EP 727
Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/EP-727 · entries shown: all, newest first
PETITION OF NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY TO INSTITUTE A RULEMAKING PROCEEDING TO ADDRESS ABUSES OF BOARD PROCESS
Caption from the Board’s record.
11 filings, 2 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 11 Oct 2026, 00:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC.
Entries
-
served (printed as 9/23/2015)Decision44698Entire BoardDECISION DENIES A PETITION TO INSTITUTE A RULEMAKING PROCEEDING TO ESTABLISH NEW RULES CREATING A PRE-APPROVAL PROCESS FOR FILINGS SUBMITTED BY PARTIES DEEMED ABUSIVE FILERS, AS WELL AS FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY PRESUMPTIONS AND ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY CERTIFICATIONS IN THE OFFER OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE PROCESS. INSTEAD, THE BOARD WILL SEEK TO ADDRESS THE CONCERNS RAISED IN THE PETITION THROUGH INCREASED ENFORCEMENT OF THE BOARD'S EXISTING RULES AND BY INSTITUTING AN ADVANCED NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING.
-
(printed as 7/24/2015)Reply238907ReplyNorfolk Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 7/21/2015)Comments238869CommentSamuel J. Nasca For And On Behalf Of Smart- Transportation Division- New York State Legislative Board
-
(printed as 7/21/2015)Statement238864Support StatementCanadian Pacific Railway Company, Soo Line Railroad Company,;Delaware And Hudson Railway Company, Inc., And Dakota,;Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Company
-
(printed as 7/21/2015)Comments238859CommentUnion Pacific Railroad Company
-
(printed as 7/21/2015)Comments238858CommentAssociation Of Transportation Law Professionals
-
(printed as 7/21/2015)Comments238857CommentCsx Transportation, Inc
-
(printed as 7/21/2015)Comments238855CommentJames Riffin
-
served (printed as 6/9/2015)DecisionDECISION GRANTED THE REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION TO FILE REPLIES TO NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY'S PETITION.
-
(printed as 6/9/2015)Comments238572CommentKansas City Southern Railway Company
-
(printed as 6/8/2015)Comments238571CommentSamuel J Nasca
-
(printed as 6/3/2015)RequestMichael F. Mcbride
-
(printed as 5/26/2015)Motion238469PetitionNorfolk Southern Railway Company
Nothing of that kind in this docket.