Formal ComplaintBefore the Surface Transportation Board

NOR 41068

Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/NOR-41068 · entries shown: all, newest first

VALLEY FEED COMPANY V. GREATER SHENANDOAH VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY D/B/A SHENANDOAH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY

Caption from the Board’s record.

0 filings, 1 decision and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 03:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC.

Cite View on stb.gov

Entries

served 11 Dec 1998 (printed as 12/11/1998)

Decision

20767Entire Board

(1) DENIED: A PETITION FILED BY VALLEY FEED TO REOPEN AND RECONSIDER THE ICC'S DECEMBER 21, 1995 DECISION; AND VALLEY FEED'S MARCH 5, 1996 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO SHENANDOAH'S REPLY AND REJECTS THE TENDERED REPLY; AND (2) GRANTED VALLEY FEED'S APRIL 16, 1996 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD AND ACCEPTED INTO THE RECORD THE SUBMISSION AND SHENANDOAH'S REPLY.

Follow this docket

Or: Atom feed · webhook

Send new entries to a webhook

Cite this docket

STB Docket No. NOR 41068

Accessed 11 Oct 2026; bulk archive docketyard-2026-10-01.sqlite.gz.

Permanent address
docketyard.org/d/NOR-41068
As data: JSON · bulk

About this record

What an NOR proceeding is — what is asked for, what the Board can do, what happens next. Every entry links to the Board’s own file. Dates are quoted from the record, never computed. Captions and summaries appear as the Board prints them. Source: STB record search.

Corrections

Does something on this sheet not match the Board's record? Every entry carries its source, so a correction propagates everywhere the entry appears. How to report one.