FD 32760 (Sub-No. 42)
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/FD-32760/sub/42 · entries shown: all, newest first
UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, AND MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY--CONTROL AND MERGER--SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL CORPORATION, SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, SPCSL CORP., AND THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY (ARBITRATION REVIEW)
Caption from the Board’s record.
24 filings, 6 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 03:06 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:28 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 8/14/2006)Decision36845Entire BoardDECISION DENIED MOTION TO STRIKE, AND PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION.
-
(printed as 5/9/2006)Motion216514Motion/Petition/RequestJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 4/27/2006)Reply216372ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/14/2006)Motion216252Motion To StrikeJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 4/6/2006)Reply216189ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 3/27/2006)Correction216083CorrectionJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 3/20/2006)AppealJohn E. Grother
-
served (printed as 2/28/2006)Decision35690Entire BoardDECLINED TO REVIEW AN ARBITRATION DECISION THAT DENIED MR. JOHN E. GROTHER'S CLAIM FOR BENEFITS UNDER THE NEW YORK DOCK CONDITIONS IMPOSED WHEN THE BOARD APPROVED THE MERGER OF THE UP AND SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY IN 1996.
-
(printed as 5/12/2005)Reply213970ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/28/2005)Motion213888Motion To StrikeJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 4/8/2005)Misc.213724MiscellaneousUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/8/2005)Motion213723Motion/Petition/RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/8/2005)Reply213722ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/8/2005)Exhibit213721Exhibit(s)Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 3/7/2005)Decision35663SecretaryGRANTED THE REQUEST OF UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, ET AL., TO FILE ITS REPLY TO THE ARBITRATION APPEAL ON OR BEFORE APRIL 8, 2005.
-
(printed as 3/4/2005)Reply213484ReplyJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 3/3/2005)RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 2/22/2005)SupplementJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 2/22/2005)Motion213368PetitionJohn E. Grother
-
served (printed as 1/13/2005)Decision35506SecretaryEXTENDED THE TIME FOR JOHN E. GROTHER TO FILE HIS APPEAL OF THE ARBITRATION COMMITTEE'S DECISION TO ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 22, 2005.
-
(printed as 1/10/2005)AppealJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 1/6/2005)Misc.212940MiscellaneousJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 1/3/2005)RequestJohn E. Grother
-
served (printed as 6/10/2004)Decision34764SecretaryNOTICE TO THE PARTIES: ADDRESSED JOHN E. GROTHER'S REQUEST TO MODIFY THE BACKGROUND SECTION OF THE BOARD'S APRIL 21, 2004 DECISION.
-
(printed as 4/26/2004)Motion210675Motion/Petition/RequestJohn E. Grother
-
served (printed as 4/21/2004)Decision34500Entire BoardDENIED THE PETITION OF JOHN E. GROTHER, AN EMPLOYEE OF THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (UP) WHO IS NOT REPRESENTED BY A LABOR ORGANIZATION, ASKING THE BOARD TO ESTABLISH THE PROCEDURES TO BE USED IN AN ARBITRATION PROCEEDING TO CONSIDER CLAIMS AGAINST UP FOR BENEFITS UNDER THE NEW YORK DOCK CONDITIONS.
-
(printed as 3/12/2004)Reply210289ReplyJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 3/5/2004)SupplementJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 3/5/2004)Reply210234ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 2/20/2004)MotionJohn E. Grother
Nothing of that kind in this docket.