NOR 42120
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/NOR-42120 · entries shown: all, newest first
CARGILL, INCORPORATED V. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY
Caption from the Board’s record.
35 filings, 12 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 23:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 10/24/2013)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 8/12/2013)Decision42719Entire BoardDECISION: (1) DENIED CARGILL'S REQUEST TO SUPPLEMENT ITS COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE; AND (2) DISMISSED THE COMPLAINT AND DISCONTINUED THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 5/25/2012)Decision42077Entire BoardDECISION DENIED A PETITION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION FILED BY CARGILL, INCORPORATED OF THE BOARD'S JANUARY 4, 2011 DECISION.
-
(printed as 4/13/2012)SupplementCargill Corporation
-
(printed as 4/2/2012)Brief232152BriefCargill Incorporated
-
(printed as 4/2/2012)Brief232147BriefBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 3/1/2012)DecisionDECISION GRANTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S PETITION FOR THE SIMULTANEOUS FILING OF FINAL BRIEFS.
-
(printed as 12/21/2011)Reply231544ReplyCargill Incorporated
-
(printed as 12/13/2011)Motion231485Motion/Petition/RequestBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/23/2011)Rebuttal231336RebuttalCargill Incorporated
-
(printed as 10/24/2011)Reply231165ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/25/2011)Statement230872Opening StatementCargill Incorporated
-
served (printed as 7/19/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A MODIFIED JOINT MOTION TO REVISE THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING FILED BY CARGILL, INCORPORATED AND BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY.
-
(printed as 7/12/2011)Motion230601Motion/Petition/RequestBnsf Railway Company, Cargill Incorporated
-
served (printed as 6/24/2011)DecisionDECISION GRANTED CARGILL'S REQUEST TO WITHDRAW ITS MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
-
(printed as 6/6/2011)Motion229699Motion To WithdrawCargill Incorporated
-
(printed as 4/15/2011)Reply229301ReplyCargill Incorporated
-
served (printed as 4/13/2011)DecisionDECISION DIRECTED CARGILL, INCORPORATED TO RESPOND TO BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S APRIL 11, 2011 REPLY BY APRIL 15, 2011.
-
(printed as 4/13/2011)RequestCargill Incorporated, Bnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/11/2011)Reply229180ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 4/8/2011)Decision41387Entire BoardDECISION (1) HELD BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY ON DAMAGES-RELATED ISSUES IN ABEYANCE UNTIL THE BOARD RULES ON THE MERITS OF CARGILL, INCORPORATED'S COMPLAINT, AND (2) SUSPENDS THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING PENDING FURTHER ORDER OF THE BOARD.
-
(printed as 3/31/2011)Motion229081Motion To CompelCargill Incorporated
-
(printed as 3/25/2011)Motion229042Motion/Petition/RequestCargill Incorporated, Bnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 3/24/2011)DecisionDECISION: (1) DETERMINED THAT THE MOTION TO COMPEL FILED BY BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF) WILL BE RULED BY THE ENTIRE BOARD; (2) DENIED CARGILL INCORPORATED'S REQUEST TO REJECT BNSF'S LETTER FILED ON MARCH 16, 2011; AND (3) DENIED BNSF'S REQUEST FOR A DISCOVERY CONFERENCE.
-
(printed as 3/23/2011)SupplementBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/17/2011)Motion229005Motion/Petition/RequestCargill Incorporated
-
(printed as 3/16/2011)Motion228998Motion/Petition/RequestBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/14/2011)Reply228986ReplyCargill Incorporated
-
(printed as 3/4/2011)Letter228934LetterCargill Incorporated
-
(printed as 3/4/2011)SupplementCargill Incorporated
-
(printed as 3/3/2011)Motion228922Motion To CompelBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/22/2011)Letter228873Letter/TelegramBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/14/2011)SupplementCargill Incorporated
-
(printed as 2/7/2011)Reply228775ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/24/2011)Motion228669Motion/Petition/RequestCargill Incorporated
-
(printed as 1/7/2011)Motion228596Motion To WithdrawCargill Incorporated
-
served (printed as 1/4/2011)Decision40959Entire BoardDECISION GRANTED BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S (BNSF) MOTION TO DISMISS CARGILL, INC.'S CLAIM THAT BNSF IS DOUBLE RECOVERING REVENUE FROM A FUEL SURCHARGE, AND DENIED BNSF'S MOTION TO DISMISS CARGILL'S CLAIM THAT BNSF IS EARNING EXCESSIVE PROFITS FROM THE SURCHARGE.
-
(printed as 1/3/2011)Letter228563Letter/TelegramCargill Incorporated
-
served (printed as 6/24/2010)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 6/17/2010)Reply227295ReplyCargill Incorporated
-
served (printed as 6/16/2010)DecisionDECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 5/28/2010)Motion227177Motion/Petition/RequestBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/26/2010)Motion227160Motion/Petition/RequestBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/24/2010)Motion
-
(printed as 5/24/2010)Motion227140Motion/Petition/RequestCargill Incorporated
-
(printed as 5/10/2010)Answer227025AnswerBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/19/2010)Complaint226842ComplaintCargill Incorporated
Nothing of that kind in this docket.