Display Kept in this browser only
Finance DocketBefore the Surface Transportation Board

FD 35523

CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.--JOINT USE--LOUISVILLE & INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY, INC.

Caption from the Board’s record.

33 filings, 11 decisions and 173 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:38 UTC.

Entries

By type (10)
Newest first · oldest first
  1. Comment
    EI-26352Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Melanie Yasbin · Towson, Maryland
  2. Comment
    EI-26252Law Offices of Louis E. Gitomer, LLC
    Louis E. Gitomer · Towson, MD
  3. Report
    242945Status Report
    Csx Transportation Inc.
  4. Comment
    EI-25340Law Office of Louis Gitomer
    Louis E. Gitomer · Towson, MD
  5. Comment
    EI-25339Law Office of Louis Gitomer
    Louis E. Gitomer · Towson, MD
  6. Comment
    EI-24061Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis E. Gitomer · Towson, MD
  7. Comment
    EO-2819Law Office of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  8. Comment
    EI-25337Law Office of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  9. Comment
    EI-25336Law Office of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  10. Comment
    EO-2699Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  11. Comment
    EI-21137Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis E. Gitomer · Towson, MD
  12. Decision
    44147Entire Board
    DECISION APPROVES THE PROPOSED JOINT USE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. AND LOUISVILLE & INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY, INC., SUBJECT TO ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS AND STANDARD EMPLOYEE PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS.
  13. Comment
    EI-20946Mayors of Columbus, Franklin, Greenwood & Seymour, IN
    K. Brown, J. McGuinness, M. Myers, and C. Luedeman
  14. Comment
    EO-2515Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
    Charlene Dwin Vaughn
  15. Comment
    EO-2511Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Melanie Yasbin
  16. Comment
    EI-20922Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  17. Comment
    EO-2487Office of US Congressman Todd Young
    Nancy Richardson
  18. Comment
    EI-20913Indiana State Historic Preservation Office
    Mitchell Zoll
  19. Comment
    EI-20921Indiana State Historic Preservation Office
    Mitchell Zoll
  20. Comment
    EI-20912Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  21. Comment
    EO-2474City of Columbus, IN
    Jeff Logston
  22. Comment
    EO-2470City of Columbus, IN
    Jeff Logston
  23. Comment
    EI-20911Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  24. Comment
    EO-2469Mayor, Columbus, IN
    Kristen Brown
  25. Comment
    EO-2468Offices of Congressman Todd Young
    Nancy Richardson
  26. Comment
    EI-20902Office of Congressman Todd Young
    Nancy Richardson
  27. Comment
    EI-20901Mayor, Columbus, IN
    Kristen Brown
  28. Comment
    EI-20898Mayors of Columbus, Franklin, Greenwood & Seymour, IN
    K. Brown, J. McGuinness, M. Myers, and C Luedeman
  29. Comment
    EO-2453Indiana State Historic Preservation Office
    Mitchell Zoll
  30. Comment
    EI-20894St. Stephen Baptist Church
    Our Comments are attached electronically
    Cheri Mills · Louisville, KY (USA)
  31. Comment
    EO-2452Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Melanie Yasbin
  32. Comment
    EI-20880KY State Clearinghouse
    Lee Nalley
  33. Decision
    44179Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ON A PROPOSAL BY CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. AND THE LOUISVILLE AND INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY (L&I) TO JOINTLY OPERATE OVER L&I'S 106.5-MILE RAIL LINE BETWEEN INDIANAPOLIS, IN, AND LOUISVILLE, KY.
  34. Comment
    EI-20875CSX Transportation, Inc.
    Louis E. Gitomer · Towson, MD
  35. Comment
    EI-20825Robert Johnson
    With all of the existing roadways crossing from Cocoa to the port, it does not seem reasonable that the only way to route this railroad line is directly through environmentally sensitive areas.
    Manalapan, NEW JERSEY
  36. Comment
    EO-2448Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  37. Comment
    EO-2447Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  38. Comment
    EI-20736Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  39. Comment
    EI-20728Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis E. Gitomer · Towson, MD
  40. Comment
    EI-20735Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  41. Comment
    EO-2446Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  42. Comment
    EI-20701Indiana State Historic Preservation Office
    Mitchell Zoll
  43. Comment
    EO-2432Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  44. Comment
    EI-20636City of Seymour, IN, Office of the Mayor
    Craig Luedeman · Seymour, IN
  45. Comment
    EI-20637University of Louisville
    From the University review of CSX’s Environment Assessment, we have a couple of concerns that we feel warranted additional study and possible mitigation measures be taken. The comments that are enumerated are as follows: We are recommending these comments for additional consideration in complete the environmental assessment. • Increase to 18 trains a day - First the assessment does appear to recognize potential noise impact on the University’s growing residential communities along the Connector, there are now six major residential developments housing a couple of thousand students. From my observations, some train operations along the corridor routinely require use of the train’s signal horn. Since CSX operations are 24-7 any improvements along the corridor that would eliminate the need to utilize horn signals, especially at night would improvement resident satisfaction • Wait time at Ship Street crossing would double dropping the level of service from “C” to “E.” will have impact on pedestrian and car traffic to Province, Retreat and especially the Bellamy, along with the University’s evening residential loop shuttle. The report’s primarily focus is on vehicular impact (movement/delays) and the assessment does not appear to study or report on the large amount of daily pedestrian crossing of the “Connector” at Shipp Street. With two completed residential projects Province and Bellamy and Retreat, now under construction, pedestrian traffic along Shipp Street has gone from non-existent to be a major component of “at grade” crossings on Shipp Street. I feel a final Environmental Assessment needs to review and make recommendations regarding mitigating the impact of stopped trains and pedestrian movements. If not adequately addresses, we are potently headed to the creation of major problem with pedestrian crossing the line when trains are delayed at this location, i.e. student climbing over or crawling under stationary train cars.
    Kenneth Dietz · Louisville, KY
  46. Comment
    EI-20635USEPA - Region 5
    Kenneth Westlake
  47. Comment
    EI-20634Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer · Towson, MD
  48. Comment
    EI-20633Kentucky Heritage Council (SHPO)
    Please see attachment.
    Jill Howe · Frankfort, KY
  49. Comment
    EI-20632Thomas Snyder
    I am commenting on the CSX upgrade from Indianapolis, Indiana to Louisville, Ky. I have lived along the route for over 60 years and don't have a problem with the upgrade. However something needs to be done with grade crossings. In a one mile length of track we have 5 active grade crossings. From a dead stop I need 25 seconds to cross a track with a loaded semi. At only 30 mph train that means I need a minimum of 1/4 mile visibility. Most crossings in the area south of Seymour, Indiana are lucky to have 200 yards. We have a new flashing light and crossing gate in front of my house. That is great the lights come on 30 seconds before a train arrives but the gates come down 5 seconds later. I dare you to stop a loaded semi in 5 seconds. I urge you to carefully consider crossing safety and visibility at these grade crossing. I also cross these tracks 12 times a day with a loaded schoolbus. Thank you. Thomas Snyder
    Seymour, IN
  50. Comment
    EI-20631Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  51. Supplement
    237121Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Csx Transportation Inc.
  52. Comment
    EI-20630Louisville Metro Government
    Please see attached letter with Louisville Metro Government's Comments
    Patrick Johnson · Louisville, KY
  53. Comment
    EI-20629Johnson County Highway Department
    The attached letter from 2011 with our comments was included in the original CSX draft environmental document submittal to STB. We never heard a response to the concerns raised in this letter, so I am resubmitting these comments during the request for additional comments. The concerns raised in the attached letter from 2011 are still relevant to this environmental review process. Additionally, we would request that STB give serious consideration to the concerns raised by the cities and towns along this line, especially those cities and towns that lie withing Johnson County. The City of Greenwood in particular has raised concerns about traffic flow restrictions, safety at rail/road intersections, and noise concerns related to increased use of this rail line. Rail transportation is an important part of our country's freight movement. While considering the request CSX has made, please keep in mind the impact that increased train traffic has on communities impacted by this request, particularly road safety concerns and nuisance impacts on residents.
    Lucas Mastin · Franklin, IN
  54. Comment
    EI-20628Office of the Mayor, Greenwood, IN
    Mark W. Myers · Greenwood, Indiana
  55. Comment
    EI-20627James Dailey
    Crothersville, IN
  56. Comment
    EO-2408Kentucky Heritage Council (SHPO)
    Jill Howe
  57. Comment
    EI-20626SCHNECK MEDICAL CENTER
    RE: Docket No. FD35523, CSX Transportation, Inc. – Joint Use – Louisville & Indiana Railroad Company, Inc.
    SEYMOUR, IN
  58. Comment
    EI-20625City of Franklin
    Attached are comments by the City of Franklin, Indiana as requested on October 31, 2014 for the Supplemental Environmental Assessment for Docket No. 35523.
    Joe McGuinness · Franklin, IN
  59. Comment
    EO-2407Law Office of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  60. Comment
    EI-20624Central Park West Neighborhood Association
    I am writing to speak against the proposed rail line work being proposed by CSXT/L&I rail lines. The proposed increase from 6-8 trains per day to a proposed 18 trains per day is too significant a jump to an already crowded and dense urban area. As a neighbor and property owner who lives a short distance from the train line in question,I find this proposal to increase rail traffic far too much to maintain the quality of life in our neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration.
    Rev. Richard Williams · Louisville, KY
  61. Comment
    EI-20623E Ninette Basil
    Seymour, in
  62. Comment
    EI-20622Keven P. Watts Sr.
    I would like to know if theirs going to be any compensation for damage to my home? or do you want to buy my home? 55k would take it. and the noise. with these maxed out loaded trains and the increase train traffic the heavier trains now vibrate the house.
    Indianapolis, IN
  63. Comment
    EI-20621Louisville Jefferson County Emergency Management Agency
    Louisville, Jefferson County Emergency Management Agency/MetroSafe Concerns: 1. With the proposed increase of 13 - 15 CSXT trains per day traveling on the L&I rail line, coupled with the trains moving at a faster rate of speed, there is greater potential for more hazmat incidents either from leaks or de-railings. 2. Trains transporting freight which includes chemicals should not travel at or exceed 49 mph in highly populated areas. When nearing a populated area at approximately 14 miles from a community, the train carrying hazardous material should reduce its speed to no more than 25 mph. 3.Trains transporting hazardous material may travel up to 45 mph through rural areas. 4. CSXT projects it will take seven years to complete the upgrades that would permit the larger, faster, and heavier trains. Depending on the economy at the end of seven years, we may see more traffic than that which is predicted in this document.
    Debbie Fox · Louisville, Kentucky
  64. Decision
    44015Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED THE SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  65. Comment
    EI-20638Indiana State Historic Preservation Office
    Mitchell Zoll
  66. Comment
    EO-2334Indiana State Historic Preservation Office
    Mitchell K Zoll
  67. Comment
    EO-2331Town of Whiteland, IN
    Nathan Bilger
  68. Comment
    EI-20540Town Of Whitehead, IN
    Nathan Bilger
  69. Comment
    EO-2330Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  70. Comment
    EI-20539Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  71. Comment
    EI-20538Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  72. Comment
    EO-2329Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  73. Comment
    EI-20537Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  74. Comment
    EO-2328Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  75. Comment
    EO-2327Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  76. Comment
    EI-20514Indiana State Historic Preservation Office
    Mitchell K Zoll
  77. Comment
    EI-20536Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  78. Comment
    EI-20504Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
    LaShavio Johnson
  79. Comment
    EI-20501Kentucky State Historic Preservation Office
    Craig Potts
  80. Comment
    EI-20535Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  81. Comment
    EI-20500Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  82. Comment
    EO-2326Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  83. Comment
    EI-20734Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Melanie Yasbin
  84. Comment
    EO-2292Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
    Charlene Dwin Vaughn
  85. Comment
    EI-20497Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  86. Comment
    EI-20496Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  87. Comment
    EI-20495Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  88. Comment
    EO-2325Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  89. Comment
    EI-20490Cultural Resources Analysts, Inc.
    Charles Niquette
  90. Comment
    EI-20534Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  91. Comment
    EI-20533Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  92. Comment
    EI-20532Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  93. Comment
    EO-2324Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  94. Comment
    EI-20531Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  95. Comment
    EO-2323Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  96. Comment
    EI-20530Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  97. Comment
    EO-2322Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  98. Comment
    EO-2321Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  99. Comment
    EO-2320Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  100. Comment
    EI-20529Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  101. Comment
    EI-20528Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  102. Comment
    EI-20453USEPA - Region 5
    Kenneth Westlake
  103. Comment
    EI-20451Kentucky State Historic Preservation Office
    Craig Potts
  104. Comment
    EI-20450City of Sidney, Ohio
    Mike Barhorst, Mayor
  105. Comment
    EI-20527Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  106. Comment
    EO-2319Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  107. Comment
    EI-20446Indiana Historic Preservation Office
    Mitchell Zoll
  108. Comment
    EI-20444Louisville/Jeff Co EMA
    are attached.
    Debbie Fox · Louisville, Kentucky
  109. Comment
    EI-20526Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  110. Comment
    EI-20442City of Columbus, Indiana
    Kristen Brown
  111. Comment
    EI-20443Kentucky Division of Air Quality
    Kentucky Division for Air Quality Regulation 401 KAR 58:025, Asbestos Standards, apply to this project, and the project must be inspected by a Kentucky Accredited Asbestos Inspector. Asbestos that will be affected by this activity must be removed by a Kentucky accredited contractor before renovation or demolition begins. Written notification must be given on form DEP 7036 to the Division for Air Quality, Paducah Regional Office at least 10 weekdays prior the start of demolitions, whether or not asbestos has been identified to be present. Please note form DEP 7036 and the Asbestos Fact Sheet located at http://air.ky.gov/Pages/OpenBurning.aspx Kentucky Division for Air Quality Regulation 401 KAR 63:010 Fugitive Emissions states that no person shall cause, suffer, or allow any material to be handled, processed, transported, or stored without taking reasonable precaution to prevent particulate matter from becoming airborne. Additional requirements include the covering of open bodied trucks, operating outside the work area transporting materials likely to become airborne, and that no one shall allow earth or other material being transported by truck or earth moving equipment to be deposited onto a paved street or roadway. Please note the Fugitive Emissions Fact Sheet located at http://air.ky.gov/Pages/OpenBurning.aspx Kentucky Division for Air Quality Regulation 401 KAR 63:005 states that open burning is prohibited. Open Burning is defined as the burning of any matter in such a manner that the products of combustion resulting from the burning are emitted directly into the outdoor atmosphere without passing through a stack or chimney. However, open burning may be utilized for the expressed purposes listed on the Open Burning Brochure located at http://air.ky.gov/Pages/OpenBurning.aspx The Division would like to offer the following suggestions on how this project can help us stay in compliance with the NAAQS. More importantly, these strategies are beneficial to the health of citizens of Kentucky. § Utilize alternatively fueled equipment. § Utilize other emission controls that are applicable to your equipment. § Reduce idling time on equipment. The Division also suggests an investigation into compliance with applicable local government regulations.
    Ron Price · Frankfort, KY
  112. Comment
    EI-20441Kentucky Transportation Cabinet
    Michael W. Hancock
  113. Comment
    EI-20525Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  114. Comment
    EO-2318Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  115. Comment
    EO-2317Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  116. Comment
    EO-2316Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  117. Comment
    EO-2315Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  118. Comment
    EI-21209Shelby County Commissioners
    The Shelby County Board of Commissioners does have a concern that the additional traffic will require more maintenance. Has the budgeting for that been addressed?
    Bob Guillozet · Sidney, Ohio
  119. Comment
    EI-20430IDNR - Division of Fish and Wildlife
    Christie Stanifer
  120. Comment
    EI-20429US Fish and Wildife Service
    Robin McWilliams Munson
  121. Comment
    EI-20426Natural Resources Conservation Service, Indiana State Office
    Jane Hardisty
  122. Comment
    EI-20425Ohio EPA, Division of Surface Water
    Debora Roth
  123. Comment
    EI-20427Village of Versailles, Ohio
    Rodd A. Hale · Versailles, Ohio
  124. Supplement
    235724Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Csx Transportation Inc
  125. Comment
    EI-20524Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  126. Comment
    EO-2314Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  127. Comment
    EI-21207Leslie K. Kavanaugh, Sr.
    Clark County, perhaps the (largest) county (Area) in Southern Indiana, as well as been part of the (Louisville, Ky) Metropolitan Area, is poised for growth & economic development. The Clark County Airport is on schedule, for run-way expansion, (adjacent) to these rail lines, The new River Ridge Commerce Center is expanding with major business's relocating (Amazon) Distribution Center, and a rail spur going in to the Commerce Center. I/We believe there to be no increased or negative impact, as to letting these (2) rail carriers increase volume. I/We feel that the opportunity for economic growth and development, will spur even more business opportunity, creating more jobs and broaden Clark County's tax base. We do work closely with CSX & LIRC, as First Responders, Haz-Mat Techs, EMS, Disaster Preparedness Planners, coordinating the rail carriers safety expertise, with our mitigation response teams, we believe we are prepared to handle the additional traffic, in years to come. In conclusion I respectfully request your agency's consideration, in allowing this operation to proceed. Thanking You, Leslie K. Kavanaugh, Sr. Executive Director Clark County Emergency Management Agency
    Sellersburg, Indiana
  128. Comment
    EO-2246Federal, state and local agencies
  129. Comment
    EI-20523Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  130. Comment
    EI-20409HDR International, Inc.
    Rose Hargrave
  131. Comment
    EO-2238Law Offices of Louis Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  132. Comment
    EI-20522Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  133. Comment
    EO-2313Law Offices of L Gitomer
    Louis Gitomer
  134. Comment
    EI-20368Kentucky State Historic Preservation Office
    Craig Potts
  135. Decision
    43471Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION HOLDS THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING IN ABEYANCE.
  136. Decision
    43472Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    PROVIDED NOTICE TO THE PARTIES THAT PREPARATION OF A SUPPLEMENTAL DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS TO ADDRESS NEW ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES IS WARRANTED.
  137. Comment
    EI-20463Butler Fairman Seufert
    Britta Rees
  138. Comment
    EI-20484Indiana State Historic Preservation Office
    Mitchell Zoll
  139. Comment
    EI-20489Kentucky State Historic Preservation Office
    Burcum Keeton
  140. Comment
    EO-2288Kentucky State Historic Preservation Office
    Burcum Keeton
  141. Comment
    EI-20346U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5
    Kenneth Westlake
  142. Comment
    EI-21205CSX Transportation, Inc
    Melanie B. Yasbin · Towson, MD
  143. Comment
    EI-20345Law Offices of Louis E. Gitomer, LLC
    Melanie Yasbin
  144. Reply
    234985Reply
    Csx Transportation Inc, Louisville & Indiana Railroad Company
  145. Statement
    234968Support Statement
    Ports Of Indiana
  146. Comment
    EI-20325Indiana State Historic Preservation Office
    Mitchell Zoll
  147. Comment
    EI-20322Indiana DNR
    See attachment.
    Christie Stanifer · Indianapolis, IN
  148. Comment
    EI-20327Indiana Department of Transportation
    Kenneth McMullen
  149. Comments
    234919Comment
    Consolidated Grain And Barge Company
  150. Comment
    EI-20324Law Offices of Louis E Gitomer, LLC
    Louis Ggitomer
  151. Comment
    EI-20323Interested Citizen
    Janie Alexander
  152. Comment
    EI-20321CAMPO
    Please see attachments
    Laurence Brown · Columbus, IN
  153. Comment
    EI-20320U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Robin McWilliams Munson · Bloomington, in
  154. Comment
    EO-2176U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Robin McWilliams
  155. Comment
    EI-20319Schneck Medical Center
    If transmission of the response letter is not successful, please contact my assistant Robin Clark at rclark@schneckmed.org or 812.524.4238.
    Gary A. Meyer · Seymour, IN
  156. Comment
    EI-20317Interested Citizen
    Rodney Farrow
  157. Comment
    EI-20335U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
    Robin McWilliams
  158. Comment
    EI-20312Town of Edinburg
    John Drybread
  159. Comment
    EI-20311Town of Sellersburg
    Paul Rhodes
  160. Comment
    EI-20309Kickapoo Tribe of Oklahoma
    Kent Collier
  161. Comment
    EO-2175Indiana Department of Natural Resources
    Robin Wilson
  162. Comment
    EI-20488Kentucky State Historic Preservation Office
    Burcum Keeton
  163. Comment
    EI-20487Kentucky State Historic Preservation Office
    Burcum Keeton
  164. Comment
    EI-20334Law Offices of Louis E Gitomer, LLC
    Louis Gitomer
  165. Comment
    EI-20333Indiana Department of Natural Resources
    Robin Wilson
  166. Comment
    EI-20315Columbus Fire Department
    The Columbus Fire Department has no comment regarding the general regulations referring to this proposal. Our major concern would be a spill/accident within the city proper or within Bartholomew County as we are a regional Haz-Mat response team provider.
    David Allmon, Chief · Columbus, Indiana
  167. Comment
    EI-20310Natural Resources Conservation Service
    Jane Hardisty
  168. Comment
    EI-20314Jackson County Emergency Medical Services
    See Attachment
    Dennis Brasher · Seymour, IN
  169. Comment
    EI-20332Law Offices of Louis E Gitomer, LLC
    Melanie Yasbin
  170. Comment
    EI-20331Civilstar, Inc.
    Garry Shook, PE
  171. Decision
    43313Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION MODIFIED THE FINAL SERVICE LIST.
  172. Statement
    234829Support Statement
    City Of Louisville
  173. Comment
    EO-2287Kentucky State Historic Preservation Office
    Burcum Keeton
  174. Comment
    EI-20330Law Offices of Louis E. Gitomer, LLC
    Melanie Yasbin
  175. Comment
    EI-20313Interested Citizen
    The bridge on this RR over Hurricane Creek in Franklin needs to be replaced. It is undersized and the difference in water surface level upstream of the bridge is as much as 4 feet higher than downsteam per the FIS for the 100 year storm. There was flooding upstream of this bridge in June 2008. The FEMA map # is 18081C)231D. Thank you for allowing me to comment.
    Dale Sedler, PE · Franklin, IN
  176. Comment
    EI-20284Indiana Dept of Natural Resources
    Christie Stanifer
  177. Comment
    EI-20283Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma
    Cynthia Stacy
  178. Decision
    43214Director, Office Of Environmental Analysis
    THE BOARD'S OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS PROVIDED A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT ON THE PROPOSED ACQUISITION OF AN EASEMENT IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  179. Certificate
    234740Certificate Of Service
    Csx Transportation Inc
  180. Certificate
    234736Certificate Of Service
    Csx Transportation Inc
  181. Statement
    234711Support Statement
    City Of Southport
  182. Certificate
    234709Certificate Of Service
    Csx Transportation Inc
  183. Decision
    43284Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION PROVIDED NOTICE TO ALL PARTIES THAT A SERVICE LIST HAD BEEN COMPILED FOR THIS PROCEEDING.
  184. Comment
    EO-2286Kentucky State Historic Preservation Office
    Jill Howe
  185. Statement
    234691Support Statement
    Jeffboat Llc
  186. Statement
    234690Support Statement
    City Of Jeffersonville
  187. Notice
    234683Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Consolidated Grain And Barge Company
  188. Notice
    234677Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Ports Of Indiana
  189. Statement
    234668Support Statement
    Bridgewell Resources, L.L.C.
  190. Statement
    234648Support Statement
    Honorable Todd Young
  191. Statement
    234647Support Statement
    Buzzi Unicem Usa
  192. Statement
    234646Support Statement
    Johnson County Development Corporation
  193. Statement
    234645Support Statement
    Dorel Juvenile Group
  194. Statement
    234644Support Statement
    City Of Seymour, Indiana
  195. Statement
    234643Support Statement
    Columbus Indiana Economic Development Board
  196. Statement
    234642Support Statement
    Essroc Cement Corp.
  197. Decision
    43168Entire Board
    DECISION ACCEPTED FOR CONSIDERATION THE APPLICATION BY CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. (CSXT) AND LOUISVILLE & INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY, INC. (L&I) FOR CSXT TO ACQUIRE AN OPERATING EASEMENT OVER A LINE OF L&I. THE BOARD FOUND THAT THE TRANSACTION IS 'MINOR' AS DEFINED BY OUR REGULATIONS AND IT ADOPTS A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
  198. Statement
    234659Support Statement
    City Of Indianapolis Indiana
  199. Statement
    234658Support Statement
    State Of Indiana
  200. Statement
    234619Support Statement
    Jackson County Industrial Development Corporation
  201. Statement
    234605Support Statement
    Town Of Whiteland
  202. Statement
    234602Support Statement
    Ilpea Industries, Inc.
  203. Statement
    234562Support Statement
    Brown-Forman Distillery Company
  204. Decision
    43209Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION DETERMINED THAT A NOTICE ACCEPTING OR REJECTING THE APPLICATION WILL BE ISSUED NO LATER THAN AUGUST 1, 2013.
  205. Decision
    43176Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER.
  206. Notice
    234519Notice Of Intent To Participate (Without Comment)
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  207. Misc.
    234497Miscellaneous
    Csx Transportation Inc
  208. Motion
    234403Motion For Protective Order
    Csx Transportation Inc
  209. Application
    234398Application
    Csx Transportation Inc, Anacostia Rail Holding Company
  210. Comment
    EO-2100CSX Transportation
    Louis Gitomer
  211. Comment
    EI-20216CSX Transportation
    Lou Gitomer
  212. Comment
    EI-18705Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Historic Resources
    James Glass
  213. Comment
    EI-20483HDR, Inc.
    Mark Wollschlager
  214. Comment
    EO-1752Indiana Department of Natural Resources
    State Historic Preservation Officer
  215. Comment
    EI-20482Indiana State Historic Preservation Office
    James Glass
  216. Comment
    EI-20486Kentucky State Historic Preservation Office
    Lindy Casebier
  217. Comment
    EI-20485HDR, Inc.
    Mark Wollschlager