AB 459
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/AB-459 · entries shown: all, newest first
This docket has not yet been observed directly in the Board’s dockets table; its entries below come from filings and decisions that name it.
Caption from the Board’s record. Sub-dockets, included below: AB 459 (Sub-No. 1X), AB 459 (Sub-No. 2X), AB 459 (Sub-No. 3X)
3 filings, 8 decisions and 2 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 01:36 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC.
Entries
-
(printed as 10/17/2006)CommentsCentral Railroad Company Of Indiana
-
(printed as 10/10/2006)CommentSimon Monroe
-
served (printed as 9/20/2006)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF INDIANA FILED A VERIFIED NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO DISCONTINUE SERVICE OVER A 2.6-MILE LINE OF RAILROAD BETWEEN MILEPOST 64.67 AND MILEPOST 67.27, NEAR GREENBURG, IN DECATUR COUNTY, IN.
-
(printed as 9/19/2006)CommentRon McAhron
-
(printed as 9/6/2006)CertificateCentral Railroad Company Of Indiana
-
(printed as 8/31/2006)NoticeCentral Railroad Company Of Indiana
-
served (printed as 11/12/1998)DecisionGRANTED CIND PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW ITS PETITION TO REOPEN FILED MAY 22, 1998, AND DISCONTINUED THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 5/4/1998)DecisionDENIED THE PETITION FOR EXEMPTION FILED JANUARY 14, 1998, BY CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY OF INDIANA (CIND) TO ABANDON THE SHELBYVILLE LINE NEAR THATCHER STATION AND THE TOWN OF GREENDALE NEAR SHELBYVILLE IN DEARBORN, DECATUR, FRANKLIN, RIPLEY AND SHELBY COUNTIES, IN, AND REJECTED THE APRIL 30, 1998 REPLY FILED BY CIND
-
served (printed as 4/1/1998)DecisionDENIED A MOTION FILED ON 3/6/98 BY PROTESTANTS TO (1) COMPEL THE PRODUCTION OF WORK PAPERS AND THE TAKING OF DEPOSITIONS, AND (2) FOR 'ADJUSTMENT' OF THE 5/4/98 DEADLINE DATE FOR ISSUANCE OF A DECISION ON THE MERITS.
-
served (printed as 3/24/1998)DecisionCONCLUDED THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED COMMENTS REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
-
served (printed as 2/27/1998)DecisionDENIED CIND'S MOTION FOR AN ORDER DENYING DISCOVERY REQUESTS.
-
served (printed as 2/2/1998)DecisionGRANTED IN PART, CIND'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER.
-
served (printed as 2/2/1998)DecisionNOTICE OF ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION; AND ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
Nothing of that kind in this docket.