NOR 41185

Entries

1. 24 Jan 2005 (printed as 1/24/2005)
   Letter
   213069Letter

   Surface Transportation Board
2. 24 Jan 2005 (printed as 1/24/2005)
   Supplement
   213067Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record

   Aps/Pacificorp
3. served 7 Jan 2005 (printed as 1/7/2005)
   Decision
   35510Secretary

   PROVIDED NOTICE THAT A COURT ACTION IN THIS PROCEEDING WAS INSTITUTED ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 17, 2004, BEFORE THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT.

   in the court-action register
4. served 13 Dec 2004 (printed as 12/13/2004)
   Decision
   33654Entire Board

   (1) VACATED THE RATE PRESCRIPTION IMPOSED IN THE BOARD'S DECISION REPORTED AT 3 S.T.B. 70 (1998), (2) DIRECTED THAT, PURSUANT TO THE KEEP-ACCOUNT REQUIREMENT IN THE BOARD'S MAY 12, 2003 DECISION (2003 REOPENING), ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY AND PACIFICORP SHALL COMPENSATE THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF) FOR THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE $6.91 RATE BNSF SOUGHT TO CHARGE AND THE $4.21 RATE HELD IN PLACE PURSUANT TO THE 2003 REOPENING, TOGETHER WITH INTEREST TO BE CALCULATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH 49 CFR 1141, FROM THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE 2003 REOPENING DECISION TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION, AND (3) DISMISSED THIS PROCEEDING.
5. served 6 Dec 2004 (printed as 12/6/2004)
   Decision
   35342Secretary

   ANNOUNCED THE AGENDA ITEMS TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE BOARD'S DECEMBER 13, 2004 VOTING CONFERENCE.
6. 8 Oct 2004 (printed as 10/8/2004)
   Reply
   212207Reply

   Arizona Public Service Company, Pacificorp
7. 5 Oct 2004 (printed as 10/5/2004)
   Letter
   212190Letter

   Pacificorp, Arizona Public Service Company
8. 4 Oct 2004 (printed as 10/4/2004)
   Letter
   212141Letter

   Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
9. 30 Sep 2004 (printed as 9/30/2004)
   Application
   212110Application

   Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
10. served 27 Sep 2004 (printed as 9/27/2004)
    Decision
    35109Secretary

    PROVIDED THE SCHEDULE OF APPEARANCES AND THE TIME ALLOCATION FOR EACH PERSON SPEAKING AT THE SEPTEMBER 29, 2004 ORAL ARGUMENT IN THIS PROCEEDING.
11. 21 Sep 2004 (printed as 9/21/2004)
    Notice
    212054Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
12. 21 Sep 2004 (printed as 9/21/2004)
    Notice
    212053Notice Of Intent To Participate In Oral Argument/Hearing

    Arizona Public Service Company And Pacificorp
13. served 9 Sep 2004 (printed as 9/9/2004)
    Decision
    35051Secretary

    (1) PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE BOARD WILL HOLD AN ORAL ARGUMENT ON WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 29, 2004, AT 10:00 A.M., AT 1925 K STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, DC; AND (2) DIRECTED THAT EACH PARTY PROVIDE THE ORAL ARGUMENT INFORMATION SPECIFIED IN THIS DECISION IN WRITING BY SEPTEMBER 21, 2004.
14. 9 Aug 2004 (printed as 8/9/2004)
    Reply
    211772Reply

    Pacificorp, Arizona Public Service Company
15. 6 Aug 2004 (printed as 8/6/2004)
    Brief
    211752Brief

    Arizona Public Service Company And Pacificorp
16. 6 Aug 2004 (printed as 8/6/2004)
    Brief
    211746Brief

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
17. served 2 Jul 2004 (printed as 7/2/2004)
    Decision
    34782Secretary

    (1) GRANTED BNSF'S MOTION TO ESTABLISH A BRIEFING SCHEDULE; AND (2) STATED THAT BRIEFS ARE DUE BY AUGUST 6, 2004, AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 15 PAGES.
18. 15 Jun 2004 (printed as 6/15/2004)
    Reply
    211351Reply

    Pacificorp, Arizona Public Service Company
19. 8 Jun 2004 (printed as 6/8/2004)
    Motion
    211319Motion/Petition/Request

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
20. 28 May 2004 (printed as 5/28/2004)
    Errata
    211133Errata Sheet

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
21. 27 Apr 2004 (printed as 4/27/2004)
    Rebuttal
    210695Rebuttal

    Arizona Public Service Company And Pacificorp
22. 9 Apr 2004 (printed as 4/9/2004)
    Reply
    210550Reply

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
23. 31 Mar 2004 (printed as 3/31/2004)
    Errata
    210443Errata Sheet

    Arizona Public Service Company
24. 27 Feb 2004 (printed as 2/27/2004)
    Statement
    210187Opening Statement

    Pacificorp, Arizona Public Service Company
25. 23 Jan 2004 (printed as 1/23/2004)
    Motion
    209934Motion/Petition/Request

    Arizonia Public Service Company And Pacificorp
26. served 16 Jan 2004 (printed as 1/16/2004)
    Decision
    34401Secretary

    GRANTED THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY'S MOTION TO COMPEL FILED ON JANUARY 15, 2004.
27. served 15 Jan 2004 (printed as 1/15/2004)
    Decision
    34352Secretary

    GRANTED ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. & PACIFICORP'S MOTION TO COMPEL TO THE EXTENT AGREED UPON BY BOTH PARTIES.
28. 15 Jan 2004 (printed as 1/15/2004)
    Appeal
    209871Appeal Arbitration Decision

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
29. 9 Jan 2004 (printed as 1/9/2004)
    Reply
    209827Reply

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
30. 30 Dec 2003 (printed as 12/30/2003)
    Appeal
    209752Appeal Arbitration Decision

    Arizona Public Service Company
31. served 23 Dec 2003 (printed as 12/23/2003)
    Decision
    34294Secretary

    GRANTED ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY AND PACIFICORP'S REQUEST FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A SUBPOENA FOR THE PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS DIRECTED TO SALT RIVER PROJECT AGRICULTURAL & POWER DISTRICT.
32. 16 Dec 2003 (printed as 12/16/2003)
    Motion
    209643Motion/Petition/Request

    Pacificorp, Arizona Public Service Company
33. served 8 Dec 2003 (printed as 12/8/2003)
    Decision
    34260Secretary

    ADOPTED THE PROPOSED REVISED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
34. 4 Dec 2003 (printed as 12/4/2003)
    Request
    209541Request For Extension Of Time

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company, Arizona Public Service Company And Pacificorp
35. served 30 Oct 2003 (printed as 10/30/2003)
    Decision
    34161Secretary

    ESTABLISHED THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING.
36. 24 Oct 2003 (printed as 10/24/2003)
    Motion
    209214Motion/Petition/Request

    Arizona Public Service Company And Pacificorp
37. served 14 Oct 2003 (printed as 10/14/2003)
    Decision
    33681Entire Board

    GRANTED IN PART THE REQUESTS FILED BY THE WESTERN COAL TRAFFIC LEAGUE AND THE AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION AND THE NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC POWER COOPERATIVE TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING. THOSE GROUPS ARE ALLOWED TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING AS AMICI. ACCEPTED EDISON ELECTRIC INSTITUTE'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMICUS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ARIZONA AND PACIFICORP AND DENIED ARIZONA AND PACIFICORP'S PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION. AGAIN DIRECTED THE PARTIES TO SUBMIT, WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS DECISION, THE PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE THAT THEY WERE DIRECTED TO SUBMIT IN THE BOARD'S MAY 12, 2003 DECISION.
38. 5 Aug 2003 (printed as 8/5/2003)
    Reply
    208631Reply

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
39. 17 Jul 2003 (printed as 7/17/2003)
    Motion
    208437Motion/Petition/Request

    Edison Electric Institute
40. 14 Jul 2003 (printed as 7/14/2003)
    Reply
    208379Reply

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
41. 23 Jun 2003 (printed as 6/23/2003)
    Reply
    208164Reply

    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
42. 23 Jun 2003 (printed as 6/23/2003)
    Reply
    208146Reply

    National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, American Public Power Association
43. 23 Jun 2003 (printed as 6/23/2003)
    Motion
    208145Motion/Petition/Request

    National Rural Electric Cooperative Association, American Public Power Association
44. served 6 Jun 2003 (printed as 6/6/2003)
    Decision
    33613Secretary

    GRANTED THE PROPOSALS TO MODIFY PROTECTIVE ORDERS ISSUED IN 12 STAND-ALONE COST RAIL RATE PROCEEDINGS.
45. 2 Jun 2003 (printed as 6/2/2003)
    Motion
    207952Petition For Reconsideration

    Pacificorp, Arizona Public Service Company
46. 2 Jun 2003 (printed as 6/2/2003)
    Motion
    207950Petition For Reconsideration

    Western Coal Traffic League
47. 2 Jun 2003 (printed as 6/2/2003)
    Motion
    207949Petition To Intervene

    Western Coal Traffic League
48. served 12 May 2003 (printed as 5/12/2003)
    Decision
    33564Entire Board

    (1) GRANTED THE MOTION FILED BNSF TO REOPEN STB DOCKET NO. 41185; (2) DENIED THE MOTION FILED BNSF FOR RETROACTIVE RELIEF; (3) REMOVED THE PRESCRIPTIVE EFFECT OF THE PRIOR RATE ORDER AND EXERCISES THE BOARD'S BROAD AUTHORITY UNDER 49 U.S.C. 721B(4) TO PREVENT IRREPARABLE HARM; AND (4) DENIED THE MOTION FILED BY ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO., TO CONSOLIDATE THIS PROCEEDING WITH DOCKET NO. 42077.
49. 9 May 2003 (printed as 5/9/2003)
    Supplement
    207790Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record

    Pacificorp, Arizona Public Service Company, Texas Municipal Power Agency, Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
50. served 2 May 2003 (printed as 5/2/2003)
    Decision
    33578Secretary

    NOTICE THAT THE BOARD WILL CONDUCT A VOTING CONFERENCE ON FRIDAY, MAY 9, 2003, AT 10 A.M.
51. served 25 Apr 2003 (printed as 4/25/2003)
    Decision
    33519Secretary

    DIRECTED THAT PARTIES TO THE CAPTIONED STAND-ALONE COST PROCEEDINGS SHOULD REVIEW AND JOINTLY PROPOSE ANY NECESSARY MODIFICATIONS OF THE PROTECTIVE ORDERS GOVERNING THESE PROCEEDINGS BY MAY 9, 2003.
52. 16 Jan 2003 (printed as 1/16/2003)
    Letter
    207057Letter

    Arizona Public Service Company, Pacificorp
53. served 17 Apr 1998 (printed as 4/17/1998)
    Decision
    28224Entire Commission

    REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING, REAFFIRMED PRIOR FINDING THAT SANTA FE HAS MARKET DOMINANCE OVER THE TRANSPORTATION AT ISSUE, AND REVISED THE MAXIMUM REASONABLE RATE PRESCRIPTION AND REPARATION DETERMINATIONS.
54. served 3 Sep 1997 (printed as 9/3/1997)
    Decision
    28176Entire Board

    GRANTED THE PETITION FILED 8/12/97 BY SANTA FE FOR A PARTIAL STAY OF A 7/29/97 DECISION.
55. served 29 Jul 1997 (printed as 7/29/1997)
    Decision
    9413Entire Board

    FOUND THA THE CHALLENGED RATES CHARGED BY SANTA FE ARE UNREASONABLY HIGH, AWARDS REPARATIONS FOR PAST SHIPMENTS, AND PRESCRIBES MAXIMUM REASONABLE RATES FOR FUTURE MOVEMENTS.

Nothing of that kind in this docket.