Comment EI-32339
Received or sent (printed as 9/27/2022)
The board should choose the no-action alternative. This would prevent any air emissions from increasing along rail lines, prevent job losses in the trucking industry, and would still provide the applicants with a means to make improvements as needed subject to market changes.
Submitted by: Jane Anderson · Not Provided, MO
The Board publishes this comment in its environmental-comment table for this proceeding. It is quoted here as printed; nothing is inferred from it, and it states the commenter's own position in their own words, not this record's.
Permanent address docketyard.org/d/FD-36500/comment/EI-32339 · back to the docket sheet