NOR 42058
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/NOR-42058 · entries shown: all, newest first
ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. V. THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Caption from the Board’s record.
60 filings, 18 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 23:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 5/2/2005)Decision35846SecretaryPROVIDED NOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT APRIL 22, 2005, IN THIS PROCEEDING, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
-
served (printed as 3/15/2005)Decision35588Entire Board(1) FOUND THAT ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. HAS FAILED TO SHOW THAT THE CHALLENGED RATES ARE UNREASONABLY HIGH; AND (2) DISMISSED THE COMPLAINT.
-
(printed as 11/3/2004)Oral212442Oral Argument ExhibitsArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 11/3/2004)Oral212437Oral Argument ExhibitsUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 10/29/2004)Decision35250SecretaryPROVIDED THE SCHEDULE OF APPEARANCES AND THE TIME ALLOCATIONS FOR EACH SPEAKER AT THE NOVEMBER 2, 2004 ORAL ARGUMENT IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 10/26/2004)Oral212338Oral Argument ExhibitsArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 10/25/2004)Oral212333Oral Argument ExhibitsUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 10/7/2004)Decision35135Secretary(1) PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE BOARD WILL HOLD AN ORAL ARGUMENT IN THIS PROCEEDING ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 2, 2004, BEGINNING AT 10:00 A.M., AT 1925 K STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, DC; AND (2) DIRECTED THAT EACH PARTY MUST PROVIDE THE ORAL ARGUMENT INFORMATION SPECIFIED IN THIS DECISION IN WRITING BY OCTOBER 25, 2004.
-
(printed as 9/16/2004)Brief212025BriefUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/16/2004)Brief212023BriefArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 9/16/2004)Reply212020ReplyArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
served (printed as 8/2/2004)Decision34709Secretary(1) DIRECTED THAT THE BRIEFS NOT EXCEED 30 PAGES IN LENGTH AND ARE DUE BY SEPTEMBER 16, 2004; AND (2) ORDERED THAT ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.'S REPLY TO THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S CLARIFICATION OF THEIR SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE IS DUE BY SEPTEMBER 16, 2004.
-
(printed as 7/2/2004)Letter211543LetterUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 7/2/2004)Reply211495ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/25/2004)Motion211439Motion/Petition/RequestArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 6/8/2004)Reply211315ReplyThe Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company , Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/19/2004)Motion210979Motion To StrikeArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 5/7/2004)Motion210807Motion/Petition/RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/15/2004)Errata210661Errata SheetArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 4/2/2004)SupplementArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 2/17/2004)Reply210080ReplyArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
served (printed as 2/11/2004)Decision34460SecretaryGRANTED AEPCO'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL REBUTTAL EVIDENCE FROM FEBRUARY 24, 2004, UNTIL APRIL 2, 2004.
-
(printed as 2/3/2004)Reply210008ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 1/30/2004)RequestArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 1/26/2004)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/26/2004)Application209961ApplicationUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/26/2004)Reply209960ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 12/10/2003)Reply209585ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 12/8/2003)Motion209563Motion/Petition/RequestArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 12/4/2003)Letter209540LetterUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/26/2003)Comments209500CommentArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
served (printed as 11/19/2003)Decision33562Entire BoardTHIS DECISION: (1) DENIES UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S (UP) APRIL 18, 2003 PETITION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT; (2) DENIES THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND UP'S JULY 23, 2003 MOTION TO STRIKE REBUTTAL EVIDENCE; AND (3) REOPENS THE RECORD FOR THE SUBMISSION OF ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE TO ALLOW FOR A FAIR AND INFORMED DECISION ON THE MERITS OF THE RATE COMPLAINT.
-
(printed as 9/22/2003)Motion208964Motion/Petition/RequestBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/12/2003)Reply208689ReplyArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 7/23/2003)Motion208496Motion To StrikeUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 7/18/2003)Errata208447Errata SheetArizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
-
(printed as 7/14/2003)Errata208377Errata SheetArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 7/3/2003)Rebuttal208352RebuttalArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 7/3/2003)Application208287ApplicationArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 7/3/2003)Rebuttal208272RebuttalBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 6/6/2003)Decision33613SecretaryGRANTED THE PROPOSALS TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDERS ISSUED IN 12 STAND-ALONE COST RAIL RATE PROCEEDINGS.
-
(printed as 5/27/2003)Reply207910ReplyThe Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/27/2003)Reply207909ReplyArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 5/27/2003)Reply207905ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/27/2003)Reply207903ReplyThe Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/9/2003)Comments207784CommentArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 5/7/2003)Reply207757ReplyArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
served (printed as 4/25/2003)Decision33519SecretaryDIRECTED THAT PARTIES TO THE CAPTIONED STAND-ALONE COST PROCEEDINGS SHOULD REVIEW AND JOINTLY PROPOSE ANY NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDERS GOVERNING THESE PROCEEDINGS BY MAY 9, 2003.
-
(printed as 4/18/2003)Motion207661Motion/Petition/RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 2/5/2003)Motion207158Motion To WithdrawArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 1/7/2003)Letter207009LetterArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 1/2/2003)Reply206984ReplyArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
served (printed as 11/27/2002)Decision33216SecretaryGRANTED THE JOINT MOTION OF ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC., UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY REQUESTING THAT A NEW PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE BE ESTABLISHED.
-
(printed as 11/20/2002)Motion206688Motion/Petition/RequestBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/4/2002)Motion206551Motion To WithdrawBurlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company, and Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 10/15/2002)Motion206656Motion/Petition/RequestBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 9/11/2002)Decision32690Secretary(1) GRANTED OR DENIED TO THE EXTENT DISCUSSED IN THIS DECISION THE MOTIONS TO COMPEL; (2) LIMITED ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.'S (AEPCO) AMENDED COMPLAINT, AS IT PERTAINS TO UP'S COLORADO RATES, TO THE PUBLISHED RATES IN UP 4244, AS AMENDED; (3) DENIED AEPCO'S REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION; AND (4) ORDERED BNSF TO FURNISH THE DISCOVERY AUTHORIZED IN THIS DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF SERVICE.
-
served (printed as 8/20/2002)Decision32689Entire BoardDENIED A PETITION FILED BY THE DEFENDANTS, BNSF AND UP, ASKING THE BOARD TO REQUIRE THE COMPLAINANT, AEPCO, TO MAKE SEPARATE STAND-ALONE COST (SAC) PRESENTATIONS FOR EACH OF THE THREE RATE CHALLENGES EMBRACED IN THIS COMPLAINT, BUT WOULD PROVIDE DIRECTION ON THE PERMISSIBLE BOUNDS OF A SAC PRESENTATION IN THS MATTER.
-
(printed as 5/20/2002)Letter205426LetterUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/20/2002)Reply205425ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/1/2002)Correction205288CorrectionArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 4/30/2002)Reply205285ReplyArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 4/22/2002)Motion205230Motion/Petition/RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/9/2002)Reply205157ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 3/20/2002)Motion205011Motion To CompelArizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.
-
(printed as 3/12/2002)Letter204957Letter/TelegramThe Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 2/28/2002)Decision32599SecretaryNOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT FEBRUARY 11, 2002, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
-
(printed as 2/26/2002)Reply204842ReplyArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 2/1/2002)Reply204674ReplyArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 2/1/2002)SupplementArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 1/31/2002)RequestThe Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/31/2002)Reply204666ReplyArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 1/30/2002)RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 12/31/2001)Decision31725Entire BoardDENIED THE (1) MOTION TO DISMISS THE AMENDED COMPLAINT FILED BY BNSF AND UP; AND (2) DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM; GRANTED THE REQUEST OF GOLD FIELDS MINING COMPANY AND LEE RANCH COAL COMPANY TO INTERVENE AND REPLY TO THE MOTION FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM.
-
served (printed as 11/27/2001)Decision32310Entire BoardDENIED THE JOINT MOTION FILED BY THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY TO CONSOLIDATE THE CAPTIONED CASES FOR CONSIDERATION OF SELECTED ISSUES.
-
served (printed as 7/19/2001)Decision32021SecretaryGRANTED THE REQUESTS FOR A 30-DAY EXTENSION OF THE REPLY DATE.
-
served (printed as 5/8/2001)Decision31852Entire BoardORDERED THAT PURSUANT TO 49 U.S.C. 11101, DEFENDANTS SHALL, NO LATER THAN MAY 14, 2001, ESTABLISH A COMMON CARRIER RATE OR RATES FOR TRAINLOAD MOVEMENTS OF COAL FROM PRB ORIGINS TO AEPCO'S APACHE PLANT NEAR COCHISE, AZ.
-
served (printed as 2/16/2001)Decision31654SecretaryGRANTED THE PARTIES JOINT MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER, AND DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AS STIPULATED IN THIS DECISION.
Nothing of that kind in this docket.