Display Kept in this browser only
AbandonmentBefore the Surface Transportation Board

AB 555

This docket has not yet been observed directly in the Board’s dockets table; its entries below come from filings and decisions that name it.

Caption from the Board’s record. Sub-dockets, included below: AB 555 (Sub-No. 1X), AB 555 (Sub-No. 2X)

0 filings, 8 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 10:06 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:16 UTC.

Entries

Newest first · oldest first
  1. Decision
    30686Entire Board · in AB 555 (Sub-No. 2X)
    (1) DENIED BOARDMAN'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE AND PENN-OHIO'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO INTERVENE, (2) COLUMBIANA COUNTY PORT AUTHORITY'S MOTION TO STAY, PETITION TO REOPEN, MOTION TO STRIKE, AND REQUEST TO REJECT, AND (3) SET $1,080,560 PURCHASE PRICE FOR RVI'S 35.7-MILE LINE OF RAILROAD EXTENDING FROM MILEPOST 0.0 AT YOUNGSTOWN, OH, TO MILEPOST 35.7 AT DARLINGTON, PA, AND A CONNECTING 1-MILE LINE SEGMENT NEAR NEGLEY, OH.
  2. Decision
    30626Director Of Proceedings · in AB 555 (Sub-No. 2X)
    POSTPONED THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE EXEMPTION AUTHORIZING ABANDONMENT IN ORDER TO PERMIT THE OFA PROCESS UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10904 AND 49 CFR 1152.27 TO PROCEED.
  3. Decision
    30540Secretary · in AB 555 (Sub-No. 2X)
    (1) GRANTED RVI'S REQUEST FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER; (2) ADOPTED THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AND UNDERTAKING IN THE APPENDIX TO THIS DECISION; AND (3) DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AND UNDERTAKING IN THE APPENDIX TO THIS DECISION.
  4. Decision
    30502Director Of Proceedings · in AB 555 (Sub-No. 2X)
    ORDERED RVI PROMPTLY TO PROVIDE OFFERORS WITH ALL THE INFORMATION REQUIRED BY 49 CFR 1152.27(A), INCLUDING SUPPORTING DATA AND ACCESS TO MAPS AND DEEDS AND ANY INFORMATION BEARING ON THE NATURE OF RVI'S TITLE TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, TO PERMIT THEM TO PREPARE THEIR OFFERS FOR SUBMISSION.
  5. Decision
    30300Entire Board · in AB 555 (Sub-No. 2X)
    (1) GRANTED A PETITION BY RVI TO ABANDON ITS ENTIRE LINE OF RAILROAD, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS, AND TO PERMIT THE OPRC TO DISCONTINUE SERVICE OVER THE SAME LINE, SUBJECT TO EMPLOYEE PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS AND (2) ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
  6. Decision
    30301Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis · in AB 555 (Sub-No. 2X)
    CONCLUDED THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
  7. Decision
    30281Director Of Proceedings · in AB 555 (Sub-No. 2X)
    NOTICE OF ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION AND ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
  8. Decision
    29976Director Of Proceedings · in AB 555 (Sub-No. 1X)
    REJECTED THE NOTICES OF EXEMPTION IN STB DOCKET NOS. AB-556 (SUB-NO. 1X) AND AB-555 (SUB-NO. 1X).