{"source":"https://docketyard.org/","licence":"CC0-1.0","licence_url":"https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/","shape_version":3,"held":{"enriched":"The party module (entity resolution, aliases, successions), the citator (citation edges, their readings, resolutions and judgements) and the machine-read text of the record's documents (every reading, its payload and its index) are derived work whose licence awaits review; they are withheld until then, not dedicated by default."},"generated_at":"2026-10-11T07:00:35+00:00","docket":{"docket_id":31404,"raw_docket":"NOR_41068_0","prefix":"NOR","sequence":41068,"title":"VALLEY FEED COMPANY V. GREATER SHENANDOAH VALLEY DEVELOPMENT COMPANY D/B/A SHENANDOAH VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY","sub_dockets":[],"is_index":false,"entries":[{"kind":"decision","date":"1998-12-11","date_printed":"12/11/1998","docket_raw":"NOR_41068_0","record_id":"20767","type":"Decision","filed_for_raw":null,"deciding_body":"Entire Board","summary":"(1) DENIED: A PETITION FILED BY VALLEY FEED TO REOPEN AND RECONSIDER THE ICC'S DECEMBER 21, 1995 DECISION; AND VALLEY FEED'S MARCH 5, 1996 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO SHENANDOAH'S REPLY AND REJECTS THE TENDERED REPLY; AND (2) GRANTED VALLEY FEED'S APRIL 16, 1996 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD AND ACCEPTED INTO THE RECORD THE SUBMISSION AND SHENANDOAH'S REPLY.","attachments":[{"url":"https://dcms-external.s3.amazonaws.com/MPD/62491/B40FC9B3DF4F7AD9852566BE005E51E2/20767.pdf","label":"20767.pdf","document_sha256":"a93bbebbaec8afe5db225bd05da0e30c47f65efe1e2d184819194b778b54fdcb","media_type":"pdf"}],"also_in":[],"submitter":null,"organisation":null,"location":null,"comment_text":null,"date_kind":"served","url":"https://docketyard.org/decision/20767"}],"filings":0,"decisions":1,"comments":0,"last_checked":"2026-10-11T06:36:35+00:00","last_new_entry":"2026-08-26T15:14:59+00:00","series":null,"printed":"NOR 41068","url":"https://docketyard.org/d/NOR-41068"}}