NOR 42123
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/NOR-42123 · entries shown: all, newest first
M&G POLYMERS USA, LLC V. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Caption from the Board’s record.
77 filings, 12 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 22:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 1/7/2013)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A REQUEST TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE FOR PAST AND FUTURE MOVEMENTS UNDER THE CHALLENGED RATES, THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2015, AND TO DISCONTINUE THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 12/27/2012)MotionM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 12/21/2012)Motion233576Petition For StayCsx Transportation Inc, M & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 12/13/2012)Reply233502ReplyM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 12/13/2012)MotionM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 12/13/2012)Motion233498Motion/Petition/RequestM & G Polymers Usa, Llc, Csx Transportation Inc
-
served (printed as 12/7/2012)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT A PRIOR DECISION IS BEING UPDATED WITH THE PUBLIC VERSION OF AN APPENDIX SUBMITTED BY THE PARTIES ON NOVEMBER 13, 2012.
-
(printed as 12/4/2012)Motion233451Motion/Petition/RequestCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 11/29/2012)Motion233425Motion/Petition/RequestAssociation Of American Railroads
-
(printed as 11/29/2012)Motion233424Motion/Petition/RequestBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/28/2012)Comments233416CommentWestern Coal Traffic League
-
(printed as 11/28/2012)Comments233413CommentBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/28/2012)Comments233411CommentAlliance For Rail Competition, Montana Wheat & Barley Committee, Colorado Wheat Administrative Committee, Idaho Barley Commission, Idaho Wheat Commission, Montana Farmers Union, Nebraska Wheat Board, Oklahoma Wheat Commission, South Dakota Wheat Commission, Texas Wheat Producer Board, And Washington Grain Commission,
-
(printed as 11/28/2012)Motion233410Motion/Petition/RequestWestern Coal Traffic League
-
(printed as 11/28/2012)Comments233408CommentNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/28/2012)Motion233407Motion/Petition/RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/28/2012)Comments233406CommentCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 11/28/2012)Comments233404CommentAssociation Of American Railroads
-
(printed as 11/28/2012)Comments233403CommentArkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation
-
(printed as 11/28/2012)Comments233402CommentUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 11/28/2012)Comments233398CommentM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 11/28/2012)Comments233397CommentAmicus Consumers United For Rail Equity
-
(printed as 11/13/2012)Misc.233338MiscellaneousM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 11/6/2012)Reply233308ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
served (printed as 10/25/2012)Decision42722Entire BoardDECISION GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.'S MOTION TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS STAND-ALONE COST PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 10/17/2012)Motion233209Petition To ReopenM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 10/16/2012)Letter233196Letter/TelegramBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/11/2012)Reply233173ReplyM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 10/9/2012)Letter233180LetterUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 10/9/2012)Letter233145Letter/TelegramNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/9/2012)Reply233121ReplyM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 10/2/2012)RequestCsx Transportation Inc
-
served (printed as 9/27/2012)Decision41926Entire BoardDECISION CONCLUDES THAT CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. POSSESSES MARKET DOMINANCE WITH RESPECT TO 36 OF THE 42 RATES CHALLENGED BY M&G POLYMERS USA, LLC AND LACKS MARKET DOMINANCE WITH RESPECT TO THE OTHER SIX.
-
served (printed as 8/23/2012)DecisionDECISION HOLDS IN ABEYANCE THE MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FILED ON AUGUST 2, 2012, BY M&G POLYMERS USA, LLC.
-
(printed as 8/13/2012)Reply232744ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 8/2/2012)Motion232638Motion To CompelM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 3/22/2012)Letter232092LetterM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 3/2/2012)Misc.231941MiscellaneousThompson Hine Llp, Etal
-
(printed as 10/14/2011)Reply231104ReplyM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 9/30/2011)Motion231016Motion To StrikeCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 9/7/2011)Errata230923Errata SheetM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 8/23/2011)Errata230859Errata SheetM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 8/4/2011)Rebuttal230767RebuttalM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 7/5/2011)Reply230565ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 6/9/2011)Errata229832Errata SheetM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 6/7/2011)Motion229733Motion/Petition/RequestM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 6/7/2011)Statement229731Opening StatementM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 6/7/2011)Reply229725ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 5/11/2011)Report229496Status ReportM & G Polymers Usa, Llc, Csx Transportation Inc
-
served (printed as 5/6/2011)Decision41521Entire BoardDECISION GRANTED A MOTION FILED BY CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. FOR EXPEDITED DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION OVER THE CHALLENGED RATES ESTABLISHED BY CSXT FOR THE TRANSPORTATION OF POLYETHYLENE TEREPHTHALATE BETWEEN 69 ORIGIN AND DESTINATION PAIRS. IN A FUTURE DECISION, THE BOARD WILL DETERMINE WHETHER CSXT FACES EFFECTIVE COMPETITION FROM OTHER TRANSPORTATION PROVIDERS. IF THE BOARD FINDS THAT CSXT HAS MARKET DOMINANCE OVER SOME OR ALL OF THE CHALLENGED RATES, IT WILL THEN SET A SCHEDULE FOR THE PARTIES TO SUBMIT EVIDENCE ON THE MAXIMUM REASONABLE RATES.
-
(printed as 4/19/2011)Letter229332Letter/TelegramM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 4/19/2011)Reply229320ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 4/15/2011)Motion229286Motion To WithdrawM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 3/16/2011)Motion229002Motion/Petition/RequestM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 2/25/2011)Letter228899LetterM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
served (printed as 2/24/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A MOTION TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE AND SET A NEW PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 2/18/2011)Reply228861ReplyM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 2/15/2011)Reply228830ReplyM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 2/11/2011)Reply228824ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
served (printed as 2/4/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED M&G POLYMERS USA, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS ITS COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE AGAINST SOUTH CAROLINA CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY AND ALSO GRANTED A MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.'S MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DETERMINATION OF JURISDICTION OVER CHALLENGED RATES.
-
(printed as 2/1/2011)RequestM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 2/1/2011)Errata228729Errata SheetM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 1/31/2011)SupplementM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 1/27/2011)Motion228691Motion/Petition/RequestCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 1/27/2011)MotionM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 1/10/2011)Motion228612Motion/Petition/RequestM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
served (printed as 12/23/2010)Decision41294Entire BoardDECISION DENIED M&G POLYMERS USA, LLC'S APPEAL OF A DECISION SERVED ON NOVEMBER 24, 2010, WHICH DENIED M&G'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY FROM CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
-
(printed as 12/14/2010)Reply228441ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 12/9/2010)Reply228412ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 12/9/2010)Reply228401ReplyM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 12/3/2010)Reply228368ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 11/30/2010)Appeal228345AppealM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
served (printed as 11/24/2010)DecisionDECISION: (1) GRANTED M&G POLYMERS USA, LLC'S (M&G) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE ITS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT IN THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) DENIED M&G'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY.
-
(printed as 11/19/2010)Motion228281Motion/Petition/RequestSouth Carolina Central Railroad Company
-
(printed as 11/19/2010)MotionSouth Carolina Central Railroad Company
-
(printed as 11/15/2010)Reply228237ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 11/8/2010)Reply228158ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 11/8/2010)Answer228157AnswerSouth Carolina Central Railroad Company
-
(printed as 11/4/2010)Motion228130Motion To CompelM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 10/18/2010)Motion227998Motion/Petition/RequestM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 9/7/2010)Reply227746ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 8/16/2010)SupplementM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
served (printed as 8/4/2010)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE AND PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 7/22/2010)DecisionDECISION GRANTED M&G POLYMERS USA, LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS ITS COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE AGAINST CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY COMPANY.
-
(printed as 7/22/2010)Motion227476Motion/Petition/RequestM & G Polymers Usa, Llc, Csx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 7/22/2010)MotionM & G Polymers Usa, Llc, Csx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 7/8/2010)Answer227404AnswerCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 7/6/2010)MotionM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
-
(printed as 6/18/2010)Complaint227307ComplaintM & G Polymers Usa, Llc
Nothing of that kind in this docket.