NOR 42069
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/NOR-42069 · entries shown: all, newest first
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION V. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Caption from the Board’s record.
59 filings, 26 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 7/8/2005)Decision36010SecretaryGRANTED THE COMPLAINANTS' SEPARATELY FILED MOTIONS TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE THE COMPLAINTS IN STB DOCKET NOS. 42069, 42070, AND 42072, AND DISMISSED AS MOOT THE COMPLAINANTS' APPEALS SEEKING ACCESS TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IN THE COSTED WAYBILL SAMPLE.
-
(printed as 6/24/2005)MotionDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 5/18/2005)Decision35880SecretaryEXTENDED THE DUE DATE FOR FILING OPENING STATEMENTS BY 30 DAYS AND MODIFIED IN A CORRESPONDING MANNER THE DEADLINES FOR REPLY STATEMENTS, REBUTTAL STATEMENTS, AND BRIEFS.
-
(printed as 5/16/2005)RequestDuke Energy Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 4/19/2005)Decision35809SecretaryGRANTED DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY'S MOTIONS TO MODIFY THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULES, AS ESTABLISHED IN THE JANUARY 6, 2005 DECISION.
-
(printed as 4/14/2005)RequestDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 4/5/2005)Decision35735SecretaryCOMPLAINANTS' JOINT MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY IS DENIED.
-
served (printed as 3/23/2005)Decision35681SecretaryGRANTED DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY'S MOTIONS TO COMPEL DISCOVERY OF RAIL TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS, AS SPECIFIED IN THIS DECISION.
-
(printed as 3/21/2005)Reply213593ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/11/2005)Motion213526Motion To CompelDuke Energy Corporation, Carolina Power & Light Company
-
(printed as 3/10/2005)Reply213514ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/7/2005)Motion213495Motion To CompelDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 3/4/2005)Decision35664SecretaryESTABLISHED A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR MOTIONS TO COMPEL IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 3/3/2005)RequestDuke Energy Corportaion, Norfolk Southern Corporation
-
(printed as 2/23/2005)Reply213390ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/14/2005)Appeal213272AppealDuke Energy Corporation, Carolina Power & Light Company
-
served (printed as 1/6/2005)Decision35475SecretarySET A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THE FILING OF EVIDENCE.
-
served (printed as 12/6/2004)Decision35391SecretaryPROVIDED NOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING ON OR ABOUT NOVEMBER 19, 2004, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.
-
(printed as 11/23/2004)Reply212608ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 11/19/2004)Reply212580ReplyDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 10/20/2004)Decision34932Entire Board(1) MODIFIED THE BOARD'S PRIOR DECISIONS IN THESE THREE EASTERN RAIL RATE CASES (STB DOCKET NO. 42069, STB DOCKET NO. 42070, AND STB DOCKET NO. 42072); AND (2) FOUND THAT NONE OF THE CHALLENGED RATES SHOWN TO BE UNREASONABLE UNDER THE STAND-ALONE COST TEST.
-
served (printed as 10/13/2004)Decision35167SecretaryANNOUNCED THE AGENDA ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE BOARD'S OCTOBER 20, 2004 VOTING CONFERENCE.
-
(printed as 3/31/2004)SupplementNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/15/2004)Reply210306ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/15/2004)Reply210305ReplyDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 2/23/2004)MotionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 2/23/2004)MotionDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 2/3/2004)Decision34320Entire BoardGRANTED IN PART THE PETITION OF DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION, SEEKING CERTAIN TECHNICAL CORRECTIONS IN THE BOARD'S DECISION SERVED ON NOVEMBER 6, 2003, IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 12/17/2003)Letter209657LetterNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/17/2003)Letter209655LetterDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 12/2/2003)Reply209510ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 11/25/2003)Decision34233Commissioner(1) STAYED THE BOARD'S NOVEMBER 6, 2003 DECISION PENDING THE BOARD'S REVIEW OF TECHNICAL ISSUES AND FURTHER ACTION; AND (2) TOLLED THE 20-DAY PERIOD FOR PARTIES TO FILE MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION AND THE 30-DAY PERIOD FOR DUKE TO INFORM THE BOARD ABOUT THE PHASING OPTION PENDING FURTHER ORDER OF THE BOARD.
-
(printed as 11/21/2003)Reply209463ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 11/18/2003)Decision34219Entire BoardNOTICE OF A CORRECTION TO THE BOARD'S DECISION SERVED ON NOVEMBER 6, 2003 IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 11/18/2003)Motion209440Motion/Petition/RequestDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 11/18/2003)Motion209439Petition For StayDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 11/12/2003)Letter209396LetterNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 11/6/2003)Decision34015Entire BoardBOARD FOUND THAT THE CHALLENGED RATES HAVE NOT BEEN SHOWN TO BE UNREASONABLE UNDER THE STAND-ALONE COST RATE REASONABLENESS TEST.
-
(printed as 10/31/2003)Reply209286ReplyDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 10/31/2003)Reply209277ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/24/2003)Comments209212CommentDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 10/24/2003)Comments209209CommentNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 10/10/2003)Decision34103Entire BoardREOPENED THE RECORD FOR THE LIMITED PURPOSE OF AFFORDING THE PARTIES AN OPPORTUNITY TO PRESENT NEEDED SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENCE TO COMPLETE THE RECORD IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 6/6/2003)Decision33613SecretaryGRANTED THE PROPOSALS TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDERS ISSUED IN 12 STAND-ALONE COST RAIL RATE PROCEEDINGS.
-
(printed as 5/8/2003)Comments207767CommentDuke Energy Corportaion
-
served (printed as 4/25/2003)Decision33519SecretaryDIRECTED THAT PARTIES TO THE CAPTIONED STAND-ALONE COST PROCEEDINGS SHOULD REVIEW AND JOINTLY PROPOSE ANY NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDERS GOVERNING THESE PROCEEDINGS BY MAY 9, 2003.
-
served (printed as 3/25/2003)Decision33401Entire BoardGRANTS THE REQUEST FILED BY DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION TO REJECT NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY'S TABLES SUBMITTED ALONG WITH ITS BRIEF IN THIS MAXIMUM RATE REASONABLENESS COMPLAINT PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 3/14/2003)Decision33453SecretaryNOTICE THAT THE BOARD WILL CONDUCT A VOTING CONFERENCE ON FRIDAY, MARCH 21, 2003, AT 9:30 A.M.
-
(printed as 2/4/2003)Reply207155ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/29/2003)Comments207133CommentDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 1/24/2003)Letter207105LetterNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/22/2003)Reply207095ReplyDuke Energy Corportaion
-
served (printed as 1/10/2003)Decision33336SecretaryDIRECTED THE PARTIES TO SUBMIT A LIST OF REPLACEMENT REFERENCES TO WORKPAPERS AND TABLES OF CONTENTS IN THESE CASES BY JANUARY 17, 2003.
-
(printed as 12/20/2002)Errata206909Errata SheetDuke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 12/13/2002)Decision33256Secretary(1) GRANTED DUKE ENERGY AND NS'S JOINT MOTION TO ESTABLISH A SCHEDULE FOR SUBMISSION OF CLOSING BRIEFS IN STB DOCKET NO. 42069; (2) GRANTED DUKE ENERGY AND CSXT'S JOINT MOTION TO ESTABLISH A BRIEFING SCHEDULE IN STB DOCKET NO. 42070; AND (3) GRANTED CP&L AND NS'S JOINT MOTION TO ESTABLISH A BRIEFING SCHEDULE IN STB DOCKET NO. 42072.
-
(printed as 12/4/2002)Motion206761Motion/Petition/RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/31/2002)Errata206529Errata SheetNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/18/2002)SupplementNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 10/7/2002)SupplementNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 8/8/2002)Decision32963SecretaryGRANTED THE JOINT REQUEST BY COMPLAINANT DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION AND DEFENDANT NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY TO ESTABLISH A NEW SCHEDULE FOR THE FILING OF REPLY AND REBUTTAL STATEMENTS.
-
(printed as 8/7/2002)Motion205997Motion/Petition/RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company, Duke Energy Corporation
-
served (printed as 7/26/2002)Decision32630Secretary(1) ACCEPTED DUKE ENERGY'S AMENDED COMPLAINTS FILED APRIL 5, 2002, AS MODIFIED APRIL 24, 2002; (2) GRANTED THE MOTIONS TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DUKE ENERGY'S COAL SUPPLY CONTRACTS, RELATED DOCUMENTS, AND THE OTHER THIRD-PARTY CONFIDENTIAL MATERIALS DISCUSSED IN THIS PROCEEDING, SUBJECT TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDERS SERVED IN THESE PROCEEDINGS ON FEBRUARY 5, 2002; (3) DIRECTED DUKE ENERGY TO SUPPLY THE INFORMATION IT HAS AGREED TO FURNISH; AND (4) DENIED IN ALL OTHER RESPECTS, THE MOTIONS TO COMPEL.
-
(printed as 7/12/2002)Reply205836ReplyNorfolk Southern Corporation
-
(printed as 7/11/2002)Reply205824ReplyDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 7/9/2002)MotionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/24/2002)Letter205254LetterDuke Energy Corportaion
-
(printed as 4/18/2002)Motion205207Motion To StrikeNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 4/18/2002)Reply205206ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 4/5/2002)Decision32658SecretaryGRANTED THE JOINT REQUEST FOR A NEW PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
(printed as 4/5/2002)SupplementDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 3/27/2002)RequestDuke Energy Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/26/2002)Letter205066LetterDayton Power And Light Company
-
(printed as 3/15/2002)Reply204984ReplyDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 3/11/2002)Letter204942LetterIntegrity Coal Sales Inc
-
(printed as 3/6/2002)Letter205134LetterAbc Coke
-
served (printed as 3/4/2002)Decision32561SecretaryGRANTED DUKE ENERGY'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY OF RAIL TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS, AS SPECIFIED IN THIS DECISION.
-
(printed as 3/4/2002)AppealNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 3/1/2002)Letter205135LetterApplalachin Power Company
-
(printed as 2/25/2002)Reply204849ReplySouthern Company Services Inc
-
(printed as 2/11/2002)Reply204741ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 2/5/2002)Decision32509Secretary(1) GRANTED THE JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; (2) DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH THE PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THE APPENDIX OF THIS DECISION; AND (3) SET A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
-
(printed as 2/5/2002)AppealDuke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 1/8/2002)Reply204334ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/7/2002)MotionNorfolk Southern Railway Company, Duke Energy Corporation
-
(printed as 1/7/2002)Report204319Status ReportDuke Energy Corporation, Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Nothing of that kind in this docket.