Comment EI-2862
Received or sent (printed as 3/28/2007)
Enclosed please find our follow up on behalf of MCEAA to Monday's NHPA consultation meeting regarding the Proposed Route. In addition, we note here for the record our comments at that meeting with respect to 44 C.F.R. 60.3 and specifically 60.3(d), which is the applicable federal requirement for NFIP-participant communities such as Medina County to abide by with respect to development of structures within floodplains. This requirement is federal law, is not discretionary for NFIP-participant communities and cannot be preempted. MCEAA reiterates that the applicant's suggestion on this point-- to modify mitigation conditions to make obtaining a permit from the floodplain administrator optional-- should be rejected.
Submitted by: David F. Barton · The Gardner Law Firm · San Antonio, TX
The Board publishes this comment in its environmental-comment table for this proceeding. It is quoted here as printed; nothing is inferred from it, and it states the commenter's own position in their own words, not this record's.
The text l-Agency Consulting Parties 032807.pdf ↓
Permanent address docketyard.org/d/FD-34284/comment/EI-2862
File docketyard.org/document/319614fdc78d02380c13aa6063ceb75edb9be36f2e10cd84791a30b5c93a96f5.pdf · back to the docket sheet