Display Kept in this browser only
Docket Yard
Finance DocketBefore the Surface Transportation Board

FD 30186

Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/FD-30186 · entries shown: all, newest first

TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC.--RAIL CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION--IN CUSTER, POWDER RIVER AND ROSEBUD COUNTIES, MONT.

Caption from the Board’s record. Sub-dockets, included below: FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)

289 filings, 79 decisions and 2,044 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:35 UTC.

The record begins with the Board’s own search, on 25 Jan 1996. If this proceeding began before then, its earlier filings and decisions are not held here, and a summary below may cite a decision this sheet does not list.

Cite View on stb.gov

Entries

By type (16)
Newest first · oldest first
  1. (printed as 5/26/2016)
    Comment
    EI-21423Catherine Logan
  2. served (printed as 4/26/2016)
    Decision
    45082Entire Board
    DECISION DISMISSED THE PROCEEDING WITHOUT PREJUDICCE TO THE REFILING OF A REQUEST FOR BOARD AUTHORITY AT A FUTURE DATE. THE DECISION ALSO DENIED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC.'S PETITION TO HOLD THE PROCEEDING IN ABEYANCE AND NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL AND ROCKER SIX CATTLE CO.'S MOTION TO DENY THE APPLICATION AND DISMISS THE PROCEEDING WITH PREJUDICE.
  3. (printed as 4/15/2016)
    Motion
    240512Motion To Dismiss Or Discontinue
    Northern Plains Resource Council And Rocker Six Cattle Company
  4. (printed as 4/5/2016)
    Reply
    240406Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc.
  5. (printed as 4/5/2016)
    Motion
    240405Motion/Petition/Request
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc.
  6. (printed as 3/15/2016)
    Reply
    240296Reply
    Northern Plains Resource Council And Rocker Six Cattle Company
  7. (printed as 3/10/2016)
    Supplement
    240276Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc.
  8. (printed as 2/16/2016)
    Comment
    EI-22289Madeleine Tesauro
  9. (printed as 2/9/2016)
    Comment
    EI-22247Commissioner of Securities & Insurance, Office of the Montana State Auditor
    Monica Lindeen
  10. (printed as 2/9/2016)
    Comment
    EI-21329Commissioner of Securities & Insurance
    Monica J. Lindeen
  11. (printed as 2/1/2016)
    Letter
    240207Letter
    Mary Catherine Dunphy
  12. (printed as 1/22/2016)
    Comment
    EI-21330Mary Catherine Dunphy
  13. (printed as 1/20/2016)
    Comment
    EI-21302350 Missoula
    Various
  14. (printed as 1/15/2016)
    Notice
    239896Notice
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc.
  15. (printed as 1/6/2016)
    Statement
    239838Verified Statement/Support Statement
    Colstrip Alternative Landowners Group
  16. (printed as 12/31/2015)
    Reply
    239819Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc.
  17. (printed as 12/16/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21299Honor the Earth
    Kellie Israel
  18. (printed as 12/11/2015)
    Motion
    239710Motion To Dismiss Or Discontinue
    Northern Plains Resource Council And Rocker Six Cattle Company
  19. served (printed as 12/3/2015)
    Decision
    44926Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC.'S PETITION TO STAY THE CURRENT FILING DEADLINES.
  20. (printed as 11/25/2015)
    Motion
    239627Petition For Stay
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc.
  21. (printed as 11/25/2015)
    Motion
    239626Motion/Petition/Request
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc.
  22. served (printed as 11/20/2015)
    Decision
    44913Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED AN EXTENSION IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  23. (printed as 11/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21178City of Miles City
    Chris Grenz, Mayor
  24. (printed as 11/12/2015)
    Request
    239537Request For Extension Of Time
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  25. (printed as 11/5/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2686City of Miles City
    Dawn Colton
  26. served (printed as 10/15/2015)
    Decision
    44821Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC.'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS. TIME IS EXTENDED TO NOVEMBER 16, 2015.
  27. (printed as 10/13/2015)
    Request
    239356Request For Extension Of Time
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc.
  28. (printed as 9/30/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21706Robert Filipovich
  29. (printed as 9/24/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21222Robert J. Filipovich
    Tongue River coal, if mined, will be hauled by rail west across Montana, crossing at least seven rail and motor vehicle crossings in East Helena and Helena lacking a bridge or underpass. The costs of bridges/underpasses will, by Montana Code Annotated MCA 7-14-2206, be paid mostly (half to 3/4ths) by Montana taxpayers. Helena's most important intersection (N. Montana Ave.) has been on the city's transportation priority list since 1993 but hasn't been built. The City/County 2015 Long Range Transportation Plan puts the cost of just this one bridge at over $21 million dollars. Aside from the Interstate highway, Montana Ave. is the most important North-South street in this capital city. There must be hundreds of RR/vehicle intersections between the proposed coal mine and Eastern Idaho. Montanans have not spent the money to build these grade separations, and are not likely to do so. Failure to consider these intersections and the costs of bridges is a cost-shifting action. As a citizen who happens to be a member of the Greater Helena Transportation Coordinating Committee, I urge you to reject Tongue River coal mine because of this collateral damage.
    Helena, MT
  30. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comments
    239245Comment
    Jay L Schollmeyer
  31. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21744Claudia Narcisco
  32. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21743Jeff Smith
  33. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21742George Price
  34. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21741Mary
  35. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21740Dave Dittloff
  36. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21739Carolyn Walker
  37. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21738Dave Morris
  38. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21737Trevein Stranger
  39. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21736Tim Skufca
  40. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21735Kevin O'Brien
  41. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21734Lee Metzgar
  42. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21733Name not provided
  43. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21732Cate Campbell
  44. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21731Name not provided
  45. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21730Liam Morrison
  46. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21729Jenny Sika
  47. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21728John BowenHollow
  48. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21727Linnea Forseth
  49. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21726Mark Fix
  50. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21725John Woodland
  51. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21724Tribal Historic Preservation Office
    Dianne Desrosier
  52. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21723Polly Pfister
  53. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21722Donetta Klein
  54. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21721Jim Roach
  55. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21720Ellen Knight
  56. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21719Michael Bowles
  57. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21718Rita Jankowski-Bradley
  58. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21717Linda Smith
  59. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21716Nick Engelfried
  60. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21715Suzette Tusso
  61. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21714Simon Bazard
  62. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21713Linda Helding
  63. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21712Brad Stacey
  64. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21711Opal and M. Brown
  65. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21710USDA
    Mary C. Erickson
  66. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21709Gordon P. MacDougall
  67. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21701Wanda Gaskill
  68. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21697John Woodland
  69. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21696Craig Clevidence
  70. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21695Svein Newman
  71. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21694Edna Elze
  72. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21693Edna Elze
  73. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21692Molly Galusha
  74. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21691Northern Plains Resource Council
    Colin Lauderdale
  75. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21690Northern Plains Resource Council
    Colin Lauderdale
  76. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21689Northern Plains Resource Council
    Colin Lauderdale
  77. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21688Northern Plains Resource Council
    Colin Lauderdale
  78. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21687Brad Sauer
  79. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21686Northern Plains Resource Council
    Colin Lauderdale
  80. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21685State of Washington Department of Ecology
    Maia D. Bellon
  81. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21684Elizabeth Eckel
  82. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21683King County and Safe Energy Leadership Alliance
    Dow Constantine
  83. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21682Thomas Miller
  84. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21681Tongue River Water Users' Association
    Brenda Lindlief Hall
  85. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21680Lake Pend Oreille Waterkeeper
    Shannon Williamson
  86. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21679Sandy Robson
  87. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21678EPA - Region 8 (EPR-N)
    Philip Strobel
  88. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21677Sandy Robson
  89. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21676Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc. and BNSF Railway Company, Inc.
    David Coburn
  90. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21675Jim Atchison
  91. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21674350.org
    Duncan Meisel
  92. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21673Montana Environmental Information Center
    Derf Johnson
  93. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21672Commissioner Of Securities& Insurance Office of Montana State Auditor
    Monica J. Lindeen
  94. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21671Sandy Robson
  95. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21669350-Missoula
    Hugh Broadus
  96. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21668Hugh Broadus
  97. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21667Alan See
  98. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21666Carolyn Walker
  99. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21664Attorney General State of Montana
    Tim Fox
  100. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21663Bob Filipovich
  101. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21662SE MT Development
    Jim Atchison
  102. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21661Patrick Johnson
  103. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21660Elena Johnson
  104. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21659Frank Kromkowski
  105. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21658Lynn Jennings
  106. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21657Duane Catlett
  107. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21656Montana House of Representatives
    Mary Ann Hunwell
  108. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21655Tim Holmes
  109. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21654John Hollow
  110. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21653Shiloh Hernandez
  111. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21652Campbell County, Wyoming Government
    Carol Seeger
  112. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21651Ed Gulick
  113. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21650Kathleen Masis
  114. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21649National Trust for Historic Preservation
    Amy Cole and Elizabeth S. Merritt
  115. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21648Ronna Cunningham
  116. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21647Alaina Buffalo Spirit
  117. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21646Christopher Carlson
  118. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21645Becky Mitchell
  119. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21643Sleeping Giant Citizen's Council
    Jayson O'Neill
  120. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21642Lori Byron
  121. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21638JW, Lori, Megan & Dakota Westman
  122. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21624Rocker Six Cattle Co.
    Clint McRae
  123. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21586Mike Linie
  124. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21585Flora Duffer
  125. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21584W. Van Straaten
  126. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21581Bob Adams
  127. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21555Roy E. Brown
  128. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21554Richard Brewer
  129. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21551Jayme Miller
  130. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21550Irene Nelson
  131. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21549Ed Joiner
  132. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21548Denise Conoo and Karen Weber
  133. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21546Bill Neumiller
  134. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21545Virginia Wiseman
  135. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21529Mark Levin
  136. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21466Mark Levin
  137. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21341Northern Plains Resources Council
    Steve Charter
  138. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21340Nothern Plains Resource Council
    Steve Charter
  139. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21339Earthjustice, Montana Environmental Information Center, National Wildlife Federation, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Sierra Club
    Jenny Harbine
  140. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21338Earthjustice, Montana Environmental Information Center, National Wildlife Federation, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Sierra Club
    Jenny Harbine
  141. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21337Earthjustice, Montana Environmental Information Center, National Wildlife Federation, Natural Resources Defense Council, and Sierra Club
    Jenny Harbine
  142. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21321Various
  143. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21320Various
  144. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21319Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    Llevando Fisher
  145. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21318Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    Llevando Fisher
  146. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21317Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    LLevando Fisher
  147. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21316Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    Llevando Fisher
  148. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21315Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    Llevando Fisher
  149. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21314Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    Llevando Fisher
  150. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21309350 Missoula
    Various
  151. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21308350 Missoula
    Various
  152. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21307350 Missoula
    Various
  153. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21306350 Missoula
    Various
  154. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21305350 Missoula
    Various
  155. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21304350 Missoula
    Various
  156. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21303350 Missoula
    Various
  157. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21301350 Missoula
    Various
  158. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21300350 Missoula
    Various
  159. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21297Northern Plains Resource Council
    Various
  160. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21296Montana Environmental Information Ccenter
    Various
  161. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21295Northern Plains Resource Council
    Various
  162. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21294Sierra Club
    Various
  163. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21293Sierra Club
    Various
  164. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21292350 Missoula
    Various
  165. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21291350 Missoula
    Various
  166. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21290350 Missoula
    Various
  167. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21289350 Missoula
    Various
  168. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21288350 Missoula
    Various
  169. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21287350 Missoula
    Various
  170. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21286350 Missoula
    Various
  171. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21285350 Missoula
    Various
  172. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21284350 Missoula
    Various
  173. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21283350 Missoula
    Various
  174. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21282350 Missoula
    Various
  175. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21281350 Missoula
    Various
  176. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21280350 Missoula
    Various
  177. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21279350 Missoula
    Various
  178. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21278350 Missoula
    Various
  179. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21271350 Missoula
    Various
  180. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21270350 Missoula
    Various
  181. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21269350 Missoula
    Various
  182. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21268350 Missoula
    Various
  183. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21252Friends of the Earth
    Various
  184. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21251Friends of the Earth
    Various
  185. (printed as 9/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21175National Trust on Historic Preservation
    Amy Cole
  186. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21707National Wildlife Federation, The Montana Wildlife Federation, The Association of Northwest Steelheaders and the Idaho Wildlefe Federation
    Michael Gibson, David Chadwick and Bob Rees
  187. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21670Ellen Pfister
  188. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21640Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    Theresa Brady Small
  189. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21639LeeAnn Cogert
  190. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21637Montana Chapter of the Sierra Club
    Jonathan Matthews
  191. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21636Siamak Samsam
  192. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21635Oregon Physicians for Social Responsibility
    Regna Merritt
  193. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21634Maggie Rose
  194. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21633Montana Department of Transportation
    Jean A. Riley
  195. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21632Otter Creek Coal, LLC
    William M.Rowlands
  196. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21631Willis Curdy
  197. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21629The City of Missoula
    Kirsten Hands
  198. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21628Western Organization of Resource Councils
    Bob LeResche
  199. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21627Western Organization of Resource Councils
    Bob LeResche
  200. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21250National Wildlife Federation Action Fund
    Various
  201. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21249National Wildlife Federation Action Fund
    Various
  202. (printed as 9/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21221Polly Pfister
    I am OPPOSED to the Tongue River Railroad because it will allow Arch Coal to greatly, irreversibly exacerbate global warming, which is unconscionable at this point in time, when we, and you, the NTSB, have full knowledge that coal burning is the major contributor to excessive atmospheric CO2, the cause of global warming. The railroad will result in pollution of the Otter Creek Valley and total destruction of this agricultural area, all for Arch Coal profits at the expense of established Montana farmers and ranchers. This coal will be sent to our major economic competitors in Asia, to the detriment of USA's economy as well as our Montana environment, neither of which is worth sacrificing for Arch Coal's profits. The NTSB should reject this proposal once and for all, and strive to protect this planet from further warming and pollution, for the sake of us and future generations.
    Helena, MT
  203. (printed as 9/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21699MEIC Montana Environmental Information Center
    Derf Johnson
  204. (printed as 9/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21626Michael Grinyer
  205. (printed as 9/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21625Morgan Vinyard
  206. (printed as 9/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21622Crawford Katherine
  207. (printed as 9/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21621Tracy Eagle
  208. (printed as 9/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21620Treasure State Resource Industry Association
    Peggy Trenk
  209. (printed as 9/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21619Slim Miller
  210. (printed as 9/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21324Rocker Six Cattle Co.
    Wallace D McRae
  211. (printed as 9/20/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21641Gillian Thornton
  212. (printed as 9/20/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21618Debra Smith
  213. (printed as 9/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21702Mary Catherine Dunphy
  214. (printed as 9/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21617Beth Kaeding
  215. (printed as 9/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21616Greg Gordon
  216. (printed as 9/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21613William Richner
  217. (printed as 9/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21612Duane Claypool
  218. (printed as 9/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21611MWF
    Tim Peterson
  219. (printed as 9/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21610Bill Janecke
  220. (printed as 9/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21609James Gore
  221. (printed as 9/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21608Christine Westland
  222. (printed as 9/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21607350pdx.org
    Fraser Ramussen
  223. (printed as 9/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21606Amy Kelly Hoitsma
  224. (printed as 9/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21605Ethel MacDonald
  225. (printed as 9/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21604Ronald Hawk
  226. (printed as 9/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21603350pdx.org
    Fraser Ramussen
  227. (printed as 9/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21602Timothy Tate
  228. (printed as 9/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21601Julia Page
  229. (printed as 9/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21600Jessie Huffman
  230. (printed as 9/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21599H.O.P.E.
    David Medford
  231. (printed as 9/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21598Michael Lee
  232. (printed as 9/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21597Robert Harris
  233. (printed as 9/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21596Jim Davis
  234. (printed as 9/16/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21665Lewis and Clark Public Health
    Anne Weber
  235. (printed as 9/16/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21591Barbara Dow
  236. (printed as 9/16/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21590Bob Hughes
  237. (printed as 9/16/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21589Nancy Kessler
  238. (printed as 9/16/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21588Joan Brownell
  239. (printed as 9/16/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21587Carrie La Seur
  240. (printed as 9/16/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21580Climate Action Coalition - Portland, OR
    Kelly O'Hanley
  241. (printed as 9/16/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2654Synapse Energy Economics,Inc.
    Rachel Wilson
  242. (printed as 9/15/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21573Jessica Eby
  243. (printed as 9/15/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21572Idaho Conservation League
    Susan Drumhell
  244. (printed as 9/15/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21093Synapse Energy Economics,Inc.
    Rachel Wilson
  245. (printed as 9/14/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21708Harold and Jan Hoem
  246. (printed as 9/14/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21704Nancy W. Carrel
  247. (printed as 9/13/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21562Dena Jensen
  248. (printed as 9/13/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21561Dena Jensen
  249. (printed as 9/13/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21560Michael Ober
  250. (printed as 9/12/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21705Cheryl and Dan M. Kenty
  251. (printed as 9/12/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21559Kathleen Masis M.D.
  252. (printed as 9/11/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21698Board of County Commissioners Powder River County
    Darold L. Zimmer and Rod Schaffer
  253. (printed as 9/11/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21630MPA
    Chere Jiusto
  254. (printed as 9/11/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2653Synapse Energy Economics,Inc.
    Rachel Wilson
  255. (printed as 9/9/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2649Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    James Walks Along
  256. (printed as 9/8/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21092Synapse Energy Economics,Inc.
    Rachel Wilson
  257. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21558Patricia Simmons
  258. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21557Doris Fischer
  259. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21277CREDO Action
    Various
  260. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21276CREDO Action
    Various
  261. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21275CREDO Action
    Various
  262. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21274CREDO Action
    Various
  263. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21273CREDO Action
    Various
  264. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21272CREDO Action
    Various
  265. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21266CREDO Action
    Various
  266. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21265CREDO Action
    Various
  267. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21264CREDO Action
    Various
  268. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21263CREDO Action
    Various
  269. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21262CREDO Action
    Various
  270. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21261CREDO Action
    Various
  271. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21260CREDO Action
    Various
  272. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21259CREDO Action
    Various
  273. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21258CREDO Action
    Various
  274. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21248CREDO Action
    Various
  275. (printed as 9/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21247CREDO Action
    Various
  276. (printed as 8/31/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21583Nancy C.Gerth
  277. (printed as 8/31/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21528Mike Sennett
  278. (printed as 8/31/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2651Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.
    Rachel Wilson
  279. (printed as 8/26/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21527Montana Senate
    Dick Barrett
  280. (printed as 8/26/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21526Wayne Tomicich
  281. (printed as 8/26/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21525k. G. H. Nicholes
  282. (printed as 8/26/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21091Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.
    Rachel Wilson
  283. (printed as 8/24/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21524Catherine Logan
  284. (printed as 8/24/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21523Great Northern Properties Partnership
    Charles H Kerr
  285. (printed as 8/24/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21522Sightline Institute
    Clark Williams-Derry
  286. (printed as 8/24/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21060MT DNRC
    Lisa Axline
  287. (printed as 8/24/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21059Army Corps of Engineers
    Brian Smith
  288. (printed as 8/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21521City of Whitefish
    John Muhlfeld
  289. (printed as 8/20/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21700Missoula City-County Air Pollution Control Board
    Garon Smith
  290. (printed as 8/20/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21578Missoula County Board of County Commissioners
    Bill Carey, Nicole Rowley and Jean Curtiss
  291. served (printed as 8/19/2015)
    Decision
    44551Entire Board
    DECISION DENIED AN APPEAL OF DECISIONS BY THE DIRECTOR OF THE BOARD'S OFFICE OF PROCEEDINGS THAT MODIFIED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
  292. served (printed as 8/19/2015)
    Decision
    44435Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED NPRC'S MOTION TO COMPEL SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENT PRODUCTION.
  293. (printed as 8/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21595Resources for Substainable Communities
    Matt Petryni(Christen R. Hansen/Peter T. Hurd)
  294. (printed as 8/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21594Resources for Substainable Communities
    Matt Petryni (Alissa French)
  295. (printed as 8/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21520Marcella Lee
  296. (printed as 8/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21582Carolyn Adams
  297. (printed as 8/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21519William Clawson
  298. (printed as 8/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21518James Mullins
  299. (printed as 8/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21517J David Gillanders
  300. (printed as 8/18/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2624Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.
    Liz Stanton
  301. (printed as 8/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21516Richard Newman
  302. (printed as 8/15/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21515Jane Stackhouse
  303. (printed as 8/14/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2638MT SHPO
    Dr. Stan Wilmoth
  304. (printed as 8/14/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2623Montana SHPO
    Stan Wilmoth
  305. (printed as 8/13/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21514Emily Niles
  306. (printed as 8/11/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21592L. Felber
  307. (printed as 8/11/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21535Hen Stole
  308. (printed as 8/8/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21512Cheryl Costigan
  309. (printed as 8/7/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21511Thunderbird Development
    John Bailey
  310. (printed as 8/7/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21510John Bosche
  311. (printed as 8/6/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2614Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.
    Rachel Wilson
  312. served (printed as 8/5/2015)
    Decision
    44655Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    DECISION GRANTED AN EXTENSION OF TIME.
  313. (printed as 8/5/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21579Jim Steitz
  314. (printed as 8/5/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21537Lee H.Metzgar
  315. (printed as 8/5/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21509Jerry Keyser
  316. (printed as 8/5/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21507350 Missoula
    Lee Metzgar
  317. (printed as 8/5/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21481Ralph Stone
  318. (printed as 8/5/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21480Nicole Weber
  319. (printed as 8/5/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21479David Strong
  320. (printed as 8/5/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21478Jonnel Covault Picture Framing
    Jonnel Covault
  321. (printed as 8/4/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21483Michelle Wood
  322. (printed as 8/4/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21482Lenny Dee
  323. (printed as 8/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21593Mike Waschbe
  324. (printed as 8/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21533J. Capozzelli
  325. (printed as 8/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21485Paul Van Tricht
  326. (printed as 8/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21484Donna Murphy
  327. (printed as 8/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21477Paul Van Tricht
  328. (printed as 8/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21476Paul Van Tricht
  329. (printed as 7/30/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21034Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.
    Rachel Wilson
  330. (printed as 7/28/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21267Missoula Air Quality Advisory Council
    Jan Hoem
  331. (printed as 7/27/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21540Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    Llevando Fisher
  332. (printed as 7/27/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21472Clinton Nagel
  333. (printed as 7/24/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21531Friends of Two Rivers
    Alice Whiteman
  334. (printed as 7/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21541Sandra Clark
  335. (printed as 7/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21473Office of the Governor
    Steve Bullock
  336. (printed as 7/20/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2606Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.
    Rachel Wilson, Liz Stanton
  337. (printed as 7/14/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21530Elizabeth Mitchell
  338. (printed as 7/14/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21471Elizabeth Mitchell
  339. (printed as 7/10/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21544Susan Schwab
  340. (printed as 7/10/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21469Andrew Mitchell
  341. (printed as 7/10/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21468Tracy Bentley
  342. (printed as 7/10/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21022Synapse Energy Economics, Inc.
    Rachel Wilson, Liz Stanton
  343. (printed as 7/9/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21543Sravasti Abbey
    Venerable Thubten Chodron
  344. (printed as 7/9/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21475Mark Fix
  345. (printed as 7/8/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21464Paul Schutt
  346. (printed as 7/8/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21463William Clawson
  347. (printed as 7/7/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21474Llevando Fisher
    Northern Cheyenne Tribe
  348. (printed as 7/7/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21462RB Garden
  349. (printed as 7/7/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21461Christa Knittle
  350. (printed as 7/6/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21460Shane Daugherty
  351. (printed as 7/6/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21459350 Eugene
    Debra McGee
  352. (printed as 7/6/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21458350 Eugene
    Patricia Hine
  353. (printed as 7/6/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21457Talen Energy
    Neil Dennehy
  354. (printed as 7/1/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21456Toyia Hatten
  355. (printed as 7/1/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21455Michael Lebwohl
  356. (printed as 7/1/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21454Rich Hohne
  357. (printed as 6/26/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2588Montana Elected Officials
  358. (printed as 6/26/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2587Board of Missoula County Commissioners
  359. (printed as 6/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21453Danny Thiemann
  360. (printed as 6/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21536John
  361. (printed as 6/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21452John Dunkum
  362. (printed as 6/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21451Lita Pepion
  363. (printed as 6/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21450Patrick Fisher
  364. (printed as 6/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21449Dwight Guynn
  365. (printed as 6/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21448Dan Elliott
  366. (printed as 6/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21000Board of Missoula County Commissioners
  367. (printed as 6/18/2015)
    Comment
    EI-20999Montana Elected Officials
  368. (printed as 6/18/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2579Northern Cheyenne THPO
    James Walksalong
  369. (printed as 6/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21703Kathy Hefferman
  370. (printed as 6/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21575Jennifer Piggott
    Minutes from online meeting on 06/17/2015.
  371. (printed as 6/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21569Jennifer Piggott
    Transcript: ONLINE PUBLIC MEETING FOR THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD JUNE 17, 2015 12:05 P.M. EST ONLINE MEETING
  372. (printed as 6/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21542Spokane Riverkeeper
    Jerry White Jr.
  373. (printed as 6/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21447Jodi Bishop
  374. (printed as 6/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21446Travis Heater
  375. (printed as 6/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21445TJ Smith
  376. (printed as 6/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21444Larry Robson
  377. (printed as 6/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21443John Sullivan
  378. (printed as 6/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21442Helen C. Foreman Trust
    Alison Jameson
  379. (printed as 6/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21441Glen Southergill
  380. (printed as 6/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21440Don Steinke
  381. (printed as 6/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21439Valerie Costa
  382. (printed as 6/17/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21438Laurel Pace
  383. (printed as 6/16/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21437City of Sandpoint Idaho
    Carrie Logan
  384. (printed as 6/14/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21401Michael Ober
  385. (printed as 6/13/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21400Cate Campbell
  386. (printed as 6/12/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21567Jennifer Piggott
    Transcript: PUBLIC MEETING FOR THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD FORSYTH, MONTANA JUNE 12, 2015 2:30 P.M. MT
  387. (printed as 6/12/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21539Montana Coal Council
    Bud Clinch
  388. (printed as 6/11/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21576Jennifer Piggott
    Minutes from public meeting in Lame Deer, Montana on 06/11/2015.
  389. (printed as 6/11/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21566Jennifer Piggott
    Transcript: PUBLIC MEETING FOR THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD LAME DEER, MONTANA JUNE 11, 2015 2:33 P.M. MT
  390. (printed as 6/11/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21547Christine Valentine
  391. (printed as 6/11/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21465Beverly Walker
  392. (printed as 6/11/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21399Randy Sailer
  393. (printed as 6/10/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21571Jennifer Piggott
    Transcript: PUBLIC MEETING FOR THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD FORSYTH, MONTANA JUNE 12, 2015 6:33 P.M. MT
  394. (printed as 6/10/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21570Jennifer Piggott
    Transcript: PUBLIC MEETING FOR THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COLSTRIP, MONTANA JUNE 10, 2015 6:31 P.M. MT
  395. (printed as 6/10/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21565Jennifer Piggott
    Transcript: PUBLIC MEETING FOR THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COLSTRIP, MONTANA JUNE 10, 2015 2:29 P.M. MT
  396. (printed as 6/10/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21398USBank
    Gary Glynn
  397. (printed as 6/10/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21397Bet Riggs
  398. (printed as 6/10/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21396Rosebud County
    Ed Joiner
  399. (printed as 6/10/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21395Charlotte Bowenhollow
  400. (printed as 6/10/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21394April Martin
  401. (printed as 6/10/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21393Jack Ballard
  402. (printed as 6/9/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21574Jennifer Piggott
    Minutes for public meeting in Miles City, Montana on 06/09/2015.
  403. (printed as 6/9/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21568Jennifer Piggott
    Transcript: PUBLIC MEETING FOR THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD MILES CITY, MONTANA JUNE 9, 2015 2:29 P.M. MT
  404. (printed as 6/9/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21556Virginia Ronning
  405. (printed as 6/9/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21553Mark Fix
  406. (printed as 6/9/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21552Mark Fix
  407. (printed as 6/9/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21532North Idaho Associate Idaho Conservation League
    Susan Drumheller
  408. (printed as 6/9/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21392Caleb Laieski
  409. (printed as 6/8/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21564Jennifer Piggott
    Transcript: PUBLIC MEETING FOR THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD ASHLAND, MONTANA JUNE 8, 2015 6:00 P.M. MT
  410. (printed as 6/8/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21563Jennifer Piggott
    Transcript of Public Meeting for the Draft EIS. Ashland, Montana, June 8, 2015.
  411. (printed as 6/7/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21391Richard Brown
  412. (printed as 6/6/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21390Christopher Preston
  413. (printed as 6/5/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21534Jeffery Smith
  414. (printed as 6/3/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21388Resident
    Harlan Wells
  415. (printed as 6/2/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21387Dave Grainger
  416. (printed as 6/1/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21436William Walksalong
  417. (printed as 6/1/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21386Ms.
    Jeanne Poirier
  418. (printed as 5/31/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21385Butch Vogel
  419. (printed as 5/31/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21255Sierra Club
    Various
  420. served (printed as 5/29/2015)
    Decision
    44514Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    DECISION EXTENDED THE COMMENT PERIOD FOR THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT UNTIL AUGUST 24, 2015.
  421. (printed as 5/29/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21435Office Of Public Instruction
    Denise Juneau
  422. (printed as 5/29/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21384Ron Moore
  423. (printed as 5/28/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21470Carrie La Seur
  424. (printed as 5/28/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21434Jon Tester
  425. (printed as 5/26/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21433Jeffrey J. Smith
  426. (printed as 5/26/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21422Catherine Logan
  427. (printed as 5/24/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21421Kathryn Matlock
  428. (printed as 5/24/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21383The Balance Point Massage
    Kathryn Matlock
  429. (printed as 5/24/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21382Paul Schutt
  430. (printed as 5/24/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21381Roxanna Mclaughlin
  431. (printed as 5/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21538Lynn E. Jennings
  432. (printed as 5/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21419Lee Metzgar
  433. (printed as 5/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21418Catie DeMets
  434. (printed as 5/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21417Bertha Brown
  435. (printed as 5/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21416Alan Hilden
  436. (printed as 5/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21380Catie DeMets
  437. (printed as 5/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21379Annabelle Taylor
  438. (printed as 5/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21378L. Busch
  439. (printed as 5/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21377University of Montana
    Nancy Cook
  440. (printed as 5/23/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21254Bertha Brown
  441. (printed as 5/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21415Jory Ruggiero
  442. (printed as 5/22/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21376Carolyn Poiassant
  443. (printed as 5/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21414Paul Van Tricht
  444. (printed as 5/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21413Paul Van Tricht
  445. (printed as 5/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21412Safe Energy Leadership Alliance
    Dow Constantine
  446. (printed as 5/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21375Paul Van Tricht
  447. (printed as 5/19/2015)
    Request
    238413Request For Extension Of Time
    Tongue River Water Users' Association
  448. (printed as 5/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21411Office of the Montana State Auditor
    Monica J. Lindeen, Commissioner
  449. (printed as 5/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21410Bones Brothers Ranch & Omega Beef Inc.
    Terry Punt and Jeania Alderson
  450. (printed as 5/19/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2548VP, Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    Winfield Russell
  451. (printed as 5/16/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21409Steve Mcarthur
  452. (printed as 5/16/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21408Marta Meegns
  453. (printed as 5/16/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21374Cate Campbell
  454. (printed as 5/16/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21373Therese Iwaniak
  455. (printed as 5/15/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21407Janet McMillan
  456. (printed as 5/15/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21372John Price
  457. (printed as 5/14/2015)
    Supplement
    238392Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc.
  458. (printed as 5/14/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21406Idaho Conservation League
    Susan Drumheller
  459. (printed as 5/14/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21405Lee Metzgar
  460. (printed as 5/14/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21404John Woodland
  461. (printed as 5/14/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21403Cate Campbell
  462. (printed as 5/14/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21402Attorney for Colstrip Alternative Landowners Group
    Carrie La Seur
  463. (printed as 5/12/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21513Patricia Mizutani
  464. (printed as 5/12/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21371Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    Llevando Fishe
  465. (printed as 5/12/2015)
    Comment
    EI-20985Mark Fix
  466. (printed as 5/12/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2551Mark Fix
  467. (printed as 5/11/2015)
    Comment
    EI-20984Mark Fix
  468. (printed as 5/11/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2550Mark Fix
  469. (printed as 5/8/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21370Western Organization of Resource Councils
    Dan Cohn
  470. (printed as 5/6/2015)
    Comment
    EI-20978Montana SHPO
    Stan Wilmoth
  471. (printed as 5/5/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21623Gary Matson
  472. (printed as 5/1/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21369Nathan Hecht
  473. (printed as 4/30/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21368Julie McAvoy
  474. (printed as 4/30/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21367Norman Bishop
  475. (printed as 4/30/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21364Tim Holmes Studio
    Tim Holmes
  476. (printed as 4/30/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21353Virjeana Brown
  477. (printed as 4/30/2015)
    Comment
    EI-20983Mark Fix
  478. (printed as 4/30/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2549Mark Fix
  479. served (printed as 4/28/2015)
    Decision
    44452Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED AN EXTENSION IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  480. (printed as 4/27/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21352Earthjustice
    Jenny Harbine
  481. (printed as 4/23/2015)
    Request
    238259Request For Extension Of Time
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc.
  482. (printed as 4/21/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21351Northern Plains Resource Council
    Colin Lauderdale
  483. served (printed as 4/17/2015)
    Decision
    44400Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED A COPY OF THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD.
  484. (printed as 4/9/2015)
    Supplement
    238165Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Jay L. Schollmeyer
  485. (printed as 4/7/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2532City of Stevenson
    Frank Cox, Mayor
  486. (printed as 4/6/2015)
    Comment
    EI-20965City of Stevenson
    Frank Cox, Mayor
  487. (printed as 3/31/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2531Northern Plains Resource Council
    Steve Charter, Chair
  488. (printed as 3/30/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2530Spokane City Council
    Ben Stuckart
  489. (printed as 3/27/2015)
    Comments
    238056Comment
    Northern Plains Resource Council And Rocker Six Cattle Company
  490. (printed as 3/18/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2519City of Hood River
    Paul Blackburn, Mayor
  491. served (printed as 3/17/2015)
    Decision
    44355Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED AN EXTENSION IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  492. (printed as 3/9/2015)
    Comment
    EI-20942City of Miles City
  493. (printed as 3/6/2015)
    Supplement
    237889Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc.
  494. (printed as 3/6/2015)
    Request
    237888Request For Extension Of Time
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc., Northern Plains Resource Council, Wally Mcrae/Clint Mcrae D.B.A. Rocker Six Cattle Company
  495. (printed as 2/25/2015)
    Comment
    EI-20938Mayor, City of Hood Oregon
  496. (printed as 2/24/2015)
    Statement
    237797Protest/Opposition Statement
    City Of Hood River
  497. (printed as 2/24/2015)
    Comment
    EI-21420Aart Dolman
  498. (printed as 2/24/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2516ACHP
    Najah Duvall-Gabriel
  499. (printed as 2/10/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2478February 2014 Conference Call Notes
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  500. (printed as 2/6/2015)
    Comment
    EI-20937Northern Plains Resource Council
  501. (printed as 1/30/2015)
    Comment
    EI-20930Bureau of Land Management
    Todd Yeager
  502. (printed as 1/28/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2473BLM
    Todd Yeager
  503. (printed as 1/28/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2472Miles City Community Services and Planning
    Dawn Colton
  504. (printed as 1/20/2015)
    Reply
    237563Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc.
  505. (printed as 1/19/2015)
    Comment
    EI-20906Clint McRae
    Forsyth, Montana
  506. (printed as 1/14/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2463Section 106 Consulting Parties
  507. (printed as 1/13/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2479January 2014 Conference Call Notes
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  508. (printed as 1/12/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2460Montana House of Representatives
    Rep. Kelly McCarthy
  509. (printed as 1/12/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2459City of Mosier
    Mayor Andrea Rogers
  510. (printed as 1/12/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2458Bonner County Board of Commissioners
  511. (printed as 1/12/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2457350-Missoula & Blue Skies Campaign
    Lowell Chandler
  512. (printed as 1/12/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2456City of Livingston Commission
    James Bennett, Chairman
  513. (printed as 1/12/2015)
    Comment
    EO-2455Paul Van Tricht
  514. (printed as 1/7/2015)
    Reply
    237404Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc.
  515. (printed as 1/5/2015)
    Comment
    EI-20889Bonner County Board of Comissioners
  516. (printed as 12/30/2014)
    Motion
    237369Motion To Compel
    Northern Plains Resource Council
  517. (printed as 12/30/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20891Montana House of Representatives
    Rep. Kelly McCarthy
  518. served (printed as 12/29/2014)
    Decision
    44209Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED AN EXTENSION IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  519. (printed as 12/23/2014)
    Request
    237323Request For Extension Of Time
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  520. (printed as 12/19/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20741Paul Van Tricht
    December 19, 2014 Daniel R. Elliott, Chairman Deb Miller, Vice Chair Ann D. Begeman, Board Member Surface Transportation Board 395 E. Street, SW Washington, DC 20423 RE: Impact Statement for Tongue River Railroad, Docket Number FD_30186_0 Request for: A Complete Study of Impacts of the Tongue River Railroad on Billings, Montana; A Public Hearing in Billings, Montana; and An Order for Increased Contributions from the Tongue River Railroad to mitigate impacts of its operations on Billings, Montana. Dear Chairman Elliott, Vice Chair Miller and Board Member Bergeman: The Surface Transportation Board is currently considering granting a license for the construction of the Tongue River Railroad in south central Montana. As part of the licensing process the Board has agreed to assess the impacts of the Tongue River Railroad on the existing rail system and the communities along that rail system. I would like to discuss the potential impact of the Tongue River Railroad on my community, Billings, Montana. I am Paul Van Tricht. I was born in Billings, Montana in 1944 and have lived in Billings most of my life. Billings is a community which is bisected by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe/Montana Rail Link Railroad. The proposed Tongue River Railroad links to this line. The sole purpose of the Tongue River Railroad is to transport coal from the planned Otter Creek Mine to the West Coast for shipment to Asia. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe/Montana Rail Link Railroad runs east to west through Billings. It divides the older parts of Billings into a “Northside” and a “Southside”. The principal road running north to south through Billings and connecting the Northside and the Southside is a four lane street, 27th Street. That street connects Highway 3 to Interstate 90 and is one of three exists from Interstate 90 to Billings. 27th Street is the major north/south thoroughfare in downtown Billings and connects downtown Billings to Interstate 90. That street which is technically part of Highway 3 and administered by the Montana Department of Transportation crosses the railroad at a street-rail grade crossing. Traffic is stopped on 27th Street each time a train comes through Billings. Since 2009 there has been a major increase in rail traffic through Billings. There has been increased general rail/intermodal traffic, increased coal export traffic from the Powder River Basin to the West Coast and increased crude oil-by-rail traffic through Billings. I travel from the Northside of Billings to the Southside of Billings on a daily basis using 27th Street. These trips are generally delayed at the rail crossing by train traffic. Every loaded coal train from the Otter Creek Mine to the West Coast and every empty coal train back to that mine will travel through Billings. Arch Coal, which owns the Otter Creek Mine and is a partner in the Tongue River Railroad along with BNSF, plans to mine about 200 million tons of coal a year from that mine. Based on the current size of coal trains that amount of coal translates to 16 additional coal trains coming through Billings each and every day; eight full coal trains going to the West Coast and eight empty coal trains returning from the West Coast. If the west coast coal ports are built many more coal trains from existing Powder River coal mines also can be expected to travel through Billings. These additional 16 coal trains to and from Otter Creek when added to existing rail traffic will create a “train wall” which will divide downtown Billings and block Highway 3. This division will result in many adverse impacts. For example, both Hospitals/ Emergency rooms in Billings a located on the Northside. People with medical emergencies in the Southside will be delayed in getting treatment by this train wall. The major city, county and federal offices and pubic safety facilities in Billings are located on the Northside. Responses to public safety emergencies in the Southside will be delayed by the train wall. The train wall will render 27th Street unusable as an exit from Interstate 90 to downtown Billings and for commerce between the Northside and Southside of Billings. Mitigating theses adverse impacts of increased rail traffic in Billings will be very, very costly. Just modernizing the traffic signals in downtown Billings to accommodate the increased railroad traffic will cost hundreds of thousands of dollars. There are other very expensive grade separation projects in Billings which will be required as a result of the increase rail traffic. It is my understanding that in past cases which presented major adverse community impacts created by new railroads the Surface Transportation Board has ordered the Railroad to contribute more than the normal 5% toward mitigating the impacts of the Railroad, e.g., new grade separation projects, and that these orders have been approved by Federal Courts. Therefore, I request that the Board issue an order requiring the Tongue River Railroad, which is owned by in part Burlington Northern Santa Fe and Arch Coal, increase the contributions that the Railroad make for grade separation projects needed in downtown Billings. What I have related is just my own limited personal observations. Therefore, I request that the Surface Transportation Board have a full detailed study of the impacts of the increased railroad traffic generated by the Tongue River Railroad. To aid the Board I request that it conduct a public information gathering hearing in Billings. To prevent undo delay I suggest the hearing be conducted by hearing officer from the Board’s Office of Environmental Analysis. Thank you for your consideration of my comments and requests. I will follow these comments with more detailed information. Sincerely Paul J.Van Tricht 1134 North 24th Street Billings, Montana 59101-0219 Ph: 406-371-5350 Email: pauljvantricht@gmail.com cc. Senator Testor, Senator Walsh, Congressman Daines, Congressman-elect Zinke, Governor Bullock, Montana Transportation Commission.
    Billings, Montana
  521. (printed as 12/11/2014)
    Motion
    237211Motion/Petition/Request
    Jay L Schollmeyer, For And On Behalf Of Smart-Td General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386)
  522. served (printed as 12/10/2014)
    Decision
    44167Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED A REQUEST BY TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. TO ADOPT THE PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  523. (printed as 12/10/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20890City of Livingston Commission
    James Bennett, Chairman
  524. (printed as 12/9/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2480December 2013 Conference Call Notes
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  525. (printed as 12/8/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2481Section 106 Consulting Parties
  526. (printed as 12/8/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2437TRRC counsel
    David Coburn
  527. (printed as 12/7/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20686MT BLM
    Doug Melton
  528. (printed as 12/6/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20730David Coburn
  529. (printed as 12/5/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2436Final Consulting Party Call Reminder
    Consulting Parties
  530. (printed as 12/4/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20672USDA, ARS
    Erica Jones
  531. (printed as 11/28/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2411ACHP
    Charlene Dwin Vaugh
  532. (printed as 11/25/2014)
    Motion
    237104Motion/Petition/Request
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  533. (printed as 11/25/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20888City of Mosier
    Mayor Andrea Rogers
  534. (printed as 11/25/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2482Section 106 Consulting Parties
  535. served (printed as 11/21/2014)
    Decision
    44141Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION DIRECTED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. TO MODIFY ITS FORTHCOMING SCHEDULE.
  536. (printed as 11/21/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20603350-Missoula and Blue Skies Campaign
    Nick Engelfried & Lowell Chandler
  537. (printed as 11/17/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2403MT SHPO copied to ACHP
    Dr. Mark Baumler
  538. (printed as 11/11/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2412Consulting Parties
    November Section 106 Conferece Call Notes
  539. (printed as 11/11/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2389PA Working Group
  540. (printed as 11/10/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2483Section 106 Consulting Parties
  541. (printed as 11/10/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2386November Section 106 Meeting Notes
  542. (printed as 11/6/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20581Lewis & Clark City-County Health Department
    Anne Webber
  543. (printed as 11/4/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20570Baumstark Braaten Law Partners
    Carrie La Seur
  544. (printed as 11/4/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2372ACHP
    Charlene Dwin Vaughn
  545. (printed as 10/30/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20571ACHP
    Charlene Dwin Vaughn
  546. (printed as 10/30/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2370October Section 106 Call Notes
  547. (printed as 10/27/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20564Yankton Sioux Tribe
    Lana Gravatt
  548. (printed as 10/20/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2368Consulting Parties
  549. served (printed as 10/14/2014)
    Decision
    44068Director Of Proceedings
    .
  550. (printed as 10/14/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20559Baumstark Braaten Law Partners
    Carrie La Seur
  551. (printed as 10/7/2014)
    Request
    236778Request For Extension Of Time
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  552. (printed as 10/7/2014)
    Reply
    236777Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  553. (printed as 9/30/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20551Baumstark Braaten Law Partners
    Carrie La Seur
  554. (printed as 9/29/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2336City of Sandpoint
    Carrie Logan, Mayor
  555. (printed as 9/26/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20548City of Sandpoint
    Carrie Logan, Mayor
  556. (printed as 9/26/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2395September 26/2014 Invitation
    PA Working Group
  557. (printed as 9/23/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2332Friends of 2 Rivers
    Alice Whiteman
  558. (printed as 9/22/2014)
    Comment
    EI-21323Mark Fix
  559. (printed as 9/22/2014)
    Comment
    EI-21322Mark Fix
  560. (printed as 9/17/2014)
    Motion
    236695Motion/Petition/Request
    Jay L Schollmeyer, For And On Behalf Of Smart-Td General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386)
  561. served (printed as 9/10/2014)
    Decision
    43611Entire Board
    DECISION ADDRESSED A MOTION FILED BY NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL (NPRC) ASKING THE BOARD TO REQUIRE TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. (TRRC) AND TWO OF ITS OWNERS TO PRODUCE INFORMATION SO THAT NPRC CAN FILE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS ON TRRC'S CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION APPLICATION. THE DECISION FOUND THAT SOME OF THIS INFORMATION SHOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE TO NPRC.
  562. (printed as 9/10/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20541Friends of 2 Rivers
    Alice Whiteman
  563. (printed as 9/8/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20518ACHP
    Charlene Dwin Vaughn
  564. (printed as 9/8/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2396September 2014 Consulting Party Call Notes
  565. (printed as 9/8/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2394September monthly call invitation with attachments
    Consulting Parties
  566. (printed as 9/8/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2309Section 106 Consulting Parties
  567. (printed as 9/5/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20578ACHP
    Charlene Dwin Vaughn
  568. (printed as 9/5/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2310ACHP
    Najah Duvall-Gabriel, Charlene Vaughn
  569. (printed as 9/3/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20520ACHP
    Charlene Dwin Vaughn
  570. (printed as 9/2/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20729ACHP
    Najah Duvall-Gabriel
  571. (printed as 8/29/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20516Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  572. (printed as 8/28/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2392Draft PA Sipulations and Timeline
    Consulting Parties
  573. (printed as 8/19/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20507Spokane Washington City Council
    Ben Stuckart
  574. (printed as 8/19/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2393NTHP
    Betsy Merritt
  575. (printed as 8/19/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2311National Trust on Historic Preservation
    Betsy Merritt
  576. (printed as 8/11/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2390Section 106 August 2014 Call Notes
  577. (printed as 8/8/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20505Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  578. (printed as 8/8/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20503BNSF
    Trent Hudak
  579. (printed as 8/4/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2377Consulting Parties
  580. (printed as 8/1/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2297Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  581. (printed as 7/31/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2301Consulting Parties
  582. (printed as 7/29/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2294THPOs
  583. (printed as 7/25/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20498Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  584. (printed as 7/16/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2290Tribes/THPOs
  585. (printed as 7/14/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2385July 14, 2014 Section 106 Consulting Party Call Notes
  586. (printed as 7/14/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2285Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  587. (printed as 7/11/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20480Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  588. (printed as 7/3/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2278Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  589. (printed as 7/2/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20479Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  590. (printed as 6/30/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2277Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  591. (printed as 6/29/2014)
    Comment
    EI-2146706/29/2014
    Robert F. Stewart
  592. (printed as 6/26/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2275Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  593. (printed as 6/24/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20478Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  594. (printed as 6/9/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2384June 9, 2014 Section 106 Call Notes
  595. (printed as 5/29/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20459Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  596. (printed as 5/29/2014)
    Comment
    EO-23835/29/2014 Draft Whereas Clauses
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  597. (printed as 5/29/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2270Section 106 Consulting Parties
  598. (printed as 5/29/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2269Consulting Parties
  599. (printed as 5/23/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2380Call Transcripts from 5/23/2013
    Stan Wilmoth
  600. (printed as 5/19/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20469Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  601. (printed as 5/14/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2265Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
    Steve Vance
  602. (printed as 5/12/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2477May 2014 Conference Call Notes
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  603. (printed as 5/5/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2261Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  604. (printed as 4/25/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2387ACHP
    Charlene Dwin Vaughn copied to Najah Duval-Gabriel
  605. (printed as 4/14/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20448Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  606. (printed as 4/14/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2382April 14 Consulting Party Call Notes
  607. (printed as 4/9/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2373Consulting parties
  608. (printed as 4/3/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20422Steptoe &Johnson
    David Coburn
  609. (printed as 3/28/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20423Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  610. (printed as 3/26/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20421MT SHPO
    Stan Wilmoth
  611. (printed as 3/26/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2250Tribal Field Representatives
    Tribes
  612. (printed as 3/18/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20413Charler Fisher Court Reporting
    February 13 and 14, 2014 106 Meeting Transcripts
  613. (printed as 3/13/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2239Steptoe & Johnson, LLP
    David Coburn
  614. (printed as 3/12/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2244MT SHPO
    Dr. Mark Baumler
  615. (printed as 3/11/2014)
    Reply
    235613Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  616. (printed as 3/10/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2374Consulting Parties
  617. (printed as 3/10/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2243Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    President Fisher
  618. (printed as 3/5/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2268Updates from April Meeting
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  619. (printed as 2/19/2014)
    Motion
    235502Motion/Petition/Request
    Northern Plains Resource Council
  620. (printed as 2/18/2014)
    Letter
    235496Letter
    Honorable David E. Wanzenried
  621. (printed as 2/13/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20411Otter Creek Homesteader Descendents
    Vanessa Braided Hair
  622. (printed as 2/13/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20410Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    President Llevando Cowboy" Fisher"
  623. (printed as 2/3/2014)
    Reply
    235418Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  624. (printed as 1/17/2014)
    Comment
    EI-20383Steptoe & Johnson, LLP
    David Coburn
  625. (printed as 1/14/2014)
    Comment
    EO-2221Section 106 Consulting Parties
  626. (printed as 1/13/2014)
    Motion
    235293Motion To Compel
    Northern Plains Resource Council
  627. (printed as 12/26/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20369Steptoe and Johnson, LLP
    David Coburn
  628. (printed as 12/20/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20380Honor the Earth
  629. (printed as 12/18/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2211Alaska SHPO
    Judith Bittner
  630. (printed as 12/16/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2210Section 106 Consulting Parties
  631. (printed as 12/11/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2201Section 106 Consulting Parties
  632. (printed as 12/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20361Honor the Earth
  633. (printed as 12/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20362Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
    Steve Vance
  634. (printed as 12/9/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2200Section 106 Consulting Parties - Call Reminder
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  635. (printed as 12/5/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2196Section 106 Consulting Parties
  636. served (printed as 11/22/2013)
    Decision
    43469Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL'S PETITION TO EXTEND THE PERIOD FOR COMPLETING DISCOVERY IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  637. (printed as 11/19/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2191Section 106 Call Notes- November
    Consulting Parties
  638. (printed as 11/15/2013)
    Request
    235081Request For Extension Of Time
    Northern Plains Resource Council
  639. (printed as 11/12/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2190Tribes
  640. (printed as 10/30/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20344Honor the Earth
  641. (printed as 10/30/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20343Honor the Earth
  642. (printed as 10/23/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20341Honor the Earth
  643. served (printed as 10/22/2013)
    Decision
    43394Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL'S EXTENSION TO FILE A MOTION TO COMPEL IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  644. (printed as 10/22/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20340Oglala Sioux Tribe
    Joyce Whiting
  645. (printed as 10/21/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2177ACHP
    Najah Duvall-Gabriel
  646. (printed as 10/18/2013)
    Reply
    234977Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  647. (printed as 10/17/2013)
    Motion
    234954Motion/Petition/Request
    Northern Plains Resource Council
  648. (printed as 10/17/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20329Honor the Earth
  649. (printed as 10/17/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20328Honor the Earth
  650. (printed as 9/25/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20318Honor the Earth
  651. (printed as 9/24/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20336ACHP
    Najah Duvall-Gabriel
  652. (printed as 9/24/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2169Consulting Parties
  653. (printed as 9/20/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2168Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  654. (printed as 9/17/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20306Honor the Earth
  655. (printed as 9/17/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2167August Call Notes
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  656. (printed as 9/16/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2166Section 106 Consulting Parties
  657. (printed as 9/12/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2164Yankton Sioux Tribe
    Lyle Miller, THPO
  658. (printed as 9/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20286Honor the Earth
  659. (printed as 9/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20285Honor the Earth
  660. (printed as 9/4/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20282Honor the Earth
  661. (printed as 8/29/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20280Honor the Earth
  662. (printed as 8/28/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2159Honor the Earth
    Winona LaDuke
  663. served (printed as 8/27/2013)
    Decision
    43228Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION: (1) GRANTED THE MOTION FILED BY THE PARTIES TO MAKE FILINGS NOT CONTEMPLATED BY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE; (2) ACCEPTED THE JULY 2 AND AUGUST 9 FILINGS INTO THE RECORD; (3) GRANTED THE REQUEST TO AMEND THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE; (4) DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO ABIDE BY THE REVISED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE; AND (5) GRANTED A MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER.
  664. (printed as 8/27/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2156Section 106 Monthly Call Reminder
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  665. (printed as 8/26/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20279Honor the Earth
  666. (printed as 8/23/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20281Steptoe & Johnson
    Cynthia Taub
  667. (printed as 8/23/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20271Honor the Earth
  668. (printed as 8/21/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20270Honor the Earth
    Winona LaDuke
  669. (printed as 8/20/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20272Christi Kasa
    Colorado Spring, Colorado
  670. (printed as 8/9/2013)
    Motion
    234664Motion For Protective Order
    Tongue River Railroad Company
    in the protective-order register
  671. (printed as 8/9/2013)
    Reply
    234656Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  672. (printed as 8/9/2013)
    Reply
    234653Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  673. (printed as 8/7/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2143Monthly Call - Reminder
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  674. (printed as 7/22/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2138Oglala Sioux Tribe
    Mary Belt
  675. (printed as 7/22/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2137Historic Maps and Call Notes
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  676. (printed as 7/19/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20254Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David Coburn
  677. served (printed as 7/18/2013)
    Decision
    43224Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED TONGUE RIVER RAILDROAD COMPANY, INC.'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL AUGUST 9, 2013.
  678. (printed as 7/18/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2136Oglala Sioux Tribe
    President Brewer
  679. (printed as 7/17/2013)
    Request
    234548Request For Extension Of Time
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  680. (printed as 7/2/2013)
    Motion
    234499Motion/Petition/Request
    Northern Plains Resource Council And Rocker Six Cattle Company
  681. (printed as 7/1/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20239Australian Rail Track Corp. Ltd.
    Phillip Campbell
  682. (printed as 7/1/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20238Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    John J. Robinson, President
  683. (printed as 6/25/2013)
    Reply
    234471Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  684. (printed as 6/17/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20230Lower Sioux Tribe - New THPO
    Thomas Ellig
  685. (printed as 6/17/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20229Steptoe & Johnson
    David Coburn
  686. (printed as 6/17/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20228Northern Arapaho - Summer Field Work
    Darlene Conrad
  687. (printed as 6/17/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20227Rosebud Sioux Tribe - Summer Field Work
    Rosebud Sioux Tribe
  688. (printed as 6/17/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2116Summer Field Work Request Reminder
    Tribes
  689. (printed as 6/12/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20231Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa
    Bruce Nadeau
  690. (printed as 6/12/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20225Department of the Interior
    Christine Whitacre
  691. (printed as 6/10/2013)
    Statement
    234383Support Statement
    Minnesota Power
  692. (printed as 6/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20251Section 106 Monthly Call -Notes
    June Notes
  693. (printed as 6/7/2013)
    Reply
    234380Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  694. (printed as 6/7/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2110Monthly call reminder
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  695. (printed as 6/7/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2109Summer Field Work Announcement
    Federally recognized tribes
  696. (printed as 6/5/2013)
    Motion
    234373Motion/Petition/Request
    Northern Plains Resource Council And Rocker Six Cattle Company
  697. (printed as 6/4/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2099Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David Coburn
  698. (printed as 6/3/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20215Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David Coburn
  699. (printed as 5/30/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2098Aurizon
    Martin Sparhawk
  700. (printed as 5/24/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20217Northern Plains Resource Council
    Natalie Snyders
  701. (printed as 5/22/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2096DEHP Queensland Gov't
    Don Arnold
  702. (printed as 5/20/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2094Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David Coburn
  703. (printed as 5/15/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2093ACOE
    Matt Mccullor
  704. (printed as 5/13/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20250May Section 106 Call - Notes
    Notes
  705. (printed as 5/13/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20196Northern Plains Resources Council
    Natalie Snyders
  706. served (printed as 5/10/2013)
    Decision
    43073Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED AN EXTENSION OF TIME.
  707. (printed as 5/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20197ICF International
    Section 106 Meeting Transcripts
  708. (printed as 5/7/2013)
    Statement
    234173Support Statement
    Billings Chamber Of Commerce/Convention & Visitor Bureau
  709. (printed as 5/3/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20192Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David Coburn
  710. (printed as 5/1/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20181Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    Sign-In Sheets (April 16-18) from 106 Meeting
  711. (printed as 5/1/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2088Baumstark Braaten
    Carrie La Seur
  712. (printed as 4/30/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20183Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David Coburn
  713. (printed as 4/26/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2092Australian Rail Track Corporation
    Leanne Cross
  714. (printed as 4/24/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2086Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
    Steve Vance
  715. (printed as 4/24/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2085USACE
    Matthew Mccullor
  716. (printed as 4/22/2013)
    Request
    234109Request For Extension Of Time
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  717. (printed as 4/22/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2084Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David Coburn
  718. (printed as 4/21/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20179Northern Cheyenne THPO
    Conrad Fisher
  719. (printed as 4/19/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20178Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David Coburn
  720. (printed as 4/18/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20187Baumstark Braaten Law Partners
    Carrie La Seur
  721. (printed as 4/16/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20582Meeting Transcripts April 16, 17, 2013
  722. (printed as 4/11/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2080Agenda and Draft Methodology
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  723. (printed as 4/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20249April Section 106 Call - Notes
    April Notes
  724. (printed as 4/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20173Patricia Poteat
    Indian Orchard, Massachusetts
  725. (printed as 4/5/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2078Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David Coburn
  726. (printed as 4/2/2013)
    Comments
    234017Comment
    Jay L. Scholllmeyer, For And On Behalf Of United Transportation Union-General Committee Of Adjustment, Go-386 (Utu/Go-386)
  727. (printed as 4/2/2013)
    Comments
    234011Comment
    Rocker Six Cattle Co, Northern Plains Resource Council
  728. (printed as 4/2/2013)
    Comments
    234006Comment
    National Wildlife Federation, Sierra Club, Montana Environmental Information Center
  729. (printed as 4/2/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20172Micheal DeSouza
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
  730. (printed as 4/2/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2076Agenda for April Call and March Meeting Notes
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  731. (printed as 3/29/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20198ICF International
    March Conference Call Notes
  732. (printed as 3/28/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20262March Section 106 Notes
  733. (printed as 3/27/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2077Logistics for April Meeting
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  734. (printed as 3/25/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2053Standing Rock Sioux Tribe
    Terence Clouthier
  735. (printed as 3/25/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2052Final Scope
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  736. served (printed as 3/22/2013)
    Decision
    43009Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    DECISION PROVIDED NOTICE OF THE FINAL SCOPE OF STUDY FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.
  737. (printed as 3/21/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20158Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe
    Dana Dupris
  738. (printed as 3/21/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20157USACE, Omaha District
    Joel Ames, Tribal Liaison
  739. (printed as 3/21/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20156MT SHPO
    Mark Baumler
  740. (printed as 3/21/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20154ARS/USDA
    Mark Petersen
  741. (printed as 3/21/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20153BNSF Railway
    Derin Warren
  742. (printed as 3/20/2013)
    Letter
    233956Letter
    Honorable Jon Tester
  743. (printed as 3/20/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20155Yankton Sioux Tribe
    Faith Spotted Eagle
  744. (printed as 3/20/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20152BNSF
    Derin Warren
  745. (printed as 3/20/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20151National Trust on Historic Preservation
    Betsy Merritt
  746. (printed as 3/20/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20150MT SHPO
    Stan Wilmoth
  747. (printed as 3/20/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2050Logistics for April Meeting in Lame Deer, MT
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  748. (printed as 3/15/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2051Northern Cheyenne
    President John Robinson
  749. (printed as 3/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20141Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    John J. Robinson · Lame Deer, Montana
  750. (printed as 2/28/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2043Section 106 Consulting Parties
  751. (printed as 2/27/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2046Land Owners
    Land Access Request Letter
  752. served (printed as 2/26/2013)
    Decision
    42930Entire Board
    DECISION DENIED TWO PETITIONS TO REJECT TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY'S APPLICATION TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A RAIL LINE IN SOUTHEAST MONTANA.
  753. (printed as 2/22/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20129Baumstark and Braaten Law Partners
    Carrie La Seur · Billings, Montana
  754. (printed as 2/21/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20125Rachel Wyon
    Cambridge, MA
  755. (printed as 2/20/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20123Robert Pougnier
    East Hardwick, Vermont
  756. (printed as 2/14/2013)
    Reply
    233805Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  757. (printed as 2/11/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2033Section 106 Consulting Parties
  758. (printed as 2/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20122Judith Akins
    Bellingham, Washington
  759. (printed as 2/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20126Doug Morehouse
    Kalispell, Montana
  760. (printed as 2/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20119Tongue River Railroad Company
    David Coburn · Washington, DC
  761. (printed as 2/6/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2038Land Owners
    Land Access Request Letter
  762. (printed as 2/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20127Barabara Oglen
    Auburn, California
  763. (printed as 2/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20121Robert Broska
    Vista, California
  764. (printed as 2/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20112Environmental Protection Agency
    EPA Region 8 · Denver, Colorado
  765. (printed as 2/2/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20108Diane Brower
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Diane Brower 642 Evans St. Steamboat Spgs., CO 80487
    Steamboat Springs, Colorado
  766. (printed as 2/1/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20111Peter Goodman
    Albany, Oregon
  767. (printed as 1/31/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20107Protect Whatcom
    Bellingham, Washington
  768. (printed as 1/29/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20110Office of the Secretary of Transportation
    Joe Ann Swann · Washington, DC
  769. (printed as 1/29/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20109Office of the Secretary of Transportation
    Joe Ann Swann · Washington, DC
  770. (printed as 1/29/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20103Oglala Sioux Tribe
    Wilmer Mesteth
  771. (printed as 1/28/2013)
    Reply
    233734Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  772. (printed as 1/28/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20106Jeremiah Jordan
    Elmira, Oregon
  773. (printed as 1/28/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20105John W. McManus
    Diberville, Mississippi
  774. (printed as 1/25/2013)
    Motion
    233723Motion/Petition/Request
    Northern Plains Resource Council And Rocker Six Cattle Company
  775. (printed as 1/23/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20080Greenpeace
  776. (printed as 1/23/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2021Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David H. Coburn
  777. (printed as 1/22/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20093Alexandra Amonette
    Richland, Washington
  778. (printed as 1/21/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20081Margarita McLarty
    Livingston, Montana
  779. (printed as 1/17/2013)
    Comments
    233685Comment
    Landowners
  780. (printed as 1/17/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20083Judith Langhans
    Olympia, Washington
  781. (printed as 1/16/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20078Ethan Holzer
    As a Bellingham resident and American/ global citizen, I have great concern for the social and environmental impacts of the proposed Cherry Point Coal Terminal. The coal port will affect the immediate site on which it is built, the surrounding ecology and human populations, as well as many people near the mining operations, along the train routes for the coal, and in proximity of the shipping lanes for the tanker vessels not to mention the vast carbon dioxide, monoxide, and various aromatic hydrocarbon releases from the combustion of the coal in China, which this project facilitates. First the most immediate effects: Cherry Point supports 50% of herring spawning within Puget Sound and the herring populations are highly sensitive to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons PAHs, which coal has a lot of. A postponement of construction should be put in place until baseline studies of Cherry Point Herring populations can be established to see how they will respond to the PAH contamination. Eelgrass, in which the herring spawn, is also highly sensitive to chemical contaminants and siltation so mitigation measures should be considered before ground is broken on site. The herring populations are the primary food source for pacific salmon in Puget Sound which are food for large mammals including orca whales and seals/sealions. Studies should be designed to determine the vulnerability of herring populations to collapse and the subsequent effects to salmon and large mammal populations. Many native fisherman depend on these fisheries for their livelyhood and the tourism industry also depends on these species. The tankers also have a large impact on marine life. Studies should be designed to sample underwater and abovewater noise and vibration pollution and its effects on bird migration and nesting as well as the effects on fish populations and whale and marine mammal communication, breeding, and wellbeing. Tankers also emit fuels waste to the air and water which impacts marine plants and animals and the risk of spills of coal is substantial at any point along the shipping lanes. Studies of the impacts of a tanker spill/sinking should be conducted for, at port, in puget sound, open ocean and other locations. The risks of invasive species introduction through the ballast dumping at the terminal also puts local marine populations in danger. Studies of potential invasive species and strict regulation of ballast exchange could lessen these effects. The trains that transport the coal from Wyoming also pose huge environmental health risks. Coal dust provides a continuous contaminant that can accumulate in aquifers across the Northwest, polluting water sources for millions of Americans and all wetlands, streams and estuaries associated with the watersheds. Agricultural plots can also be contaminated and many lie along the trail routes. Studies to determine the extent of contamination and possible alternative options like covered traincars or sealant or a no action proposal. PAHs from coal dust can also poison animals and plants throughout the northwest, destroying the natural resources that contribute to our wellbeing. These coal dusts contribute to cancer and asthma rates and weaken human immune systems. The highest population densities in urban areas are most susceptible to these effects. Noise pollution is also a result of 50 1.5 mile long trains per day (20 up the coast). Animal migration routs will be impacted and must be monitored. The noise impacts on humans are also substantial. Many people living close to the tracks will lose sleep time and sleep quality decreasing health and stressing the immune system. Vibrations impact sensitive instrumentation and structural stability of buildings near the tracks. Property values decrease and social venues become futile with such constant distraction. Traffic is held up and access to the shorefront is limited. The bellingham port has enormous potential for commercial use and environmental cleanup, but this will be unreasonable with constant trains passing through. These impacts are temporally and spatially localized and it is difficult for the EIS to cover a global perspective or look generations into the future. Global warming is a serious issue and our rapid releases of greenhouse gasses threaten to surpass a threshold at which the global environment will no longer be able to buffer the climate effects. Oceanic acidification corrodes the shells of diatoms which provide by far the largest carbon sink and oxygen source on the planet. If these populations collapse, rapid carbon increases in the atmosphere would feedback on itself with further acidification and temperature increase. This tragedy of the common atmosphere and oceans can only be avoided by regulation international and interstate trade in situations just such as this. Our Clean Air Act was imposed to prevent releases of CO2 from burning of fossil fuels but this coal terminal facilitates the braking of the Clean Air Act by shipping it to China to be released into the same atmosphere. What is the use of our environmental regulations if corporations like Peabody Coal continue to pollute through technicalities? The impacts of this scoping decision will have permanent global consequences so it is in humanities best interest to analyze all impacts meticulously. The moralities of local populations contradict those of corporate investors like Goldman Sachs or Warren Buffet and so often the costs do not fall upon those who profit. Do we have the right to rob subsequent generations of their resources, of their environment, of their health without consent for unustained profit?
    Bellingham, Washington
  782. (printed as 1/15/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20079Aart Dolman
    There are environmental concerns created by the extreme density on the BNSF tracks between Miles City and the Mossmain Junction. Additional coal trains will only complicate this tremendous if not dangerous situation of over crowding. The derailments will cause the spillage of coal and oil. This is a rail system dating back to the Age of Steam. Anymore additional coal trains will endanger the environmental impact more. So please record my opposition.
    Great Falls, Montana
  783. (printed as 1/15/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19979Ron Lindsay
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: The wider implications of building this line...the significant impacts extend far beyond the immediate vicinity of the line itself. Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  784. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20096Daniel D. Lourie
    Bozeman, Montana
  785. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20095Dana D. Heald
    La Conner, Washington
  786. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20092Day Benoliel
    Lopez Is., Washington
  787. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20091Ernesto Paul
    Lame Deer, Montana
  788. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20090Rose Medicine Bull
    Ashland, Montana
  789. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20089Ken Kaline
    Ashland, Montana
  790. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20088Joseph M. Littlebird
    Ashland, Montana
  791. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20087JD Little
    Billings, Montana
  792. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20086Alaina Buffalo Spirit
    Lame Deer, Montana
  793. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20085Powder River County Board of Commissioners
    Broadus, Montana
  794. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20084Suzanne Cali
    Seattle, Washington
  795. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20082Mark Fix
    Miles City, Montana
  796. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20077Corey Bressler
    Missoula, Montana
  797. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20076Svein Newman
    Billings, Montana
  798. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20075Gary Matson
    Milltown, Montana
  799. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20074Mabel Dobbs
    Weiser, Idaho
  800. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20073Noru Cimon
    La Grande, Oregon
  801. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20072Megan Marolt
    Missoula, Montana
  802. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20071Susan Clarion
    Missoula, Montana
  803. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20070Land Lindbergh
    Greenough, Montana
  804. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20069Johanna DeVries
    Livingston, Montana
  805. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20068Stephanie Cebulla
    Bozeman, Montana
  806. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20067Janet McMillan
    Greenough, Montana
  807. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20066Gonnie Siebel
    Bozeman, Montana
  808. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20065Lana Sangmeister
    Nye, Montana
  809. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20064Nathan Varley
    Gardiner, Montana
  810. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20063Bill Bery
    Gardiner, Montana
  811. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20062Marshall Swearingen
    Bozeman, Montana
  812. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20061Robert Lindstrom
    West Yellowstone, Montana
  813. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20060Jean Dahlman
    Forsyth, Montana
  814. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20059Pari Kemmick
    Missoula, Montana
  815. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20058Caelen Simeone
    Missoula, Montana
  816. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20057Ellora Duncan
    Missoula, Montana
  817. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20056Elizabeth Costello
    Missoula, Montana
  818. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20055Howard Williams
    Victor, Montana
  819. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20054Harrison Stein
    Missoula, Montana
  820. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20053Dawn McGee
    Missoula, Montana
  821. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20052Kerri Wolenetz
    Billings, Montana
  822. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20051Nina Corelei
    Missoula, Montana
  823. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20050Rose Bender
    Billings, Montana
  824. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20049Mary Dickson
    Missoula, Montana
  825. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20048Michael Stoerger
    Bozeman, Montana
  826. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20047Maria Ibarbia
    Milltown, Montana
  827. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20046Max Anderson
    Missoula, Montana
  828. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20045Richard Newman
    Bozeman, Montana
  829. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20043Ilona Popper
    Gardiner, Montana
  830. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20042Janet D. Fiero
    Missoula, Montana
  831. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20041Sheila A. Ashley
    Bozeman, Montana
  832. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20040Sarah Juster
    Roundup, Montana
  833. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20039Sally Orr
    Big Timbu, Montana
  834. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20038Cecily Schroepfer
    Billings, Montana
  835. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20037Betty Whiting
    Billings, Montana
  836. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20036Danielle Nicholas
    Bozeman, Montana
  837. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20035Elizabeth Scanlin
    Red Lodge, Montana
  838. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20034Terry Hanson
    Miles City, Montana
  839. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20033Deborah L. Hanson
    Miles City, Montana
  840. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20032Mellie Israel
    Joliet, Montana
  841. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20031Theresa Keaveny
    Billings, Montana
  842. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20030Tom Tully
    Billings, Montana
  843. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20029Richard Parks
    Gardiner, Montana
  844. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20028Ruth Towe
    Billings, Montana
  845. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20027Thomas H. Crawford
    Belgrade, Montana
  846. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20026Ed Gulick
    Billings, Montana
  847. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20025Jens Iverson
    Big Thunder, Montana
  848. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20024Bill Milton
    Roundup, Montana
  849. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20023John Smillie
    Billings, Montana
  850. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20022Deborah Muth
    Red Lodge, Montana
  851. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20021Susan M. Elliot
    Red Lodge, Montana
  852. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20020Anna Lucas
    Billings, Montana
  853. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20019Caleb Lande
    Billings, Montana
  854. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20018Eric Vanderbeek
    Lewistown, Montana
  855. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20017Sarah Sweeney
    Ballatine, Montana
  856. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20016Joseph Splinter
    Billings, Montana
  857. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20015John R. Gibson
    Billings, Montana
  858. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20014Linda Thurston
    Gardiner, Montana
  859. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20013Charles Sangmeister
    Sillwater County, Montana
  860. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20012Martha Adkins
    Gardiner, Montana
  861. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20011Ellen Pfister
    Shepherd, Montana
  862. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20010Glenn B. Smith
    Bozeman, Montana
  863. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20009Shivley Smith
    Bozeman, Montana
  864. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20008Catriona Simms
    Missoula, Montana
  865. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20007John Kemmick
    Missoula, Montana
  866. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20006Charyn Ayoub
    Helena, Montana
  867. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20005Ann de Meij
    Bozeman, Montana
  868. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20004Aart Dolman
    Great Falls, Montana
  869. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20003Katie Noland
    Bozeman, Montana
  870. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20002Juliane Devlin
    Missoula, Montana
  871. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20001Terry Dokken
    Missoula, Montana
  872. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20000Anne Black
    Missoula, Montana
  873. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19999Gloria Roe
    Missoula, Montana
  874. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19998Deborah Scott
    Missoula, Montana
  875. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19997Lila Cebulla
    Bozeman, Montana
  876. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19996Mary LaPorte
    Missoula, Montana
  877. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19995Cheryl McMillan
    Missoula, Montana
  878. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19994Janice Hoem
    Missoula, Montana
  879. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19993Raymond McMillan
    Missoula, Montana
  880. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19992Nicholas Littman
    Missoula, Montana
  881. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19991Tyler McRoe
    Missoula, Montana
  882. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19990Virjeana Brown
    Belgrade, Montana
  883. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19989Brad Baner
    Helena, Montana
  884. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19988Phil Knight
    Bozeman, Montana
  885. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19987Craig Zakovi
    Bozeman, Montana
  886. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19986Joe Gutkoski
    Bozeman, Montana
  887. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19985Christopher Spozis
    Bozeman, Montana
  888. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19984Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    Lame Deer, Montana
  889. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19983Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation
    Shawn Thomas
  890. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19981Beth Kaeding
    Bozeman, Montana
  891. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19978Claudia Narcisco
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Granting eminent domain is not consistent with the long held standard that a grant of eminent domaine be in the public interest and thus would lower the standard of this time honored law and practice. TRR is nothing more than a private coal conveyor belt destined for export and would only benefit the mine and railroad company. It is not in the interest of the people of Montana and would not benefit the public interest in any real way. Sincerely, Claudia Narcisco 5607 Gharrett Ave Missoula, MT 59803 City, State, Zip
    Missoula, Montana
  892. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19977Meri Olmstead
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Meri Olmstead 2606 N 4th Street La Grande, Oregon 97850
    La Grande, Oregon
  893. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19976Sheila Berry
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. You also can post a letter to: Mr. Ken Blodgett Surface Transportation Board 395 E Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20423-0001 Note environmental filing: Docket No. FD 30186 in your letter.
    Mount Vernon, Washington
  894. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19975Nina Hiatt
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Nina Hiatt 55 Alder Ct Battlement Mesa, Co 81635
    Battlement Mesa, Colorado
  895. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19974Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation
    Montana DNRC
  896. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19973Montana Fish, Wildlife, and Parks
    Jeff Hagener · Helena, Montana
  897. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19972Miles City Preservatioon Office
    Constance L. Muggli
  898. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19971Standing Rock Sioux Tribe
    Waste'Win Young and Mary Wilson
  899. (printed as 1/14/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19863Greenpeace
  900. (printed as 1/13/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19968Karen Michaelis
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Karen Michaelis 21115 Uncompahgre Road Montrose, CO 81403
    Montrose, Colorado
  901. (printed as 1/13/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19967Linda Streett Todd
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Linda Streett Todd PO Box 116 Broadview, Mt 59015
    Broadview, Montana
  902. (printed as 1/12/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19966Jennifer O'Toole
    News article found today in Bejing China. We cannot say that coal does not effect our air quality when their levels are at a hazardous level. In case it doesn't pull up, here is the cite. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-china-20998147
    Vancouver, Washington
  903. (printed as 1/12/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19965Power Past Coal
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Paul Amieux · Seattle, Washington
  904. (printed as 1/12/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19963Suzanne Babayan
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is NOT for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Climate Change: The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  905. (printed as 1/12/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19962Allison Warner
    I am very concerned about the impacts of this project to our nation and the local community of ranchers. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. All of the impacts and true costs of this project must be evaluated in a cost benefit analysis to weigh whether it is truly in the public interest. Public expenditures for impacts caused by this project should not be borne by the local communities for the benefit of one coal company. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. These costs are a result of this project and must be disclosed and evaluated at this time, rather than dissected to some future process. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Please evaluate the impacts to flooding and water patterns. The overall impacts to our planet are catastrophic. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. The EIS MUST consider the full repercussions of this project which will result in burning of a phenomenal amount of polluting and climate altering CO2.
    Camano Island, Washington
  906. (printed as 1/12/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19961Andrea Xaver
    The Mission Statement for Montana’s Department of Environmental Quality is to: “…protect, sustain, and improve a clean and healthful environment to benefit present and future generations.” Washington State’s Department of Ecology is similar. It reads: “…to protect, preserve and enhance Washington’s environment, and to promote the wise management of our air, land and water for the benefit of current and future generations.” How then can either state approve a coal train endeavor that delivers coal to China, where it is burned unclean; and when winds from there come back to the western portion of the U.S., residents in Washington and other areas will breathe contaminated air? One would think polluted air will impact water and soils, as well. There is an abundant supply of pollutants in the earth’s air already - why keep adding to it? Why do “we” continue to endanger ourselves and others so that a few get even wealthier? Clean energy solutions have been around for quite awhile. One might also think that the above mission statements would support the development of these solutions. Otherwise, perhaps the mission statements should be changed to include: “… benefit present/current and future generations as long as there is money to be made by those who don’t care about the environment.” It seems agencies that started out with good intentions have been co-opted. I am the 4th of 6 generations who owns and operates small, organic farms here in Washington State. I have seen vast and unhealthy changes in the environment here for many years. Certain people act as though we can be in decline “forever” without consequence. Air pollution from coal & exhausts, noise pollution, light pollution – they affect us all. And, what about natural events beyond our control that could impact this coal train proposal? Earthquakes, mud slides, and weather can play a significant part to the detriment of coal transport and hence the environment. Pollution affects everybody – from those with a small voice to those in power, making laws, making even more money, and breaking laws. Please do not expand the Tongue River Railroad for the sake of coal. Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
    Mt Vernon, Washington
  907. (printed as 1/12/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19960Lisa Marcus
    The Tongue River Railroad would create an intolerable and significant worldwide impact which can't possibly be offset by the small benefit in profits, nor the small number of increased jobs created. It would allow coal, that should stay in the ground, to drive prices down in China, causing much more coal to be burned in dirty plants. This would create an infrastructure that would assure decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled inside China to the plants. All this creates more carbon emissions, greenhouse gasses and increased climate change. In addition, delicate ecosystems and many species of animals on land and sea will suffer from the rail line itself, the coal dust emitted in transit, and the local noise, air, and water pollution from daily transit of trains and boats as well as inevitable spills. Communities of people all along the route will also be greatly impacted, including myself. We will suffer from increased health issues, traffic congestion, increased noise, environmental degradation, lowering of tourist attraction, increased taxes, and lowering of property values. Thank you for your serious consideration of the broad scope of the environmental impact this rail line would have on us all. We need to move instead toward a clean energy future which will slow the destructive effects we've already unwittingly brought on ourselves and our delicate environment.
    Seattle, Washington
  908. (printed as 1/12/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19959Gayle Cue
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Gayle Cue 2351 Solomon Ave #328 Billings MT 49102
    Billings, Montana
  909. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-21200Earthjustice
    It appears I may have had technical problems when I last submitted these at 6:53 p.m. MST on 1/11/13, so I am resubmitting the same two documents (letter and attachment) to ensure receipt by STB. Please contact me if you have any questions. Thank you.
    Kristin Carden · Bozeman, MT
  910. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20182Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David Coburn
  911. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-20094Sandra Joos
    Portland, Oregon
  912. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19982Lisa Axline
  913. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19980Mary Catherine Dunphy
    Miles City, Montana
  914. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19964Clean Columbia County
    Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries.
    Linda Cyders · Scappoose, Oregon
  915. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19958Friends of the Bitterroot
    Because of the new route you should reopen the public comment period and hold a hearing in Colstrip. Please analyze the devastating effects climate change will have on Montana and the nation and analyze the harm to existing agricultural operations and livelihoods along the new route.
    Doug Soehren · Hamilton, Montana
  916. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19957Elizabeth Hartsoch
    As a mother and a life-long resident of the Pacific Northwest I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal, the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the validity of the claim that the proposed railroad is for the “public convenience and necessity”, which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries.
    Bellingham, Washington
  917. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19956Nan and John Hughes
    Having grown up in Idaho, and visiting Montana many times, we urge you to NOT allow the pollution of the coal trains, which we are currently trying to stop in Washington state and Idaho, as they would be an environmental disaster as well as a threat to worker and residents health.
    Bothell, Washington
  918. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19955Maria Hodkins
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Maria Hodkins Paonia, CO 81428
    Paonia, Colorado
  919. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19954Laurel Felber
    I write as a concerned citicen in expressing my concern for the Tongue River. I request that the EIS study the following: Public convienience and necessity. Is the railway meeting the requirement to have power of eminent domain? I have many concerns for the ranchers and farmers whoes land, many which have had this land for generations, will be impacted. Impacts on property values. This would most likely be significant and impact a large number of people.Please study impacts from fires, spreading weeds, splitting property. What financial impacts will this have on ranchers, farmers, and other individulas near the tracks and surrounding areas? I plan on visiting what I've heard is an extremely beautiful place: the Tongue River, and I worry about the wildlife there. Please study the impacts on elk and mule deer populationsion and upland birds. What impacts will this have on all the ecosystems around the rail corridor, coal mine, and any impacts on wildlife this project will create. Please study the potential for flooding as there is a likelihood of incresed flooding by the railroad acting as an earten dam. Noise: plaese sudy impacts on the nearby recreation area near Miles City. Please study impacts on wildlife from noise, lights, and rail accidents as the impacts will likely be significant. Please study the impacts on our Climate from increased Carbon Dioxide. By shipping our coal overseas we create the likely impact of severe increases in climate change. The President of the United states and the Pentagon have stated that climate change is now serious threat to people, ecosystems,and real estate. What will the impacts be of coal being burned in Asia on the U.S. and our planet? Please study the cummulative impacts of all the proposed terminals, mines, and railroads under permit process currently who have plans to ship coal. What cummulative impacts will we have as a result? I sincerely ask your help to throughougly study these significant and likely impacts, Laurel Felber
    Bellingham, Washington
  920. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19953Lawrence Ribnick
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Lawrence Ribnick 38741 Indian Head Lane Crawford, CO 81415
    Crawford, Colorado
  921. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19952Melanie Bennett
    The proposed coal-hauling line should not be built through the Tongue River Valley. It is not worth the damage to human health that mining, shipping, and burning coal will create. It's ridiculous that coal is even being considered a viable energy source in this day and age. It's not the 1800s, time to leave their technology behind.
    Milwaukie, Oregon
  922. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19951Gonnie Siebel
    The newly proposed alternate route for the Tongue River Railroad is still part of a very bad plan and should not be accepted or permitted. The mine will turn the Otter Creek valley into a massive open pit coal mine, very likely ruining the properties, ranches and other livelihoods of those who have made the valley home, often since generations. Together with a potential permit request for additional acreage to mine, all coal will be hauled to and burned in Asia, but ultimately will result in over 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gases going into our planet's already overloaded atmosphere. These projects should not be permitted when the obvious effects of climate change that are affecting the planet can clearly no longer be denied!!
    Bozeman, Montana
  923. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19950Earthjustice
    Please see attached.
    Kristin Carden · Bozeman, Montana
  924. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19949Lindsey Schromen-Wawrin
    This proposed activity is extracting coal from the ground, transporting the coal, and burning the coal. One byproduct of this activity is greenhouse gases, both from burning the coal directly and the extraction and transportation process. The agency should consider the greenhouse gas emissions in its environmental impact. It should also consider the impacts of increased atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations on the earth system. Scientists from numerous natural science disciplines are studying how the earth system is affected by increased atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations. These studies should be taken into account in the environmental impact of the activity. One may conclude, however, that atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations are rising due to emissions from all over the world, and so the marginal increase in concentration due to this coal extraction, transportation, and combustion, does not significantly contribute to the greenhouse gas concentration increase. This reasoning – while logical – is faulty. Under this reasoning the greenhouse gas emissions from the activity are not considered because they are just one small part of a massive problem. The problem, however, is really just the cumulative effect of millions of small parts. While this coal is only a small part of a massive problem, it must be recognized for its role in exacerbating that problem. Indeed, scientists recognize that the greenhouse gas emission rate must decrease (and some scientists argue that the greenhouse gas concentration itself must decrease) to mitigate the harm to the earth system from the increased greenhouse gas concentration. Since this decrease is the requirement for mitigating harm, any activity that does not contribute to decreasing the emission rate should be considered as contributing to the problems caused by the increased greenhouse gas concentration. In other words, all fossil fuel extraction activities must be considered to be causing the harm from the increased greenhouse gas concentration, because each extraction is contributing to that harm by preventing a decrease in the emission rate. The alternative that must be explored is leaving the coal in the ground. A fair impact assessment will include this as an alternative. “No action” does not just mean “not this transportation route” but rather “not this coal extraction.” We have a right to know the environmental impact of extracting this coal, and the agency should take this impact into account in making its decision.
    Spokane, Washington
  925. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19948SafeGuard the South Fork
    Nicole Brown · Acme, Washington
  926. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19947Linda Greenway
    I am opposed to plans for the coal trains going through Washington. Against all plans for coal facilities. The impact on our health, our air, our climate is far too great. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  927. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19946Mary Lee Mooney
    My husband and I live in Bellingham, Washington, on a beautiful piece of waterfront property looking out on the San Juan Islands. The BNSF trains which would carry coal from the Tongue River Valley, and from other Powder River Basin mines, to one of the several coal export terminals currently being planned for Washington and Oregon run right across our property, less than 100 feet from our home. But the potential impact of the transport and eventual burning of coal which the Tongue River Railroad's expansion would greatly facilitate affects not only everyone living near the mines and along the railroad routes, but ultimately everyone on this planet. Already our drinking water here in Whatcom County is polluted by mercury in our water source (Lake Whatcom) which has been traced to coal-burning facilities in China. Making cheap coal more readily available for such uses will encourage more coal burning, and do more damage to our planet. It will also make Chinese industries more competitive, and thus threaten even more U.S. jobs than have already been lost to less developed foreign countries. Thus I would like the Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad (TRR) to analyze the following: -- The impact on infrastructure and traffic. The trains running from the TRR to the West Coast, combined with dozens of other daily trains hauling coal, could clog rail networks and also obstruct road transportation with lengthy crossing delays, potentially causing losses to the production, transportation and export of other products which are NOT damaging our planet. They will also cause serious noise, air and water pollution, much of which cannot be mitigated. Required infrastructure improvements will have to be funded by local taxpayers, as railroad liability for such expenses is severely limited by federal law. -- Impacts on property values. Greatly increased railroad operations will cause fires and other damage to adjacent private properties; contribute to air, water, soil, and noise pollution; cause delays in the movement of emergency and other vehicles; divide some cities' commercial districts in half; isolate public and park lands on the wrong side of the tracks"; and thus have a severe negative impact on residential, commercial, and even industrial property values. -- Public convenience and necessity. The proposal to expand the TRR appears to be more in the interest of some corporate giants and of the Chinese economy, rather than for the "public convenience and necessity" which would be required to justify use of eminent domain to confiscate public property and condemnation authority. It certainly does not seem in the interest of the general public and the hundreds of thousands of taxpayers all along the 1,000+ miles of railroad lines which would carry the coal; they will have to pay for expensive safety and infrastructure improvements, but will gain not one cent from added employment or tax revenues. -- Impacts on wildlife habitats in the Tongue River Valley, and the flooding problems already being experienced in Miles City. -- Finally, because expansions of coal production, transportation by railroad and vessel, and export are being planned throughout the Pacific Northwest, I ask that you conduct a PROGRAMMATIC EIS (PEIS) which will systematically examine the combined effects of all these RELATED PROPOSALS. Specifically, a rail PEIS should provide sufficient notice to ALL the potentially impacted populations to enable them to understand the possible effects on their families, property, environment, and quality of life. This means ALL the communities along the railroad lines between the Powder River Basin and the various proposed ports in Washington and Oregon. Thank you very much for your careful and conscientious consideration of this and the many other scoping comments you will receive. Please keep always in your mind the responsibility you carry to ensure a safe and sound environment for future generations, for your, our, and all the other affected citizens' children, grandchildren, and offspring for many years to come."
  928. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19945Stacia Boston
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  929. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19944Kenneth L Kaliher
    I am a resident of Bellingham, Washington. The BNSF trains which would carry coal from the Powder River Basin to one of the several coal export terminals currently being planned for Washington and Oregon cross our property, less than 100 feet from my house. But the potential impact of the transport and eventual burning of coal which the Tongue River Railroad's expansion would greatly facilitate affects not only everyone living near the mines and along the railroad routes, but ultimately everyone on this planet. Already our drinking water here in Whatcom County is polluted by mercury in our water source (Lake Whatcom) which has been traced to coal-burning facilities in China. Making cheap coal more readily available for such uses will encourage more coal burning, and do more damage to our planet. It will also make Chinese industries more competitive, and thus threaten even more U.S. jobs than have already been lost to less developed foreign countries. Thus I would the Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad (TRR) to analyze the following: -- The impact on infrastructure and traffic. The trains running from the TRR to the West Coast, combined with dozens of other daily trains hauling coal, could clog our transportation system and obstruct road transportation, potentially causing losses to the production, transportation and export of other products which are NOT damaging our planet. They will also cause serious noise, air and water pollution, much of which cannot be mitigated. Required infrastructure improvements will have to be funded by local taxpayers, as railroad liability for such expenses is severely limited by federal law. -- Impacts on property values. Greatly increased railroad operations will cause fires and other damage to adjacent private properties, and have a severe negative impact on property values. -- Public convenience and necessity. The proposal to expand the TRR appears to be more in the interest of some corporate giants and of the Chinese economy, rather than for the public convenience and necessity" which would be required to justify use of eminent domain to confiscate public property and condemnation authority. It certainly does not seem in the interest of the general public and the hundreds of thousands of taxpayers all along the 1,000+ miles of railroad lines along which coal would travel. -- Impacts on wildlife habitats in the Tongue River Valley, and the flooding problems already being experienced in Miles City. -- Finally, because expansions of coal production, transportation by railroad and vessel, and export are being planned throughout the Pacific Northwest, I ask that you conduct a PROGRAMMATIC EIS (PEIS) which will systematically examine the combined effects of all these RELATED PROPOSALS. Specifically, a rail PEIS should provide sufficient notice to ALL the potentially impacted populations to enable them to understand the possible effects on their families, property, environment, and quality of life. This means ALL the communities along the railroad lines between the Powder River Basin and the various proposed ports in Washington and Oregon. Thank you very much for your careful and conscientious consideration of this and the many other scoping comments you will receive. Please keep always in your mind the responsibility you carry to ensure a safe and sound environment for future generations, for your, my, and all the other affected citizens' children, grandchildren, and offspring for many years to come."
  930. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19943Western Organization of Resource Councils
    I am submitting the attached comments for the Western Organization of Resource Councils, endorsing the comments of the Northern Plains Resource Council on the scope of the Environmental Impact Statement to be prepared on the application of the Tongue River Railroad Co. in this matter.
    John Smillie · Billings, Montana
  931. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19942Kristen Walser
    Now that the plans for the Tongue River Railroad have shifted to send the coal west for export, there will be a host of other impacts than were presented earlier in the Environmental Impact Statement. Transporting 1.3 Billion tons of coal through Montana, Idaho, and Washington will greatly increase train traffic, on a system already close to capacity. This would crowd out other industries from using the rails, forcing them to use other routes or increasing their cost of doing business. Increased coal train traffic will also impact the health of residents all along the route, from the dust, sirens heard at night, diesel from locomotives and fumes from idling cars, and delays of emergency vehicles at the two crossings in Bozeman. The Environmental Impact Statement must also consider the impact that increases in carbon dioxide, sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide, from burning dirty Montana coal in plants in Asia with poor emissions controls will have by acidifying our oceans and contributing to global warming to the point of being unable to sustain plant life in the oceans or on land. I urge you to pursue the no-action alternative.
    Bozeman, Montana
  932. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19941Danielle Montague-Judd
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Danielle Montague-Judd Wanship, UT
    Wanship, Utah
  933. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19940Emilie Marlinghaus
    Although I am not a resident of Montana or Wyoming, I have resided in Oregon for many years and that makes me part of the greater Northwest Region that will be impacted by the vastly increased scope of coal mining and shipping from those two states to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. I am deeply concerned about the potential for significant negative impacts on both public and environmental health that would result from this dramatically increased level of activity. From what I know of the Tongue River Valley, the current proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through this beautiful area is particularly misguided for two main reasons: 1) the negative consequences on the residents health, the quality of life, and the environment; 2) the contributions to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of live, and the environment throughout the Pacific Northwest. In seems to me that any EIS for the Tongue River Valley rail proposal should focus on the following areas of concern: public convenience & necessity; impacts on property values; impacts on wildlife; increased potential for flooding; noise; & infrastructure and traffic congestion. Because, as stated previously, this Tongue River proposal is only one part of a much larger project that would vastly increase the amount of coal being mined and then trained (and barged) through the one of the Earth's most beautiful river systems - the Columbia River Gorge - to be shipped through several proposed ports on the Pacific Coast, in both Oregon and Washington, to destinations throughout Asia: it should be clear that this proposal has the potential for much more extensive impacts that encompass not just the Northwest region, but - through the greatly increased contribution of greenhouse gasses and other pollutants produced by the vastly augmented level of mining, shipping and burning of coal unleashed by these activities - all parts of the U.S. and potentially the world. I strongly believe that a responsible and comprehensive EIS will - must - take those impacts into account. Thank you for seriously considering these requests on this topic of potentially global import. Sincerely, Emilie Marlinghaus
    Bend, Oregon
  934. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19939Mary Schaad
    I am writing to comment on the scope of the Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed coal railroad that would haul 1.3 billion tons of coal from southeast Montana, through Bozeman and to export terminals in Washington to be shipped to Asia. I am requesting that the Surface Transportation Board analyze: - The impacts of increased train traffic on communities like Bozeman that are affected by the railroad, including increased noise, increased wait time for emergency vehicle crossing, and pollution from coal dust. - The impacts of burning the coal in Asia (climate change).
    Bozeman, Montana
  935. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19938June Doolittle
    Living in a beautiful state like MT, and hearing plans for a railroad to be built to haul coal to the west coast, for the profit of an Eastern coal company, I am more than appalled. There is no way that this project is for public convenience and necessity." There is NOTHING convenient for the public and this is certainly NOT necessary. There are no positives involved, only negatives and probable negatives. The carving up of a beautiful, pristine valley, the effects on property values, health (!!!,) to say nothing of the noise pollution, possiblility of flooding--there simply is nothing at all that could benefit the citizens of Montana and the other states the railroad would pass through. If YOU lived and ranched in the Tongue River Valley, would YOU support the project?? Probably not. Please do the right thing. Do NOT allow this travesty to occur. Once done, it can't be un-done, and too many people will suffer terribly."
  936. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19937Paul W. Birkeland
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  937. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19936Greener Clearwater County
    Please do not allow Arch Coal to ship coal through the Tongue River Valley. Please do not allow Arch Coal to ship coal out of Wyoming. There is too much risk of pollution to remove the coal from Woming. Keep coal underground to reduce carbon & mercury pollution.
    Will Wise · Orofno, Idaho
  938. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19935Melly Reuling
    The Surface Transportation Board needs to analyze: - The impacts of increased train traffic on communities like Bozeman that are affected by the railroad. (increased noise, increased wait time for emergency vehicle crossing). - The impacts of burning the coal in Asia (climate change).
    Bozeman, Montana
  939. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19934Marilyn
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: As a westerner, I support ranchers and farmers staying on the land, wildlife and their habitat and maintaining our water supply through the summer. This project endangers all of these values and necessities of our western heritage. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Marilyn Stone P.O. Box 1534 Paonia, CO 81428
    Paonia, Colorado
  940. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19933Jeffrey L. Jacobs
    Construction of the Tongue River Railroad is solely to link it with the existing rail lines delivering powder river coal to British Columbia ports and eventually to ports currently under consideration in Wash. and Oregon for coal shipment to Asia. Because of the direct impacts- due to the increased volumn of coal from the Tongue River Mines- to the railroads in Wash. and possibly Oregon, all cumulative impacts to not only the railroads but also the communities and citizenry of Wash. and Oregon should be included in the EIS. Being a resident in Bow, Wash., I can't speak for the residents of the Tongue River on some of the impacts there, but having lived for years next to a major siding here, as well as a busy at-grade crossing, I can speak of of a few impacts they will have there and thus share with us. 1) inconvenience of getting from one side of a crossing to the other, including emergency vehicles, school buses, etc. 2) coal dust from cars will be a major concern to residents so close to the mining location,as will diesel particulates fron the engines. Birds native to the area such as pheasant and grouse will may ingest coal. Biologists could study wildlife to see if that is the case and to what extent. We raise chickens that freerange within 50' of the Bow siding, and we're concerned for their health and ours, because chickens (birds) eat grit. As coal becomes the prominent grit along the tracks, are not birds going to eat more and more of it? 3)Should coal even be mined here to sell to overseas markets if the consensus is that it's too evironmentally damaging to burn here? Why escalate global warming by providing these companies and the Chinese with government subsidized coal and in turn make a complete mess of our own local environment with more air and noise pollution and mass traffic tieups? Please study these issues as it relates to the Tongue River Railroad proposal, and broaden the scope of the EIS to include all cumulative impacts. Please consider the impacts to us residing in Bow, Washington Sincerely, Jeff Jacobs
    Bow, Washington
  941. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19932Ken Crawbuck
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. * Coal Dust - this is not an insignificant problem as coal dust will waft everywhere along the coal route from the mine all the way to China. In particular, it impacts the health of anyone in the path of this coal transport, degrades the quality of the rail lines itself, and also presents a potential fire hazard which needs mitigation.
    Friday Harbor, Washington
  942. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19931Suzanne Ravet
    Please extensively study potential cultural effects on the Northern Cheyenne and Crow people. The railroad would run near the Northern Cheyenne Reservation and the Custer National Forest destroying Indian sacred sites. It’s commonly known that the exposure to Western European culture through invasion, genocide, illness, social injustices, industrialization, and assimilation efforts has already killed over 90% of indigenous peoples in North America. The development of the Tongue River Railroad would place further stress on a sovereign people, further deteriorating customs, traditions, and a way of life. Any government agency in the United States, as a nation professing a commitment to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, has an obligation to study harmful cultural and social impacts. The psychosocial effect of losing established sacred and memorial sites should be examined broadly. In a recent study on the role memorials and sites play in society, the director of the International Coalition of Historic Site Museums, stated, “Remembering is a basic human instinct, and memory cannot be imprisoned— it will usually come out in one form or another. The challenge is to find ways to harness memory to learn lessons from the past in an effort to avoid repeating it.” (See: http://www.usip.org/files/resources/srs5.pdf). It is imperative that all impacts from this project on the Cheyenne and Crow cultures be studied, including effects on population, health, stressors, mental health, etc. As stated in the above quote, otherwise we run the risk of repeating history and further genocide against a people. It is important to take into account not only what the mainstream culture would consider a sacred or memorial site, but also the interconnection of the natural world in Indian culture. As stated by Kenneth Cooper of the Lumni Tribe, “Everything on the floor of the ancient forest has a use for Indian people. When they kill a thousand-year-old tree they also kill the environment beneath it, and that can’t be put back by the smartest person on Earth. No one can duplicate what the Creator made.” The spiritual and physiological interdependence on the landbase of indigenous people who have lived and relied on the land for thousands of years is imperative. Research should not be viewed merely through the lens of western culture and should include the involvement of the indigenous people. Also, taken into account should be research connecting ecological displacement and the connection to health and mental health.
    Blaine, Washington
  943. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19930Oregon Department of Environmental Quality
    Resubmission due to possible error on first attempt
    Dick Pedersen · Portland, Oregon
  944. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19929Protect Whatcom
    Please see the attached comment.
    Terry Wechsler · Bellingham, Washington
  945. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19928Wendy Joseph
    Don't do this. Coal is filthy. No one needs to die from the sulfurous toxins it produces.
    Wilmington, California
  946. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19927Montanans for Safe Wildlife Passage
    see attached.
    Monique DiGiorgio · Bozeman, Montana
  947. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19926Patricia Tillmann
    Seattle, Washington
  948. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19925Kendall Mackey
    I am concerned with the way in which the Surface Transportation Board has handled the scoping process under NEPA. The TRRC should not be able to submit an alternative plan after the public hearings concluded. This undermines landowners who have not been able to speak out against a new route because it was not made available to them during the appropriate time. This is just unfair and wrong. The folks in Colstrip deserve an opportunity to voice their concerns. The EIS must include analysis on the climate change impacs of mining, transporting and burning coal from the Otter Creek area. Otter Creek is potentially the largest new mine in the lower 48 and the STB is obligated to look at all impacts this project and the TRR would have on local communities, wildlife, and climate change. I also believe that the investigation proposed by Murkowski and Wyden into the fair market value" of coal needs to weigh in on the discussion and analysis of the Otter Creek mine."
  949. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19924Kim Feringer
    In your EIS I request that you include the effects that mining, hauling and burning this coal will have on climate change. It's clear that our weather is increasing in it's severity and violence and this should be considered. Thank you very much for your time. Kim Feringer
    Everson, Washington
  950. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19923Stacy Neal
    I would like the EIS to include the monetary cost of building out this rail line. I would also like you to include the cost in terms of loss in property value, degradation of air and water quality. I would also like you to include the cost of derailment and mitigation of all crossings. Who will bear this cost and how much will it cost...it should be projected out for the life of this railroad line. Thank you Stacy Neal
    Everson, Washington
  951. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19922Elspeth Tanguay-Koo
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  952. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19921Beth Flake
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. The coal dust spills out of the trains into rivers and streams damaging air and water quality and adding to the mercury and arsenic pollution as well as damaging fisheries. Please make sure the environmental impact statement includes all of these important issues.
    Hood River, Oregon
  953. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19920Patricia Holm
    Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Olympia, Washington
  954. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19919Jim Popper
    There are better ways of getting Coal to China. Destroying our countryside is NOT one of them.
    Gold Bar, Washington
  955. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19918Gary Vodehnal
    I am concerned about the increased train traffic in my community and the effects it might have on noise and air pollution, and increased wait for emergency vehicles. I also am very concerned about the impacts of burning increased amounts of coal in asia and the effect on global warming. Thank you, Gary
    Bozeman, Montana
  956. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19917Joyce George
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Joyce Georg 40820 O Rd Paonia, CO 81428
    Paonia, Colorado
  957. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19916Jasmine Zimmer-Stucky
    Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Please study the overall impact of the use of this railroad for coal export including the mining, transport, and burning.
    Portland, Oregon
  958. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19915David Hopkinson
    My name is David Hopkinson. I live in Bellingham. Washington, with my wife, Judy. Both of us are retired. We love Bellingham. Having lived in Kent, Ohio, where the railroad line bifurcated the town, we are concerned that this beautiful place will become something similar. The town of Kent was built adjacent to the railroad for convenience. As the town grew, the fact that the tracks divided the town became destructive to quality of life, to the health of residents, and to all of the business located in the downtown area. I fully agree with every part of the comment of Debbie Milburn, of Helena, Montana, dated January 7, 2013. Her remarks hold true for everybody who lives close to the rail lines upon which coal will be shipped to the West Coast for export. I also believe that the federal government must look systemically at the effect of all these proposals on rail communities in considering impacts to the environment, human health, traffic, economies, etc. Without a programmatic, area-wide EIS that models all possible rail expansion, regulators have no basis on which to identify indirect impacts or measure cumulative impacts which include reasonably foreseeable future activities. We should stop addressing proposed expansions in the Powder River Basin in a piecemeal fashion, and conduct an area-wide rail PEIS so that all potentially impacted populations can be given proper notice of how they may be impacted. People like Debbie - that would be us, as well - have no way to know how to address potential impacts on their family, their property, and their environment without a systematic determination of how much coal may be extracted from the Otter Creek Mine at peak operations for shipment to terminals on the Columbia River or elsewhere on the west coast of North America. Her situation is the same as all residents of rail communities from the Powder River Basin to the West Coast. Thank you. David Hopkinson 1446 Franklin B Bellingham, Washington 98225 360-4417639
    Bellingham, Washington
  959. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19914Tongue River Water Users' Ass'n
    Please accept the attached supplemental comments regarding the proposed Tongue River Railroad EIS and proposed new route. We appreciate the opportunity to comment.
    Art Hayes. Jr. · Birney, Montana, Montana
  960. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19913Rosemarie Bisiar
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Finally, it is absolutely immoral for us to even be thinking of shipping coal to China or even extracting coal for that matter in light of the current climate change crisis we are experiencing. Rosemarie Bisiar
    Greenacres, Washington
  961. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19912CREDO Action
    RE: Docket No. FD 30186 On behalf of 489 Action members in Montana, we urge you to conduct a thorough environmental review of the proposed Tongue River Railroad. The review should include consideration of the railroad’s environmental and public health threats, including but not limited to greenhouse gas emissions, impacts on wildlife, flooding, toxic coal dust pollution, diesel fumes, noise pollution and property values. The attached public comments were collected by CREDO Action, and though they vary throughout, the messages within can be summed up as follows: The last thing Montana needs is another dirty coal rail line that will pollute our air, bisect our ranches and result in decreased property values. Put Montana families before coal company profits, and don't let the Tongue River Railroad pollute Montana. If you have any questions about these public comments, don’t hesitate to contact me.
    Josh Nelson · San Francisco, California
  962. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19911Stacia Miller
    Dear Sir: I am opposed to the proposed Tongue River Railroad Company's application due to the risks it poses to humans and nature. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Climate change impacts: The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be excavated, transported, shipped and finally burned in Asia. Transporting the polluter overseas does not eliminate the global cost. The proposal will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. Public health: In addition to the climate change impacts, transporting this coal to Asia puts our health at risk as smoke plumes and dangerous participles are blown to our shores. Thus it is not only Chinese people's health put at risk by this proposal but that of thousands and thousands of American residents along the west coast. There are additional health risks that must be analyzed, including potential respiratory problems resulting from the mining and transportation of the coal. Traffic problems could yield dangerous results for surrounding communities all along the proposed train line. Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. I strongly encourage a thorough and objective review of all possible impacts from this proposal, particularly those to the environment & public health. Such an assessment will surely demonstrate how this proposal is flawed and should be rejected. Yours sincerely, Stacia Miller
    Federal Way, Washington
  963. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19910Coalition of Retired National Park Service Employees
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: 1. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is home to large elk, deer and upland bird populations and the industrial degradation of the valley would seriously impact the ability for these animals to survive. 2. Environmental Impacts: Railroads have a history of causing fires, spreading weeds, impeding migratory animals and splitting ranch lands and farm lands which makes these businesses more expensive to operate. 3. Flooding and water pollution: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and contribute to existing local flooding and water pollution in and around Miles City. 4. Power of eminent domain and condemnation authority: The proposed railroad is not for public convenience or necessary. It serves only one small railroad and enriches one large coal company. 5. Climate Change: On a larger scale, when this coal is burned in China and other Asian countries, it will emit huge quantities of carbon dioxide gas which will increase global warming in the United States and around world. leading to evermore widespread destruction of property and loss of life. 6. First Nation Peoples: Exploitation of the environment as well as native people and their cultures for the sake of financial gain is immoral. It is possible to have both a thriving economy and environmental ethics without threatening the existence of life on our planet. Sincerely yours, Arthur C. Hathaway
    Arthur Hathaway · Cheney, Washington
  964. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19909Steve Guettermann
    Dear Surface Transportation Board, Thank you very much for asking for comments on FD 30186, regarding transporting an estimated 1.3 billion tons of coal from and through Montana and the Northwest, for shipment to Asia. The negative impacts of teh Tongue River Railroad shipping proposal far outweigh any possible benefits. The costs to area farmers and ranchers and to the mining area's water quality and quantity alone exceed the profits of this proposal. But this proposal also is a lose-lose for all but a handful of people. It's a lose-lose for Montana's wildlife, people throughout the state, as well as people throughout the Northwest and Asia. In essence, it's not so much that just coal is burned, but the land, itself, and all that depends on it, is being ransomed for short term gain. Of course, as Montana is, for the most part, downwind" for China, Montanans will bear a tremendous amount of the brunt from burning this coal in terms of reduced air quality, which translates into reduced water quality, impacting fish and wildlife, as well, on which many Montanans depend. What is the sense of exporting this coal and, at the time time, building a pipeline from Alberta, Cananda, through part of Montana, to import tar sands oil? To at least temporarily stop this type of "development" until there is a true national energy policy in place that embodies long term common sense rather than short term extraction is paramount to both our health and economic viability. With that said, please deny the permit to build the Tongue River Railroad line necessary to transport this coal."
  965. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19908Mary Jokela
    Please ensure that the EIS fully addresses the adverse environmental impacts in the Spokane area: the greatly increased potential danger of vehicle/pedestrian conflicts with the estimated 50 train per day increase over the current west- bound train traffic heading west through Spokane.
    Deer Park, Washington
  966. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19907Mary Jokela
    Please ensure that the EIS fully addresses the adverse environmental impacts in the Spokane area, particularly derailments. Please address the emergency response time and capabilities of the full-time and volunteer response teams. Also, please address the effect of derailments on our surface waters, our Spokane Valley Rathdrum Prairie Aquifer (Spokane's sole source aquifer), air quality, and our human, flora and fauna environments.
    Deer Park, Washington
  967. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19906Mary Jokela
    Please ensure that the EIS fully addresses the adverse environmental impacts in the Spokane area. My daughter and her family live within ¼ mile of the rail system south of I-90 and I am especially concerned about the increase particulates in the air from diesel exhaust due to the dramatic proposed increase in the number of trains heading west through Spokane. As a minimum I urge only the newest diesel engines or only retrofit engines meeting the current diesel engine standards.
    Deer Park, Washington
  968. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19905Mary Jokela
    This project is NOT for public convenience and necessity", would serve only Arch Coal, produce elevated particulates, negatively impact property values, wildlife habitat, infrastructure, emergency and other traffic, causing grossly disturbing noise and exacerbated flooding from railroad roadbed construction. Every community along this proposed route should be included in the scoping process."
  969. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19904Laura Ackerman
    The new coal-hauling line in the Tongue River Valley will increase train traffic, noise, diesel emissions, flooding, traffic delays, negative impacts to wildlife, negative health impacts to humans, increase sprawl, fires and spread weeds. It will also devalue property, infringe on property rights by making farming and ranching unnecessarily expensive and splitting ranches up. It will also significantly contribute to global warming, and does not serve the public purpose, but rather the pocketbooks of Arch Coal. I want all the above issues studied in the EIS, not just individually but how they relate to one another. In additions please use Dr. Tom Powers' (MSU Prof. EM. of Economics) White paper on Coal Exports and Tom Sansillo's work on fossil fuel subsidies in the U.S, as well as the Whatcom Docs (WA ST, Whatcom CT) position paper on coal-exports and health impacts in helping you to study all the impacts mentioned above. I agree with the letter written to Mr. Ray La Hood, and Mr. Ken Blodgett from the WA Dept. of Ecology Director Ted Sturdevant dated 1-4-2013. I request those concerns in that letter be studied in the EIS.
    Spokane, Washington
  970. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19903Christian Meny
    The Tongue River Railroad project should be denied. This is due to the fact that, if built, it would create only adverse environmental and social impacts on the people of Montana and the Northwest. These impacts include, but not limited to: imminent domain of property, severed wildlife corridors on the Tongue River, air and water pollution due to coal dust, increased greenhouse gas emissions from idling vehicles at railroad crossings, increased anxiety level for those communities in close proximity to the railroad tracks and climate change impacts such as intensified droughts and floods across the World. This coal being shipped along the Tongue River serves only the Corporations that extract it. Otherwise the Montanans, Idahoans and those living in Washington State bear the heavy environmental costs. For your children's sake, do not permit this railroad to be built. Sincerely, Christian Meny
    Missoula, Montana
  971. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19902Stacy Neal
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, I am writing to you regarding my concerns about the proposed Tongue River Valley rail line for coal transport. I am concerned about the effects these trains will have on air and water quality. According to BNSF's own website they estimate that each box car loses approximately 500 lbs of coal per trip. Considering that each train is estimated to contain 120-150 cars, that is an incredible amount of toxic material being lost along the route. For these reasons I request that you include in your EIS, the effects coal dust has on air and water quality. As I am sure you are aware coal dust is toxic because it contains elements such as mercury, lead, arsenic, lead, cadmium, selenium, nickel, vanadium and copper. These materials are referred to as toxic metals, or toxic heavy metals because of their negative physiological effects, both chronic and acute on plants,animals and aquatic life and, for the latter, their physical density and atomic weight." "Radioactive elements such as uranium, thorium and radium [the latter of which decays to radon gas] are also accumulated and concentrated in coal strata, therefore present in coal dust. These are toxic in their own right and toxic via the radioactivity they produce," Coal dust also contains significant amounts of sulphur and sulfides who bio-toxicity increases when exposed to air or water. The fine particulate nature of coal dust, and the toxic constituents therein are readily inhaled and lodge in the lungs as well as being ingested. Mr. Blodgett, On a personal note, I know we have competing interests in our country. I just wonder how it serves us as a Nation to be exporting all of our natural resources? Sending this coal to Asia to be used to manufacture goods that then are sold back to us. Is that what's best for us? I don't believe it is. If we sell off all of our resources what do we have to defend? It's a complicated time,that's for sure. I wish you the best. Stacy Neal Everson WA 360.966.0204"
  972. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19901Phyllis Swackhamer
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: We have entered a New Era. There are enough people now recognizing that our industrialized civilization is destroying the very ecological systems that we depend on for the survival of humanity. The time has come (is way past due) to stop exploiting the Earth for fossil fuels, and create with others a new chapter in mankind's history. Our planet is finite---therefore there can be no logic is continuing to plunder the Earth for more and more and more. Every ecological system on the planet has been stressed already and global climate change is accelerating faster than the worst predictions. Do you believe we can benefit from more droughts, more floods, more hurricanes... Mr. Blodgett it is time to support others in dropping the denial that continues to perpetuate decisions which bring us all closer to collapse. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Your Name Address City, State, Zip Go here to submit your comments post on the Surface Transportation Board website. You also can mail your comments to: Mr. Ken Blodgett Surface Transportation Board 395 E Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20423-0001
    Paonia, Colorado
  973. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19900Bill Jimmerson
    Keep in mind that Montana is the Treasure" state. A few more trains through Bozeman (I live very close to the railroad) will not impact anything as there are adequate ways to keep from getting stuck at the track if you are an emergency vehicle. Plus, there isn't any dust as they coat the coal with a vegetable oil once it is loaded. As far as Asia purchasing our coal, that is just fine. It adds to our economy which helps our schools and other public programs. Global warming is an issue but new technology has helped reduce the emission of greenhouse gases from coal burning plants. Listen to the Environmental Groups but do not allow them to be the decision makers for the future of Montana. Thank you! Bill Jimmerson"
  974. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19899Jon Slenk
    Succinctly: the Tongue River Railroad appears to be an abuse of eminent domain, aimed at enriching a corporation and its customers, rather than at improving the lot of US citizens in the area. I urge all involved to deny and halt this ridiculous request. A short list of all the things which stand to suffer should this abuse of law pass: Public necessity, convenience; Property values; Ecology, wildlife; Flooding; Noise; Taxes; Infrastructure, traffic; Global climate change. sincerely.
    Santa Clara, California
  975. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19898Sandra Palm
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. *In addition, the propropal should include the cumulative impacts for all rail transportation from existing and proposed coal mining operations as it relates to Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Washington, and Oregon. *Full disclosure of proposed and intended amounts of coal extraction in Montana and Wyoming by all companies must be contained in EIS to be able to fully assess transportation impacts, natural resource impacts, and human resource impacts in the affected states of Montana, Wyoming, Idaho, Washington and Oregon. and Oregon. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Respectfully, Sandra Palm 2623 Lynn Street Bellingham WA 98225 wentletrap8@hotmail.com
    Bellingham, Washington
  976. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19897Julia Page
    My comments are attached. Thank you.
    Boise, Idaho
  977. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19896Kathleen Masis
    Please see attachment
    Billings, Montana
  978. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19895Holly Byrne
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Holly Byrne
    Brookings, South Dakota
  979. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19894Joan L. Brownell
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Fishtail, Montana
  980. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19893Dan Dickinson
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Thank You, Dan Dickinson
    Bellingham, Washington
  981. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19892Bonnie McKinlay
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, I am urge you to deny development of the Tongue River Railroad. At the very least, further study must proceed on the potential threats to wildlife, citizen's quality of life, native ancestral sites and rights. Of foremost concern to me is the construction of another route to climate disaster with coal shipments to Asia. I agree with the climate scientists' majority assessment that the only way to lower our carbon level is to limit emissions. The Tongue River RR only enhances climate disruption. Sincerely, Bonnie McKinlay
    Portland, Oregon
  982. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19891David Graber
    We as a nation have believed our laws are not selective, or to be obeyed by only the majority. The Tongue River Railroad advocates need to obey the law and complete the environmental impact studies appropriately. Our farms and ranches need government protection, not government collusion in destruction.
    Hardin, Montana
  983. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19890Bill Zanoni
    To Whom it May Concern, I am a resident of Livingston, Montana, a rural railroad town on the banks of the Yellowstone River. This is a quiet town that attracts hundreds of tourists every year because of its iconic beauty and close proximity to Yellowstone National Park. We boast some of the best freshwater fly fishing on the longest undammed river in the US. I am deeply concerned about the impacts of the new railroad proposed to transport coal from southeast Montana, through my town, through nearby communities, and to Asian markets. We have already seen immense increases in train traffic over the past few years. The increased traffic brings with it noise, congestion, and dust. The railroad tracks split our community in half. We have several traffic lights in town to control traffic at the railroad crossings, but we are not prepared to deal with the significant increase in train traffic this project contemplates. Increased traffic and congestion leads to accidents and endangers the pedestrian traffic in our downtown. The Surface Transportation Board must seriously evaluate the cumulative impacts from this project on Montanan railroad communities like Livingston. As a small community, we likely do not have the resources we need to deal with the increased train traffic through the middle of our town. I have a one-year-old son that loves to see the trains. He shouts and covers his ears. They are loud and exciting, but we are happy when they pass and we can continue our walks through one of the parks on the railroad in our downtown community. Additionally the increased trains bring noise and dust that further pollute our community. The train passes through downtown Livingston. Several very popular restaurants sit on the railroad, including the famous Montana Rib and Chop House. The outdoor seating in these areas is uncomfortable and loud when a train passes through town. With the increased train traffic these outdoor seating areas may be unusable. During the summer months Livingston hosts a farmer's market and artists markets in the park adjacent to the railroad tracks. This is important community space to Livingston that may no longer be usable as a result of increased train traffic. I work as an architect in a firm downtown in a historic railroad building. Our community has been built around the railroad. We value the beauty the old railroad buildings add to our community. I am concerned that many of these old structures could be impacted negatively by the increased traffic on our railroads. I respectfully request that the Surface Transportation Board analyze the impacts of increased train traffic on rural Montana railroad communities, including communities like Livingston that rely on tourism and the iconic beauty and quiet of our community for our economic livelihood. I also respectfully request that the Surface Transportation Board consider the cumulative impacts from burning the billions of tons of Montana coal to increased carbon in our atmosphere. This project will facilitate significant increases of carbon in the atmosphere. The increase of carbon in our atmosphere and resulting impacts from global climate change threatens the United States economy, security, and health. Not to mention the tourist based industry that the community of Livingston depends upon--healthy rivers, snow in the mountains, abundant wildlife and biological diversity. I hope that I can look forward to a future where I can teach my son to fish in the Yellowstone, take him skiing in the Bridger Mountains, and see grizzly bears in Yellowstone National Park. All of these activities are threatened by climate change. Climate change that this project has the potential to greatly exacerbate. Finally, the Surface Transportation Board must consider impacts to the Yellowstone River. Thank you for your time and consideration. Best regards, Bill Zanoni (and on behalf of Luke Zanoni)
    Livingston, Montana
  984. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19889Abigail Breuer
    Dear Members of the Surface Transportation Board: As a 12 year resident of Bozeman, MT, I write to request additional attention to 3 aspects of the proposed coal railroad that would affect my community, and others like it in Montana, Idaho and Washington. I am concerned that the increase in railroad traffic would be a detriment to our community, where the railroad already affects the ability to cross town in key locations for emergency vehicles and others needing access to no longer 'remote' parts of town throughout the day. Second, I have misgivings about the maintaining the environmental integrity of the transportation route, which includes agricultural lands, wildlife habitat, and water resources on which we all depend. Third, given that the majority of the coal is projected to be burned in countries where strict environmental controls are known to be lacking, the greenhouse gas and potential climate impacts are those whose burden will be shared by present and future generations around the world alike. I hope you will take the time to investigate and debate my concerns. I would appreciate the courtesy of a response. Thank you.
    Bozeman, Montana
  985. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19888Tim Walsh
    Please heed my request that an EIS for the Tongue RR closely examine the following: Public convenience and necessity Impacts on property values Impacts on Wildlife Flooding and groundwater problems as a result of a railroad bed. Increased noise pollution Impacts on infrastructure and traffic. I am a resident of Seattle and have spent a significant portion of my life in Whatcom county. The impact on mine and my families lives should not be at the mercy of a profit driven motive. America needs to be the source for a global transition from fossil fuel, not a supplier of it.
    Seattle, Washington
  986. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19887Elisha Rose
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Bozeman, Montana
  987. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19886Montana Elders for a Livable Tomorrow (MELT)
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, We write in opposition to the Tongue River Railroad construction through the Tongue River Valley in order to export coal to Asia. Granting the railroad construction would serve Arch Coal, but it would not be in the best interest of the citizens who live along the railroad or for the state of Montana as a whole. Tremendous expenses by individual communities would be required to mitigate the effects of the additional trains transporting the coal across the entire state. At the very least, overpasses and at-grade crossing bars (four) at crossings need to be borne by the companies that make the profit, which is unlikely. This railroad would not be for the public convenience and necessity." Transporting that amount of coal would no-doubt leave coal dust dropped through bottom dumpers onto the tracks. That weakens the ballast and would lead to derailments, as has happened in the past. We've witnessed cleaning efforts on the tracks, and small particulates of unknown material are thrown over fifty feet into the air. This can't be good for lungs. Please investigate this. Is the infrastructure of the railroad lines strong enough, especially at bridges, to deal with the amount of traffic that would join the tracks? We attended the scoping hearing in Spokane, and the following concerns, to name a few, were expressed: impacts on property values, noise and its effects, traffic delays (especially for emergency vehicles -- we were both EMT's for eight years), and the health impacts of increased diesel down-line. In the bigger picture, our children's lungs don't mature until age ten, and they don't handle coal emissions well. This coal burned in Asia would take longer to get there from the Tongue River than the emission from burning it would take to return to us on prevailing world air currents. The health impacts are devastating. Putting this railroad in place insures that at least three decades of children will suffer the effects. We are better than this. Harold and Jan Hoem"
    Harold and Jan Hoem
  988. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19885Dolores Andersen
    To: US Surface Transportation Board Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett From: Dolores Andersen Resident of Missoula, Montana The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Why is this project and the increase in exporting of coal to China even being considered!? The mining of coal and the infrastructure required to export it to China uses our tax dollars in the form of subsidies directly and indirectly. How can we afford this? How can this be justified? How much in direct and indirect subsidies are going to be used or are already being used? The People’s Republic of China is the world’s largest consumer of coal, using more coal each year than the United States, the European Union and Japan combined. Coal power has been the dominate source of energy used to fuel the rapid economic development of China. Many carbon-industries in the U.S. are moving to China because of the less stringent environmental codes, cheap labor and vast coal resources How can our economy afford the job loss that is a result of this coal going to China? China’s leaders have vowed to improve their nation’s energy efficiency, but have been reluctant to approve the extra spending to do that. Every week to ten days, another coal-fired plant opens somewhere in China using old style equipment; equipment that has a 75 year lifespan. China’s coal-produced air pollution reaches the United States. Studies show that particles of iron, titanium and other elements are being sent airborne and are reaching the U.S. These particles are dense enough that, at maximum levels during the spring , they account for a fifth or more of the maximum levels of particles allowed by the latest federal air quality standards. These particles effect the higher elevations and not lower lying cities like Seattle. Over the course of a year, Chinese pollution averages 10 to 15 percent of allowable levels of particles. How is this increased air pollution being monitored? How is this increased air pollution being mitigated? Renewable energy is the future, not fossil fuels How can we say NO to this project? Dolores Andersen (406) 493-0606
    Missoula, Montana
  989. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19884Scott Bischke
    Dear STB members-- We are writing to ask you to disallow the transport of coal from SE Montana across the Western US (and eventually to China and the Far East) via rail or any other route. Our desire is that neither the infrastructure to allow such tansfer, nor the permission be granted. Two issues loom large: * The smaller is the quality of life decline (noise pollution, air quality declines, repeated long road closures) for those having to put up with thousands of passing trains each year. ** The larger is the impact of putting this much carbon into the air. Climate change is real and our society should be doing everything it can to minimize its impact. As the STB you have the potential to make an impact, to help our society make a stance and a statement, to say No" this is not the direction we want to go. Thank you for considering our thoughts Scott Bischke and Katie Gibson Bozeman, MT"
  990. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19883Montana Elders for a Livable Tomorrow (MELT)
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, We write in opposition to the Tongue River Railroad construction through the Tongue River Valley in order to export coal to Asia. Granting the railroad construction would serve Arch Coal, but it would not be in the best interest of the citizens who would live along that railroad or for the state of Montana as a whole. Tremendous expenses by individual communities would be required to mitigate the effects of the additional trains transporting the coal across the entire state. At the very least, overpasses and at-grade crossing bars (four) at crossings need to be borne by the companies that make the profit, which is unlikely. This railroad would not be for the public convenience and necessity." Transporting that amount of coal would no-doubt leave coal dust dropped through the bottom dumpers onto the tracks. That weakens the ballast and would lead to derailments, as has happened in the past. We've witnessed cleaning efforts on the tracks, and small particulates are thrown over fifty feet into the air. Please investigate this. Is the infrastructure of the railroad lines strong enough, especially at bridges, to deal with the amount of traffic that would join other tracks? We attended the scoping hearing in Spokane, and the following concerns, to name a few, were expressed: impacts on property values, noise and its effects, traffic delays (especially for emergency vehicles -- we were both EMT's for eight years), and the health impacts of increased diesel emissions down-line. In the bigger picture, this coal burned in Asia would take longer to get from the Tongue River than it would take for the emissions to return to us on prevailing air currents. Our children's lungs don't mature until age ten, and they don't handle coal emissions well The health impacts to them are devastating. Putting this in place ensures that at least three decades of children will suffer the effects. We are better than this. Harold and Jan Hoem"
    Harold and Jan Hoem
  991. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19882Patricia Rodgers
    Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Patricia Rodgers 8121 NE 141st Street Kirkland, WA, 98034
    Kirkland, Washington
  992. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19881Sherwood Hake
    I am deeply concerned about the impact increased rail traffic will have on environmental concerns. Please consider impacts to wildlife habitat as well as to air and water quality due to the pollution generated by these trains both from the diesel fumes and the coal dust.
    Pendleton, Oregon
  993. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19880Sleeping Giant Citizens Council
    See attached comments.
    Shiloh Hernandez · Helena, Montana
  994. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19878Sarah DeOpsomer
    My family and I reside near railroad tracks (east Frontage Road, Bozeman.) Every day we cross the tracks several times a day. The school bus is on the other side of the tracks for both pick up and drop off. I am deeply concerned about an increase in rail traffic. I am concerned as both a home owner and parent about the impact more trains will have on our life. More noise, more waiting, more fumes. I am also concerned about the increased amount of vibrations from the passing trains on our home, we feel each and every train. Please consider everyone's welfare in this decision, not just the welfare of those who stand to profit.
    Bozeman, Montana
  995. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19877Laura Ziemer
    Please consider the impact to communities of increased rail traffic. The air pollution is a significant issue, as well as noise pollution. Our Montana communities should not have to bear the brunt of a decrease in the quality of our lives and our health for others to profit.
    Bozeman, Montana
  996. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19876JM Callahan
    In consideration of the Tongue River Railroad and the intentions of Arch Coal to haul hundreds of thousands of tons of coal across Montana. I hope that you will seriously study the impacts of train traffic on communities like Bozeman and Belgrade. Thank you.
    Bozeman, Montana
  997. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19875Steve Hinton
    Dear Mr. Blodgett; It is my understanding the Tougue Valley Rail project is being constructed on the speculation that an appropriate terminal will be developed on the West Coast to handle shipments of coal product to China. Given the dependency of the Tougue Valley project on export markets I believe the EIS analysis for this project must take into consideration the environmental impacts derived both locally, regionally, and nationally from the proposed Tougue River Valley project. Coal shipments will impact the environment throughout the shipment corridor by; Impacting Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade these keystone populations. Flooding: Railroad beds often function as earthen dams that impede hydraulic connections between floodplains, river bottoms and wetlands. These impediments to natural processes lead to shifts in native populations of flora and fauna and functioning ecosystems. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution throughout the shipment corridor. Thank you for considering my comments, Steve Hinton Bellingham, WA.
    Bellingham, Washington
  998. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19874Barbara Williamson
    You surely have heard the comments before which follow. Transport of coal through many communities in the United States is being applied for simultaneously, so there is little (yet) to observe to see what damage can be done. However, look to Delta in the Vancouver, BC area to see the effects of the filth of clean" coal. The comparatively few jobs cannot begin to compensate for the damage done. Please do not be taken in by their glossy presentations. Read on: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants."
  999. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19873K Scott
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, K Scott
    Bel Air, Maryland
  1000. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19872LaTrelle Scherffius
    My concern is the negative impacts of increased train traffic on communities throughout the northwest like Bozeman that would be impacted by noise and wait time for emergency vehicle crossings. I live close to the tracks and worry that increased traffic would severely impact both myself and neighbors. I am also concerned with the impact that shipping coal to Asia would have on global warming. Thank you for your consideration and attention.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1001. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19871Cal Cumin
    The Tongue River Railroad is not for the public convenience and necessity" and should not have the right of eminent domain and condemnation. The impact of increased rail traffic on local governments needs to be carefully analyzed."
  1002. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19870John Horner
    I am very concerned about the potential negative impacts of coal export facilities and the associated rail lines in Whatcom County where I have been a resident for 36 years. These include the negative impact on public health, local finances, environment and quality of life. I realize, too, that the impact of coal export extends well beyond my city, county and state. I share these same concerns with proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. Specifically, the proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad through the Tongue River Valley is truly disturbing. The Tongue River Railroad Company’s proposal renews it’s attempt to cut the Tongue River Valley in half destroying Montana ranchland. Thus, I request the new EIS address and analyze the following: 1) Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. 2) Financial impact: This would include potential devalued property, infringement on property rights and the increased difficulty and cost associated with spitting ranches in half. 3) Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is a rich wildlife habitat which will be seriously compromised by the coal strip mine and associated rail lines. Please investigate the impacts. 4) Noise: The impact of loud trains on the recreation areas and the residents living in communities near the rail lines should be studied. 5) Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Finally, the Otter Creek coal transported on these lines will be exported to China. Mining, transportation to terminals, shipping overseas and hauling coal to plants all involve the burning of fossil fuel. Transporting and burning this coal is contrary to the essential need to decrease carbon emissions, which contribute to global climate change. This, too, should be addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement to determine whether proposed rail lines should be built. Sincerely, John Horner
    Bellingham, Washington
  1003. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19869Sean Perry
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Sean Perry
    Mill Valley, California
  1004. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19868Jeanine Hart-Horner
    I am very concerned about the potential negative impacts of coal export facilities and the associated rail lines in Whatcom County where I have been a resident for 36 years. These include the negative impact on public health, local finances, environment and quality of life. I realize, too, that the impact of coal export extends well beyond my city, county and state. I share these same concerns with proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. Specifically, the proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad through the Tongue River Valley is truly disturbing. The Tongue River Railroad Company’s proposal renews it’s attempt to cut the Tongue River Valley in half destroying Montana ranchland. Thus, I request the new EIS address and analyze the following: 1) Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. 2) Financial impact: This would include potential devalued property, infringement on property rights and the increased difficulty and cost associated with spitting ranches in half. 3) Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is a rich wildlife habitat which will be seriously compromised by the coal strip mine and associated rail lines. Please investigate the impacts. 4) Noise: The impact of loud trains on the recreation areas and the residents living in communities near the rail lines should be studied. 5) Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Finally, the Otter Creek coal transported on these lines will be exported to China. Mining, transportation to terminals, shipping overseas and hauling coal to plants all involve the burning of fossil fuel. Transporting and burning this coal is contrary to the essential need to decrease carbon emissions, which contribute to global climate change. This, too, should be addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement to determine whether proposed rail lines should be built. Sincerely, Jeanine Hart-Horner
    Bellingham, Washington
  1005. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19867Kathleen Wright
    Docket No. FD 30186 Dear Mr. Ken Blodgett, I am highly concerned about the impacts that a Tongue River Railroad would have. Specifically: • Public convenience and necessity: It is not right for our government to use the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority in this case. This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity.” It would serve only one coal company, Arch Coal; the coal is not being mined for domestic needs. • Wildlife: Not only does the Tongue River Valley itself support rich wildlife populations highly valued by sportsmen and many others, the increase in coal trains across Montana and beyond would lead to an unconscionable increase in wildlife collisions with trains. Increased train traffic in wildlife crossing zones – including recognized movement corridors important for wildlife migration, such as the routes north from Yellowstone National Park – would impact wildlife populations, and this must be addressed. • Increased train traffic: This project would impact many, many communities along our rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. Increase coal train traffic – a result of the Tongue River rail-line – will cause more delays, more noise, more diesel pollution, more noxious weed spreading, more dead/injured wildlife. Increased train traffic not only inconveniences a large number of citizens, it often require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by taxpayers. • Property value: This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds and make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive. It will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river. Most insidious, it will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner – that makes NO sense. Perhaps most important for our children, the Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in power plants on the other side of the world, power plants with few (if any) restrictions on emissions. This continued addition to decades-long increases in CO2 in our atmosphere can’t go on for the profits of a few businessmen and shareholders. The climate impacts of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. This coal must be mined and then hauled by diesel-powered trains and ships half way around the globe. It simply does not make sense. Sincerely, Kathleen Wright Bozeman, Montana
    Bozeman, Montana
  1006. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19866Laura Derevensky
    I am very concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general.” “Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. For example the EIS should investigate possible negative impacts on the values of coastal properties in the San Juan islands, and should include a plan to recompense property owners for any decrease in property values. It should investigate the possible effects on tourism in the San Juan islands, on which may businesses rely, especially whale watching, boating, fishing and consequently the hotel industry. It should investigate the possible effect of the shipping from the coal port terminal on the marine wildlife populations, especially the orcas, which are already under stress. Please make sure that the EIS addresses the impact of coal shipping on property values and quality of life, on the tourism industry, and on the marine wildlife in the Pacific Northwest. Furthermore, by encouraging the use of coal in China, this project would contribute further to global warming. Therefore, the EIS would have to consider the contributions of the increased coal use on air quality and global temperature
    Montgomery, New York
  1007. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19865Cottonwood Environmental Law Center
    The scope of the EIS for the proposed Tongue River Railroad needs to include an analysis of the impacts to all wildlife. A Baseline analysis needs to be conducted to determine what species exist in the area and the population levels for those species. The cumulative impacts of the coal mines and the railroad need to be considered. The impacts of burning the coal in Asia needs to be considered as an indirect impact. The climate change impacts will have huge consequences and need to be considered. In addition, the EIS must consider the impacts of increased train traffic on communities along the rail between Miles City and the ports in Washington State. Thank you for your consideration.
    John Meyer · Bozeman, Montana
  1008. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19864Maureen Kelly
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Maureen Kelly
    Cove, Oregon
  1009. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19862Greenpeace
  1010. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19861Sierra Club
  1011. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19860Julie Bergevin
    Please stop the coal trains. Shipping coal on the Tongue River Railroad will: • contribute to the devastation beautiful Montana • drive down prices in China causing more coal to be burned in dirty plants • significantly increase CO2 emissions in the mining, hauling over land/sea/land, and finally in the burning all leading to further climate change • increase dependence on and demand for a limited resource further prolonging the world’s necessary switch to sustainable energy futures • have a significant local impact on communities along the way from the dust, the noise, and the unsightly reminder of the will of a business winning out over the needs of future generations for a cleaner, more sustainable and more stable source of energy. The deleterious effects of the dust on the sensitive lungs of many here will be problematic beyond measure. The time to stand up and invest in our future is now. Our numbers our growing and we need to invest in ways that can support the coming tide - not in a manner that is shortsighted, unsustainable and destructive. The only way to make that happen is to stop the coal trains and start working on alternatives that will support the future that is barreling our way.
    Kirkland, Washington
  1012. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19859Terri Copeland
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Terri Copeland B
    Pocatello, Idaho
  1013. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19858Mark Schofield
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: I live in Bellingham, WA - about 1000 miles from the Tongue River Valley. However, I'm directly connected to this magnificent Montana landscape by: *RAIL - Coal transport made possible by the proposed coal-hauling line through the Tongue River Valley would likely result in an increase of coal train traffic through my community on its way to current and proposed coal export terminals in the Northwest. *CLIMATE - Increased coal burning made possible by the proposed coal-hauling line through the Tongue River Valley would exacerbate global anthropocentric climate change, intensify ocean acidification, release additional toxic mercury into air and water, and impact my local community in a host of other ways (especially when considering the cumulative impact with other fossil fuel activities). *HUMANITY - Though strangers to me, the rural residents of the Tongue River Valley are my brothers and sisters and are every bit entitled to a clean and healthy environment, protection of their livelihoods and traditional ways of life, and self-determination in matters that affect their lives. Because of my connections to the Tongue River Valley, I respectfully request that you take a hard look at the following impacts in your EIS for the proposed Tongue River Railroad: 1) Study the increased coal train traffic and its resulting traffic delays, noise, fugitive coal dust and diesel pollution. 2) Study the taxpayer burden of constructing expensive overpasses and safety crossings, which would be necessary to deal with considerable train traffic. 3) Study and explain whether and how this proposal (that's dependent on a variety of public resources) is in the short-term and long-term public interest. 4) Study how the proposed coal-hauling line would impact elk and mule deer populations, upland bird species and other wildlife, as well as native plant communities. 5) Study what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any, of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. 6) Study the quantitative (economic loss from decreased visits) and qualitative (perceptions on sense of place) impacts of loud trains diminishing the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. 7) Study how this proposed coal-hauling line would contribute to the acceleration of anthropocentric climate change - and include analysis of local and regional climate impacts such as more violent storm events, shifts in precipitation patterns, habitat disruption, etc. Thank you for considering these comments. Sincerely, Mark Schofield 400 Whatcom Street Bellingham, WA 98225
    Bellingham, Washington
  1014. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19857Patti Steinmuller
    Docket No. FD 30186 I am very concerned regarding the application for the proposed Tongue River Railroad. Due to a recent change in the route that would go through Colstrip, instead of Miles City, a public hearing is warranted in Colstrip and the comment period should be reopened. Also, the likelihood of transport of additional coal beyond that in the Otter Creek Mine warrants further investigation into the pollution effects, negative impacts on agriculture, and transportation effects on communities along the transport line. I am requesting that the review be halted and further investigation be conducted due to the recent changes in the transportation route, incomplete information provided on the intended scope of the proposal, and the pollution effects to be imposed on communities in Montana and Washington state and especially those communities along the transportation route.
    Gallatin Gateway, Montana
  1015. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19856Marsha Riek
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad - analyze the following: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve for the profit only of Arch Coal, who plans to sell coal to China and Asia who will use this coal to compete with the U.S. to produce products more cheaply. No residents of the Tongue River will benefit in any way from this. There are many negatives to this proposed project that greatly impact the residents of this area. Please investigate the impacts to the following: Impacts on property values: loss of property value and infringement on property rights. This railroad will cause devaluation of property (especially riverfront property), will cause ranches and farms to be split in half making portions unusable, liability of train crossings will be left to the landowner. Impacts to Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife and home to elk and mule deer populations as well as birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Impacts on Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise Impacts: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Noise also impacts health with disrupted sleep. Impacts on Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. There are health issues involved with diesel fumes for people with asthma or emphysema. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. National & Global Impacts: The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1016. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19855Jean Olson
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, On December 13, 2012, I attended the Coal Terminal Hearing held at the Washington State Convention Center in Seattle. I went because as a resident of the Seattle area, I am concerned about the train traffic here. However, while I was listening to the comments, I heard two very troubling things. 1. In order to haul the coal from the mine to Western Washington, the tracks would travel through private land currently held by ranchers. One rancher has traveled from Montana to Seattle, just so he could comment. He stated that several miles of his land was going to be condemned so the tracks could be laid. This is appalling, in two ways. First, that the railroad can condemn private land, build a line thus cutting a ranch in half. Second, that there was not a process in Montana for this rancher to comment so that he would not be required to spend the money to travel several hundred miles for a 3 hour comment section. 2. That the cultural heritage of the Native American communities living in the area where the mines are planned does not appear to have been considered in this process. Cultural Resources need to be respected. How would you like it if someone decided to mine where your ancestors buried? Because of the two aforementioned concerns, I believe that the EIS for the Tongue River Valley should include the following items. 1. The unlawful condemnation of privately held land. 2. The cultural resources and heritage of the Native American tribes in and around the Tongue River Valley. 3. The impacts to the wildlife in the area. Montana is home to wide-ranging species such as elk, cougar, grizzley bear and wolf should be assessed. 4. Mining is notorious for polluting water resources. The EIS needs to have an in-depth study into which streams will be affected by the coal from the mines and leaked fluids from machinery used to mine as well as by workers moving throughout the area. 5. Effects to fish species need to be considered. Not just those species which are recreationally fished, but also the aquatic invertebrates and smaller fish species they depend on. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposed project. Jean Olson
    Kirkland, Washington
  1017. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19854Michelle Lenhart
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Michelle Lenhart 9630 W Glen Ellyn St. Boise, ID 83704
    Boise, Idaho
  1018. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19853Paul Coe
    Please don't approve this scheme with such a downside.
    Mayer, Arizona
  1019. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19852James Plunkett
    The environmental impact statement for the Tongue River Railroad should include analysis of how the power of eminent domain would be applied. The criteria of public convenience or necessity needs to be measured against the actual harm to the public caused by this railroad. The public will be injured by air pollution, especially diesel particulates. The public will be injured by climate change caused by CO2 emitted when the coal is burned.
    Portland, Oregon
  1020. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19851Judith Akins
    Please study the entire expected coalmtrai route and not just this one. Secondly we need to study the need for removing more coal from the earth. We are at a critical point in our CO2 capacity. We need to look to the science of climate change and listen to the International Academy of Scientists who agree that the burning of fossil fuels is harmful to our planet.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1021. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19850Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    I am opposing the Tongue River Railroad. I am a member of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe, mother, grandmother to children who may be exposed to coal waste from cars passing through/by the reservation, either by probable derailments or just from the blow off. I am citing the Executive Order 12898 from the U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Railroad Administration Executive Order 12898 EO 12898, known as the Federal Environmental Justive Policy, requires federal agencies to address, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, the potential disproportionately high, adverse human health and environmental impacts of thier programs, policies, and activities on minority and low income populations. Federal agency responsibilities under this Evecutive Order also apply to Native American Programs. The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) order 5610.2 was issued in 1997 to comply with EO 12898. The policy of the DOT Order is to promote the principles on the environmental justice in all DOT programs which includes the FRA. The DOT Order defines environmental justice to mean adverse impact that is predominately borne by a minority population and/ or a low income population, or that would be suffered by the minority population and /or low income population. I will also be sending a certified letter to the Northern Cheyenne Tribe. Thank you
    Theresa L. Small · Lame Deer, Montana
  1022. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19849Elizabeth Braided Hair
    Requesting an extension on the 01/11/13 cut off date for submitting comments on TRR.
    LamDeer, Montana
  1023. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19848James Emerson
    Let's not destroy any more of The Last Best Place.We can't afford to subsidize big coal with traffic problems at every grade crossing,so they can trundle miles of coal cars full one way and again empty.NO TO COAL TRAINS!!
    Helena, Montana
  1024. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19847Carol Suzanne Bryan
    I urge you to consider the effect of coal mining, transportation and burning on air quality NO MATTER WHICH ROUTE IS SELECTED. Air quality is getting to be a global problem in which there is a cumulative effect from many sources. This combines to produce global warming. Any amount of air pollution must be considered as part of a serious global problem. The costs of coal outweigh the benefits.
    Spokane, Washington
  1025. (printed as 1/11/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19846Paul J. Pickett
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. The complete climate impact of the lifecycle carbon emissions of minining, processing, shipping, and burning the coal should be analyzed, quantified, and mitigated so there is zero net emissions of greenhouse gasses. Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers.
    Olympia, Washington
  1026. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19879Buffy Hake
    I am deeply concerned about property values due to increased rail traffic - There will be significant impacts on property values all along the route. I would like you to study the impact on property values.
    Pendleton, Oregon
  1027. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19845Tom Tully
    Mr. Blodgett: This project has kept ranchers, the Northern Cheyenne Tribe, and others along the proposed route and alternative routes in limbo for over 30 years. At this point the only reason for building this railroad is to ship Montana coal to China and other Asian countries in an ill-advised attempt to balance our trade deficit. What we give up to do so is one of the last relatively un-developed river valleys in Montana, a unique combination of geography, culture, history, and rural landscape that cannot be re-established. This is a short-sighted and irresponsible approach to managing precious resources, whether they be energy, cultural, agricultural, human, or wildlife. We strongly urge you to deny this permit. Sincerely, Tom Tully and Barbara Archer 2210 Pryor Ln Billings, MT 59102 archtul@bresnan.net
    Billngs, Montana
  1028. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19844Connie Voget
    I am a member of Earth Ministry and attend a church that has earned the designation of Energy Star Congregation. We are committed to responsible stewardship of the earth and its resources and acknowledge the grave threat of climate disruption/global warming related to the burning of fossil fuels. The Tongue River Railroad Company proposal to transport 20 million tons of coal per year for export to China would result in 35 million tons of carbon dioxide being released into the atmosphere when the coal is burned The diesel fuel used to move the coal would emit 700,000 tons more. Additionally the door would be opened to expanded mining operations and even more emissions. Damaging the natural systems that sustain us is wrong. Jeopardizing our children's future is wrong. I ask you to include climate disruption/global warming impacts in the EIS. Thank you.
    Seattle, Washington
  1029. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19843National Wildlife Federation
    Please accept these comments on behalf of the National Wildlife Federation in regards to the proposed Tongue River Railroad.
    Alexis Bonogofsky · Billings, Montana
  1030. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19842Lisa Penny
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Lisa Penny 28 South Kings Road Nampa, ID 83687
    Nampa, Idaho
  1031. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19841Geraldine Dalbec
    No Action", please. You are intelligent people who realize that our planet is in peril. Science has proven that our global warming situation is caused by burning fossil fuels & it has become a threat to our freedom. Our State has had enough fire and floods. We need Agriculture and Ranches. Protecting the environment improves the economy.Start putting back, enough has been taken from this planet. Please. Thank you."
  1032. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19840Danny Galloway
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Mesa, Colorado
  1033. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19839Geri Weigum
    I am in favor of the coal transport and believe that it is time for the united states to allow our citizens to have good paying jobs. I have attended meetings here locally and read everything I can get my hands on and do believe it would be a great idea to support this industry and put American workers back to work.
    Hermiston, Oregon
  1034. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19838Ann Jarrell
    Please study the impact that coal transported on the proposed Tongue River Railroad that will be burned without benefit of scrubbing in coal plants in China will have on Carbon Dioxide emissions. Please study the impact to the economy as this coal is mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Friday Harbor, Washington
  1035. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19837Ann Jarrell
    • Please study the impacts on property values, potential risk and damage caused by fires, spread of notious weeds, the impact on ranching and farming including the shift of liability at train crossings to the property owner. in half and separate fields from the river and Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Friday Harbor, Washington
  1036. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19836Evan Brown
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Evan Brown 6247 S. Snowdrop Way, Boise, ID 83716
    Boise, Idaho
  1037. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19835Cynthia Patterson
    Docket No. FD 30186 Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Marietta, Georgia
  1038. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19834Ann Jarrell
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries.
    Friday Harbor, Washington
  1039. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19833Irene Blomberg
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, I am a full time resident of the Pacific Northwest for over 20 years. I am deeply concerned about the mining and shipping of additional coal in the Pacific Northwest and the impacts it will have on communities small and large along the way. At this time I understand that Arch coal has agreements with the proponents (Ambre Energy and Kinder Morgan) of the three proposed terminals on the Columbia River. Those terminals propose to ship a combined 82 million metric tons of coal per year, and would require a minimum of 27 round-trip rail passages from/to the Powder River Basin. All coal bound for the west coast will probably go west through the Columbia River Gorge, including trains ultimately bound for GPT (16 round-trip passages) and Coos Bay (3.6 train passages).That would make the grand total round trip train passages if every train is 1.6 miles long: 46. The Grand total of coal proposed to be exported through the five terminals proposed in Oregon and Washington: 155 million metric tons. This is a seismic shift in U.S. export of this commodity, impacting a region of 5 states with an infrastructure system that was never designed for activity at this level. I agree with the comments made by Debbie Milburn of Montana. The federal government must look systemically at the effect of all these proposals on rail communities in considering impacts to the environment, human health, traffic, economies, etc. Without a programmatic EIS that models all possible rail expansion, regulators have no basis on which to identify indirect impacts or measure cumulative impacts which include reasonably foreseeable future activities. The Surface Transportation Board should stop addressing proposed expansions in the Powder River Basin in a piecemeal fashion, and conduct a rail PEIS so that all potentially impacted populations can be given proper notice of how they may be impacted. Many property owners who will be involved in this development have no way to know how to address potential impacts on their family, their property, and their environment without a systematic determination of how much coal may be extracted from the Otter Creek Mine at peak operations for shipment to terminals on the Columbia River or elsewhere on the west coast of North America. This situation is the same as all residents of rail communities from the Powder River Basin to the West Coast. Thank you for your time and efforts. Irene Blomberg
    Lopez Island, Washington
  1040. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19832N Zack Blomberg
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, I was born and raised in the San Juan Islands and have chosen to raise my family and spend the rest of my days here. I am deeply concerned about the mining and shipping of additional coal in the Pacific Northwest and the impacts it will have on communities small and large along the way. At this time I understand that Arch coal has agreements with the proponents (Ambre Energy and Kinder Morgan) of the three proposed terminals on the Columbia River. Those terminals propose to ship a combined 82 million metric tons of coal per year, and would require a minimum of 27 round-trip rail passages from/to the Powder River Basin. All coal bound for the west coast will probably go west through the Columbia River Gorge, including trains ultimately bound for GPT (16 round-trip passages) and Coos Bay (3.6 train passages).That would make the grand total round trip train passages if every train is 1.6 miles long: 46. The Grand total of coal proposed to be exported through the five terminals proposed in Oregon and Washington: 155 million metric tons. This is a seismic shift in U.S. export of this commodity, impacting a region of 5 states with an infrastructure system that was never designed for activity at this level. I agree with the comments made by Debbie Milburn of Montana. The federal government must look systemically at the effect of all these proposals on rail communities in considering impacts to the environment, human health, traffic, economies, etc. Without a programmatic EIS that models all possible rail expansion, regulators have no basis on which to identify indirect impacts or measure cumulative impacts which include reasonably foreseeable future activities. The Surface Transportation Board should stop addressing proposed expansions in the Powder River Basin in a piecemeal fashion, and conduct a rail PEIS so that all potentially impacted populations can be given proper notice of how they may be impacted. Many property owners who will be involved in this development have no way to know how to address potential impacts on their family, their property, and their environment without a systematic determination of how much coal may be extracted from the Otter Creek Mine at peak operations for shipment to terminals on the Columbia River or elsewhere on the west coast of North America. This situation is the same as all residents of rail communities from the Powder River Basin to the West Coast.
    Lopez Island, Washington
  1041. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19831Hope Smith
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Hope Smith
    Red Lodge, Montana
  1042. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19830Ms. Shaun Hubbard
    I am a regular visitor to Montana where I enjoy the wild beauty and the excellent fishing opportunities. I am particularly troubled by the proposed construction of a rail line for the sole purpose of carrying coal. I would ask that the EIS include a study of the impacts of the railroad construction on the water quality of the area's watershed and the fisheries habitat and fisheries survival. Please study the impacts of train activity, pollution from the trains, and pollution from the loads of coal on the water quality, future of the fisheries, the wildlife habitats, and the cultural/tribal resources of the region. In addition, the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Friday Harbor, Washington
  1043. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19829Lisa Schmidt
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Lisa Schmidt Helena, MT 59601
    Helena, Montana
  1044. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19828Suzanne Ravet
    Please scope the impacts on student learning, as created by health problems from noise pollution caused by increased rail traffic from coal mining and transportation via rail. As an educator and parent, I am very concerned about the additional rail traffic, both proximity to family homes and schools, existing tracks and proposed ‘new’ tracks in the Pacific Northwest. Many of the children I work with have learning disabilities, health impairments, mental health issues and asthma. I want to know what noise pollution, as related to student learning, will have on my child and all children in the communities along the proposed or foreseeable rail routes between the Powder River Basin and export terminals. I believe that school district leaders, educators, families, and students should know what risks the increased rail traffic has on student learning and student ability to meet state testing standards, both students’ already at-risk and otherwise ‘healthy’ students. I believe it is imperative to know how additional exposure to noise pollution will effect education. This study should be comprehensive in range from the first year through to when the trains and terminal(s) is in full operation; year 5, year 20, etc. The following areas of research are important to consider: 1. Potential Noise exposure impacts, as compiled by Whatcom Docs, such as cardiovascular disease, including increased blood pressure, arrhythmia, stroke, and ischemic heart disease; cognitive impairment in children; sleep disturbance and resultant fatigue, hypertension, arrhythmia, and increased rate of accidents and injuries; exacerbation of mental health disorders such as depression, stress and anxiety, and psychosis. Reference: Statement of the Whatcom Docs organization (http://www.coaltrainfacts.org/whatcom-docs-positionstatement- [1] and-appendices) and referenced research. 2. Researched data from medical, educational, and scientific sources. Potential effects on student learning due to noise pollution. “Noise is defined as unwanted sound. Environmental noise consists of all the unwanted sounds in our communities except that which originates in the workplace. Environmental noise pollution, a form of air pollution, is a threat to health and well-being. It is more severe and widespread than ever before, and it will continue to increase in magnitude and severity because of population growth, urbanization, and the associated growth in the use of increasingly powerful, varied, and highly mobile sources of noise. It will also continue to grow because of sustained growth in highway, RAIL, and air traffic, which remain major sources of environmental noise. The potential health effects of noise pollution are numerous, pervasive, persistent, and medically and socially significant. Noise produces direct and cumulative adverse effects that impair health and that degrade residential, social, working, and learning environments with corresponding real (economic) and intangible (well-being) losses. It interferes with sleep, concentration, communication, and recreation. The aim of enlightened governmental controls should be to protect citizens from the adverse effects of airborne pollution, including those produced by noise. People have the right to choose the nature of their acoustical environment; it should not be imposed by others. http://journals.lww.com/smajournalonline/Abstract/2007/03000/Noise_Pollution__A_ Modern_Plague.16.aspx [2] I would ask that you review and include in your scope known studies, collected and existing data from all school districts along the route and conduct additional studies as needed to quantify impacts with certainty. Increase in rail traffic from the Powder River Basin to the proposed export terminals is noted to be between a minimum of 18 trains to a maximum of 60 additional trains through towns, cities, etc. each day. The EIS should measure the cost of increased school services to meet student learning needs due to missed school days, mental health and counseling issues, increased school health and nursing needs, remedial programs, and testing needs. The EIS should measure a dollar equivalent for these services with direct and indirect costs. The EIS should measure the loss to school districts in all states impacted by increased coal exportations, due to families who will be unwilling or unable to move to school districts/or move out of school districts due to the perception of being located in a injurious area due to rail traffic. The EIS should also measure the costs to school districts for the increase cost for inability to meet national and state testing standards. All relevant incurred costs should be reviewed with an allocated dollar amount for future mitigation paid for by the applicant. Potential mitigations for the preceding concerns might include, increasing funding for school districts to meet student needs due to lost school days and decreased test scores, relocating families along the rail corridor to less injurious localities, and creating sound buffers along the rail tracks near all schools and family homes. Thank you for your due attention to this comment and please accept an electronic signature if this document is submitted as the contents of or attached to an e-mail. You may call me, if you have any questions. Links: ------ [1] http://www.coaltrainfacts.org/whatcom-docs-positionstatement- [2] http://journals.lww.com/smajournalonline/Abstract/2007/03000/Noise_Pollution__A_ Modern_Plague.16.aspx
    Blaine, Washington
  1045. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19827Suzanne Ravet
    Please scope the impacts on student learning, as created by health problems from noise pollution caused by increased rail traffic from coal mining and transportation via rail. As an educator and parent, I am very concerned about the additional rail traffic, both proximity to family homes and schools, existing tracks and proposed ‘new’ tracks in the Pacific Northwest. Many of the children I work with have learning disabilities, health impairments, mental health issues and asthma. I want to know what noise pollution, as related to student learning, will have on my child and all children in the communities along the proposed or foreseeable rail routes between the Powder River Basin and export terminals. I believe that school district leaders, educators, families, and students should know what risks the increased rail traffic has on student learning and student ability to meet state testing standards, both students’ already at-risk and otherwise ‘healthy’ students. I believe it is imperative to know how additional exposure to noise pollution will effect education. This study should be comprehensive in range from the first year through to when the trains and terminal(s) is in full operation; year 5, year 20, etc. The following areas of research are important to consider: 1. Potential Noise exposure impacts, as compiled by Whatcom Docs, such as cardiovascular disease, including increased blood pressure, arrhythmia, stroke, and ischemic heart disease; cognitive impairment in children; sleep disturbance and resultant fatigue, hypertension, arrhythmia, and increased rate of accidents and injuries; exacerbation of mental health disorders such as depression, stress and anxiety, and psychosis. Reference: Statement of the Whatcom Docs organization (http://www.coaltrainfacts.org/whatcom-docs-positionstatement- [1] and-appendices) and referenced research. 2. Researched data from medical, educational, and scientific sources. Potential effects on student learning due to noise pollution. “Noise is defined as unwanted sound. Environmental noise consists of all the unwanted sounds in our communities except that which originates in the workplace. Environmental noise pollution, a form of air pollution, is a threat to health and well-being. It is more severe and widespread than ever before, and it will continue to increase in magnitude and severity because of population growth, urbanization, and the associated growth in the use of increasingly powerful, varied, and highly mobile sources of noise. It will also continue to grow because of sustained growth in highway, RAIL, and air traffic, which remain major sources of environmental noise. The potential health effects of noise pollution are numerous, pervasive, persistent, and medically and socially significant. Noise produces direct and cumulative adverse effects that impair health and that degrade residential, social, working, and learning environments with corresponding real (economic) and intangible (well-being) losses. It interferes with sleep, concentration, communication, and recreation. The aim of enlightened governmental controls should be to protect citizens from the adverse effects of airborne pollution, including those produced by noise. People have the right to choose the nature of their acoustical environment; it should not be imposed by others. http://journals.lww.com/smajournalonline/Abstract/2007/03000/Noise_Pollution__A_ Modern_Plague.16.aspx [2] I would ask that you review and include in your scope known studies, collected and existing data from all school districts along the route and conduct additional studies as needed to quantify impacts with certainty. Increase in rail traffic from the Powder River Basin to the proposed export terminals is noted to be between a minimum of 18 trains to a maximum of 60 additional trains through towns, cities, etc. each day. The EIS should measure the cost of increased school services to meet student learning needs due to missed school days, mental health and counseling issues, increased school health and nursing needs, remedial programs, and testing needs. The EIS should measure a dollar equivalent for these services with direct and indirect costs. The EIS should measure the loss to school districts in all states impacted by increased coal exportations, due to families who will be unwilling or unable to move to school districts/or move out of school districts due to the perception of being located in a injurious area due to rail traffic. The EIS should also measure the costs to school districts for the increase cost for inability to meet national and state testing standards. All relevant incurred costs should be reviewed with an allocated dollar amount for future mitigation paid for by the applicant. Potential mitigations for the preceding concerns might include, increasing funding for school districts to meet student needs due to lost school days and decreased test scores, relocating families along the rail corridor to less injurious localities, and creating sound buffers along the rail tracks near all schools and family homes. Thank you for your due attention to this comment and please accept an electronic signature if this document is submitted as the contents of or attached to an e-mail. You may call me, if you have any questions. Links: ------ [1] http://www.coaltrainfacts.org/whatcom-docs-positionstatement- [2] http://journals.lww.com/smajournalonline/Abstract/2007/03000/Noise_Pollution__A_ Modern_Plague.16.aspx
    Blaine, Washington
  1046. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19826Kay Paine
    There is so much more harm than good when it comes to suppling coal to China, including, but not limited to: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. Please do whatever you can do to stop these coal trains and prevent the health and enviromental damage that using coal has proven to cause from damaging the lives of current and future generations. Thank you.
    Everett, Washington
  1047. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19825Marian Schwarzenbach
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. Major ranching interests would be unjustly damaged, native lands would become unlivable, and a trail of poison, filth and death of plants and animals, as well as ill health of populations enroute would result. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. There is no benefit to USA in general. A few related jobs are touted as a great benefit, but in comparison to the mountain of damages caused by the project there is still a huge deficit--both economic and environmental-- and immense permanent losses, for instance: Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, poison rivers and water sources, as well as agricultural and ranching lands, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive (or impossible), will split ranch lands in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowners. This is pure Theft, public nussance and environmental terrorism. Native American Tribal Lands, already threatened, will be made unlivable, poisoning water sources, agricultural lands and air quality with noxious, poisonous chemicals (ega; arsenic, lead, mercury, coal dust and others)that make the rivers so toxic that merely getting the water on one's skin burns it. We have tribal treaties that MUST be respected. We cannot just poison and drive away entire tribes just so one company can make a huge profit, and on a dying, destructive industry, at that. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. An earthen dam filled with horribly toxic water that would seep into the surrounding soils and aquafirs. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Quiet enjoyment" (a legal Right of real estate ownership) is a joke, with 16 mile-long trains a day issuing deafening horns at each intersection all through towns. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Who would PAY extra to live in a ruined town with air and water that makes them sick? The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The CO2 and other poisons will also blow back to US shores and lands via the Jet Stream. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. This project is a boost to Global Warming problems, Ocean acidification problems, US Air Quality problems, Agricultural challenges, Native American survival problems and legal affronts. Please thoroughly investigate and report on all these issues. There is only one argument in favor of this project: One coal company would make a lot of money."
  1048. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19824Kim Potts
    Please do not allow the Tongue River Railroad. This is another bad idea, allowing a corporation to strip resources and profit out of Montana and leaving Montanans to live with and clean up the mess. It does not even benefit Americans but goes to Asia. All we will get is more drought from climate change and degraded ranch lands. Please put the greater public good first. Thank you
    Three Forks, Montana
  1049. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19823Peter Albrecht
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Spokane, Washington
  1050. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19822James Robitaille
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett I implore you and all other agencies working on the EIS for the proposed Tongue River Railroad to seriously examine the following issues before any approval is made: Overall Public Convenience and Necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which I understand is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, not the general public and it's sole purpose is to sell our natural resource of coal to China and other Asian countries. This serves only the wealthiest 1%. Environmental Pollution: A study of the direct effects that these coal trains will have on the people, animals, land, water and air caused from the increased diesel pollution and coal dust which blows off these trains must be conducted. Contamination of mercury, lead, arsenic and other heavy metals must be measured to see it's effect on all living organisms in this area. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult because it will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner, taxpayers and county budget responsibilities, while returning no financial rewards to these parties. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley has one of the last remaining in-tact wildlife habitats in the world and is home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations, as well as upland birds. Allowing the industrialization of this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource now and for future generations. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise/Quality of Life: The amount of loud trains rumbling through this valley will both ruin the quiet enjoyment of all the residents near Miles City, along with nearby recreation areas, but will also have a detrimental effect in disrupting the animal habit and breeding in this area. Infrastructure and Traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment do to the needed infrastructure. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing, not paid for by the railroad purposing this expansion, but are paid for primarily by local taxpayers and city governments. The Tongue River Railroad will take our natural resource which should stay in the ground, but instead be burned in China and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to purposed West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then transported throughout China to it's coal fired energy plants. There are BETTER alternative that are available today and must be used today for the sake of the planet and civilizations future. We each have a responsibility to do what is right, just and sustainable for today and future generations. As responsible citizens given the job to protect it's people and it's overall community, we ask you to do just that and conduct an expansive EIS covering all of the topics listed above.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1051. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19821Mary Belshaw
    I live on Puget Sound in Wa state, but coal train impacts have no boundaries. On December 17, two months after submitting an application for a new rail line, and after all of the public hearings, the Tongue River Railroad submitted a new application to the Surface Transportation Board. Please do not allow this last minute permit change without reopening the public comment period and hold a hearing in Colslip. Thank you.
    Everett, Washington
  1052. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19820Kathrin Olson
    The Tongue River Railroad for hauling coal from southeast Montana to Miles City is one part of a travesty. It's appalling that we rape and pillage our resources, sell them to China to be burned and we receive the environmental fallout of both the mining and transporting here and the coal burning there. The construction permit for this railroad needs to include a study of: The impacts of increased train traffic on communities like Bozeman that are affected by the railroad. The impact of increased train traffic on wildlife migrations. The impacts of burning the coal in China. Thank you!
    Bozeman, Montana
  1053. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19819Darlene L. Grove
    Mr. Blodgett and Members of the Board, My family has followed the corporate efforts to force the Tongue River Railroad and the extraction of unneeded coal on Montanans for over 10 years. We strenuously object to this project for many reasons in addition to the main one which is the exploitation of our natural resources for the benefit of corporations and their shareholders without thought of the impacts on the citizens of Montana. l. The ranching economy in that area has long been in the area and is self-sustaining. A coal economy plus the railroad would destroy that and leave the area without a future. Even though we have reclamation laws, when the coal is gone and the corporations have pulled out, there will be nothing left of the good farmland, the water resources and the families to carry on. 2. It has been proven it is not economical to mine and transport the coal to China which is the only market right now, unless the value of the coal is literally given to the corporations. The coal in the ground is worth more to the citizens of this country and the ecosystem than the money paid to the state. 3. In addition to selling cheap coal to China, we are encouraging an even greater impact on the air with the production of CO 2 from old and inefficient power plants in China. It only takes five days for the pollution from Asian power plants to come across the ocean to North America. 4. Why should the citizens of Montana, Idaho and Washington bear the impacts of increased taxes for infrastructure, increased traffic and delays in our communities, air and diesel pollution, noise and the health effects of transporting this coal to the coast. There are many more impacts, but the whole project is bad for everybody, but the corporate structure. We hope the Environmental Impact Statement will be intensive, deliberate and all impacts to the citizens, the environment, Wildlife, water systems, local economies will be assessed. In addition, the long term effects should be thoroughly analyzed.
    Stevensville, Montana
  1054. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19818Oregon Rural Action
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Health Impacts: There is no question and no denying that significant amounts of airborne pollutants will result if the project is approved. So the question is what will be the effect of these increased pollutants on human health and quality of life, fish and wildlife, water and air quality, among others. How will these effects—additively and cumulatively—compare with the standards that State and Federal government agencies regulate? More specifically, coal dust is associated with the following health effects; and, therefore attention to each of these should be included in the study: • Early death (can shorten life 1–3 years) • Risk of death from cardiovascular disease • Risk of dying from lung cancer • Incidence of hospitalization for asthma in children • Growth of lung function in children • Increase mortality in infants and young children Toxic chemicals are often used to control dust. They must be studied in conjunction with all the particulate matter (i.e.: coal dust; diesel particulate) and in relation to the health effects mentioned above. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Emergency preparedness & Response: What are the Emergency preparedness and hazardous materials response needs along the proposed route? Are local and state first responders trained, prepared and fully equipped to handle an emergency that could result? Where will costs be incurred? Who will take responsibility for training and liability of accidents? • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, C. Fuji Kreider 60366 Marvin Road La Grande, Oregon 97850
    C. Fuji Kreider · La Grande, Oregon
  1055. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19817Charlene Woodcock
    As a Montana property owner I am very concerned to see clean, renewable energy development in Montana that will benefit the state's economy, people, and wildlife. To allow the Tongue River Railroad to carry dirty coal across the state, disrupting farms and ranches and sending toxic coal dust across Montana and polluting its clean air and water will profit only the railroad and the coal company. A rigorous analysis must be done to examine the true costs to the state and its residents of allowing the mining and transport of this toxic fossil fuel, the worst driver of climate change, to be burned in China. It is an outrage. Our public officials are paid by taxpayers to represent our best interests, not the profits of corporations.
    Berkeley, California
  1056. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19816Sherwood Hake
    I have concerns about the following: Environmental impacts due to increased rail traffic - Consider impacts to wildlife habitat, as well as increases in noise and air/water pollution to ranch and farm lands. - Infrastructure – increased rail activity through towns will be major challenges to communities along the route. Delays, traffic disruption and new infrastructures will become new local burdens. - Jobs - the number of jobs attributed to coal development (whether miners or rail employees) can just as easily be shifted to the development of cleaner sources of energy.
    Pendleton, Oregon
  1057. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19815Kristina Avery
    I'm writing to urge you study the impacts of a coal train coming through the Bozeman community--pollution, traffic, and quality of life for our residents, as well as the effects this coal will have when it is exported and burned.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1058. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19814Montana Preservation Alliance
    We are submitting comments for the Scope of Study Regarding Cultural Resources for Docket No. FD-30186-0, the Tongue River Railroad Company—Rail Construction and Operation—In Custer, Powder River and Rosebud Counties, MT. Please see attachment.
    Chere Jiusto · Helena, Montana
  1059. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19813Buffy Hake
    The transpotation of this coal is going to hurt everyone except the people making millions of dollars from it. Coal is a very dirty source of energy - The hidden costs of burning coal need to be taken into account when making decisions about coal production, transportation and use. Use of coal contributes to much of the exorbitant health care costs in the US. Coal causes the acceleration of climate change. To ignore global warming is to do so at our own peril in the near future. While the US is still dependent on some coal, current and future efforts and monetary resources need to be directed toward cleaner sources of energy. New technology needs to be developed to further the shift to solar, geothermal and wind power, as well as better recovery techniques for natural gas that have less impact to the environment than dirty coal. Coal needs to be phased out. Coal mining companies should be encouraged to focus their attention and resources on producing cleaner energy.
    Pendleton, Oregon
  1060. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19812Vyna Werner
    Having read the following letter, I must say that I am in total agreement with Debbie Milburn. I feel there is no need for further comments.Thank you for your consideration. Vyna Werner Individual comment detail Name: Milburn, DebbieDate: Jan. 7, 2013 City: HelenaPart: Multiple/not listedHuman environment: Air quality, Traffic or safety, Other human environment topicNatural environment: Wildlife or vegetationEIS process: Area of potential effectComment: Dear Mr. Perry: Please excuse the first comment I sent using WORC's canned response. I meant to replace it with a personal testimony, but technology confused my efforts. My husband and I own property that includes 1 mile of active rail line near Helena, MT. We have first-hand experiences with railroad traffic. As we have watched the current coal traffic run past our house, our opinions about furthering future coal production have evolved. Please consider the following issues when developing an EIS regarding the shipping of Powder River Basin coal across Montana to the proposed Cherry Point, WA, export terminal: - Invasive, noxious weeds and increased rail traffic - railroad beds are fertile sites for noxious, invasive weeds and trains are a constant vector for spreading those seeds. Adjacent property owners face a continuing battle to contain this unwanted, destructive vegetation. Annual spraying of toxic chemicals may slow the process, but those efforts never completely address the problem. - Property values and increased rail traffic - There would be significant impacts on property values all along the route. - Environmental concerns due to increased rail traffic - Consider impacts to wildlife habitat, as well as increases in noise and pollution to traditional ranch and farm lands. - Infrastructure – increased rail activity through towns will be major challenges to communities along the route. Delays, traffic disruption and new infrastructures will become new local burdens. - Jobs - the number of jobs attributed to coal development (whether miners or rail employees) can just as easily be shifted to the development of cleaner sources of energy. - Coal is a very dirty source of energy - The hidden costs of burning coal need to be taken into account when making decisions about coal production, transportation and use. Use of coal contributes to much of the exorbitant health care costs in the US. Coal causes the acceleration of climate change. To ignore global warming is to do so at our own peril in the near future. While the US is still dependent on some coal, current and future efforts and monetary resources need to be directed toward cleaner sources of energy. New technology needs to be developed to further the shift to solar, geothermal and wind power, as well as better recovery techniques for natural gas that have less impact to the environment than dirty coal. Coal needs to be phased out. Coal mining companies should be encouraged to focus their attention and resources on producing cleaner energy. - Shipping coal to China - Chinese plants have less environmental safeguards and will affect more than just the health of that country’s population. Atmospheric currents will carry the pollution right back to the US. To argue that the US might as well be the country to satisfy Asia’s demand for coal is bogus. The US should be setting a better example for the world. The US should be demonstrating leadership in the development of cleaner sources of energy and promoting more conservation here and abroad. The bottom line of any company should not be the only or most important consideration for continuing the mining and use of coal. The use of coal is NOT strictly a local concern. There is much more at stake for the US economy as a whole, when the many hidden costs are taken into account. Sincerely, Debbie Milburn
    Point Roberts, Washington
  1061. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19811Barbara Comess, MD
    The proposed coal transportation rail line via the Tongue River Valley is antithetical to US environmental and public interests. The DOD already considers climate change as a seriously destabilizing element for the near-term and long-term future. Coal burning advances this problem. Environmentally,the American public is implicitly assuming a significant financial and health-related burden by virtue of the negative exteranalities" implicit in this project. These include loss of toursim revenue, pollution from mining & transportation-related activities and clean-up costs. Stated otherwise, this proposal is for private profit which is publicly subsidized. For these and multiple other reasons, it should not be allowed to advance."
  1062. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19810Virginia Organizing
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Thank you for the opportunity to express our views.
    Joe Szakos · Charlottesville, Virginia
  1063. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19809Linda Wilson
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Linda Wilson 809 Herrick St. Gary, SD 57237
    Gary, South Dakota
  1064. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19808Judy Staigmiller
    I'd like to preface my questions by stating that I grew up on a Montana cattle ranch and know first-hand how hard it is for a family to make a living raising beef cattle. What will be done to help surface land-owners retain the value of the land when a railroad cuts across it? What will be done to prevent sparks from the train from starting grass fires? What percentage of fire suppression cost will Arch Coal pay? What will be done to ensure that livestock can freely access grass and water? What percentage of costs is Arch Coal willing to pay for livestock lost on the tracks? As I mentioned above, it is hard for cattle ranchers to make a living, and the loss of only a few head of cattle can make or break an enterprise. What will be done to preserve the wildlife population including elk, deer and upland birds? What will be done to maintain the peace of security of recreational areas? Who will pay for any noise mitigation efforts? There are laws about containing coal dust from moving trains, but they are not consistently enforced. Coal dust in the air causes severe respiratory problems, contaminates the water you and I drink and eventually contaminates the food we eat. What will be done to make sure these laws are consistently enforced? Please take this very seriously. This railroad will not benefit Montana residents, it will benefit only Arch Coal.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1065. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19807CCE
    The proposed Tongue River Railroad and Otter Creek Mine are dependent on each other. Arch Coal leased 1.3 billion tons of coal in the Otter Creek area. It has told the state it wants a permit for an even larger area, over 18,000 acres in total. If that coal is dug up and hauled off, the inevitable burning of the coal will result in over 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gases going into an already overloaded atmosphere. I don't like this last minute bait and switch, it should not be tolerated. Since there is a new route, it should reopen the public comment period and hold a hearing in Colstrip. We need to analyze the devastating effects climate change will have on Montana and the nation and to analyze harm to existing agricultural operations and livelihoods along the new route. The new Low Energy Nuclear Reaction (LENR)energy sources are now undergoing testing for commercial boilers. LENR will soon replace coal as a fuel source for power plants and it is much more environmentally friendly than coal. There is no need to plunder Montana for non-renewable energy - we borrow the land from our grandchildren - we need responsible use of our state lands.
    Kathleen Gessaman · Great Falls, Montana
  1066. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19806Lu Goodrum
    I am against the increase in train traffic as it relates to harmful climate change, interruption in wildlife migration, hinderance of local emergency response and increase in noise and air pollution. You are responsible for protecting the citizens of this country against these and all other harms that will result in allowing the Tongue River railroad to be built.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1067. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19805River Ranch of Montana, LLC
    River Ranch of Montana, LLC is an agricultural entity located 2.5 miles north of Ashland. The property is bound on the West side by Tongue River and on the East side by National Forest. The length of property from the Southern boundary to the Northern boundary is approximately 4 miles. The attached map shows the boundaries. The proposed Railroad will have devastating effect on the operation and the value of the ranch. 1. Due to the fact that in several locations the riverbank is a high bluff carved out of the hills (see attached map) the 200’ Railroad will cut off access and create a series of five isolated farmland along the River. Additionally the Railroad will separate the East side of the ranch from the West side. In summary the Ranch will be split into six separate pieces. 2. The proposed Railroad goes right through the Ranch headquarters separating house and shop from other house and structures. 3. The Railroad will go through two pivot irrigation systems. For obvious reasons the pivots cannot go across the Railroad and the 220 acre hay production grounds cannot be irrigated. Without hay production, which provides feed for the cattle in winter months, the whole ranching operation is destroyed. 4. The current daily migration of the Wildlife is to come down from the hills every afternoon and feed in the fields along the River and go back to the shelter of the pine covered hills in the morning. The proposed Railroad will separate the hills from the fields and totally disrupt the wild life feeding. 5. The water shed from the hills on the East side of the Railroad thru the fields on the West side is in the form of sheet flow from the face of the hills across the fields on to the River. The Railroad berm acts as a dike channeling the storm water into the few culverts where Railroad crosses existing Coulees, causing huge increase in the Coulee flows. This concentration of flow will result in severe erosion in the hay fields and the spill points into the River. The erosion ruts will disrupt the pivot irrigation (the pivot wheels cannot go across the erosion ruts) and other haying practices currently in use will be totally disrupted. 6. The very close proximity of the Railroad to banks of Tongue River in four areas creates a real potential for derailment of a train load of coal into Tongue River. 7. It is a known fact that Rail operations create grass fires, which in this case could grow into a large forest fire. This past June 26th the fire that swept through the River Ranch demonstrated that not a single Fire Crew will risk fighting that kind of fire. The fire fighting responsibility would then unduly fall on River Ranch, which it lack adequate resources. 8. The Railroad operation would introduce noxious weed seeds from other areas. River Ranch is currently free of such weeds and cannot afford the responsibility of weed control when the problem is caused by the Railroad. 9. The fugitive coal dust pollution will contaminate the air over an area much wider than the 200’ Rail Corridor. The farms along the River are where most area residents live. An alternative route away from the heavily populated area might cost more but it is the right choice to make. 10. The pristine riparian corridor along the Tongue River is the only unspoiled one in South Eastern Montana. Why does it have to be ruined to maximize profit for a few large companies? Current and future generations enjoy aesthetics and recreational value of this undisturbed natural resource. What is the impact value of losing this recreational opportunity for the current and all future generations? The construction and operation of the proposed Railroad will have cataclysmic economical effect on River Ranch and I strongly urge you to choose the No Action Alternative. The public will be grateful to those decision makers who saw the negative impact of this ill-conceived project on lives of all who work and live along Tongue River.
    Siamak Samsam · Tucson, Arizona
  1068. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19804Bob Adams
    In regard to the pending docket item brought by the Tongue River Railroad and its owners, Arch Coal, BNRR and Forrest Mars, Jr., I urge you to consider the following points in either denying the application or setting it over for further public hearing in Montana. First, I oppose the building of the Tongue River RR on any proposed route, including the latest iteration, in that the analysis of the climate change effects on MT and the US from burning the 1.3 billion tons of coal to be ultimately burned in Asia (or anywhere) will be dire. Second, the destruction of existing agricultural operations along the route (farming and ranching)and jobs in those long-standing operations, will be devastating to the generations-old community of local people in the Otter Creek Valley. This last-minute proposed change in route, along with prior route applications, should either be denied, or, due to the short-notice change in plans by the proposed RR's owners, put out to public hearing again in Montana, specifically in Colstrip, the merger point for the new route. Thank you for your consideration. Bob Adams Helena, MT
    Helena, Montana
  1069. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19803Sara Bobby
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Sara Bobby
    Yankton, South Dakota
  1070. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19802Rozlyn Reynolds
    As a resident of Portland, Oregon, it astounds me that Oregon would consider being a tool for shipping coal to China after the Fukushima disaster. China is not on a different planet. We are shipping one of the largest countries on the planet the means to further degrade the air we breathe. This has nothing to do with climate change. We have proof from the large eastern cities where coal was burned for heating fuel how devastating burning coal can be to humans. Please do not burden our children with the cleanup required to recover from shipping coal to China.
    Portland, Oregon
  1071. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19801Martin Glynn
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Martin Glynn
    Bozeman, Montana
  1072. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19800Bill Richner
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze public convenience and necessity, impacts on property values, wildlife, flooding, noise, infrastructure and traffic. The proposed railroad is not for the public convenience and necessity" and does not justify the power of eminent domain and condemnation for the Tongue River Railroad. The railroad will serve only Arch Coal and its customers in Asia. The Surface Transportation Board needs to address the safety and railroad traffic improvements required if 40 million tons of coal are to be shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine to west coast ports. All costs should be covered by the railroad and its customers. All environmental costs of this project, including mining risks, transportation, and major increased carbon dioxide emissions need to be considered. Sincerely, Bill Richner 5811 Woodcreek Lane Middleton, Wisconsin 53562"
  1073. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19799Sierra Club
  1074. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19798Greenpeace
  1075. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19797Jennifer Bezanson
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Jennifer Bezanson
    Helena, Montana
  1076. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19796Northern Plains Resource Council
    Attached, please see the following: 1. Northern Plains Resource Council's official scoping comments addressing Tongue River Railroad Company's application for rail route to Colstrip, Montana, dated January 9, 2013; 2. Northern Plains' official scoping comments addressing Tongue River Railroad Company's October 16, 2012 preferred route and application, dated December 5, 2012; 3. Northern Plains Resource Council's and Rocker Six Cattle Company's Petition to Revoke Supplemental Application, submitted Monday, January 7, 2013. All documents were certified and mailed to the Surface Transportation Board, ATTN: Ken Blodgett, Tuesday, January 8, 2012.
    Kelsey Miller · Billings, Montana
  1077. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19795Renate Haberpointner
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Edmonds, Washington
  1078. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19794Kathryn Mohar
    Please don't allow the beautiful Tongue River Valley to be destroyed with a railroad. We own a beautiful painting of the valley. We don't want just the representation but the real thing in existence for the long term as a trade-off for short-term economics. We also feel strongly that coal should be left in the ground. Short-term jobs will mean nothing if our children and grandchildren can no longer exist on our planet.
    Troy, Montana
  1079. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19793Mark M Giese
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Racine, Wisconsin
  1080. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19792Jim Davis
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Jim Davis 2004 Phoebe Dr Billings, MT 59105
    Billings,, Montana
  1081. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19791Dr. Byron E. Ruth
    I am very familiar with the Tongue River having lived in Montana and spent much time in The Big Horns. I cannot believe that big money interests want to decimate this viable and beautiful valley in order to supply coal to China. I am totally against this environment destructive railway line. .
    Gainesville, Florida
  1082. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19790Katie Waller
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Katie Waller 315 Hillcrest Dr Durango, Co 81301
    Durango, Colorado
  1083. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19789Margaret Bitz
    Profit is not the ultimate value. The pollution that will result from this will eventually ruin our world. Let's stop investing in any further coal resources.
    Fargo, North Dakota
  1084. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19788Liz McCall
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: * Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. * Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. * Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. * Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. * Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. * Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. * The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. * The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Liz McCall 2811 Manhattan Drive Billings, MT 59102
    Billings, Montana
  1085. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19787Sally Berg
    Dear Ken, How many generations have to remind your office to regard the public interest." We who think about these things can find no way that the RR in in any but corporate interest. PLEASE change course. Do what is RIGHT rather than what increases productivity for BIG oil, coal, sugar, etc. interests. Thank you, Sally Berg"
  1086. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19786Loren White Jr
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Rockvale, Montana
  1087. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19785Darlene Fahrenbruch
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad in southeastern Montana should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Please recommend the no-action alternative.
    Big Timber, Montana
  1088. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19784Susan Powell
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Susan Powell Billings, Montana
    Billings, Montana
  1089. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19783Tim Lohrenz
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Tim Lohrenz 1003 Princeton Ave Billings, MT 59102
    Billings, Montana
  1090. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19782Tom and Marie Anderson
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Tom and Marie Anderson 5532 Sandhill Rd Lewistown MT 59457
    Lewistown, Montana
  1091. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19781Conor Corkrum
    I am writing to voice my oppostion to the Tongue River Railroad. This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries.
    Seattle, Washington
  1092. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19780Caleb Hutton
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Caleb Hutton - Former Montana Resident 258 E. Lynwood St Grand Junction, Colorado 81503
    Grand Junction, Colorado
  1093. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19779WORC
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Debbie Kenyon
    Debbie Kenyon · Apex, North Carolina
  1094. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19778Lois Andersen
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Lois Andersen 45817 204th Street Arlington, SD 57212
    Arlington, South Dakota
  1095. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19777Oregon Rural Action
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Teresa Roark
    Teresa Roark · Minneapolis, Minnesota
  1096. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19776Leonard Weinbaum
    Do not permit the tongue river railroad to ruin our environs for the generations to come. No rail to china.
    Keystone Heights, Florida
  1097. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19775Alan Goldich
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Alan Goldich PO Box 772366 Steamboat Springs, CO 80477
    Steamboat Springs, Colorado
  1098. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19774Becca Fischer
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Becca Fischer Billings, MT
    Billings, Montana
  1099. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19773Amy Hoitsma
    I respectfully request that you do not approve the new, last-minute route change to the proposed Tongue River Railroad without first accepting new public comment on the proposal, holding a public hearing in Colstrip, and -- most importantly -- analyzing the effects that climate change will have on Montana and the entire country when all of the proposed coal is mined, transported across the country, shipped to Asia, and burned. I have seen satellite imagery of the plume of smoke from coal-burning facilities in China that drift directly over Montana. Not only is this pollution a climate change issue, it is a public health issue as it contains mercury, lead, and other dangerous substances. The proposed change in the Tongue River Railroad route does nothing to change these serious problems. They must be addressed to protect the health and livelihood of Montanans. Thank you.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1100. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19772Laurie Gano
    Please Do Not permit the proposed Tongue River Railroad to haul coal destined for China. This will not benefit the public, the state or the landowners whose land will be degraded. It is only for the benefit of a few greedy developers. thanks you, Laurie Gano
    Melville, Montana
  1101. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19771WORC
    Please take a hard look at this ill-advised railroad project in its environmental review.
    John O'Connor · Casper, Wyoming
  1102. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19770Joetta Venneman
    Docket FD 30186 Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: 1. Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. 2. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. 3. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. 4. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. 5. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Joetta Venneman 4707 Lynn Lea Road Louisville, KY 40216
    Louisville, Kentucky
  1103. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19769WORC
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Marilyn McCaulley 31880 Bradley Ranch Steamboat Springs, CO 80487
    Marilyn McCaulley · Steamboat Springs, Colorado
  1104. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19768Peter Lesica
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, I believe the Tongue River Railroad is a bad idea because I am convinced that shipping coal to Asia will be a very short-lived endeavor. China suffers from extreme air pollution and will have to cut back on coal burning in the near future. Thus the Tongue River Railroad will cause disturbance and environmental degradation with little or no benefit to the people of Montana. I believe an EIS should analyze whether there really is a LONG-TERM need for the Tongue River Railroad. Regards, Peter Lesica
    Missoula, Montana
  1105. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19767Peggy Ames Nerud
    Please consider the serious environmental effects as well as the impact on the health and well being of animals and humans in regards to coal transportation. Is it really worth it? Peggy Ames Nerud
    Circle, Montana
  1106. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19766Ellen Knight
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: While the words below were written by someone else, I feel extremely strongly about this issue and my own words would have been almost identical. I hope you will take this message to heart. This railroad is not a good thing...for the people who live there or for this Earth. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Ellen Knight 5800 Rattlesnake Missoula, MT 59802
    Misoula, Montana
  1107. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19765David Lehnherr
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: To be complete, the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. To invoke eminent domain" would be a travesty. Property value impacts: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade an excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of adjacent recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will increase for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, David Lehnherr 2222 Spruce Street Billings, MT 59101"
  1108. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19763Sue Snyder
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely,
    Erie, Pennsylvania
  1109. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19762Sara Simmers
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Sara Simmers Mandan, ND
    Mandan, North Dakota
  1110. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19761Emily Wallace
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Emily Wallace
    Mount Orab, Ohio
  1111. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19760Martha Nochimson
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Martha P. Nochimson 5020 Tibbett Avenue Riverdale NY 10471
    Bronx, New York
  1112. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19759Janet E. Duecy
    Sir, I am deeply concerned about the extensive negative consequences of a potential Tongue River Rail line which would not serve the public interest, but rather would benefit wealthy and powerful private profit interests instead. As such the proposed rail line does not meet the standard for imposing power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. I further strongly urge you to fully research the issues of: potential local flooding, of noise pollution, of the impacts on wildlife and hunting, on the issue of compromising local infrastructure and commerce, on the devaluation of surrounding lands, and on the unfair taxes that local communities will have to incur in their attempts to mitigate all the negative consequences of this proposed project. I respect that you bear a heavy responsibility in studying this complex issue and making judgements that will permanently affect our human and natural environments. I trust that you will do the right thing and oppose this disastrous, unjust proposal snd permit request. Sincerely, Janet Duecy
    Seattle, Washington
  1113. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19757Valerie Rose
    Given the far-reaching impact of the proposed Tongue River Railroad, the scoping process should include a regional programmatic EIS (PEIS) considering the cumulative rail impacts of the 5 proposed coal terminals in OR & WA, including potential economic and environmental impacts on all rail communities from the coast to the Powder River Basin. Legally, Eminent Domain is to be used for public convenience and necessity. The proposed railroad would serve only Arch Coal. Dividing ranch land does not serve the public convenience & necessity.
    Mt. Vernon, Washington
  1114. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19750James Felton
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, James Felton 504 W. Galloway Weiser, Idaho 83672
    Weiser, Idaho
  1115. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19748Jon Kirkpatrick
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Jon Kirkpatrcik
    Silverthorne, Colorado
  1116. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19747Catherine Dash
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, CATHERINE DASH.
    South Bend, Indiana
  1117. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19666Jeanie Alderson
    Ken Blodgett Surface Transportation Board 395 E Street SW Washington, D.C. 20423-0001 Attention: Environmental Filing, Docket No. FD 30186 January 9, 2012 Dear Mr. Blodgett: Our family owns and operates a cow/calf operation near Birney MT. In addition to this business, my husband and I have a separate business; we raise and sell grass-finished Wagyu beef directly to customers. Both of these businesses depend not only on healthy land and water, but also upon our neighbors and our community. We have opposed the building of the Tongue River Railroad (TRRC) since it was first proposed in the 1980s. Although our ranch would no longer be directly crossed by the TRR we are still opposed the building of this project. We find the recent maneuvers and the rapid changes in the TRRC’s application to the STB and the process alarming and completely unfair to landowners and community members affected by this project. How are people affected by the December 17th “Supplemental Application for Construction and Operation Authority” going to be included in this scoping process when this is an entirely new project that has come about at the end of the scoping process? There are so many changes and yet this December 17th application is still full of contradictory and misleading information. It is time to start over and fully and honestly assess the impacts of this project. It is time to do this assessment right. CUMMULTIVE IMPACTS Wherever this rail line is constructed it will have huge impacts on an entire region. There is no way to build a rail line in one part of this valley and not affect the entire river valley and surrounding communities. The ranches and business of the Tongue River Valley are economically connected. The diverse cultural communities are interconnected. When you look at the economic harm of this project on ranching and farming you have to look at the entire valley not simply the acres that will be crossed by the TRR. Our ranch and our small beef business cannot raise the feed we need for our cattle. We have to buy hay and feed. When you are looking at the harm to agricultural production by the TRR look at the entire region that will be affected. The Two biggest industries in Montana (AGRICULTURE & TOURISM) will be harmed by the building and operation of TRR. The STB has been tasked with looking at the cumulative impacts of the proposed Otter Creek coal development and the TRR and Coal Bed Methane development in this area. The further industrialization of this entire region from the Otter Creek Valley to the Tongue River Valley must be honestly and thoroughly assessed. Again, you cannot industrialize just a portion of the valley without having a huge impact on the businesses and lives of the entire region. Tourism- People come to this part of the state for its incredible natural beauty, for hunting and fishing, for its immense historic and cultural value. This entire region is a National Historic Treasure. There are important sites that have been listed as National Historic sites and Landmarks but there are also many places of equal value that have never been officially listed. Of course there is intrinsic value in beauty, the wildlife, culture, history of this valley, and we ask that you to consider this– but there is also economic value in to this rich and vibrant region just as it is. There are existing and potential opportunities for Conservation Tourism, Historic & Cultural Tourism, and Hunting and Fishing outfitting and recreation. Who wants to come visit and industrial zone? How will the TRR ensure that these existing and potential businesses will not be harmed? If the TRR cannot ensure that these vital and sustainable businesses and the potential for these businesses are not harmed in any way, you need to recommend the NO BUILD option. The value of tourism in this area is not speculative – we know these businesses thrive. My family has a ranch today (The Bones Brothers Ranch) because my granddad and great uncles added value to their cattle ranching operation- in the depression of the 20s and 30s they went into the guest ranching business. Lots of other ranches in this area did the same thing. We not only survived but we got through a depression – the most difficult economic times. I ask you to look at the long-term costs of building the TRR. Not simply the very short term and very limited gain. If, as you are asked to do, you look at the cumulative impacts of the TRR & Coal Development in this area you will see way more costs than benefits. We are asking you to fully assess what these combined projects will take from our lives, our businesses, our communities. The changes that this rail line will bring will cause irrevocable harm to a stable and sustainable industry. We are here for the long term- for generations. We look ahead to leaving our land in better shape than when it came to us. We look ahead to our children’s and grandchildren’s futures. We ask this board to do that as well. It is really about the future. A rancher from Wyoming who lives near a coalmine and coal-hauling railroad has told us about the hardships these industries has caused his ranching operation. He described the acres and acres of productive land that he has lost to these developments. As a fourth generation rancher, the part of his story that is most sobering is the reality that while his children love ranching and want to come home to take over the family business – they most likely cannot come back to live at their family’s ranch. They see the day-to-day fights that their parents have with the coal company just trying to keep their ranch going. They don’t want that. They also do not want to raise their babies in a polluted and unhealthy environment. I do not want this to be a story in my neighborhood and community. Projects like the Tongue River Railroad and the coal development this railroad will serve, will take our futures and our health and our land and water – Why would the country allow destruction of a productive area simply so it can send dirty coal to China? PLEASE look honestly and deeply into the true costs of building the Tongue River Railroad. I ask you to recommend the NO BUILD alternative. Sincerely, Jeanie Alderson PO BOX 505 Birney, MT 59012
    Birney, Montana
  1118. (printed as 1/10/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2015Yankton Sioux Tribe
    Chairman Cournoyer
  1119. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19764Gareth Hermann
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Gareth Hermann
    Billings, Montana
  1120. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19758Carol Lapetino
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Carol Lapetino 6441 Loomes Ave. Downers Grove, Il 60516
    Downers Grove, Illinois
  1121. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19756Jennifer Struckholz
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1122. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19755Jeffrey Butts
    Hello, I'm writing about the Tongue River Railroad proposal. I was born and raised in Montana and am currently studying for a Masters Degree in Urban and Regional Planning in Portland, OR. Once I have finished this portion of my formal education, I would like to return to Montana. Also, I would like to return to a clean and healthful" environment. I am studying transportation in my Masters studies and one thing I have learned from the best in the world is that when planning for transportation we must first ask ourselves, "How do we want to live?" This is a transportation project with great consequences. I am writing to advocate that those quality of life issues, including beauty and equity, are expressly considered throughout the process. Additionally, I would like to advocate that the process includes documented considerations for regional impacts. It should factor trip delays, noise pollution and potential public health concerns. There, also, needs to be consideration of carbon targets set forth in signed documents. Climate change impacts and carbon cycle analysis should be considered for the mining, shipping and burning of the coal. Additionally, because the environment and economy are so closely linked in Montana through agriculture, tourism and resource extraction, the process should include a double-blind, peer-reviewed and objective, third party scenario projections and forecasts for short and long term economic environmental factors, e.g., jobs. Also, as a reminder, Montana is a part of the "crown continental ecosystem" that extends from Yellowstone Park through Glacier on up to Canada and the Alaska. The only segmented section is where the train and I-90 pass through the Livingston/Bozeman area. When moving forward with the EIS, I believe these factors should be included in the formal process. Gracias."
  1123. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19754Adam Baumgartner
    The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. We should not exploit the earth for more unnatural growth.
    Billings, Montana
  1124. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19753Mark Poole
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Mark Poole
    Eugene, Oregon
  1125. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19752J David Gillanders
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, J David Gillanders PO Box 2786 State University, AR 72467
    State University, Arizona
  1126. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19751Hugh Zackheim
    This proposed railroad is for the sole purpose of generating financial profit motives for its private developers, and has no relation to public necessity or to the public good as a whole. The proposed railroad has no relation to national energy independence -- any representation of national interest as being a motivation for the railroad is a complete, utter and transparent falsehood. It is not the role of the STB to authorize private interests to destroy the private lands of others, simply because the proponents cloak their arguments as being in the public interest. This is simply a scheme to profit through coal export, and destroy the private property rights of Montana landowners. STB: Wake up, and deny this railroad ripoff.
    Helena, Montana
  1127. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19749Jeffrey Butts
    Hello, I'm writing about the Tongue River Railroad proposal. I was born and raised in Montana and am currently studying for a Masters Degree in Urban and Regional Planning in Portland, OR. Once I have finished this portion of my formal education, I would like to return to Montana. Also, I would like to return to a clean and healthful" environment. I am studying transportation in my Masters studies and one thing I have learned from the best in the world is that when planning for transportation we must first ask ourselves, "How do we want to live?" This is a transportation project with great consequences. I am writing to advocate that those quality of life issues, including beauty and equity, are expressly considered throughout the process. Additionally, I would like to advocate that the process includes documented considerations for regional impacts. It should factor trip delays, noise pollution and potential public health concerns. There, also, needs to be consideration of carbon targets set forth in signed documents. Climate change impacts and carbon cycle analysis should be considered for the mining, shipping and burning of the coal. Additionally, because the environment and economy are so closely linked in Montana through agriculture, tourism and resource extraction, the process should include a double-blind, peer-reviewed and objective, third party scenario projections and forecasts for short and long term economic environmental factors, e.g., jobs. Also, as a reminder, Montana is a part of the "crown continental ecosystem" that extends from Yellowstone Park through Glacier on up to Canada and the Alaska. The only segmented section is where the train and I-90 pass through the Livingston/Bozeman area. When moving forward with the EIS, I believe these factors should be included in the formal process. Gracias."
  1128. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19746Glenn Hockett
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett I am very concerned about the negative impacts of this proposal to eastern Montana, the Tongue River Valley, the quiet, primitive nature of the area as well as the wildlife which I enjoy hunting and viewing. As well the larger impacts of this proposal related to the mining and shipment of coal and the eventual burning of that coal have dramatic implications to the serious issues related to global climate change/warming. Please include me on any future mailings about this project. Furthermore, the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Thank you for considering these comments and please reconsider proceeding with this project.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1129. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19745Kristen Mark
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Hardin, Montana
  1130. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19744Russell Doty
    In the 1970s when I was a Special Assistant Attorney General representing the Montana Public Service Commission (PSC), it intervened in a case before the Federal Power Commission in opposition to a petition to export natural gas from Montana to Minnesota. Our premise was that Minnesota was wasting such gas on many outdoor decorative gas lamps (the fuel from 8 of which would heat a home for a year). This Tongue River railroad would create a similar situation. It should not be built because it will allow coal to be burned in inefficient Chinese coal-fired electric generation stations whose air pollution control standards do not meet those in the US and because China is not sufficiently committed to reducing greenhouse gases. The most recent consensus of climate scientists posted yesterday at www.realclimate.org indicates the IPCC IV report was low in calculating probable sea level rise by as much as 74% -- meaning a rise by century end of 2 meters rather than 1. Since this railroad would facilitate that sea level rise, causing untold displacement of coastal communities (i.e., fratricide), the railroad should not be built. Nobody sets their own house on fire to keep temporarily warm. For when that glow is gone, all we have left are the ashes. All of earth’s peoples deserve a better legacy!
    Greeley, Colorado
  1131. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19743Judith Hughes
    Please put the people and their property, air, and peace of mind before greed this time. Please!
    Grand Junction, Colorado
  1132. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19742Frances P. Lazear
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Frances P. Lazear
    Cedaredge, Colorado
  1133. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19741Richard Millikan
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Richard Millikan Burris Flats West Boulder Road McLeod MT 59052
    McLeod, Montana
  1134. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19740Ken Deshaies
    No comments were attached.
    Littleton, Colorado
  1135. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19739Terry Schaunaman
    Fargo, North Dakota
  1136. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19738Teresa Koschmeder
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Teresa Koschmeder
    Lawrenceburg, Indiana
  1137. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19737Diana McGuire
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely,
    Lyons, Oregon
  1138. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19736Jim Kirkpatrick
    no on coal. montana or otherwise. it is dirty and an ill of society that profits the few at the expense of the health of many (respiratory illnesses) and at the expense of the environment from the mining of it to the burning of it. there is no such thing as clean coal.
    Grand Junction, Colorado
  1139. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19735Terry Lynn Minow
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett, Because I was raised on a ranch a few miles from the Tongue River, I know the value of the ranches and the unique and valuable country in this area. I believe the environmental impact statement for the Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Terry Lynn Minow
    Boulder, Montana
  1140. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19734Natalie Leivant
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1141. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19733Tana Patterson
    Please stop destroying my home with fossil fuel foolishness and trains which carry away the big money that murders my unborn grandchildren. It is time to convert to alternative enery and stop being such greedy and stupid ancestors. Everyone knows this deep down in their hearts and souls, be brave, move forward with alternative energy not with foolish coal and trains
    Billings, Montana
  1142. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19732Catherine Dexter
    “I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general.” Intelligent citizens are awaking to the reality of climate change on our fragile planet and we should realize that this whole project would very directly contribute to it. I believe, and pray you look into, it would have negative health effect on people and animals, such as whales, from Montana to China and beyond. Let's not ship our natural resources to China but rather discover clean ways to use it here in the US. That would create jobs and help with our dependence on oil from abroad.Please study and health effects from coal dust, pollution, and climate change. Respectfully submitted,
    Bellingham, Washington
  1143. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19731William Jones
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, William Jones 3819 112th Ave Allegan, MI 49010
    Allegan, Michigan
  1144. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19730Dawn M. Nothwehr
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Dawn M. Nothwehr, OSF, Ph.D. 5416 S. Cornell Ave Chicago, IL 60615
    Chicago, Illinois
  1145. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19729Carl Anderson
    I have been hunting in the Otter creek drainage for the last 30 years. I have no doubt that the wildlife in this area will suffer if this railroad and mine are built. It would be a great loss to sportsman if this remote area of Montana is industrialized. I also wonder how we will cope with the additional rail traffic here in Billings MT. I frequently have to wait for trains now in downtown Billings. Who will pay for the additional overpasses or underpasses? I do not believe our pristine areas should be spoiled so that dirty coal can be shipped to China. Thank You for this chance for me to comment.
    Billings, Montana
  1146. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19728Mark A. Hicks
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. For example the proposed coal trains and export terminal(s) on the Pacific Coast would impact human health, access to standard emergency medical care (crossing in Northwest Washington are often blocked for many long minutes while trains pass), and the fragile marine environment of the Northern most edge of Puget Sound, an already highly impacted body of water. For the sake of our future and the future of our children's children, please do not approve this project."
  1147. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19727Catherine Hicks
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. For example the proposed coal trains and export terminal(s) on the Pacific Coast would impact human health, access to standard emergency medical care (crossing in Northwest Washington are often blocked for many long minutes while trains pass), and the fragile marine environment of the Northern most edge of Puget Sound, an already highly impacted body of water. For the sake of our future and the future of our children's children, please do not approve this project."
  1148. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19726Wallace Mills
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Wallace W. Mills PO Box 4612 Ketchum, ID 83340-4612 (208) 726-7151
    Ketchum, Idaho
  1149. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19725Michael O'Brien
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Michael O'Brien 400 West 23 St. New York, NY 10011
    New York, New York
  1150. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19724Pamela Hoadley
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Pamela J Hoadley
    N Garden, Virginia
  1151. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19723Stephen Lyons
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Your Name Address City, State, Zip
    Paonia, Colorado
  1152. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19722Lawrence W Klee
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Lawrence Klee 39 Yellowstone Ave Billings MT 59101
    Billings, Montana
  1153. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19721Jeanmarie Todd
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Jeanmarie Todd 15183 Mitchell Creek Dr. Fort Bragg, CA 95437
    Fort Bragg, California
  1154. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19720Cynthia Ziegler
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Cynthia Ziegler
    Paonia, Colorado
  1155. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19719Paul Hawks
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Paul Hawks
    Melville, Montana
  1156. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19718Cathleen Kuras
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Cathleen Kuras Billings, MT
    Billings, Montana
  1157. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19717Howard Greene
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely,
    Ridgway, Colorado
  1158. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19716Lois Sutton
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Lois Sutton 3336 Farm to Market Road Midvale, ID, 83645 Go here to submit your comments post on the Surface Transportation Board website. You also can mail your comments to: Mr. Ken Blodgett Surface Transportation Board 395 E Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20423-0001 Be sure to refer to environmental filing: Docket No. FD 30186 in your letter. Best wishes, If you have any questions, feel free to contact John Smillie. WORC's Member Organizations: Dakota Rural Action Dakota Resource Council Northern Plains Resource Council Oregon Rural Action Powder River Basin Resource Council Western Colorado Congress
    Midvale, Idaho
  1159. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19715Daniel M. Leahy
    This proposed railroad is not for the public convenience and necessity" and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal wold benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It muse be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas b ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants."
  1160. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19714Robert MacCarthy
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely,
    Steamboat Springs, Colorado
  1161. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19713Northern Plain Resources Council
    Please see attachments for scanned copies of 716 scoping comments generated by Northern Plains members and members of organizations concerned about negative environmental, economic and community impacts of coal export. Hard copies of each of these comments were mailed to Ken Blodgett Wednesday, January 9, 2012
    Northern Plains Resource Council · Billings, Montana
  1162. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19712G. DiLabio
    As a Pacific Northwest resident and frequent visitor to Tongue River Valley,Yellowstone, and other beautiful areas in the West I'm very concerned about the impact on public health and the environment from proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to the Pacific Northwest for export to Asia. Proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through Tongue River Valley seems misguided because of negative impacts on citizens, their quality of life and adverse impact on the environment of the Tongue River Valley and on those of us who live in the Pacific Northwest. Because it's part of a larger project to export coal to Asia through Northwest ports, the proposed Tongue River Valley Railroad ine would have far reaching impacts on millions of people and a responsible EIS would take them into account. Some of my concerns are the impact the proposal on property values, fires caused from spills and derailments, the spread of weeds, the splitting of ranch lands, degradation of wildlife habitat and reduced hunting, and noise everywhere along the line. More trains cause traffic delays and affect public safety. Infrastructure will need to be upgraded and those tax burdens will fall on taxpayers. Railroads pay 2% of those costs generally. Lastly, this proposal fuels global warming which affects us all. Thank you for consideration of my comments.
    Mount Vernon, Washington
  1163. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19711Catherine Deuter
    I AM OUTRAGED!!! COAL IS DONE, SOLAR IS IN, ALONG WITH WIND - THIS IS THE 21ST CENTURY, NO THE DARK AGES. THAT SINKING STUFF NEEDS TO BE LEFT IN THE GROUND WHERE IT BELONGS!
    Cedaredge, Colorado
  1164. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19710Susan Hagen
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Susan Hagen Hot Springs Montana
    Hot Springs, Montana
  1165. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19709John Francis
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, It is my impression that some anti energy development groups are doing mass E-mails to try to persuade the Surface Transportation Board to prohibit this railroad which would help us balance our trade with China. Assuming that this particular railroad would have to follow the same laws as other railroads, I would strongly encourage the board to look at the facts, not the emotions of those who are opposed to realistic development of our energy resources. This railroad could serve to create jobs in mining, construction and shipping, as well as the related jobs that come with the growth of these industries. I believe that China is going to import and burn coal. I think that we should capitalize on this opportunity, and not obstruct progress with un-needed regulation. Thank you John Francis, Cheyenne WY
    Cheyenne, Wyoming
  1166. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19708Sarah K Howard
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Your Name Address City, State, Zip
    New Orleans, Louisiana
  1167. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19707David Hunt
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, David Hunt 934 Elm Coeur d'Alene, ID. 83814
    Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
  1168. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19706William Whitaker
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Dr. William H. Whitaker
    La Grande, Oregon
  1169. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19705William E. Woodcock
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Berkeley, California
  1170. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19704Noalani Terry
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Montrose, Colorado
  1171. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19703Stephen Blair
    I urge you to seriously consider the wisdom of the proposed Tongue River Railroad, and in particular the need to mine and ship coal to China - a nation that is not our ally, and will likely burn the coal with few environmental controls. Further, I would argue that anything that pollutes upstream from Yellowstone National Park should be considered not just from the perspective of residents of the effected areas, but from the perspective of all citizens of the United States. Sincerely, Stephen G. Blair 115 La Vista Drive Los Alamos, NM 87544
    Los Alamos, New Mexico
  1172. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19702Kim Feringer
    Dear Sir, I am very concerned about the proposal to construct a rail line through the Tongue River Valley to transport coal to Asia via the Pacific NW. This would have a hugely negative impact on the Valley, not only for the people living there but for the wildlife and environment as well. Further, since the railroad would serve only one coal company, Arch Coal, it does not satisfy the requirement for eminent domain, that condemnation is for public convenience and necessity." The negative impacts will extend far beyond the Tongue River Valley impacting communities all along the proposed route. I ask that you study the effects these coal trains will have on both surface and ground water. According to BNSF, each one of their rail cars loses 500 lbs of coal dust per trip. Considering this fact it seems inevitable that both surface and ground water will be contaminated with these heavy metals. I ask also that you study the effects these heavy metals will have on aquatic life in local rivers,streams,lakes,wetlands. Please also consider the impact it will have on wildlife movement and migration. I request the EIS also consider what costs the public is likely to bear to mitigate the effects of the proposed rail line. These costs would include, but not be limited to: Rail crossing upgrades, any costs to mitigate disruptions to public transportation, public health, ecosystem health, and likely loss of property value caused by the rail line and numerous coal trains. These studies should not just identify what the public would have to pay for, but include a realistic estimate of how much it would actually cost. Thank you, Dr. R Kim Feringer"
  1173. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19701Wade Sikorski
    Before it makes any decisions, I would like the board to calculate the energy return on energy invested (EROI) for mining and transporting the coal, also for converting it into electricity once it gets to China. That way we could compare the energy we use to make energy with alternatives, like wind or photovoltaics. My guess is that coal won't turn out very good. Especially if you calculate the amount of energy it would take to either sequester the carbon dioxide from burning the coal or to take it out of the atmosphere. EROI is a very important concept, I believe. It is something that should be calculated for any energy decision the government makes, especially when it involves a large amount of carbon. If we know what the EROI is, it makes it a lot easier to make policy decisions.
    Baker, Montana
  1174. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19700Thomas G Pollock
    Stop the additional pollution and unnecessary shipment of coal through our beautiful State of Oregon! Thank you for representing the REAL wishes of the informed citizens of Oregon.
    Portland, Oregon
  1175. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19699Christine McGinley
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Christine McGinley POB 2493 Telluride, CO 81435
    Telluride, Colorado
  1176. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19698Dorothy Starshine
    You MUST not allow this duplication of surface transportation which will pollute the air in Montana as well as China and cause damage to ALL of our lungs.
    Great Falls, Montana
  1177. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19697Janet Marie
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Janet Marie 6404 SE 23rd Ave #611 Portland, OR 97202
    Portland, Oregon
  1178. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19696Kristi Chester Vance
    I have serious concerns about the tongue river railroad project, specifically regarding: - The impacts of increased train traffic on communities like Bozeman that are affected by the railroad. - The impacts of burning the coal in China. - The impacts on the communities on the coast where the coal will be transferred to ship. - the impact of extracting and burning all of that coal on the world, but particularly on mountainous communities such as those we have in montana, where we are already experiencing the effects of climate change.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1179. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19695Ric Bernat
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Ric Bernat
    Portland, Oregon
  1180. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19694Michael R. Marquardt
    My comments regarding environmental impacts of The Tongue River Railroad mainly concern the fact that this project would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Therfore, the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should seriously analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. Personally, I cna't find any reason to justify this project other than corporate profit greed and an insatiable Chinese appetite for dirty energy. I hope you agree. Sincerely, Michael R Marquardt, Ph.D.
    Whitewater, Colorado
  1181. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19693Lynne Toepfer
    If 500 pounds of coal dust is released from each car, who's kids and grandkids are you poisoning? Yours?
    Del Norte, Colorado
  1182. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19692Carl Klein
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Carl Klein
    Wales Center, New York
  1183. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19691Justin Runyon
    The proposed Tongue River Railroad is a VERY BAD idea. In 2012 the US experienced the warmest on record and the 2nd worst bout of extreme weather on record. This will only make things much worse. China will benefit in the short term but the US and world will pay the price in the longer term. Please Deny this request. Sincerely, Justin
    Bozeman, Montana
  1184. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19690Bill Skidmre
    There is no reasonable explanation in the public interest for anything less than a full EIS from port to mine covering every community along the way, the mine and it's environs, and the effect on our air from the burning of the coal in China.
    Bozeman, Montans
  1185. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19689Charles Jennings
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Charles Jennings 317 Fox Drive Great Falls, MT 59404
    Great Falls, Montana
  1186. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19688Dennis Clark
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely DENNIS CLARK
    Boise, Idaho
  1187. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19687Charles Koch
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. I do not want this train in its pollution to go through my city or neighboring cities. Sincerely, Charles Koch
    Lebanon, Oregon
  1188. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19686Keith Cantrell
    We've already fought this idea here in Oregon. Special interests wanted to ship Montana and Wyoming coal down through the beautiful Columbia Gorge jeopardizing range and forest land and the wildlife that depends on it as well as subjecting residents all along the way to unknown amounts of coal dust. Please don't make the same mistake in Montana.
    Beaverton, Oregon
  1189. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19685Ernest Paviour
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely,
    Victor, New York
  1190. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19684Joseph Brown
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. •The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. •The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Joseph Brown
    Redwood City, California
  1191. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19683Priscilla Woodward
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Dear Mr. Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Just because the coal is finally burned in China, does not mean it does not affect our quality of life. Sincerely, Priscilla G. Woodward
    Salmon, Idaho
  1192. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19682Nash Emrich
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: This letter is in reference to the proposed Tongue River Railroad, listed under environmental filing: Docket No. FD 30186. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity,” and the Tongue River Railroad Company should not get the power of eminent domain and condemnation for a railroad that does not serve the public interest. This railroad would serve only one huge coal company, Arch Coal, and its customers in China and other Asian countries. None of the coal would benefit U.S. utility customers or the U.S. public interest. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. The proposed railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and could shift the liability for accidents and livestock losses at train crossings to landowners. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent outdoor resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed would act as an earthen dam and could worsen the flooding problems that can occur in the area in winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents of communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossing, which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. • The Surface Transportation Board should determine what safety and railroad traffic improvements would be needed if 40 million tons or more of coal are shipped from the proposed Otter Creek mine, along the proposed railroad, and through Montana and on to west coast ports -- and how much, if any of these costs would and should be borne by taxpayers, and how much by the railroad and its overseas customers. • The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Nash Emrich 2512 Hancock Drive Billings, MT, 59102
    Billings, Montana
  1193. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19681Tyrrell Hibbard
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to exercise the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infring on property rights. Like any railroad, this one will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will rise for the residents of communities, like mine, along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Respectfully,
    Helena, Montana
  1194. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19680Charm Miller-Davis
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment of the Pacific Northwest in general. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. As a resident of Whatcom County Washington who lives near the BNS rail line a short distance from Cherry Point, I am concerned about noise pollution, diesel fumes, coal dust and a negative economic impact upon my community and other communities near the rail that coal shipment to China will produce.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1195. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19679Andrew LeTourneau
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, I am writing because I have deep concerns about the proposed Tounge River Railroad in eastern Montana, and to urge your agency to make your Environmental Impact Statement as comprehensive as possible for this proposal. Over the holidays, my family and I took a road trip through eastern Montana, on our way to Minnesota. I got to experience firsthand the expansive beauty of this part of our country. I know from reading some of the history of the state, that Montana has a sordid past of mining, in which out of state and overseas companies extract its rich mineral resources saddling local communities with much of the infrastructure and cleanup costs while reaping much of the profit. The Tounge River project would be no different. The railroad would be used to ship coal from the Otter River mine to existing rail, then west to ports in the Pacific Coast, to be loaded onto ships bound for Asia to be burned there. This rail line would thus not serve the public interest of the United States, it would be solely for private profit. As I understand it, this line would have detrimental effects on the land and its wildlife, as well as the landowners, farmers and ranchers on whose land it would bisect. It would also have negative and far-reaching consequences beyond just the beautiful valley it would cut through. It would greatly increase coal train traffic through western Montana, Idaho, Washington, and Oregon, a region of our country with some of our most prized natural areas and rich farmland. It would have negative environmental and health effects for these areas, as well as for the towns and cities these trains pass through. I live in one of these cities. Far worse than all of these negative effects would be the effect that burning all of this coal would have on climate change. The western states mentioned above have already been ravaged by forest fires and drought, problems that will become much worse if China and other asian countries were to burn the Otter River coal. I strongly urge you to take all of these factors into consideration in preparing the Environmental Impact Statement. In a deeply interconnnected world, you cannot ignore the larger implications this railroad will have beyond its immediate surroundings. Sincerely, Andrew Letourneau
    Portland, Oregon
  1196. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19678Renee Evanoff
    Tongue River Railroad Company filed a new application for a permit to build a coal-hauling line through the Tongue River Valley. This long-proposed project renews its attempt to cut the valley in half, abusing the power of eminent domain to destroy good Montana ranchland in order to ship Montana coal to China. I urge you to consider the following in your Environmental Impact Statements: Public convenience and necessity (particularly for the railroad, eminent domain requires that the project be for public convenience and necessity" when in fact it is only for an Eastern coal company's profits), impacts on property values, wildlife, public health, flooding, noise, infrastructure and traffic."
  1197. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19677Gordon Wood
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1198. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19676Kristin Barber
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. It will have serious health consequences to the public and will negatively impact the economies and traffic of all the cities and towns it passes through. Kristin Barber
    Bellingham, Washington
  1199. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19675Bridget Callahan
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    La Grande, Oregon
  1200. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19674Kristin Barber
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. As my grandson has asthma and asthma is tied to air pollution, I am disturbed by the addition of diesel trains carrying toxic coal. thank you.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1201. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19673Laura Alsenas
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1202. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19672Gerry Burnett
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Renton, Washington
  1203. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19671Washington State Department of Ecology
    Hard copy to follow via USPS.
    Ted Sturdevant · Olympia, Washington
  1204. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19670T.H. Crawford
    Dear STB Members, Please extend the public comment period for sixty to ninety days on the Tongue River Railroad Proposal(s). I think the public is confused about the real route which this dubious project will follow. Given the uncertainties of this project, a fair and transparent review of it is questionable.
    Belgrade, Montana
  1205. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19669Mary Anne Rangel
    I oppose the latest application for a new route to build the railroad from Otter Creek to existing rail lines in Colstrip (Docket No. FD 30186). This last minute bait and switch should not be tolerated. This new route proposal should reopen the public comment period and hold a hearing Coltsrip. Furthermore, you should analyze the devastating effects climate change will have on Montana and the nation and also the harm to existing agricultural operations and livelihoods along the new route. When analyzing the effects of climate change, consider the latest findings about the temperatures in the U.S. for 2012, the hottest year ever and how scientists who express that this new record may have been set without the backdrop of global warming but at the same time, global warming caused by the human release of greenhouse gases may well have contributed to the record and will likely cause more climate warming. (The New York Times, Jan. 9, 2013)
    Bellingham, Washington
  1206. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19668Diana and Thomas Gordon
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, We go through Montana every year when we drive to the Midwest and I am very concerned about the impacts of coal mining and increased rail traffic in that state. The Tongue River Valley is a ranching and farming valley in eastern Montana. Wildlife abounds and it is a lovely place. Unfortunately, the Tongue River Railroad Company has filed a new application for a permit to build a coal-hauling line through it. I fear that this line is for the sole purpose of sending Montana coal to Asia. It is not for the public and the public will get no use out of it. The only folks that will benefit are the folks at Arch Coal. They should not, therefore, be able to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority to carry out this project. This project will be have a negative impact on property values. Property along the line will be devalued (especially waterfront property), as some ranch land will be split in half and some fields will be separated from the river. This valley has wildlife resources as well. A rail line with its noise and pollution will disrupt the healthy populations of elk, mule deer, and upland birds that live there. This rail line will bring traffic delays, noise, diesel pollution, potential flooding downstream in Miles City, coal dust and many other problems to a way of life that is truly American. It will move coal that is too dirty to burn in this country to lands far away who will in turn send the pollution back to us. As a resident of the Pacific Northwest, we are the recipients of much of the mercury and other pollutants emitted by plants in Asia. AND WE DON'T WANT IT. Please do not issue this permit. Sincerely, Diana L. Gordon 642 I Street Washougal, Wa. 98671 tndgardens@comcast.net
    Washougal, Washington
  1207. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19667Deborah Muth
    Dear Surface Transportation Board, I am writing you to NOT approve the Tongue River Railroad proposed from the Otter Creek coal deposits. Why NOT approve this plan? Because eminent domain needed to build this is not an appropriate use and serves only big coal company Arch Coal for their profits to send coal to China and Asia. This railroad if allowed would devalue private property, destroy wildlife habitat, interfere with natural drainage and increase the chances for flooding, train noise would scare away wild animals and disrupt the peacefulness of the valley and recreational activities. Why not because the infrastructure tax payers would need to fund overpasses and rail route building, put up with increased traffic at crossings and impede emergency response vehicles. Coal should stay in the ground and not be sent to China to burn and increase our carbon dioxide emissions. Just say NO!
    Red Lodge, Montana
  1208. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19665Heidi Clark
    The Surface Transportation Board needs to study: - The impacts of increased train traffic on communities like Bozeman that are affected by the railroad. - The impacts of burning the coal in China. - The impacts of heavily increased train traffic on migrating wildlife such as elk, bears and antelope
    Bozeman, Montana
  1209. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19664Charlotte Bowenhollow
    It is wrong to allow the Arch Creek Company to change and enlarge the area requested for mining. At this time there is inadequate regulation and follow-through to deal with environmental problems caused by destruction of the landscape and habitat; reclamation efforts are not sufficient to resolve these issues. The plans to build the Tongue River RR to Colstrip, and then sending coal trains across Montana, need to include safe guards protecting citizens from coal dust spread by these trains throughout the communities and landscape. There are numerous unresolved concerns about the impact of numerous trains running through towns across mainstreets at the busiest times of the day. These trains will also cause harm to existing agricultural operations. The public comment period should be reopened and a hearing held in Colstrip. These plans will inrease the devastating effects on climate change in Montana and across the nation.
    Helena, Montana
  1210. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19663Roger Sherman
    This proposal is a very bad idea. We are experiencing the warmest winter here in the state and the cause is global warming. Now we want to add to that by approving this proposal. Let's be smart about our future. The proposed Tongue River Railroad and Otter Creek Mine are dependent on each other. Arch Coal leased 1.3 billion tons of coal in the Otter Creek area. It has told the state it wants a permit for an even larger area, over 18,000 acres in total. If that coal is dug up and hauled off, the inevitable burning of the coal will result in over 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gases going into an already overloaded atmosphere.
    Whitefish, Montana
  1211. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19662Terry Sullivan
    Any new right of way entails physical and social consequences. The essential question is what do the people impacted by this new right of way gain? This right of way is to be created for private profit in the transport and sale of a commodity the use of which will severely jeopardized the long term health and security not only for those directly impacted by the rail line, but that of the entire life system on this planet. Don't be a party to a decision for which you will be rightly villified by your grandchildren. Please think in the long term!
    Vashon, Washington
  1212. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19661Georgia Milan M.D.
    As a doctor I am very concerned about the proposed coal shipping through Montana. I am also concerned about expanding coal mining in the state. There are many human health impacts from the above actions and a complete human health impact study needs to be performed before any action is taken.
    Missoula, Montana
  1213. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19660Todd Gage
    I could quibble over the last minute change in the route of the Tongue River railroad, the impact to the local environment and that the people of Colstrip should be given a chance to have their say, but I will not. I oppose the railroad altogether because it is intended to ship coal and coal-generated electricity is single largest cause of global warming. I feel that we need to start eliminating coal-generated electricity altogether and this can not be accomplished if we keep opening new coal mines to support the power plants. We need to start phasing out these plants immediately.
    Bozeman, Montna
  1214. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19659Teri Ball
    The change in the Tongue River Rail line to join the rail lines in Colstrip must require a public comment period and public hearing in Colstrip. This change has impacts on agriculture and families that live all along the proposed route. We live in a country that saw a record full degree of warming last year and as such we must study the impact of burning this coal in our and other countries to the global climate and air quality.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1215. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19658Lynn Anderson
    I live about 150 feet from the train line that goes to Coos Bay. Running coal long, uncovered coal trains will adversely effect us in many ways. Not only will our property values be hurt, and our health and crops be in danger, we will also be cut off for up to 20 minutes every time a train is going. Our only outlet is blocked by the train tracks, and with such long trains (they can only go 10 miles per hour) we will not be able to leave, and also emergency vehicles will not be able to enter. The coal trains will over-load the rail system so badly, according to a report this summer, that normal rail traffic will be delayed and the ability of the companies relying on rail transport to ship their goods. It is also reported that many companies who normally ship out of Oregon or Washington ports will opt to ship out of Canada because of long delays on our rail lines. This will cost us jobs. Aside from all that, our health, property values, and peace of mind will be ruined by the constant coal trains. Multiply our property and lives by thousands along the rail line, and you have catastrophic damages to Oregon home owners. Please don't allow this to ruin our beautiful state, especially when all the profit is not even staying in the state. Lynn Anderson
    Veneta, Oregon
  1216. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19657Marie Root
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, Having been born and brought up in Miles City, Montana, and as a lifelong resident of Montana and multi-decade member of Northern Plains Resource Council, my message to you is that it is VITAL that the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad analyzes the following: *Public convenience and necessity: The proposed Tongue River Railroad is NOT for the public convenience and necessity" which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only ONE entity, Arch Coal Company, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. *Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. This railroad would cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), would make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, would split ranch land into pieces and separate fields from the river, and would shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. *Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it would serve would seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. *Flooding: This railroad would act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City (at the confluence of the Tongue and Yellowstone Rivers)in the winter with ice jams. *Noise: The loud trains would ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes would go up for resident communities along the rail lines carrying coal to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad would increase coal train traffic, substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to cope with this increased traffic would require expensive overpasses and safety crossings which would have to be paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and would fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by diesel-fueled ships, and then, once in China, hauled to the plants. This entire environmental travesty is to be avoided for the sake of the greatest global good. PLEASE ENSURE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT INCLUDES THESE VITAL ISSUES. Thank you for your consideration. Regards, Marie A. Root"
  1217. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19656Matt Skoglund
    The EIS for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze, among other things, the following: (1) impacts on wildlife and wildlife-related tourism (e.g., hunting); (2) impacts on the health, infrastructure, and traffic for the communities (e.g., Bozeman) along the rail lines with increased train traffic as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment; (3) impacts on noise; (4) potential for flooding; (5) impacts on property values; (6) the necessity of this proposal; and (7) the impacts of burning such coal.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1218. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19655David Rockwell
    The number of coal trains that would run through our little town if this railroad is improved would have very significant negative impacts. I am opposed.
    Dixon, Montana
  1219. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19654Buffy Hake
    I would like to know what the economic impacts will be on recreational users and tourism due to noise disturbance and air/water quality degradation from the coal trains.
    Pendleton, Oregon
  1220. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19653Jennifer Rusnak
    Please, before you make a drastic an irreversible decision that affects not only you, but me, and everyone else in Montana, and yes, the world at large, please do your homework. We all pay for the decision you make. I'm willing to pay more for cleaner energy. Please study: - The impacts of increased train traffic on communities like Bozeman that are affected by the railroad. - The impacts of burning the coal in China Instead of investing in energy sources that are known to wreak havoc on humans, animals, and the environment, why not find a way to champion for alternatives. Surely there is a way to make new energies profitable.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1221. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19651Joshua Gage
    I feel strongly that the construction of the Tongue River Railroad should be studied in much more detail before moving forward. Most importantly, I feel the impacts of burning additional coal in China need to be analyzed. Secondly, the impacts of increased train traffic in communities like Bozeman need to be analyzed. Finally, the effects of increased train traffic on wildlife need to be further analyzed. thank you, Joshua Gage
    Bozeman, Montana
  1222. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19650Krista Burdick
    Please do more research about: - The impacts of increased train traffic on communities like Bozeman that are affected by the railroad. - The impacts of burning the coal in China.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1223. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19649Dusty Collings
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Mr. Ken Blodgett Surface Transportation Board 395 E Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20423-0001
    Brainbridge Island, Washington
  1224. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19648David Perk
    Based on recent news reports I am concerned that the Otter Creek coal intended for export is being acquired at a discount to fair market prices. Until a fair price is paid for the natural resource being extracted, the construction of the Tongue River railroad should be postponed. Please consider this news report as an attachment: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/12/04/us-usa-coal-royalty-idUSBRE8B30IL20121 204 Please consider this study as an attachment: http://www.worc.org/userfiles/file/Coal/062512_IEEFA_PRB_coal_report_FINAL2.pdf
    Seattle, Washington
  1225. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19647John Felton
    The Tongue River Railroad company should not be allowed to build a coal-hauling line through the Montana countryside. The EIS should be mindful of the fact that this project is not being built for the convenience and necessity of the general public which is what is required for an entity to obtain the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. It is being built for the sole purpose to transport Coal to the West Coast for Export to China and other Asian Countries.
    Vancouver, Washington
  1226. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19646Dr. Matthew Becker
    Dear Sir or Ms: I am writing in opposition of the proposed railroad development, the Tongue River Railroad. There needs to be serious consideration of the environmental impacts on both a local (Bozeman, and Montana in general) and broader (ie coal provision to China) scale and this is not being done. Thus this should be opposed. Thank you for your consideration, Matt
    Harrison, Montana
  1227. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19595Adriann Killsnight
    Lame Deer, Montana
  1228. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19594Chris Callahan
    Missoula, Montana
  1229. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19593Anita McNamara
    Great Falls, Montana
  1230. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19592Scott Buchner
    Belgrade, Montana
  1231. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19591Thomas Graff
    Missoula, Montana
  1232. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19590Mike O'Connor
    Bozeman, Montana
  1233. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19589Joan Kallay
    Whitefish, Montana
  1234. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19588Robert Kaiser
    Whitefish, Montana
  1235. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19587Paul Policastro
    Hamilton, Montana
  1236. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19586Laurel Pace
    Eureka, Montana
  1237. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19585Pamela Hall
    Joliet, Montana
  1238. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19584Dillon Jenkins
    Bozeman, Montana
  1239. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19583Elizabeth Bloom
    Missoula, Montana
  1240. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19582Charlie Donnes
    Billings, Montana
  1241. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19581Toni Semple
    Livingston, Montana
  1242. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19580Travis Howard
    Missoula, Montana
  1243. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19579Carol Hoffmann
    West Yellowstone, Montana
  1244. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19578Emily Almberg
    Bozeman, Montana
  1245. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19577Elloie Jeter
    Florence, Montana
  1246. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19576Marta Cramer
    Billings, Montana
  1247. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19575Richard Brown
    Bozeman, Montana
  1248. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19574Elizabeth Rivard
    Helena, Montana
  1249. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19573Kilary Honadel
    Havre, Montana
  1250. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19572Roger and Olive Robison
    Bozeman, Montana
  1251. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19571Suzanna Mcdougal
    Hamilton, Montana
  1252. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19570Christian Black
    Bozeman, Montana
  1253. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19569Catherine Matthew
    Billings, Montana
  1254. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19568Montana Department of Transportation
    Jean A. Riley · Helena, Montana
  1255. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19567Beth Underwood
    Stevensville, Montana
  1256. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19566Bill Sweet
    Darby, Montana
  1257. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19565Joel Vignere
    Lakeside, Montana
  1258. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19564Doug Johnson
    Billings, Montana
  1259. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19563Dyani Bingham
    Billings, Montana
  1260. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19562Robin Neubauer
    Stevensville, Montana
  1261. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19561Tara Ashmore
    Seely Lake, Montana
  1262. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19560John Randall
    Great Falls, Montana
  1263. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19559Nina Jackson
    Billings, Montana
  1264. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19558Gerry Rhoades
    Billings, Montana
  1265. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19556Douglas Baty
    Dixon, Montana
  1266. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19554P. Ayla Williams
    St. Ignatius, Montana
  1267. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19553Pam Knowles
    Townsend, Montana
  1268. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19552Kathie Daviau
    Billings, Montana
  1269. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19551Nancy Reynolds
    Bozeman, Montana
  1270. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19550Marlene Miller
    Butte, Montana
  1271. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19549Jonathan Matthews
    Helena, Montana
  1272. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19548Carol Marsh
    Missoula, Montana
  1273. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19547Claire Kelly
    Stevensville, Montana
  1274. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19546Deborah Hayes
    Missoula, Montana
  1275. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19545Dan Schreiber
    Washington, DC
  1276. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19544Dawn Bicket
    Washington, DC
  1277. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19543Karson Kluver
    Comments attached
    Forsyth, Montana
  1278. (printed as 1/9/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2016Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe
    JB Weston, THPO
  1279. served (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Decision
    42845Entire Board
    DECISION PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE BOARD ACCEPTED A DECEMBER 17, 2012 SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION FILED BY TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A RAIL LINE IN SOUTHEAST MONTANA.
  1280. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19652Landy Figueroa
    I am completely opposed to the Tongue River Railroad project. As a citizen in a community that will be affected by this construction and train traffic, I realize that the quality of life of the entire community will be greatly diminished. Increased traffic congestion, noise pollution, and wait times, in addition to severe impacts on the ability of emergency responders to access an entire subsection of the community because of increased train traffic are the outcome of this project for this community. This is a serious concern. This is also only one side of the ticket. The STB needs to study in depth 2 things: -The impacts of increased train traffic on communities like Bozeman that are affected by the railroad. - The impacts of burning the coal in China. Climate change is very real, and you cannot discount the end result of increased coal traffic, mining, and eventually burning on the climate. It's imperative that more study on the impacts of this project are undertaken before you can consider the Tongue River Project.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1281. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19645Gerry Jennings
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Great Falls, Montana
  1282. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19644Elizabeth Durnford
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for 3 main reasons. The first is the negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life and the environment in the Tongue River Valley. The environmental impact statement should analyze the following items: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the public convenience and necessity," which is required in order for a body to get the the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. The impact statement must also look at impacts on property values. The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property, particularly river front property, will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the land owner. In addition, the impact statement must look at the impact on wildlife. The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to elk and mule deer populations as well as many birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coals strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman and environmental resource. Flooding must also be considered. The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise will also be a problem with the loud trains. The study should look at the impact on infrastructure and traffic. Taxes will rise, train traffic will cause traffic delays, noise, and diesel and coal dust pollution. The only way to deal with this will require expensive overpasses and safety crossings with the costs being passed on to the taxpayers. The second reason this project is misguided is that there will be similar negative impacts for the residents, quality of life and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports in the Pacific Northwest, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take all of the above these impacts into account for all of the communities that will be impacted. I don't live on the river but I live on Bellingham Bay and am concerned about the coal dust and diesel pollution affecting my health and I am worried about the increased noise pollution from the 20 trains per day that are being projected. I already have interrupted sleep from the current ones. I'm concerned about my property value since I live 2 blocks from the tracks. I'm worried about the crossings being blocked while the trains are passing through town and I am concerned that I will have to pay much higher taxes that the railroad company will pass on for rail infrastructure. The third and final reason I feel this venture is misguided is that the coal is going to China to be burned in polluting plants further destroying the environment and the dirty air will blow back to us and further damage our health and property. If this project is allowed to happen, the quality of life for all of us in these communities will forever be ruined."
  1283. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19643Madeleine Brown
    Scoping should address the following: 1. Cumulative impacts of rail transportation for coal, from mining to final destination. 2. Public convenience and necessity." Is this line truly for the convenience of the public or is it for the benefit of a private company exploiting public lands? 3. Impacts to wildlife, particularly rare, threatened, and endangered species, and disruption of native lands. 4. Environmental justice. What steps should be taken to mitigate the ugly reality that dirty and dangerous projects are usually sited in areas where populations are sparse, poor, or of color? 5. what benefit comes to the public from exploiting public resources? 6. Property values that may be ruined by the tracks and the polluting materials they would carry. 7. Public health impacts from the tracks and especially the polluting materials transported on them. 8. Flooding from the raised rail bed"
  1284. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19642Laura Brakke
    Please evaluate this project in relation to the environmental effects of taking natural resource land and dividing it up with a new rail corridor. Evaluate the mining of coal with the effects of burning the coal and the resultant pollution and contribution to acid rain and ocean acidification. Is this proposed mining of coal to occur from Public lands? Will the American taxpayer get full value for our resource? The coal will not be able to be shipped from the West Coast as the risks to our precious marine life is too great. Where will this coal go? Please review this misguided project in it's entirety, include global effects, the health of the people breathing the coal dust, the ranches that will be cut up by the rail road and the lack of benefit to the general public. Thank you.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1285. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19641David Myers
    It is important that the scoping for the Tongue River Railroad application include wildlife and flooding concerns/impact along the route.
    Billings, Montana
  1286. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19640Dennis A. Moore
    I take my responsibility as an informed and active citizen seriously. The continued development of dirty coal is a proven threat to our health and safety, as well as an impediment to the development of safer, longterm solutions to our energy needs. I'm opposed to the proposed movement of mile long coal trains through my community headed to our coastal ports for shipment to China. Our community would bear all of the dangers and interruption in our daily lives while international corporations would reap all of the profits, this is unacceptable.In my community these coal trains would run on tracks seperating our high school and middle school. Oregonians should take these corporate exploitative attacks on our precious environment and satety as a personal insult and threat. Oregon is'nt for sale. Stay out of Oregon!
    Salem, Oregon
  1287. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19639Leslie Smith
    NO to turning the Otter Creek valley into a massive open pit coal strip mine to feed demand for dirty coal in Asia. The proposed Tongue River Railroad and Otter Creek Mine are dependent on each other. Arch Coal leased 1.3 billion tons of coal in the Otter Creek area. It has told the state it wants a permit for an even larger area, over 18,000 acres in total. If that coal is dug up and hauled off, the inevitable burning of the coal will result in over 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gases going into an already overloaded atmosphere. Suggested comments: This last minute bait and switch should not be tolerated. That because of the new route, it should reopen the public comment period and hold a hearing in Colstrip. To analyze the devastating effects climate change will have on Montana and the nation and to analyze harm to existing agricultural operations and livelihoods along the new route.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1288. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19638Kristin Wimberg
    Please study the effects of increased railroad traffic through the town of Bozeman. And please study the effects of increased coal burning in China - both outcomes of the possible increased trainl traffic in southwest Montana carrying coal from strip mines allong the Tongue River Railroad.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1289. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19636Mary McFadzen
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1290. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19635Sheri Archey
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Canby, Oregon
  1291. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19634Susan C. Stubblefield
    My comments concern the local and global impacts of the proposed Tongue River Railroad project and the necessity that these impacts be responsibly addressed in the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The EIS must analyze issues of public convenience and necessity. For the Tongue River Railroad to obtain eminent domain and condemnation authority, it must meet criteria for public convenience and necessity". However, the TRR project, as proposed, will answer only to Arch Coal which plans to sell the mined coal to China and other Asian countries. To address public convenience and necessity requirements for eminent domain, impacts to residents along the proposed rail line must be thoroughly analyzed - infrastructure costs, potential for traffic congestion, the documented health impacts of increased diesel fumes and coal dust, and the noise pollution. Local residents along the rail line would carry an increased tax burden for infrastructure upgrades that primarily benefit Arch Coal and TRR. Noise, traffic, diesel fumes and coal dust would become a constant reality. How do these impacts serve public convenience and necessity? Also, the EIS must analyze impacts on private property. The project would impact property rights by making ranching and farming in the areas affected more difficult and expensive. Ranch land would be cut in half separating fields from previously adjacent waterways. Furthermore, the liability of train crossings would be passed on to the landowners. Other negative property impacts include devaluing property values (especially river front property) and increased potential for fires and weed damage due to increased train volume. Impacts to wildlife in the Tongue River Valley need to be analyzed. The valley abounds in elk, deer and upland bird populations. If the TRR project is implemented, sportsmen will find the quantity and quality of wildlife in the valley greatly diminished. In addition, the impact of potential flooding along the railroad bed must be analyzed. The bed will act as an earthen dam adding to the flooding problems and ice jams that Miles City already experiences in the winter months. Finally, it is folly to remove Otter Creek coal from the ground. If it is shipped and burned in dirty Chinese plants, it will fuel massive increases in Co2 emissions for decades to come. And the world will reap the effects - fossil-fueled superstorms, droughts, wildfires and floods. And, all of this to ship Montana coal to China! Thank you for your consideration of my comments."
  1292. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19633Andrew Roberts
    I support a “no action” alternative for the Tongue River railroad because it is a terrible abuse of eminent domain and the environmental impacts of the mines and railroad are not justified. Taking land for the benefit of one company that will sell its product to Asia was not the intended us of eminent domain. The small number of jobs created by the mines and railroad do not justify taking of private property nor do they justify the environmental impact the mines and railroad will have at the local and international level. A recent article in the local paper documented serious concern the DEQ had about the environmental impact that proposed expansion of coal mines in Canada would have on water quality and the environment in the US. These concerns must also be relevant to the mines and railroad in MT.
    Kinsey, Montana
  1293. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19632Phil Knight
    In regard to the proposed Tongue River Railroad, STB needs to study the impacts of increased train traffic on communities like Bozeman that are affected by the railroad. -The impacts of heavily increased train traffic on migrating wildlife such as bears, elk and proghorn - The impacts of burning the coal in China. 2012 was the hottest year on record in the US, with average temperates a full degree higher than ever recorded. We cannot act like we have an unlimited ticket to burn fossil fuels!
    Bozeman, Montana
  1294. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19631Kathryn Alexandra
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience or necessity” which is a requirement for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property (especially water front property) and infringe on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: These loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents in communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants
    Anacortes, WA
  1295. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19630Vicki Watson
    Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the new application for a Tongue River Railroad [Docket No. FD 30186]. It is my understanding that this new application was put in after public hearings and represents a new route (from Otter Creek to Colstrip). If so, then this should extend the public comment period, and there should be a public hearing at Colstrip. Such a railroad would facilitate the extraction of much more coal by Arch Coal. The review process must consider the impact of burning all that coal on the climate and the impact of resulting climate change on Montana’s citizens, agricultural operations and other aspects of Montana’s economy. Even more directly, the review process must consider the land disturbance of over 18000 acres that Arch Coal proposes to strip mine ultimately.
    Missoula, Montana
  1296. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19629M Hutchins
    This is a VERY bad idea. [Docket No. FD 30186] The proposed Tongue River Railroad and Otter Creek Mine are dependent on each other. If coal is dug up and hauled off, the inevitable burning of the coal will result in over 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gases going into an already overloaded atmosphere. This last minute bait and switch should not be tolerated. That because of the new route, it should reopen the public comment period and hold a hearing in Colstrip. WE need to analyze what the devastating effects climate change will have on Montana and the nation, and analyze harm to existing agricultural operations and livelihoods along the new route.
    Missoula, Montana
  1297. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19628Steve Knutzen
    Any coal shipped west from Montana could end up passing right by where I live, both on the train and then on a large ship. I would personally suffer from coal dust pollution, as would every human and every living thing from the mines to the end point in Asia. Burning coal is changing the makeup of the air we breathe, killing thousands, and possibly killing millions into the future. It is time to stop using coal. Please help save my life, and do not allow the Tongue River Railroad to happen.
    Anacortes, Washington
  1298. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19626Ryan Krueger
    To Whom It May Concern, This issue gets at the root of many of the economic and social problems that are currently facing our region and nation. Putting our energy security in the hands of a foreign government is decidedly short-sighted. Destroying pristine wilderness areas in the name of economic growth does not take into account the environmental benefits realized from the preservation of these areas, such as the Tongue River. It is absolutely paramount that we understand the full scale of the impacts our energy policies have on the environment BEFORE we act, not after. As a resident of Bozeman, I would like to know the impacts of increased train traffic on communities like ours. What will be the effects on the community well-being and health with the increased presence of uncovered coal trains traveling through our town? What will be the increase in noise pollution? And how will burning coal on the scale that the Chinese are seeking to implement impact the global environment? These are not easy questions and their answers should not be taken lightly. Dollar's generated no longer equates to freedom from responsibility. If there is this much money and unknown costs at stake we owe it to ourselves, our friends and communities, to understand and answer all of these questions. I hope you will ask Arch Coal to do just that, as anything less would be irresponsible. Thank you for your time. Regards, Ryan Krueger
    Bozeman, Montana
  1299. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19625Edna Oberman
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only the coal company, Arch Coal. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Coal's day should be over. We should not enable it to be dug, shipped, or exported.
    Seattle, Washington
  1300. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19624Eric Holtz
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Kirkland, Washington
  1301. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19623R Eugene Curtis
    The Otter Creek valley should not be turned into a massive open pit coal mine to feed dirty coal to Asia (or anywhere else)! This would be bad for MT and bad for the world, especially because of effects on residents along the newly proposed rail route and global pollution. To quantify these problems, a new public comment period should be opened and a new hearing held in Colstrip. Bottom line - we need government policy and permitting decisions that support clean energy (and jobs that go along with it), not more pollution and global warming from dirty coal.
    Columbia Falls, Montana
  1302. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19622Carol Jo Enge
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. AND IT IS AN ENVIRONMENTAL DANGER ON A GLOBAL LEVEL - when the coal gets to the coast and on the single hulled ships carrying tons of fuel traveling through fragile ecosystems - FOR CHINA????? (or more honest - for the PROFIT OF THE COAL INDUSTRY)... DON'T FORGET GLOBAL WARMING!!!
    Olga, Washington
  1303. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19621Marcie Keever
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    San Francisco, California
  1304. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19620Brenda Frey
    I want to see the comment period reopen and hold a hearing in Colstrip because of the quick change that was done. The people of Montana have the right to make their opinions known it is their livelihoods that will be affected. Sincerely, Brenda
    West Seneca, New York
  1305. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19619Julie Hirsch
    Reopen public comment and hold hearing in Colstrip due to the application by Tongue River Railroad for a coal transport route from Otter Creek to Colstrip
    Lummi Island, Washington
  1306. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19618Mary Ferm
    This is in regard to the application for the rail line for the Tongue River Railroad. Because of the last minute change and new proposed route, please open a new comment period and hold a hearing in Colstrip. The health and environmental cost of the coal being transported on this railroad must be considered in the application. Please study: the pollution and health hazards caused by mining, transporting and eventual burning of the coal in the Otter Creek Coal mine. Please determine the potential for both everyday and catastrophic spills into watersheds, the ocean and the air. Please compare these pollution levels to alternative fuels available to Asian markets. Please consider how long it will be economically viable to operate a coal mine an ocean away from its destination, given rising prices of fuel. Please compare the income to the government of taxes on this operation, to the expenses caused by rising health care costs, costs of cleanup, costs due to climate change and ocean acidification. If this mine is permitted to expand, please ensure that the coal dust is contained during the entire extraction and transportation process, and that the company has an escrow account sufficient to pay for cleanup of spills and claims of damage to human health. Please consult scientific research on coal in academic journals, for example in Science" in determining the cost-benefit to society of using coal. Please ensure that the company has the trained personnel and equipment available on site to immediately deal with spills. Coal is an outdated fuel source, and we should know better than to release this poison into our air, water and soil."
  1307. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19617Powder River County Board of Commissioners
    Les Thompson · Broadus, Montana
  1308. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19616Mary Ferm
    Please study: the pollution and health hazards caused by mining, transporting and eventual burning of the coal in the Otter Creek Coal mine. Please determine the potential for both everyday and catastrophic spills into watersheds, the ocean and the air. Please compare these pollution levels to alternative fuels available to Asian markets. Please consider how long it will be economically viable to operate a coal mine an ocean away from its destination, given rising prices of fuel. Please compare the income to the government of taxes on this operation, to the expenses caused by rising health care costs, costs of cleanup, costs due to climate change and ocean acidification. If this mine is permitted to expand, please ensure that the coal dust is contained during the entire extraction and transportation process, and that the company has an escrow account sufficient to pay for cleanup of spills and claims of damage to human health. Please consult scientific research on coal in academic journals, for example in Science" in determining the cost-benefit to society of using coal. Please ensure that the company has the trained personnel and equipment available on site to immediately deal with spills. Coal is an outdated fuel source, and we should know better than to release this poison into our air, water and soil."
  1309. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19615Shawn Wall
    Docket No. FD 30186 I understand that On December 17, two months after submitting an application for a new rail line, and after all of the public hearings, the Tongue River Railroad submitted a new application to the Surface Transportation Board. The new application makes it perfectly clear, this coal is intended to go through the proposed west coast terminals and off to Asian markets. The newest route would build the railroad from Otter Creek to existing rail lines in Colstrip. The proposed Tongue River Railroad and Otter Creek Mine are dependent on each other and that Arch Coal leased 1.3 billion tons of coal in the Otter Creek area. It has now told the state it wants a permit for an even larger area, over 18,000 acres in total. If that coal is dug up and hauled off, the burning of the coal will result in over 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gases going into an already overloaded atmosphere. This last minute change should not be allowed. At the very least the new route request should trigger reopening the public comment period and holding a hearing in Colstrip. There should be full analysis of the effects climate change will have on Montana and the nation and to analyze harm to existing agricultural operations and livelihoods along the new route.
    Portland, Oregon
  1310. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19614Victor Chieco
    Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Ashland, Oregon
  1311. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19613Ryan Walters
    Due to the last minute route change proposed by Arch Coal, I feel that the public comment period should be reopened and a hearing be held in Colstrip. Additionally, I feel the devastating environmental impacts of the proposed route should be better researched and communicated to the public. As a resident of the Pacific Northwest, I want to ensure a landscape that is as gloriously beautiful for my children like the one we enjoy today.
    Portland, Oregon
  1312. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19612Eileen Chieco
    I am writing because the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad must analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. In summary, this is an outrage to all who are working for a more carbon fuel-free economy, and care about the earth.
    Ashland, Oregon
  1313. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19611John Dunkum
    The proposed Tongue River Railroad is a very bad idea. The amount of coal Arch Coal wants to dig up, and haul off will result in 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gases into an already overburdened atmosphere.
    Missoula, Montana
  1314. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19610Virginia Wolff
    My husband and I like in northwest Washington State, near where the railroad tracks headed to Cherry Point pass. Coal trains headed through the Tongue River Valley would likely pass our house, adding to significant adverse impacts in our communities should the Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point, WA be built in NW Washington. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Local impacts at the site of the proposed railroad expansion, including: Does the proposal pass the “public convenience and necessity” litmus tests required to enforce eminent domain and condemnation authority, since this railroad would serve only the coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries? What are the effects on property values and farming and ranching management operations; impacts on flooding danger, wildlife habitat, and noise? What are the effects on taxpayers who would have to foot the bill for expensive overpasses and other upgrades necessary to public safety and convenience? Long range impacts: Consider in your analysis the effects of the additional coal train traffic “downstream:” Impacts to communities all along the route from the Tongue River Valley to the port destination of the trains: These include: Traffic congestion with resultant negative impacts on local economies due to disruption of access to local businesses and tourist destinations; Emergency vehicle delays, with the potential of loss of life and property; Exposure to higher levels of diesel emissions and coal dust with potential dangers to human health; Severe economic stress on all communities through which the trains pass, to raise probably prohibitive funding for necessary grade separations and other rail improvements in order to maintain the viability of our communities; Disruption of badly needed passenger rail service, which is becoming more widely used where I live. The additional freight train traffic would likely make passenger rail non-viable. Please include in your analysis consideration of these impacts on all the communities through which trains traversing the proposed tracks in the Tongue River Valley would pass.
    Bow, Washington
  1315. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19609FRIENDS of the San Juans
    Dear Mr. Ken Blodgett, I live on San Juan Island in Washington State. I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: 1. Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. 2. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. 3. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. 4. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. 5. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. 6. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. For example: 1. OIL/COAL SPILL RISKS: How will marine vessel traffic increase collision risks with tankers and other cargo ships in the Pacific Northwest? What would be the effects on the region of a catastrophic oil and/or coal spill? 2. BOATING & SAFETY: How might fishing and recreational boating be affected by the additional capesize and Panamax coal ships in the Salish Sea? By how much will accident and collision rates increase? 3. ORCA, MARINE MAMMALS & BIRDS: How would the noise, pollution and physical presence of the additional huge vessels affect the endangered orca populations? How would construction and operation of coal ports and the continuous transiting of coal ships affect other marine mammals, fish, birds, and the food web that supports them? 4. SALMON & FISHERIES: How would construction and operation of coal ports; and the coal ships themselves (size, pollution, noise, anchor dragging, etc) impact the crab, herring and salmon fisheries in the Pacific Northwest? 5. TOURISM & OTHER ECONOMIC COSTS: How would lost beauty, decreased orca populations, damaged fisheries and more crowded waterways affect the Pacific Northwest tourism industry? How would property values be affected? How much will we, the taxpayers, ultimately pay for costs directly and indirectly associated with coal export? Thank you for your consideration and the opportunity to comment. Sincerely, Katie Fleming
    Katie Fleming · Friday Harbor, Washington
  1316. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19608Corey Wiscomb
    After reviewing the pro and con list for the potential coal transport from Montana to Wyoming and on to the Pacific Coast for export to Asia I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. For example the impacts on property values; the effects of strip mining on the environment and wildlife; increased instances of flooding and potential ice jams in the winter months; desecration of recreational quiet areas due to rail-noise pollution; increased taxes due to transportation demands... and all for something that is just to sell coal to Asia. This appears to me to be an instance where industry is going to take everything and give back next to nothing. Please take this into careful consideration.
    Olga, Washington
  1317. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19607Marguery Lee Zucker
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Eugene, Oregon
  1318. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19606Amy Glasser
    Please consider the environmental damage increased train traffic causes to the people and the enviroment. The coal dust along with increased diesel particulates will result in increased disease among those with respiratory illnesses. Please study that impact. I am also concerned about the trains blocking crossings and thus making emergency vehicles stalled at crossings when a life may be in the balance. Please also study whether mining, transporting by train, then by ship, then burning in China will adversely affect the global climate. At a time when we now know how quickly we are warming, it appears that the impact of this project will expedite the warming and thus greatly impact our planet and future. Lastly coal prices are not competitive with natural gas and coal is becoming less attactive to mine and sell than other commodoties. Amy Glasser
    Custer, Washington
  1319. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19605Ted Light
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1320. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19604Clean Energy Action
    A new hearing is needed on the Tongue River Railroad! We should not be shipping our coal to Asia. It is a strategic resource that should be conserved for future generations.
    Leslie Glustrom · Boulder, Colorado
  1321. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19603Mac Donofrio
    RE: Tongue River Railroad proposal and new coal mine expansion Because of the new route selection, you need to reopen the public comment period and hold hearings in Colstrip, and throughout the state. I would like to see hearings in Missoula and Helena. You must analyze the horrible effects of climate change that will effect Montana, the country and really all the world. Existing agricultural operations and livelihoods along the new route need to be considered fully and given first priority, along with the increases to climate change. Also the Tongue river is too beautiful and too valuable for wildlife (aquatic, avian and terrestrial species) to have this railroad built nearby it.
    Hamilton, Montana
  1322. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19602Mac Donofrio
    RE: Tongue River Railroad proposal and new coal mine expansion Because of the new route selection, you need to reopen the public comment period and hold hearings in Colstrip, and throughout the state. I would like to see hearings in Missoula and Helena. You must analyze the horrible effects of climate change that will effect Montana, the country and really all the world. Existing agricultural operations and livelihoods along the new route need to be considered fully and given first priority, along with the increases to climate change. Also the Tongue river is too beautiful and too valuable for wildlife (aquatic, avian and terrestrial species) to have this railroad built nearby it.
    Hamilton, Montana
  1323. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19601Catherine H. Ream
    The last minute changes are unacceptable. Thepublic comment perios for the new route must be reopened. Agricultural and climatic effect need to be analysed.
    Clinton, Montana
  1324. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19600Lisa Neulicht
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley in Montana seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail, the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will also take these impacts into account. Transporting strip-mined coal from Montana and Wyoming on trains to the proposed coal export terminal at Cherry Point, Washington and then on ships throughout the Northwest would negatively affect Whatcom County, the Pacific Northwest and the global community by increasing congestion and noise with more coal train traffic, polluting our air and local waterways, harming existing businesses, delaying emergency responders, damaging aquatic ecosystems and fishing grounds at the terminal site, increasing tanker traffic and the potential for serious shipping accidents and escalating climate change. I urge you to consider all these impacts in the scope of the Environmental Impact Statement. Sincerely, Lisa Neulicht 899 Piper Road Ferndale, WA 98248
    Ferndale, Washington
  1325. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19599Tarn Ream
    Please do not allow the Tongue River Railroad to construct a rail line from Otter Creek to Colstrip. This part of Montana is precious country for agriculture and the livelihoods of generations of families. Montana needs also to be a leader in addressing that coal shipped to Asia contributes to global warming--and WHY are we sending coal to Asian markets when we don't use it in the United States??? These items need to be addressed: -Because of the new route, you should reopen the public comment period and hold a hearing in Colstrip. -It is necessary analyze the devastating effects climate change will have on Montana and the nation and to analyze harm to existing agricultural operations and livelihoods along the new route. Sincerely, Tarn Ream
    Missoula, Montana
  1326. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19598Zack Winestine
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, I am writing to urge that the new application for the Tongue River Railroad be rejected. Because the proposed route has now significantly changed, the public comment process should be reopened and a new public hearing held. Furthermore, it is now explicitly clear that the sole function of the new railroad would be to haul coal for export to Asia. Any decision regarding whether the railroad is in the public interest must consider the impacts of the climate change exacerbated by the burning of the huge amounts of coal which would be hauled by the railroad, and by the economic impacts to agricultural operations along the proposed new route. Sincerely, Zack Winestine
    New York, New York
  1327. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19597William E Clawson II
    The route change make this a new appilication and the public hearing process should be restarted. The impact of the mining and burning of coal should be analyzed with regard to climate change and agriculture.
    Helena, Montana
  1328. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19596Amy Gladwin
    Please stop the development of the Tongue River Railroad and the otter creek mine. Our Montana forests are dying from wildfires and beetle kill due to global warming. The short term gain from selling coal to Asia will not compare to the long term loss of our habitat. We can sell it later once we develop the technology to use it without releasing carbon onto the atmosphere.
    Darby, Montana
  1329. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19539Rosann Wuebbals
    “I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general.” Then say: “Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal…” I have concerns specific to the Tongue River Valley. “Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. For example…the health of ecosystem and the huge impact on traffic withthe the proposed coal trains and export terminal(s) on the Pacific Coast. Thank you, Rosann Wuebbels
    Anancortes, Washington
  1330. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19538Dave Garding
    I am against any further expansion of mining. Why are we destroying out landscape, shipping the coal by train which emits coal dust(know carcinogen)into the air of our communities, then sending it to countries with little or no environmental restrictions on air pollution. The burning of coal is the leading contrubutor of global warming issues and is nothing but pollution plain and simply. It's time to stop this insanity!!
    Helena, Montana
  1331. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19537David Perk
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River railroad should include in its analysis the following: What quantity of CO2 emissions per year will result from the coal exported via the rail line? What amount of increased ocean acidity will that amount of emissions produce, per year, and beginning in what year? What will the impact be to Washington State's shellfish industry of any additional CO2 resulting from the burning of Tongue River coal? What percentage of Washington State's mitigation costs will be attributable to Tongue River coal? As a resident of Washington State I am concerned that 3,200 shellfish industry jobs are at risk from ocean acidification. The shellfish industry generates $270 million in revenue for Washington State. The Washington Department of Ecology will be spending $3.3 million dollars a year studying ocean acidification and mitigation strategies. I am concerned that by allowing the Tongue River railroad to be constructed, Washington State's shellfish industry will be harmed as a direct result. Please consider this document an attachment: http://pmel.noaa.gov/co2/files/wa_state_blue_ribbon_panel_oa_11-27-2012.pdf
    Seattle, Washington
  1332. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19536Dianna MacLeod
    I have several concerns about the impact of coal trains through the Tongue River Valley. Coal trains will lower property values, adversely affect wildlife, impose considerable noise pollution to areas of outstanding natural beauty and recreation, place tax burdens on the public to construct infrastructure (such as safety crossings and overpasses),, and increase traffic in the area.
    Langley, Washington
  1333. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19535Karen Brandenburger
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Tigard, Oregon
  1334. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19534Peter J. Schweinsberg
    I oppose approving the Tongue River Railroad Company's permit to build a coal-hauling line through the Tongue River Valley in order to export coal to China. Global warming is a very serious issue and the United States has dragged its feet on the issue for a dangerous amount of time. Moreover, the recent discovery of the great extent of thawing methane hydrates (methane bubbles trapped in frozen sea floors, permafrost, and polar ice) shows the perilous situation in which the planet lies as a result of our procrastination. We must act to stop the expansion of fossil fuel projects and immediately convert solely to energy projects that do not use fossil fuels if we are to ever control climate change. As methane hydrates thaw, they release methane, a powerful greenhouse gas. The methane release further warms the planet and subsequently causes the release of yet more methane from methane hydrates, in a potentially unstoppable feedback loop. If we pass the tipping point where global warming is unstoppable, no other human goal is going to matter for long. I repeat, no other human goal is going to matter for long. We will never be able to erradicate female genital mutilation, hunger, illegal slavery, warfare, or that many more diseases from the world. Global warming's consequences upon agriculture, forests, coastal cities, and low-lying nations will be enormous. In fact, even if we immediately stop greenhouse gas emissions, we are still due for five feet of eventual sea level rise from the lag time between greenhouse gas emissions and their heat-trapping ability. Many people's livelihoods will be worsened and ended, even if one cannot precisely tie the harm to specific individuals. This rail line will facilitate the further use of coal, which is a very dirty fossil fuel. Coal pollution not only warms the planet, it also dumps mercury into the environment and contributes to acid rain. In fact, one in six U.S. women already has enough mercury in her body to damage a fetus during a pregnancy. Those pregnancys that are carried to term will harm future people. Coal pollution already kills 10 million people per year and the mercury, a neurotoxin, damages people's valuable cognitive abilities and is a leading source of mercury pollution. Furthermore, exporting coal to a non-democratic country like China, where the people have extremely limited ability to influence government pollution policy and face human rights abuses when they protest is particularly immoral. In light of the above, I argue that the rail line would not qualify as a public convenience and necessity," as would be required for the proposal to proceed. There are many cleaner extant forms of energy which can be alternatively utilized. The cost of inaction on climate change far exceeds the cost of action. We can think ahead. Let us do so. Please refuse the construction of the Tongue River Railroad. I have only touched the surface of the resultant environmental harm which would occur in if the project is allowed to go forward. I have not even broached the damage to wildlife, flood control, property values, traffic fluidity, or noise pollution control if this project proceeds. Thank you."
  1335. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19533Gary Pierson
    Coal, a fossil fuel is a big contributor of climate change. Why do it? Leave it where it is, and turn to sustainable alternatives. Do it for the future.
    Auburn, Washington
  1336. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19532Hannah Sullivan
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal: Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1337. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19531Susan Rolfe
    This project proposes to cut the valley in half, jeopardizing local farm and ranch operations, disrupting wildlife movements, devaluing property, and increasing flooding potential in Montana. In my home region of western Washington, we would suffer increased pollution from coal dust, diesel fumes and noise. Taxpayers would have to pay the costs associated with safety infra-structure to prevent rail car accidents as well as injuries and deaths at crossings. This is a huge investment in a dirty, unsustainable business. Dirty fuel being sent to other countries with lower air quality standards is still dirty…and the planet is getting smaller all the time. Big Coal stands to make a lot of money on a limited resource, and when it’s gone, all we will have is rusted and obsolete equipment. Yet the social and environmental costs of this backward step would be with us for generations to come. It’s an irresponsible use of resources. Please do NOT approve this project
    Seattle, Washington
  1338. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19530Amanda Niles
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Bremerton, Washington
  1339. (printed as 1/8/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2010Section 106 Consulting Parties
  1340. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Motion
    233647Petition
    Northern Plains Resource Council And Rocker Six Cattle Company
  1341. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19541Joe and Helen Curran
    Forsyth, Montana
  1342. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19540Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    John J. Robinson
  1343. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19529Heidi Madden
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Because the Tongue River Valley rail proposal is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. For example there are numerous public parks along the rail tracks that the Tongue River Valley rail would be a tributary to. There are also numberous residential neighborhoods and highly populated urban areas within 8 city blocks of the rail tracks in many areas along the Pacific Northwest. What impact would fugituve coal dust and diesel fuel from these additional trains have (on an immediate and cumulative basis) on the health of the public living, working or using the parks within 8 city blocks of the rail tracks? Will residents who live this close to the tracks even be able to keep their windows open in summer without risking a compromise to their health? Will pre-existing health conditions be aggravated by the coal dust/dielsel pollution? What about babies, who have been proven to have weaker lungs and be more vulnerable to resperitory illnesses? Will vegetables grown in gardens close to the track be safe to eat? And what about the emotional impact of that much more noise from that many more one and a half mile long trains carrying coal? Please consider these impacts in your EIS. Thank you for your consideration.
    Seattle, Washington
  1344. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19528Friends of the San Juans
    For Alternative Analysis: please describe the alternatives analysis for the proposed Tongue River Valley coal train project including but not limited to site design and a review of different locations throughout the nation that are already developed ports or Brownfields with pre-existing environmental impacts and rail tracks.
    Stephanie Buffum · Friday Harbor, Washington
  1345. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19527Susan Delles
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. You also can post a letter to: Mr. Ken Blodgett Surface Transportation Board 395 E Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20423-0001
    Rogue River, Oregon
  1346. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19526Ilene Silver
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should include an analysis of the effects on global warming, and the direct pollution on the west coast, from burning the coal that would be extracted from the Montana mines. The winds will carry the sulfur dioxide, mercury and other pollutants directly to the west coast. The effects of the pollution from coal dust from the trains, will affect the health of people in communities like mine, in Washington State. This must also be considered in the environmental impact statement. The proposed railroad does not benefit the public at all. It is for the exclusive benefit of a giant coal company, Arch Coal. There is no public necessity whatsoever - this project has no benefit to the public at large and in fact is a challenge to everyone's health and well being. A few people will profit mightily and they will try to make the case that this is 'better for all' - a very tired argument. This project will have a devastating effect on the pristine Tongue River Valley and the wildlife that find refuge there. We do not need yet another industrial wasteland dumped into the last of our pristine areas by a coal giant that will only hasten the demise of our biodiversity through rampant global warming resulting from burning the coal - not to mention the enormous costs in fuel just to get the coal to China. The railroad will split ranches and farmland, and will do everything we don't want to see in a rural, pristine area. And THEN it will serve to increase global warming, increase ocean acidification, increase coastal flooding. We have the justifications to stop this. Mr. Blodgett, you must step up - this is it.
    Olympia, Washington
  1347. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19525John Seeburger
    Greetings, I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. I am against these coal terminal plans 100% Here in the Puget Sound region, we citizens are working to create a living model that is healthful, bio-diverse, and sustainable as well as repair the damage down by shortsighted, careless peoples of the past, and these coal terminals do not fit into our model in any way. To let this project go forward would be an overall travesty. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Please act with mindful consideration for the long term and sustainability and conservation. Don't allow our Orcas, our forests and our wildlife to be compromised. Thank you, john seeburger
    Lakewood, Washington
  1348. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19524Martin Kimbell
    I am a former Montana Resident, and in fighting power transportation routes here in NH, Nothern Pass, I am familiar with the plight of the people opposed to demands on our resources and personal properties. Too much land is being sacraficed for the needs of others outside our state boundaries. It is time to stand up for greener energy sources. Coal burning for energy is a huge step in the wrong direction for a healthy planet and its people. Greed among the millionairs and billionaires only adds to the problems of our global capitalistic society. NIMBY is all well and good, but seriously, who would want any railroad, strip mine, or polluted skies in their back yard. Look to the pollution problems surrrounding the Chinese manufacturing cities and industial areas, and we see what is not in our own back yard. Out of sight, out of mind, that is our view. Here in NH, I can't see Otter Creek, or Asia's needs for the energy in the future, yet I can see the remains of our own industrial cities and manufacturing centers, now moved to the foreign countries. It is time we USA citizens take resposiblity for our global community, and begin to make our planet a healthy growing community and to respect the bio economic difficulties ahead. Thankyou for allowing my comments to be submitted. Martin Kimbell
    Campton, New Hampshire
  1349. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19523David Hornor
    I grew up in West Virginia with my father and grandfather both working in the coal mines. I have experienced what the mining industry has done to destroy the environment in that state. I oppose this railroad project for an number of reasons listed below. Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1350. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19522Nora Ferm
    I am writing because I am extremely concerned about the proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia, because they are likely to have serious impacts on public health and the environment. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley is particularly worrisome for two reasons: 1) it would have adverse consequences for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. I grew up in the Pacific Northwest and go there several times a year to visit my family. I also care deeply about climate change. For those reasons, this proposal is particularly concerning to me. Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal, the Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) should analyze a number of things, in particular: 1. Degradation of wildlife: Industrializing the valley with the railroad and a coal strip mine will hurt the Valley's rich wildlife habitate. 2. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. This will have serious economic, environmental and societal consequences. 3. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. 4. Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. 5. Climate change from increased greenhouse gas emissions: The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. For example, the Gateway Pacific Terminal will have negative impacts on the communities, ecosystems, ecosystem services, and quality of life in the region. Likely serious impacts include underwater noise from the propellers on the ships, in excess of 180 decibels; a greater risk of oil spills; ballast water that introduces exotic species; coal dust and diesel exhaust that will cause respiratory health problems; and impacts on Pacific herring that spawn in the spring near Cherry Point. As a result, I urge you to include studies of underwater noise, exotic species from ballast water, coal dust and diesel exhaust from the trains, and the potential for oil spills in the EIS. Climate change is a serious problem, and it is time to enact policies and measures that mitigate climate change rather than exacerbating it. We should support US-China partnerships, both public and private, that help China transition to cleaner energy sources rather than burning more and more coal - for example, China already has a burgeoning solar panel industry. We should support incentives for the development of clean energy businesses in Wyoming, Montana, and Washington State, and for consumers to use cleaner energy and use it more efficiently. I will continue to follow this issue closely, as I feel that moving forward with this proposal would have terrible consequences for all of us, and for our children and grandchildren. Sincerely, Nora Ferm
    Washington, DC
  1351. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19521Janet Alderton
    I am a retired biologist and resident of Orcas Island, San Juan County. San Juan County is the only U.S. county entirely surrounded by water. Our islands are nestled in the Salish Sea that extends from Puget Sound in Washington State to Johnstone Strait in British Columbia. In countless ways we all are connected to communities that will be negatively impacted by the expansion of coal mining and the transport of coal by rail and by ship to Asia. My island is connected to the Tongue River Valley and to the entire globe. I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal, the environmental impact statement should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. For example, the greatly increased volume of shipping traffic that would result from coal terminal expansion has the potential to pollute the waters around my island when a grounding or collision occurs. Human error is not uncommon -as illustrated by the decision to tow a huge oil drilling platform, the Kulluk, in mid-winter through dangerous waters. This rig is grounded on an island south of Kodiak Island, Alaska. Combine human error with mechanical failure and/or severe weather and ecological disasters do happen. An ecological disaster in the Salish Sea would bring economic disaster to our community because we reply heavily on tourism. Because San Juan County is the geographic center of shipping within the Salish Sea, the transportation challenges of the additional coal ships only increases the concerns of county citizens. Narrowly limiting EIS studies to the Tongue River Valley railway proposal alone, while ignoring the marine transportation component, will not adequately address the concerns of the citizens of San Juan County, nor adequately represent their interests. Therefore, I request that the Tongue River Valley railway Environmental Impact Statement fully and completely include the linked and cumulative activities of transporting 50 million tons of strip-mined coal from Montana and Wyoming by rail to the proposed export terminal at Cherry Point, Whatcom County, Washington and to other Pacific Northwest ports and then transporting those millions of tons by ship through the Salish Sea to Asia. Please conduct a thorough, comprehensive, vessel traffic study that should at least include the following: 1. The increased risk of collision, allison, or grounding of all vessels while navigating the narrow, reef strewn, shipping lanes around the San Juan and Gulf Islands. What measures, if any, could reduce the risks to vessels, shorelines, and public safety from shipping accidents? 2. The increased risk and consequences to the economy, wildlife, and the environment by any oil or cargo spill in or near the San Juan or Gulf Islands. Are local and regional oil spill resources adequate to limit and then clean up a significant spill? What would be the economic consequences of a large spill on the shellfish, tourism, recreational boating and fishing industries of the San Juan Islands? 3. Given that tankers containing bitumen already use our waters, what technology and spill response capabilities exist, or would be required, to limit and clean up a spill of that product? What are the unique characteristics of bitumen that would pose a threat to the environment in the event of a spill? 4. The harmful effects on marine mammals of mechanical and surface sound propagation into the Salish Sea and the waters surrounding the San Juan and Gulf Islands. How will additional ship noise affect the foraging, rearing of young, social interactions, and possibly survivability of endangered Southern Resident Killer Whales? 5. The environmental risks of greater and greater numbers of ships using the Strait of Juan de Fuca and Unimak Pass, Alaska as the prime great circle route to Asia. What facilities and capabilities exist to assist vessels in distress while in the continental waters off Washington, British Columbia, or the Aleutian Islands? Are oil spill resources capable of responding to a spill in these waters? What would be the environmental consequences of being unable to contain a spill in these more remote waters? A comprehensive regional vessel traffic study is particularly necessary now because not only is the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal adding ships to the already significant existing traffic but expansions are proposed for the tar-sands pipelines at Burnaby, BC and Anacortes, WA. Expansions of these facilities will contribute additional vessel transits to the increasingly crowded waters of the Salish Sea and beyond. Those of us who live in San Juan County know the inherent hazards of sailing our cold, stormy waters and foggy mist shrouded islands. Channels dedicated to large ships are narrow, sinuous, and abound in rocks, reefs and small islets. Adding more and more very large vessels to these navigational hazards will elevate all the mechanical failures, weather related accidents, and human errors to levels which are unacceptable to San Juan County and Washington State residents. Therefore, I strongly oppose the construction of the Tongue River Valley railway. Additionally, since there are currently five coal export proposals that would transport as much as 150million tons of coal through the Northwest, I urge the Army Corps of Engineers conduct a comprehensive, inclusive, area wide Environmental Impact Statement to assess the cumulative environmental impacts from all of the proposed coal export terminals. from: http://cliffmass.blogspot.com/ SATURDAY, JANUARY 5, 201 Gulf of Alaska Storms Versus Shell Oil Drilling Platform The storms win. Shell Oil made a misguided and poorly informed decision to move a huge drilling platform (the Kulluk) from Dutch Harbor Alaska to Seattle starting December 21st. As described in the Seattle Times and elsewhere the problems grew from broken tow lines and faulty engines on December 26th, to the eventual grounding the Kulluk on an island just south of Kodiak island on December 31st. The Kalluk beached south of Kodiak Island Anyone familiar with the meteorology of the North Pacific and the Gulf of Alaska knows that this region is one of the stormiest on the planet with one major storm after another during midwinter. Unbelievably, a Shell Oil spokesman said, that forecasts indicated a favorable two-week weather window. This is at odds with the facts. First, as I will show below the forecasts on the day they left clearly suggested the potential for big storms during the 3-4 week voyage to Seattle, including the first week. Second, forecast skill drops substantially after 4-6 days and thus there was no guarantee of fair weather for this difficult tow.
    Deer Harbor, Washington
  1352. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19520Gerri Gunn
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal, the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. For example, the proposed Cherry Point Terminal in Northwest Washington for the coal transported by rail will impact marine life along the Pacific Coast and the Puget Sound. Copper is an environmental contaminant that is highly toxic for aquatic plants and animals. See: http://magazine.mining.com/Issues/0904/ImpactsCopperAquaticEcosystemsHumanHealth.pdf. For railways that are close to the marine shoreline or to wetlands, cumulative copper releases could present a significant source of pollution. Wetlands that lack an outlet and poorly flushed marine areas would be at greater risk. Many miles of the railway that would carry the increased traffic generated by the Gateway Pacific Terminal Expansion are located near the marine shoreline or near wetlands. Copper pollution from the expanded terminal could impact the unique and ecologically significant Cherry Point herring population. The study cited below found that about 9.4 kilograms (20 lbs) of copper was released into the environment per kilometer of railway per year. Twenty pounds of copper per kilometer per year equals 200 pounds of copper for every six miles of railway per year. This is for rail stretches where the trains are not accelerating or braking. Larger amounts of copper would be released at railway terminals and in maneuvering areas, such as at the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal. The Gateway Pacific Terminal is upland from the Cherry Point Herring spawning grounds. The negative impact of copper from railways on this genetically unique strain of herring could be significant. The contamination would be cumulative over the life of the terminal. If the Gateway Pacific Terminal expansion is approved, copper contamination could pose a significant threat to the aquatic ecosystems that are near the railways that experience increased traffic. Approximately 80% of the copper pollution generated by railways is released to the atmosphere and soil. This measurement of copper release from railways into the environment is derived from the following reference: Long-term Management of Track Ballast- A Case Study In Prevention and Recycling of Large Waste Flows" Ulrich Kral, Vienna University of Technology and Paul H. Brunner, Vienna University of Techology presented at the 2010 ISWA World Congress This study shows that significant amounts of copper are released from level sections of railways where trains are neither accelerating nor braking. 9.4 kilograms of copper per kilometer of railway were estimated to be lost to the environment per year. 9.4 kilograms per kilometer per year equals 200 pounds per six miles per year. http://www.railway-research.org/IMG/pdf/b4_kral_ulrich.pdf http://www.iswa.org/uploads/tx_iswaknowledgebase/Kral.pdf The results of this study show, that gravel, contact wire, and brake pads are sources of equal importance for copper release from the railroad stretch investigated."
  1353. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19519Susan Schwab
    Because of the new route, public comment period should be reopened and hold a hearing in Colstrip. Fair process for all involved.
    Belgrade, Montana
  1354. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19518Mary Gropp
    My name is Mary Gropp, I am a resident of San Juan County in NW Washington, living across the waters from the proposed Gateway Pacific Terminal at CherryPt. I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal, concerns which I feel should be addressed include: • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. • Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. I know that residents of the Tongue River Valley share similar concerns about the impact of the rail proposal with residents all along the line to Cherry Pt. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. Please require a thorough Environmental Impact statement, taking into consideration the multiple impacts to all the regions involved in this proposal. Thank you.
    Eastsound, Washington
  1355. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19517Edd Blackler
    The effects of the use of this fuel on climate change have not been sufficiently studied. The new shipping route requires new public hearings. The extraction and use of this fuel is a bad decision!
    Bigfork, Montana
  1356. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19516Gerry Jennings
    No comments were attached.
    Great Falls, Montana
  1357. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19515Sheila Brown
    No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Vashon, Washington
  1358. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19514Pamela Erickson
    There are many questions to be answered about the coal sales in Montana over the last 5 years and forward. Why did we and do we Montanans continue to sell our coal to Asian countries at low prices, knowing full well there will be clean-up to pay for, as well as restoration. And that statement does not even take into account the effects of burning coal. The transformation of coal into energy really needs to be examined by experts.
    Hamilton, Montana
  1359. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19513Pamela Erickson
    There are many questions to be answered about the coal sales in Montana over the last 5 years and forward. Why did we and do we Montanans continue to sell our coal to Asian countries at low prices, knowing full well there will be clean-up to pay for, as well as restoration. And that statement does not even take into account the effects of burning coal. The transformation of coal into energy really needs to be examined by experts.
    Hamitlon, Montana
  1360. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19512Chris Riley
    Expanding coal extraction in Montana or anywhere in the US is a mistake. The country is currently transitioning to cleaner burning natural gas, and many utilities are selling off their coal-fired plants, particularly in light of their pollution and greenhouse gas liabilities. The construction of the proposed of the rail spur will also impact the connectivity of native fish & wildlife populations, in addition to associated mortality and the risk of pollution due to inherent coal loss and worse - potential derailment. Sincerely, Chris RIley
    Manistee, Michigan
  1361. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19511Janet Weedman
    I’m a retired Special Education/Reading Specialist. I’m very concerned about the demonstrated link between lead, mercury and neurological damage and the effects of blowing coal dust along the entire route of the proposed project as well as the site itself. The incidence of learning disabilities, ADHD, and autism has increased significantly and I have personally witnessed the devastating impacts these issues have not only on the individuals who have them, but also their families, classrooms and schools. Neurological damage is a very serious consequence in all populations. The effects are cumulative and last a lifetime. http://www.plosmedicine.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pmed.0050112 The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Amounts of coal dust likely to escape cumulatively from trains all along the route and amounts of lead and mercury in that dust. The amount of lead and mercury already in the bodies of children. How much lead and mercury is tolerable? Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account.
    Anacortes, Washington
  1362. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19510Laura Crafton
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Spokane, Washington
  1363. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19509Pat Robertson
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general.” Then say: “Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal…” Include here concerns specific to the Tongue River Valley. (You can even cut and paste the list from the Northern Plains Resource Council’s web site: www.northernplains.org/trr-comments-due-jan-11/.) Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1364. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19508C. Currey
    Corporate Welfare is not necessary, there is already enough of that in the U.S. So much in fact that we have deficits and debt. This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company corporation, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries so it is not even in the U.S. economy's interest. It is corporate welfare and welfare for China, both of whom do not need more U.S. taxpayer-funded welfare
    Portland, Oregon
  1365. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19507Erin Denton
    As a voter, tax payer and resident of Montana, I am vehemently opposed to both the Tongue River Railroad and the Otter creek mine - Thanks, erin Denton
    Livingston, Montana
  1366. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19506Elizabeth A. Taylor
    No comments were attached.
    Frenchtown, Montana
  1367. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19505Beth Doglio
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner.
    Olympia, Washington
  1368. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19504Ian Cox
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Thank you for your time Ian Cox
    Seattle, Washington
  1369. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19503Kyle Barnett
    The proposed Tongue River Railroad is a bad idea for Montana, the Nation, and the World. The mining of Otter Creek coal and the export of that coal to Asia will adversely affect the rural economy and the outdoor heritage of Montana and undermine the efforts to curb the ever more extreme climate of this planet. The added train traffic to the city where I live will create ever more frequent delays where there are already to few railroad bypasses. The cost benefit ratio of this proposed project for Montanans does not add up.
    Helena, Montana
  1370. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19502Laura Ferguson
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, I write to express concerns about the Otter Creek Mine in Montana and the proposal to expand this mine and re-route the rail shipping. The negative impacts on Montana and all along the railway are enormous. Even now, as the coal trains pass the Yellowstone River, the dust blows off like smoke and settles in the river, which is one of the most vital waterways in Montana. We don't need to destroy our land, air and water so that these coal companies can get rich by exporting coal to China. We ought to be limiting coal and really expanding clean (i mean CLEAN not clean") energy sources. Why has there not been a public comment period for the new route? It appears the railway and coal mines are skirting the public's right to be involved in this issue, an issue which the public has for many years spoken out very strongly against (along with opposition to the expansion of the Otter Creek coal mine). It's China's job to come up with their own clean energy. It's NOT our job to be their energy colony and let our own nation be ruined by dirty coal, coal dust, contaminated water and acid rain from the coal burned in China."
  1371. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19501Jeffrey J. Smith
    Montana citizens analyze impact statements and give public testimony at public hearings. Then the Tongue River Railroad and Arch Coal decide, whoops, I guess we don't like where that plan is headed. They want to short-circuit the process with a new application to the Surface Transportation Board. Don't let them. Please let's follow through with analyzing the true effects of this disastrous idea, to dig up 1.3 million tons of coal, shipping it by railroad through a pristine agricultural valley and themn through many populated cities and towns all the way to the West Coast, and then to Asian markets to be burned and further pollute our atmosphere. This is a VERY bad idea. If that coal is dug up and hauled, then burned, we will add over 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gases going into our already overloaded atmosphere. Don't tolerate this last minute bait and switch by powerful corporate interests that are subverting the public welfare. Reopen the public comment period and hold a hearing in Colstrip. And for the sake of the people -- in which all political power rests according to our Constitution -- you need to analyze the devastating effects climate change will have on Montana and the nation. You also need to analyze harm to existing agricultural operations and to those people like me who live along the new route.
    Missoula, Montana
  1372. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19500Betty Whiting
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: The Otter Creek coal mines in Montana and the additional rail services to transport coal through Montana to the West Coast should NOT be permitted. At this time in history, coal is known to be the dirtiest fuel available. With all the fracking going on for natural gas and the advance of wind power and solar power, we no longer need coal. Keep it in the earth for a time we may need it and when it can be used safely without destroying our air and water. Coal trains increase asthma and lung problems of all of us living near the tracks --- thousands of people are affected by the coal dust blowing on us. The additional health care and related costs here in the West is far greater than the benefit of the coal to China. The train and coal industries should be expected to pay for the additional health damage if you allow the proposal to go through. And it is impossible to calculate the cost of an increase in hurricanes, drought, wildfires, and floods caused by additional coal use. There is only an overall economic loss in developing and transporting coal. Please stop it. Sincerely, Betty Whiting 925 Burlington Avenue Billings, MT 59101 406-252-5647 bettywhiting@bresnan.net
    Billings, Montana
  1373. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19499Christy Nielsen
    You need to have another public meeting at Colstrip before proceeding any further with studies on the Tongue River Railroad. Colstrip was not considered on route the Railroad was going to take an no meeting was held there. We do not need another railroad going through Montana effecting ranchers, agriculture, or our air quality.
    Forsyth, Montana
  1374. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19498John Bremer
    In 2013, it is bizarrely monstrous to promote coal burning. Only a deficient corporate management like the bookkeepers at Berkshire Hathaway, Inc., the largest United States of America corporation that refuses to disclose its carbon emissions, would be capable of proposing to burn coal to poison the poor children downwind of the power plants; to cause the dispatch of myriad mile and half long coal trains through our environment, our farms, and our communities; and to acidify our oceans, raise global temperatures and flood our capitals with rising sea levels. You must be aware that there is no one named as an accountable and competent person for the railroad owned by Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. SourceWatch provides the following information about the BNSF railroad owner, Berkshire Hathaway, Inc. Appalling as individual death and suffering are, the important thing to note is that these costs are imposed by the conglomerate on local communities in which the conglomerate operates. Death and disease attributable to fine particle pollution from MidAmerican Energy coal plants In 2010, Abt Associates issued a study commissioned by the Clean Air Task Force, a nonprofit research and advocacy organization, quantifying the deaths and other health effects attributable to fine particle pollution from coal-fired power plants. Fine particle pollution consists of a complex mixture of soot, heavy metals, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides. Among these particles, the most dangerous are those less than 2.5 microns in diameter, which are so tiny that they can evade the lung's natural defenses, enter the bloodstream, and be transported to vital organs. Impacts are especially severe among the elderly, children, and those with respiratory disease. The study found that over 13,000 deaths and tens of thousands of cases of chronic bronchitis, acute bronchitis, asthma, congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, dysrhythmia, ischemic heart disease, chronic lung disease, and pneumonia each year are attributable to fine particle pollution from U.S. coal plant emissions. These deaths and illnesses are major examples of coal's external costs, i.e. uncompensated harms inflicted upon the public at large. Low-income and minority populations are disproportionately impacted as well, due to the tendency of companies to avoid locating power plants upwind of affluent communities. To monetize the health impact of fine particle pollution from each coal plant, Abt assigned a value of $7,300,000 to each 2010 mortality, based on a range of government and private studies. Valuations of illnesses ranged from $52 for an asthma episode to $440,000 for a case of chronic bronchitis. Table 1: Death and disease attributable to fine particle pollution from MidAmerican Energy coal plants Type of Impact____Annual Incidence_______Valuation Deaths_____________234________________$1.7 billion Heart attacks________362_______________$39.6 million Asthma attacks_____4,305________________$0.22 million Chronic bronchitis____152_______________ $67.5 million Asthma ER visits_____229________________ $.08 million Hospital admissions___167________________ $3.9 million I'll tell you why I like the cigarette business," he explained to Salomon-Chairman John Gutfreund in 1987, according to the book "Barbarians at the Gate." "It costs a penny to make. Sell it for a dollar. It's addictive. And there's fantastic brand loyalty." Source: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Warren_Buffett"
  1375. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19497Mary Mele
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1376. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19496Sustainable Edmonds
    Dear Mr. Blodget, I am a board member of Sustainable Edmonds and I speak for the whole organization. We oppose construction of coal ports in the whole region. Edmonds is a coastal town that would be greatly affected along with many other communities if mile and a half coal trains pass through town, cutting off access to part of the city and disrupting ferry traffic. We are concerned about health issues due to due dust and diesel exhaust, noise pollution and a general decrease in the quality of life. Edmonds has a high percentage of senior citizens, many of whom, live near the tracks, which is also directly across the street. We are concerned about derailments as a good portion of tracks along Puget Sound pass by high unstable hillsides. Due to heavy rains the past few months, we have had nearly a hundred slides and even a freight train was hit and 7 cars toppled off the tracks south of Everett. A coal train derailment would land in Puget Sound and even could land in our Edmonds Marsh where migratory birds pass through and threatened species rest. A derailment would be a death knell for the marsh. Lastly, our biggest concern is that if all this coal gets to Asia, (up to 150 million tons), the greenhouse gases would pollute the air and hasten climate change. But all the exhaust doesn't stay in Asia. It is blown to the northwest where mercuric coal markers from Montana have been found in the sediments of lakes in Washington I/we ask you to review our concerns and consider all impacts near and far, especially for the people and communities any additional trains would pass through. Thank you. Richard Bisbee, for Sustainable Edmonds
    Richard Bisbee · Edmonds, Washington
  1377. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19495Chris Daum
    The best way to sequester carbon is to leave it in the ground. Shipping across the northwest to barges heading for China is VERY short-sighted. The public comment period about Colstrip should be re-opened. Corporate profits shouldn't harm people, land, air and water.
    Stevensville, Montana
  1378. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19494Roy O'Connor
    I wish to comment on the proposed new route of the Tongue River Railroad. This new route should get a full EIS, to determine the affects on local ranches, ranchers,and recreationalists. It will affect them all. It should be opened to public comment, as the route has changed. It should also have a full EIS, to anayze the affects of climate change, shipping coal to Asia, and how Montana's agricultural and recreational economy and lifestyle will be affected by the extracting, shipping, and burning of these huge amounts of coal. We do not want to turn into Arizona! I depend on agriculture, both livestock and grains, and need to insure adequate temperature and rainfall for my crops-which global warming certainly is and will affect!
    Clinton,, Montana
  1379. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19493Citizens for Labor and Environmental Justice
    Please reopen the public comments for the Tongue River Railroad's new route. It is unfair to the landowners and people living along that route if you allow the change to go forward without their input. You implicitly allow ecocide otherwise. The whole thing is unfair to the people of the planet, as it is unconscionable to put another 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere by sending dirty coal to China.
    Mary Kay Craig · Butte, Montana
  1380. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19492Arlene Vogele
    No comments were attached.
    Atascadero, California
  1381. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19491Irondale Community Action Neighbors (Jefferson County)
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention: Mr. Ken Blodgett Any environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should thoroughly investigate and expose the following: 1)“Public convenience and necessity” is required in order for any entity to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries, and, as a special interest only represents private parties not concerned about the public interest. 2)Property values: The non-zero risk that the railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, and spill coal dust, copper, and other pollutants will mean that it will devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive It will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. 3)Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. 4)Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. 5)Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. 6)Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents in communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. We, the People are the sovereign controllers of our own destiny, and shall not be over-ruled by non-elected private entities who have no concern for the future of our children, the economic viability of our communities, or the health and safety of our citizens
    Mike Regan · Hadlock, Washington
  1382. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19490Loren Elmaleh
    No comments were attached.
    Santa Fe, New Mexico
  1383. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19489Peter Tamsky
    As a citizen inside of the area to be affected by the proposed Cherry Point coal terminal I would like to express my opposition to this project.I work in the energy sector as a Union Millwright,working the western US .I have seen alot facilities,they are short time boons with long term consequences.The people and the industry leave blemishes all over the country and then walk away.They are trying to limit the scopeing because if you and I look at the big picture we would not put up with the shortsighted nature of these projects.Please look at the total project and its consequences. As someone who makes my living from this type of work I have a better perspective than most. No matter what the promises are the all mighty dollar will control what is fulfilled and what is not .The short term work and economic gains fall well short of sustainable, with the gains walking off in a very few pockets,the mess will be left for the rest of us to clean up,some and alot of it permanent. Sincerely Peter Tamsky
    Concrete, Washington
  1384. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19488Misa Heater
    Seattle, Washington
  1385. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19487Brent Harris
    Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Petaluma, California
  1386. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19486Nadya Volsky
    No coal shipments from MT to China!!! NO!!! all logical reasons have been already cited, this is just one more reminder.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1387. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19485Sylvia Boudreau
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Blaine, Washington
  1388. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19484Kathy Danze
    The proposed Tongue River Railroad should be denied permits for the following the reasons: 1) It does not meet the standards for eminent domain. It is not for public convenience and necessity. It serves only one coal company, Arch Coal, which intends to ship its product to China and other Asian markets. 2) It will devalue property and infringe on property rights. It will make farming and ranching more difficult and expensive., and will split ranch and farm land in half. It will separate fields from the river, and shift liability for the crossings to the land owner. 3) Industrializing the area will degrade excellent habitat for elk and deer, and negatively impact local revenue generated by sportsmen and other recreational visitors. 4) The noise will ruin the quiet environment of nearby recreation in Miles City.5) Increased coal traffic will cause traffic delays, and increased deisel pollution. Ther will be a need for expensive overpasses and safety crossings costing millions of dollars that will increase taxes. 6) It will promote a dirty energy source tha will increase carbon emissions in many ways over and above the burning of the coal. Mining, halting from the mine to the West Coast in trucks, shipping to Asian markets in deisel fueled ships, and transporting once in Asia to desired locations will all add to global pollution at a time when we, as a species, are dangerously close to creating irreversible climate chaos by our dependence on fossil fuels. This proposal may create much needed jobs in the short term, but at what cost to the quality of life for the next generation and beyond? I implore you to consider this in your EIS, and to deny permits for this proposal. , hauling from the mines to the West Coast
    Portland, Oregon
  1389. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19483George A Thomas
    George Thomas <papermaker.george@gmail.com> Environ mental Technician For GP Bellingham PSPAND T 12:05 PM (4 minutes ago) to lynne.oulman Dear sir and Miss Lynne oulman In regards to the shipping of coal by rail along rivers. I worked many years on the Milwaukee section gang replacing ties ,rails and switches.. Several years ago I was walking with my wife along the rail lines in Bellingham. I was pointing out where I had worked as young man. There is a strong cuve south of Bellingham adjoining the water.This curve had ties with loose spikes, badly worn rails. I was so concerned that we went to the rail office. They no longer knew me but when I mentioned my old boss they immediately listened to my observations and scheduled repairs.These rail lines are not maintained properly and present an ongoing danger to our waters. There have already been some derailments in the lines in feeding into Cherry point . The chuckanut rail line curve was in a place that a coal car could have derailed dumping the coal into the salt water. I am now immediately concerned for all the rivers running next to the rail lines. This is an unwanted danger to our protected waters. Coal is only now being recognized as to the danger it is to our prime waters. Please help our clean waters stay that way.Reject the coal coming to Bellingham. , The burning of coal and transport and loading areas like Cherry point all phases present world changing dangers affecting all of our lives. Ths must seem a small thing but it is huge .It is definitely attributal to Sea ice loss of sea ice. We must stop this unrecognized destruction of our environment by the coal producers and transporters.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1390. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19482Andrea Faste
    Arch Coal should not be granted permission to build a railroad line through the Tongue River Valley. The environmental risks are too high, and the costs to the people living there are outrageous. Only the Arch Coal Company will benefit from this. The coal should stay in the ground. Global warming is not to be ignored.
    Seattle, Washington
  1391. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19481Robin Leavy
    Regarding the proposed rail line and shipment of Montana coal to the Pacific NW for export to Asia, I have great concerns about public health and environmental quality, both locally and globally. Any environmental impact statement evaluating the Montana project really should include effects literally down the line". My passion is birds. Please consider what migrating and endemic local populations of passerines and other small birds would be disrupted, as they are the food for the raptors who also may be living there year round, or at least migrate through in fall and spring. The quality of life for all living things, including humans, I believe will be negatively impacted by this tremendous volume of trains carrying coal. It truly is the time in the world to move to clean energy, and away from fossil fuels. The impact of the burning of this much coal on the global environment MUST be included in the evaluation of this project. Thank you so much for considering my concerns."
  1392. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19480Betsy Harris
    Please do not allow another assault on our land just to benefit a large coal company. The broader implications of coal dust pollution, increased flooding problems, noise pollution for our states just for profit" is unthinkable. "
    Edmonds, Washington
  1393. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19479Nancy Richardson
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, There is absolutely nothing of value in this proposal for the American people. It is solely to serve one company's financial gain at major expense to many areas of quality of life. When American leaders, such as yourself, begin to make every decision based on the sustainability of America which involves the decision to be based on how economic, environmental, and social well-being are inextricably linked then we will have a stronger nation. Please take into consideration the following, which do provide for a sustainable future for our country, which is in a huge mess due to major decisions based on money only. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Ashland, Oregon
  1394. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19478William Olson
    Please help our communities from the KNOWN toxic complications of shipping coal through and from our cities, ports and by-ways. Our community of Longview/Kelso, Wa.(nestled along the lower Columbia river) is full of cancer deaths! The industrial pollution is huge in our community already and the KNOWN health problems surrounding the coal transfer areas have got to be addressed. When I reached the age of 59(62 now) I developed alergies from grasses,trees and weeds". I have been receiving shots to prevent the symptoms and they are still there, over 15 mos.of shots so far. My Dr. has increased the dosage potency again to get a handle on the symptoms. I asked my Dr. "Can this be from the mills" and he said "Yes it can".I never beleived that I could develope alergies from "grasses, weeds and trees" as my Dr. had told me after the scratch tests because I have been here in Longview all my life (except Nam war) and in this location for 20 yrs..I beleive a change in the pollution structure could have caused the alergies. Millenium coal came into town and started moving large coal piles between the old smelter building and the aluminum cable plant(both shut down now) at the time my symptoms started.The area is going through a huge toxic clean-up at this time. The air from the mills passes over the towns and along the River. The area in which we live acts like a syphon and this canyon full of residences actually has a pulling effect all the way up the Creek to the top of the canyon. I worked at one of the mills for 33 yrs., 20 of those yrs. as the effluent treatment plant operator in which I contained a turpentine/red liquer spill in our diversion pond one time, the standard operating procedure. A day or two later the material gassed-off and the air currents took the toxic odor to Olympia Wa., north of here about 60 miles and to almost Cannon Beach Or.,about 90 miles to the south. When I came home from my job that day, the odor had permeated the inside of our house via our heat-pump system!!! Please help us and prevent the transfer of coal to our community for shipment to asia. We don't need the few jobs and the added toxic pollution will cause asthma,alergies and even death in some instances. Please call me for some info I cannot write about. Thankyou! Sincerely, William Olson"
  1395. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19477Sandra Cole
    - Coal companies want to develop coal export facilities in many NORTH WEST locations to ship to ship 150 million tons of coal every year to Asian markets. These are the markets undermining American jobs. -The environmental result will be increased diesel emissions, a known carcinogen. There are robust correlations between these pollutants and cardiovascular and respiratory disease, reproductive health problems, and malignancy. - Coal dust itself is a health concern for people with allergies, asthma, chronic bronchitis, emphysema, and heart disease. The dust which blows off train cars (full and empty cars) contains mercury, lead and arsenic, which can coat the yards where children play. To date, no covered rail cars have been utilized. - Long unit trains will block emergency vehicles for over five minutes as they rumble slowly through small towns. -Rail improvements to decrease the number of grade-level crossings, for example, are expensive. In many cases, rail companies are limited by federal law to pay only 5 % of the cost of improvements. Where will the money come from to finance rail improvements? - Coal dust damages tracks and can lead to derailments. There were 12 derailments of coal trains this summer, with four fatalities of innocent bystanders. - We can't afford to dump coal into precious salmon-bearing streams, either. Coal dust harms the tracks, increasing the risk of derailment for other, non-coal bearing trains. - Coal is notoriously harmful to its workers and to everyone along the line, from the mines, to the trains, to the barges, to the ports. Because of harmful emissions, Oregon's one coal-burning power plant will be shut down by 2020. But emissions from coal burned in Asia will also cause serious illness right here in Oregon. - Several recent studies have shown that powerful spring trade winds can carry Asian pollution into the atmosphere above North America. Some of the imported pollution descends to the surface, where it affects ground-level concentrations of ozone, mercury, sulfur compounds and soot. Ground-level ozone can cause severe respiratory problems, including asthma, in susceptible individuals. - A 2008 study found that Asian emissions of mercury contribute 18% of springtime mercury concentrations at Mount Bachelor. Snowpack runoff ends up in our rivers and lakes where the mercury contaminates the fish we eat. Pregnant women and children are particularly vulnerable to the toxic effects of mercury. - Mercury is a potent neurotoxin that damages developing brains in children and fetuses. It is estimated that between 300,000 and 600,000 children are born in the U.S. each year with dangerous levels of mercury in their bodies, putting them at heightened risk for developmental disabilities, mental retardation, seizures, and disturbances of gait and speech. - Another major health concern is the role of coal emissions in causing global climate change. Rising oceans, prolonged droughts, stronger hurricanes, and more intense heat waves are examples of climate change that lead to food shortages, heat stroke and death and injury from natural disasters. The dislocation of people from floods and drought leads to outbreaks of pest and water borne diseases. Children, the poor, the elderly, and anyone with a weak or impaired immune system are among the most vulnerable. Only a small minority of scientists still deny man made global climate change. Even the skeptic the Koch brothers hired to do their study changed his mind and now believes climate change is a man made phenomenon, capable of the eventual extinction of life as we know it on this planet.
    Vancouver, Washington
  1396. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19476Mary Louise Tucker
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal, I'd like to request that the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. As a resident of the San Juan Islands in the Pacific Northwest & one who lives within view of the proposed Cherry Point West Coast Coal Terminal, let me offer just a few examples of areas of impact upon my local community: 1. An increase in nearly 1000 large vessel trips annually through local waters would impact recreational & fishing boater safety. 2. In addition to far heavier ship traffic, the increase in underwater noise & pollution would impact our already stressed Orca Whale populations, as well as other marine mammals & birds, fish, & the food web that supports them. 3. Construction & operation of the port's impact on crab, herring & salmon fisheries. 4. Increased risk of a large oil &/or coal spill in these waters would be catastrophic & difficult, if not impossible to fully recover from. 5. Likely introduction of invasive species in ballast water from Asia. 6. Negative impact on local tourism industry & resulting economy & property values. 7. Widespread environmental impact of transporting & burning coal all the way from its source to its final destination. Thank you for your consideration in this very important issue. Our children, grandchildren, & great grandchildren may thank you as well. Sincerely, Mary Louise Tucker
    Eastsound, Washington
  1397. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19475Vancouver Audubon Society
    Reasons I oppose coal export. Increased c carbon dioxide emissio Increased air pollution from coal djust Habitats cut half to construct New lines Devalue property Noise and traffic increased
    Carol Peterson · Vancouver, Washington
  1398. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19474Joel and Lucinda Wingard
    We adamantly oppose coal exportation from Washington state's ports. In the battle to reduce carbon emissions it makes no sense to mine and export coal for use in other countries when we have determined that it is bad for our environment in the USA. Allowing export through Washington's ports only encourages unwise mining practices in the US while increasing the risk of environmental damage caused by the transport over long distances by train. Please, oppose the exportation of coal through Washington state's port. Thank you for this opportunity to comment on this vital issue.
    Gig Harbor, Washington
  1399. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19473David J Ellenberger
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Wheat Ridge, Colorado
  1400. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19472Delll Goldsmith
    Dear Staff: I am very concerned about the impact of very large, frequent coal trains through the Tongue River Valley. This project which deeply affects residents in the valley as well as people all along the route and eventually does global damage. This project degrades ranch land, air quality, water quality and the well being of people, domestic animals and wild life all along the route. Animals include insect and aquatic invertebrates upon which fish and birds depend. Vegetation and all living things along the route are affected by coal dust, coal liquid drippings and diesel pollution including heavy metals. Increased weight, vibration and frequency of trains further stress the rail road beds, bridges and overpasses. The trains will delay all transportation at level crossings including emergency vehicles. The mental health of people in the Tongue River Valley and all along the route will be affected by pollution including noise pollution, air and water pollution and disruption to their way of life. I urge you to cancel this project which ships coal to China and when burned will come back in the form of world wide air pollution.
    Portland, Oregon
  1401. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19471Sally Stapp
    Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. The Union of Concerned Scientists, in their recent publication – Cooler Smarter: Practical Steps for Low-Carbon Living - support Pete’s assertion. They present data collected hourly at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii beginning in 1958 that show a continuous, nearly linear increase in atmospheric Carbon Dioxide - the Keeling Curve, Figure 3.2 on p. 34. “As part of the carbon cycle, the world’s oceans have long absorbed roughly one-third of all the carbon dioxide emitted by human activity…” (p. 42). “In fact, current measurements indicate the Earth’s oceans are already about 30% more acidic than they were before the Industrial Revolution. As the world’s oceans absorb more carbon dioxide, they become more acidic, threatening the ocean’s reefs and some of the plankton that form the base of the aquatic food chain” (p. 43). Please study the significant, negative, cumulative impact the burning of coal and all fossil fuels has on ocean acidification in our local, state, national and worldwide oceans and all other water systems. Additionally, please study the impact on our local, state, national and worldwide fisheries caused by mining, transporting, storing, shipping and burning fossil fuels – including sub-bituminous coal from the Powder River Basin, Wyoming. If a spill were to occur at any of the above stages, please study the exacerbation of the impacts listed above. Thank you.
    Everett, Washington
  1402. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19470Sally Stapp
    Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. For example - About 30% of the carbon dioxide generated from fossil fuel burning is absorbed by the earth’s oceans, which then become more acidic. We are already seeing the impacts to shellfish in Puget Sound, impacts now recognized in the scientific literature, impacts now being studied by NOAA.” “North Pacific salmon eat huge quantities of a microscopic floating mollusk called a pteropod, also know as a “sea butterfly”. It has a shell that is vulnerable to ocean acidification. If we lose the pteropod, we endanger the salmon which feed orca, bear, cedar, human and the whole living web of the north Pacific Rim.” The Union of Concerned Scientists, in their recent publication – Cooler Smarter: Practical Steps for Low-Carbon Living - support Pete’s assertion. They present data collected hourly at the Mauna Loa Observatory in Hawaii beginning in 1958 that show a continuous, nearly linear increase in atmospheric Carbon Dioxide - the Keeling Curve, Figure 3.2 on p. 34. “As part of the carbon cycle, the world’s oceans have long absorbed roughly one-third of all the carbon dioxide emitted by human activity…” (p. 42). “In fact, current measurements indicate the Earth’s oceans are already about 30% more acidic than they were before the Industrial Revolution. As the world’s oceans absorb more carbon dioxide, they become more acidic, threatening the ocean’s reefs and some of the plankton that form the base of the aquatic food chain” (p. 43). Please study the significant, negative, cumulative impact the burning of coal and all fossil fuels has on ocean acidification in our local, state, national and worldwide oceans and all other water systems. Additionally, please study the impact on our local, state, national and worldwide fisheries caused by mining, transporting, storing, shipping and burning fossil fuels – including sub-bituminous coal from the Powder River Basin, Wyoming. If a spill were to occur at any of the above stages, please study the exacerbation of the impacts listed above. Thank you.
    Everett, Washington
  1403. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19469Arlene F French
    Attention Mr. Ken Blodgett: I believe that the proposed Tongue River Valley Railroad would have extensive impacts. I agree most heartedly with the following statements from the Northern Plains Resource Council: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. I believe that projects as massive as this affect the well being of our entire country. While that particular train will not rumble through my back yard or your back yard, it rumbles through the heart of our country for the benefit of China and the wealth of a small number of individuals.
    Anacortes, Washington
  1404. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19468Erik Lillquist
    The Tongue River Railroad project hurts Montanans. Please review the serious environmental concerns attached to this project and the ways in which they will hurt Montana, and the citizens of Montana. The cons outweigh the pros; the TRR is not needed and we do not want it in Montana.
    Missoula, Montana
  1405. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19467Claire Reimer
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1406. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19466Donna Mason
    I am very concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal, because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take all impacts into account including all communities involved along the way and on the Pacific Coast.
    Sedro-Woolley, Washington
  1407. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19465Marcia Rutan
    I disagree with the request by the Tongue River Railroad Company to have a permit to build a coal-hauling line through the Tonge River Valley. There are too many questionable factors to ensure that this is viable. These factors include: 1) Wildlife habitat in the Tongue River Valley is rich and supports sportsman and animal populations. The line will ruin this area. 2) There could be more flooding which is already a problem in Miles City. 3). This is not for the public's use and convenience - it is purely a business venture for Arch Coal so they can sell to China and other Asian countries. This is not acceptable and does not mee the eminent domain" requirements. 4) There are other issues with taxes and property values. Please do not grant this permit."
  1408. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19464Jeremy Mattox
    I was active in the maritime industry for nearly 40 years. • I worked in the steamship business in San Francisco, Oakland, Portland, and Seattle. • I worked for a Seattle stevedoring company. • I worked as a maritime consultant and expert witness. • I served as chairman of the Greater Seattle Chamber of Commerce Maritime Committee. I also am active in the environmental industry, serving as publisher of the Environmental Services Directory for Washington State for the past 22 years. The export of American coal to Asia will create regional jobs. However, there are negatives related to these coal export proposals, the most significant of which is climate change. Climate change is occurring at a rapid rate and is having far reaching impacts on much of the world. Most scientists agree that climate change is man-made, with the burning of fossil fuels being the major cause. That being the case, the limited number of regional jobs and economic development that coal export will generate clearly are not worth the adverse effect that transporting and burning this coal, even far away in Asia, will have on our nation and our planet. We need to be part of the solution, not part of the problem. Please ensure that climate change issues are included in evaluation of the Tongue River Railroad permit application.
    Seattle, Washington
  1409. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19463Sherri L Loveland
    I oppose the exportation of coal - not to mention mountain top removal of coal. This rail line is only going to line the pockets of share holders of Arch Coal. It will destroy the areas that the rail goes through and therefore, destroy the economy of those areas. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Tustin, California
  1410. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19462Jonnel Covault
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, I am very concerned about the plans for the Tongue River Valley train which would potentially carry coal from Montana to terminals on the Pacific Coast. Please consider the numerous hazards of mining and transporting coal and their costs to the environment, people's health and property! Tons of toxic dust blows off of coal trains, polluting the air and water all along the way. The dust damages the tracks which other trains use which is a cost to taxpayers. The noise and air pollution and traffic lower property values. But the real issue is : There needs to be a price on carbon! This venture would not even be realistic if there was a real price on carbon. Coal is dirty and is not a viable energy source for the FUTURE. We should be investing in alternative, clean energy! Why are we mining coal for China to burn?! The trade winds blow the pollution right back to us! The amount of jobs provided by this industry is not even that significant when you include the health and environmental costs. Please do the right thing and consider the REAL COST OF COAL to our health, natural environment and climate. Thank You for your consideration, Jonnel Covault
    Portland, Oregon
  1411. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19461Christina Marx
    I am concerned that this proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity”, which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. The railroad bed will also act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. As a resident of Seattle, I am working in my local community as well to oppose export of coal from our northwest ports. It just doesn't make sense.
    Seattle, Washington
  1412. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19460Connie Gall
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. When are we going to stop damaging people's lives because of environmental mistakes made by industries? Be responsible about this. It is better and cheaper to protect than to restore.
    Quilcene, Washington
  1413. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19459Mark M Giese
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Racine, Wisconsin
  1414. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19458Irene Blomberg
    My concern over the proposed Tongue River Railway and strip mine are huge. Every living creature from the coal mine along the railway to the west coast export facility, in the ocean and in Asia will be affected by this proposal and that impact needs to be reviewed and given deep serious consideration. This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries.The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. The wildlife and the impact on sportsman and recreational activities will be affected and needs to be considered. How will traffic in the newly proposed rail areas be redirected and who will pay the price for new overpasses and safety crossings? Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. Thank you.
    Lopez Island, Washington
  1415. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19457Fred Karlson
    I am opposed to a railroad shipping coal in uncovered cars. I am against a project that threatens our fragile environment in terms of air quality, noise to the Puget Sound's water habitat, and intrusion into our already crowded city traffic conditions. We should not be seeking to please corporate powers, that merely want to sell a natural resource and a dirty one at that, to a foreign country that is unconcerned about its own environment. Thank you for considering my comments.
    Ferndale, Washington
  1416. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19456Virginia
    I am very concerned about the proposed Tongue River Valley rail line to take coal. Please study the effects of copper that would be caused to be air bourne from the rail cars and how it would effect local habitat. Copper is a known poison to plants and animals and these rail cars would be dumping a lot of it on the ground and in the air. Also, please study the effects of coal lost from the rail cars and landing on the ground. Finally, please study the effects of diesel particulates on everyone, animals and people alike. New research says that soot polution is a contributing factor with autism, COPD, and much more. How will the rail polution effect people and animals?
    Bellingham, Washington
  1417. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19455Nancy Orlowski
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. For example... What is the impact of small but persistent daily contamination of the waters at the terminal site? What would be the impact of a minor spill of coal into the marine environment at the terminal site? What would be the impact of a major spill of coal into the marine environment? How would a spill be cleaned up? What is the long-term effect of coal in the marine environment?
    Bellingham, Washington
  1418. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19454Sherwood Hake
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general.” The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Pendleton, Oregon
  1419. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19453Buffy Hake
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general.” The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Pendleton, Oregon
  1420. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19452Mariann Carrasco
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Acme, Washington
  1421. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19451Cat Zavis
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general.” Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal, these include the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. Thank you. Sincerely ~ cat j. zavis
    Bellingham, Washington
  1422. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19450Debbie Milburn
    The EIS for the Tongue River Railroad in SE Montana should consider the following issues: - Evoking eminent domain by claiming that the railroad is for “public convenience and necessity” - Arch Coal is a private company and is the only entity that will profit. They intend to ship the coal that they mine to Asian countries. - Invasive, noxious weeds - railroad beds are a fertile site for noxious, invasive weeds and trains are a constant vector for spreading those seeds. Adjacent property owners face a continuing battle to contain this unwanted, destructive vegetation. Spraying toxic chemicals may slow the process, but those efforts never completely address the problem. - Property values - There would be significant impacts on property values all along the route. - Environmental concerns - Consider impacts to wildlife, Miles City flooding, as well as increases in noise and pollution to traditional ranch and farm lands. - Infrastructure – increased rail activity through towns will be major challenges to communities along the route. Delays, traffic disruption and new infrastructures will become new local burdens. - Jobs - the number of jobs attributed to coal development can just as easily be shifted to the development of cleaner sources of energy. - Coal is a very dirty source of energy - The hidden costs of burning coal need to be taken into account when making decisions about coal production, transportation and use. Use of coal contributes to much of the exorbitant health care costs in the US. Coal causes the acceleration of climate change. To ignore global warming is to do so at our own peril in the near future. While the US is still dependent on some coal, current and future efforts and monetary resources need to be directed toward cleaner sources of energy. New technology needs to be developed to further the shift to solar, geothermal and wind power, as well as better recovery techniques for natural gas that have less impact to the environment than dirty coal. Coal needs to be phased out. Coal mining companies should be encouraged to focus their attention and resources on producing cleaner energy. - Shipping coal to China - Chinese plants have less environmental safeguards and will affect more than just the health of that country’s population. Atmospheric currents will carry the pollution right back to the US. To argue that the US might as well be the country to satisfy Asia’s demand for coal is bogus. The US should be setting a better example for the world. The US should be demonstrating leadership in the development of cleaner sources of energy and promoting more conservation here and abroad. The bottom line of any company should not be the only or most important consideration for continuing the mining and use of coal. The use of coal is NOT strictly a local concern. There is much more at stake for the economy as a whole, when the many hidden costs are taken into account.
    Helena, Montana
  1423. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19449Gordon Hait
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett Why we would enable China and other Asian countries to kill the planet we all depend on is inexcusable. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Olympia, Washington
  1424. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19448Saralee Kane
    The Tongue river Railroad project is not for public convenience and necessity, which is the basic requirement for emminent domain. It's only purpose is to benefit a private coal company. We are concerned about the impact on property values, wildlife, water quality, infrastructure and traffic.
    Mercer Island, Washington
  1425. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19447Charles Brod
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers.
    Tualatin, Oregon
  1426. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19446Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community
    Leonard E. Wabasha
  1427. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19445Mike Mccallum
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Mercury is a naturally occurring element (Hg on the periodic table) that is found in air, water and soil. It exists in several forms: elemental or metallic mercury, inorganic mercury compounds, and organic mercury compounds. Elemental or metallic mercury is a shiny, silver-white metal and is liquid at room temperature. If heated, it is a colorless, odorless gas. Exposures to mercury can affect the human nervous system and harm the brain, heart, kidneys, lungs, and immune system. Learn more about the health effects of mercury. The most common way we are exposed to mercury is by eating fish or shellfish that are contaminated with mercury. Learn more about mercury in fish and shellfish and about other ways you can be exposed to mercury. Forms of mercury. Mercury is a naturally occurring element that is found in air, water and soil. It exists in several forms: elemental or metallic mercury, inorganic mercury compounds, and organic mercury compounds. More information Sources of mercury. Mercury is an element in the earth's crust. Humans cannot create or destroy mercury. Pure mercury is a liquid metal, sometimes referred to as quicksilver that volatizes readily. It has traditionally been used to make products like thermometers, switches, and some light bulbs. Mercury is found in many rocks including coal. When coal is burned, mercury is released into the environment. Coal-burning power plants are the largest human-caused source of mercury emissions to the air in the United States, accounting for over 50 percent of all domestic human-caused mercury emissions (Source: 2005 National Emissions Inventory). EPA has estimated that about one quarter of U.S. emissions from coal-burning power plants are deposited within the contiguous U.S. and the remainder enters the global cycle. Burning hazardous wastes, producing chlorine, breaking mercury products, and spilling mercury, as well as the improper treatment and disposal of products or wastes containing mercury, can also release it into the environment. Current estimates are that less than half of all mercury deposition within the U.S. comes from U.S. sources. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Eugene, Oregon
  1428. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19444Nicholas Jones
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1429. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19443Jane Civiletti
    Regarding above mentioned docket#; I am very concerned about the impact of long coal trains traveling to the coast with the sole purpose of providing one company, Arch Coal, with a means of selling it's toxic product to China. Properties all along this line will be devalued due to the filth spewed by long, noisy trains which will stall regular and emergency vehicles for long periods. The noise of the greatly increased number of trains per day will disrupt every aspect of life along the railroad. The increased potential for flooding along the new easements is of great concern. Coal needs to stay IN THE GROUND if we are to survive as a species. Granting permits to companies to dig us deeper into the hole in which we are standing is insanity.
    Oak Grove, Oregon
  1430. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19442Paige Garberding
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Shoreline, Washington
  1431. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19441Mary Masters
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett I am a resident of San Juan County and work as a marine naturalist on a whale watch boat there. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Thank you for your attention to these concerns.
    Orcas, Washington
  1432. (printed as 1/7/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19440Jeff Jackson
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Roseburg, Oregon
  1433. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19439Carolyn Rasch
    Reputable scientists agree that the threat of global warming is not only real but the potential disatrous impacts are increasing at an expoential rate. To foster an increase in the very fuel that contributes to the advance of severe global impacts by permitting transport across Washington strikes me as incredibly short sighted and fiscally unsound. I grant you that there will be much needed jobs lost, but in the end, it would be by far more cost effective for deal with that short term economic loss in order to avoid a vastly increased liability in the future. We need to take a stand against fossil fuels and begin to figure out ways to build a successful economy without. To wait is essentialy penny wise and pound foolish. The transition will be difficult, but there is no doubt that both the world environment, our own beautiful Washington State enviroment and the health of not only our citizens but those in the countries that will receive the exported coal will improve over time. The time is now to stop the proposed railroad and coal transport over existing rails. Thank you for your attention to an issue that is so critical to the health of our environment and to all Washington State citizens.
    Seattle, Washington
  1434. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19438Mark Lucianna
    Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that sh
    Stanwood, Washington
  1435. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19437Sherry Bupp
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Redmond, Washington
  1436. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19436Josiah M. Erickson Jr
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1437. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19435Feryll Blanc
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Mt. Vernon, Washington
  1438. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19434Karen Bray
    As a native Montanan and now a resident of Washington, I am familiar with all the negative aspects of shipping millions of tons of coal to Asia. The Tongue River rail line will only benefit Arch Coal Co. I ask your consideration for the many folks impacted by noise, traffic disruption, diminished air quality and the greater impact to Climate Change. Thank you, Karen Bray
    Olympia, Washington
  1439. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19433Lynne Oulman
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal my concerns are as follows: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. My name is Lynne Oulman and I live in Bellingham Washington. Though a NW resident most of my life, I moved to Bellingham several years ago because of its clean air, beautiful Salish Sea, peaceful surroundings and its commitment to sustainable, respectful living. I am writing to ask you to study the impact of both coal dust and diesel particulate from not only trains and terminal sites, but from ships, locomotives and any other service vehicles needed to operate a coal terminal. Simply, these residues, diesel particulate and coal dust, will determine whether or not I can remain in my retirement home as I have compromised lungs. It is already known from studies of the Spokane rail yard that cancer rates increase in the proximity of diesel particulate. This has been proven the case in other similar studies. We also know that coal dust causes black lung and other respiratory disorders. We know that increases of both coal dust and diesel particulate will increase the rates of asthma in children and will adversely impact the elderly, such as myself. I want you to carefully study the situation here in Bellingham. On “South Hill” not only does the excruciating train noise float uphill, but so does the dust and diesel particulate. I already see some of these residues on my sills inside my house! In addition, I ask that you study these residues in all seasons and in various weather conditions, during the day and at night. We, the residents and taxpayers, already know there is fluctuation, but we need honest research to tell us the actual impact. We need to know if daily walks will be unhealthy (long term impact), will I experience more illness (cumulative over time); will our wildlife suffer from the pollution (canary in the cage!)? This cannot be a band-aid job like filter cigarettes were for tobacco. We need you to be scrupulously careful because people’s lives depend on your integrity. While I need to find out about these particular impacts in order to make personal life choices, I must add that similar impacts will be experienced by all living near the rail road from Powder River to Cherry Point. This dust and particulate must not be swept under the “proverbial rug,” because its consequences are deadly. I must trust you to study coal dust and diesel particulate air pollution with exacting science, remembering that your diligence will impact the health of our community – human and otherwise - as well as all the communities along the tracks, and around the 80 acre pile. Thank you for your attention. Most Sincerely, Lynne Oulman
    Bellingham, Washington
  1440. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19432Lynne Oulman
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal my concerns are as follows: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. After spending many years in the classroom, around machinery, problem solving, I have learned the necessity and importance of being able to control one’s sound environment. It has an enormous, important relationship with mental health and overall well-being for all living creatures. (There is research on the effect of noise on milk production in cows.) It seems too that there is a special relationship with getting older and the stress of noise. I personally suffer a great deal from blowing whistles and screeching brakes and wheels. I ask that you measure and quantify the noise increase that will certainly happen if you add 18 trains a day through our neighborhoods and towns. Train noise is a foreseeable, adverse, and significant impact facing everybody along the entire train route. As things stand now, in summer you have to accept wrenching noise in trade off for fresh air. The train runs through our bedroom every night, and the noise is guaranteed. It interrupts sleep, causing chronic sleep deficit. Train whistles blow inconsistently but regularly with each train that passes. If GPT gets permitted, my family shall probably leave because South Hill will continuously reverberate with screeching brakes and tooting horns. After awhile you cannot think, or enjoy a normal conversation, and you find the outdoor existence you so much treasured will no longer be pleasant or restoring. Noise is a killer and it will affect many in the community. Research torture methods, and constant noise will be found in the list. Screeching brakes are a very special kind of torture. They hit randomly. At times the unexpected screech pitch is piercing. I know from my husband that he has several days of tinnitus after an unexpected encounter with train screech. He carries earplugs with him, but usually the noise hits before he can make successful use of earplugs. With repeated occurrences, one’s hearing is decimated, one screech at a time. You know why many train engineers have suffered hearing impairment… not hard to figure out. Now imagine one train an hour going through your neighborhood, town, farm, and community. Many of us will leave. Who wants to live like this? Many who cannot leave will suffer disorders from sleep problems and constant interruption. You must measure noise, and quantify the costs: mental disorder, impaired hearing, people moving out, overall damage caused by noise. Add to these will be the doctor visits and general stress. Businesses will fail, and some companies will move away. (Visit the Lighthouse Mission area in downtown Bellingham and experience the noise up close.) Please – research the impact of train noise all along the proposed train route. Thank you.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1441. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19431Lynne Oulman
    I am deeply concerned about the potential impact on public health and the environment from the various proposals to transport coal from Montana and Wyoming to terminals on the Pacific Coast for export to Asia. The proposal to build a coal-hauling railroad line through the Tongue River Valley seems especially misguided for two main reasons: 1) it would have negative impacts on the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Tongue River Valley; and 2) it would contribute to similar negative impacts for the residents, the quality of life, and the environment in the Pacific Northwest in general. Regarding the Tongue River Valley rail proposal my concerns are as follows: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Because it is part of a larger project to export coal from the US to Asia through ports on the Pacific coast, the proposed Tongue River Valley railroad would have much more extensive impacts. I believe that a responsible EIS will take these impacts into account. I am very concerned about the effluent run-off from coal train cars and from the very coal pile itself. You spray water on the terminal pile to keep the dust down, but the water eventually joins the life-giving water of the Salish Sea. What heavy metals will flood into those waters, routinely, and constantly….. mercury, lead, cadmium, selenium, arsenic, just to name a few!? Then there is the run off from the coal train cars themselves. Yesterday we had a deluge and I thought about the amount of water cascading through the coal cars traversing my city and neighborhood. GPT has talked about using surfactants to mitigate the dust. Although surfactant does not truly do the job against dust, just what is this surfactant, and do we want it added to the coal car run-off along the tracks and from the terminal pile? I suggest the chemical stew added to our ground water and pouring into the Puget Sound will be harmful to all animals (humans included as well as all aquatic life). I ask that you study all the chemicals found in coal and determine just what exactly these substances will do to our water (therefore our health and health of all living organisms)? What will they do to our ground water, our drinking water, and ultimately, the Puget Sound? People used to say that cigarettes did no harm. Then the fraud, and corporate manipulation of the public came to forefront. We are smarter now, and can hope not to be deceived. The science is out there and most of the nasty chemicals found in coal are “old hat.” What we need is honest evaluation, with no bias given to money and power. We, the public look to you to safeguard our health and well-being and the well-being of our environment. Thank you for studying this foreseeable, significant, adverse Impact.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1442. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19430Robin Rowedder
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. To the contrary, it impairs public convenience by interrupting the normal flow of traffic, including emeergency vehicles (see below.) •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: I have personally experienced extensive delays due to at-grade crossings in Seattle, WA cutting off our waterfront from the city center. Already delays that might prevent an ambulance from saving a life are not uncommon; I can only imagine the delays from mile-long laden coal trains. Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. To: Mr. Ken Blodgett Surface Transportation Board 395 E Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20423-0001 Note environmental filing: Docket No. FD 30186
    Seatte, Washington
  1443. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19429Skagit Audubon Society
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Timothy Manns · Mount Vernon, Washington
  1444. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19428E. Patricia Carp
    No coal export from Washington or Oregon ports to China
    Anacortes, Washington
  1445. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19427Mary Rausch
    Please do NOT allow coal trains in our state.
    Lynnwood, Washington
  1446. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19426Marilyn Hill
    I am writing in opposition to the proposed permit for the Tongue River railroad. As a Montanan, I feel that it is unfair to other Montanans, especially the ranchers and farmers whose property this proposal will impact. Hopefully the environmental impact statement will demonstrate the various harms that will likely affect people living or owning property along the railroad, such as: increased taxes, loud noise, flooding, devaluation of property, traffic delays, diesel fumes, degradation of wildlife habitat, fires, shifting of liability to landowners, and infringement on property rights, to name a few. Montanans as well as other United States citizens who are sportsmen use the resources of this area, and the industrialization of this area with a strip mine and a railroad to carry dirty coal will undoubtedly be of negative effect to the area and to the wildlife therin. I understand that the power of eminent domain will have to be used in order to condemn the land necessary for this railroad to be built to begin the long shipment of this dirty coal to China. My hope is that when the environmental impact statement addresses this and brings forth the requirement of public convenience and necessity" in order to condemn, the Surface Transportation Board will realize that this is an unfair and bad deal for Montana and in fact would be un-American to permit this for one coal company when it is hardly a necessity and certainly not a convenience to the public! Please act responsibly and fairly in your decision-making, and take into strong consideration the best interests of Montana and our country, rather than the interests of one coal company and those of China. Thank you."
  1447. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19425Carolyn E Koehnline
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1448. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19424Michael Gary
    The proposed Tongue River Railroad project is a bad idea on many levels. Why are government agencies selling out to corporations which will leave a legacy of pollution for future generations? This is wrong.
    Woodland, Washington
  1449. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19423Karen Alexander-Brown
    Pursuing expansion of distribution of the most egregious contributor to global warming, degradation of air, earth and water quality is not in the interest of Oregonians or anyone on this planet.
    Hillsboro, Oregon
  1450. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19422David Nelson
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Brightwood, Oregon
  1451. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19421Arvia Morris
    I believe the Environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue river railroad needs to evaluate the public need for the rail road. The main driver to build the rail road is to ship coal from Western states to Asia. This enterprise will benefit coal companies at great cost to the public. First and for most the rail line will create multiple global and local hazards not general public benefits. Locally ranch lands will be divided and ranching will be much more difficult to operate. Air and water pollution from coal dust and accidents are a major concern. Noise pollution and interference with wildlife is a concern that needs to be investigated in the environmental impact statement. Globally, climate change and the use of fossil fuels is causing disruption to the atmosphere and disrupting food supplies globally and ranching in particular with increased drought, warmer winters etc. All these impacts need to be evaluated. I can not think of one public benefit that would justify construction of this rail line. Please include all these aspects in the environmental impact statement. People who want to have the rail line build say that if we don't build it here it will be built in Canada and no matter what Asia will one way or anther burn all the coal. This is not a done deal. Solar and wind energy are becoming increasingly competitive commercially and if we invest in these forms of electricity generation we will have no driver to build rail lines for coal transport. Thus to capture the economic benefit of selling energy to Asia and create public benefit we need to invest government and private resources into solar and wind power.
    Seattle, Washington
  1452. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19420Rick Barrett
    No comments were attached.
    Seattle, Washington
  1453. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19419Unknown
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. As carbon emissions from coal contribute heavily to the earth's greatest environmental threat, global warming, the U.S. should in no way encourage the further development and use of coal in this or any other country. Thank you for this opportunity to comment.
    Kirkland, Washington
  1454. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19418James Paine
    Please consider the following reasons why is it important not to allow shipment of U.S. coal to Asia (where they won't suffer the consequences of it): •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. •Jobs: More jobs will be destroyed for several generations from the shipping and use of coal than the jobs that are proposed to be made from the shipping of it. Thank you for your time and effort on this important issue.
    Everett, Washington
  1455. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19417Doug Balcom
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers.
    Seattle, Washington
  1456. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19416Russell Alexander
    Comments attached Docket No. FD 30186 The Docket # does not fit in form above.
    Ashland, Montana
  1457. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19415Antonia E. Bailey
    Any progress of Arch Coal will be detrimental to our world. We cannot allow this to happen.
    Friday Harbor, Washington
  1458. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19414Mary Grace Brogdon
    Please do not allow this rail line to go through. It does not serve anyone but Arch Coal and their cronies. Moving dirty coal across 3 states and an ocean so it can be burned in Asia and waft pollution back across the Pacific makes no sense at all from an energy stand point and even less from an ecological perspective. Please keep that coal off the rails and don't try sending it through my state. Sincerely, Mary Grace Brogdon
    Springfield, Oregon
  1459. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19413Elizabeth Sloss
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1460. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19412Climate Solutions
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Alexandra Loeb
    Alexandra Loeb · Seattle, Washington
  1461. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19411Sarah Lannelli
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Spokane, Washington
  1462. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19410James C Roberts
    We MUST move away from coal burning immediately for the sake of our children and future generations. Because of its widespread use, it is the worst of the worst in terms of global warming. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Thank you.
    Palouse, Washington
  1463. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19409Penny Russell
    I am seeing so many decisions made that are detrimental to the environment and our way of life. As far as I can tell, the root of these decisions usually amounts to greed. When will we learn?
    Lynnwood, Washington
  1464. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19408Sustainable West Seattle
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: 1) Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. 2)Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. 3) Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. 4) Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. 5) Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. 6)Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Denis Martynowych · Seattle, Washington
  1465. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19407Yoko Silk
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1466. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19406Kayla Weiner
    The idea of shipping coal 1/2 way around the world boggles my mind. The level of destruction to so much of the environment is un conscionable. I am writing as a former Montanan who wants to protect that state and as a Seattle-ite who fears for the dust I will be forced to breathe and the interference to transportation in my city. The only one who benefits is the coal industry. The rest are hurt.
    Seattle, Washington
  1467. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19405Loren Willson
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. One burned in China, the coal particulates will blow back across the Pacific, deposit on North American snowfields, accelerate their melting speed, and further contribute to water shortages in the central Rockies and southwest. At the same time, mercury contamination from burned coal will enter the marine food chain rendering toxic may fish species that humans rely on for food. Coal is a fuel we can no longer afford to use--the environmental and human health costs of facilitating its use by approving the Tongue River Railroad are prohibitive. Please take the long view and reject projects the promote coal extraction, transportation, and combustion. Thank you.
    Puyallup, Washington
  1468. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19404Kay Fields
    Mr. Ken Blodgett Surface Transportation Board 395 E Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20423-0001 Note environmental filing: Docket No. FD 30186 This project would contribute substantially to the use of coal from the US by foreign countries, most prominently China, and thus contribute to the rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide. It is the informed opinion of the climate research community, not including those sponsored by the energy and mining interests, that continuing or enabling the use of coal anywhere in the world will severely impact portions of the United States as well as all the other countries and regions threatened by global warming. It is in the interests of the United States to oppose this rail project. I base this on my scientific background (chemistry and biology), my current reading in this field, and the opinions and warnings of the legitimate scientific community You, too, should pay attention, for your role in public policy and science-based governmental decisions. Sincerely, Kay Fields PhD kfields123@gmail.com. I agree with the following statement: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Bethesda, Maryland
  1469. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19403Maureen Bo
    I urge you do to everything in your power to stop the creation of the new coal line for Arch Coal. The destruction of farmland, property values, and increase in serious safety problems in Montana is just the beginning of the disaster this action would create. It also adds to the dangers of global warming and destruction which will cause horrendous destruction for human beings now and in the future. The impact is far beyond Montana. Some people actually love their children and grandchildren who will be left with the mess we are creating now. Please act to stop the Tongue River Railroad expansion. Maureeen Bo
    Seattle, Washington
  1470. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19402Ahwren Ayers
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants
    Ferndale, Washington
  1471. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19401Diane Dulken
    The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Thank you. Diane
    Portland, Oregon
  1472. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19400Mike Vandeman, Ph.D.
    It's time to stop throwing good money after bad, and stop supporting more fossil fuel development and use. Not one more dime for coal or oil!
    San Ramon, California
  1473. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19399Mark Hennon
    Don't wreck Montana to power up China Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Thanking you for your time and cooperation in this matter, I am, Very truly yours, --Mark Hennon
    Seattle, Washington
  1474. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19398Carol Gerl
    Is the U.S. going to lower its carbon output and actualize policies and behaviors to the decrease of carbon outputs globally or not? The single greatest threat to humanity is global warming. The Public has no interest in increasing global warming. The use of coal for energy must cease. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Lincoln City, Oregon
  1475. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19397Power Past Coal
    Ilive near rr tracks where 6 coal trains a day are currently passing and sittig at a siding below my house and near the propsed gteway terminal. the disruption caused by the trains is terribe already and this could add to our misery. A new rail line thru pristn ranch and wildlfe habitat will cause huge misery and disruption. please study the effect n property values along the rail route. please study the disruption of ranching activities in the area. please study now wildlife areas will be degraded and loss of revenue as hunters and tourists flee the area. please study the cost of this to taxpayers so arch coal can get rich. please study what rail lines thse trains will end up on as ours are already overloaded as is spokane and other cities.
    Jan Gordon · Bow, Washington
  1476. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19396Joni Zimmerman
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Newberg, Oregon
  1477. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19395Michael Jessen
    We must move toward a zero carbon society. Coal exports will not help. We have a moral obligation to future generations to lower greenhouse gas emissions. Coal exports will not help. We must preserve the environmental integrity of special places. A railroad exclusively for coal exports through the Tongue River Valley destroys property and wildlife values. Please do not approve this proposed railline.
    Nelson, British Columbia
  1478. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19394Diane E George
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Hobart, Washington
  1479. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19393Mary Belshaw
    The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Everett, Washington
  1480. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19392Jeanne Clausen
    I think it is a disastrous idea to even consider transporting coal along the rivers or railways of Portland Oregon. This idea needs to be abolished, for the sake of the health of human beings living in this environment.
    Portland, Oregon
  1481. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19391Gary S Pettis
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Marysville, Washington
  1482. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19390Martha Koester
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries As a Seattle, WA resident, I am concerned about the impact these trains will have when they get to Seattle. http://www.seattle.gov/mayor/press/newsdetail.asp?ID=13226 A proposed coal export terminal at Cherry Point in Whatcom County could lead to as many as 18 coal trains per day traveling through Seattle, bringing coal mined in Wyoming to the terminal for export to markets in Asia. The Seattle Department of Transportation commissioned Parametrix to study the impact of these trains on traffic and public safety in Seattle. The study found that daily gate down times at railroad crossing would increase with coal train operations. The increase is dependent on the length of train, how fast it is travelling, and how many daily trains are scheduled. In 2015, the estimated additional daily gate down time for coal trains could be 31 to 83 minutes. This could represent an increase in daily gate down time of approximately 18% to 49% at Broad Street and 15% to 39% at both Holgate and Lander Street. In 2026, the estimated additional daily gate down time for coal trains could be approximately 67 to 183 minutes. This could represent an increase in daily gate down of approximately 39% to 108% at Broad Street and 31% to 86% at Holgate and Lander Streets. In turn, vehicles could be lined up for a longer period of time at railroad crossings. Depending on the time between gate closures, vehicle queues may not fully dissipate before the next gate closing, meaning some drivers would have to wait for multiple trains to pass before being able to cross to the other side of the tracks. The study also examined impacts to public safety, finding that blockage from the proposed coal trains would impact emergency vehicle trips to and from the waterfront. Blocked train crossings affect response time for fire responses, technical rescue groups, hazardous materials responses, and emergency medical responses where rapid response times are especially important. Delays would not only affect local area responses, but could also affect the ability to send more safety resources from one area of the city to another as needed. Another finding of the study was that in the past 10 years, trains of all kinds were directly involved in a total of four collisions at Broad Street, Wall Street, and Holgate Street. A total of 127 improper crossings were recorded within a 24-hour period at the Broad Street, South Holgate Street, and South Lander Street crossings alone involving vehicles, bicycles and/or pedestrians. Improper crossings occur when vehicles, bicycles and pedestrians cross the tracks when the red lights start to flash or the railroad gates were down. This type of behavior could increase with more delays and could increase the potential for train collisions with vehicles, pedestrians, or bicyclists, and blocking incidents. These issues come up everywhere these trains will go.
    Seattle, Washington
  1483. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19389Krystal Weilage
    This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Furthermore,this project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. The railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. In addition, the Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource.
    Butte, Montana
  1484. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19388Vincent Alvarez
    Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries.
    Milwaukie, Oregon
  1485. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19387Gary
    Mr. Blogett, It is almost shocking that this project would even be considered. The ultimate contribution to global climate change from the results of this project is just unconscionable. Here are some salient points that the EIS should consider. Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. The economic outfall, includes the scenario that enables Chinese companies to sell goods and materials in the US market at cheap prices, undercutting other American businesses. This is to the benefit of one company, Arch Coal. Arch Enemy Coal, I say! This is a watershed moment in human history - and the environmental impact statement must reflect this reality. Regards.
    Seattle, Washington
  1486. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19386Charlie Weiss
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is required for eminent domain and condemnation authority. It is in fact a public inconvenience, and benefits not the public for the long term, but only one entity for the short term, Arch Coal. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad would spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property) by making ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, dividing ranch lands, separating fields from the river and would leave train-crossing liability to landowners. It would destroy the peace and tranquility of every property it passes through. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves would degrade this valuable resource. Flooding: The railroad bed would dam natural drainages and worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: Trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of all residents and wildlife, as well as nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes would go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad would increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. Accommodating this traffic will require expensive traffic and safety infrastructure paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad would allow US coal to be burned in Asia, where the benefits will accrue, but we will all bear the costs of its global environmental footprint.
    Portland, Oregon
  1487. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19385Joel Vancil
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1488. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19384Gerry Milliken
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Spokane, Washington
  1489. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19383Mildred Estrin
    Coal trains are a really bad idea. They impact the folks living along the routes, pollute the air, cause disease, disturb wildlife, dirty waterways and only bring profit to coal companies. When you consider the care" that big OIL has for the environment, you can visualize what big Coal will mean to environments that it degrades. Please say "NO" to coal trains! Sincerely, Mildred Estrin"
  1490. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19382Cheri Carlson
    Why are we still considering COAL???? Have we not heard about global warming??? Or superstorm Sandy? Have you read about the melting of the polar ice cap? nice to have a northern passage I suppose, but no need to accelerate it, right??
    Arlington, Washington
  1491. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19381Mike
    We are like tenant farmers chopping down the fence around our house for fuel when we should be using Nature's inexhaustible sources of energy — sun, wind and tide. ... I'd put my money on the sun and solar energy. What a source of power! I hope we don't have to wait until oil and coal run out before we tackle that." Thomas Edison In conversation with Henry Ford and Harvey Firestone (1931); as quoted in Uncommon Friends : Life with Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, Harvey Firestone, Alexis Carrel & Charles Lindbergh (1987) by James Newton, p. 31"
  1492. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19380John Bosche
    The noise study associated with this EIS should consider the effects of infrasound, that is sound with frequency content below 20 Hz.
    Everson, Washington
  1493. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19379John Bosche
    This proposed rail line should be treated as a connected action with the mining, shipping, and burning of coal. The coal would not be mined, shipped, or burned but for" this rail line. Therefore, the EIS should also consider the environmental impact of coal mining, effects of shipping the coal (including effects on marine flora and fauna, and the potential impacts of a shipping accident or spill), and the impact of burning the coal. The examination of the burning of the coal should consider wind currents that could potentially carry particulates from Asia back to the Northwestern United States. It should also include the impacts of burning this coal on global warming and any endangered species whose habitat is affected by global warming."
  1494. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19378John Bosche
    The EIS should study the effect of this proposed rail line on sage grouse. The impact criteria used should be consistent with federal rules regarding wind turbines and sage grouse leks. Federal rules promulgated by Fish & Wildlife do not allow wind turbines to be sited within 1 mile of a sage grouse lek. A similar rule should be applied to this rail line.
    Everson, Washington
  1495. (printed as 1/6/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19377Stephen Curry
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Olympia, Washington
  1496. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-21228Robert M. Johnston
  1497. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19376Ron & Marci Moore
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Longview, Washington
  1498. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19375Clayton Jones
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Clayton Jones
    Seattle, Washington
  1499. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19374Joann Edmonds-Rodgers
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: -Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. -Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. -Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. -Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. -Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. I personally do not think this railroad stands the test of being environmentally sound. Please use all due diligence in conducting the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad and take the serious environmental concerns of citizens whom this railroad will gravely affect into account. Thank you.
    Seattle, Washington
  1500. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19373Meryle A. Korn
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The jet stream will carry much of the pollution eastward to poison the Pacific Ocean and soil the air quality of Oregon, Washington, British Columbia and further. This in turn will raise the already high incidence of asthma among children, adults and elders living on the North American continent. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1501. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19372C. Hannah
    NO COAL EXPORT!!!
    Springfield, Oregon
  1502. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19371Lydia Garvey
    NIX Tongue River Railrd. Co. permit (destroy quiet pristine Tongue River Valley) for new line, for Arch Coal for China!!! This is clearly Not for 'Public convenience/ necessity' or good!- Serves Arch Coal Only! Also would devalue property, nixes property rights, ^ fires/weeds, degrade wildlife habitat/livelihoods, ^ flooding/noise/pollution/climate change. Do your job- Protect Our Public lands, waters, wildlife, Rights & health! You work for citizens, Not industry, Not China! Disgusted! Tongue River Valley is a unique, spectacular, World Heritage Wilderness Area- Keep it that way! Your attention to this most urgent matter would be much appreciated by all present & future generations of all species. Thank you Lydia Garvey Public Health Nurse
    Clinton, Oklahoma
  1503. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19370No Coal Export
    As you are aware, the shipment of coal in open train cars, leaves a trail of environmental toxins. There is little purpose to build a new train line for this explicit purpose. Protecting our local and global environmental health is of utmost concern.
    Gary T. Pederson · Salem, Oregon
  1504. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19369Patricia Young
    Please do NOT permit Tongue River Railroad Company access to building a coal-hauling line through the Tongue River Valley. This long-proposed project renews its attempt to cut the valley in half, abusing the power of eminent domain to destroy good Montana ranchland in order to ship Montana coal to China. This proposal would impact property values, disrupt wildlife, cause flooding, and create noise that will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Salem, Oregon
  1505. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19368Jane H Beattie
    The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Ketchum, Idaho
  1506. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19367Nancy Eichner
    I am AGAINST shipping coal through the West and on to Asia. As a matter of fact, I am AGAINST the continued use of coal at all. Accelerating destruction of the environment because of the continued use of fossil fuels is insane self-destruction. Let us stop participating in our suicide. But I must assume you've read the science and know this! Use that knowledge to help save us all. Thank you.
    Seattle, Washington
  1507. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19366Joseph M.Dunford
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1508. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19365Robert Kenny and Julia Glover
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Clinton, Washington
  1509. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19364M. Chessin
    I am opposed to the plan to build a railroad line for the purpose of stripping Montana coal, damaging the range and ranchlands, disturbing the environment and ecosystem of the plains, wasting tremendous resources to ship coal 1/2 way across the world, and supporting dirty coal burning facilities.
    Seattle, Washington
  1510. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19363Lina Church
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1511. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19362Arnold Jolles
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1512. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19361JoAnn Keenan
    To those considering coal transport through Washington State: Please consider keeping Washington ports, air and water free of coal pollution. Having grown up in a coal port in NE Ohio, where filthy air and water, as well as lung disease, especially in the harbor area, seem rampant, a cleaner, safer environment was no small consideration when I relocated to Western Washington. Try a Google Earth search of Ashtabula, Ohio, and take a good look at color of the water along the shoreline. The windowsills in the harbor area are quickly covered with soot, even inside the homes. Many have breathing problems. In addition to obvious air/water/soil concerns, there is the huge issue of clogging already poor traffic patterns as long coal trains close RR intersections for inordinate lengths of time. We need to face the fact that fossil fuels are dirty, expensive, dangerous, and passe. We need not to be transporting this filthy substance to other countries. I'm speaking as an RN, a mother, an asthmatic, a citizen. Please keep coal trains out of Washington State. Thanks you for your consideration. JoAnn Keenan
    Seattle, Washington
  1513. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19360H.M. Sutton
    Profits from this scam will only enrich the coal industries who have proven themselves corrupt to the max--plus the stuff will pollute the environment in Washington in spite of what those industries claim (which we can NEVER trust to be true), and the fumes from burning it in both China and Russia are guaranteed to blow back here as per normal wind currents. So, just who will gain from this mess anyway??????
    Seattle, Washington
  1514. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19359TA Anderson
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers.
    Wilsonville, Oregon
  1515. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19358Jessie Tierney
    I am writing to request that you please include the following when addressing Air Quality and Human Health resulting from the shipment of coal: 1. Appropriately and accurately estimate air pollutant concentrations as a function of distance from railways. What are diesel emissions exposures based on close proximity and distant proximity to railways. 2. Estimate air pollutant concentrations under normal and poor air mixing conditions (such as temperature inversions). 3. Estimate health impacts for those most exposed and susceptible (for example, the elderly, children, people with suppressed immune systems, and pregnant women). Please also look at subclinical risks, (such as high blood pressure, enlarged left ventricular hypertrophy, diabetes): examine the extent to which these are exacerbated by chronic or acute exposure, and how does proximity to railways influence these risk factors? 4. Please take into account disparity in those who will be most affected (for example, those who work, live, and go to school closest to the railways). 5. Please investigate the chemicals, listed as nano particles," that are proposed to be sprayed on the coal to "mitigate" coal dust. What are these chemicals? What health impacts do they have? Do we want them in our ground water, our air? How effective are they at decreasing coal dust? 6. Please determine the impacts of the 48 million tons of coal being shipped to China and burned with limited or no pollution control devices. How much more mercury will end up in our shared oceans? How much will end up in the air that we breathe? How will this impact our warming planet? We cannot pretend that once this commodity product is shipped off our shores that it will no longer impact us. 7. Please consider a no-action alternative to this proposal. What kind of air quality and overall health would we enjoy if this route never exists? Could we instead work toward cleaner air, less emissions, more efficient energy, cleaner water, and improve health? These are things I currently work toward in my individual daily actions and choices. Air pollution has been improving across the US over the past 30 years. Would a no-action alternative keep us moving in that direction? I appreciate your time and consideration. I do not envy your work, but I implore you to please look into this issue as deeply and thoroughly as possible. My health, the health of my family, the health of my community, and the health of future generations depend on it. Thank you, Jessie"
  1516. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19357April Taylor
    Mr. Blodgett, The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Thank you, April Taylor
    Greenacres, Washington
  1517. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19356Jean Davis
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Hoquiam, Washington
  1518. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19355l. Sherwood
    Keep coal out of Bellingham. It doesn't belong here.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1519. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19354John Nettleton
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett To allow environmental degradation to further this project of shipping coal for overseas export, which project in itself poses serious threats to the overall global environment makes no sense unless one values the greed of those who will profit. Respectfully, John P. Nettleton Veteran, Parent, Concerned Citizen The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: * Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. * Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. * Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. * Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. * Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. * Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1520. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19353Janet Lind
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Tacoma, Washington
  1521. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19352Jennifer Nitz
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad must analyze: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required for power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property, make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and wildlife. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine will seriously degrade that habitat. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The trains will ruin the quiet nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Missoula, Montana
  1522. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19351Kevin Head
    I have many problems with this proposal. We as a country need to stop using coal and for sure not let China have more coal. China's polution currently is making sunsets in the west red. That is from polution of coal. Not good for our health. Secondly the coal dust from coal trains are uncontroalable. The company can not cover the trains and over 1000 pds of dust will cover the trains path from Montana to the west coast. This is not acceptable to our enviroment, or health and the possiblity of fire to communities along the track. I know the project will create jobs, but not sustainable jobs that in ten years we will be paying the consquences for our actions. Please Mr Blogett stop this project for your kids and mine.
    Olympia, Washington
  1523. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19350Lorraine D. Johnson
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1524. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19349Phillip Noe
    We (the informed) have been trying to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on a state and national level. Facilitating more and more burning of coal (the major contributor to global GHG pollution) shifts the pollution sources out-of-sight. This serves only to exacerbate the problem. Enough already! Don't do ANYTHING to encourage more pollution! We may escape the consequences of our inaction but our future generations won't. As it's been said, we should leave those that follow us a better world not one that our short-sighted interests have depleted.
    Albany, Oregon
  1525. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19348Kyler Meserve
    please don't sacrifice this beautiful ecosystem....
    Portland, Oregon
  1526. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19347Terry Wissler
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Thank you, Terry Wissler
    Bellingham, Washington
  1527. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19346Jere C. Rosemeyer
    The application by Arch Energy for eminent domain rights in its Tongue River Railroad proposal does not meet the public convenience and necessity requirement. It will only serve to accelerate global overheating which, of course, is extremely hazardous to the public. Here in Oregon it will result in sea level rise and dangerous decrease in the Cascade snow pack. Please deny the proposal.
    Eugene, Oregon
  1528. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19345Mary E. Bonnier
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Bainbridge Island, Washington
  1529. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19344Alice Shapiro
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” and therefore is not qualified to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will likely cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. Developing the infrastructure to try to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossings which would be financed primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1530. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19343Patricia Ann Scott
    I oppose building this coal-hauling line, based on several environmental threats it would cause. The coal dust from transport and diesel exhaust are pollution hazards for the earth and for the people and creatures who breathe along the line's path. Train noise and increased traffic inconveniences would also negatively impact quality of life. This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Please do not go forward with this project.
    Seattle, Washington
  1531. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19342Bob Scott
    Considering all that is known regarding greenhouse gas emissions to our atmosphere and the lethal effect they will have on our planet, it is outrageous that huge increases in coal export and burning are being proposed. I strongly oppose the the new coal port being planned for the Bellingham area. That the port itself would disturb a valuable and sensitive area is reason enough to abandon the project, but the environmental havoc of further reliance on coal when all human effort should be directed to alternative energy sources, makes the coal port unacceptable. Please DO NOT give any approval of any kind to the coal port project. Bob Scott
    Hamilton, Montana
  1532. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19341Barbara F. Ray
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Salem, Oregon
  1533. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19340Basey Klopp
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Mrs. Basey Klopp Bend, Oregon
    Bend, Oregon
  1534. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19339James Groat
    I am against mining and shipping coal. I am against buinding or using railroads or shipping terminals. Coal is very polluting and would cause sickness and environmental damage. •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Thank You, James Groat
    Portland, Oregon
  1535. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19338Rock Hoyer
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Lees Summit, Missouri
  1536. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19337Sharon Hunt
    It is unreasonable and inappropriate to ignore the very real risk to our health which would be caused by the transportation of coal through our area in order to achieve more greedy corporate profit. It is unacceptable !
    Aloha, Oregon
  1537. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19336Douglas Ogg
    The long-term environmental impact of this project is not worth the short-term financial gain of a small group of people. Please try to keep in mind the larger perspective when making decisions that affect communities, regions, nations, and the health of the planet.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1538. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19335Linda D. Smith
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Rogue River, Oregon
  1539. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19334Karin Granstrom
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Edmonds, Washington
  1540. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19333Kathleen Beavin
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Kathleen Beavin
    Bothell, Washington
  1541. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19332Laura M. Ohanian
    Please see attached letter. Thank you.
    Eugene, Oregon
  1542. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19331Aaron Blake
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Corbett, Oregon
  1543. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19330Tom Craighead
    The proposed Tongue River Railroad line comes too late in the evolution and development of this precious valley. Viable alternatives exist for the applicant to transport its product. Please don't permit more of their 19th century infrastructure for a need that will not exist in a few decades. Thank you.
    Vashon, Washington
  1544. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19329Unknown
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Olympia, Washington
  1545. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19328Zena Hartung
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY- The proposed railroad does not meet this standard IMPACTS ON PROPERTY VALUES- the proposed railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue especially waterfront property and will make ranching and farming more difficut and potentially harm the communities where the train passes WILDLIFE- The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. NOISE- Forget quiet enjoyment" with a constant trail of trains! INFRASTRUCTURE AND TRAFFIC: TAXES will rise on communities along the rail lines and traffic delays and pollution will abound The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants."
  1546. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19327Donna Leavitt
    In my town these trains would run between the waterfront where our senior center is located and town, where emergency services are located. A stalled train could cause someone their life! Also China has access to coal from Mongolia.... what will happen to the terminals when they stop wanting coal from the US?
    Edmonds, Washington
  1547. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19326Jenn Dean
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Carnation, Washington
  1548. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19325Karen Swoope
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad will need to address the elephant in the room, i.e. why American communities must suffer the degradation of our lands and economy for the benefit of China. This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Range fires and noxious weeds follow railroad lines; Montana is a prime suspect in the spread of spotted knapweed, we already ban hay exports from that state because of it. Every summer we have field and range fires started by trains. We don't need more so that China can get our coal. This railroad will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. As you may or may not know, many of these populations, especially birds, are in trouble due to habitat loss and degradation. The environmental impact statement should address the likely effects of pushing any species to the brink of endangered listing, which would further impact the local citizenry and economy. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade hunting and fishing, and associated economies of the region. In short, we in the West are getting more and more tired of the rape of the environment to line the pockets of industry. The planet is in trouble and coal is a big contributer. Let's not wreck more of the last best places to hasten its collapse. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. FEMA is already broke...the budetary implications of flooding needs to be added to the cost/benefit analysis of this proposal. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City, not to mention the residents and wildlife in the area. What will be the impact on the migration and breeding opportunities of the wildlife? Further, the deer and elk kill on ouir highways in winter is ghastly in Montana as they use them as routes easier to navigate than the deep snow. Will the same be true of the train tracks? High banks of snow trapping them on the tracks as it does on the highways in winter? Fish and game should participate in the analysis of the impact of this proposed railroad on the herds already impacted by habitat loss and wolf/grizzly predation. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The folks closer to the coastal ports are also screaming about the impact of increased rail traffic not only for coal but also for oil which is being transported more and more by train traffic. Are you all looking at the big picture of impacts, or just one project at a time? Last but not least, The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. We are rapidly approaching what may be a climatic tipping point. Coal should stay in the ground until we figure out a way go burn it without burning up the planet. What's the rush? China can and should get its act together without wrecking Montana, Idaho, Washington in the process. Hope you're really out there listening and thinking. Cheers! In short, we in the West are getting more and more tired of the rape of the environment to line the pockets of industry. The planet is in trouble and coal is a big contributer. Let's not wreck more of the last best places to hasten its collapse.
    Colfax, Washington
  1549. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19324Chris Bast
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1550. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19323Lyle Funderburk
    Deny the coal permit
    Portland, Oregon
  1551. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19322MaryAnn Seward
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Port Townsend, Washington
  1552. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19321Anne Greene
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, I am writing with grave concerns about the proposed Tongue River Railroad which will carry Montana coal to west coast ports for energy production in China. I have lived in Montana for over 20 years, and I have seen the consequences of resource extraction over the last hundred years or so. We have just completed the largest Superfund project in the country: removing huge amounts of sediment tainted with heavy metals from the Clark Fork River, the result of years of copper and gold mining upriver Now we are faced with a proposed coal mine in Otter Creek. It will destroy healthy sustainable ranch communities and the surrounding pristine environment (I have been there and it is a gorgeous area). The proposed Tongue River Railway will carry this coal to west coast ports and winds through a biologically rich area which is relatively undisturbed. This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal. The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, and will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive. It will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Taxes will go up for residents along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially in many parts of Montana causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. I am most concerned about the global impacts of mining coal and selling it to power plants in China. We all realize that global warming is threatening our societies worldwide. If you have children, surely you must understand the lunacy of adding more CO2 to the atmosphere when we know we have already gone beyond what many scientists feel is a tipping point (the inevitable 4 degree rise in average global temperatures). Longer fire seasons, less snow pack, and hotter drier summer weather are already being felt here in Montana and throughout the west. Please do the right thing for our collective future and deny the permit for the Tongue River Railroad. Sincerely, Anne Greene
    Missoula, Montana
  1553. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19320Miriam Duerr
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: - Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for an organization to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. - Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringe on property rights. This railroad will cause pollution (both air and soil from spills) and fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river, and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. - Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat, and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. - Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. - Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. - Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution in both air and soil from spills. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. - The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Tumwater, Washington
  1554. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19319Carol Bryan
    Developing new rail lines through the Tongue River Valley so more coal can be shipped to China is ridiculous. Someone must consider the environmental degradation that will occur in Montana, Washington, China. Next the pollutants blow back across the ocean to pollute the air in WA, Mt etc with lead and Mercury. Please vote for the survival of the planet. Individual decisions such as allowing a new rail line and shipping coal to China has a cumulative effect and our survival as a species is at stake.
    Spokane, Washington
  1555. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19318Lyle Anderson
    Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1556. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19317Power Past Coal
    Mr Ken Blodgett, Our interest is the interest of all the people who condemn this coal train idea. Even if there were no environmental risks or dangers, the carbon dioxide coming back on the jet stream as the coal is burned in China and other Asian countries would overwhelm the Pacific Ocean and kill off all the shore life here in the Northwest. Ocean acidification would take place at a much higher rate than is going on now, and the eel beds and herring beds would be inundated with coal soot from the burning, killing the smaller creatures that feed the bigger ones. And Dr Kappan, sharer of the Nobel Prize, states that by the time the coal terminals are up and running, the Chinese will be using solar and wind power and will no longer need our coal. WHere does that leave the terminals and railroad infrastructure? Let's follow that example. Invest in the future, not the past where in doing so we will all suffer from the blowback of these coal trains. Thank you. Bonnie and Doug Rohrer
    Bonnie and Doug Rohrer · Mount Vernon, Washington
  1557. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19316Robert Stang
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Astoria, Oregon
  1558. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19315Robert M. Johnston
    Comments attached
    Bellingham, Washington
  1559. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19314Lynda Cunningham
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Please stop the coal trains. Thank You. Lynda Cunningham
    Vancouver, Washington
  1560. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19313Nicole Weber
    Environment impact should be analyzed for Tongue River Railroad for: wildlife, noise, flooding and property values.
    Pasadena, Maryland
  1561. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19312Kit Robinson
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Woodinville, Washington
  1562. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19311Russ Berger
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Boise, Idaho
  1563. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19310Dian Berger
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Boise, Idaho
  1564. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19309Power Past Coal
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Mr. Ken Blodgett Surface Transportation Board 395 E Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20423-0001
    Doug Rohrer · Mount Vernon, Washington
  1565. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19308Grace Neff
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Albany, Oregon
  1566. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19307Power Past Coal
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Mr. Ken Blodgett Surface Transportation Board 395 E Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20423-0001
    Bonnie Rohrer · Mount Vernon, Washington
  1567. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19306J C Bettencourt
    I am opposed to the Arch Coal's project to use the Tongue River Railroad to transport coal across our beautiful northwest to be shipped to overseas buyers. I have many reasons: 1)This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. 2) • The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. 3) The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. 4) The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. 5) The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. 6) Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. I would urge you to carefully consider all of my concerns before approving this project, which is environmentally detrimental not only to the northwest but to the world at large. There are many citizens in Oregon and Washington states vehemently opposed to coal mining in general and specifically to the transport of coal across our state lands and shipments from our rivers to the sea. Thank you for your attention to my views.
    Salem, Oregon
  1568. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19305Sherry Meier
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Global warming: coal burning is one of the largest contributors to global warming, exponentially increasing mass glacial melting. Our planet is at a point where alternative green fuels must be promoted and used, not carbon producing fossil fuels. • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. As a resident of the Columbia river Gorge, I do not want my area utilized as a coal transport corridor for this dirty fuel. sherry meier
    Hood River, Oregon
  1569. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19304Michael McLaughlin
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett Thank you for the opportunity to comment: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Strong consideration of coalburning to global warming must be addressed before allowing any increase in coal mining or sale for export. Because the effects are worldwide - ocean acidification, greater incidence of severe weather events, highly probable drought and dessication in the Great Plains, ecosystem change too fast for a great many plant species to survive, and consequent problems for animal species indigenous to the Great Plains and Rocky Mountains, as well as other subsequent human environmental and economic impacts, this consideration must be addresses before granting any permit resulting in increased coal extraction and use. Severe pollutants such as methyl mercury and low intensity radionuclides are contained in this coal, and coal dust and other spread must be considered. ALL factors affecting human and ecosystem health due to direct polluting effects, and end-use atmospheric pollution must be weighed and have significant effect on permitting decisions. Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as diking, or levee. Such damming will narrow and speed water flow, very likely worsening the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive overpasses and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. The whole scheme is highly unfavorable economically to the entire area in both long- and short-term, and this consideration should require denial of permit to ravage the Tongue River Valley for single corporate profit. Please vote to deny permit with discriminiation - denying it forever. Thank you.
    Eureka, California
  1570. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19303Kay McPherson
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: 1. Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. 2. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. 3. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. 4. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. 5. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. 6. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Missoula, Montana
  1571. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19302Calvin C. Patterson
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers.
    Glacier, Washington
  1572. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19301Linda Frank
    Coal is dirty, and pollutes the air that trains transporting it travel through. I do not want MORE coal taken out of the ground. We need solar and wind and hydro power, NOT more fossil fuels. And how utterly wasteful not only to mine more coal, but to transport it to China, using petrol. Sustainability means meeting the needs of our generation WHILE SIMULTANEOUSLY enabling subsequent generations to meet their needs as well. At the rate we're going, we'll reach peak coal and peak oil and not leave anything for future generations. It is predominantly, however, for the air pollution (and water pollution) factor[s] that I ABSOLUTELY UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES want to see more coal trained through Washington State. Thank you in advance for caring about people and our precious environment.
    Tacoma, Washington
  1573. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19300Barbara Rosenkotter
    Docket No. FD 30186 The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent resource. •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. Requiring expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Deer Harbor, Washington
  1574. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19299Kathleen Lowney
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Even though the words come from a community organized group, I agree with the contents. Thank you for you time and attention.
    Issaquah, Washington
  1575. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19298Oliver Crew
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Sincerely, Oliver T. Crew
    Olympia, Washington
  1576. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19297Tina Blade
    As lifelong resident of the Pacific Northwest and one who is very concerned about protecting the environment and preventing practices that contribute to pollution, environmental degradation and global warming, I object strongly to the proposed coal rail line through Montana's Tongue River Valley. The project would cut the valley in half, abusing the power of eminent domain to destroy good Montana ranch land in order to ship Montana coal to China. I therefore request that the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad analyze the following: PUBLIC convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian markets. IMPACTS on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. IMPACTS ON WILDLIFE: The Tongue River Valley is a rich in wildlife habitat and home to significant elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. FLOODING: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. NOISE: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. INFRASTRUCTURE and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. GLOBAL WARMING: The Tongue River Railroad is one piece of a project that would allow the mining and transport of coal so it can then be burned in dirty Chinese plants. This will contribute to serious increases in carbon dioxide emissions. Clearly, the greenhouse gas costs of this project go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Kirkland, Washington
  1577. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19296Gayle Janzen
    I am concerned that this railroad will serve no other purpose than to make Arch Coal more money as it ships coal to China. There is absolutely no public convenience and necessity which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. How do you justify destroying the environment for the sole purpose of one company's profits?
    Seattle, Washington
  1578. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19295Larry Mahlis
    he environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1579. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19294Stan Woldtvedt
    The only thing going for coal was it's relatively inexpensive to market cost. The total cost of coal can no longer be ignored in every aspect of its use. The use of coal in any future energy plans is to say we would rather be wrong, than to take steps to mitigate our polluting the planet.
    Colville, Washington
  1580. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19293Mark Eikeland
    I am concerned about a new train line proposed through Tongue River Valley. Effects on wildlife in the area, the economy (both tourism and agriculture), traffic congestion, and the health of nearby residents should be addressed.
    Stanwood, Washington
  1581. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19292Rick Rosenberry
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1582. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19291Washington Environmental Council
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Jane Hadley · Seattle, Washington
  1583. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19290Lisa Read
    Please stop the transport of coal via the Tongue River Railroad. It will cause a lot of noise pollution at Miles City and hurt the habitat at Tongue River Valley and cause flooding. Also, the coal will get into the air and cause pollution that makes it hard for people to breathe.
    Seattle, Washington
  1584. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19288Stephen Eichelberger
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Tacoma, Washington
  1585. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19287Blue Skies Campaign
    I love about 100 yards from the tracks in Missoula. Already due to increased coal exports I am feeling impacts. The diesel pollution has got much worse. There are two fueling stations and a locomotive maintenance area right in front of my house. Permitting the TRR would only worsen diesel pollution in the Missoula valley and my neighborhood. Alon with the diesel pollution there is noise pollution and I'm not talking about the train horns. The empty coal trains on their way back to the PRB have to do their maintenance checks, which involves coupling and switching empty coal cars. Noise levels of up to 119 decibels come from the railyard during coal car maintenance. They bang together so loud it sounds like bombs going off. Prior to permitting this rail line these issues need to be considered and investigated. The rail line doesn't end at Miles City, so folks further down the line should have a chance to attend a scoping hearing. It'd be nice to have one out this way. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Lowell Chandler · Missoula, Montana
  1586. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19286Blue Skies Campaign
    I love about 100 yards from the tracks in Missoula. Already due to increased coal exports I am feeling impacts. The diesel pollution has got much worse. There are two fueling stations and a locomotive maintenance area right in front of my house. Permitting the TRR would only worsen diesel pollution in the Missoula valley and my neighborhood. Alon with the diesel pollution there is noise pollution and I'm not talking about the train horns. The empty coal trains on their way back to the PRB have to do their maintenance checks, which involves coupling and switching empty coal cars. Noise levels of up to 119 decibels come from the railyard during coal car maintenance. They bang together so loud it sounds like bombs going off. Prior to permitting this rail line these issues need to be considered and investigated. The rail line doesn't end at Miles City, so folks further down the line should have a chance to attend a scoping hearing. It'd be nice to have one out this way. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Lowell Chandler · Missoula, Montana
  1587. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19285Beedy Parker
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Camden, Maine
  1588. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19284Pam Engler
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Warm Regards, Pam Engler
    Seattle, Washington
  1589. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19283P. Jarvis
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett I am writing today with deep concerns for our future, my children's and grand-children's future and the future of my state's and neighboring state's wildlife, environment and farm land if this permit to build a coal-hauling line through the Tongue River Valley is granted. We cannot cut the valley in half, jeopardizing farm and ranch operations, disrupting wildlife movements, devaluing property, and increasing flooding potential. This proposal is dangerous and would destroy the environment irreparably just for profit from sales to China. Please consider the hearings held in four rural southeastern Montana communities, where hundreds of people turned out to oppose the railroad and all of us writing to you regarding this dirty deal. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Thank you for reading my comments and taking them into serious consideration that this dangerous permit be thrown out. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH!!!
    Port Hadlock, Washington
  1590. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19282Debbie Thorn
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Kirkland, Washington
  1591. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19281Power Past Coal Portland
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Nicholas Jacobs · Portland, Oregon
  1592. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19280L. Jarvis
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett I am writing today with deep concerns for our future and the future of my state's and neighboring state's wildlife, environment and farm land and it's people if this permit to build a coal-hauling line through the Tongue River Valley is granted. We cannot cut the valley in half, jeopardizing farm and ranch operations, disrupting wildlife movements, devaluing property, and increasing flooding potential. This proposal is dangerous and would destroy the environment irreparably just for profit from sales to China. Please consider the hearings held in four rural southeastern Montana communities, where hundreds of people turned out to oppose the railroad and all of us writing to you regarding this dirty deal. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Thank you for reading my comments and taking them into serious consideration that this dangerous permit be thrown out. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH!!!
    Chimacum, Washington
  1593. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19279Dorothy Larco
    Why should this rail line be approved, causing the removal of more mountain tops and the further pollution of the air, just for the financial benefit of a few people? Jobs? Create jobs by increasing renewable energy! Germany already has 25% of its electricity need filled with renewables. Why not this country?
    Portland, Oregon
  1594. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19278Chris Covert-Bowlds, MD
    As a family doctor, father, and resident of this planet, I feel the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad may cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1595. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19277Bud Laurent
    This project has so many documented negative impacts, environmental, public health, and social, that the few jobs created cannot possibly justify its approval. In addition, from a more global perspective, I completely agree with this statement, and any reasonable person should also: The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Say NO TO COAL!
    Corvallis, Oregon
  1596. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19276Bill Stites
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. THIS IS JUST WRONG ON SO MANY LEVELS. Thank you.
    Portland, Oregon
  1597. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19275William Skidmore
    New infrastructure to carry coal to china is a very poor approach for Montana. Why undermine the health of montanans and others to support a dying industry and extenally owned private interests.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1598. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19274Joseph LaValle
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Tumwater, Washington
  1599. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19273Judith Carter
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Friday Harbor, Washington
  1600. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19272Dixon Haynes
    Dear Ken Blodgett: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. The proposed Tongue River Railroad expansion should never occur. Dixon Haynes Long Beach, Washington
    Long Beach, Washington
  1601. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19271Mary Manous
    I urge you to include in the scope of this Environmental Assessment an evaluation of the impact of this route to ship additional coal to Asia through Northwest ports on the health, water and air quality, and economies of communities along the whole railway line through Spokane, the Columbia Gorge and along the rest of the routes. The additional coal will likely lead to more frequent trains intersecting many communities, impacting emergency services, access to and quality of tourist sites along the way, and reduced air quality from the diesel emissions. In addition this additional coal being exported will potentially mean that the emissions from the coal fired power plants in Asia will be dropped across the ocean and into the air of the United States with adverse impacts on the mercury content of the food chain, ocean acidification and the air quality along the way. In addition, consideration should be given to the impact of this additional coal on the climate and ocean levels around the world as it contributes to the fossil fuels combusted and delays the shift to sustainable energy that will not have this adverse impact on climate and environmental and human health.
    Seattle, Washington
  1602. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19270Jonathan Mark
    Please analyze the following in the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad: Public convenience and necessity Impacts on property values Wildlife Flooding Noise Infrastructure and traffic Thank you, Jonathan Mark
    Seattle, Washington
  1603. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19269Mary V. Cassell
    we know it's a filthy industry that encourages the slow destruction of our planet.It's time to stop using it or selling it to other countries to use it.We need to think GREEN....encourage other sources for power.
    Eugene, Oregon
  1604. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19268Pat Milliren
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. I simply cannot understand why Arch Coal should have the 'right' to screw up everyone else's way of life as well as the relatively pristine web of life where they want to build a rail line. You need to address what gives them priority over EVERYONE ELSE. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. *You need to address how this coal that is proposed to be transported west will impact the global climate change balance of CO2 (and other greenhouse gases) in the atmosphere--both as it is mined and as it is burned in Asia and spread around the world.
    Port Angeles, Washington
  1605. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19267Jay Humphrey
    There are no advantages placed on the people of Montana or the US or even the planet in connection with the proposal to build a railway in order to ship coal to China. It is not necessary for the people of Montana and there is not convenience given to the citizens by the proposal. Their land values will fall, their air and environment will be compromised and wildlife will be negatively impacted. Please refuse application by the Tongue River Railroad Company due to the negative impacts to the people of Montana and other states affected by this transportation proposal.
    Estacada, Oregon
  1606. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19266Adina Parsley
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Ferndale, Washington
  1607. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19265Jackie Johnson
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries.
    Eugene, Oregon
  1608. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19264Sheila Spencer
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. You also can post a letter to: Mr. Ken Blodgett Surface Transportation Board 395 E Street, SW Washington, D.C. 20423-0001 Note environmental filing: Docket No. FD 30186 in your letter.
    Gresham, Oregon
  1609. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19263Orlando Martin
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodget The entire human civilization is at risk due to increased carbon levels in our only atmosphere. Do not stand idle while our species is killed off in favor of the profits of a minority. Do not act so that your descendants will curse your name, please carry out your duties as a regulator and act in the interests of the vast majority of citizens over the interests of a wealthy minority. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents in communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment overseas, affecting hundreds of communities and many states. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays-(which will directly affect the lives of citizens in need of emergency medical care while their ambulances are delayed by the lengthy and more frequent coal trains along the entire length of the mining and shipment-lanes, even those in China), as well as causing noise pollution, coal-dust pollution and diesel pollution. A consequence of this proposed increased rail traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which have historically been paid for primarily by local taxpayers. Require any new new mining proposal to include paying for these and other expenses, such as covers for the rail cars. The comprehensive EIS should consider all impacts of the proposed mining operation, from cradle to grave." The Tongue River Railroad would allow coal that MUST stay in the ground if our civilization is to survive, to be burned in dirty Chinese plants which will fuel decades-long increases in climate destabilizing Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants."
  1610. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19262Monica Gilman
    I am opposed to further exploitation in the US to enable the coal and railroad industry to transport dirty coal to China through our lands and communities. US citizens are affected negatively through the coal dust dumped into their air, railroads being constructed where they don't belong and affect on wildlife and property values in the Tongue River Valley. There is NO neccesity to the public for this proposal, nor is there any convenience, only inconvenience to the public. Please address these concerns in your environmental impact statement. This proposal is not forward looking in the negative impacts placed on ours and the planet's environment.
    Estacada, Oregon
  1611. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19261Linda Knudson
    The Pacific Northwest has been intentionally and diligently working to create an environmentally sustainable, clean energy economy for several years now. We have no interest in coal coming through our states and creating health risks, environmental catastrophes and products that send pollution to Asia and its peoples. We will fight coal companies who try to come here and do all the above mentioned things. The people in our states have the responsibility to keep our region free of this dirty, polluting substance that is in no way compatible with our goals. Please do all you can to stop Arch Coal from bringing its coal to our rivers, roads, air and streams. Linda Knudson Portland, Oregon
    Portland, Oregon
  1612. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19259Keith Comess, MD
    The proposed coal transportation rail line via the Tongue River Valley is antithetical to US strategic, environmental and public interests. The Department of Defense already considers climate change as a seriously destabilizing element for the near-term and long-range future. Coal burning advances this problem. Environmentally, the American public is implicitly assuming a significant financial and health-related burden by virtue of the negative exteranalities" implicit in the project. These include loss of tourism revenue, pollution from mining and transportation-related activities and clean-up costs. Stated otherwise, this proposal is for private profit which is publicly subsidized. For these and a plethora of other reasons, it should not be allowed to advance."
  1613. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19258Bob Vella
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Longview, Washington
  1614. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19257World Temperate Rainforest Network
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries through our community of Olympia and in fact through al of Western Washington - we are adamantly opposed to that. It would impact our environment, endangered salmon and orcas and public health. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals - where there is adamant opposition - , shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. It is a bad idea that should not be approved. We need to start making good decisions for a sustainable future - not continue to make bad decisions causing pollution as we have in the past.
    Pat Rasmussen · Olympia, Washington
  1615. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19256Anita Das
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett NO to Tongue River Railroad, NO to coal exports off West Coast! The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: * Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. * Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. * Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. * Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. * Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. * Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. * Climate Change: The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. NO to Tongue River Railroad, NO to coal exports off West Coast! Thank you for considering my comments.
    Seattle, Washington
  1616. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19255Larry Read
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    West Linn, Oregon
  1617. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19254Nancy Kramis
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1618. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19253World Wildlife
    We are trying so hard to keep the coal trains from coming thru our beautiful Pacific Northwest. Just look at Seward Alaska to see what the ocean loading terminals look like and picture that on the Oregon coast. Or coming thru the Columbia River Gorge on trains or barges. I grew up with Peabody Coal Co. in southern Indiana so I know what it's like to live with the pollution and incredible filth of coal and coal trains. We're working to eliminate coal fired generation of electricity out here, not have more coal to deal with. Please help us. Don't cave in to the huge coal monopoly. Please. Thanks for your consideration
    Hugh Cochran · Eugene, Oregon
  1619. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19252Karen Loida
    Dear Ken Blodgett, I am very concerning about transporting coal along the Puget sound area that will be headed for China. Few jobs will be created, the US will get little benefit by digging up and shipping this dirty energy to China and yet the risks are great including; increased GHG emissions that affect the US as China continues to burn more dirty coal, impacts on property values, affect on wildlife and wildlife habitat, noise and traffic issues,and health risks including asthma as trains leave coal dust along their path. I think we can do better. I still have hope a good decision can be made by not allowing The Tongue River Railroad transport coal from Montana across our beautiful lands for use in China. Sincerely Karen Loida
    Edmonds, Washington
  1620. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19251Connie Lloyd
    I am opposed to the transport of coal across the US and especially to the building of a new track. The environmental risks are great i.e. spills coal dust, disruption of communities,traffic etc. I can see minimum public benefit for the project. The jobs created do not outweigh the negative impact. I believe we should be encouraging truly clean" energy instead. "
    Greenbank, Washington
  1621. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19250Karen Wible
    I DO NOT WANT ANY COAL OR COAL BY PRODUCTS SHIPPED THROUGH ANY STATE FOR CHINA! Actually coal usage should be reduced dramatically and eventually eliminated! Everyone knows the potential and known hazards to people, wildlif and the environment! THIS SHOULD ABSOLUTELY NOT BE TOLERATED, ACCEPTED OR ALLOWED!
    Vancouver, Washington
  1622. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19249Laura Blackmore
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washingon
  1623. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19248Randall Webb
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1624. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19247Chris Stay
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Edmonds, Washington
  1625. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19246David S. Nichols
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1626. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19245Estelle Voeller
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impact along entire route: The impact of coal train traffic on the environment and communities all along the transport route to the ocean must be considered. Costs to local communities for increased infrastructure and its maintenance, traffic delays, noise, health effects on people and wildlife due to increased diesel pollution and escaping coal dust, and economic impacts on tourism along the route, including especially the iconic Columbia River Gorge, must also be studied. Greenhouse gas emissions: The reality of climate change is established, and our future survival requires it be addressed. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. Toxic emissions are carried to the US, with highest impacts on far-western states, where we are already having challenges with acidification of water bodies and impacts on amphibians and other wildlife. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Medford, Oregon
  1627. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19244Helen Logan Hays
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Taxes will go up for residents' communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossings which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Oregon City, Oregon
  1628. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19243Gad Levy
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1629. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19242David J. Cunningham
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1630. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19241Robert J. Lockhorn
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Do The Right Thing!!
    Vancouver, Washington
  1631. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19240Christian Bock
    A rail new line, mainly for transporting coal from the mines to export terminals, would only serve the mining companies (and their share-holders). For us, the people living near the planned facilities, it would be bad all the way. I object to it, and I'm against allowing them to take land by eminent domain. Respectfully Christian Bock
    Longview, Washington
  1632. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19239Jan Sundquist
    This railroad would serve ONLY one coal company, Arch Coal and will devalue property-especially riverfront-and if built would shift the liabiliity of train crossing to private landowners!
    Lopez Island, Washington
  1633. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19238Mary Keeler
    We cannot afford to continue supporting industries that destroy the Earth!
    Seattle, Washington
  1634. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19237H. M. Sustaita
    No one corporation should have the right to cut through public or private land by way of eminent domain for their own private profits. At this time in humanities history it is unwise to be digging out and selling coal to any country. If we as a species are to survive the greatest environmental change, in thousands of years, we must stop the pillaging of this planet and begin to use resources that can be replenished and that do not put more carbine dioxide into our atmosphere. Selling coal to China is the worst idea and is deadly to all in the long run. Let's get serious and say NO to profits before life.
    Eugene, Oregon
  1635. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19236Janet Alderton
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Deer Harbor, Washington
  1636. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19235David Dumas
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Florence, Oregon
  1637. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19234Jude Armstrong
    What pulic need or convenience would the proposed rail line meet? What would be the impact on property values? How would the farming/ranching in the valley be impacted? What provisions would be made to prevent flooding? Will wildlife be adversely affected. will wildlife coridors wbe provided? What are the potential health impacts for the residents of the valley? Will childhood problems of asthma and other health issues be affected? The impacts of noise on the valley inhabitants should be throughly studied. What measures will be made to reduce the impacts? How much will the proposed railway affect the economics of citizens of the valley? Will taxes rise because of infrastructure needs? Will traffic be impacted? Will needed repairs and new facilities, such as overpasses be required? Whjo will pay for the needed changes? Will the safety and health of the people be impacted by delays in police, fire and health assistance? What meassures will be taken to eliminate the polution arising from the effects of coal dust and diesel fuel. Will the pollution be concentrated because of thermal changes in the atmosphere? Will the climate of the world be changed because of the burning of the fossil fuel in China? Who, other than Arch Coal, will benefit by the project? Will those benefits outweigh the harm done?
    Hoquiam, Washington
  1638. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19233Edward Mills
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Bellevue, Washington
  1639. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19232Kathleen Wolfe
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Des Moines, Washington
  1640. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19231Beth Levin
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City.
    Portland, Oregon
  1641. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19230Alan Mooers
    I hope that the long term and large scale effects of moving coal from the interior to the coast and shipping it globally will be considered in this process. This may be an opportunity to reconsider what things may be included in the scoping and permitting process-things that may change the face of the local area over time as well as the effects further away. Thank you for your time.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1642. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19229Bob Bachman
    No more coal to the Pacific NW.
    Friday Harbor, Washington
  1643. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19228Tom Hopkins
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett Argument in opposition to the Tongue River Railroad Company's application to build a rail line for the purpose of hauling coal. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Milwaukie, Oregon
  1644. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19227Robin Hirsch
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Robin Hirsch San Juan,Washington
    Orcas, Washington
  1645. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19226Shane Daugherty
    no LNG, keepm our gas and keep our prices low!
    Bandon, Oregon
  1646. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19225Eva Cosgrove
    Please do not approve the Tongue River Railroad Company's permit. Although coal it may bring profit, we must remember that money is not everything and that the environmental and human effects will last far beyond the time at which the money is used up. I am begging you to protect out environment, protect our children's lungs, and deny the request for a permit to build the coal-hauling line though the Tongue River Valley.
    Seattle, Washington
  1647. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19224Anthony Albert
    * Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. * Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. * Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. * Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. * Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. * Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers.
    Corvallis, Oregon
  1648. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19223Patti Dill
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Bellevue, Washington
  1649. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19222MaryLee Mahar
    Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers.
    Seattle, Washington
  1650. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19221Richard Low
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Ferndale, Washington
  1651. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19220Theresa Nuccio
    The people of Montana and the Tongue River Valley, as well as those who would have come to visit the state for recreation, will be adversely affected by a new rail line through this area just to serve Arch Coal. We are dealing with the same problem in my home region of western Washington State. Noise, coal dust pollution, increased diesel and other engine fumes, increased infrastructure costs to deal with preventing injuries and deaths at crossings, and increased infrastructure costs to prevent rail car accidents are all part of the future legacy of this unfortunate proposed project. Obviously these are all environmental concerns. In addition, wildlife will be affected and Montana will lose one of its most attractive areas for visitors. Farms and ranches along the way may also lose value and usefulness. Please do not approve this project just to send coal overseas to one of the most polluting nations on the planet. Coal is on its way out; and Montana will be stuck with outdated and rusting infrastructure when it is all said and done. Thank you.
    Seattle, Washington
  1652. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19219Margaret Hastings
    The gathering of coal destroys the environment; the transport across the country damages the environment and risks further destruction should a derailment occur; the shipping of coal around the world puts the entire path at risk; and allowing it to be used for power in another country destroys that country's environment and puts the entire planet at risk. This is not about power; it's about GREED. Just say no, I beg of you, for all of the creatures of this planet, and those that follow them.
    Blaine, Washington
  1653. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19218Linda Kelley
    The biggest challenge for me now that I am over 60 years old is to watch mankind continue to make irresponsible and shortsighted decisions that will effect future generations and will perhaps be irreversible due to secondary climate related effects. To make these decisions based on short term profits is at this point immoral at best and amoral and stupid in fact. To do this in order to send coal to China is beyond all of that. It does nothing to create energy independence" the supposed reason for destroying our environment, and in fact perpetuates unsound use of dirty energy by a country who is quickly becoming our economic rival. This only benefits those who already are pocketing huge sums of profits and in the short run some local jobs that could easily be created in other areas if the political will was there"
  1654. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19217Nicole Fisher
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Mount Vernon, Washington
  1655. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19216Marianne Shapiro
    We live along side the railroad tracks. But more important that us, is the generations to come and the effect coal debris and the burning of coal will have on the global environment. Every day, as coal already passes by my home I am reminded to the deteriorization of the young people on this earth, and this is the most upsetting.
    Bow, Washington
  1656. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19215Colby Chester
    I strongly oppose this project. It is for profit and against health and reason. As you and I know from simple common sense, the Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Please lt reason triumph over greed, for once!
    Seattle, Washington
  1657. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19214Lucy Whipps
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1658. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19213Matt Lancaster
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers.
    Portland, Oregon
  1659. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19212Michael DuPas
    Trading our environment for coal exports is a terrible idea. An environmental impact statement must be thorough to identify all of the costs which are not borne by those benefiting from the Tongue River Valley proposal.
    Orcas, Washington
  1660. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19211Marceline McKinney
    No coal hauling through Tongue River Valley No coal shipping to China thru Wash or Ore ports. Protect our environment.
    Cosmopolis, Washington
  1661. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19210S.F. Brown
    The proposed Tongue River railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. Prevailing winds will blow these emissions across the Pacific. These emissions will adversely affect all of us living on the western coast of the U.S. This application should be denied.
    Lynnwood, Washington
  1662. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19209Laird Weaver
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Valencia, California
  1663. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19208Eric Edwards
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    West Chicago, Illinois
  1664. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19207Bob Thomas
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Myrtle Creek, Oregon
  1665. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19206Sally & Dick Brigham
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett We agree with the sentiments and comments below. Please reconsider your actions regarding coal shipments for the sake of our environment and oceans. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Everett, Washington
  1666. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19205Joan Littlefield
    Docket No.Fd 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Aptos, California
  1667. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19204Carol Marsh
    Please do not approve the building of this railroad line to carry coal to the coast and export it to China. It is an abuse of eminent domain, because this line is purely commercial and against the public interest. The public is organized to oppose this huge increase in coal trains all the way to the coast, and in every city where expansion of terminals for the coal is proposed. The US has cut back and is moving toward the elimination of burning coal because of its devastating impact on the environment. But that impact is exactly the same whether the coal is burned here or in China. Ground transportation? The ongoing drought in the Midwest has brought the level of the Mississippi River so law that it is interfering in shipping. Floods, wildfires, and superstorms are all causing billions of dollars in damage. The burning of coal is responsible for much of the climate change causing these extreme weather phenomena. If our leaders are responsible, they will soon agree on limits to carbon emissions worldwide, putting this railroad out of business shortly after it is built. If they are unable to agree, then we are in for worldwide disaster, all traceable back to the carbon emissions of coal, oil and natural gas, but especially coal. The world's scientific community is united and increasingly trying to ring the warning bell before it is too late. Ignoring them to make some more money for coal companies is greed over public interest. Please don't approve this application.
    Missoula, Montana
  1668. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19203Jodi Tanner Tell
    Please include the following elements to analyze in the environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad: - Climate change. The railroad will allow additional coal to reach the market and be burned. Both the process of mining and the operation of the diesel trains will also emit dangerous greenhouse gases. The science is clear that this will negatively impact the environment in the United States. - air and water quality. The diesel pollution will spread carcinogens and other damaging particulates throughout the area. In addition, the potential for coal train spills creates hazards, especially in areas near the river. There have been several coal train spills in recent months demonstrating that this is a real possibility. - Flooding. The railroad bed will bisect the valley, which could potentially worsen flooding problems. - Wildlife. This project will industrialize a valley that is currently a prime natural resource, prized by hunters and citizens seeking nature. The railroad and coal strip mine will damage the wildlife value of the valley. - Negative impacts on property values. Having a railroad go through this area will devalue property, and make the value of ranching and farming land decline, especially for property near the railroad or that the railroad will cross. Please take the environmental impacts of this project seriously. It has the potential to damage our environment, with few to no benefit for the local Montana residents.
    Portland, Oregon
  1669. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19202Norman Thomas Baker
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Sequim, Washington
  1670. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19201Nancy Young
    The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Laguna Woods, California
  1671. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19200Elisabeth Banse
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Sincerely, Elisabeth Banse
    Seattle, Washington
  1672. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19199Jim McRoberts
    •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Bellevue, Washington
  1673. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19198Northern Plains Defense
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    David Walseth · Vancouver, Washington
  1674. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19197Laura Belson
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1675. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19196Duane Miller
    Any short term gains that go only to Arch coal would be nothing compared to the long term cost to the citizens of the region. This rape of our environment for the gain of a few to ship coal to china must stop. Destruction of the environment must require most stronger reasons than profit. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Portland, Oregon
  1676. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19195Joanne Chase
    I am absolutely not in favor of this coal mining and moving through out western states for export.
    Eugene, Oregon
  1677. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19194Amy Mower
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett I have several comments on the Scoping for the Environmental Impact Statement for the proposed application for this project. The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following impacts of the proposed project: 1. Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. 2. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. 3.Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. 4. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. 5. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. 6. Greenhouse Gas Impacts: The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions which will not only impact China but also be blown to the West Coast of the USA, increasing climate change impacts on the West Coast The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Please include all of these impacts in the required research under the Environmental Impact Statement for this project.
    Maple Falls, Washington
  1678. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19193Carol Boudreau
    I am writing to oppose the building of the Tongue River Railroad Company 's coal-hauling line through the quiet, pristine Tongue River Valley in eastern Montana primarily for exporting coal to Asia. This long-proposed project renews its attempt to cut the valley in half, jeopardizing farm and ranch operations, disrupting wildlife movements, devaluing property, and increasing flooding potential. I also oppose the building of the exportation of coal ports along the west coast and the Columbia River.
    Longview, Washington
  1679. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19192Gloria Hatrick
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. Clearly, this proposal is a very bad idea on all levels with the possible exception of lining the pockets of a few men of no conscience.
    Hillsboro, Oregon
  1680. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19191Sandra Joos
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. In sum, it is a very bad idea!
    Portland, Oregon
  1681. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19190Mary Ruth Holder
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Mount Vernon, Washington
  1682. (printed as 1/5/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19189Layne Martin
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1683. (printed as 1/4/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19188Margaret Patterson
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett Please do what you can to avoid having these train cars full of coal travel through our pristine natural region. Each car releases a lot of coal dust which will be harmful to plants, animals and people. We must not allow this to happen. We should be working on alternative clean energy sources and LEAVE THE COAL IN THE GROUND! The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Astoria, Oregon
  1684. (printed as 1/4/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19187Lana Sangmeister
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: •Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. •Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. •Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. •Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. •Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. •Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Nye, Montana
  1685. (printed as 1/4/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19186IUOE Local 400
    The IUOE Local 400 represents approximately 360 workers and their families that live and work in the Colstrip, Hardin, Lame Deer, Ashland and Forsyth MT. area that could be adversely affected by the proposed BNSF preferred Colstrip route" of the Tongue River Railroad. We feel that the Surface Transportation Board should consider the socioeconomic impacts of this route on all of these cities and towns and the residents in the surrounding areas. This route has the possibility of devastating the local economies, displacing families, increasing unemployment, lowering the tax base and creating innumerable hardships on the people and businesses in this area. This route should not be approved."
    Charles E. Cashell
  1686. (printed as 1/4/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19185Joe Newman
    Let the Chinese build solar and wind plants, we in Montana are not interested in sacrificing our ranch lands to speed the collective suicide of global warming. Richard Newman
    Bozeman, Montana
  1687. (printed as 1/4/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19184Sue Meadows
    Docket Number: S30186 I grew up on a ranch near Choteau, Mt. and can't imagine it being bisected by a railroad that would pollute with coal dust, being weeds and cheat grass, and cost thousands off dollars in extra miles travel and making my own crossings. it would ruin the land my family for generations have worked and loved. We have enough problems with drought and wind. So I know how the rancher Mark Fox (I think that's his name) feels. And it's sole purpose is to pollute China, the Pacific Ocean, Western USA and who knows where else for profit for the few Please reject this permit of the Tongue River Railroad PS I could not figure out how to enter the docket number at the top of this web page. I am 67 years old and write because I know how important it is to put our environmental health at top priority since we have neglected it for so long in our regard for the the almighty dollar. Thank you for your serious and in depth investigation of this matter. Again Docket number S30186 Sue Meadows
    Bozeman, Montana
  1688. (printed as 1/4/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19183Dick Forehand
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Red Lodge, Montana
  1689. (printed as 1/4/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19182Becky
    Please don't allow coal to be sold and shipped to China. For the profit it will give to a few. Is not enough to justfiy the damage it will do to our country. We need to move past coal and gas.
    Spokane, Washington.
  1690. (printed as 1/4/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19181Russell Blalack
    I own a small ranch in the area. As I put more and more of my life into the ranch, I become more concerned with the environmental impact of extractive industries in my area. Please consider the following point of view that I offer: The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: • Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. • Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. • Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. • Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. • Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. • Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Cupertino, California
  1691. (printed as 1/4/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19176MT DNRC
    Lisa Axline
  1692. (printed as 1/4/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19175Steptoe and Johnson, LLP
    David Coburn
  1693. (printed as 1/3/2013)
    Letter
    233621Letter
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1694. (printed as 1/3/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19542EarthJustice
    Jenny Harbine · Bozeman, Montana
  1695. (printed as 1/3/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19180Marian Hennings
    I am concerned that the proposed railroad will increase flood danger to the area and have adverse impacts on wildlife. Coal burning is toxic to the environment and we shouldn't be encouraging this. The air pollution will get back to the Pacific Northwest via air currents and will acidify the ocean and other Pacific Northwest waterways.
    Spokane, Washington
  1696. (printed as 1/3/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19179Catherine DeMets
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. There is no substantive, long-term study that assesses and analyzes the potential damage to the aquifer underlying the railroad route. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains, fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants. For the young people of not just Montana, but the entire world, the implications of enabling more coal to be mined are too serious to be ignored. Thank you for your attention to this fact.
    Appleton, Wisconsin
  1697. (printed as 1/3/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19178Jon Kohn
    The TRR EIS needs to consider the permanent degradation of habitat all along its route and the coal shipping routes it makes likely across Montana. Habitat is not resilient to its original diversity: it must be restored once messed up, and the TRR has no provision for that. Bringing belching thundering trains, diesel drippings, coal dust, and drainage problems to a gentle valley is ecologically indefensible... only for $ is it defensible. Present and past uses of the Tongue River valley are perhaps highest, best use," in the sense that the landscape can barely support current development. Even with current development, the valley has problems with invasive plants, noise pollution from aircraft, degradation from road construction and recreational use.... only the profit motive explains why we could permit further degradation. Thank you. Please also consider: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: Noise from earthshaking trains will ruin the habitat for each species of the valley, even for humans seeking quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially through cities such as Billings and Helena, causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. Expensive over passes and safety crossing would need to be paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in carbon dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants."
  1698. (printed as 1/3/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19177Paul James
    The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad (Docket No. FD 30186) should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: The proposal would only serve a single company (Arch) with primary benefits to the energy security of China as opposed to energy security of the United States. This contradicts current US energy policy and makes the environmental impacts non-necessary. The EIS must study the impacts on the following: 1) property values decreasing due to visual impacts, sound impacts and air quality impacts of the rail line. 2) Property values decreasing due to traffic impacts of the rail line. 3) economic impacts on ranching and farming in the valley. Including assessment of impacts on local food security, and the health impacts on range animals and crops duet to coal dust and diesel particulate increases. 4) economic cost of the increased number of livestock deaths due to rail/livestock collisions. 5) the health impact measured in number of lives lost due to increased rail-pedestrian and rail-automobile collisions. 6) the economic costs to taxpayers compared to costs born by rail operators of making rail crossing safety improvements. 7) the economic impacts due to noise disturbance on recreational users and tourism. 8) the economic and environmental impacts of flooding and hydrological changes due to the rail line, including ice dams. 9) the economic impacts due to decreased recreational and subsistence hunting of elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. The impact of this on out of state hunters and tourism. 10) the impact of decreases in elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds on Native American tribal treaty rights to subsistence hunting. 11) the impact of runoff on stream fish populations. 12) the impact of declining fish populations on tribal subsistence fishing rights. 13) the hydrological impact to surface and sub-surface water sources for both human use and irrigation. 14) the economic impact of changes to hydrological changes in surface and sub-surface water sources for both human use and irrigation. 15) assessment of changes in the tax burden born by Arch and local property owners. Changes in property values and associated impacts on local government revenue. 16) the impacts of coal dust on track and local environments, according to BNSF 500 pounds to a ton of coal can escape from a single loaded car.” Coal dust accumulates in the ballast between the rails, undermining the track structure and causing derailments. And coal dust deposits sometimes even cause fires. 17) the impact of future fires (or the risk of fires) in coal dust along tracks, and coal lost due to derailments in the future. 18) the risk to the environment of derailments. 19) the economic burden of emergency response to coal train derailments. 20) the human health risk due to coal train derailments. 21) the environmental risk to wildlife and water due to coal train derailments. 22) the global impacts that the new rail line will have in increasing access to a specific volume of coal and the impact on the rate of combustion of this coal as it impacts global CO2 levels, other greenhouse gas levels and global warming. Thanks for your time and attention to these matters. Paul James"
  1699. (printed as 1/3/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19174Joelle Robinson
    Docket No. FD 30186 Attention of: Mr. Ken Blodgett The environmental impact statement for the proposed Tongue River Railroad should analyze the following: Public convenience and necessity: This proposed railroad is not for the “public convenience and necessity” which is what is required in order for a body to get the power of eminent domain and condemnation authority. This railroad would serve only one coal company giant, Arch Coal, which intends to sell the coal to China and other Asian countries. Impacts on property values: The project would devalue property and infringes on property rights. This railroad will cause fires, spread weeds, devalue property (especially riverfront property), will make ranching and farming more difficult and expensive, will split ranch land in half and separate fields from the river and will shift the liability of train crossings to the landowner. Wildlife: The Tongue River Valley is rich in wildlife habitat and home to outstanding elk and mule deer populations as well as upland birds. Industrializing this valley with a railroad and the coal strip mine it serves will seriously degrade this excellent sportsman resource. Flooding: The railroad bed will act as an earthen dam and potentially worsen the flooding problems now experienced in Miles City in the winter with ice jams. Noise: The loud trains will ruin the quiet enjoyment of nearby recreation areas near Miles City. Infrastructure and traffic: Taxes will go up for residents communities along the rail lines as the coal heads to coastal ports for shipment. This railroad will increase coal train traffic substantially causing traffic delays, noise, and diesel pollution. The only way to live with this increased traffic will require expensive over passes and safety crossing which are paid for primarily by local taxpayers. The Tongue River Railroad will allow coal that should stay in the ground to be burned in dirty Chinese plants and will fuel intolerable, decades-long increases in Carbon Dioxide emissions. The greenhouse gas costs of Otter Creek coal go far beyond just burning the coal. It must be mined, hauled by trains fueled by diesel to West Coast terminals, shipped overseas by ships fueled by diesel, and then hauled in China to the plants.
    Seattle, Washington
  1700. (printed as 1/3/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19173Dianna Broadie
    I previously gave comment at the Miles City meeting as the Planning Director. I wanted to give additional comment in that capacity. It has come to my attention that the Moon River alternative has an impact that I did not note in the original comment. The map provided did not clearly illustrate the use of the Old Milwaukee Railroad portion of that route. The text more clearly states the actual route. The original comment about emergency service impact would be further exaserbated by the use of this alternative route. Miles City would have the possibility of trains running on both lines which bisect our City causing delays to emergency vehicles at key intersections. Unlike the current main line, the Milwaukee has no alternative routes as all crossings are at grade. From recent notices it appears that this is not the preferred alternative but as it was scoped as an alternative, I did want to offer this comment for evaluation. Thank you for your consideration.
    Miles City, Montana
  1701. (printed as 1/3/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19172NPS
    Christine Whitacre
  1702. (printed as 1/3/2013)
    Comment
    EI-19171Yankton Sioux Tribe
    Lana Gravatt
  1703. (printed as 1/3/2013)
    Comment
    EO-2009Yankton Sioux Tribe
    Lana Gravatt
  1704. (printed as 12/31/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19169US ACOE
    Shannon Johnson
  1705. (printed as 12/31/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19168MT DNRC
    Patrick Rennie
  1706. (printed as 12/27/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19167Lowel Greenberg
    I am deeply opposed to any route granted to the Tongue River Railroad for the transport of coal from the Poweder River basin. If the criteria for granting of eminent domain is public convenience and necessity," then eminent domain should not be granted for the purpose of transporting coal for any purpose, including export to Asia. The extraction, transport and burning of coal is environmentally desructive; damaging to the health of children, seniors and others and detrimental to the economy, by promoting higher energy prices and delaying the shift to sustainable and renewable techologies."
  1707. (printed as 12/27/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19161Crow Nation
    Herbert Two Leggins
  1708. (printed as 12/27/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19160Blackfeet Nation
    John Murray, THPO
  1709. (printed as 12/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19163U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
    Todd N. Tillinger · Billings, Montana
  1710. (printed as 12/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19162Robert M. Knight
    Missoula, Montana
  1711. (printed as 12/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19158National Trust for Historic Preservation
    Elizabeth Merritt
  1712. (printed as 12/20/2012)
    Certificate
    233567Certificate Of Publication
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1713. (printed as 12/20/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19157Christine Westland
    I live in Birch Bay, WA, and in the same way I am opposed to the Gateway Pacific Terminal project, I object strenuously to the plan to haul coal from Otter Creek via the Tongue River Valley, enroute to Asia. The new permit now being considered by Arch Coal calls for approval of an 83-mile long rail line from the Otter Creek Mine to Miles City, where it would join the main rail line that goes to the West Coast. Once this coal gets burned it will add about 2.6 Billion tons of greenhouse gases (CO2)into an already overloaded, warming atmosphere, leading to further catatrosphic climate change. Please study this impact and also study the disruption it will cause in hauling Montana's current commodities. Consider further how this project will bisect ranches in the area - through the power of eminent domain and permanently transform the rural Tongue River Valley into an industrial coal extraction zone.
    Blaine, Washington
  1714. (printed as 12/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19156The Lands Council
    The Lands Council is commenting on the Tongue River Railroad EIS Scope of Work
    Mike Petersen · Spokane, Washington
  1715. (printed as 12/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19152U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    R. Mark Wilson · Helena, Montana
  1716. (printed as 12/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19151Southeastern Montana Development Corporation
    John Williams · Colstrip, Montana
  1717. (printed as 12/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19150Deborah Hanson
    Miles City, Montana
  1718. (printed as 12/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19149Miles City Area Economic Development Council
    Mike Coryell · Miles City, Montana
  1719. (printed as 12/19/2012)
    Comment
    EO-2001Tribes
  1720. (printed as 12/19/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1997Section 106 Consulting Parties
  1721. (printed as 12/18/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19155Rosebud Conservation District
    see attached RCD board comment letter, RCD Model Rules, Joint Application Instructions and Joint Application Form
    Bobbi L. Vannattan · Forsyth, Montana
  1722. (printed as 12/18/2012)
    Comment
    EO-2014Yankton Sioux Tribe
    Chairman Counroyer Sr., Chairman
  1723. (printed as 12/17/2012)
    Supplement
    233527Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1724. (printed as 12/17/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19154Wayne Dudley
    Colstrip, Montana
  1725. (printed as 12/17/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1996Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    John Robinson, President
  1726. (printed as 12/13/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19147Terry James Hanson
    Miles City, Montana
  1727. (printed as 12/11/2012)
    Comment
    EO-2003Section 106 Consulting Parties
  1728. (printed as 12/10/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19145Kelly F. and Cynthia S. Radue
    Miles City, Montana
  1729. (printed as 12/10/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19144Craig Dudley
    Forsyth, Montana
  1730. (printed as 12/10/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19143Janetta Dudley
    Colstrip, Montana
  1731. (printed as 12/10/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19142Hugh and Ann Wells
    Forsyth, Montana
  1732. (printed as 12/10/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19141Christy Nielson
    Forsyth, Montana
  1733. (printed as 12/10/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19140Levi McEuen
    Broadus, Montana
  1734. (printed as 12/10/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19139Dean Seifert
    Miles City, Montana
  1735. (printed as 12/10/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19138Chris Riley
    I have been hunting and recreating in eastern Montana for over 20 years and am concerned for the impacts that coal mining in the area can have upon our environment. I am formally submitting my input to your environmental analysis (EIS) for the Tongue River Railroad Company's proposed railroad construction and operation of a rail line to access coal deposits proposed for extraction in several counties in eastern Montana. My comments are summarized by noting that I am not in favor of this coal extraction (Otter Creek deposits) or the railroad construction to access these deposits. I believe that climate change issues should be focusing all of our nation's attention and effort at energy production toward relatively clean alternative forms of energy, particularly wind and solar. Wind & solar have the potential for replacing fossil fuels and strongly improving the quality of our nation and world's air and water, and hence, our health. Since much of the Otter Creek deposits could be exported to Asian countries with little or no mitigation to protect the world's air and water resources from pollution, all the more reason to not mine these polluting resources. This project is simply designed for short term financial gain, and a broader scope of analysis of economic/health/social costs would reveal the wider spectrum of costs to our society. I also have concerns for the design and safety of the rail system proposed for this analysis and request that the highest standards be designed into this project to prevent accidents, spills, etc. that could impact the environment. A strong monitoring program designed to track air and surface and ground water quality, including a statistical design with power to detect significant change over time. Standards and an action plan to respond to pollution impacts should be included as part of this monitoring program. Please do keep me informed as this analysis progresses.
    Manistee, Michigan
  1736. (printed as 12/10/2012)
    Comment
    EO-2002ACHP
    Charlene Dwin-Vaughn
  1737. (printed as 12/10/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1995Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    Conrad Fisher
  1738. (printed as 12/7/2012)
    Comments
    233473Environmental Comment
    Jennifer Esp
  1739. (printed as 12/7/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19136Jennifer Esp
    Broadus, Montana
  1740. (printed as 12/6/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19137Sharon Sutherland
    I would ask that the Transportation Board consider the environmental impacts of increased coal traffic on all the towns in MT that will be affected. Noise is of particular importance, because these towns are small enough that everyone can hear the train whistles. If the number of trains are even doubled, it will have a large effect on the noise level. Then there is the issue of the uncovered cars, which release coal dust into the atmosphere. I would appreciate your considering these potential health problems.
    Belgrade, Montana
  1741. (printed as 12/6/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19135Rocker Six Cattle Co.
    Clint McRae · Forsyth, Montana
  1742. (printed as 12/5/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19131Beth Kaeding
    Bozeman, Montana
  1743. (printed as 12/4/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19130Larry Hops
    I am not a scientist. But I do live on the same planet as everyone else and I do understand that we are all connected in ways that some folks are not paying attention to. It’s about the air we all breathe when it comes to burning more coal. No matter where it’s burned; Asia, Montana, New Jersey or England, it affects my house, my spaceship. This little spaceship does not have a large vacuum system for dirty air. My question is: Why are we contributing to this disaster by continuing to extract this proven dirty and costly fossil fuel? Coal that is sub grade and disallowed in this country because of EPA protections is going to return to us in about one week of burning, compliments of China, in the form of arsenic, mercury and other pollutants in Montana air. I don’t care where it comes from; Otter Creek, MT or Eagle Butte, Wy,. The end result is the same for Montanans: increased pollution, more train noise, more traffic delays in fact as many as 8000 cars a day, increased costs (the folks in Montana will bear-not the railroad) for overpasses, underpasses and rail crossings, more diesel fumes and increased health issues for all of us. Short term thinking has long term consequences! China gets the dirty energy, Wall Street gets the profits and we pay the bill. A recent AP article noted that China is the worlds biggest polluter (about twice as much as the US)--before we send them dirty coal from the USA. If you have children or grand children they won't thank you for rolling over to this big money scheme. Use your heads and do the right thing for this country!!!
    Bozeman, Montana
  1744. (printed as 12/4/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19129City of Colstrip
    Ladies and Gentlemen, I wanted to take this opportunity to assure you that rail traffic through the community of Colstrip is nothing new. There is no objection to increased rail traffic, only the consideration of speed. As for the overall Tongue River Rail Road, the increased advantage of making use of the existing rail line heading north toward the river from Colstrip would decrease environmental impact in several respects. It seems there would be less trackage, less land disturbance and less agricultural and wildlife disturbance, and fewer public access issues by using a shorter route; the Colstrip alternative. Thank you, Rose Hanser Mayor of Colstrip
    Rose Hanser · Colstrip, Montana
  1745. (printed as 12/4/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19125Terry Punt
    Birney, Montana
  1746. (printed as 12/3/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19128Tongue River Water Users' Association
    Please see the attached comments of the Tongue River Water Users' Association. A hard copy of our comments will be sent via U.S. Mail.
    Brenda Lindlief Hall · Birney, Montana
  1747. (printed as 12/3/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19127Travis Johnston
    See Attached
    Bozeman, Montana
  1748. (printed as 12/3/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19126Holly Johnston
    See Attached
    Bozeman, Montana
  1749. (printed as 12/3/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19124David L. Matin
    Forsyth, Montana
  1750. (printed as 12/3/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19122Mike J. Stevenson
    Miles City, Montana
  1751. (printed as 12/3/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19121Barbara E. Stein
    Ashland, Montana
  1752. (printed as 12/3/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19120Dick and Kay Wells
    Forsyth, Montana
  1753. (printed as 12/3/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19117Wallace D. McRae
    Forsyth, Montana
  1754. (printed as 12/2/2012)
    Comment
    EI-21198collette brooks-hops
    I am not a scientist. But I do live on the same planet as everyone else and I do understand that we are all connected in ways that some folks are not paying attention to. It’s about the air we all breathe when it comes to burning more coal. No matter where it’s burned; Asia, Montana, New Jersey or England, it affects my house, my spaceship. This little spaceship does not have a large vacuum system for dirty air. My question is: Why are we contributing to this disaster by continuing to extract this proven dirty and costly fossil fuel? Coal that is sub grade and disallowed in this country because of EPA protections is going to return to us in about one week of burning, compliments of China, in the form of arsenic, mercury and other pollutants in Montana air. I don’t care where it comes from; Otter Creek, MT or Eagle Butte, Wy,. The end result is the same for Montanans: increased pollution, more train noise, more traffic delays, increased costs for overpasses, underpasses and rail crossings, more diesel fumes and increased health issues for all of us. Its time for all of us to take note of the consequences of our actions. . . short term thinking has long term consequences! Thank you.
    Bozeman, MT
  1755. (printed as 12/2/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19116Howard Christiansen
    Bozeman, Montana
  1756. (printed as 12/2/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19115Collette Brooks-Hops
    I am not a scientist. But I do live on the same planet as everyone else and I do understand that we are all connected in ways that some folks are not paying attention to. It’s about the air we all breathe when it comes to burning more coal. No matter where it’s burned; Asia, Montana, New Jersey or England, it affects my house, my spaceship. This little spaceship does not have a large vacuum system for dirty air. My question is: Why are we contributing to this disaster by continuing to extract this proven dirty and costly fossil fuel? Coal that is sub grade and disallowed in this country because of EPA protections is going to return to us in about one week of burning, compliments of China, in the form of arsenic, mercury and other pollutants in Montana air. I don’t care where it comes from; Otter Creek, MT or Eagle Butte, Wy,. The end result is the same for Montanans: increased pollution, more train noise, more traffic delays, increased costs for overpasses, underpasses and rail crossings, more diesel fumes and increased health issues for all of us. Its time for all of us to take note of the consequences of our actions. . . short term thinking has long term consequences! Thank you.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1757. (printed as 12/1/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19114Guy Dean Bateman
    I strongly oppose building the proposed Tongue River Railroad. Approval of the Tongue River railroad will have a major impact on Montanan's way of life, the health of our communities, and our economy. We don’t want more dirty coal trains clogging up our rail lines, disrupting our communities, and displacing the hauling of Montana’s agricultural commodities. The environmental analysis should include a full-blown environmental impact statement that comprehensively considers the environmental and economic impacts this line will have on climate change, air pollution, water pollution, wildlife, agricultural operations, communities, recreational opportunities, and rail transport. It is imperative that you consider the climate change impacts of digging, hauling, and burning 1.3 billion tons of coal. The analysis must consider the possibility that a new rail line could lead to the digging, hauling and burning of other coal resources in the area, contributing even more than the projected 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions that will result from the development of the Otter Creek tracts alone. Thank you for your consideration.
    Poplar, Montana
  1758. served (printed as 11/30/2012)
    Decision
    42798Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    DECISION ADVISES THE PUBLIC AND ALL INTERESTED PARTIES THAT THE COMMENT PERIOD WILL BE EXTENDED UNTIL JANUARY 11, 2013.
  1759. (printed as 11/30/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1992Section 106 Consulting Parties
  1760. (printed as 11/29/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19110James K. Mitchell
    Miles City, Montana
  1761. (printed as 11/29/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19109Tiena Mitchell
    Miles City, Montana
  1762. (printed as 11/28/2012)
    Certificate
    233399Certificate Of Publication
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1763. (printed as 11/27/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19099Greg Gordon
    In addressing the environmental impact of the proposed Tongue River Railroad, the Surface Transportation Board needs to consider the following: 1. The cumulative impacts of leasing and development of the Otter Creek tracts. The reality is that the TRRR and Otter Creek are inexorably linked. The reason for building the TRRR is to access and ship coal strip mined from Otter Creek; the railroad serves no other purpose. Therefore the EIS for the TRRR needs to include a full assessment of the environmental impacts of coal development of Otter Creek and the subsequent impacts that will reverberate throughout the Tongue River Valley. 2. The need for the railroad. Since the TRRR only serves one entity—Arch Coal, the STB should assess whether the proposed railroad meets the meets the requirement for public convenience and necessity. 3. Impacts on wildlife, including threatened and endangered species. The TRRR and the development of Otter Creek will have significant impacts on myriad wildlife species. These impacts need to be analyzed in light of conversion of the entire Tongue River Watershed being converted into an industrial zone. The cascading impacts to wildlife species that result from the building the railroad and development of Otter Creek need to be address. 4. Impacts to quality of life. These include visual and aesthetic impacts, noise, traffic congestion, emergency vehicle response time. The STB needs to analyze the substantial impact to the sense of place enjoyed by residents and visitors that will result from conversion of an agricultural landscape to an industrial one. 5. The EIS needs to examine the substantial contribution to climate change through the burning of 1.3 billion tons of coal that building the TRRR will enable.
    Spokane, Washington
  1764. (printed as 11/27/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19098LeAnn Rhodes
    As recent business owner in Powder River County and now a employee of Powder River County I understand the positive effect the Tongue River Railroad will bring to our local area. I also understand the positive effects using natural resources for utilities in lowering the cost. I do support the Tongue River Railroad.
    Broadus, Montana
  1765. (printed as 11/27/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19097Two Rivers Authority
    Jeffrey S. McDowell · Hardin, Montana
  1766. (printed as 11/27/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19096Leroy Schwartz
    Forsyth, Montana
  1767. (printed as 11/27/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19095Dan and Peggy Barkemeyer
    Miles City, Montana
  1768. (printed as 11/27/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19093Tom Tully
    I strongly oppose the construction of the Tongue River Railroad and increased coal-for-export traffic throughout Montana. Requiring taxpayers to shoulder the cost of infrastructure upgrades through Montana towns and condemning private land for corporate profit, just to sell coal to Asia is yet one more instance of short term gain with long term negative impacts to the land, air, water and rural communities in SE Montana. It would also irreparably damage the Tongue River Valley and all of its agricultural, historical, and cultural resources. Ranchers and farmers have made living in this valley for generations, and the TRR would harm property values and ag operations. I urge you to consider these impacts in the scope of the environmental impact statement and to pursue the no-action alternative. Sincerely, Tom Tully 2210 Pryor Ln Billings, MT 59102
    Billngs, Montana
  1769. (printed as 11/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19094Montana State Senate
    Robert L. Hawks · Bozeman, Montana
  1770. (printed as 11/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19092Daniel Krueger
    I think that the prospect of establishing coal trains from the Tongue River Valley through Bozeman is not an innovative solution to our nations energy crisis. By shipping this coal out of the US, you do not nourish our nations economy and you contribute to countries poor energy plans that are ruining our environment on a global scale. Although renewable resources can be a large initial investment, it will bring jobs to back to the US, improve you impact on nature, is the way of the future, and will become very profitable in the future. Think about how the world around you is changing, hotter winters, floods, drought across the Midwest. These are a result of carbon emissions by fossil fuels.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1771. (printed as 11/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19091Gary Weiner
    Building a new port on the west coast to process a dramatic increase in coal delivered from eastern Montana will absolutely cause significant impacts to my community of bozeman, MT, as well as many other communities through which additional coal trains will pass. Impacts of the port project can not be accurately characterized by assessing only the local, port-area effec6ts. raffic delays, requiring infrastructure upgrades, increased noise, worsened air pollution, slower emergency response times - all are significant impacts to the many communities through which the additional trains will pass, and must be analyzed in the EIS. To do an adequate job, the COE MUST analyze cumulative impacts.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1772. (printed as 11/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19090Kathryn Kasic
    I strongly the impacts to Bozeman should be taken into consideration for coal transport.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1773. (printed as 11/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19089Darren Long
    Dear Ken, I am writing to oppose the application for a permit to allow construction of the Tongue River Railroad in eastern Montana for transporting coal. This unnecessary train traffic would have adverse impacts on my hometown of Bozeman, not to mention the environmental impact on the beautiful Tongue River Valley from the coal that is proposed to be mined there. I also urge you to consider the serious climate impacts of fossil fuel use in this and other transportation projects. As you know, this railroad is already opposed by a majority of local landowners, citizens of the Northern Cheyenne Tribe, hunters and anglers and conservationists in eastern Montana. In fact, during the evening public hearings, (in Forsyth, Ashland, Lame Deer and Miles City) only a single person spoke in favor of the railroad. Please do not put commercial interests in front of the interests of the citizens of Montana and the U.S. Thank you, Darren Long
    Bozeman, Montana
  1774. (printed as 11/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19088Kristin Wimberg
    Regarding the Tongue River Railroad proposal, please make sure the new Environmental Impact Analysis examines all impacts to the environment, climate, culture and archeologic resources. Regarding Bozeman, MT specifically, please examine the impact of increased traffic patterns and any potential changes in air quality.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1775. (printed as 11/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19087Wilderness Recreation Partnership
    To Whom It May Concern, I am troubled that an EIS for construction of a railroad hauling a known toxic substance would not look at the full impact on all Montana citizens and wildlife; from where the coal is generated to where it is ultimately consumed. We are no longer being afforded an environmental carte blanche when it comes to personal responsibility in the name profit. Where this coal goes and what impact it has on it's complete life cycle journey is one of the fight's of this generation. There is a strong political will to see the Tongue River area preserved, but more than that, we need a long-term plan that is not myopic in it's scope for energy extraction. As an avid climber I utilize the man-made climbing boulders scattered around town. One of my favorites is near the railroad tracks and the depot made famous by Robert Redford in A River Runs Through It. During the summer months trains laden with coal, destined for China not for the preservation of our own energy security in the US, role by that boulder numerous times an hour. The effects on air quality, especially the release of increased amount of particulate matter, DOES have an environmental impact that should be taken into account. I hope the comments you receive in this process help you to see that we as Montanans and Americans are tired of seeing not only our resources whole-sale sold to countries that have no ties to this country and do not care about our health BUT also that a lack of effort, doing the bare minimum EIS, is nothing more than bending to this desire by making a cheap buck today and passing the costs on to the folks of tomorrow. Would you do that to your own family? Friends? Community members? I encourage you to go above and beyond what is asked you. Be proud of what you accomplish and stand behind the information you generate. Then you and your fellow citizens can make the most informed decision together. Thank you for your time, Ryan Krueger
    Ryan Krueger · Bozeman, MT
  1776. (printed as 11/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19086Rosemary Burton
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, I am extremely concerned about the impacts that so many additional train will make as they pass through Bozeman from the Tongue River to western ports. What really bugs me is the delay at train crossings. the added noise, dust and train pollution with all these trains passing through. More than anything, I can't believe that digging up and selling more coal to eager markets in the far east is still considered in this day and age. Can't you see how dirty coal is? Is everyone turning a blind eye to all the pollution coal plants produce? Are pockets so deep that selling coal, which is responsible for so may greenhouse gasses, is more important than cleaning the air we breather and leaving a decent planet for our kids? Do you have kids? Is this the legacy you want to leave for them? Do the responsible thing, becaoue that old saying about how We all live downwind" is going to jump up and bite us in the butt. The whole planet is downwind of coal emissions and you have the power to make a difference. i implore you to prevent this action from going forward. Regards, rosemary burton"
  1777. (printed as 11/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19085Angela Kociolek
    Dear Mr. Blodgett- I am very concerned about the impact of coal mining on the Tongue River Watershed and the place I call home. As I understand it, IF the proposal goes through, coal trains could rumble through Bozeman and other towns on the way to the West coast causing unnecessary disturbance in their wake. It would be unconscionable to not include impacts statements (environmental and otherwise) on the cities and towns through which the impacting element would travel. This is a no-brainer. The whole proposal is dubious because what we need is clean energy and protection of our precious natural resources - not a project like this. Thank you for your attention and for including cities and towns like Bozeman in the impact research.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1778. (printed as 11/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19084Mary Lee Reese
    I strongly oppose the construction of the Tongue River Railroad and increased coal-for-export traffic throughout Montana. This proposal would negatively affect eastern Montana as well as all towns along the route to the shipping locations by requiring taxpayers to shoulder the cost of infrastructure upgrades through Montana towns and by condemning private land for corporate profit, just to fuel competing Asian economies. It would also irreparably damage the Tongue River Valley and all of its agricultural, historical, and cultural resources. Ranchers and farmers have made living in this valley for generations, and the TRR would harm property values and ag operations. I urge you to consider these impacts in the scope of the environmental impact statement, to act upon the statewide opposition to this project, and to pursue the no-action alternative.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1779. (printed as 11/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19062Gilbert Fennern
    Forsyth, Montana
  1780. (printed as 11/26/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19060Ray and Wanda Gaskill
    Ashland, Montana
  1781. (printed as 11/25/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19123Nancy W. Carrel
    Birney, Montana
  1782. (printed as 11/23/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19061Ladd Coates
    Miles City, Montana
  1783. (printed as 11/23/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19058Northern Plains Resource Council
    As is obvious by the address above, we do not live in Montana at the present time. We do, however, have a familiarity with, and fondness for, the natural beauty of the area and its sacredness. Many writers often talk of the last great places," and the northern plains will unfortunately fit that description if the current push for gas, coal, pipelines, and railroad routes continues. The plains have always been a great place and, as the dust bowl era will attest, subject to ecological abuse. Let us not repeat the abusive history of our past through infrastructure construction that will make them the "last" great place. Eastern Montana in particular has much suffering to look forward to if this proposal becomes a reality. Therefore, we strongly oppose the construction of the Tongue River Railroad and increased coal-for-export traffic throughout Montana. This proposal would negatively affect eastern Montana by requiring taxpayers to shoulder the cost of infrastructure upgrades through Montana towns and by condemning private land for corporate profit, just to fuel competing Asian economies. It would also irreparably damage the Tongue River Valley and all of its agricultural, historical, and cultural resources. Ranchers and farmers have made living in this valley for generations, and the TRR would harm property values and and operations. I urge you to consider these impacts in the scope of the environmental impact statement, to act upon the statewide opposition to this project, and to pursue the no-action alternative. Bob and Judy Cureton"
    Bob and Judy Cureton
  1784. (printed as 11/22/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19057Yellowstone Valley Citizens Council
    I strongly oppose the construction of the Tongue River Railroad and increased coal-for-export traffic throughout Montana. This proposal would negatively affect Billings by requiring taxpayers to shoulder the cost of infrastructure upgrades through our city and by condemning private land for corporate profit, just to fuel competing Asian economies. It would also irreparably damage the Tongue River Valley and all of its agricultural, historical, and cultural resources. Ranchers and farmers have made living in this valley for generations, and the TRR would harm property values and ag operations. I urge you to consider these impacts in the scope of the environmental impact statement, to act upon the statewide opposition to this project, and to pursue the no-action alternative.
    Barbara Guick · Billings, Montana
  1785. (printed as 11/22/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19056Debbie Smith
    I strongly oppose the construction of the Tongue River Railroad. Please consider that the Tongue River Valley is land that is already in productive use in a sustainable way and to allow a single corporation preference to export dirty fuel to Asian economies could do irreversible damage to the land and water. Please consider the sustainability of such an industry over the long term as compared to the historical sustainability of the agricultural use of the same land. I urge your consideration to use the no-action for this project. In gratitude, Debbie Smith
    Miles City, Montana
  1786. (printed as 11/22/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19055Phil Smith
    I do not envy the task at hand; there is so much responsibility you have. I would hope that one of your main objectives is for future generations and not a quick at present time necessity. The longer we are on this earth the more sustainable we are going to have to be. I think a good example of what I am thinking or concerned about is the history of the Great Plains (Dust Bowl and now the depletion and pollution of the Ogallala Aquifer). I am strongly opposed to the construction of the Tongue River Railroad and would hope you would choose the no action for this project. Thank you Phil smith
    Miles City, Montana
  1787. (printed as 11/21/2012)
    Certificate
    233381Certificate Of Publication
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1788. (printed as 11/21/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19054Paul Holland
    It is a myth that coal is clean energy. I decry the use of public funds to facilitate the Tongue River Railroad. Montana is largely and agrarian state. Please abandon this project that will harm the environment that is my heritage as a Montanan.
    East Glacier Park, Montana
  1789. (printed as 11/21/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19053Marie Root
    Respectful greetings to the Surface Transportation Board, Attn: Ken Blodgett: As a native of Miles City, the confluence of the Tongue and Yellowstone Rivers, I strongly oppose the construction of the Tongue River Railroad and increased coal-for-export traffic throughout Montana. This proposal would negatively affect eastern Montana by requiring taxpayers to shoulder the cost of infrastructure upgrades through Montana towns and by condemning private land for corporate profit, just to fuel competing Asian economies. This proposal would also irreparably damage the Tongue River Valley and all of its agricultural, historical, cultural, and environmental resources. Ranchers and farmers have made their living in the Tongue River Valley for generations, and the Tongue River Railroad would harm property values and ag operations, by destroying the very environment it would occupy. I urge you to consider these impacts in the scope of the environmental impact statement, to harken to and act upon the statewide opposition to this project, and to PURSUE THE NO-ACTION alternative. Sincerely, Marie A. Root
    Missoula, Montana
  1790. (printed as 11/20/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19052David Lehnherr
    The proposal to construct the Tongue River Railroad would negatively affect Montana by requiring taxpayers to shoulder the cost of infrastructure upgrades through Montana towns and by condemning private land for corporate profit, just to fuel competing Asian economies. I strongly oppose construction of the railroad. The railroad would also irreparably damage the Tongue River Valley and all of its agricultural, historical, and cultural resources. Ranchers and farmers have made living in this valley for generations. In addition, the railroad would harm property values and agricultural operations. I urge you to consider these impacts in the scope of the environmental impact statement, to act upon the statewide opposition to this project, and to pursue the no-action alternative. Thank you.
    Billings, Montana
  1791. (printed as 11/20/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19051June E. Persons
    I am against the Tongue River Railroad, and recommend the no action" option. The adverse effects of this railroad far outweigh the benefits on all levels. Environmentally it is a disaster. Condemning agricultural land to benefit the hierarchy of Arch Coal is a travesty. Destroying the beautiful Tongue River Valley is a travesty. Who benefits? Only Arch Coal benefits. Please stop this from happening."
  1792. (printed as 11/20/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19050Darlene L. Grove
    Tongue River Railroad - My family opposes. Montana's long term sustainable future is agriculture in the eastern part of the state. Yes, we are blessed with abundant coal reserves which when removed, leave a virtual wasteland. The awesome hydrologoic systems put in place will be no longer viable. And the coal is not being extracted to sustain Montanans or even the nation, but an out of control economic sustem in the near East that is not sustainable. As knowledgeable citizens of this country do we not understand the value of water? There is only so much and we are fortunate to have the purest in the nation. Siting the Tongue River Railroad up a valley that sustains a good agricultural base will be economically disastrous, shortsighted, costly to residents of the area andf environmentally distructive. Wise leaders would not condone such a thing. Hundreds of hours of testimony, hundreds of hours of research has been done on this proposal for many years. All point to the wastefulness of it. We hope you will choose the no action alternative.
    Stevensville, Montana
  1793. (printed as 11/20/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19049Dick Forehand
    I strongly oppose the construction of the Tongue River Railroad and increased coal-for-export traffic throughout Montana. This proposal would negatively affect eastern Montana by requiring taxpayers to shoulder the cost of infrastructure upgrades through Montana towns and by condemning private land for corporate profit, just to fuel competing Asian economies. It would also irreparably damage the Tongue River Valley and all of its agricultural, historical, and cultural resources. Ranchers and farmers have made living in this valley for generations, and the TRR would harm property values and ag operations. I urge you to consider these impacts in the scope of the environmental impact statement, to act upon the statewide opposition to this project, and to pursue the no-action alternative.
    Red Lodge, Montana
  1794. (printed as 11/20/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19048Liz Moran
    I strongly oppose the construction of the Tongue River Railroad and increased coal-for-export traffic throughout Montana. This proposal would negatively affect eastern Montana by requiring taxpayers to shoulder the cost of infrastructure upgrades through Montana towns and by condemning private land for corporate profit, just to fuel competing Asian economies. It would also irreparably damage the Tongue River Valley and all of its agricultural, historical, and cultural resources. Ranchers and farmers have made living in this valley for generations, and the TRR would harm property values and ag operations. I urge you to consider these impacts in the scope of the environmental impact statement, to act upon the statewide opposition to this project, and to pursue the no-action alternative.
    Wilsall, Montana
  1795. (printed as 11/20/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19047Gayle Joslin
    My family adamantly opposes construction of the Tongue River Railroad and the disruption to Montana landscapes, environment and transportation disruptions that will ensue for the benefit of Asian coal corporations. We rhetorically ask, WHY would the U.S. STB endorse a project with so many negative consequences to its citizens, such as mandating that the people subsidize this development through upgrades of railroad crossings, bridges and the like through the state and by gut-wrenchingly taking people's land so others can financially benefit, and so Asia can burn Montana coal and send the pollutants back to North America within a week's time??? Members of my family have lived in the Tongue River Valley and love and respect the agricultural, historical, and cultural resources of area, as well as its hardy and determined families who have lived there for generations. We fervently ask that you consider the impacts of this proposed railroad upon the people, landscapes, and environment of Montana in the scope of the environmental impact statement. Please fully acknowledge and respond to the statewide opposition to this project. We ask that you choose the no-action alternative.
    Helena, Montana
  1796. (printed as 11/20/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19046Taylor Orr
    I strongly oppose the construction of the Tongue River Railroad and increased coal-for-export traffic throughout Montana. This proposal would negatively affect eastern Montana by requiring taxpayers to shoulder the cost of infrastructure upgrades through Montana towns and by condemning private land for corporate profit, just to fuel competing Asian economies. It would also irreparably damage the Tongue River Valley and all of its agricultural, historical, and cultural resources. Ranchers and farmers have made living in this valley for generations, and the TRR would harm property values and ag operations. I urge you to consider these impacts in the scope of the environmental impact statement, to act upon the statewide opposition to this project, and to pursue the no-action alternative.
    Big Timber, Montana
  1797. (printed as 11/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19045Karen Tibbs
    I strongly oppose the construction of the Tongue River Railroad and the increased traffic it would impose on Montana. We would negatively be affected by increased taxes for infrastructure upgrades and taking over private lands for corporate profit only to add competition for our economy. I have witnessed some environmental impacts on the ranchers and farmers in the Tongue River Valley and do not support the impact the railroad would have on this agricultural area. I implore you to consider these impacts in the scope of the environmental impact statement, to act upon the statewide opposition to this project and to pursue the no-action alternative. Yours truly, Karen M. Tibbs
    Billings, Montana
  1798. (printed as 11/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19044Sandra Abraham
    I strongly OPPOSE the construction of the Tongue River Railroad and increased coal-for-export traffic throughout Montana. This proposal would negatively affect eastern Montana by requiring taxpayers to shoulder the cost of infrastructure upgrades through Montana towns and by condemning private land for corporate profit, just to fuel competing Asian economies. It would also irreparably damage the Tongue River Valley and all of its agricultural, historical, and cultural resources. Ranchers and farmers have made living in this valley for generations, and the TRR would harm property values and ag operations. I urge you to consider these impacts in the scope of the environmental impact statement, to act upon the statewide opposition to this project, and to pursue the no-action alternative.
    Billings, Montana
  1799. (printed as 11/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19043Sally Berg
    I am deeply troubled that so little attention gets paid to the legitimate concerns ( resources are planned to be sold to Asia, jobs promised that hold little real future for virile workers and so much environmental destruction, enormous health hazards, taxes on the already stressed small population of Montana with no benefit to the core population...I could go on. How can responsible public servants vote for the slash and burn of Eastern Montana and the attendant risks? Do listen, please to something besides $$$$$. Sincerely, Sally Berg
    Fishtail, Montana
  1800. (printed as 11/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19042Deborah Muth
    I strongly oppose the construction of the Tongue River Railroad and increased coal-for-export traffic throughout Montana. This proposal would negatively affect eastern Montana by requiring taxpayers to shoulder the cost of infrastructure upgrades through Montana towns and by condemning private land for corporate profit, just to fuel competing Asian economies. It would also irreparably damage the Tongue River Valley and all of its agricultural, historical, and cultural resources. Ranchers and farmers have made living in this valley for generations, and the TRR would harm property values and ag operations. I urge you to consider these impacts in the scope of the environmental impact statement, to act upon the statewide opposition to this project, and to pursue the no-action alternative.
    Red Lodge, Montana
  1801. (printed as 11/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19041Mark Browning
    Regarding the proposed Tongue River Rairoad alternate routes: Though the map proposals don't show it, the narrative describes the routeleaving Miles City following the old Milwaukee Road alignment to the west, crossing the Yellowstone River---". This would sound as if train traffic will be passing through Miles City on the little used, former CMSP railbed and exiting to the west across the Tongue & Yellowstone Rivers. I can't imagine that this additional railway traffic would not significantly hinder cross-town traffic for all. If this is the case, will additional street overpass/underpass crossings be required to minimize traffic congestion and long delays, especially for emergency vehicles?"
  1802. (printed as 11/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19040David J Ellenberger
    Approval of the Tongue River railroad will have a major impact on our way of life, the health of our communities, and our economy. We don’t want more dirty coal trains clogging up our rail lines, disrupting our communities, and displacing the hauling of Montana’s agricultural commodities. The environmental analysis should include a full-blown environmental impact statement that comprehensively considers the environmental and economic impacts this line will have on climate change, agricultural operations, communities, and rail transport. It is imperative that you consider the climate change impacts of digging, hauling, and burning 1.3 billion tons of coal. The analysis must consider the possibility that a new rail line could lead to the digging, hauling and burning of other coal resources in the area, contributing even more than the projected 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions that will result from the development of the Otter Creek tracts alone.
    Wheat Ridge, Colorado
  1803. (printed as 11/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19039Larry Winslow
    Please take the no action option on the Tongue River Railroad application. The Tongue River Valley is too beautiful and unique to turn into an industrial corridor
    Billings, Montana
  1804. (printed as 11/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19038Joseph Tonan
    Ontario, California
  1805. (printed as 11/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19037Roger N. Steward
    Broadview, Montana
  1806. (printed as 11/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19036Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes
    Michael L. Durglo · Pablo, Montana
  1807. (printed as 11/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19035Ann A. Wilsnack
    Helena, Montana
  1808. (printed as 11/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19034John E. Dunkum
    Missoula, Montana
  1809. (printed as 11/16/2012)
    Certificate
    233367Certificate Of Service
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1810. (printed as 11/16/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19112Lame Deer, MT (6:00pm)
    11/16 Public Meeting Transcript · Lame Deer, Montana
  1811. (printed as 11/16/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19105Lame Deer, MT (2:00pm)
    11/16 Public Meeting Transcript · Lame Deer, Montana
  1812. (printed as 11/16/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19078Diane Spotted Elk
    Lame Deer, Montana
  1813. (printed as 11/16/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19076Adeline Spotted Elk
    Lame Deer, Montana
  1814. (printed as 11/16/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19075Jolisa Bahr
    Lame Deer, Montana
  1815. (printed as 11/16/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19068John Menyhart
    Miles City, Montana
  1816. (printed as 11/16/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19063Linda Helding
    Arlee, Montana
  1817. (printed as 11/16/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19059Gonnie Siebel
    Bozeman, Montana
  1818. (printed as 11/15/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19104Miles City, MT (6:00pm)
    11/15 Public Meeting Transcript · Miles City, Montana
  1819. (printed as 11/15/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19103Miles City, MT (2:00pm)
    11/15 Public Meeting Transcript · Miles City, Montana
  1820. (printed as 11/15/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19083Craig Nile
    Forsyth, Montana
  1821. (printed as 11/15/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19081Julie Korkow
    Volborg, Montana
  1822. (printed as 11/15/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19080Raymond Harwood
    Miles City, Montana
  1823. (printed as 11/15/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19079Bice Ranch LLC
    Lauren, Danette and Donald Bice · Miles City, Montana
  1824. (printed as 11/15/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19032Matthew Fochs
    I am writing in favor of the Tongue River Railroad project in Southeastern Montana. I believe this project will be a great opportunity for the people of Montana. It will provide a lot of very good jobs and will have many more benefits for the region.
    Havre, Montana
  1825. (printed as 11/14/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19166Ashland, MT (6:00pm)
    11/14 Public Meeting Transcript · Ashland, Montana
  1826. (printed as 11/14/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19165Ashland, MT (2:00pm)
    11/14 Public Meeting Transcript · Ashland, Montana
  1827. (printed as 11/14/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19082James Mitchell
    Miles City, Montana
  1828. (printed as 11/14/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19069Kyle and Gail Shaw
    Miles City, Montana
  1829. (printed as 11/14/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19067Kenneth A. Kania
    Ashland, Montana
  1830. (printed as 11/14/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19066Les and Donna Hirsch
    Miles City, Montana
  1831. (printed as 11/14/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19065Felton Angus Ranch, Inc.
    Kathy Felton
  1832. (printed as 11/14/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19064Henry L. Coffin
    Ashland, Montana
  1833. (printed as 11/14/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19031Shirley Bollinger
    I am concerned about the Tongue River Railroad facillatating shipping coal to Asia, where it will be burned, contributing to global warming and water, air, and noise pollution along the rail lines that go through the United States. I am concerned about the condemnation of productive ranch and farm country for 89 miles along the Tongue River Valley. This is Montana Ranch country, a valued historical region and provides great habitat for wildlife. This agricultural land would be condemned, cut in half and devalued just to help private developers export this coal to Asia. Lastly, if the railroad has to be built, the Colstrip alternative would be best for this part of Montana. It would cross less agricultural land and would partially use a existing rail line. Respectively submitted by Shirley Bollinger, resident of eastern Montana.
    Rosebud, Montana
  1834. (printed as 11/14/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19030Tim Erickson
    Dear Mr. Blodgett: I support the Tongue River Railroad Company's application to construct a new rail line, and request a fair and timely review. The Tongue River Railroad and the development of the Otter Creek mine will provide great economic value to the state of Montana and a tremendous boost to Eastern Montana's economy. The railroad project would positively affect Montana by creating much needed family-wage jobs and increasing local and state tax revenue. Please ensure compliance with Montana's high environmental standards, but avoid unnecessary delays. Sincerely, Tim Erickson
    Billings, Montana
  1835. (printed as 11/14/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19027Billings Chamber of Commerce/Convention and Visitors Bureau
    Bruce MacIntyre · Billings, MT
  1836. (printed as 11/14/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19026James T. Grant
    Medical Lake, Washington
  1837. (printed as 11/13/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19102Forsyth, MT (6:00pm)
    11/13 Public Meeting Transcript · Forsyth, Montana
  1838. (printed as 11/13/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19101Forsyth, MT (2:00pm)
    11/13 Public Meeting Transcript · Forsyth, Montana
  1839. (printed as 11/13/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19072Public Comment #1
  1840. (printed as 11/13/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19071Rosebud County Fire Chief
    Rodney Dresbach · Forsyth, Montana
  1841. (printed as 11/13/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19070Mark Dill
    Forsyth, Montana
  1842. (printed as 11/13/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19029Steve Thompson
    I have grave concerns about the proposed Tongue River Railroad and the many negative impacts that it will directly and indirectly entail. Of particular concern is the question of eminent domain. Private land should be condemned by the government on behalf of large corporations only if the public good that will result from condemnation outweighs the negative impacts to the landowner. The TRR fails that test of public benefit because it will facilitate the export of coal, the world's dirtiest source of climate changing greenhouse gases, to Asian markets. Please complete a comprehensive EIS to evaluate the social, environmental and economic impacts this line will have on climate change, agricultural operations, communities, and rail transport. It is critical that you consider the climate change impacts of digging, hauling, and burning 1.3 billion tons of coal. The analysis must consider the possibility that a new rail line could lead to the digging, hauling and burning of other coal resources in the area, contributing even more than the projected 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions that will result from the development of the Otter Creek tracts alone. Thank you for addressing these concerns in your environmental analysis and please keep me informed about this case.
    Whitefish, Montana
  1843. (printed as 11/13/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19025Spokane City Council
    Ben Stuckart · Spokane, Washington
  1844. (printed as 11/13/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19024Eric Grimsrud
    Due to AGW, the world simply can not tolerate the cumbustion of its vast reserves of coal. There is simply too much coal left to burn. We can hardly tolerarate use of the clean forms of fossil fuels, gas and oil. So we must use only the latter two while we switch over to the alternative source of energy. If we develop these feeds" of coal and tar sands oil (Keystone pipeline) we will use it for many years, unfortunately. Please don't go in that direction. Thank you and see my web site, ericgrimsrud.com for more."
  1845. (printed as 11/13/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19023Michael L. Sandiland
    The Tongue River Rail line in south east Montana must be REFUSED simple based upon irrefutable facts regarding increased carbon emissions adding to global warming. It matters not where the coal is burned it is warming the planet.
    Bozeman, Montana
  1846. (printed as 11/12/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19164Lame Deer, MT (2:00pm)
    11/12 Public Meeting Transcript · Lame Deer, Montana
  1847. (printed as 11/12/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19100Lame Deer, MT (6:00pm)
    11/12 Public Meeting Transcript · Lame Deer, Montana
  1848. (printed as 11/12/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19074LeWarren Whiteman
    Lame Deer, Montana
  1849. (printed as 11/12/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19073Brad Sauer
    Forsyth, Montana
  1850. (printed as 11/12/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19022John Werner
    Mr. Blodgett:Re: the Tongue River Railroad in Montana being proposed to haul coal out of the Otter Creek area to Miles City, I strongly urge you to insist on a full environmental impact statement and one that includes the effects of climate change. It is becoming increasingly evident that global climate change is real, that it is impacting cities and communities across the globe and that we cannot continue to ignore its causes and effects. To continue burning coal, be it in Montana or China, makes no sense in the face of an increasing number of alternative energy sources. Let's not burden our children and future generations with problems that could have been avoided by common sense solutions. Montana doesn't need the coal, the US doesn't need the coal, the only purpose in this undertaking is short-term financial gain - at the long-term expense of all of us. Thank you for your consideration. John Werner
    Ronan, Montana
  1851. (printed as 11/12/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19021Thomas Kilmer
    The Tongue River Valley is one of my favorite places in Montana. This pristine, isolated agricultural valley has provided a sustainable way of life for thousands of years. The Native Americans before us and now ranchers and farmers. This beautiful, thriving valley is an important piece of Montana just as it is. Construction of the Tongue River Railroad would destroy the Tongue River Valley. Farms and Ranches would be sundered. Ground water would be polluted. The clear, clean air would be fouled. Outside of the Tongue River Valley dirty coal trains coming out of the mines would clog rail lines. The shipment of sustainable agriculture products from Montana would be displaced. Communities big and small would be impacted by coal dust, noise and diesel fumes. Rail crossings would be blocked for extended periods of time, slowing the movement of school busses and emergency vehicles. World wide the impact of digging, hauling and burning all that coal transported by the railroad would contribute horribly to global warming. You must do a complete Environmental Impact Statement that considers Global Warming and the economic impacts this railroad will have on the sustainable agriculture of the Tongue River Valley. Please do non approve this railroad. thanks. Tom Kilmer. Native of Montana. I live in Helena but have a deep appreciation for the beauty of the Tongue River Valley and the people who live and work on it's farms and ranches.
    Helena, Montana
  1852. (printed as 11/12/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19020Northern Cheyenne Nation
    The Tongue River Valley is at stake...the Valley of the Chiefs. Archeological sites abound...springs, wildlife, water diversity, native plants/food, berries, bugs, animals, etc. The rich Northern Cheyenne culture will be impacted. The grreat Cheyenne Nation...the Morningstar People have much to give, while our communities are not prepared and do not have infrastructure in place...no irrigation systems, wind/solar power, cogen, etc., no business...I am against this railroad and projected coal mine, which I think will not be constructed. its a losing business and is not a solution to pollution; it is an end of pipe solution to more pollution. Technological advancements in enery development overshadow Fischer Tropsch gasification process. We can make energy from other sustainable sources and $100 of millions from other developments.
    Yellowbeard · Ashland, Montana
  1853. (printed as 11/12/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19019Friends of the Bitterroot
    The environmental analysis should include a full-blown environmental impact statement that comprehensively considers the environmental and economic impacts this line will have on climate change, agricultural operations, Montana, Idaho, Washington and Oregon communities, and rail transport.
    Doug Soehren · Hamilton, Montana
  1854. (printed as 11/11/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19018Russell Salisbury
    We don'twant more dirty coal trains clogging up our rail lines, disrupting our communities, and displacing the hauling of Montana's agricultural commodities. The environmental analysis should include a full-blown environmental impact statement that comprehensively considers the environmental and economic impacts this line will have on climate change, agricultural operations, communities, and rail transport. Most importantly, it is imperative that you considerthe climate change impacts of digging, hauling, and burning 1.3 billion tons of coal. The analysis must consider the possibility that a new rail line could lead to the digging, hauling and burning of other coal resources in the area, contributing even more than the projected 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions that will result from the development of the Otter Creek tracts alone.
    Floweree, Montana
  1855. (printed as 11/10/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19017Lydia Garvey
    I strongly urge you to Nix coal (for China!) railroad through spectacular, pristine, World Heritage Tongue River Valley! Not only will it destroy this area but greatly add to greenhouse gases & pollute water/air. Needs a Full EIS! I strongly urge you to- Do your job- Protect Our Public lands, waters, livelihoods, air, wildlife & health! You work for citizens, Not industry! Your attention to this most urgent matter would be much appreciated by all present & future generations of all species. Thank you Lydia Garvey Public Health Nurse
    Clinton, Oklahoma
  1856. served (printed as 11/9/2012)
    Decision
    42770Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED ADDITIONAL NOTICE OF THE INTENT TO PREPARE AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT, A DRAFT SCOPE OF STUDY, AND SCOPING MEETINGS IN THIS PROCEEDING. ADDITIONAL MEETINGS WILL BE HELD IN LAME DEER, MONT., ON NOVEMBER 16, 2012.
  1857. (printed as 11/9/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19016Leaf Schumann
    While the need to create jobs in our economy is understandable, I strongly oppose the mining, transporting and shipping of our coal resources to the west coast and then to Asia. There are many reasons for this, but paramount among them is the level of disruption it will bring to our rural community. Numerous school buses, aid cares, 911 responders, and fire trucks pass countless train crossings in our rural county. A quick response means everything. Unless coal producers/shippers are willing to take responsibility for the loss of life and property OR are willing to fully fund mitigation required (something with no precedent) the impact will be insurmountably negative. Of course the risk of ocean spills, bilge dumps, diesel and coal dust with accompanying heavy metals, noise at each of the dozens of crossings, loss of revenue and jobs that might otherwise result from attempts to develop Bellingham Bay, etc. are to be considered as well.
    Deming, Washington
  1858. (printed as 11/8/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19015Sara Brooke Benjamin
    The environmental analysis should include a full-blown environmental impact statement that comprehensively considers the environmental and economic impacts this line will have on climate change, agricultural operations, communities, and rail transport. It is imperative that you consider the climate change impacts of digging, hauling, and burning 1.3 billion tons of coal. The analysis must consider the possibility that a new rail line could lead to the digging, hauling and burning of other coal resources in the area, contributing even more than the projected 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions that will result from the development of the Otter Creek tracts alone.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1859. (printed as 11/8/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19014Arona K Henderson MD
    Approval of the Tongue River railroad will have a major impact on our way of life, the health of our communities, and our economy. We don’t want more dirty coal trains clogging up our rail lines, disrupting our communities, and displacing the hauling of Montana’s agricultural commodities. The environmental analysis should include a full-blown environmental impact statement that comprehensively considers the environmental and economic impacts this line will have on climate change, agricultural operations, communities, and rail transport. It is imperative that you consider the climate change impacts of digging, hauling, and burning 1.3 billion tons of coal. The analysis must consider the possibility that a new rail line could lead to the digging, hauling and burning of other coal resources in the area, contributing even more than the projected 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions that will result from the development of the Otter Creek tracts alone. Arguments against Coal Export Terminal at Cherry Point and Railway's Custer Spur Rail Expansion If Peabody Coal and SSA Marine (49% owned by Goldman Sachs) put North America’s largest coal export terminal at Cherry Point, they will get huge profits, China will get cheap coal, and people living in communities surrounding the Gateway Pacific terminal,GPT, will get pollution in their air, land and water. The GPT threatens our health, clean air, and water. If the GPT is built, each year over 48 million tons of coal would be brought on trains to Cherry Point, dumped on 80 feet tall open storage piles, loaded onto ships and sent to China. According to the rail operator, BNSF, every single coal car can lose as much as 500 pounds of coal dust en route. A 2001 Canadian study of coal dust emissions at the Westshore Terminal near Tsawassen B.C., estimated that the Westshore Terminal emits roughly 1.5 million lbs. of coal dust a year. The proposed Cherry Point Terminal would be more than twice the size of Westshore with potentially twice the coal dust problem. Coal dust escaping from trains and terminal storage piles and diesel exhaust from train engines and cargo ships threaten our health because they contain toxic substances such as lead, mercury, arsenic, benzene, and formaldehyde. These can cause serious health problems including cancer, asthma, heart attacks, lung and breathing problems, birth defects and infant deaths. 180 Whatcom County doctors say there is no safe level of exposure to these substances. The prevailing winds at Cherry Point do not blow out to sea. The prevailing winds at Cherry Point blow toward the surrounding communities. Every year the wind would carry millions of pounds of toxic coal dust onto the neighborhoods, homes, farms, cars, patio furniture, and vegetable gardens of people living in Whatcom County. Terminal cities across North America are experiencing problems with coal dust coating their communities: Even though the prevailing winds blow out to sea at the Westshore coal terminal and even though it is only half as big as the proposed GPT, residents in Point Roberts, WA report coal dust blackens their homes, vehicles, patio furniture and boats. The Point Roberts marina manager reports the coal dust is a “constant problem” blackening boats and has resulted in lost business. The Ridley coal terminal, near Port Edward, B.C., ships only 9 tons of coal a year but photos show huge coal-dust clouds rising from the storage piles and residents report black coal dust coats their property. In response to homeowner complaints, the Ridley terminal now sends out a contractor “free of charge” to power wash the coal dust off residents’ homes. Residents in Seward Alaska have sued the coal terminal because coal dust blowing off the coal storage piles coats and damages their fishing boats, their neighborhoods and their scenic harbor. The state of Alaska has already given a $220,000 fine to the railroad that brings coal to the Seward terminal for failing to control coal dust coming off the trains. In Newport News, Virginia, despite the “advanced” water sprinkling systems and coal conveyer belts used at the Dominion 1.7 million ton coal shipping terminal, residents say coal dust coats their homes and, if they open the windows, coal dust coats the inside too. In the community near the coal terminal, the asthma rate is twice that for the rest of Virginia. The GPT threatens the beauty and natural resources upon which our communities are built. The GPT threatens the Cherry Point Aquatic Reserve, Birch Bay beaches, Whatcom County’s recreational fishing, commercial fishing, and tourism industry. Flooding tides flow from Cherry Point, through the aquatic reserve toward Point Whitehorn and then into and around Birch Bay. The flooding tides carrying coal dust and cargo ship ballast water would damage eel grass, herring, salmon, crabs, clams and other wildlife. If the GPT is built, the daily high tides would deposit black coal dust on Birch Bay beaches. When people buy a home or locate their business they look for safe, healthy neighborhoods with good schools, clean environments, and thriving communities. People do not want to move into dirty neighborhoods with noise, pollution, traffic and major industry that negatively impact the single largest investment they are ever likely to make. As proposed the Gateway Pacific Terminal at Cherry Point would create the largest coal export facility in North America. Each year 450 ships would travel through the straits enroute to Asia. A third of the ships would be Capesize vessels which are: An ocean-going cargo vessel that is physically too large to fit through the locks of either the Panama or Suez Canals and therefore must voyage via Cape Horn at the southernmost tip of South America to get to or from the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, or the Cape of Good Hope at the southernmost tip of South Africa to get to and from the Indian and Atlantic Oceans. Capesize vessels generally serve deep-water terminals handling raw materials, such as iron ore and coal. The rest of the vessels would be Panamax: ocean-going cargo vessels of the maximum size possible to pass through the locks of the Panama Canal, which are 1000 ft. long by 110 ft. wide and 85ft deep. These vessels are typically of 50,000 to 80,000 dwt, 965ft (290m) in length; 106ft. (32.3m) beam; and 39.5ft (12.04m) draft. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has determined the Gateway Pacific Terminal (GPT) and Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) Railway's Custer Spur Rail Expansion projects are interrelated and may have significant individual and/or cumulative impacts on the human environment. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) will be prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 and the Washington State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA). Preparation of the EIS will support the Corps' eventual decision to either issue, issue with modification or deny DA permits for the proposed actions. The EIS will assess the potential social, economic, and environmental impacts of the projects and is intended to be sufficient in scope to address Federal, State, and local requirements, environmental and socio-economic issues concerning the proposed action, and permit reviews. Sierra Club Scrapbook September 28, 2012 Oregon Gives the Stop Signal to Big Coal That was the message the Portland City Council, the Metro, and the city of The Dalles sent Big Coal last week after they all approved resolutions opposing coal exports through the Pacific Northwest without a full area-wide environmental review conducted by the Army Corps of Engineers. Portland's council vote was just the latest example in a string of cities and municipalities demanding environmental reviews and putting the interests of communities and public health before Big Coal profits. Tens of thousands of residents, 400 business leaders, 570 healthcare professionals, 200 faith leaders, and more than 160 public officials, including Oregon Governor Kitzhaber, have written letters, submitted comments, and rallied for a full review. There are so many better sources of energy available," says Howard Shapiro, Beyond Coal campaign volunteer in Portland, who lives less than a mile from the train tracks that coal trains would use. The idea that we're working hard to get off coal and then some guys come here who want to send coal through the Columbia River Gorge in open trains is crazy. Environmentally it's a disaster. And I'm particularly concerned by coal train derailments and that these trains would use the same tracks as passenger trains." Big Coal wants to connect its coal mining operations in Wyoming with Asian markets by building export terminals at such places as Coos Bay, Oregon, and Longview, Port Westward, and Cherry Point, Washington. Peabody in particular wants to export 48 million tons through Cherry Point each year. Coal companies want to send 32 coal trains a day through Portland, reports The Oregonian. It's not just environmentalists who want to stop Big Coal in its tracks. The medical and public health communities, small business owners, educators, and all sorts of political figures and municipalities have opposed the idea. “Will you please study the impact of the thousands of coal trains going from their points of origin through the regions of Bellingham and Blaine and the other areas that the rail lines pass through in this area to the storage and shipping facility planned at Cherry Point. My family and I are living in dread of the proposed coal terminal construction and transfer of freight trains of coal to the site for storage before shipping. The only benefit I see from this egregious act is the profit that the sponsoring and underwriting massive corporations will make. At the expense of the health of all the people residing along the rail lines or within air current reach of the lines, residing near the terminal with its mounds of coal piled high in the air blowing dust in over the adjacent land, if this project goes forward undeterred by environmental and common sense studies, I foresee a disaster of immeasurable consequences. Other regions in Canada that had similar projects have had enormous regrets. Impacts are wide ranging: Health of individuals as coal dust gets into the lungs with each breath; vulnerable are the already ill, babies, children, those with asthma or other COPD, and the rest of the population Wildlife affected similarly Vegetation affected Sea life affected Property values decline even further than has already occurred in this current recession Interminable trains going by loaded with coal spewing the dust into the air Lines of cars at the railway crossings burning gasoline with fumes rising into the air as they wait for the innumerable box cars to roll by. The stored coal and vessels shipping the coal will kill off the Orca whales. The beautiful forests will suffer; the trees will be exposed to the noxious fumes. Trees were not meant to live in a coal laden atmosphere. Coal is a dirty fuel. It will be shipped away to countries that will burn it and use it and the environmental impact of it then becomes more pronounced worldwide. The promised jobs for the region will not materialize. People will be brought in from elsewhere to work at low wages. This project must be stopped The whole reason for this is in a word PROFIT to those who are already rolling in billions of PROFIT. Thank you for reading this. My only hope is that the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers will find this project a scheming, shameful, immoral, reprehensible, despicable, and environmentally dangerous one and veto it. Arona K Henderson retired MD"
  1860. (printed as 11/8/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19013Carol Makela
    It is imperative that you consider the climate change impacts of digging, hauling, and burning 1.3 billion tons of coal. The analysis must consider the possibility that a new rail line could lead to the digging, hauling and burning of other coal resources in the area, contributing even more than the projected 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions that will result from the development of the Otter Creek tracts alone. I also urge you to consider the countless lives of animals and plants that will be lost as a direct result of strip mining and laying new tracks through their habitat.
    Bellingham, Washington
  1861. (printed as 11/8/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19012Peter Goodman
    Approval of the Tongue River railroad will have a major impact on our way of life, the health of our communities, and our economy. We don’t want more dirty coal trains clogging up our rail lines, disrupting our communities, and displacing the hauling of Montana’s agricultural commodities. The environmental analysis should include a full-blown environmental impact statement that comprehensively considers the environmental and economic impacts this line will have on climate change, agricultural operations, communities, and rail transport. It is imperative that you consider the climate change impacts of digging, hauling, and burning 1.3 billion tons of coal. The analysis must consider the possibility that a new rail line could lead to the digging, hauling and burning of other coal resources in the area, contributing even more than the projected 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions that will result from the development of the Otter Creek tracts alone. Peter Goodman____________________
    Albany, Oregon
  1862. (printed as 11/8/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19011Susan Schwab
    I am greatly concerned about the added congestion and pollution (cars backed up idling waiting for train tracks to clear) that the increased coal train traffic would cause. My community is bisected with train tracks—there is no other way to access the interstate to the hospital. I'm concerned about the delays emergency responders would face. There is also the added noise pollution of trains blowing whistles through my small town. I live six blocks from the tracks, but when the whistle blows, it sounds like the train is literally in my back yard. I'm also concerned about the loss of agricultural land and way of life, and the loss of business along the tracks in communities all along the route. If one can't get to the business, the business goes OUT of business. The coal industry and railroad are the only entities truly benefiting from this endeavor. Ad of course, there's the climate concern. All around, it's just a BAD idea.
    Belgrade, Montana
  1863. (printed as 11/7/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19010William E Clawson II
    The Tongue River railroad is a very bad idea. Please take into consideration that Montana has clean air and water for the most and our biggest problem with their quality is coal. In addition to that, this project would release 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gas. Our planet's climate is at risk. Please do not permit this project.
    Helena, MT
  1864. (printed as 11/7/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19009Linda Eichwald
    Whether coal is healthy is not an debatable. Whether the mining is good for the environment is not debatable. Whether a railroad is put in Mt. to haul the coal should be carefull studied and considered as part of our values in Montana. Not just a bottom line profit motive. Please slow this down and do your job to protect the land and it's people. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Linda Eichwald
    Missoula, MT
  1865. (printed as 11/7/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19008Paul Callahan
    Ken, I would like to be placed on the mailing list for all communications related to the Tongue River Railroad EIS. Thanks very much, Paul
    Missoula, MT
  1866. (printed as 11/7/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19007Sarah Craig
    Dear Mr. Blodgett, I am writing to oppose the 83-mile railroad line to transport coal through the pristine Tongue River Valley. I believe that the Surface Transportation Board should takes these following issues into account before further action. 1. Approval of the Tongue River railroad will have a major impact on our way of life, the health of our communities, and our economy. We don’t want more dirty coal trains clogging up our rail lines, disrupting our communities, and displacing the hauling of Montana’s agricultural commodities. 2. The environmental analysis should include a full-blown environmental impact statement that comprehensively considers the environmental and economic impacts this line will have on climate change, agricultural operations, communities, and rail transport. 3. It is imperative that you consider the climate change impacts of digging, hauling, and burning 1.3 billion tons of coal. The analysis must consider the possibility that a new rail line could lead to the digging, hauling and burning of other coal resources in the area, contributing even more than the projected 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions that will result from the development of the Otter Creek tracts alone. I hope you take this points into consideration. Thank you very much.
    Bozeman, MT
  1867. (printed as 11/7/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19006MEIC
    Reducing carbon emissions is imperative. A new rail line will lead to increased coal mining, hauling and burning of coal, the dirtiest fuel. This rail project must have a thorough environmental analysis that considers its effect on climate change, agricultural operations, communities, and rail transport.
    Claudia S. Brown · Missoula, MT
  1868. (printed as 11/7/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19004Edd Blackler
    Please enter these comments in your record. I feel that the environmental analysis should include a full-blown environmental impact statement that comprehensively considers the environmental and economic impacts this line will have on climate change, agricultural operations, communities, and rail transport. More than the projected 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gas emissions that will result from the development of the Otter Creek tracts alone. Due consideration for the impact on the health and economy of the community must be given, as well as how this proposal will change the way of life for these local citizens.
    Bigfork, MT
  1869. (printed as 11/7/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19003Mary Schaad
    Arch Coal is seeking a permit to strip mine Otter Creek coal. The analysis of this proposal should include a full environmental impact statement that comprehensively considers the environmental and economic impacts this line will have on climate change, agricultural operations, communities, and rail transport. We don't want more dirty coal displacing the hauling of Montana's agricultural commodities, and impacting the health of our communities.
    Bozeman, MT
  1870. (printed as 11/7/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19002Russell Blalack
    I am opposed to granting this lease for the following reasons. 1) Arch Coal has leased 1.3 billion tons of coal in the Otter Creek area. If that coal is dug up and hauled off, the inevitable burning of the coal will result in about 2.6 billion tons of greenhouse gases going into an already overloaded atmosphere. The acid fall out and other noxious by products will be blown back into our front yard, the Western United States. 2) Construction and use of the Tongue River Railroad will bring hardship, destruction, and loss of livelihood to all ranchers on this proposed and unnecessary railroad. Sincerely, Russell Blalack owner/rancher Section 26, T1N R31E nr Hardin Montana
    Cupertino, CA
  1871. (printed as 11/7/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1990Rocker Six Cattle Company
    Mr. Clint McRae
  1872. (printed as 11/5/2012)
    Comment
    EI-18997Northern Cheyenne Tribe
    President Leroy Spang
  1873. (printed as 11/5/2012)
    Comment
    EI-18996Montana SHPO
    Stan Wilmoth
  1874. (printed as 11/2/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19001U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
    Todd Tillinger
  1875. (printed as 11/2/2012)
    Comment
    EI-18999Bureau of Land Management
    Todd Yeager
  1876. served (printed as 11/1/2012)
    Decision
    42755Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IS ISSUING THIS NOTICE OF CORRECTION BECAUSE THE LOCATION LISTED ON PAGE 3 OF THE NOTICE OF INTENT FOR THE SCOPING MEETING IN FORSYTH, MONTANA, IS UNAVAILABLE AND HAS BEEN CHANGED.
  1877. served (printed as 11/1/2012)
    Decision
    42741Entire Board
    DECISION: (1) CLARIFIED WHAT THE BOARD WILL REVIEW IN THIS CASE; (2) DIRECTED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. (TRRC) TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE TRANSPORTATION MERITS OF THE REVISED LINE TRRC PROPOSES TO BUILD; (3) ESTABLISHED A NEW PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE FOR THIS PROCEEDING; AND (4) REQUIRED TRRC TO PUBLISH NEW NOTICES CONSISTENT WITH THIS DECISION.
  1878. (printed as 11/1/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1989Section 106 Consulting Parties
  1879. (printed as 10/29/2012)
    Comment
    EI-18998Mr. Clint McRae
  1880. (printed as 10/24/2012)
    Comment
    EI-19000U.S. Department of Agriculture
    Mark Peterson
  1881. (printed as 10/23/2012)
    Comment
    EI-18976Bureau of Land Management
    Mark Sant
  1882. served (printed as 10/22/2012)
    Decision
    42738Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS DETERMINED THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT IS APPROPRIATE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  1883. (printed as 10/22/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1987Distribution List
  1884. (printed as 10/22/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1986USFWS
    Mark Wilson
  1885. (printed as 10/22/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1985Montana SHPO
    Mark Baumler
  1886. (printed as 10/22/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1984Rosebud County Floodplain Administrator
    John Marks
  1887. (printed as 10/22/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1983Section 106 Consulting Partie
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  1888. (printed as 10/22/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1982Powder River County Floodplain Administrator
    Wanda Smith
  1889. (printed as 10/22/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1981Miles City Flood Plain Administrator
    Samantha Malenovsky
  1890. (printed as 10/22/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1980City Planner, Miles City
    Dianna Broadie
  1891. (printed as 10/22/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1979EPA - Region 8
    Stephen Potts
  1892. (printed as 10/22/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1978Custer County Floodplain Administrator
    Bill Ellis
  1893. (printed as 10/22/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1977Custer County Attorney
    Wyatt Glade
  1894. (printed as 10/22/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1976USDA NRCS
    Dennis Dellow
  1895. (printed as 10/19/2012)
    Comment
    EI-18975ICF International
  1896. (printed as 10/18/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1973Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David H. Coburn
  1897. (printed as 10/18/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1972Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David H. Coburn
  1898. (printed as 10/16/2012)
    Supplement
    233203Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1899. (printed as 10/11/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1970U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
    Brad Thompson
  1900. (printed as 10/11/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1969BLM
    Todd Yeager
  1901. (printed as 10/11/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1968USDA
    Mark Peterson
  1902. (printed as 10/11/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1967Montana Department of Natural Resources & Conservation
    Lisa Axline
  1903. (printed as 10/9/2012)
    Comment
    EI-18969Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David Coburn
  1904. (printed as 10/9/2012)
    Comment
    EI-18968Steptoe & Johnson LLP
    David Coburn
  1905. (printed as 10/1/2012)
    Motion
    233091Petition
    Jay L. Scholllmeyer, For And On Behalf Of United Transportation Union-General Committee Of Adjustment, Go-386 (Utu/Go-386)
  1906. (printed as 10/1/2012)
    Certificate
    233089Certificate Of Service
    Jay L. Scholllmeyer, For And On Behalf Of United Transportation Union-General Committee Of Adjustment, Go-386 (Utu/Go-386)
  1907. (printed as 10/1/2012)
    Certificate
    233077Certificate Of Service
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1908. served (printed as 9/20/2012)
    Decision
    42651Director Of Proceedings
    PROVIDED NOTICE TO THE PARTIES THAT A SERVICE LIST HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM NOTICES OF INTENT TO PARTICIPATE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE SET FORTH IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  1909. (printed as 8/20/2012)
    Notice
    232796Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    David W. Brockpahler
  1910. (printed as 8/20/2012)
    Notice
    232795Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Eileen Morris
  1911. (printed as 8/20/2012)
    Notice
    232792Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Barbara J. Braided Hair
  1912. (printed as 8/20/2012)
    Notice
    232791Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Otto C. Braided Hair, Jr.
  1913. (printed as 8/14/2012)
    Notice
    232810Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Siamak Samsam
  1914. (printed as 8/14/2012)
    Notice
    232747Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Adriann M. Killsnight
  1915. (printed as 7/31/2012)
    Notice
    232628Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    City Of Spokane
  1916. (printed as 7/30/2012)
    Notice
    232622Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Spokane Riverkeeper
  1917. (printed as 7/20/2012)
    Notice
    232894Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Kyle Shaw, Dru Burk
  1918. (printed as 7/19/2012)
    Notice
    232642Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Maurice Felton, Doug Mcrae, Del Dinstel, Clint Mcrae, Alice Orr, John A. Beardsley, Mark Fix, Nancy W Carrel, Gary Ochsner, Les & Donna Hirsch, Raymond Harwood, Nick Golder, Jeff & Susan Perla, Richard J. Anderson, Sharon Dinstel, Terry J. Hanson, Brad Sauer, Christine Valentine, Roger Muggli, John Hamilton, Curtis Yarlott
  1919. (printed as 7/19/2012)
    Notice
    232583Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Paul E. Miller
  1920. served (printed as 7/18/2012)
    Decision
    42534Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL AUGUST 17, 2012.
  1921. (printed as 7/18/2012)
    Notice
    232562Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    National Wildlife Federation
  1922. (printed as 7/17/2012)
    Notice
    232558Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Western Organization Of Resource Councils
  1923. (printed as 7/16/2012)
    Notice
    232564Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Northern Cheyenne Tribe Administration
  1924. (printed as 7/16/2012)
    Reply
    232555Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1925. (printed as 7/13/2012)
    Notice
    232579Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Mark Fix
  1926. (printed as 7/13/2012)
    Notice
    232551Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Jay L Schollmeyer
  1927. (printed as 7/12/2012)
    Certificate
    232548Certificate Of Service
    Northern Plains Resource Council
  1928. (printed as 7/12/2012)
    Notice
    232547Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1929. (printed as 7/11/2012)
    Notice
    232578Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Jeanie Alderson, Terry Punt
  1930. (printed as 7/11/2012)
    Notice
    232559Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Northern Plains Resource Council
  1931. (printed as 7/11/2012)
    Notice
    232544Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Mark Fix
  1932. (printed as 7/10/2012)
    Request
    232541Request For Extension Of Time
    Northern Plains Resource Council
  1933. (printed as 7/10/2012)
    Notice
    232540Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Beth Kaeding
  1934. (printed as 7/2/2012)
    Notice
    232527Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Sierra Club Environmental Law Program, Montana Environmental Information Center
  1935. (printed as 6/21/2012)
    Comment
    EI-18926Northern Plains Resource Council
    Kelsey Miller
  1936. (printed as 6/21/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1911ARS/USDA
    Mark Petersen
  1937. (printed as 6/20/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1910Section 106 Consulting Parties
  1938. (printed as 6/19/2012)
    Notice
    232476Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Montana Department Of Environmental Quality
  1939. served (printed as 6/18/2012)
    Decision
    42434Entire Board · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    DECISION: (1) DISMISSED TWO TONGUE RIVER PROCEEDINGS AND REOPENS TONGUE RIVER I DUE TO SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES IN THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL; (2) REQUIRED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY (TRRC) TO REVISE ITS APPLICATION THAT FULLY REFLECTS TRRC'S CURRENT PLANS; (3) DISMISSED THE NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL, MARK FIX (NPRC) PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION; AND (4) DENIED NPRC'S REQUEST TO REOPEN ALL THREE TONGUE RIVER PROCEEDINGS.
  1940. (printed as 5/8/2012)
    Reply
    232287Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    , Northern Plains Resource Council And Mark Fix
  1941. (printed as 5/8/2012)
    Reply
    232286Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    , Northern Plains Resource Council And Mark Fix
  1942. (printed as 5/7/2012)
    Reply
    232279Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1943. (printed as 5/7/2012)
    Reply
    232278Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1944. (printed as 5/7/2012)
    Reply
    232275Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Jay L Schollmeyer
  1945. (printed as 5/7/2012)
    Reply
    232274Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Native Action Inc
  1946. (printed as 5/7/2012)
    Reply
    232273Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Native Action Inc
  1947. (printed as 5/7/2012)
    Reply
    232272Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Jay L Schollmeyer
  1948. (printed as 4/19/2012)
    Motion
    232218Motion/Petition/Request · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1949. (printed as 4/19/2012)
    Motion
    232217Motion/Petition/Request · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1950. (printed as 4/17/2012)
    Motion
    232204Petition To Reopen · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council IncMark Fix,
  1951. (printed as 4/17/2012)
    Motion
    232203Petition To Reopen · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, , Mark Fix
  1952. (printed as 3/9/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1868Section 106 Consulting Parties · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
  1953. (printed as 3/2/2012)
    Report
    231945Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1954. (printed as 2/29/2012)
    Comment
    EI-18833Transcripts from Section 106 Consultation Meeting · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
  1955. (printed as 2/10/2012)
    Comment
    EI-18808Northern Cheyenne Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
    Leroy Spang
  1956. (printed as 1/10/2012)
    Comment
    EO-1821Tongue River RR Consulting Parties · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
    Tribes
  1957. (printed as 12/14/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18760Rosebud Sioux · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
    Russell Eagle Bear
  1958. (printed as 12/9/2011)
    Comment
    EO-1809Section 106 Consulting Parties · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
  1959. (printed as 12/8/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18755Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
    Dianne Desrosiers
  1960. (printed as 12/7/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18757ACHP · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
    Najah Duvall-Gabriel
  1961. (printed as 11/22/2011)
    Comment
    EO-1806Section 106 Consulting Parties · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
  1962. (printed as 11/4/2011)
    Report
    231248Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1963. (printed as 11/4/2011)
    Comment
    EO-1822Section 106 Consulting Parties/ Tribes · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
  1964. (printed as 11/4/2011)
    Comment
    EO-1796Programmatic Agreement Consulting Parties · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
  1965. (printed as 10/13/2011)
    Comment
    EO-1778Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Dianne Desrosiers
  1966. (printed as 10/11/2011)
    Comment
    EO-1777Three Affiliated tribes · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Curley Yupee
  1967. (printed as 10/6/2011)
    Comment
    EO-1776Section 106 Consulting Parties · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  1968. (printed as 9/2/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18671Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  1969. (printed as 8/29/2011)
    Report
    230885Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1970. (printed as 8/25/2011)
    Reply
    230874Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1971. served (printed as 8/9/2011)
    Decision
    41803Director Of Proceedings · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    DECISION GRANTED AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL AND MR. MARK FIX TO FILE A RECONSIDERATION OF A DECISION SERVED ON JUNE 15, 2011.
  1972. (printed as 8/9/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18768National Trust for Historic Preservation · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
    Elizabeth Merritt
  1973. (printed as 8/9/2011)
    Comment
    EO-1741Tribes and Federal Agencies/Seciton 106 Parties · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tribes and Federal Agencies/Section 106 Parties
  1974. (printed as 8/1/2011)
    Request
    230746Request For Extension Of Time · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1975. (printed as 7/25/2011)
    Motion
    231495Petition To Reopen · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Mark Fix, Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  1976. (printed as 7/25/2011)
    Motion
    231494Petition To Reopen
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, Mark Fix
  1977. (printed as 7/25/2011)
    Motion
    230672Petition To Reopen · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Mark Fix, Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  1978. (printed as 7/22/2011)
    Comment
    EO-1735Section 106 consulting parties and tribes · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  1979. (printed as 7/8/2011)
    Report
    230586Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1980. (printed as 7/7/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18641National Park Service · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Christine Whitacre
  1981. (printed as 7/6/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18640Advisory Council on Historic Preservation · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Reid Nelson
  1982. served (printed as 7/1/2011)
    Decision
    41746Director Of Proceedings · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    DECISION GRANTED NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL'S AND MARK FIX'S PETITION TO EXTEND THE DUE DATE TO FILE A PETITION OF RECONSIDERATION OF THE DECISION SERVED ON JUNE 15, 2011 IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  1983. (printed as 6/29/2011)
    Request
    230480Request For Extension Of Time · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, Mark Fix
  1984. (printed as 6/23/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18656Tribes and Other Section 106 Consulting Parties · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Rapid City Tribal Meeting Transcripts Day 3 (June 23, 2011)
  1985. (printed as 6/22/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18655Tribes and Other Section 106 Consulting Parties · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Rapid City Tribal Meeting Transcripts (June 22, 2011, Day 2)
  1986. (printed as 6/21/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18654Tribes and Other Section 106 Consulting Parties · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Rapid City Tribal Meeting Transcripts - Day 1 (June 21, 2011)
  1987. served (printed as 6/15/2011)
    Decision
    41709Entire Board · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    DECISION DENIED A PETITION, FILED BY NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL AND MARK FIX, TO REOPEN SEVERAL RELATED CASES WHERE THE BOARD GRANTED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE AN APPROXIMATELY 130-MILE RAIL LINE PROPOSED FOR CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN MILES CITY AND DECKER, MONT.
  1988. (printed as 6/9/2011)
    Comment
    EO-1668PA Consulting Parties · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  1989. (printed as 6/6/2011)
    Comment
    EO-1667PA consulting parties · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  1990. (printed as 5/3/2011)
    Comment
    EO-1638Tribal Meeting Iinvitation in Rapid City · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    PA Consulting Parties
  1991. (printed as 4/11/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18520Ft. Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Curley Youpee
  1992. (printed as 4/4/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18517Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Franky Jackson
  1993. (printed as 4/4/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18515Northern Cheyenne Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Joe Fox, JR.
  1994. (printed as 4/1/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18514Lower Brule Sioux Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Clair Green
  1995. (printed as 4/1/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18513Santee Sioux Nation / ACHP · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Rick Thomas / Najah Gabriel
  1996. (printed as 3/30/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18511Rosebud Sioux Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Russell Eagle Bear
  1997. (printed as 3/30/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18510ACHP · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Najah Duvall-Gabriel
  1998. (printed as 3/23/2011)
    Correction
    229031Correction · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  1999. (printed as 3/23/2011)
    Report
    229030Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2000. (printed as 3/23/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18508Montana DNRC · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Lisa Axline
  2001. (printed as 3/21/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18504U.S. Department of Interior, National Park Service · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Christine Whitacre
  2002. (printed as 3/21/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18503Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Dianne Desrosiers
  2003. (printed as 3/18/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18502Montana Preservation Alliance · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Chere Jiusto
  2004. (printed as 3/18/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18501TRRC / Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2005. (printed as 3/18/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18500U.S. Dept. of Agriculture · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Lisa Baete
  2006. (printed as 3/17/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18499Bureau of Land Management · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Dalice Landers
  2007. (printed as 3/16/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18494Northern Plains Resource Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Jeanie Alderson
  2008. (printed as 3/4/2011)
    Letter
    228939Letter · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2009. (printed as 3/4/2011)
    Letter
    228938Letter · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2010. (printed as 3/4/2011)
    Letter
    228937Letter · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2011. (printed as 3/4/2011)
    Letter
    228936Letter
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2012. (printed as 3/2/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18493Montana Preservation Alliance · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    James Jenks
  2013. (printed as 2/23/2011)
    Reply
    228879Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Mark Fix, Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2014. (printed as 2/23/2011)
    Reply
    228878Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, Mark Fix
  2015. (printed as 2/23/2011)
    Reply
    228877Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, Mark Fix
  2016. (printed as 2/23/2011)
    Reply
    228876Reply
    Mark Fix, Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2017. (printed as 2/15/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18491Montana Historical Society · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Stan Wilmoth
  2018. (printed as 2/4/2011)
    Letter
    228772Letter · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2019. (printed as 2/4/2011)
    Letter
    228771Letter
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2020. (printed as 2/4/2011)
    Letter
    228769Letter · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2021. (printed as 2/4/2011)
    Letter
    228768Letter · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2022. served (printed as 2/1/2011)
    Decision
    41384Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    PROVIDED NOTICE OF THE REOPENING OF THE PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT PROCESS TO UPDATE AND REVISE THE EXISTING PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT.
  2023. (printed as 1/27/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18468Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Dianne Desrosiers
  2024. (printed as 1/7/2011)
    Comment
    EO-1581Sisseton Wahpteon Oyate THPO · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Dianne Desosiers
  2025. (printed as 1/6/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18450Yankton Sioux Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Lana Gravatt
  2026. (printed as 1/6/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18447Northern Cheyenne Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Jolene Spang
  2027. (printed as 1/4/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18451National Park Service, Heritage Partnerships Program · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Christine Whitacre
  2028. (printed as 1/4/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18449Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Steve Vance
  2029. (printed as 1/3/2011)
    Comment
    EI-18448Standing Rock Sioux Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Waste'Win Young
  2030. (printed as 1/3/2011)
    Comment
    EO-1580Section 106 consulting parties · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2031. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1577Northern Arapaho Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Darlene Conrad
  2032. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1576Three Affiliated Tribes (MHA Nation) · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Perry Brady
  2033. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1575Blackfeet Nation · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    John Murray
  2034. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1574Cheyenne River Sioux · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Dana Dupris
  2035. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1573Flandreau Santee Sioux · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Sam Allen
  2036. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1572Santee Sioux Tribe of Nebraska · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Franky Jackson
  2037. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1571Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Leonard Wabasha
  2038. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1570Standing Rock Sioux Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Wast'Win Young
  2039. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1569Upper Sioux Community · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Scott Larsen
  2040. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1568Yankton Sioux Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Lana Gravatt
  2041. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1567Sisseton-Wahpeton Oyate · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Dianne Desrosiers
  2042. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1566Rosebud Sioux Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Russell Eagle Bear
  2043. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1565Ft. Peck Assiniboine and Sioux Tribes · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Curley Youpee
  2044. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1564Crow Creek Sioux Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Brandon Sazue
  2045. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1563Oglala Sioux · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Wilmer Mesteth
  2046. (printed as 12/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1562Lower Sioux Indian Community · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Anthony Morse
  2047. (printed as 12/21/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1560National Historic Landmarks Program · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Christine Whitacre
  2048. (printed as 11/15/2010)
    Report
    228227Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2049. (printed as 11/1/2010)
    Reply
    228101Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2050. (printed as 11/1/2010)
    Reply
    228100Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2051. (printed as 11/1/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1537Section 106 Consulting parties/PA Signatories etc · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2052. (printed as 10/29/2010)
    Comment
    EI-18398Northern Cheyenne · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Joe Fox Jr
  2053. (printed as 10/29/2010)
    Comment
    EI-18397ACHP · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    John Eddin for Charlene Dwin Vaughn
  2054. (printed as 10/29/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1535ACHP · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Najah Duvall-Gabriel
  2055. (printed as 10/28/2010)
    Comment
    EI-18396MT DNRC · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Lisa Axline
  2056. (printed as 10/28/2010)
    Comment
    EI-18395Agricultural Research Services · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Lisa Baete
  2057. (printed as 10/28/2010)
    Comment
    EI-18394WY BLM · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Dalice Landers
  2058. (printed as 10/27/2010)
    Comment
    EI-18393MT SHPO · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Stan Wilmoth
  2059. (printed as 10/26/2010)
    Comment
    EI-18391ACOE · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Martha S. Chieply
  2060. (printed as 10/25/2010)
    Comment
    EI-18392TRRC · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Doug Day
  2061. (printed as 10/25/2010)
    Comment
    EI-18389Northern Cheyenne Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Joe Fox, JR
  2062. (printed as 10/25/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1532Section 106 Consulting Parties · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Cheyenne, Crow, SHPO, applicant
  2063. (printed as 10/22/2010)
    Comment
    EI-18388Northern Cheyenne · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Joe Fox
  2064. (printed as 10/22/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1533PA Extension · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Section 106 Consulting Parties
  2065. (printed as 10/19/2010)
    Comment
    EI-18386Northern Cheyenne Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Leroy Spang
  2066. (printed as 10/12/2010)
    Oral
    227967Oral Argument/Hearing Request · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, Mark Fix
  2067. (printed as 10/12/2010)
    Motion
    227966Motion/Petition/Request · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Mark Fix, Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2068. (printed as 10/12/2010)
    Oral
    227965Oral Argument/Hearing Request · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
    Mark Fix, Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2069. (printed as 10/12/2010)
    Motion
    227964Motion/Petition/Request · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
    Mark Fix, Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2070. (printed as 10/12/2010)
    Oral
    227963Oral Argument/Hearing Request · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, Mark Fix
  2071. (printed as 10/12/2010)
    Motion
    227961Motion/Petition/Request · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, Mark Fix
  2072. (printed as 10/12/2010)
    Oral
    227960Oral Argument/Hearing Request
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, Mark Fix
  2073. (printed as 10/12/2010)
    Motion
    227959Motion/Petition/Request
    Mark Fix, Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2074. (printed as 10/8/2010)
    Comment
    EI-18383ACHP · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Charlene Dwin Vaughn
  2075. (printed as 10/5/2010)
    Comment
    EI-18378Northern Plains Resource Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Ed Gulick
  2076. (printed as 9/16/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1518Crow Tribe of Indians · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Dale Old Horn, THPO
  2077. (printed as 9/16/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1517Crow Tribe of Indians · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Cedric Black Eagle, Chairman
  2078. (printed as 9/16/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1516Northern Cheyenne Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Conrad Fisher, THPO
  2079. (printed as 9/16/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1515Northern Cheyenne Tribe · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Leroy Spang, President
  2080. (printed as 9/16/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1514Northern Plains Resource Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Rebecca Fischer
  2081. (printed as 9/16/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1513U.S. Dept. of Agriculture - ARS · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Lisa Baete
  2082. (printed as 9/16/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1512Tongue River Railroad Company · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Doug Day
  2083. (printed as 9/16/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1511Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2084. (printed as 9/16/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1510U.S. Army Corps of Engineers · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Rebecca Shipman
  2085. (printed as 9/16/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1509Montana Dept. of Natural Resources & Conservation · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Lisa Axline
  2086. (printed as 9/16/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1508U.S. Dept. of Interior, Bureau of Land Management · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Dalice Landers
  2087. (printed as 9/16/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1507Montana State Office of Historic Preservation · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Stan Wilmoth
  2088. (printed as 9/16/2010)
    Comment
    EO-1506Advisory Council on Historic Preservation · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Valerie Hauser
  2089. (printed as 9/9/2010)
    Reply
    227764Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2090. (printed as 9/9/2010)
    Reply
    227763Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2091. (printed as 9/9/2010)
    Reply
    227761Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2092. (printed as 9/9/2010)
    Reply
    227756Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2093. served (printed as 8/6/2010)
    Decision
    41019Director Of Proceedings · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    DECISION GRANTED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC.'S PETITION REQUESTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO THE NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL AND MR. MARK FIX'S SUBMISSION IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  2094. (printed as 8/6/2010)
    Reply
    227589Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2095. (printed as 8/6/2010)
    Reply
    227588Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2096. (printed as 8/6/2010)
    Reply
    227587Reply
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2097. (printed as 8/6/2010)
    Reply
    227586Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2098. (printed as 8/3/2010)
    Request
    227565Request For Extension Of Time · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2099. (printed as 7/26/2010)
    Motion
    227497Petition To Reopen · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, Mark Fix
  2100. (printed as 7/26/2010)
    Motion
    227496Petition To Reopen · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, Mark Fix
  2101. (printed as 7/26/2010)
    Motion
    227495Petition To Reopen · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1)
    Mark Fix, Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2102. (printed as 7/26/2010)
    Motion
    227494Petition To Reopen
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, Mark Fix
  2103. (printed as 7/22/2010)
    Report
    227481Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2104. (printed as 3/22/2010)
    Report
    226672Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2105. (printed as 12/23/2009)
    Comment
    EI-18017Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2106. (printed as 11/25/2009)
    Report
    226070Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2107. (printed as 11/24/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17953Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2108. (printed as 11/24/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17952Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2109. (printed as 7/22/2009)
    Report
    225392Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2110. (printed as 6/12/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1242U.S. Fish & Wildlife · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Steve Guertin
  2111. (printed as 5/4/2009)
    Comment
    EI-17556Director, Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Joe Maurier
  2112. (printed as 3/24/2009)
    Report
    224743Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2113. (printed as 11/25/2008)
    Report
    224051Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2114. (printed as 7/18/2008)
    Report
    222986Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2115. (printed as 4/30/2008)
    Comment
    EI-7209Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2116. (printed as 3/17/2008)
    Report
    221836Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2117. served (printed as 3/13/2008)
    Decision
    38568Entire Board · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    DECISION DENIED PETITIONS REQUESTING RECONSIDERATION OF THE DECISION SERVED IN THESE PROCEEDINGS ON OCTOBER 9, 2007.
  2118. (printed as 12/17/2007)
    Reply
    221043Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2119. (printed as 12/10/2007)
    Motion
    220942Petition For Reconsideration · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Jerry Lunde
  2120. (printed as 12/10/2007)
    Motion
    220941Petition For Reconsideration · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Trout Unlimited
  2121. served (printed as 12/7/2007)
    Decision
    38606Secretary · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    DECISION GRANTED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC.'S REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ITS REPLY ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 17, 2007.
  2122. (printed as 12/7/2007)
    Reply
    220926Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Diamond Cross Ranch Llc
  2123. (printed as 12/3/2007)
    Motion
    220872Petition For Waiver · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Brown Cattle Company
  2124. (printed as 11/30/2007)
    Request
    220855Request For Extension Of Time · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2125. (printed as 11/27/2007)
    Motion
    220857Petition For Reconsideration · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    American Prairie Foundation
  2126. (printed as 11/26/2007)
    Motion
    220789Petition For Reconsideration · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Diamond Cross Ranch Llc
  2127. (printed as 11/26/2007)
    Motion
    220788Petition For Reconsideration · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Alice Orr
  2128. (printed as 11/23/2007)
    Motion
    220781Petition For Reconsideration · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Powder River Basin Resource Council
  2129. (printed as 11/19/2007)
    Report
    220714Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2130. (printed as 11/19/2007)
    Motion
    220712Petition For Reconsideration · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Honorable David E. Wanzenried
  2131. (printed as 11/19/2007)
    Motion
    220711Petition For Reconsideration · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Brown Cattle Company
  2132. served (printed as 11/13/2007)
    Decision
    38551Secretary · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
    in the court-action register
  2133. served (printed as 11/7/2007)
    Decision
    38509Commissioner · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    DECISION DENIED ALL PETITIONS REQUESTING THE BOARD TO STAY THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE DECISION SERVED IN THESE PROCEEDINGS ON OCTOBER 9, 2007. IN THE ABSENCE OF A STAY, THE DECISION WILL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON NOVEMBER 8, 2007.
  2134. (printed as 11/5/2007)
    Reply
    220642Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Native Action Inc
  2135. (printed as 11/5/2007)
    Reply
    220641Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Native Action Inc
  2136. (printed as 11/2/2007)
    Correction
    220658Correction · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386), United Transportation Union Montana State Legislative Board, City Of Forsyth
  2137. (printed as 11/2/2007)
    Correction
    220632Correction · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    City Of Forsyth, United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386), Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, United Transportation Union Montana State Legislative Board
  2138. (printed as 11/1/2007)
    Reply
    220630Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2139. (printed as 10/29/2007)
    Motion
    220573Petition For Waiver · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United Transportation Union Montana State Legislative Board, United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386), City Of Forsyth, Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2140. (printed as 10/29/2007)
    Motion
    220572Petition For Waiver · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386), Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, City Of Forsyth, United Transportation Union Montana State Legislative Board
  2141. (printed as 10/29/2007)
    Motion
    220571Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc, United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386), United Transportation Union Montana State Legislative Board, City Of Forsyth
  2142. (printed as 10/29/2007)
    Motion
    220570Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386), United Transportation Union Montana State Legislative Board, City Of Forsyth, Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2143. (printed as 10/25/2007)
    Reply
    220535Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2144. (printed as 10/19/2007)
    Motion
    220489Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Fi Ranch
  2145. (printed as 10/19/2007)
    Motion
    220488Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    V-C Cattle Company
  2146. (printed as 10/19/2007)
    Motion
    220487Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Musgrave Ranch
  2147. (printed as 10/19/2007)
    Motion
    220486Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Diamond Cross Ranch Llc
  2148. (printed as 10/19/2007)
    Motion
    220485Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Trout Unlimited
  2149. (printed as 10/19/2007)
    Motion
    220484Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Alice Orr
  2150. (printed as 10/19/2007)
    Motion
    220483Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    S&P Land Company
  2151. (printed as 10/19/2007)
    Motion
    220482Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Jerry Lunde
  2152. (printed as 10/19/2007)
    Motion
    220481Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Brown Cattle Company
  2153. (printed as 10/19/2007)
    Motion
    220480Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Powder River Basin Resource Council
  2154. (printed as 10/19/2007)
    Motion
    220479Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Honorable David E. Wanzenried
  2155. (printed as 10/19/2007)
    Motion
    220478Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Caribou Land & Livestock Co
  2156. (printed as 10/19/2007)
    Motion
    220472Petition For Stay · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    American Prairie Foundation
  2157. served (printed as 10/9/2007)
    Decision
    36956Entire Board · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    DECISION APPROVED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC.'S APPLICATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A 17.3-MILE LINE IN ROSEBUD AND BIG HORN COUNTIES, MT. THE BOARD ALSO MODIFIED THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS IMPOSED ON EARLIER APPROVALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF 89 MILES OF RAIL LINE BETWEEN MILES CITY AND ASHLAND, MT, AND THE EXTENSION OF THAT LINE FROM ASHLAND TO DECKER, MT, VIA THE 41-MILE FOUR MILE CREEK ALTERNATIVE ROUTE.
  2158. (printed as 7/16/2007)
    Report
    219763Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2159. (printed as 3/14/2007)
    Report
    218795Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2160. (printed as 12/19/2006)
    Comment
    EI-2611Montana DNRC · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Lisa Axline
  2161. (printed as 11/13/2006)
    Report
    218070Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2162. (printed as 11/13/2006)
    Comment
    EI-2586U.S. EPA · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    John Wardell
  2163. served (printed as 10/13/2006)
    Decision
    37356Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    ISSUED FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (FINAL SEIS), WHICH DISCUSSED THE POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS THAT COULD RESULT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF THE PROPOSED RAIL LINE AND INCLUDED FINAL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MITIGATING POSSIBLE ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS.
  2164. (printed as 7/17/2006)
    Report
    217071Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2165. (printed as 5/24/2006)
    Comment
    EI-2089Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2166. (printed as 5/18/2006)
    Comment
    EO-274U.S. Fish and Wildlife · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Mark Wilson
  2167. (printed as 5/12/2006)
    Comment
    EI-2087Montan FW&P · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Jeff Hagener
  2168. (printed as 3/16/2006)
    Report
    216000Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2169. (printed as 2/3/2006)
    Comment
    EO-254U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Mark Wilson
  2170. (printed as 1/23/2006)
    Comment
    EI-1870U.S. Fish and Wildlife · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    R. Mark Wilson
  2171. (printed as 12/20/2005)
    Comment
    EO-236ACHP · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Don Klima
  2172. (printed as 11/28/2005)
    Comment
    EI-1807U.S. Fish & Wildlife · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    R. Mark Wilson
  2173. (printed as 11/13/2005)
    Report
    215136Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2174. (printed as 9/30/2005)
    Comment
    EI-1690Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2175. (printed as 9/20/2005)
    Comment
    EI-1686Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2176. (printed as 9/20/2005)
    Comment
    EO-223U.S. Fish and Wildlife · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Mark Wilson
  2177. (printed as 8/29/2005)
    Comment
    EO-216Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2178. (printed as 7/22/2005)
    Comment
    EO-215US Fish and Wildlife · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Mark Wilson
  2179. (printed as 7/18/2005)
    Report
    214354Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2180. (printed as 6/27/2005)
    Comment
    EI-1575U.S. Dept. of the Interior, F&W Service · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    R. Mark Wilson
  2181. (printed as 6/27/2005)
    Comment
    EI-1574Montana FW&P · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Jeff Hagener
  2182. (printed as 6/21/2005)
    Comment
    EI-1573Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2183. (printed as 6/21/2005)
    Comment
    EI-1554Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2184. (printed as 6/6/2005)
    Comment
    EI-1487Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2185. (printed as 5/13/2005)
    Comment
    EO-206U.S. Fish and Wildlife · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Mark Wilson
  2186. (printed as 5/12/2005)
    Comment
    EI-1475Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2187. (printed as 4/20/2005)
    Comment
    EI-1459Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2188. (printed as 4/6/2005)
    Comment
    EI-1450Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2189. (printed as 4/5/2005)
    Comment
    EI-1454Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    M. Jeff Hagener
  2190. (printed as 3/14/2005)
    Report
    213538Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2191. (printed as 2/2/2005)
    Comment
    EI-1386World Wildlife Fund · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Curtis Freese · Bozeman, Montana
  2192. (printed as 12/15/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1291Montana Preservation Alliance · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Chere Jiusto
  2193. (printed as 12/15/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1206Congress Member · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Denny Rehberg
  2194. (printed as 12/15/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1187Northern Cheyenne Tribe Administration · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Eugene LIttleCoyote
  2195. (printed as 12/13/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1198Douglas Benge · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2196. (printed as 12/13/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1195Musgrave Ranch · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Bill and Judy Musgrave
  2197. (printed as 12/10/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1218Trout Unlimited · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Charles Gauvin
  2198. (printed as 12/10/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1156United States Senate · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Conrad Burns
  2199. (printed as 12/9/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1210Montana Department of Natural Resrources · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Kevin Smith
  2200. (printed as 12/9/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1197Marya Grathwohl · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2201. (printed as 12/9/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1151Mark Fix · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2202. (printed as 12/9/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1147The Lodge at Diamond Cross, LLC · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Dick Hosford and Laurie Oakland
  2203. (printed as 12/8/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1143BLM · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David McIlnay
  2204. (printed as 12/8/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1117Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Mr. Blodgett - As we discussed on the telephone earlier today, Gary Bertellotti of my staff e-mailed comments on Monday, December 6, 2004. Those comments had not received a final edit and I would like to replace them with these final comments. Thanks for your help. If there are any questions, please call me at 406-444-3183 Sincerely, Chris Hunter
    Chris Hunter · Helena, MT
  2205. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comments
    212700Environmental Comment · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United Transportation Union-General Committee of Adjustment and United Transportation Union Montana State Legislative Board
  2206. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1219The Brown Cattle Co. · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Art Hayes Jr
  2207. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1217Ronald Nernec · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2208. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1202Julia Page · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2209. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1184Native Action · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Gail Small
  2210. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1159Monty Lesh · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2211. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1158Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Lynn Fitterer
  2212. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1157Deborah Hanson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2213. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1155Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railroad Company · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Sarah Bailiff
  2214. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1154Bones Brothers Ranch · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Terry Punt and Jeanie Alderson
  2215. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1153Diamond Cross Ranch · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Phil and Denise Wood
  2216. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1152US EPA · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    John Wardell
  2217. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1149Northern Plains Resource Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Michael Reisner
  2218. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1142United Transportation Union · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Gordon MacDougall
  2219. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1140Steptoe and Johnson LLP · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2220. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1116Dick Hosford & Laurie Oakland · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Birney, Montana
  2221. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1114Northern Plains Resource Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council comments on SDEIS for Tongue River Railroad III-STB Docket o. 30186 (Sub-No. 3). Hard copy to follow by mail.
    Michael Reisner · Billings, Montana
  2222. (printed as 12/6/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1113Minnesotans - Energy-Efficient Economy · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Attached are the joint Comments of Minnesotans for an Energy-Efficient Economy, and Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy. Contact information for both organizations is printed in the comments.
    Elizabeth Goodpaster · St. Paul, MN
  2223. (printed as 12/5/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1290Gary Huckins · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2224. (printed as 12/5/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1191Joan Brownell · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2225. (printed as 12/3/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1213Doug Martens · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2226. (printed as 12/3/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1091Electronic Recording · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Charlene A. Berdahl
  2227. (printed as 12/3/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1090Electronic Recording · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Charlene A. Berdahl
  2228. (printed as 12/2/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1146Dept. of Interior · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Robert Stewart
  2229. (printed as 12/2/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1141Karen Morris · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2230. (printed as 12/2/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1136Cormorant Bay Lakeview Estates Subdivision · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    John Day/Tateishi (George/Poland)
  2231. (printed as 12/2/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1134Miles City School District · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Jack Regan
  2232. (printed as 12/1/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1148Minnesotans for an Energy-Efficient Economy · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Elizabeth Goodpaster
  2233. (printed as 12/1/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1131Beth Kaeding · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2234. (printed as 12/1/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1130Alice Orr · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2235. (printed as 11/30/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1139Rocker Six Cattle Company · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Wallace McRae
  2236. (printed as 11/30/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1137Nancy Carrel · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2237. (printed as 11/29/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1132Amish · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Perry Keim
  2238. (printed as 11/29/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1127Miles City Chamber of Commerce · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Linda Wolff
  2239. (printed as 11/29/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1126Stan Taylor · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2240. (printed as 11/26/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1145MDT · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Dan Martin
  2241. (printed as 11/26/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1135Stephen Valentine · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2242. (printed as 11/26/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1133Miles Community College · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Darrel Hammon
  2243. (printed as 11/26/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1129Berniece Musgrave · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2244. (printed as 11/22/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1128Powder River Board of County Commissioners · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Ray Traub
  2245. (printed as 11/18/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1125Judy Staigmiller · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2246. (printed as 11/17/2004)
    Report
    212565Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2247. (printed as 11/17/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1093Daniel Dutton · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2248. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1144USGS · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Brenda Johnson
  2249. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1124Stephen and Christine Valentine · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2250. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1123United States Senate · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Max Baucus
  2251. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1122Custer County · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Duane Mathison
  2252. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1121Office of the Governor · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Judy Martz
  2253. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1120Montanans for Responsible Energy Development · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tom McKerlick
  2254. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1119ACHP · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Alan Stanfill
  2255. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1105Miles City Economic Development Council, Inc. · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tom McKerlick
  2256. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1104C. A. Grenz · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    C.A. Grenz
  2257. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1103Anne McKinney · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2258. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1102Lee Akers · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2259. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1101Clifford Locke · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2260. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1100Mark Fix · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2261. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1099Gerald Tallent · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2262. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1098Duane Mathison · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2263. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1097Clint McRae · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2264. (printed as 11/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1096David Davenport · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
  2265. (printed as 11/3/2004)
    Supplement
    212435Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company, Inc.i
  2266. served (printed as 10/21/2004)
    Decision
    34035Entire Board · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    (1) DENIED A JOINT PETITION FILED BY THE UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION-GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT AND THE UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION-MONTANA STATE LEGISLATIVE BOARD ASKING THE BOARD TO RECONSIDER ITS DECISION SERVED SEPTEMBER 2, 2003, WHICH GRANTED A PETITION JOINTLY FILED BY TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY (TRRC PARTNERSHIP) AND TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. (TRRC INC.) ASKING THE BOARD TO SUBSTITUTE TRRC INC. FOR TRRC PARTNERSHIP AS THE APPLICANT FOR AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE THE SO-CALLED WESTERN ALIGNMENT RAIL LINE BETWEEN ASHLAND AND DECKER, MT; AND (2) DIRECTED THAT TRRC INC. FILE SUPPLEMENTAL, UPDATED INFORMATION IN SUPPORT OF THE TONGUE RIVER III CONSTRUCTION APPLICATION.
  2267. (printed as 10/19/2004)
    Comment
    EO-178Northern Plains Resource Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Jeanie Alderson
  2268. served (printed as 10/15/2004)
    Decision
    35117Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    ISSUED A DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (DSEIS), REQUESTED COMMENTS ON THE DSEIS FROM INTERESTED PARTIES BY DECEMBER 6, 2004, AND ANNOUNCED THAT THE BOARD WILL HOLD PUBLIC MEETINGS IN MILES CITY, MT, ON NOVEMBER 16, 2004, AND IN ASHLAND, MT, ON NOVEMBER 17, 2004.
  2269. (printed as 10/15/2004)
    Comment
    EO-177St. Labre Indian School · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Dan Burke
  2270. (printed as 10/15/2004)
    Comment
    EO-176Miles City Public Library · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Mike Hamlett
  2271. (printed as 10/15/2004)
    Comment
    EO-175EPA · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Office of Federal Activities
  2272. served (printed as 10/13/2004)
    Decision
    35167Secretary · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    ANNOUNCED THE AGENDA ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE BOARD'S OCTOBER 20, 2004 VOTING CONFERENCE.
  2273. (printed as 10/13/2004)
    Comment
    EO-174Advisory Council on Historic Preservation · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Don Klima
  2274. (printed as 9/29/2004)
    Comment
    EI-1051Northern Plains Resource Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Jeanie Alderson
  2275. (printed as 7/16/2004)
    Comment
    EI-929Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    David Coburn
  2276. (printed as 7/14/2004)
    Report
    211567Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2277. (printed as 3/26/2004)
    Comment
    EO-75Northern Plains Resource Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Michael Reisner
  2278. served (printed as 3/18/2004)
    Decision
    33975Entire Board · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    DENIED THE APPEAL FILED BY THE UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION-GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT AND THE UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION-MONTANA STATE LEGISLATIVE BOARD ASKING THE BOARD TO REVISE THE AMENDED FINAL SCOPE OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT SERVED BY THE BOARD'S SECTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ON AUGUST 22, 2003.
  2279. (printed as 3/16/2004)
    Report
    210307Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2280. served (printed as 3/3/2004)
    Decision
    34492Secretary · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    GRANTED THE UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION-GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT AND THE UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION-MONTANA STATE LEGISLATIVE BOARD'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY, SUBJECT TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDER IMPOSED BY THE DECISION SERVED IN THIS PROCEEDING ON NOVEMBER 18, 2003.
  2281. (printed as 2/26/2004)
    Comment
    EI-737Tongue River Railroad · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Doug Day
  2282. (printed as 1/22/2004)
    Comment
    EI-459Tongue River Railroad · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Doug Day
  2283. (printed as 12/5/2003)
    Comment
    EO-49Standing Rock Sioux · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Charles Murphy
  2284. (printed as 12/4/2003)
    Comment
    EI-339Public Affairs Management · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Mary Bean
  2285. (printed as 12/2/2003)
    Reply
    209519Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2286. served (printed as 11/28/2003)
    Decision
    34246Secretary · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    GRANTED A MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR FILING COMMENTS TO TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY'S SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE.
  2287. (printed as 11/26/2003)
    Reply
    209492Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2288. (printed as 11/24/2003)
    Reply
    209482Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2289. (printed as 11/24/2003)
    Comment
    EO-47Oglala Sioux Tribal Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    John Yellow Bird Steel
  2290. (printed as 11/19/2003)
    Notice
    209448Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment) · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2291. served (printed as 11/18/2003)
    Decision
    34213Secretary · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    (1) GRANTED TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD, INC.'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND (2) DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH THE PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THE APPENDIX TO THIS DECISION.
  2292. (printed as 11/18/2003)
    Appeal
    209435Appeal Arbitration Decision · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment
  2293. (printed as 11/17/2003)
    Reply
    209425Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2294. (printed as 11/13/2003)
    Motion
    209409Motion For Protective Order · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
    in the protective-order register
  2295. (printed as 11/12/2003)
    Comments
    209389Comment · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United Transportation Union Montana State Legislative Board, United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386)
  2296. (printed as 11/12/2003)
    Comments
    209388Comment - Fax Copy · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2297. (printed as 11/12/2003)
    Comments
    209387Comment · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    City Of Forsyth
  2298. (printed as 11/12/2003)
    Comments
    209386Comment · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Mark Fix
  2299. (printed as 11/12/2003)
    Report
    209384Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2300. served (printed as 11/10/2003)
    Decision
    34196Secretary · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    DENIED THE MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER FILED BY TRRC.
  2301. (printed as 11/10/2003)
    Request
    209423Request For Extension Of Time - Fax Copy · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Terry Punt, Jeannie Alderson, Art Hayes, Irv Alderson
  2302. (printed as 11/10/2003)
    Motion
    209363Motion For Protective Order · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
    in the protective-order register
  2303. (printed as 11/6/2003)
    Reply
    209337Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2304. (printed as 11/5/2003)
    Motion
    209321Motion For Protective Order · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
    in the protective-order register
  2305. (printed as 10/31/2003)
    Certificate
    209279Certificate Of Service · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2306. served (printed as 10/24/2003)
    Decision
    34129Secretary · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    THIS NOTICE PROVIDES CHANGES TO THE OCTOBER 3, 2003 SERVICE LIST AND THOSE CHANGES PERTAIN SOLELY TO THE PARTIES OF RECORD IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  2307. (printed as 10/21/2003)
    Comment
    EO-40Eastern Shoshone Business Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Floyd Osborne
  2308. (printed as 10/20/2003)
    Misc.
    209188Miscellaneous · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United Transportation Union - General Committe Of Adjustment Go-245
  2309. (printed as 10/20/2003)
    Supplement
    209148Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386)
  2310. (printed as 10/17/2003)
    Motion
    209146Motion/Petition/Request · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386), United Transportation Union Montana State Legislative Board
  2311. (printed as 10/15/2003)
    Misc.
    209197Miscellaneous · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    House District 5, Montana House Of Representatives
  2312. (printed as 10/15/2003)
    Misc.
    209196Miscellaneous · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Stephen Valentine Iii
  2313. (printed as 10/14/2003)
    Misc.
    209195Miscellaneous · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Patrick Landers
  2314. (printed as 10/14/2003)
    Misc.
    209194Miscellaneous · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Terry Punt
  2315. (printed as 10/14/2003)
    Misc.
    209193Miscellaneous · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Brown Cattle Company
  2316. (printed as 10/14/2003)
    Misc.
    209192Miscellaneous · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Fl Ranch
  2317. (printed as 10/14/2003)
    Misc.
    209191Miscellaneous · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Diamond Cross Ranch Llc
  2318. (printed as 10/14/2003)
    Misc.
    209190Miscellaneous · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Mr. And Mrs. Richard J Anderson
  2319. (printed as 10/14/2003)
    Misc.
    209189Miscellaneous · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Nellie Israel
  2320. (printed as 10/14/2003)
    Certificate
    209104Certificate Of Service · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2321. (printed as 10/10/2003)
    Reply
    209095Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2322. (printed as 10/9/2003)
    Misc.
    209199Miscellaneous · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Mark Fix
  2323. (printed as 10/9/2003)
    Misc.
    209198Miscellaneous · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Marilyn Fortune
  2324. (printed as 10/9/2003)
    Comment
    EO-38Tongue River Railroad · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Doug Day
  2325. (printed as 10/8/2003)
    Misc.
    209201Miscellaneous · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Ted Hirsch
  2326. (printed as 10/8/2003)
    Misc.
    209200Miscellaneous · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Les Hirsch
  2327. (printed as 10/7/2003)
    Certificate
    209069Certificate Of Service · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    John D. Fitzgerald
  2328. served (printed as 10/3/2003)
    Decision
    33981Secretary · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    PROVIDED THE COMPLETE SERVICE LIST FOR THIS PROCEEDING.
  2329. served (printed as 9/30/2003)
    Decision
    33834Entire Board · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    DENIED TWO APPEALS OF THE JULY 7, 2003 SECRETARY DECISION FILED BY (1) THE UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION-GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT AND THE TRANSPORTATION UNION-MONTANA STATE LEGISLATIVE BOARD AND (2) THE NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL, INC.
  2330. (printed as 9/24/2003)
    Comment
    EO-37Arapaho Business Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Burton Hutchinson
  2331. (printed as 9/24/2003)
    Comment
    EO-36Crow Tribal Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Carl Venne
  2332. (printed as 9/24/2003)
    Comment
    EO-35Shoshone Business Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Vernon Hill
  2333. (printed as 9/24/2003)
    Comment
    EO-34Oglala Sioux Tribal Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    John Yellow Bird Steele
  2334. (printed as 9/24/2003)
    Comment
    EO-33Standing Rock Sioux Tribal Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Jess "Jay"" Taken Alive"
  2335. (printed as 9/22/2003)
    Reply
    208957Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2336. (printed as 9/22/2003)
    Motion
    208955Petition To Reopen · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386)
  2337. served (printed as 9/2/2003)
    Decision
    33891Entire Board · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    GRANTED A PETITION TO SUBSTITUTE THE TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. FOR TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY AS THE APPLICANT FOR AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE THE SO-CALLED WESTERN ALIGNMENT RAIL LINE BETWEEN ASHLAND AND DECKER, MT.
  2338. (printed as 9/2/2003)
    Motion
    208821Petition For Reconsideration · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386)
  2339. served (printed as 8/22/2003)
    Decision
    33929Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    AMENDED FINAL SCOPE OF THE SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.
  2340. (printed as 8/6/2003)
    Motion
    208639Motion/Petition/Request - Fax Copy · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    City Of Forsyth
  2341. (printed as 7/23/2003)
    Reply
    208494Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2342. (printed as 7/17/2003)
    Letter
    208427Letter - Fax Copy · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2343. (printed as 7/17/2003)
    Statement
    208420Support Statement · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2344. (printed as 7/15/2003)
    Appeal
    208403Appeal · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment, United Transportation Union Montana State Legislative Board
  2345. (printed as 7/15/2003)
    Report
    208390Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2346. served (printed as 7/7/2003)
    Decision
    33641Secretary · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    ADOPTED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE AND PROVIDED PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS PROCEEDING.
  2347. (printed as 6/5/2003)
    Comment
    EI-81Montana Natural Heritage Program · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Martin Miller
  2348. (printed as 6/2/2003)
    Comment
    EI-80Steptoe & Johnson · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Betty Jo Christian
  2349. served (printed as 5/28/2003)
    Decision
    33640Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    EXTENDED THE REPLY DATE SET FORTH IN THE AMENDED NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE A SUPPLEMENT TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON THE ADEQUACY OF THE FINAL SCOPE OF THE SUPPLEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 3, 1999 TO JUNE 3, 2003.
  2350. (printed as 5/22/2003)
    Request
    207859Request For Extension Of Time · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2351. (printed as 5/21/2003)
    Reply
    207854Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2352. served (printed as 5/19/2003)
    Decision
    33511Entire Board · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    DENIED SEPARATE PETITIONS FILED BY (1) THE UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION-GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT AND THE UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION-MONTANA STATE LEGISLATIVE BOARD, AND (2) THE NORTHERN PLAINS RESOURCE COUNCIL, INC. ASKING THE BOARD TO RECONSIDER THE DECISION SERVED ON MARCH 11, 2003.
  2353. (printed as 5/19/2003)
    Comments
    207836Comment · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United States Department Of The Interior, Bureau Of Land Management
  2354. (printed as 5/19/2003)
    Comment
    EI-70State of Arkansas · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tracy Copeland
  2355. (printed as 5/19/2003)
    Comment
    EI-69N/A · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Mark Fix
  2356. (printed as 5/19/2003)
    Comment
    EI-68Northern Plains Resource Council · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Michael Reisner
  2357. (printed as 5/16/2003)
    Reply
    207825Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2358. (printed as 5/16/2003)
    Comment
    EI-67N/A · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Beth Kaeding
  2359. (printed as 5/15/2003)
    Reply
    207823Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386)
  2360. (printed as 5/14/2003)
    Reply
    207814Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386)
  2361. (printed as 5/12/2003)
    Comment
    EI-66Montana Environmental Information Center · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Jeff Barber
  2362. (printed as 5/12/2003)
    Comment
    EI-65Bones Brothers Ranch · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Terry Punt and Jeanie Alderson
  2363. (printed as 5/12/2003)
    Comment
    EI-64U.S. Environmental Protection Agency · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    John F. Wardell
  2364. (printed as 5/1/2003)
    Supplement
    207727Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2365. (printed as 5/1/2003)
    Motion
    207726Petition To Substitute Applicant · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2366. (printed as 4/21/2003)
    Reply
    207665Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2367. (printed as 4/10/2003)
    Comment
    EI-36Montana Natural Heritage Program · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Martin Miller
  2368. (printed as 4/8/2003)
    Comment
    EI-32Public Affairs Management · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Kay Wilson
  2369. served (printed as 3/26/2003)
    Decision
    33460Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    AMENDED NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE A SUPPLEMENT TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS ON THE ADEQUACY OF THE FINAL SCOPE OF THE SUPPLEMENT DATED FEBRUARY 3, 1999.
  2370. (printed as 3/24/2003)
    Comment
    EO-6Bureau of Land Management · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Fred Wombolt
  2371. (printed as 3/24/2003)
    Comment
    EO-5Army Corps of Engineers · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Rodney Schwartz
  2372. (printed as 3/24/2003)
    Comment
    EO-4Montana Dept. of Natural Resources and Conservation · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Debra LaFountaine
  2373. (printed as 3/19/2003)
    Report
    207426Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2374. served (printed as 3/11/2003)
    Decision
    33429Entire Board · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    BOARD GAVE NOTICE THAT IT IS ALLOWING THE TONGUE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY TO SUPPLEMENT ITS APPLICATION, FILED ON APRIL 27, 1998, TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE 17.3 MILES OF TRACK, CALLED THE WESTERN ALIGNMENT, TO BE BUILT BETWEEN DECKER, MT, AND A POINT 17.3 MILES NORTH OF DECKER.
  2375. (printed as 2/24/2003)
    Reply
    207285Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386)
  2376. (printed as 2/20/2003)
    Reply
    207257Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Native Action Inc
  2377. (printed as 2/13/2003)
    Reply
    207233Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2378. (printed as 2/13/2003)
    Motion
    207232Motion/Petition/Request · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2379. (printed as 2/6/2003)
    Reply
    207174Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    United Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386), United Transportation Union Montana State Legislative Board
  2380. (printed as 2/6/2003)
    Reply
    207169Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Northern Plains Resource Council Inc
  2381. (printed as 1/17/2003)
    Motion
    207066Motion/Petition/Request · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2382. (printed as 11/19/2002)
    Report
    206672Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2383. (printed as 7/15/2002)
    Report
    205852Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2384. (printed as 3/15/2002)
    Report
    204978Status Report · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2385. served (printed as 10/15/1999)
    Decision
    30570Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    REMOVED THE RANGE RIDERS MUSEUM IN MILES CITY, MT FROM THE LIST OF PLACES TO VIEW THE DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT.
  2386. served (printed as 10/8/1999)
    Decision
    30546Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF A DRAFT PROGRAMMATIC AGREEMENT AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS DUE NOVEMBER 30, 1999.
  2387. served (printed as 3/30/1999)
    Decision
    30147Entire Board · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    --
  2388. served (printed as 3/23/1999)
    Decision
    30051Entire Board · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    (1) GRANTED THE PETITION FILED BY TRRC TO REMOVE THE PREVIOUSLY IMPOSED REQUIREMENT IN BOTH FD-30186 AND FD-30186 SUB 2, AND (2) REQUIRED RRC TO CONTINUE SUBMITTING PROGRESS REPORTS EVERY FOUR MONTHS.
  2389. served (printed as 2/3/1999)
    Decision
    30008Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    FINAL SCOPE OF THE SUPPLEMENT.
  2390. (printed as 11/23/1998)
    Environmental
    192399Environmental Materials · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Terrance & Deanna George
  2391. served (printed as 11/6/1998)
    Decision
    29749Secretary · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    GRANTED PETITIONERS' EXTENSION REQUESTS AND PROTESTANTS' REPLY STATEMENTS ARE DUE ON NOVEMBER 23, 1998.
  2392. (printed as 11/2/1998)
    Reply
    192017Reply · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2393. (printed as 9/16/1998)
    Letter
    191235Letter/Telegram · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Thomas Wozniak
  2394. (printed as 9/16/1998)
    Letter
    191227Letter/Telegram · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tonya B Bill Strong
  2395. (printed as 9/16/1998)
    Letter
    191225Letter/Telegram · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Paul Schmeling
  2396. (printed as 9/16/1998)
    Letter
    191215Letter/Telegram · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Nancy W Carrel
  2397. (printed as 9/16/1998)
    Letter
    191214Letter/Telegram · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Thomas Wozniak
  2398. (printed as 9/16/1998)
    Letter
    191213Letter/Telegram · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tonya B Bill Strong
  2399. (printed as 9/16/1998)
    Letter
    191209Letter/Telegram · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Paul Schmeling
  2400. served (printed as 7/29/1998)
    Decision
    29484Secretary · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    NOTICE TO THE PARTIES ISSUING COMPILED SERVICE LIST FROM NOTICES OF INTENT TO PARTICIPATE; OPENING COMMENTS MUST BE FILED BY 9/16/98 AND REPLY COMMENTS MUST BE FILED BY 11/2/98.
  2401. served (printed as 7/10/1998)
    Decision
    29408Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    NOTICE OF INTENT TO PREPARE A SUPPLEMENT TO THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS.
  2402. served (printed as 6/23/1998)
    Decision
    29285Entire Board · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    ISSUED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE THAT ESTABLISHES THE DUE DATES FOR FILING COMMENTS AND REPLIES, AND INITIATED THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCESS.
  2403. (printed as 4/27/1998)
    Application
    187265Application · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    Tongue River Railroad Company
  2404. served (printed as 4/16/1998)
    Decision
    29010Entire Board · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    (1) GRANTED GREAT NORTHER, NORTHERN PLAINS, JOHN D. FITZGERALD AND FRANCIS G. MARCEAU LEAVE TO LATE-FILE THEIR APPEALS, AND (2) DENIED THEIR APPEALS OF THE WAIVER DECISION.
  2405. served (printed as 3/24/1998)
    Decision
    29011Entire Board · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 3)
    DENIED THE PETITION FILED 2/27/98 BY TRRC TO ESTABLISH A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
  2406. served (printed as 12/1/1997)
    Decision
    28078Entire Board · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    DENIED TRRC'S PETITION TO REOPEN A DECISION SERVED 11/8/96, AND GRANTED BNSF'S PETITION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE AND OTHER PROCEDURAL MOTIONS.
  2407. served (printed as 7/8/1997)
    Decision
    28026Secretary · in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    GRANTED TRRC A 7-DAY EXTENSION INSTEAD OF A 14-DAY EXTENSION TO FILE A PROGRESS REPORT.
  2408. served (printed as 2/11/1997)
    Decision
    21584Secretary · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    --
    in the court-action register
  2409. served (printed as 1/30/1997)
    Decision
    21517Secretary · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    --
    in the court-action register
  2410. served (printed as 1/29/1997)
    Decision
    21500Secretary · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    --
    in the court-action register
  2411. served (printed as 12/31/1996)
    Decision
    21328Entire Board · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    DENIED A PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION.
  2412. served (printed as 11/8/1996)
    Decision
    20262Entire Board · also entered in FD 30186 (Sub-No. 1), FD 30186 (Sub-No. 2)
    --