Display Kept in this browser only
Finance DocketBefore the Surface Transportation Board

FD 36833

LAMPWRIGHTS LLC – CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A LINE OF RAILROAD – IN ELK AND JEFFERSON COUNTIES, PA.

Caption from the Board’s record. Sub-dockets, included below: FD 36833 (Sub-No. 1)

43 filings, 3 decisions and 69 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 23 Sep 2026, 20:33 UTC.

Entries

By type (8)
Newest first · oldest first
  1. Comment
    EI-34407Clark Hill
    Please see attached document.
    Justin J. Marks · Washington, DC
  2. Comment
    EO-4125Clark Hill
    Justin J. Marks
  3. Motion
    312389Motion/Petition/Request · in FD 36833 (Sub-No. 1)
    Lampwrights LLC
  4. Comment
    EI-34386Clark Hill
    Please see attachment.
    Justin J. Marks · Washington, DC
  5. Comment
    EI-34253Clark Hill
    Please see attached document.
    Justin J. Marks · Washington, DC
  6. Reply
    311492Reply · in FD 36833 (Sub-No. 1)
    Horton Township
  7. Reply
    311490Reply · in FD 36833 (Sub-No. 1)
    First Apostles' Doctrine Church
  8. Motion
    311318Motion/Petition/Request · in FD 36833 (Sub-No. 1)
    Lampwrights LLC
  9. Motion
    311317Petition For Declaratory Order · in FD 36833 (Sub-No. 1)
    Lampwrights LLC
  10. Supplement
    311316Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Lampwrights LLC
  11. Reply
    310935Reply
    Lampwrights LLC
  12. Motion
    310925Motion To Strike
    The First Apostles’ Doctrine Church
  13. Comment
    EI-34201Commissioners of Elk County
    Please see attached document.
    M. Fritz Lecker, Matthew G. Quesenberry, and Gregory J. Gebauer · Ridgway, PA
  14. Reply
    310915Reply
    Lampwrights LLC
  15. Statement
    310852Support Statement
    Brockway Area Sewage Authority
  16. Comment
    EO-4081Clark Hill
    Justin J. Marks
  17. Statement
    310851Support Statement
    A Noble Cause
  18. Reply
    310844Reply
    Horton Township, Elk County, Pa.
  19. Reply
    310839Reply
    First Apostles’ Doctrine Church
  20. Decision
    52905Chief Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel
    GRANTED IN PART THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FOR HORTON TOWNSHIP, ELK COUNTY, PA.'S REQUEST TO FILE ITS REPLY BY FEBRUARY 5, 2026.
  21. Motion
    310780Motion/Petition/Request
    Lampwrights LLC
  22. Decision
    52894Chief Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel
    GRANTED IN PART FIRST APOSTLES’ DOCTRINE CHURCH MOTION TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO REPLY TO THE PETITION FILED BY LAMPWRIGHTS. REPLY IS DUE FEBRUARY 5, 2026.
  23. Request
    310769Request For Extension Of Time
    Horton Township Supervisors
  24. Statement
    310765Protest/Opposition Statement
    County of Elk Commissioners, Elk County, Pennsylvania
  25. Reply
    310755Reply
    Lampwrights LLC
  26. Request
    310746Request For Extension Of Time
    First Apostles' Doctrine Church
  27. Reply
    310730Reply
    Brockway Area Sewage Authority
  28. Letter
    310702Letter
    Bishop Jack Wisor
  29. Decision
    52812Chief Counsel, Office of Chief Counsel
    ORDERED THAT REPLIES TO LAMPWRIGHTS’ PETITION ARE DUE BY JANUARY 22, 2026.
  30. Statement
    310564Protest/Opposition Statement
    Toby Creek Watershed Association, Inc. of Elk and Jefferson Counties
  31. Statement
    310524Protest/Opposition Statement
    Horton Township Sportman's Club
  32. Comments
    310483Comments
    First Apostles Doctrine Church
  33. Letter
    310482Letter
    Lampwrights LLC
  34. Comments
    310468Comments
    Horton Township Board of Supervisors
  35. Comments
    310415Comments
    Charles Marchiori
  36. Statement
    310381Protest/Opposition Statement
    Jarrett Faulk
  37. Comments
    310370Comments
    Tammi Groppe
  38. Comments
    310369Comments
    Stan Kline
  39. Comments
    310368Comments
    Shelly Mattson
  40. Comments
    310365Comments
    Michael Gibbons
  41. Comments
    310364Comments
    Mary Wolff
  42. Comments
    310363Comments
    Christine Boyer
  43. Notice
    310362Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    A Noble Cause
  44. Comments
    310351Comments
    Chondale Terry
  45. Statement
    310350Protest/Opposition Statement
    Joseph Russell
  46. Comments
    310349Comments
    Jonathan Clark
  47. Comments
    310348Comments
    James Lagle
  48. Statement
    310310Protest/Opposition Statement
    Bishop Jack Wisor
  49. Comments
    310242Comments
    Honorable Mike Armanini
  50. Comment
    EI-34169County of Elk Commissioners
    Comments from County of Elk Commissioners. Please see attached document.
    M. Fritz Lecker, Matthew G. Quesenberry, and Gregory J. Gebauer · Ridgeway, PA
  51. Comment
    EI-34137First Apostles' Doctrine Church
    Letter to Pennsylvania DEP
    Bishop Jack Wisor · Brockport, PA
  52. Comments
    310244Comments
    Honorable Brian Smith
  53. Comment
    EI-34132First Apostles' Doctrine Church
    See attachment
    Bishop Jack Wisor · Brockport, PA
  54. Notice
    310120Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    National Association of Reversionary Property Owners
  55. Motion
    310117Petition For Exemption
    Lampwrights LLC
  56. Comment
    EI-34129First Apostles' Doctrine Church
    Please see attached document.
    Sarah-Grace Buddenbohn · Brockport, PA
  57. Comment
    EO-4066First Apostles' Doctrine Church
    Bishop Jack Wisor
  58. Comment
    EO-4065Tribes, Historical Societies, and Local leaders
    Sec 106 Consulting Party Invitation
  59. Comment
    EI-34125Clark Hill
    Remaining information request response.
    Justin J. Marks · Washington, DC
  60. Comment
    EI-34123Brockport United Methodist Church
    The attached letter is from the Administration Board as well as the members of the Brockport United Methodist Church and outlines our position on this project.
    Jarrett Faulk, Administration Board Member · Brockport, PA
  61. Comment
    EI-34128First Apostles' Doctrine Church
    Bishop Jack Wisor · Brockport, PA
  62. Comment
    EI-34115Justin Marks
    See attachment
    Washington, DC
  63. Comment
    EI-34113Bishop Jack Wisor
    See attached letter
    Brockport, PA
  64. Comment
    EO-4060Clark Hill
    Justin Marks
  65. Comment
    EI-34110Seneca Nation
    Seneca Nation - Consultation Questionnaire
    David L. George-Shongo Jr. · Salamanca, NY
  66. Comment
    EI-34107Thomas Parolari
    Please See Attachment
    Brockport, PA
  67. Comment
    EI-34105Clark Hill
    Justin J. Marks · Washington, DC
  68. Comment
    EI-34104Justin Marks
    Washington, DC
  69. Comment
    EI-34103Clark Hill
    Response to Information Request - Part 1
    Justin Marks · Washington, DC
  70. Comment
    EI-34098House of Representatives
    Letter from Rep. Glenn Thompson
    U.S. Representative Glenn Thompson · Washington, DC
  71. Comment
    EO-4056Clark Hill
    Justin Marks
  72. Comment
    EO-4045Clark Hill
    Justin Marks
  73. Comment
    EI-34089USFWS
    Emily Ernst · State College, PA
  74. Comment
    EI-34088Clark Hill
    Justin Marks · Washington, DC
  75. Comment
    EO-4041Chuck Marchiori
  76. Comment
    EI-34036Amy Brubaker
    I am a concerned citizen and property owner in Brockway, PA. I got a notice from BAI Group regarding the intention of Greentree Rail, LLC to file an application with PaDEP to utilize 15 acres for a waste transfer station in Snyder Twp. The waste transfer station will be in a residential area just outside the borough of Brockway. The transfer station will be located within feet of my driveway. Most likely the train unloading the waste will block access to my home which is a safety concern among other things. The increased truck traffic, noise pollution and smell will be major issues. My property value, as well as all surrounding homes, will be drastically affected by such a facility. Brockway is a beautiful small town in Pennsylvania and a waste transfer station will be detrimental to the community and it's citizens.
    Brockway, PA
  77. Comment
    EO-4027Chuck Marchiori
  78. Comment
    EI-34029Jared Marchiori
    Brockport, PA
  79. Comment
    EI-33993Susan Shugars
    Brockport, PA
  80. Comment
    EI-33985Traci Meredith
    Dear Members of the Surface Transportation Board, I am writing to formally express my concerns regarding Docket FD 36833, a proposed rail line that would negatively impact several sensitive ecological areas, including Little Toby Creek, Mead Run, and Oyster Run. This proposal threatens the delicate balance of the surrounding wetland areas and native trout streams, which are home to a variety of protected wildlife and unique ecosystems. The area along the former rail line is a vital habitat for a wide range of species, including aquatic organisms and terrestrial wildlife such as bald eagles, blue herons, pileated woodpeckers, and turtles. These species rely on the integrity of these ecosystems, and the construction and operation of this rail line could disrupt their habitats, leading to potential harm or loss of biodiversity. Additionally, the wetlands and streams in question play a crucial role in maintaining water quality and providing flood control. The disturbance caused by the rail line construction, along with the potential risks from pollution and waste associated with its operation, could irreparably damage these critical environmental resources. We must prioritize the protection of these thriving ecosystems and wildlife habitats, which are not only invaluable from an environmental perspective but are also important for local communities that rely on the beauty and biodiversity of these areas for recreation and livelihood. I urge the Surface Transportation Board to carefully consider the environmental consequences of this proposal and take all necessary steps to prevent harm to these irreplaceable ecosystems. The future of these vital natural resources depends on our collective action to safeguard them from disruptive projects like this one. Thank you for your time and consideration.
    Brockport, PA
  81. Comment
    EI-34030Fran Hutchins
    We have grandchildren that use the abandoned railroad trail for walking, riding their go carts, and cross country skiing. It would be a huge impact to our community to lose any natural resources available for our use. The rail line disruption to our wildlife, eagles nest, beaver dams etc. would create an unpleasant environment to all. I am hoping that the requested permit will be denied for the health and safety of our community.
    Brockport, PA
  82. Comment
    EI-33992North Central Pa Regional Planning and Development Commission
    Amy Kessler · Ridgway, PA
  83. Comment
    EI-33988Brian Halvonik
    More information needs to be obtained in regards to this proposal. Sewer lines,wetlands studies,flooding,dredging all need to be addressed.My family and I would see,hear and smell this train from our property. It doesn’t benefit the town of Brockport,PA in any way!
    Harrisville, NH
  84. Comment
    EI-33987Chuck Marchiori
    Based off STB- FRA rules an Executive Order 11988 Floodplain Management Issued in May 1977, this Executive Order directs Federal Agencies to: 1. assert leadership in reducing flood losses and losses to environmental values served by floodplains; 2. avoid actions located in or adversely affecting floodplains unless there is no practicable alternative; *There are several practical alternatives - 3. take action to mitigate losses if avoidance is not practicable; and 4. establishes a process for flood hazard evaluation based upon the 100-year base flood standard of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). It also directed Federal agencies to issue implementing procedures; provided a consultation mechanism for developing the implementing procedures; and provided oversight mechanisms. Please see above as we have several alternative solutions to this problem to avoid flood plain disruption then running a railroad through sensitive areas of wetlands, streams rivers and creeks
    Brockport, PA
  85. Comment
    EI-33986Bishop Jack Wisor
    I am writing in response to the proposed garbage train right of way using the abandoned Erie Lackawanna Railroad grade going through Brockport, Pennsylvania, north to the Greentree landfill.
    Brockporet, PA
  86. Comment
    EI-33977Anna Marchiori
    As a long time resident of Elk County/Horton Township, Pa. , I feel the need to voice my concerns against Docket No. FD 36833. As the residents of the community struggle to understand how a project of this nature got to this point without any environmental studies, and community input, it is IMPORTANT to outline the environment impacts created by this project. The railroad proposal through Horton Township, PA., listed as 3.81 miles of railroad will impact many areas that could cause irreversible damage! Currently listed are 4 trout streams (2 considered Native Brook trout streams), and 2 unnamed tributaries of Toby Creek watershed. The community has worked hard to bring Toby Creek and it's watershed back from a sulfur polluted stream, to a place of enjoyment for many. A success story that could be directly impacted by this project. The environmental disruption caused by this proposed rail line would cause long-term consequences to all current wildlife, natural resources, beaver dams, bald eagles nest, and wetlands. Studies and impact to the community regarding flood plains need to be done. This is another huge concern for the community and a total disaster. Any introduction of rail crossings to main roadways brings concerns and issues to our emergency services for response time. Proposed rail crossing is a prime example of creating this situation not to mention increasing accidents. Last but not least is human safety...toxic fumes, train derailments, leaking cars, water contamination should not be taken lightly. By approving this permit, the health and well-being of our community will be at risk.
    Brockport, PA
  87. Comment
    EI-33976Thomas Parolari
    Brockport, PA
  88. Comment
    EI-33975Horton Township
    PJ Piccirillo, Kimberly Faulk, Tim Hutchins · Brockport, PA
  89. Comment
    EI-33973Jefferson County- Department of Development
    Hello-- It was brought to my attention that this project might be attempting to obtain an exemption from doing a full environmental review of this project. We would like to put on record that we would strongly encourage a full environmental review be mandatory for this project. Thank you! Jess Seary Director of Economic Development- Jefferson County
    Jess Seary · Brookville, PA
  90. Comment
    EI-33972Linda Meredith
    My environment issue and concern with this rail line going along Little Toby in my township (Horton Township) is there is a pair Bald Eagles that use that creek daily. It is directly across from my home and we see them daily if not a couple times a day, and have been watching them for years. This trash train would disrupt them and possible the other wild life for sure if it is allowed to proceed! Thank you
    Brockport, PA
  91. Comment
    EI-33971Sandra Cherubini
    The area where Lampwright Landfill LLC is proposing to build train tracks is through the area where my family and I live. The area surrounding where they are proposing to build this track is located in a zone rich in habitat for turtles, frogs, rabbits, rough green snakes, salamanders, Eastern hellbenders, fox and weasals. There is a deer family that births a couple of fawns every Spring/ Summer in the area where the tracks would go. There are Bald Eagles nesting somewhere in this area also. They fish from Little Toby Creek and the wetlands surrounding this area.There are also wood cocks that show up every Spring and pileated woodpeckers nesting in this area. The impact of building a rail line through this rich wetland would be catastrophic for the creatures that not only survive but thrive in this environment!
    Brockport, PA
  92. Comment
    EI-33965Gordon & Dennison
    Attached please find letter regarding the Brockway Area Sewage Authority concerning Docket No. FD 36833 Lamprights, LLC Project in Elk County and Jefferson Counties
    Jeffrey M. Gordon, Esq. · Brookville, PA
  93. Comment
    EI-33962Cooper
    As a current Elk County/Horton Township resident and taxpayer, I am writing to express my concerns regarding docket number FD 36833. As a community, we all must ensure that environmental safeguards are prioritized. The long-term consequences of this project are far reaching and could be devastating to the area. The railroad proposal through Horton Township Pa, listed at 3.81 miles, will affect 4 listed trout streams.... 2 of these steams are currently considered Native Brook trout streams. The railroad will additionally cross 2 unnamed tributaries of Toby Creek watershed which have fish and Native Brook trout. The work done to bring Toby Creek and its watershed back from a sulfur polluted stream (coal industry impact), is a success story for the state of PA. The proposed route for the railroad line will disrupt natural habitats, fragment ecosystems and displace wildlife! Noise pollution from the trains will damage animal behavior, impacting breeding cycles and migration patterns. The impact to human safety because of a train derailments or car leaks could lead to irreversible damage to many. Protecting our environment is vital for future generations, and this project jeopardizes that protection. Environment is an important role in healthy living and the existence of life on this planet. Environmental studies must be done to quantify impact to the areas in this proposal. I request that you reject the permit for the proposed rail line ....the health and well-being of our community is at stake.
    Cynthia A Cooper · Brockport, PA
  94. Comment
    EI-33961Bruce Buganza
    To: Elizabeth Webster Surface Transportation Board 395 East Street SW Washington, D.C. 20423 Re: FD_36833 I am writing to strongly oppose Lampwrights LLC proposal to build a railroad line in Elk and Jefferson Counties for the following reasons. *Toby Creek was once a polluted stream with damage from the coal mines with no life in it. For the past few decades it has undergone restoration to become the now healthy flourishing stream that it is. *Bear Run, Oyster Run and Mead Run are native trout streams that empty into Toby Creek which runs along the railroad bed. *There is a wetlands and beaver dam located along the railroad bed. *There are two bald eagles nesting within 100 feet from the railroad bed. As you can see, a railroad running through this area would greatly disturb the natural environment which our community has worked so hard to restore and preserve. Other reasons to oppose this railroad: *The railroad bed has washed out several times due to flooding of Toby Creek. This would cause continual problems. *The Brockway sewer authority system runs under the railroad bed. Tracks and trains on top of the sewer lines will cause serious problems. *If a train hauling trash has leakage or a derailment, this will cause major pollution and great harm to the natural wildlife of this inhabited area. I am hopeful you will research and strongly consider our opposition to this railroad running through this area. Thank you for your time. Bruce Buganza Brockport, PA
    Reynoldsville, PA
  95. Comment
    EI-33960NOAA National Geodetic Survey
    Timothy Salisbury · Silverspring, MD
  96. Comment
    EI-33959PennDOT District 10-0
    • Mead Run: Chapter 93 Designation-Cold Water Fishes: PFBC designated “Stocked” and “Naturally Reproducing Wild Trout”: In-stream restrictions of February 15th through June 1st and October 1st through December 31st will apply. • Little Toby Run and UNTs to Little Toby Run: Chapter 93 Designation-Cold Water Fishes • Oyster Run: Chapter 93 Designation – Cold Water Fishes: PFBC designated “Naturally Reproducing Wild Trout”: In-stream restriction of October 1st through December 31st applies. • Bear Run: Chapter 93 Designation-Cold Water Fishes: PFBC designated “Naturally Reproducing Wild Trout”: In-stream restriction of October 1st through December 31st applies. • Watercourses within 0.50 mile of PFBC designation will adopt the same designation and any in-stream restrictions unless otherwise stated from PFBC. • Please note any wetlands within the area of “Naturally Reproducing Wild Trout” waters will be considered Exceptional Value (EV) and antidegradation best available combination of technologies (ABACT) erosion and sediment control measures should be utilized. • On the National wetlands inventory mapper, there are several PEM and PFO wetland cells identified in the proximity of the proposed project. A wetland identification and delineation will need completed.
    Jeffrey Matko, P.E., District Grade Crossing Engineer on behalf of Jessica Schrecengost, Environmental Unit Supervisor. · Indiana, PA
  97. Comment
    EI-33958Pennsylvania Dept. of Transportation
    Environmental Concerns • The old Toby Branch corridor may cross or run near small streams, wetlands, or floodplains. • Even though it’s an old rail corridor, new fencing, berms, and active train operations could fragment wildlife corridors, particularly for deer • The area likely has noise-sensitive receptors (homes, schools, wildlife habitats) close to the alignment *See attached File* Recommendation: The proposed rail line, while utilizing a former railroad corridor, presents risks to water quality, habitat connectivity, historic resources, and air quality during construction and operation. We strongly recommend detailed studies addressing wetlands, contamination risks, wildlife habitat disruption, and cumulative impacts associated with landfill expansion. Special attention must also be paid to resilience in rail infrastructure design.
    David Wachob · Clearfield, PA
  98. Comment
    EI-33956Jarrett Faulk
    Brockport, PA
  99. Comment
    EI-33953Horton Township
    PJ Piccirillo · Brockport, PA
  100. Comment
    EI-33951Army Corps of Engineers Pittsburgh District Regulatory Division
    I refer to your request for information and comments on environmental resources that may be affected by the construction and operation of the proposed Lampwrights LLC Line of Railroad proposed in Elk and Jefferson Counties, Pennsylvania. The project involves the construction and operation of 3.87 miles of new rail line beginning at the end of an active Buffalo & Pittsburgh Railroad, Inc. line located at the O-I Crenshaw Glass Plant to the Superior Greentree Landfill, owned by Noble Environmental, LLC. Lampwrights LLC also intends to construct a private industry track to receive waste at the Superior Greentree Landfill. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers regulates earth moving activities within streams or wetlands. This includes any placement of fill material, temporary or permanent. The letter and location map do not clearly identify streams or wetlands, nor describe proposed temporary and permanent impacts or avoidance measures. We recommend that a qualified wetland consultant evaluate the entire project area to determine if any streams or wetlands are present. If impacts to streams or wetlands are in fact proposed, this office should be contacted by the applicant to discuss permitting requirements. Every effort should be made to avoid and minimize impacts to the aquatic resources on-site.
    Pittsburgh, PA
  101. Comment
    EI-33950Chuck Marchiori
    St. Marys, PA
  102. Comment
    EO-4016Horton Township
    PJ Piccirillo
  103. Comment
    EI-33926USDA-NRCS
    Tyson Myers · Harrisburg, PA
  104. Comment
    EI-33920USDA NRCS
    Thank you for the opportunity to review. USDA - NRCS does not have any US held conservation easements in the project area.
    Melissa Hanner · Harrisburg, PA
  105. Comment
    EI-33927Horton Township
    PJ Piccirillo · Brockport, PA
  106. Comment
    EO-4013Federally Recognized Tribes
    Preliminary Consultation Letter to Federally Recognized Tribes
  107. Comment
    EO-4012Federal, State and local
    Elected Officials
  108. Comment
    EO-4011Federal, State and local agencies
    Preliminary Consultation Letter to Agency Representatives
  109. Comment
    EI-33785VHB
    Signed Disclosure Statement
    Alan Summerville · Washington, DC
  110. Comment
    EO-4001Executed MOU
    Lampwrights and VHB
  111. Comment
    EI-33718Chuck Marchiori
    ---, PA
  112. Comment
    EO-3989Clark Hill
    Justin Marks
  113. Comment
    EO-3988Clark Hill
    Justin Marks
  114. Comment
    EI-33675Clark Hill
    Justin Marks · Washington, DC
  115. Comment
    EI-33674Clark Hill
    Waiver Request of Six-Month Prefiling Requirement
    Justin Marks · Washington, DC