NOR 42076
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/NOR-42076 · entries shown: all, newest first
ALBANY & EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY V. THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILROAD COMPANY
Caption from the Board’s record.
10 filings, 4 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 23:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 1/12/2004)Decision34343SecretaryDISMISSED THIS PROCEEDING WITH PREJUDICE.
-
(printed as 12/29/2003)MotionAlbany & Eastern Railroad Company
-
served (printed as 11/10/2003)Decision33919Entire BoardDENIED A PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION, FILED BY JOHN D. FITZGERALD, UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION-GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT, CLAIMING MATERIAL ERROR IN THE BOARD'S JULY 22, 2003 DECISION AND CITING 49 CFR 1115.3.
-
(printed as 9/2/2003)Reply208831ReplyBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 9/2/2003)Reply208809ReplyAlbany & Eastern Railroad Company
-
(printed as 8/11/2003)Motion208679Petition To ReopenJohn D Fitzgerald (Utu/Go-386)
-
served (printed as 7/22/2003)Decision33477Entire Board(1) GRANTED AERC'S REQUEST TO ACCEPT ITS LATED-FILED REPLY; AND (2) DENIED UNITED TRANSPORTATION UNION-GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT'S APPEAL.
-
(printed as 3/17/2003)Motion207400Motion/Petition/RequestAlbany & Eastern Railroad Company
-
(printed as 2/24/2003)Motion207286Petition To ReopenJohn D Fitzgerald (Utu/Go-386)
-
served (printed as 2/13/2003)DecisionNOTICE THAT AERC AND BNSF HAVE AGREED TO BINDING VOLUNTARY ARBITRATION PURSUANT TO 49 CFR 1108 TO RESOLVE A DISPUTE BETWEEN THE TWO CARRIERS.
-
(printed as 2/6/2003)SupplementJohn D Fitzgerald (Utu/Go-386)
-
(printed as 12/26/2002)Answer206942AnswerBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/11/2002)Motion206806Petition To InterveneJohn D Fitzgerald (Utu/Go-386)
-
(printed as 11/26/2002)Complaint206723Arbitration ComplaintAlbany & Eastern Railroad Company
Nothing of that kind in this docket.