FD 36472 (Sub-No. 6)
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/FD-36472/sub/6 · entries shown: all, newest first
VILLAGE OF VOORHEESVILLE V. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Caption from the Board’s record.
5 filings, 2 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 00:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 04:26 UTC.
Entries
-
(printed as 7/13/2026)Reply311771ReplyVillage of Voorheesville
-
served (printed as 6/29/2026)DecisionGRANTED VILLAGE OF VOORHEESVILLE'S MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE MOTION TO DISMISS THE COMPLAINT FILED BY NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY.
-
(printed as 6/23/2026)RequestVillage of Voorheesville
-
(printed as 6/16/2026)MotionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
served (printed as 5/20/2026)DecisionGRANTED A MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT FILED IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 5/15/2026)RequestNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 5/13/2026)Complaint311342ComplaintVillage of Voorheesville
Nothing of that kind in this docket.