WCC 104
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/WCC-104 · entries shown: all, newest first
TRAILER BRIDGE, INC. V. SEA STAR LINES, LLC
Caption from the Board’s record.
1 filing, 10 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 22:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 4/30/2002)Decision32693SecretaryDISMISSED TRAILER BRIDGE'S COMPLAINT WITH PREDJUDICE, AND DISCONTINUED THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 4/5/2002)MotionTrailer Bridge Inc
-
served (printed as 10/4/2001)Decision(1) ORDERED SEA STAR TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER BY OCTOBER 15, 2001; (2) GRANTED THE SECOND MOTION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF ORDERS COMPELLING DISCOVERY AND RENEWED REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS TO THE EXTENT SPECIFIED IN THIS ORDER; AND (3) DENIED THE REQUEST FOR SANCTIONS.
-
served (printed as 9/20/2001)DecisionNOTICE THAT AN ORAL ARGUMENT ON THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AT 10:00 A.M. ON OCTOBER 3, 2001, IN A HEARING ROOM OF THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, 888 FIRST STREET, N. E., WASHINGTON, D. C. 20426.
-
served (printed as 6/12/2001)Decision31925SecretaryASSIGNED DISCOVERY DISPUTES IN THIS PROCEEDING TO ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE CARMEN A. CINTRON.
-
served (printed as 5/15/2001)Decision31764Entire Board(1) DENIED COMPLAINANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL AS MOOT AND THE MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; (2) ORDERED DEFENDANT TO COMPLY WITH THE BOARD'S OCTOBER 27, 2001 DECISION WITHIN 20 DAYS FROM THE SERVICE DATE OF THIS DECISION; (3) DENIED DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION TO COMPEL AND FOR SANCTIONS AS MOOT; AND (4) APPOINTED AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE TO OVERSEE ANY FURTHER DISCOVERY DISPUTES.
-
served (printed as 10/27/2000)Decision30947Entire Board(1) DENIED THE PARTIES REQUEST FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE; (2) GRANTED COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE OUT OF TIME; (3) GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART COMPLAINANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY; AND (4) DENIED AS PREMATURE DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY.
-
served (printed as 5/10/2000)Decision30980SecretaryADOPTED THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AND CONFIDENTIALITY UNDERTAKING PROPOSED BY SEA STAR, EXCEPT AS DISCUSSED HEREIN, THAT ORDER APPEARS IN THE APPENDIX ATTACHED.
-
served (printed as 5/1/2000)Decision31007SecretarySUSPENDED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING PENDING FURTHER ORDER OF THE BOARD.
-
served (printed as 1/13/2000)Decision30759Secretary--
-
served (printed as 12/10/1999)Decision30491Entire Board--
Nothing of that kind in this docket.