Display Kept in this browser only
Docket Yard
AbandonmentBefore the Surface Transportation Board

AB 1014

Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/AB-1014 · entries shown: all, newest first

DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAILWAY HISTORICAL FOUNDATION--ADVERSE ABANDONMENT--IN MINERAL COUNTY, CO

Caption from the Board’s record.

51 filings, 7 decisions and 7 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC.

Cite View on stb.gov

Entries

By type (11)
Newest first · oldest first
  1. (printed as 5/24/2011)
    Notice
    229600Consummation Notice
    City Of Creede Colorado
  2. served (printed as 4/28/2009)
    Decision
    39893Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION: (1) REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) REMOVED THE SECTION 106 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONDITION IMPOSED IN THE MAY 2008 DECISION IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  3. (printed as 4/6/2009)
    Comment
    EO-1182Post Post EA
  4. (printed as 4/3/2009)
    Comment
    EI-16734Akin Gump
    Ronald M. Johnson · Washington, DC
  5. served (printed as 5/23/2008)
    Decision
    38878Entire Board
    DECISION GRANTED AN ADVERSE ABANDONMENT APPLICATION FILED BY THE CITY OF CREEDE, CO (THE CITY), SUBJECT TO CERTAIN EMPLOYEE AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS, FOR A 1-MILE PORTION OF RAIL LINE WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS THAT IS OWNED BY THE DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAILWAY HISTORICAL FOUNDATION.
  6. (printed as 4/14/2008)
    Reply
    222078Reply
    City Of Creede Colorado
  7. (printed as 3/24/2008)
    Letter
    221873Letter/Telegram
    Denver & Rio Grande Railway Historical Foundation
  8. (printed as 3/17/2008)
    Reply
    221839Reply
    City Of Creede Colorado
  9. served (printed as 3/4/2008)
    Decision
    38822Director Of Proceedings
    DECISION (1) GRANTED WASON RANCH CORPORATION'S (WASON) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO DENVER & RIO GRANDE RAILWAY HISTORICAL FOUNDATION'S FEBRUARY 5, 2008 LETTER; AND (2) DENIED WASON'S REQUEST TO CONSOLIDATE OR BROADEN THE SCOPE OF THIS PROCEEDING.
  10. (printed as 2/29/2008)
    Reply
    221713Reply
    City Of Creede Colorado
  11. (printed as 2/29/2008)
    Letter
    221710Letter/Telegram
    Denver & Rio Grande Railroad Company, Denver & Rio Grande Railway Historical Foundation
  12. (printed as 2/29/2008)
    Comment
    EO-816Post Environmental Asssessment
    Post Environmental Assessment
  13. (printed as 2/25/2008)
    Letter
    221681Letter/Telegram
    Denver & Rio Grande Railway Historical Foundation, Denver & Rio Grande Railroad Company
  14. (printed as 2/22/2008)
    Correction
    221669Correction
    City Of Creede Colorado
  15. (printed as 2/15/2008)
    Reply
    221627Reply
    City Of Creede Colorado
  16. (printed as 2/14/2008)
    Reply
    221613Reply
    Denver & Rio Grande Historical Foundation
  17. (printed as 2/14/2008)
    Motion
    221610Motion/Petition/Request
    Watson Ranch Corporation
  18. (printed as 2/14/2008)
    Misc.
    221606Miscellaneous
    Denver & Rio Grande Historical Foundation
  19. (printed as 2/14/2008)
    Comment
    EI-5435Robert John Davis
    Having read the case documented in Docket No. AB-1014, I can only conclude that the historical group is in the right. Creede has shown no intention to do anything with the mile of track in question that serves the public good. When there is a group trying to preserve a rail line, should the STB allow adverse abandonment? I think not. If there was not an active effort to operate the line, I might feel differently, but if you rule for Creede, then any operator (common carrier, non-profit) who is busy raising funds for restoration would be under risk of having their ROW taken away. This case should be a slam dunk. Let the current operators get out of the courts and onto the rails. Creede should not be allowed to throw them out. And how, if this track was not already officially abandoned, did Creede build a playground on it? Very odd. Rob Davis
    Red Bank, NJ
  20. (printed as 2/7/2008)
    Comments
    221556Comment
    J. B. Alexander
  21. (printed as 2/7/2008)
    Comments
    221554Comment
    Thomas R. And Genevieve L. Basler
  22. (printed as 2/7/2008)
    Comments
    221553Comment
    Lynn A Anderson
  23. (printed as 2/6/2008)
    Comments
    221551Comment
    F. Stannard And Julie M. Lentz
  24. (printed as 2/6/2008)
    Comments
    221550Comment
    Maurice Lamee
  25. (printed as 2/5/2008)
    Comments
    221536Comment - Fax Copy
    Robert D. Frederick
  26. (printed as 2/5/2008)
    Reply
    221534Reply
    Denver & Rio Grande Railway Historical Foundation
  27. (printed as 2/4/2008)
    Comments
    221516Comment
    David R. Basler
  28. (printed as 2/4/2008)
    Comments
    221515Comment
    Ken And Wendy Leggitt
  29. (printed as 2/4/2008)
    Comments
    221511Comment
    Liz Curry
  30. (printed as 2/1/2008)
    Comments
    221499Comment
    George And Charlene Ameel
  31. (printed as 2/1/2008)
    Comments
    221497Comment
    Damon Clay Gibbons
  32. (printed as 2/1/2008)
    Comments
    221494Comment
    Louise Gray
  33. (printed as 2/1/2008)
    Comments
    221492Comment
    , Anne M. Pizel
  34. (printed as 1/31/2008)
    Statement
    221490Protest/Opposition Statement
    San Luis And Rio Grande Railroad Company
  35. (printed as 1/31/2008)
    Motion
    221489Motion/Petition/Request
    Wason Ranch Corporation
  36. (printed as 1/31/2008)
    Comments
    221488Comment
    Creede Historical Society
  37. (printed as 1/31/2008)
    Comments
    221487Comment
    Peter Calandruccio
  38. (printed as 1/31/2008)
    Comments
    221486Comment
    Betty Jean Myers
  39. (printed as 1/31/2008)
    Statement
    221485Protest/Opposition Statement
    Denver & Rio Grande Railway Historical Foundation
  40. (printed as 1/31/2008)
    Comment
    EI-6214Union Pacific
    Warren Wilson · Omaha, NE
  41. (printed as 1/30/2008)
    Comments
    221473Comment
    Janis G. Jacobs
  42. (printed as 1/30/2008)
    Comments
    221472Comment
    Paul E. Stone
  43. (printed as 1/30/2008)
    Comments
    221471Comment
    Michael S. Lewis
  44. (printed as 1/30/2008)
    Comments
    221470Comment
    John W. And Janet R. Thompson
  45. (printed as 1/30/2008)
    Comments
    221469Comment
    Sharon G. Brown
  46. served (printed as 1/29/2008)
    Decision
    38659Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis
    CONCLUDED THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT.
  47. (printed as 1/29/2008)
    Comments
    221463Comment
    Creede Historical Society
  48. (printed as 1/29/2008)
    Comments
    221462Comment
    Thomas S. Brummett
  49. (printed as 1/29/2008)
    Comments
    221461Comment
    Rincon Real Estate
  50. (printed as 1/29/2008)
    Comments
    221459Comment
    Rose Odom
  51. (printed as 1/28/2008)
    Comments
    221415Comment
    Ron C. Fief
  52. (printed as 1/28/2008)
    Comments
    221413Comment
    Stephen Quiller
  53. (printed as 1/23/2008)
    Comments
    221341Comment
    Avery Augur
  54. (printed as 1/11/2008)
    Comment
    EI-3467Akin Gump
    Ronald Johnson · Washington, DC
  55. (printed as 1/10/2008)
    Supplement
    221239Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    City Of Creede Colorado
  56. served (printed as 1/4/2008)
    Decision
    38681Director Of Proceedings
    PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE CITY OF CREEDE, CO FILED AN APPLICATION TO AUTHORIZE THE THIRD-PARTY OR ADVERSE ABANDONMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 1.0 MILE OF RAIL LINE IN MINERAL COUNTY, CO.
  57. (printed as 12/21/2007)
    Comment
    EO-768Accep/Reject Memo
  58. served (printed as 12/20/2007)
    Decision
    38609Secretary
    DECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING.
  59. (printed as 12/17/2007)
    Application
    221048Application
    City Of Creede Colorado
  60. (printed as 11/29/2007)
    Motion
    220846Motion For Protective Order
    Denver & Rio Grande Historical Foundation, City Of Creede Colorado
    in the protective-order register
  61. (printed as 11/16/2007)
    Certificate
    220708Certificate Of Publication
    Concerned Citizens Of Creede And Mineral County, Colorado
  62. served (printed as 10/18/2007)
    Decision
    38192Entire Board
    DECISION GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART THE CITY OF CREEDE, CO'S (THE CITY) PETITION SEEKING EXEMPTIONS FROM SEVERAL STATUTORY PROVISIONS AND WAIVERS OF CERTAIN REGULATIONS PERTAINING TO ITS INTENT TO FILE A THIRD-PARTY APPLICATION FOR 'ADVERSE' ABANDONMENT OF APPROXIMATELY 1.0-MILE OF RAIL LINE IN THE CITY.
  63. (printed as 6/19/2007)
    Reply
    219586Reply
    Denver & Rio Grande Historical Foundation
  64. (printed as 6/12/2007)
    Correction
    219516Correction
    City Of Creede Colorado
  65. (printed as 6/6/2007)
    Motion
    219474Petition For Waiver
    City Of Creede Colorado