracks. If there is another oil disaster, it is going to be tough for small towns to recover.
    Not Provided, MO
  600. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32405Alessandra Cort
    I oppose this merger for environmental reasons.
    Not Provided, MO
  601. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32404Oliver Martin
    This is another ploy by a greedy company to take more land and money that isn't theirs. They wont have to suffer the consequences- the people, earth, and animals do!
    Not Provided, MO
  602. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32403Pia Axel
    This has been my home for over 40 years. I have watched it be destroyed by pollution and noise from the trains. I oppose this merger!
    Not Provided, MO
  603. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32402Clementine Willoughby
    I fully oppose this merger. If we even have one oil spill like the one in 2013, we are screwed!
    Not Provided, MO
  604. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32401Simon Davies
    No more trains! IDC if my son loves them.... we don't need anymore coming through our town!
    Not Provided, MO
  605. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32400Sophia Wilkinson
    These trains smell and these trains are noisy. I dont care if they gonna transport stuff- we dont need more of 'em!
    Not Provided, MO
  606. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32399Nikola Fernandez
    I dont want this merger happening. Only bad things are going to come from it.
    Not Provided, MO
  607. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32398Mateo White
    This merger is unnecessary and is going to be costly to small communities, in more ways than one!
    Not Provided, MO
  608. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32397Mark Linter
    This merger is terrible for the environment and does not benefit the public
    Dayton, OH
  609. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32396Sarah Marcus
    Both companies are environmentally unsafe. No to this merger!
    Bettendorf, IA
  610. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32395Ellie Thompson
    NEVER to this merger!
    Saint Louis, MO
  611. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32394Guiseppe Trimoga
    It's like they're trying to kill the planet.
    New York, NY
  612. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32393Jenny Baker
    No more! No to the merger.
    Miami, FL
  613. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32392Arwen Sook
    NO! No the this stupid merger.
    Omaha, NE
  614. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32391Jim Smith
    This is yet another useless merger for corporate greed.
    Washington, DC
  615. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32390Mike Trager
    No to the merger.Thanks.
    Washington, DC
  616. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32389Julie Smith
    This will impact my daily life. No to the merger.
    Denton, TX
  617. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32388Kara Hafez
    My childhood home is in Scott County along Great River Road. Bald eagles hunt and fish in our trees. 14 more trains a day would totally disrupt the bald eagle population. I have low confidence the train system infrastructure is capable of handling the increases in traffic. Further, the private crossings to access our neighborhood are part of a sharp curve causing the train to appear quickly and sometimes without proper warning. During my time living at the home there were several collisions and death as a result of this curve. Increased traffic just increases these odds. In addition, the affect of noise pollution has a real impact on mental health. Numerous studies have linked noise pollution to increased anxiety, depression, high blood pressure, heart disease, and stroke. Even small increases in unwanted ambient sound have significant effects. This is an environmental hazard for our community
    Lakewood, CO
  618. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32387Peter Clerkin
    This merger is going to harm my family. My kids dont need any more train pollution!
    Not Provided, MO
  619. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32386Tony Franneli
    This merger is a joke. Those big companies dont care about the little man! I hope it doesnt happen!
    Not Provided, MO
  620. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32385Polly LeRoy
    It's the people who are going to suffer if this merger goes through! It is unfair to the people who live along the rail lines!
    Not Provided, MO
  621. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32384Aton Guirren
    This merger will ruin both human and animal lives! Our eco system will become even more destroyed. If a train derails.. we are in for a lot of trouble!
    Not Provided, MO
  622. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32383Cathy Cunningham
    I oppose this merger for environmental reasons!
    Not Provided, MO
  623. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32382Brian Chumsky
    I oppose this merger because I love the land I live on, the animals in my back yard, and the air I breathe!
    Not Provided, MO
  624. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32381Adam Gilmore
    I oppose this merger, it needs to not happen!
    Not Provided, MO
  625. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32380John Randle
    No one in my town wants this merger to happen. We are a small town and we are going to bear the most consequences!
    Not Provided, MO
  626. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32379Armando Medina
    I oppose this due to increased noise level, pollution, disruption of possible emergency services and delayed commute. I get alot of noise from airplanes flying over my house, which i am also complaining about. We dont need the extra headache.
    Wood Dale, IL
  627. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32378Bobbie Fryrer
    I oppose this merger for many reasons. Canada Pacific has ruined our land before....2013! They could do it again, they need to be stopped!
    Not Provided, MO
  628. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32377George Naberstack
    This merger violates our environment. I oppose it!
    Not Provided, MO
  629. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32376Krista Kefauver
    I live in Davenport Iowa Near The Tracks. My personal take, its greatly effecting my job & way of life; from non stop horns and loud screeching, it's bad enough that large trucks make my historical house rumble...... I work from home and I already use noise blockers.. Now not even they are enough, I can't even have a normal phone conversation now with my clients!! I shouldn't be rethinking where I just moved. I moved out here for simi quiet... This is uncalled for and subpar in the fact that no one is talking about properly placing these routes underground. We dealt with the raised trains due to flooding which we asked to be reversed which is blocking our river view now we have to think about moving... How many people work from home now due to the pandemic? The money will be there; put it underground. This is ill planning and forcing people off their land.
    Davenport, IA
  630. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32375Killian Jeffreys
    Im sick of big companies coming to our land and always wanting more and more and more!! I oppose this merger!
    Not Provided, MO
  631. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32374Robbie Smith
    I oppose this merger for environmental and health reasons.
    Not Provided, MO
  632. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32373greg Allen
    This merger increases the probability for pollution and traffic. Two terrible things in my book!
    Not Provided, MO
  633. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32372Jerry Smiley
    Regardless of the transaction, the railroads need to upgrade the railroad gates at Roselle Rd, Prospect Street and Park St. There is absolutely no reason that other crossings (e.g., Rodenburg) are whistle-free while we have incessant horns day and night. Get it done - now!
    Roselle, IL
  634. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32371Jennifer Crowley
    As a resident of Roselle, I am concerned by the findings of the draft stating that impacts on the affected environments would be “negligible”. My residence is located along Irving Park Road, across the street from the rail line, and I am well aware of every time a train comes through because I can feel the vibration from inside my home. Many of the homes located near the rail line are older homes and this issue is not unique to Roselle. My business is also located along the rail line. The existing rail traffic causes a disruption to my business due to the noise and vibration from passing trains, as well as a disruption to my customers from vehicle traffic. While these issues may seem negligible to you, I would gladly invite you to spend a day at either my residence or my business to truly understand these impacts for yourself. The substantial increase in rail traffic will disrupt daily life of residents along the rail lines and cause extended commutes, delayed emergency response and prolonged bus rides to/from school for our children. I am also concerned regarding the dismissive language used in section 3.1 regarding hazardous materials. The report states, “OEA expects that the number of hazardous material releases along rail lines and at rail yards would remain low if the Board authorizes the Proposed Acquisition.” This is unacceptable. Primarily because any hazardous material release will have an potentially unknown environmental impact, but also because the level of these materials being released remaining low is not something that can be guaranteed. This is a real concern for the people who will be impacted by this merger. Without additional resources being given to emergency management programs in the affected communities, no one can state that the impact of a possible incident will be negligible.
    Roselle, IL
  635. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32370Andy Ascher
    I oppose this merger. CP is a corporate bully that refuses to share information about the number of trains and what is being transported through effected communities. They routinely blare horns in places they are not supposed to and nobody at their corporate office will even respond to inquiries. Guaranteed they are licking their chops to start transporting highly toxic Canadian tar sands oil on longer and longer trains right through communities at high speeds. Every town within a mile of CP track will highly regret allowing this corporate bully to get larger and stronger.
    Plymouth, MN
  636. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32369Victor Cellarny
    I oppose this merger because it's going to ruin lives!
    Unknown, MO
  637. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32368Robert Bush
    Go for the merge. Increase train traffic.
    Roselle, IL
  638. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32367Matthew Rhomberg
    The increase in loud noise may directly relate to increased thefts locally. I myself cannot hear much now days if something was happen how would anyone know? It becomes a health and safety issue at that point. Its not hard to imagine how this would help people if placed in a sound barrier, tunnels, underwater, etc; this would eliminate flooding issues. There are ways around this being a burden to those who live near and cannot sleep or have normal conversations anymore; It is NOT just annoying, people are discussing moving and we already are a major disaster area. I suggest you try to hold a meeting at our local city hall or try to call a loved one while visiting our town. Perhaps then you would not brush off those crying out. This directly impacts our city and those in it. We all advise you to place it underground. There is a right way and a wrong way to do this and our pleas are being ignored any and every time we hold comity.
    Davenport, IA
  639. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32366Wood Dale resident
    I’m shocked to here of the merger and the amount of freight trains disrupting so many communities and residents life. We have lived here almost 30 years, the transportation growth is taking a toll on our community. Airport plane traffic has increased. We did try to fight that and lost. Big $$ trumps residents ! Some residents benefited new windows and doors for soundproofing, the rest of the residents didn’t make the cut. So the rest of the residents have to suffer with the noise daily. Windsor Avenue is the first east to west Street in Wood Dale that people use as a cut off when Irving Park is blocked with a train. About 15 -20 years ago there was a problem with the trains during rush hour backing up traffic. So they would cut down Windsor; as a result we couldn’t get in and out of our driveways on our block due to the parade of cars from the hours of 3:30 to 6:30 PM due to the traffic. The village installed speed bumps and they are still here today. This is just my problem, l can’t imagine the cars and backups during rush hours creating road raged driver's!! 14 to 18 additional freight trains a day is insane, the grid lock is unfathomable! The traffic,noise, rumbling, is going to decrease properly value! What are you all thinking? Think of the impact on these people and communities. Life is already stressful due to the economy. This is just as bad as big Pharma bleeding people dry with costly meds, insurance companies with sky high deductibles, government overstepping, hedge fund management, all big corporations thinking of themselves and stepping on the little people. Why do people with power like to destroy all that is good; MONEY and GREED drives all evil. Leave these people and communities alone. Life itself today has stricken many of us, we are going with less and less daily due to the economy. Leave what little peace we have alone. The additional trains is a nightmare in the making. Find another way and leave well enough alone for God’s sake.
    Maryann Cartina · Wood Dale, IL
  640. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32365Karly Carriker
    I completely oppose the train merger. I believe more people would be voicing opposition to this if they knew the ramifications. I personally can barely sleep through the night because of the horrendous train horns blaring at midnight, 3 am, 4am, 5 am, and so on, not to mention being auditorily assaulted during the day, when taking a walk or riding a bike or attending the farmers market or any concerts by the River. Overloading the railways is going to cause more problems than noise pollution, such as clogging up traffic, more accidents, toxic spills, etc which are all very dangerous.
    Davenport, IA
  641. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32364Tracy Wrona
    The area is already too overdeveloped. Rodenburg near the Schaumburg airport already has more traffic than it was designed for. It’s a complete lie that having rush hour traffic stopped there for more trains won’t have a high environmental impact or negative impact on residents and workers in this area.
    Roselle, IL
  642. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32363Amy Clove
    There is beautiful walking trail along the river in Muscatine that crosses the railroad tracks at several points. I use the trail multiple times each week to run. I have been stopped by trains a few times which is a great inconvenience but it doesn't happen often enough to make me avoid the trail. Increasing train traffic through Muscatine would cause significantly more interruptions to pedestrians and bikers who utilize this riverfront trail. Because of this and the many other negative impacts to our community I am strongly opposed to this merger.
    Muscatine, IA
  643. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32362Willa Harris
    This merger increases the chances for disaster on the rails, I oppose it!!
    Not Provided, MO
  644. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32361Stephen Tottenham
    I oppose this merger because it is going to unfairly use resources from our small towns.
    Not Provided, MO
  645. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32360Brian Johnstone
    Based on this draft, I am against the draft. On Sunday 9/19/2022, on York Road in Bensenville a simple 2 car maintenance train blocked the street with the gates gate for over 15 minutes, Because the train was not across the street but just west of the gates, multiple cars were going around the gates with no care. Had this been on of the potential freights coming inbound and waiting for access into the yard ND another was coming out of the yard, this could have been a very deadly issue. A 1st Responder had to go around the gates to stop one of the offenders. Too many streets will be affected by this increased rail traffic.
    Wood Dale, IL
  646. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32359Gary Wegmann
    As a property owner who lives adjacent to the RR tracks, I oppose the merger due primarily to safety concerns regarding the substantial increase in proposed train traffic, almost tripling the number of trains per day.
    Sherrill, IA
  647. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32358Mary Jo Retherford
    Increasing the number er of trains from 8 to 22 will not be conducive to our peaceful living with all the blasting of horns here in Bettendorf, IA. Also there is the safety issue to consider. I vote No!
    Bettendorf, IA
  648. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32357Bonnie Stephenson
    Re Docket # FD 36500 You cannot in all good conscious state that NOISE will be the only negative factor concerning the merger of CP/KCS. The health and welfare of tens of thousands of Illinois citizens will be in grave danger by this absurd future debacle! Wood Dale was not even considered in your analysis! WHY? Is it because the the angle of the tracks will block the two major intersections at the same time; thus blocking traffic in all directions at the same time! And up to fourteen times per day! Said traffic will be gridlocked from Elgin to Bensenville. Hours of traveling will be added to the lives of each citizen. Businesses will also be financially affected along with family obligations and schedules lost to extra hours of commuting. Of primary concern is the.lives that will come into harms way. First responders, fire trucks and police will not be able to reach victims due to extreme delays! Whomever in your independent non government agency that thinks otherwise should be severely reprimanded! Many lives will be lost! Just how many are worth 31 Billion dollars?
    Wood Dale, IL
  649. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32356Jack Harp
    I oppose this merger for environmental reasons
    Not Provided, MO
  650. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32355Chip Craver
    This merger is going to be detrimental to the entire area, it should not happen!
    Not Provided, MO
  651. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32354Sandra Poyer
    I live near the Mississippi River and there are already so many pollutants. This merger will only add more, I hate this merger.
    Not Provided, MO
  652. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32353Heather Connape
    I oppose this merger for because it's going to destroy the natural habitat of many animals!!!
    Not Provided, MO
  653. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32352Kevin McMann
    I think this merger will do more bad than good, I oppose it tremendously!
    Not Provided, MO
  654. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32351Angela Cox
    I oppose this merger for environmental reasons!
    Not Provided, MO
  655. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32350Dean Franco
    This merger is dumb. It does not need to happen, the rails are fine as it is!
    Not Provided, MO
  656. (printed as 9/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32349Christen Heath
    This merger is going to ruin my life. I am already always stuck in traffic! More trains coming through my small town means more delays!
    Not Provided, MO
  657. served (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Decision
    51428Director Of Proceedings · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    (1) ACCEPTED LATE-FILED NOTICES OF INTENT; (2) UPDATED THE SCHEDULE OF APPEARANCES FOR THE HEARING TO BE HELD SEPTEMBER 28, 29, AND 30, 2022; AND (3) ORDERED THAT NO ADDITIONAL REQUESTS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE HEARING WILL BE GRANTED.
  658. served (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Decision
    51423Entire Board · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    DENIED A REQUEST OF THE COMMUTER RAIL DIVISION OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY D/B/A METRA TO FILE A SURREPLY.
  659. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Notice
    305391Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Caddo Parish Commission
  660. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Reply
    305390Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  661. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Errata
    305389Errata/Correction
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  662. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Motion
    305388Motion To Withdraw
    Archer Daniels Midland Company
  663. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32455Carl & Shirley Johnson
    Milan, IL
  664. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32348CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Clarification on line segments.
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  665. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32345Lori McCollum
    Quad Cities, IA
  666. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32344Carl and Shirley Johnson
    Milan, IL
  667. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32343John Hammill
    LeClaire, IA
  668. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32342Carl & Shirley Johnson
    Milan, IL
  669. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32341Scott Finnegan
    Simply because animals may have exposure to railways and passing trains does not mean they will not be effected by a significant increase in the frequency of passing trains. If you let someone use an easement on your property for their family to access a road, does that mean you wont feel the effect should the family allow 30 other people to use the easement as well? These natural habitats will be effected by the increase in frequency of train passage. Considering that the Indiana bat (an endangered species) may be adversely effected by this decision, it is irresponsible and unethical to approve this proposed acquisition.
    Not Provided, MO
  670. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32340Sam Spector
    Approving this proposed acquisition would be yet another failure to learn lessons from the past. Many of the factors contributing to derailments and spillage of hazardous materials resulting therefrom are unforeseeable (i.e., human error, bad management, infringement of regulations, etc.). Therefore the mitigating factors offered in support of the proposed acquisition will not be able to prevent disasters resulting from said unforeseen circumstances. he consequences of these hazardous product spills and leakages can include fire & explosion, contamination of soil, water and air as well as human fatalities in some cases. It is not worth the risks involved to approve of this acquisition.
    Not Provided, MO
  671. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32339Jane Anderson
    The board should choose the no-action alternative. This would prevent any air emissions from increasing along rail lines, prevent job losses in the trucking industry, and would still provide the applicants with a means to make improvements as needed subject to market changes.
    Not Provided, MO
  672. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32338Jaymee Ackerman
    Should the proposed acquisition be approved, and should the frequency of rail transportation of hazardous material increase in the northeast, there is a major possibility of environmental devastation. Because of the immense amount of waterways in the northeast (where my home happens to be located), even one spill of hazardous material can spread via said waterways causing widespread damage. This acquisition should not be approved by the board because the risks involve are too great.
    Not Provided, MO
  673. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32337Debra McAllister
    I am against this merger. Living on the east side of Davenport just a few blocks from the tracks, it is already noisy with train whistles going by. When we're in our backyard and the blow, you cannot hear each other talking. The same when walking on the riverfront bike path. In the summer we are frequently woke up bt train whistles when the windows are open. A merger would only increase train traffic, decreasing quality of outdoor life.
    Davenport, IA
  674. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32336Lisa Kozell
    Don't live in Iowa, I live in Illinois. But worry about the environment and it's effect on the Mississippi river or lands where trains may travel. What will train cars be carrying? I don't worry so much about Canadian freight, but what's coming from mexi? They don't have as many environmental protection laws as the U.S. and Canada. I know I may not have as much say in this matter as someone who lives in Iowa, but I still care about our environment and the effects it will have on our great country. It's just not about this one area.
    Hollowayville, IL
  675. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32335Karene Nagel
    As a nearly life long resident of Davenport, Iowa I am appalled to think that this merger is even being seriously considered. This is backward thinking or not thinking at all. The mere idea of tripling the rail traffic through my hometown is frightening. Then add on that these train lengths will be huge. Then add on that the product on these trains would be a big environmental threat if there was any accident like derailments. And finally consider that these trains will not be of any benefit to our community, but will negatively subtract from our beautiful riverfront and quality of life for many residents and businesses, too. Also how will emergency vehicles be able to make speedy access to those in need? I Vote - NO, Absolutely NO. What sane thinking person would want this - Ever?!
    Davenport, IA
  676. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32334Morgan Kinch
    Trains have caused constant hindrances to my quality of life while living in the Quad Cities. While working, taking phone calls, or trying to sleep, passing trains blow their horns and shake entire buildings. The merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern would advance these interruptions by 300% with 14 more trains than what currently exists. The draft Environmental Impact Statement cited noise as the main impact of the train merger but fails to mention that trains typically reach sound levels of 96-110 decibels when 70 decibels is what is safe for human ears. Anything above 85 decibels can cause hearing loss. Please consider the impact of increased noise levels that would be brought on by 14 more trains a day in the final Environmental Impact Statement and reject this merger.
    Ankeny, IA
  677. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32333Christopher Yohn
    Pollutions from all the diesel particulate dust everywhere from all these extra trains. We already are inundated with diesel pollution with the diesel trains we have currently, both freight and commuter, now these corporate crooks want to give us all emphysema and lung cancer. If this goes thru with many, many more diesel trains we are doomed.
    Wood Dale, IL
  678. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32332Daniel Bennett
    My family lived along the Mississippi river between LeClaire, IA and Princeton, IA for 25 years. We lived in a narrow stretch of land between the railroad tracks and the river. This area has a substantial number of houses, sixty I would guess, between the tracks and river. All of the residents that live in the houses are required to use the private crossings that are maintained by the railroad companies in order to reach US highway 67. In the years that our family owned river front property there have been at least three incidences of train/car crashes, that i know of personally, in less than a one mile stretch of track. In those crashes two people were killed and one injured to the point that they were in a vegetative state until their death. The . curve of the tracks near 23005 great river road and the 45 MPH speed limit certainly played a role in the crashes. The area just north of our house is similar in that the homes on the river, between the river and the tracks are required to use private crossings. If this proposed merger goes through and there are three times more trains rolling by there will CERTAINLY be more deaths in this area. There will also be a substantial devaluation of the properties affected in this area. Many of these homes, ours included, that have been in families for nearly a century will certainly lose monetary value and a also lower the daily quality of life for us. The increased value of this property over the years will, no doubt, go down in value substantially if the merger goes through. This would cause many families to lose the wealth that has been generated over the many years of ownership. This could certainly cause some families to lose their properties. Please consider the fact that the diesel smoke, extra noise and vibration from the train traffic (our house shakes when trains go by) will also violate the pristine nature of this beautiful stretch of the mighty Mississippi river
    Blue Grass, IA
  679. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32331Giles Verheecke
    As a home owner on canalshore drive in LeClaire Iowa 50’ from the CP tracks I would like to know what is going to be done to minimize noise and increase safety? Currently the trains blow the horn directly behind my house far exceeding osha safe noise levels. An increase in trains will mean more exposure and possible injuries. Second CP has already had a major accident on this stretch of track and an increase of trains increases the risk of another accident. With houses close to the tracks and an increase in noise and potential accidents puts the people of LeClaire in greater risk for both physical harm from train derailment and hearing loss from horns. I ask that if the merger is approved a quiet zone is put in place for the entire area these trains will be operating on and set a maximum speed limits in towns/ areas of people to less than 15mph. Additionally trains blocking car crossings will increase response time for fire, police, and EMTs. How will this be addressed for home owners being cut off from these basic services? The chance for survival of a stroke and heart attack significantly decrease for every minute advanced care is delayed. The increase in traffic will certainly add to response time and an increase in deaths from delayed care.
    LeClaire, IA
  680. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32330Giles Verheecke
    I disagree with the methodology and study in that averages are nice for a very high level view, but don’t work on individual impacts. While the overall impact could be minimal in all categories if averaged there will be extreme impact in other areas. Noise will significantly increase in some areas while staying the sam in other areas. Crashes will increase potentially in populated areas
    LeClaire, IA
  681. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32329andrew cheselka
    if the cp kcs meger is approved it wll cause a public saftey hazard in beaumont and houston texas due to increased volume of train traffic blocking croosigs hindering emergency respone vechies and causing massive traffic cogestion also the possibility of hazmat incidents and grade croosing accidents will increase
    spring, TX
  682. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32328Britt Vickstrom
    Please do not approve the merger. It will bisect towns, increase rail noise and vibrations, increase risk of spills and damage, and will potentially delay emergency help to those on the river side of the tracks.
    Davenport, IA
  683. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32327Grant Nelson
    As a student at St. Ambrose University, I am opposed to the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern railroad merger. The draft Environmental Impact Statement states that noise would be the most significant impact of the merger, yet fails to mention that 14 more trains a day will slow public safety response time, hinder railroad safety, and decrease quality of life. Iowa has ranked the third worst state for childhood rail safety and this merger will push Iowa to the worst state if approved. I ask that the Surface Transportation Board consider the threat this merger poses to safety and reject this merger.
    Davenport, IA
  684. (printed as 9/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32308Community of Hope Church
    The subject property referred to is across the street from the Hanover Park Metra Train Station and impacted by the CPKC merger. As both a resident of an older home and Pastor of a church located on subject property, I feel an obligation to express the views of myself and my church congregation. We are in a historical area with both a residential and a church building structure, roughly 145 years old, located on the property. There are several other historical buildings and businesses in this area located just steps away from the tracks. With that being said, any derailments would be disastrous. The current train traffic that we have learned to deal with already presents issues with earthquake type tremors causing visible cracks in the building foundations. The loud train horns wake us as residents and disrupts our church worship services as a church congregation. We just completed a $30,000 historical church building renovation improving our church structure and repairing visible damage caused. Adding new train traffic to the current train traffic will cause deterioration of the repairs just completed over a quicker time frame creating a need for additional funds to repair. It will place a financial burden on the church and decrease the value of the property. The new train traffic will not only block commuter trains, crosswalks, and parking lots, but inhibit a thorough way to the businesses across from the train station. This will negatively impact the new Village Center downtown area businesses, housing, and community events located by the Train Station. It will also create higher risk issues in emergency situations because of trains blocking tracks for longer periods of time.
    Pastor Larry & Tina Greathouse · Hanover Park, IL
  685. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Misc.
    305384Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  686. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Notice
    305375Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Amy Koch
  687. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32765Scott D. Tunnicliff
    The attached comment letter was submitted by U.S. Mail.
    Not Provided, IA
  688. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32454Jody Millar
    Comments of Jody Millar, LeClaire, Iowa, US Fish & Wildlife Service Supervisory Biologist, Retired; Quad-City Audubon Society, President; American Eagle Foundation, Eagle Grants Coordinator
    LE CLAIRE, IA
  689. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32326Cole Hand
    This merger is based on greed. These companies have already damaged our lands and lifestyles with oil spills. I vote no on this merger!
    Not Provided, MO
  690. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32325Helen Fautner
    I oppose this merger for moral reasons. This merger has the potential to disturb the drinking water of many lower income communities.
    Not Provided, MO
  691. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32324Callen Brydon
    This merger will disrupt the natural habitat of many plants and animals. For that reason alone, I oppose it!
    Not Provided, MO
  692. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32323Mike Knobloch
    This merger should be opposed by all those living along the Mississippi River. The damage it could cause is huge. No way should this merger happen.
    Not Provided, MO
  693. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32322Cynthia Benjamin
    I oppose this merger because of the potential damages it will have on our climate.
    Not Provided, MO
  694. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32321Roger McCanny
    This merger will ruin the good land that we have left along the river. It is unfair to those communities. I oppose this merger.
    Not Provided, MO
  695. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32320Stephen Brooks
    The oil spill that happened in 2013 was devastating. This merger will add ever more daily trains which translates to a higher possibility of oil spills. I oppose this merger.
    Not Provided, MO
  696. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32319Donnie Scarsdale
    I oppose this merger because it's useless. Our communities don't need more trains, noise, and pollution.
    Not Provided, MO
  697. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32318Florencia Wohl
    This merger will feed into corporate greed. It does not give a voice to the smaller communities who will be affected. I oppose this merger.
    Not Provided, MO
  698. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32317Yohann Wicken
    I oppose this merger because of the environment and the damage it will cause to the Mississippi River!
    Not Provided, MO
  699. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32316Woodside Homeowners Association
    On behalf of the 85 homes and hundreds of residents of the Woodside HOA in Wood Dale, I respectfully submit our strong opposition to this merger. The draft EIS states, “Increased rail traffic has the potential to result in environmental impacts related to noise and vibration, air quality, freight and passenger rail safety, grade crossing safety and delay, passenger rail transportation, and hazardous material transportation.” We couldn’t agree more! Woodside Subdivision is immediately west of Route 83. In Wood Dale, there are 3 grade level crossings (Front Street, Wood Dale Road & Prospect Ave.) all 3 have been identified as being directly impacted by delays and safety. The Bensenville Intermodal Yard will see a 25% daily increase in cars, from 1439 to 1807. This increase will also result in 10,977 additional carloads of hazardous material per year. That's 30 carloads of hazardous materials PER DAY. We are already seeing an increase in truck traffic in this area due to the eventual western access to O’Hare. The truck traffic at the Bensenville yard will increase 82% from 383 to 698. The Franklin Park Intermodal Yard will see a 103% daily increase in cars from 74 to 150 and a 70% increase in truck traffic from 190 to 324. OEA has concluded that, apart from train noise, which could result in adverse impacts at some locations, the potential adverse impacts of the Proposed Acquisition would be negligible, minor, and/or temporary. We strongly disagree with any impact assessment characterized as negligible. Tom Lindelof
    Tom Lindelof · Wood Dale, IL
  700. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32315Scott Gibrich
    The railroads operate under an over 100 year old (interstate commerce act) accommodation awarded by state and federal governments that virtually gives them a right-of-way to any operations that expands and disrupts the surrounding communities. The STB, EPA, Congress and local governments have very little to zero jurisdiction over the railroads so the affected cities end up getting lawyers to fight it legally. But a legal fight is almost always fruitless as the railroads have unlimited funds to beat back any opposition to expansion and the 19th century government protections are on their side. Scott Gibrich Hoffman Estates, IL. abbey641@comcast.net
    Hoffman Estates, IL
  701. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32314Nicole Catalano
    Please do not do this to our community. Traffic is already bad with metra trains commuting this will be worse.
    Itasca, IL
  702. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32313Michele DeCanio
    Docket No. FD 36500 I am quite concerned at the impact the CP/KCS Acquisition Draft EIS will have on the Roselle community and the surrounding communities. I am concerned about public safety. We have one fire department and police department on the southside of the railroad tracks and a portion of our community is on the north side of the tracks. If this is approved there will be an over 300% increase in freight trains in my small community. It is imperative that the impact of this be mindfully and honestly considered. Thus far, the impact seems as if it is being downplayed and that is unacceptable.
    ROSELLE, IL
  703. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32312Ben Daley
    Among the several weak justifications for these proposed acquisitions, there is one I want to discuss, the justification for Noise and Vibration. Other than brushing off the concern for structural damage resulting from noise and vibration from passing trains (potential impact on property rights), the fact that people may feel vibrations from passing trains (and more frequently) has been downgraded to an “annoyance.” If people can feel vibrations from passing trains and if the frequency of these vibrations is to rise from the proposed acquisition this is more than an annoyance, it rises to the level of a nuisance. Board members, if you and/or your family lived near these railways, would you downgrade a consistent vibrating sensation (which some would compare to feeling a minor earthquake) as being a mere annoyance? I think not.
    Not Provided, MO
  704. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32311Davin Illikal
    The Applicants apparently provided information suggesting that the proposed acquisition would “potentially” support a shift away from the transportation of flammable crude oil (a hazardous material). Transporting flammable crude oil implicates the environment (spillage) as well as safety should a derailment produced spill and fire occur. If this acquisition is permitted railway transportation of hazardous materials such as crude oil will heavily increase. Should this increase cause a derailment-produced spill and fire in any area, or even worse in a major urban area, the damage and casualties will be tremendous. That the proposed acquisition would “potentially” support a shift away from the transportation of flammable crude oil does not rise to the level of certainty required to prevent these potential dangers. Weighing the benefit of this acquisition (financial gain for the rich) against its potential harms (oil spills, fires, traffic incidents, job losses, property damage, etc.) the balance clearly favors denying this proposed acquisition. Looking to the past, it is evident that oil spills cause significant and seerious damage to the environment, the economy, and to human health. Oil spills are not contained to the immediate spill site and often spread into adjacent waterways (ex. Lac-Mégantic rail disaster where derailment caused fires and explosions, killed 47 people, destroyed more than thirty buildings, and oil from the disaster traveled from the derailment site in the village ultimately reaching the river). Guess who a major player in the aforementioned disaster was, Canadian Pacific Railway.
    Not Provided, MO
  705. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32310Ava Tobin
    As evidenced by this proposed acquisition, the increase of volume of oil shipped by rail occurs because of the rail industry’s ability to quickly respond to increased oil production by modifying routes, adding cars, etc. However as history has showed us, this increase in oil transport via railways has also increased oil spill incidents involving trains. It is necessary to put a cap on the amount of oil transported via railway. Therefore the board should deny the proposed acquisition and protect the environment and the public before lining the pockets of the applicants.
    Not Provided, MO
  706. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32309Kyra Illusi
    I understand that there are “mitigating factors” intended to support the proposed acquisition. However, these mitigating factors most likely cannot prevent some of the major causes of rail disasters such as human error and weather conditions. Not only do these trains carry crude oil, they also often carry other hazardous materials and information about the commodity carried in any given car is not sufficient for responders to take adequate protocols when disasters ensue. Because the mitigating factors will not be able to adequately prevent railway disasters this proposed acquisition should be DENIED.
    Not Provided, MO
  707. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32307Stacey York
    I oppose this merger for environmental reasons and for the damage it will cause for indigenous peoples.
    Not Provided, MO
  708. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32306Brad Lopez
    I oppose this merger for financial reasons and the money it will cost these small river towns.
    Not Provided, MO
  709. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32305Prabal Guhn
    This merger does not seem well thought through. People are not understanding the damage it will cause. This merger should not happen!
    Not Provided, MO
  710. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32304Willa Carreyrou
    I oppose this merger based on environmental concerns.
    Not Provided, MO
  711. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32303Aneta Lospen
    This merger is a terrible idea and I oppose it. Lands will be ruined and the possibility for oil spills increases!
    Not Provided, MO
  712. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32302Peter Berger
    The merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City will be a disaster for all locals. We should all be fighting against this merger.
    Unknown, MO
  713. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32301Sandra Lowenstein
    This merger is taking money away from America and giving it to Canada and Mexico. I oppose!
    Not Provided, MO
  714. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32300Patricia Jordan
    I'm concerned about safety and the effect on first responders, the environment, metra train delays, infrastructure failures on train lines and also on nearby properties, and property values decreasing due to the negativity of living in a community monopolized by train traffic and noise.
    Roselle, IL
  715. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32299Jamie Horfner
    I oppose this merger because of the environmental damage it will cause to underserved communities.
    Not Provided, MO
  716. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32298John Loveless
    I would like to ask a question concerning emergency responses and the possibility of continuing training efforts for emergency responders. If the rail line is going to see an increase in traffic. I would like to participate in assisting in this important aspect if possible. Respectfully Submitted John C. Loveless Training Chief Little Dixie Fire District
    Mexico, MO
  717. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32297MIHAI VARGA
    MY COMMENT IS. NO! BUT WHO CARES? SCHAUMBURG DOESN'T CARE, THEY WENT AHEAD WITH THEIR TRUCK BUSINESS TO CREATE NOISE/AIR POLLUTION., YOU DON'T LIVE HERE, YOU DON'T CARE!
    ROSELLE, IL
  718. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32296Lana Wasylenko
    Do not do this! Will negatively affect too many people, too many lives, too many towns. Stop the insanity. The almighty dollar will ruin us all. Shame on you.
    Wood Dale, IL
  719. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32295Randy Blake
    The main concerns I have is the noise decibel level of the trains when they constantly blow their horns. In my view the greatest risk is to small children which run the risk of permanent hearing damage. Other concerns are decreased property values, risk of derailments through subdivisions which could potentially kill people and environmental impact to the river from the dirt and dust created by the trains
    Le Claire, IA
  720. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32294Esther Mendez
    I vehemently oppose the proposed KCS merger. In Roselle between Roselle Road and Barrington Road, there is only one road to get through to Irving Park Road , which is Rodenburg Road. It is a small two-lane road with already heavy traffic. Over the years there has been a significant increase in commercial warehouse construction along Gary Avenue. The increased train traffic coupled with the new townhome construction on Rodenburg and commercial planned construction on the corner of Irving and Rodenburg would create a traffic jam like no one has ever seen before. Please reconsider the planned merger for the sake of residents and commuters in this and many other communities that will be affected. Thank you.
    Roselle, IL
  721. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32293Jade Mara
    I fully and emphatically support the No-Action Alternative to the Proposed Acquisition. CP and KCS have been very successful and this acquisition is unnecessary to sustain their success. On the other hand, what is necessary, is taking precautionary measures to protect the environment. Such precautionary measures should include this Board reviewing corporate initiatives with the upmost scrutiny and granting approval only when proposals such as these pose little to no danger to the public interest. Enough damage has been done, please utilize your authority to prevent more from occurring.
    Not Provided, MO
  722. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32292Pamela Re
    I oppose the CPKCS merger due to the negative impact it would have on Roselle. The noise from a 300% increase in trains would be disruptive to downtown businesses and residents as the tracks run down Main Street. The additional trains would clog traffic and jeopardize the efficiency of emergency vehicles. The impact to our village would NOT be minimal. Please stop this merger! Thank you
    Roselle, IL
  723. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32291Michael Taldon
    The No-Action alternative to the proposed acquisition does not leave the applicants empty handed. With the potential environmental devastation this acquisition could cause in conjunction with the fact that the no-action alternative would still allow for the applicants to make necessary changes to support their operations and growth, the No-Action alternative should be chosen by this board.
    Not Provided, MO
  724. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32290Gordon Paisley
    As a resident of Roselle, one of the cities the proposed merger's lines run through, I am strongly opposed to an increase in freight train traffic in my city. Because there is only one overpass within 12 miles either way of my city (that I am aware of), train stoppages would cause local drivers to have to wait for trains to clear or find a way to go around them. Even if a train doesn't stop, the increased idling time from hundreds of cars waiting for a train to pass a crossing will be significant. The disruption to fire, police and rescue traffic is potentially life-threatening while these responders are forced to wait at crossings for long and slow freight trains. All this results in zero benefit to my community--even indirectly. I am generally pro-business, but this is a case where regulators have to step in to consider the significant impacts on residents and the environment. Sincerely, Gordon Paisley
    Roselle, IL
  725. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32289sasha Adams
    One implication of this Acquisition that may not be of heightened scrutiny comes directly from the Applicants stated purpose of the proposed acquisition. One purpose listed is that the proposed acquisition would generate environmental benefits by reducing truck transportation on highways in North America by more than 64,000.00 trucks annually. While I fully support environmental benefits, it should be a concern that reducing truck transportation in excess of 64,000.00 trucks will at the same time eliminate 64,000 peoples means to earn a living via commercial trucking. This cannot be justified by claiming the increased railways will provide more jobs because people should not be forced out of one occupation based upon a finding that some slots for a substantially different occupation may open up.
    Not Provided, MO
  726. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32288Leiana Carriello
    As stated in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Under the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended, the Board “shall approve and authorize a transaction” such as this when, after considering several factors, “it finds the transaction is consistent with the public Interest.” 49 U.S.C §§ 11324 (b) & (c). How can the transaction be consistent with the public interest when the public at large has little to no awareness of potential corporate mergers such as these that pose a severe threat to their property via environmental deterioration and their modes of transportation. I only developed awareness of this transaction because of my heightened concern and research into corporate impact on the environment. I strongly encourage the board to take into consideration that these comments (assuming most of them do not support this acquisition) likely represent what the public at large, (the public interest) would feel if they had the awareness and opportunity to voice their concerns.
    Not Provided, MO
  727. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32287James Mcguire
    Where will all this corporate money go when we all sink below sea level? Who will work for all these corporations when they block up railways and modes of transportation for those who do not have the luxury of calling their private pilot? This acquisition is simply a way for high level corporate members to get richer with no accountability on how this may impact the well-being of society as a whole.
    Not Provided, MO
  728. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32286Jamie Lynn
    This acquisition appears to be largely justified based on proposed “mitigation measures” that “could eliminate or lessen” the environmental effects of the Proposed Acquisition. How can hypothetical “mitigation measures” that may not even work justify an almost certain and devastating impact to the environment. This is unacceptable.
    Not Provided, KS
  729. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32285Wyatt Conker
    Small towns in the USA are becoming far and few between. They are national treasures that must be protected... yes, even from the Canadians! If this merger goes through, many of these towns will be at a standstill everytime one of these monster trains roll through. Why is this so terrible? It won't just be cars and trucks stuck in traffic. The ambulances and firetrucks will be too- unable to get to where they need to be the most. With all the construction happening in my own small town, I cannot imagine adding more train traffic to it. This merger should NOT happen.
    Not Provided, MO
  730. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32284Joe Feretti
    This merger is a waste of time and money. There are already plenty of trains running through our towns. By adding more, the lives of our townspeople will be severely interrupted. Riverfront property will not be accessible for families or sports teams! No more leisurely walks by the water admiring the animals. We can say goodbye to those summer concerts on the waterfront.... all because of some money hungry companies that don't actually care about the American people
    Not Provided, MO
  731. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32283Amy Ghallagher
    The Proposed acquisition as stated in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, “has the potential to result in significant environmental impacts.” I emphasize that it is imperative that steps be taken to prevent this potential damage. If the heat wave in California this week does not speak for itself, our planet is in danger, and it is now everyone’s responsibility to prevent corporate entities such as the Applicants from contributing to further irreparable damage to our environment.
    Not Provided, MO
  732. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32282Alexis Johnson
    1. Based upon my review of Draft Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”), it is of great concern that the Applicants provided inconsistent data to OEA. This Board had to suspend the Applicants procedural schedule due to what has been labeled a “apparent inconsistency.” (Draft EIS pg. S-1). This suspension indicates to me and likely the public at large that the Applicants data would likely not meet OEA standards and therefore they may have provided inaccurate information to try and “slide by.” I do not find it necessary to reiterate the potential severity of damage this acquisition will impose upon the environment, as it appears to be realized by those involved who have already made efforts to conceal it.
    Not Provided, MO
  733. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32281Alicia Gross
    As a resident of Davenport, I am very concerned about the possibility of oil spills. Not only are added trains going to increase noise levels, the chances for oil spills will also increase! Oil spills have happened in the past and it's safe to say they will happen again in the future. Why add more trains to increase the probability? Back in May 2020, a Canadian Pacific train derailed in Western Minnesota! There was an estimated 20,000-30,000 gallons of oil spilled! It wreaked havoc on the surrounding communities. Is it really worth the risk??
    Davenport, IA
  734. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32280Smyth Peterson
    I strongly oppose this merger. It will only bring more problems to our waterfront towns. Now we have to worry about 22 daily trains polluting our air and water, instead of 14 trains. Now instead of being stuck at a railroad crossing 14 times a day, we have to worry about being stuck 22 times a day (with longer train lengths too!). Doesn't Canadian Pacific own enough already? They already have an effect on our lives, no need to make it greater.
    Not Provided, MO
  735. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32279Shveta Yarosh
    I do not think the Office of Environmental Analysis did a thorough enough job when creating their study. They studied only 277 crossings and crossings with more than 2500 cars per day. This does not represent many of the smaller towns along the route. I do not believe this study was created without bias. It's clearly in the best interest of the OEA to have this merger succeed, their favoritism shows throughout the report.
    Not Provided, MO
  736. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32278Rose Coppen
    I've lived by these tracks for over 30 years. Occasionally there would be freight trains and/or commuter trains. But now.... it's beyond what I could have ever imagined. Train after train chugs by my house every day. My grandchildren are often awakened from their naps by the noise. Our windows are covered with more dust and soot than ever, I don't ever try to host any backyard BBQ's. This has truly affected our lifestyle and I do not believe MORE trains need to be added to the route.
    Not Provided, MO
  737. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32277Jahn Coley
    As a member of the "Stop the Train," facebook page, I want to also make my opposition known here as well! This merger will be devastating to those living near it and also the overall environment of the United States. This merger will increase the amount of hazardous materials that are transported above ground, travelling 19,200 miles through our beautiful American land. These greedy companies are not to be trusted! We have seen time and time again how they value money over the environment
    Not Provided, MO
  738. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32276Aidan Hartley
    My biggest concern is the damage that this would create for the idigninous people. These people have been historically uprooted and forced to change their lives for the big corporate companies. Enough is enough. We have rail lines already, they do enough damage. I fully oppose this merger because again, it's the people who have always lived there will suffer.
    Not Provided, MO
  739. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32275Richard Gilmore
    : I'm here to voice my opposition to this merger. There are already 14 trains going between Chicago and Laredo. The noise, the pollution, the traffic... all consequences to these 14 trains. If that isn't already harmful enough, they want to add 8 more lines to this route. That is more than half of what already exists. The Americans living alongside these traintacks don't deserve this increase, they've had enough!!
    Not Provided, MO
  740. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32274Sasha Pennett
    I have many reasons for my opposition to this merger. Overall it comes down to how minority groups are going to be affected. The black and brown people of these small river towns aren't having their voices heard. When it comes to issues like access to potable water, these communities are always the first to experience issues. And based on Canadian Pacific's history, our waters are in real danger.
    Not Provided, MO
  741. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32273Stephanie Behre
    I am very distressed about the increase in rail traffic and the effects it will have on the environment and the people living in the areas affected by this. We have wonderful wildlife in this area and many of us live here because of that. Also, going places will be impacted badly, which I'm sure you realize even if you don't want to admit it. Listen to the people and not just your wallets! This will have a terrible impact!!
    Roselle, IL
  742. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32272Adam Lethbridge
    Some of these railroads are extremely close to the Mississippi River. These companies have not had the best track record over the years (ahem 203 cough cough). What if something happens to the train as it's blaring down the tracks towards the South? What happens if we have an oil spill that goes into the Mississippi River? This river is a LIFE SOURCE, not just for humans but for animals. Don't get me started on the animals...!
    Not Provided, MO
  743. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32271Katie Wheeler
    The Office of Environmental Analysis (OEA) has concluded that the impacts of this acquisition would be "negligible, "minor," "minimal," and "temporary." All I see when I read those words is the OEA admitting that there WILL BE negative impacts caused by this merger. They can use these words to make the public think that this acquisition wont impede lives, but there is no way that it cannot.
    Not Provided, MO
  744. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32270Bill Henderson
    I fully oppose this merger because the increased number of trains will produce much more loud and aggressive noise. The river towns of Iowa will be on the receiving end of this surging noise. The smaller cities chose not to sign million dollar agreements with Canadian Pacific to be silent on the matter. Sellout cities such as Davenport, Muscatine, and Bettendorf were all paid off in exchange for not commenting! I wonder what their thoughts would have been on the matter had they not accepted hush money. Shame!
    Not Provided, IA
  745. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32269Wilson Kirkpatrick
    This merger is going to negatively affect both small and large towns. These railroads will go through riverfronts, bike trails, and parks. Even more horrifying, it will bisect the water plant in my hometown of Davenport. That is our only source of drinking water for the region. These deals that are formed with private businesses are directly affecting the public! And not in a good way!
    Davenport, IA
  746. (printed as 9/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32268Wendy Anderson
    Many are touting this merger as economically beneficial.... but to who? The United States is going to lose money on their rail labor, US based railroad warehouses and distribution centers, as well as port trucking companies. Connecting Canada and Mexico by rail will cut out many of the "middlemen" who have worked tirelessly for many years. This is not a beneficial move for the economy of all these small towns along the railroad lines.
    Not Provided, MO
  747. (printed as 9/25/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32266Kelsey Brodt
    I oppose Canadian Pacific (CP) and Kansas City (KCS) Southern railroad merger! We cannot continue to repeat the patterns that have us in this mess of corporate power/greed & environmental destruction. This merger would nearly double the number of trains running through the White Earth Nation, as well as through the territory ceded in the 1855 Treaty. CP/KCS wants to use these trains to ship crude oil from Canada to Mexico. CP and KCS both generate billions of dollars in revenue each year and stand to earn even more as a result of increased efficiency from the merger. The communities impacted by the trains won't see a dime of that money even though they need to go through reservation territory, as well as the 1855 Treaty territory to ship their products. This is climate injustice! I oppose this merger! However, if it is ultimately approved, then given the danger it poses to native people and nature CP/KCS must set aside sufficient funds to pay for any damage that their trains may cause. Increased noise/pollution from these trains running through the territory & oil pipelines threaten the nibi and manoomin in ceded territories. If oil were to leak or spill, it could permanently erode the land & native’s right to fully use and enjoy this territory.
    Coon Rapids, MN
  748. (printed as 9/24/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32267Keriann Cooper
    We need to move off of fossil fuels, no more crude oil. You must deny the merger of trains going through the White Earth reservation. People are already dying and losing their livelihoods because of climate change. On an airplane, I met people from New Mexico who were evacuating because of the wildfires and they were scared of losing their home. In Minnesota where I'm from, our winters are getting warmer which is increasing agricultural pests. Parts of Minnesota experienced a drought last summer which was a burden on farmers and hurt many crops. We need to change our energy systems to use renewable energy and be more energy efficient, not use more fossil fuels. Many people from the White Earth Nation are against CP and KCS railroads going through their reservation and treaty territory. It would be unjust to do this without their consent. Deny these railroad mergers, Thank you, Keriann Cooper
    Prescott, AZ
  749. served (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Decision
    51426Entire Board · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    DENIED A REQUEST FROM THE APPLICANTS IN THIS PROCEEDING TO PRECLUDE A PARTY FROM PARTICIPATING IN A PUBLIC HEARING.
  750. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Comments
    305378Comment
    Railroad Workers United
  751. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Reply
    305371Reply
    Pamela Fraser, Heather Dockrell, Edward Dockrell, Lorelei Desrochers, and Kaitlyn Timmerman
  752. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Notice
    305369Notice
    Pamela Fraser, Heather Dockrell, Edward Dockrell, Lorelei Desrochers, and Kaitlyn Timmerman
  753. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32459Platick
    I oppose this merger for environmental reasons!
    Natalie · Oklahoma City, OK
  754. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32456Chris Colton
    This merger is a terrible idea. There is more harm than good that will come. Our small towns will be destroyed by noise and pollution. There are studies to back this up but NO ONE seems to care.
    Oklahoma City, OK
  755. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32444Choctaw Nation
    Lindsey Bilyeu · Durant, OK
  756. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32264Novasutras
    If this merger were to go through, leading to an increase in fossil fuel shipments through treaty territory, it would impinge on indigenous rights and threaten the well-being of people everywhere. The risk of an oil spill in manoomin wetlands is not trivial. The climate implications of more transport of Canadian tar sands oil are unacceptable. We urge you to deny this merger.
    Michelle Merrill · Santa Cruz, CA
  757. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32263Anthony Causi
    This merger does not need to happen. We are fine the way we are, no need to add more trains. I am already stuck in traffic enough when Im driving!
    Philip, SD
  758. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32262Chad Smith
    Im sick of companies like Canadian Pacific coming onto American lands and trying to make money off of us. We have enough trains as is, we dont need to be adding more to the rail lines. I oppose this merger.
    Memphis, MS
  759. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32261Allen Thomas
    I dont want my soil/land to be destroyed by more pollution that this merger is going to cost. This merger needs to be stopped by any means possible!
    Riceville, TN
  760. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32260Bobby Vanderbuilt
    I am deeply opposed to this merger. Us small towns in the middle of America don't ever get a say. I want my voice to be heard and for more people to realize the damage this merger is going to cause!
    SHELBYVILLE, TN
  761. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32259Arnold Schmidt
    I oppose this merger for environmental reasons. This should not go through because it is going to destroy our Earth and her precious resources!
    Brooklyn, NY
  762. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32258Allie Kershwin
    I don't live in this area but my family does. I grew up spending summers on the Mississippi River. I look back with fond memories but I do remember traffic and noise increasing over the years. This merger will take that to a whole new level. I don't want to take my own kids to a place with even MORE trains and pollution. I fully oppose this merger!
    Buffalo, NY
  763. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32257Mark Cratzer
    I oppose this merger for environmental reasons. The potential for an oil spill will greatly increase with the addition of new trains. This merger should not happen!
    Oklahoma City, OK
  764. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32256Mike Stanley
    Milwaukee, WI
  765. (printed as 9/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32255Marinette Fire Department
    Jay Heckel · Marinette, WI
  766. (printed as 9/22/2022)
    Notice
    305367Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Michael LaRoque, Secretary/Treasurer for White Earth Reservation
  767. (printed as 9/22/2022)
    Notice
    305365Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    City of Gonzales
  768. (printed as 9/22/2022)
    Notice
    305364Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Honorable Michael Echols
  769. (printed as 9/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32458Gale Francione
    Dear Mr. Tabachnick, I have attached a note with more details than I could put in a 2000 work comment. It includes questions and concerns. Hopefully that will be acceptable to you. I look forward to your reply. Thank you, Gale
    Davenport, IA
  770. (printed as 9/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32450East End District
    See Attached
    Veronica Chapa Gorezynski · Houston, TX
  771. (printed as 9/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32346Paulette Taylor
    Davenport, IA
  772. (printed as 9/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32265Sidley and Austin · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Clarification on line segments.
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  773. (printed as 9/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32249TIna Karagulian
    I oppose this merger.
    Austin, TX
  774. served (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Decision
    51420Director Of Proceedings · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    PROVIDED A SCHEDULE OF APPEARANCES FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING TO BE HELD ON SEPTEMBER 28, 29, AND 30.
  775. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Reply
    305363Reply
    Pamela Fraser, Heather Dockrell, Edward Dockrell, Lorelei Desrochers, and Kaitlyn Timmerman.
  776. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Notice
    305359Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Honorable Ron Reynolds
  777. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Supplement
    305356Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Dead River Company, LLC
  778. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-33079Alice Srp
    The merger of the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern rails has serious consequences for this eastern Iowa Community. I have sent the attached letter to Chm Oberman. Your attention to this is appreciated. Thank you. Alice Srp
    CAMANCHE, IA
  779. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32463Alice Srp
    The merger of the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern rails has serious consequences for this eastern Iowa Community. I have sent the attached letter to Chm Oberman. Your attention to this is appreciated. Thank you. Alice Srp
    CAMANCHE, IA
  780. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32457Alice Srp
    The merger of the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern rails has serious consequences for this eastern Iowa Community. I have sent the attached letter to Chm Oberman. Your attention to this is appreciated. Thank you. Alice Srp
    CAMANCHE, IA
  781. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32448Lori Freudenberg
    We are against this merger. We live at 22715 Great River Road in LeClaire and will be GREATLY affected by the train noise as well as the frequency. There are two crossings by our house. The trains, being 1 mile long, if they were to stop, would cover both crossings. What if an ambulance was needed? The whistles are blown, by some engineers, the full length of the tracks from Princeton to LeClaire and visa versa. I would beg you to put in crossing arms at each crossing and have this be a quiet zone. The whistles can be deafening, I don't care what your report has found - they are LOUD. The railroad, in their letter to homeowners concerning their work to raise the track, said that "Once ballast is poured and the track profile raised, crossings will be reinstalled and a new transition poured between the crossing and the adjacent roadway." Our railroad crossing is nothing but rock on either side of the track and is deteriorating quickly. See picture attached. It was not pored as the letter promised. We have cars that bottom out going over the tracks. I invite you to come to my house and stay overnight. If you believe the trains don't make noise and shouldn't affect anyone, please come see/hear for yourself.
    LeClaire, IA
  782. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32447Alice Srp
    The merger of the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern rails has serious consequences for this eastern Iowa Community. I have sent the attached letter to Chm Oberman. Your attention to this is appreciated. Thank you. Alice Srp
    CAMANCHE, IA
  783. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32446Alice Srp
    The merger of the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern rails has serious consequences for this eastern Iowa Community. I have sent the attached letter to Chm Oberman. Your attention to this is appreciated. Thank you. Alice Srp
    CAMANCHE, IA
  784. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32248Larry Huntley
    Regarding the KP-KCS railroad merger, my wife Martha and I are soundly against this transaction for these reasons: We live directly across the Mississippi River from LeClaire, IA, on the proposed route considered. We already can hear the obnoxious horn blowing at every crossing and feel the vibrations from these increasingly lengthy trains. This disruption of our lives will double or triple if this merger takes place. Also, there was a serious train derailment recently in the LeClaire, IA business area. This is a busy and thriving tourist shopping area and boating launch area. Besides the obvious noise and access problems, the degree of danger is huge. The train horns are so loud here that we have to blast our tv volume or play music too loud to mask the sound from these trains.And that is not even enough. Forget being able to sit outside on our deck and listen to nature’s sounds. This is intrusive, unwanted noise in an already noisy world. To double or triple this intrusion is unacceptable and illegal. Yes, railroads were here first, but that doesn’t give them the right to take over U. S. citizen’s and taxpayer’s rights to living a peaceful existence in our dream home. We are former public school teachers who wish to enjoy our retirement in a reasonably peaceful manner. If this merger goes through, we will be initiating or joining any class-action lawsuits that oppose this intrusion on our lives!
    Rapids City, IL
  785. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32247Bill Gluba
    Re Docket # FD 36500 I’m Bill Gluba, retired four time mayor of Davenport, IA. I’ve registered to speak at OEA’s Sept 13 Public Hearing. Please tell me how to register for the hearing in DC. I want to express the concerns of my City as often as possible before STB makes your final decision. Thank you.
    Davenport, IA
  786. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32246Mike Sorensen
    I support the additional rail traffic as one train easily removes 80 semi trucks from long distance runs, this in turn reduced emissions. Train traffic is the way to go and allows for more efficient means to transport large quantities of goods. I honestly don't see the issue here. If there's a problem ask the railroad to put an underpass on roselle road and Irving park road. Sincerely, a roselle resident
    Roselle, IL
  787. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32245Starlyn Vidales
    I am a resident of Roselle, and I live near the Schaumburg train station. I walk in the neighborhood every morning. When a train goes by I can smell the exhaust and it lingers in the air. There is a playground near the train station as well, so the children are breathing this as well. I fear that more trains will only contribute to a worsening of the quality of the air and detract from our lovely neighborhood. I am against the proposed merger.
    Roselle, IL
  788. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32244Kelli Carlson
    Railroad traffic is bad for communities. A recent study found that frequent railroad traffic lowers property values by nearly 20%. Some areas could see up to triple the amount of railroad traffic. How does this benefit them? This is bad for the economy and is dangerous when it comes to public safety and pollution.
    Minneapolis, MN
  789. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32243Manilan Houle
    We shouldn’t be approving corporate mergers that will ramp up the trade and movement of crude oil. Our country is getting closer to carbon-neutral every day and although trains are a relatively environmentally friendly way to move commodities around the country, enabling more burning of fossil fuels totally undercuts the benefits of rail commerce. Unless drastic changes are made, this deal isn’t good for Minnesota.
    Minneapolis, MN
  790. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32242Joshua Lindscomb
    I am concerned about the additional noise levels as proposed on the maps. I live about 1/2 mile away from the tracks and presently cannot hold a conversation when a train passes. With extra noise, I am worried about our citizens. I grew up by this railroad, so I am used to sleeping right thru train noises, but what about the increase??
    Starks, LA
  791. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32241Dave Bowman
    My name is Dave Bowman and I live at 621 4th Avenue in Camanche, Iowa. As you know the merger will result in between 20 and 30 long (as in at least 1.5 miles) trains passing through our towns each day. These trains will be carrying oil from Canada to refineries in Mexico. Additionally, the railroad is already planning to reduce the size of the crews on these trains, as a cost saving measure. Basically we have a Keystone Pipeline on wheels. The only beneficiaries of this merger are the executives and stockholders in the railroads. There is zero benefit and a lot of risk for any and all residents in the affected communities. The noise, the inconvenience, the loss of property values, the impact on our personal safety should one of these trains block access to emergency services. In my town, Camanche, God forbid one of these long trains is blocking the tracks and something happens at the nuclear plant across the river. All of that pales to the risk to the environment when one of these trains derails and ruptured cars dump their cargo into the river. When something happens, whether in two years or twenty, I will have little satisfaction in saying “I told you so” to those who supported this merger. Because all the I told you so’s in the world will not undo the damage caused when a derailed train dumps thousands of gallons of oil into our precious river. Thank you.
    Camanche, IA
  792. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32240Maggiy Emery
    This merger is bad for the environment. Much of the new cargo that will travel through our neighborhoods and along the Mississippi River will be oil. In the event of a derailment, there are serious threats toward our major water source in Minnesota, not to mention the displacement if communities if it were to occur in a city or neighborhood. Additionally, we should be moving away from fossil fuels, not approving mergers that enable their further use. Minnesota treasurers its environment, and this merger is inconsistent with our values.
    Not Provided, MN
  793. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32239Linda Grist
    I am a senior citizen & live in downtown Roselle, IL. The rail traffic & extreme noise is overwhelming presently & traffic which interferes with fire department trucks & paramedics. There must be a better way to deal with this that does not interfere with all these critical services.
    Roselle, IL
  794. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32238theresa cool
    My family and I are very distressed that this merger process is still pending. The noise, traffic, and pollutions that the increased freight traffic will create is highly distressing. These are our NEIGHBORHOODS, our HOMES, SCHOOLS, and BUSINESSES. They need to be protected and nurtured to continue to be safe and friendly communities and not become just passages for endless transit!
    Bartlett, IL
  795. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32237Jeff Skalberg
    Regarding crossing IDs 375779U (Ottumwa), 375761J & 375759H (Lerado). There is significant blocking of these intersections. adding more trains will not reduce the blocking when currently atleast 4 times a day they are blocked for more than 20 minutes from just 1 train. yes the "average" time down will reduce only because you will be blocking it more by running more trains thru here but the total time of blockage will only go up. Your crack pot analysis of these intersections is junk and does not tell the real story. My deputies cant even find operators to ticket them per Iowa code as they all run and hide when the law shows up. The railroad company should be responsible for constructing and management of a bridge over the 375779U (Ottumwa) crossing. also share your data that you are minupliating to show that you will do better. Or just move your train persons swap and rail yard west of ccrossing 375779U (Ottumwa) where there is more room and you are not blocking first responders. Also, shorting up the trains from 2 miles to 1.5 miles does not do [expletive]. as the it still will block 2 of the 3 crossings.
    Ottumwa, IA
  796. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32236Kathryn Windsor
    I oppose this merger for many reasons, one of them being property values. With the noise and pollution, properties all along the Mississippi are going to lose value. There are hardworking people (My cousin is one of them) who have worked to flip houses to make a profit. This merger would negatively affect their livelihood.
    Chicago, IL
  797. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32235Charles Gerard
    As a long time environmental lover, I find it disgusting that these big corporate companies want to yet again destroy habitats. The need of additional rail lines does not supersede the lives of animals and plants. Our planet is dying as we speak, there is absolutely no need to hurry it along.
    Not Provided, MO
  798. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32234Nikita Cedermark
    As somebody who lives in the area, my major concern is traffic and time spent waiting for trains to cross. I commute each day to work and often encounter traffic delays- whether that be accident, weather, construction. We do not need to increase the amount of trains running through, further delaying traffic and aggravation.
    Not Provided, IL
  799. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32233Thomas Szuba
    These corporate companies are using words like "minimal," "negligible," and "minor." All of those words prove something- they prove that inconvenience and harm are happening. No matter minor or major, minimal or maximal... these companies are outright admitting that there will be negative consequences to their actions. And for what? So they can earn more millions and lay down some extra track line? We are just fine without it!
    N/A, MO
  800. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32232Franz Wollin-Wood
    WIth increased train traffic, there comes a higher probability of disaster. There have already been horrific oil spills... think back to Lac-Megantic back in 2013. If there are more trains running each day, the chances of something terrible happening are bound to rise. No one needs to be killed just so a company can lay some rail lines and make billions off of destroying the environment.
    N/A, MO
  801. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32231T Dolan
    Free Minnesota opposes this merger in every way. There is no benefit to the public, only increased risk. This merger will lead to more pollution and accidents that threaten us all.
    Minneapolis, MN
  802. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32230Nahant Marsh Education Center
    I am a resident of Davenport and also serve as the Executive Director of Nahant Marsh Education Center, a non-profit nature preserve that owns land on both sides of the CP-owned railroad tracks. Over the years, the community has invested millions of dollars to restore this unique ecosystem, to connect people to it and the Mississippi River, and to provide education for over 20,000 people annually. Nahant Marsh is home to over 1,000 documented plant and animal species, including 3 federally listed species, and at least 21 state-listed species. We are greatly concerned about this merger's impacts on the marsh and river ecosystems, visitor impact, and our overall ability to manage and access all parts of the preserve. We have concerns about the potential for increased noise, air, and water pollution from the increase in train traffic. We are concerned about the agreement signed with the City of Davenport that would permanently close the crossing at Wapello Ave since this is our main link to 1/3 of our property and the Mississippi River. It is also the main link between Nahant Marsh and the Mississippi River Trail. We are greatly concerned about the overpass that would be constructed on South Concord Avenue because this could impact our recently-completed wetland mitigation bank and the rare species that live there. Furthermore, since a major CP railyard is located immediately next to Nahant Marsh and is located within the Mississippi River floodplain, we are concerned about the impact of future floods on the railyard, the marsh, and the Mississippi River. For instance, during the record flooding in 2019, a large fuel separator located at the CP railyard was overwhelmed and spilled an unknown large quantity of diesel that ran into a parcel that had been recently acquired by Nahant Marsh.
    Brian Ritter · Davenport, IA
  803. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32229Lucia Dryanski
    The merger of the two railroads, with its resulting dramatic increase in rail traffic through the Quad Cities, is a mistake. Davenport has worked to make its riverfront a destination for tourists and residents alike; current rail traffic is disruptive to that goal; increased traffic will make such places at the Freight House intolerably loud with frequent high decibel train horns blasting. Additionally, the more frequent trains pose access issues in case of emergency to the areas on the river side of the tracks. Emergency vehicles unable to get through, etc. The noise is also disruptive to wildlife along the river.
    Donahue, IA
  804. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32228Dustin Henslee
    My comment is not really and environmental issues, but currently, we have issues with rails cars blocking one of our roadways for most of and sometimes all day (Richmond Rd, Texarkana). This mentioned increased rail cars daily so what impact will this have on Richmond Rd here in Texarkana.
    Texarkana, TX
  805. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32183Alice Srp
    The merger of the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern rails has serious consequences for this eastern Iowa Community. I have sent the attached letter to Chm Oberman. Your attention to this is appreciated. Thank you. Alice Srp
    CAMANCHE, IA
  806. (printed as 9/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32182Alice Srp
    The merger of the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern rails has serious consequences for this eastern Iowa Community. I have sent the attached letter to Chm Oberman. Your attention to this is appreciated. Thank you. Alice Srp
    CAMANCHE, IA
  807. (printed as 9/20/2022)
    Reply
    305353Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  808. (printed as 9/20/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32227self
    I am in opposition to the proposed CP and KCS merger. One of the reasons I am opposed, is the proposed route follows and or crosses many miles of the Mississippi River, Missouri river and the Arkansas river and multiple tributaries. Increased train traffic in the areas of these rivers and wetlands will adversely affect many birds, fish, other wild life and insects who live and migrate along these river basins. For instance, in the area by lock and dams #14 and #15 many bald eagles (our nation’s bird) nest in trees close to the river in the winter because even during the coldest part of the year the water is open for them to catch fish for them and their hatchlings to eat. Increased traffic could disturb this hangout for the eagle who are protected under two Federal acts. Many pelicans now call the Mississippi River their home in the warmer months in the Quad City and surrounding areas and would be disturbed also. Nahant marsh home to many species is located near a train yard and would be greatly affected. Many of the trains will be carrying hazardous chemicals and any spill will greatly affect wildlife and humans in close proximity, and possibly for many miles for years afterward. The city of Davenport, Iowa is doing amazing things with their waterfront to make it a wonderful place to live, run a business and recreate. If this merger is allowed to go through with the increased train traffic. No one will want to go down to the riverfront (our most valuable natural asset). Just like when a highway is built that goes around a town and the town dies, the opposite will happen and the increased train traffic and with it the loud and more frequent noise, and congestion for traffic caused by these trains will cause the death of the Davenport downtown and many areas along the route. Also, once this merger gets the go ahead, what is to stop the company from adding more and more trains to run along this route? Please do NOT allow this merger to go through.
    Mary M Maher · Davenport, IA
  809. (printed as 9/20/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32226Budge Gierke
    The proposed merger would have catastrophic consequences all along the route. The relationship between the river and the communities along it would be broken.
    Bettendorf, IA
  810. (printed as 9/20/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32225Beth Anne Halsey
    My house sits in the city of Riverdale,Iowa. Now we have 8 trains a day. With the merger, we will have 22. Thia will be a disaster for everyone that lives there.The train stops and land locks the people who live on the other side of the track. The trains are going to be100 cars or more. This will cover alot of the crossings and our emergency vehicles will not be able to help thoses medically in need. The children will not be able to get to there buses for school. The Canadian pacific has a very poor record. They derail or spill often. We live very close to the Mississippi, our duck creek empty's into it. If they would derail, which they do, it would cause an ecological disaster. There is an eagle sanctuary one block to the south of the tracks on Arconics land. The constant high pitch sound will interfere with there migration patterns and nesting. The sound levels are deplorable. The horn of the train and wheels range between 96 and 110 decibels. Hearing loss begins at 70 decibels. 86 decibels increases it rapidly, and 120 is complete hearing loss. When the train stops,it blocks Arconic .The workers can't get into the factory and they back up onto state( HIGHWAY 67). They block the entrance to Kensington st and the school bus cannot get down the street to get the children, nor can get out to take them to school. There is another rail line that can be used and if anything happens will not effect a lot of people. Run the train through Muscatine to Dubuque. It will travel through lower populated areas. To finish ,if this merger goes through, people will die from it and become deaf. We have been hear for 40 years and we both experience decreased hearing from the train horn and wheels. Canadian Pacific have been very poor neighbors. Only once has the company come to take care of its property in 40 years.
    Riverdale, IA
  811. (printed as 9/19/2022)
    Letter
    305350Letter
    Honorable Paul Anderson
  812. (printed as 9/19/2022)
    Notice
    305349Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Unifor
  813. (printed as 9/19/2022)
    Notice
    305345Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Honorable Friday Ellis
  814. (printed as 9/19/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32760Draft EIS Public Meeting
    Transcript from the online public meeting for the Draft EIS.
    Washington, DC
  815. (printed as 9/19/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32443Texas House of Representatives
    See attached for a letter signed by ten Texas state representatives from Southeast Texas regarding the draft EIS and public comment process for the proposed CP-KCS merger.
    Representative Ron Reynolds · Missouri City, TX
  816. (printed as 9/19/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32347Alice Srp
    I placed this letter in the US Mail today. I would appreciate you sharing this with Mr. Oberman and the other members of the board. Thank You. Alice Srp
    CAMANCHE, IA
  817. (printed as 9/19/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32224Margaret Emery
    This merger is bad for the environment. Much of the new cargo that will travel through our neighborhoods and along the Mississippi River will be oil. In the event of a derailment, there are serious threats toward our major water source in Minnesota, not to mention the displacement if communities if it were to occur in a city or neighborhood. Additionally, we should be moving away from fossil fuels, not approving mergers that enable their further use. Minnesota treasurers its environment, and this merger is inconsistent with our values.
    St Paul, MN
  818. (printed as 9/19/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32223Manilan Houle
    The proposed merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern railroads would create a direct pipeline for oil that cuts right through White Earth reservation and goes all along the Mississippi River watershed. As an enrolled member of Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa, I am highly concerned about the potential environmental impact of the increased rail traffic and increase of potentially harmful materials being freighted throughout Minnesota alongside our most precious clean water resources. I am additionally concerned by the fact that in its report for environmental impact the company only cited one tribe that had responded for consultation, but that consultation never actually occurred. Through many parts of Minnesota, the railroad runs through ceded territory. Endangering such land is irresponsible and a violation of the 1854 Treaty. By routing oil, in any amount, along these lines, it directly threatens ceded territories and land that should be protected. Furthermore, an increase in localized emission, runoff, leaks, still poses a threat to our precious land and waterways. The report minimizes the impacts to wetlands and streams by accounting for site work and construction as minimal by projected cumulative measurements. But it fails to consider any damages that occur regularly by an increase in railroad usage or future site work and construction for additional maintenance. I request that the STB reevaluate and reconsider this proposed merger and the EIS report to account for a more in-depth analysis and consult with the appropriate tribal leaders.
    Saint Paul, MN
  819. (printed as 9/19/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32210Chanda m Massengale
    This merger would be so detrimental in so many ways. My husband & I have recently renovated a dilapidated home in LeClaire Iowa right on the Mississippi river. The line that would be involved is literally out the back door about 50 feet from the back of this home. This home is part of the history and charm of LeClaire Iowa. We experienced a derailment January 2020, this was so scary being concerned about our property. We were fortunate that it was further south from us otherwise it would have taken out our home. We purchased this home to be able to enjoy LeClaire and the river. We rent this home as an airbnb and we enjoy it as well. We, as well as our guests love to sit on the deck and enjoy the view of the river, we often fish from there or just hang out and enjoy a fire. All activities that will not be enjoyable with 3xs the amount of train traffic. LeClaire depends on tourism and utilizes the riverfront so much and this merger will take away so much of the enjoyment and tourism dollars. Please consider all comments and concerns while deciding. Thank you Chanda & Jim Massengale
    davenport, IA
  820. (printed as 9/18/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32254Reginald Arkell
    Wheaton, IL
  821. (printed as 9/18/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32222Resident
    NO! A big NO. This will increase the already congested traffic areas along the rail. Personally it will inhibit my visits and use of the Police and Fire Departments, Park District Facilities, The Public Library and access to the Elgin-O'hare Expressway.
    Patty Anne · Wood Dale, IL
  822. (printed as 9/17/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32221Daniel Freeman
    I do not support the Proposed CP KCS rail merger. Can you please provide information regarding method, process or equation used to determine how much weight semi truck freight would be switched to rail freight? This issue needs to be evaluated because moving freight by rail is not cost efficiant in terms of reliability in load date and delivery time. The company I work for avoides rail because of this fact. Best Regards, Daniel Freeman
    Muscatine, IA
  823. (printed as 9/16/2022)
    Reply
    305343Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas City Southern
  824. (printed as 9/16/2022)
    Letter
    305342Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  825. (printed as 9/16/2022)
    Letter
    305341Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  826. (printed as 9/16/2022)
    Letter
    305340Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  827. (printed as 9/16/2022)
    Errata
    305339Errata/Correction
    Canadian National Railway Company
  828. (printed as 9/16/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32764Sierra Club, Eagle View Group
    The attached comment letter was submitted by U.S. Mail.
    Jon Duyvejonck · Princeton, IA
  829. (printed as 9/16/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32442Texas House of Representatives
    See attached for a letter signed by ten Texas state representatives from Harris County/Southeast Texas regarding the proposed merger. We call on the STB to hold an in-person hearing in Houston during the extended public comment period.
    Representative Ron Reynolds · Missouri City, TX
  830. (printed as 9/16/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32220Claudia Baxley
    The increase in train traffic in Excelsior Springs will adversely affect the health and well-being of citizens of Excelsior Springs. In particular, i am greatly concerned about the street-level intersection of the railroad crossing at Tracy Avenue/Miller Avenue/Dunbar street, East of US Hwy 69. Rail traffic blocks access by ambulance and fire fighters . Headquarters for both of these vital Public Health and Infrastructure services are located west of this street-level RR crossing. The town of Excelsior Springs provides a significant home base for employees at the Ford Claycomo auto plant. It is the home of a JobCorps training provider. Public Schools and students who will be the basis for the town’s future are impacted by the street-level crossing. It is my understanding that rail traffic through Excelsior Springs will increase significantly (reportedly 18 more trains each day, for starters). Concomitant risk of derailment is incalculably great. If my concerns are categorized as being “other” than “envirronmental,” please consider that this town of roughly 11,000 citizens is a significant microcosm, if you will, of Clay County and a significant contributor to the future of Missouri. The continued existence of Excelsior Springs would be helped by substituting a Railroad Overpass at this vital intersection. I want to thank you for your time and attention to this concern, which reflects the opinion of my family. Sincerely, Claudia Baxley
    Excelsior Springs, MO
  831. (printed as 9/16/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32212N K Martin Co Inc
    I am opposed to the merger. The additional train traffic will place an additional burden on the people of Wood Dale who are already experiencing extreme noise levels due to Ohare Airport. Safety will also be compromised due to splitting our first responders.
    Norbert K Martin · Wood Dale, IL
  832. (printed as 9/15/2022)
    Reply
    305334Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  833. (printed as 9/15/2022)
    Notice
    305329Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Nahant Marsh Education Center
  834. (printed as 9/15/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32759Draft EIS Public Meeting
    Transcript from the public meeting for the Draft EIS.
    Beaumont, TX
  835. (printed as 9/15/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32219Tom Beeter
    The current train traffic situation in Bartlett is already causing life threatening delays due to the blocking of on grade crossings. This proposed merger and the additional train traffic it will bring will only exacerbate an already growing problem. Averages do not mean anything to the person that cannot receive life saving help due to train delays. The problem is that this becomes a domino effect. Not only are local residents affected by these delays, other towns and municipalities requiring help from other towns in emergency situations will not have the support they need. Create the infrastructure to support these mergers by way of underpasses and or overpasses and then propose the merger. All things come with a price tag and human life should not be one of them.
    Bartlett, IL
  836. (printed as 9/15/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32218Pam Arrigoni
    The merger of these rail lines will cause many hardships to the City of Wood Dale as well as all of the neighboring towns to along the Metra line. Traffic will be impacted; emergency vehicles will not having access; the extra noise will be disruptive to the residents. The railway in our community is meant for Metra traffic and not long freight trains. There must be enough train tracks along unpopulated areas because how else could these trains have operated before? Thank you for your consideration.
    Wood Dale, IL
  837. (printed as 9/15/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32184MO SHPO
    Toni Prawl · Jefferson City, MO
  838. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305327Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  839. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305324Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Michelle Solis Russell
  840. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305322Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Canadian National Railway Company
  841. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305320Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    California Association of Port Authorities
  842. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305319Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  843. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305317Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Sierra Club
  844. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305316Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    City of Houston City Council, District I
  845. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305315Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Pacific Northwest Waterways Association
  846. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305314Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Office of Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of the Fifth District of the State of Minnesota
  847. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305313Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Archer Daniels Midland Company
  848. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305312Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    BNSF Railway Company
  849. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305311Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    The Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  850. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305309Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Dead River Company, LLC
  851. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305308Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Progressive Rail Incorporated
  852. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305307Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Winona LaDuke, Honor the Earth
  853. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305306Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  854. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305305Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Baton Rouge Area Foundation
  855. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Comments
    305304Comment
    Solutionary Rail
  856. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305303Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Southern Rail Commission
  857. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305301Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Canadian Forest Products Ltd.
  858. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305299Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    NFI Industries
  859. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305298Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  860. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305297Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Coalition to Stop CPKC
  861. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305296Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Canpotex Limited
  862. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305295Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Hennepin County, Minn., and the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
  863. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305294Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Americold
  864. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305293Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Hapag-Lloyd (America) LLC
  865. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Notice
    305292Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Ingredion Incorporated
  866. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32758Draft EIS Public Meeting
    Transcript from the public meeting for the Draft EIS.
    Excelsior Springs, MO
  867. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32681PJ Slobojan
    Davenport, IA
  868. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32253Hahn Ready Mix
    Good Morning, Please see attached letter document. Thank you, Griffin Hahn Hahn Ready Mix
    Griffin Hahn · Davenport, IA
  869. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32217Christian Sanchez
    More trains means more air pollution, more sound pollution, and a lot more additional traffic than usual. We are strongly against this. Please do proceed with this merge. Let’s help our environment stay clean.
    Bartlett, IL
  870. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32214Kathy klabachs
    The merger of the trains will affect many people and interrupt fire and police being able to access those on need please do not let this happen.
    Wood dale, IL
  871. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32211N/A
    I live on the Mississippi River across the railroad tracks from all services that Davenport provides. This merger puts our family at risk if there are medical emergencies and essentially cuts off our access to food, health care, or any other services that we rely on the City of Davenport to provide. Furthermore, we already see railroad waste up and down our road from the current Canadian Pacific rail yard. Railroad ties that are washed away during floods etc. This merger will cut us off from everything in Davenport with three times the train traffic. This merger will also triple the risk of accidental spills during derailment emergencies that not only impacts the city of Davenport but also every city from here to the Gulf of Mexico. This merger as it is written should absolutely not be permitted when it triples the train traffic along the Mississippi River threatening every home for 2500 miles. These engineers have absolutely no respect for the state laws or the communities in which they operate. We are already blocked by trains often for up to an hour trying to get into town. Iowa State law prohibits blocking the intersections for more than 10 minutes but Canadian Pacific is aware that Federal law supersedes that. My understanding is that this merger is being suplemented with Federal funds to mitigate the risks to local communities. I DO NOT SUPPORT corporate welfare and if they cannot fund the merger themselves and reroute away from the Mississippi River communities without milking money from taxpayers, then they may need to rethink their business model.
    John Thurber · DAVENPORT, IA
  872. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32181Cherokee Nation
    Elizabeth Toombs · Tahlequah, OK
  873. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32171DEBRA R FREEDLAND
    This project for profit of CP rail, will put the safety, welfare, and environment of over 300,000 people in at least ten municipalities west of Chicago. The proposed added freight traffic of 14+ trains up to over two miles long will endanger public safety by blocking grade level crossings making emergency services unable to reach those in need in a timely fashion. It will cause more accidents, both vehicle and pedestrian deaths. The idea that it will only create an average wait time of a few seconds, as suggested by CP, is ludicrous. We are people, not averages, and we all know how long we can be delayed by long freight trains, and it sure isn't a few seconds. The average is meaningless if you're the one delayed for a half an hour, unable to get around it, just as a 90% cancer survival rate is meaningless if you are in the 10%. As it is a known fact that requests for quiet zones are ignored, noise pollution (and of course air, also) is a serious problem, even without the additional traffic proposed. In the event of a derailment a densely populated area will be at risk of a hazmat situation, and danger to our health. A derailment near the Fox River in Elgin will likely destroy the water supply of Elgin and all the downriver communities. A lesser but still important issue is the disruption of beautiful music at Hemmens Auditorium by train whistles. The Elgin Symphony Orchestra has for years tolerated the ruin of delicate moments in music which is created only after hours and days of work, but could be laughed off. The additional frequency proposed will ruin many beautiful works of art.
    Roselle, IL
  874. (printed as 9/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32170Mark Zaputil
    I sincerely believe any negative impact of the proposed CP-KCS merger to be minimal at the most. Any impact would be temporary and could rapidly be overcome in a short amount of time. Shipping of oil over rail is much less hazardous than having many, many more tank trucks on our highways. Any regard to noise is minor as well, people should be more concerned about the noise pollution of traffic on the highways and streets in their neighborhoods. Our society and economy will benefit much from a merger of the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern Railroads. Thank You
    Davenport, IA
  875. served (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Decision
    51385Entire Board · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART A MOTION FILED BY THE APPLICANTS IN THIS PROCEEDING TO STRIKE CERTAIN EVIDENCE FROM THE RECORD.
  876. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Notice
    305290Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Pamela Fraser, Heather Dockrell, Edward Dockrell, Lorelei Desrochers, and Kaitlyn Timmerman
  877. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Notice
    305289Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    CHS Inc.
  878. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Notice
    305288Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Mastronardi Produce Limited
  879. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Notice
    305286Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Savage
  880. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Notice
    305284Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    SSAB Enterprises, LLC
  881. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Notice
    305283Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    J.D. Iriving, Limited
  882. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Notice
    305282Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    William E. Gluba
  883. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Notice
    305279Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Southeast Louisiana Super Region
  884. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Notice
    305278Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    The American Chemistry Council, The Fertilizer Institute, and The National Industrial Transportation League
  885. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Notice
    305276Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    USD Group
  886. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Notice
    305275Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Bartlett, a Savage Company
  887. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32757Draft EIS Public Meeting
    Transcript from the public meeting for the Draft EIS.
    Davenport, IA
  888. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32484U.S. Department of the Interior
    Attached are the updated comments on this Draft EIS from the U.S. Department of the Interior. This version corrects contact information in the attachment to the letter. You can disregard the previous comment file uploaded by the U.S. DOI.
    Glenn Schroeder · Denver, CO
  889. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32252Melissa Suzik
    Addison, IL
  890. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32251Richard Clewell
    Davenport, IA
  891. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32216Connie allen
    The noise when outside at my house (live above the highway) is unbearable. Increased traffic will decrease home value significantly. Please put a crossing in at green gables and stop the horn by my house. With high inflation, decrease 401k value due to current administration policies, my home is one main asset I have. Also super concerned about festivals on Leclaire levy. I saw the trains derailed 1/5/20. If the levy was full, there would be significant death. Please slow speed up 35 in towns at least. I am pro-business but please put in sound and safety mitigations
    Leclaire, IA
  892. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32215Sara Gavin
    The proposed merge between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern railroad poses a significant concern in increased railroad traffic. It inhibits commuters from getting across railways in a timely and functional manner. With the merger 14 additional trains are expected on the route which already increases my travel time to and from work. As a full time health technician at a hospital and as a full time mother, I cannot afford to constantly alter my transit time especially in cases of emergency. This also poses as a concern for emergency response vehicles and police services as there are no alternative routes around the rail tracks.
    Wood Dale, IL
  893. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32213Christine
    It's not necessary to add more trains through small towns along the Mississippi. It blocks for emergencies and getting to work.
    Camanche, IA
  894. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32198Scott County Animal Hospital
    Noise pollution is already an impact day and night. Disrupts residents and wildlife daily. Speed of train is concern as well as hazardous materials if a derailment could destroy and kill property, animals and humas.
    Lori Brownson · LeClaire, IA
  895. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32197Diane E. Franken
    The proposed merger of the railroad companies that pass along our Mississippi River has the makings of an environmental disaster. Just last year up the river from Davenport in LeClaire there was a "derailing". Luckily the contents were cleaned up and did not affect the river. The proposal includes almost 3 times as many trains; so the chances of an environmental disaster to our river will rise expotentially. In a flood, Nahant Marsh, a beautiful refuge for all kinds of wildlife, could experience irreparable damage. Last week a car in Davenport was side-swiped by a train. The increase in trains would delay any emergency vehicles getting across the tracks to save lives and, again, raise the probability of an increase in accidents with cars and people. Our area is a winter nesting place for our American eagles. The increased sound would not only be sound pollution for humans; it would, most likely, disturb these beautiful creatures and could cause a disruption of their past patterns. My husband and I walk between the train tracks and the river and use earplugs when a train passes. The Mississippi is a flyway for many birds and butterflies, guiding them on their paths of migration. The increased sound pollution and possible river pollution, will undoubtedly negatively affect them. Trains run on diesel fuel so the effect of the merger would be more air pollution, affecting people and wildlife. Many people cross the tracks to enjoy many activities such as music, festivals, the highest ranking minor league park in the midwest, etc. Air and sound pollution will greatly deter the use of these treasures. Davenport is planning a destination playground in an area on the river side of the park. Families will not expose their children or themselves to this air and sound pollution, no matter how wonderful these ammentities are. ANY increase in air, sound, or environmental spills would be a disaster waiting to happen. Please do no approve this merger.
    Davenport, IA
  896. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32196Jeffrey & Judith Eaton
    To whom this may concern: PLEASE VOTE NO! We wish to add our concerns to this merger. Our home is within a very short distance from rail track that will be much affected by this merger if train traffic triples as stated. We must cross said tracks to and from our home and/or driveway. My husband and I are up in years where either one of us may need emergency help in the future. I have been diagnosed in the past with heart issues and have had a stroke. If we need emergency access to main road, there is a good possibility we will not be able to drive across tracks to get help due to a major addition to train traffic. Also, even now the noise from the horn and passing trains are very loud, Additional train traffic would extensively add to the noise both day and night that would affect our quality of life day and night. The additional train traffic also brings more ground shaking vibration that will most likely affect roads, driveways, and foundations. Our home is not the only home that would be affected by this merger as several other homes are in the same dilemma. Please consider this plea when making your final decision on this merger. I would be interested in any or all alternatives to our concerns, and thank you for reading our concerns. Jeff & Judy Eaton 3758 Midway Beach Road Muscatine, Iowa 52761
    Muscatine, IA
  897. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32195John Lukis
    As a resident of the area to be impacted by this merger, the increased railway traffic will cause delays on getting my children to school. Also, in the event of a medical emergency, there will be delays to the local hospital due to the increased rail traffic that may cause worsening outcomes for treatment if it is delayed due to waiting for a train.
    Wood Dale, IL
  898. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32194Self empoyed
    There is lots of noise and pollution already in this area. It is hard for me to breathe outdoors most of the time. I keep my windows close and I can't air out my place. Some days I feel already sick if I try to be outdoors. Adding more trains will make my life more unbearable in this area. We don't want to move but more pollution, trains, noise will make this area less desirable.
    Monica Gor · Wood Dale, IL
  899. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32178LA SHPO
    Kristin Sanders · Baton Rouge, LA
  900. (printed as 9/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32177Osage Nation
    Andrea Hunter · Pawhuska, OK
  901. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Notice
    305272Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Richardson international Limited and Italgrani U.S.A., Inc.
  902. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Notice
    305271Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    The Chlorine Institute
  903. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Notice
    305269Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Ray-Carroll County Grain Growers, Inc.
  904. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comments
    305268Comment
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  905. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32756Draft EIS Public Meeting
    Transcript from the public meeting for the Draft EIS.
    Itasca, IL
  906. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32250Woodside Homeowners Association / Wood Dale, IL
    On behalf of the 85 homes and hundreds of residents of the Woodside HOA in Wood Dale, I respectfully express our strong opposition to this merger. The draft EIS states, “Increased rail traffic has the potential to result in environmental impacts related to noise and vibration, air quality, freight and passenger rail safety, grade crossing safety and delay, passenger rail transportation, and hazardous material transportation.” We couldn’t agree more! In Wood Dale, there are 3 grade level crossings (Front Street, Wood Dale Road & Prospect Ave.) all 3 have been identified as being directly impacted by delays and safety. According to the draft EIS, the Bensenville Intermodal Yard will see a 25% daily increase in cars, from 1439 to 1807. This increase will also result in 10,977 additional carloads of hazardous material per year. That's 30 carloads of hazardous materials PER DAY. We are already seeing an increase in truck traffic in this area due to the eventual western access to O’Hare. The truck traffic at the Bensenville yard will increase 82% from 383 to 698. The Franklin Park Intermodal Yard will see a 103% daily increase in cars from 74 to 150 and a 70% increase in truck traffic from 190 to 324. OEA has concluded that, apart from train noise, which could result in adverse impacts at some locations, the potential adverse impacts of the Proposed Acquisition would be negligible, minor, and/or temporary. We strongly disagree with any impact assessment characterized as negligible.
    Tom Lindelof, President · Wood Dale, IL
  907. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32208Elizabeth Smithson
    I am opposed to the CP-KCS rail merger. As a resident living near affected rail lines I am opposed to the increase in freight traffic that will adversely impact passenger rail service that use the same rail lines, automobile transportation including emergency service access at rail crossings, and have serious concerns on the environmental impact the increased freight traffic will cause. Train accidents do happen and an increase in freight traffic through residential areas is asking for a disaster whether via derailment spills or at road crossings.
    Medinah, IL
  908. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32207Dennis R Torii Sr
    This proposal creates a dangerous delay in, safety, life, fire and police service to part of the Itasca community north of the RR tracks. Blocking access to the closest Alexian Brothers Hospital. It would require an additional underpass under the tracks or possibly create a ramp from Irving Park road to the expressway.
    Itasca, IL
  909. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32206anah bertois wagrez
    I am concerned not about the gas emissions but the noise, vibrations, possible hazards and the consequences that the delays will create at the gates. Many people will be upset at the wheel and will cut through areas where the speed limit is supposed to be 25 at a way higher speed because they will want to catch up the time they are losing. What about people taking the Metra to go to work? how is it going to affect them? I am not against this project but I think the infrastructure is not there for such long trains. Why not shorter trains?
    MEDINAH, IL
  910. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32205Susan Brinskelle
    The increased rail traffic will greatly impact my community environment. With no over or underpass the rail line dissects our city in half. Already trains can back up surface road traffic for half a mile. As the additional trains may be longer and need to uncouple to fit into the rail yard, more road traffic will be delayed for longer amounts of time. These delays will affect emergency vehicles, school buses, Metrarail, and commuters. There is no alternative route for walking or biking across town. The noise and air pollution will increase exponentially. O'Hare already overwhelms our area. The noise, air pollution, and increased traffic disruptions are going to put undue stress on our environment and citizens. There is NO benefit for Wood Dale.
    Wood Dale, IL
  911. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32204KAROL KANZLER
    The Canadian Pacific / Kansas City Southern. The extra train traffic and length of time these trains could be crossing through the middle of Itasca would cause a huge detrimental effect on all residents ages 0-100. Itasca being a small comfortable village has the benefits of being people friendly. On any given day at any given time you will see people strolling through the town on their way to the park district, the library, the pool during the warmer months, Itasca Country Club, assorted restaurants, churches, work, and many other venues. The tracks themselves pass through the center of town and to arrive at these destinations they must be crossed. This I believe would not only be a frustrating but dangerous situation. Especially regarding the length of time it would take our first responders to access locations on either side of these tracks. So, one of the comments I read is there would be a "detrimental impact on the quality of life". Should read this "will have a detrimental impact on life itself".
    Itasca, IL
  912. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32203Stacy Leakakos
    Working in an operating room we are on call alot.If an emergency happens during our call hours (which is quite often) we have to be at the hospital in 30 mins to get everything ready to save a patient's life. We cannont be stopped by a frieght train during these situations. This merger would start putting patients lives in danger if it goes through.
    ITASCA, IL
  913. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32202Noreen M Torii
    Itasca is attempting to attract businesses to our downtown area, however, who would want to operate or shop in an area with constant train traffic and noise. More importantly, as a resident who has used ambulance services this would greatly impact getting to Alexian Bros. Hospital and/or if we needed police assistance. This would affect my banking, grocery shopping, park district use, library etc. This is a horrible proposal! Totally against it!!!
    Itasca, IL
  914. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32201Kathleen Moretti
    I’ve seen the impact that CP has already made on our town through the 10 years I have lived here. If we continue to allow CP onto our railway, by adding on another acquisition, then our town will continuously have issues with our main intersections. I’ve been late to picking up my children already due to stopped trains on the tracks from CP, and refuse to allow this to continue even more. We deal enough with planes over our homes from OHare that the railway traffic will more invade our environment, effect our lives and our children’s lives.
    Wood Dale, IL
  915. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32200Amador Montiel
    In Itasca some schools are on the north side of the railroad tracks and the police and fire department are on the south side of the tracks which would create a serious problem in an emergency.
    Itasca, IL
  916. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32199Betty Montiel
    It could cause problems getting help to the elderly. In an emergency, the police and fire department cannot get to the other side of the tracks to the schools if a long freight train is blocking both crossing streets in town (Itasca).
    Itasca, IL
  917. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32193ROBERT JOSEPH SHAMIE
    This merger between these 2 railroads is totally unacceptable. This will turn our once peaceful neighborhood into a main detour route for drivers to get past streets blocked by a long freight train. Which will be unavoidable because there are only two streets to get north of the tracks. It is time that corporations like the Canadian Pacific start thinking about the negative impact that they are going to make in all of the communities instead of how much money they will make. This merger will make our town into another Franklin Park where you can sit helplessly for at times a half an hour or more, while a freight train is sitting motionless blocking the crossing. Please do not do this to our town and every town west of us.
    WOOD DALE, IL
  918. (printed as 9/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32174Mission Church
    Bloomingdale, IL
  919. (printed as 9/11/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32209Mary Jean Kreusler
    I am gravely concerned about the increased train traffic and the impact that would have on our fire/ambulance/police services on the north side of town. I don’t think corresponding communities will work especially well as I am a block away from the border of a completely different county and city. (Elk Grove Village, Cook) if this train merger is to go through, I feel they must be responsible for building underpasses along the route as needed at their expense.
    Itasca, IL
  920. (printed as 9/11/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32192Georgia Schroeder
    I feel this merger would be detrimental to my community and am totally against it
    Wood Dale, IL
  921. (printed as 9/11/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32190Frances A Henderson
    There are already too many slow moving freight trains at the Irving Park and Wood Dale Rd intersection without the negative impact of additional freight trains resulting from a CPKC rail merger.
    Wood Dale, IL
  922. (printed as 9/11/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32169Tricia D Colsant
    I am against this merger and the negative impact it will have on our community.
    Wood Dale, IL
  923. (printed as 9/10/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32191Phil Munton
    My environmental concern is the additional amount of air pollution that would result from 14 more trains driving through our town and the extra risk of an accident causing even more toxins to be released in the air by us. Wood Dale train traffic is unique in that three roads are blocked at the same time when a train passes through. One of those roads is the east and west traffic flow and the other blockage is on two north and southbound roads. Please stop this proposed merger.
    Wood Dale, IL
  924. (printed as 9/10/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32189Nanci Munton
    I’m concerned about up to an extra 14 trains coming through my little town and putting out more air pollution than we already have. We get to much air pollution as it is from Ohare airport and the diesel trucks driving down the major route of 19 Irving Park Road. And if there would ever be a railroad accident in my little town, who knows what kind of toxins would be released into the air around here. Another huge concern is the stoppage of road traffic in Wood Dale. When a train comes through my town, it blocks traffic in all four directions on three different roads all at the same time. Please don’t allow these two railroad companies to merge.
    Wood Dale, IL
  925. (printed as 9/9/2022)
    Notice
    305264Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    North Dakota Grain Dealers Association, Fessenden Co-op Association
  926. (printed as 9/9/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32188STEPHEN JAMES
    It is going to make my life miserable, because Iam having many health issue.
    WOOD DALE, IL
  927. (printed as 9/9/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32185Kyla Johnson
    I do not agree with the trains merging through our Hanover park metra. It’s very peaceful and quit right now. I have A newborn who sleeps and don’t need trains to be the cause of the night owl. Also I’m one one of those who ride the metra the trains may make it hard to cross the walkovers if trains are blocking the path.
    Hanover Park, IL
  928. (printed as 9/9/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32176OK SHPO
    Matthew Pearce · Oklahoma City, OK
  929. (printed as 9/9/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32172Reem Aldhahiry
    Dear Mr. Wayland. As a resident of Hanover park, I am requesting that you look into the tremendous negative effects that this project will cause to our quality of life. My opposition comes mainly from my concern of the noise that this project will cause. Our mayor of Hanover park, Mr. Craig has made a list of many negative impacts that this projects will cause. Please take them all into consideration. Sincerely, Reem Aldhahiry
    Hanover park, IL
  930. (printed as 9/8/2022)
    Motion
    305261Motion To Strike
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  931. (printed as 9/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32755Draft EIS Public Meeting
    Transcript from the online public meeting for the Draft EIS.
    Washington, DC
  932. (printed as 9/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32461Minnesota House of Representatives
    State Representative Paul Anderson · St. Paul, MN
  933. (printed as 9/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32187Patty and Tom Bertrand
    Concerned with increased rail traffic through our community, long delays getting through rail crossings because of much longer trains, no real benefit to anyone but those two companies, insufficient over passes or under passes to prevent reasonable traffic flow.
    Wood Dale, IL
  934. (printed as 9/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32186Tom Kalisz
    I am opposed to this merger. Wood Dale was a quiet community when I moved here in 1999. O'Hare airport expanded. Now I listen to planes all day and night. Planes fly 300 ft above my home. Yet I am not eligible for noise proofing insulation nor windows. There is no public transportation to the airport if I want to fly anywhere. My taxes continue to increase, while the quality of life here goes down. Now you want to increase the noise and vibration from freight trains? Increase congestion and delay traffic on Irving and Wood Dale Rd? Two train crossing in Wood Dale at the same intersection. How much more noise do we need to endure. DO NOT allow this merger to happen!
    Wood Dale, IL
  935. (printed as 9/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32175Lois Pasquale
    We just recently got out of freight train limbo with changes to the intersection of Wood Dale Road and Rte. 19, as well as moving tracks off grade at York and Irving. I do not want to go backward with increased delays and traffic backups from more freight trains. Waiting at a streetlight for 7.5 minutes is a huge waste of time, gas, energy, and creates more global warming. More long, slow trains through built out areas across heavily trafficked intersections is a bad deal for those left to live with it.
    Wood Dale, IL
  936. (printed as 9/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32173Jacquelyn Servaty
    One of the impacts stated for Houston, TX is increased delays at 30 crossings. This is very worrisome as the East End and Fifth Ward communities are already greatly impacted by stopped trains blocking crossings on major corridors. Our communities have been trying to fight this problem for years and are finally getting attention from the FRA. I worry that this merger will only magnify the issue of stopped trains/blocked railroad crossings in my community.
    Houston, TX
  937. (printed as 9/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32166CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Clarification email on FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3).
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  938. (printed as 9/8/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3780White Earth Reservation
    Laura Lee Erickson
  939. (printed as 9/7/2022)
    Notice
    305246Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Harris County, Tex.
  940. (printed as 9/7/2022)
    Letter
    305244Letter
    Honorable Betty McCollum
  941. (printed as 9/7/2022)
    Comments
    305239Comment
    Surface Transportation Board
  942. (printed as 9/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-33025IL SHPO
    Carey Mayer · Springfield, IL
  943. (printed as 9/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32754Draft EIS Public Meeting
    Transcript from the online public meeting for the Draft EIS.
    Washington, DC
  944. (printed as 9/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32683U.S. House of Representatives
    Congresswoman Betty McCollum · Washington, DC
  945. (printed as 9/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32682Catherine Weideman
    Bettendorf, IA
  946. (printed as 9/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32160Heide Larson
    I do not want to see this merger take place. Tripling the number of railroad cars through our little town will cordon off homeowners and businesses from the main thoroughfare. It will create triple the dangerous hazards of derailment and release of toxic materials. The added noise will cause business losses and 'inspire' people to move. ("Quiet zones" ha!) The public safety will be compromised. We hold many events down by the river -- plenty of children running around to get on to the track in a split second of non supervision. Emergency vehicles will be delayed reaching urgent response. I see nothing of value to communities up and down the river. I will resent this merger if it goes through, in spite of you glowing advertisements.
    Le Claire, IA
  947. (printed as 9/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32159Parents who hate parked trains
    My neighborhood already suffers from parked trains blocking intersections for hours and cutting us off from public transit
    Susan Green · Houston, TX
  948. (printed as 9/7/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3710Tom Wilcox
  949. served (printed as 9/6/2022)
    Decision
    51404Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    EXTENDED THE DEADLINE TO SUBMIT COMMENTS ON A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, AND DETERMINED THAT NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS OF THE COMMENT PERIOD WILL BE GRANTED.
  950. (printed as 9/6/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32167CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    CN Responses to Information Request No. 1
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  951. (printed as 9/6/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32162Lori McCollum
    Concerned about noise pollution if train traffic is tripled. We already have about 8-10 trains daily. Secondly, this will bisected our river front where commerce, tourism recreation and industry are vital to our economy. The area adjacent to the tracks is predominantly black and brown communities of lower income so this also is an environmental justice issue.
    Rock island, IL
  952. (printed as 9/6/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32161Canadian National Railway Company
    Washington, DC
  953. (printed as 9/5/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32696Ann Schwickerath
    Davenport, IA
  954. (printed as 9/2/2022)
    Misc.
    305231Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  955. (printed as 9/2/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32163Scott County
    Please refer to the attached letter for details, however, Scott County does not support the proposed merger.
    Ken Beck · Davenport, IA
  956. (printed as 9/2/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32158Richard McBroom
    Noise abatement is not the primary environmental concern, as stated in the advance EIS draft by the STB; rather, it should relate to the transport of tar sands from Alberta to refineries along the Gulf Coast. For the tar sands industry to succeed, EXTREME EFFICIENCY of transport is needed to make this industry competitive with other sources of energy. The Keystone XL pipeline failed in a manner similar to the failure of coal slurry pipelines in the past, where the railroads provided a more competitive and environmentally friendly service; but the merger of KCS and CP will provide a MONOPOLISTIC RAILROAD VERSION of the Keystone XL pipeline, using a NEW TECHNOLOGY to efficiently extract the diluent at the destination, returning it to Alberta for reuse-- a service pipelines cannot provide. Further, the atmospheric carbon and heavy metals produced by the tar sands industry, facilitated by this new technology, will be many times more destructive to the environment than currently possible from energy production, in general. All this is occurring at a time when global warming requires EVERY EFFORT to be made to limit atmospheric carbon as a greenhouse gas driving global warming to the destruction of the environment for all life-- to say nothing of the threat to, aquifers and rivers-- particularly, the Mississippi River, where contiguous derailments are almost certain to occur in the future. Money is driving this merger, when in all reality conscience should be the deciding factor. I know this in my own life, because as a former KCS employee I will not sign over my held stock to the CP. I will not "touch pen to paper" to profit from this merger!
    Kansas City, MO
  957. (printed as 9/1/2022)
    Reply
    305227Reply
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  958. (printed as 9/1/2022)
    Notice
    305223Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, International Association of Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Workers Mechanical Division, National Conference of Firemen and Oilers 32BJ/SEIU
  959. (printed as 9/1/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3757Iowa SHPO
    Heather Gibb
  960. (printed as 8/31/2022)
    Statement
    305211Support Statement
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  961. (printed as 8/31/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32733White Earth Reservation
    Laura Lee Erickson · White Earth, MN
  962. (printed as 8/31/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32155Robyn Robbins
    I moved to this town 5 years ago. Had I known how many trains and how loud they are at EACH street crossing, I would not have purchased this house. Increasing the train traffic in and around the Quad Cities will NOT benefit the majority of citizens. In fact, it will likely have a negative effect on the population. Please reject this merger! Thank you, Robyn
    Durant, IA
  963. (printed as 8/31/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3753Canadian Pacific
    Joe Van Humbeck
  964. (printed as 8/30/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3713MN SHPO
    Alice Roberts-Davis
  965. served (printed as 8/26/2022)
    Decision
    51399Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    NOTIFIED ALL INTERESTED PARTIES THAT THE VENUE FOR THE SEPT. 15, 2022 IN-PERSON PUBLIC MEETING WILL NOW BE HELD AT THE DOWNTOWN EVENT CENTRE IN BEAUMONT, TEX.
  966. (printed as 8/26/2022)
    Motion
    305194Motion/Petition/Request
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  967. (printed as 8/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32154Sidley Austin for CN · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Extension Request for Responses to Information Request #1.
    Brooklyn Hildebrandt · Washington, DC
  968. (printed as 8/26/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3711Kevin Kimble
  969. (printed as 8/25/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32153Ann Geiger
    I don't know if you are aware of this environmental impact statement which is analyzed by an environmental firm here. I don't know where they got their 200+ communities, but there aren't enough large towns along this route to come to those conclusions.
    Princeton, IA
  970. (printed as 8/25/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32152Kane County
    Please see attached letter from the Chairwoman for Kane County, Illinois
    Jodie Wollnik - Director Water Resources for Kane County · Geneva, IL
  971. (printed as 8/24/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32150Camanche Fire Department
    As the individual directly responsible for the health and safety of our team members and the community we serve, I am extremely concerned with the recent US Surface Transportation Board’s (STB) review and analysis of the Canadian Pacific‐Kansas City Southern merger. It should be noted that the impact study on crossing delays only included 277 crossings and only crossings with more than 2,500 cars per day were studied. This means smaller cities like ours and many others were not included or considered. It would appear that the study was done to support the merger and not to truly show the overall impact to all of the cities and town along the entire route. Given the initial analysis indicated the train lengths potentially doubling, and train travel frequency increasing to three times greater than the current schedule, I am choosing to submit comments requesting the STB further investigate and analyze the potential hazards and delay that would adversely affect the CFD and the community members we serve that will be negatively impacted by these changes. Our city is divided by the Canadian Pacific Railroad Tracks and over 400 residences and 100% of our boat ramps to access the river are temporarily isolated from emergency services everytime a CP train passes through our city. In the past year alone, we recorded more than 100 emergency calls to these areas. I believe this merger would compromise the critical effectiveness of our Paramedics, EMTs and firefighters, and the health and livelihood of those who need timely response. This merger will significantly increase the frequency and duration of these periods of isolation from emergency servicesfor this area of our city. For these reasons, the CFD is requesting that the STB require more data, analysis and transparency as it relates to the Canadian Pacific‐Kansas City Southern merger. For the health and safety of our department, and the Citizens of Camanche, we believe this is a reasonable request.
    Dave Schutte · Camanche, IA
  972. (printed as 8/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32164Kevin Kimble
    Email, DC
  973. (printed as 8/22/2022)
    Errata
    305172Errata/Correction
    Canadian Pacific Railway
  974. (printed as 8/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32149Doug Necker
    Many cities have these "quiet zones". I would like to see Davenport and Bettendorf have those quiet zones as well. I know it's a federal law that requires the horn blaring for public safety. This law should not be necessary when almost all intersections already have crossing arms to alert the driver. The person that chooses to drive around these barriers already knows a train is coming, with or without a horn. If that person wants to take the Darwin challenge let them. The other option is install better barricades and let tens of thousand of citizens in this community get uninterrupted slept which is absolutely important for good metal and physical health. Thank you, Doug Necker
    Bettendorf, IA
  975. (printed as 8/20/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32144Brian Trentz
    Hello, I have lived in my present residence for 21 years. At times, train horns are inaudible and at other times the trains sound like they are roaring right down our street (depending on atmospheric conditions). The noise pollution is most alarming at night while trying to sleep. After being woken by loud train horns, it is difficult to get back to sleep. I contacted our city council and mayor years ago only to be shut down by the city administrator telling me to stop bothering the city council with this concern and that it was too expensive to set-up quiet zones. My reaction was to ask, what is the city council in existence to do other than to address constituent concerns. Now we are looking at the possibility of tripling the number of trains passing through our Iowa Quad Cities every day. This will not only increase the noise but will put our water treatment facility at risk due to trains traveling right along side it. Any derailment could result in eliminating the water source for hundreds of thousands of people. The trains will also affect the use of our riverfront, where many events are held throughout the year. Riverfront music festivals will be interrupted every time a train passes. Based on the map, it appears the Quad Cities will be affected by this acquisition more than any other community in the United States, Canada and Mexico. It is not right that our lives will be interrupted by this additional pollution and danger. Please reject this proposed acquisition. Thanks, Brian
    Bettendorf, IA
  976. (printed as 8/20/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32143Dave Willis
    I am submitting my opposition to the “Authorization of the Proposed Acquisition of the Canadian Pacific/Kansas City Southern Railroad merger” currently being considered and reviewed by the Surface Transportation Board (STB). This proposed merger would create a 26,000 mile, single-line rail system connecting Mexico to USA to Canada. This proposed merger would also allow longer trains, up to a mile long, traveling through our local small city of Camanche, Iowa, from 8 trains per day to 22 trains per day, which includes much more noise, longer delays at rail crossings and delaying local Police, Fire and Emergency Services to serve residents on the South side of the railroad tracks that literally bisect our city into two sections. Police, Fire, and Emergency Services are staffed and housed on the North side of the tracks. With the increased length of trains, this will close all city rail crossings until train has cleared town. I strongly feel the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) created by the Office of Environmental Analysis (OEA) grossly understates many vulnerable environmental ares in our area. Let’s not forget or overlook the vast numbers of waterfowl, wild life, and fish that is plentiful along these river banks along the shoreline of Camanche. I am requesting someone from your office physically come to our area to personally review these areas of concern. I would gladly walk/drive anyone who will come to better understand that there is a vast difference between looking info. up on computers and maps vs. physically experience what I am discussing. Plus, PLEASE closely review the EIS. What really sticks out to me in 3.12-6, Impact Camanche, the Draft states”No Impact to Camanche”. How many other locations in Iowa and all other involved locations were grossly overlooked ?? I retired 9 years ago from the University of IOWA, Facilities Management Department, Environmental Services as a trained and Certified HAZWOPPER, Asbestos Inspector & Supervisor
    Camanche, IA
  977. (printed as 8/19/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32147Dana Fox-Andrews
    We have plenty of trains running currently past our house. This will create additional trains running crude oil from Canada to Mexico. Derailments happen and have happened in our town of LeClaire, but can wipe out little towns that these trains run through. We already have excessive noise with train horn decibels higher than they should be. More trains will add more pollution and have he ability to stop emergency workers from crossing tracks in life/death situations.
    LeClaire, IA
  978. (printed as 8/19/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32145Ellen Nelson
    The tracks are two feet from the embankment of the Mississippi River near my house. When/ if rail cars derail and contaminate this waterway what will be the impact on drinking water, wildlife, water life? When the last derailment happened in LeClaire the cars ended up on the levee. Could we be that lucky again? Water is a precious commodity as we have seen this summer. Is the economic gain for the railroad worth this risk? The speed limit for cars in town is 25 but trains thunder through at 55mph. Why? Longer, faster, increased numbers of trains exponentially increases the risks of contamination to a resource we can’t live without !
    LeClaire, IA
  979. (printed as 8/18/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32148WILLIAM ALLEN GRUNDER
    Contrary to the popular belief of weekend motorcycle enthusiasts and railroad engineers louder tailpipes and locomotive horns do not save lives they simply damage the environment in which they are deployed. High decibel locomotive horns do not stop at grade collisions they stop conversations, pause television programs, end telephone calls, disturb sleep patterns and denigrate the lives of people who live near rail lines. Noise negatively impacts the quality of and life expectancy of humans. I am not opposed to the merger of CP and KCS the result will be the more efficient transportation of commodities between the nations of North America. In my small Iowa town we have three gated at grade crossings within less than a mile. The KCS tracks run parallel between the Mississippi River and Hwy 67. Two of the three crossings have limited sight lines for west bound vehicular traffic trying to cross the tracks. All three crossings have nowhere for vehicles turning east to wait for rail traffic other than to block a travel lane on Hwy 67. Despite these hazardous conditions the only fatality in the past 20 years has been a pedestrian who was hit by a railroad service vehicle between the marked street crossings. Every train that passes through Princeton no matter the time of day begins blowing their earsplitting pointless air horns on one end of town and does not stop until they reach the other. This noise is an environmental hazard. To protect the citizens and the environment the STB should close the two crossings with limited sight lines which also cannot be crossed by a semitrailer without risk of high centering on the tracks. A waiting lane along Hwy 67 at the Lost Grove road crossing should be installed and the railroad should be made to construct a 4’ fence on both sides of their tracks to prevent negative pedestrian / train interactions. These modifications will eliminate the need for locomotive air horns thus remove an environmental hazard from my community.
    PRINCETON, IA
  980. (printed as 8/18/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32146Roy Birchard
    I am concerned about potential for oil spills or damage to my community as I live in downtown Davenport, Iowa.
    Davenport, IA
  981. (printed as 8/18/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32142City of Moravia
    For a small community of 600 we are anticipating major changes and challenges coming to our area and we are concerned about the effect it will have on our town and what if anything we can do in finding ways to improve the situation before hand. Concerns: 1. Traffic efficiency and safety at Trussell & J18 rail crossing for vehicles, Amish buggies, pedestrians and school children. 2. Alternative Emergency routes for Fire & Rescue 3. How to deal with increased train engine and horn noise. We are open to hearing any suggestions or ideas. Thank you
    Gary Ehrle · Moravia, IA
  982. (printed as 8/18/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3752Canadian Pacific
    Joe Van Humbeck
  983. (printed as 8/16/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32141Arkansas Historic Preservation Program / SHPO
    Kathryn Bryles · Little Rock, AR
  984. (printed as 8/16/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32140Miami Tribe of Oklahoma
    Diane Hunter · Miami, OK
  985. (printed as 8/12/2022)
    Letter
    305133Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  986. (printed as 8/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32139Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Law Office of Thomas W. Wilcox, LLC · Washington, DC
  987. (printed as 8/12/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3766Osage Nation
    Andrea Hunter
  988. (printed as 8/12/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3764Oklahoma Archeological Survey
    Kary Stackelbeck
  989. (printed as 8/12/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3763Oklahoma SHPO
    Lynda Ozan
  990. (printed as 8/12/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3762Missouri SHPO
    Toni Prawl
  991. (printed as 8/12/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3760Louisiana SHPO
    Kristin Sanders
  992. (printed as 8/12/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3756Illinois SHPO
    Carey Mayer
  993. (printed as 8/12/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3755Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma
    Ian Thompson
  994. (printed as 8/12/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3754Cherokee Nation
    Elizabeth Tombs
  995. (printed as 8/12/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3751Arkansas SHPO
    Stacy Hurst
  996. (printed as 8/11/2022)
    Rebuttal
    305127Rebuttal · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  997. (printed as 8/11/2022)
    Rebuttal
    305126Rebuttal · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    Canadian National Railway Company and Illinois Central Railroad Company
  998. (printed as 8/11/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32137JIM TJEPKEMA
    I am apposed to this rail merger because it will result in an increase in oil coming by rail from Canada at a time when we should be cutting back on the shipping of this oil which comes from the tar sands oil fields in Canada. This is very dirty oil and it is one of the first kinds of oil we should stop using to reduce our use of fossil fuels to reduce CO2 being added to the air which is causing climate warming.
    Minneapolis, MN
  999. (printed as 8/9/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32138John R Johnson
    Good morning, thank you for the opportunity to comment. This is in regard to FD 36500. Just as the STB has acknowledged in its environmental review that there would be minor or minimal down-sides to this merger, I would also agree that these are valid studies. This country has a transportation/distribution problem, and this merger would in some small but potentially significant ways possibly help to ease the shipments of good across the country. I urge the STB to also consider the request by CN to either purchase the former Gateway Western lines from CP/KCS or at a minimum allow trackage/haulage rights to CN, which would further increase efficiencies in the transportation grid in this country. thank you John Johnson
    Mexico MO area, MO
  1000. (printed as 8/9/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32136Wells Fargo
    I have serious concerns about the increase in train traffic that this merger is likely to cause. I love on the western edge of Bartlett. One of the rail lines that will see increased traffic is across the main east-west roads that were need to use to reach the rest of Bartlett. It already makes it inconvenient for us to shop in our own community due to the likelihood of needing to wait for a freight train that has stopped across those roads. In addition, the rail line is between several large neighborhoods (including mine) and the nearest fire station. This poses a risk to everyone in those neighborhoods who may have to wait longer for first responders in an emergency. Please prevent this merger. Thank you for your attention.
    Michael Pajeau · Bartlett, IL
  1001. (printed as 8/9/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32135Jean Ross
    This merger will allow more oil trains to pass through White Earth Reservation and the tribe's ceded territoriesof Minnesota. This is unjust as they were forced to have a new tar sands oil pipeline constructed through their territories last year. It was built on the primise that fewer oil trains would be needed. Many fought hard against the oil pipeline that threatens the water and wild rice Indigenous people rely on for survival. If oil was to spill from these oil trains it could damage their ability to exercise their rights to fully use and enjoy their ceded territories. I oppose this merger. However, if it is ultimately approved, then given the danger it poses to The Native people and their land, CP/KCS should pay some kind of fee or set aside funds to pay for any damage that their trains may cause.
    Minneapolis, MN
  1002. (printed as 8/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32132Robert Skwarek
    Your analysis completely lacking of the regard of how an average of 8 freight trains a day, placed upon existing tracks that have multiple Metra trains running on them, will create havoc in communities like mine (Bartlett, IL). The recent merger of the CN railway with CP in my community has created a NIGHTMARE of congestion and increased train traffic that is FAR WORSE than anything predicted. Not to mention a derailment close to the Spaulding Road crossing which could have been a disaster. Stop looking at the dollars here and start thinking about the communities who are adversely affected by these trains which cause serious delays, carry dangerous poisons and cut us off from other parts of our communities. Regards, Bob Skwarek
    Bartlett, IL
  1003. (printed as 8/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32131Sabrina Chan
    The merger of these 2 companies will negatively impact the area of Bartlett that I reside in by adding additional train and traffic delays. The increase in freight train traffic is already substantially adding congestion. There are limited routes in and out of my neighborhood which already restrict access of critical emergency vehicles. I am legitimately concerned about the repercussions of adding an additional 8 trains running through our town.
    Bartlett, IL
  1004. (printed as 8/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32130Meg Thomas
    I am concerned about the additional oil traffic that will cross both lands in the White Earth reservation and areas ceded under an 1855 treaty, due to the proposed CP, KCS merger. That treaty, which allowed many of us who are not Ojibwe or Dakota to occupy land in Minnesota, promised to keep the ceded lands in good condition for hunting, fishing and harvesting wild rice. Increased oil traffic across reservation lands and ceded territory puts all of those things at risk. We must honor the treaties our ancestors signed. Resources dedicated to increased transportation of oil, rather than to developing renewable sources of energy also endanger all of us by contributing to global warming. I oppose the merger due to this potential for increasing the transportation of oil across vulnerable areas.
    St. Paul, MN
  1005. served (printed as 8/5/2022)
    Decision
    51355Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.
  1006. (printed as 8/5/2022)
    Notice
    305111Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing
    Federal Maritime Commission
  1007. (printed as 8/5/2022)
    Substitution
    305109Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    U.S. Department of Transportation
  1008. (printed as 8/5/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32133Michigan Environmental Council
    Beau Brockett Jr. · Lansing, MI
  1009. (printed as 8/5/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3816Various
    Interested Parties/Various
  1010. (printed as 8/5/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3706Sidley Austin LLP · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield
  1011. (printed as 8/4/2022)
    Reply
    305106Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1012. (printed as 8/3/2022)
    Letter
    305098Letter
    Honorable Sam Graves , Honorable Emanuel Cleaver , Honorable Roy Blunt , Honorable Jerry Moran
  1013. (printed as 8/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32134Pickett Pictures llc
    I live in the blast zone. As a part of my work as a journalist I have studied oil vs rail and I want to go on record as being opposed to the merger of Canadian Pacific (CP) and Kansas City (KCS) Southern railroad and I see the resulting increased oil traffic as presenting an increased risk that isn't worth the price. Except there is no price for the merged entity and the people who will pay the price are those who live with the trains and their liability. This is the time for the world to take Indigenous wisdom to the heart of our systems - including energy. We have to turn this carbon train around before it is too late and the levels push us to the brink of environmental collapse. I stand with the White Earth Nation to demand a deposit in case of damages. Where is the “No bankruptcy” clause? No matter what the tribe, extractive industry's impact is felt in a deeper way by people whose culture and tradition is to honor the earth as a mother. The time is now to turn the train around on fossil fuel extraction and now is not the time to double down on systems guaranteed to increase climate chaos. I have learned a lot in my years of being connected to White Earth Reservation communities. I feel a close tie to the lands that fall within the 1855 Treaty and want to protect the waters of Northern Minnesota for future generations. Big Agriculture has already ruined the water in Southern Minnesota so we have to take care because the time is now.
    Keri Pickett · Minneapolis, MN
  1014. (printed as 8/3/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3761Miami Tribe of Oklahoma
    Diane Hunter
  1015. (printed as 8/3/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3759Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska
    Lance Foster
  1016. (printed as 8/1/2022)
    Reply
    305094Reply
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  1017. (printed as 8/1/2022)
    Reply
    305093Reply
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1018. (printed as 8/1/2022)
    Motion
    305092Motion/Petition/Request
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1019. (printed as 8/1/2022)
    Reply
    305091Reply
    Canadian National Railway Company
  1020. (printed as 8/1/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32656U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Oklahoma Ecological Services Field Office · Tulsa, OK
  1021. (printed as 7/29/2022)
    Reply
    305077Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas City Southern
  1022. served (printed as 7/28/2022)
    Decision
    51369Director Of Proceedings · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    ORDERED THAT REPLIES TO APPLICANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE IN THIS PROCEEDING ARE DUE ON AUGUST 1, 2022.
  1023. (printed as 7/28/2022)
    Supplement
    305073Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1024. (printed as 7/28/2022)
    Reply
    305072Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway
  1025. (printed as 7/28/2022)
    Reply
    305071Reply
    BNSF Railway Company
  1026. (printed as 7/28/2022)
    Report
    305069Status Report
    Surface Transportation Board
  1027. (printed as 7/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32655U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Illinois-Iowa Field Office · Moline, IL
  1028. (printed as 7/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32107Sun Prairie Fire Department
    Chris Garrison · Sun Prairie, WI
  1029. (printed as 7/27/2022)
    Reply
    305053Reply · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    Village of Itasca and Coalition to Stop CPKC
  1030. (printed as 7/26/2022)
    Letter
    305052Letter
    Honorable Richard J. Durbin, Honorable Raja Krishnamoorthi, Honorable Tammy Duckworth, Honorable Marie Newman
  1031. (printed as 7/26/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32108West Salem Volunteer Fire Department
    Dave Munson · West Salem, WI
  1032. (printed as 7/25/2022)
    Reply
    305048Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
  1033. (printed as 7/25/2022)
    Reply
    305045Reply
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  1034. (printed as 7/25/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3715Harris County Precinct One
    Commissioner Rodney Ellis
  1035. served (printed as 7/22/2022)
    Decision
    51348Entire Board · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE BOARD WILL HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING IN THIS PROCEEDING ON SEPTEMBER 28, 29, AND 30, 2022.
  1036. (printed as 7/21/2022)
    Motion
    305033Motion/Petition/Request
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1037. (printed as 7/21/2022)
    Misc.
    305031Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1038. (printed as 7/20/2022)
    Motion
    305022Motion To Strike
    Canadian Pacific Railway
  1039. (printed as 7/19/2022)
    Misc.
    305019Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1040. (printed as 7/19/2022)
    Statement
    305011Verified Statement
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1041. (printed as 7/19/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32097Ann Louise Geiger
    Hello, I thought I would contact you with a little new information. There was a train/farmer crash in western Iowa a couple of days ago. Fire and death. Not CP, but an example of someone trying to get their crop to market and the result. In addition, I do not know if you knew that the CP train that derailed a month or so ago near Lansing dumped five carloads of coal into the river. I was at a meeting with a local, and he verified the railroad did its best to cover it up and deny access. We were originally told one car. Big difference. Also, did someone send you the op-ed from Chief Sikowis Nobiss is Plains Cree/Saltueax and the executive director of Great Plains Action Society. She is a member of George Gordon First Nation, in Saskatchewan, and has been living in Iowa for 17 years? I would attach the letter, but I don't know how. Not a computer genius. Anyway, very damning of CP based on activities in Canada. Also, would LOVE to have you come visit. Enjoying Iowa summer heat is something everyone should experience, and the corn is coming into season. I can assure you there is nothing better than Iowa corn - shipped all over the world to those who know. Thanks, Ann
    Princeton, IA
  1042. (printed as 7/18/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32094State Representative, House District 100
    PDF attached submitted to the project email address on 7/15
    Chuck Isenhart · Dubuque, IA
  1043. (printed as 7/18/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32093Appleton Fire Department
    Jeremy J Hansen · Appleton, WI
  1044. (printed as 7/16/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32091Michelle Javornik
    I am writing to voice my opposition to the proposed CP rail expansion. As a Davenport, Iowa resident, I live approximately 5 miles from the railroad tracks and can hear the trains’ loud, lengthy whistles at any hours of the night. The effects of an additional 14 trains per day along the Mississippi River from Clinton, Iowa to Muscatine, Iowa will be immediate and profound. Traffic backups will be exacerbated along the crossings, impeding everyone’s ability to get to their destinations in a timely manner, safety will be compromised as most of the crossings are not guarded, and the noise from the whistles can be heard day and night even many miles from the tracks. All these effects combined will contribute to a lower quality of life for the many residents living in this area. Please require the railroads involved with this merger to re-route this portion of their merged railroad lines off the Mississippi River. An editorial written by CP management in the QC Times this past spring told Quad City residents who will be affected by this merger to “take one for the team.” In the article, CP extolled the energy savings benefits of this merger for the country (and CP-Santa Fe Railroad) but did not feel compelled to mitigate the negative effects that will be experienced daily by those of us who live here. In fact, CP’s strategy appears to be to negotiate separate deals with each community, thereby weakening a unified opposition to this project. If the railroad is not willing, at their expense, to construct overpasses and implement stringent noise controls at all major crossings along this route, they shouldn’t be allowed to move this project forward. Sincerely, Michelle Javornik
    Davenport, IA
  1045. served (printed as 7/13/2022)
    Decision
    51347Director Of Proceedings
    GRANTED A JOINT MOTION TO ALLOW CERTAIN KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN PERSONNEL TO ACCESS CERTAIN HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENTS PRODUCED BY BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY IN DISCOVERY.
  1046. (printed as 7/13/2022)
    Rebuttal
    304973Rebuttal
    Kansas City Southern, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1047. (printed as 7/12/2022)
    Reply
    304974Reply
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  1048. (printed as 7/12/2022)
    Reply
    304972Reply
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1049. (printed as 7/12/2022)
    Comments
    304971Comment · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak")
  1050. (printed as 7/12/2022)
    Reply
    304970Reply
    BNSF Railway Company
  1051. (printed as 7/12/2022)
    Motion
    304969Motion/Petition/Request
    Kansas City Southern (“KCS”) and BNSF Railway Company (“BNSF”)
  1052. (printed as 7/12/2022)
    Reply
    304968Reply
    Canadian National Railway Company, Grand Trunk Corporation, and CN’s Rail Operating Subsidiaries
  1053. (printed as 7/12/2022)
    Reply
    304967Reply
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1054. (printed as 7/12/2022)
    Reply
    304964Reply
    Coalition to Stop CPKC
  1055. (printed as 7/12/2022)
    Reply
    304963Reply
    Olin Corporation
  1056. (printed as 7/12/2022)
    Reply
    304961Reply · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1) · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    Coalition to Stop CPKC
  1057. (printed as 7/12/2022)
    Reply
    304959Reply
    J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
  1058. (printed as 7/12/2022)
    Reply
    304958Reply · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Commission for the Port of New Orleans , New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Commission for the Port of New Orleans
  1059. (printed as 7/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32098Candidate for House District 70
    I am very concerned that the increase train traffic that would be caused by the merger of the Canadian Pacific and Santa Fe railroads. The constant noise will be harmful to the many residents and businesses along the Mississippi river. Many of the small towns have been working for years to increase tourism and beautify their river fronts. My son lives about 1 block from the tracks and when a train goes by now all conversation must stop because of the noise. An additional concern is the safety hazard the trains would cause when they cut off the emergency responders from the homes, businesses and boat ramps along the river. The delay of the first responders for a boating accident, fire or health emergency could result in loss of multiple lives. There is not enough room to allow an overpass or underpass to get around a train that unfortunately stops blocking all access to the river side of the tracks. A train derailment in this area would be deadly.
    Kay Pence · Eldridge, IA
  1060. (printed as 7/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32089Burns and McDonnell · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Signed Disclosure Statement.
    Steve Thornhill · Kansas City, MO
  1061. (printed as 7/11/2022)
    Comments
    304957Comment · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, International Association of Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Workers Mechanical Division, National Conference of Firemen and Oilers 32BJ/SEIU
  1062. (printed as 7/11/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32106Stoddard Bergen Fire Department
    Joseph Pfaff · Stoddard, WI
  1063. (printed as 7/11/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3702Executed MOU · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    CN and Burns and McDonnell
  1064. (printed as 7/10/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32096Vernon willits
    The plan to send an additional 14 trainloads of oil cars down the tracks from Clinton to Muscatine is absurd and harmful. No doubt there will be train derailments, there will be environmental disaster from this. And as a homeowner 2blocks from the tracks I will see my noise levels go up still higher, creating more stress, my house will shake even more than it does now and my property value will diminish. I am wholeheartedly against this.
    Camanche, IA
  1065. (printed as 7/8/2022)
    Errata
    304950Errata/Correction
    The Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1066. (printed as 7/8/2022)
    Letter
    304949Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  1067. (printed as 7/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32654U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Missouri Ecological Services Field Office · Columbia, MO
  1068. (printed as 7/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32099Grace Calhoun
    As a lifelong Missourian, I am urging the Surface Transportation Board to review the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern railroad merger more seriously. Communities across Missouri along the route have no benefits from a merger that would have many downsides, such as increased rail traffic and train length going through our towns every day. There are many issues with this merger that need to be addressed such as safety and how Missourians will benefit from these trains that disrupt their everyday life. Due to a recent train derailment in Missouri, I would like to see CP focus on how they can ensure Missourians that they will make advances in train safety and make this merger be beneficial for Missourians.
    Columbia, MO
  1069. (printed as 7/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32113Canadian Pacific
    Venable LLP · Washington, DC
  1070. (printed as 7/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32086Sidley Austin LLP · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  1071. (printed as 7/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32085Sidley Austin LLP · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  1072. (printed as 7/6/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32079N/A
    The proposed merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern railroads is extremely concerning to me. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Americans have dealt with, and continue to deal with supply chain issues. This merger threatens our nation’s economic output while everyday Americans feel the economic burden of the current recession. For this reason, I believe that the merger should be struck down.
    Brady Chuhel · Maplewood, MN
  1073. (printed as 7/6/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32078Jack Still
    As a Stillwater, Minnesota resident, I am extremely concerned with the proposed merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern railroads. The possible derailment of a train could threaten the natural beauty of Stillwater which holds acres of shoreline on the St. Croix River. The railroad seemingly presents no benefits to me or my community and will only threaten Minnesota’s landscape, increase traffic and wait times at railroad crossings.
    Stillwater, MN
  1074. (printed as 7/6/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32077Catherine McCarthy
    I’m worried about an oil spill if this merger is approved. Derailments happen all the time, after all. Just last month a coal train fell off the track, dumping its cargo into the Mississippi River. If an entire train of crude oil were to do the same, it could permanently harm the Mississippi. I hope the STB realizes that.
    Woodbury, MN
  1075. (printed as 7/6/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32075Samuel Sonntag
    The cost to communities outweighs the larger economic benefits here. Moving crude oil from Canada to Mexico might benefit those on either side of the line, but without any jobs or financial guarantees from CP or KCS, I fail to see how Minnesotans can feel good about this project. Not enough people know about it either. These companies need to do more community outreach!
    St. Joseph, MN
  1076. (printed as 7/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32080Tyler Nack
    As a Princeton resident, I do not support the merger and subsequently increased rail traffic. Alternatively a pipeline is far less disruptive and less risk.
    Princeton, IA
  1077. served (printed as 7/1/2022)
    Decision
    51298Entire Board · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT RESPONSIVE APPLICATIONS ARE ACCEPTED FOR CONSIDERATION AND ARE CONSOLIDATED FOR DISPOSITION WITH THE PRIMARY APPLICATION.
  1078. (printed as 7/1/2022)
    Misc.
    304911Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1079. (printed as 6/30/2022)
    Misc.
    304890Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1080. (printed as 6/30/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3701Sidley Austin LLP · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield
  1081. served (printed as 6/29/2022)
    Decision
    51317Director Of Proceedings · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    DENIED KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN (KCS) MOTION TO REDESIGNATE AND DIRECTED KCS AND BNSF TO MEET AND CONFER ON THE DISCOVERY ISSUES RAISED IN KCS’S MOTION.
  1082. (printed as 6/29/2022)
    Supplement
    304880Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1083. (printed as 6/29/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32082Milwaukee Fire Department
    Aaron Lipske · Milwaukee, WI
  1084. (printed as 6/29/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32081ann geiger
    Touching base with you again. Still opposed to this merger because of the danger to the river and the homes and traffic. In the past 6 weeks there was a farmer killed over in Durant (Iowa Inter-Urban) crossing the tracks in his semi. We had the coal spill into the river up near Lansing. And, as is all over the news right now, the Amtrack derailment. With the exception of the Lansing derailment, which the railroad did its best to cover up, the issues have been with crossing tracks. with the high population rate, cities, and tourists and boaters visiting the Mississippi River, the chances of more accidents increases exponentially. Thank you again for your time, and please remember the invitation to come visit is open, and I would be glad to show you around and/or put you in contact with local politicians. Ann
    princeton, IA
  1085. (printed as 6/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32083Katie Borth
    This merger will add exponentially more train traffic would be coming through LeClaire. Of those, none will be passenger rail. This would only be to move goods more throughout North America & expand travel with Canada & Mexico; meaning much of this would be passthrough traffic of goods leaving the US. As the rail unions have left all of their employees without a contract for 2 years. This will put more stress on workers as well that have been overlooked in their value as employees to this industry. I would need to see more offered to our residents and the train workers to consider this a win for the City of LeClaire.
    LeClaire, IA
  1086. (printed as 6/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32084Brianna Smith
    Concerned with the upcoming merge, train derailments, and excessive horns in the middle of the night
    Princeton, IA
  1087. (printed as 6/23/2022)
    Statement
    304832Protest/Opposition Statement · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1088. (printed as 6/23/2022)
    Misc.
    304831Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1089. (printed as 6/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32074Harris County, Texas
    Commissioner Rodney Ellis · Houston, TX
  1090. (printed as 6/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32073Princeton City Council
    As a city council member for Princeton, Iowa, my responsibility is to lead my city in the right direction. The proposed CP-KCS merger will impair my city as the new traffic could decrease property values by around 18% and lead to adverse health conditions from the constant vibrations and rumblings. On top of that, Iowa ranks as the third-worst state for railroad safety; this will only worsen if the merger happens. If these companies do not address the dangers they are creating, they will forsake our community's well-being. The STB’s goal is to see the impact of this merger, so it should require these railroads to hold public, in-person forums to hear from our community.
    Gina Wolfe · Princeton, IA
  1091. (printed as 6/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32072Daniel Allison
    Dear Sirs, I'm writing to you concerning the proposed Canadian Pacific and Santa Fe rail merger. I live next to CP’s rail line in Princeton, Iowa. When I moved here, I knew living here would take some “gettting used to”. But that’s okay. I’ve become accustomed to the rail traffic and have learned it’s the price you pay for the privilege to live next to the Mississippi River. I have no problem with the rail line the way it is now. That being said, I have to say this merger could bring catastrophic environmental, economic, and cultural ramifications. Running crude along this river will always be a roll of the dice. I've witnessed derailments in the past and fully expect to see them again. I don’t need to tell you what dumping oil in this river will do ecologically. It’s not a matter of “if” but “when” it happens. Touting a past safety record will offer little comfort when that time comes. Adding the additionally proposed traffic will cut people off from their own communities. People identify with these river towns. It’s their culture and in many cases, their very livelihood. A road runs along here that's designated a “scenic highway” and called the “Great River Road”. Let me suggest: What great river? All you're going to see are miles and miles of rail cars. I’m not against CP’s merger efforts. There has to be alternative routes that mitigate environmental and economic impacts, and also won’t sandwich communities against the river, isolating them from emergency services. I’m sure there are bean counters that will tell you. “Well, there’s still going to be public access a given percentage of the day”. Well guess what. They don’t live here. We know what it’s like now and have a pretty good idea of what to expect by the numbers we’ve been given. It just doesn’t work. The Mississippi River is a national treasure that belongs to everyone. It can’t always be about dollar signs for some big corporation. Dan Allison
    Princeton, IA
  1092. (printed as 6/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32071Steve Meyer
    As a resident and parent in Kirkwood, Missouri, I live right between two very busy rail tracks. After reading about the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern proposed merger, I stand firm in opposition. With the railroad merger, there will be more and longer trains each and every day along the route in the western and northern parts of Missouri and I don’t think any parent along the route should have to worry about their kids' safety while they’re walking to school. Due to this merger having more trains, there will be worries by all parents. I worry about my son having to cross two busy railroad tracks, so I can only imagine the fears that other parents in the community will face if this proposed acquisition by Canadian Pacific is approved by the STB.
    Kirkwood, MO
  1093. (printed as 6/22/2022)
    Letter
    304817Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  1094. (printed as 6/22/2022)
    Comments
    304815Comment
    Commissioner Bentzel
  1095. (printed as 6/22/2022)
    Misc.
    304812Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1096. (printed as 6/22/2022)
    Statement
    304810Verified Statement
    Bartlett Grain Co., LP
  1097. (printed as 6/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32067Jane Roth
    These trains sit and cover crossings for hours. They block the quickest route for fire and medical. We often have to reroute our way to and from work.
    Camanche, IA
  1098. (printed as 6/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32066Jared Smith
    The noise, possible pollution, extreme danger to population and housing, as well as limiting use to the river and emergency services is a terrible idea. The public deserves safety, security, and to enjoy the beauties of the Mississippi. Running more trains down these tracks will disrupt and endanger so many people on the iowa side. These trains can be rerouted to less populated areas as well as not running on the largest river in America.
    Bettendorf, IA
  1099. (printed as 6/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32065Amy Jarrard
    I’m a Minneapolis resident, and I worry that the merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern will hurt my community. The merger is said to remove hundreds of jobs from Minnesota, increase traffic, and even pollute the Mississippi River. We cannot allow this merger to happen for the sake of Minnesotans’ wellbeing.
    Minneapolis, MN
  1100. (printed as 6/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32064Kate Daly
    As a teacher in the Twin Cities, I am strongly against the railroad merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern. This rail merger is another example of large corporations sacrificing the greater good in effort to gain a profit. I ask that the Service Transportation Board does not allow the merger to pass and protects my community.
    Rosemount, MN
  1101. (printed as 6/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32063Chandra Dowda
    I live 1 block from the railway. The current level of trains and the horn noise is very loud and frequently wakes members of my family. Increased train noise would decrease my home value due to the noise pollution. There are already instances of trains stopping and blocking traffic to the river front since they are longer than our town. When you are down by the river you are trapped for hours sometimes. It is terrifying to think that in an emergency EMS, police or fire could not get to us. The only restaurants in town are also by the river. We also have a local beach that is only accessible by the river. Of which emergency responses would be unable to get through. The homes in Princeton are very close to the tracks, mere feet. Increased traffic would increase the risk of derailments. And that would cause significant loss of life without warning to occupants. A derailment that caused a spill of oil or potentially hazardous materials would end up directly in the Mississippi River and could cause catastrophic consequences far further reaching downstream being carried by the river. I urge you to not to allow this merger to move forward and not risk the health and safety of our wonderful river town and the amazing ecosystem on the upper Mississippi River.
    Princeton, IA
  1102. (printed as 6/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32062Princeton City Council
    The elected officials and residents of the City of Princeton, IA are greatly concerned over the potential Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern merger. Our riverfront community will be negatively impacted by the increased rail traffic, traveling speed of trains, and hazardous crude oil. There are serious safety and hazardous concerns regarding the limited access to private homes and business on River Drive with an increase in rail traffic. There are a high number of pedestrian and cyclists in town that will be limited to riverfront access. The Surface Transportation Board must consider how 1) first responders will be impacted when responding to calls along River Drive as well as the Princeton Beach and marina, 2) economical impact to business along Hwy 67 and River Drive, and 3) ecological disaster hazard of crude oil runoff into the Mississippi River.
    Christina McDonough · Princeton, IA
  1103. (printed as 6/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32061Kate Daly
    As a teacher in the Twin Cities, I am strongly against the railroad merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern. This rail merger is another example of large corporations sacrificing the greater good in effort to gain a profit. I ask that the Service Transportation Board does not allow the merger to pass and protects my community.
    Rosemount, MN
  1104. (printed as 6/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32060Jamie Elizabeth Lorch
    As a student at the University of Minnesota, I strongly oppose the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern railroad merger. Not only would the construction cause extensive harm to wildlife in the Mississippi River, but the rail would also cut through historically underserved neighborhoods, further marginalizing at-risk communities.
    Eagan, MN
  1105. (printed as 6/21/2022)
    Motion
    304808Motion To Compel · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  1106. (printed as 6/21/2022)
    Reply
    304806Reply
    BNSF Railway Company
  1107. (printed as 6/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32070Sidley and Austin LLP · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield on behalf of ICCR · Washington, DC
  1108. (printed as 6/20/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32059Town of Shelby Fire Department
    Tony Holinka · La Crosse, WI
  1109. (printed as 6/16/2022)
    Misc.
    304782Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1110. (printed as 6/15/2022)
    Motion
    304771Motion/Petition/Request
    Kansas City Southern and its U.S. rail carrier subsidiaries The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Gateway Eastern Railway Company, and The Texas Mexican Railway
  1111. (printed as 6/15/2022)
    Misc.
    304762Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1112. (printed as 6/15/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32056Kaitlin Shultes
    I’m a student in graduate school in the Quad Cities, and there have been several instances in which I’ve been stuck behind the train on my way to class. Given the amount of current train traffic, I can’t see how this exponential increase is sustainable. Such a drastic increase in rail traffic will make it harder for emergency services to operate, and I worry that many of Iowa’s historic districts on the Mississippi will be rendered useless. While I’m sure Canadian Pacific will enjoy the profits from this merger, it will only hurt communities in Eastern Iowa and surrounding states. I encourage the STB to deny this proposal, considering that there is slim to no benefit of the project for anyone other than Canadian Pacific.
    Davenport, IA
  1113. (printed as 6/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32057City of Wauwatosa Fire Department
    James Case · Wawautosa, WI
  1114. (printed as 6/13/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3814USFWS Oklahoma Ecological Services Field Office
    Susan Minnick
  1115. (printed as 6/9/2022)
    Supplement
    304747Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1) · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    Canadian National Railway Company and Illinois Central Railroad Company
  1116. (printed as 6/9/2022)
    Supplement
    304746Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1117. (printed as 6/9/2022)
    Supplement
    304745Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1118. (printed as 6/9/2022)
    Supplement
    304744Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  1119. (printed as 6/9/2022)
    Comments
    304743Comment
    Canadian National Railway Company, Grand Trunk Corporation, and CN’s Rail Operating Subsidiaries
  1120. (printed as 6/9/2022)
    Supplement
    304742Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    BNSF Railway Company
  1121. (printed as 6/9/2022)
    Errata
    304741Errata/Correction
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1122. (printed as 6/9/2022)
    Supplement
    304740Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    The Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1123. (printed as 6/9/2022)
    Supplement
    304739Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  1124. (printed as 6/9/2022)
    Supplement
    304735Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    National Association of Wheat Growers
  1125. (printed as 6/9/2022)
    Supplement
    304732Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Village of Itasca and Coalition to Stop CPKC
  1126. (printed as 6/9/2022)
    Request
    304731Request For Extension Of Time
    Federal Maritime Commission
  1127. (printed as 6/9/2022)
    Comments
    304727Comment
    The Chlorine Institute
  1128. (printed as 6/9/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32048Sidley Austin LLP · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    Canadian National Railway · WASHINGTON, DC
  1129. (printed as 6/7/2022)
    Letter
    304713Letter
    Honorable Katie Porter
  1130. (printed as 6/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32058Town of Campbell Fire Department
    Nate Melby · La Crosse, WI
  1131. (printed as 6/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32050U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Arkansas Ecological Service Field Office · Conway, AR
  1132. (printed as 6/6/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32044Brandon LeClair
    I was really disappointed to hear that there will be an increase in trains going through my area, but especially upset that I heard through word of mouth. Why are there not in person meetings scheduled for residents that will be impacted to hear about how the merger will impact Milwaukee, and voice concerns? Myself and neighbors have discussed how the noise is disrupting enough as is. With more trains, it will be noisier, more dangerous, traffic will be impacted, and our quality of life will be negatively affected. Milwaukee deserves to have meetings and get attention regarding how this merger will affect us!
    Milwaukee, WI
  1133. (printed as 6/6/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3812USFWS Missouri Ecological Services Field Office
    Karen Herrington
  1134. (printed as 6/6/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3811USFWS Illinois-Iowa Ecological Services Field Office
    Aleshia Kenney
  1135. (printed as 6/6/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3694U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Arkansas Ecological Services Field Office
  1136. (printed as 6/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32041Ann Geiger
    This is the latest. Happened Wed. June 1. At least you can get the coal out of the river for the most part. The coal cars are normally filled to the top and you can see, so how much one car holds.....The DNR is on it. LANSING, Iowa (Iowa's News Now) — A Canadian Pacific train derailed in northeast Iowa on Wednesday, spilling coal into the Mississippi River. The train derailed around 6:40 in the morning according to the Iowa Department of Natural resources. Ten coal cars derailed, but only one tipped coal into the river. An unknown amount of coal spilled about 4 miles south of Lansing, just south of the Lansing power plant.
    princeton, IA
  1137. (printed as 6/2/2022)
    Substitution
    304684Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    U.S. Department of Transportation
  1138. (printed as 6/2/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32043Logan Ferrie
    The noise and inconvenience that will come from more trains in Milwaukee and surrounding areas is unacceptable. What is even worse is that most residents are not informed of the potential increase in trains, as we have not been given the proper avenues to learn about the mergers impacts and/or voice our concerns. This will impact all in the community. We do not want more loud, dangerous, carbon-emitting trains going through our backyards.
    Milwaukee, WI
  1139. (printed as 6/2/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32042Sarah Spaude
    As a resident of Milwaukee, I do not want to see an increase in trains throughout the city and county. This will not only impact commutes, it will bring more noise, emissions, and risk of accidents. I have heard of trains blocking emergency response vehicles as well, which brings another serious and scary drawback. Residents that will be impacted deserve to voice their concerns with in-person hearings and meetings. This is not in the best interest of Milwaukee residents!
    Milwaukee, WI
  1140. (printed as 6/2/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32040Ivan Barnett
    I oppose the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern proposed railroad merger. This merger is vastly opposed along the rail tracks, and across the state of Missouri. There are risks involved with this merger that I want to point out, such as children’s safety. With this merger, there will be more trains going through our towns than ever before, with longer length and that brings a risk to safety. Canadian Pacific has done nothing to address the concerns of Missourians in order to keep our kids safe. So, why would we be expected to support a merger that has no benefits to us, and only makes us have more inconveniences than we already do. Until Canadian Pacific addresses the concerns that we have, there is no reason that the Surface Transportation Board allows for this merger to pass.
    Columbia, MO
  1141. (printed as 6/2/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32039Louisa County Emergency Management
    Please see the attached comment document.
    Brian Hall · Wapello, IA
  1142. (printed as 6/1/2022)
    Reply
    304674Reply
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  1143. (printed as 6/1/2022)
    Notice
    304670Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1144. (printed as 6/1/2022)
    Notice
    304669Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1145. (printed as 6/1/2022)
    Notice
    304668Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1146. (printed as 6/1/2022)
    Substitution
    304667Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1147. (printed as 6/1/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32112Canadian Pacific
    Venable LLP · Washington, DC
  1148. served (printed as 5/27/2022)
    Decision
    51252Director Of Proceedings · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    ISSUED A REVISED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
  1149. (printed as 5/26/2022)
    Misc.
    304641Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1150. (printed as 5/25/2022)
    Settlement
    304632Settlement/Agreement/Amendment
    Bayer CropScience LP, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Bayer CropScience LP
  1151. (printed as 5/25/2022)
    Reply
    304628Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1152. (printed as 5/24/2022)
    Reply
    304622Reply · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    Village of Itasca and Coalition to Stop CPKC
  1153. (printed as 5/23/2022)
    Reply
    304592Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1154. (printed as 5/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32037Go Fish Marina Bar and Grill
    As the owner of a home and small business located just a half-block from the railroad tracks, this merger will directly impact my business and property values. My business sits on the banks of the Mississippi River; half-block west is the railroad track and Highway 67. There is literally nowhere for people to pull over and wait to cross the tracks to get to my business. They will just drive past me and go elsewhere.
    Krista Kay · Princeton, IA
  1155. (printed as 5/20/2022)
    Errata
    304591Errata/Correction
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1156. (printed as 5/20/2022)
    Request
    304576Request For Extension Of Time · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    Canadian National Railway Company
  1157. (printed as 5/19/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32038Tyler Kingsley
    My family lives near the tracks in Davenport and I can't begin to describe how annoying this merger would be. We recently bought a house and I'm definitely worried about its resale value if three times the normal train traffic is blowing past it each day. All of the "mitigation" measures are terribly expensive for our town as well, so I really don't think this is in our best interest.
    Davenport, IA
  1158. (printed as 5/19/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32027Ann Louise Geiger
    I have written before. I live between the railroad tracks and the river, and my house is over 100 years old, and I have live here about 45 years. The trains have made their whistles louder, and for some reason they are noisier on the tracks. It used to be a few years ago with the windows closed the noise was muffled. Now it is as though the windows are open. The volume of noise is increasing, and sometimes they are so heavy they make my house shake, and I am about a football field away. This is not healthy for anyone. This is basically a residential area along H-67, and medical science has shown noise is a factor for poor health. The number of trains now is enough, and to add 14 more - all day and all night - is not healthy for our daily lives and trying to get sleep. Some of the engineers at night like to blow the whistle the entire length of the town, and that wakes us all up. 14 more opportunities hauling a potential accident waiting to happen, keeping us awake at night and shaking our houses is not good, especially since the crude oil is not coming from the U.S. or going to the U.S. There are plenty of stretches of farmland away from the river with less human population where those cars can run.
    Princeton, IA
  1159. (printed as 5/18/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32029Ruthie Harrington
    Who or what is this merger helping? It’s certainly not homeowners living near the tracks, given property values will plummet. It’s not the environment, as I heard most of this new traffic will be crude oil from Canada. It’s not our local economy, given these trains will blow right by on their way to Texas. And it’s certainly not families, as our part of the state has seen our fair share of recent derailments and train accidents. The STB needs to have CP and KCS address these concerns instead of hastily approving their merger.
    Davenport, IA
  1160. (printed as 5/18/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32028Jaelynn Klein
    As a lifelong resident of Muscatine, this merger is concerning to say the least. Given the amount of trains already going through town, I can’t imagine how the city would function if traffic tripled. Moreover, I’m unhappy with the fact that CP will transport more crude oil along the Mississippi River. The river is one of the most endangered in the country, and we don’t need to increase the risk of water pollution. If this merger is only about profits for CP, why should it be approved?
    Muscatine, IA
  1161. (printed as 5/13/2022)
    Supplement
    304552Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1162. (printed as 5/12/2022)
    Motion
    304540Motion To Compel
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
  1163. (printed as 5/11/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32019Township of Palatine
    Andy-John G. Kalkounos · Palatine, IL
  1164. (printed as 5/10/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32020Ann Geiger
    The route along the Mississippi River of the Santa Fe/Canadian Pacific railway to run 14+ trains per day of crude oil from Canada to Mexico is a disaster looking to happen. First, if there is a derailment - and there eventually will be - many of the rails run less than 100 fee from the river. Once the oil hits the river, it will not pool like a lake or the ocean, it will head downstream and pollute anything in its path. This is one of the most important waterways in the world, and it runs along the Great River Road which was just designated an All American Road. Second, this is a HUGE tourism area, and boaters, bikers, and general tourists go from adjoining highways all day long, especially during the summer. Additionally, many towns have their business districts between the railroad and the river, and - is the case here in Princeton - the railroad wants to reduce our crossings from 3 to 2 and one of the two cannot support tractor/trailers or large delivery trucks because they high-center, thanks to a previous rail owner. Our property values will decrease, because from adjusting from a few trains a day to 14+ more, which are transporting crude oil not produced in the U.S. and not heading to the U.S. will ruin what is now a place where people from all over the world tour the Great River Road and enjoy one of the most important waterways in the world. PLEASE, do not approve this rail route.
    Princeton, IA
  1165. (printed as 5/9/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32023Linda J. Kamp
    Le Claire, IA
  1166. (printed as 5/9/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32022Fahad Channa
    I must add here that the freight line has already started on Rodenburg Rd at around 3:40 PM during work days and starting to cause long queues along Rodenburg Rd in Roselle. This is disrupting daily life of the community and causing idling which leads to Carbon Emissions. Concerned Homeowner Fahad Channa
    Roselle, IL
  1167. (printed as 5/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32025Kathey Lindahl
    Increased railroad traffic presents an unnecessary risk for our communities. As a caregiver in serving the Minneapolis area, this merger will add to traffic congestion and may threaten my ability to promptly care for those I serve. Not only is traffic safety a concern, but a large portion of the new cargo heading through our neighborhoods will be crude oil and other flammable materials. Unnecessary congestion and increased risks of devastating accidents is not good for our community.
    Bloomington, MN
  1168. (printed as 5/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32024Amy DeMarino
    Wilmette, IL
  1169. (printed as 5/5/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32026self
    This merger is bad for the environment and even worse for Minnesota’s natural beauty. These trains will be hauling more oil than ever through our state. I can hear trains running past my cabin where I spend my summers. I can’t imagine how devastating an oil spill there would be. So many of Minnesota’s small communities rely on the tourism our lakes bring. One derailment, one oil spill could completely ruin an entire town. This merger cannot be allowed.
    Mary Behrends · St. Peter, MN
  1170. (printed as 5/5/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32021Brian Fremo
    Right now, Minnesota needs all the jobs it can get. There’s talk of a possible upcoming recession and anything cutting local employment is bad for our city and state. As a condition of this merger, Canadian Pacific will move their headquarters to Kansas City taking with them more than 200 well-paying jobs. Canadian Pacific headquarters have been in Minneapolis for the last 120 years, that’s a lot of history moving out of a downtown that is still plagued with empty office buildings and boarded up storefronts.
    St Peter, MN
  1171. (printed as 5/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32076Canadian Pacific
    Revised Voluntary Mitigation Measures
    Venable LLP · Washington, DC
  1172. (printed as 5/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32018Peggy Dimock
    Please vote NO on the CP-KCS merger as it will significantly increase the number of trains running through Minnesota, causing real harm to communities. Each state along the line will see 20 more trains every month. In some rural communities, residents can expect to see 14.4 additional trains every day. High railroad activity often disrupts traffic, including first responders. On average, freight trains are longer than ever, posing challenges for emergency responders and other traffic. The average length of a CP train in 2021 was over 1.5 miles, a figure that could increase significantly after the merger. Railroads are an all-too-common obstacle for emergency workers. Elevated rail traffic has detrimental health effects. Consistent exposure to train vibrations and noise can create recurrent physical reactions, which over time can lead to adverse health conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases. Vibration caused by heavy rail traffic negatively impacts sleep patterns. Railroads drive down nearby property values. A residential property’s consistent exposure to 65 decibels or greater of railroad noise pollution reduces property values between 14% and 18%. Freight trains emit, on average, 85 decibels of sound. Increased railroad traffic is more likely to result in accidents and spills of potentially hazardous materials. Most of the new train cars on the rail will carry Canadian tar sands crude oil. A significant amount of new railroad traffic would contain ammonia, ethanol, and other explosive materials. In Minnesota in 2020, a CP train carrying crude oil derailed, spilling 20,000 to 30,000 gallons into the environment. CP trains have a recent history of dangerous derailments. In Quebec in 2013, a CP oil train exploded, killing 47 people. In Saskatchewan in 2020, a CP train crashed, spilling 400,000 gallons of oil. Also, in Saskatchewan in 2020, a CP train derailed and spilled oil.
    North Mankato, MN
  1173. (printed as 5/2/2022)
    Misc.
    304484Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1174. (printed as 5/2/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32017Josh Madlinger
    As a resident of Missouri, I have significant concerns about the proposed Canadian Pacific merger with Kansas City Southern. This merger between two multi-billion dollar corporations is set to be the first single line railroad from the Gulf of Mexico, all the way to Canada, carrying oil. This is a problem and has many concerning factors. Train wait times are annoying anywhere you go, and with this railroad merger, there will be an average of 14.4 more trains per day along the route, with an additional length of nearly 5,000 feet, opposed to the current train length. Going from 8,000 to 12,850, is an excessive length difference which will lead to residents of Missouri to become more annoyed and upset with this merger. Once CP and KCS address these concerns, we can talk. But until then, I stand in opposition to this proposed railroad merger.
    Springfield, MO
  1175. (printed as 5/2/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32016Carson Anderson
    The proposed railroad merger between Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern is set to bring the first single line rail track from the Gulf of Mexico to Canada. This is only good for members of the two companies, and not good for people along the route, especially in the state of Missouri. These trains are set to become longer than the safety warnings issued by Missouri, and Canadian Pacific has yet to address these concerns. With the lack of safety due to the length of the trains getting longer, I also question why Canadian Pacific has yet to address the recent train derailments that have occurred within their company, and they still expect to make these trains longer in length.
    Columbia, MO
  1176. (printed as 4/28/2022)
    Comments
    304467Comment
    I-20 Corridor Council
  1177. (printed as 4/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32015Amy DeMarino
    Wilmette, IL
  1178. (printed as 4/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32009Tim Carroll
    Chicago, IL
  1179. (printed as 4/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32008Jack Duffy
    Chicago, IL
  1180. (printed as 4/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32007Nick Riccardi
    Arlington Heights, IL
  1181. (printed as 4/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32006Kevin Aldwaik
    I understand the importance of rail to transport goods and build local economies. Minnesota was built on the railroads. These transportation lanes have allowed our communities to thrive. Rail traffic is an unavoidable fact of life in a lot of Minnesota. Both people and businesses understand the need behind the loud noises and time spent waiting for a train to pass. But this merger doesn’t serve a clear purpose outside of giving CP more control of its commerce. The merged line will increase the frequency trains pass by local communities, and some trains could reach up to 2.25 miles in length. This will create more delays for people, more frustration on the roads, and a bigger pain in the neck for all of us. For the sake of my community and the rest of Minnesota, I hope the STB requires CP to address community concerns before moving forward.
    Minneapolis, MN
  1182. served (printed as 4/27/2022)
    Decision
    51200Entire Board · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    FOUND THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS SHALL BE CONDUCTED USING THE BASELINE TRAFFIC DENSITY DATA TO BE RESUBMITTED BY APPLICANTS; DIRECTED APPLICANTS TO FILE AN AMENDED EXHIBIT 13 TO THE APPLICATION AND TO RESUBMIT THE UNDERLYING WORKPAPERS; AND PERMITED OTHER PARTIES TO FILE AMENDED COMMENTS AND RESPONSIVE APPLICATIONS. THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE WILL RESUME, AS MODIFIED, UPON FILING OF AMENDED COMMENTS AND RESPONSIVE APPLICATIONS.
  1183. (printed as 4/27/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32010NWSOFA-Indivisible
    This kind of merger is, in my opinion, anti-competitive. Rather than continuing on the present course of ever larger corporations and mergers I believe the US and the world businesses should be more competitive and worker oriented. This merger, although seeming to make transportation more efficient, actually blurs the environmental and societal impacts with negative results. Please consider these effects in coming to a conclusion on granting this action favorably.
    Mark T. Lundholm · Palatine, IL
  1184. (printed as 4/25/2022)
    Letter
    304411Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  1185. (printed as 4/24/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32002Illinois Beaver Alliance
    As an environmental organization in Illinois, the Illinois Beaver Alliance is opposed to the CP and KCS merger, and we are also opposed to a CN and KCS merger. Northeastern Illinois is a heavily populated area. The scope of disaster that would ensue in the event of a derailment of crude oil or other flammable/explosive/poisonous cargo is unspeakable. Plus the other risks such as coal particles blowing off open top cars, noise pollution, ground shaking risks to infrastructure are a concern. Finally as residents of the area, we object to decreasing our property values and increasing traffic headaches. Thank you.
    Rachel Siegel · Glenview, IL
  1186. (printed as 4/24/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32001Together for Nature
    As an environmental organization in Lake County, IL, we are opposed to the CP and KCS merger, and we are also opposed to a CN and KCS merger. This is a heavily populated area. The scope of disaster that would ensue in the event of a derailment of crude oil or other flammable/explosive/poisonous cargo is unspeakable. Plus the other risks such as coal particles blowing off open top cars, noise pollution, ground shaking risks to infrastructure are a concern. Finally as residents of the area, we object to decreasing our property values and increasing traffic headaches. Thank you.
    Gloria Charland · Ingleside, IL
  1187. (printed as 4/24/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32000La Coalition Rail Safety Campaign, Woods & Wetlands Group - Sierra Club IL Chapter
    Please do not increase freight capacity for trains carrying hazardous substances through Lake and north Cook counties. Residents complain their homes already vibrate to the point they're repeatedly woken from a sound night's sleep when tankers pass. Vibrations can loosen pipelines at connections, causing gas leaks. Residents along rail corridors who depend on well water fear a derailment of hazardous substances or leak from a ruptured pipeline will compromise their only source of drinking water. Some communities have no fire hydrants. The most important thing needed to combat such an incident is water access. Foam doesn't work because the resulting fire is too hot; foam dissipates unless tankers are first cooled with water. Residents living where access to water is unavailable for firefighters must wait until it is transported to the scene, provided they survive the potential atomic bomb-sized explosion. Residents along rail corridors where cargo can include any of nearly 400 hazardous substances assume all of the risks and receive absolutely no benefit. Aggravating the possibility of another catastrophic incident such as that experienced by citizens of Lac-Mégantic in Quebec, Canada, which killed 47 unsuspecting residents and decimated the core of their city center - not rebuilt to date - is inconsistent with our campaign outcome to protect students and staff at schools and other public facilities located near rail corridors where hazardous substances are transported or stored. We strongly opposes both a KCS merger with CP as well as one with CN based on the dangers associated with transporting toxic and explosive substances on turn of the century railroads by an industry that continues to thumb its nose at safety standards and tolerable working conditions. We consider industry practices extraordinarily dangerous and negligent. We do not support increased capacity, nor do we support the exploration of alternative routes that will compromise other communities.
    Gerri Songer · Hawthorn Woods, IL
  1188. (printed as 4/22/2022)
    Letter
    304369Letter
    U.S. Department Of Agriculture
  1189. (printed as 4/22/2022)
    Letter
    304359Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  1190. (printed as 4/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32003Jacob Wolken
    As a Missouri resident, there are many pros to living in this state. Access to many parks, restaurants, businesses among many other things. With the Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern proposed merger, there will be a lack of accessibility to these wonderful things, due to the effective length in trains that is being proposed by CP. The current average length of train in the CP and KCS fleet is around 8,000 feet, and with the proposed merger, it will grow to an excess of 12,850 feet, which is over 1.5x the current length. With the pandemic being at a resting point, people across Missouri are thrilled to experience many parts of the Missouri economy again, but due to lack of patience, Missourians won’t want to wait longer for a passing train, especially when there will be an average of 14.4 more trains per day.
    California, MO
  1191. (printed as 4/21/2022)
    Comments
    304353Comment
    Village of Bannockburn, The City of Lake Forest, Village of Deerfield, Village of Northbrook, The Village of Green Oaks
  1192. (printed as 4/21/2022)
    Reply
    304352Reply
    Village of Glenview, Illinois
  1193. (printed as 4/19/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31997Illinois State Association of Counties
    Joe McCoy · Springfield, IL
  1194. (printed as 4/18/2022)
    Environmental
    304321Environmental Materials · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Canadian National Railway Company
  1195. (printed as 4/18/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32005Canadian National Railway · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Sidley Austin LLP · Washington, DC
  1196. (printed as 4/18/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32004Canadian National Railway · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Sidley Austin LLP · Washington, DC
  1197. (printed as 4/17/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31998Isabella Wobbe
    The proposed railroad merger between Kansas City Southern and Canadian Pacific is of concern to me. This railroad merger will bring many more trains through the railroad lines of Missouri each and every day, and these trains will be much longer. With the amount of trains being more frequent and longer, I’m worried about children's safety and how this will impact Missourians' lives. Children all across the state, and across these routes walk to school, and don’t have the ability to get a ride to school in some instances. Without the safety aspect of being in a car driven by children’s parents, having to walk across railroad tracks is very worrisome due to the excessive amounts of trains, resulting in a lack of responsibility by Canadian Pacific and Kansas City Southern.
    Springfield, MO
  1198. (printed as 4/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31999Gabe Kingsley
    This merger doesn’t have the Quad Cities in mind. It will triple the number of trains we see, slow down local traffic, and worst of all, put people in harm’s way. Some of the railroad in question immediately borders event venues and houses, likely many with children. That is an accident waiting to happen, if you ask me.
    Davenport, IA
  1199. (printed as 4/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31996Aubrey Thomas
    What is the point of shipping more crude oil around? Wasn’t that the reason that we cancelled several pipelines up north? Now, rather than weaving through rural, mostly unpopulated areas, the crude oil will move right past busy town centers and commercial districts. This will almost certainly end up poorly. Also, what if there’s a derailment near the river? I hope all parties involved are forced to consider the worst case scenario, not just hope for the best.
    Davenport, IA
  1200. served (printed as 4/13/2022)
    Decision
    51205Administrative Law Judge
    GRANTED A MOTION TO COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS REQUESTED IN DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., SUBJECT TO A PROTECTIVE ORDER.
  1201. (printed as 4/11/2022)
    Reply
    304263Reply
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  1202. (printed as 4/8/2022)
    Substitution
    304259Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    The Chlorine Institute
  1203. (printed as 4/8/2022)
    Misc.
    304257Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1204. (printed as 4/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31992Peder Ouren
    Today, Minnesota is in danger of more oil trains running down our tracks. Canadian Pacific is working to merge with Kansas City Southern to haul oil from the Canadian tar sands down to refineries in Texas. The average Canadian Pacific oil train already stretches over a mile long. Add much more length, these trains become a higher risk of any accident being a disaster. This merger will give Canadian Pacific full power as they transport oil down to Texas refineries. Canadian Pacific won’t have any checks upon them as they do this, no other companies they need to work with to encourage them to keep trains below regulation level lengths. This leaves us in danger of oil-filled train cars just waiting to derail. I oppose this merger.
    Eagan, MN
  1205. (printed as 4/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31993Chase Kilby
    I am writing in opposition to the Canadian Pacific-Kansas City Southern railroad merger. This merger is detrimental to the safety of Missourians, and I am deeply against it. With the proposed merger, there will be an average of 14.4 more trains going through towns every day, with an additional length of 5,000 feet per train. With these trains, civilians of Missouri, mostly children, will face significant safety risks. There are students that walk to school and will have to walk across these train lines, and that’s never been safe. With more trains along these lines, this will bring possible safety issues to the children of Missouri and that deeply concerns me.
    Springfield, MO
  1206. (printed as 4/4/2022)
    Letter
    304239Letter
    Honorable Steve Cohen
  1207. (printed as 4/4/2022)
    Substitution
    304223Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    The Chlorine Institute
  1208. (printed as 4/4/2022)
    Reply
    304220Reply
    Village of Itasca, Ill., and Coalition to Stop CPKC
  1209. (printed as 4/1/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31981Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Tom Wilcox · Washington, DC
  1210. (printed as 3/31/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31979Canadian Pacific
    Voluntary Mitigation Measures
    Venable LLP · Washington, DC
  1211. (printed as 3/30/2022)
    Motion
    304199Motion To Compel
    Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1212. (printed as 3/30/2022)
    Motion
    304192Motion To Compel
    Kansas City Southern and its U.S. rail carrier subsidiaries The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Gateway Eastern Railway Company, and The Texas Mexican Railway, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1213. (printed as 3/30/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31970Choctaw Nation
    Lindsey Bilyeu · Durant, OK
  1214. (printed as 3/29/2022)
    Reply
    304190Reply
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1215. (printed as 3/29/2022)
    Reply
    304189Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1216. (printed as 3/28/2022)
    Reply
    304184Reply
    Canadian National Railway Company, Grand Trunk Corporation, and CN’s Rail Operating Subsidiaries
  1217. (printed as 3/28/2022)
    Reply
    304181Reply
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1218. (printed as 3/23/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31893Ellet Taylor
    I write in opposition to the Canadian Pacific-Kansas City Southern merger. If approved, Canadian Pacific would be able to transport Canadian tar oil through Minnesota to Texas. This oil creates more carbon emissions when burned than any other type. This is incredibly damaging to our environment and will speed up climate change. This merger should not be approved.
    Saint Peter, MN
  1219. (printed as 3/22/2022)
    Motion
    304160Motion/Petition/Request
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  1220. (printed as 3/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31980Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Tom Wilcox · Washington, DC
  1221. (printed as 3/21/2022)
    Reply
    304153Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas City Southern
  1222. (printed as 3/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31881Coy Clark
    The Minneapolis Star Tribune reported that this merger could cause an increase of 15 to 20 more trains containing crude oil from Canada. I thought the Biden Administration was trying to shift away from our reliance on fossil fuels. This merger will do the opposite and make it easier to transport crude oil from Canada to refineries in Texas, thus furthering our reliance on fossil fuels.
    Burnsville, MN
  1223. (printed as 3/21/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31880EJ Fleischmann
    The proposed railroads merger between Kansas City Southern and Canadian Pacific creates a $31 billion-dollar amount of concern for me. This deal hinders Missourians from doing their daily tasks and activities, while resulting in safety concerns across the state. Missourians are will see more trains going through their towns every day, and these trains are longer than the previous trains. The safety of Missouri citizens should be the focus of everyone studying this merger and with 14.4 more trains going through towns each day across the state and an increased length from 8,285 feet to upwards of 13,000, Missourians have another impact on their qualify of life. While kids’ safety is a parent's concern, kids' concerns are focused on school and their daily activities. Children don’t have the patience to wait 30 minutes for a train while walking across train tracks and will attempt to beat the train resulting in their safety being compromised. Despite the acquisition of Kansas City Southern by Canadian Pacific, they have done little to mitigate the concerns of citizens through this merger. This multi-billion-dollar merger is not serving the people of Missouri, but rather inconveniencing them and putting our safety in jeopardy.
    Arnold, MO
  1224. (printed as 3/18/2022)
    Settlement
    304136Settlement/Agreement/Amendment
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Iowa Interstate Railroad, The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
  1225. (printed as 3/18/2022)
    Errata
    304132Errata/Correction
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1226. served (printed as 3/16/2022)
    Decision
    51159Entire Board · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    DIRECTED APPLICANTS TO ADDRESS AN APPARENT INCONSISTENCY IN CERTAIN DATA SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD, PROVIDED AN OPPORTUNITY FOR OTHER PARTIES TO REPLY TO APPLICANTS’ SUBMISSION, AND SUSPEND THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE. DECISION ALSO EXPLAINED THE SERVICE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SUB-DOCKETED PROCEEDINGS.
  1227. (printed as 3/15/2022)
    Comments
    304109Comment
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1228. (printed as 3/15/2022)
    Misc.
    304102Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1229. (printed as 3/14/2022)
    Letter
    304133Letter
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1230. (printed as 3/10/2022)
    Errata
    304088Errata/Correction · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1) · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    Canadian National Railway Company and Illinois Central Railroad Company
  1231. (printed as 3/8/2022)
    Environmental
    304074Environmental Materials · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1232. (printed as 3/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31877OK SHPO
    Lynda Ozan · Oklahoma City, OK
  1233. (printed as 3/7/2022)
    Report
    304069Status Report
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1234. (printed as 3/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31895Lucas Anton
    I live near these train tracks in Davenport. To say that I’m upset about the potential approval of this merger is a vast understatement. I can’t tell you how many bad experiences I’ve had with trains passing through town. The idea of facing triple the number of trains daily is nauseating – both in terms of traffic disruptions and noise. These companies don’t act in good faith right now, so why would they if this merger is approved?
    Davenport, IA
  1235. (printed as 3/7/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31894Greg Taylor
    This project will result in a single-line rail network linking Canada and Mexico for the sake of corporate profit, not need or necessity. The CP-KCS will push trains far longer than what is considered safe through Minnesota rail lines. Trains will be as long as 2.25 miles, a public safety danger at all moments. At the minimum, steps need to be taken to ensure these trains don’t run longer than what safety demands. Without real consistent oversight on the trains CP will be running through Minnesota, the company will recklessly skirt safety standards to better their own bottom line.
    Saint Peter, MN
  1236. (printed as 3/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31874Cherokee Nation
    Elizabeth Toombs · Tahlequah, OK
  1237. (printed as 3/3/2022)
    Comments
    304055Comment
    National Association of Wheat Growers
  1238. (printed as 3/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31896Chris Phillips
    As a Minnesotan, I’ve always been taught to value our state’s beautiful landscape and unique wildlife. Now, deals made in corporate boardrooms threaten my values. This merger will send crude oil from Canada to Mexico, slicing right through our state. What if there’s a spill? It could irreparably damage ecosystems that make our state beautiful.
    Mendota Heights, MN
  1239. (printed as 3/2/2022)
    Comments
    304047Comment
    Transit Equity Team, Delta Chapter of the Sierra Club
  1240. (printed as 3/2/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31978Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Tom Wilcox · Washington, DC
  1241. (printed as 3/2/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31897Eric Bert
    I live not too far away from train tracks in Bettendorf, and the reason I know that is because I can hear trains traveling through them all the time. The prospect of tripling the train traffic through the Quad Cities is annoying at best and destructive at worst. Not only will it slow traffic to a standstill, but will almost certainly hurt our quality of life overall. This proposed merger would provide benefit to almost no one in our community.
    Bettendorf, IA
  1242. (printed as 3/1/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31873Jane Vogel
    Did you know that excessive and nearby train traffic can reduce property values over time? Is there any plan to compensate those being financially harmed due to this merger? I haven’t heard nearly enough from these giant, faceless companies to warrant my support of this deal. I hope the STB votes it down.
    Mendota Heights, MN
  1243. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304046Comment
    BNSF Railway Company
  1244. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304045Comment
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1245. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Application
    304041Responsive Or Inconsistent Application · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1) · also entered in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 2), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 3), FD 36500 (Sub-No. 4)
    Canadian National Railway Company and Illinois Central Railroad Company
  1246. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304040Comment
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  1247. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304039Comment
    Canadian National Railway Company, Grand Trunk Corporation, and CN’s Rail Operating Subsidiaries
  1248. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Application
    304037Responsive Or Inconsistent Application · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 5)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1249. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304035Comment
    Lyondell Chemical Company; Equistar Chemicals, LP; LyondellBasell Acetyls, LLC; and LyondellBasell Advanced Polymers Inc.
  1250. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304033Comment
    Hennepin County, MN and the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
  1251. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Substitution
    304032Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1252. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304031Comment
    National Corn Growers Association
  1253. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304028Comment
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  1254. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304027Comment
    Occidental Chemical Corporation and Oxy Vinyls, LP
  1255. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Request
    304026Request For Merger Condition(s)
    Industrial Minerals Association - North America
  1256. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304025Comment
    Evergy Metro, Inc.
  1257. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304024Comment
    U.S. Wheat Associates
  1258. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304023Comment
    Bayer CropScience LP
  1259. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304022Comment
    U.S. Department Of Agriculture
  1260. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304020Comment
    The Chlorine Institute
  1261. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304019Comment
    International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO
  1262. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304018Comment
    Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, International Association of Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Workers Mechanical Division, National Conference of Firemen and Oilers 32BJ/SEIU
  1263. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304017Comment
    Texas International Terminals Ltd.
  1264. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304014Comment
    International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division and American Train Dispatchers Association
  1265. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304013Comment
    The American Chemistry Council
  1266. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Request
    304012Request For Merger Condition(s)
    Private Railcar Food and Beverage Association, Inc., Private Railcar Food and Beverage Association
  1267. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Request
    304011Request For Merger Condition(s)
    North Dakota Wheat Commission
  1268. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304010Comment
    Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
  1269. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304009Comment
    Village of Itasca, Ill. and Coalition to Stop CPKC
  1270. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304008Comment
    IAM District Lodge 19
  1271. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comments
    304007Comment
    National Grain and Feed Association
  1272. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Letter
    304005Letter
    U.S. Department of Transportation
  1273. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31872Rebecca T. Fremo
    I oppose the Canadian Pacific–Kansas City Southern rail merger. Minnesota has gorgeous natural resources, and our state parks are unmatched. Frankly, it's about more than the "gorgeous" factor here: it's about how those natural resources support delicate ecosystems, species of plants and animals that exist nowhere else in the state, and in few other places in the country. Oil spills that will result from any derailments after this merger will cause incalculable damage to Minnesota’s pristine landscape. This merger would encourage Canadian Pacific to run more trains through Minnesota, increasing the chances of derailments like we saw in Detroit Lakes just last week. That derailment happened only a few miles from where I spent the entire month of January, 2022 while serving as an Artist in Residence at the New York Mills Cultural Center. I shudder to think waht might have happened to that community, its inhabitants, and the lakes and farms nearby. This merger should not move forward.
    Saint Peter, MN
  1274. (printed as 2/28/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31871Ian Klein
    I have significant concerns about the Canadian Pacific - Kansas City Southern rail merger. If approved, this merger will results in an increased number of longer, oil-filled trains running through Minnesota all the way down the Gulf of Mexico. This is a problem on multiple levels. Train delays are a common annoyance as it currently stands. Increasing the opportunities for train delays will encourage reckless driving. How many people will risk beating the train when the see it coming instead of waiting behind the tracks for lengthy minutes? Canadian Pacific trains average out to be over a mile and a half long! These inconveniences will quickly add up to lost time, lost productivity, and lost opportunities. This merger will nearly double the amount of rail traffic we could see each month. How much more time would that cost first responders in the case of a fire or health emergency? The recent infrastructure bill passed by Congress includes funding for a study that will provide answers to these questions. In the meantime, this merger remains what it is -- a genuine danger for public safety.
    Bloomington, MN
  1275. served (printed as 2/25/2022)
    Decision
    51141Director Of Proceedings
    ORDERED THAT THE COMMUTER RAIL DIVISION OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, D/B/A METRA'S COMMENTS ON A PROPOSED TRANSACTION WILL BE DUE BY MARCH 15, 2022.
  1276. (printed as 2/24/2022)
    Reply
    303992Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1277. (printed as 2/23/2022)
    Reply
    303991Reply
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1278. (printed as 2/23/2022)
    Motion
    303989Motion To Withdraw
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1279. (printed as 2/23/2022)
    Reply
    303988Reply
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  1280. (printed as 2/23/2022)
    Reply
    303987Reply
    Canadian National Railway Company
  1281. (printed as 2/23/2022)
    Reply
    303986Reply
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  1282. (printed as 2/23/2022)
    Reply
    303985Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1283. served (printed as 2/22/2022)
    Decision
    51139Director Of Proceedings
    ORDERED THAT REPLIES TO COMMUTER RAIL DIVISION OF THE REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, D/B/A METRA'S EXTENSION REQUEST ARE DUE NO LATER THAN FEBRUARY 23, 2022.
  1284. (printed as 2/22/2022)
    Motion
    303976Motion To Compel
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1285. (printed as 2/22/2022)
    Supplement
    303961Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1286. (printed as 2/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32123Sidley Austin · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  1287. (printed as 2/22/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31868Maria Determan
    Although traffic won’t increase as dramatically in Mason City as it will in eastern Iowa, I’m worried that what happens there may soon find its way to our doorsteps, given the same companies operate in my hometown. In the Quad Cities, folks are scared about increased traffic and how that will hurt public safety. What’s to stop these companies from doing the same thing in my hometown? We need some clarity on this right away.
    Ames, IA
  1288. served (printed as 2/18/2022)
    Decision
    51129Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE FINAL SCOPE OF STUDY FOR AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT IS AVAILABLE.
  1289. served (printed as 2/18/2022)
    Decision
    51105Entire Board
    FOUND THAT, BASED ON THE CURRENT RECORD, THE BOARD CANNOT DETERMINE IF RESPONSIVE APPLICATIONS THAT MAY BE FILED BY BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY AND CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY WOULD BE "MINOR" TRANSACTIONS. THE BOARD ALSO CLARIFIED AND WAIVED CERTAIN FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESPONSIVE APPLICATIONS.
  1290. (printed as 2/18/2022)
    Request
    303960Request For Extension Of Time
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1291. (printed as 2/17/2022)
    Errata
    303952Errata/Correction
    The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
  1292. (printed as 2/17/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31869Katie K
    My family lives near the tracks that this merger will impact and I cannot fathom how troublesome this could be for my neighborhood. Not too far away, backyards filled with young children border the tracks, which creates several safety concerns in my mind. Also, I read in the paper that frequent train traffic can reduce property values over time, due to the excessive noise and vibrations. There’s no benefit to this merger for the folks along the line, just for huge companies with nothing to lose.
    Iowa City, IA
  1293. (printed as 2/15/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32122Sidley Austin · in FD 36500 (Sub-No. 1)
    Peter Whitfield · Washington, DC
  1294. (printed as 2/15/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31866Canadian National Railway
    Sidley Austin LLP · WASHINGTON, DC
  1295. (printed as 2/14/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31861Jay Van Luven
    Proposed railroad merger is bad for Missouri In 2021, railroad companies Kansas City Southern and Canadian Pacific agreed to a whopping $31 billion merger. This merger would create a single-line railroad from the Gulf of Mexico to Canada. Resulting from this merger, Missouri companies will be at a competitive disadvantage and that will result in higher costs, more trains on the routes, and longer trains to boot! If this proposed merger is approved, Missouri companies and their ability to bring products to market will be slowed down. The proposed merger will have areas seeing 14.4 trains a day that are twice as long. The Biden administration needs to urgently take a look at this merger, as the safety and quality of life in Missouri will be greatly affected by it. There are safety concerns across the state, and with the already worsening economy, Joe Biden shouldn’t want more businesses affected by this merger. The Surface Transportation Board and Congress, which have been charged with studying the merger, must take action and consider the economy for the average citizen, not just the trains getting longer and more frequent. A multi-billion-dollar merger doesn’t help the people of Missouri, rather hurts our economy, and affects our citizens.
    Chesterfield, MO
  1296. (printed as 2/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31862Greg Wenker
    I am concerned about this merger. I hear persuasive messaging related to economic benefits and improved efficiency, but I am not convinced it will have a positive net effect on citizens and business owners in Minneapolis. In fact, I am reasonably confident the only true beneficiaries of this deal are the investors who stand to profit from the $31 billion merger. The merger has been touted as an economic windfall for regions along the route, supposedly bringing new customers and markets to our doorsteps. But this isn’t sufficient to put up with the resulting congestion and nuisance. Rather than spurring economic growth, the line will bring way more rail traffic, noise pollution, traffic congestion, and potential for accidents than we have right now. Once Minneapolis residents become fully mired in the “new normal,” they will flee to quieter parts of the state and tourists will look elsewhere. The merger will not help our communities. Rather, it will hurt us.
    Edina, MN
  1297. (printed as 2/10/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31863Linda M Ragsdale
    I read in the Missouri Times that this merger is going to be a good thing for our state. And it may seem that way to the casual observer, but it’s hardly a positive move. Tripling train traffic throughout the state will force hundreds of thousands of residents into dealing with train-induced congestion, traffic delays, or worse. We’ve all seen what can happen when people live near these tracks – is this really the right move? Profits from this merger should not come at the expense of quality of life in Missouri. I’d like to see mitigation plans before this merger is approved.
    O Fallon, MO
  1298. (printed as 2/8/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31864Dave Myers
    I am a longtime resident of Missouri and understand the impact the rail industry has on my community. I have experienced the traffic delays that go hand-in-hand with this region serving as a “choke point” for rail traffic. I have tolerated the trains blaring their horns while enjoying outdoor concerts or parks. As someone who grew up here, these things are part of the fabric of everyday life. However, plans to triple the number of daily trains by merging lines have me very worried. We have our limits, and triple the noise, vibration, and congestion is too much to ask us. This will have a decidedly negative impact on the economy and plans for future growth. In the interest of residents like myself, I implore the STB to look at the economic and social ramifications of this merger before deciding on approval.
    Springfield, MO
  1299. (printed as 2/7/2022)
    Reply
    303740Reply
    Kansas City Southern and its U.S. rail carrier subsidiaries The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Gateway Eastern Railway Company, and The Texas Mexican Railway
  1300. (printed as 2/7/2022)
    Misc.
    303698Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1301. (printed as 2/7/2022)
    Statement
    303693Support Statement
    City of Lockport
  1302. (printed as 2/7/2022)
    Statement
    303692Support Statement
    Village of Manteno
  1303. (printed as 2/4/2022)
    Reply
    303669Reply
    Canadian National Railway Company
  1304. (printed as 2/4/2022)
    Misc.
    303662Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1305. (printed as 2/3/2022)
    Supplement
    303648Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1306. (printed as 2/2/2022)
    Settlement
    303645Settlement/Agreement/Amendment
    National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak")
  1307. (printed as 2/2/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31977Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Tom Wilcox · Washington, DC
  1308. (printed as 2/1/2022)
    Misc.
    303634Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1309. (printed as 2/1/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31855Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate
    Dianne Derosiers · Agency Village, SD
  1310. (printed as 1/31/2022)
    Reply
    303630Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
  1311. (printed as 1/31/2022)
    Misc.
    303626Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1312. (printed as 1/28/2022)
    Reply
    303623Reply
    Candian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas City Southern
  1313. (printed as 1/28/2022)
    Supplement
    303620Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1314. (printed as 1/27/2022)
    Motion
    303617Motion To Compel
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  1315. (printed as 1/27/2022)
    Misc.
    303602Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1316. served (printed as 1/26/2022)
    Decision
    51099Entire Board
    DENIED CSX TRANSPORTATION INC.’S REQUEST TO WAIVE THE DEADLINE FOR DESCRIPTIONS OF ANTICIPATED RESPONSIVE APPLICATIONS.
  1317. (printed as 1/25/2022)
    Motion
    303584Motion/Petition/Request
    Iowa Interstate Railroad, LLC
  1318. (printed as 1/21/2022)
    Misc.
    303564Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1319. (printed as 1/20/2022)
    Motion
    303563Motion To Compel
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  1320. (printed as 1/20/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31854Miami Tribe of Oklahoma
    Diane Hunter · Miami, OK
  1321. (printed as 1/20/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31852Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community
    Leonard Wabasha · Prior Lake, MN
  1322. (printed as 1/14/2022)
    Notice
    303528Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Bartlett, a Savage Company
  1323. (printed as 1/14/2022)
    Misc.
    303524Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1324. (printed as 1/13/2022)
    Notice
    303518Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Hennepin County, MN and the Hennepin County Regional Railroad Authority
  1325. (printed as 1/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32114Canadian Pacific
    Calgary, Calgary
  1326. (printed as 1/13/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31974Canadian Pacific
    Calgary, Alberta
  1327. (printed as 1/13/2022)
    Comment
    EO-3686Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Tom Wilcox
  1328. (printed as 1/12/2022)
    Notice
    303516Notice
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1329. (printed as 1/12/2022)
    Motion
    303515Petition For Waiver
    BNSF Railway Company
  1330. (printed as 1/12/2022)
    Notice
    303514Notice
    BNSF Railway Company
  1331. (printed as 1/12/2022)
    Reply
    303513Reply
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  1332. (printed as 1/12/2022)
    Notice
    303512Notice
    Canadian National Railway Company
  1333. (printed as 1/12/2022)
    Motion
    303511Petition For Waiver
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  1334. (printed as 1/12/2022)
    Misc.
    303508Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1335. (printed as 1/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31976Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Tom Wilcox · Washington, DC
  1336. (printed as 1/12/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31835Comanche Nation
    Theodore E. Villicana · Lawton, OK
  1337. (printed as 1/11/2022)
    Misc.
    303504Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1338. (printed as 1/10/2022)
    Notice
    303500Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Iowa Interstate Railroad, LLC
  1339. (printed as 1/10/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31836Village of Bartlett, Illinois
    Kevin Wallace · Bartlett, IL
  1340. (printed as 1/6/2022)
    Notice
    303490Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Port of Corpus Christi
  1341. (printed as 1/4/2022)
    Supplement
    303482Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1342. (printed as 1/4/2022)
    Comment
    EI-32893Metra
    Christian Alexander · Washington, DC
  1343. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Motion
    303471Motion To Compel
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1344. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31831Nancy Ferenzi
    Canadian Pacific's acquisition of Kansas City Southern would have very negative effects for our small community. Not only environmentally but the safety of the residents would be greatly impacted due to our first responders being delayed responding to emergencies when these freight trains are passing through. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1345. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31830Karen Machynia
    The increase in freight traffic will wreak havoc with our Police, Fire and Ambulance service. There are no alternate routes to reach the north side of town. Perhaps the CP/KCS would fund a bridge or tunnel to accommodate the residents on the north side that would be in need of emergency vehicles that are stopped by trains. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1346. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31829Joanna Grabowski
    My family can’t even imagine how much this will negatively impact our lives as we live right by the railroad. Everyone in the community will be effected children, adults and elderly as Itasca is a small city and railroad is located in the residential area. Please STOP this project! (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1347. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31828Lana Wasylenko
    No more freight trains in Wood Dale, IL! More trains lead to more traffic congestion, more traffic speeding through side streets to avoid trains, pollution, noise.... What about emergency vehicles not being able to cross tracks ... the list goes on. NO MORE FREIGHT TRAINS! (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1348. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31827Mark Savignani
    Hell no, I live 200 yards from the track as it is. I say hell no. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1349. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31826Hollie Hollesen
    I would request that a significant increase in freight traffic through the Village of Itasca be reconsidered and not implemented. So many freight trains disecting the Village of Itasca would cause severe harm due to cutting off the north half of the Village from fire, paramedic and police services for extended periods multiple times each and every day. It would also cut off the South side of the Village from getting to the nearest hospital in Elk Grove Village. Additionally, it would separate residents from the Village Hall, Post Office, and overall basic errands. I think additional freight trains cutting off the main through fares of Itasca would be detrimental and harmful to each and every resident, but even more for the infirmed who may need ambulance services. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1350. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31825Carol Christophe
    It is of great concern for myself and the residents of our small village that I write to you to express my concern for the proposal to increase freight traffic in our community by 300%. I feel it would have a very negative impact on our community and it is my hope that knowing how negatively the citizens of Itasca feel about it that you will reconsider and find another option (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1351. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31824Ronald starczewski
    I strongly oppose any additional train traffic coming thru our small town. We already face long delays several times a day causing traffic to back up. I must cross 2 crossings daily going to and from work and it is very annoying waiting for these never ending trains to clear the crossing. Stop, Stop, Stop (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1352. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31823Mark Joel Orbon
    I'm from Franklin Park and we're known for our many trains. Back when I was a student and for many students across the tracks from the high school and middle schools, getting to school on time was always a struggle, not because we were running late (I would actually be thirty minutes early), but because of the long slow-moving trains with no consistent schedule. While there was an overpass that allowed a twenty minute detour, only a minority of the commuters would actually take this trip because as previously mentioned, it was always inconsistent, so I believe they had the mindset that there's a chance the train could be over in five minutes, saving them time from the detour. It is not uncommon for students, even top students, to show up an hour late and miss an entire class. This is with a "convenient" detour option in my hometown. And not only this. For the students walking, especially in the cold, it became habit to just jump over between the train cars that have slowed down enough or stopped. Fortunately, police enforcement has discouraged this act, but that does not solve the issue of the walkers' need to get to school. In regard to the Itasca community, this merger could negatively influence their smaller economy to a recession especially with its impact on home values, homeowner wealth, and overall consumer confidence. (Received via project website)
    Franklin Park, IL
  1353. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31822Crystal Zgela
    To whom it may concern: I live north of the tracks and the fire station is on the south side of the tracks. My child has a congenital heart defect, I need to know that this project will not negatively impact our access to emergency services if needed. I am also very concerned about how this project will impact my activities of daily life. I live on the north side of the tracks and my son attends school on the south side of the tracks. I can barely make his school drop off and make it to my shift at a local children's hospital on time as it is. I worried this will negatively impact my daily commute. We are actively involved with the park district, library, nature center, post office and pool which are all on the other side of the tracks. I worry how this project will negatively impact our activities of daily life. Please provide us answers with the questions that we have. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1354. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31821Katie Schweizer
    This project will cut off our access to schools and our church. This could potentially block all three of our train crossings at one time, cutting off half the town from emergency services. Please reconsider. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1355. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31820Brian Hudec
    The freight trains already keep the traffic backed up on green st. If you increase it i will never be able to get out of my driveway. Also the train tracks are in my back yard. My children will never be able to go outside and play. On top of the added noise from these extra trains. We live in a no train horn zone. Whats the point of keeping the noise down and then letting all of the extra trains go through our town. They will be loader than any train horn. Also think of how it will effect emergency response times and school busses. Please think of the residents along the train tracks. (Received via project website)
    Bensenville, IL
  1356. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31819Louis Perillo
    I do not support this idea at all if train traffic will increase. My main concern is the ability for the fire department/paramedics to immediately be able to get to the people on the north side of town which is on the other side of the tracks. If the fire department/paramedics and all of the town lived on same side of the tracks then I wouldn't be as concerned. Since our town is laid out the way it is, I do not support the idea of more train traffic. Thanks for reading my comment. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1357. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31817Judy Damour
    I am against the acquisition and plan of multiple lengthy freight trains on the Itasca rail lines. Itasca is a one fire station town and one police station town and they are located on the south side of the train tracks. I am a senior citizen who lives on the north side and would have limited services from emt/ambulance/police and fire when needed. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1358. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31816Linda Zahn
    This project will not benefit the residents of Itasca. We are a small village and over half of its residents live on the north side of the railroad tracks. Our only fire department and ambulance are on the south of the tracks. This project would only cause problems and undue harm to the residents on the north side of the tracks. I fully oppose this project. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1359. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31815Jane Callas
    This would be a huge problem for the residents of Itasca and I am opposed to this (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1360. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31814Frank Fiore
    This could be a great loss to my business. I own a hair salon north of the tracks. This will impact my appointments times and customers coming and leaving my salon. I sometimes now have problems serving my customers. This is a bad acquisition (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1361. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31813Bessie Alexopoulos
    Please reconsider this project, Itasca firefighters already have to wait to go across the train tracks when they have a call. The residents and businesses will burn down if the firefighters have to wait until a 2.7 mile train has to pass before they go on there call. The noise and environment sent of the trains will definitely cause new buyers to reconsider on moving to our beautiful small town. It is enough that we have the airplane noise pollution and the existing train noise pollution we don’t need additional noise pollution. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1362. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31812Frank McKenna
    This merger and the increased train traffic will impact our quality of life in Itasca and the safety of our children and other residents who cross the tracks to/from school and to visit friends on the other side of the tracks. The Burlington Northern tracks south of itasca has a better railroad grade. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1363. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31811Beth McKenna
    This merger and the increased train traffic will impact our quality of life in Itasca and the safety of our children and other residents who cross the tracks to/from school and to visit friends on the other side of the tracks. The Burlington Northern tracks south of itasca has a better railroad grade. Plus we have enough noise and air pollution from planes now. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1364. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31810Austin McKenna
    This merger and the increased train traffic will impact our quality of life in Itasca and the safety of our children and other residents who cross the tracks to/from school and to visit friends on the other side of the tracks. The Burlington Northern tracks south of itasca has a better railroad grade. Plus we have enough noise and air pollution from planes now Plus I do not like Canada. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1365. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31809Joanna Lada
    I am extremely concerned about this project. Itasca has train tracks running through the middle of the village, dividing it into the south and the north part. Itasca's only police and fire stations are located on the south side. I am really concerned about the project's impact on the emergency response times. Also, our 3 schools are located on both south and north sides. The school buses have to cross the train tracks constantly, delivering students to and from schools. I am concerned about safety of students and busses not being able to deliver students on time. Furthermore, many residents are relaying on Metra to transport them to work or school. Will this new project affect Metra's schedule? (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1366. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31808Wallace
    I oppose CP Raul traffic. It was impact traffic, air quality, noise. It will cause congestion (Received via project website)
    Teresa · Itasca, IL
  1367. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31807Rigoberto Cortes
    Any structures along the tracks will be constantly shaking and vibrating with this massive increase in rail traffic. I live on Center Street in Itasca behind the tracks and we've had objects fall off shelves with the current level of rail activity. The local fire department is across Irving Park Road and we moved into the community because of the location of EMS services. My son is a disabled, quadriplegic, ventilator dependent and medically fragile young adult. We've had past occurrences where we had to call EMS due to medical emergencies. Time is critical when these situations have occurred and the thought of even more and longer freight disruptions is a grave concern to our family the next time EMS is needed. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1368. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31806Brittany Bellgardt
    We are a small town and rely on access across Walnut and Prospect and Rohlwing Road for medical attention, schools, businesses and that would be blocked all day if additional freight trains are coming through our small town all day long. It would make our daily lives very difficult - we spend enough time waiting for commuter and freight trains to pass as it is. Bad idea! (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1369. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31805Debra Taylor
    Itasca is a small quiet family driven town. Having all the additional freight trains run through here will be horrible. It will be noisy cause delays getting to the main roads to go to work and will be very unsafe for our neighborhoods. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1370. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31804Laura Kelley
    The train when stuck on the tracks, will block traffic for minutes. We had one this past fall that got stuck near Rohlwing Rd. and Wooddale and the semi-trucks were backed up for miles and for hours. It was terrible. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1371. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31803Lilly Djuric
    I oppose the proposal. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1372. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31802Theresa Hubbard
    As a property owner whose land the railroad runs next too, and as a resident of Liberty who drives on Birmingham regularly, I am curious how the car traffic issues around the increased rail traffic will be addressed by the railroad. Birmingham Road by the tracks is a narrow road, and when the trains are going through if you are driving from the south to the north on Birmingham the sight distance is so short coming over the hill that there is nothing you can do once you get there and see the train. There is no place to turn around. You are stuck. So with more trains, more people will be stuck there with each passing train. Is it possible to build an overpass for car traffic? Again, I am curious how this continued traffic issue will be addressed with the increase in rail traffic. Thank you! (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1373. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31801Lu Semenzin
    Itasca is a small community with four RR crossings in a 1.5 mile stretch. Increasing freight train traffic through our small town would negatively impact everything from safety, noise levels, and convenience. We would be trapped by freight trains multiple times a day. This expansion is not a good idea for the residence of Itasca. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1374. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31800Dr. Rick Reed
    I am deeply concerned about the impact of increased rail activity along the Mississippi River and especially in the many communities that will be impacted. Concerns extend to and are not limited to increases in pollution, noise pollution, endangerment to wildlife, people, and ongoing long-term environmental vibration impacts to land and buildings. Concerns for decreases in quality of life, mental health, peace, and property values are also of great concern amongst the many negative impacts from increases in rail traffic. (Received via project website)
    LeClaire, IA
  1375. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31799Jamie Peterson
    Itasca already has a ton of traffic due to Irving Park Road and the Metra from Chicago. My biggest concern is EMS safely reaching North side and getting South side residents to the closest hospital over the tracks. This is not my only concern. I worry for the families with homes close to the track, their peace at night and the heightened traffic in Irving Park Road. The delays getting over the tracks has me extremely concerned about my work commute, getting my kids to school, etc. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1376. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31798Carol Huntowski
    This merger and the resulting greatly increased freight train traffic will cripple the small town of Itasca, with its public services on opposing sides of the tracks: fire, police and ambulance service on the south side and public works and related services on the north side. With only two train crossings in the entire town, the increased congestion and reduced availability of public safety entities will be a serious detriment to the health and well being of the people of Itasca. I am strongly opposed to this merger. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1377. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31797Lisa May
    The impact this project would have on our town could be devastating. Itasca is split in half by the railroad tracks. Both the fire and police station are on the South side of town. By increasing the number of freight trains, it would block fire, police, and EMS from being able to access the North side of town, which also is home to 2/3 of our public schools. I have witnessed an ambulance having to wait for a Metra train to pass by until it can cross over to reach the North side of town and I’ve thought about the lost valuable minutes that causes. A freight train can be even more damaging with the large increase of wait time, and the increase in the frequency. We do not have any other way to reach the North side of town without passing over the train tracks. Furthermore, this would backup traffic on Irving Park Road. In relation to schools- this would impact the bus system as well as getting to and from schools in a timely manner whether it be by car or children walking to/from school. This project would impact our small town greatly in a negative way. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1378. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31796Susan Phares
    We live in a small town (Le Claire, IA) that sees a lot of visitors because of all the wonderful shops and picturesque view of the Mississippi. My request is that the trains be required to SLOW down when going through small towns like ours for the safety of the people who live and visit there. (Received via project website)
    LeClaire, IA
  1379. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31795Patricia Palace
    It is imperative that this merger not be approved since this would greatly impact the safety of the community and our children. There are crossings in these areas where children use to access the Itasca library, the pool and on their way to school. We are a small community and cannot withstand this increase in train traffic for the safety of our children. They are our No 1 priority. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1380. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31794Erika Picardi
    I DO NOT AGREE with excessive Freight Trains commuting through my town of Itasca. It raises many SAFETY concerns as well as an abundance of traffic throughout the town. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1381. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31793J L
    This is not a good idea for Itasca. The mayor outlined several issues which I agree with. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1382. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31792O'Byrne Monica
    As a 28 year resident of Itasca I am opposed to an increase of freight traffic coming through our town. Not only because of increased noise but also the issues such as traffic congestion and for the safety of our residents. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1383. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31791Dolores Poltorak
    We are inundated with traffic from the expressway. Having trains 2 miles long would lead to extreme backup of vehicles and casualties from irate commuters. We are a small town wanting to protect our children and get to work on time as well as live without noise pollution. Itasca cannot afford this type of traffic. Safety of our people would be jeopardized. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1384. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31790Virginia Fiala
    Please, no more train traffic impacting the Peace and safety of our communities. With the heavy traffic flow through Itasca and surrounding towns, train traffic will impact our daily lives until we cannot drive to a store or engage in other activities without waiting for miles of trains to pass. I for one am against more trains traveling through this area. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1385. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31789Irene L Hoff
    I am a resident of Itasca for 66 years and are 92 years old. This expansion would delay me the access of Ameta Hospital if needed and increase the noise factor that Itasca enjoys. Please do not upset our Village pease any more than it is. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1386. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31788Paul Butler
    It is time to change the crossings to overhead tracking, The other option is to have the tracks tunneled under the road. These options will fix the problem. It is time to update tunneling technology to perform this modernization, (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1387. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31787Theresa Prendergast
    I am opposed to the increased train traffic through this residential area. The traffic along Lancaster would be adversely affected and I am concerned about travelers' safety as well as constant delays. Also, as a resident near the tracks, the noise and frequency of trains would negatively impact my quality of life as well as my home's value for resale. I am therefore, opposed to this proposed change. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1388. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31786Peter Rastrelli
    I support this merger. This will be great for our local economy. (Received via project website)
    Clinton, IA
  1389. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31785Patrick Prendergast
    As a resident near to the proposed increase in train traffic, I am writing today to express my opposition. The increased train traffic poses a safety issue as well as numerous traffic delays on Lancaster. The additional noise will also adversely affect my enjoyment of my residence as well as decrease the value of my home. For the reasons above, I am opposed to this change. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1390. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31784Jeff Craven
    My wife and I live on the North side of the tracks between Walnut and Catalpa and for work and almost everything else that we do, we have to get to Irving Park which is South of the tracks. Between the passenger trains and the current freight trains, we already get significantly delayed on a regular basis. An increase in the amount of train traffic, especially freight trains would not only pose a significant inconvenience, it could also pose a significant safety issue due to the fire station and ambulance being on the South side of the tracks but the nearest hospital that nearly all of us use is on the North side. Any increase in train traffic would be putting residents lives at risk. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1391. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31783Terri Applegate
    As time goes by and more trains run blowing their horns all the way through town it gets harder to sleep. Now there will be more? Then the railroad needs to put in more double crossing arms so we can have a no alarm section through town. We do not need more noise pollution! (Received via project website)
    Princeton, IA
  1392. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31782Andrew Bednarz
    I grew up on the S.E. side of Chicago, (Hegewisch) surrounded by railroad tracks and know what it is like to be stranded for a long time, waiting on trains. Got a appointment, better add 30 minutes to your time to get there, just in case! Do I have to drive around under the Roselle underpass and waste gas, spend more tax dollars on a north side fire/police department, and cripple a new downtown development who shops rely on Irving Park road traffic...doesn't make a whole lot of economic sense for Itasca or any community along the corridor. The railroad was ALWAYS for us, to ship our farmers milk to Chicago and to supply commuter service east and west. It was NEVER meant to hinder our community!!!! (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1393. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31781Michael Rice
    I think the trains now are getting longer and more frequent. Adding a possible 8 freight trains per day will become a serious congestion problem at certain times of the day. I have waited quite a few times at wood dale road and Irving UP TO 10 MINUTES (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1394. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31780Ellen Abbinanti
    This would be terrible for Itasca! The trains would go through our downtown tiny town with no way around for miles! NO (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1395. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31779Leanos
    This will create major delays for working people and students! Too many buses go through that and to think they will be sitting waiting for these trains is ridiculous not in wooddale please (Received via project website)
    Lidia · Wood Dale, IL
  1396. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31778Sarah Albrecht
    Hello. I live on Main Street in downtown Roselle and I am against this merger, primarily for the continuous noise disturbance the increased frieght traffic would create. If the merger is approved we must have QUIET ZONES in residential communities, including mine, at Canadian Pacific's expense. I am in agreement with the demands outlined by the Mayor of Roselle in an official comment submitted Dec 17, 2021. Thank you for your respect. Sarah J. Albrecht, Roselle, IL (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1397. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31777Nancy Elkin
    I grew up with railroads nearby that were like what is being proposed. It directly impacts the quality of life. Delays happen often during the day. People become impatient and try to beat the trains, losing sometime. Many cars sit idling, filling the air with fumes and contaminants. We use Roselle Rd all the time as north to south pathway. The intersection of Irving & Roselle will become a mess - and it is so close to the heart of Roselle. This is a terrible idea and we are completely against it. (Received via project website)
    Schaumburg, IL
  1398. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31776Joseph Spytek
    These long freight trains will limit access into & out of the north side of the village along Irving Park Road. Three intersections will be closed off while the trains pass. Normal travel, school busses, people going to work as well as emergency responders will not be able to move until the freight train passes. These intersections/tracks are located along Irving Park Road, which is a main artery through this village. This will also cause the turn lanes on Irvng Park Road into the north end of the village to get backed-up causing traffic jams in both directions. Traffic will most likely increase on the only other street to exit or enter the north side of Itasca (North Prospect Avenue & I390). Also, the intersection of Wood Dale & Irving Park roads, in Wood Dale, is already a traffic nightmare when a passenger train passes, causing back-ups daily. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1399. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31775Debra Schlomann
    This would be so harmful to our community and for some life threatening not being able to cross the tracks. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1400. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31774Marvin Maples
    We live right very close to the tracks in a rural area on the edge of Liberty Mo. The current train traffic is very disturbing to the animals and wildlife as well as our selves. The noise and train whistles all hours of the day and night is disturbing. Additional trains per day as planned will make the area unbearable for all but especially the wildlife as they cross the tracks regularly to get to the nature preserve to the East. We sincerely hope this is not allowed to happen. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1401. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31773Randy Drolen
    1) What will be the net increase of freight cars , loads and empties, both directions, (NOT number of trains) that a) go through Itasca now and b) will be going through Itasca when this plan is fully implemented? 2) How many of those cars (not trains) will be carrying hazardous material? 3) Will downtown Itasca remain "ding ding free" at the Walnut and Catalpa crossings, or will the warning "dingdings" be reinstated? (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1402. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31772Randy Drolen
    Will eastbound freight trains waiting for clearance into Bensenville yard be stopped across Itasca crossings? How often? For how long? Penalties for long dwell time? (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1403. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31771John Amabile
    Regarding the CP/KCS acquisition. We live on the north side of the tracks. Our concern is how this will impact the health and safety of us and others who live north of the tracks. What is the potential for delay of fire and police? Who would pay for another police and fire station north of the tracks? A delay in fire and police response could cause imminent danger to residents. What is the estimated time that a freight would take to cross one of the intersections? Please advise the Itasca residents of these impacts. Thank you Mr and Mrs Amabile (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1404. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31770Cheryl Finley
    Absolutely not! Itasca is too small to have more freight trains....it would be disruptive and inconvenient. Commuter trains are one thing...more freight trains would not be welcome. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1405. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31769Susan Ourth
    I am greatly opposed to this merger! The impact to the Itasca Community of an additional 8 trains through our village causes greater safety issues at the four crossings not too mention increases in sound and air pollution. We are already greatly impacted by O’Hare Airport with sound and air pollution. Please protect our community by denying the merger. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1406. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31768Christine Williams
    As a resident of Itasca that has her back yard facing the tracks I do not wish to have additional train traffic as the noise impact would be significantly disturbing. In additional this would cause a great impact on traffic seeing there are only 4 roads that lead out of my end of the town of which 2 would be impacted by the additional train traffic. (Received via project website)
    Williams, IL
  1407. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31767Leisa Storbeck
    I oppose this merger if it increases the freight train traffic through Itasca. Itasca is a small, quaint, friendly and quiet village. We have three schools in our town which are separated by the train tracks. Children regularly cross the tracks to get to school or to play sports. The increase in train traffic will cause safety concerns to parents and increase the traffic to cross town. In addition, the poor air quality is concerning as well. Please take these factors into consideration as this would significantly decrease the quality of living in Itasca which is currently a special community. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1408. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31766Dianna Barthel
    I am concerned that the new trains will not allow emergency vehicles to reach our house if trains are blocking all crossing to the north side of town. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1409. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31765Holly Silva
    I am writing this in hopes to not allow the increase of trains (reading the proposal sounds like 14+ more a day). The reason for my opposable view is that increasing by SO many trains, it’s one thing if just a few more a day but increasing by more than 14 plus what already occurs in a day, is completely absurd. The train track is right by all the current houses ( Lancaster road and H highway) and was fine because there were not that many trains each day, but trying to add that many is going to create so much more noise and traffic on our road that truly is unreasonable to ask citizens. I understand we need trains however in this area an increase of that many is going to create more issues than needed. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1410. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31764Dalia Kern
    My 2 greatest concerns with increased freight trains passing thru the village of Itasca are: -our one and only fire station is located on the south side of the tracks. What happens in the case of an emergency or fire on the north side of the tracks? All three crossings in town are grade level and could be blocked by a longer freight train. -Irving park rd is the main thoroughfare thru Itasca, and is a 2 lane road with limited turning lanes. If a freight train is passing thru Itasca, it is possible for traffic to become jammed up on the roadway and motorists would resort to shortcuts thru the neighborhoods which would endanger pedestrians and children playing. And a stopped freight train would snarl traffic for miles. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1411. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31763Brock Friedman
    See attached. (Received via project website)
    Hanover Park, IL
  1412. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31762Serena Hager
    I am very concerned about increased freight traffic in the Itasca area. There is no place to cross (Itasca or Wood Dale) when a freight train is coming through. I work and access Healthcare on the the North side of the track and live on the South side of the tracks. I also worry about increased noise and pollution. There are also major delays when trains get backed up in the yards in Bensenville. Please fo not let this happen...for the communities sake!! (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1413. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31761Randy Hager
    I am very concerned about increased freight traffic in the Itasca area. There is no place to cross (Itasca or Wood Dale) when a freight train is coming through. I work and access Healthcare on the the North side of the track and live on the South side of the tracks. I also worry about increased noise and pollution. There are also major delays when trains get backed up in the yards in Bensenville. Please do not let this happen...for the communities sake!! Plus, they will be blowing horns all night, carrying Haz mat.. NO SIR, (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1414. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31760Mike and Pat Mondelli
    Itasca is way too small of a town to have all this extra train movement . Besides that that noise level will be very disruptive. I'm sure there are other areas that can accommodate this type of extra train traffic. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1415. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31759Julie Gordy
    Years ago I lived in the South end of Muscatine. The horns of the trains were so loud and never ending. Not only was that a concern, but each day as I was trying to cross the tracks to get to work, a train would be crossing the tracks and sometimes it would last over a half and hour. My employer had written me up at work for BEING LATE TOO MANY TIMES. So, I would say they should think about the inconvenience it can cause for those people living behind those tracks, and their ability to get across the tracks having a minimal waiting time to get to work or possibly to a hospital should a health concern arise!! (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1416. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31758Ted Selepa
    As I see it an large increase of train traffic would be bad for our community. In addition the rail line that goes through town also carries passenger trains and people getting and off the the passenger cars could be in harms way. This is not a good situation. I agree with Mayor Pruyn's detailed letter that such an increase in rail traffic is not for our community and our region. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1417. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31757Forrest Swafford
    I am very opposed to the significantly increased rail traffic through this residential area of Liberty. This will cause major traffic delays on public crossings, increased accidents, increased noise, and destruction of more wildlife. Assuming the average train requires 10 minutes to clear a crossing, 14 additional trains per day means 2-1/2 hours more time each day with traffic impeded, cars idling causing air pollution, and drivers becoming enraged. As I live near one of the affected crossings the additional noise and traffic will have a very negative impact on my quality of life, property value, and general well being. This speaks nothing of the danger presented by potential oil spills and environmental pollution when (not if) an accident occurs. We do NOT need to take the additional risk or suffer the environmental damage this additional traffic brings. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1418. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31756Becky Olmsted
    If this sale goes through my life will be threatened. Police, Fire and Ambulance cannot reach me in case of emergency. They will be on the other side of the track from our home. I beg you to prevent this from happening. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1419. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31755Nicole Catalano
    This is not a good idea. We are a small town as it is. This will negatively impact the community. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1420. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31754Monica Maniez
    I am Against this proposal. We would not have access to emergency vehicles north of the tracks if there is a freight train going through town. I have A child with epilepsy and am worried if something happens with her that we cannot get emergency care if needed. Or anyone else. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1421. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31753Dennis Bunch
    I live less than a mile from the crossing on Birmingham Road in Liberty, MO. I am NOT opposed to the merger of KCS and CP and the predicted increase in traffic on this route. Our neighborhoods of Holt Estates and White Tail Pond were both built after the railroad was established. Complaints about noise do not have much weight with me. People who bought or built houses in these 2 subdivisions should have been aware of the railroad tracks passing through. Some comments have been made in local news media about people driving around rail crossing arms. People often do not obey laws concerning driving. A comment was made that there are already 25 trains that run daily on this track. I was not aware of that as it certainly doesn't seem like that. Some days do seem busier than others and I am aware that freight does not have a set schedule. In the past couple of years, a southern route around Liberty was completed. Because of that, I use the crossing on Birmingham Road more than I used to. I am not often stopped by trains. I am NOT opposed to the merger and the predicted increase in rail traffic through Liberty, MO. Should you want to check my address in relationship to the tracks, our home address is 532 Sharon Dr, Liberty, MO 64068. We have lived here for 20 years. I also have to admit that I enjoy trains. At 70 years of age, I still count the cars when I stop for a train. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1422. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31752Nancy De Mayo
    Just found out about the merger and how it is going to effect our lives. We are 7 houses from the train tracks. The horns, the sounds of the train on the track the motions of the train are going to affect our daily, as is th e traffic on Irving Park Road. We are two lanes through the center of town and if the train blocks the tracks we will have a terrific traffic jam. With all that being said our Fire and Police Department would not be able to get to the other side of town in an emergency but that also means that those on the side with the fire and police department could not get to the nearest Hospital Alexian Brothers to save lives. This not only impacts Itasca but other neighboring towns. Please reconsider this merge and look at what harm and how it impacts the communities and the people who live there that it will go through. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1423. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31751John J McNally
    It is important for our fire and police department to be able to answer emergencies on the north side of the tracks. Longer freight trains can hinder quick responses. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1424. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31750Camanche, Iowa
    I am the City Administrator for camanche. We already experience multiple times were CP trains block crossings in town creating public safety issues. It's not the volume of trains that bother us. It's the stopped trains that create a safety issue for police, fire and ambulance. (Received via project website)
    Andrew Kida · Clinton, IA
  1425. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31749Alicia Rutili
    Growing up in Franklin Park it was painful if you got stuck by a train. You could be stuck for hours! There was an option of crossing over the tracks at Manheim but that was a solid 10min out of your way. Where is that option here in town? I oppose NO (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1426. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31748Patricia Fuscone
    emergence equipment will be blocked which we all know could cause death. The size and quantity of the cars and the thought of just one of those cars flipping over can take out the full downtown area. I am completely opposed to this happening in Itasca. It's unsafe for so many reasons. We have enough trains coming thru blocking traffic so as I said I am completely opposed to this. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1427. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31747Tony Severino
    This will undoubtedly cause more commuter train delays and stoppages of local traffic that will make every quality of life worse for our town of Roselle. This is a big NO to more cargo trains! Please don't give us any more reasons to want to leave this town and the state of Illinois. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1428. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31746Susan DeBiase
    My concern is what do we do when we need assistance for police, fire or ambulance and there is a 2 mile long freight train on the tracks, and they cannot get to us because we are on the North side of the tracks. I say no we do not want this to go forward. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1429. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31745Celeste Cichonski
    Please think about the impact this situation would have on our community. All the extra train traffic presents significant safety issues for our residents, especially the children, and the impact of causing significant traffic delays. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1430. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31744Jeff Watt
    When you add the increased traffic from CP Rail & KC Southern merger, 14/day, with the UP traffic of approximately 20/day, Liberty needs help with our at grade crossing on Birmingham Rd. 40 trains a day will be a real challenge to navigate the tracks! (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1431. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31743Scott Forbes
    This will be a terrible move for our city and surrounding communities. Currently there is no respect for towns theses trains travel thru, the do not maintain the area around the tracks, and basically blow their horns when they are not even near any traffic crossways. Our town has worked for years to meet requirements to silence the trains at certain times, just to be lied to, and never respond to issues or concerns. It’s all about making money at the expense of all those living near the tracks who have no say in a matter. My opinion is felt by many in our community but most certainly will fall of deaf ears. Hope it falls through. (Received via project website)
    Princeton, IA
  1432. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31742Colleen Twarog
    I’m worried about the towns safety if fire and police equipment will have problems getting to emergencies. Both are located south of the tracks. I also worry about the children crossing the tracks with the number of increased trains running through our small town. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1433. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31741Luis Perez
    I am totally opposed to that Project. It is already hard to get a good night sleep without being awakened by trains blowing their horns in the wee hours of the morning. I am sick and tired of that situation and increasing the number of trains passing through Elgin, will make the matter worse. It seems to me that, in the long run, It will discourage people from moving in and encourage current Residents to move out. (Received via project website)
    Elgin, IL
  1434. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31740Tammy Maples
    I own property and live near the tracks and already experience excessive noise day and night from the current amount of train traffic. Additionally, in our area we have many deer and other animals that are affected by the fast moving, loud trains. With a Nature Sanctuary right by my house, we are attempting to attract nature while the trains certainly are discouraging nature in the area. As a Missouri Bumblebee Watch surveyor, the bees in our area are fewer with the increase in train traffic over the past 8 years. Since we grow our own food on our property, this is very concerning. I'm writing to request that the number of trains, the speed of the trains and the number of cars per train are not increased. It is currently a huge problem night and day at the current rate of use with the train horns blowing, the cars connecting, the wheels squeaking and the loudness of the train speed. Thanks for allowing me to comment. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1435. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31739Jennifer Marcinkus
    I strongly oppose the proposed merger to increase freight way traffic on the Milwaukee West line. The line connects the nearby suburbs to each other and specific to Itasca runs through the center of town. The EMS services reside South of the line and increasing the freight traffic would cause a certain divide in this very small town and hinder EMS services to the North side of town on a regular basis as well as direct through-fare to the nearest hospital. As life-long resident of towns along the Milwaukee Line and I am very familiar with the long wait times of freight trains into and out of the yard for years prior to the York Rd renovation. The years living in the nearby communities supply historical data of how traffic and crossing over tracks running this type of freight-line severely impacts traffic flow and how adversely it is affected. The idea of waiting additional time to have EMS respond in any emergency situation due to a freight-train can mean the difference of life and death or severe disabilty when time is of the essence. My background as an ICU RN in a local hospital provides countless stories of good and adverse outcomes based on how fast EMS services are activated and on on-site to emergent situations. I strongly oppose this merger increasing the freight-train traffic throughout the region Milwaukee West runs. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1436. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31738Michael Marcinkus
    Hi, I would like to comment regarding the additional rail traffic that would result in Itasca from the CP/KCS merger. I have been a resident of Itasca for 25 years and I fully support progress and change, but the additional freight trains that would pass through Itasca is just change without the progress. In a world where the focus leans more and more on mobility and ease of transportation, the existence of 2-mile freight trains chugging regularly through a small town sets us back when other towns are moving forward. Noise pollution is a serious concern as well, and with an abundance of planes already flying over Itasca, expecting residents to endure consistent freight trains through town is asking too much. Add in the safety factor where many residents live on the north side of the tracks while the fire department resides on the south side, and it is clear that increased train traffic that would block the crossings simply isn’t the best use of resources. Lastly, if the merger is approved, it would be for profit and to increase efficiencies, so anyone who has taken a business class in their life knows that if 8 additional freight trains per day increases revenue, then 16 per day can’t be far behind. Please do not sacrifice quality of life for a little extra profit. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1437. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31737David Schulz
    Having lived at 405 E. Center for over 20yrs. I think increased freight train traffic of any kind will be disastrous to the quaint village that I enjoy. What about the downtown development? What about pedestrian s at catulpa and walnut? This is terrible (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1438. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31736Steve Bornack
    Our village cannot tolerate more freight trains. It leave no access to emergency vehicles. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1439. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31735Walter Wydra
    I am opposed to the increased rail traffic in our community. I was not informed of the public meetings until this morning 1/3/22. Please reconsider this expansion. My concern is for the community safety and traffic possibly caused by this increase. Our police and fire departments are on the opposite side of the tracks where most residents live. Please reconsider the halting the increase in rail traffic as it negatively (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1440. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31733MaryAnn Wydra
    I am a long time resident of Itasca(46years). I am strongly opposed to the Canadian Pacific Acquisition of Kansas City Southern. The safety and welfare of our town is too much at risk. The length of trains and increased number of trains would create an undo burden on our emergency vehicles to attend to situations where needed in a timely mannrer. The transporting of hazardous materials poses a threat to the safety of our citizens. The noise and environmental pollution will potentially effect our town. The “risks” are too much for our community. I am definitely opposed to this acquisition and the risks it poses for Itasca. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1441. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31732Christine Lewis
    As a resident near the railroad tracks in question, I oppose the proposed increase in train traffic. The increased traffic poses safety issues for people and animals, environmental concerns from possible spills and increased traffic through my section of the neighborhood as people try to out run/go around the stoppage due to the trains. I also am concerned it will affect my quality of life with all the noise and pollution from the extra trains as well as the resale value of my home. For these reasons, I oppose this proposal. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1442. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31731Susan and Phil Nolte
    The prospect that the freight train traffic can increase up to 300% through our village (Itasca) is very concerning and will affect our way of living in a very negative way. First, our fire department and ambulance services will be significantly delayed with long waits at the train crossings. This could be life threatening in many cases. Second, our school busses, that transport students to and from the north and south sides of town will be regularly delayed. Third, our town is very interconnected and we already have to wait for trains and are, many times, late for appointments and important meetings/gatherings as we travel from one side of town to the other with the current train schedule. A 300% increase will make the problem even more difficult. Fourth, it is certain that there will be large bottlenecks of traffic jamming the intersections by the train crossings as there is not alot of road space there, making this area more susceptible to accidents and further jeopardizing the safety of our residents. Last, we have quite a few houses along the train line. The noise from even more long freight trains will very negatively affect their everyday lives. The lifestyle, safety and general well being for Itasca residents would be very severely impacted negatively with such increased freight train traffic. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1443. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31730Jim Jones
    The abusive train horns are unbearable at 3 am! More traffic will mean more of the same ignorance Im assuming. Gone. (Received via project website)
    Princeton, IA
  1444. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31729Scott Wilhelm
    I have home and property against a portion of the track area. There are regular herd of deer, flocks of turkeys, coyote and other wildlife in this area that will be impacted. I have not seen this quantified. The increases in numbers of trains alone will do this. Any efforts to build (I have not seen plans for such) will exacerbate these impacts. Additionally, train operators need better guidance/training on not using train horns in areas without crossings. These inappropriate uses are bad for both humans and wildlife. All of these impacts should be adequately studies, results published, and a review period established. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1445. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31728Appanoose County, Iowa
    As County Engineer for Appanoose County, Iowa (southern most on the CP in the state), I am concerned about the current status of crossings within our County and the impact additional traffic will have on said crossings. We have several at grade crossings that need adjustments in the approaches. We have three crossings over our roads that are low and at least one of those that has abutments very poor condition. We recently were forced to close a Canadian Pacific owned bridge (carrying our vehicle traffic) that is in danger of structural failure. While we have not had time to work out a replacement plan and process, I am concerned that growth on the line will be at County expense in any replacement structures and that the facilities in our area are not sufficient for additional rail traffic. I would like assurances that the railroad will provide necessary upgrades for the increased traffic and current shortcomings. (Received via project website)
    Bradley Skinner · Centerville, IA
  1446. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31727Gina Wolfe
    The increased train traffic will definitely impact our emergency response to those citizens living on the Mississippi river across highway 76. I don't think the railroad wants any negative publicity when a train wreck or breakdown prevents a small town to respond to their citizens. You seriously need to think about and communicate the impact of your plan of increased train traffic to ensure everyone gets the facts of why this happening. (Received via project website)
    Princeton, IA
  1447. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31726Frank Grage
    Resident Concerns: As a resident living between the CP Rail and the Mississippi River in LeClaire, there are legitimate concerns due to the potential for increased traffic from the proposed merger, to triple the current volume. Quiet zones are needed, and can be enhanced by controlling the speed of trains through towns. The noise decreases as speed decreases. This also can improve the safety factor, as speed is the major contributing factor to the severity of derailments. LeClaire is a community with the rail next to historical buildings and the riverfront levy. A derailment occurred on Jan. 3, 2020 and could have destroyed several blocks of properties and cost many lives had the train derailed towards the buildings instead of the riverfront. We are fortunate there was no loss of life or property at that time. The risk is high for our community. As a LeClaire resident living farther downriver from the location described, I have concerns regarding negative impact to property values in our residential neighborhood on Canal Shore Drive SW due to the proposed increased traffic. As far as public safety, we cannot afford to have crossings blocked from increased traffic either. Public safety is at risk for police, fire, and EMS calls. In summary if the merger is allowed there need to be control measures including: Quiet Zones Speed controls/Noise controls Traffic flow controls Limits to blocked crossings Public Safety measures Thank You for your consideration. Frank Grage (Received via project website)
    LeClaire, IA
  1448. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31725Ann Meeker
    We live on the corner of Mississippi Drive and Iowa Avenue; i.e., directly across the street from the tracks. Our building was built in 1914 and we refurbished it during the period of 2006-2009. Last month we spent $200,000.00 on tuck pointing due to the vibration from the trains. Large pieces of the facade fell off the building. Increasing the volume of train traffic will have a detrimental effect on infrastructure along the riverfront and possibly further into downtown. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1449. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31724Katherine Sisto
    I am very concerned that there is a possibility of an additional 6+ freight trains that could be going through our area daily. Wood Dale is already plagued with more than our share of traffic, air pollution and noise due to road and air traffic from O’Hare. Emergency vehicles in our town need to be able to access residents on both sides of the tracks. This could be a matter of life and death for our residents. The railroad tracks that these trains will be running on run right through the middle of our town. During commute times, even the amount of Metra trains that already run on these tracks cause terrible delays – especially if you are traveling on Wood Dale Road. Air cargo planes and freight trains already create a lot of noise during the night. We cannot handle any more of this. Irving is a main through way from the city and is always very congested during morning and evening rush hours. Blocking this road for any additional length of time would be unfair not just to those who live in our town, but to all who commute through it. The tracks that cross Irving by York are already elevated. There has to be a better solution than to block our roadways and create additional noise and pollution for residents of Wood Dale and nearby towns. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1450. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31723John Cieslak
    I live 2 blocks SE of the Rt 19/Wood Dale Rd. In Wood Dale IL., and OPPOSE the proposed merger. Trains passing thru town block all North- South traffic and East -West bound traffic, including emergency response vehicles. We already have a significant number of Metra commuter trains in addition to an increasing number of freight train traffic including fair amounts of tanker trains hauling dangerous chemicals. Freight train traffic moving in and out of the Bensenville yard should be routed over the recently built viaduct at York and art 19 and not thru towns and residential neighborhoods with grade level crossings. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1451. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31722Timothy Fearon
    I think that, if approved, this will devastate the quality of life in WoodDale. Unless a bridge is built, like at York Rd and Irving Park Rd, I don’t see how this increased train traffic wouldn’t destroy the residents’ quality of life. Please do not allow this increase. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1452. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31721Gail Herff
    Hello - We do not need additional train traffic in our city. It creates unwanted traffic, pollution, EMS response and safety issues in our community. Isn’t the expansion at O’Hare airport enough for us to take? This proposal only benefits the railroad. Please stop!! (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1453. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31720Mary Murphy
    If this gets approved my house will be on the market as well as my mom’s in Wood Dale. We don’t approve this and will not be a resident of this happens. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1454. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31719Kimberly Rush
    I am opposed as it will disrupt traffic and significantly increase wait times to move in and out of the community. It may endanger lives if additional long trains block roads in and out of the community for ambulance, fire and police response. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1455. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31718Stan Jakubowski
    Major renovation to revitalize the downtown area and we're considering increasing train traffic through the heart of our area? The tracks divide the town in half. Store and apartments along this noisy stretch .... who would want to move their or even shop there. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1456. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31717Patricia and Michael Zimay
    In regards to the Railroad proposal for the Canadian Pacific we have been fighting the trains since 2006, there is no need to increase the freight trains!!! We live with the tracks in our backyard, freighters go through now and since 2006 shaking the house, , china cabinet(moving china and glasses) chairs , everything. Windows have settled from the constant vibration. These homes were not built with trains weighing tons. We have lived here almost 49 years and we don't plan on moving anytime soon. This is not acceptable. When does anybody care about us?? Also, increasing the lengthy trains would only impair our way of living, hampering critical services such as medical and fire help and causing more noise and deadly pollution and much, much more. Again, when does anybody care about us?? Respectfully, Home Owner (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1457. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31716Teri Sarris
    Wood Dale residents (especially in Ward 4), are already subjected to unbelievable noise and pollution from the planes, as well as constant driving delays due to the rail system. Our quality of life in Wood Dale is becoming non-existent! We have been here since 1976, but now are seriously thinking about getting out of here while we can still get something for our homes! Wood Dale WAS a great little place to live, but no longer. With this expansion, everyone will definitely see a further decline in property values as well as any interest of potential new residents even considering Wood Dale as their home. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1458. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31715Sandra Hansen
    The train line coming through the town of Wood Dale cuts off Irving Park Road and Wood dale Road. Irving Park Road is a main thoroughfare in Illinois going from Chicago out west for 33.6 miles. This train tracks cuts the town of Wood dale in half. if there's any serious fire or accidents the train in the way could cause a life-threatening problem. If you or your companies would like to add extra Fire Equipment and manpower to make sure that this doesn't happen in case of a tragedy or an accident. if you would like to sign something, make some official form saying you were responsible for anybody's life that is affected by the added train traffic. to pay them damages for what your train track in extra trains are causing or caused them. It could be a very deadly situation thanks to the extra time and blockage of onthese tracks. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1459. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31714Virginia Halac
    i'm responding to the possible daily increased rail traffic thru the village. there is nothing positive about your proposal for itasca. traffic will be impacted negatively. there are already 2-3 freight trains that pass thru itasca daily. they already create traffic disturbance & congestion & excessive air & noise pollution on a daily /nighttime basis. all fire & police response originate from south of the current rail lines. it is possible for these trains to block all intersections to the north side of town. a delayed response due to trains blocking all crossings could result in a life threatening incident(s). furthermore, these trains will have a negative impact on private residences that already exist close to the present railroad lines. your proposal definitely has a totally negative impact on the village of itasca. please find another location for your plan!!! (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1460. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31713Dave Sbertoli
    I have been residing just west of O'hare airport for over 40 years and have heard for years of the advantages of airport expansion and seen the negative effects it has had the residents and especially the impacts on the roads. The rail merger imformation tells us yet another impact on our roads will be inevitable. Our main surface roads thru our towns can no longer be widened and we now have to share streets and roads with more and more truck traffic brought on by aggressive large warehouse construction brought on from airport expansion. This increase in congestion the last few years have brought will be compounded by an increase in train traffic that will guarantee far more road congestion that will put even more thru traffic into residential neighborhoods. Traffic on our main east west road, Irving Park in Wood Dale has also increased due to the excessive toll cost of the recently built 390 toll road which eliminated east west Thorndale thoroughfare. CP rail line crosses Irving Park and Wood Dale road in the center of Wood Dale which will be hit hard by additional freight train traffic. I understand the benefits of this merger for CP rail, but if it increases train traffic in our town it will be a permanent and unsolvable. We also have had to deal with a major increase in airport noise due to the O'hare runway realignment and due not deserve another impact, such as additional train traffic, affecting our town. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1461. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31712Arlene Derma
    I do not agree with the CP/KCS Merger affecting our small town of Itasca, Il. Within our town; we have 4 train crossings affected in a short distance. This affects Fire, EMS, & Policing for our residents, daily visitors, employees of companies within our village, school children walking and bussed daily. This is not acceptable for our community. Thank you! (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1462. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31711Genoa, Illinois
    The City of Genoa appreciates the ability to voice concerns regarding the Canadian Pacific’s acquisition of the Kansas City rail. More specifically, the City is concerned about the environmental impact of a 100% train traffic increase as the Canadian Pacific railway runs all the way through the City. This additional train traffic would be noisy for residents at all hours of the day and night. Additionally, this will create traffic concerns as our police, fire, and EMS are all on the north side of the City which would be blocked from the south side of the City for additional time throughout the day and night with the increased train traffic. Furthermore, civilian traffic will also be blocked between the north and south side of our City while trains pass-through. The City of Genoa encourages the possibility of economic growth due to the acquisition of Kansas City and the City also appreciates its relationship with the Canadian Pacific thus far, however, the significantly increased traffic along the rail presents dire consequences to the safety and wellbeing of the residents of Genoa. Should this acquisition move forward and cause a 100% increase in train traffic, the City would request partnership with Canadian Pacific to establish quiet zones in City limits. Additionally infrastructure such as rail bridges would be necessary in order to reduce the adverse effect of the increased rail traffic. Taking into account that the rail divides the City of Genoa in half and runs through residential neighborhoods, the City of Genoa would be severely environmentally impacted with increased noise and traffic issues should improvements to the existing rail not be made. (Received via project website)
    Alyssa Seguss · Genoa, IL
  1463. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31710Maureen R
    I oppose of the proposed railroad merger that will increase freight traffic to my town by 300%. I live near the train traffics and this would deeply impact my peace, quiet, and happiness along with my neighbors. In addition, it would have negative environmental impact on the town. I ask that you reconsider for a solution that doesn’t involve increasing freight traffic from the merger. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1464. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31709Joyce Jezuit
    Wood Dale/Itasca residents desperately hoping your mind has changed about your proposed venture of 100% disrupting our ability to get to our hospital among many other major and serious disruptions. It’s not bad enough fighting Covid for 2 years and fighting Haymarket demanding to out a drug rehab in poor little Itasca (we live on the border of Itasca/Wood Dale and mist of their services) who absolutely positively cannot support this with ONE ambulance etc etc etc etc etc. this fight is still ongoing after two years. We need another fight like a hole in our heads while trying to avoid Covid and watch our friends and relatives suffer illness and death from this blight. PLEASE rethink your proposal. Have mercy and compassion. Haven’t we been through enough the past few years?! Thank you for reading this. Please. Just please say No. Tim and Joyce Jezuit Wood Dale/Itasca residents for 54 years. Same house. (Received via project email)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1465. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31708Camille Serbicki
    NO - Canadian Pacific Railway to purchase Kansas City Southern rail network should not be approved as they would want to run several freight trains per day thru Roselle, Illinois and this is not a feasible option as Roselle, Illinois is a small community and additional freight trains would add more congestion to our street traffic. One of the roads involved would be Rodenburg which is a two lane roadway (one lane either way). This roadway is heavily trafficked already and would cause further back-ups and would be a big hindrance to emergency vehicles. Look forward to hearing from you that NO vote on has passed on this acquisition. Canadian Pacific Railway needs to run their freight trains elsewhere. Respectfully submitted, Camille B. Serbicki Roselle, Illinois serbickic@comcast.net (Received via project email)
    Roselle, IL
  1466. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31707Thomas Parker
    I'm concerned as a business owner and resident in Itasca, IL of the potential additional traffic on the rail line through town this was would cause. Please see Mayor Pruyn's letter for reference to concerns I also have. Thank you - Tom (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1467. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31706Kate Nichols
    I am against this. Traffic is already picking up in the area. Irving Park Rd. Is down to 1 lane in most of Itasca…this will slow down the flow of traffic even more and hinder emergency services from reaching the north side of town (since they’re located on the south side of town). School drop-off and pick-up would also face delays. No thanks (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1468. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31705Pamela Antonopoulos
    I respectively vote against the increased rail traffic that is being proposed. Itasca already suffers from additional air traffic, noise, and air pollution due to O'Hare runway expansion, and, suffers from additional vehicle noise due to I390 expansion. Itasca also suffers from current railway noise and train horns in the late hours and overnight. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1469. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31694Matthew and Helen Fiore
    1.)Concerns about no access to our (north side) side of town due to increased train length and activity. Causing delayed police and fire department response time. Also delayed access to nearest hospital Alexian Brothers Hospital. 2.) Increased train activity and noise on top of airplane activity and noise causing decreased home values. 3.) Safety concerns for pedestrians especially children walking/ riding bikes to and from, pool, library, nature center, etc. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1470. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31693Betty Montiel
    With at least three schools on the north side of the tracks and the fire department on the south side of the tracks, it would be extremely dangerous in case of an emergency. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1471. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31692Amador Montiel
    With three schools on the north side of the tracks and the fire department on the south side of the tracks, it would be extremely dangerous in case of an emergency. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1472. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31691Evelyn Murphy
    No, no and NO! This request from the OEA to allow more freight transport through our village is definitely not in the Village’s best interest at all. The village is a small community that already has too much train traffic and noise from trains that impacts the quality of life and emergency services of which we have very little and share with other communities. We are going to be swallowed by big corporate interests! What don’t these groups of businesses understand about the size and scope of the projects that they propose to build in a small town? We just went through a harrowing 2 years of explaining to Haymarket that our small town’s fire and ambulance services cannot afford the economic impact of a large non profit facility that services the needs of Opioid victims. Our residents and those victims will both suffer if this is allowed by the courts. Now Haymarket is suing the town! So to add more congestion of train crossings , substantial disruptions of emergency services, added noise and air pollution, the added dangers of travelers crossing the rails, the time limitations imposed by train delays and the decrease in market values of homes near the tracks are not what Itasca needs or wants. So I say no to this proposal. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1473. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31690Cynthia Bellgardt
    I have lived in Itasca all my life and I do not want more trains coming through here. The railway splits our town in half and emergency services would be disrupted along with Transport of school buses with more trains Coming through. I live one block from the tracks and the constant train traffic would be An annoyance of noise and vibration near my home. Please move this traffic somewhere else. Thank you, Cynthia Bellgardt (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1474. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31689David Schweizer
    We have three kids that attend different schools in Itasca. This much of an increase in freight traffic on our railroad tracks will impact our ability to get our kids to their schools in time and pick them back up. Not to mention getting them to other extracurricular activities and our church. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1475. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31688Todd Chionis
    If this happens, we move! Plain and simple. We live one block from one of these crossings. As is, the amount of freight, tankers, and commmuter trains is quite enough. Adding more freight equals more noise, backed up traffic on Irving Park Road, and just an unbearable nuisance. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1476. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31687Pat Butler
    Your extra trains are not welcome in Itasca. We are a surrounded by planes and cars already. Please reconsider (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1477. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31686Jennifer Ritorno
    I strongly oppose the proposed increased freight train traffic thru Itasca for the following reasons: 1.). These trains blocking our roadways will greatly hinder ambulances, police cars, and fire trucks ability to quickly respond to emergencies at schools, residences and roads. It will also limit their ability to transport patients to hospitals for life saving care. 2.). These additional trains will reduce air quality for my family at home, and kids at school and playing sports outside. 3.). These additional trains will increase the likelihood of train/vehicle/pedestrian incidents in Itasca and surrounding towns. 4.). These additional trains will slow down commuter train times to/from Chicago. 5.). These additional trains will create a noise nuisance for my family at home, at school, at church, playing sports, at the library, at the Itasca Nature Center, etc. 6.). These additional trains will create traffic jams on already busy roads (some of which are neighborhood streets) that are not large enough to support the increased, lengthy backups. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1478. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31685Nenad Djuric
    I oppose the proposal. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1479. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31684MaryAnn Tardi
    We cross those tracks every day & freight trains are long . We go to the hospital and church and this is an important decision. If it brings extra revenue to help our taxes, but hospital emergencies must be considered. A bridge to go over ? Would they pay to build a bridge ? (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1480. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31683Laura M Herrig
    We are concerned with the railways expansion of transporting hazardous materials through Dubuque ,Iowa and surrounding areas and along the Mississippi River. We are also concerned with the toxic fumes from the railway transporting and storing creosote railway ties, in the open area without any correct storage facility.
    Dubuque, IA
  1481. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31682Chris Popescu
    I do no agree with the proposal that will increase 3 folds the freight train traffic thru Itasca. I feel that Itasca being a small village is in the crossfire of ruthless business activities that are incompatible with a quiet village. We have the newly constructed and noisy O'Hare extension, we have the green area of the Hamilton Park taken away by a Data Center (in Elk Grove), the other Data Center proposed on the golf club, we have the jet noise of O'Hare airport, we have the unsettled treatment for addiction pending, we have the issue of high voltage (I don't know if that was settled with ComEd or not). It certainly bites to have a village with more CONCERN to make money than to offer a better environment to its citizens. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1482. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31681Sabrina Abbrescia
    I oppose this merger due to the projected impact that this will have on the Wood Dale community from the burdens it will place on our residents, commuters and public safety response time will likely outweigh the benefits cited by the companies in this merger. Wood Dale would see an increase in freight trains of over 50% per day , increasing from an average of 16 trains per day to 24 trains per day. This will result in an increase in road closures that separate our town in half, slowing or significantly delaying response to emergency situations. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1483. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31680Stephanie Behre
    This beautiful community will be impacted in a very damaging way if more trains come through every day. The noise level is bad for citizens and wildlife and the time spent trying to get to work the store or to see family may cause people to move to a different area. Please do not let this impact our beautiful area! (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1484. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31679Elizabeth Knaus
    I am strongly against the proposed increased in train traffic in Itasca. I have had previously lived in a town with increased traffic and the noise and the delays in traffic were overwhelming. Traffic was snarled from anywhere 10-20 mins and we had train whistles going off at all hours of the night. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1485. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31678Patricia Gomez
    Voting NO for the additional railroad traffic. As one of several residents who lives within close proximity to the tracks, the current traffic is already more than enough. The added rail traffic will only deter future buyers. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1486. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31677Robert Williams
    Often I am forced to cross the same tracks in this area 4+ times on the way to my destination, alternative routes, in some cases, do not exist, and could result in certain areas being inaccessible. The impact on the community needs to be considered. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1487. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31662DuPage County
    Attached
    John Loper · Wheaton, IL
  1488. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31661City of Dubuque - Engr. Dept.
    Please see attached comments from Greater Dubuque Development Corporation.
    Steve Sampson Brown · Dubuque, IA
  1489. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31660City of Dubuque - Engr. Dept.
    Please see attached letter from the Dubuque Area Chamber of Commerce.
    Steve Sampson Brown · Dubuque, IA
  1490. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31659City of Buffalo, Iowa
    Sally Rodriguez · Buffalo, IA
  1491. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31658Canadian National Railway Company
    Sidley Austin LLP · Washington, DC
  1492. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31657Quad Cities Chamber of Commerce
    Paul Rumler · Davenport, IA
  1493. (printed as 1/3/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31656Downtown Davenport Partnership
    Kyle Carter · Davenport, IA
  1494. (printed as 1/2/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31664Laura Joseph
    I am against having the 2 mile trains run though out town. We have three crossing close to each other and they all could be closed when a two mile train runs through. It is a small town, cars would be lined up for extended amounts of time blocking the other main roads. and people are crazy mad drivers to begin with. I'm concerned there would just be trouble. the kids walking to school or to the library or park district would have to wait for ever. I live near the tracks and the homes shake when the trains go by. I can't image a 2 mile train. omg.
    Itasca, IL
  1495. (printed as 1/2/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31663Bradley Dice
    See attached file, also available at https://bit.ly/cpkc-dice-comments.
    Liberty, MO
  1496. (printed as 1/1/2022)
    Comment
    EI-31665Itasca resident
    It was brought to our attention that as a result of merger the freight traffic through our small town of Itasca would increase dramatically. As a concerted citizen living on the north side of the tracks, and police and fire departments being on the south side of the tracks, it will potentially delay the response time to emergency calls for all businesses and residents. I would hope that at least an overpass is considered for construction to reach both sides of town. Not to mention the increase in pollution, noise, and traffic times. Regards
    Joseph Amir · Itasca, IL
  1497. (printed as 12/31/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31666Lyndell Brenton
    Liberty, MO
  1498. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31674Jarred Lassiter
    See attached. (Received via project website)
    West Burlington, IA
  1499. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31673Claudia Bush
    I oppose additional trains to our already busy railroad crossing on Lancaster Road, one mile north of H Highway. The noise factor and inaccessibility would create issues for people living close to these railroads and crossings (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1500. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31672Guadalupe Sanchez
    I do not want more trains going through roselle IL (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1501. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31671Emanuel Fernandez
    I decline to have more train traffic because there would be more traffic congestion by the pass, there would be more noise pollution because the horn by the pass and the most important is that would be movement on the terrain and the the buildings, Houses around the rails will crack or compromise the integrity of the foundation. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1502. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31670Houston County, MN
    Houston County is the southeastern most county in Minnesota with the Mississippi River basin occupying our eastern boundary and the existing Canadian Pacific right-of-way follows the river adjacent to these numerous NWI classified wetlands. The capital improvements project slated for an area near Brownsville as part of the CP-KCS merger may affect those wetland and water resources and we respectfully ask that you evaluate the risks to those vulnerable resources as part of the EIS. Thank you for your time and consideration. (Received via project website)
    Amelia Meiners · Caledonia, MN
  1503. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31669City of LeClaire, IA
    Mr. Joshua Wayland, Please see attached comments regarding Docket No. FD 36500, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, et al.—Control of— Kansas City Southern, et al. These comments were also uploaded to the Surface Transportation Board website and have been mailed in hard copy form. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. (Received via project email)
    Edwin Choate · LeClaire, IA
  1504. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31668City of Excelsior Springs
    Melinda Mehaffy · Excelsior Springs, MO
  1505. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31667Lindsey Fauske
    I would like to take a moment to voice my opposition to increase freight rail traffic in Itasca, IL. To increase it by 300% seems absurd. This is a family town with kids riding bikes through town at all times of the day going to and from school. Why wouldn’t this route be in more of a rural or industrial town where the increased probability of accident would not be as high? How would this effect the commuters that rely on the multiple commuter trains to get them to and from work during the week? Thank you for considering my comments. Lindsey Fauske
    Itasca, IL
  1506. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31655Kirk Sievers
    My wife and I are long term (>45 yrs) residents of Roselle. We oppose this change in the railway traffic for Roselle. Reasons are environmental, noise, traffic and safety. In particular, Emergency Services will suffer increased delays in responding to life threatening situations. Traffic congestion will increase, traffic accident risk will increase and railroad noise, already bad, will become intolerable. Please consider this when making a decision. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1507. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31654Patricia Jordan
    I see no benefit except for the two conglomerates in this merger. As stated In the Mayor's letter, this will cause so many problems within our community from noise, pollution, traffic delays as well as major safety issues that I am strongly against this merger. This will forever change Roselle and not in a good way. I fear the long term effects will be lower property values, a noisy, polluted main street area that will cause the businesses there to suffer and major safety issues. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1508. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31653Destenee Sanchez
    Vote AGAINST allowing additional freight trains due to horrible noise pollution, air pollution, and traffic. We already hear trains every 30min to an hour and if this is allowed then it will force me to leave Roselle. Moved here a couple years ago to get away from traffic & pollution! (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1509. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31652Katarzyna Malanowska
    The addition of train lines to the tracks passing through Roselle will cause a great inconvenience to an already busy train schedule. Personally, I live in an apartment building next to the tracks. I work from home and there is already a busy train schedule which disrupts my working environment. Additional trains would make my work environment close to impossible with constant disturbances to meetings/calls. I hope that this will not take place. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1510. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31651Joseph Faraci
    I understand the need for transportation of commerce, but since the people of my community will suffer while the owners of the companies doing the shipping will benefit, I suggest that they be responsible for building overpasses to lessen the impact on commuters. And unless they take the onus, they should not be allowed to increase the number of trains. Period. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1511. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31650Vincent Jurgena
    As a resident of Riverdale, the CP line runs directly behind my home, roughly 100 feet from my back door. While I'm used to having 4-8 trains a day go by, I feel the tripling or quadrupling of train traffic will have an adverse effect on my quality of life. I am imploring the CP to find a solution to this, i.e. re-route the line along the river side of Arconic, or failing that, install crossing arms/implementing quiet zones through my neighborhood. my home is situated between crossings 865-636A and 865637G. Thank you for the opportunity to provide input towards this very important issue. Vince Jurgena (Received via project website)
    Riverdale, IA
  1512. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31649Patricia Rummelhart
    Concerned about noise and traffic tie-ups especially on Roselle Road (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1513. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31647Jim Greener
    Please do not allow the Canadian Pacific Railway to increase train traffic through the town of Roselle. I live a half mile from the tracks and this will decrease safety and increase automotive and rail traffic. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1514. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31646Mark Washburn
    To CP: I appreciate the fact that you have acquired KCS and due to this rail traffic could be increasing through the downtown Muscatine area. I think this is to be expected but would like to submit my opinion that the proposed 3x increase in daily rail traffic seems a bit too much. I think most of us around here could see something like a 30% increase and not feel too put off by that...but 300%...that to me would impact our downtown area in a negative way. Thanks for asking for public comments on this topic. Mark (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1515. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31645Ruben Laugon
    Hello, Im a Ruben resident of Hanoverpark. I decided to write this comments because I have read and have been informed by my city regarding the merge. In fact this concerns whole other including me. I love my city and thats the reason we have been residing here for long and who knows how many years more. My main concern is that due to higher increases in daily fright train it will impact the city traffic and another big factor could be environmental. We all hate noise because we want to have peace and happiness but with the increase number of train traffic this will no longer be an option for many residents living nearby. Danger to city and massive impact in communities I would request all the higher to impose the limitations on approval. I believe in our city and city counseling to take this subject in strong manner to resolving resolution for all the Hanoverpark residents including our neighbors. (Received via project website)
    Hanover Park, IL
  1516. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31644Shane Duncan
    Maybe you shouldn't have built subdivisions around 100 year old railroad track. The movement of goods through this country is more important to me than your comfort. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1517. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31643Andrew Vogel
    I lived near the tracks for twenty years. 14.4 trains a day passing through my neighborhood is going to drastically reduce the value of my house. I'm not at all happy about the merger. Which railroad company is going to pay me when my property value plummets? (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1518. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31639Gregory Peto
    We are very worried with the disruption to daily travel, a decrease in property values, and the damage from the train vibrations. There are zero positives or benefits to any resident because of this. (Received via project website)
    Hanover Park, IL
  1519. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31637Thomas Neff
    I conduct the NEPA review of HUD funded projects in KCMO (Municipality of 319 square miles). Given the substantial increase in traffic, post acquisition, I am interested in hearing what specific steps are planned to reduce/minimize noise impacts, including whether you are in talks with the FRA, MoDOT and others, to abolish crossings that are no longer open, so that horn sounding is not necessary at those locations. (Received via project website)
    Kansas City, MO
  1520. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31636Jeanna Matuszewski
    I do not want to see this happen. As it is there are periods in the day when two Metra trains come in right after the other and I get stuck at the light for over 8 minutes. This is especially bad in the morning when I am trying to get to work. Since the train tracks are on the ground this will back up traffic too many times. I live on Wood Dale Road and it is not pleasant when this back up happens. It's hard to just get across town! (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1521. (printed as 12/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31616Carol Jones
    We live near the tracks and DO NOT wish to have increase train traffic. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1522. (printed as 12/29/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31818Ralph W. Heninger
    This merger will triple the number of "bomb trains" passing within 250 feet of our living room as shown in the attached video. The public is not fully informed about the grave harm that will occur if a bomb train derails when passing through populous residential areas. Derailments occur despite safety measures adopted by the rail operators and bomb trains are easy targets for terrorist activity.
    Bettendorf, IA
  1523. (printed as 12/29/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31675Bi-State Regional Commission
    Denise Bulat · Rock Island, IL
  1524. (printed as 12/29/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31648President, LeClaire Chamber of Commerce
    Kathleen M Anderson · LeClaire, IA
  1525. (printed as 12/29/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31642Illinois Commerce Commission
    Brian Vercruysse · Springfield, IL
  1526. (printed as 12/29/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31641DuPage County, IL
    Donald Puchalski, Transportation Committee Chair/DuPage County Board Member · Wheaton, IL
  1527. (printed as 12/29/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31640City of Dubuque - Engr. Dept.
    Please see attached letter from the City of Dubuque. Thank you.
    Steve Sampson Brown · Dubuque, IA
  1528. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Safety
    303462Safety Implementation Plan
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1529. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-32124Osage Nation
    Dr. Andrea Hunter · Pawhuska, OK
  1530. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31695Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning
    Tim McMahon (CMAP) · cHICAGO, IL
  1531. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31638Judy Eaton
    We knew about the tracks when we bought our house. The blowing horns at all hours are disturbing. But we knew about that. I cannot imagine three time the noise and disruption when the merger happens. I would like to see a crossing arm/lights at our crossing, or similar instead of the VERY loud horns disrupting sleep etc. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1532. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31635Rebecca Howe
    I am against this merger as it would have severe detrimental affects to Muscatine. Safety, quality of life are two main issues for those that live and work near the tracks. However other detrimental variables are loss of property value and getting people to invest near the tracks (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1533. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31634Brittani Bender
    Do not want (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1534. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31633Rose Schott
    The noise from horns is very loud . You can not open a window at night if you want to sleep at all. Last Tuesday a train pull body off the wheels which could have cause a derailment . Many houses and people could be put out if this happens! Dangerous to so much property and people! (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1535. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31632Laura Perry
    The tracks are about in my backyard. It’s heavy train traffic already and to add more daily would be incredibly unwelcome for the neighborhood here. They are loud and the house shakes. The crossing is always backed up, these trains are long we loose count when they go by. We don’t want more train traffic! What about derailment? Our homes? This neighborhood doesn’t need more trains on a daily basis. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1536. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31631Dave Heller
    See attached. (Received via project website)
    Davenport, IA
  1537. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31630Jennie Rist
    The sub-division we live in Whitetail Pond butts up against the the tracks on Birmingham Rd. When we built our house we were told that when crossing arms were installed that the train horns would stop. Well, we were misinformed. They still blow day and night. Also apparently this crossing is where trains sit and wait. We have them idling nonstop. If this merger goes through it will be unbearable for this subdivision. Unless the city places a quit zone at this intersection! (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1538. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31629William Rist
    Train horn sounding at neighborhood crossings is horrible now with existing traffic that has been increasing daily and somehow our particular crossing has become a rest stop for idling trains throughout the night. A merger of additional traffic will be unbearable for residents. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1539. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31628Angela Schroeder
    Safety, access and reasonable levels of quiet are all valued in Muscatine. We are Iowa’s 24th largest city and just 6 yrs shy of Iowa’s oldest city. Several homes in the south end are just feet from the tracks. The tracks and homes have co-existed peacefully for decades. But this is a significant change for the south end, downtown residents, small businesses and guests. Unique to Muscatine, is our air quality. According to the web site, Muscatine’s air quality has historically been over acceptable levels for dangerous materials. We have a good track record of improvement. But still today, we have poor air quality in one remaining area. We can not afford backward steps in Muscatine’s air quality. It’s not rocket science to say quality of life in Muscatine will be significantly impacted more than any community along the railway if we don’t start planning now. Muscatine supports jobs, effective and efficient rail transportation, but we also want to preserve quality of life on our unique and historic location along the Mississippi River. We request partnering with our city on a newly established quiet zone in the south end. An overpass at up to two of our major traffic intersections for safety. And an air quality impact study with actionable steps taken to improve air quality where we are at risk. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1540. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31627Donald Blake
    if trains increase in Muscatine how many trains a hour would come through town compared to now. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1541. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31626Shayanna Troncin
    I would perfer no more train traffic going through my neighborhood at Whitetail Pond. It already goes through enough to be disruptive and causes traffic issues. Also the loud horn that gets blown for 4 minutes during night hours is awful!!!! Being woke up from midnight or three the morning is frustrating. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1542. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31625Marc Wallace
    This is not a good plan. A major increase in traffic in a residential area where people are constantly crossing the Train Tracks is a very poor plan. It would negatively impact Musactine and all the neighboring communities. It would be best to reroute the train through a rual area. Musactine tracks along the River should not carryover 5-6 trains per day. As it now with 5-6 trains creates a huge hardship for residents to go in and out of the parks. To increase the train traffic would negatively impact the towns and Parks along the Mississippi from Musactine to Davenport. I doubt Musactine residents would want see this increase happen. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1543. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31624Patrick Keith Porter
    I am very concerned that this action will increase train traffic in Muscatine to a level that causes serious issues for our residents, workers, and local businesses/corporations. The disruptions will impact homes, offices, and corporate headquarters very near the tracks. They will slow emergency responses and trap others attempting to access parking and other parts of town. I ask that you do not approve any changes which will increase train traffic in Muscatine. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1544. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31623Brian Freitag
    This bothers me, it's already a pain in the Ass! More trains at the crossings means a lot more potential to be held up or detained from our normal everyday lives. I say divert the trains around Muscatine or build an overpass/underpass!! (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1545. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31622Chris Soltwedel
    I am against having this significant increase in rail traffic. It will impact quality of life, business, traffic accidents all in a negative way. I’m guessing this public comment opportunity is a nicety and this is a done deal already. Canadian Pacific should also be heavily fined for blocking railways any longer than 5 minutes. This is already a huge problem in Muscatine with an average 6 trains per day. I can’t imagine 20+. There should be overpasses built for busy intersections. Funded by Canadian Pacific. Not taxpayers. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1546. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31621Regina Rivera
    Town life is already interrupted with a few long-lasting freight train visits a day here in Wood Dale. To double or triple the amount is completely unfair & disruptive to our town. Please reconsider. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1547. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31620Brian Freitag
    This bothers me, it's already a pain in the Ass! More trains at the crossings means a lot more potential to be held up or detained from our normal everyday lives. I say divert the trains around Muscatine or build an overpass/underpass!! It's bad enough now, sometimes we have to wait for 45 minutes or longer to get across the tracks. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1548. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31619Corey Hultgreen
    I have lived in Roselle for 62 years. These last few years we've had an uptick of trains passing thru Roselle. This has caused a considerable amount of stress to the taxpayers of Roselle. Noise pollution, air pollution, and congestion at train crossings are to name a few. We also need to be concerned for our children who cross over the tracks to use our Public Library, Park District, and the popular Skate Park. Let's do the right thing and put our children's safety first! (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1549. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31618Eric Field
    I am not in favor of the increase in rail traffic through Muscatine. Some of it needs to be rerouted to avoid noise and air pollution, as well avoiding limited river access. If rail traffic increases, the amount through down town Muscatine should not be impacted. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1550. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31617Cindy Bruhn
    This merger will be a huge detriment to our community and the Quad City region. (Received via project website)
    LeClaire, IA
  1551. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31615Christine Bending
    The Milwaukee/West line runs along my back yard. I’m on an acre, so the noise from passenger trains is not too bad. Freight trains, however, can cause some vibrations in my house. Having an additional 6-8 freight trains per day could cause structural damage to my house, as well as added noise pollution. I moved here from Bensenville, and am relieved to be away from airplane noise and house vibrations. Additionally, leaving my subdivision in Medinah requires crossing the railroad tracks. More wait time with cars runnings - more pollution. I am very much against this merger. (Received via project website)
    Medinah, IL
  1552. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31614David Maeglin
    I believe if people had a reasonable expectation of the time a track / street crossing would be blocked, the driving public would be less frustrated. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1553. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31613Lenna Bohlman
    I believe that this should not be approved. Speaking on behalf of Rodenburg rd, there's already construction of the new homes taking place and the road has been getting backed up. This affects residents living in Pembroke Estates and Turnberry as well as other commuters. Many people come and go to that area, especially to access the train station for the Schaumburg stop. This will cause further disruption and have the rd backed up even more. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1554. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31612Janet Taylor
    Muscarine is a town with part of it is cut-off by railroad tracks. We already have trouble getting to/from one part os town. In that part people have long, 30 or so minutes sometimes, wait for trains. One of. Muscatine's largest employers is on the "other side" of the tracks. In an emergency transportation is somewhat halted. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1555. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31611Megan Treml
    My house is less than a mile between two separate train tracks on White Tail Pond in Liberty. When we first moved here in 2013 the trains blew their horns a few times a day. Now there are multiple horns blowing in excess all night long at loud volumes. I do not support almost doubling the amount of trains running by my home. Even without the train traffic, the crossing guards at the tracks are frequently down in error (sometimes for hours at a time) This causes people not to respect the crossing guards and drive around them. We put a lot of money into renovating our home with the intention on staying here forever. With almost double the noise and safety concerns moving doesn't sound like a bad option! My kids don't deserve to live in a house that is constantly rumbling and filled with horns all hours of the night. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1556. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31610Dawn Coonrod
    40 additional trains a day! That’s almost 2 an hour every single day. That will greatly decrease my property value, not to mention make it impossible to cross Birmingham Road, let alone be able to have a conversation with the neighbors outside. That is absolutely too many! (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1557. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31609Jeff Osborne
    Safety, access and reasonable levels of quiet are all valued in Muscatine. We are Iowa’s 24th largest city and just 6 yrs shy of Iowa’s oldest city. Several homes in the south end are just feet from the tracks. The tracks and homes have co-existed peacefully for decades. But this is a significant change for the south end, downtown residents, small businesses and guests. Unique to Muscatine, is our air quality. According to the proposal’s web site, Muscatine’s air quality has historically been over acceptable levels for dangerous materials. It shows have a good track record of improvement. But still today, we have poor air quality in one remaining area. We can not afford take backward steps in Muscatine. It’s not rocket science to say quality of life in Muscatine will be significantly impacted more than any community along the railway if we don’t start planning now. Muscatine supports jobs, effective and efficient rail transportation, but we also want to preserve quality of life on our unique and historic location along the Mississippi River. We request partnering with our city officials on a newly established quiet zone in the south end. An overpass at up to two of our major traffic intersections for safety. And an air quality impact study with actionable steps taken to improve air quality or at least do no additional harm in areas where we are at the most risk. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1558. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31608Gregory Harper
    My business is adjacent to the railroad tracks and the increased traffic would be detrimental to my business. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1559. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31607Sam Semrow
    If this merger is approved please require the railroad to provide mitigation funding for impacts to vehicle traffic as needed specifically in the Chicago area suburbs. (Received via project website)
    Lake Zurich, IL
  1560. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31606Jenelle Bigo
    We are within an 1/8 of a mile from the railroad crossing on Birmingham Rd. The mandatory horn blowing already disrupts sleep and normal conversations. Additional noise will decrease our home values as well as disrupt daily living. If the train traffic is going to increase the crossing needs to be reinforced to reduce the need to blow the horn and add to noise pollution. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1561. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31605Victoria Walter
    We do not need the added headache of more trains. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1562. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31604David Dennis
    My concern with the additional rail traffic would be the habitat displacement. Having 39 acers next to the tracks I have seen how the train traffic affects the wild life and I am concerned that more traffic will minimize wildlife growth. In addition I have two creeks that run along the tracks and under the railroad, I'm concerned about environmental impact from run off from the cargo in the case of accidents. Not against the merger just concerned about the number of trains increasing dramatically in this track (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1563. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31603Michael Beeton
    I am not in favor of foreign companies acquiring US assets (Received via project website)
    Kansas City, MO
  1564. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31602Lora Davison
    The addition of trains running across Birmingham Road in Liberty will greatly impact the quality of life for the many, many residents living next to or within a close range to that Crossing. The noise level and inability to cross that track at numerous times throughout each day will make it much more than inconvenient. It will make this area an undesirable place to live. Please consider denying the request for this plan. (Received via project website)
    Liberty, MO
  1565. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31601Carol Li
    No merger please! Our community is already very noisy with excessive trains and their accompanying noise and pollution. Plus we certainly don’t need the added traffic congestion . (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1566. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31600Lindsay Salgado
    So many small towns and homes line these tracks. The environmental impact, and the noise would impact us greatly. The almost 4 daily trains are already too much, moving that to almost 3 times that amount would be detrimental to our community, not to mention the increase of hazards being shipped along these lines in such close proximity to homes and schools that are less than .25 mile away. (Received via project website)
    Hampshire, IL
  1567. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31599Vijay Kamdar
    This will cause both traffic congestion and increased noice for residents and for that reason please do not approve additional trains. (Received via project website)
    Schaumburg, IL
  1568. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31598Jurado
    i hate this idea, the trains are very loud and we have enough blocking traffic as it is (Received via project website)
    Giselle · Roselle, IL
  1569. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31597Michael Onystok
    Roselle already has a huge traffic congestion problem getting in and out of the housing neighborhood on the south side of the tracks. Not to mention the huge traffic problem this will cause on Roselle Road. This is a very bad idea, the noise, pollution and disruption of movement is going to be a huge deterrent to people selection Roselle as a place to live and for those already here a reason to think of leaving! (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1570. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31596Janet Meyer
    We may be stuck between airplane traffic noise and, it sounds like, freight train traffic delays. At least we will still have Rt. 83 to mitigate some of the traffic interruption. (Received via project website)
    Bensenville, IL
  1571. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31595Gordon Paisley
    I am very concerned about this change which will affect many--even most--people in my community. The increase in freight train traffic will cause automobile traffic backups since there are very few overpass crossings. People like me who commute on the train will face more frequent delays for freight train interference. All these impacts come with no benefit to our community. Therefore, I am strongly opposed to this change. Thank you, Gordon Paisley (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1572. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31594Village of Hanover Park
    Please see attached letter on behalf of the Village of Hanover Park, IL
    Rodney Craig · Hanover Park, IL
  1573. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31593Melinda Peterson
    We don't want more trains. They already cause issues with our town (blocking crossings 30 minutes or more repeatedly). (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1574. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31592Brenda Christensen
    Musketee is working hard too improve it's riverfront. They're in the process of raising money for a new amphitheater that would be feat from the train tracks. Additional trains through this area will hinder the progress the community is making to use this riverfront property for the people of Muscatine. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1575. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31590Leuze
    I don't believe that adding additional freight trains through H.P. will be much of an issue. There are no crossings to be impacted. There should only be additional noise and or exhaust in the areas along the tracks. (Received via project website)
    Arlene · Hanover Park, IL
  1576. (printed as 12/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31589Daniel Freeman
    If this merger is approved the rail company must install over/underpass as City and County of Muscatine determine necessary at no cost to city and county. (Received via project website)
    Muscatine, IA
  1577. (printed as 12/27/2021)
    Notice
    303458Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Agricultural Retailers Association
  1578. (printed as 12/27/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31591MAYOR DENNIS GERARD
    SEE ATTACHED
    LECLAIRE, IA
  1579. (printed as 12/23/2021)
    Comment
    EI-32892Metra
    Christian Alexander · Washington, DC
  1580. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31975Canadian Pacific
    Calgary, Alberta
  1581. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31586Edward Osadzinski
    As a longterm resident of Roselle, my family and I have come to appreciated the small town atmosphere and scope of the town. This proposal would negativeley impact this town and surrounding area and devistate this small town community. Roselle is not in contention to compete as an industrial or rail hub of the midwest. This will have a major negative impact on the envirement and local traffic flow (pedestrian, vechicular and especially emergency vechicle response). Please reconsideryour plans. We do not need this for our community. Thank you for your attention. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1582. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31585Wallace Pfeifer
    No (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1583. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31584Bonnie Piddington
    In no way should Roselle do this - not only do we already have spotty train service but the detrimental effects on the environment and our ability to use Metra would be horribly impacted. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1584. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31583Karen Aho
    No more freight trains, please. We have enough already. They are disruptive at the very least. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1585. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31582Matthew Schubert
    I live within a half mile from this train line. The current train traffic is horrible. It's loud, shakes the entire area and makes it impossible to have a conversation when the train goes by. This proposal would also need to include hundreds of millions of dollars to update all the train tracks and sound barriers, update everybody's fencing around the train line and improve all building and windows if this would even be possible. This would also add more traffic congestion to the area and add significant delays. This is not a good deal for communities and is just capitalism at it's finest. Make money now don't care what it costs the people that have to live with it (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1586. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31581Beth Stein
    My bet is that not many are in favor of more trains – as I am not either. If we don't have a choice though, I would suggest looking at our crossings – especially at Prospect and Irving Park Road – the "holding pattern is not large. Might be time to close-off that road. Or, make Prospect one way (North), like in the old days when the train station was on Main Street. Imagine the congestion at Main street and Prospect too, south of the tracks. People on Main traveling East, may want to drive further East to avoid trying to cross at the tracks to get to Irving. This might create more traffic in front of areas like Polyanna's. Is there room to increase the width of Main street in this area? Noise will be a factor. Not a whole lot you can do to lessen the sound of the wheels on the tracks. We will also have to consider the routes our emergency vehicles would have to take to get to areas north of Irving. For pedestrians, I still throw out the idea of pedestrian bridges to get across Irving Park. Considering that we will soon have a parking issue when Menge Dogs opens, creating a way for pedestrians to safely cross Irving Park, might encourage people to park on the north side of irving (bank parking lot after certain hours). This pedestrian bridge can be for bikers too. I see the bridge being beautifully crafted – "Welcome to Tradition Meets Tomorrow" is included on this bridge. That's all I have for now! (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1587. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31580Donna Zuttermeister
    No I do not want this project to go through. It will tie up all railroad crossings g too long and change the metro schedule to Chicago. I frequently take the train to Chicago and also travel across several railroad crossings frequently and do not want to sit for 19-20 minutes for freight trains. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1588. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31579Carl Robertson
    I don't wanted added train travel through Roselle causing more congestion and noise. Also more chance of accidents. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1589. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31578Pamela Chepil
    Absolutely "NO" more freight trains! Adding 6 to 8 more freight trains a day will make it very difficult and time consuming for residents of Roselle, IL to get anywhere north of Irving Park Road. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1590. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31577Dominic Mazoch
    I have concerns about extra trains coming through the fragile Houston Texas rail terminals. 25 years after the UP-SP merger meltdown, the area can not handle the present traffic load. I am afraid traffic via the I35 corridor, and via the Flatonia TX junction will start coming into Houston. And KCS only has trackage rights on the UP Beaumont-Houston-Rosenberg. Any increase of rail traffic will slow down local roads and METRO transit services. Suggestions: 1. Monitor rail traffic and speeds in the area. 2. Work with UP for placement of extra sidings, et. al, with CPKC paying for it. 3. Have the Spring Dispatch Center become semi-independent, of yrain control in theHouston area apart from CPKC, UP and BNSF national centers. 4. Have CPKC, UP, and BNSF have places to hold trains at the edge of the Houston Terminal. Trains could not enter unless it can clear the Terminal, or has a space in a Terminal yard. Loyld, Kendelton, and Glidden are places trains could weight. Thanks, Dominic Mazoch (Received via project website)
    Houston, TX
  1591. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31576Anne Downes
    Adding additional freight train traffic along the Irving Park Road corridor will be detrimental to the communities along the corridor. The Irving Park/RoselleRoad crossing in Roselle is already congested, and accidents occur every month. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1592. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31575Janet Swiontek
    I certainly am not in favor of this merger and having 6or more freight trains traveling through our village each day and night...I dont like the environmental impact,the train whistles,the stalled traffic,etc.etc,I hope the Vil.of Roselle will present a valid argument against this impact on our community. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1593. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31574Joe Ricchio
    As a homeowner in Pingree Grove, I strongly disagree with this movement. We currently have one active crossing in town and CP is consistently placing trains there at a stand still. Not only is this a major inconvenience but this also disrupts our Emergency Medical services. This crossing by the roundabout is also in such poor shape as CP has neglected the proper maintenance on the crossing. Granted, both these issues are currently with only 3 trains coming into town, with the proposed amount of more trains coming on a single track, this is something our town just can’t afford to continue to be a disruption too. (Received via project website)
    Pingree Grove, IL
  1594. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31573Joseph Kelly
    In general optimization is a good thing. But I would also point out the tracks in our city really obstruct commerce and transit. And any increase in train traffic is detrimental with our current configuration. If however we elevated the tracks over the intersection it would really improve things similar to what they did in Bensenville for Irving park road. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1595. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31572Kirsten Bultman
    I do NOT want any more trains passing through my neighborhood. It is said we will go from about 3 trains a day to 11? These trains carry flammable materials and by upping the amount of trains the odds are not in our favor regarding a serious explosion or accident. Many many homes are just feet from the railroad. No more trains! No acquisition! (Received via project website)
    Pingree Grove, IL
  1596. (printed as 12/22/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31571Lewis Sutton
    This merger will cause undo burden on the residence of the small Village of Pingree Grove by tripling the amount of traffic through our town. The current crossing is in bad disrepair and there has been constant push-back on getting it fixed. The noise pollution is a serious problem that will become much worse with this merger. Property values in the area are sure to be adversely effected as well. On behalf of my neighbors, I ask that this merger not take place.
    Pingree Grove, IL
  1597. (printed as 12/21/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31570Mary Lu Plonczynski
    I live at the Main St. condo at the Prospect St. crossing. I oppose the merger if it means 6-8 additional freight trains per day, a 300% increase. This is environmental pollution. The noise and vibration level will be nearly intolerable, especially in the summer with open windows. The whistles are louder than Metra trains. It will devalue the property of those living near the tracks, and have the potential for accidents and toxic spills. Please reconsider the merger or greatly reduce the number of additional freight trains. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1598. (printed as 12/21/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31569Audrey Voss
    I am against having 6 to 7 more trains coming through Wood Dale. There are too.many coming through as it is and timing up traffic on Irving Park Rd (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1599. (printed as 12/21/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31568Nicci Krebasch
    The intersection of Irving Park Rd (state route 19) and Wood Dale Road is already backed up and takes extra time just with the commuter trains and existing freight trains that come through. This intersection is the main crossroads between schools, stores and residential homes. Adding more freight trains will adversely affect the city of Wood Dale by: 1) making it even harder to cross town, 2) increase emissions as vehicles sit and wait for trains to pass, 3) increase air and noise pollution as more trains pass theough 4) cause emergency vehicles to be delayed getting to residents who need help, 5) as well as affecting the daily life of all residents of the city of Wood Dale. I am strongly opposed to adding more freight traffic through our city. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1600. (printed as 12/21/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31567Karen Koeller
    This would greatly impact our city not only on a traffic situation but also on an air quality issue. I am whole heartedly against the addition of any additional train traffic. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1601. (printed as 12/21/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31566Chris Bower
    If possible, I'd like the EIS to analyze the projected increase in truck traffic around CP's Shoreham Yard in Minneapolis as a result of the merger and determine what affect this will have on roadway crashes (including with bicycles and pedestrians), along with any potential mitigation strategies. The analysis should project any potential increase in crashes using a predictive safety model like AASHTO's Highway Safety Manual and use the same methodology to identify ways to mitigate any increase in crashes as a condition of the merger. I'm bringing this up because currently University Ave NE and Central Ave NE (the roadways on which trucks use to get to Shoreham) are part of Minneapolis' High Injury Network (https://www.minneapolismn.gov/government/programs-initiatives/visionzero/vz-data-stats/), which represents the roadways with the highest proportion of severe or fatal crashes within the city. I'd like the Board to investigate this because even a minor increase in truck traffic on a roadway with an above-average fatal and serious crash rate may ultimately result in a demonstrable negative outcome in terms of road user safety, and a data-driven approach will help analyze the magnitude of the issue and if any mitigation is appropriate. Thank you for your consideration. (Received via project website)
    Not Provided, MN
  1602. (printed as 12/21/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31565Vanessa Mackay
    I have seen many of these types of Aquisitions in the past in multiple states I have lived. As much as freight states the times they would stop traffic would be within a 6-15 minute window, it's impossible to state with certainity as well as impossible to enforce. Most freights last well over 6 minutes in the Chicagoland area. Our intersection was restructured to help eliminate the traffic clog in the past, when it was simply Metra traffic. This aquisition will undo everything that millions of dollars were spent in the past to circumvent. I urge the City of Wood Dale to look past adding to their pocketbook and think about the traffice congestion and noise level in our town, which is already too great. You will turn our town into a mini O'Hare airport of traffic travel, noise and congestion. Please think of your Residents and VOTE NO on this proposition! (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1603. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31587Canadian Pacific
    Response to Information Request No. 2.
    Venable LLP · Washington, DC
  1604. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31546Sonja Bechler
    This merger will negatively affect the corner of Bowes Road and Nesler! It is already a dangerous corner with a bad blind spot. There are no crossing gates plus cars going at a high rate of speed can go airborne. We also working on petitioning for a quiet zone at that crossing. Bowes Creek Regency Adult Community is not in favor of this merger! Sincerely, Sonja Bechler
    Elgin, IL
  1605. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31545Patricia S Thompson
    I took Metra from Roselle, IL to my job in Chicago for eighteen and a half years. It was extremely rare to have freight train interference and if we did, it was very brief (minutes). In contrast, I had a co-worker who took the BNSF line from Naperville, IL to Chicago. He was often late for work due to freight train interference on his line. In addition, I once had lunch with a friend in Downers Grove, IL which is on the BNSF line; the restaurant faced the train tracks. I was amazed at the number of freight trains that went past the restaurant during our meal; they went in each direction and were long and noisy. Most distressing of all was the number of "bomb" trains, the long trains of only liquid container cars, which can present a safety problem. I sincerely hope that the proposed merger between CP and KCS will not result in the kind of disruption that currently occurs on area train lines. Thank you for the opportunity to express my thoughts on this issue.
    Roselle, IL
  1606. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31544Kelly Krell
    While I realize that you own the property that the trains run on, and that access to/across it is granted as a courtesy, I implore you to think about the impact of this merger on neighboring residents on a day-to-day basis. My property abuts CP property, and an increase of this magnitude will impact my quality of life and that of thousands of others. Thank you for your consideration. (Received via project website)
    Riverdale, IA
  1607. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31543Nancy Mathewson
    I have serious concerns about an increase in freight train traffic through Roselle. I worry about structural damage to our condo building over time with the 300% increase in freight trains we are told would occur. Our building is quite close to the tracks. I am also concerned about the air quality for our building, as we are so close to the tracks. I am concerned about noise and quality of life for residents of our building and the other condos & homes that line the train tracks. The freight trains can be loud, but they can also shake the building enough to wake you at times. Lastly, I worry about resale condo units and other homes near the tracks if this particular line starts carrying a drastically increased number of freight trains. WIll this make it difficult for homeowners along and near the tracks to sell their homes, should they need to? (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1608. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31542Georgiajean Shannon
    I strongly oppose the proposed Canadian Pacific merger with Kansas City Southern. As an elderly person living in an unincorporated area am concerned about any additional delay of emergency services (police, fire & paramedics), air quality and noise pollution the additional freight trains will cause. (Received via project website)
    Medinah, IL
  1609. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31541Jim Mathewson
    I live in a condo building next to the railroad tracks (Main St, Roselle) and I am strongly opposed to increased freight train traffic. Our building literally vibrates when freight trains pass. I'm very concerned about what a 300% increase in freight traffic could do to the structural integrity of the building over time. From a quality of life standpoint, I also don't want my home to go from vibrating infrequently to a frequent and regular basis. Finally, freight trains sound their horns much louder and longer the commuter trains (sometimes even between 1-4 am, when they are not supposed to). Roselle is currently not a quiet zone and additional freight trains will significantly disrupt community enjoyment of Main St restaurants, shopping, and residential life. Please do not allow an increase in freight train traffic. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1610. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31540Michael Ondek
    If this acquisition goes through I read this could cause a 300% increase in traffic through Roselle, IL. If there is even a 50% increase I think the acquiring companies should pay to study and upgrade the intersections of Roselle Rd and the tracks and any other roadways nearby to lower the noise from all the additional traffic and create a Quiet Zone in Roselle. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1611. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31539Cathy Hecht
    I am in favor of allowing one freighter daily during non-commuting hours. Supply issues are impacted by rail issues and this could be favorable for our economy. Anything more than one daily freighter could have too much of a negative impact on our environment and the town's presence. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1612. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31538Cathe Ondek
    No we dont want Canadian pacific adding trains thru Roselle. We are a small quiet community. We definitely dont want that kind of train traffic thru our village. I grew up in Streator , il and there were alot of trains that went thru our community. Very loud, disruptive, caused change in traffic patterns. Really not a positive experience on a daily basis. Dont do that to our community! We deserve better! (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1613. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31537John Ondek
    This is what's wrong with this country today. Roselle is a small town with a small town fill. There's no reason that we should let the railroad come in here and wreck it and just make noise and traffic disruptions and have our residents pay for it. I think the whole thing is disgusting and that it should be stopped. It's just another case of big business enforcing its will on the people of the state for profit!
    Roselle, IL
  1614. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31536James Pauley
    I am vehemently opposed to the addition of 8 to 10 freight trains using the Milwaukee Road West Line tracks. The additional noise and traffic jams will have a extremely negative impact on the quality of life in Roselle. Current train traffic, Schaumburg air traffic and O’Hare air traffic already make my Roselle neighborhood one of the noisiest I have lived in. And now we will have an additional 8 to 10 freight trains? And please don’t give me that good neighbor garbage. We all know how that will work out. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1615. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31535Nancy Todor
    I oppose this e quad it will introduce too much freight activity crossing g a busy Irving Park Road in the heart of Wood Dale. Increase noise and air pollution as well.
    Wood Dale, IL
  1616. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31534Jim Pauley
    But on the bright side, when Roselle’s residents are forced to leave town due to the additional noise, traffic and air pollution, it will be so much easier to hop one of the additional west bound freight train rumbling through downtown Roselle. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1617. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31533Amy Mitchell
    We live in the area and have a family business near the train tracks. Daily freight trains would significantly affect our day to day lives negatively. I was recently stopped by a freight train which took nearly a half hour and made me miss getting my very young children off the bus. I shouldn’t have to budget an hour to get home from the grocery store, which is 10 minutes away. Do NOT allow the acquisition to go through!!! (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1618. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31532Ethan Auburn
    I am against an increase of freight train traffic in our area. This would be a burden and adversely impact the local community and environment. (Received via project website)
    Elgin, IL
  1619. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31531Gerald Meisel
    way too much interaction on our roads please we reject this proposal... Jerrry meisel (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1620. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31530Douglas Diefeenthal
    I am a Professional Engineer in Illinois who has specialized in environmental and geotechnical engineering. Increased freight rail traffic in Roselle Illinois could result in an environmental catastrophe. Recent construction of apartment complexes just East of the commuter station would expose many residents if a petroleum car freight train were to derail. Can the railway guarantee such an accident would not occur? (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1621. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31529Heather Frink
    I am concerned with how this will affect residents of South Concord Street. Train traffic is already an issue with the tracks at Wapello and at Concord being blocked for extended periods of times. I personally have sat at the tracks at Concord waiting for a train to move for almost two hours. This is not safe if an emergency were to arise. A family member sat in an ambulance at the tracks, after suffering a heart attack, for 15 minutes before the train was able to be moved. This is unacceptable. I suggest building a train bridge or something similar so that residents of South Concord Street are able to come and go in a timely fashion. (Received via project website)
    Davenport, IA
  1622. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31528Heather Frink
    I am concerned with how this will affect residents of South Concord Street. Train traffic is already an issue with the tracks at Wapello and at Concord being blocked for extended periods of times. I personally have sat at the tracks at Concord waiting for a train to move for almost two hours. This is not safe if an emergency were to arise. A family member sat in an ambulance at the tracks, after suffering a heart attack, for 15 minutes before the train was able to be moved. This is unacceptable. I suggest building a train bridge or something similar so that residents of South Concord Street are able to come and go in a timely fashion. (Received via project website)
    Davenport, IA
  1623. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31526Diane Paisley
    This is something that will affect thousands of people DAILY doing their jobs and maintaining this economy me without any incremental value to the people who live in the area. There is only two over passes to get beyond the trains blocking our way. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1624. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31525Tayler Jensen
    I live right near river front and the occasional train isn’t bad but they can be extremely loud blowing there horn all the way up and down river front I Think this would be a huge inconvenience especially in the spring and summer times on the windows are open (Received via project website)
    Davenport, IA
  1625. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31524Cindy Kliem
    Today 12/19/2021 is the first time I’ve heard of this rail merger. I would like to know the direct impact this merger will have on the rail intersection at Bowes Road and Nestler in Elgin, Illinois. (Received via project website)
    Elgin, IL
  1626. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31523Ronald Skleney
    I am opposed to this acquisition and resultant increase in freight train traffic. I live in Wood Dale and my mother who is elderly and requires care lives in Elk Grove Village. I am called to her house several times a week and use the Prospect Rd crossing to get to her house in a timely manner. Additional freight trains tying up the crossing would cause delays in me getting to her. Please stop this acquisition and do not increase rail traffic. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1627. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31522Caroline Ventrella
    There are enough freight trains going through Roselle. My condo shakes and vibrates each time one comes through. This is a highly residential area. This is extremely disturbing to think additional freight trains may come through. It brings anxiety as they are so loud and heavy. My paintings, etc shake and vibrate. You feel the earth moving. It's very scary. And makes me anxious. Please do not allow more freight trains here. We have enough with freight trains and Metra. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1628. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31521Nancy Flynn
    I am very against this merger. We are trying to get a quiet zone due to the noise from 3 trains, more would be horrible!!!! We live in a 55 plus community. Give us old folks a break! Nancy Flynn 3898 Valhalla Drive Elgin, Illinois (Received via project email)
    Elgin, IL
  1629. (printed as 12/20/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31520Lynette Navigato
    Being on the other side of the tracks in wood dale, I cannot stress enough how more trains put our lives in danger. The fire department and the police department will not be able to get to us. (Received via project email)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1630. (printed as 12/18/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31549Bi-State Regional Commission
    Mr. Joshua Wayland, Please see attached comments regarding Docket No. FD 36500, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, et al.—Control of— Kansas City Southern, et al. These comments were also uploaded to the Surface Transportation Board website and are being expressed mailed in hard copy form. Note, individual letters providing comments on impacts and mitigations needed are also being sent by individual local governments that have signed on to this letter. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Denise Bulat Executive Director Bi-State Regional Commission 1504 Third Avenue Rock Island, Illinois 61201 309-793-6300 Ext. 1140 (Received via project email)
    Denise Bulat · Rock Island, IL
  1631. (printed as 12/18/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31547City of Wood Dale, IL
    Greetings: Please see the attached public comment regarding docket #FD 36500, Canadian Pacific Ry. – Control – Kansas City Southern, and the \ review of the proposed Canadian Pacific acquisition of Kansas City Southern, from Mayor Nunzio Pulice, City of Wood Dale. Thank you. Sincerely, Janelle Janelle Silva | Executive Administrative Assistant Administration Office 404 N Wood Dale Rd | Wood Dale, IL | 60191 direct: (630) 787-3711| fax (630) 766-3898
    Janelle Silva on behalf of Mayor Nunzio Pulice · Wood Dale, IL
  1632. served (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Decision
    51072Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    EXTENDED THE SCOPING COMMENT DEADLINE TO JANUARY 3, 2022.
  1633. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31973Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Tom Wilcox · Washington, DC
  1634. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31553Melanie Lewis
    See attached. (Received via project website)
    Unknown, MN
  1635. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31548State of Minnesota
    See attached. (Received via project website)
    Lisa Elliott · St. Paul, MN
  1636. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31519Robert Skwarek
    PLEASE STOP with all these trains coming through our Village and creating extra noise, congestion and blockages. If you truly have this process in place to hear the concerns of citizens, look up the huge backlash our surrounding community has specific to this issue. We are sick and tired of these trains crossing our main thoroughfares multiple times a day. Enough is enough. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Bartlett, IL
  1637. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31518Jenn Troutman
    I’m particularly concerned about potential impacts to traffic as well as emergency services. I recall in certain nearby towns when lengthy and frequent freight trains would block crossings for 20+ minutes, causing quite a few issues. Clearly those issues had enough of an impact to warrant an overpass being implemented. What is the plan for a small town like Itasca where if even a short freight train blocked our various crossings, we would have zero access to one side or the other of our town? (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1638. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31517Ann Wright
    I oppose the merger of these rail companies, especially if it will mean increased traffic. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1639. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31516Anthony Fini
    Extremely concerned over the traffic congestion, noise levels, and air quality issues the proposed trains would create. Not to mention potential safety issues. How would the railroads prevent these issues from occuring? (Received via project website)
    Bartlett, IL
  1640. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31515Karen Andrews
    I am a resident of roselle, IL. I am against Canadian Pacific railway acquisition of KC Southern rail network. This acquisition would case 6-8 extra freight trains daily through Roselle . (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1641. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31514James Andrews
    I am a resident of roselle, IL. I am against Canadian Pacific railway acquisition of KC Southern rail network. This acquisition would case 6-8 extra freight trains daily through Roselle . (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1642. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31513James Andrews
    I am a resident of roselle, IL. I am against Canadian Pacific railway acquisition of KC Southern rail network. This acquisition would case 6-8 extra freight trains daily through Roselle . (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1643. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31512Carla Pfeiffer
    From a review of the proposal it looks like the effect on our small, quiet town will be devastating. I am opposed to additional railway traffic through Roselle. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1644. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31511Jeff & Joyce Lazzari
    This merger of CP and KCS Rail line is a VERY BAD IDEA! We CANNOT have this happen because we feel the Emergency Vehicles are MORE IMPORTANT to SAVE PEOPLE'S LIVES, and the Railroad tracks NEED TO BE OPEN for the Emergency Vehicles. First of all, this is going to bring 6 to 8 ADDITIONAL FREIGHT TRAINS A DAY on the Milwaukee/West Line which goes through our town, Wood Dale. This will make traffic frequently snarled, and that police, fire, and paramedic units will get held up responding to emergencies. WE ARE VERY MUCH AGAINST THIS!!!! Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1645. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31510Beth Grubb
    There is already too much congestion on Ieving /Roselle. The Metra is loud enough . Tge 2 freight trains going thru now are loud enough. Additional trains will add more congestion more noise and possible more accidents. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1646. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31509Bob Lukkes
    I am against increasing the freight train traffic through Roselle by 300% per day. I live near the rail line and the added noise would be a big negative to the value of our property. Also I take the Metra train into the city and that is already disrupted frequently by freight train traffic. Increasing the amount of freight traffic would make this worse. The tracks feel as though they are already in need of repair and adding that many more heavy trains would deteriorate the rails even more. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1647. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31508Pat Gerdisch
    I have been a resident of Roselle IL for 28 years. I live very close to the railroad tracks that are being impacted. I feel that merger would be disastrous to all the small communities along the tracks. Most of these communities are small and have no underpass as Roselle does. I feel that the environmental impact will be terrible along with all the noise that all the extra train traffic will cause. Not to mention the dangers of how many people are crossing the tracks on foot due to the fact it is a major transportation line for the regions metro trains. Please reconsider this acquisition for the sake of our small communities. There are other rail lines that are more dedicated to rail freight. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1648. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31507Terese Butera
    We are a small town and if this merger is approved , our town would have 6 to 8 more freight trains a day! This will cause more motor vehicle traffic and delays, poor air quality and not to mention the noise! (Received via proejct website)
    Roselle, IL
  1649. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31506David Figueiredo
    I am in opposition to this merger. The railways on the west side of Bartlett impact traffic, safety vehicles, and home costs. This needs to be stopped. (Received via project website)
    Bartlett, IL
  1650. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31505Jessie Weinberg
    I have concerns that the acquisition will increase freight traffic over a reasonable amount in Roselle. 1-2 extra trains during normal commuting/working hours (7am-6pm) seems reasonable over time. 6-8 extra daily trains will have huge impacts on traffic and emergency vehicles. This feels invasive and unnecessary. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1651. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31504Mike Sorensen
    Hey for the record as a roselle resident, I fully support increased train traffic on our Milwaukee west district line. Going from 3 to 11 or more frieght trains is not that big of a deal. Keeps truck traffic off the roads. Possibly increase options for routes in the future for Amtrak to the quad cities and maybe south. So yes I support the merger and hope they are successful. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1652. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31503Barbara Albrecht
    Has Canadian Pacific shown sufficient proof of purpose and need for increasing the freight traffic? Are they willing to pay to protect the communities they want to invade against environmental pollution? Things like safer crossing gates that will allow for a quiet zone, or sound proofing businesses and residences near the tracks. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1653. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31502Vicki Little
    Having freight train traffic up by 300% coming through our small town of Roselle is totally unacceptable. Our downtown area is congested enough already. We don't need any more noise and traffic congestion. Not to mention the risk of a chemical spill and the pollution it would create. Take your freight trains elsewhere and leave our town and people alone. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1654. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31501Jerry Smiley
    I am not opposed to any merger, but VERY concerned about the loud and ongoing train whistles that occur throughout the night. I was under an understanding that we have quiet hours from 10pm-6am. This must be enforced. Installing additional barriers (like on Rodenburg Rd). should eliminate the need for train whistles at all. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1655. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31500Randy Hager
    The Freight trains, are very slow entering & exiting the Frankin Park mixing yard. Plus it hurts Metra's on-time service. NO VOTE on More Traffic. (Received via project website)
    Itasca, IL
  1656. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31499Craig Christensen
    I am against the proposed merger. I believe it will have a profound detrimental effect on the environment and quality of life for the communities impacted specifically Le Claire, Iowa and the Quad Cities. (Received via project website)
    Le Claire, IA
  1657. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31498Kari McGinn
    I object to the increased volume of freight trains that will run along the Milwaukee West rail line. The length of these trains already blocks traffic in our area creating a potential hazard by causing dangerous delays in police, fire, ambulance and emergency vehicles. Please do not allow the merger, or reduce the number and length of trains permitted to use this line. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Bartlett, IL
  1658. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31497Jody Millar
    My family lives river ward of the train tracks as do about 100 other families between LeClaire and Princeton. The difficulties of gaining access to our property will be hugely compounded by tripling the train traffic. Our home is also just past a switch yard which means we could have 3 times as many trains blocking our road. What do we do if we have a medical emergency and our driveway is blocked? The trains also blow their screeching horns at our crossing - this is going to happen 3 times more??? Who can sleep through that? If the number of trains triple, the general winter peace that wildlife experience along the river now will result in permanent disturbance and harassment. Every time a train passes, Bald Eagles perched along the riverfront are disturbed and vacate the area, as do the flocks of migrating waterfowl. A continual disturbance could cause Eagles and waterfowl to vacate the area permanently. I believe the current number of trains are already at their limit of compatibility with established residents of this area - residents who settled here based on a bareable amount of train traffic, not a train super highway! (Received via project website)
    Le Claire, IA
  1659. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31496Karen Schulz
    Roselle is a community that has traditional and family values. When OUR community has a need, request or threat, we unite together, and make our concerns heard. We want to make sure we are respectful, and honor the authorities of those who have been placed there by our vote or appointment. So please hear (and listen) to my comment and offer careful consideration when making your careful and thoughtful decision. Why? This additional freight traffic is NOT required. The sound disruption, travel inconveniences, and over & abundance of ...what? STUFF! is not needed. My (and my neighbors) quality of life (and sleep) is in question. There are many other ways that this cargo can be transported. There are certainly options that could be explored. Take a look at and research other ways that have less of an impact. We will all benefit. A committee group should be formed to research what other options are best. Please reconsider (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1660. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31495Robert Burke
    The railroads cannot keep holding the communities they run through hostage. If trains are going to be tripled in the Quad Cities, there better be passenger service at the very least, and the railroad needs to step up and invest in mitigations to the disruption they cause - e.g. quiet zones, track relocation, downtown redevelopment. (Received via project website)
    Rock Island, IL
  1661. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31494Katie Moretti
    Our city has the railroad going right through the middle of our town. I already this summer has been stuck at the railroad crossing to get to my child because the train had stopped for 10 minutes without any sign of it moving. There is NO WAY that this will pose a risk for safety of residents (with our police station only one one end), along with the safety of children (delays to school), but impose issues with the traffic that gets locked up at the intersections. We also are a “quiet” town but know the freights still will blow their whistles. I am against this and hope the public gets heard on this. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1662. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31493Teresa Garrison
    The proposed merger will increase the rail traffic in front of my home. The increase traffic creates more blasting of whistles and increased chances of accidents and derailments. (Received via project website)
    Le Claire, IA
  1663. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31492Derek Riddle
    This merger will increase train traffic in my town threefold - this is a terrible idea. Too few people will have to carry too much of the burden for this. (Received via project website)
    Moline, IL
  1664. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31491Harris County Precinct 1
    See attached comments
    Rodney Ellis · Houston, TX
  1665. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31490City of Houston
    Mayor Sylvester Turner · Houston, TX
  1666. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31488Sarah Grealish
    As to the additional trains you would like to run thru Roselle I am against. The traffic is already terrible with the trains we have coming thru and most are just quick Metra. I’m assuming you are suggesting long freight trains which would hinder traffic even more . Roselle Road and Irving park especially would be back up for miles. I don’t want our village turning into a Bensonville situation where you sat in traffic forever if stuck by a train. Plus if there was a train accident with chemicals on board or not there are too many people living too close to the train tracks and they would be in danger. I don’t think this would do anything to promote Roselle as a place to settle. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1667. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31487Julie Persons
    I think the merger of the 2 railways should be approved. The improvement to greenhouse gas emissions alone should be enough to let this go forward. I agree the Water Treatment Plant should receive an overpass as to not block the access, however, the noise complaints are of little consequence. As railways expand in the United States, it will be easier to upgrade to the better trains you see in Europe and Asia. Millions of people on those continents live, work, and play next to train tracks. People in the United States only complain because our rail system is so far behind the times. The environment must be protected. This would help. (Received via project website)
    Not Provided, IA
  1668. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31486Tony Pelletier
    I am concerned about the impact of increased noise, emergency access for fire and police and safety of crossings and travel congestion due to close proximity of crossings. It’s a nightmare now during rush our. Roselle is a small town and the impact would be huge. Perhaps less or no horns since we have three intersections close to each other. Or, reroute to another more rural track system. Not a big fan of the change in Roselle, IL. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1669. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31485Timothy Johanson
    I am opposed to the approval of the Canadian Pacific Railway and Kansas City Southern merger. The increased freight train traffic through the Milwaukee District/West rail line is not only unwanted, but also problematic for emergency vehicles needing to cross the train tracks throughout the small villages along the train route. PLEASE DO NOT APPROVE THIS MERGER. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Not Provided, IL
  1670. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31484Michelle Bach
    I am adding my comment because this train line is adjacent to my neighborhood at Spaulding Lane in Bartlett and also crossing Naperville Rd. in Bartlett, IL. It is very challenging when freight trains come through our residential community and block access to our roads. It is one thing when we are stopped by a quick moving Metra train, but our surrounding communities are opposed to more freight train traffic. If this happens we need to have significant roadway enhancements so that the roads overpass the train tracks. We absolutely can not allow Spauliding or West Bartlett Road areas in Bartlett to be used as switching stations with trains blocking access to our residential communities. We also worry about the safety of our community with hazardous materials being transported right along rail lines that are in very close proximity to residential communities. Thank you for taking my concerns into consideration. (Received via project website)
    Elgin, IL
  1671. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31483Rose Rinker
    Adding this rail line to the tracks going through our town will add more traffic, and cause major disruption to our small town. This is too close to both high schools. I live on Roselle Road and this will be a major inconvenience. (received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1672. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31482Cher Yeager
    Besides trains in general being a problem For our community. Train’s shouldn’t run at high traffic times the engineers don’t understand to not stop on the tracks where the gates are. I’ve called the police to get the train to move. The people sitting for so long we’re causing issues trying to turn around. Also, when the train finally clears the tracks the cars now late for work drive like there’s a checkered flag at the end of the street. Trains should move at night after the rush hour is done. (Received via project website)
    Streamwood, IL
  1673. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31481Diana FlorCruz
    The train noises have increased since we moved in, and even at night you cannot sleep with your windows open, because of the horns as the train comes thru, along with the heavy idling sound. This plus the truck depot they want to put near rodenburg, we didn't move to a warehouse district, this is suppose to be a neighborhood! (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1674. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31480Deborah O'Neil
    We are very currently very concerned with the level of train traffic that runs next to our neighborhood. The concern is great enough to have created a committee to address this concern in Bowes Creek. We are awakened at all hours and have many older residents who already struggle to get a good nights rest. The crossing at Bowes and Nesler Rd is extremely dangerous and is a very busy intersection. Many school buses use this crossing daily and it is already not safe. More trains would increase the level of danger. Please do not allow this acquisition to occur. It will be a detriment to our community, greatly disturb homeowners, lower property value, and increase danger in the area. (Received via project website)
    Elgin, IL
  1675. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31479Rose Cannella
    I do not approve the freight trains rolling through Roselle. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1676. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31478Stefanie Howard
    I am not okay with this decision. This railway is already full hazards and has too many houses located too close to it which would be problematic with pollution, cause major traffic delays with few options to get around it plus if there was an accident, the implications could be harmful to the environment and residents of the area. There are already enough land use problems in this area. Don't add another one. (Received via project website)
    Schaumburg, IL
  1677. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31477David ONeil
    This project will only result in increased traffic on roads due to long wait times at railroad crossings, increase the chances of accidents and collisions with cars, trains, and school buses. It will also decrease property values for thousands of illinois residents and make residents unhappy due to the loudness of horns and the trains themselves. I am strongly against the Canadian Pacific Acquisition of Kansas City Southern. My vote is no. (Received via project website)
    Elgin, IL
  1678. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31476Diana Eckert
    This is mostly a commuter line, additional freight trains will mean we will never get across especially in rush hour without an overhead crossing. Freight trains often transport hazardous material putting nearby residents and businesses at risk. Not to mention additional train horn noise pollution. PLEASE DO NOT PROCEED WITH THIS PLAN. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1679. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31475Julie Gard
    The train traffic across the West Bartlett Road crossing is already causing issues with my daughter getting to and from school on time. This merger would exacerbate the situation. While trains are no longer allowed to stop and block the road, they still do without consideration for the safety and needs to the community. In an emergency, all first responders are coming from the other side of the tracks. While they have a contingency plan, precious minutes are wasted which can be the difference between a life and death situation. (Received via project website)
    Bartlett, IL
  1680. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31474Jen Cones
    Please do not increase the train traffic. It already impacts our ability to function and sleep at home. We are also very concerned about our property value and how thousands of families would be economically impacted by an increase in train traffic. We have all been through so much already. There must be something else that can be done, utilizing other routes and means rather than increasing traffic on these rails. (Received via project website)
    Bartlett, IL
  1681. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31473June Fergus
    As a long-time resident of Roselle, I am concerned about the safety in the downtown area with additional train traffic. There are two major train crossings in our main town area where pedestrians are frequently present. Parking for some of the businesses is on the other side of the train crossing which requires pedestrians to cross the tracks. If additional train traffic is created, these two crossings would need to be improved significantly via an overpass or similar solution. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1682. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31472Thomas Oconnery
    The train blockages by our neighborhood are already unbearable with 15-20minute wait times usually. I've watched numerous ambulances/firetrucks/police cars sitting stopped at the tracks dozens of times over the years and to know that the freight train traffic will double makes me sick to my stomach. (Received via project website)
    Bartlett, IL
  1683. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31471Stacy McCaffrey
    These trains are terrible!! WAY TOO LONG and has such a constant impact on our daily routine. I OBJECT to ANY MORE TRAINS COMING THROUGH HERE. The ones now are hard enough to manage. (Received via project website)
    Bartlett, IL
  1684. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31470Anthony Baker
    This existing rail traffic already causes significant congestion, noise pollution, and environmental pollution. All of this causes significant local negative impacts. Additional rail traffic, will simply make the existing problem even worse. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1685. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31469Rick Gard
    The Crossings in Bartlett have become so bad in past five years or so. This will just be adding fuel to the fire. (Received via project website)
    Bartlett, IL
  1686. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31468Beverly Jaszczurowski
    The number of trains coming through across West Bartlett Road in Bartlett is unbearable. There is not rhyme or reason to the timing. My entire family of 5 has been late to appointments, work, school, etc due to the number of trains, the length of the trains and the number of times the trains are stopped across the road for more than 15 minutes at a time. Adding more rail traffic will put our neighborhood at risk for more delays at the very least. The amount of pollution is increased the potential for catastrophic contamination increases with every car that passes. We suffer from noise pollution as well. No more trains in our neighborhood!!!! (Received via project website)
    Bartlett, IL
  1687. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31467Yasmeen
    As a resident, I am concerned that the increase in trains will lead to increased noise and atmospheric pollution, delays to commuter trains, and traffic delays. Please clarify your plan with specific points on how these forthcoming issues will be remedied. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Hanover Park, IL
  1688. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31466Patricia Huntington
    I do not support more train. I live 1/2 from the Rodenburg Road crossing. Auto traffic backs-up and congested that road, spilling increased traffic onto Travis Pkwy…with impatient drivers. Several residents have nearly been hit by cars turning around. Additionally the price of “progress” impends upon my rights to enjoy my property…peacefully. With new residential construction going up nearby, traffic will already be a huge issue. Not to forget the 140,000 square transit project of Schaumburg’s. I vote “NO” to more train traffic! I want to be able to use roads my tax dollars support, walk in a quiet neighborhood and not risk getting struck by upset drivers. I want to breathe clean air and I want to be able to get to my doctor’s office or ER if necessary without train delays. This also will decrease my property values. No one wants to live by a constant stream of freight train traffic. No one. Do not permit this assault on peaceful communities. Vote “NO”! (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1689. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31465City of Elgin
    Richard Kozal · Elgin, IL
  1690. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31464City of Muscatine
    See attachment
    Carol Webb · Muscatine, IA
  1691. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31463Jack Oneil
    I live in Bowes Creek and there is already an issue of loud trains. The trains operate at all times of the day and night and the horns go off as late/early as 3am waking up me and my family. The Canadian Pacific Acquisition of Kansas Southern will only make this worse, which is why I, and my family, am strongly against this. I vote NO (received via project website)
    Elgin, IL
  1692. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31462Pamela Malek
    I live in Turnberry Manor in Roselle which is directly to the south of the railroad tracks. There are already multiple heavy freight trains each day on this rail line that cause my entire building to shake for several minutes with each train, even waking me in the middle of the night because the bed shakes so much. The trains also travel at high speed and sound like they are overloaded. I am against this additional train traffic on the Milwaukee District West line. It will cause more noise and pollution in the area and congestion at the railroad crossing at Rodenburg road and there are limited access roads to and from my neighborhood. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1693. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31461James Wisniewski
    I find the idea of adding 6 - 8 freight trains daily to a residential train route to be absolutely absurd. The additional disruption and danger to the communities along the route from Chicago to Elgin by increasing the amount of freight traffic is totally unacceptable. The wear and tear alone on track and equipment on a rail line that runs in close proximity to downtown areas, schools, hospitals, apartments, condominiums and innumerable single -family residences is a recipe for disasters. These are long-standing communities where people try to live, work and sleep without the delays, disruption and dangers that the additional freight traffic would bring. There simply has got to be a better solution to the issue of moving freight across the country - and for how the Canadian Pacific Railroad can increase its profits. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1694. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31460Village of Bartlett
    Paula Schumacher · Bartlett, IL
  1695. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31459Village of Itasca
    Please see attached from Mayor Jeff Pruyn on behalf of the citizens of Itasca.
    Carie Anne Ergo · Itasca, IL
  1696. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31458Iowa Department of Natural Resources
    The Iowa Department of Natural Resources has no comments or concerns regarding the Canadian Pacific acquisition of Kansas City Southern. (Received via project website)
    Seth Moore · Des Moines, IA
  1697. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31457Jean Ott
    I strongly oppose this merger. The tracks in our suburbs, Itasca, Medinah, Roselle are and have been basically commuter trains. The surrounding neighborhoods nearby these tracks have homes close to the tracks. It is one thing to have a commuter train go by your home, but to have a string of an additional 6-8 freight trains pass by your home and neighborhood at all hours of the day and night is unconscionable. This merger will create additional, noise, air and environmental pollution to all areas affected. Emergency vehicles, Police, Fire, ambulances, will be at a stand still due to this merger. Downtown areas that have local shopping areas and restaurants will be destroyed due to the unpleasantness of a freight train passing right through their store fronts and outdoor restaurant eating areas, due to the unsightliness, noise and pollutions that freight trains generate. I vote NO to this proposal. Sincerely, Jean I. Ott (Received via project website)
    Medinah, IL
  1698. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31456Roselle
    Attached response to Notice of Intent to Prepare Environmental Impact Statement
    Jason Bielawski · Roselle, IL
  1699. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3810Metra
    Janice Thomas
  1700. (printed as 12/17/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3685Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Tom Wilcox
  1701. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31564Iowa Congressional Delegation
    Senator Joni K. Ernst, Senator Charles E. Grassley, Representative Mariannette Miller-Meeks · Washington, DC
  1702. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31455Laurel Lawrence
    NO! This is not something that anyone wants for their neighborhoods. It will greatly reduce the quality of life for not only the towns that have the railway through them, but for all of us in surrounding areas. The traffic, the noise, the ugliness. Go somewhere else to run your trains, not through our neighborhoods. (Received via project website)
    Not Provided, IL
  1703. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31454Michele Pochay
    I am against the merger, there would be too many freight trains running. I would have a very hard time getting to work or going home. I live and work in Wood Dale, but on opposite ends of the tracks.
    Wood Dale, IL
  1704. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31453Michael Melone
    Adding up to Six more trains a day in Wood Dale would be disastrous! The backups caused by this would put things at a standstill creating an environment that would lower property values and be a detriment to quality of life in the area! (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1705. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31452Chris Hickey
    This should not be allowed. We do not need more freight trains coming through our towns with additional pollution & noise not to mention wasting time waiting. Kids in buses sucking in the fumes of idling cars, trucks & the freight trains. Sick of these companies & complicit towns for the sole purpose of the almighty dollar. Quality of life is what matters to the residents in our towns. (Received via project website)
    Schaumburg, IL
  1706. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31451Christine Sporleder
    Hello- As a resident of Hanover Park (and also someone that crosses tracks in Roselle daily) I am very concerned at the idea that there might be up to 8 freight trains running through our towns daily. While I understand freight traffic is necessary, the current commuter + freight schedule is already more than sufficient to cause delays and disruptions. The added traffic would increase noise, traffic backups, and would add to congestion issues. Please reconsider this acquisition for the safety and health of our communities. (Received via project website)
    Hanover Park, IL
  1707. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31450Debra Andis
    The increased rail traffic from this merger will be a detriment to my community. The increased noise and traffic congestion, from the added trains, will adversely affect property values and interfere with emergency services. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1708. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31449GERALENE KELLER
    I totally oppose this proposal. Those of us living near the Milwaukee have line has had to endure an increase in airplane noise and pollution with the completion of O'Hare and now we are being asked to add up to 8 freight trains, adding more noise and causing increase traffic jams. It's very hard now to get across Irving Park with the train crossings closed for long periods of time. The Fire Station is on the south side of Irving, with only one way for vehicles to cross by going way out of the way to one underpass. That does not work for the safety of our community. Roselle has finally developed a downtown area with outdoor eating. My husband and I find it impossible to enjoy the outdoors downtown or on our patios due to the constant train whistles blowing repeatedly, making it impossible to carry on a conversation. I think those of us living near this railroad line and airplane route has endured enough. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1709. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31448Kim Freitag
    I am opposed to this merger as it will have a deleterious impact on traffic flow, noise, and the environment. If the merger is approved, however, there should be significant requirements placed on the railroads at their expense to mitigate impacts, e.g., should have to build over- or under-passes to avoid traffic impacts. (Received via project website)
    Elgin, IL
  1710. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31447City of Wood Dale
    I am the Mayor of the City of Wood Dale, Illinois. I am submitting the attached letter in response to the Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) served in the captioned proceeding on November 12, 2021. That decision in part invited public comment on the scope of the EIS to be prepared by the Surface Transportation Board’s (STB) Office of Environmental Analysis (OEA). On behalf of the City of Wood Dale, I urge OEA to ensure that the scope of the EIS includes a thorough examination of the potential impacts of the merger on the roads and communities of the City of Wood Dale and the greater Chicago area. Based on the information we have reviewed to date, there is the potential that the merged railroad’s will further burden the Chicagoland area with increased road network congestion by significantly increasing freight rail volumes over existing rail lines. Specifically, we understand the merger applicants estimate that traffic over the Milwaukee District West Metra line (Bensenville Metra) between the Bensenville Rail Yard and Randall Road is expected to increase by 235% - or 8 freight trains per day (TPD) - and 128%, or 17.44 million Annual Gross Ton Miles (GTMs). The impacts from such increases will be felt most strongly at the following five at-grade railroad crossings within the City of Wood Dale: Wood Dale Rd (US DOT #372178A), Irving Park Rd (US DOT #372177T), Wood Dale center pedestrian (US DOT #920565F), Wood Dale east pedestrian (US DOT #920564Y), Ash Ave (US DOT #372176L). Attached is my full response on behalf of the City of Wood Dale.
    Annunziato Pulice · Wood Dale, IL
  1711. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31446City of Davenport
    Letter from Mayor Mike Matson and the Davenport City Council is uploaded.
    Mayor Mike Matson and the Davenport City Council · Davenport, IA
  1712. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31445Village of Bensenville
    See attached letter detailing the Village of Bensenville's concerns regarding the proposed acquisition of KCS by CP and the scope of the draft EIS.
    Frank DeSimone · Bensenville, IL
  1713. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31444City of Bettendorf
    See attached letter which details the City of Bettendorf's concerns about the proposed Canadian Pacific/Kansas City Southern Merger.
    Robert S. Gallagher · Bettendorf, IA
  1714. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31442Kristina Tranel
    Any changes that would require new construction for this line may need a floodplain permit through Jackson County (approved after FEMA & IA DNR have approved or stated that no permits from them are needed) and may also be subject to Archeological review by the Iowa Office of the State Archeologist.
    Maquoketa, IA
  1715. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31441City of Davenport
    Corri Spiegel, City Administrator · Davenport, IA
  1716. (printed as 12/16/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31440Kansas Historical Society (SHPO)
    Tim Weston · Topeka, KS
  1717. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31696City of Letts
    We are small town (363) we have 3 crossing in town.At least 2-3 times a week we are unable to go from one side of town to other side.There are times that crossing are blocked 2 hrs. This causes concerns with fire station and ambulance services are on one side of town. What happens if there is a fire and some needs a ambulance.With this merger it can only means more trains..Not good thing for City of Letts.
    Karen Koppe · Letts, IA
  1718. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31489Lac Vieux Desert Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians of Michigan
    Alina J. Shively · Watersmeet, MI
  1719. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31443Bi-State Regional Commission
    Denise Bulat · Rock Island, IL
  1720. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31422Colleen Wisniewski
    Please don't add more trains, especially freight trains to go through our town. We have just built condominiums right near our train station and plan to build a new apartment complex right on Irving Park Rd near train. I think the noise and pollution will drive the people out of Roselle. Thank you (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1721. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31421Jack Storino
    I have concerns about the added freight train traffic this would cause. This would cause additional car traffic as the rail crossing is located at two of our towns most traveled streets. Irving Park and Wood Dale rd. This would increase both police and fire response times as both of those main locations are on the other side of the crossing. EMS vehicles would need to cross freight trains by using rt 83 or going out of their way to Itasca. Either way causing significant delays to respond to emergencies. (received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1722. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31420Kelsey Fawell
    The Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an EIS for the proposed merger indicates that the OEA has identified rail lines located within Illinois that would experience increased rail traffic. Increases in activities at rail yards and intermodal facilities would also occur. An interactive map published by the Board displays calculations of transaction-related traffic for the year 2027, five years after the proposed acquisition could be granted authorization. Data indicates the CP Bensenville Yard is projected to see a 25.8% growth in the average number of cars handled per day, from an estimated 1,427.7 without the merger, to 1795.5 with the merger. Similarly, the portion of the rail line that feeds into the Bensenville Yard, running through the heart of Bensenville’s downtown, will experience an estimated 8 more trains per day than what our community would experience without the merger. As Bensenville is located within a designated nonattainment area, there are concerns that increased freight traffic, along with a possible increase in hazardous cargo, may worsen already poor air quality. Additional traffic will only exacerbate the issues that communities, commuters, and other regional economic drivers in the region are currently enduring. Adverse impacts include increases in noise pollution, vehicular traffic congestion, grade crossing delays, as well as the potential to impede emergency vehicle access and response. Additional data regarding traffic counts and grade crossing delays is needed in order for the STB to adequately review CP’s requested acquisition of KCS. These projections should be both short- and long-term, a minimum of 10 years.
    Bensenville, IL
  1723. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31419Michael Fiddick
    The addition of six to eight trains daily will affect grade crossing safety and cause delays to motor vehicle traffic and emergency services, decrease air quality and increase noise. Please , lets keep our town safe! (received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1724. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31418Lisa Drugan
    Adding this many additional freight trains going thru Roselle and its surrounding towns would be a mistake!! This would cause a traffic , noise, air quality nightmare for Roselle and the surrounding towns!! With the freight trains we currently have traffic gets backed up. Roselle has so many housing projects being built which will already add to our traffic/congestion adding up to 8 more freight trains would be a nightmare for our town and potentially stop first responders from helping people by extending the time it takes to get to them! Please do not allow this in our town!! (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1725. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31417Roselle Public Library District
    I am the Executive Director of the Roselle Public Library District in Roselle, IL. Our library building is located near the railway that bisects the Village of Roselle. If the estimate of a 300% increase in freight traffic with Canadian Pacific Railway's acquisition of the Kansas City Southern rail network is accurate, then I am extremely concerned about the wear this may cause on our facility and the impact of all our staff, visitors, and passerby to the village's municipal complex. Throughout our facility cracks are plainly visible and slowly growing, on walls and in the foundation. Our building was constructed in 1982 and the source of these cracks has long been attributed to the nearby railway. Even if the majority of these cracks are cosmetic today, I am concerned of what the future holds for our facade and structure if there is an extreme increase freight train traffic. And then there is also the noise factor. Even today's amount of train traffic can be disruptive to staff and patrons when they are inside the facility. What will 300% more train traffic do to our staff and patrons' ability to read quietly, listen to a presentation, concentrate on the work they are doing, and otherwise enjoy their time spent in the Library and its surrounding environs? I also have concerns about the impact an increase in freight trains may have on traffic in and out of the Library's parking lot just south of the railroad - and also in and out of the municipal complex the Library is situated within. Wait times for cars and pedestrians to cross seem manageable right now, but if we see more freight trains during the day it seems likely the complex and surrounding neighborhood will see traffic build up dramatically at Park Street, Prospect Street, and Roselle Road - a major road through town. Because Irving Park Road and the entry onto Illinois Route 390 are all north of the railroad we do see a regular flow of drivers passing our building from Maple Avenue.
    Samantha Johnson · Roselle, IL
  1726. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31416City of Bensenville, IL
    The Notice of Intent (NOI) to prepare an EIS for the proposed merger indicates that the OEA has identified rail lines located within Illinois that would experience increased rail traffic. Increases in activities at rail yards and intermodal facilities would also occur. An interactive map published by the Board displays calculations of transaction-related traffic for the year 2027, five years after the proposed acquisition could be granted authorization. Data indicates the CP Bensenville Yard is projected to see a 25.8% growth in the average number of cars handled per day, from an estimated 1,427.7 without the merger, to 1795.5 with the merger. Similarly, the portion of the rail line that feeds into the Bensenville Yard, running through the heart of Bensenville’s downtown, will experience an estimated 8 more trains per day than what our community would experience without the merger. As Bensenville is located within a designated nonattainment area, there are concerns that increased freight traffic, along with a possible increase in hazardous cargo, may worsen already poor air quality. Additional data regarding traffic counts and grade crossing delays is needed in order for the STB to adequately review CP’s requested acquisition of KCS. These projections should be both short- and long-term, a minimum of 10 years. Additional traffic will only exacerbate the issues that communities, commuters, and other regional economic drivers in the region are currently enduring. Adverse impacts include increases in noise pollution, vehicular traffic congestion, grade crossing delays, as well as the potential to impede emergency vehicle access and response. (Received via project website)
    Kelsey Falwell · Bensenville, IL
  1727. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31415Bensenville Chamber of Commerce
    The Bensenville Chamber of Commerce, comprised of over 150 businesses and organizations throughout the Village of Bensenville, Illinois, has numerous concerns with the proposed CP/KCS merger. As Chamber President, I am submitting this comment on the organization's behalf. According to the data compiled on the interactive map located on the project’s EIS website, Bensenville’s rail line, which runs through the heart of the downtown business district, is expected to experience an estimated 8 more trains per day than what our community would without the merger. This increased freight traffic has the potential to cause vehicular traffic congestion at grade crossings, heavily impacting Bensenville’s economic spheres. Additional data regarding traffic counts and grade crossing delays is needed in order for the STB to adequately review CP’s requested acquisition of KCS. These projections should be both short- and long-terms, a minimum of 10 years.
    Pete Gallagher · Bensenville, IL
  1728. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31413Kelly Caruso
    Increased rail traffic will make commuting longer and could potentially cause children to be late to school. Not to mention the noise and environmental pollution that this will create in our community. I don't believe this will benefit our community and will cause problems immediately and in the future. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1729. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31412Michelle Henkelman
    Our downtown in Roselle does not need more freight train activity. It is already not in a convenient area so adding more trains will add to traffic and noise. Please consider another option. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1730. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31411Norm Niss
    The tracks near RT20 in Elgin seem to be unsafe, you can hear a very loud metel on metel noise when trains pass over. Adding more trains will cause more derailments (Received via project email)
    Elgin, IL
  1731. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31410Kody Ward
    The increased rail traffic could delay police, fire and ambulance vehicles rushing to and from emergency calls. It could make all of its crossings unavailable at the same time, and Wood Dale reports that there could be an aggregate of more than two hours of road closures every day. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1732. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31409Charles Gold
    I am in favor of the merger of both railroad companies. The public will benefit from lower cost of goods and lower air pollution . This comes from the efficiencies from the combined operation and scheduling. (Received via project website)
    Bartlett, IL
  1733. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31408Ashley Cook
    The proposed increase of freight train traffic along the Milwaukee District West train line through Roselle will negatively impact my and my family’s life and health, with no benefit in return. Fumes from the trains, traffic delays including emergency vehicles, and the substantial noise of freight trains will negatively affect my community. Our downtown area, like many others, is along the train lines; when I walk, shop, eat, and attend community events, I do not want to be assaulted by emissions and noise. Our town is trying to be more engaging, and the increase of freighter traffic will hinder its progress. Please do not allow an increase of freight train traffic through my town. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1734. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31407Elizabeth Bolivar
    Adding 6-8 more freight trains through the already very busy Milwaukee District West line will negatively impact residents of the community but more importantly the environment. The increase will escalate the pollution the current diesel powered freights already produce which include global warming gases (carbon dioxide, methane, carbon monoxide to name a few), they will increase the particulates in our air, will cause extreme noise pollution, and adding shaking of the land as the trains go by. All of these things will greatly impact the local environment – including humans, wildlife and plant life. We strongly disapprove of adding more freight traffic to this line as the environmental impact is too high. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1735. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31406Citizens of Cowgill, Missouri
    Please see attached 41 letters from Citizens of Cowgill, Missouri. (received via mail)
    Cowgill, MO
  1736. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31405Emilio Di Cesare
    Clarification is needed on the following: 1. Amount of freight traffic increase and impact on traffic flow 2. Noise - will no horn areas be implemented? Some areas hear train horns throughout the day including at night. Not only that, but the sound and vibrations of train traffic can be excessive as is. 3. Impact on local infrastructure given additional total weight (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1737. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31404Cerena Fischer
    I'm concerned about the noise all of these trains will bring. Congestion on the rails and are the rails good enough to handle excess traffic. It will also hamper the commuter services as well. I think they should use another railroad to handle this service. (Received via project website)
    Hanover Park, IL
  1738. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31403Angela C
    Since the freight increase, I have seen multiple ambulances and fire trucks stopped. This is totally unacceptable and could cost many of our elderly or sick villagers their lives- not to mention children who may need assistance quickly. Considering how crucial the first 5-10 minutes are in an anaphalaxis or stroke are, I think it's reprehensible that this is considered acceptable by the railway. (received via project website)
    Bartlett, IL
  1739. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31400Jessica Olague
    I stand against this change it will make it more unsafe and add addition traffic in small street putting in danger our kids. Plus the added noise is not acceptable (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1740. (printed as 12/15/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31399Village of Schaumburg, IL
    See attached letter which details the Village of Schaumburg's concerns about the proposed CP/KCS merger and the scope of the draft EIS.
    Brian Townsend · Schaumburg, IL
  1741. (printed as 12/14/2021)
    Voting
    303356Voting Trust Agreement
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas City Southern
  1742. (printed as 12/14/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31439Environmental Protection Agency
    Robert Houston · Dallas, TX
  1743. (printed as 12/14/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31402Louisiana DOTD
    Attached are Louisiana DOTD comments on the proposed merger.
    William Shrewsberry · Baton Rouge, LA
  1744. (printed as 12/14/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31401Kansas Department of Health and Environment
    See attached letter from the Kansas Department of Health and Environment. (received via mail)
    Donna Fisher · Topeka, KS
  1745. (printed as 12/14/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31383Arkansas SHPO
    Jessica Cogburn · Little Rock, AR
  1746. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303352Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Agricultural Retailers Association
  1747. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303351Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    National Corn Growers Association
  1748. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Certificate
    303349Certificate Of Service
    National Association of Wheat Growers
  1749. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303348Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    BNSF Railway Company
  1750. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303347Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    American Soybean Association
  1751. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303346Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Port Authority of Kansas City, Missouri
  1752. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303345Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
  1753. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303344Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    City of Liberty, Texas
  1754. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303343Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Olin Corporation
  1755. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303342Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    City of Dayton, Texas
  1756. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303341Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    County of Liberty, Texas
  1757. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303340Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Liberty County Rural Rail District #1
  1758. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303339Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Texas International Terminals Ltd.
  1759. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303338Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    City of Cleveland, Texas
  1760. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303337Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.
  1761. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303336Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Houston-Galveston Area Council
  1762. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303335Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Nebraska Wheat Board
  1763. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Certificate
    303334Certificate Of Service
    National Industrial Transportation League
  1764. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303333Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    National Industrial Transportation League
  1765. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303332Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Occidental Chemical Corporation and Oxy Vinyls, LP
  1766. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303330Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    U.S. Department Of Agriculture
  1767. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303329Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    National Association of Wheat Growers
  1768. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303328Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Canadian National Railway Company
  1769. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303327Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Minnesota Wheat Research and Promotion Board
  1770. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303326Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    The Village of Itasca, Illinois
  1771. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303323Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    North Dakota Wheat Commission
  1772. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303322Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, International Association of Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Workers, National Conference of Firemen and Oilers 32BJ/SEIU
  1773. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303320Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Kansas Association of Wheat Growers
  1774. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Notice
    303318Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Oklahoma Wheat Commission
  1775. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-32111Canadian Pacific
    Calgary, Calgary
  1776. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31392USACE
    Brian Donahue · Kansas City, MO
  1777. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31389Samuel Thomas
    I would like to voice my objection to Canadian Pacific Railway recently application to acquire Kansas City Southern rail network which could result in 6 to 8 additional freight trains traveling through Roselle, IL. The negative impacts to local noise pollution and traffic would not be acceptable. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1778. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31388Michael Drugan
    I think this is way too much additional train traffic through our town. The environmental aspect can’t be ignored, as well as the negative impact. I hope there’s a way to stop this. We need someone to look out for us in this matter. (Received via project email)
    Roselle, IL
  1779. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31387Cynthia Wolf-Franden
    Environmental concerns-noise and air pollution Increased traffic congestion having negative impact on quality of life as well as local businesses I do not want proposal to be accepted (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1780. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31386Christopher Yohn
    NO, NO, NO!! Maybe fix all your junk, antiquated, diesel polluting engines before talking about spreading your pollution and noise, and horns from the arrogant drivers with all your multiple trains coming through (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1781. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31385Kara McAuliffe
    My family and I oppose this acquisition and increased train traffic. Our town cannot accommodate an increase in the resulting auto traffic, noise pollution, air pollution, economic decline and safety hazards. The intersection of Roselle Road and Irving Park Road is already very dangerous with the existing train schedule. The noise pollution has already increased in Roselle from the new flight paths at O’hare. It would not be fair to the residents to increase the noise level yet again! The air pollution, especially in our downtown area, would directly impact our small businesses who have restaurants located directly on or across the tracks. With the pandemic sending more people outdoors, we don’t need more noise and air pollution preventing our small town festivals and local outdoor dining options to decrease. Please reconsider this merger and do not run more trains through the Milwaukee West District Line! (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1782. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31384Tim Dolan
    I am vehemently opposed to this merger. Canadian Pacific is simply not safe enough to transport oil anywhere, much less through populated areas of the United States. We must not allow this merger to pass for the sake of the people and the environment. (Received via project website)
    Minneapolis, MN
  1783. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31382Arkansas SHPO
    Stacy Hurst · Little Rock, AR
  1784. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31381Ann Thomas
    I would like to voice my objection to Canadian Pacific Railway recently application to acquire Kansas City Southern rail network which could result in 6 to 8 additional freight trains traveling through Roselle, IL. The negative impacts to local noise pollution and traffic would not be acceptable. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1785. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31380Shelby Thomas
    I would like to voice my objection to Canadian Pacific Railway recently application to acquire Kansas City Southern rail network which could result in 6 to 8 additional freight trains traveling through Roselle, IL. The negative impacts to local noise pollution and traffic would not be acceptable. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1786. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31379Jacqueline Feliciano
    This merger is greatly concerning. I don't think research has been done on the impact this will have on my community. Traffic will increase severely, as seen in other nearby communities. What is the impact to health and the environment for residents? This will cheapen our community and make living here untenable. (Received via project website)
    Bensenville, IL
  1787. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31378Shari Caboor
    I live near the Medinah Metra station on Maple Ave. Not only would the additional noise be disruptive, I can barely turn left onto Medinah Road between 4:00-6:30pm as it is. Additional trains would severely impact emergency vehicles reaching their destination in a timely matter putting lives at risk. Sincerely, Shari Caboor (Received via project website)
    Medinah, IL
  1788. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31377Cheryl Sanchez
    I am against the addition of more freight trains running through Roselle. It will increase traffic build up and cause major delays. I have lived here for 7 years, came from Plainfield and was glad to only have the Metra trains running through Roselle. Plainfield trail traffic was always an issue with traffic back ups due to the very long freight trains running through. Moving away from all of that was one of the reasons I chose Roselle. Roselle is small, the traffic has increased already, allowing freight trains to run through will create a traffic nightmare. Also a safety issue. Roselle is not prepared to handle the excess traffic and any environmental issues that will arise from that traffic and excess trains running through. Do not allow extra freight traffic! (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1789. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31369Fahad Channa
    As a homeowner of Pembroke Estates, property adjacent to Rodenburg Road just south of the train tracks, I disagree with the proposal based on my personal triple bottom line analysis of the environmental impact this project will cause to the neighborhood. The additional train traffic will result in noise pollution, and additional traffic queuing which is bad for air quality caused by the idling of these vehicles for prolonged periods of time on Rodenburg Road due to passing freight trains. Economically it will cost the residents additional money to take the Elgin Ohare Tollway to travel northward to avoid the queuing due to the freight train passing. Not to mention the social impact due to the economics of traveling northward from Roselle. (received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1790. (printed as 12/13/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3684Coalition to Stop CPKC
    Tom Wilcox
  1791. (printed as 12/10/2021)
    Notice
    303317Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  1792. (printed as 12/10/2021)
    Notice
    303316Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Bayer CropScience LP
  1793. (printed as 12/10/2021)
    Notice
    303314Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Freight Rail Customer Alliance
  1794. (printed as 12/10/2021)
    Notice
    303313Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    U.S. Department of Transportation
  1795. (printed as 12/10/2021)
    Notice
    303312Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  1796. (printed as 12/10/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31376Oklahoma Corporation Commission
    I would like to know how much train traffic would increase on the following KSC lines in Oklahoma: i.e. "9 trains per day for a total of..." RR DIVISION RR SUB-DIVISION Midwest Heavener Midwest Shreveport Midcontinent Heavener South Waldron System 1st (Received via project website)
    Brent Payne · Unknown, OK
  1797. (printed as 12/10/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31375Debra Freedland
    We know that freight rail rarely gives right of way to passenger traffic, even though they are supposed to. Freight traffic is a major cause of significant delays on Amtrak, and I doubt it would be better for Metra. W can expect traffic delays and safety problem is this goes through. Freight trains will cause negative environmental impact. What will be being shipped through our residential neighborhoods? Toxic or nuclear waste, petroleum, coal, or chemicals? Just the air pollution caused will be detrimental. The impact of a spillage could be disastrous. I certainly don't want this. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1798. (printed as 12/10/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31374Richard Hertz
    I STRONGLY OPPOSE this merger. I have a home within a quarter mile of the Franklin Park, IL train yard. As much as the train track crossings are annoying to wait for, that’s the least of my concerns. Do you know what it’s like to have a new born baby close to a train yard?!?!? It’s horrible. And that’s been my life. The NOISE from the trains turning the massive curve to enter and exit the yard is a high pitched, ear piercing, deafening screeching that is constant whenever a train is entering or exiting. Which is very often!!! The ONLY crossing left on York road in Bensenville has signs that say “No Train Horn, Proceed With Caution”. But that’s a blatant LIE!!!!! The trains, ESPECIALLY, the freight trains, are blowing their horns ALL THE TIME!!!! And then they blow their horns at all hours of the night and early morning hours while they’re parked inside the train yard!!! There’s people trying to live and thrive over here and these guys don’t give two shits!!! What makes you think it’ll be better with more trains??? It’s not going to get any better!!! Please don’t do this to us!!! I will be forced to move my family out of town!!! (Received via project email)
    Bensenville, IL
  1799. (printed as 12/10/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31373Jessica Martens
    The railroad should be responsible for soundproofing houses along the tracks if this all goes through. We haven’t gotten windows from O’hare and now we are being overtaken by the trains. Someone should help us!! (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1800. (printed as 12/10/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31372Regina Vescovi
    I live a few blocks away from the train tracks and am concerned about the additional noise and delays this will cause. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1801. (printed as 12/10/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31371Sarah loomis
    The lives that were lost during this railways constant disregard for human life is disgusting. If the merger goes forward I guarantee more lives will be lost. STOP the merger. End the bloodshed!
    Minneapolis, MN
  1802. (printed as 12/10/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31370Sarah caya
    The focus needs to be why were even thinking of trusting a company that is ok with bloodshed.
    Minneapolis, MN
  1803. (printed as 12/10/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31368Village of Pingree Grove
    Jeff Cook · Pingree Grove, IL
  1804. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Notice
    303310Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Genesee & Wyoming, Inc.
  1805. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Notice
    303308Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Evergy Metro, Inc.
  1806. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Comments
    303306Comment
    John E. Musser
  1807. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31982Public Scoping Meeting Transcript
    Washington, DC
  1808. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31367Danielle Skwierczynski
    What data is being used for the estimation of increased local traffic? If the estimation is 8 trains/day now (Bensenville, IL), what is the forecast for the additional number of trains 10, 20, 40 years from now? With the continued growth of ecommerce during the pandemic driving 25% growth in ecommerce alone, what is the impact on this particular acquisition? Improvements to infrastructure across the board are a non-negotiable to mitigate the extensive supply chain issues we are seeing now from becoming our status quo, but with there being so many unknowns about the interconnectivities associated with this (likely port upgrades, other rail line improvements, IT infrastructure improvements amongst myriad companies involved in the coming years), it is not possible to identify the true impact. There is great value here from a supply chain and logistics standpoint, but on a community level the disruption may be significant for many, **MANY** years to come.
    Bensenville, IL
  1809. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31366Frank Pozdol
    Increase freight train traffic will increase the polluting of air quality in our Village with longer waits at train tracks causing autos , buses etc. . emitting unnecessary fumes into our current clean air . The residents of Roselle will bear the pain from this proposal while Canadian Pacific shall profit .
    ROSELLE, IL
  1810. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31365Adam caya
    The railway has not took any responsibility to the employee deaths in fact tried to cover it up. Now they are asking more trust by bringing oil in. They have blood on there hands! Take accountability!!!!
    Minneapolis, MN
  1811. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31364Texas Historical Commission (SHPO)
    Justin Kockritz · Austin, TX
  1812. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31363Holly Kapsa Priestly
    What impact is this going to have on the Metra commuter rail? What impact is this going to have on the East Irving Park Road TIF? What hours of the day will be impacted by additional freight traffic? What impact is this going to have on Metro 19 and other surrounding new developments? (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1813. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31362Jennifer Sword
    I am in opposition of this. I do not want increased freight traffic in our town. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1814. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31361Liz Fitzgerald
    More freight trains would cause horrible delays in traffic. Roselle and Irving park is a major area with no other options to get around train. We have no overpasses. Please do not add freight trains to this line. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1815. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31360City of Liberty, MO
    Can you please tell me if this project anticipates more trains running through Liberty, Missouri? (Received via project website)
    Katherine Sharp · Liberty, MO
  1816. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31359Erik Ogrady
    Apart from the noise, the freight liners shake my house and all surrounding homes. If this acquisition goes through I will be forced to move my family. I've already had to spend a lot on repairing nail pops due to the vibration created by the freight liners, and those are just the known issues I'm facing (god knows what other impact the vibration is having on my home). If freight rail traffic is to increase by 300% that can only mean one thing for me and my family, we're moving and we've only been hear 1.5 year. (Received via project website)
    Roselle, IL
  1817. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31358OK SHPO
    Lynda Ozan · Oklahoma City, OK
  1818. (printed as 12/9/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31357Village of Bensenville, Illinois
    Evan K . Summers · Bensenville, IL
  1819. (printed as 12/8/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31983Public Scoping Meeting Transcript
    Washington, DC
  1820. (printed as 12/8/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31356Bonnie Matter
    CP has both CP rail lines and "trackage rights" in the following areas: Zip code / City or Township 55071 / Grey Cloud Island, MN 55016 / Cottage Grove, MN 55071 / St. Paul Park, MN What is the anticipated impact of the CP-KCS merger on the "trackage rights" rail in these areas; e.g., Potential for or anticipated increase in number of trains (how many - existing vs 2027), increased number of freight cars, increased times per day environmental impact. etc. Please provide as much information as possible regarding possible impacts. Same question relative to what is the anticipated impact of the CP-KCS merger on the current CP rail lines in these areas. Anticipated improvements or required ROWS, bridge replacements. How is this information communicated to the appropriate city officials; What are the titles of the city officials that are notified for follow up. Thank you. (Received via project website)
    Cottage Grove, MN
  1821. (printed as 12/8/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31355Stephen Baker
    I am concerned about nose from the freight trains and concerned about trains sitting on the tracks. Especially at night. I have seen this happen and it causes massive traffic jams in the area. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1822. (printed as 12/7/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31984Public Scoping Meeting Transcript
    Washington, DC
  1823. (printed as 12/7/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31350Ashley
    Hello, I do not approve of Canada Pacific acquiring KCS. The increase in traffic will do a number of damages to Pingree grove, IL. Too often are there already issues at the single railroad crossings which cause delays since there are very limited options for roadways. There are also houses right along the tracks. An almost 3 times increase in daily trains would cause an excessive amount of noise pollution for these homeowners. There are families and children living just feet away from the tracks. The increase in train traffic would also increase the rate of structural damage to these homes. (Received via project email address)
    Pingree Grove, IL
  1824. (printed as 12/7/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31349Patty Anne
    I oppose to this project and support the City of Wood Dale's letter of opposition. An additional 6-8 freight trains per day traveling through Wood is definetely undesirable for our community. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IN
  1825. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303287Certificate Of Service
    Village of Barrington
  1826. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303286Certificate Of Service
    Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, International Association of Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Workers, National Conference of Firemen and Oilers 32BJ/SEIU
  1827. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303284Certificate Of Service
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1828. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303283Certificate Of Service
    CN
  1829. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303282Certificate Of Service
    IAM District Lodge 19
  1830. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303281Certificate Of Service
    International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO
  1831. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303280Certificate Of Service
    Lyondell Chemical Company, Equistar Chemicals, LP, LyondellBasell Acetyls, LLC and LyondellBasell Advanced Polymers Inc.
  1832. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303279Certificate Of Service
    Private Railcar Food and Beverage Association, Inc.
  1833. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Notice
    303278Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Private Railcar Food and Beverage Association, Inc.
  1834. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303277Certificate Of Service
    National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak")
  1835. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303276Certificate Of Service
    American Train Dispatchers Association
  1836. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303275Certificate Of Service
    International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers-Transportation Division
  1837. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303274Certificate Of Service
    U.S. Wheat Associates
  1838. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Notice
    303273Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    U.S. Wheat Associates
  1839. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303272Certificate Of Service
    The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
  1840. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Notice
    303271Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Industrial Minerals Association - North America
  1841. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303270Certificate Of Service
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  1842. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303269Certificate Of Service
    Private Railcar Food and Beverage Association, Freight Rail Customer Alliance, National Coal Transportation Association
  1843. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303268Certificate Of Service
    The American Chemistry Council and The Fertilizer Institute
  1844. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Notice
    303266Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    The American Chemistry Council and The Fertilizer Institute
  1845. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Certificate
    303265Certificate Of Service
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  1846. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31345Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska
    Alan Kelley · White Cloud, KS
  1847. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31343Barry Grabert
    This project will increase the possibility of a catastrophic mass casualty event in Pingree Grove. The railroad tracks run straight through the heart of a large 2000 home subdivision with hundreds of homes within a mear 100 feet of the tracks. The tracks also run through the middle of a Forest Preserve and an increase of train traffic through this Forest Preserve will be very harmful to this environment. I ask you to please stop this acquisition as it will be very harmful to all that live in our community. (Received via project website)
    Pingree Grove, IL
  1848. (printed as 12/3/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31342Kelly Harland
    To whom it may concern. I oppose this merger of the CP and Kansas city railroad. I moved out of the city of Chicago to get away from all of the trains. I moved to Pingree Grove knowing that there were 2 to 3 trains a day which is ok but what you are proposing 11 trains a day would ruin the quality of the community life. Our property values would go down because communities with a lot of trains are less valuable and the residents of our community paid a lot for our houses. Thank you Kelly Harland (Received via project website)
    Pingree Grove, IL
  1849. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Certificate
    303264Certificate Of Service
    BNSF Railway Company
  1850. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Certificate
    303263Certificate Of Service
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1851. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Certificate
    303260Certificate Of Service
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1852. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31985Public Scoping Meeting Transcript
    Washington, DC
  1853. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31972Canadian Pacific
    Venable LLP · Washington, DC
  1854. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31347Chitimacha Tribe of Louisiana
    Kimberly S. Walden · Charenton, LA
  1855. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31344Adam caya
    Na
    Minneapolis, MN
  1856. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31341John O'Connor
    I strongly urge you to reject this proposal. The environmental consequences of this merger, that has only been proposed out of greed, would be devastating. The potential for increased pollution and deadly oil spills is far to high to allow this to go through. I sincerely hope that you protect citizens, and the planet, from this dangerous proposal.
    St. Paul, MN
  1857. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31340City of Wood Dale, IL
    Greetings: Please see the attached public comment regarding the Surface Transportation Board’s environmental review of the proposed Canadian Pacific acquisition of Kansas City Southern, from Mayor Nunzio Pulice, City of Wood Dale. Thank you. Sincerely, Janelle
    Janelle Silva · Wood Dale, IL
  1858. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31339City of Wood Dale
    As Mayor of the City of Wood Dale, a suburb of Chicago with two railroad tracks that traverse three different crossings through our town, I am writing you with serious concerns about the impact of the merger of Canadian Pacific Railway with Kansas City Southern Railway. After review of the proposed merger and the projected impacts that this merger will have on our community, it is evident that the burdens placed on our residents, commuters, and public safety response times will likely outweigh the benefits cited by the companies in this merger. Currently, there are approximately 75 trains that pass through our community each day, which includes commuter and freight trains. The documents supporting this merger show that Wood Dale would see an increase in freight trains of over 50 percent per day, increasing from an average of 16 trains per day to 24 trains per day. At an average closure of 6 minutes per 8,500-foot-long train at 40 miles per hour, this would result in another 48 minutes of road closures that separate our town in half, slowing or significantly delaying response to emergency situations. In addition to the public safety concerns, our residents who live near the tracks will experience a significant increase in noise pollution at all times of the day. Due to our proximity to the Bensenville railyard, there are concerns of substantial slowdowns or complete stoppages of trains due to this volume. While the proposed merger cites some environmental benefits such as reduced truck traffic, this merger would increase the shipping of hazardous cargo from states that produce these items that are not currently operating under this rail system. The impact of an accident involving hazardous cargo would far outweigh any environmental benefits achieved in the short-term. For these reasons, I respectfully request that the Surface Transportation Board reject this proposed merger until these concerns can be mitigated for our residents. Respectfully, Annunziato Pulice
    Mayor Annunziato Pulice · Wood Dale, IL
  1859. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31338City of Wood Dale, IL
    Mayor Annunziato Pulice · Wood Dale, IL
  1860. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31337David Wolf
    As a homeowner on directly behind the Wood Dale Train Station. I will be directly affected in a negative way by this merger. I already have foundation, and house settling issues from the trains as it is. the increase of noise will affect my daily life as well. (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1861. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31336Roger McCready
    I don't agree with the merger (Received via project website)
    Wichita, KS
  1862. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31335Katherine Roco
    I am against the acquisition. Already our town is plagued by commute trains. Without an under or overpass the town is shut down when trains are passing thru. Also I’m concerned about property value as we live so close to the loud tracks (Received via project website)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1863. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31334Frances Vines
    I live in Wood Dale IL and DO NOT want an additional 6-8 freight trains coming thru here per day. that is RIDICULOUS. (Received via project email address)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1864. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31333Rachel Gergely
    I am concerned about the environmental impacts this merger will have, specifically in regards to Canadian Pacific's historical use of railways to transport oil (which has a high chance of spillage and environmental destruction). If these railways merge will any steps be taken to prevent increased oil shipments (which would lead to a higher chance of major environmental disaster)? (Received via project website)
    Not Provided, MN
  1865. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31332Tammy Scooter
    I see that the proposed acquisition states that there would be environmental benefits, less trucks on the road AKA less pollution. However, that does not outweigh the NEGATIVE environmental impacts. Things such as air quality, biological resources, noise, water resources, hazardous waste sites. And yes there may be less trucks...but more trains are being added. All of these negatives affect many more people than reduced truck traffic. Can you elaborate more on the "impact topics," that I listed above?
    Not Provided, NY
  1866. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31331Anshul Gupta
    I vigorously oppose this merger, which will increase the number of bomb trains filled with filthy tar sands oil, or at least make it more profitable and easier for dirty Canadian tar sand oil companies to send their trashy product to the US. (Received via project website)
    Valhalla, NY
  1867. (printed as 12/2/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31330Rachel Gergely
    I don’t understand how this merger can offer any benefits aside from capital gain. It will only serve to harm the environment more than has already been done due to oil spillage. What are the potential benefits to the people and/or the environment of this merger? Are there any? (Received via project email)
    Not Provided, MN
  1868. (printed as 12/1/2021)
    Notice
    303256Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    United States Army Military Surface Deployment and Distribution Command
  1869. (printed as 12/1/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31986Public Scoping Meeting Transcript
    Washington, DC
  1870. (printed as 12/1/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31326Kelly
    Please do not come they Wood Dale, IL Between all the railroad repairs and accidents we have had. All the construction on the Main Street in town, Covid, bridge repairs, and the current Metra trains, my business located along the tracks can not with stand any more reason for people to avoid our main road which this would affect! People will take alternate routes and my small business, which is reliant upon people driving they town, will be destroyed!!!! They will use alternate routes and avoid our area which will causes dozens and dozens of small businesses to go under. NOT big retail stores, small business like mine that will ruin our lives!!!!! We do not need any more trains and train accidents in our town!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!’ It is one of the more dangerous locations already…do your research to see how bad of an intersection it already is…Wood Dale Rd and Irving Park Road in Illinois! Please do NOT do this to us! Have a great day, Kelly (Received via project email address.)
    Wood Dale, IL
  1871. (printed as 11/30/2021)
    Notice
    303250Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    The Chlorine Institute
  1872. (printed as 11/30/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31987Public Scoping Meeting Transcript
    Washington, DC
  1873. (printed as 11/29/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31325EPA Region 7
    NEPA Team Leader, EPA Region 7. Would like to be a part of the cross-agency NEPA process.
    Joe Summerlin · Lenexa, KS
  1874. (printed as 11/29/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31322Venable LLP
    See attached
    Kathryn Kusske Floyd · Washington, DC
  1875. (printed as 11/24/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3604Canadian Pacific
    Venable LLP
  1876. served (printed as 11/23/2021)
    Decision
    51021Entire Board
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE BOARD IS ACCEPTING FOR CONSIDERATION AN APPLICATION SEEKING BOARD APPROVAL FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CONTROL BY CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY LIMITED (CANADIAN PACIFIC), THROUGH ITS INDIRECT, WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY CYGNUS MERGER SUB 2 CORPORATION, OF KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN, AND THROUGH IT, OF THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY (KCSR) AND ITS RAILROAD AFFILIATES, AND FOR THE RESULTING COMMON CONTROL BY CANADIAN PACIFIC OF ITS U.S. RAILROAD SUBSIDIARIES, AND KCSR AND ITS RAILROAD AFFILIATES.
  1877. (printed as 11/23/2021)
    Misc.
    303237Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1878. (printed as 11/23/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31320Village of Elmwood Park
    docket #36500 Additional Contact for Elmwood Park: Paul A. Volpe, Village Manager 708-452-3912 pvolpe@elmwoodpark.org
    Angelo "Skip" Saviano · Elmwood Park, IL
  1879. (printed as 11/22/2021)
    Reply
    303235Reply
    Canadian National Railway Company
  1880. (printed as 11/22/2021)
    Reply
    303232Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas City Southern
  1881. (printed as 11/19/2021)
    Misc.
    303231Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1882. (printed as 11/19/2021)
    Motion
    303229Motion/Petition/Request
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  1883. (printed as 11/19/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31319John Johnson
    I urge the STB to approve the proposed CP/KCS merger. The merger will help streamline (speed up) the movement of freight on a new rail system that is more 'seamless' across the entire North American continent. Easier movement of freight will also reduce emissions in the long run which is a positive thing. Finally, since i believe everyone wants goods to be moved efficiently and emissions to be reduced, I suggest the STV consider the possibility of allowing (even requiring) that other rail carriers be granted trackage or haulage rights on the CP/KCS routes in certain situations when doing so could also allow businesses along those routes to have more options for competition through these other carriers. A corresponding reciprocal agreement between the CP/KCS and the other carriers for trackage or haulage in other areas would certainly (in the long run) also reduce emissions and speed the delivery of goods across the country. (The greater Chicago area comes to mind) thank you for the opportunity to comment. John Johnson
    Mexico, MO
  1884. (printed as 11/19/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31318Edward McRoy
    The City of Krum's Development Services Department is primarily concerned with potential changes in activity related to rail traffic passing through the community that would increase the average number or length of trains passing through the City of Krum but particularly y during the hours of 6AM and 6PM. There are no grade-separated thoroughfare crossings over the rail line in town. This means that our fire department, which is located at 400 N 1st St (FM156) and provides fire suppression, emergency response, and medical response can be significantly degraded in its response when trains are present at the primary crossing point at FM 1173. The City of Krum Police station which, is located at 146 W. McCart St. (FM 1173) is likewise also affected by rail traffic passing through the community. Besides emergency response, significant traffic congestion also arises during peak travel hours when rail traffic is present. FM 1173 is a significant primary commuter route for a number of in - town travelers and those going to and from the cities of Denton, Ft Worth and the DFW metroplex. Increased rail traffic or longer trains may result in loss of economic productivity, increased emissions of VOC's, increased emission of carbon dioxide and other potentially harmful air pollutants and may result in marginal increases in the rates of vehicular accidents, injury rates or fatality rates due to vehicular accidents. Although potentially not measurable objectively, increased wait times for crossings to clear may also have a negative psychological impact on commuters and passengers by raising stress levels which could lead to a minimal but measurable increase related health conditions or criminal acts.
    Krum, TX
  1885. (printed as 11/19/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31317Canadian National Railway Company
    Sidley Austin LLP · Washington, DC
  1886. (printed as 11/18/2021)
    Misc.
    303221Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1887. (printed as 11/18/2021)
    Misc.
    303220Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1888. (printed as 11/17/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3776Texas SHPO
    Mark Wolfe
  1889. (printed as 11/17/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3775Oklahoma SHPO
    Lynda Ozan
  1890. (printed as 11/17/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3774Missouri SHPO
    Toni Prawl
  1891. (printed as 11/17/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3773Louisiana SHPO
    Kristin Sanders
  1892. (printed as 11/17/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3772Kansas SHPO
    Patrick Zollner
  1893. (printed as 11/17/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3771Illinois SHPO
    Colleen Callahan
  1894. (printed as 11/17/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3770Iowa SHPO
    Heather Gibb
  1895. (printed as 11/17/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3769Arkansas SHPO
    Stacy Hurst
  1896. (printed as 11/17/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3768MN SHPO
    Alice Roberts-Davis
  1897. (printed as 11/17/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3695U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
    Oklahoma Ecological Services Field Office
  1898. (printed as 11/16/2021)
    Reply
    303216Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas City Southern
  1899. (printed as 11/16/2021)
    Misc.
    303215Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1900. (printed as 11/16/2021)
    Misc.
    303214Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1901. served (printed as 11/15/2021)
    Decision
    51024Director Of Proceedings
    SUSPENDED THE PROTECTIVE ORDER ENTERED IN THIS DOCKET TO A LIMITED EXTENT.
  1902. (printed as 11/15/2021)
    Notice
    303213Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1903. served (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Decision
    50990Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    DETERMINED THAT THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT IS APPROPRIATE PURSUANT TO THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT.
  1904. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comments
    303207Comment
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  1905. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comments
    303206Comment
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas CIty Southern
  1906. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comments
    303205Comment
    The American Chemistry Council, The Fertilizer Institute and The National Industrial Transportation League
  1907. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comments
    303203Comment
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  1908. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Notice
    303197Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Lyondell Chemical Company; Equistar Chemicals, LP; LyondellBasell Acetyls, LLC; and LyondellBasell Advanced Polymers Inc.
  1909. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comments
    303195Comment
    BNSF Railway Company
  1910. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3599U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Arkansas Ecological Services Field Office
  1911. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3598U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Illinois-Iowa Ecological Services Field Office
  1912. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3597U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Louisiana Ecological Services Field Office
  1913. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3596U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Minnesota Wisconsin Ecological Services Field Office
  1914. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3595U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Missouri Ecological Services Field Office
  1915. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3594U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Upper Mississippi River National Wildlife and Fish Refuge
  1916. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3593Local Agencies
    Local Agency Contacts
  1917. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3592U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    USFWS Contacts
  1918. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3591U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
    USACE Contacts
  1919. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3590Environmental Protection Agency
    EPA Contacts
  1920. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3589Community Leaders
  1921. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3588Federally Recognized Tribes
    Tribal Historic Preservation Officers
  1922. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3587Federally Recognized Tribes
    Tribal Contacts
  1923. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3586Elected Officials
    State Officials
  1924. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3585State Agencies
    State Agency Contacts
  1925. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3584Federal Agencies
    Federal Agency Contacts
  1926. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3583Elected Officials
    Local Officials
  1927. (printed as 11/12/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3582Elected Officials
    Federal and State Officials
  1928. (printed as 11/10/2021)
    Comments
    303194Comment
    Canadian National Railway Company
  1929. (printed as 11/10/2021)
    Misc.
    303193Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1930. (printed as 11/10/2021)
    Misc.
    303186Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1931. (printed as 11/8/2021)
    Misc.
    303173Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1932. (printed as 11/5/2021)
    Supplement
    303170Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1933. (printed as 11/5/2021)
    Errata
    303169Errata/Correction
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1934. (printed as 11/3/2021)
    Letter
    303154Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  1935. served (printed as 11/2/2021)
    Decision
    50974Entire Board
    INVITED PUBLIC COMMENTS ON A PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THIS PROCEEDING.
  1936. (printed as 10/29/2021)
    Application
    303143Application
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas City Southern
  1937. (printed as 10/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31354Canadian Pacific
    Maps by segment book supporting response to Information Request No. 1
    Venable LLP · Washington, DC
  1938. (printed as 10/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31353Canadian Pacific
    Master segment and yard tables supporting response to Information Request No. 1.
    Venable LLP · Washington, DC
  1939. (printed as 10/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31352Canadian Pacific
    Response to Information Request No. 1 supporting information.
    Venable LLP · Washington, DC
  1940. (printed as 10/28/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31312Canadian Pacific
    Response to Information Request No. 1.
    Venable LLP · Washington, DC
  1941. (printed as 10/25/2021)
    Misc.
    303120Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1942. (printed as 10/22/2021)
    Misc.
    303119Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1943. (printed as 10/20/2021)
    Misc.
    303110Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1944. (printed as 10/20/2021)
    Statement
    303109Support Statement
    Honorable Eddie Bernice Johnson
  1945. (printed as 10/19/2021)
    Notice
    303105Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1946. (printed as 10/14/2021)
    Misc.
    303088Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1947. (printed as 10/12/2021)
    Misc.
    303083Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1948. (printed as 10/4/2021)
    Misc.
    303062Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1949. served (printed as 9/30/2021)
    Decision
    50961Entire Board
    PROVIDED NOTICE OF AN AMENDMENT TO A PREFILING NOTICE OF INTENT THAT WAS FILED WITH THE BOARD ON MARCH 23, 2021.
  1950. (printed as 9/24/2021)
    Misc.
    303037Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1951. (printed as 9/20/2021)
    Misc.
    303017Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1952. (printed as 9/17/2021)
    Motion
    303014Motion To Withdraw
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1953. (printed as 9/16/2021)
    Notice
    303003Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, et al.
  1954. (printed as 9/15/2021)
    Supplement
    303002Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas City Southern
  1955. (printed as 8/30/2021)
    Misc.
    302946Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1956. (printed as 8/27/2021)
    Notice
    302924Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  1957. (printed as 8/19/2021)
    Motion
    302882Motion/Petition/Request
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  1958. served (printed as 8/2/2021)
    Decision
    50866Entire Board
    GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART A PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF RELATING TO MATERIALS SOUGHT TO BE USED BY CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY LIMITED, CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, AND THEIR U.S. RAIL CARRIER SUBSIDIARIES IN PREPARING ITS APPLICATION IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  1959. (printed as 7/22/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3547Venable LLP
    Kathryn Kusske Floyd
  1960. (printed as 7/16/2021)
    Letter
    302738Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  1961. (printed as 7/15/2021)
    Statement
    302734Support Statement
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1962. (printed as 7/8/2021)
    Misc.
    302693Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1963. (printed as 7/1/2021)
    Letter
    302670Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  1964. (printed as 6/29/2021)
    Notice
    302638Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak")
  1965. (printed as 6/25/2021)
    Comments
    302602Comment
    Honorable John Hoeven, Honorable Kevin Cramer, Honorable Kelly Armstrong
  1966. (printed as 6/25/2021)
    Comments
    302601Comment
    Forest Products Association of Canada, American Forest & Paper Association
  1967. (printed as 6/25/2021)
    Notice
    302599Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    National Railroad Passenger Corporation ("Amtrak")
  1968. (printed as 6/24/2021)
    Reply
    302588Reply
    Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, International Association of Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Workers, National Conference of Firemen and Oilers 32BJ/SEIU
  1969. (printed as 6/23/2021)
    Comments
    302585Comment
    Village of Barrington, Ill.
  1970. (printed as 6/23/2021)
    Motion
    302580Motion To Strike
    The Kansas City Southern Et. Al.
  1971. (printed as 6/23/2021)
    Motion
    302577Motion To Withdraw
    LC Logistics GPS
  1972. (printed as 6/21/2021)
    Notice
    302567Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
  1973. (printed as 6/21/2021)
    Reply
    302559Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1974. (printed as 6/16/2021)
    Notice
    302537Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    New Orleans Public Belt Railroad Commission for the Port of New Orleans
  1975. (printed as 6/16/2021)
    Reply
    302534Reply
    The Kansas City Southern, Et Al.
  1976. (printed as 6/11/2021)
    Motion
    302496Motion To Withdraw
    National Cold Chain
  1977. (printed as 6/10/2021)
    Comments
    302492Comment
    CHS Inc.
  1978. (printed as 6/10/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31197Venable LLP
    Kathryn Kusske Floyd · Washington, DC
  1979. (printed as 6/9/2021)
    Comments
    302485Comment
    Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, International Association of Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Workers, National Conference of Firemen and Oilers 32BJ/SEIU
  1980. served (printed as 6/7/2021)
    Decision
    50808Director Of Proceedings
    DENIED A REQUEST FOR AN EXPEDITED REPLY DEADLINE AND ORDERED THAT REPLIES TO A PETITION ARE DUE BY JUNE 16, 2021.
  1981. (printed as 6/7/2021)
    Comments
    302482Comment
    Transportation Division of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, American Train Dispatchers Association
  1982. (printed as 6/7/2021)
    Comments
    302477Comment
    IAM District Lodge 19
  1983. (printed as 6/7/2021)
    Comments
    302476Comment
    Transportation Communications Union/IAM
  1984. (printed as 6/3/2021)
    Misc.
    302458Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  1985. (printed as 6/3/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3546Venable LLP
    Kathryn Kusske Floyd
  1986. (printed as 6/2/2021)
    Comments
    302444Comment
    Paterson GlobalFoods Inc.
  1987. (printed as 6/2/2021)
    Comments
    302443Comment
    City of Saint Paul, Minn.--Dept. of Public Works
  1988. (printed as 6/1/2021)
    Notice
    302435Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen
  1989. (printed as 6/1/2021)
    Statement
    302433Support Statement
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1990. (printed as 5/28/2021)
    Letter
    302430Letter
    The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
  1991. (printed as 5/27/2021)
    Motion
    302420Motion/Petition/Request
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1992. (printed as 5/27/2021)
    Comments
    302416Comment
    American Chemistry Council
  1993. (printed as 5/27/2021)
    Comment
    EO-3545Venable LLP
    Kathryn Kusske Floyd
  1994. (printed as 5/25/2021)
    Comments
    302403Comment
    Cargo Montreal
  1995. (printed as 5/21/2021)
    Notice
    302395Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    BNSF Railway Company
  1996. (printed as 5/21/2021)
    Letter
    302390Letter
    Kansas City Southern, The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Gateway Eastern Railway Company, and The Texas Mexican Railway Company
  1997. (printed as 5/21/2021)
    Letter
    302385Letter
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  1998. (printed as 5/19/2021)
    Notice
    302381Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Commuter Rail Division of the Regional Transportation Authority d/b/a Metra
  1999. (printed as 5/17/2021)
    Comments
    302374Comment
    Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT, Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, International Association of Sheet Metal Air Rail and Transportation Workers, National Conference of Firemen and Oilers 32BJ/SEIU
  2000. (printed as 5/17/2021)
    Statement
    302346Support Statement
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  2001. (printed as 5/14/2021)
    Letter
    302348Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  2002. (printed as 5/14/2021)
    Letter
    302338Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  2003. (printed as 5/14/2021)
    Letter
    302337Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  2004. (printed as 5/14/2021)
    Comment
    EI-31195Venable LLP
    Kathryn Kusske Floyd · Washington, DC
  2005. (printed as 5/12/2021)
    Letter
    302328Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  2006. (printed as 5/12/2021)
    Letter
    302323Letter
    Surface Transportation Board
  2007. (printed as 5/12/2021)
    Comment
    EI-30693Venable LLP
    Kathryn Floyd · Washington, DC
  2008. (printed as 5/11/2021)
    Misc.
    302311Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  2009. (printed as 5/10/2021)
    Notice
    302304Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    BNSF Railway Company
  2010. (printed as 5/10/2021)
    Voting
    302298Voting Trust Agreement
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  2011. (printed as 5/10/2021)
    Comments
    302297Comment
    Davenport Industrial Railroad
  2012. (printed as 5/10/2021)
    Notice
    302295Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers ("IBEW")
  2013. (printed as 5/10/2021)
    Notice
    302292Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT; Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen; International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers-Mechanical Division; and National Conference of Firemen and Oilers, 32BJ/SEIU
  2014. (printed as 5/10/2021)
    Statement
    302284Support Statement
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  2015. (printed as 5/7/2021)
    Comments
    302277Comment
    Village of Barrington, Illinois
  2016. (printed as 5/7/2021)
    Misc.
    302276Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  2017. served (printed as 5/6/2021)
    Decision
    50715Entire Board
    FOUND THAT FORMAL BOARD REVIEW OF THE VOTING TRUST AGREEMENT PROPOSED FOR USE IN CONNECTION WITH THIS TRANSACTION IS WARRANTED AND DETERMINED THAT THE PROPOSED ARRANGEMENT IS ACCEPTABLE WITH CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS.
  2018. (printed as 5/5/2021)
    Comments
    302262Comment
    New Ulm Steel and Recycling
  2019. (printed as 5/5/2021)
    Comments
    302259Comment
    Northern Plains Railroad Inc.
  2020. (printed as 5/5/2021)
    Comments
    302258Comment
    Ontario Southland Railway Inc.
  2021. (printed as 5/4/2021)
    Comments
    302250Comment
    CHS Inc.
  2022. (printed as 5/3/2021)
    Comments
    302263Comment
    ArcelorMittal North America
  2023. (printed as 5/3/2021)
    Comments
    302246Comment
    Rhomberg Sersa North America
  2024. (printed as 5/3/2021)
    Comments
    302245Comment
    J.W. Scott Farm
  2025. (printed as 4/30/2021)
    Notice
    302231Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    The National Grain and Feed Association
  2026. (printed as 4/30/2021)
    Notice
    302227Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    The National Grain and Feed Association
  2027. (printed as 4/30/2021)
    Reply
    302217Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  2028. (printed as 4/29/2021)
    Comments
    302212Comment
    Standard Rail Corporation
  2029. (printed as 4/29/2021)
    Comments
    302211Comment
    Crow Wing Recycling
  2030. (printed as 4/29/2021)
    Comments
    302208Comment
    Global Upholstery Co. Inc.
  2031. (printed as 4/29/2021)
    Comments
    302207Comment
    Albatrans Canada Inc.
  2032. (printed as 4/29/2021)
    Comments
    302206Comment
    Clayton County Recycling Inc.
  2033. (printed as 4/29/2021)
    Comments
    302205Comment
    J Carpenter Environmental, LLC
  2034. (printed as 4/29/2021)
    Comments
    302204Comment
    Meadowland Farmers Cooperative
  2035. (printed as 4/29/2021)
    Comments
    302203Comment
    Fullerton Farmers Elevator
  2036. (printed as 4/29/2021)
    Comments
    302202Comment
    G. Thompson Livestock Co. Inc.
  2037. (printed as 4/29/2021)
    Comments
    302201Comment
    VantEdge Logistics Inc.
  2038. (printed as 4/29/2021)
    Comments
    302199Comment
    Logistique Canamex Inc.
  2039. (printed as 4/29/2021)
    Comments
    302198Comment
    Grand Prix Inc.
  2040. (printed as 4/29/2021)
    Comments
    302197Comment
    PFL Petroleum Services Limited
  2041. (printed as 4/29/2021)
    Reply
    302195Reply
    Canadian National Railway Company
  2042. (printed as 4/28/2021)
    Comments
    302192Comment
    Kaycan Ltd.
  2043. (printed as 4/28/2021)
    Comments
    302191Comment
    Kaytec Inc.
  2044. (printed as 4/28/2021)
    Comments
    302190Comment
    ENX Inc.
  2045. (printed as 4/28/2021)
    Comments
    302189Comment
    KP Building Products Ltd.
  2046. (printed as 4/28/2021)
    Comments
    302188Comment
    Sprague Operating Resources LLC
  2047. (printed as 4/28/2021)
    Comments
    302186Comment
    Stewart Southern Railway
  2048. (printed as 4/27/2021)
    Comments
    302185Comment
    Phoenix Park Energy Marketing LLC
  2049. (printed as 4/27/2021)
    Comments
    302184Comment
    Routes Transport Group
  2050. (printed as 4/27/2021)
    Comments
    302183Comment
    Iowa Southern Railway
  2051. (printed as 4/27/2021)
    Comments
    302182Comment
    Iowa Traction Railway
  2052. (printed as 4/27/2021)
    Reply
    302176Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  2053. (printed as 4/27/2021)
    Comments
    302175Comment
    Park Farm Grains Ltd.
  2054. (printed as 4/26/2021)
    Comments
    302169Comment
    AEG Fuels LLC
  2055. (printed as 4/26/2021)
    Comments
    302168Comment
    Pattison Sand Company
  2056. (printed as 4/26/2021)
    Comments
    302161Comment
    Horizon Grains Ltd.
  2057. (printed as 4/26/2021)
    Comments
    302160Comment
    Southland Pulse Inc.
  2058. (printed as 4/26/2021)
    Comments
    302157Comment
    Canadian National Railway Company
  2059. (printed as 4/26/2021)
    Comments
    302152Comment
    Federal White Cement Ltd.
  2060. (printed as 4/26/2021)
    Comments
    302151Comment
    Caravan Supply Chain Inc.
  2061. served (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Decision
    50743Entire Board
    FOUND A TRANSACTION TO BE SUBJECT TO THE REGULATIONS SET FORTH AT 49 C.F.R. SUBPART A, IN EFFECT BEFORE JULY 11, 2001, PURSUANT TO THE WAIVER FOR TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY UNDER 49 C.F.R. § 1180.0(b).
  2062. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Comments
    302149Comment
    Up On Me Imports Inc.
  2063. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Comments
    302148Comment
    Transport Procal Inc.
  2064. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Comments
    302147Comment
    National Cold Chain
  2065. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Comments
    302146Comment
    Trendwood Limited
  2066. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Comments
    302145Comment
    Continental Logistics Ltd.
  2067. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Comments
    302144Comment
    Great Sandhills Railway Ltd.
  2068. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Comments
    302143Comment
    Forest River Bean Co., Inc.
  2069. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Comments
    302142Comment
    Ceres Global Ag Corp.
  2070. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Comments
    302140Comment
    Best Cartage Limited
  2071. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Comments
    302135Comment
    Boss Lubricants
  2072. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Comments
    302130Comment
    USD Terminals Canada
  2073. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Comments
    302129Comment
    Alberta Prairie Railway
  2074. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Statement
    302123Support Statement
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  2075. (printed as 4/23/2021)
    Comments
    302121Comment
    Canadian National Railway Company
  2076. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Reply
    302120Reply
    USD Group LLC
  2077. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302119Comment
    South West Terminal
  2078. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302116Comment
    TDWP Partners LLC
  2079. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302115Comment
    Guanajuato Energy Terminal LLC
  2080. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302114Comment
    USD Group LLC
  2081. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302113Comment
    Ostara Nutrient Recovery Technologies Inc.
  2082. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302112Comment
    Port Arthur Terminal LLC
  2083. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302110Comment
    Maine Propane Distributors Inc.
  2084. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302109Comment
    RG Phillips Group of Companies Inc.
  2085. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302108Comment
    Western Asphalt Products
  2086. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302105Comment
    IMCO International Steel Trading Inc.
  2087. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302103Comment
    Central Farm Service
  2088. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302099Comment
    Target Transportation Ltd.
  2089. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302098Comment
    Eurochem North America Corporation
  2090. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302097Comment
    FJ Robers Co Inc.
  2091. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302096Comment
    Tepper Holdings Inc.
  2092. (printed as 4/22/2021)
    Comments
    302091Comment
    Citi-Cargo & Storage Co., Inc.
  2093. served (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Decision
    50709Entire Board
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT APPLICANTS INTEND TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR CONTROL INVOLVING TWO CLASS I RAILROADS AND ASSIGNED AN ALJ TO HANDLE DISCOVERY MATTERS.
  2094. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302092Comment
    La Milanaise Inc.
  2095. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302087Comment
    Bison Transport
  2096. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302086Comment
    Canada Drayage Inc.
  2097. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302085Comment
    Progressive Rail Incorporated
  2098. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302084Comment
    Consolidated Fastfrate Inc.
  2099. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302083Comment
    Re-Transportation
  2100. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302082Comment
    Timiron LLC
  2101. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302081Comment
    Bay and Bay Transportation
  2102. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302080Comment
    Veikle Grain Ltd.
  2103. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302079Comment
    Maddox Logistics Limited
  2104. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302078Comment
    Great Northern Transport Inc.
  2105. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302077Comment
    Wheaton-Dumont Coop Elevator
  2106. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302076Comment
    K+S North America Corporation
  2107. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302074Comment
    North Dakota Grain Dealers Association
  2108. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302073Comment
    The Farmers Elevator Company of Honeyford North Dakota
  2109. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Reply
    302068Reply
    Timiron Llc
  2110. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302067Comment
    APPRO Development, Inc.
  2111. (printed as 4/21/2021)
    Comments
    302064Comment
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  2112. (printed as 4/20/2021)
    Comments
    302063Comment
    Villaume Industries, Inc.
  2113. (printed as 4/20/2021)
    Comments
    302062Comment
    Lee Container
  2114. (printed as 4/20/2021)
    Comments
    302055Comment
    Taconic Maintenance
  2115. (printed as 4/20/2021)
    Comments
    302054Comment
    Thomson Reuters
  2116. (printed as 4/20/2021)
    Comments
    302053Comment
    Crow Wing Recycling
  2117. (printed as 4/20/2021)
    Comments
    302052Comment
    TYT Group Inc.
  2118. (printed as 4/20/2021)
    Comments
    302051Comment
    Brookstone Specialty Service, Inc.
  2119. (printed as 4/20/2021)
    Comments
    302049Comment
    General Transport Inc.
  2120. (printed as 4/20/2021)
    Comments
    302048Comment
    Western Logistics Inc.
  2121. (printed as 4/20/2021)
    Statement
    302046Support Statement
    The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  2122. (printed as 4/20/2021)
    Comments
    302045Comment
    Gopher Resource, LLC
  2123. (printed as 4/19/2021)
    Comments
    302039Comment
    Salt Source LLC
  2124. (printed as 4/19/2021)
    Comments
    302038Comment
    Canadian Heartland Training Railway Services Inc.
  2125. (printed as 4/19/2021)
    Comments
    302037Comment
    Centerville Iron & Metal Inc.
  2126. (printed as 4/16/2021)
    Comments
    302029Comment
    Custom Stud, Inc.
  2127. (printed as 4/16/2021)
    Comments
    302026Comment
    Independent Dispatch, Inc.
  2128. (printed as 4/16/2021)
    Comments
    302025Comment
    Boundary Trail Railway Company
  2129. (printed as 4/16/2021)
    Comments
    302024Comment
    GCT Global Container Terminals Inc.
  2130. (printed as 4/16/2021)
    Comments
    302022Comment
    V Modal Mexicana, S.C.
  2131. (printed as 4/15/2021)
    Statement
    302020Support Statement
    Watco
  2132. (printed as 4/15/2021)
    Comments
    302019Comment
    CMA CGM (America) LLC
  2133. (printed as 4/15/2021)
    Comments
    302017Comment
    Vogelsberg Trucking, Inc.
  2134. (printed as 4/15/2021)
    Comments
    302016Comment
    Dakota, Missouri Valley and Western Railroad
  2135. (printed as 4/15/2021)
    Comments
    302015Comment
    American Iron and Metal Company Inc.
  2136. (printed as 4/15/2021)
    Comments
    302013Comment
    Lafarge Canada
  2137. (printed as 4/14/2021)
    Comments
    302011Comment
    Centerville Produce LLC
  2138. (printed as 4/14/2021)
    Comments
    302010Comment
    Lakeside Foods Inc.
  2139. (printed as 4/14/2021)
    Comments
    302004Comment
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  2140. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Notice
    302001Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    The Transportation Division of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers
  2141. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    302000Comment
    Cando Rail & Terminals Ltd.
  2142. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301999Comment
    Bay and Bay Transportation
  2143. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301998Comment
    Jim Donnan Companies
  2144. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301997Comment
    Smart Sand Inc.
  2145. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301996Comment
    Mactrans Logistics Inc.
  2146. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301995Comment
    Axsun Inc.
  2147. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301994Comment
    Conagra Brands Canada Inc.
  2148. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301993Comment
    Best Cartage Limited "Bestway"
  2149. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301992Comment
    Centennial Energy LLC
  2150. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301991Comment
    Continental Intermodal Group LP
  2151. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301990Comment
    La Milanaise, Inc.
  2152. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301989Comment
    Independent Energy Corp.
  2153. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301988Comment
    Hapag-Lloyd (America) LLC
  2154. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301987Comment
    Keltic Transportation
  2155. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301986Comment
    Nestle Canada Inc.
  2156. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301985Comment
    Logistics Alliance Inc.
  2157. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301984Comment
    Tepper Holdings Inc.
  2158. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301983Comment
    New World Global LLC
  2159. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301982Comment
    AV Terrace Bay
  2160. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301977Comment
    XTL Transport Inc.
  2161. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301976Comment
    GAC Chemical Corporation
  2162. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301975Comment
    Consolidated Fastfrate Inc.
  2163. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Notice
    301972Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    The American Train Dispatchers Association
  2164. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301971Comment
    HCL Logistics Inc
  2165. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301969Comment
    Routes Transportation Group
  2166. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301968Comment
    Celtic International, LLC
  2167. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301964Comment
    Pattison Sand Company
  2168. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301963Comment
    Zekelman Industries
  2169. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301962Comment
    Re-Transportation
  2170. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301961Comment
    Great Northern Trans-Port Inc.
  2171. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301960Comment
    Sharp Base Shipping And Transport (Canada) Ltd.
  2172. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301959Comment
    Fisher Wavy Inc.
  2173. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301958Comment
    Park Farm Grains Ltd.
  2174. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301957Comment
    Transport Procal Inc.
  2175. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301956Comment
    Phoenix Park Energy Marketing LLC
  2176. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301955Comment
    FJ Robers Co Inc.
  2177. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301954Comment
    Yang Ming (America) Corp
  2178. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301953Comment
    Western Asphalt Products
  2179. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301952Comment
    Boss Lubricants
  2180. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301951Comment
    Caravan Supply Chain Inc.
  2181. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301950Comment
    Transport Services and Logistics Canada Ltd.
  2182. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301949Comment
    DP World - Americas
  2183. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301948Comment
    Viterra Canada Inc.
  2184. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301947Comment
    Midstream Energy Partners
  2185. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301946Comment
    Richardson International Limited
  2186. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301945Comment
    K+S North America Corporation
  2187. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301944Comment
    Canada Drayage Inc.
  2188. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301942Comment
    VanKam Freightways Ltd.
  2189. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Reply
    301941Reply
    Grand Prix Inc.
  2190. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301940Comment
    Border Chemical Company Limited
  2191. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301939Comment
    Ceres Global Ag Corp.
  2192. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Comments
    301938Comment
    Wheaton-Dumont Coop Elevator
  2193. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Reply
    301936Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  2194. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Statement
    301935Support Statement
    Forest River Bean Co., Inc.
  2195. (printed as 4/13/2021)
    Statement
    301933Support Statement
    CHS Inc.
  2196. (printed as 4/12/2021)
    Comments
    301937Comment
    Byron Dorgan
  2197. (printed as 4/12/2021)
    Reply
    301930Reply
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas City Southern and its U.S. rail carrier subsidiaries The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Gateway Eastern Railway Company, and The Texas Mexican Railway
  2198. (printed as 4/12/2021)
    Reply
    301927Reply
    Samuel J. Nasca, for an on behalf of SMART/Transportation Division, New York State Legislative Board
  2199. (printed as 4/12/2021)
    Comments
    301925Comment
    Office of Attorney General of the United States, c/o Assistant Attorney General, Antitrust Division
  2200. (printed as 4/12/2021)
    Statement
    301917Support Statement
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
  2201. (printed as 4/9/2021)
    Misc.
    301913Miscellaneous
    Surface Transportation Board
  2202. (printed as 4/8/2021)
    Statement
    301909Support Statement
    Valero Marketing and Supply Company
  2203. (printed as 4/6/2021)
    Statement
    301895Support Statement
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas City Southern
  2204. served (printed as 4/5/2021)
    Decision
    50714Director Of Proceedings
    DETERMINED REPLIES TO THE OBJECTIONS TO THE WAIVER SET FORTH IN 49 C.F.R. § 1180.0(b) ARE DUE ON APRIL 12, 2021.
  2205. served (printed as 4/2/2021)
    Decision
    50701Director Of Proceedings
    GRANTED A MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER.
  2206. (printed as 4/2/2021)
    Letter
    301879Letter
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
  2207. (printed as 4/2/2021)
    Comments
    301876Comment
    BNSF Railway Company
  2208. (printed as 4/1/2021)
    Statement
    301874Protest/Opposition Statement
    Canadian National Railway Company
  2209. (printed as 4/1/2021)
    Comments
    301873Comment
    CSX Transportation, Inc.
  2210. (printed as 4/1/2021)
    Letter
    301872Letter
    Freight Rail Customer Alliance, National Coal Transportation Association, Private Railcar Food and Beverage Association
  2211. (printed as 4/1/2021)
    Statement
    301871Protest/Opposition Statement
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  2212. (printed as 4/1/2021)
    Motion
    301870Motion/Petition/Request
    American Chemistry Council, The Fertilizer Institute, Corn Refiners Association, and The National Industrial Transportation League
  2213. (printed as 4/1/2021)
    Comments
    301866Comment
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  2214. (printed as 4/1/2021)
    Statement
    301865Protest/Opposition Statement
    Cargill Inc.
  2215. (printed as 3/31/2021)
    Statement
    301859Support Statement
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas City Southern Railway Company
  2216. (printed as 3/31/2021)
    Statement
    301857Support Statement
    Genesee & Wyoming Inc.
  2217. (printed as 3/26/2021)
    Statement
    301851Protest/Opposition Statement
    Wasatch Railroad Contractors
  2218. (printed as 3/24/2021)
    Notice
    301808Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    District Lodge 19 of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO
  2219. (printed as 3/24/2021)
    Statement
    301806Support Statement
    Pleasant River Lumber
  2220. (printed as 3/24/2021)
    Notice
    301804Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Transportation Communications Union/IAM
  2221. (printed as 3/23/2021)
    Errata
    301800Errata/Correction
    Canadian Pacific
  2222. (printed as 3/22/2021)
    Motion
    301793Motion/Petition/Request
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas City Southern
  2223. (printed as 3/22/2021)
    Motion
    301792Motion For Protective Order
    Kansas City Southern, Canadian Pacific Railway Limited
    in the protective-order register
  2224. (printed as 3/22/2021)
    Notice
    301790Notice Of Intent To Initiate Case
    Canadian Pacific Railway Limited, Kansas City Southern