AB 290 (Sub-No. 404X)
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/AB-290/sub/404X · entries shown: all, newest first
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY - ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION -IN THE CITY OF GREENSBORO, N.C.
Caption from the Board’s record.
17 filings, 7 decisions and 4 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 04:06 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:39 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 1/4/2024)Decision51912Entire BoardCLARIFIED THAT A PORTION OF THE WIDTH OF A RAILBANKED RIGHT-OF-WAY IN NORTH CAROLINA, WHICH IS NOT NEEDED TO PERMIT THE REACTIVATION OF RAIL SERVICE, IS NO LONGER PART OF THE NOTICE OF INTERIM TRAIL USE OR ABANDONMENT.
-
(printed as 12/29/2023)SubstitutionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/19/2023)Letter307652LetterCity of Greensboro, NC
-
(printed as 10/12/2023)Motion307295Motion/Petition/RequestCity of Greensboro, N.C.
-
served (printed as 8/25/2023)DecisionEXTENDED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 8/25/2023)RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 7/28/2023)DecisionGRANTED A JOINT REQUEST TO EXTEND A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
(printed as 7/27/2023)RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 6/28/2023)Decision51648Entire BoardCLARIFIED A REGULATORY AUTHORITY OVER A RAILBANKED LINE IN NORTH CAROLINA AND EXPLAINED THE BOARD’S PROCEDURES FOR DETERMINING WHETHER A PORTION OF A RIGHT-OF-WAY CAN BE REMOVED FROM SUCH A LINE. ALSO, PROVIDED THE RAILROAD AN ADDITIONAL 30 DAYS TO RESPOND TO A PETITION FROM THE CITY OF GREENSBORO.
-
(printed as 6/20/2023)Reply306751ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/20/2023)Motion306750Motion/Petition/RequestCity of Greensboro, N.C.
-
(printed as 1/30/2023)Reply306071ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/9/2023)Rebuttal305935RebuttalCity of Greensboro, N.C.
-
(printed as 1/9/2023)Motion305934Motion/Petition/RequestCity of Greensboro, N.C.
-
(printed as 12/27/2022)Reply305865ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/7/2022)Motion305750Motion/Petition/RequestCity of Greensboro, N.C.
-
(printed as 11/8/2019)TrailNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 10/11/2019)DecisionDECISION: (1) REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) MODIFIED THE NOTICE SERVED AND PUBLISHED IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER ON SEPTEMBER 13, 2019.
-
(printed as 10/7/2019)CommentEO-3162Final EA
-
(printed as 9/24/2019)CommentEI-26723NC SHPOThis undertaking will not affect any historic properties per our comments to Norfolk Southern.Renee Gledhill-Earley · Raleigh, NC
-
served (printed as 9/20/2019)DecisionDECISION DETERMINED THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT.
-
(printed as 9/20/2019)Reply248496ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/19/2019)SupplementCity Of Greensboro
-
served (printed as 9/13/2019)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY FILED A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION TO ABANDON AN APPROXIMATELY 3.1-MILE RAIL LINE IN THE CITY OF GREENSBORO, N.C.
-
(printed as 9/13/2019)Trail248465Trail Use RequestCity Of Greensboro
-
(printed as 9/4/2019)CommentEO-3113Accept/Reject Notice
-
(printed as 8/26/2019)Notice248381Notice Of ExemptionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/8/2019)Comment
Nothing of that kind in this docket.