Decision 32689
Served (printed as 8/20/2002) · Decision · Entire Board
DENIED A PETITION FILED BY THE DEFENDANTS, BNSF AND UP, ASKING THE BOARD TO REQUIRE THE COMPLAINANT, AEPCO, TO MAKE SEPARATE STAND-ALONE COST (SAC) PRESENTATIONS FOR EACH OF THE THREE RATE CHALLENGES EMBRACED IN THIS COMPLAINT, BUT WOULD PROVIDE DIRECTION ON THE PERMISSIBLE BOUNDS OF A SAC PRESENTATION IN THS MATTER.
Read it here The text 32689.pdf ↓
Permanent address docketyard.org/decision/32689 · back to the docket sheet
If the file does not appear here, open it in its own tab (some phones show only the first page inside a frame).