Decision 31095
Served (printed as 6/9/2000) · Decision · Director Of Proceedings
(1)DENIED THE REQUESTS FOR AN ORAL HEARING FILED BY THE PARTIES; AND (2) FOUND THAT THE PARTIES REQUESTING AN ORAL HEARING HAVE NOT SHOWN THAT ONE IS NECESSARY TO RESOLVE MATERIAL ISSUES OF FACT IN THIS CASE.
Read it here The text 31095.pdf ↓
Permanent address docketyard.org/decision/31095 · back to the docket sheet
If the file does not appear here, open it in its own tab (some phones show only the first page inside a frame).