Display Kept in this browser only
Finance DocketBefore the Surface Transportation Board

FD 34305

THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY--CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION EXEMPTION--MERCED COUNTY, CA

Caption from the Board’s record.

2 filings, 6 decisions and 26 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 03:36 UTC; last new entry 31 Aug 2026, 20:16 UTC.

Entries

By type (2)
Newest first · oldest first
  1. Decision
    34863Director Of Proceedings
    GRANTED BNSF'S REQUEST THAT CONDITIONS 11 AND 12 OF THE MITIGATION MEASURES BE REMOVED FROM THE BOARD'S MARCH 4, 2004 DECISION.
  2. Decision
    34452Entire Board
    GRANTED FINAL APPROVAL FOR AN EXEMPTION UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10502 FROM THE PRIOR APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS OF 49 U.S.C. 10901 FOR THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY (BNSF) TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE AN 850-FOOT LINE OF RAILROAD IN MERCED COUNTY, CA. THE PROPOSED LINE WOULD CONNECT TO THE BNSF STOCKTON SUBDIVISION MAIN LINE BETWEEN STOCKTON AND BAKERSFIELD, CA.
  3. Comment
    EI-417CA Office of Historic Preservation (SHPO)
    Knox Mellon
  4. Comment
    EI-415City of Merced
    Jack Lesch
  5. Comment
    EI-418BNSF
    Larry Naeger
  6. Comment
    EI-416US Environmental Protection Agency, Region IX
    Lisa Hahf
  7. Comment
    EI-413Merced County Department of Public Works, Road Division
    Stephen Lyon
  8. Comment
    EI-414Merced Irrigation District
    Rory Randol
  9. Decision
    34141Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis
    NOTICE OF AVAILABILITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND REQUEST FOR COMMENTS.
  10. Decision
    34055Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis
    CONCLUDED THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT REGARDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT.
  11. Comment
    EI-184Myra L. Frank & Associates
    Gary Petersen
  12. Comment
    EO-18Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw
    Kathryn A. Kusske Floyd
  13. Comment
    EI-193Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw
    Kathryn A. Kusske Floyd
  14. Comment
    EI-186CA Public Utilities Commission
    Richard Clark
  15. Comment
    EI-192U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Sacramento Office
    David L. Harlow
  16. Comment
    EI-191City of Merced, Mayor
    Hubert Walsh
  17. Comment
    EI-190Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
    Brian Erlandsen
  18. Comment
    EI-189U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Sacramento District, San Joaquin Valley Office
    Nancy A. Haley
  19. Comment
    EI-188Merced Irrigation District
    Steven C. Dunn
  20. Comment
    EI-187Merced Irrigation District
    Rory Randol
  21. Comment
    EI-185CA Office of Historic Preservation (SHPO)
    Knox Mellon
  22. Decision
    33350Entire Board
    CONDITIONALLY EXEMPTED, UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10502, FROM THE PRIOR APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS OF 49 U.S.C. 10901, THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION BY BNSF OF AN APPROXIMATELY 850-FOOT LINE OF RAILROAD IN MERCED COUNTY, CA.
  23. Decision
    33453Secretary
    NOTICE THAT THE BOARD WILL CONDUCT A VOTING CONFERENCE ON FRIDAY, MARCH 21, 2003, AT 9:30 A.M.
  24. Comment
    EO-17Federal, state and local agencies
    Multiple Recipients
  25. Supplement
    207065Modify/Supplement Prior Filing Or The Record
    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
  26. Motion
    207047Petition For Exemption
    Burlington Northern And Santa Fe Railway Company
  27. Comment
    EI-140BNSF
    Sarah Whitely Bailiff
  28. Comment
    EI-142Myra L. Frank & Associates
    Myra L. Frank
  29. Comment
    EO-23Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw
    Kathryn A. Kusske
  30. Comment
    EO-16Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw
    Kathryn A. Kusske
  31. Comment
    EI-245Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw
    Kathryn A. Kusske
  32. Comment
    EI-137Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw
    Kathryn A. Kusske
  33. Comment
    EI-183Burlington Northern Santa Fe
    Sarah Bailiff
  34. Comment
    EI-182Burlington Northern Santa Fe
    Sarah Bailiff