NOR 42087
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/NOR-42087 · entries shown: all, newest first
GROOME & ASSOCIATES, INC. AND LEE K. GROOME V. GREENVILLE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Caption from the Board’s record.
21 filings, 5 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 00:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 7/27/2005)Decision35870Entire BoardFOUND THAT GREENVILLE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (GCEDC) HAD A COMMON CARRIER OBLIGATION TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO GROOME & ASSOCIATES, INC. AND LEE K. GROOME (GROOME). FOUND THAT GCEDC WAS LIABLE FOR DAMAGES FROM AUGUST 2002 THROUGH JUNE 2003, ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED STORAGE, HANDLING, AND SHIPPING COSTS INCURRED BY GROOME.
-
served (printed as 7/20/2005)Decision35862SecretaryANNOUNCED THE AGENDA ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE BOARD'S JULY 27, 2005 VOTING CONFERENCE.
-
(printed as 7/20/2005)Reply214372ReplyGreenville County Economic Development Corporation
-
(printed as 7/18/2005)Motion214346Motion/Petition/RequestGroome & Associates, Inc.
-
(printed as 4/1/2005)StatementChristy A. Hall, P.E., Of The South Carolina Dept. Of Transportation
-
(printed as 3/31/2005)StatementGroome & Associates, Inc., Lee K Groome
-
(printed as 3/29/2005)Letter213637LetterChristy A. Hall, P.E., Of The South Carolina Dept. Of Transportation
-
(printed as 3/14/2005)Reply213545ReplyGroome & Associates, Inc.
-
(printed as 3/4/2005)Correction213480CorrectionGreenville County Economic Development Corporation
-
(printed as 2/22/2005)Rebuttal213385RebuttalGroome & Associates, Lee K Groome
-
served (printed as 2/10/2005)Decision35600SecretaryEXTENDED THE TIME FOR GROOME & ASSOCIATES, INC. AND LEE K. GROOME TO FILE THEIR REBUTTAL STATEMENT TO FEBRUARY 22, 2005.
-
(printed as 2/8/2005)RequestGroome & Associates, Inc., Lee K Groome
-
(printed as 1/26/2005)SupplementGreenville County Economic Development Corporation
-
(printed as 1/25/2005)SupplementGreenville County Economic Development Corporation
-
(printed as 1/24/2005)Reply213073ReplyGreenville County Economic Development Corporation
-
served (printed as 1/4/2005)Decision35482SecretaryEXTENDED THE DUE DATE FOR THE GREENVILLE COUNTY ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TO FILE ITS REPLY STATEMENT TO JANUARY 24, 2005, AND EXTENDED THE DUE DATE FOR GROOME & ASSOCIATES, INC. AND LEE K. GROOME TO FILE ITS REBUTTAL STATEMENT TO FEBRUARY 14, 2005.
-
(printed as 12/28/2004)RequestGreenville County Economic Development Corporation
-
(printed as 12/22/2004)Statement212835Opening StatementGroome & Associates, Inc.
-
(printed as 11/8/2004)Answer212472AnswerGreenville County Economic Development Corporation
-
served (printed as 10/12/2004)Decision35163SecretaryINSTITUTED A FORMAL COMPLAINT PROCEEDING AND ESTABLISHED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 10/12/2004)Reply617787ReplyGreenville County Economic Development Corporation
-
(printed as 10/12/2004)Reply617785ReplyGreenville County Economic Development Corporation
-
(printed as 10/12/2004)Motion617784Motion/Petition/RequestLee Groome And Groome Associates, Inc.
-
(printed as 9/30/2004)Reply219300ReplyGreenville County Economic Development Corporation
-
(printed as 9/27/2004)SupplementGroome & Associates, Inc.
-
(printed as 8/23/2004)Complaint617779ComplaintLee Groome And Groome Associates, Inc.
Nothing of that kind in this docket.