AB 874
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/AB-874 · entries shown: all, newest first
This docket has not yet been observed directly in the Board’s dockets table; its entries below come from filings and decisions that name it.
Caption from the Board’s record. Sub-dockets, included below: AB 874-X, AB 874 (Sub-No. 1X)
12 filings, 10 decisions and 14 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 00:36 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC.
Entries
-
(printed as 6/16/2021)NoticeSierra Northern Railway
-
served (printed as 6/22/2020)DecisionDECISION PERMITTED THE ABANDONMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 0.70 MILES OF RAIL LINE IN YOLO COUNTY, CAL., SUBJECT TO STANDARD EMPLOYEE PROTECTIONS.
-
served (printed as 5/28/2020)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT NO CONDITIONS ARE RECOMMENDED BY THE OFFICE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS.
-
(printed as 5/18/2020)CommentEI-26902California Dept of Parks and Recreation, Office of Historic Preservation · in AB 874 (Sub-No. 1X)Julianne Polanco
-
served (printed as 4/22/2020)DecisionDETERMINED THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT.
-
(printed as 4/22/2020)CommentJulianne Polanco
-
(printed as 4/13/2020)LetterSurface Transportation Board, Chairman Fuchs, Surface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 4/10/2020)StatementHonorable Doris Matsui
-
served (printed as 4/8/2020)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT SIERRA NORTHERN RAILWAY FILED A PETITION FOR EXEMPTION TO ABANDON APPROXIMATELY 0.70 MILES OF RAILROAD LINE IN YOLO COUNTY, CAL.
-
(printed as 4/8/2020)StatementSacramento Area Flood Control Agency
-
(printed as 4/6/2020)SupplementSierra Northern Railway
-
(printed as 4/1/2020)CommentJulianne Polanco
-
(printed as 3/30/2020)Comment
-
served (printed as 3/25/2020)DecisionGRANTED A MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER.
-
(printed as 3/19/2020)MotionSierra Northern Railway
-
(printed as 3/19/2020)MotionSierra Northern Railway
-
served (printed as 11/8/2005)Decision(1) REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) REPLACED THE PREVIOUSLY IMPOSED HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONDITION WITH THE ONE CURRENTLY RECOMMENDED BY SECTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS.
-
(printed as 10/12/2005)CommentMilford Wayne Donaldson
-
(printed as 10/3/2005)CommentAnne Marie Medin
-
(printed as 9/21/2005)CommentJanie Sheng
-
served (printed as 6/23/2005)Decision(1) REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) REPLACED THE CONDITION PREVIOUSLY IMPOSED FOR THE U. S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE WITH THE ONE CURRENTLY RECOMMENDED BY SECTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS.
-
(printed as 5/4/2005)CommentMilford Wayne Donaldson
-
(printed as 4/7/2005)CommentChris Nagano
-
(printed as 4/7/2005)CommentDave Shpak
-
(printed as 2/22/2005)CommentRandall Goodwin
-
(printed as 2/8/2005)CommentMilford Wayne Donaldson
-
(printed as 1/27/2005)CommentTerry Roberts
-
(printed as 1/26/2005)TrailSierra Northern Railway
-
served (printed as 1/24/2005)DecisionREOPENED THE PROCEEDING TO IMPOSE AN INTERIM TRAIL USE/RAIL BANKING CONDITION AND TWO ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS ON THE EXEMPTION OF THE ABANDONMENT OF THE LINE.
-
(printed as 1/6/2005)ReplySierra Northern Railway
-
served (printed as 12/30/2004)DecisionCONCLUDED THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS WAS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
-
(printed as 12/27/2004)TrailCity Of West Sacramento
-
(printed as 12/27/2004)CommentJanie C. I. Sheng
-
served (printed as 12/23/2004)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT SIERRA NORTHERN RAILWAY HAS FILED A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO ABANDON AN APPROXIMATELY 9.27-MILE LINE OF RAILROAD IN YOLO COUNTY, CA.
-
(printed as 12/15/2004)CorrectionSierra Northern Railway
-
(printed as 12/6/2004)NoticeSierra Northern Railway
Nothing of that kind in this docket.