FD 35724
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/FD-35724 · entries shown: all, newest first
CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY-CONSTRUCTION EXEMPTION-IN MERCED, MADERA AND FRESNO COUNTIES, CAL.
Caption from the Board’s record. Sub-dockets, included below: FD 35724 (Sub-No. 1)
184 filings, 13 decisions and 40 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 06:36 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:41 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 12/20/2022)DecisionAUTHORIZED THE CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY TO PROCEED WITH AN ADDITION TO THE MERCED TO FRESNO SECTION AND A MODIFICATION TO THE FRESNO TO BAKERSFIELD SECTION OF THE PROPOSED CALIFORNIA HIGH SPEED RAIL SYSTEM, SUBJECT TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS. THE BOARD PREVIOUSLY AUTHORIZED CONSTRUCTION OF THESE TWO SECTIONS IN DOCKET NOS. FD 35724 AND FD 35724 (SUB-NO. 1).
-
(printed as 6/23/2022)CommentBill Mullins · Washington, DC
-
(printed as 6/17/2022)CommentBill Mullins · Washington, DC
-
(printed as 6/13/2022)CommentBill Mullins · Washington, DC
-
(printed as 5/5/2022)CommentBill Mullins · Washington, DC
-
(printed as 5/5/2022)CommentBill Mullins · Washington, DC
-
served (printed as 2/11/2022)DecisionGRANTED THE PETITIONS OF THE CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY TO REOPEN TWO CONSTRUCTION EXEMPTION PROCEEDINGS TO CONSIDER AN ADDITION TO THE MERCED TO FRESNO SECTION AND A MODIFICATION TO THE FRESNO TO BAKERSFIELD SECTION OF THE PROPOSED CALIFORNIA HIGH SPEED RAIL SYSTEM.
-
(printed as 1/26/2022)CommentBill Mullins · Washington, DC
-
(printed as 1/25/2022)CommentBill Mullins · Washington, DC
-
(printed as 9/17/2021)MotionCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 9/17/2021)Motion303005Petition To ReopenCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 8/26/2015)CommentEI-21078Comments from Local Citizens
-
(printed as 11/4/2014)CommentThis is about the California High-Speed Rail case. The rail authority filed a request for declaratory relief and this is a comment. It is supposed to go to Cynthia T. Brown and I have the number as STB Finance Docket FD 357241. Is there anyway to send me a note by email to let me know you received my letter?Ruskin, Florida
-
served (printed as 8/12/2014)DecisionDECISION AUTHORIZED THE CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT A 114-MILE HIGH-SPEED PASSENGER RAIL LINE BETWEEN FRESNO AND BAKERSFIELD, CAL., SUBJECT TO ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION CONDITIONS.
-
(printed as 7/28/2014)LetterMichael E. Lasalle
-
(printed as 7/24/2014)EnvironmentalDignity Health
-
(printed as 7/16/2014)EnvironmentalCity Of Bakersfield
-
(printed as 7/11/2014)Comment
-
(printed as 6/24/2014)ReplyCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 6/17/2014)CommentMark McLoughlin
-
(printed as 6/4/2014)LetterMichael E. Lasalle
-
(printed as 6/3/2014)CommentsKaren J. Stout
-
(printed as 5/27/2014)Comment
-
(printed as 5/15/2014)CommentCharlene Dwin Vaughn
-
(printed as 5/7/2014)CommentsBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/5/2014)CommentBorton Petrini, LLP
-
(printed as 5/1/2014)CommentAlan Tandy
-
(printed as 4/14/2014)CommentVirginia Gennaro
-
(printed as 4/7/2014)LetterMichael E. Lasalle
-
(printed as 4/4/2014)CommentDouglas Carstens and Jason Holder
-
(printed as 4/3/2014)LetterWilliam C. Descary
-
(printed as 4/2/2014)CommentsDignity Health
-
(printed as 4/2/2014)ReplyAaron Fukuda
-
(printed as 3/27/2014)MotionCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 3/14/2014)CommentsCarol Bender
-
(printed as 3/10/2014)CommentsRoss C. Browning, Agnes Morrison
-
(printed as 3/10/2014)CommentsCity Of Bakersfield
-
(printed as 3/10/2014)CommentsCarol Bender
-
(printed as 3/7/2014)ReplyKings County Water District And Citizens For California High Speed Rail Accountability
-
(printed as 3/7/2014)ReplyCommunity Coalition On High Speed Rail
-
(printed as 3/7/2014)ReplyWilliam H. Warren
-
(printed as 3/7/2014)ReplyWilliam Grindley
-
(printed as 3/7/2014)CommentsRochelle Andranigian
-
(printed as 3/7/2014)ReplyBrotherhood Of Maintenance Of Way Employes Division/Ibt, The Brotherhood Of Railroad Signalmen, And The Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, And Transportation Union Mechanical Division
-
(printed as 3/7/2014)CommentsJoyce Cody
-
served (printed as 3/6/2014)DecisionDECISION DETERMINED THAT THE COMMUNITY COALITION ON HIGH-SPEED RAIL'S PETITION TO EXTEND THE COMMENT DEADLINE IN THIS PROCEEDING CANNOT BE GRANTED, AS THE BOARD WAS UNABLE TO REACH A MAJORITY DECISION.
-
(printed as 3/6/2014)CommentsAaron Fukuda
-
(printed as 3/6/2014)CommentsFrank Oliveira
-
(printed as 3/6/2014)ReplyAlan Scott
-
(printed as 3/6/2014)CommentsAnil Mehta
-
(printed as 3/5/2014)ReplyCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 3/5/2014)CommentsKaren J. Stout
-
(printed as 3/5/2014)CommentsWilliam C. Descary
-
(printed as 2/28/2014)RequestCommunity Coalition On High Speed Rail
-
(printed as 2/26/2014)NoticeMichael Austin
-
served (printed as 2/4/2014)DecisionDECISION DETERMINED THAT THE REPLIES TO THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION IN THIS PROCEEDING ARE DUE MARCH 7, 2014.
-
(printed as 1/30/2014)CorrectionCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 1/29/2014)NoticeMichael Lamb
-
(printed as 1/28/2014)NoticeKathy Hamilton
-
(printed as 1/28/2014)NoticeNina Zandt
-
(printed as 1/27/2014)NoticeAlfred Morrison
-
(printed as 1/27/2014)NoticeMichael A. And Germaine Dias
-
(printed as 1/27/2014)NoticeAnil Mehta
-
(printed as 1/27/2014)NoticeMary Jane Fagundes
-
(printed as 1/27/2014)NoticeJennifer Hanson
-
(printed as 1/27/2014)NoticeAlisa Gomez
-
(printed as 1/27/2014)NoticeRoss C. Browning
-
(printed as 1/27/2014)NoticePhyllis M. Browning
-
(printed as 1/27/2014)NoticeStanley Crawshaw
-
(printed as 1/27/2014)NoticeDavid Zandt
-
(printed as 1/27/2014)NoticeAgnes Morrison
-
(printed as 1/24/2014)NoticeJoyce Cody
-
(printed as 1/24/2014)NoticeWaymire Farms
-
(printed as 1/24/2014)NoticeRachael Pepe
-
(printed as 1/24/2014)NoticeKaren J. Stout
-
(printed as 1/24/2014)CertificateCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 1/23/2014)NoticeMichael Murray
-
(printed as 1/23/2014)NoticeCarol Bender
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeWilliam H. Warren
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeWilliam Grindley
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeWilliam C. Descary
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticePreserve Our Heritage
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeFindley M. Upton Family Trust
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeCommunity Coalition On High Speed Rail
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeChowchilla Water District
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeBrent Parsons
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeAaron Fukuda
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeKing County
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeMichael E. Lasalle
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeRochelle Andranigian
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)LetterAlan Scott
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeAlan Scott
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeWestern Mfg. Corp.
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeGerald Fagundes
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeTransportation Trades Department Afl-Cio
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeBrotherhood Of Maintenance Of Way Employes Division/Ibt, The Brotherhood Of Railroad Signalmen, And The Sheet Metal, Air, Rail, And Transportation Union Mechanical Division
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)CommentsCitizens For California High Speed Rail Accountability
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeFrank Oliveira
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)NoticeKing County Water District
-
(printed as 1/22/2014)CommentPlease find my commentary about the California High-Speed Rail Project. Thank you, Kathy Hamilton PS. I had a little trouble with my attachment. I am also figure impaired so it could be my problem. Please let me know if this attachment is dated today.Menlo Park, California
-
(printed as 1/13/2014)StatementFresno Council Of Governments
-
(printed as 1/13/2014)StatementFresno County Economic Development Corporation
-
(printed as 1/8/2014)NoticeCity Of Bakersfield
-
(printed as 1/2/2014)CertificateCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 12/23/2013)StatementFresno Works
-
(printed as 12/23/2013)StatementCity Of Fresno Ca
-
(printed as 12/23/2013)StatementCity Of Fresno Ca
-
served (printed as 12/20/2013)DecisionDECISION DETERMINED THAT: (1) THE REPLIES TO THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION IN THIS PROCEEDING ARE DUE FEBRUARY 14, 2014; AND (2) CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY MUST NOTIFY ALL PARTIES OF RECORD IN THE MAIN DOCKET OF THIS PROCEEDING OF THE PROPOSED TRANSACTION BY JANUARY 3, 2014, AND CERTIFY CONTEMPORANEOUSLY TO THE BOARD THAT IT HAS DONE SO.
-
(printed as 12/20/2013)NoticeKings County Water District, Citizens For California High Speed Rail Accountability
-
(printed as 12/20/2013)StatementCounty Of Kings
-
(printed as 12/20/2013)CommentRe: STB Finance Docket No. 35724 (Sub-No 1) CA High-Speed Rail Authority's Petition for Exemption of Fresno to Bakersfield HST Section. To: Cynthia T. BrownDouglas P Carstens · Hermosa Beach, CA
-
(printed as 12/19/2013)LetterFresno County Economic Development Corporation
-
(printed as 12/19/2013)StatementFresno Council Of Governments
-
(printed as 12/17/2013)RequestWilliam C. Descary
-
(printed as 12/16/2013)LetterCommunity Coalition On High Speed Rail
-
(printed as 12/12/2013)RequestCitizens For California High Speed Rail Accountability
-
(printed as 12/9/2013)MotionMichael E. Lasalle
-
served (printed as 12/4/2013)DecisionDECISION DENIED THE CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY'S REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL GRANT OF AUTHORITY TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 114-MILE HIGH-SPEED PASSENGER RAIL LINE BETWEEN FRESNO AND BAKERSFIELD, CAL. IN ADDITION, THE DECISION EXTENDED THE TIME FOR PUBLIC COMMENT ON THE TRANSPORTATION MERITS OF THE PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.
-
(printed as 11/27/2013)CommentsMichael E. Lasalle
-
(printed as 9/26/2013)MotionCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 8/27/2013)CommentDavid Valenstein
-
served (printed as 6/13/2013)Decision43070Entire BoardDECISION GRANTED THE PETITION FILED BY THE CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY FOR EXEMPTION FROM THE PRIOR APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 65-MILE HIGH-SPEED PASSENGER RAIL LINE BETWEEN MERCED AND FRESNO, CALIFORNIA, SUBJECT TO ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION CONDITIONS.
-
(printed as 6/12/2013)CommentEO-2112Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 6/6/2013)Comments234374CommentMorris Brown
-
(printed as 6/4/2013)Motion234359Motion/Petition/RequestCommunity Coalition On High Speed Rail
-
(printed as 6/3/2013)StatementKathy Hamilton
-
(printed as 5/22/2013)Certificate234290Certificate Of ServiceCity Of Bakersfield
-
served (printed as 5/21/2013)Decision43105Entire BoardDECISION DENIED A REQUEST TO EXTEND THE COMMENT PERIOD IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 5/21/2013)Comments234287CommentCommunity Coalition On High Speed Rail
-
(printed as 5/21/2013)Letter234286LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 5/21/2013)Letter234285LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 5/21/2013)Letter234284LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 5/21/2013)Letter234283LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 5/21/2013)Reply234281ReplyCarol Bender
-
(printed as 5/21/2013)Letter234279LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 5/21/2013)Letter234278LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 5/21/2013)Letter234277LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 5/21/2013)Letter234276LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentPlease see attached letter and exhibits.James R. Janz · Woodside, CA
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentPlease see attached letterRick Farinelli · Madera, California
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentEI-20213Preserve Our HeritageSan Francisco, CA
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentWoodside, CA
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentEI-20211I Ping Ho
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentMadera, CA
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentEI-20208Mark LoeserModesto, CA
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentMadera, California
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentFresno, California
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentFresno, California
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)Comment
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentFresno, California
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)Comment
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentEI-20201Alan ScottHanford County, California
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentSan Francisco, California
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentHandford, California
-
(printed as 5/17/2013)Comments234495CommentEt3 Global Alliance Inc.
-
(printed as 5/17/2013)StatementTransportation Trades Department Afl-Cio
-
(printed as 5/17/2013)Reply234266ReplyCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 5/17/2013)Motion234265Motion/Petition/RequestCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 5/17/2013)Letter234261LetterHonorable Andre Carson, Honorable George Miller, Honorable Corrine Brown, Honorable Richard J Durbin, Honorable Doris Matsui, Honorable Louise M Slaughter, Honorable Michael Honda, Honorable Adam Schiff, Honorable David Price, Honorable Paul Tonko, Honorable Frank R Lautenberg
-
(printed as 5/17/2013)CommentFremont, CA
-
(printed as 5/16/2013)Comments234248CommentFresno Workforce Investment Board
-
(printed as 5/15/2013)Letter234244LetterHonorable Barbara Boxer, Honorable Dianne Feinstein
-
(printed as 5/15/2013)Letter234239LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 5/15/2013)Letter234229LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
served (printed as 5/14/2013)DecisionDECISION WAIVED THE SERVICE REQUIREMENTS, UNDER 49 C.F.R. § 1104.12(a), FOR INDIVIDUAL PRIVATE CITIZENS PARTICIPATING IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 5/14/2013)RequestJeff Taylor
-
(printed as 5/13/2013)Letter234215LetterWilliam C. Descary
-
(printed as 5/13/2013)Certificate234214Certificate Of ServiceFresno Council Of Governments
-
(printed as 5/13/2013)Comments234213CommentFresno Ca Chamber Of Commerce, Fresno Works
-
(printed as 5/10/2013)Certificate234205Certificate Of ServiceEconomic Development Corp
-
(printed as 5/10/2013)Reply234203ReplyCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 5/10/2013)CommentEI-21202I Ping HoTo: Mr. Dave Navecky, Office of Environmental Analysis Dear Mr. Navecky My name is I Ping Ho. My wife and I own 243 acres of development land in Chowchilla; zoned for industrial and commercial use. We also own another 126 acres of land with Union Land Development in Chowchilla; zoned for commercial and light industrial use. We oppose Road 18 Wye recommended by the High-Speed Rail Authority. The reasons are as follows: 1. It would be too close to the Green Hill community and would negatively affect more than 2,000 existing residences. Green Hill Estates is a prestigious area in Chowchilla, and this proposal would make the location undesirable. Future home buyers would avoid that area because of noise and vibration. The area would lose its visual appeal. This would not be good for the people or the real estate market of Chowchilla. 2. My wife and I have owned our 243 acres property since 1989. Our property includes one mile of Highway 152 frontage and the Road 17 1/2 highway entrance. We are planning to put up industrial and commercial developments onto the property because it has been annexed to the city last year. The railroad track would cut a portion of our property in half. Without knowing the exact location of the future railroad track, designing large factory buildings becomes impossible. 3. The railroad track of the Road 18 Wye proposal also cuts the 126 acre property into 3 pieces. This property includes 0.8 miles of Highway 99 frontage and the Avenue 24 overpass. It is zoned for commercial and light industrial use. The major owner of this property is Union Land Development. Union Land has developed a large shopping center in the San Francisco Bay Area. The name of this shopping center is Milpitas Square, the largest regional specialty shopping center, anchored by Ranch 99 supermarket. Ranch 99 is a very successful supermarket chain. Road 18 Wye turns the 126 acres of land to waste and makes it impossible to develop. Road 13 Wye would be a better choice because it would pass by an area with little population and would not pass through city limits. Thank you for your attention. I Ping Ho and Janette Ho (650)348-6358, (650)669-1768Millbrae, California
-
(printed as 5/9/2013)StatementCarol Bender
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)Comments234209CommentCarol Walters
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)Comments234208CommentNick Garzilli
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)StatementCounty Of Kings
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)Comments234199CommentHonorable Janice Hahn, Honorable Zoe Lofgren, Honorable Tim Costa
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)Comments234197CommentMayor Ashley Swearengin
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)Comments234196CommentAnil Mehta
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)StatementFrank Oliveira
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)Comments234194CommentEconomic Development Corp
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)Comments234193CommentAndy Vidak
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)Comments234192CommentFresno Council Of Governments
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)Comments234191CommentKathy Hamilton
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)StatementPreserve Our Heritage
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)Reply234188ReplyPamela C. Wolter
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)Statement234185Support StatementGovernor Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)StatementKings County Water District And Riverdale Public Utility District
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)RequestHonorable Kevin Mccarthy, Honorable Dana Rohrabacher, Honorable Doug Lamalfa, Honorable Edward Royce, Honorable Howard Mckeon, Honorable Tom Mcclintock, Honorable John Campbell, Honorable Paul Cook, Honorable David G. Valadao, Honorable Devin Nunes, Honorable Darrell Issa, Honorable Ken Calvert, Honorable Duncan Hunter
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)Comments234178CommentBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen, National Conference Of Fireman & Oilers, American Train Dispatchers Association, Brotherhood Of Maintenance Of Way Employes Division/Ibt And Brotherhood Of Railroad Signalmen, International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers
-
(printed as 5/8/2013)StatementCommunity Coalition On High Speed Rail
-
(printed as 5/7/2013)Comments234275CommentAaron Fukuda
-
(printed as 5/7/2013)StatementMorris Brown
-
(printed as 5/7/2013)SupplementWilliam C. Descary
-
(printed as 5/7/2013)StatementBill James
-
(printed as 5/7/2013)StatementCitizens For California High Speed Rail Accountability
-
(printed as 5/7/2013)SupplementJeff Taylor
-
(printed as 4/25/2013)CommentThe State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality, is responsible for Clean Water Act section 401 Water Quality Certification for the California High-Speed Rail Authority's High Speed Train Projects. As staff person assigned to this task, please place my name on your mailing list for notifications from your agency regarding these projects (e.g., the notice of adoption of the Final EIS, 43056 OEA, dated April 9, 2013). E-mail is preferred. For paper mailings, please enter my address exactly as shown. Please contact me if you have any questions about this request. Thank You. cnhCliff Harvey · Sacramento, CA
-
served (printed as 4/18/2013)Decision43065Entire BoardDECISION DENIED CALIFORNIA HIGH-SPEED RAIL AUTHORITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS ITS PETITION FOR EXEMPTION.
-
(printed as 4/16/2013)Letter234091LetterAlview-Dairyland Union School District
-
(printed as 4/16/2013)StatementJeff Taylor
-
(printed as 4/16/2013)RequestHonorable David G. Valadao
-
(printed as 4/16/2013)StatementTrain Riders Association Of California
-
served (printed as 4/15/2013)DecisionDECISION INSTITUTED A PROCEEDING, UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10502.
-
(printed as 4/15/2013)Letter234082Letter/TelegramFrank Bigelow
-
(printed as 4/15/2013)Letter234080LetterDiane L. Harkey
-
(printed as 4/15/2013)StatementCity Of Bakersfield
-
served (printed as 4/12/2013)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE OF ADOPTION RECOMMENDATION AND RECIRCULATION OF FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT.
-
(printed as 4/12/2013)Reply234066ReplyCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 4/12/2013)Letter234065LetterJim Patterson
-
(printed as 4/12/2013)StatementWilliam C. Descary
-
(printed as 4/12/2013)Letter234062LetterAlan Scott
-
(printed as 4/11/2013)Comments234061CommentAaron Fukuda
-
(printed as 4/11/2013)Letter234060LetterFindley M. Upton Family Trust
-
(printed as 4/11/2013)Reply234059ReplyCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 4/11/2013)NoticeFrank Oliveira
-
(printed as 4/11/2013)StatementFrank Oliveira
-
(printed as 4/10/2013)Letter234054LetterPreserve Our Heritage
-
(printed as 4/10/2013)Letter234053LetterDonald P. Wagner
-
(printed as 4/10/2013)Motion234051Motion/Petition/RequestRiverdale Public Utility District
-
(printed as 4/9/2013)RequestCitizens For California High Speed Rail Accountability
-
(printed as 4/9/2013)StatementChowchilla Union High School District
-
(printed as 4/9/2013)StatementBoard Of Supervisors County Of Madera
-
(printed as 4/8/2013)StatementCommunity Coalition On High Speed Rail
-
(printed as 4/8/2013)NoticeCommunity Coalition On High Speed Rail
-
(printed as 4/8/2013)Motion234036Motion/Petition/RequestKings County Water District
-
(printed as 4/5/2013)Letter234032LetterChowchilla Elementary School District
-
(printed as 3/27/2013)Letter234033LetterHonorable Jeff Denham
-
(printed as 3/27/2013)Letter233997LetterDarlene Rodriguez
-
(printed as 3/27/2013)Letter233996LetterDewey And Karen Allen
-
(printed as 3/27/2013)Letter233995LetterKings County Board Of Supervisors
-
(printed as 3/27/2013)Letter233993LetterCharlene & Richard Hook
-
(printed as 3/27/2013)Letter233992LetterChowchilla Water District
-
(printed as 3/27/2013)Letter233989LetterKaren J. Stout
-
(printed as 3/27/2013)Letter233988LetterMichael E. Lasalle
-
(printed as 3/27/2013)MotionCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
-
(printed as 3/27/2013)Motion233978Petition For ExemptionCalifornia High-Speed Rail Authority
Nothing of that kind in this docket.