NOR 42130
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/NOR-42130 · entries shown: all, newest first
SUNBELT CHLOR ALKALI PARTNERSHIP V. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Caption from the Board’s record.
64 filings, 20 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 9/7/2016)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE FOLLOWING COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON AUGUST 26, 2016, IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT.
-
served (printed as 6/30/2016)Decision45039Entire BoardDECISION MODIFIED A PRIOR DECISION AND FOUND THAT CHALLENGED RATES HAVE NOT BEEN DEMONSTRATED TO BE UNREASONABLY HIGH.
-
(printed as 6/29/2015)SubstitutionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/9/2014)Reply236633ReplySunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 9/9/2014)Reply236629ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 8/8/2014)DecisionDECISION EXTENDED THE DEADLINE FOR FILING REPLIES TO THE PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION IN THIS PROCEEDING UNTIL SEPTEMBER 9, 2014.
-
(printed as 8/5/2014)Motion236405Motion/Petition/RequestSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 7/30/2014)MotionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/30/2014)MotionSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 7/30/2014)Motion236370Motion/Petition/RequestSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 7/25/2014)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE PAGE LIMITS FOR PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 7/16/2014)Reply236326ReplySunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 7/16/2014)Reply236325ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/14/2014)Motion236312Motion/Petition/RequestSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
served (printed as 7/2/2014)DecisionDECISION GRANTED THE JOINT MOTION REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION IN THIS PROCEEDING UNTIL JULY 30, 2014.
-
(printed as 6/27/2014)Motion236249Motion/Petition/RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company, Sunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
served (printed as 6/20/2014)Decision43849Entire BoardDECISION FOUND THAT THE COMPLAINING SHIPPER DID NOT HAVE A FEASIBLE SHIPPING ALTERNATIVE TO DEFENDANT RAILROAD FOR THE TRANSPORTATION AT ISSUE, BUT THE CHALLENGED RATES HAVE NOT BEEN DEMONSTRATED TO BE UNREASONABLY HIGH UNTIL THE YEAR 2021.
-
(printed as 6/20/2014)Motion236209Motion/Petition/RequestNorfolk Southern Corporation
-
(printed as 8/15/2013)Reply234685ReplySunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 7/26/2013)Brief234588BriefNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/26/2013)Motion234586Motion To StrikeNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/26/2013)Brief234584BriefSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
served (printed as 7/15/2013)Decision43219Entire BoardDECISION SETS A 60-PAGE LIMIT ON FINAL BRIEFS AND EXTENDS THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE BY ONE WEEK.
-
(printed as 7/10/2013)Reply234526ReplySunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 7/9/2013)Errata234517Errata SheetSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 7/8/2013)Motion234510Motion/Petition/RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 7/3/2013)DecisionDECISION DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO LIMIT THEIR CLOSING BRIEFS IN THIS PROCEEDING TO 30 PAGES, INCLUDING EXHIBITS.
-
(printed as 6/3/2013)Rebuttal234353RebuttalSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
served (printed as 3/27/2013)Decision42995Entire BoardDECISION DENIED AS MOOT A REQUEST TO CLARIFY WHICH PARTY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE COST OF A LICENSE TO CERTAIN MODELING SOFTWARE FOR COMPLAINANTS' USE IN THESE PROCEEDINGS.
-
served (printed as 3/8/2013)DecisionDECISION GRANTED COMPLAINANTS' REQUEST TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED.
-
(printed as 3/5/2013)Motion233907Motion/Petition/RequestCorn Refiners Association
-
(printed as 2/27/2013)Reply233850ReplySunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 2/22/2013)Reply233842ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/22/2013)Motion233840Motion/Petition/RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/14/2013)Reply233803ReplyE.I. Dupont De Nemours And Company, Sunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 2/13/2013)Letter233794LetterNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/11/2013)Letter233785LetterSurface Transportation Board
-
(printed as 1/25/2013)Letter233728LetterNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/25/2013)Motion233722PetitionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/7/2013)Reply233641ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 12/7/2012)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A REQUEST BY NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 12/5/2012)Motion233455Motion/Petition/RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 11/29/2012)Decision42675Entire BoardDECISION DENIED A REQUEST TO PLACE ON HOLD TWO RATE PROCEEDINGS WHILE THE BOARD, IN A SEPARATE PROCEEDING, CONSIDERS MODIFYING SOME OF ITS RULES AND PROCEDURES IN RATE CASES.
-
served (printed as 11/1/2012)DecisionDECISION GRANTED NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
(printed as 10/23/2012)Motion233244Motion/Petition/RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/11/2012)Reply233177ReplySunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 9/21/2012)Motion233016Motion/Petition/RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/1/2012)Statement232634Opening StatementSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
served (printed as 6/5/2012)DecisionDECISION GRANTED NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW ITS PETITION FOR SUBPOENA WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
-
served (printed as 5/25/2012)DecisionDECISION GRANTED THE MOTION OF SUNBELT CHLOR ALKALI PARTNERSHIP TO DISMISS ITS COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE AND TO WITHDRAW, AS MOOT, ITS 'MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION THAT COMPLAINANT IS ENTITLED TO PRESCRIPTION OF REASONABLE JOINT RATE,' FILED ON DECEMBER 6, 2011.
-
(printed as 5/24/2012)Answer232357AnswerNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/15/2012)Motion232304Motion To WithdrawNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/7/2012)Errata232271Errata SheetSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 5/4/2012)SupplementSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 5/4/2012)MotionSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
served (printed as 4/25/2012)DecisionDECISION APPROVED A MOTION TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 4/20/2012)Motion232223Motion/Petition/RequestSunbelt Chlor Alkali PartnershipSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 4/9/2012)Letter232168LetterSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 3/2/2012)Misc.231942MiscellaneousThompson Hine Llp, Etal
-
(printed as 2/23/2012)Letter231892Letter/TelegramNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/21/2012)Correction231871CorrectionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/16/2012)Reply231863ReplyOccidental Chemical Corporation
-
(printed as 2/16/2012)Reply231862ReplyOxyvinyls Llp
-
(printed as 2/16/2012)Reply231856ReplySunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 1/27/2012)Motion231767Motion/Petition/RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/9/2012)Reply231639ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/6/2012)Reply231624ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 1/6/2012)Reply231621ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/19/2011)Motion231513Motion/Petition/RequestSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
served (printed as 12/16/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A MOTION TO CONTINUE THE STAY OF PROCEEDINGS ON UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL DISMISSAL AND TO EXTEND THE DUE DATE FOR REPLIES FOR CLARIFICATION UNTIL JANUARY 6, 2012.
-
(printed as 12/13/2011)Reply231480ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/12/2011)RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Sunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/6/2011)Reply231427ReplySunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 12/6/2011)Motion231426Motion/Petition/RequestSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
served (printed as 11/21/2011)DecisionDECISION ESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 11/15/2011)Motion231295Motion/Petition/RequestSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
served (printed as 10/5/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A JOINT MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF THE MEDIATION PERIOD AND A PARTIAL STAY OF THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 10/3/2011)RequestSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/26/2011)Motion230994Motion/Petition/RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 9/6/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 8/22/2011)MotionNorfolk Southern Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Sunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
-
(printed as 8/15/2011)Answer230814AnswerUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 8/15/2011)Answer230813AnswerNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/26/2011)Complaint230693ComplaintSunbelt Chlor Alkali Partnership
Nothing of that kind in this docket.