Comment EI-21817
Received or sent (printed as 4/7/2016)
I know the people havent driven around to see what they have drawn up on paper they say they will go under I 43 in clinton wi...well it was built up because of sink holes and springs and the spot they say they will go is on a hill so will they close 43 to cut under it? it is 2 lanes on each side and they want a 200 foot tunel to go under it in that area there have been countless axidents already I dont know if it is because of a dip in the highway maybe a wet spot? The hwy is rough there and they say they will have 140 go over it 140 (is north south)by bc town line this is crazzy are they going to tunel under on both sides of town line or leave a huge cliff that snow will fill over the track ?it may look flat on google earth but it is a huge hill on both sides of the road this makes no cents at all. To who sticks them to there word if they arent even in the same state they say they will give farmers acess to there cut up fields to get to the other side...will they truly do this?there are lots of land locked fields Thanks for listening Melanie Hofstrom-waite
Submitted by: Melanie Hofstrom-Waite · clinton, Wisconsin
The Board publishes this comment in its environmental-comment table for this proceeding. It is quoted here as printed; nothing is inferred from it, and it states the commenter's own position in their own words, not this record's.
2016-04-03 17.31.56.png ↓ Screenshot_2016-03-28-21-53-19.png ↓
Permanent address docketyard.org/d/FD-35952/comment/EI-21817
File docketyard.org/document/2eb030aefaf695ae0673517794afb0f07b1a05ec3c16c6daea8ce545f7404dd6.bin
File docketyard.org/document/6ad456cd26d106a42b5cbe673599240be9365bb718b2cf861f71fb9bf9283f20.bin · back to the docket sheet