FD 34795
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/FD-34795 · entries shown: all, newest first
ROQUETTE AMERICA RAILWAY, INC.- CONSTRUCTION EXEMPTION- IN KEOKUK, IA
Caption from the Board’s record.
20 filings, 3 decisions and 24 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 21:36 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 4/10/2006)Decision36650SecretaryDECISION GRANTED A MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISCONTINUED THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 4/4/2006)MotionRoquette America Inc
-
(printed as 2/10/2006)CommentEI-1907Thompson HineJeffrey O. Moreno
-
(printed as 2/2/2006)Reply215728ReplyRoquette America Inc
-
(printed as 1/24/2006)Errata215638Errata SheetRoquette America Inc
-
(printed as 1/23/2006)Reply215628ReplyRoquette America Inc
-
(printed as 1/21/2006)CommentEI-1809Department of the ArmyRock Island District, Corps of Engineers
-
(printed as 1/19/2006)Reply215601ReplyRoquette America Inc
-
(printed as 1/17/2006)SupplementKeokuk Junction Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/13/2006)Motion215560Motion To CompelKeokuk Junction Railway Company
-
served (printed as 1/12/2006)Decision36651SecretaryDECISION PROVIDED THAT ROQUETTE AMERICA RAILWAY, INC. MAY RESPOND TO KEOKUK JUNCTION RAILWAY CO.'S PLEADING ON OR BEFORE JANUARY 23, 2006.
-
(printed as 1/12/2006)CommentEI-1821Thompson HineNicholas J. DiMichael
-
(printed as 1/9/2006)CommentEI-1820Baker & Miller PLLCWilliam A. Mullins
-
(printed as 1/5/2006)Reply215504ReplyKeokuk Junction Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/4/2006)Motion215491Motion/Petition/RequestRoquette America Inc
-
served (printed as 1/3/2006)Decision36613SecretaryDECISION GRANTED THE JOINT MOTION FILED BY THE PARTIES FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING.
-
(printed as 12/29/2005)Reply215455ReplyKeokuk Junction Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/27/2005)MotionRoquette America Inc, Keokuk Junction Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/23/2005)SupplementRoquette America Inc
-
(printed as 12/22/2005)Motion215420Motion/Petition/RequestRoquette America Inc
-
(printed as 12/21/2005)CommentEO-237Baker & Miller PLLCWilliam Mullins
-
(printed as 12/19/2005)Reply215384ReplyKeokuk Junction Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/9/2005)Letter215320Letter/TelegramKeokuk Junction Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/8/2005)Letter215317Letter/TelegramRoquette America Inc
-
(printed as 12/7/2005)Letter215302Letter/TelegramKeokuk Junction Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/6/2005)Letter215297Letter/TelegramKoekuk Junction Railway Company
-
(printed as 12/6/2005)CommentChristine M. Schwake - Environmental Specialist
-
(printed as 12/6/2005)CommentRick Larkin - Chair
-
(printed as 12/5/2005)CommentDeanne Bahr
-
(printed as 12/5/2005)CommentRichard C. Nelson - Field Supervisor
-
(printed as 12/5/2005)CommentThomas J. Vilsack, Governor
-
(printed as 12/2/2005)CommentMike Norris - Transportation Director
-
(printed as 11/30/2005)Errata215236Errata SheetRoquette America Inc
-
(printed as 11/29/2005)Motion215218Petition For ExemptionRoquette America Inc
-
(printed as 11/28/2005)CommentEI-1775Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Policy and Coordination Conservation and Recreation DivisionDiane Ford-Shivvers
-
(printed as 11/22/2005)CommentDouglas W. Jones
-
(printed as 11/21/2005)CommentEI-1772City of KeokukThe City of Keokuk states that it has no concerns regarding the proposed rail line construction.David Gudgel, Mayor
-
(printed as 11/16/2005)CommentPatrick G. Carroll
-
(printed as 11/3/2005)CommentEO-231Iowa Agencies
-
(printed as 8/25/2005)CommentEO-234Thompson HineNicholas J. DiMichael
-
(printed as 8/12/2005)CommentEI-1783Thompson HineNicholas J. DiMichael
-
(printed as 8/12/2005)CommentEI-1782Thompson HineNicholas J. DiMichael
-
(printed as 7/11/2005)CommentSteve Thornhill
-
(printed as 7/11/2005)CommentEO-233Thompson HineNicholas J. DiMichael
-
(printed as 7/11/2005)CommentEO-232Thompson HineNicholas J. DiMichael
-
(printed as 7/8/2005)CommentEI-1780Thompson HineNicholas J. DiMichael
-
(printed as 7/6/2005)CommentEI-1779Thompson HineNicholas J. DiMichael
Nothing of that kind in this docket.