AB 167 (Sub-No. 1095X)
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/AB-167/sub/1095X · entries shown: all, newest first
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION--ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION--LANCASTER AND CHESTER COUNTIES, PA
Caption from the Board’s record.
21 filings, 9 decisions and 138 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:19 UTC.
Entries
-
(printed as 12/10/2007)CommentDouglas C. McLearen, Chief Division of Archaeology & Protection · Harrisburg, PA
-
(printed as 10/24/2007)CommentEI-4027ASC Group, Inc.Susan Peters · Harrisburg, PA
-
(printed as 8/20/2007)CommentCharlene Dwin Vaughn · Washington, DC
-
(printed as 7/30/2007)CommentMr. Don Klima
-
(printed as 7/6/2007)CommentCharlene Dwin Vaughn
-
(printed as 7/3/2007)CommentEI-3162Norfolk Southern CorporationJames Paschall · Norfolk, VA
-
(printed as 6/29/2007)CommentKara Russell
-
(printed as 6/22/2007)CommentEI-3024Bart Township SupervisorsCalvin Keene · Quarryville, PA
-
(printed as 6/19/2007)CommentEI-3023Martic Township SupervisorsJudy Ament · Pequea, PA
-
(printed as 6/18/2007)CommentDouglas McLearen · Harrisburg, PA
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentJulie Collins
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentEO-579Quarryville BoroughJerry McCarrell
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentEO-578Randolph Harris
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentMr. Tom Sexton
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentEO-576Lancaster Farmland TrustKaren Martynick
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentRalph Goodno
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentDick Schellenberger, etc.
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentJames Paschall
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentEO-572Joyce Nettke
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentPA DOT
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentCraig Eshleman
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentMr. Don Klima
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentCalvin Keene
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentMs. Susan Zacher
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentN. Eugene Lammey
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentC. Williams Shaffer
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentMr. Ellis Ferguson
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentMr. Thomas Irwin
-
(printed as 5/24/2007)CommentTimothy Smedick
-
(printed as 2/27/2007)CommentEI-2844ACHPCharlene Dwin Vaughn
-
(printed as 1/19/2007)CommentMr. Don Klima
-
(printed as 3/18/2005)CommentEI-1427Norfolk SouthernJames Paschall
-
(printed as 3/18/2005)CommentEO-203Norfolk SouthernJames Paschall
-
(printed as 2/22/2005)Notice213366Consummation NoticeNorfolk Southern Corporation
-
(printed as 2/18/2005)Notice213342Consummation NoticeNorfolk Southern Corporation
-
(printed as 1/24/2005)Reply213066ReplyLancaster County, Pa
-
served (printed as 1/19/2005)Decision34987Entire BoardREMOVED THE SECTION 106 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONDITION IMPOSED IN THIS PROCEEDING, IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT'S REMAND IN FRIENDS OF THE ATGLEN-SUSQUEHANNA TRAIL, INC. V. SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BD., 252 F.3D 246 (3D CIR. 2001).
-
(printed as 1/7/2005)Reply212951ReplyFriends Of The Atglen-Susquehanna Trail Inc,
-
(printed as 12/28/2004)RequestLancaster County, Pa
-
(printed as 12/13/2004)Reply212744ReplyConestoga-Martic-Providence-Eden-Bart And Sadsbury Township
-
(printed as 12/13/2004)Reply212738ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/22/2004)Motion212590Motion/Petition/RequestLancaster County, Pa
-
(printed as 9/7/2004)CommentKurt W. Carr, Chief
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)Comment
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentMike Reynolds
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentEO-159Township of SadsburyN. Eugene Lammey
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentJim Landis
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentRails-to-Trails Conservnacy
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)Comment
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentEO-155Township of EdenKaren Hurd
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentEO-154Lancaster CountyBernadette Hohendael
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentHoward "Pete"" Schaub, Molly S. Henderson, and Dick Schellenberger"
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentEO-152Township of ConestogaCraig C. Eshleman
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentEO-151Township of BartCalvin D. Keene
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentEO-150Quarryville BoroughDan Mylin
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentEO-149Lancaster Farmland TrustHeidi J. Shellenger
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentTimothy A. Smedick
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentJoyce A. Nettke, Attorney
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentRalph Goodno
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentJames R. Paschall, General Attorney
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentEO-144Township of MarticJames Hostetter, Jr.
-
(printed as 8/5/2004)CommentEO-143Township of ProvidenceWayne Herr
-
(printed as 7/28/2004)CommentKaren Theimer Brown
-
(printed as 7/1/2004)CommentDon L. Klima, Director
-
served (printed as 6/3/2004)DecisionDENIED THE COUNTY OF LANCASTER, PA'S REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF A NITU.
-
(printed as 5/6/2004)CommentClarification of Section 106 issues.Karen Theimer Brown
-
(printed as 5/6/2004)CommentQuestions and answers related to the Section 106 process.Karen Theimer Brown
-
(printed as 5/6/2004)CommentFreedom of Information Act Request and Response to April 2004 Notice and Final MOA. The letter, written on behalf of FAST, states that FAST will not sign the Final MOA because of concerns regarding historic preservation and the Section 106 process. Attached is a list of sites and resources that is called Examples of the Kinds of Historic and Cultural Resources Likely to be Discovered During Post Review.""Randolph J. Harris · Mount Joy, PA
-
(printed as 5/4/2004)CommentTom Sexton, Director, Northeast Region Office · Harrisburg, PA
-
(printed as 5/3/2004)CommentComment on Final MOA.Susan Zacher
-
(printed as 4/30/2004)CommentComment on Final MOA.Susan Zacher
-
(printed as 4/30/2004)CommentIn response to SEA's April 12, 2004 letter, the Lancaster County Conservancy (concurring party to the Final MOA) has elected not to sign the Final MOA.Ralph H. Goodno, Pesident and CEO
-
(printed as 4/30/2004)CommentIn response to SEA's April 12, 2004 letter, the Historic Preservation Trust (concurring party to the Final MOA) has elected not to sign the Final MOA.Timothy A. Smedick, Executive Director
-
(printed as 4/30/2004)CommentSusan Zacher & Karen Theimer Brown
-
(printed as 4/30/2004)CommentSusan Zacher
-
(printed as 4/29/2004)Comment
-
(printed as 4/28/2004)CommentPatricia A. Tomes
-
served (printed as 4/12/2004)DecisionNOTICE TO THE PARTIES: PURSUANT TO SECTION 106 OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT, THIS NOTICE TO THE PARTIES SUMMARIZES AND RESPONDS TO ALL COMMENTS RECEIVED IN RESPONSE TO THE OCTOBER 2003 NOTICE AND DRAFT MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT (MOA), INCLUDING THOSE THAT FAVOR CONVERTING THIS RAILROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY TO A TRAIL, AND PRESENTS THE FINAL MOA, WHICH SETS FORTH MEASURES FOR MITIGATING ADVERSE EFFECTS OF THE PROPOSED ABANDONMENT ON HISTORIC PROPERTIES.
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentEO-96Township of MarticJames Hostetter, Sr.
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentWayne Herr
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentEO-94Township of SadsburyN. Eugene Lammey
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentJim Landis
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)Comment
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)Comment
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)Comment
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentEO-89Township of EdenKaren Hurd
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentDon Klima
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentJames R. Paschall
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentJoyce A. Nettke
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentTimothy A. Smedick
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentHoward "Pete"" Schaub, Molly S. Henderson, and Dick Schellenberger"
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentRalph Goodno
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentHeidi J. Schellenger
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentEO-81Quarryville BoroughDan Mylin
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentMike Reynolds
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentEO-79Township of BartCalvin D. Keene
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentCraig Eshleman
-
(printed as 4/12/2004)CommentEO-77Lancaster CountyOffice of County Commissioners
-
(printed as 4/1/2004)CommentEI-771Lancaster CountyLetter includes a proposed draft of Principles for Intergovernmental Partnership Agreement.""Office of the County Commissioners
-
(printed as 3/29/2004)Reply210411ReplyPennsylvaiia Lines Llc, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/26/2004)CommentEI-752Martic TownshipAt Frank Peiffer's request, Martic Township faxed newspaper articles regarding the case. Aattched is a March 24, 2004 article Railroad: Get County off Rail Line" and a March 22, 2004 article "In our Opinion...A Matter of Trust.""Judy Ament, Sectretary · Pequea, PA
-
(printed as 3/23/2004)Reply210379Reply - Fax CopyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/23/2004)CommentNS's response to Lancaster County's request for interim trail use. NS states that it is not willing to negotiate with Lancaster County for interim trail use.James R. Paschall, General Attorney · Norfolk, VA
-
(printed as 3/22/2004)Trail210371Trail Use RequestLancaster County, Pa
-
(printed as 3/18/2004)CommentEI-753AmtrakAmtrak describes its rights on the right-of-way (ROW), including an easement. Amtrak also describes the above-ground power lines, which it does not believe would be incompatible with public use of the ROW as a trail, if certain precautions are taken.Peter D. Cohen, Director, Government Affairs · -, -
-
(printed as 3/18/2004)CommentEO-72FASTJoyce A. Nettke, Attorney
-
(printed as 3/17/2004)CommentEI-742Stevens & LeeFax copy of Lancaster County's Petition for Notice of Interim Trail Use and for Reconsideration.""Keneth Zielonis · Harrisburg, PA
-
(printed as 3/3/2004)CommentCongressman Joseph R. Pitts
-
(printed as 2/27/2004)CommentEI-682F.A.S.T.Joyce A. Nettke, Attorney
-
(printed as 2/13/2004)CommentEI-594Lancaster CountyStevens & Lee, P.C., Mr. Kenneth Zielonis
-
(printed as 2/2/2004)CommentCongressman Joseph R. Pitts
-
(printed as 1/23/2004)CommentEI-468Norfolk SouthernJames R. Paschall, General Attorney
-
(printed as 1/23/2004)CommentJames R. Paschall, General Attorney
-
(printed as 1/12/2004)Comment
-
(printed as 1/5/2004)CommentJames R. Paschall
-
(printed as 1/5/2004)CommentPaul Thibault
-
(printed as 12/20/2003)CommentEI-372Eschbach Bus ServiceAl Sama, Director of Operations
-
(printed as 12/19/2003)Comment
-
(printed as 12/15/2003)CommentEI-822AmtrakComments and questions regarding Amtrak's high voltage lines and easement.Peter D. Cohen
-
(printed as 12/9/2003)CommentEO-130AmtrakPeter D. Cohen
-
(printed as 12/8/2003)CommentCarl Knoch, Chairman
-
(printed as 12/8/2003)CommentAllen J. Smith and other members
-
(printed as 12/8/2003)CommentBarbara Long, Secretary
-
(printed as 12/8/2003)CommentEI-341Benjamin R. King
-
(printed as 12/8/2003)CommentEI-340Randolph J. Harris
-
(printed as 12/5/2003)CommentEI-343Dean Baker
-
(printed as 12/4/2003)Comment
-
(printed as 12/4/2003)Comment
-
(printed as 12/3/2003)CommentEI-395Norfolk SouthernJames R. Paschall, General Attorney
-
(printed as 12/3/2003)CommentEI-373Paul Clark
-
(printed as 11/24/2003)CommentHoward Pete" Schaub, Molly S. Henderson, Dick Shellenberger"
-
(printed as 11/24/2003)Comment
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)Comment
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentEI-454Dr. Alan S. Peterson
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentEI-453Benjamin R. King
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentEI-450Charlie H. Wolfinger
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentEI-407Taylor
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentEI-406Paul B. Glazier
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentEI-399David R. Morrison
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentEI-397Penn Manor Girl ScoutsChristine Brubaker
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentEI-394Richard S. Leoup
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentEI-393William R. Miller
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentEI-392Tess Miller
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentEI-391Boy Scout Troop 76Frederic J. Knerr, Scoutmaster
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentEI-390Delores Garrett
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentEI-389George T. Heebner
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentEI-388M. Miller
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentRichard G. Sprenkle, Deputy Secretary for Conservation and Engineering Services
-
(printed as 11/19/2003)CommentGlenn J. Kendig
-
(printed as 11/14/2003)CommentEI-331Duvall Chevrolet, Inc.Robert L. Duvall
-
(printed as 11/12/2003)Letter209378LetterBart Township
-
(printed as 11/12/2003)CommentBrice Obermeyer
-
(printed as 11/12/2003)CommentEI-332Stuart F. Mylin
-
served (printed as 10/20/2003)DecisionTHIS NOTICE TO THE PARTIES RESPONDS TO THE COMMENTS RECEIVED ON THE OCTOBER 24, 2002 NOTICE TO THE PARTIES IN THIS RAIL LINE ABANDONMENT PROCEEDING, DISCUSSES THE POSSIBILITY OF TRAIL USE FOR THE RAIL LINE RIGHT-OF-WAY, DESCRIBES AND SOLICITS COMMENTS ON THE PROPOSED DRAFT MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT PROVIDED AS AN ATTACHMENT TO THIS NOTICE, AND PROVIDES INFORMATION FOR A PUBLIC MEETING TO BE HELD ON NOVEMBER 19, 2003.
-
(printed as 12/30/2002)Reply206966ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 12/26/2002)DecisionNOTICE TO THE PARTIES ADVISING ALL INTERESTED PERSONS THAT COMMENTS ARE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE ON THE BOARD'S WEBSITE, AND MAY BE ACCESSED BY VISITING WWW.STB.DOT.GOV, SELECTING THE 'ECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENT' SECTION, SELECTING 'KEY CASES' FROM THE LIST OF ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES, THEN SELECTING THE CASE TITLED 'ENOLA BRANCH.
-
(printed as 12/16/2002)Comments206863Environmental CommentCounty Of Chester, Pa
-
(printed as 12/9/2002)Comments206792Environmental CommentNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/9/2002)Comments206790Environmental CommentMartic Township Planning Commission
-
(printed as 12/9/2002)Comments206789Environmental CommentSadsbury Township, Providence Township, Eden Township, Martic Township Planning Commission, Conestoga Township, Bart Township
-
(printed as 12/9/2002)Comments206776Environmental CommentFriends Of The Atglen-Susquehanna Trail Inc
-
(printed as 12/2/2002)Comments206743Environmental CommentHoward Groff
-
(printed as 12/2/2002)Comments206742Environmental CommentConestoga Township
-
served (printed as 10/24/2002)DecisionNOTICE TO THE PARTIES: DISCUSSED THE BACKGROUND OF THE ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION PROCEEDING, DESCRIBED THE BOARD'S REINITIATION OF THE NATIONAL HISTORIC PRESERVATION ACT SECTION 106 PROCESS, AND REQUESTED COMMENTS ON SEVERAL SPECIFIC ISSUES.
-
(printed as 1/16/2002)Letter204455LetterConestoga-Martic-Providence-Eden-Bart And Sadsbury Township
-
served (printed as 10/18/1999)Decision30571SecretaryNOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT OCTOBER 7, 1999, INVOLVING THE ABOVE-ENTITLED PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 8/13/1999)Decision30264Entire Board(1) DENIED THE PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION BY FRIENDS OF THE ATGLEN-SUSQUEHANNA TRAIL, INC., (2) TERMINATED THE SECTION 106 PROCESS AND (3) REMOVED THE PREVIOUSLY IMPOSED HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONDITION, AS MODIFIED.
-
served (printed as 10/2/1997)Decision28287Entire Board(1) REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING, (2) MODIFIED THE PREVIOUSLY IMPOSED HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONDITION, AND (3) DENIED THE REQUEST BY FAST TO EXPAND THIS CONDITION TO INCLUDE THE ENTIRE LINE AS A LINEAR RESOURCE.
Nothing of that kind in this docket.