NOR 41191 (Sub-No. 1)
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/NOR-41191/sub/1 · entries shown: all, newest first
AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY V. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Caption from the Board’s record.
91 filings, 30 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 02:06 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 10/26/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED THE REQUEST OF AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY TO DISMISS ITS COMPLAINT AGAINST BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY WITH PREJUDICE.
-
(printed as 10/19/2011)Motion231136Motion/Petition/RequestAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 1/28/2011)Reply228703ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 1/21/2011)DecisionDECISION DETERMINED THAT AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY HAS UNTIL FEBRUARY 18, 2011, TO FILE A REPLY TO BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S COMMENTS ON REMAND.
-
(printed as 12/7/2010)Letter228380LetterBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/29/2010)Reply228334ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 11/22/2010)Comments228290CommentBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 8/18/2009)Decision40106SecretaryPROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 5/15/2009)Decision39556Entire BoardDECISION: (1) DENIED AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION; AND (2) MADE CERTAIN TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE DECISION SERVED ON SEPTEMBER 10, 2007, IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 9/17/2008)Errata223618Errata SheetAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 9/5/2008)Reply223544ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 9/5/2008)Reply223541ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/8/2008)Statement223152Opening StatementAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 8/8/2008)Statement223139Opening StatementBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 6/18/2008)Decision39154SecretaryDECISION (1) GRANTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; AND (2) MODIFIED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 6/4/2008)RequestBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 5/29/2008)Decision38823Entire BoardDECISION DENIED THE PETITIONS OF RECONSIDERATION TO THE BOARD'S SEPTEMBER 10, 2007 DECISION FILED BY AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY AND BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE COST OF CAPITAL ISSUE.
-
(printed as 11/13/2007)Notice220685NoticeBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/13/2007)Reply220684ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/13/2007)Reply220674ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 10/22/2007)Motion220507Petition To ReopenAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 10/22/2007)Motion220499Petition To ReopenBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 9/26/2007)Decision38423SecretaryDECISION GRANTED WESTERN FUELS ASSOCIATION, INC.'S, BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.'S, AND AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME.
-
(printed as 9/20/2007)RequestAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 9/10/2007)Decision36778Entire BoardDECISION FOUND THAT AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S RATES ARE UNREASONABLY HIGH. HOWEVER, THIS DECISION OFFERED AEP TEXAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE UNDER THE STAND-ALONE CONSTRAINT.
-
(printed as 4/2/2007)Reply218950ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 3/19/2007)Reply218820ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/23/2007)Correction218697CorrectionAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 2/16/2007)Reply218646ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 12/4/2006)Report218199Status ReportAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 11/28/2006)Decision37580SecretaryPROVIDED NOTICE TO REFLECT THE CORRECT YEAR IN THE DECISION SERVED ON NOVEMBER 22, 2006, WHICH INADVERTENTLY CONTAINED AN ERROR ON PAGE 4 OF THE DECISION.
-
served (printed as 11/22/2006)Decision37567SecretaryORDERED THE PARTIES TO STB DOCKET NO. 41191 (SUB-NO. 1) AND STB DOCKET NO. 42088 TO SUBMIT THE REQUESTED INFORMATION TO THE BOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REVISED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE SET FORTH IN THIS DECISION.
-
(printed as 11/21/2006)Correction218119CorrectionAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 11/17/2006)Reply218101ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/14/2006)MotionAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 11/13/2006)Decision37520Entire BoardCONCLUDED THAT THE 3-YEAR LIMITATION PROVISION OF 49 U.S.C. 11701 (C) DOES NOT REQUIRE THE TERMINATION OF THIS STAND-ALONE COST RATE PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 11/8/2006)Decision37530Entire BoardINSTRUCTED THE PARTIES IN STB DOCKET NO. 41191 (SUB-NO. 1) AND NO. 42088 TO SUBMIT THE REQUESTED INFORMATION NEEDED TO THE BOARD FOR COMPLETION OF THE BOARD'S ANALYSIS OF THESE TWO PROCEEDINGS BY THE DATES SPECIFIED IN THIS DECISION.
-
(printed as 8/1/2006)Reply217185ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 7/25/2006)MotionBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/14/2006)Rebuttal217053RebuttalAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 6/30/2006)Reply216920ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 6/15/2006)Reply216777ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/1/2006)Reply216662ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 5/15/2006)Evidence216556EvidenceAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 5/1/2006)Comments216473CommentAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 5/1/2006)Comments216468CommentCsx Transportation Inc, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 4/14/2006)Decision36911Entire BoardDECISION DENIED PETITIONERS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION.
-
served (printed as 4/10/2006)Decision36925Entire BoardDENIED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE BOARD'S MARCH 17, 2006 DECISION.
-
(printed as 4/5/2006)Motion216185Petition To ReopenBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/3/2006)Letter216153Letter/TelegramAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 3/20/2006)NoticeAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 3/17/2006)Decision36611Entire BoardDIRECTED AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY AND BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE SO THAT THE BOARD WILL HAVE A FULL RECORD UPON WHICH TO ANALYZE THE TRAFFIC GROUP AND OPERATING PLAN ISSUES THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED IN THIS CASE.
-
served (printed as 2/27/2006)Decision36722Entire BoardDECISION INSTITUTED A RULEMAKING PROCEEDING TO ADDRESS MAJOR ISSUES REGARDING RAIL RATE CASES.
-
(printed as 6/9/2005)Brief214164BriefBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/9/2005)Brief214161BriefAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 6/7/2005)Reply214151ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 6/6/2005)Decision35903SecretaryDENIED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION FILED ON MAY 18, 2005, TO SUSPEND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE.
-
(printed as 5/20/2005)Reply214035ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 5/18/2005)MotionBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/18/2005)Motion214011Motion/Petition/RequestBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 4/22/2005)Decision35705SecretaryESTABLISHED JUNE 9, 2005 AS THE DUE DATE FOR THE FILING OF BRIEFS IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 3/10/2005)Reply213517ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/28/2005)Reply213435ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 2/14/2005)Reply213268ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 1/14/2005)Decision35530SecretaryDIRECTED BNSF TO REPLY TO AEP TEXAS' SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE BY FEBRUARY 14, 2005.
-
(printed as 11/24/2004)StatementBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/8/2004)Motion212480Motion/Petition/RequestAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 11/8/2004)SupplementAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 10/20/2004)Reply212285ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 9/27/2004)Decision35095SecretaryEXTENDED THE DUE DATE FOR AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY TO FILE A REPLY TO THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION TO STRIKE TO OCTOBER 20, 2004.
-
(printed as 9/23/2004)Reply212069ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/21/2004)RequestAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 9/9/2004)Motion211968Motion To StrikeBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/17/2004)Errata211830Errata SheetAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 8/12/2004)Decision34989SecretaryEXTENDED THE DUE DATE FOR BNSF TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S REBUTTAL EVIDENCE TO SEPTEMBER 9, 2004.
-
(printed as 8/10/2004)Reply211781ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 8/9/2004)RequestBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/27/2004)Letter211670LetterAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 7/27/2004)Rebuttal211669RebuttalAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 7/27/2004)Rebuttal211664RebuttalBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 6/21/2004)Decision34808SecretaryEXTENDED THE DUE DATE FOR FILING REBUTTAL EVIDENCE FROM JULY 6, 2004 TO JULY 27, 2004.
-
(printed as 6/16/2004)RequestAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 5/24/2004)Statement211060Opening StatementAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 5/24/2004)Reply211050ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/17/2004)SettlementBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company, Aep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 4/19/2004)SupplementAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)Errata210581Errata SheetAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 3/24/2004)NoticeBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 3/19/2004)Decision34279Entire BoardDENIED THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S (BNSF) MOTION TO DISMISS AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S COMPLAINT THAT ALLEGES THAT BNSF POSSESSES MARKET DOMINANCE OVER THE TRAFFIC AND REQUESTS THAT MAXIMUM REASONABLE RATES BE PRESCRIBED ALONG WITH OTHER RELIEF.
-
(printed as 3/19/2004)Errata210356Errata SheetAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 3/2/2004)Misc.210213MiscellaneousAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 3/2/2004)Misc.210212MiscellaneousAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 3/1/2004)Misc.210195MiscellaneousBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 1/13/2004)Decision34387SecretaryGRANTED THE PETITION OF AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY FILED JANUARY 9, 2004, REQUESTING REVISION OF THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
(printed as 1/13/2004)Letter209849LetterBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/9/2004)RequestAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 1/7/2004)Reply209799ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 12/31/2003)Reply209758ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/23/2003)SupplementAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 12/22/2003)SupplementAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 12/4/2003)Decision34235SecretaryGRANTED THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF AGREEMENTS AND DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE PRODUCTION AND TRANSPORTATION OF COAL TO AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S OKLAUNION GENERATING STATION.
-
(printed as 11/21/2003)AppealBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 11/14/2003)Decision34178SecretaryGRANTED: AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S (AEP) SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S AGREEMENTS RELATED TO THE SALE, LEASE, MAINTENANCE AND/OR OPERATION OF A RAIL LINE BETWEEN STERLING AND WALLACE, NE; AND AEP'S SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF MATERIAL RELATED TO JOINT FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT LEASES, AND REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS TO THE EXTENT AGREED UPON BY BOTH PARTIES.
-
(printed as 11/7/2003)Reply209357ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/31/2003)AppealAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 10/30/2003)Decision34164Entire BoardGRANTED THE REQUEST OF FORMER CONGRESSMAN JOHN R. THUNE, THE BOARD APPOINTED MEDIATOR, TO EXTEND THE MEDIATION PROCESS IN THIS PROCEEDING THROUGH NOVEMBER 4, 2003.
-
(printed as 10/8/2003)Letter209080LetterAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 10/7/2003)Decision34084SecretaryGRANTED AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S MOTION TO COMPEL THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S PRODUCTION OF TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION, AS AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES.
-
(printed as 10/3/2003)Reply209041ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 9/26/2003)Decision34051SecretaryMODIFIED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE PER JOINT MOTION FILED BY AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY AND THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE DISCOVERY.
-
(printed as 9/25/2003)Motion208979Motion/Petition/RequestAep Texas North Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/22/2003)AppealAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 9/22/2003)Reply208956ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 9/11/2003)Decision33976Secretary(1) GRANTED AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER; (2) DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH THE PROTECTIVE ORDER; (3) SET A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THIS PROCEEDING; AND (4) INSTRUCTED THE PARTIES TO MEET AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, BUT NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 19, 2003, TO DISCUSS DISCOVERY MATTERS.
-
(printed as 9/11/2003)Reply208903ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/2/2003)MotionBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/2/2003)Answer208828AnswerBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/29/2003)Motion
-
(printed as 8/25/2003)Reply208775ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/22/2003)Motion208765Motion/Petition/RequestAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 8/11/2003)Complaint208675ComplaintAep Texas North Company
Nothing of that kind in this docket.