AB 33 (Sub-No. 232X)

Entries

1. 13 Mar 2006 (printed as 3/13/2006)
   Notice
   215976Consummation Notice

   Union Pacific Railroad Company
2. served 23 Dec 2005 (printed as 12/23/2005)
   Decision
   36545Director Of Proceedings

   (1) REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) REMOVED THE SECTION 106 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONDITION IMPOSED IN THE NOVEMBER 17, 2005 DECISION.
3. served 17 Nov 2005 (printed as 11/17/2005)
   Decision
   36356Director Of Proceedings

   (1) REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) IMPOSED THREE CONDITIONS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD'S SECTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IN THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
4. 9 Nov 2005 (printed as 11/9/2005)
   Comment
   EI-1729City of Orange, CA

   Gail Farber, P.E.
5. 7 Nov 2005 (printed as 11/7/2005)
   Comment
   EI-1742Mcleod, Watkinson & Miller

   Charles A Spitulnik
6. served 21 Oct 2005 (printed as 10/21/2005)
   Decision
   36302Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis

   CONCLUDED THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
7. served 18 Oct 2005 (printed as 10/18/2005)
   Decision
   36293Director Of Proceedings

   PROVIDED NOTICE THAT UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY FILED A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION UNDER 49 CFR 1152 SUBPART F TO ABANDON A 1.46-MILE LINE OF RAILROAD KNOWN AS THE TUSTIN INDUSTRIAL LEAD FROM MILEPOST 514.84 TO MILEPOST 516.10 AND FROM MILEPOST 514.70 TO 514.90 IN THE CITY OF ORANGE, ORANGE COUNTY, CA.
8. 3 Oct 2005 (printed as 10/3/2005)
   Comment
   EI-1699California Office of Historic Preservation

   Milford Wayne Donaldson
9. 28 Sep 2005 (printed as 9/28/2005)
   Notice
   214769Notice Of Exemption

   Union Pacific Railroad Company
10. 18 Aug 2005 (printed as 8/18/2005)
    Environmental
    214551Environmental Materials

    , Union Pacific Railroad Company
11. 18 May 2005 (printed as 5/18/2005)
    Comment
    EI-1700National Geodetic Survey

    Richard A. Snay

Nothing of that kind in this docket.