Display Kept in this browser only
Docket Yard
Ex ParteBefore the Surface Transportation Board

EP 676

Docket Yard · docketyard.org/d/EP-676 · entries shown: all, newest first

RAIL TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10709

Caption from the Board’s record.

35 filings, 3 decisions and 0 environmental comments observed here; last checked 10 Oct 2026, 22:36 UTC; last new entry 26 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC.

Cite View on stb.gov

Entries

By type (4)
Newest first · oldest first
  1. served (printed as 1/22/2010)
    Decision
    40013Entire Board
    DECISION DISCONTINUED THE PROCEEDING FOR TWO REASONS: (1) BECAUSE THE PROPOSED DISCLOSURE STATEMENT WOULD NOT ADEQUATELY CAUTION A POTENTIAL SHIPPER OF ITS RIGHTS UNDER THE STATUTE OR OF THE FULL LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF AGREEING TO A RAIL TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT; AND (2) THERE HAS NOT BEEN SUPPORT FOR THE PROPOSED RULE FROM THE SHIPPERS, THE COMMUNITY THE RULE IS DESIGNED TO PROTECT.
  2. (printed as 10/14/2009)
    Substitution
    225866Substitution/Withdrawal Of Counsel
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  3. (printed as 3/9/2009)
    Reply
    224649Reply
    Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation
  4. (printed as 3/9/2009)
    Reply
    224648Reply
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  5. (printed as 3/9/2009)
    Reply
    224647Reply
    Western Coal Traffic League
  6. (printed as 3/9/2009)
    Reply
    224646Reply
    Bnsf Railway Company
  7. (printed as 3/9/2009)
    Reply
    224643Reply
    Edison Electric Institute, Nebraska Wheat Board, South Dakota Wheat Commission, Idaho Wheat Commission, Fertilizer Institute, Washington Wheat Commission, Idaho Barley Commission, Texas Wheat Producers Board, Colorado Wheat Administrative Committee, National Industrial Transportation League, Alliance For Rail Competition, American Chemistry Council, National Grain And Feed Association, U.S. Clay Producers Traffic Association, Inc., Montana Wheat & Barley Committee, Oklahoma Wheat Commission
  8. (printed as 2/19/2009)
    Statement
    224550Support Statement
    Potash Corporation
  9. (printed as 2/9/2009)
    Statement
    224501Support Statement
    Terra Indsutries Inc.
  10. (printed as 2/5/2009)
    Comments
    224492Comment
    Kansas City Southern Railway Company
  11. (printed as 2/5/2009)
    Comments
    224491Comment
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  12. (printed as 2/5/2009)
    Comments
    224490Comment
    Bnsf Railway Company
  13. (printed as 2/5/2009)
    Comments
    224489Comment
    Nasstrac
  14. (printed as 2/5/2009)
    Comments
    224488Comment
    National Grain And Feed Association, Alliance For Rail Competition, Texas Wheat Producers Board, Idaho Barley Commission, U S Clay Producers Traffic Association Inc, Washington Wheat Commission, South Dakota Wheat Commission, American Chemistry Council, Edison Electric Institute, Fertilizer Institute, Colorado Wheat Administrative Committee, Nebraska Wheat Board, Montana Wheat & Barley Committee, Idaho Wheat Commission, Oklahoma Wheat Commission, American Chemistry Council, National Industrial Transportation League
  15. (printed as 2/5/2009)
    Comments
    224487Comment
    Ppg Industries, Inc.
  16. (printed as 2/5/2009)
    Comments
    224486Comment
    Western Coal Traffic League
  17. (printed as 2/5/2009)
    Comments
    224485Comment
    National Grain And Feed Association
  18. (printed as 2/5/2009)
    Comments
    224484Comment
    Csx Transportation Inc
  19. (printed as 2/5/2009)
    Comments
    224482Comment
    Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation
  20. (printed as 1/29/2009)
    Comments
    224447Comment
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  21. served (printed as 1/6/2009)
    Decision
    39285Entire Board
    DECISION PROVIDED NOTICE THAT THE BOARD PROPOSED TO AMEND ITS RULES REGARDING THE DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT IN RAIL TRANSPORTATION CONTRACTS AUTHORIZED BY 49 U.S.C. 10709.
  22. (printed as 5/15/2008)
    Comments
    222376Comment
    National Grain And Feed Association
  23. (printed as 5/12/2008)
    Comments
    222350Comment
    U.S. Clay Producers Traffic Association, Inc.
  24. (printed as 5/12/2008)
    Comments
    222349Comment
    Occidental Chemical Corporation
  25. (printed as 5/12/2008)
    Comments
    222347Comment
    Edison Electric Institute
  26. (printed as 5/12/2008)
    Comments
    222346Comment
    Norfolk Southern Railway Company
  27. (printed as 5/12/2008)
    Comments
    222345Comment
    Csx Transportation Inc
  28. (printed as 5/12/2008)
    Comments
    222344Comment
    Union Pacific Railroad Company
  29. (printed as 5/12/2008)
    Comments
    222343Comment
    National Industrial Transportation League
  30. (printed as 5/12/2008)
    Comments
    222338Comment
    Jay L. Scholllmeyer, For And On Behalf Of United Transportation Union-General Committee Of Adjustment, Go-386 (Utu/Go-386)
  31. (printed as 5/12/2008)
    Comments
    222337Comment
    Bnsf Railway Company
  32. (printed as 5/12/2008)
    Comments
    222336Comment
    Association Of American Railroads
  33. (printed as 5/12/2008)
    Comments
    222335Comment
    Ppg Industries, Inc.
  34. (printed as 5/12/2008)
    Comments
    222334Comment
    Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation
  35. (printed as 5/12/2008)
    Comments
    222333Comment
    Western Coal Traffic League
  36. (printed as 5/12/2008)
    Comments
    222327Comment
    Olin Corporation
  37. (printed as 3/24/2008)
    Comments
    221866Comment
    Progressive Rail Incorporated
  38. served (printed as 3/12/2008)
    Decision
    38557Entire Board
    DECISION DECLINED TO ADOPT A DEFINITION OF THE TERM 'CONTRACT' THAT HAD BEEN PROPOSED IN STB EX PARTE NO. 669 AND INSTITUTED A PROCEEDING SEEKING COMMENTS ON AN INFORMED CONSENT REQUIREMENT FOR CONTRACTS UNDER 49 U.S.C. 10709.