NOR 42125
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/NOR-42125 · entries shown: all, newest first
E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY V. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Caption from the Board’s record.
90 filings, 26 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 22:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 12/23/2015)Decision44700Entire BoardDECISION DENIED RECONSIDERATION OF A PRIOR DECISION, WHICH FOUND THAT THE CHALLENGED RATES IN THIS PROCEEDING HAVE NOT BEEN DEMONSTRATED TO BE UNREASONABLY HIGH.
-
served (printed as 10/29/2015)DecisionDECISION GRANTED E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY'S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE THE CHEMOURS COMPANY FC, LLC, AND THE CHEMOURS COMPANY TT, LLC AS THE COMPLAINANTS IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 8/6/2015)Reply238987ReplyE.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company, The Chemours Company Fc, Llc, And The The Chemours Company Tt, Llc
-
(printed as 7/30/2015)Reply238948ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/14/2015)SupplementE.I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company, The Chemours Company Fc, Llc, And The The Chemours Company Tt, Llc
-
(printed as 6/29/2015)SubstitutionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/12/2014)Reply237222ReplyE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 12/12/2014)Reply237221ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/12/2014)MotionJason D. Tutrone
-
(printed as 11/12/2014)MotionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/12/2014)Correction237034CorrectionNorfolk Southern Railway Company, E.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
served (printed as 10/9/2014)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A REQUEST BY E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS & COMPANY TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 10/8/2014)RequestE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
served (printed as 10/3/2014)Decision44043Entire BoardDECISION: (1) MADE TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE FINAL MERITS DECISION SERVED ON MARCH 24, 2014; (2) ADDED A PUBLIC VERSION OF THE MARKET DOMINANCE APPENDIX TO THE MERITS DECISION; (3) MADE SEVERAL GRAMMATICAL AND FORMATTING CHANGES TO THE MERITS DECISION; AND (4) ESTABLISHED A DEADLINE FOR THE FILING OF PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION.
-
served (printed as 6/11/2014)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE PAGE LIMITS FOR PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 6/11/2014)Reply236172ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/10/2014)SupplementE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 5/13/2014)Reply236037ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/9/2014)Motion236022Motion/Petition/RequestE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
served (printed as 4/30/2014)DecisionDECISION ORDERED PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION TO BE DUE 20 DAYS FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE DECISION CORRECTING TECHNICAL ERRORS.
-
(printed as 4/23/2014)Reply235955ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/14/2014)Motion235892PetitionE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 4/11/2014)DecisionDECISION TOLLS THE DEADLINE FOR THE FILING OF PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION.
-
(printed as 4/2/2014)Reply235758ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/31/2014)Motion235726Motion/Petition/RequestE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
served (printed as 3/24/2014)Decision43717Entire BoardDECISION UPDATED THE DECISION SERVED ON MARCH 24, 2014, TO INCLUDE AN APPENDIX IN THIS DOCKET.
-
served (printed as 3/14/2014)Decision43699Entire BoardDECISION FOUND THAT THE COMPLAINING SHIPPER DOES NOT HAVE A FEASIBLE SHIPPING ALTERNATIVE TO THE DEFENDANT RAILROAD FOR MUCH OF THE TRANSPORTATION AT ISSUE, BUT THAT THE COMPLAINANT HAS FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE CHALLENGED RATES ARE UNREASONABLY HIGH.
-
(printed as 11/13/2013)Reply235077ReplyE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 10/24/2013)MotionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/1/2013)Reply234617ReplyE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 7/25/2013)Motion234574Motion To StrikeNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/19/2013)Letter234560LetterNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/18/2013)Errata234554Errata SheetE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 6/21/2013)Misc.234451MiscellaneousNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/14/2013)Brief234405BriefE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 6/14/2013)Brief234399BriefNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/10/2013)Errata234382Errata SheetE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company,
-
(printed as 4/15/2013)Rebuttal234078RebuttalE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
served (printed as 3/27/2013)Decision42995Entire BoardDECISION DENIED AS MOOT A REQUEST TO CLARIFY WHICH PARTY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST OF A LICENSE TO CERTAIN MODELING SOFTWARE FOR COMPLAINANTS' USE IN THESE PROCEEDINGS.
-
served (printed as 3/8/2013)DecisionDECISION GRANTED COMPLAINANTS' REQUEST TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED.
-
(printed as 3/5/2013)Motion233906Motion/Petition/RequestSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership, E.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 2/27/2013)Reply233849ReplyE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 2/22/2013)Reply233841ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/22/2013)Motion233839Motion/Petition/RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/14/2013)Reply233802ReplyE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company, Sunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 2/13/2013)Letter233793LetterNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/11/2013)Letter233784LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 1/25/2013)Letter233727LetterNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/25/2013)Errata233725Errata SheetNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/25/2013)Motion233721PetitionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/3/2013)Reply233620ReplyE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 1/2/2013)Letter233618LetterNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/12/2012)SupplementNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/30/2012)Reply233436ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 11/29/2012)Decision42675Entire BoardDECISION DENIED A REQUEST TO PLACE ON HOLD TWO RATE PROCEEDINGS WHILE THE BOARD, IN A SEPARATE PROCEEDING, CONSIDERS MODIFYING SOME OF ITS RULES AND PROCEDURES IN RATE CASES.
-
served (printed as 9/11/2012)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A REQUEST BY NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 8/31/2012)Letter232896LetterNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/27/2012)Reply232871ReplyE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 8/27/2012)Reply232870ReplyE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 8/17/2012)Letter232788LetterE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 8/17/2012)RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/10/2012)Errata232715Errata SheetNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/6/2012)Motion232653Motion/Petition/RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 6/12/2012)DecisionDECISION GRANTED NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY'S REQUEST TO REVISE THE MODIFIED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 5/29/2012)Reply232370ReplyE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 5/24/2012)RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/17/2012)Errata232328Errata SheetE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 4/30/2012)Errata232436Errata SheetE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 4/30/2012)Statement232257Opening StatementE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 3/2/2012)Misc.231943MiscellaneousThompson Hine Llp, Etal
-
(printed as 2/28/2012)Errata231912Errata SheetE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
served (printed as 1/13/2012)DecisionDECISION GRANTED E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY'S MOTION TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FILED ON DECEMEBER 12, 2011.
-
(printed as 12/23/2011)Reply231564ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/22/2011)Misc.231556MiscellaneousE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/21/2011)Reply231545ReplyE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 12/20/2011)Reply231532ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 12/14/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME FOR FILING THE JOINT SUBMISSION OF OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS UNTIL DECEMBER 22, 2011.
-
(printed as 12/12/2011)RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company, E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 12/12/2011)Motion231465Motion/Petition/RequestE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
served (printed as 12/9/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A PETITION FOR ISSUANCE OF A SUBPOENA DIRECTING THIRD-PARTY DISCOVERY.
-
(printed as 12/5/2011)SupplementE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 11/30/2011)Reply231365ReplySentinel Transportation Llc
-
served (printed as 11/25/2011)DecisionDECISION HELD IN ABEYANCE A MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FILED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 11/23/2011)Motion231334PetitionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 11/17/2011)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE TO THE PARTIES THAT A CONFERENCE HAS BEEN SCHEDULED AND WILL BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 2011.
-
(printed as 11/10/2011)Reply231272ReplyE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 10/31/2011)Motion231217Motion To CompelNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 8/25/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY'S MOTION TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
served (printed as 8/11/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW ITS SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FILED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 8/9/2011)Motion230790Motion/Petition/RequestE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 8/8/2011)Answer230786AnswerNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/3/2011)Motion230761Motion To WithdrawE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 8/1/2011)Reply230742ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/22/2011)Motion230657Motion To CompelE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 7/18/2011)SupplementE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 7/12/2011)Reply230600ReplyE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 7/11/2011)Reply230595ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/30/2011)RequestE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 5/31/2011)Answer229662AnswerNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 5/23/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED SEPARATE MOTIONS TO WITHDRAW TWO PREVIOUSLY FILED MOTIONS TO COMPEL DISCOVERY.
-
(printed as 5/20/2011)Motion229558Motion/Petition/RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/19/2011)Motion229549Motion/Petition/RequestE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
served (printed as 5/13/2011)DecisionDECISION EXTENDED THE DEADLINE FOR A BOARD DECISION ON 2 MOTIONS TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FILED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 5/11/2011)SupplementE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
served (printed as 5/4/2011)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT A CONFERENCE WITH E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY AND NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY WILL BE HELD ON MAY 6, 2011.
-
(printed as 5/2/2011)Reply229429ReplyE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 4/25/2011)Reply229392ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/20/2011)Motion229353Motion To CompelNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/14/2011)Motion229280Motion To CompelE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company
-
served (printed as 2/24/2011)DecisionDECISION ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 1/11/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER.
-
(printed as 1/10/2011)Motion228610Motion/Petition/RequestE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 12/29/2010)MotionNorfolk Southern Railway Company, E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
-
(printed as 10/27/2010)Answer228068AnswerNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/12/2010)Misc.227955MiscellaneousNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/7/2010)Complaint227941ComplaintE I Du Pont De Nemours And Company
Nothing of that kind in this docket.