NOR 42113
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/NOR-42113 · entries shown: all, newest first
ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. V. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Caption from the Board’s record. Sub-dockets, included below: NOR 42113 (Sub-No. 1)
55 filings, 25 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 3/28/2018)Decision46321Entire BoardDECISION REMOVED THIS PROCEEDING FROM ABEYANCE AND REINSTITUTED THE RATE PRESCRIPTION FOR 2017-2018.
-
served (printed as 12/20/2017)Decision46199Entire BoardDECISION REINSTITUTED THE RATE PRESCRIPTION IN THIS PROCEEDING FOR 2015, USING 2015 FINANCIAL DATA.
-
served (printed as 8/19/2016)Decision45335Entire BoardDECISION REINSTITUTED THE RATE PRESCRIPTION IN THIS PROCEEDING FOR 2014, USING 2014 FINANCIAL DATA. THE BOARD CONTINUES TO HOLD THIS CASE IN ABEYANCE FOR 2015-2018, TO ALLOW THE ASSET MARKUP RESULTING FROM THE BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY, INC. ACQUISITION OF BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY TO BE FULLY REFLECTED IN THE VARIABLE COSTS AND THE RATE PRESCRIPTION.
-
served (printed as 9/2/2015)Decision44635Entire BoardDECISION CLARIFIED ITS EARLIER DECISION BY DIRECTING THE PARTIES, FOR PURPOSES OF THE 2010-2013 RATE PRESCRIPTION CALCULATION, TO USE THE CORRECTED UNIFORM RAILROAD COSTING SYSTEM (URCS) COSTS, OR IF THERE ARE NO CORRECTED URCS COSTS, THE MOST RECENT AVAILABLE URCS COSTS FOR THE CORRESPONDING YEAR.
-
(printed as 6/12/2015)Reply238622ReplyArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 5/29/2015)MotionUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 5/14/2015)Decision44298Entire BoardDECISION: (1) REINSTITUTED THE RATE PRESCRIPTION IN THIS PROCEEDING FOR THE YEARS 2009-2013, USING THE MOST RECENT, CORRECTED FINANCIAL DATA AVAILABLE TO THE BOARD TO RESTATE THE BNSF AND WESTERN REGION VARIABLE COSTS FOR 2010-2012, AND USING THE MOST RECENTLY AVAILABLE 2013 DATA; AND (2) CONTINUE TO HOLD THIS CASE IN ABEYANCE FOR 2014-2018, TO ALLOW THE ASSET MARKUP RESULTING FROM THE BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY ACQUISITION OF BNSF TO BE FULLY REFLECTED IN BNSF'S VARIABLE COSTS AND THE RATE PRESCRIPTION.
-
(printed as 12/30/2014)Notice237359NoticeUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 12/30/2014)Notice237352NoticeUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 9/23/2013)Reply234872ReplyArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 9/23/2013)Comments234871CommentBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/23/2013)Comments234870CommentUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 7/25/2013)Decision42914Entire BoardDECISION DIRECTED PARTIES TO CONFER AND COMMENT ON APPROACHES TO REINSTITUTE THE RATE PRESCRIPTION IN THIS PROCEEDING BY SEPTEMBER 23, 2013.
-
served (printed as 6/15/2012)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 5/22/2012)Decision42337Entire BoardDECISION DENIED A PETITION FILED BY ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC., WHICH REQUESTED THAT THE BOARD ORDER BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY TO PUBLISH JOINT RATES TO COMPLY WITH A DECISION SERVED ON NOVEMBER 22, 2012.
-
served (printed as 4/27/2012)Decision42338Entire BoardDECISION ORDERED THE DEFENDANT CARRIERS TO PAY REPARATIONS IN THE AMOUNT OF $9,244,143.90, WITH INTEREST ACCRUING FROM DECEMBER 30, 2011, UNTIL THE DATE OF PAYMENT.
-
(printed as 3/20/2012)Motion232078Motion/Petition/RequestArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 1/30/2012)Reply231771ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 1/30/2012)Reply231770ReplyBnsf Railway Company
-
served (printed as 1/26/2012)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 1/25/2012)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 1/25/2012)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 1/20/2012)Decision42164Entire BoardDECISION: (1) FOUND THAT CHANGED CIRCUMSTANCES JUSTIFIED REOPENING THIS PROCEEDING; (2) TEMPORARILY LIFTED THE PRESCRIPTIVE EFFECT OF THE RATE PRESCRIPTIONS IN THIS CASE; AND (3) HELD THIS PROCEEDING IN ABEYANCE, REGARDING AN ISSUE RAISED IN A PETITION TO REOPEN ONLY, PENDING FINAL RESOLUTION OF THE ISSUES RAISED IN DOCKET NO. FD 35506.
-
(printed as 1/9/2012)Motion231641Motion/Petition/RequestArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 12/20/2011)Motion231536Petition To ReopenArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
served (printed as 11/22/2011)Decision41181Entire BoardDECISION FOUND THAT ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC. (AEPCO) DOES NOT HAVE A FEASIBLE SHIPPING ALTERNATIVE FOR THE TRANSPORTATION AT ISSUE. IN ADDITION, THIS DECISION FOUND THAT THE CHALLENGED RATES BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF) AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY (UP) CHARGES AEPCO ARE UNREASONABLY HIGH. AS A RESULT, THIS DECISION PRESCRIBED MAXIMUM REASONABLE RATES FOR FUTURE AT-ISSUE SHIPMENTS AND ORDERS BNSF AND UP TO PAY REPARATIONS FOR PAST, EXCESSIVE CHARGES.
-
(printed as 8/1/2011)Errata230744Errata SheetUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Bnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/21/2011)Rebuttal230654RebuttalArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 7/19/2011)Reply230644ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Bnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/5/2011)SupplementArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
served (printed as 6/27/2011)Decision41696Entire BoardDECISION DIRECTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT NEW COSTING EVIDENCE IN THIS RAIL RATE REASONABLENESS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 5/31/2011)Decision41652Entire BoardDECISION DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO ATTEND A TECHNICAL CONFERENCE WITH THE BOARD'S STAFF TO DISCUSS VARIOUS ASPECTS OF THE COSTING EVIDENCE SUBMITTED IN THIS RAIL RATE REASONABLENESS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 4/15/2011)DecisionDECISION: (1) GRANTED ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.'S MOTION DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE ITS COMPLAINT AGAINST UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY; AND (2) DISCONTINUED THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 3/24/2011)MotionArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
served (printed as 11/3/2010)DecisionPROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE BOARD WILL NOT POSE ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS BASED ON THE ORAL ARGUMENT HELD ON SEPTEMBER 28, 2010.
-
(printed as 10/22/2010)Reply228046ReplyArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 10/18/2010)Motion228000Motion/Petition/RequestBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/28/2010)Oral227884Oral Argument ExhibitsArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 9/21/2010)Letter227839LetterArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 9/21/2010)Letter227838LetterBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/29/2010)Brief227541BriefArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 7/29/2010)Brief227538BriefUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Bnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/13/2010)Errata227428Errata SheetArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 7/1/2010)Rebuttal227380RebuttalArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 7/1/2010)Rebuttal227379RebuttalArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
served (printed as 6/15/2010)DecisionDECISION MODIFIED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 6/9/2010)RequestArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 6/8/2010)Errata227256Errata SheetUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Bnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/7/2010)Reply226998ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Bnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/25/2010)Statement226351Opening StatementArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 1/11/2010)SupplementArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
served (printed as 1/8/2010)DecisionDECISION REVISED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 1/4/2010)RequestArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
served (printed as 11/5/2009)Decision40360SecretaryDECISION (1) GRANTED ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.'S SECOND MOTION TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) MODIFIED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 10/30/2009)RequestArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 9/11/2009)Report225723Status ReportUnion Pacific Railroad Company, Arizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc, Bnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 8/25/2009)SupplementArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 7/1/2009)ReportUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 6/1/2009)Decision40012SecretaryDECISION GRANTED ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.'S MOTION TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 5/20/2009)RequestArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 5/6/2009)NoticeUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 4/23/2009)DecisionDECISION ORDERED A PORTION OF ARIZONA ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE, INC.'S (AEPCO'S) RATE REASONABLENESS COMPLAINT TO BE HELD IN ABEYANCE PENDING A DETERMINATION BY THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA AS TO WHETHER, AND TO WHAT EXTENT, A RAIL TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT EXISTS BETWEEN UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY AND AEPCO FOR TRAFFIC ORIGINATING IN COLORADO AND WYOMING'S SOUTHERN POWDER RIVER BASIN (SPRB). THIS DECISION ALSO MOVED THE COLORADO/SPRB PORTION OF AEPCO'S RATE COMPLAINT TO A SUB-DOCKET OF THIS PROCEEDING AND ORDERED THAT AEPCO'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY BE HELD IN ABEYANCE PENDING A BOARD DECISION TO RESUME THE NEWLY SUB-DOCKETED PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 4/22/2009)Letter224934LetterArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 4/13/2009)Reply224882ReplyUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 4/2/2009)Motion224820Motion To CompelArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
served (printed as 3/16/2009)Decision39807SecretaryDECISION GRANTED A JOINT MOTION TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 3/16/2009)Reply224687ReplyArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 3/11/2009)RequestArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc, Union Pacific Railroad Company, Bnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/11/2009)Reply224660Reply, Bnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/24/2009)Motion224596Motion/Petition/RequestUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 2/20/2009)SupplementArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 2/19/2009)Answer224557AnswerBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/19/2009)Answer224556AnswerUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 2/3/2009)Decision39697SecretaryDECISION: (1) ADOPTED THE PARTIES' STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH THE PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THE APPENDIX TO THIS DECISION.
-
(printed as 1/30/2009)SupplementArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 1/21/2009)Answer224377AnswerUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 1/21/2009)Answer224375AnswerBnsf Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/13/2009)Report224344Status ReportArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc, Bnsf Railway Company, Union Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 1/8/2009)Certificate224324Certificate Of ServiceArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
-
(printed as 12/30/2008)Complaint224276ComplaintArizona Electric Power Cooperative Inc
Nothing of that kind in this docket.