AB 512
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/AB-512 · entries shown: all, newest first
This docket has not yet been observed directly in the Board’s dockets table; its entries below come from filings and decisions that name it.
Caption from the Board’s record. Sub-dockets, included below: AB 512-X
17 filings, 8 decisions and 50 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 04:36 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC.
Entries
-
(printed as 7/13/2010)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 6/23/2010)CommentMilford Wayne Donaldson
-
(printed as 6/23/2010)CommentNajah Duvall-Gabriel
-
(printed as 6/23/2010)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 6/17/2010)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 6/3/2010)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 5/24/2010)CommentMilford Wayne Donaldson
-
(printed as 3/22/2010)CommentGary Reinoehl
-
(printed as 3/8/2010)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 3/3/2010)CommentLarry Cenotto, President
-
(printed as 3/1/2010)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 2/22/2010)CommentLarry Cenotto, President
-
(printed as 2/18/2010)CommentDave Butow
-
(printed as 2/16/2010)Comment
-
(printed as 2/5/2010)CommentDave Butow
-
(printed as 12/1/2009)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 11/30/2009)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 11/30/2009)CommentDave Butow
-
(printed as 11/30/2009)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 11/24/2009)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 11/18/2009)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 11/10/2009)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 11/6/2009)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 11/3/2009)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 1/12/2009)CommentSusan Stratton
-
(printed as 1/12/2009)CommentDavid Brown
-
(printed as 10/2/2008)CommentDavid Brown
-
(printed as 9/29/2008)NoticeSierra Pacific Industries
-
served (printed as 9/22/2008)DecisionDECISION: (1) REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) REMOVED THE SECTION 106 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONDITION IMPOSED IN THE FEBRUARY 25, 2005 DECISION.
-
(printed as 9/11/2008)CommentLaShavio Johnson
-
(printed as 9/4/2008)Comment
-
(printed as 9/4/2008)CommentDave Brown
-
(printed as 9/4/2008)CommentSusan Stratton
-
(printed as 9/4/2008)CommentDon L. Klima
-
(printed as 9/3/2008)CommentMilford Wayne Donaldson
-
(printed as 5/19/2008)CommentRichard Forster
-
(printed as 5/19/2008)CommentM.D. Emmerson
-
(printed as 5/19/2008)CommentSusan Stratton
-
(printed as 11/14/2007)CommentMilford Wayne Donaldson
-
(printed as 9/17/2007)CommentKatry Harris
-
(printed as 8/28/2007)CommentDon L. Klima
-
(printed as 8/14/2007)CommentShelly Davis-King
-
(printed as 3/17/2006)CommentBill Breimer
-
served (printed as 3/6/2006)DecisionDECISION GRANTED SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES, INC.'S REQUEST TO WITHDRAW ITS CONSUMMATION NOTICE.
-
(printed as 3/1/2006)CommentDavid E. Butow
-
(printed as 2/28/2006)MotionSierra Pacific Industries
-
(printed as 2/21/2006)CommentG. Blanc
-
(printed as 2/16/2006)NoticeSierra Pacific Industries,
-
served (printed as 5/13/2005)Decision(1) REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING; (2) GRANTED THE RAILROAD'S REQUEST TO MAKE THE EXEMPTIONS EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY; (3) TERMINATED THE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROCESS IN THESE PROCEEDINGS; AND (4) ORDERED THAT THE EXEMPTIONS WILL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON THE SERVICE DATE OF THIS DECISION, SUBJECT TO THE PREVIOUSLY IMPOSED CONDITIONS.
-
(printed as 5/4/2005)MotionMartell Industrial Center, Llc
-
(printed as 5/4/2005)OFASierrapine, Sierra Pacific Industries
-
served (printed as 3/11/2005)Decision(1) DIRECTED THE RAILROADS TO PROVIDE MARTELL INDUSTRIAL CENTER, LLC (MIC) WITH THE INFORMATION IT REQUESTED IN ITS DECEMBER 13, 2004 LETTER, AND TO NOTIFY THE BOARD IN WRITING THAT THEY HAVE DONE SO; (2) GRANTED MIC'S REQUESTS THAT THE DEADLINE FOR ITS OFA BE TOLLED UNTIL 45 DAYS FOLLOWING THE DATE THAT THE RAILROADS PROVIDES MIC WITH THIS INFORMATION; AND (3) POSTPONED THE EFFECTIVE OF THE EXEMPTION UNTIL 10 DAYS AFTER THE DUE DATE FOR MIC'S FILING OF ITS OFA.
-
(printed as 3/8/2005)MotionMartell Industrial Center, Llc
-
(printed as 3/7/2005)ReplySierra Pacific Industries
-
(printed as 2/28/2005)RequestMartell Industrial Center, Llc
-
served (printed as 2/25/2005)DecisionGRANTED THE PETITION TO ABANDON A LINE OF RAILROAD IN AMADOR COUNTY, CA, SUBJECT TO PUBLIC USE, TRAIL USE, AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS.
-
served (printed as 2/16/2005)DecisionANNOUNCED THE AGENDA ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE BOARD'S FEBRUARY 23, 2005 VOTING CONFERENCE.
-
(printed as 2/16/2005)CommentKelly Hobbs
-
served (printed as 1/11/2005)DecisionCONCLUDED THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS WAS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
-
(printed as 1/10/2005)ReplySierrapine
-
(printed as 1/10/2005)MotionSierra Pacific Industries
-
(printed as 1/10/2005)ReplySierra Pacific Industries
-
(printed as 1/7/2005)MotionSierrapine, Martell Industrial Center, Llc
-
(printed as 1/7/2005)CommentSam Baugh, Cultural Resources Representative
-
(printed as 1/7/2005)CommentDonna Marie Potts
-
(printed as 1/7/2005)CommentChristine Boston, Environmental Coordinator
-
(printed as 1/3/2005)CommentRichard A. Snay
-
(printed as 12/22/2004)StatementAmador County Transportation Commission
-
(printed as 12/22/2004)TrailAmador County Transportation Commission
-
(printed as 12/20/2004)CommentJohn F. Hahn, Amador County Counsel
-
served (printed as 12/2/2004)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT SIERRA PACIFIC INDUSTRIES (SPI) AND SIERRAPINE JOINTLY FILED A PETITION FOR EXEMPTION FOR SPI TO ABANDON AND SIERRAPINE TO DISCONTINUE SERVICE OVER A LINE OF RAILROAD EXTENDING FROM MILEPOST 0.0 AT IONE, CA, TO THE END OF THE LINE AT MILEPOST 12.0 AT MARTELL, CA.
-
(printed as 11/15/2004)SupplementSierra Pacific Industries
-
(printed as 11/12/2004)MotionSierra Pacific Industries
-
(printed as 11/8/2004)CommentRichard A. Allen
-
(printed as 10/25/2004)EnvironmentalSierrapine, Sierra Pacific Industries
Nothing of that kind in this docket.