Comment EI-32805
Received or sent (printed as 12/2/2022)
Dear Mr. Tabachnick, Salt River Project is in receipt of STB’s Section 106 consultation package dated 11/22/22. I have reviewed the revised report and attachments and SRP concurs with the finding of adverse effect, NRHP eligibility determinations, need for additional surveys, and expansions of archaeological site boundaries described. We would appreciate a copy of the GIS shapefile/geodatabase of the revised site locations, as SRP has a number of ongoing power projects in this area. Also, please note that a number of SRP transmission and distribution facilities are described as Isolated Occurrences of Cultural Materials on page 85 of the report. Specifically, Isolated Features 28, 29, 30, and 31 are in-use modern maintained SRP Critical Energy Infrastructure and need not be recorded as cultural resources or evaluated for NRHP eligibility. Please let me know if you have any questions. Dan Garcia
Submitted by: Dan Garcia · SRP · Phoenix, AZ
The Board publishes this comment in its environmental-comment table for this proceeding. It is quoted here as printed; nothing is inferred from it, and it states the commenter's own position in their own words, not this record's.
Permanent address docketyard.org/d/FD-36501/comment/EI-32805 · back to the docket sheet