NOR 42070
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/NOR-42070 · entries shown: all, newest first
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION V. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Caption from the Board’s record.
74 filings, 25 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 23:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 7/8/2005)Decision36010SecretaryGRANTED THE COMPLAINANTS' SEPARATELY FILED MOTIONS TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE THE COMPLAINTS IN STB DOCKET NOS. 42069, 42070, AND 42072, AND DISMISSED AS MOOT THE COMPLAINANTS' APPEALS SEEKING ACCESS TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN THE COSTED WAYBILL SAMPLE.
-
(printed as 6/29/2005)MotionDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 5/18/2005)Decision35880SecretaryEXTENDED THE DUE DATE FOR FILING OPENING STATEMENTS BY 30 DAYS AND MODIFIED IN A CORRESPONDING MANNER THE DEADLINES FOR REPLY STATEMENTS, REBUTTAL STATEMENTS, AND BRIEFS.
-
(printed as 5/17/2005)SupplementDuke Energy Corporation, Csx Transportation Inc
-
served (printed as 4/19/2005)Decision35809SecretaryGRANTED DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY'S MOTIONS TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULES, AS ESTABLISHED IN THE JANUARY 6, 2005 DECISION.
-
(printed as 4/14/2005)RequestDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 4/5/2005)Decision35735SecretaryCOMPLAINANTS' JOINT MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY IS DENIED.
-
served (printed as 3/23/2005)Decision35681SecretaryGRANTED DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL DISCOVERY OF RAIL TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS, AS SPECIFIED IN THIS DECISION.
-
(printed as 3/21/2005)Reply213591ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 3/11/2005)Motion213528Motion To CompelDuke Energy Corporation, Carolina Power & Light Company
-
(printed as 3/10/2005)Reply213515ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 3/7/2005)Motion213494Motion To CompelDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 3/4/2005)Decision35664SecretaryESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO COMPEL IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 3/3/2005)RequestDuke Energy Corporation, Norfolk Southern Corporation
-
(printed as 2/23/2005)Reply213389ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 2/14/2005)Appeal213273AppealCarolina Power & Light Company
-
served (printed as 1/6/2005)Decision35475SecretarySET A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THE FILING OF EVIDENCE.
-
served (printed as 12/6/2004)Decision35392SecretaryPROVIDED NOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 19, 2004, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
-
(printed as 11/24/2004)Correction212628CorrectionCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 11/23/2004)Reply212604ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 11/19/2004)Reply212581ReplyDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 10/20/2004)Decision34932Entire Board(1) MODIFIED THE BOARD'S PRIOR DECISIONS IN THESE THREE EASTERN RAIL RATE CASES (STB DOCKET NO. 42069, STB DOCKET NO. 42070, AND STB DOCKET NO. 42072); AND (2) FOUND THAT NONE OF THE CHALLENGED RATES SHOWN TO BE UNREASONABLE UNDER THE STAND-ALONE COST TEST.
-
served (printed as 10/13/2004)Decision35167SecretaryANNOUNCED THE AGENDA ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE BOARD'S OCTOBER 20, 2004 VOTING CONFERENCE.
-
(printed as 4/14/2004)Reply210598ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 4/14/2004)Reply210594ReplyDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 4/5/2004)Reply210499ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 3/25/2004)MotionCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 3/25/2004)Motion210395Petition To ReopenDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 3/16/2004)Motion210318Motion/Petition/RequestDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 2/20/2004)Decision34486CommissionerGRANTED DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION'S (DUKE) REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DUE DATE FOR FILING PETITIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE BOARD'S FEBRUARY 4, 2004 DECISION AND GRANTED DUKE'S REQUEST FOR STAY OF THE MARCH 5, 2004 DUE DATE FOR IT TO ADVISE WHETHER IT WISHES TO SEEK RELIEF UNDER THE PHASING CONSTRAINT.
-
(printed as 2/17/2004)Reply210082ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 2/13/2004)RequestDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 2/4/2004)Decision32508Entire BoardBOARD FOUND THAT THE CHALLENGED RATES HAVE NOT BEEN SHOWN TO BE UNREASONABLE UNDER THE STAND-ALONE COST RATE REASONABLENESS TEST.
-
(printed as 1/12/2004)Reply209842ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 1/12/2004)Reply209841ReplyDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 1/5/2004)Evidence209775EvidenceDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 1/5/2004)Evidence209773EvidenceCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 12/8/2003)Motion209561Motion/Petition/RequestCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 11/26/2003)Letter209502LetterCsx Transportation Inc
-
served (printed as 10/14/2003)Decision34112Entire BoardPROVIDES FOR LIMITED REOPENING OF THE RECORDS FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE AND SETS PROCEDURAL SCHEDULES FOR THE SUBMISSION OF THAT EVIDENCE AND REPLIES TO IT.
-
(printed as 10/3/2003)Letter209049LetterCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 10/1/2003)Letter209026LetterDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 9/24/2003)Report208977Status ReportDuke Energy Corporation, Csx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 9/10/2003)Application208886ApplicationCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 9/10/2003)Application208883ApplicationDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 9/5/2003)Decision33982SecretaryPROVIDED INSTRUCTIONS FOR ATTENDANCE AND SCHEDULE OF APPEARANCES FOR THE SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 ORAL ARGUMENT.
-
(printed as 8/27/2003)Letter208794LetterDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 8/27/2003)NoticeCsx Transportation Inc
-
served (printed as 8/11/2003)Decision33899Secretary(1) GRANTED DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION'S REQUEST FOR AN ORAL ARGUMENT; AND (2) SCHEDULED THE ORAL ARGUMENT TO BE HELD ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2003, BEGINNING AT 10:00A.M., IN THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD HEARING ROOM , ROOM 760, AT 1925 K STREET, N. W., WASHINGTON, D. C.
-
served (printed as 6/6/2003)Decision33613SecretaryGRANTED THE PROPOSALS TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDERS ISSUED IN 12 STAND-ALONE COST RAIL RATE PROCEEDINGS.
-
(printed as 5/8/2003)Comments207769CommentDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 5/5/2003)Letter207732LetterCsx Corporation
-
(printed as 4/30/2003)Reply207716ReplyDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 4/25/2003)Decision33519SecretaryDIRECTED THAT PARTIES TO THE CAPTIONED STAND-ALONE COST PROCEEDINGS SHOULD REVIEW AND JOINTLY PROPOSE ANY NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDERS GOVERNING THESE PROCEEDINGS BY MAY 9, 2003.
-
(printed as 4/21/2003)Motion207666Motion To StrikeCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 4/17/2003)Brief207651BriefDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 4/14/2003)Brief207606BriefCsx Transportation Inc
-
served (printed as 3/25/2003)Decision33391Entire BoardGRANTED CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.'S MOTION TO STRIKE PORTIONS OF THE REBUTTAL EVIDENCE FILED BY COMPLAINANT DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION.
-
served (printed as 3/14/2003)Decision33453SecretaryNOTICE THAT THE BOARD WILL CONDUCT A VOTING CONFERENCE ON FRIDAY, MARCH 21, 2003, AT 9:30 A.M.
-
served (printed as 1/10/2003)Decision33336SecretaryDIRECTED THE PARTIES TO SUBMIT A LIST OF REPLACEMENT REFERENCES TO WORKPAPERS AND TABLES OF CONTENTS IN THESE CASES BY JANUARY 17, 2003.
-
(printed as 12/20/2002)Errata206908Errata SheetDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 12/13/2002)Decision33256Secretary(1) GRANTED DUKE ENERGY AND NS'S JOINT MOTION TO ESTABLISH A SCHEDULE FOR SUBMISSION OF CLOSING BRIEFS IN STB DOCKET NO. 42069; (2) GRANTED DUKE ENERGY AND CSXT'S JOINT MOTION TO ESTABLISH A BRIEFING SCHEDULE IN STB DOCKET NO. 42070; AND (3) GRANTED CP&L AND NS'S JOINT MOTION TO ESTABLISH A BRIEFING SCHEDULE IN STB DOCKET NO. 42072.
-
(printed as 12/4/2002)Motion206760Motion/Petition/RequestCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 10/7/2002)SupplementCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 10/7/2002)SupplementCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 10/7/2002)SupplementCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 10/3/2002)SupplementCsx Transportation Inc
-
served (printed as 8/8/2002)Decision32964SecretaryGRANTED DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.'S PETITION FILED ON AUGUST 7, 2002, REQUESTING THAT THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE BE REESTABLISHED.
-
(printed as 8/7/2002)Motion205998Motion/Petition/RequestDuke Energy Corporation, Csx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 7/12/2002)Reply205837ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 7/11/2002)Reply205825ReplyDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 7/9/2002)MotionCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 5/28/2002)SupplementCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 4/24/2002)Letter205253LetterDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 4/17/2002)Answer205201AnswerCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 4/17/2002)Motion205200Motion/Petition/RequestCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 4/17/2002)Motion205199Motion To StrikeCsx Transportation Inc
-
served (printed as 4/5/2002)Decision32659SecretaryGRANTED THE PARTIES REQUEST FILED ON MARCH 27, 2002, FOR A NEW PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
(printed as 4/5/2002)SupplementDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 4/1/2002)Letter205104LetterSlover & Loftus, Balch & Bingham Llp
-
(printed as 3/27/2002)RequestDuke Energy Corporation, Csx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 3/20/2002)Letter205132LetterSlover & Loftus
-
(printed as 3/20/2002)Letter205014LetterAbc Coke
-
(printed as 3/20/2002)Letter205013LetterPerdue Farms Incorporated
-
(printed as 3/15/2002)Reply204985ReplyDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 3/13/2002)Letter204964LetterSonoco Products Company
-
(printed as 3/13/2002)Letter204959LetterSouthern Company Services Inc
-
(printed as 3/11/2002)Letter205143LetterCardinal Operating Company
-
(printed as 3/11/2002)Letter205142LetterAep Kentucky Coal Llc
-
(printed as 3/11/2002)Letter204945LetterOhio River Terminals Company
-
served (printed as 3/4/2002)Decision32562SecretaryGRANTED DUKE ENERGY'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY OF RAIL TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS, AS SPECIFIED IN THIS DECISION.
-
(printed as 3/4/2002)AppealCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 3/1/2002)Letter205133LetterAppalachian Power Company
-
(printed as 2/12/2002)Reply204748ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
served (printed as 2/5/2002)Decision32510Secretary(1) GRANTED THE JOINT MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER; AND (2) DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH THE PROTECTIVE ORDER.
-
(printed as 2/5/2002)AppealDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 1/8/2002)Reply204333ReplyCsx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 1/7/2002)MotionDuke Energy Corporation, Csx Transportation Inc
-
(printed as 1/7/2002)Report204321Status ReportCsx Transportation Inc
Nothing of that kind in this docket.