AB 492
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/AB-492 · entries shown: all, newest first
This docket has not yet been observed directly in the Board’s dockets table; its entries below come from filings and decisions that name it.
Caption from the Board’s record. Sub-dockets, included below: AB 492 (Sub-No. 1X), AB 492 (Sub-No. 2X)
2 filings, 15 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 23:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC.
Entries
-
(printed as 2/28/2018)NoticeAbe Fairmont, Llc
-
served (printed as 1/29/2018)DecisionDECISION PERMITTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY TO DISCONTINUE ITS TRACKAGE RIGHTS OVER APPROXIMATELY 0.77 MILES OF RAIL LINE IN FILLMORE COUNTY, NEB., AND FOR ABE FAIRMONT, LLC, TO ABANDON ITS COMMON CARRIER RAIL SERVICE OVER APPROXIMATELY 2.77 MILES OF RAIL LINE ALSO IN FILLMORE COUNTY, NEB., SUBJECT TO STANDARD EMPLOYEE PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS.
-
(printed as 1/4/2002)ReplyManning Grain Company
-
served (printed as 11/20/2001)Decision(1) TERMINATED THE OFA PROCESS IN THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) VACATED THE DECISION SERVED AUGUST 31, 2001 TO PERMIT THE PRIOR ABANDONMENT AUTHORIZATION FOR THE PORTION SUBJECT TO THE OFA TO BECOME EFFECTIVE ON THE SERVICE DATE OF THIS DECISION.
-
served (printed as 11/1/2001)DecisionCORRECTED TO REFLECT CERTAIN EDITORIAL AND FORMAT CHANGES INADVERTENTLY OMITTED IN THE DECISION SERVED LATE-RELEASE OCTOBER 31, 2001.
-
served (printed as 10/31/2001)DecisionESTABLISHED THE CONDITIONS AND AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10904(F) FOR A LINE OF RAILROAD IN FILLMORE COUNTY, NE, PURSUANT TO A REQUEST FILED BY PROVIDENT INDUSTRIES, LLC.
-
served (printed as 10/23/2001)DecisionDENIED FWRY'S MOTION TO STRIKE FILED SEPTEMBER 28, 2001, AND FWRY'S APPEAL FILED SEPTEMBER 10,2001, REQUESTING A REVERSAL OF THE AUGUST 31 DECISION.
-
served (printed as 9/18/2001)DecisionGRANTED PROVIDENT INDUSTRIES, LLC REQUEST FOR EXTENSION UNTIL SEPTEMBER 24, 2001, TO FILE ITS REPLY TO FWRY'S APPEAL AND FOR AN EXTENSION UNTIL OCTOBER 1, 2001, OF THE DUE DATE FOR THE FILING OF ITS REQUEST FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TERMS AND CONDITIONS.
-
served (printed as 8/31/2001)DecisionPOSTPONED THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE DECISION AUTHORIZING ABANDONMENT OF A PORTION OF THE LINE BETWEEN MILEPOST 8.1 AND MILEPOST 23.0 IN ORDER TO PERMIT THE OFA PROCESS UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10904 AND 49 CFR 1152.27 TO PROCEED.
-
served (printed as 7/26/2001)DecisionRECOMMENDED THAT A CONDITION BE IMPOSED REQUIRING FWRY TO CONSULT WITH THE NGS AND PROVIDE NGS WITH 90 DAYS' NOTICE PRIOR TO DISTURBING OR DESTROYING ANY GEODETIC MARKERS.
-
served (printed as 7/20/2001)DecisionTOLLED THE TIME PERIOD FOR PROVIDENT INDUSTRIES, LLC (PI) TO FILE AN OFA UNTIL AUGUST 27, 2001, OR UNTIL 20 DAYS AFTER PI'S RECEIPT OF THE REQUIRED INFORMATION, WHICHEVER IS LATER, AND THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE EXEMPTION IS FURTHER POSTPONED UNTIL SEPTEMBER 5, 2001, OR 30 DAYS AFTER PI'S RECEIPT OF THE REQUIRED INFORMATION, WHICHEVER IS LATER.
-
served (printed as 7/2/2001)DecisionCONCLUDED THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
-
served (printed as 6/27/2001)DecisionNOTICE THAT FILLMORE WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY FILED A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION UNDER 49 CFR 1152 SUBPART F, TO ABANDON A LINE OF RAILROAD A DISTANCE OF APPROXIMATELY 23.2 MILES IN FILLMORE COUNTY NE.
-
served (printed as 8/4/1998)DecisionREOPENED THIS PROCEEDING AND MODIFIED TO THE EXTENT NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT INTERIM TRAIL USE/RAIL BANKING AS SET FORTH IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 6/26/1998)DecisionEXEMPTED FROM THE PRIOR APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS THE ABANDONMENT BY FWRY OF LINES OF RAILROAD KNOWN AS THE BRUNING LINE, THE DAYKIN LINE, AND THE SHICKLEY LINE, IN FILLMORE, JEFFERSON, SALINE AND THAYER COUNTIES, NE, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS, AND SET A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
served (printed as 5/8/1998)DecisionCONCLUDED THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
-
served (printed as 3/27/1998)DecisionNOTICE OF ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION AND ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
Nothing of that kind in this docket.