Display Kept in this browser only
FD 36500 · CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY LIMITED; CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY; SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY; CENTRAL MAINE & QUEBEC RAILWAY US INC.; DAKOTA, MINNESOTA & EASTERN RAILROAD CORPORATION; AND DELAWARE & HUDSON RAILWAY COMPANY, INC. – CONTROL – KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN, THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, GATEWAY EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, AND THE TEXAS MEXICAN RAILWAY COMPANY

Comment EI-32312

Received or sent (printed as 9/26/2022)

Among the several weak justifications for these proposed acquisitions, there is one I want to discuss, the justification for Noise and Vibration. Other than brushing off the concern for structural damage resulting from noise and vibration from passing trains (potential impact on property rights), the fact that people may feel vibrations from passing trains (and more frequently) has been downgraded to an “annoyance.” If people can feel vibrations from passing trains and if the frequency of these vibrations is to rise from the proposed acquisition this is more than an annoyance, it rises to the level of a nuisance. Board members, if you and/or your family lived near these railways, would you downgrade a consistent vibrating sensation (which some would compare to feeling a minor earthquake) as being a mere annoyance? I think not.

Submitted by: Ben Daley · Not Provided, MO

The Board publishes this comment in its environmental-comment table for this proceeding. It is quoted here as printed; nothing is inferred from it, and it states the commenter's own position in their own words, not this record's.

Permanent address docketyard.org/d/FD-36500/comment/EI-32312 · back to the docket sheet