NOR 42056

Entries

1. served 23 Apr 2013 (printed as 4/23/2013)
   Decision
   43074Director Of Proceedings

   DECISION GRANTED TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY'S REQUEST TO DISMISS THE PETITION TO REOPEN AND MODIFY RATE PRESCRIPTION WITH PREJUDICE, AND DISCONTINUE THE PROCEEDING.
2. 29 Mar 2013 (printed as 3/29/2013)
   Motion
   233999Motion To Dismiss Or Discontinue

   Texas Municipal Power Agency
3. served 7 Dec 2012 (printed as 12/7/2012)
   Decision
   42815Director Of Proceedings

   DECISION GRANTED TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY AND BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION FOR STAY AND TO HOLD THIS PROCEEDING IN ABEYANCE.
4. 5 Dec 2012 (printed as 12/5/2012)
   Motion
   233458Petition For Stay

   Texas Municipal Power Agency, Bnsf Railway Company
5. 10 May 2012 (printed as 5/10/2012)
   Reply
   232295Reply

   Bnsf Railway Company
6. 10 May 2012 (printed as 5/10/2012)
   Motion
   232294Motion/Petition/Request

   Bnsf Railway Company
7. 23 Apr 2012 (printed as 4/23/2012)
   Supplement
   232237Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record

   Texas Municipal Power Agency
8. 20 Apr 2012 (printed as 4/20/2012)
   Motion
   232228Petition To Reopen

   Texas Municipal Power Agency
9. served 7 Mar 2012 (printed as 3/7/2012)
   Decision
   42261Director Of Proceedings

   PROVIDED NOTICE THAT COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED IN THIS PROCEEDING.

   in the court-action register
10. served 20 Jan 2012 (printed as 1/20/2012)
    Decision
    41918Entire Board

    DECISION DENIED A PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED BY TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY (TMPA) OF A DECISION SERVED ON JULY 27, 2011. THE JULY 2011 DECISION DENIED RELIEF TMPA REQUESTED, FINDING THAT DECISIONS 2003 AND 2004 CLEARLY PROVIDE THAT TMPA WAS ENTITLED TO A RATE PRESCRIPTION ONLY THROUGH 2010.
11. 6 Sep 2011 (printed as 9/6/2011)
    Reply
    230912Reply

    Bnsf Railway Company
12. 16 Aug 2011 (printed as 8/16/2011)
    Motion
    230821Petition For Reconsideration

    Texas Municipal Power Agency
13. served 27 Jul 2011 (printed as 7/27/2011)
    Decision
    41714Entire Board

    DECISION DENIED TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY'S PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF A RATE PRESCRIPTION AGAINST THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. IN THE DECISION, THE BOARD FINDS THAT THE MAXIMUM RATE PRESCRIPTION EXPIRED IN 2010.
14. 19 Jan 2011 (printed as 1/19/2011)
    Letter
    228654Letter/Telegram

    Bnsf Railway Company
15. 18 Jan 2011 (printed as 1/18/2011)
    Letter
    228640Letter/Telegram

    Texas Municipal Power Agency
16. 6 Jan 2011 (printed as 1/6/2011)
    Reply
    228591Reply

    Bnsf Railway Company
17. 21 Dec 2010 (printed as 12/21/2010)
    Letter
    228507Letter

    Bnsf Railway Company
18. 17 Dec 2010 (printed as 12/17/2010)
    Motion
    228495Petition

    Texas Municipal Power Agency
19. served 29 Oct 2004 (printed as 10/29/2004)
    Decision
    35232Secretary

    PROVIDED NOTICE OF A CORRECTION TO THE BOARD'S DECISION SERVED ON SEPTEMBER 27, 2004 IN THIS PROCEEDING.
20. served 27 Sep 2004 (printed as 9/27/2004)
    Decision
    33561Entire Board

    ON RECONSIDERATION, THE FINDING THAT THE CHALLENGED RATE WAS UNREASONABLY HIGH WAS AFFIRMED BUT THE REPARATIONS AND RATE PRESCRIPTION WERE MODIFIED.
21. served 17 Sep 2004 (printed as 9/17/2004)
    Decision
    35071Secretary

    ANNOUNCED THE AGENDA ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE BOARD'S SEPTEMBER 24, 2004 VOTING CONFERENCE.
22. served 13 Nov 2003 (printed as 11/13/2003)
    Decision
    34148Secretary

    ORDERED THAT, WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER SERVICE OF THIS DECISION, BNSF SHALL REMIT TO TEXAS MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY REPARATIONS WITH INTEREST AS DETERMINED IN THIS DECISION.
23. 30 Sep 2003 (printed as 9/30/2003)
    Motion
    209021Motion/Petition/Request

    Texas Municipal Power Agency
24. served 6 Jun 2003 (printed as 6/6/2003)
    Decision
    33613Secretary

    GRANTED THE PROPOSALS TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDERS ISSUED IN 12 STAND-ALONE COST RAIL RATE PROCEEDINGS.
25. 9 May 2003 (printed as 5/9/2003)
    Supplement
    207792Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record

    Texas Municipal Power Agency, Arizona Public Service Company, Pacificorp, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
26. 5 May 2003 (printed as 5/5/2003)
    Reply
    207747Reply

    Texas Municipal Power Agency
27. 5 May 2003 (printed as 5/5/2003)
    Reply
    207741Reply

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
28. 5 May 2003 (printed as 5/5/2003)
    Reply
    207739Reply

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
29. served 25 Apr 2003 (printed as 4/25/2003)
    Decision
    33519Secretary

    DIRECTED THAT PARTIES TO THE CAPTIONED STAND-ALONE COST PROCEEDINGS SHOULD REVIEW AND JOINTLY PROPOSE ANY NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDERS GOVERNING THESE PROCEEDINGS BY MAY 9, 2003.
30. 17 Apr 2003 (printed as 4/17/2003)
    Motion
    207650Petition For Reconsideration

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
31. 14 Apr 2003 (printed as 4/14/2003)
    Motion
    207622Petition To Intervene

    Western Coal Traffic League
32. 14 Apr 2003 (printed as 4/14/2003)
    Motion
    207619Petition To Intervene

    National Industrial Transportation League, North America Freight Car Association
33. 14 Apr 2003 (printed as 4/14/2003)
    Motion
    207618Petition For Reconsideration

    Western Coal Traffic League
34. 14 Apr 2003 (printed as 4/14/2003)
    Motion
    207617Petition To Reopen

    Texas Municipal Power Agency
35. 14 Apr 2003 (printed as 4/14/2003)
    Motion
    207615Petition For Reconsideration

    National Industrial Transportation League, North America Freight Car Association
36. served 24 Mar 2003 (printed as 3/24/2003)
    Decision
    31522Entire Board

    FOUND THAT THE DEFENDANT RAILROAD HAS MARKET DOMINANCE OVER THE TRANSPORTATION AT ISSUE AND THAT THE CHALLENGED RATE IS UNREASONABLY HIGH. A MAXIMUM REASONABLE RATE IS PRESCRIBED AND REPARATIONS ARE ORDERED.
37. served 14 Mar 2003 (printed as 3/14/2003)
    Decision
    33453Secretary

    NOTICE THAT THE BOARD WILL CONDUCT A VOTING CONFERENCE ON FRIDAY, MARCH 21, 2003, AT 9:30 A.M.
38. served 28 May 2002 (printed as 5/28/2002)
    Decision
    32701Secretary

    THE DECISION (1) GRANTED TMPA'S MOTION TO PERMIT THE FILING OF BRIEFS IN THIS PROCEEDING, AND (2) GAVE DIRECTIONS TO THE PARTIES ON THE FILING OF BRIEFS.
39. 20 Mar 2002 (printed as 3/20/2002)
    Reply
    205010Reply

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
40. 8 Mar 2002 (printed as 3/8/2002)
    Motion
    204938Motion/Petition/Request

    Texas Municipal Power Agency
41. served 6 Feb 2002 (printed as 2/6/2002)
    Decision
    32547Secretary

    DESCRIBED HOW THE PARTIES' STAND-ALONE COST PRESENTATIONS IN THE ABOVE PROCEEDING HAVE FAILED TO FULLY COMPLY WITH THE GENERAL PROCEDURES FOR PRESENTING EVIDENCE IN STAND-ALONE COST RATE CASES AND INSTRUCTS THE PARTIES WHAT STEPS SHOULD BE TAKEN WHEN FILING FUTURE EVIDENCE.
42. 23 Jan 2002 (printed as 1/23/2002)
    Reply
    204561Reply

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
43. 17 Jan 2002 (printed as 1/17/2002)
    Letter
    204464Letter

    Texas Municipal Power Agency
44. served 27 Nov 2001 (printed as 11/27/2001)
    Decision
    32310Entire Board

    DENIED THE JOINT MOTION FILED BY THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY AND THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY TO CONSOLIDATE THE CAPTIONED CASES FOR CONSIDERATION OF SELECTED ISSUES.
45. served 4 Oct 2001 (printed as 10/4/2001)
    Decision
    32216Director Of Proceedings

    GRANTED THE JOINT REQUEST TO ESTABLISH A NEW PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
46. served 19 Jul 2001 (printed as 7/19/2001)
    Decision
    32021Secretary

    GRANTED THE REQUESTS FOR A 30-DAY EXTENSION OF THE REPLY DATE.
47. served 13 Mar 2001 (printed as 3/13/2001)
    Decision
    31672Secretary

    (1) DENIED COMPLAINANT'S THIRD MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY AS MOOT; AND (2) GRANTED COMPLAINANT'S FOURTH MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY, AS SPECIFIED IN DECISION.
48. served 9 Feb 2001 (printed as 2/9/2001)
    Decision
    31557Entire Board

    (1) DISPOSED THE VARIOUS MOTIONS INVOLVED IN THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) SUSPENDED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE UNTIL DISCOVERY IS COMPLETED AND THE PARTIES SHALL NEGOTIATE AND JOINTLY SUBMIT A NEW SCHEDULE.
49. served 22 Jan 2001 (printed as 1/22/2001)
    Decision
    31604Secretary

    GRANTED THE REQUEST FOR A 14-DAY EXTENSION OF THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.
50. served 13 Nov 2000 (printed as 11/13/2000)
    Decision
    31421Secretary

    GRANTED THE JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER; (2) DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO COMPLY WITH THE PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THE APPENDIX TO THIS DECISION; AND (3) SET A REVISED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE.

Nothing of that kind in this docket.