NOR 41685
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/NOR-41685 · entries shown: all, newest first
CF INDUSTRIES, INC. V. KOCH PIPELINE COMPANY, L.P.
Caption from the Board’s record.
0 filings, 14 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 9/15/2000)Decision31317SecretaryORDERED KOCH PIPELINE TO PAY FARMLAND REPARATIONS OF $4,212,512.65, EXCLUSIVE OF INTEREST.
-
served (printed as 9/11/2000)Decision31292SecretaryORDERED THAT KOCH PIPLINE SHALL PAY CF INDUSTRIES $10,509,346.80 IN REPARATIONS AND INTEREST THROUGH AUGUST 7, 2000.
-
served (printed as 6/7/2000)Decision31077CommissionerDENIED THE PETITION FILED BY KOCH SEEKING A PARTIAL STAY.
-
served (printed as 6/5/2000)Decision31086SecretaryNOTICE THAT COURT ACTIONS WERE INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT MAY 18 AND MAY 24, 2000, RESPECTIVELY, INVOLVING THE ABOVE-ENTITLED PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 5/26/2000)Decision31059SecretaryNOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT MAY 19, 2000, INVOLVING THE ABOVE-ENTITLED PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 5/9/2000)Decision30976Entire Board(1) DENIED CF INDUSTRIES, INC.'S MOTION TO AMEND ITS COMPLAINT, DIRECTED (2) KOCH PIPELINE COMPANY, L.P., WITHIN 60 DAYS, ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN PIPELINE RATES THAT DO NOT EXCEED THE RATES IN EFFECT ON MARCH 31, 1996, FOR TRANSPORTATION TO THE DESTINATIONS SERVING THE COMPLAINANTS, OTHER THAN PALMYRA, MO AND GARNER, IA AND (3) PAY REPARATIONS AND INTEREST, CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 49 CFR PART 1141, BACK TO THE POINT WHEN IT INCREASED THE RATES ORDERED TO BE REDUCED BY PARAGRAPH 3 OF THE ORDERING PARAGRAPH IN THE ABOVE PROCEEDING.
-
served (printed as 10/13/1998)Decision29630SecretaryDIRECTED THE PARTIES TO RESPOND WITHIN 20 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF SERVICE OF THIS DECISION TO THE EXTENT THAT THEIR PLEADINGS CONTAIN 'CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION' OR 'HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'
-
served (printed as 7/6/1998)Decision29388SecretaryREQUESTED PARTIES TO SUBMIT BRIEFS SUMMARIZING THE EVIDENCE THAT HAS BEEN PRESENTED AND ARGUING EACH PARTY'S CASE, AND REMINDED THE PARTIES THAT NEW EVIDENCE INTRODUCED IN THE BRIEFS IS NOT PERMITTED AND WILL BE SUBJECT TO MOTIONS TO STRIKE AND OTHER SANCTIONS.
-
served (printed as 2/20/1998)Decision28964SecretaryGRANTED THE MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME.
-
served (printed as 12/9/1997)DecisionDENIED KOCH'S MOTION TO LIMIT THE NUMBER OF DEPOSITIONS OF A WITNESS AND FOUND, AS REQUESTED BY CF, THAT THE PARTIES MAY DEPOSE EACH EXPERT ONLY ON THE TESTIMONY THE EXPERT PRESENTED IN THE IMMEDIATELY PRECEDING ROUND.
-
served (printed as 12/2/1997)Decision28650SecretaryGRANTED THE PARTIES' EXTENSION REQUEST TO 1/9/98 AND 2/23/98.
-
served (printed as 9/10/1997)DecisionGRANTED THE PARTIES' MOTION TO ADOPT THE ANNEXED JOINT STIPULATION.
-
served (printed as 6/23/1997)DecisionGRANTED PARTIES MOTION TO ADOPT THE PROTECTIVE ORDER.
-
served (printed as 5/14/1997)Decision9402Entire Board(1) SET OUT A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE FOR THE SUBMISSION OF EVIDENCE, RULES ON PROCEDURAL AND DISCOVERY MATTERS, (2) DETERMINED METHODOLOGIES ACCEPTABLE FOR DETERMINING THE REASONABLENESS OF PIPELINE RATES, AND (3) GRANTED A REQUEST TO REFER DISCOVERY ISSUES TO AN ALJ.
Nothing of that kind in this docket.