Display Kept in this browser only
Formal ComplaintBefore the Surface Transportation Board

NOR 42058

ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. V. THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY

Caption from the Board’s record.

60 filings, 18 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 23:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC.

Entries

By type (12)
Newest first · oldest first
  1. Decision
    35846Secretary
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT APRIL 22, 2005, IN THIS PROCEEDING, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
  2. Decision
    35588Entire Board
    (1) FOUND THAT ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. HAS FAILED TO SHOW THAT THE CHALLENGED RATES ARE UNREASONABLY HIGH; AND (2) DISMISSED THE COMPLAINT.
  3. Oral
    212442Oral Argument Exhibits
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  4. Oral
    212437Oral Argument Exhibits
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  5. Decision
    35250Secretary
    PROVIDED THE SCHEDULE OF APPEARANCES AND THE TIME ALLOCATIONS FOR EACH SPEAKER AT THE NOVEMBER 2, 2004 ORAL ARGUMENT IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  6. Oral
    212338Oral Argument Exhibits
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  7. Oral
    212333Oral Argument Exhibits
    Union Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
  8. Decision
    35135Secretary
    (1) PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE BOARD WILL HOLD AN ORAL ARGUMENT IN THIS PROCEEDING ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2004, BEGINNING AT 10:00 A.M., AT 1925 K STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, DC; AND (2) DIRECTED THAT EACH PARTY MUST PROVIDE THE ORAL ARGUMENT INFORMATION SPECIFIED IN THIS DECISION IN WRITING BY OCTOBER 25, 2004.
  9. Brief
    212025Brief
    Union Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
  10. Brief
    212023Brief
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  11. Reply
    212020Reply
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  12. Decision
    34709Secretary
    (1) DIRECTED THAT THE BRIEFS NOT EXCEED 30 PAGES IN LENGTH AND ARE DUE BY SEPTEMBER 16, 2004; AND (2) ORDERED THAT ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.'S REPLY TO THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S CLARIFICATION OF THEIR SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE IS DUE BY SEPTEMBER 16, 2004.
  13. Letter
    211543Letter
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  14. Reply
    211495Reply
    Union Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
  15. Motion
    211439Motion/Petition/Request
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  16. Reply
    211315Reply
    The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company , Union Pacific Railroad Company
  17. Motion
    210979Motion To Strike
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  18. Motion
    210807Motion/Petition/Request
    Union Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
  19. Errata
    210661Errata Sheet
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  20. Supplement
    210475Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  21. Reply
    210080Reply
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  22. Decision
    34460Secretary
    GRANTED AEPCO'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL REBUTTAL EVIDENCE FROM FEBRUARY 24, 2004, UNTIL APRIL 2, 2004.
  23. Reply
    210008Reply
    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company
  24. Request
    209991Request For Extension Of Time
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  25. Motion
    209965Motion To Dismiss Or Discontinue
    Union Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
  26. Application
    209961Application
    Union Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
  27. Reply
    209960Reply
    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company
  28. Reply
    209585Reply
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  29. Motion
    209563Motion/Petition/Request
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  30. Letter
    209540Letter
    Union Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
  31. Comments
    209500Comment
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  32. Decision
    33562Entire Board
    THIS DECISION: (1) DENIES UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S (UP) APRIL 18, 2003 PETITION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT; (2) DENIES THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND UP'S JULY 23, 2003 MOTION TO STRIKE REBUTTAL EVIDENCE; AND (3) REOPENS THE RECORD FOR THE SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE TO ALLOW FOR A FAIR AND INFORMED DECISION ON THE MERITS OF THE RATE COMPLAINT.
  33. Motion
    208964Motion/Petition/Request
    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
  34. Reply
    208689Reply
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  35. Motion
    208496Motion To Strike
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  36. Errata
    208447Errata Sheet
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
  37. Errata
    208377Errata Sheet
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  38. Rebuttal
    208352Rebuttal
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  39. Application
    208287Application
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  40. Rebuttal
    208272Rebuttal
    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company
  41. Decision
    33613Secretary
    GRANTED THE PROPOSALS TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDERS ISSUED IN 12 STAND-ALONE COST RAIL RATE PROCEEDINGS.
  42. Reply
    207910Reply
    The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
  43. Reply
    207909Reply
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  44. Reply
    207905Reply
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  45. Reply
    207903Reply
    The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
  46. Comments
    207784Comment
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  47. Reply
    207757Reply
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  48. Decision
    33519Secretary
    DIRECTED THAT PARTIES TO THE CAPTIONED STAND-ALONE COST PROCEEDINGS SHOULD REVIEW AND JOINTLY PROPOSE ANY NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDERS GOVERNING THESE PROCEEDINGS BY MAY 9, 2003.
  49. Motion
    207661Motion/Petition/Request
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  50. Motion
    207158Motion To Withdraw
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  51. Letter
    207009Letter
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  52. Reply
    206984Reply
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  53. Decision
    33216Secretary
    GRANTED THE JOINT MOTION OF ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC., UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY REQUESTING THAT A NEW PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE BE ESTABLISHED.
  54. Motion
    206688Motion/Petition/Request
    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
  55. Motion
    206551Motion To Withdraw
    Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, and Union Pacific Railroad Company
  56. Motion
    206656Motion/Petition/Request
    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
  57. Decision
    32690Secretary
    (1) GRANTED OR DENIED TO THE EXTENT DISCUSSED IN THIS DECISION THE MOTIONS TO COMPEL; (2) LIMITED ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.'S (AEPCO) AMENDED COMPLAINT, AS IT PERTAINS TO UP'S COLORADO RATES, TO THE PUBLISHED RATES IN UP 4244, AS AMENDED; (3) DENIED AEPCO'S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION; AND (4) ORDERED BNSF TO FURNISH THE DISCOVERY AUTHORIZED IN THIS DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF SERVICE.
  58. Decision
    32689Entire Board
    DENIED A PETITION FILED BY THE DEFENDANTS, BNSF AND UP, ASKING THE BOARD TO REQUIRE THE COMPLAINANT, AEPCO, TO MAKE SEPARATE STAND-ALONE COST (SAC) PRESENTATIONS FOR EACH OF THE THREE RATE CHALLENGES EMBRACED IN THIS COMPLAINT, BUT WOULD PROVIDE DIRECTION ON THE PERMISSIBLE BOUNDS OF A SAC PRESENTATION IN THS MATTER.
  59. Letter
    205426Letter
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  60. Reply
    205425Reply
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  61. Correction
    205288Correction
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  62. Reply
    205285Reply
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  63. Motion
    205230Motion/Petition/Request
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  64. Reply
    205157Reply
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  65. Motion
    205011Motion To Compel
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
  66. Letter
    204957Letter/Telegram
    The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
  67. Decision
    32599Secretary
    NOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 11, 2002, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
  68. Reply
    204842Reply
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  69. Reply
    204674Reply
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  70. Supplement
    204672Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  71. Request
    204667Request For Extension Of Time
    The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
  72. Reply
    204666Reply
    Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
  73. Request
    204656Request For Extension Of Time
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  74. Decision
    31725Entire Board
    DENIED THE (1) MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY BNSF AND UP; AND (2) DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM; GRANTED THE REQUEST OF GOLD FIELDS MINING COMPANY AND LEE RANCH COAL COMPANY TO INTERVENE AND REPLY TO THE MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM.
  75. Decision
    32310Entire Board
    DENIED THE JOINT MOTION FILED BY THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY TO CONSOLIDATE THE CAPTIONED CASES FOR CONSIDERATION OF SELECTED ISSUES.
  76. Decision
    32021Secretary
    GRANTED THE REQUESTS FOR A 30-DAY EXTENSION OF THE REPLY DATE.
  77. Decision
    31852Entire Board
    ORDERED THAT PURSUANT TO 49 U.S.C. 11101, DEFENDANTS SHALL, NO LATER THAN MAY 14, 2001, ESTABLISH A COMMON CARRIER RATE OR RATES FOR TRAINLOAD MOVEMENTS OF COAL FROM PRB ORIGINS TO AEPCO'S APACHE PLANT NEAR COCHISE, AZ.
  78. Decision
    31654Secretary
    GRANTED THE PARTIES JOINT MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, AND DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AS STIPULATED IN THIS DECISION.