FD 34305
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/FD-34305 · entries shown: all, newest first
THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY--CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION EXEMPTION--MERCED COUNTY, CA
Caption from the Board’s record.
2 filings, 6 decisions and 26 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 03:36 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 7/8/2004)DecisionGRANTED BNSF'S REQUEST THAT CONDITIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE MITIGATION MEASURES BE REMOVED FROM THE BOARD'S MARCH 4, 2004 DECISION.
-
served (printed as 3/4/2004)Decision34452Entire BoardGRANTED FINAL APPROVAL FOR AN EXEMPTION UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10502 FROM THE PRIOR APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS OF 49 U.S.C. 10901 FOR THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF) TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE AN 850-FOOT LINE OF RAILROAD IN MERCED COUNTY, CA. THE PROPOSED LINE WOULD CONNECT TO THE BNSF STOCKTON SUBDIVISION MAIN LINE BETWEEN STOCKTON AND BAKERSFIELD, CA.
-
(printed as 12/29/2003)CommentKnox Mellon
-
(printed as 12/29/2003)CommentEI-415City of MercedJack Lesch
-
(printed as 12/24/2003)CommentEI-418BNSFLarry Naeger
-
(printed as 12/18/2003)CommentLisa Hahf
-
(printed as 12/16/2003)CommentStephen Lyon
-
(printed as 12/15/2003)CommentRory Randol
-
served (printed as 11/7/2003)DecisionNOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS.
-
served (printed as 11/7/2003)DecisionCONCLUDED THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
-
(printed as 6/30/2003)CommentGary Petersen
-
(printed as 6/27/2003)CommentKathryn A. Kusske Floyd
-
(printed as 6/11/2003)CommentEI-193Mayer, Brown, Rowe & MawKathryn A. Kusske Floyd
-
(printed as 5/27/2003)CommentRichard Clark
-
(printed as 4/7/2003)CommentDavid L. Harlow
-
(printed as 4/7/2003)CommentEI-191City of Merced, MayorHubert Walsh
-
(printed as 4/7/2003)CommentBrian Erlandsen
-
(printed as 4/7/2003)CommentNancy A. Haley
-
(printed as 4/7/2003)CommentSteven C. Dunn
-
(printed as 4/7/2003)CommentRory Randol
-
(printed as 3/31/2003)CommentKnox Mellon
-
served (printed as 3/28/2003)Decision33350Entire BoardCONDITIONALLY EXEMPTED, UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10502, FROM THE PRIOR APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS OF 49 U.S.C. 10901, THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION BY BNSF OF AN APPROXIMATELY 850-FOOT LINE OF RAILROAD IN MERCED COUNTY, CA.
-
served (printed as 3/14/2003)Decision33453SecretaryNOTICE THAT THE BOARD WILL CONDUCT A VOTING CONFERENCE ON FRIDAY, MARCH 21, 2003, AT 9:30 A.M.
-
(printed as 3/4/2003)CommentMultiple Recipients
-
(printed as 1/17/2003)SupplementBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/14/2003)Motion207047Petition For ExemptionBurlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
-
(printed as 1/7/2003)CommentEI-140BNSFSarah Whitely Bailiff
-
(printed as 12/31/2002)CommentMyra L. Frank
-
(printed as 12/27/2002)CommentKathryn A. Kusske
-
(printed as 12/27/2002)CommentKathryn A. Kusske
-
(printed as 12/23/2002)CommentEI-245Mayer, Brown, Rowe & MawKathryn A. Kusske
-
(printed as 12/23/2002)CommentEI-137Mayer, Brown, Rowe & MawKathryn A. Kusske
-
(printed as 12/17/2002)CommentSarah Bailiff
-
(printed as 12/17/2002)CommentSarah Bailiff
Nothing of that kind in this docket.