NOR 41191
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/NOR-41191 · entries shown: all, newest first
WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY V. THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY
Caption from the Board’s record. Sub-dockets, included below: NOR 41191 (Sub-No. 1)
113 filings, 40 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:37 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 10/26/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED THE REQUEST OF AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY TO DISMISS ITS COMPLAINT AGAINST BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY WITH PREJUDICE.
-
(printed as 10/19/2011)MotionAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 1/28/2011)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 1/21/2011)DecisionDECISION DETERMINED THAT AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY HAS UNTIL FEBRUARY 18, 2011, TO FILE A REPLY TO BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S COMMENTS ON REMAND.
-
(printed as 12/7/2010)LetterBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/29/2010)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 11/22/2010)CommentsBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 8/18/2009)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 5/15/2009)DecisionDECISION: (1) DENIED AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION; AND (2) MADE CERTAIN TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS TO THE DECISION SERVED ON SEPTEMBER 10, 2007, IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 9/17/2008)ErrataAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 9/5/2008)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 9/5/2008)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/8/2008)StatementAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 8/8/2008)StatementBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 6/18/2008)DecisionDECISION (1) GRANTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME; AND (2) MODIFIED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 6/4/2008)RequestBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 5/29/2008)DecisionDECISION DENIED THE PETITIONS OF RECONSIDERATION TO THE BOARD'S SEPTEMBER 10, 2007 DECISION FILED BY AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY AND BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE COST OF CAPITAL ISSUE.
-
(printed as 11/13/2007)NoticeBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/13/2007)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/13/2007)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 10/22/2007)MotionAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 10/22/2007)MotionBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 9/26/2007)DecisionDECISION GRANTED WESTERN FUELS ASSOCIATION, INC.'S, BASIN ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.'S, AND AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME.
-
(printed as 9/20/2007)RequestAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 9/10/2007)Decision38340Entire BoardDECISION REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING AND VACATED THE RATE PRESCRIPTION FOR COAL SHIPMENTS FROM THE RAWHIDE MINE IN THE POWDER RIVER BASIN OF WYOMING TO THE OKLAUNION GENERATING STATION NEAR VERNON, TEXAS.
-
served (printed as 9/10/2007)DecisionDECISION FOUND THAT AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY FAILED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S RATES ARE UNREASONABLY HIGH. HOWEVER, THIS DECISION OFFERED AEP TEXAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE UNDER THE STAND-ALONE CONSTRAINT.
-
(printed as 4/2/2007)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 3/19/2007)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/23/2007)CorrectionAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 2/16/2007)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 12/4/2006)ReportAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 11/28/2006)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE TO REFLECT THE CORRECT YEAR IN THE DECISION SERVED ON NOVEMBER 22, 2006, WHICH INADVERTENTLY CONTAINED AN ERROR ON PAGE 4 OF THE DECISION.
-
served (printed as 11/22/2006)DecisionORDERED THE PARTIES TO STB DOCKET NO. 41191 (SUB-NO. 1) AND STB DOCKET NO. 42088 TO SUBMIT THE REQUESTED INFORMATION TO THE BOARD IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REVISED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE SET FORTH IN THIS DECISION.
-
(printed as 11/21/2006)CorrectionAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 11/17/2006)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/14/2006)MotionAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 11/13/2006)DecisionCONCLUDED THAT THE 3-YEAR LIMITATION PROVISION OF 49 U.S.C. 11701 (C) DOES NOT REQUIRE THE TERMINATION OF THIS STAND-ALONE COST RATE PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 11/8/2006)DecisionINSTRUCTED THE PARTIES IN STB DOCKET NO. 41191 (SUB-NO. 1) AND NO. 42088 TO SUBMIT THE REQUESTED INFORMATION NEEDED TO THE BOARD FOR COMPLETION OF THE BOARD'S ANALYSIS OF THESE TWO PROCEEDINGS BY THE DATES SPECIFIED IN THIS DECISION.
-
(printed as 8/1/2006)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 7/25/2006)MotionBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/14/2006)RebuttalAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 6/30/2006)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 6/30/2006)Rebuttal216919RebuttalAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 6/15/2006)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/1/2006)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 6/1/2006)Reply216661ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 5/15/2006)EvidenceAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 5/1/2006)CommentsAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 5/1/2006)Comments216472CommentAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 5/1/2006)CommentsCsx Transportation Inc, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/1/2006)Comments216467CommentCsx Transportation Inc, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 4/14/2006)DecisionDECISION DENIED PETITIONERS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION.
-
served (printed as 4/10/2006)DecisionDENIED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE BOARD'S MARCH 17, 2006 DECISION.
-
(printed as 4/5/2006)MotionBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/3/2006)LetterAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 3/20/2006)NoticeAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 3/17/2006)DecisionDIRECTED AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY AND BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE SO THAT THE BOARD WILL HAVE A FULL RECORD UPON WHICH TO ANALYZE THE TRAFFIC GROUP AND OPERATING PLAN ISSUES THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED IN THIS CASE.
-
served (printed as 2/27/2006)DecisionDECISION INSTITUTED A RULEMAKING PROCEEDING TO ADDRESS MAJOR ISSUES REGARDING RAIL RATE CASES.
-
(printed as 6/9/2005)BriefBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/9/2005)BriefAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 6/7/2005)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 6/6/2005)DecisionDENIED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION FILED ON MAY 18, 2005, TO SUSPEND THE BRIEFING SCHEDULE.
-
(printed as 5/26/2005)Reply214079ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/20/2005)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 5/18/2005)MotionBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/18/2005)MotionBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/6/2005)Appeal213937AppealAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 4/22/2005)DecisionESTABLISHED JUNE 9, 2005 AS THE DUE DATE FOR THE FILING OF BRIEFS IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 3/10/2005)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/28/2005)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 2/14/2005)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 1/14/2005)DecisionDIRECTED BNSF TO REPLY TO AEP TEXAS' SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE BY FEBRUARY 14, 2005.
-
(printed as 11/24/2004)StatementBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/8/2004)MotionAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 11/8/2004)SupplementAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 10/20/2004)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 9/27/2004)DecisionEXTENDED THE DUE DATE FOR AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY TO FILE A REPLY TO THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION TO STRIKE TO OCTOBER 20, 2004.
-
(printed as 9/23/2004)ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/21/2004)RequestAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 9/9/2004)MotionBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/17/2004)ErrataAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 8/12/2004)DecisionEXTENDED THE DUE DATE FOR BNSF TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S REBUTTAL EVIDENCE TO SEPTEMBER 9, 2004.
-
(printed as 8/10/2004)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 8/9/2004)RequestBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/27/2004)LetterAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 7/27/2004)RebuttalAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 7/27/2004)RebuttalBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 6/21/2004)DecisionEXTENDED THE DUE DATE FOR FILING REBUTTAL EVIDENCE FROM JULY 6, 2004 TO JULY 27, 2004.
-
(printed as 6/16/2004)RequestAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 5/27/2004)Decision34755SecretaryNOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT MAY 17, 2004, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
-
(printed as 5/24/2004)StatementAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 5/24/2004)ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/17/2004)SettlementBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company, Aep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 4/19/2004)SupplementAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)ErrataAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 3/24/2004)NoticeBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 3/19/2004)Decision34427Entire BoardGRANTED AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S PETITION TO VACATE THE CURRENT RATE PRESCRIPTION GOVERNING UNIT-TRAIN MOVEMENTS OF COAL BY THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY FROM THE RAWHIDE MINE IN THE POWDER RIVER BASIN OF WYOMING TO THE OKLAUNION GENERATING STATION, A COAL-FIRED ELECTRICITY GENERATING PLANT IN VERNON, TX.
-
served (printed as 3/19/2004)DecisionDENIED THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S (BNSF) MOTION TO DISMISS AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S COMPLAINT THAT ALLEGES THAT BNSF POSSESSES MARKET DOMINANCE OVER THE TRAFFIC AND REQUESTS THAT MAXIMUM REASONABLE RATES BE PRESCRIBED ALONG WITH OTHER RELIEF.
-
(printed as 3/19/2004)ErrataAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 3/2/2004)Misc.Aep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 3/2/2004)Misc.Aep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 3/1/2004)Misc.Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 1/13/2004)DecisionGRANTED THE PETITION OF AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY FILED JANUARY 9, 2004, REQUESTING REVISION OF THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
(printed as 1/13/2004)LetterBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/9/2004)RequestAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 1/7/2004)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 12/31/2003)ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/23/2003)SupplementAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 12/22/2003)SupplementAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 12/4/2003)DecisionGRANTED THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF AGREEMENTS AND DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE PRODUCTION AND TRANSPORTATION OF COAL TO AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S OKLAUNION GENERATING STATION.
-
(printed as 11/21/2003)AppealBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 11/14/2003)DecisionGRANTED: AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S (AEP) SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S AGREEMENTS RELATED TO THE SALE, LEASE, MAINTENANCE AND/OR OPERATION OF A RAIL LINE BETWEEN STERLING AND WALLACE, NE; AND AEP'S SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF MATERIAL RELATED TO JOINT FACILITIES, EQUIPMENT LEASES, AND REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS TO THE EXTENT AGREED UPON BY BOTH PARTIES.
-
(printed as 11/7/2003)ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/31/2003)AppealAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 10/30/2003)DecisionGRANTED THE REQUEST OF FORMER CONGRESSMAN JOHN R. THUNE, THE BOARD APPOINTED MEDIATOR, TO EXTEND THE MEDIATION PROCESS IN THIS PROCEEDING THROUGH NOVEMBER 4, 2003.
-
(printed as 10/8/2003)LetterAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 10/7/2003)DecisionGRANTED AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S MOTION TO COMPEL THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S PRODUCTION OF TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION, AS AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES.
-
(printed as 10/3/2003)ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 9/26/2003)DecisionMODIFIED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE PER JOINT MOTION FILED BY AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY AND THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE DISCOVERY.
-
(printed as 9/25/2003)MotionAep Texas North Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/22/2003)AppealAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 9/22/2003)Reply208958ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/22/2003)ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 9/11/2003)Decision(1) GRANTED AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER; (2) DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH THE PROTECTIVE ORDER; (3) SET A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THIS PROCEEDING; AND (4) INSTRUCTED THE PARTIES TO MEET AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, BUT NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 19, 2003, TO DISCUSS DISCOVERY MATTERS.
-
(printed as 9/11/2003)ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/2/2003)MotionBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/2/2003)AnswerBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/2/2003)Motion208824Motion/Petition/RequestAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 8/29/2003)MotionAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 8/25/2003)ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/22/2003)MotionAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 8/11/2003)ComplaintAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 8/11/2003)Misc.208674MiscellaneousAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 7/23/2003)Decision33819Entire Board(1) HELD WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY'S (WTU) REQUEST FOR A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN ABEYANCE; AND (2) ORDERED WTU TO ADVISE THE BOARD WITHIN 30 DAYS, HOW IT WISHES TO PROCEED.
-
(printed as 7/8/2003)Reply208305ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 6/27/2003)Decision33675CommissionerDENIED AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY'S REQUEST FOR A STAY OF THE BOARD'S MAY 29, 2003 DECISION.
-
(printed as 6/25/2003)Letter208198LetterBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/18/2003)MotionWestern Coal Traffic League
-
(printed as 6/18/2003)Motion208116Petition To InterveneWestern Coal Traffic League
-
(printed as 6/18/2003)MotionAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 6/16/2003)Reply208078ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/9/2003)Motion208008Petition For StayAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 6/6/2003)Decision33613SecretaryGRANTED THE PROPOSALS TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDERS ISSUED IN 12 STAND-ALONE COST RAIL RATE PROCEEDINGS.
-
(printed as 6/3/2003)Reply211073ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 5/29/2003)Decision33605Entire Board--
-
(printed as 5/19/2003)Letter207834LetterBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/14/2003)Motion207813Motion/Petition/RequestAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 5/9/2003)SupplementTexas Municipal Power Agency, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company, Pacificorp, Arizona Public Service Company, West Texas Utilities Company
-
(printed as 5/7/2003)Reply207756ReplyAep Texas North Company
-
(printed as 4/18/2003)Letter207655LetterAep Texas North Company
-
served (printed as 3/23/2001)Decision31161Entire BoardDENIED WEST TEXAS UTILITIES COMPANY'S PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND ITS REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT.
-
served (printed as 11/7/2000)Decision31331Entire Board(1) REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING TO DETERMINE THE REASONABLENESS OF THE $15.78 PER TON RATE FROM OTHER PRB ORIGINS; (2) INSTRUCTED THE PARTIES TO JOINTLY FILE A MOTION TO GOVERN FURTHER PROCEEDINGS; AND (3) DENIED WTU'S ALTERNATIVE REQUESTS.
-
served (printed as 10/24/1997)Decision28346Entire BoardCONCLUDED THAT BNRC SHALL REMIT TO WTUC REPARATIONS WITH INTEREST WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER THE SERVICE OF THIS DECISION.
Nothing of that kind in this docket.