AB 124
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/AB-124 · entries shown: all, newest first
WATERLOO RAILROAD COMPANY ABANDONMENT BETWEEN GILBERTVILLE AND CEDAR RAPIDS IN BLACK HAWK, BURCHANAN, BENTON AND LINN COUNTIES, IA
Caption from the Board’s record. Sub-dockets, included below: AB 124 (Sub-No. 1), AB 124 (Sub-No. 2)
44 filings, 13 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 22:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 6/30/2004)DecisionNOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT JUNE 17, 2004, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT.
-
served (printed as 5/3/2004)DecisionDENIED THE APPLICATION OF THE TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF THE BANGOR AND AROOSTOOK RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. (BAR), WHO HAD SOUGHT A BOARD FINDING THAT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE OR PERMIT THE TERMINATION OF THE RIGHTS OF THE CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY AND ITS SUBSIDIARY WATERLOO RAILWAY COMPANY TO OPERATE OVER A SEGMENT OF TRACK CURRENTLY OWNED BY THE MONTREAL, MAINE & ATLANTIC RAILWAY, LTD., BAR'S SUCESSOR.
-
(printed as 12/30/2003)RebuttalTrustee Of Bangor And Aroostook Railroad Company
-
(printed as 12/12/2003)StatementCanadian National Railway Company, Waterloo Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/11/2003)CommentsFraser Papers Inc
-
(printed as 12/11/2003)CommentsNational Industrial Transportation League
-
(printed as 12/8/2003)MotionCanadian National Railway Company, Waterloo Railway Company
-
served (printed as 12/4/2003)Decision(1) GRANTED FRASER PAPERS, INC.'S (FRASER) MOTION TO REQUIRE DISCLOSURE OF A CONFIDENTIAL VERSION OF JAMES N. HELLER'S VERIFIED STATEMENT (HELLER'S STATEMENT) UNDER THE TERMS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND (2) DIRECTED THAT, WITHIN 3 BUSINESS DAYS OF THE SERVICE OF THIS ORDER, THE TRUSTEE OF THE BANGOR AND AROOSTOOK RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. MUST PROVIDE TO FRASER'S OUTSIDE COUNSEL A CONFIDENTIAL VERSION OF HELLER'S STATEMENT SO THAT IT CAN BE GIVEN TO FRASER'S IN-HOUSE PERSONNEL.
-
served (printed as 11/26/2003)DecisionEXTENDED THE DEADLINE FOR THE SUBMISSION OF PROTESTS AND COMMENTS TO DECEMBER 11, 2003.
-
(printed as 11/25/2003)LetterTrustee Of Bangor And Aroostook Railroad Company
-
(printed as 11/24/2003)Misc.Trustee Of Bangor And Aroostook Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 11/21/2003)DecisionGRANTED THE JOINT REQUEST OF CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY AND FRASER PAPERS, INC. TO EXTEND THE TIME FOR FILING PROTESTS TO THE APPLICATION UNTIL DECEMBER 11, 2003.
-
(printed as 11/20/2003)ReplyMontreal Maine & Atlantic Railway Ltd
-
(printed as 11/20/2003)ReplyTrustee Of Bangor And Aroostook Railroad Company
-
(printed as 11/18/2003)CertificateFraser Papers Inc
-
served (printed as 11/14/2003)DecisionGRANTED, IN PART, THE MOTION OF THE CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY TO COMPEL THE SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS FROM THE MONTREAL, MAINE & ATLANTIC RAILWAY, LLC AND THE TRUSTEE OF THE BANKRUPTCY ESTATE OF THE BANGOR AND AROOSTOOK RAILROAD COMPANY.
-
(printed as 11/14/2003)ReplyTrustee Of Bangor And Aroostook Railroad Company, Et Al
-
(printed as 11/12/2003)LetterCanadian Pacific Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/12/2003)LetterMontreal Maine & Atlantic Railway Ltd
-
(printed as 11/12/2003)RequestFraser Papers Inc, Canadian National Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/12/2003)ReplyCanadian National Railway Company, Waterloo Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/12/2003)RequestFraser Papers Inc, Canadian National Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/12/2003)CorrectionWaerloo Railway Companies, Canadian National Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/6/2003)MotionCanadian Pacific Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/6/2003)ReplyCanadian Pacific Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/6/2003)CertificateCanadian Pacific Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/6/2003)ReplyMontreal Maine & Atlantic Railway Ltd
-
(printed as 11/5/2003)ReplyTrustee Bangor And Aroostook Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/31/2003)LetterCanadian Pacific Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/31/2003)RequestMontreal Maine & Atlantic Railway Ltd
-
(printed as 10/29/2003)AppealCanadian National Railway Company, Waterloo Railway Company
-
served (printed as 10/24/2003)DecisionNOTICE THAT THE TRUSTEE OF THE BANGOR AND AROOSTOOK RAILROAD COMPANY (BAR) FILED AN APPLICATION UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10903 SEEKING: (A) IN STB DOCKET NO. AB-279 (SUB-NO. 3), THE ADVERSE DISCONTINUANCE OF CERTAIN TRACKAGE RIGHTS ACQUIRED BY THE CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY (CN) FROM BAR AND ITS WHOLLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY, THE VAN BUREN BRIDGE COMPANY; AND (B) IN STB DOCKET NO. AB-124 (SUB-NO. 2), THE ADVERSE ABANDONMENT OF THE OPERATING EASEMENT ACQUIRED BY A CN SUBSIDIARY, THE WATERLOO RAILWAY COMPANY OVER THE SAME LINES. THE LINES RUN BETWEEN MADAWASKA, ME, AND THE CANADIAN BORDER, AND SERVE A MILL OWNED BY FRASER PAPERS INC. AT MADAWASKA, ME.
-
(printed as 10/7/2003)ApplicationTrustee Of Bangor And Aroostook Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 9/25/2003)DecisionGRANTED MONTREAL, MAINE & ATLANTIC RAILWAY LTD.'S PETITION TO INTERVENE.
-
(printed as 9/22/2003)MotionMontreal Maine & Atlantic Railway Ltd
-
(printed as 9/4/2003)SupplementTrustee Bangor And Aroostook Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/13/2003)SupplementBangor And Aroostook Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 5/21/2003)DecisionGRANTED A MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ADOPTED THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AND CONFIDENTIALITY UNDERTAKINGS APPENDED TO THIS DECISION.
-
(printed as 5/16/2003)MotionTrustee Of Bangor & Aroostook Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 5/6/2003)DecisionGRANTED, IN PART, THE MOTION OF THE TRUSTEE OF THE BANGOR AND AROOSTOOK RAILROAD COMPANY TO COMPEL CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY REQUEST.
-
served (printed as 5/6/2003)DecisionGRANTED, IN PART, THE MOTION OF THE TRUSTEE OF THE BANGOR AND AROOSTOOK RAILROAD COMPANY TO COMPEL FRASER PAPERS, INC., A SHIPPER, TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY.
-
(printed as 1/10/2003)ReplyCanadian National Railway Company, Waterloo Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/10/2003)ReplyCanadian National Railway Company And Grand Trunk Corporation, Waterloo Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/6/2003)ReplyBangor And Aroostook Railroad Company
-
(printed as 1/6/2003)MotionBangor And Aroostook Railroad Company
-
(printed as 1/6/2003)MotionBangor And Aroostook Railroad Company
-
(printed as 12/30/2002)ReplyCanadian National Railway Company, Waterloo Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/13/2002)ReplyFraser Papers Inc
-
served (printed as 12/12/2002)DecisionDENIED THE TRUSTEE OF THE BANGOR AND AROOSTOOK RAILROAD COMPANY'S (BAR) REQUEST THAT THE BOARD SET DECEMBER 16, 2002 AS THE DUE DATE FOR THE CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY'S REPLY TO BAR'S MOTION TO COMPEL IN CONNECTION WITH DISCOVERY IN THESE PROCEEDINGS.
-
(printed as 12/12/2002)ReplyCanadian National Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/11/2002)ReplyCanadian National Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/9/2002)AppealTrustee Of Bangor And Aroostook Railroad Company, Et Al
-
(printed as 12/6/2002)AppealTrustee Of Bangor And Aroostook Railroad Company, Et Al
-
(printed as 11/14/2002)NoticeTrustee Of Bangor And Aroostock Railroad Company Et Al
-
served (printed as 10/23/2002)Decision(1) GRANTED THE PETITION OF THE TRUSTEE OF THE BANGOR & AROOSTOOK RAILROAD COMPANY (BAR), FOR WAIVER OF CERTAIN REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS, AND EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS, IN CONNECTION WITH AN ADVERSE (THIRD-PARTY) ABANDONMENT APPLICATION THAT BAR INTENDS TO FILE IN STB AB-124 SUB-NO. 2 PROCEEDING; (2) DENIED BAR'S PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE PORTION OF THE BOARD'S PRIOR DECISION SERVED SEPTEMBER 25, 2002, THAT INSTRUCTED BAR ON HOW TO PROCEED IF IT SEEKS TO FILE AN ADVERSE ABANDONMENT APPLICATION IN STB AB-124 SUB-NO. 2; AND (3) ORDERED THAT THESE PROCEEDINGS BE CONSOLIDATED FOR CONCURRENT HANDLING.
-
(printed as 10/21/2002)ReplyWaterloo Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/30/2002)MotionTrustee Of Bangor And Aroostook Railroad Company, Et Al
Nothing of that kind in this docket.