FD 35523
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/FD-35523 · entries shown: all, newest first
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.--JOINT USE--LOUISVILLE & INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY, INC.
Caption from the Board’s record.
33 filings, 11 decisions and 173 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC.
Entries
-
(printed as 9/4/2018)CommentEI-26352Law Offices of Louis GitomerMelanie Yasbin · Towson, Maryland
-
(printed as 12/27/2017)CommentLouis E. Gitomer · Towson, MD
-
(printed as 4/17/2017)Report242945Status ReportCsx Transportation Inc.
-
(printed as 8/12/2016)CommentEI-25340Law Office of Louis GitomerLouis E. Gitomer · Towson, MD
-
(printed as 8/12/2016)CommentEI-25339Law Office of Louis GitomerLouis E. Gitomer · Towson, MD
-
(printed as 5/31/2016)CommentEI-24061Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis E. Gitomer · Towson, MD
-
(printed as 5/10/2016)CommentEO-2819Law Office of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 5/8/2016)CommentEI-25337Law Office of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 4/8/2016)CommentEI-25336Law Office of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 11/24/2015)CommentEO-2699Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 10/7/2015)CommentEI-21137Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis E. Gitomer · Towson, MD
-
served (printed as 4/10/2015)Decision44147Entire BoardDECISION APPROVES THE PROPOSED JOINT USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. AND LOUISVILLE & INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY, INC., SUBJECT TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND STANDARD EMPLOYEE PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS.
-
(printed as 3/6/2015)CommentK. Brown, J. McGuinness, M. Myers, and C. Luedeman
-
(printed as 2/24/2015)CommentCharlene Dwin Vaughn
-
(printed as 2/5/2015)CommentEO-2511Law Offices of Louis GitomerMelanie Yasbin
-
(printed as 1/29/2015)CommentEI-20922Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 1/29/2015)CommentNancy Richardson
-
(printed as 1/28/2015)CommentMitchell Zoll
-
(printed as 1/27/2015)CommentMitchell Zoll
-
(printed as 1/26/2015)CommentEI-20912Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 1/26/2015)CommentEO-2474City of Columbus, INJeff Logston
-
(printed as 1/26/2015)CommentEO-2470City of Columbus, INJeff Logston
-
(printed as 1/22/2015)CommentEI-20911Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 1/22/2015)CommentEO-2469Mayor, Columbus, INKristen Brown
-
(printed as 1/22/2015)CommentNancy Richardson
-
(printed as 1/21/2015)CommentEI-20902Office of Congressman Todd YoungNancy Richardson
-
(printed as 1/20/2015)CommentEI-20901Mayor, Columbus, INKristen Brown
-
(printed as 1/20/2015)CommentK. Brown, J. McGuinness, M. Myers, and C Luedeman
-
(printed as 1/9/2015)CommentMitchell Zoll
-
(printed as 1/8/2015)CommentEI-20894St. Stephen Baptist ChurchOur Comments are attached electronicallyCheri Mills · Louisville, KY (USA)
-
(printed as 1/8/2015)CommentEO-2452Law Offices of Louis GitomerMelanie Yasbin
-
(printed as 1/5/2015)CommentEI-20880KY State ClearinghouseLee Nalley
-
served (printed as 12/31/2014)DecisionFINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ON A PROPOSAL BY CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. AND THE LOUISVILLE AND INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY (L&I) TO JOINTLY OPERATE OVER L&I'S 106.5-MILE RAIL LINE BETWEEN INDIANAPOLIS, IN, AND LOUISVILLE, KY.
-
(printed as 12/19/2014)CommentEI-20875CSX Transportation, Inc.Louis E. Gitomer · Towson, MD
-
(printed as 12/19/2014)CommentEI-20825Robert JohnsonWith all of the existing roadways crossing from Cocoa to the port, it does not seem reasonable that the only way to route this railroad line is directly through environmentally sensitive areas.Manalapan, NEW JERSEY
-
(printed as 12/18/2014)CommentEO-2448Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 12/18/2014)CommentEO-2447Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 12/17/2014)CommentEI-20736Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 12/15/2014)CommentEI-20728Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis E. Gitomer · Towson, MD
-
(printed as 12/11/2014)CommentEI-20735Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 12/11/2014)CommentEO-2446Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 12/5/2014)CommentMitchell Zoll
-
(printed as 12/4/2014)CommentEO-2432Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 12/2/2014)CommentCraig Luedeman · Seymour, IN
-
(printed as 12/1/2014)CommentEI-20637University of LouisvilleFrom the University review of CSX’s Environment Assessment, we have a couple of concerns that we feel warranted additional study and possible mitigation measures be taken. The comments that are enumerated are as follows: We are recommending these comments for additional consideration in complete the environmental assessment. • Increase to 18 trains a day - First the assessment does appear to recognize potential noise impact on the University’s growing residential communities along the Connector, there are now six major residential developments housing a couple of thousand students. From my observations, some train operations along the corridor routinely require use of the train’s signal horn. Since CSX operations are 24-7 any improvements along the corridor that would eliminate the need to utilize horn signals, especially at night would improvement resident satisfaction • Wait time at Ship Street crossing would double dropping the level of service from “C” to “E.” will have impact on pedestrian and car traffic to Province, Retreat and especially the Bellamy, along with the University’s evening residential loop shuttle. The report’s primarily focus is on vehicular impact (movement/delays) and the assessment does not appear to study or report on the large amount of daily pedestrian crossing of the “Connector” at Shipp Street. With two completed residential projects Province and Bellamy and Retreat, now under construction, pedestrian traffic along Shipp Street has gone from non-existent to be a major component of “at grade” crossings on Shipp Street. I feel a final Environmental Assessment needs to review and make recommendations regarding mitigating the impact of stopped trains and pedestrian movements. If not adequately addresses, we are potently headed to the creation of major problem with pedestrian crossing the line when trains are delayed at this location, i.e. student climbing over or crawling under stationary train cars.Kenneth Dietz · Louisville, KY
-
(printed as 12/1/2014)CommentEI-20635USEPA - Region 5Kenneth Westlake
-
(printed as 12/1/2014)CommentEI-20634Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer · Towson, MD
-
(printed as 12/1/2014)Comment
-
(printed as 11/30/2014)CommentEI-20632Thomas SnyderI am commenting on the CSX upgrade from Indianapolis, Indiana to Louisville, Ky. I have lived along the route for over 60 years and don't have a problem with the upgrade. However something needs to be done with grade crossings. In a one mile length of track we have 5 active grade crossings. From a dead stop I need 25 seconds to cross a track with a loaded semi. At only 30 mph train that means I need a minimum of 1/4 mile visibility. Most crossings in the area south of Seymour, Indiana are lucky to have 200 yards. We have a new flashing light and crossing gate in front of my house. That is great the lights come on 30 seconds before a train arrives but the gates come down 5 seconds later. I dare you to stop a loaded semi in 5 seconds. I urge you to carefully consider crossing safety and visibility at these grade crossing. I also cross these tracks 12 times a day with a loaded schoolbus. Thank you. Thomas SnyderSeymour, IN
-
(printed as 11/28/2014)CommentEI-20631Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 11/26/2014)SupplementCsx Transportation Inc.
-
(printed as 11/26/2014)CommentEI-20630Louisville Metro GovernmentPlease see attached letter with Louisville Metro Government's CommentsPatrick Johnson · Louisville, KY
-
(printed as 11/25/2014)CommentThe attached letter from 2011 with our comments was included in the original CSX draft environmental document submittal to STB. We never heard a response to the concerns raised in this letter, so I am resubmitting these comments during the request for additional comments. The concerns raised in the attached letter from 2011 are still relevant to this environmental review process. Additionally, we would request that STB give serious consideration to the concerns raised by the cities and towns along this line, especially those cities and towns that lie withing Johnson County. The City of Greenwood in particular has raised concerns about traffic flow restrictions, safety at rail/road intersections, and noise concerns related to increased use of this rail line. Rail transportation is an important part of our country's freight movement. While considering the request CSX has made, please keep in mind the impact that increased train traffic has on communities impacted by this request, particularly road safety concerns and nuisance impacts on residents.Lucas Mastin · Franklin, IN
-
(printed as 11/25/2014)CommentMark W. Myers · Greenwood, Indiana
-
(printed as 11/25/2014)CommentEI-20627James DaileyCrothersville, IN
-
(printed as 11/25/2014)CommentJill Howe
-
(printed as 11/24/2014)CommentEI-20626SCHNECK MEDICAL CENTERRE: Docket No. FD35523, CSX Transportation, Inc. – Joint Use – Louisville & Indiana Railroad Company, Inc.SEYMOUR, IN
-
(printed as 11/24/2014)CommentEI-20625City of FranklinAttached are comments by the City of Franklin, Indiana as requested on October 31, 2014 for the Supplemental Environmental Assessment for Docket No. 35523.Joe McGuinness · Franklin, IN
-
(printed as 11/24/2014)CommentEO-2407Law Office of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 11/18/2014)CommentI am writing to speak against the proposed rail line work being proposed by CSXT/L&I rail lines. The proposed increase from 6-8 trains per day to a proposed 18 trains per day is too significant a jump to an already crowded and dense urban area. As a neighbor and property owner who lives a short distance from the train line in question,I find this proposal to increase rail traffic far too much to maintain the quality of life in our neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration.Rev. Richard Williams · Louisville, KY
-
(printed as 11/18/2014)CommentEI-20623E Ninette BasilSeymour, in
-
(printed as 11/17/2014)CommentEI-20622Keven P. Watts Sr.I would like to know if theirs going to be any compensation for damage to my home? or do you want to buy my home? 55k would take it. and the noise. with these maxed out loaded trains and the increase train traffic the heavier trains now vibrate the house.Indianapolis, IN
-
(printed as 11/17/2014)CommentLouisville, Jefferson County Emergency Management Agency/MetroSafe Concerns: 1. With the proposed increase of 13 - 15 CSXT trains per day traveling on the L&I rail line, coupled with the trains moving at a faster rate of speed, there is greater potential for more hazmat incidents either from leaks or de-railings. 2. Trains transporting freight which includes chemicals should not travel at or exceed 49 mph in highly populated areas. When nearing a populated area at approximately 14 miles from a community, the train carrying hazardous material should reduce its speed to no more than 25 mph. 3.Trains transporting hazardous material may travel up to 45 mph through rural areas. 4. CSXT projects it will take seven years to complete the upgrades that would permit the larger, faster, and heavier trains. Depending on the economy at the end of seven years, we may see more traffic than that which is predicted in this document.Debbie Fox · Louisville, Kentucky
-
served (printed as 10/31/2014)DecisionPROVIDED THE SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 10/7/2014)CommentMitchell Zoll
-
(printed as 9/23/2014)CommentMitchell K Zoll
-
(printed as 9/17/2014)CommentEO-2331Town of Whiteland, INNathan Bilger
-
(printed as 9/16/2014)CommentEI-20540Town Of Whitehead, INNathan Bilger
-
(printed as 9/4/2014)CommentEO-2330Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 9/3/2014)CommentEI-20539Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 9/2/2014)CommentEI-20538Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 9/2/2014)CommentEO-2329Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 8/26/2014)CommentEI-20537Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 8/26/2014)CommentEO-2328Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 8/25/2014)CommentEO-2327Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 8/21/2014)CommentMitchell K Zoll
-
(printed as 8/8/2014)CommentEI-20536Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 8/6/2014)CommentLaShavio Johnson
-
(printed as 8/5/2014)CommentCraig Potts
-
(printed as 8/4/2014)CommentEI-20535Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 8/4/2014)CommentEI-20500Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 8/4/2014)CommentEO-2326Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 8/1/2014)CommentEI-20734Law Offices of Louis GitomerMelanie Yasbin
-
(printed as 7/25/2014)CommentCharlene Dwin Vaughn
-
(printed as 7/22/2014)CommentEI-20497Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 7/19/2014)CommentEI-20496Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 7/19/2014)CommentEI-20495Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 7/15/2014)CommentEO-2325Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 6/30/2014)CommentCharles Niquette
-
(printed as 5/27/2014)CommentEI-20534Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 5/27/2014)CommentEI-20533Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 5/27/2014)CommentEI-20532Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 5/27/2014)CommentEO-2324Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 5/21/2014)CommentEI-20531Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 5/21/2014)CommentEO-2323Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 5/20/2014)CommentEI-20530Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 5/20/2014)CommentEO-2322Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 5/20/2014)CommentEO-2321Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 5/13/2014)CommentEO-2320Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 5/12/2014)CommentEI-20529Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 5/9/2014)CommentEI-20528Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 5/8/2014)CommentEI-20453USEPA - Region 5Kenneth Westlake
-
(printed as 5/5/2014)CommentCraig Potts
-
(printed as 5/5/2014)CommentEI-20450City of Sidney, OhioMike Barhorst, Mayor
-
(printed as 4/30/2014)CommentEI-20527Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 4/25/2014)CommentEO-2319Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 4/23/2014)CommentMitchell Zoll
-
(printed as 4/23/2014)Comment
-
(printed as 4/22/2014)CommentEI-20526Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 4/22/2014)CommentEI-20442City of Columbus, IndianaKristen Brown
-
(printed as 4/21/2014)CommentEI-20443Kentucky Division of Air QualityKentucky Division for Air Quality Regulation 401 KAR 58:025, Asbestos Standards, apply to this project, and the project must be inspected by a Kentucky Accredited Asbestos Inspector. Asbestos that will be affected by this activity must be removed by a Kentucky accredited contractor before renovation or demolition begins. Written notification must be given on form DEP 7036 to the Division for Air Quality, Paducah Regional Office at least 10 weekdays prior the start of demolitions, whether or not asbestos has been identified to be present. Please note form DEP 7036 and the Asbestos Fact Sheet located at http://air.ky.gov/Pages/OpenBurning.aspx Kentucky Division for Air Quality Regulation 401 KAR 63:010 Fugitive Emissions states that no person shall cause, suffer, or allow any material to be handled, processed, transported, or stored without taking reasonable precaution to prevent particulate matter from becoming airborne. Additional requirements include the covering of open bodied trucks, operating outside the work area transporting materials likely to become airborne, and that no one shall allow earth or other material being transported by truck or earth moving equipment to be deposited onto a paved street or roadway. Please note the Fugitive Emissions Fact Sheet located at http://air.ky.gov/Pages/OpenBurning.aspx Kentucky Division for Air Quality Regulation 401 KAR 63:005 states that open burning is prohibited. Open Burning is defined as the burning of any matter in such a manner that the products of combustion resulting from the burning are emitted directly into the outdoor atmosphere without passing through a stack or chimney. However, open burning may be utilized for the expressed purposes listed on the Open Burning Brochure located at http://air.ky.gov/Pages/OpenBurning.aspx The Division would like to offer the following suggestions on how this project can help us stay in compliance with the NAAQS. More importantly, these strategies are beneficial to the health of citizens of Kentucky. § Utilize alternatively fueled equipment. § Utilize other emission controls that are applicable to your equipment. § Reduce idling time on equipment. The Division also suggests an investigation into compliance with applicable local government regulations.Ron Price · Frankfort, KY
-
(printed as 4/21/2014)CommentEI-20441Kentucky Transportation CabinetMichael W. Hancock
-
(printed as 4/18/2014)CommentEI-20525Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 4/17/2014)CommentEO-2318Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 4/16/2014)CommentEO-2317Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 4/16/2014)CommentEO-2316Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 4/14/2014)CommentEO-2315Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 4/11/2014)CommentEI-21209Shelby County CommissionersThe Shelby County Board of Commissioners does have a concern that the additional traffic will require more maintenance. Has the budgeting for that been addressed?Bob Guillozet · Sidney, Ohio
-
(printed as 4/10/2014)CommentChristie Stanifer
-
(printed as 4/10/2014)CommentEI-20429US Fish and Wildife ServiceRobin McWilliams Munson
-
(printed as 4/7/2014)CommentJane Hardisty
-
(printed as 4/7/2014)CommentDebora Roth
-
(printed as 4/3/2014)CommentEI-20427Village of Versailles, OhioRodd A. Hale · Versailles, Ohio
-
(printed as 3/31/2014)SupplementCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 3/28/2014)CommentEI-20524Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 3/28/2014)CommentEO-2314Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 3/27/2014)CommentEI-21207Leslie K. Kavanaugh, Sr.Clark County, perhaps the (largest) county (Area) in Southern Indiana, as well as been part of the (Louisville, Ky) Metropolitan Area, is poised for growth & economic development. The Clark County Airport is on schedule, for run-way expansion, (adjacent) to these rail lines, The new River Ridge Commerce Center is expanding with major business's relocating (Amazon) Distribution Center, and a rail spur going in to the Commerce Center. I/We believe there to be no increased or negative impact, as to letting these (2) rail carriers increase volume. I/We feel that the opportunity for economic growth and development, will spur even more business opportunity, creating more jobs and broaden Clark County's tax base. We do work closely with CSX & LIRC, as First Responders, Haz-Mat Techs, EMS, Disaster Preparedness Planners, coordinating the rail carriers safety expertise, with our mitigation response teams, we believe we are prepared to handle the additional traffic, in years to come. In conclusion I respectfully request your agency's consideration, in allowing this operation to proceed. Thanking You, Leslie K. Kavanaugh, Sr. Executive Director Clark County Emergency Management AgencySellersburg, Indiana
-
(printed as 3/21/2014)Comment
-
(printed as 3/18/2014)CommentEI-20523Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 3/14/2014)CommentEI-20409HDR International, Inc.Rose Hargrave
-
(printed as 3/12/2014)CommentEO-2238Law Offices of Louis GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 2/25/2014)CommentEI-20522Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 2/6/2014)CommentEO-2313Law Offices of L GitomerLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 12/26/2013)CommentCraig Potts
-
served (printed as 11/25/2013)DecisionDECISION HOLDS THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING IN ABEYANCE.
-
served (printed as 11/22/2013)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE TO THE PARTIES THAT PREPARATION OF A SUPPLEMENTAL DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS TO ADDRESS NEW ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IS WARRANTED.
-
(printed as 11/20/2013)CommentEI-20463Butler Fairman SeufertBritta Rees
-
(printed as 11/19/2013)CommentMitchell Zoll
-
(printed as 11/5/2013)CommentBurcum Keeton
-
(printed as 11/5/2013)CommentBurcum Keeton
-
(printed as 11/1/2013)CommentKenneth Westlake
-
(printed as 10/31/2013)CommentEI-21205CSX Transportation, IncMelanie B. Yasbin · Towson, MD
-
(printed as 10/31/2013)CommentMelanie Yasbin
-
(printed as 10/21/2013)Reply234985ReplyCsx Transportation Inc, Louisville & Indiana Railroad Company
-
(printed as 10/17/2013)Statement234968Support StatementPorts Of Indiana
-
(printed as 10/3/2013)CommentMitchell Zoll
-
(printed as 10/3/2013)Comment
-
(printed as 10/2/2013)CommentKenneth McMullen
-
(printed as 9/30/2013)Comments234919CommentConsolidated Grain And Barge Company
-
(printed as 9/30/2013)CommentLouis Ggitomer
-
(printed as 9/30/2013)CommentEI-20323Interested CitizenJanie Alexander
-
(printed as 9/30/2013)Comment
-
(printed as 9/30/2013)CommentEI-20320U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceRobin McWilliams Munson · Bloomington, in
-
(printed as 9/30/2013)CommentRobin McWilliams
-
(printed as 9/27/2013)CommentEI-20319Schneck Medical CenterIf transmission of the response letter is not successful, please contact my assistant Robin Clark at rclark@schneckmed.org or 812.524.4238.Gary A. Meyer · Seymour, IN
-
(printed as 9/26/2013)CommentEI-20317Interested CitizenRodney Farrow
-
(printed as 9/24/2013)CommentEI-20335U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceRobin McWilliams
-
(printed as 9/24/2013)CommentEI-20312Town of EdinburgJohn Drybread
-
(printed as 9/23/2013)CommentEI-20311Town of SellersburgPaul Rhodes
-
(printed as 9/23/2013)CommentEI-20309Kickapoo Tribe of OklahomaKent Collier
-
(printed as 9/23/2013)CommentRobin Wilson
-
(printed as 9/20/2013)CommentBurcum Keeton
-
(printed as 9/20/2013)CommentBurcum Keeton
-
(printed as 9/20/2013)CommentLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 9/20/2013)CommentRobin Wilson
-
(printed as 9/20/2013)CommentEI-20315Columbus Fire DepartmentThe Columbus Fire Department has no comment regarding the general regulations referring to this proposal. Our major concern would be a spill/accident within the city proper or within Bartholomew County as we are a regional Haz-Mat response team provider.David Allmon, Chief · Columbus, Indiana
-
(printed as 9/20/2013)CommentJane Hardisty
-
(printed as 9/19/2013)Comment
-
(printed as 9/18/2013)CommentMelanie Yasbin
-
(printed as 9/18/2013)CommentEI-20331Civilstar, Inc.Garry Shook, PE
-
served (printed as 9/17/2013)DecisionDECISION MODIFIED THE FINAL SERVICE LIST.
-
(printed as 9/16/2013)Statement234829Support StatementCity Of Louisville
-
(printed as 9/11/2013)CommentBurcum Keeton
-
(printed as 9/10/2013)CommentMelanie Yasbin
-
(printed as 9/9/2013)CommentEI-20313Interested CitizenThe bridge on this RR over Hurricane Creek in Franklin needs to be replaced. It is undersized and the difference in water surface level upstream of the bridge is as much as 4 feet higher than downsteam per the FIS for the 100 year storm. There was flooding upstream of this bridge in June 2008. The FEMA map # is 18081C)231D. Thank you for allowing me to comment.Dale Sedler, PE · Franklin, IN
-
(printed as 9/9/2013)CommentChristie Stanifer
-
(printed as 9/4/2013)CommentCynthia Stacy
-
served (printed as 8/30/2013)DecisionTHE BOARD'S OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PROVIDED A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ON THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF AN EASEMENT IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 8/30/2013)Certificate234740Certificate Of ServiceCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 8/29/2013)Certificate234736Certificate Of ServiceCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 8/26/2013)Statement234711Support StatementCity Of Southport
-
(printed as 8/26/2013)Certificate234709Certificate Of ServiceCsx Transportation Inc
-
served (printed as 8/23/2013)DecisionDECISION PROVIDED NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES THAT A SERVICE LIST HAD BEEN COMPILED FOR THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 8/23/2013)CommentJill Howe
-
(printed as 8/19/2013)Statement234691Support StatementJeffboat Llc
-
(printed as 8/19/2013)Statement234690Support StatementCity Of Jeffersonville
-
(printed as 8/15/2013)NoticeConsolidated Grain And Barge Company
-
(printed as 8/14/2013)NoticePorts Of Indiana
-
(printed as 8/12/2013)Statement234668Support StatementBridgewell Resources, L.L.C.
-
(printed as 8/5/2013)Statement234648Support StatementHonorable Todd Young
-
(printed as 8/5/2013)Statement234647Support StatementBuzzi Unicem Usa
-
(printed as 8/5/2013)Statement234646Support StatementJohnson County Development Corporation
-
(printed as 8/5/2013)Statement234645Support StatementDorel Juvenile Group
-
(printed as 8/5/2013)Statement234644Support StatementCity Of Seymour, Indiana
-
(printed as 8/5/2013)Statement234643Support StatementColumbus Indiana Economic Development Board
-
(printed as 8/5/2013)Statement234642Support StatementEssroc Cement Corp.
-
served (printed as 8/1/2013)Decision43168Entire BoardDECISION ACCEPTED FOR CONSIDERATION THE APPLICATION BY CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. (CSXT) AND LOUISVILLE & INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. (L&I) FOR CSXT TO ACQUIRE AN OPERATING EASEMENT OVER A LINE OF L&I. THE BOARD FOUND THAT THE TRANSACTION IS 'MINOR' AS DEFINED BY OUR REGULATIONS AND IT ADOPTS A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
(printed as 8/1/2013)Statement234659Support StatementCity Of Indianapolis Indiana
-
(printed as 8/1/2013)Statement234658Support StatementState Of Indiana
-
(printed as 8/1/2013)Statement234619Support StatementJackson County Industrial Development Corporation
-
(printed as 7/30/2013)Statement234605Support StatementTown Of Whiteland
-
(printed as 7/30/2013)Statement234602Support StatementIlpea Industries, Inc.
-
(printed as 7/23/2013)Statement234562Support StatementBrown-Forman Distillery Company
-
served (printed as 7/11/2013)DecisionDECISION DETERMINED THAT A NOTICE ACCEPTING OR REJECTING THE APPLICATION WILL BE ISSUED NO LATER THAN AUGUST 1, 2013.
-
served (printed as 7/11/2013)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER.
-
(printed as 7/9/2013)NoticeNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/2/2013)Misc.234497MiscellaneousCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 6/14/2013)Motion
-
(printed as 6/14/2013)Application234398ApplicationCsx Transportation Inc, Anacostia Rail Holding Company
-
(printed as 6/4/2013)CommentEO-2100CSX TransportationLouis Gitomer
-
(printed as 5/20/2013)CommentEI-20216CSX TransportationLou Gitomer
-
(printed as 10/18/2011)CommentJames Glass
-
(printed as 9/9/2011)CommentEI-20483HDR, Inc.Mark Wollschlager
-
(printed as 9/6/2011)CommentState Historic Preservation Officer
-
(printed as 8/15/2011)CommentJames Glass
-
(printed as 8/1/2011)CommentLindy Casebier
-
(printed as 7/11/2011)CommentEI-20485HDR, Inc.Mark Wollschlager
Nothing of that kind in this docket.