FD 32760
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/FD-32760 · entries shown: all, newest first
UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, AND MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY--CONTROL AND MERGER--SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL CORPORATION, SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, SPCSL CORP., AND THE DENVER AND RIO GRANDE WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY UP-SP MERGER
Caption from the Board’s record. Sub-dockets, included below: FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 3), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 4), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 5), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 6), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 7), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 8), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 9), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 10), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 11), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 12), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 13), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 14), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 15), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 16), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 17), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 18), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 20), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 21), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 22), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 23), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 24), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 25), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 26), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 27), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 28), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 29), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 30), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 31), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 32), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 33), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 34), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 35), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 36), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 37), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 38), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 39), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 40), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 41), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 42), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 43), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 44), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 45), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 46), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 47), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 48), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 49), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 50), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 51), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 52)
403 filings, 224 decisions and 1 environmental comment observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 25 Sep 2026, 21:03 UTC.
The record begins with the Board’s own search, on 25 Jan 1996. If this proceeding began before then, its earlier filings and decisions are not held here, and a summary below may cite a decision this sheet does not list.
Entries
-
(printed as 9/25/2026)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 9/24/2026)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING ON SEPTEMBER 21, 2026, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
-
(printed as 8/26/2026)SupplementBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/24/2026)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 8/21/2026)Misc.Surface Transpotation Board
-
served (printed as 8/5/2026)DecisionGRANTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE A PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION TO AUGUST 20, 2026.
-
(printed as 8/4/2026)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 8/4/2026)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 8/3/2026)RequestBNSF Railway Company
-
served (printed as 7/22/2026)DecisionGRANTED BNSF’S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE MAY 26 DECISION.
-
served (printed as 7/21/2026)DecisionDENIED A REQUEST FROM BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF) TO ISSUE AN ORDER CLARIFYING THAT IT HAS THE RIGHT TO SERVE SHIPPER COLORADO MATERIALS PURSUANT TO CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE BOARD AS PART OF THE UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION/SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL CORPORATION MERGER APPROVAL.
-
served (printed as 7/21/2026)DecisionDENIED THE AMENDED PETITION BY BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY SEEKING ENFORCEMENT OF CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE BOARD AS PART OF THE UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION/SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL CORPORATION MERGER APPROVAL.
-
served (printed as 7/21/2026)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE BOARD ESTABLISHED COMPENSATION TERMS FOR BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY’S USE OF THE TERMINAL TRACKAGE RIGHTS AUTHORIZED BY THE BOARD IN A PRIOR DECISION.
-
(printed as 7/21/2026)SectionSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 7/21/2026)SectionSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 7/21/2026)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 7/17/2026)RequestBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/10/2026)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 7/1/2026)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 6/24/2026)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 6/11/2026)RebuttalBNSF Railway Company
-
served (printed as 5/26/2026)Decision(1) DECLINED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY’S REQUEST TO SET A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE BUT PERMITTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY TO SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD WITH ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND EVIDENCE; (2) BNSF’S SUPPLEMENTAL FILING IS DUE ON JULY 27, 2026; (3) REPLIES TO BNSF’S SUPPLEMENTAL FILING ARE DUE ON AUGUST 24, 2026; AND (4) DENIED CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY D/B/A CANADIAN PACIFIC KANSAS CITY’S REQUEST TO EXPAND THE SCOPE OF THE PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 5/12/2026)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/13/2026)StatementBNSF Railway Company
-
served (printed as 2/26/2026)DecisionAMENDED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
(printed as 1/30/2026)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 1/30/2026)MotionBNSF Railway Company
-
served (printed as 1/23/2026)DecisionDIRECTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, UNION PACIFIC RAIL CORPORATION, AND SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL CORPORATION TO FILE A JOINT PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE BY JANUARY 30, 2026.
-
(printed as 1/13/2026)NoticeCSX Transportation, Inc.
-
(printed as 1/7/2026)ReplyCanadian Pacific Railway Company dba CPKC
-
(printed as 1/7/2026)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 1/7/2026)ReplyThe National Industrial Transportation League
-
(printed as 1/7/2026)ReplyAmerican Chemistry Council
-
(printed as 12/22/2025)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 12/22/2025)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 12/19/2025)DecisionGRANTED UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY’S MOTION TO FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION.
-
(printed as 12/17/2025)LetterBNSF Railway Company
-
served (printed as 12/16/2025)DecisionORDERED THAT A REPLY TO UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION IS DUE ON OR BEFORE DECEMBER 18, 2025.
-
(printed as 12/12/2025)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 12/10/2025)DecisionGRANTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY’S MOTION TO COMPEL.
-
served (printed as 12/10/2025)DecisionGRANTED TO EXTEND THE REPLY DEADLINE TO BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY’S PETITION TO JANUARY 7, 2026.
-
(printed as 12/8/2025)RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 12/5/2025)DecisionGRANTED A MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER.
-
(printed as 12/1/2025)CertificateBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/1/2025)CertificateUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 11/28/2025)MotionBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/28/2025)MotionBNSF Railway Company
-
served (printed as 11/26/2025)DecisionASSIGNED AND AUTHORIZED AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE TO ADDRESS DISCOVERY MATTERS AND CONTINUES TO HOLD THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING IN ABEYANCE PENDING FURTHER ORDER OF THE BOARD.
-
(printed as 11/20/2025)SupplementBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/20/2025)ApplicationBNSF Railway Company
-
served (printed as 11/14/2025)DecisionORDERED THAT BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S AMENDED PETITION, IF IT CHOOSES TO FILE ONE, IS DUE BY NOVEMBER 20, 2025.
-
served (printed as 11/14/2025)DecisionORDERED THAT BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S AMENDED PETITION, IF IT CHOOSES TO FILE ONE, IS DUE BY NOVEMBER 20, 2025.
-
(printed as 9/30/2025)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 9/26/2025)DecisionHELD IN ABEYANCE THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 9/25/2025)MotionBNSF Railway Company
-
served (printed as 8/19/2025)DecisionGRANTED A CONSENT MOTION TO MODIFY A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
served (printed as 8/15/2025)DecisionGRANTED A MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER.
-
served (printed as 8/15/2025)DecisionGRANTED A MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER.
-
(printed as 8/15/2025)MotionBNSF Railroad Company
-
(printed as 8/12/2025)MotionBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/12/2025)MotionBNSF Railway Company
-
served (printed as 7/25/2025)DecisionGRANTED MOTION TO MODIFY PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
served (printed as 7/25/2025)DecisionGRANTED MOTION TO MODIFY PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
(printed as 7/23/2025)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 7/23/2025)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 7/16/2025)DecisionGRANTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 7/16/2025)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 7/15/2025)MotionBNSF Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 7/11/2025)CommentsUtah Inland Port Authority
-
served (printed as 7/10/2025)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT BOARD STAFF WILL HOLD A CONFERENCE WITH BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY AND UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY TO DISCUSS THEIR POSITIONS, THE OPERATIONAL ISSUES RAISED BY THEIR FILINGS, AND THE STATUS OF THEIR DISCUSSIONS.
-
(printed as 7/10/2025)LetterBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/10/2025)LetterUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 7/8/2025)StatementBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/8/2025)StatementBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/7/2025)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 7/7/2025)StatementBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/7/2025)MotionBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/7/2025)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
served (printed as 6/30/2025)DecisionDENIED A PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT, HOWEVER, PERMITTED PETITIONER TO SEEK DISCOVERY AND REFILE.
-
served (printed as 6/30/2025)DecisionDENIED A REQUEST FROM BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY TO ISSUE AN ORDER CLARIFYING THAT IT HAD THE RIGHT TO SERVE A SHIPPER NAMED COLORADO MATERIALS PURSUANT TO CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY THE BOARD AS PART OF THE UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION/SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL CORPORATION MERGER APPROVAL.
-
served (printed as 4/28/2025)DecisionGRANTED A MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER.
-
served (printed as 4/28/2025)DecisionDENIED UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY’S REQUEST TO DISMISS BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY’S PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT AND SET A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 4/17/2025)MotionBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/7/2024)ReplyThe Kansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/23/2024)ReplyBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/23/2024)SupplementKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/2/2024)NoticeMullins Law Group PLLC
-
(printed as 7/25/2024)ReplyBNSF Railway Company
-
served (printed as 7/23/2024)DecisionGRANTED AN EXTENSION OF THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 7/19/2024)RequestKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/10/2024)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 7/10/2024)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 7/3/2024)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 7/2/2024)CommentsThe Romney Group, LLC
-
served (printed as 6/25/2024)DecisionISSUED A REVISED SCHEDULE FOR THE SUBMISSION OF SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS AND DATA.
-
(printed as 6/20/2024)MotionBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/20/2024)MotionBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/31/2024)NoticeBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/31/2024)NoticeUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/28/2024)NoticeKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 5/24/2024)DecisionSCHEDULED A TECHNICAL CONFERENCE WITH BOARD STAFF FOR 10:00 A.M. (ET) ON THURSDAY, JUNE 13, 2024, AT THE BOARD’S HEADQUARTERS.
-
(printed as 4/8/2024)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/2/2024)ReplyBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/26/2024)ReplyBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/13/2024)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 3/6/2024)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 2/26/2024)StatementCRH Americas, Inc.
-
served (printed as 2/20/2024)DecisionEXTENDED THE DEADLINE FOR REPLYING TO BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT TO MARCH 13, 2024.
-
served (printed as 2/20/2024)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT RECENT PETITIONS FILED UNDER DOCKET NO. FD 32760 HAVE BEEN TRANSFERRED TO DOCKET NOS. FD 32760 (SUB-NO. 48) AND FD 32760 (SUB-NO. 49).
-
(printed as 2/16/2024)RequestUnion Pacific Railroad
-
(printed as 2/15/2024)MotionBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/8/2024)MotionBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/24/2024)ReplyKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 1/10/2024)DecisionGRANTED A REQUEST FOR A STAFF-SUPERVISED TECHNICAL CONFERENCE, LIMITED TO OUTSIDE COUNSEL AND OUTSIDE CONSULTANTS ONLY.
-
(printed as 12/29/2023)SubstitutionKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/22/2023)MotionLyondell Chemical Company, Equistar Chemicals, LP, and LyondellBasell Acetyls
-
(printed as 12/21/2023)ReplyBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/20/2023)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 12/14/2023)MotionThe Kansas City Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 11/28/2023)DecisionORDERED PARTIES TO SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS AND DATA DUE TO AN APPARENT ERROR IN THE PARTIES’ EVIDENCE REGARDING THE PROPOSED METHODS FOR DETERMINING COMPENSATION FOR BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY’S TERMINAL TRACKAGE RIGHTS OVER THE ROSEBLUFF LEAD.
-
(printed as 9/15/2023)SubstitutionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 8/2/2023)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 2/7/2023)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 9/1/2022)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
served (printed as 7/29/2022)DecisionDISMISSED A PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
-
(printed as 7/22/2022)MotionBNSF Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 5/5/2022)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT ON APRIL 29, 2022, A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
-
(printed as 5/3/2022)Reply304490ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/25/2022)Reply304423ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 4/13/2022)DecisionGRANTED, IN PART, THE REQUEST OF BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF) TO ESTABLISH GENERAL PRINCIPLES THE BOARD EXPECTS PARTIES TO INCLUDE IN ANY FUTURE OPERATING PLANS FOR DIRECT SERVICE BY BNSF ON THE ROSEBLUFF LEAD, PURSUANT TO TERMINAL TRACKAGE RIGHTS GRANTED IN A 2016 DECISION IN THIS PROCEEDING. ALSO, DENIED BNSF’S REQUEST FOR AN EXPEDITED PROCESS FOR RESOLVING DISPUTES OVER CONDITIONS OF USE.
-
(printed as 4/5/2022)MotionBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/24/2022)SubstitutionBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/31/2022)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 12/10/2021)SubstitutionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 8/31/2021)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 5/18/2021)Reply302347ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/14/2021)Letter302341LetterBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/11/2021)RebuttalBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/11/2021)RebuttalThe Kansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/11/2021)RebuttalUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/19/2021)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 4/14/2021)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 4/13/2021)ErrataThe Kansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/12/2021)ReplyThe Kansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/12/2021)ReplyBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/12/2021)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 3/5/2021)ErrataThe Kansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/9/2021)SubstitutionLyondell Basell Industries
-
(printed as 2/8/2021)ReplyBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/26/2021)StatementBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/26/2021)StatementKansas City Southern, The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Gateway Eastern Railway Company, and The Texas Mexican Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/26/2021)StatementUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 1/19/2021)ReplyThe Kansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/19/2021)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 12/31/2020)DecisionEXTENDED THE DEADLINE TO FILE REPLIES TO A PETITION TO JANUARY 19, 2021.
-
(printed as 12/28/2020)RequestThe Kansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/18/2020)MotionBNSF Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/8/2020)SubstitutionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 9/14/2020)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 8/12/2020)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 5/19/2020)NoticeLyondell Chemical Company, Equistar Chemicals, LP, and LyondellBasell Acetyls
-
served (printed as 4/14/2020)DecisionCOURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING ON APRIL 7, 2020.
-
served (printed as 4/1/2020)DecisionADOPTED A JOINTLY PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE AND GRANTED A JOINT REQUEST TO APPOINT AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE.
-
(printed as 3/16/2020)MotionBNSF Railway Company, Kansas City Southern and its U.S. rail carrier subsidiaries The Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Gateway Eastern Railway Company, and The Texas Mexican Railway, Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 2/21/2020)DecisionESTABLISHED CONDITIONS FOR DIRECT SERVICE BY BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY TO A FACILITY IN WEST LAKE CHARLES, LA., PURSUANT TO BOARD-AUTHORIZED TERMINAL TRACKAGE RIGHTS GRANTED IN A 2016 DECISION AND SET FORTH A PROCEDURE FOR ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION FOR SUCH TRACKAGE RIGHTS.
-
(printed as 11/29/2019)LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
served (printed as 7/3/2019)DecisionDECISION ORDERED THE PARTIES IN THIS PROCEEDING TO PARTICIPATE IN BOARD-SPONSORED MEDIATION.
-
(printed as 7/1/2019)ReplyKansas City Southern Railway Company And Union Pacific Railroad;Company
-
(printed as 6/25/2019)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/18/2019)MotionKansas City Southern Railway Company And Union Pacific Railroad;Company
-
(printed as 2/25/2019)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/25/2019)ReplyKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/25/2019)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 2/4/2019)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/4/2019)ReplyKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/4/2019)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 1/29/2019)DecisionDECISION DIRECTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION (UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY) AND KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY TO PROVIDE THE INFORMATION SET FORTH IN THE APPENDIX OF THE DECEMBER 7, 2018 DECISION BY FEBRUARY 4, 2019.
-
served (printed as 12/7/2018)DecisionDECISION DIRECTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF), UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, AND KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT WOULD ASSIST THE BOARD IN ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION FOR BNSF'S USE OF THE ROSEBLUFF LEAD.
-
(printed as 10/17/2018)LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 7/16/2018)RebuttalBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/16/2018)RebuttalKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/25/2018)ReplyKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/25/2018)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 6/5/2018)DecisionDECISION GRANTED KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYS REQUEST TO WITHDRAW ITS MOTION TO COMPEL FILED ON MAY 25, 2018, IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 6/1/2018)MotionKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/25/2018)MotionKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 5/24/2018)DecisionDECISION DENIED UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY 'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER.
-
(printed as 5/17/2018)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 5/15/2018)DecisionDECISION AMENDED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE THAT GOVERNS THIS PROCEEDING, INITIATED MEDIATION, AND SET A DEADLINE FOR REPLIES TO A MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER FILED BY UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY.
-
(printed as 5/14/2018)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/11/2018)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/10/2018)LetterBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/9/2018)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/9/2018)LetterKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/7/2018)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 5/4/2018)DecisionDECISION CORRECTED THE DECISION SERVED ON MAY 1, 2018, IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 5/4/2018)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 5/1/2018)DecisionDECISION DENIED KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS A PETITION FILED BY BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF) REQUESTING THAT THE BOARD ESTABLISH CONDITIONS AND COMPENSATION FOR BNSF TO DIRECTLY SERVE A FACILITY IN WEST LAKE CHARLES, LA., PURSUANT TO BOARD-AUTHORIZED TERMINAL TRACKAGE RIGHTS. THIS DECISION ALSO SET FORTH A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 4/16/2018)ReplyKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/9/2018)LetterLyondell Chemical Company, Equistar Chemicals, Lp, And;Lyondellbasell Acetyls, Llc
-
(printed as 3/22/2018)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/9/2018)CommentsUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 3/5/2018)ReplyKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/26/2018)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 2/26/2018)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 2/21/2018)SupplementBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/21/2018)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/21/2018)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/21/2018)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 2/14/2018)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 2/7/2018)SupplementUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 2/1/2018)MotionKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/1/2018)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 1/31/2018)Decision46140Entire BoardDECISION GRANTED THE JOINT PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT FILED BY BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF) AND MISSION RAIL INDUSTRIAL PARK, LLC (MISSION RAIL PARK) AND DIRECTED UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY TO ALLOW BNSF TO PROVIDE RAIL SERVICE TO MISSION RAIL PARK.
-
(printed as 1/31/2018)Section245089Section 5 SummarySurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 1/12/2018)ExhibitBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/12/2018)MotionBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/14/2017)SubstitutionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 7/12/2017)Reply243943ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 7/6/2017)Reply243918ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/30/2017)Reply243882ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 6/29/2017)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 6/19/2017)SupplementMission Rail Industrial Park, Llc
-
(printed as 6/16/2017)Motion243775PetitionMission Rail Industrial Park, Llc
-
(printed as 5/25/2017)Reply243523ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/24/2017)Motion
-
served (printed as 5/5/2017)Decision45755Entire BoardDECISION DENIED UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S MOTION TO DISMISS OR HOLD IN ABEYANCE A JOINT PETITION FILED BY BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY AND MISSION RAIL INDUSTRIAL PARK, LLC, SEEKING ENFORCEMENT OF CONDITIONS IMPOSED BY A PREVIOUS BOARD DECISION APPROVING THE UP/SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAIL CORPORATION MERGER.
-
(printed as 3/7/2017)Reply242752ReplyMission Rail Industrial Park, Llc
-
(printed as 3/7/2017)Reply242750ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/21/2017)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 2/1/2017)Motion242556PetitionBnsf Railway Company, Mission Rail Industrial Park, Llc
-
served (printed as 9/7/2016)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE FOLLOWING COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2016, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
-
served (printed as 7/5/2016)DecisionDECISION GRANTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S APPLICATION FOR TERMINAL TRACKAGE RIGHTS OVER A SINGLE TRACK JOINTLY OWNED BY KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY.
-
(printed as 4/27/2016)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/27/2016)ReplyKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/7/2016)OralBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/8/2016)ReplyKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/8/2016)ReplyUnion Pacific System Railroad Company
-
(printed as 1/19/2016)MotionBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/30/2015)BriefBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/30/2015)BriefCitgo Petroleum Corporation
-
(printed as 12/30/2015)BriefKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/30/2015)BriefUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 12/2/2015)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 11/30/2015)DecisionDECISION GRANTED UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S PETITION FOR FINAL BRIEFS AND DIRECTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT FINAL BRIEFS BY DECEMBER 30, 2015.
-
(printed as 11/12/2015)MotionKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/3/2015)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/30/2015)MotionUnion Pacific System Railroad Company
-
(printed as 10/26/2015)ErrataKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/23/2015)RebuttalBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/23/2015)RebuttalKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/23/2015)RebuttalUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 10/22/2015)SupplementUnion Pacific Railway
-
(printed as 8/25/2015)ErrataKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/24/2015)ReplyKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/24/2015)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 8/24/2015)ReplyCitgo Petroleum Corporation
-
served (printed as 7/31/2015)DecisionDECISION DECLINES TO DISTURB AN ARBITRATION AWARD FINDING THAT UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY MAY USE ARTICLE IX OF THE 1986 NATIONAL ARBITRATION AWARD TO ESTABLISH NEW INTERDIVISIONAL OPERATIONS BETWEEN YERMO, CAL., AND WEST COLTON, CAL., AND BETWEEN YUMA, ARIZ., AND WEST COLTON, CAL.
-
(printed as 7/23/2015)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
served (printed as 7/8/2015)DecisionDECISION GRANTS RESUMPTION OF THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
(printed as 7/6/2015)MotionKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 6/1/2015)DecisionDECISION CANCELLED A DISCOVERY CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR JUNE 2, 2015.
-
(printed as 5/27/2015)MotionKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 4/29/2015)DecisionDECISION RESCHEDULED THE DISCOVERY CONFERENCE INITIALLY SCHEDULED FOR MAY 4, 2015 UNTIL JUNE 2, 2015, AT 10 A.M. IN A HEARING ROOM TO BE DESIGNATED AT THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION.
-
(printed as 4/28/2015)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 4/28/2015)MotionCovington & Burling
-
served (printed as 4/27/2015)DecisionDECISION SCHEDULED A DISCOVERY CONFERENCE IN THIS PROCEEDING TO BE HELD ON MAY 4, 2015, AT 10 A.M. IN A HEARING ROOM TO BE DESIGNATED AT THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, AND DIRECTED ALL PARTIES TO THE DISCOVERY DISPUTES TO ATTEND.
-
(printed as 4/17/2015)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 4/17/2015)MotionKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/17/2015)Misc.Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 4/17/2015)MotionBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/16/2015)Misc.Mayer Brown, Llp
-
served (printed as 4/8/2015)DecisionDECISION (1) ASSIGNED THIS PROCEEDING TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE STEVEN A. GLAZER FOR HANDLING OF ALL DISCOVERY MATTERS AND INITIAL RESOLUTION OF ALL DISCOVERY DISPUTES; AND (2) EACH PARTY MUST SEND A COPY OF ITS FILINGS TO JUDGE STEVEN A. GLAZER AT THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES, 888 FIRST STREET, N.E., WASHINGTON DC 20426.
-
(printed as 4/8/2015)SubstitutionBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/27/2015)SubstitutionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 3/19/2015)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/18/2015)ReplyCitgo Petroleum Corporation
-
(printed as 3/16/2015)LetterKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 3/12/2015)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 3/11/2015)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/10/2015)ReplyCitgo Petroleum Corporation
-
(printed as 3/6/2015)LetterUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 3/2/2015)ReplyCitgo Petroleum Corporation
-
(printed as 2/26/2015)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 2/25/2015)DecisionDECISION HOLDS THIS PROCEEDING IN ABEYANCE PENDING THE RESOLUTION OF THE DISCOVERY DISPUTES AND FURTHER ORDER OF THE BOARD.
-
(printed as 2/9/2015)MotionKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/6/2015)MotionKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/4/2015)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/15/2015)MotionKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/31/2014)StatementBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 12/30/2014)Decision43887Entire BoardDECISION DENIED A PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE BOARD'S DECEMBER 20, 2013 DECISION IN THIS PROCEEDING, FINDING THAT THE PETITIONERS HAVE FAILED TO SHOW THAT THE BOARD COMMITTED MATERIAL ERROR.
-
(printed as 12/30/2014)Notice237357NoticeUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 12/30/2014)NoticeUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 12/18/2014)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 12/17/2014)ReplyKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/16/2014)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 12/1/2014)DecisionDECISION ISSUED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY TO GOVERN FOR TERMINAL TRACKAGE RIGHTS OVER A SINGLE TRACK JOINTLY OWNED BY KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY.
-
(printed as 9/5/2014)LetterBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/4/2014)ReplyCitgo Petroleum Corporation
-
(printed as 8/29/2014)ReplyKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/29/2014)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 8/26/2014)MotionBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/19/2014)LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 4/23/2014)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 4/14/2014)DecisionDECISION DIRECTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF), UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (UP), KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY (KCS), AND CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION TO ENGAGE IN MANDATORY MEDIATION TO RESOLVE THE ISSUES REGARDING BNSF'S ACCESS OVER APPROXIMATELY 9 MILES OF TRACK FORMERLY OPERATED BY SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY AND NOW JOINTLY OWNED AND OPERATED BY KCS AND UP.
-
served (printed as 3/27/2014)DecisionDECISION GRANTED UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME AND LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF IN EXCESS OF 30 PAGES IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 3/25/2014)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 3/14/2014)AppealBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen
-
(printed as 3/6/2014)NoticeUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 2/27/2014)DecisionDECISION GRANTED THE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND LEAVE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 2/24/2014)SupplementBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen
-
(printed as 2/20/2014)MotionBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen
-
(printed as 1/29/2014)Reply235386ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 1/9/2014)MotionBnsf Railway Company, G3 Enterprises
-
served (printed as 12/20/2013)Decision43330Entire BoardDECISION DENIED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY AND G3 ENTERPRISES' AMENDED JOINT REQUEST FOR ENFORCEMENT OF DECISION NO. 44 IN THIS DOCKET ON THE GROUNDS THAT THEY HAVE FAILED TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED.
-
(printed as 11/20/2013)Letter235134LetterHonorable Jeff Denham
-
(printed as 9/27/2013)LetterUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 9/27/2013)LetterKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/23/2013)LetterBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/16/2013)LetterUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 9/16/2013)LetterKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/11/2013)LetterBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/17/2013)LetterBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/16/2013)CorrectionKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/14/2013)ReplyKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/3/2013)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/24/2013)MotionCitgo Petroleum Corporation
-
(printed as 4/8/2013)ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/19/2013)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 3/19/2013)ReplyKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/27/2013)ApplicationBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/25/2013)Reply233724ReplyG3 Enterprises, Bnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/18/2013)Reply233699ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 1/15/2013)Oral233680Oral Argument ExhibitsG3 Enterprises, Bnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/15/2013)Oral233679Oral Argument ExhibitsUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 1/11/2013)Statement233667Support StatementE & J Gallo Winery
-
(printed as 1/11/2013)Statement233666Support StatementCal Freight
-
(printed as 1/2/2013)Notice233617NoticeBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/2/2013)Notice233616NoticeUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 12/5/2012)DecisionDECISION PROVIDED NOTICE THAT AN ORAL ARGUMENT WILL BE HELD IN THIS PROCEEDING ON JANUARY 15, 2013.
-
(printed as 10/11/2012)Reply233174ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 10/9/2012)Motion233143Motion/Petition/RequestBnsf Railway Company, G3 Enterprises
-
(printed as 9/20/2012)Reply233004ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 9/13/2012)SupplementG3 Enterprises, Bnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/4/2012)Motion232908PetitionBnsf Railway Company, G3 Enterprises
-
served (printed as 12/16/2010)DecisionDECISION DENIED UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S APPEAL OF A DECEMBER 2007 AWARD RENDERED BY ARBITRATOR ROBERT PERKOVICH IN ARBITRATION BOARD NO. 589.
-
served (printed as 11/18/2009)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF) HAS AGREED TO AMEND THE EXISTING OVERHEAD TRACKAGE RIGHTS PREVIOUSLY GRANTED TO UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY OVER BNSF'S BIEBER LINE AT KEDDIE, CA, PURSUANT TO A WRITTEN SUPPLEMENTAL TRACKAGE RIGHTS AGREEMENT DATED JANUARY 1, 2009.
-
served (printed as 1/22/2009)Decision39252Entire BoardDECISION: (1) GRANTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION IN THIS PROCEEDING AS DESCRIBED IN THE DECISION; AND (2) DENIED THE UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION'S PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DECISION NO. 103, WHICH DID NOT IMPOSE EMPLOYEE PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS.
-
served (printed as 11/12/2008)DecisionDECISION DISMISSED THE PORT OF CORPUS CHRISTI AUTHORITY OF NUECES COUNTY, TX'S PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION.
-
(printed as 10/20/2008)MotionPort Of Corpus Christi Authority Of Nueces County
-
served (printed as 7/9/2008)Decision39183SecretaryPROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 6/20/2008)Letter222647Letter/TelegramBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/16/2008)Reply222626ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 6/2/2008)Reply222503ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/22/2008)Letter222436LetterUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/21/2008)MotionUnited Transportation Union General Committee Of Adjustment (Go-386)
-
(printed as 5/21/2008)Motion222426PetitionBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 5/1/2008)Decision38824Entire BoardDECISION: (1) CLARIFIES THE EXTENT OF TRACKAGE RIGHTS ACCORDED TO BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY INTERMODAL TRAINS MOVING OVER TWO LINES OF UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (UP) IN CALIFORNIA UNDER THE BNSF RAILWAY AGREEMENT AND THE RESTATED AND AMENDED BNSF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT (RESTATED AGREEMENT); (2) DENIED JOHN FITZGERALD'S REQUEST FOR LABOR PROTECTION CONDITIONS ; AND (3) DENIED AS MOOT UP'S PETITION TO REFORM THE RESTATED AGREEMENT.
-
(printed as 4/11/2008)MotionBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen
-
(printed as 4/11/2008)ReplyBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen
-
served (printed as 2/29/2008)DecisionDECISION (1) GRANTED UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S (UP) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO EXCEED THE 30-PAGE LIMIT FOR APPEALS AND REPLIES; AND (2) GRANTED THE BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS & TRAINMEN'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO UP'S APPEAL OF THE ARBITRATION AWARD ISSUED IN THIS PROCEEDING TO APRIL 11, 2008.
-
(printed as 2/27/2008)RequestBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen
-
(printed as 2/22/2008)ExhibitUnion Pacific Railroad CompanyBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen
-
(printed as 2/22/2008)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 2/22/2008)AppealUnion Pacific System Railroad Company, Brotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen Union Pacific Railroad--Central Region
-
(printed as 2/20/2008)ReplyBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen
-
served (printed as 2/14/2008)DecisionDECISION GRANTED UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE AN APPEAL TO THE ARBITRATION AWARD ISSUED IN THIS PROCEEDING UNTIL FEBRUARY 22, 2008.
-
(printed as 2/13/2008)RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 1/15/2008)DecisionDECISION GRANTED UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S MOTION TO EXTEND THE TIME TO FILE AN APPEAL TO THE ARBITRATION AWARD ISSUED IN THIS PROCEEDING TO FEBRUARY 15, 2008.
-
(printed as 1/11/2008)RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 12/3/2007)SupplementKansas City Southern Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 10/4/2007)Reply220399ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 10/4/2007)Reply220398ReplyJohn D Fitzgerald (Utu/Go-386)
-
(printed as 10/4/2007)Reply220396ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 10/3/2007)DecisionDECISION GRANTED THE PORT AUTHORITY'S REQUEST TO DEFER ACTION ON ITS PETITION. AFTER THE BOARD RESUMES CONSIDERATION OF THE PETITION, IT WILL ESTABLISH A NEW DUE DATE FOR REPLIES.
-
(printed as 10/2/2007)MotionPort Of Corpus Christi Authority Of Nueces County
-
(printed as 9/14/2007)MotionTexas Mexican Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/20/2007)Brief220095BriefBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/20/2007)Brief220084BriefUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 6/15/2007)SubstitutionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 6/15/2007)Certificate219554Certificate Of ServiceBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/15/2007)SubstitutionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 6/11/2007)Certificate219503Certificate Of ServiceKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 6/8/2007)Decision38039SecretaryPROVIDED NOTICE THAT A SERVICE LIST HAD BEEN CREATED FOR THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 5/22/2007)NoticeMaersk Inc
-
(printed as 5/22/2007)NoticeJohn D. Fitzgerald
-
(printed as 5/9/2007)LetterUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 5/7/2007)Decision37894SecretaryDECISION ADOPTED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THIS PROCEEDING AND ORDERED THAT NOTICES OF INTENT TO REMAIN ON THE SERVICE LIST IN THIS PROCEEDING MUST BE RECEIVED BY MAY 22, 2007.
-
(printed as 3/28/2007)Reply218914ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 3/8/2007)Reply218772ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/21/2007)NoticeKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/16/2007)Motion218644PetitionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 9/11/2006)CommentEI-2522Richard Gebhart
-
served (printed as 8/14/2006)DecisionDECISION DENIED MOTION TO STRIKE, AND PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION.
-
(printed as 5/9/2006)MotionJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 4/27/2006)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/14/2006)MotionJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 4/6/2006)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 3/27/2006)CorrectionJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 3/20/2006)AppealJohn E. Grother
-
served (printed as 2/28/2006)DecisionDECLINED TO REVIEW AN ARBITRATION DECISION THAT DENIED MR. JOHN E. GROTHER'S CLAIM FOR BENEFITS UNDER THE NEW YORK DOCK CONDITIONS IMPOSED WHEN THE BOARD APPROVED THE MERGER OF THE UP AND SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY IN 1996.
-
served (printed as 7/27/2005)Decision(1) GRANTED: (A) THE BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND TRAINMEN'S (BLET) APPEAL OF THE ARBITRATOR'S DECISION OF APRIL 14, 2005, AND VACATES THAT DECISION; (B) BLET'S MOTION TO EXCEED THE 30-PAGE LIMIT OF 49 CFR 1115.2(D), WITH EXHIBITS CONTAINING SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS OR TELEPHONE NUMBERS REMOVED FROM THE PUBLIC DOCKET AND KEPT UNDER SEAL; (C) UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S (UP) MOTION TO EXCEED THE 30-PAGE LIMIT OF 49 CFR 1115.2 (D); AND (D) UP'S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE THE WITNESS STATEMENT OF ARTHUR TERRY OLIN; AND (2) DENIED (A) BLET'S REQUEST FOR STAY OF THE CARRIER'S EMPLOYMENT ACTIONS; AND (B) BLET'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO A REPLY.
-
served (printed as 7/20/2005)DecisionANNOUNCED THE AGENDA ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE BOARD'S JULY 27, 2005 VOTING CONFERENCE.
-
(printed as 6/6/2005)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 6/2/2005)ReplyBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen
-
(printed as 6/2/2005)MotionBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen
-
(printed as 5/24/2005)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/23/2005)ReplyBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen, Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/18/2005)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/17/2005)ReplyBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen, Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/12/2005)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/11/2005)SupplementBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen
-
(printed as 5/11/2005)MotionBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen
-
(printed as 5/3/2005)MotionBrotherhood Of Locomotive Of Engineers And Trainmen
-
(printed as 5/3/2005)AppealBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers And Trainmen Union Pacific Railroad--Central Region
-
(printed as 4/28/2005)MotionJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 4/8/2005)Misc.Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/8/2005)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/8/2005)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/8/2005)ExhibitUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 3/7/2005)DecisionGRANTED THE REQUEST OF UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, ET AL., TO FILE ITS REPLY TO THE ARBITRATION APPEAL ON OR BEFORE APRIL 8, 2005.
-
(printed as 3/4/2005)ReplyJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 3/3/2005)RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 2/22/2005)SupplementJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 2/22/2005)MotionJohn E. Grother
-
served (printed as 1/21/2005)DecisionDENED A PETITION FILED BY THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY SEEKING TO LATE-FILE AN APPEAL OF AN ARBITRATION AWARD.
-
served (printed as 1/13/2005)DecisionEXTENDED THE TIME FOR JOHN E. GROTHER TO FILE HIS APPEAL OF THE ARBITRATION COMMITTEE'S DECISION TO ON OR BEFORE FEBRUARY 22, 2005.
-
served (printed as 1/12/2005)DecisionANNOUNCED THE AGENDA ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE BOARD'S JANUARY 19, 2005 VOTING CONFERENCE.
-
(printed as 1/10/2005)AppealJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 1/6/2005)Misc.John E. Grother
-
(printed as 1/3/2005)RequestJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 11/1/2004)ReplyBrotherhood Of Locomotive Of Engineers And Trainmen
-
(printed as 11/1/2004)MotionBrotherhood Of Locomotive Of Engineers And Trainmen
-
(printed as 9/28/2004)RequestBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen A Division Of The Rail Conference, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters
-
(printed as 9/21/2004)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 9/20/2004)AppealUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 9/15/2004)ReplyBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen A Division Of The Rail Conference, International Brotherhood Of Teamsters
-
(printed as 8/31/2004)RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 8/11/2004)ReplyBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers
-
(printed as 8/2/2004)RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 6/10/2004)DecisionNOTICE TO THE PARTIES: ADDRESSED JOHN E. GROTHER'S REQUEST TO MODIFY THE BACKGROUND SECTION OF THE BOARD'S APRIL 21, 2004 DECISION.
-
(printed as 4/26/2004)MotionJohn E. Grother
-
served (printed as 4/21/2004)DecisionDENIED THE PETITION OF JOHN E. GROTHER, AN EMPLOYEE OF THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (UP) WHO IS NOT REPRESENTED BY A LABOR ORGANIZATION, ASKING THE BOARD TO ESTABLISH THE PROCEDURES TO BE USED IN AN ARBITRATION PROCEEDING TO CONSIDER CLAIMS AGAINST UP FOR BENEFITS UNDER THE NEW YORK DOCK CONDITIONS.
-
(printed as 3/12/2004)ReplyJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 3/5/2004)SupplementJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 3/5/2004)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 2/20/2004)MotionJohn E. Grother
-
(printed as 10/28/2003)Misc.Baker & Miller Pllc
-
(printed as 10/28/2003)Misc.209229MiscellaneousBaker & Miller Pllc
-
(printed as 10/28/2003)Misc.Baker & Miller Pllc
-
served (printed as 10/10/2003)DecisionDECLINED TO REVIEW TWO ARBITRATION AWARDS THAT RESOLVED DISPUTES BETWEEN THE BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS AND THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY.
-
(printed as 7/15/2003)MotionBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers
-
(printed as 7/15/2003)MotionBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers - Union Pacific Railroad -Central Region
-
(printed as 7/9/2003)LetterSociety Of The Plastics Industry Inc, Kansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/9/2003)LetterKansas City Southern Railway Company, Society Of The Plastics Industry Inc
-
(printed as 7/9/2003)LetterSociety Of The Plastics Industry Inc, Kansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/9/2003)LetterKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/9/2003)LetterKansas City Southern Railway Company, Society Of The Plastics Industry Inc
-
(printed as 7/9/2003)LetterKansas City Southern Railway Company, Society Of The Plastics Industry Inc
-
(printed as 7/9/2003)LetterKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/9/2003)LetterKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/9/2003)Letter208330LetterKansas City Southern Railway Company, Society Of The Plastics Industry Inc
-
(printed as 7/2/2003)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 7/2/2003)ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 6/10/2003)AppealBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers - Union Pacific Railroad -Central Region
-
(printed as 6/10/2003)AppealBrotherhood Of Locomotive Engineers - Union Pacific Railroad -Central Region
-
served (printed as 3/19/2003)Decision33348SecretaryDISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE THE PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED ON DECEMBER 2, 2002, BY THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY.
-
(printed as 12/19/2002)Motion206891Motion To WithdrawBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/11/2002)Report206818Status ReportUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Rail Corporation, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/2/2002)MotionBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
served (printed as 11/12/2002)Decision33160SecretaryEXTENDED, BY 20 DAYS, ALL APPLICABLE FILING DEADLINES WITH RESPECT TO DECISION NO. 98 IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 11/12/2002)RequestBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 10/22/2002)Decision32884Entire Board(1) RESOLVED A DISPUTE OVER THE MECHANISM FOR ADJUSTING THE FEES TO BE PAID BY THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF) FOR TRACKAGE RIGHTS THAT BNSF ACQUIRED OVER THE LINES OF UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY IN CONNECTION WITH THE 1996 UP/SP MERGER; AND (2) FOUND THAT BNSF HAS NOT SHOWN THAT CERTAIN DISPUTED ITEMS SHOULD BE OMITTED FROM THE CALCULATIONS USED TO DETERMINE ANNUAL ADJUSTMENTS TO THE TRACKAGE RIGHTS FEES.
-
(printed as 7/9/2002)Comments205810CommentUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 7/3/2002)Reply205781ReplyAmerican Chemistry Council
-
(printed as 7/3/2002)Motion205775Motion/Petition/RequestAmerican Chemistry Council
-
(printed as 6/28/2002)Motion205746Motion/Petition/RequestAmerican Chemistry Council
-
(printed as 6/28/2002)Rebuttal205745RebuttalBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/20/2002)Correction205668CorrectionUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Corporation, Southern Pacific Rail Corporation
-
(printed as 6/19/2002)Reply205661ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Corporation, Southern Pacific Rail Corporation
-
(printed as 5/22/2002)Reply205463ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/22/2002)Evidence205459EvidenceAmerican Chemistry Council
-
served (printed as 4/16/2002)Decision32706SecretaryEXTENDED: (1) THE DEADLINE BY WHICH BNSF MUST, AND BY WHICH OTHER INTERESTED PARTIES MAY, SHOW CAUSE WHY THE BOARD SHOULD NOT DISMISS THE BNSF-98 PETITION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM TO MAY 2, 2002; AND (2)THE DEADLINE BY WHICH UP MAY FILE A REPLY TO ANY PLEADING THAT PURPORTS TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE BOARD SHOULD NOT DISMISS THE BNSF-98 PETITION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM TO JUNE 19, 2002.
-
(printed as 4/15/2002)RequestBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/11/2002)Reply205162ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/9/2002)Reply205159ReplyAmerican Chemistry Council
-
(printed as 4/9/2002)Reply205158ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/27/2002)Motion205073Motion/Petition/RequestBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/25/2002)Motion205042Motion/Petition/RequestSouthern Pacific Rail Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 3/25/2002)Motion205041Motion/Petition/RequestSouthern Pacific Rail Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 3/21/2002)Decision32580Entire BoardADDRESSED A DISPUTE CONCERNING THE MECHANISM FOR ADJUSTING THE FEES THAT ARE APPLICABLE TO THE TRACKAGE RIGHTS THAT BNSF ACQUIRED OVER THE LINES OF UP IN CONNECTION WITH THE 1996 UP/SP MERGER.
-
served (printed as 3/4/2002)Decision32536Entire BoardADDRESSED THE PETITION FILED BY THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILWAY CONCERNING CONDITIONS IMPOSED IN THE UNDERLYING MERGER PROCEEDING TO PRESERVE 'BUILD-IN/BUILD-OUT' OPTIONS FOR SHIPPERS TO OBTAIN ACCESS TO AN ADDITIONAL RAIL CARRIER.
-
(printed as 3/1/2002)Letter204876LetterBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/1/2002)SupplementUnion Pacific Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company, Southern Pacific Rail Corporation
-
(printed as 3/1/2002)SupplementBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Corporation, Southern Pacific Rail Corporation
-
served (printed as 2/5/2002)DecisionDENIED AN APPEAL FROM AN ARBITRATION PANEL'S DECISION FINDING THAT CLAIMANT HAD VOLUNTARILY ACCEPTED A SEVERANCE PACKAGE AND WAIVED ANY POTENTIAL CLAIM TO LABOR PROTECTION BENEFITS.
-
(printed as 2/4/2002)Reply204685ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/14/2002)Reply204412ReplyTxu Us Holdings Company
-
(printed as 1/14/2002)Letter204410LetterNational Industrial Transportation League
-
(printed as 1/14/2002)Reply204409ReplyNational Industrial Transportation League
-
(printed as 1/14/2002)Reply204408ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Corporation, Southern Pacific Rail Corporation
-
(printed as 1/14/2002)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Southern Pacific Rail Corporation, Union Pacific Corporation
-
(printed as 1/14/2002)Reply204406ReplyAmerican Chemistry Council
-
(printed as 1/14/2002)Reply204405ReplyAmerican Chemistry Council
-
(printed as 1/14/2002)Reply204404ReplyWestern Coal Traffic League
-
(printed as 1/14/2002)Comments204403CommentUnion Carbide Corporation
-
(printed as 1/14/2002)Comments204402CommentAtofina Petrochemicals Inc, Equistar Chemicals Lp, Lyondell Chemical Company, Basell Usa Inc
-
served (printed as 1/4/2002)Decision32468SecretaryGRANTED UP'S REQUESTS FOR AN EXTENSION FOR FILING REPLIES TO THE BNSF-98 PETITION TO JANUARY 14, 2002.
-
served (printed as 12/26/2001)Decision32442SecretaryEXTENDED THE TIME FOR FILING REPLIES TO THE BNSF-97 PETITION TO JANUARY 14, 2002.
-
served (printed as 12/20/2001)DecisionADDRESSED THE REMAINING UNRESOLVED ISSUES RAISED IN THE FIFTH ANNUAL ROUND OF THE UP/SP 'GENERAL OVERSIGHT' PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 12/20/2001)DecisionADDRESSED CERTAIN ISSUES-INVOLVING THE DEFINITION OF '2-TO-1' POINTS, THE DEFINITION OF TRANSLOAD FACILITIES, THE STOCKTON-ELVAS TRACKAGE RIGHTS LINE, AND TEAM TRACKS-THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED IN THE FIFTH ANNUAL ROUND OF THE UP/SP 'GENERAL OVERSIGHT' PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 11/8/2001)DecisionADDRESSED THE HOUSTON-MEMPHIS-ST. LOUIS CORRIDOR TRACKAGE RIGHTS ISSUES RAISED IN THE FIFTH ANNUAL ROUND OF THIS GENERAL OVERSIGHT PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 10/30/2001)Decision32251Entire BoardDENIED THE JOINT PETITION BNSF-95/ESI-34 FILED BY BNSF AND ENTERGY ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2001.
-
served (printed as 10/3/2001)Decision32211SecretaryNOTICE THAT ANY INTERESTED PERSON THAT INTENDS TO SUBMIT A WRITTEN REPLY TO THE BNSF-95/ESI-34 JOINT PETITION IS DIRECTED TO FILE THAT REPLY WITH THE BOARD NO LATER THAN 5:00 P.M. ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 9, 2001.
-
served (printed as 9/13/2001)DecisionEXTENDED THE DATE FOR FILING REPLIES IN THE FIFTH ANNUAL ROUND OF THE UP/SP GENERAL OVERSIGHT PROCEEDING TO SEPTEMBER 19, 2001.
-
served (printed as 8/30/2001)DecisionEXTENDED THE DATE FOR FILING REPLIES IN THE FIFTH ANNUAL ROUND OF THE UP/SP GENERAL OVERSIGHT PROCEEDING, HERETOFORE SET AS SEPTEMBER 4, 2001 TO SEPTEMBER 14, 2001.
-
served (printed as 5/9/2001)DecisionDENIED THE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE SECRETARY DECISION SERVED JULY 8, 1999.
-
served (printed as 12/15/2000)Decision(1)ADDRESSED THE ISSUES RAISED IN THE FOURTH ANNUAL ROUND OF THE UP/SP GENERAL OVERSIGHT PROCEEDING; (2)FOUND AFTER REVIEWING THE RECORDS, THAT THERE HAVE BEEN NO DEMONSTRABLE COMPETITIVE PROBLEMS RESULTING FROM THE MERGER, AND THE BOARD WILL CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE SITUATION.
-
served (printed as 12/8/2000)DecisionDENIED THE REQUEST FILED BY DAVID E. THOMPSON, OF THE BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, SEEKING PERMISSION TO LATE-FILE AN APPEAL OF AN ARBITRATION AWARD.
-
served (printed as 10/30/2000)Decision31394Entire BoardDENIED A PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE JUNE 1, 2000 DECISION.
-
served (printed as 8/16/2000)DecisionDECLINED THE GENERAL CHAIRMAN OF THE BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, ST. LOUIS SOUTHWESTERN GENERAL COMMITTEE'S PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ARBITRATION AWARD ENTERED BY AN ARBITRATION PANEL CHAIRED BY NEUTRAL MEMBER ECKEHARD MUESSIG.
-
served (printed as 8/16/2000)DecisionDECLINED THE BROTHERHOOD OF LOCOMOTIVE ENGINEERS, GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT FOR THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD--EASTERN REGION'S PETITION FOR REVIEW OF AN ARBITRATION AWARD ENTERED BY A PANEL CHAIRED BY NEUTRAL MEMBER ECKEHARD MUESSIG.
-
served (printed as 6/28/2000)DecisionNOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT JUNE 16, 2000, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE 10TH CIRCUIT.
-
served (printed as 6/1/2000)Decision30860Entire BoardGRANTED UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY D/B/A AMERENUE (UE) REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE ITS FEBRUARY 23RD REPLY AND UP'S REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE ITS UP/SP-375 REPLY, AND THESE TWO REPLIES ARE ACCEPTED FOR FILING AND MADE PART OF THE RECORD IN ABOVE PROCEEDING, (2) DISMISSED THE BNSF-91 PETITION AS MOOT, AND (3) DENIED IN PART AND GRANTED IN PART, UE'S JANUARY 19TH PETITION 'FOR CLARIFICATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF MERGER CONDITIONS' AS INDICATED IN DECISION.
-
served (printed as 5/1/2000)DecisionDECLINED TO REVIEW AN ARBITRATION DECISION THAT UPHELD AN IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UP AND THE UTU, PERMITTING UP TO CREATE A HUB AT SALINA, KS.
-
served (printed as 3/21/2000)Decision30604Entire BoardINTERPRETED CONDITIONS THAT THE BOARD IMPOSED IN GRANTING MERGER AUTHORITY THAT RELATE TO THE PRESERVATION OF PRE-MERGER BUILD-IN, BUILD-OUT OPTIONS FOR ALL SHIPPERS.
-
served (printed as 2/25/2000)Decision(1) DENIED TCU'S PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF THE O'BRIEN AWARD; AND (2) FOUND THAT THE AWARD IS A VALID EXERCISE OF THE ARBITRATOR'S DISCRETION AND WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT.
-
served (printed as 1/3/2000)Decision30745SecretaryGRANTED THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION FROM JANUARY 3, 2000 TO JANUARY 18, 2000, OF THE DEADLINE FOR FILING ITS NEXT QUARTERLY PROGRESS REPORT IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 12/15/1999)DecisionEXTENDED THE STAY IMPOSED BY THE DECISION SERVED ON OCTOBER 29, 1999, FOR AN ADDITIONAL 60 DAYS, UNTIL FEBRUARY 26, 2000.
-
served (printed as 12/14/1999)DecisionGRANTED MS. SULLIVAN'S REQUEST FOR A 30 DAY EXTENSION, UNTIL JANUARY 5, 2000 TO FILE AN APPEAL, AND NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.
-
served (printed as 11/30/1999)DecisionDENIED THE REQUESTS FOR RELIEF URGED BY CALIFORNIA PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, CONTINUED THE GENERAL OVERSIGHT, AND SET A PROCUDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
served (printed as 11/17/1999)DecisionEXTENDED THE DEADLINE FOR UP TO FILE ITS REPLY TO TCU'S PETITION UNTIL NOVEMBER 22, 1999.
-
served (printed as 10/29/1999)DecisionINSTRUCTED UP TO TAKE NO ACTION TO: (1) ABOLISH THE POSITIONS OF 12 FORMER SP CLERKS WORKING OUT OF THE ARMOURDALE YARD; (2) TO TRANSFER THEIR WORK TO UP'S NEFF YARD FACILITY; OR (3) TO REMOVE THEM FROM THE SP COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT FOR A PERIOD OF 60 DAYS FROM THE SERVICE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
-
served (printed as 10/22/1999)DecisionEXTENDED MS. SULLIVAN THE DEADLINE FOR FILING AN APPEAL UNTIL DECEMBER 6, 1999.
-
served (printed as 7/12/1999)Decision30288Entire BoardADDRESSED A REQUEST BY THE BNSF FOR A DETERMINATION WHETHER, UNDER THOSE CONDITIONS, IT HAS THE RIGHT TO SERVE A PARTICULAR SHIPPER LOCATED WITHIN A UP'S YARD THAT IS ADJACENT TO A LINE OVER WHICH BNSF HAS TRACKAGE RIGHTS.
-
served (printed as 7/8/1999)DecisionDENIED E.E. SCHOPPA'S PETITION FOR A 30-DAY EXTENSION FILED JUNE 23, 1999 UNDER 49 CFR 1115.8.
-
served (printed as 4/30/1999)DecisionDENIED A STAY OF AN ARBITRATION DECISION SOUGHT BY INDIVIDUAL EMPLOYEES, PENDING A RULING ON THEIR APPEAL.
-
served (printed as 1/29/1999)Decision29968Entire BoardACKNOWLEDGED THE FIRST ISSUANCE OF PROJECT BONDS, AND DETERMINES THAT THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECISION NO. 84 WAS DECEMBER 28, 1998.
-
served (printed as 1/4/1999)Decision29911Secretary · in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 26) · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 27), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 28), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 29), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 30), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 31), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 32)NOTICE TO THE PARTIES CORRECTING CERTAIN TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS ON DECISION NO. 10 SERVED LATE RELEASE ON DECEMBER 21, 1998.
-
served (printed as 1/4/1999)DecisionNOTICE TO THE PARTIES CORRECTING CERTAIN TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS ON DECISION NO. 13 SERVED LATE RELEASE ON DECEMBER 21, 1998.
-
served (printed as 12/21/1998)Decision29887Entire Board · in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 26) · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 27), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 28), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 29), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 30), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 31), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 32)GRANTED CMTA'S REQUEST TO MODIFY THE TRACKAGE RIGHTS USED BY BNSF AND TO CHANGE THE INTERCHANGE USED BY LONGHORN FROM ELGIN; ORDERED UP TO (1) INCLUDE AN INFRASTRUCTURE REPORT IN ITS ANNUAL OVERSIGHT FILINGS AND (2) WORK WITH BNSF AND OTHER CARRIERS THAT HAVE TRACKAGE RIGHTS OVER ITS LINES WHEN ITS MAKES OPERATIONAL CHANGES; AND DENIED, ALL REQUESTS FOR RELIEF DISCUSSED IN THE DECISION, EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE INDICATED.
-
served (printed as 12/21/1998)DecisionADDRESSED ISSUES RAISED IN THE SECOND ANNUAL ROUND OF THE UP/SP GENERAL OVERSIGHT PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 12/17/1998)Decision29853Entire BoardREOPENED THIS PROCEEDING AND RESOLVED THE PENDING ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION ISSUES ENTERED INTO ON DECEMBER 1, 1998, BETWEEN RENO AND UP.
-
served (printed as 12/11/1998)DecisionGRANTED BMWE'S PETITION TO DISMISS ITS APPEAL OF THE DECISION ISSUED BY ARBITRATOR PETER R. MEYERS (ARBITRATION AWARD) AND TO VACATE THE ARBITRATION AWARD.
-
served (printed as 12/7/1998)Decision29839Secretary · in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 26) · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 27), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 28), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 29), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 30), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 31), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 32)NOTICE TO THE PARTIES CORRECTING THE LIST OF PARTICIPANTS IN APPENDIX A OF DECISION NO. 8 SERVED LATE RELEASE DECEMBER 7, 1998.
-
served (printed as 12/7/1998)Decision29829Secretary · in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 26) · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 27), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 28), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 29), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 30), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 31), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 32)LIST OF PARTICIPANTS AUTHORIZED TO APPEAR AND PRESENT ORAL AGRUMENT DECEMBER 15, 1998, AT 10:00 AM; LIMITED PUBLIC SEATING AVAILABLE
-
served (printed as 11/23/1998)Decision29797Entire Board · in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 26) · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 27), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 28), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 29), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 30), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 31), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 32)(1) GRANTED THE REQUEST FOR AN ORAL ARGUMENT - TO BE HELD DECEMBER 15, 1998; AND (2) INSTRUCTED PARTIES SEEKING SPECIFIC CONDITIONS AND THAT WISH TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ORAL ARGUMENT TO FILE BY DECEMBER 2, 1998, OF THEIR INTENT.
-
served (printed as 11/16/1998)Decision29778Entire BoardEXTENDED THE STAY OF THE 18-MONTH MITIGATION STUDY ORDERED FOR RENO IN DECISION NO. 44, APPENDIX G, 22A-22D, AND THE TRAIN CAP, WITH ASSOCIATED REPORTING REQUIREMENTS, THROUGH JANUARY 31, 1998.
-
served (printed as 10/9/1998)DecisionVACATED THE ABANDONMENT AUTHORIZATION CONTAINED IN UP/SP NO. 44 CONCERNING DOCKET NO. AB-3(SUB-NO. 134); AND (2) DISMISSED THE PROCEEDING IN DOCKET NO. AB-3(134X).
-
served (printed as 10/5/1998)Decision29636Entire BoardGRANTED BN/SF-85 PETITION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY AND BN/SF-84'S PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF MERGER CONDITION TO THE EXTENT SET FORTH IN THIS DECISION.
-
served (printed as 9/18/1998)Decision29615Secretary · in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 26) · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 27), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 28), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 29), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 30), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 31), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 32)NOTICE TO THE PARTIES CORRECTS AND ADDS OMITTED PARTIES IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 9/10/1998)Decision29584Secretary · in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 26) · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 27), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 28), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 29), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 30), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 31), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 32)NOTICE TO THE PARTIES ATTACHING SERVICE LIST THAT HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM THE NOTICES OF INTENT TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 9/1/1998)DecisionGRANTED UP'S MOTION FOR A 1-WEEK EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO BMWE'S PETITION FOR AN ORDER OF VACATUR OF THE OCTOBER 15, 1997 ARBITRATION AWARD.
-
served (printed as 8/27/1998)DecisionESTABLISHED A REVISED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THE SUB-NO. 21 PROCEEDING, UNDER WHICH WCTL WILL HAVE UNTIL SEPTEMBER 9, 1998, TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INITIAL FILING WITH ITS ANTICIPATORY REBUTTAL.
-
served (printed as 8/4/1998)Decision29481Entire Board · in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 26) · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 27), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 28), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 29), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 30), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 31), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 32)NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS TO THE UP/SP MERGER FOR THE HOUSTON, TEXAS/GULF COAST AREA; DECISION NO. 6.
-
served (printed as 7/31/1998)Decision29490Entire Board(1) CONTINUED THE EX PARTE NO. 573 PROCEEDING, (2) ORDERED UP AND BNSF TO PROVIDE BI-WEEKLY REPORTS ACCORDING TO THE TERMS SET FORTH IN THIS DECISION, (3) AUTHORIZED TEX MEX, UNTIL 9/17/98 TO CONTINUE PROVIDING THE TYPE OF SERVICE AUTHORIZED IN THE SERVICE ORDER NO. 1518 PROCEEDING, (4) DIRECTED UP, UNTIL 9/17/98 TO CONTINUE TO RELEASE HOUSTON SHIPPERS THAT ARE SWITCHED BY HOUSTON BELT TERMINAL RAILROAD AND THE PORT TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION FROM THEIR CONTRACTS SO THAT THEY CAN BE SERVED BY TEX MEX AND BNSF, (5) DENIED THE PETITIONS FILED BY THE SPI PETITIONERS AND ENTERGY, AND (6) DEFERRED ACTION ON SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA REGIONAL RAIL AUTHORITY'S REQUEST AT THIS TIME.
-
served (printed as 7/8/1998)Decision29401Entire BoardGRANTED THE JOINT PETITION BY WICHITA/SEDGWICK AND UP AND REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 6/30/1998)DecisionGRANTED UP AND BMWE'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING STATEMENTS AND MODIFIED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
served (printed as 6/1/1998)DecisionNOTICE OF EXTENSION TO FILE REQUESTS FOR ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS TO THE UP/SP MERGER FOR THE HOUSTON, TEXAS/GULF COAST AREA, AND REVISED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
served (printed as 5/26/1998)DecisionNOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT ON THE REFILED MOTION TO COMPEL AND TO CONSIDER ANY OTHER MATTERS THE PARTIES MAY DESIRE TO RAISE CONCERNING DISCOVERY ISSUES, WILL BE HELD ON JUNE 1, 1998, AT 10:00 A.M., IN HEARING ROOM AT THE FERC, 888 FIRST ST., N.E. WASH., D. C.
-
served (printed as 5/19/1998)DecisionGRANTS TEX MEX/KCS' PETITION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER AS SET FORTH IN THE APPENDIX; ALJ STEPHEN GROSSMAN ASSIGNED TO HANDLE ALL DISCOVERY MATTERS
-
served (printed as 5/19/1998)DecisionCORRECTS THE DECISION SERVED 3/31/98 BY DESIGNATING 'SUB NO. 26' FOR THE HOUSTON/GULF COAST OVERSIGHT PROCEEDING RATHER THAN 'SUB NO. 21' - ALL OTHER ASPECTS REMAIN THE SAME INCLUDING THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE
-
served (printed as 5/19/1998)DecisionDENIED THE PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED BY THE UTU COMMITTEES. PARTIES MAY, HOWEVER, SEEK INDIVIDUAL WAIVERS OF THE DISK/CD REQUIREMENT.
-
served (printed as 5/15/1998)DecisionMODIFIED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ESTABLISHED IN THE APRIL 7, 1998 DECISION.
-
served (printed as 4/7/1998)DecisionGRANTED UP'S EXTENSION REQUEST AND MODIFIED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE AS SET FORTH IN THIS DECISION.
-
served (printed as 3/31/1998)DecisionINSTITUTED A PROCEEDING AS PART OF THE 5-YEAR OVERSIGHT CONDITION THAT WAS IMPOSED IN DECISION NO. 44 AND REQUESTED ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS TO THE UP/SP MERGER FOR THE HOUSTON, TEXAS/GULF COAST AREA.
-
served (printed as 3/26/1998)DecisionGRANTED BMWE'S AND UP'S MOTION FOR ANOTHER EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THEIR OPENING SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENTS, AND MODIFIED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE ACCORDINGLY.
-
served (printed as 3/2/1998)DecisionGRANTED BMWE'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME AND ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
served (printed as 3/2/1998)Decision28988Entire BoardGRANTED RENO'S REQUEST AND TOLL FOR AN 8-MONTH PERIOD OF THE TIME FOR FILING COMMENTS ON THE FMP AND UNDERTAKING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THE RENO MITIGATION STUDY.
-
served (printed as 2/11/1998)DecisionNOTICE TO THE PARTIES: FINAL MITIGATION PLAN FOR RENO, NV.
-
served (printed as 2/11/1998)Decision(1) REQUIRED THAT UP AND BMWE SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL STATEMENTS ADDRESSING OUR CONCERNS BY 3/3/98, AND EACH SHALL SERVE A COPY OF ITS STATEMENT ON THE OTHER; (2) UP MUST ALSO PROVIDE A COPY OF ITS COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT WITH BMWE FOR UP-PROPER; (3) BMWE MUST ALSO PROVIDE A COPY OF ITS COORDINATING AGREEMENT FOR UP OPERATIONS OVER WP; AND (4) BOTH PARITES MAY FILE RESPONSES BY 3/13/98.
-
served (printed as 1/23/1998)DecisionREJECTED BNSF'S PROTOCOL PROPOSALS AND ADOPTED THE DRAFT PROTOCOL AGREED TO BY UP AND BSNF, AS MODIFIED BY THE REVISIONS OF UP.
-
served (printed as 1/7/1998)Decision28789SecretaryNOTICE TO THE PARTIES CORRECTING A TYPOGRAPHIC ERROR.
-
served (printed as 1/7/1998)Decision28758Entire BoardDENIED BN/SF-83 PETITION TO THE EXTENT IT SEEKS CLARIFICATION OF DECISION NO. 44.
-
served (printed as 12/30/1997)DecisionDENIED BMWE'S PETITION FOR STAY.
-
served (printed as 12/12/1997)Decision28710Entire BoardGRANTED UP AND WICHITA/SEDGWICK'S JOINT REQUEST AND TOLL THE TIME FOR UNDERTAKING FURTHER PROCEEDINGS IN THE MITIGATION STUDY BEING CONDUCTED FOR WICHITA/SEDGWICK.
-
served (printed as 12/2/1997)DecisionGRANTED UP'S EXTENSION REQUEST TO 12/5/97.
-
served (printed as 11/10/1997)DecisionGRANTED BMWE'S EXTENSION REQUEST TO FILE PETITION FOR REVIEW OF THE ARBITRATION DECISION ISSUED ON 10/15/97.
-
served (printed as 10/27/1997)DecisionDIRECTS UP AND BNSF TO SUBMIT THEIR PROPOSED PROTOCOLCONCERNING IDENTIFICATION OF 2-TO-1 POINTS WITHIN 30 DAYS AND ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
served (printed as 10/27/1997)Decision28175Entire BoardGRANTED BNSF PERMISSION TO SERVE THE PROPOSED TRANSLOAD FACILITY.
-
served (printed as 10/6/1997)DecisionNOTICE OF COURT ACTION NO. 97-4287.
-
served (printed as 10/3/1997)DecisionNOTICE OF TRACKAGE RIGHTS EXEMPTION AND ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
served (printed as 9/26/1997)DecisionFOUND THAT THE TERMS OF THE PROPOSED MERGER OF SSW INTO SSW MERGER CORP., ARE JUST AND REASONABLE , AND DISCONTINUED THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 9/15/1997)DecisionISSUANCE OF PRELIMINARY MITIGATION PLAN - RENO, NV, REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS.
-
served (printed as 9/15/1997)DecisionISSUANCE OF PRELIMINARY MITIGATION PLAN - WICHITA, KS, REQUEST FOR PUBLIC COMMENT, AND NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETINGS.
-
served (printed as 9/5/1997)DecisionDENIED THE PETITION TO REOPEN FILED 9/4/97 BY BENJAMIN ZATZ AND DONALD ZATZ.
-
served (printed as 8/29/1997)Decision28122Entire Board · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 20)DENIED THE PETITION FOR DETERMINATION OF ITS WLC FACILITY AS A 2-TO-1 POINT.
-
served (printed as 8/20/1997)DecisionACCEPTED THE PETITIONERS PLEADING FILED 8-19-97 FOR FILING AND MADE PART OF THE RECORD IN THIS PROCEEDING AND ADJUSTED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
served (printed as 8/14/1997)Decision28174Entire Board · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 20)CLARIFIED BNSF'S HALSTED TRACKAGE RIGHTS BY TREATING BN/SF-80 PLEADING AS A PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION.
-
served (printed as 8/7/1997)DecisionNOTICE TO THE PARTIES ADDING PARTIES TO SERVICE LIST.
-
served (printed as 8/1/1997)DecisionGRANTED OR/DOT'S EXTENSION REQUEST.
-
served (printed as 7/29/1997)DecisionNOTICE TO THE PARTIES GRANTING THE REQUESTS TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 7/29/1997)DecisionNOTICE TO THE PUBLIC AND INVITES COMMENTS REGARDING APPLICANTS' REQUEST.
-
served (printed as 7/25/1997)DecisionDENIED PETITIONERS' REQUEST FOR A 14-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE COMMENTS IN THE UP/SP OVERSIGHT PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 7/23/1997)DecisionGRANTS USDA'S REQUEST FOR A 2-WEEK EXTENSION TO FILE ITS COMMENTS IN THE UP/SP OVERSIGHT PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 7/16/1997)DecisionNOTICE TO THE PARTIES REMOVING D. W. SHERROD FROM THE SERVICE LIST
-
served (printed as 6/30/1997)DecisionNOTICE TO THE PARTIES OF SOME ADDITIONS/CORRECTIONS TO THE SERVICE LIST.
-
served (printed as 6/26/1997)DecisionGRANTED, IN PART, UTU'S APPEAL OF AN ARBITRATION DECISION.
-
served (printed as 6/19/1997)DecisionNOTICE TO THE PARTIES ISSUING SERVICE LIST IN THIS PROCEEDING
-
served (printed as 6/10/1997)DecisionSTAYED IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ARBITRATION AWARD UNTIL JULY 1, 1997.
-
served (printed as 5/30/1997)Decision--
-
served (printed as 5/23/1997)Decision21654Entire Board · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 20)ACCEPTED THE UP/SP-229 AND TUE-23 REPLIES FOR FILING AND MADE IT PART OF THE RECORD.
-
served (printed as 5/7/1997)Decision(1) INSTITUTES A PROCEEDING TO IMPLEMENT THE OVERSIGHT CONDITION IMPOSED IN FD-32760, DEC. NO. 44, SERVED 8/12/96; (2) SEEKS COMMENTS FROM INTERESTED PERSONS ON ANY EFFECTS OF THE MERGER; (3) AND REQUEST PERSONS INTENDING TO PARTICIPATE TO FILE A NOTICE OF INTENT TO PARTICIPATE.
-
served (printed as 4/17/1997)Decision25447Entire BoardCLARIFIES THE DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL MITIGATION AS SET FORTH IN DECISION NO. 44.
-
served (printed as 4/14/1997)Decision25426Secretary--
-
served (printed as 4/14/1997)Decision25424Secretary · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 20)--
-
served (printed as 3/10/1997)Decision21653Entire Board · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 10), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 20)DENIED (1) LONGHORN'S REQUEST THAT THE LONGHORN/BNSF INTERCHANGE BE LOCATED AT GIDDINGS AND (2) BNSF'S REQUEST THAT THE ELGIN INTERCHANGE ARRANGEMENTS AGREED TO BY CMTA AND UP/SP BE MODIFIED IN CERTAIN WAYS THAT CONCERN THE USE OF THE UP SIDING SOUTH OF ELGIN
-
served (printed as 3/10/1997)Decision21490Entire Board · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 20)DENIED A PETITION FILED 12/19/96 BY EPC AND ADDRESSES RECENT FILINGS BY BNSF AND UP/SP.
-
served (printed as 3/3/1997)Decision
-
served (printed as 2/3/1997)Decision
-
served (printed as 2/3/1997)Decision--
-
served (printed as 2/3/1997)Decision21536Secretary · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 13), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 14), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 20)--
-
served (printed as 1/24/1997)Decision--
-
served (printed as 1/24/1997)Decision21479Secretary · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 12), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19)--
-
served (printed as 1/24/1997)Decision
-
served (printed as 1/14/1997)Decision21456Secretary · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 10), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 20)--
-
served (printed as 12/31/1996)Decision21272Entire Board · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 18), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 20)GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART THE UTAH-7 PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION; CLARIFIED CONDITIONS; GRANTED RAILCO'S REQUEST FOR A WAIVER; AND DENIED THE RELIEF SOUGHT BY RAILCO.
-
served (printed as 12/12/1996)Decision21327Secretary · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 10), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 20)--
-
served (printed as 12/10/1996)Decision21312Secretary · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 20)--
-
served (printed as 12/4/1996)Decision21102Entire Board · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 20)DENIED THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.'S PETITION TO REOPEN/RECONSIDER DECISION NO. 44.
-
served (printed as 11/27/1996)Decision21103Entire Board · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 13), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 14), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 20)DECISION NO. 62 - DENIED TEX MEX'S PETITION TO REOPEN DECISION NO. 44.
-
served (printed as 11/20/1996)Decision21104Entire Board · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19)DECISION NO. 61 - ADDRESSED UP/SP'S PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION/RECONSIDERATION OF THE NEW FACILITIES AND TRANSLOADING COMDITION IMPOSED IN DECISION NO. 44.
-
served (printed as 11/20/1996)Decision21101Entire Board · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19)DECISION NO. 60 - DENIED DOWNEY'S (1) CWD-3 PETITION TO REOPEN AND (2) CWD-4 MOTION TO STRIKE
-
served (printed as 11/20/1996)Decision21100Entire BoardDECISION NO. 59 - DENIED SCOTT MANATT'S PEITION FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED SEPTEMBER 4, 1996.
-
served (printed as 11/20/1996)Decision21099Entire Board · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19)DECISION NO. 58 - DENIED DOW-27 PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED SEPTEMBER 3, 1996
-
served (printed as 11/20/1996)Decision20756Entire Board · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 12), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 19)DECISION NO. 57 -ADDRESSED THE PETITION FOR CLARIFICATION REGARDING THE CONTRACT MODIFFICATION CONDITION IMPOSED IN DECISION NO. 44.
-
served (printed as 11/4/1996)Decision--
-
served (printed as 8/12/1996)Decision20247Entire Board · also entered in FD 32760 (Sub-No. 1), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 2), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 3), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 4), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 5), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 6), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 7), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 8), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 9), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 10), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 11), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 12), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 13), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 14), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 16), FD 32760 (Sub-No. 17)--
Nothing of that kind in this docket.