AB 1022
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/AB-1022 · entries shown: all, newest first
This docket has not yet been observed directly in the Board’s dockets table; its entries below come from filings and decisions that name it.
Caption from the Board’s record. Sub-dockets, included below: AB 1022 (Sub-No. 1X)
19 filings, 11 decisions and 8 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 02:36 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC.
Entries
-
(printed as 6/16/2011)TrailArizona & California Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 12/29/2010)DecisionDECISION GRANTED SAN PEDRO TRAILS, INC.'S REQUEST TO EXTEND THE INTERIM TRAIL USE OR ABANDONMENT NEGOTIATING PERIOD TO JUNE 17, 2011.
-
(printed as 12/9/2010)ReplyArizona & California Railroad Company
-
(printed as 12/9/2010)RequestSan Pedro Trails Inc
-
served (printed as 6/21/2010)DecisionDECISION: (1) REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) MODIFIED THE DECISION SERVED ON JUNE 30, 2009.
-
(printed as 6/15/2010)ReplyArizona & California Railroad Company
-
(printed as 6/10/2010)TrailSan Pedro Trails Inc
-
served (printed as 3/30/2010)DecisionDECISION: (1) REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) REMOVED THE SECTION 106 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONDITION IMPOSED IN THE JUNE 30, 2009 DECISION IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 3/2/2010)Comment
-
(printed as 2/24/2010)MotionArizona & California Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 1/14/2010)DecisionDECISION: (1) TERMINATED THE OFFER OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROCESS IN THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) VACATED, TO THE EXTENT DESCRIBED, THE DECISION SERVED ON OCTOBER 28, 2009, IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 12/18/2009)OFABg & Cm Railroad Inc
-
served (printed as 10/28/2009)DecisionDECISION GRANTED THE REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 10/27/2009)RequestBg & Cm Railroad Inc
-
served (printed as 8/21/2009)DecisionDECISION GRANTED THE MOTION TO EXTEND THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 8/13/2009)ReplyBg & Cm Railroad
-
(printed as 8/12/2009)CommentMr. Monroe, NGS, states that there is a single geodetic station marker located in the area of the proposed abandonment.Simon Monroe
-
(printed as 8/10/2009)RequestArizona & California Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 7/29/2009)DecisionDECISION POSTPONED THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE EXEMPTION IN THIS PROCEEDING TO PERMIT THE OFFER OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROCESS TO PROCEED.
-
(printed as 7/22/2009)OFABg & Cm Railroad Inc
-
(printed as 7/17/2009)LetterBg&Cm
-
served (printed as 7/15/2009)DecisionDECISION REJECTED BG&CM RAILROAD, INC.'S OFFER OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE WITHOUT PREJUDICE TO REFILING.
-
(printed as 7/10/2009)OFABg & Cm Railroad Inc
-
served (printed as 6/30/2009)DecisionDECISION GRANTED ARIZONA & CALIFORNIA RAILROAD COMPANY'S PETITION FOR EXEMPTION TO ABANDON A 49.40-MILE RAIL LINE IN SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES, CA, SUBJECT TO AN ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION AND LABOR PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS.
-
(printed as 6/29/2009)CommentJoseph Ontiveros · San Jacinto, CA
-
(printed as 6/15/2009)Comment
-
(printed as 6/9/2009)CommentEI-17774CA Dept of Environment Protection; Department of Toxic Substances Control · in AB 1022 (Sub-No. 1X)Mr. Greg Holmes · Cypress, CA
-
(printed as 5/18/2009)ReplyCommittee For Preservation Of The Rice-Blythe-Ripley Rail Line
-
served (printed as 5/11/2009)DecisionCONCLUDED THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT.
-
(printed as 5/11/2009)ReplyArizona & California Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/11/2009)MotionArizona & California Railroad Company
-
(printed as 5/11/2009)Comment
-
(printed as 4/21/2009)ReplyCommittee For Preservation Of The Rice-Blythe-Ripley Rail Line
-
served (printed as 4/1/2009)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT ARIZONA & CALIFORNIA RAILROAD COMPANY FILED A PETITION FOR EXEMPTION TO ABANDON A 49.40-MILE RAIL LINE IN SAN BERNARDINO AND RIVERSIDE COUNTIES, CA.
-
(printed as 3/26/2009)CertificateArizona & California Railroad Company
-
(printed as 3/16/2009)Comment
-
(printed as 3/12/2009)MotionArizona & California Railroad Company
-
(printed as 11/24/2008)CommentThomas F McFarland · Chicago, IL
Nothing of that kind in this docket.